State-of-the-art mathematically induced filtration approaches for smart spectrophotometric assessment of silodosin and solifenacin mixture in their new challenging formulation: Multi-tool greenness and whiteness evaluation

Benign prostatic hyperplasia is one of the most predominant health disorders in men with increasing incidence by age and usually accompanied with other bothersome symptoms. A new fixed dose combination, containing Silodosin and Solifenacin, has been recently launched for relieving such disorder associated with overactive bladder syndrome. In the current work, three smart, innovative and white spectrophotometric methods have been newly developed and optimized for simultaneous determination of the studied drugs in their binary mixture using water as an eco-friendly solvent. The adopted strategy relied on calculation of one or two factors as numerical constant or spectrum allowing mathematical filtration of desired analyte and full removal of any overlapped components in the mixture. The developed methods are categorized over two spectrophotometric platform windows. Window I deals with absorption spectra in its native forms (zero-order) including a newly developed method termed induced concentration subtraction (ICS) as well as induced dual wavelength (IDW) methods. Whereas window III is concerned with ratio spectra as in induced amplitude modulation (IAM) method. Compared to classical spectrophotometric methods, the proposed ones are superior in overcoming the inherited challenges in zero-order absorption spectrum of Solifenacin, particularly its very low absorptivity and lack of unique absorption maximum. Validity of the methods were thoroughly assured as per ICH guidelines with unified regression over 3.0-50.0 µg/mL in ICS method while IDW and IAM ones possessed linearity ranges of 3.0-50.0 µg/mL of Silodosin and 5.0-60.0 µg/mL of Solifenacin. The work was also extended to verify content uniformity of dosage units in accordance with USP recommendations. Greenness profile of the proposed methods was clearly assessed, in comparison to the reported analysis ones, via state-of-the-art software metrics, namely, green solvent selection tool (GSST), complementary green analytical procedure index (ComplexGAPI) and analytical greenness (AGREE). Finally, the proposed methods were in good adherence to the recently published postulates of white analytical chemistry.

Separation and simultaneous estimation of enantiomers and Diastereomers of muscarinic receptor antagonist Solifenacin using stability-indicating Normal-phase HPLC technique with chiral stationary phase amylose tris-(3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate)

The R,S-enantiomer impurity and diastereomer impurities (S,S-isomer and R,R-isomer) of the solifenacin (S,R-enantiomer) were effectively separated and quantified simultaneously utilizing normal-phase high-performance liquid chromatography with a chiral stationary phase consisting of amylose tris (3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate) coated on silica-gel (Chiralpak, AD-H). The enantiomeric and stereo-selective separation was achieved within a run time of 35 minutes using a mobile phase of 'n-hexane, ethanol, and diethylamine' in an isocratic elution mode with a detection wavelength of 220 nm. The validation attributes assessed were accuracy (which showed excellent recoveries between 97.5% and 100.4%) and linearity (which was proven in the range of 0.081-1.275 μg.mL-1 , with a linear regression of 0.999). The stress testing experiments proved that the developed methodology by the HPLC technique has stability-indicating characteristics, as all closely eluting peak pairs were separated well with a resolution of 2.3 and without any interference. The proposed methodology was highly efficient in separating and simultaneously determining the chiral impurities (enantiomers and diastereomers) of the solifenacin in the release and stability sample analyses of drug substances and tablets in pharmaceutical formulations.

Efficacy and Safety of High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation vs Solifenacin or Standard Urotherapy for Overactive Bladder Dry in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial

PURPOSE

We investigated the efficacy and safety of high-dose vitamin D supplementation (VDS) plus standard urotherapy (SU) in managing overactive bladder dry in children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 3-arm, randomized clinical trial was performed at an academic center in China between January 2023 and June 2023. Eligible patients (n=303) were randomized to receive 8 weeks of high-dose VDS (vitamin D3 drops encapsulated as soft capsules, 2400 IU/d) plus SU (VDS + SU group; n=100), solifenacin (5-10 mg/d) plus SU (SOL + SU group; n=102), or SU alone (SU group; n=101). Reduction in voiding frequency was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes encompassed improvement in urgency, nocturia, quality of life score, pediatric lower urinary tract symptom score, and participant satisfaction. Treatment-emergent adverse events were recorded within each group.

RESULTS

Participants had a median age of 82.0 months and their baseline mean vitamin D level was 22.64 ng/mL. The VDS + SU group showed greater improvements in voids/d than the SOL + SU group (median difference 3.0; 95% CI, 2.0 to 3.5; P < .001) and the SU group (median difference 4.0; 95% CI, 3.0 to 5.0; P < .001) after intervention. The VDS + SU group also showed the greatest improvement in quality of life and pediatric lower urinary tract symptom scores. Patient satisfaction was similar between the SOL + SU and SU groups. The VDS + SU group did not exhibit a heightened risk of treatment-emergent adverse events compared to the other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

High-dose VDS plus SU was effective and well-tolerated in managing overactive bladder dry in children, suggesting its potential as a novel therapeutic option for this population.

Expeditive Chromatographic Methods for Quantification of Solifenacin Succinate along with its Official Impurity as the Possible Acid Degradation Product

Two selective stability-indicating procedures were adopted for the quantification of Solifenacin succinate (SOL) along with its acid degradant, in its powder form or in pharmaceutical tablet. Under stress conditions, the acid degradation pathway of SOL was investigated, its official impurity (SOL imp-A) was obtained as the possible acid degradation product, also. A densitometric technique based on the separation of SOL from SOL imp-A employing HPTLC plates prelaminated with silica gel 60 F254 as the stationary phase and a developing solution containing methanol:chloroform:ammonia (8:1:1, v/v/v) and UV scanning of the developed bands at 220 nm. Linear regression analysis data for the calibration plot of SOL showed perfect linear relationships throughout the range of concentration 10-60 μg/band. A reversed phase C18 analytical column (4.6 × 250 mm, 5 μm) was also used to separate the mixture at a flow rate of 1 mL/min, using acetonitrile:0.05 M phosphate buffer (70:30, v/v) as the mobile phase and phosphoric acid to set pH = 3.5. Quantification was obtained at 220 nm using peak area and linear calibration curve across a concentration range of 10-70 μg/mL. The recommended procedures were applied to the existing dosage form, and they generated satisfactory results.

Comparative Study of Continuous Wavelet Transform and Multivariate Calibration for the Simultaneous Spectrophotometric Determination of Tamsulosin and Solifenacin in Pharmaceutical Formulation and Biological Sample

BACKGROUND

Spectrophotometry alone is not applicable for the simultaneous determination of drugs in a multicomponent pharmaceutical formulation owing to their overlap.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, the combination of UV-Vis spectrophotometry and chemometric methods, including continuous wavelet transform (CWT) and partial least-squares (PLS) was presented for the simultaneous estimation of tamsulosin (TAM) and solifenacin (SOL) in synthetic mixtures, commercial formulations, and a biological sample.

METHODS

The simultaneous spectrophotometric determination of TAM and SOL in binary mixtures, a real sample, and a biological sample was performed by applying CWT and PLS approaches.

RESULTS

In the CWT method, two various wavelet families named Daubechies (db2) at wavelength 223 nm and Biorthogonal (bior1.3) at wavelength 227 nm based on the appropriate zero-crossing point were selected for TAM and SOL, respectively. The linear ranges of TAM and SOL were 0.25-4 μg/mL and 10-30 μg/mL, respectively. The LODs were 0.0459 μg/mL and 0.2085 μg/mL, while the LOQs were 0.3208 μg/mL and 0.6495 μg/mL for TAM and SOL, respectively. The average recovery values of 18 mixtures were 98.28% and 97.79% for TAM and SOL, respectively. Also, the root mean square error (RMSE) of both components was lower than 2.3. Based on the k-fold cross-validation in the PLS approach, the optimum number of components related to TAM and SOL were 9 and 5 with a mean square error prediction (MSEP) of 0.0153 and 0.0370, respectively. The mean recovery values of the test set were found to be 100.09% for TAM and 99.95% for SOL where RMSE values were 0.0064 and 0.0169 for TAM and SOL, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to the results of the real sample and there was no significant difference between the proposed methods and HPLC as a reference technique. The result obtained revealed that the proposed methods were found to be fast, facile, economical, and precise, and provide a suitable alternative to the HPLC technique for the concurrent determination of TAM and SOL in QC laboratories.

HIGHLIGHTS

UV-Vis spectrophotometry combined with CWT and PLS was developed. Simultaneous analysis of TAM and SOL was performed using the proposed approaches. These methods were implemented on synthetic mixtures, commercial formulations, and a biological sample. ANOVA test was used to compare the suggested methods and the HPLC technique.

Pharmacological Management of Ureteral Stent-related Symptoms: A Systematic Review, Bayesian Network Meta-analysis, and Meta-regression

PURPOSE

Ureteral stents are commonly used for the treatment of ureteral obstruction, most often urolithiasis. Their use may be associated with significant bothersome symptoms and discomfort. Prior studies have examined the effects of various medication regimens on ureteral stent symptoms. This study utilized Bayesian network meta-analysis to analyze all available evidence on the pharmacological management of ureteral stent-related symptoms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In December 2022 a systematic review was conducted following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines on randomized prospective studies on pharmacological management of ureteral stent-related symptoms reporting outcomes using the Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire score on urinary symptoms and pain. The data were analyzed in Review Manager 5.3 and R Studio where a Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed. Treatments were ranked using surface under the cumulative ranking curve and mean difference vs placebo with 95% credible intervals.

RESULTS

A total of 26 studies were analyzed. These were used to build networks which were modeled to run 100,000 Markov Chain Montecarlo simulations each. Drug-class analysis revealed the most effective class for each domain: for urinary symptoms, sexual performance, general health, and work performance-combined α-blocker and anticholinergic and phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors; for pain-combined anticholinergic and pregabalin. The following were the most effective drugs and dosages for specific symptoms: for urinary symptoms-combined silodosin 8 mg+solifenacin 10 mg; for pain-combined silodosin 8 mg+solifenacin 10 mg; for sexual performance-tadalafil 5 mg. Combined silodosin 8 mg+solifenacin 10 mg+tadalafil 5 mg has the best general health scores while solifenacin 10 mg had the best work experience scores.

CONCLUSIONS

This network meta-analysis demonstrated that the most effective drug therapy is different for each symptom domain. It is important to consider a patient's chief complaint and domains in order to ascertain the optimal medication regimen for each patient. Further iterations of this analysis can be strengthened by trials that directly compare more of these drugs instead of relying on indirect evidence.

Real world co-prescribing contraindicated drugs with fluconazole and itraconazole

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate co-prescribing of contraindicated drugs with fluconazole and itraconazole using real-world nationwide data.

METHODS

This retrospective cross-sectional study was performed using claims data collected by the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) of Korea during 2019-2020. To determine the drugs that should be avoided in patients taking fluconazole or itraconazole, Lexicomp® and Micromedex® were used. The co-prescribed medications, co-prescription rates, and potential clinical consequences of the contraindicated drug-drug interactions (DDIs) were investigated.

RESULTS

Of the 197 118 prescriptions of fluconazole, 2847 co-prescriptions with drugs classified as contraindicated DDI by either Micromedex® or Lexicomp® were identified. Further, of the 74 618 prescriptions of itraconazole, 984 co-prescriptions with contraindicated DDI were identified. Solifenacin (34.9%), clarithromycin (18.1%), alfuzosin (15.1%), and donepezil (10.4%) were frequently found in the co-prescriptions of fluconazole, whereas tamsulosin (40.4%), solifenacin (21.3%), rupatadine (17.8%), and fluconazole (8.8%) were frequently found in the co-prescriptions of itraconazole. In 1105 and 95 co-prescriptions of fluconazole and itraconazole, accounting for 31.3% of all co-prescriptions, potential DDIs were associated with a risk of corrected QT interval (QTc) prolongation. Of the total 3831 co-prescriptions, 2959 (77.2%) and 785 (20.5%) were classified as contraindicated DDI by Micromedex® alone and by Lexicomp® alone, respectively, whereas 87 (2.3%) were classified as contraindicated DDI by both Micromedex® and Lexicomp®.

CONCLUSIONS

Many co-prescriptions were associated with the risk of DDI-related QTc prolongation, warranting the attention of healthcare providers. Narrowing the discrepancy between databases that provide information on DDIs is required for optimized medicine usage and patient safety.

Micellar-enhanced and green-assessed first-derivative synchronous spectrofluorimetric approach for concurrent determination of alfuzosin hydrochloride and solifenacin succinate in different matrices: Docking simulation

Alfuzosin hydrochloride (AZH) is co-formulated with solifenacin succinate (SOS) in Solitral® capsules for treating prostate hyperplasia in patients with overactive bladder syndrome. Herein and for the first time, an ultrasensitive synchronous spectrofluorimetric approach coupled with first-order derivative signal processing was designed for simultaneous determination of AZH and SOS in their pure forms, newly-released pharmaceutical capsules, and human biological fluids. AZH and SOS showed their conventional emission spectra in bi-distilled water at 382 nm and 294 nm after excitation at 325 nm and 250 nm, respectively. The native fluorescence intensities of AZH and SOS were greatly enhanced through micellar formation using sodium dodecyl sulfate surfactant (2%). The proposed approach included the use of synchronous mode at Δλ of 60 nm where the overlap between the studied analytes' fluorescence spectra wasn't completely resolved. The complete resolution was achieved by derivatization of the synchronized spectra to the first-order yielding two zero-crossing points which allowed the determination of AZH and SOS simultaneously without interference at 408 nm and 321 nm, respectively. Under optimum experimental circumstances, good linearities were accomplished over the concentration ranges of (1-24) ng/mL and (4-250) ng/mL with LOD of 0.26 ng/mL and 1.31 ng/mL for AZH and SOS, respectively. The proposed approach was validated successfully according to guidelines adopted by the ICH and compared statistically with the reported LC method with no discernible differences concerning accuracy or precision at p = 0.05. Successful application of the proposed approach achieved with excellent recovery percentages for analysis of the studied analytes in different matrices (pharmaceutical capsules and biological fluids) confirms its suitability for use in QC laboratories and other bioanalytical applications. The proposed approach's greenness was evaluated using two tools namely; penalty points scoring system and green analytical procedure index (GAPI) divulging excellent greenness of this approach relative to the reported LC method. The proposed approach relied chiefly on water as the cheapest and greenest solvent.

Effect of Acupuncture for Mixed Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Systematic Review

Background

Mixed urinary incontinence increasingly undermines women's quality of life. Previous studies showed some effects of acupuncture for MUI, but no systematic review has been done to evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture for MUI in women.

Objective

To systematically review the efficacy and safety of acupuncture for women with MUI.

Methods

Ten databases (i.e., PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, the Cochrane Library, CBM, Scoups, CNKI, VIP and WANFANG DATA) were searched up to July 19th, 2021, using tailored search strategies with keywords not limited to “female,” “mixed urinary incontinence,” “acupuncture,” and “randomized controlled trial,” etc. RCTs and quasi-RCTs were included if investigating effect of any type of acupuncture for female patients with MUI. Data were extracted from eligible studies, and risks of bias were assessed according to the Cochrane Handbook from seven aspects using the RevMan 5.4 software.

Results

A total of three randomized studies with 591 women were included. The risk of bias among the studies varied, with major concerns on blinding of participants and outcome assessor. Liu's study (497) mainly showed that electroacupuncture's effect on reduction of numbers of incontinence, urgency, nocturia episodes, and amount of urine leakage etc. was not inferior to that of PFMT-Solifenacin group at 12, 24, and 36 weeks. Zhan's study (60) showed that electroacupuncture reduced significantly more amount of urine leakage than Tolterodine at 8 weeks, with no data on incontinence episodes frequency. All 3 studies reported that acupuncture significantly increased the quality of life assessed by ICIQ score. In addition, incidence of acupuncture-related adverse events was rare, while antimuscarinic agents related adverse events were common in two studies.

Conclusion

Although acupuncture showed some benefit for women with MUI, more evidences were required to draw a solid conclusion of effectiveness and safety of acupuncture for women with MUI.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier: CRD42021224600.

Smart UV spectrophotometric methods based on simple mathematical filtration and classical methods for the simultaneous determination of tamsulosin and solifenacin: A comparative study of efficacy and spectral resolution

Treatment protocols combining tamsulosin and solifenacin proved better management of the complicated urinary tract symptoms. The pharmaceutical preparations of tamsulosin and solifenacin suffered from the high difference in their ratio, 0.4 mg tamsulosin and 6 mg solifenacin, and strong spectral overlap. Here, we developed four simple, accurate and selective spectrophotometric methods based on simple mathematical manipulations. These methods require the simplest mathematical filtration using short steps performed using built-in functions of the spectrophotometer operating software utilizing zero-order or derivative spectra. These methods are namely absorption correction method (ACM), induced dual-wavelength (IDW), absorptivity factor method (AFM) and first derivative method (D1). The linear ranges were 15-70 µg/ml and 100-1200 µg/ml for TAM and SFN, respectively. The limits of quantitation were in the range of 3.8-4.05 µg/ml and 23.34-59.05 µg/ml, while the limits of detection were in the range of 1.25-1.34 µg/ml and 7.7-24.6 µg/ml for TAM and SFN, respectively. All validation parameters investigated as per ICH guidelines. A statistical comparison executed for the proposed methods with each other and with the reported methods showed no significant difference between the proposed and the reported methods.

History and current trends in the treatment of idiopathic overactive bladder

OBJECTIVE

Historical and current view on the therapy of overactive bladder.

METHODS

This review summarizes the historical approach and current therapy of overactive bladder. The articles were gathered from Pubmed and Scopus databases. Studies published before December 2020 were used for the review.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Overactive bladder is a condition that quite a lot reduces the quality of life of our patients. Our therapeutic approach starts with non-pharmacological treatment, such as pelvic floor exercises. The next step is a pharmacological approach. The entry level drug is trospium. If the effect is not sufficient, propiverine, solifenacin, fesoterodine, darifenacin or mirabegron are used. Electrostimulation or botulinum toxin A application is an option only in cases that didnt respond to pharmacological treatment. It is safe to say, that in the end, there is a way of reducing the severity of overactive bladder symptoms for every  patient.

A novel HPLC-DAD method for simultaneous determination of alfuzosin and solifenacin along with their official impurities induced via a stress stability study; investigation of their degradation kinetics

Stability and impurity profiling are in high demand to guarantee the potency, safety and efficacy of new formulations along with their shelf-life. In this study, stability testing of alfuzosin (ALF) and solifenacin (SOL) in their newly co-formulated capsules was conducted under different stress conditions. The obtained degradation products were structurally elucidated and found to be their official impurities, namely; ALF impurity-D and SOL impurities-A, E & I. A selective and reliable stability-indicating HPLC method was developed for assaying the cited drugs along with three of those official impurities. Chromatographic separation was accomplished within 8 minutes using a XBridge® C18 column as the stationary phase and acetonitrile : phosphate buffer (pH 8) : triethylamine (60 : 40 : 0.02, by volume) as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 1.3 mL min-1. Quantification of the analytes was performed at 210 nm using a diode array detector through which peak purity was assessed. The proposed method was validated as per ICH guidelines and it was successfully applied for the determination of the cited drugs in their combined pharmaceutical formulation with percent recoveries of 100.47 and 100.15 for ALF and SOL, respectively. Moreover, the proposed method was exploited for the assessment of the two drugs' stability in Solitral® capsules under accelerated storage conditions. The method was further extended for studying the degradation kinetics of the two drugs.

[The Efficacy of Fesoterodine Switched from Solifenacin for Overactive Bladder Patients]

We investigated the efficacy of Fesoterodine, in 51 patients who did not respond to treatment with Solifenacin from January 2017 to December 2018. We assessed the overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS), thirst, constipation, and residual urine at baseline, as well as at 3 and 6 months from the start of drug administration. The mean age of the patients was 83. 0±6. 55 years. The OABSS indicated significant improvement in urge urinary incontinence and residual urine at 6 months, and significant aggravation in urgency at 3 months. Thus, Fesoterodine is considered useful for patients who did not respond to treatment with Solifenacin.

Long-term efficacy and safety of solifenacin in pediatric patients aged 6 months to 18 years with neurogenic detrusor overactivity: results from two phase 3 prospective open-label studies

INTRODUCTION

The standard recommended treatment for neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) is clean intermittent catheterization combined with an antimuscarinic agent. However, the adverse systemic side-effects of oxybutynin, the most widely used agent, are of concern.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of solifenacin in pediatric patients with NDO, aged 6 months-<5 years and 5-<18 years.

STUDY DESIGN

Two open-label, baseline-controlled, phase 3 studies were conducted in pediatric patients with NDO. Patients were treated with sequential doses of solifenacin oral suspension (pediatric equivalent doses 2.5-10 mg) for 12 weeks to determine each patient's optimal dose, followed by a fixed dose ≥40-week treatment period. Primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline in maximum cystometric capacity (MCC) after 24 weeks. Secondary endpoints included bladder compliance, bladder volume until first detrusor contraction (>15 cmH₂O), number of overactive detrusor contractions (>15 cmH₂O), maximum catheterized volume (MCV)/24 h, and incontinence episodes/24 h. Safety parameters were treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious adverse events, laboratory variables, vital signs, electrocardiograms, and ocular accommodation and cognitive function assessments.

RESULTS

After 24 weeks, MCC had significantly increased compared with baseline in patients aged 6 months -<5 years and 5-<18 years (37.0 ml and 57.2 ml, respectively; P < 0.001; Fig.). Improvement was also observed after 52 weeks' treatment. Significant changes were observed from baseline to week 24 in all secondary endpoints in both age groups: increase in bladder compliance, increase in bladder volume to first detrusor contraction as a percentage of expected bladder capacity, reduction in the number of overactive detrusor contractions, increase in MCV, and decreased incontinence episodes. TEAEs were mostly mild or moderate, and there were no new drug-related TEAEs compared with adult studies. Age-related improvements were noted in ocular accommodation and cognitive function.

DISCUSSION

These long-term multicenter investigations demonstrated the efficacy and safety of solifenacin in pediatric patients with NDO. The observed increases in MCC were clinically relevant and demonstrated that an increase in fluid volume can be accommodated in the bladder prior to reaching intravesical pressures that endanger kidney function and/or are associated with leakage or discomfort. Solifenacin was well tolerated with low incidences of constipation and dry mouth (typically associated with antimuscarinics), central nervous system-related side-effects, and facial flushing.

CONCLUSION

Solifenacin was effective and well tolerated in pediatric patients with NDO, aged 6 months-<18 years, suggesting that it is a viable alternative to oxybutynin, the current standard of care. STUDIES ARE REGISTERED AT CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT01981954 and NCT01565694.

Therapeutic effect of myofascial trigger point electroacupuncture technology on the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome in female

OBJECTIVES

To explore the therapeutic effect of myofascial trigger point electroacupuncture technology on treating female overactive bladder syndrome.

METHODS

Forty female patients with overactive bladder were randomly divided into 2 groups: an experimental group and a control group. The experimental group was treated with myofascial trigger point electroacupuncture therapy combined with solifenacin succinate while the control group was only treated with solifenacin succinate. Patients in both groups were treated for 12 weeks. The overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS), urinary urgency score and urination frequency of 24 h in the 2 groups were compared to analyze the therapeutic effect.

RESULTS

Before the comprehensive treatment, there was no significant difference between the experimental group and the control group (P>0.05). After 2 and 12 weeks of continuous treatment, the OABSS, urinary urgency symptoms score and 24 h urination frequency in the experimental group and the control group were lower than those before the treatment, and the degree of decline in the experimental group was more obvious, with significant difference (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Treating overactive bladder syndrome in women with myofascial trigger point electroacupuncture combined with solifenacin succinate can significantly improve the OABSS and improve the life quality of the patients.

[The combined symptoms of male lower urinary tract: current treatment options]

This literature review presents current data on epidemiology and views on the pathogenesis of male lower urinary tract symptoms. The authors discuss current options for the management of male lower urinary tract symptoms using a fixed-dose combination drug that includes one of the most selective and safe 1-blockers tamsulosin OCAS and the most selective of anticholinergic agent solifenacin.

Solifenacin for Overactive Bladder with Incontinence: Symptom Bother and Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes

Background:

Approximately one-third of patients with overactive bladder (OAB) experience incontinence, a bothersome symptom with a clear negative effect on quality of life.

Objective:

To assess OAB patients' perceptions of improvements in symptom bother and quality of life after taking solifenacin under conditions reflecting day-today practice.

Methods:

VOLT (the VESIcare Open-Label Trial) was a prospective, open-label study in patients with OAB (defined as urgency, urge urinary incontinence, daytime frequency, or nocturia for ≥3 mo) who were treated with flexibly dosed, once-daily solifenacin for 12 weeks. This study included subjects enrolled in VOLT who, at baseline, had urge incontinence and reported incontinence as their most bothersome symptom. All patients were started on solifenacin 5 mg/day; at week 4, the dosage could be increased to 10 mg/day and at week 8 could be maintained or decreased back to 5 mg/day. Efficacy was assessed by 3 independent patient-reported outcomes: the Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) scale, a visual analog scale (VAS) for assessing individual symptoms, and the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q).

Results:

Of the 2205 patients in the VOLT full analysis set, 1586 (71.9%) had urge incontinence at baseline, of which 582 (36.7%) reported incontinence as their most bothersome symptom. In this cohort, mean PPBC score at baseline was 4.6 (indicating moderate-to-severe problems) and at endpoint had decreased significantly to 2.9 (very minor to some minor problems; p < 0.001). At endpoint, 80.4% of patients achieved improvement in their PPBC score. These patients reported significant improvements from baseline in urinary urgency, urge incontinence, frequency, and nocturia on the VAS (p < 0.001) and all OAB-q domains (symptom severity, coping, concern, sleep, social, health-related quality of life) at endpoint (p < 0.001).

Conclusions:

Patients reporting urge incontinence as their most bothersome OAB symptom can be expected to demonstrate significant improvements in multiple patient-related outcomes following treatment with flexibly dosed solifenacin.

Drug treatment patterns for the management of men with lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia who have both storage and voiding symptoms: a study using the health improvement network UK primary care data

BACKGROUND

Real-world data on the pharmacological management of men who have lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) are limited.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize men with LUTS/BPH who had both storage and voiding symptoms and to evaluate treatment patterns in UK primary care.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

This was an observational study of men aged ≥45 years with a diagnosis, symptoms or therapies indicative of LUTS/BPH with both storage and voiding components. These men were identified from the large Health Improvement Network (THIN) database between 1 January 2004 and 30 September 2011.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Drug prescriptions and switching/discontinuation patterns for α₁-blockers and antimuscarinics.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

We identified 8694 men with a median age of 66.0 (interquartile range [IQR], 59.0-74.0) years. Most (7850; 90.3%) received an α₁-blocker, and 2167 (24.9%) received antimuscarinic therapy over a median of 2.1 years. The most commonly prescribed α₁-blocker was tamsulosin (81.8%); most frequent antimuscarinics were tolterodine (41.0%), oxybutynin (37.2%) and solifenacin (35.7%). Concomitant prescription of α1-blocker and antimuscarinic therapy (within 30 days of each other) was received by 1160 men (14.8% of α₁-blocker-treated men). Of α₁-blocker recipients, 3024 (38.5%) discontinued during follow-up, while 1149 (53.0%) discontinued antimuscarinic therapy. Of 2167 men who received an antimuscarinic, 476 (22.0%) switched to another antimuscarinic. Of the three most commonly prescribed antimuscarinics, solifenacin had the lowest proportions of discontinuations (43.0%) and switches (15.3%), and the longest median duration of therapy (90 days, IQR 30-300). General practice consultations accounted for most resource use (5307.9 per 1000 patient-years).

CONCLUSIONS

This study presents real-world management of men with LUTS/BPH who have both storage and voiding symptoms. The low proportion of men who received concomitant α₁-blocker and antimuscarinic therapy suggests that some patients are sub-optimally treated in routine clinical practice.

[PROSPECTS FOR THE TREATMENT OF IDIOPATHIC AND NEUROGENIC OVERACTIVE BLADDER]

Overactive bladder (OAB) is a common problem in modern population. The main line of medical treatment of this condition is the use of M-cholinoblockers. Solifenacin has shown high selectivity for the bladder in preclinical studies. Data on the efficacy and safety of high-dose (10 mg/day) of solifenacin are insufficient. The study was aimed to the comparative evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of solifenacin at a dose of 5 and 10 mg/day. The study included 28 patients (17 women and 11 men), mean age was 41.3±6.7 years. All patients were divided into two groups. In Group 1 included 12 patients with idiopathic overactive bladder, the Group 2 (n=16) - with neurogenic overactive bladder. Depending on the effect obtained, in some patients the dose was increased to 10 mg/day 1 month after starting treatment. The duration of treatment was 12 weeks. Application of solifenacin at a dose of 5 mg in patients with overactive bladder significantly reduces the severity of symptoms. Increasing the dose was required in 3 (25%) patients with idiopathic OAB and in 10 (62.5%) - with neurogenic OAB. Patients unsatisfied by therapy with solifenacin 5 mg/ day initially had more severe symptoms of the disease - significantly more urgency frequency, incontinence episodes, and nocturia. The use of high doses of solifenacin increased the effectiveness of treatment. Statistical significance was achieved for all parameters evaluated. Against the background of increasing doses, the number ofadverse effects may increase, but within a month of therapy in most cases they are reduced.

[ASSESSMENT OF EFFICIENCY OF TREATMENT OF OVERACTIVE BLADDER IN ELDERLY PATIENTS]

The effectiveness of overactive bladder treatment with M-cholinoblocker solifenacin (Vesicare) as monotherapy and in combination with α1-andrenoblocker terazosin (Setegis) or bladdrer training in elderly patients was evaluated. The results of 12 weeks treatment in all treatment modality groups were comparable. Use of solifenacin in combination with α1-andrenoblocker in comparison to solifenacin monotherapy resulted in longer symptoms remission.

Validation of the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia

OBJECTIVE

To assess the reliability and validity of scores derived from the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale (PPIUS) in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

METHODS

A post hoc analysis of the phase II Solifenacin and Tamsulosin in Males with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Associated with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia trial (NCT00510406), a 12-week clinical trial in men with LUTS associated with BPH, assessed the measurement properties of six PPIUS-derived scores: mean score; maximum urgency score; total urgency and frequency score (TUFS; average sum of urgency scores over 3 days); and numbers of urgency episodes, urgency episodes of grade 3 or 4, and urgency incontinence episodes. Test-retest reliability, presence of floor/ceiling effects, responsiveness to change, known-group validity, and concurrent validity were assessed for each score.

RESULTS

A total of 901 patients had at least one valid PPIUS assessment after baseline. TUFS demonstrated good test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.8), discriminated between groups defined based on International Prostate Symptom Score storage score severity (known-groups validity), had high concurrent validity, and had high responsiveness to change (Guyatt's responsiveness statistic 0.88), with an absence of floor or ceiling effects. The psychometric properties of other PPIUS-derived scores were not as consistently robust and showed either low-to-moderate responsiveness, presence of a floor or ceiling effect, or low-to-moderate test-retest reliability.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that the PPIUS is reliable and valid in patients with LUTS associated with BPH. TUFS provided the best combination of psychometric properties of the six scores derived from the PPIUS and appeared to be an appropriate measure of urgency and frequency.

A comparative study on the efficacy of solifenacin succinate in patients with urinary frequency with or without urgency

Objectives

Patients with overactive bladder (OAB) often have trouble perceiving urgency because of difficulties in distinguishing between urgency and desire to void. Empirical antimuscarinic treatment of patients with frequency only may be reasonable if conservative management has failed. We compared the efficacy of solifenacin in patients with frequency with or without urgency.

Materials and Methods

This multicenter, 12-week, open-label, comparative, non-inferiority clinical trial assessed whether the solifenacin efficacy for frequency without urgency is non-inferior to its efficacy for frequency with urgency. All patients had micturition frequency ≥8 voids/day with or without urgency. Primary efficacy variable: daily frequency change at 12 weeks relative to baseline. Secondary efficacy variables: change at 12 weeks relative to baseline in Patients' Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC), OAB Symptom Score (OABSS), and Benefit, Satisfaction, Willingness to continue (BSW) questionnaire.

Results

Of the 286 enrolled patients, 240 (83.9%) completed the study (without urgency n = 115; with urgency n = 125). Full dataset analysis revealed that the groups without and with urgency exhibited significant reductions in daily micturition frequency of −2.49±0.35 (mean ± standard error) and −2.63±0.37, respectively. The lower limit of the 95% two-sided CI of the comparison of the two group means was −1.14, which is smaller than the −0.8 margin of clinical equivalence. The two groups did not differ in improvement in PPBC, OABSS, or BSW scores. Both tolerated the treatment well.

Conclusions

It was not possible to verify that the solifenacin efficacy for frequency alone was non-inferior to its efficacy for OAB. Nevertheless, solifenacin tended to be effective for frequency regardless of urgency.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00979472

[Pharmacoeconomic study of using solifenacin for the treatment of urge urinary incontinence in patients with overactive bladder syndrome]

Overactive bladder syndrome (OAB), accompanied by incontinence, is a relatively common disease. Currently, in the Russian Federation, unfortunately, management of patients with OAB includes the recommendations for symptomatic use of incontinence pads without pharmacotherapy. Along with this, the market is represented by a number of drugs that can reduce the occurrence of adverse symptoms associated with OAB syndrome. This study presents the pharmacoeconomic analysis of use of solifenacin for the treatment of patients with the OAB syndrome in Russia. Based on previous clinical studies, formal mathematical model for the development of OAB have been suggested, taking into account the concomitant symptoms (urinary incontinence), and complications (urinary tract infections, skin infections, depression and fractures). The model considers the direct medical and non-medical costs, as well as indirect social costs, arising from the traditional management of patients with OAB syndrome (no medication) and the use of solifenacin. As a result, it was found that the use of solifenacin is economically feasible option for the management of patients with OAB within 1 year, the difference in costs between these strategies per patient is 2,385 rubles. The use of solifenacin ceases to be a resource-saving if the cost of incontinence pads will reduced by more than half of the basic price included in the calculations, or if the effectiveness of solifenacin would be 15% lower than the value used in the basic model.

[Comparisons of therapeutic efficacy and safety of solifenacin versus tolterodine in patients with overactive bladder: a meta-analysis of outcomes]

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of solifenacin versus tolterodine in patients with overactive bladder (OAB).

METHODS

Literature searches were performed with PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid and Google Scholar databases, Wanfang and CNKI from inception to October 2013 for comparative studies assessing solifenacin and tolterodine for OAB. The data were extracted and evaluated by two reviewers independently according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews. Meta-analyses were conducted with RevMan 5.2.

RESULTS

A total of 7 studies involving 1 805 patients were retrieved. Compared with tolterodine immediate release (IR), the number of urgency episodes and urge incontinence episodes in 24 h and the rate of dry mouth were significantly lower in patients on solifenacin (RR = -0.34, 95% CI: -0.50--0.18, P = 0.00; RR = -0.29, 95% CI:-0.55--0.04, P = 0.03; RR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.41-0.83, P = 0.00) and the rate of constipation was higher in those on solifenacin (RR = 2.72, 95% CI: 1.38-5.39, P = 0.00). No significant differences existed between tolterodine IR and solifenacin in mean micturition volume per voiding and micturitions episodes in 24 h (P = 0.05,0.08). Between solifenacin and tolterodine extended release (ER), the number of urgency episodes, micturition and urge incontinence episodes in 24 h and mean micturition volume per voiding were not statistically different (all P > 0.05). The incidence of major adverse events, such as dry mouth, constipation and blurred vision, was not significantly different (all P > 0.05). And most adverse events were mild.

CONCLUSIONS

Solifenacin is superior to tolterodine IR in treating OAB symptoms. However the rate of constipation is higher for solifenacin. Both solifenacin and tolterodine ER have similar therapeutic efficacies and adverse events.

The cost-effectiveness of solifenacin vs. trospium in the treatment of patients with overactive bladder in the German National Health Service

OBJECTIVE

To carry out a cost-utility analysis comparing initial treatment of patients with overactive bladder (OAB) with solifenacin 5 mg/day versus either trospium 20 mg twice a day or trospium 60 mg/day from the perspective of the German National Health Service.

METHODS

A decision analytic model with a 3 month cycle was developed to follow a cohort of OAB patients treated with either solifenacin or trospium during a 1 year period. Costs and utilities were accumulated as patients transitioned through the four cycles in the model. Some of the solifenacin patients were titrated from 5 mg to 10 mg/day at 3 months. Utility values were obtained from the published literature and pad use was based on a US resource utilization study. Adherence rates for individual treatments were derived from a United Kingdom general practitioner database review. The change in the mean number of urgency urinary incontinence episodes/day from after 12 weeks was the main outcome measure. Baseline effectiveness values for solifenacin and trospium were calculated using the Poisson distribution. Patients who failed second-line therapy were referred to a specialist visit. Results were expressed in terms of incremental cost-utility ratios.

RESULTS

Total annual costs for solifenacin, trospium 20 mg and trospium 60 mg were €970.01, €860.05 and €875.05 respectively. Drug use represented 43%, 28% and 29% of total costs and pad use varied between 45% and 57%. Differences between cumulative utilities were small but favored solifenacin (0.6857 vs. 0.6802 to 0.6800). The baseline incremental cost-effectiveness ratio ranged from €16,657 to €19,893 per QALY.

LIMITATIONS

The difference in cumulative utility favoring solifenacin was small (0.0055-0.0057 QALYs). A small absolute change in the cumulative utilities can have a marked impact on the overall incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) and care should be taken when interpreting the results.

CONCLUSION

Solifenacin would appear to be cost-effective with an ICER of no more than €20,000/QALY. However, small differences in utility between the alternatives means that the results are sensitive to adjustments in the values of the assigned utilities, effectiveness and discontinuation rates.

Therapeutic benefit in patients switching tolterodine to other novel antimuscarinic agents

OBJECTIVES

To explore in the daily clinical practice setting that antimuscarinic, Fesoterodine or Solifenacin, provides a greater clinical benefit after changing their prior Overactive Bladder (OAB) therapy with tolterodine extended-release (ER) to other novel antimuscarinic agents.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A post-hoc analysis of data from an observational multicenter, cross-sectional, retrospective study. Adult patients of both sexes, with OAB and OAB-V8 score≥8, who switched to fesoterodine or solifenacin within the 3-4 months before study visit from their prior tolterodine-ER-based therapy due to poor response were included. 92 patients were selected for each treatment group, matched (1:1) according to conditioned probability using the propensity score. Benefit of treatment change perceived by the physician and patient was evaluated by means of the Clinical Global Impression of Improvement subscale (CGI-I) and Treatment Benefit Scale (TBS), respectively. Degree of worry, bother and interference with daily living activities due to urinary symptoms, level of satisfaction, and preference for current treatment were also assessed.

RESULTS

Fesoterodine provided a significantly greater improvement than solifenacina in terms of therapeutic benefit perceived by the physician according to ICG-I. 96.7% of the patients on fesoterodine treatment vs. 81.6% of the solifenacin group showed a score of improvement in TBS (P<.05). Fesoterodine was also better rated than solifenacin with regard to satisfaction and preference for the new treatment (93.4 vs. 78.2% P<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In daily clinical practice the switch from tolterodine LP to fesoterodine seems to provide greater benefits both from the physician's and the patient's point of view compared with those provided by solifenacin.

[Efficacy of combination therapy of tamsulosin and solifenacin for mild and moderate benign prostatic hyperplasia with overactive bladder]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination therapy of tamsulosin and solifenacin for mild and moderate benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with overactive bladder (OAB).

METHODS

We randomly divided 166 patients with BPH and concomitant OAB into a mild obstruction symptom group (n = 88) and a moderate obstruction symptom group (n =78), 48 of the former group treated with 0. 2 mg tamsulosin + 5 mg solifenacin and the other 40 with 0. 2 mg tamsulosin; 36 of the latter group treated with 0. 2 mg tamsulosin + 5 mg solifenacin and the other 42 with 0. 2 mg tamsulosin, all administered once daily for 12 weeks. We obtained the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), urine storage period symptom score (USPSS), voiding symptom score (VSS), Qmax, residual urine volume, OAB symptom score (OABSS) and adverse reactions, and compared them among different

RESULTS

Among the patients with mild obstruction symptoms, the combination of tamsulosin and solifenacin achieved remark-groups. able improvement in IPSS, USPSS, Qmax and OABSS as compared with the baseline (P < 0.05), but made no significant difference in the residual urine volume (P > 0. 05) , while tamsulosin improved IPSS only (P < 0.05). The combination therapy exhibited an obvious superiority over tamsulosin alone in improving IPSS (9.7 micro 3.0 vs 15.8 micro 3.3), USPSS (8. 1 micro 1.7 vs 12.3 micro 3.1), Qmax ([18.6 micro 2.3] ml/s vs [14.2 micro 2.3] ml/s ), and OABSS (5.3micro 1.3 vs 9.7 micro 2.7) (P < 0.05), but there were no obvious differences in residual urine, urine routine test results and adverse events between the two therapies ( P > 0. 05). In those with moderate obstruction symptoms, the combination therapy significantly improved IPSS, VSS, Qmax and OABSS (P < 0.05) but not the residual urine (P > 0. 05) in comparison with the baseline. The tamsulosin therapy achieved obvious improvement in IPSS, VSS, Qmax, OABSS and residual urine. The combination therapy showed a better effect than tamsulosin only in OABSS (4. 8 +/-1.5 vs 6.5 +/-2.5, P < 0.05), but no significant differences from the latter in IPSS, Qmax, VSS, routine urine test results, and adverse

CONCLUSION

Combination therapy of tamsulosin and solifenacin is obviously safe and efficacious in the treatment (P > 0.05). events of both mild and moderate BPH with concomitant OAB, and it is superior to tamsulosin alone.

[Treatment of overactive bladder in older women increased doses of antimuscarinic drugs safe and effective alternative to existing methods]

The study included 95 female patients of 65 to 74 years (average age 67,1 years), who previously (more than 6 months before this study) took a course of monotherapy with hydrochloride trospium in higher dosages with unstable or weak effect. In this study, all patients were divided into three groups and were treated with two antimuscarinic drugs. The majority of older women suffering from OAB and treatment-resistant taking one antimuscarinic drug in high doses showed a significant positive progress in a state by adding a second antimuscarinic agent. The received side effects do not exceed thereof in comparison with treatment with a single drug.

[Peculiarities of clinical course, diagnostics and treatment of overactive bladder in men older than 60 years]

The article presents the issues of the characteristics of the course, diagnostics and treatment of hyperactive urinary bubble in older men. Conservative treatment of urinary incontinence includes changes in lifestyle, behavioural and medical therapy with m-anticholinergic drugs. The combination solifenacini in a dose of 5 mg/day and α1-adrenoceptor blocking agent terasolini in a dose of 2 mg/day significantly improves the results of treatment and well tolerated.

Overactive bladder symptom score to evaluate efficacy of solifenacin for the treatment of overactive bladder symptoms

BACKGROUND

Overactive bladder (OAB) is a series of symptoms with high prevalence in elderly people. This study was conducted using the overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS) to evaluate the efficacy of solifenacin succinate for the treatment of OAB.

METHODS

This was a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, 12-week study that enrolled 241 OAB patients. The patients received 5-10 mg/day solifenacin. Changes in OABSS, symptoms from voiding diary, perception of bladder condition (PPBC) score, international prostate symptom score (IPSS) and quality of life (QOL) were evaluated at weeks 0, 4, and 12. The relationship between OABSS and PPBC score or parameters of voiding diary was also evaluated.

RESULTS

At baseline, the mean OABSS for all patients was 9.41 ± 2.40, and was reduced significantly at week 12 (-3.76 points; 61.21%, P < 0.0001). The OABSS subscore, PPBC score, IPSS, and QOL were also significantly reduced during the study (P < 0.0001). The overall incidence of adverse events was 19.91% (44 cases). The gastrointestinal system was the most commonly affected (11.31%). Around 5.88% of the cases had adverse events related to the genitourinary system. There was a strong correlation between OABSS and urinary symptoms that was recorded in the 3-day voiding dairy.

CONCLUSIONS

We showed that solifenacin was clinically effective for relieving OAB symptoms, considering the balance between efficacy, patients' well-being, and tolerability. OABSS integrates four OAB symptoms into a single score and can be a useful tool for research and clinical practice.

Decrease of risk of developing symptoms of OAB in elderly men and women treated with loop diuretic for hypertensive disease using solifenacin

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Randomized double blind longitudinal study was performed from December 1, 2012 to June 15, 2013 in urological ward of gerontological hospital (Vladivostok city, Russian Federation). 378 men and women over 65 (average age: 69.8 (7.2)), who suffered from stage 1 (initial) hypertension, had participated in this study. During the treatment all patients, except for those who were assigned to the control group, received Loop Diuretic Furosemide dosed at 20-30 mg per day and Solifenacin dosed at 5 mg per day (First comparison group) and 10 mg per day (Second comparison group). Functional performance of lower urinary tract (LUT) at enrollment and at the end of the treatment was evaluated using ICIQ-SF questionnaires. During the whole period of treatment patients were keeping bladder diaries where records on frequency and volume of daily urinations, episodes of urgency (EU), episodes of incontinence (EI) and other symptoms were kept.

RESULT

Comparison of data obtained from control group (7.2%), group of the patients treated with Furosemide and standard- dosed (11.1%) and low-dosed (16.2%) Solifenacin allows to draw conclusion on the absence of significant differences in number of patients with symptoms of OAB between these groups (p ≥ 0.05). At the same time percentage of patients with symptoms of OAB in the group treated only with Furosemide was significantly different from three other groups (p ≤ 0.05) and reached 46.1%.

CONCLUSION

Risk of developing symptoms of OAB in elderly patients, whose hypertensive disease has been treated with loop diuretic for a long period of time, decreases significantly, provided antimuscarinic drug Solifencin is administered at the same time. Administration of low dosed Solifenacin is sufficient for significant decrease in risk of developing symptoms of overactive bladder.

[A combination of solifenacin succinate and naftopidil in the treatment of female overactive bladder]

OBJECTIVE

To explore the effective therapy of female overactive bladder unresponsive to behavior training.

METHODS

A total of 67 patients with female overactive bladder unresponsive to behavior training were enrolled from January 2012 to January 2013 at Liaocheng Second People's Hospital. They were randomized into trial and control groups (Iand II). Their mean age was 39.8 (19-57) years. And the mean disease course was 3.8 (1-16) years. The trial group (n = 24) received oral formulations of solifenacin succinate (5 mg, once a day)and naftopidil (25 mg, every evening). The control group I (n = 22) had only solifenacin succinate and the control group II (n = 21) only naftopidil. The treatment lasted for 4 weeks. The time of urination per day, average amount of mona-urination and maximum amount of mona-urination were observed. The changes of all parameters before and after treatment were assessed. And statistic analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The urinary urgency score of the trial, control group I and control II groups were 0.8 ± 0.1, 1.8 ± 0.8, 2.1 ± 0.9; and the times of urination per day 9 ± 4, 13 ± 4, 14 ± 5, average amount of mona-urination (295 ± 79), (211 ± 67), (185 ± 64) ml and maximum amount of mona-urination (352 ± 88), (292 ± 75), (235 ± 69) ml respectively. These parameters showed significant differences between the trial and control groups (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

A combination of solifenacin succinate and naftopidil can effectively relieve the symptoms of female overactive bladder and improve the life quality.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of solifenacin versus oxybutynin immediate-release in the treatment of patients with overactive bladder in the United Kingdom

OBJECTIVE

To carry out a cost-utility analysis comparing initial treatment with solifenacin 5 mg/day vs oxybutynin immediate-release (IR) 15 mg/day for the treatment of patients with overactive bladder (OAB) from the perspective of the U.K. National Health Service (NHS).

METHODS

A Markov model with six health states was developed to follow a cohort of OAB patients treated with either solifenacin or oxybutynin during a 1-year period. Costs and utilities were accumulated as patients transited through the health states in the model and a drop-out state. Some of the solifenacin patients were titrated from 5 mg to 10 mg/day at 8 weeks. A proportion of drop-out patients were assumed to continue treatment with tolterodine ER. Utility values were obtained from a Swedish study and pad use was based on a multinational clinical trial. Adherence rates for individual treatments were derived from a U.K. database study. For pad use and utility values, the drop-out state was split between those patients who were no longer receiving treatment and those on second-line therapy. Patients on second-line therapy who drop-out were referred for a specialist visit. Results were expressed in terms of incremental cost-utility ratios.

RESULTS

Total annual costs for solifenacin and oxybutynin were £504.30 and £364.19, respectively. First-line drug use represents 49% and 4% of costs and pad use represent 23% and 40% of costs for solifenacin and oxybutynin, respectively. Differences between cumulative utilities were small but were greater for solifenacin (0.7020 vs. 0.6907). The baseline incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was £12,309/QALY.

CONCLUSION

Under the baseline assumptions, solifenacin would appear to be cost-effective with an incremental cost-utility of less than £20,000/QALY. However, small differences in utility between the alternatives and the large number of drop-outs means that the results are sensitive to small adjustments in the values of utilities assigned to the drop-out state.

[Flexible approach to the appointment of solifenacin: for whom and when?]

Solifenacin at a dose of 5 mg per day has demonstrated the high efficacy in the treatment of patients with overactive bladder. However, for patients who remained dissatisfied with the outcome of treatment, the dose may be increased to 10. mg per day, which leads to the improvement of patient's condition. However, there is an opinion that treatment should be started with the use of high doses of the drug. Efficiency of solifenacin at a dose of 10 mg was accompanied by favorable safety and tolerability profile. Despite the fact that numerous studies have shown that the clinical efficacy of different anticholinergics is not very different from one another, it is known that patients may prefer some other drugs. Application of solifenacin in these patients leads to significant improvement in quality of life. Thus, flexible approach to the use of solifenacin allows to achieve the best results in the treatment of patients, including those cases where the initial treatment is not effective or is interrupted due to pronounced side effects.

Efficacy and safety of solifenacin plus tamsulosin OCAS in men with voiding and storage lower urinary tract symptoms: results from a phase 2, dose-finding study (SATURN)

BACKGROUND

Storage symptoms are often undertreated in men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the combination of an antimuscarinic (solifenacin) with an α-blocker (tamsulosin) versus tamsulosin alone in the treatment of men with LUTS.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A double-blind, 12-wk, phase 2 study in 937 men with LUTS (≥ 3 mo, total International Prostate Symptom Score [IPSS] ≥ 13, and maximum urinary flow rate 4.0-15.0 ml/s).

INTERVENTION

Eight treatment groups: tamsulosin oral controlled absorption system (OCAS) 0.4 mg; solifenacin 3, 6, or 9 mg; solifenacin 3, 6 or 9 mg plus tamsulosin OCAS 0.4 mg; or placebo.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The primary efficacy end point was change from baseline in total IPSS. Secondary end points included micturition diary and quality-of-life (QoL) parameters. Post hoc subgroup analyses were performed by severity of baseline storage symptoms, with statistical comparisons presented only for tamsulosin OCAS alone versus combination therapy, due to the small sample size of the solifenacin monotherapy and placebo subgroups.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Combination therapy was associated with significant improvements in micturition frequency and voided volume versus tamsulosin OCAS alone in the total study population; improvements in total IPSS were not significant. Statistically significant improvements in urgency episodes, micturition frequency, total urgency score, voided volume, IPSS storage subscore, IPSS-QoL index, and Patient Perception of Bladder Condition were observed in a subpopulation of men with two or more urgency episodes per 24h (Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale grade 3 or 4) and eight or more micturitions per 24h at baseline (storage symptoms subgroup) with combination therapy versus tamsulosin OCAS alone (p ≤ 0.05 for the dose-response slope, all variables). Combination therapy was well tolerated, and adverse events were consistent with the safety profiles of both compounds.

CONCLUSIONS

Solifenacin plus tamsulosin OCAS did not significantly improve IPSS in the total study population but offered significant efficacy and QoL benefits over tamsulosin OCAS monotherapy in men with both voiding and storage symptoms at baseline. Combination therapy was well tolerated.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT00510406.

[Safety of solifenacin and tolterodine in the treatment of overactive bladder: a meta-analysis]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety of solifenacin and tolterodine in the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB).

METHODS

Studies on the solifenacin, tolterodine and OAB were searched and those fulfilling the inclusion criteria were selected. RevMan 5.0 software was used to perform meta-analysis. Three studies were included with an overall sample size of 1013 cases. The experimental group of solifenacin contained 517 cases while the control group had 496 cases.

RESULTS

The incidence rates of overall adverse event, dry mouth, constipation and blurred vision of the experimental group (solifenacin 5 mg once per day) was 26.69% (138/517), 10.64% (55/517), 5.42% (28/517) and 6.55% (26/397) while those of the control group (tolterodine 2 mg twice per day) 33.27% (165/496), 16.73% (83/496), 2.22% (11/496) and 4.20% (16/381) respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in overall adverse event (RR = 0.76, 95%CI: 0.52 - 1.12, P = 0.170) and blurred vision (RR = 1.59, 95%CI: 0.88 - 2.90, P = 0.130) between two groups. However, the incidence rate of key antimuscarinic adverse events such as dry mouth (RR = 0.63, 95%CI: 0.46 - 0.87, P = 0.005) and constipation (RR = 2.38, 95%CI: 1.21 - 4.66, P = 0.010) showed statistically significant difference.

CONCLUSIONS

Dry mouth is the most common adverse event of solifenacin (5 mg once per day) and tolterodine (2 mg twice per day). Solifenacin has a lower incidence rate of dry mouth and a higher rate of constipation than tolterodine. A clinical physician should consider the incidence of adverse events during treating OAB, especially for those patients prone to constipation.

Comparison of two selective muscarinic receptor antagonists (solifenacin and darifenacin) in women with overactive bladder--the SOLIDAR study

Overactive bladder (OAB) is a common, often debilitating, condition defined as urgency and urge incontinence, usually with frequency and nocturia. The use of muscarinic receptor antagonists are the mainstay of treatment, but their non-selectivity can result in unacceptable adverse effects that limit their usefulness. The purpose of this study was to evaluate 2 of the newer antimuscarinic agents, solifenacin and darifenacin, which demonstrate greater selectivity, in order to compare their tolerance and effectiveness. This was a multicentre, prospective, randomised, comparative (1:1) open-label study conducted in 4 centres comprising Slovenian gynaecologists and urologists. A total of 77 female patients with OAB were enrolled who received either solifenacin 5 mg or darifenacin 7.5 mg once daily. Study measurements consisted of changes in OAB symptoms and quality of life (QOL) evaluations after 1 and 3 months of treatment. Both treatment groups showing a reduction in all OAB symptoms but with no notable difference being seen between the 2 groups. Solifenacin though showed statistically greater improvements in QOL, better overall treatment satisfaction, and a decreased incidence of dry mouth after 3 months of treatment compared to the darifenacin group. This study demonstrates interesting initial results and indicates that these 2 drugs have a different profile that may confer an advantage to patients, but further methodologically rigorous studies comparing the use of solifenacin and darifenacin in OAB are required to establish the differences between these drugs over longer periods of treatment.

Anticholinergic therapy vs. onabotulinumtoxina for urgency urinary incontinence

BACKGROUND

Anticholinergic medications and onabotulinumtoxinA are used to treat urgency urinary incontinence, but data directly comparing the two types of therapy are needed.

METHODS

We performed a double-blind, double-placebo-controlled, randomized trial involving women with idiopathic urgency urinary incontinence who had five or more episodes of urgency urinary incontinence per 3-day period, as recorded in a diary. For a 6-month period, participants were randomly assigned to daily oral anticholinergic medication (solifenacin, 5 mg initially, with possible escalation to 10 mg and, if necessary, subsequent switch to trospium XR, 60 mg) plus one intradetrusor injection of saline or one intradetrusor injection of 100 U of onabotulinumtoxinA plus daily oral placebo. The primary outcome was the reduction from baseline in mean episodes of urgency urinary incontinence per day over the 6-month period, as recorded in 3-day diaries submitted monthly. Secondary outcomes included complete resolution of urgency urinary incontinence, quality of life, use of catheters, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Of 249 women who underwent randomization, 247 were treated, and 241 had data available for the primary outcome analyses. The mean reduction in episodes of urgency urinary incontinence per day over the course of 6 months, from a baseline average of 5.0 per day, was 3.4 in the anticholinergic group and 3.3 in the onabotulinumtoxinA group (P=0.81). Complete resolution of urgency urinary incontinence was reported by 13% and 27% of the women, respectively (P=0.003). Quality of life improved in both groups, without significant between-group differences. The anticholinergic group had a higher rate of dry mouth (46% vs. 31%, P=0.02) but lower rates of catheter use at 2 months (0% vs. 5%, P=0.01) and urinary tract infections (13% vs. 33%, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Oral anticholinergic therapy and onabotulinumtoxinA by injection were associated with similar reductions in the frequency of daily episodes of urgency urinary incontinence. The group receiving onabotulinumtoxinA was less likely to have dry mouth and more likely to have complete resolution of urgency urinary incontinence but had higher rates of transient urinary retention and urinary tract infections. (Funded by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the National Institutes of Health Office of Research on Women's Health; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01166438.).

[Solifenacin in the treatment of overactive bladder: results of a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study]

The article presents the results of the evaluation of clinical efficacy and safety of the M-cholinoblocker solifenacin in the treatment of symptoms of overactive bladder (OAB). The study included 24 women aged from 47 to 69 years with symptoms of OAB lasting more than 3 months. It is shown that solifenacin at a dose of 5 mg reduces the quality of urinary urgency, improves the condition according to assessment of degree of discomfort due to symptoms of the OAB, treatment satisfaction and condition of the bladder.

The efficacy and safety of solifenacin in patients with overactive bladder syndrome

The aim of the randomised, double blind, placebo controlled study was to evaluate the efficacy, tolerability and safety of solifenacin, a once-daily M3 selective receptor antagonist, in patients with overactive bladder syndrome. Following a single blind 2-week placebo run in period, patients who complained from symptoms of OAB for at least 6 months, were randomized to 4 weeks of solifenacin in 5 mg once daily doses or placebo. 171 patients were enrolled in the study and 157 patients completed the study. Patients with solifenacin had significantly improved micturitions per 24 hours after first week of treatment (1.75 +/- 0.63 vs. 2.64 +/- 0.48, p < 0.001), and after four weeks (1.56 +/- 0.58 vs. 2.71 +/- 0.45, p < 0.001) compared to placebo group. The mean number of urgency episodes per 24 hours had significantly decreased in patients with solifenacin compared to placebo after first week (5.75 +/- 1.43 vs. 6.65 +/- 0.65, p < 0.001), and after four weeks of treatment (5.77 +/- 1.33 vs. 6.54 +/- 0.50, p < 0.001). Solifenacin was also significantly more effective than placebo in reducing the mean number of episodes of severe urgency from baseline to end point (5.83 +/- 1.16 vs. 6.48 +/- 0.50, p < 0.001). Compared with changes obtained with placebo, episodes of urinary frequency were significanlty reduced after first week (0.3 vs. -0.5, p < 0.001) and four weeks check up periods in patients treated with solifenacin (0.19 vs. -0.15, p < 0.001). Episodes of nocturia was significantly reduced in patients treated with solifenacin after first week (0.3 vs. -0.5, p < 0.001), and after four weeks treatment period (0.45 vs. -0.50, p < 0.001). The number of incontinence episodes was also significantly decreased in solifenacin group compared to placebo group after first week (1.06 +/- 0.57 vs. 2.74 +/- 0.47, p < 0.001) and four weeks check up (0.96 +/- 0.57 vs. 2.75 +/- 0.43, p < 0.001). The most common adverse effects with solifenacin were dry mouth and constipation. Adverse effects were mild or moderate severity. The discontinuation rate owing to adverse effects was 4.5%-6.7% with solifenacin and 3.8%-6.1% with placebo, respectively. According to subjective estimation, significant improvement was achieved in 71 (92.21%) of patients treated with solifenacin and in 68 (85%) patients treated with placebo there was no change in OAB symptoms compared to baseline values. UDI score was significantly improved after solifenacin (22.26 +/- 5.91 vs. 29.61 +/- 8.45, p < 0.001) compared to placebo. IIQ score was significantly decreased in patients with solifenacin (36.25 +/- 10.34 vs. 46.86 +/- 6.81, p < 0.001) compared to placebo. In conclusion, solifenacin is a safe and effective treatment alternative for patients with overactive bladder symptoms.

Which anticholinergic drug for overactive bladder symptoms in adults

BACKGROUND

Around 16% to 45% of adults have overactive bladder symptoms (urgency with frequency and/or urge incontinence - 'overactive bladder syndrome'). Anticholinergic drugs are common treatments.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of different anticholinergic drugs for overactive bladder symptoms.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Incontinence Group Specialised Trials Register (searched 8 March 2011) and reference lists of relevant articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials in adults with overactive bladder symptoms or detrusor overactivity that compared one anticholinergic drug with another, or two doses of the same drug.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed eligibility, trial quality and extracted data. Data were processed as described in the Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook.

MAIN RESULTS

Eighty six trials, 70 parallel and 16 cross-over designs were included (31,249 adults). Most trials were described as double-blind, but were variable in other aspects of quality. Crossover studies did not present data in a way that could be included in the meta-analyses. Twenty nine collected quality of life data (the primary outcome measure) using validated measures, but only fifteen reported useable data.Tolterodine versus oxybutynin: There were no statistically significant differences for quality of life, patient reported cure or improvement, leakage episodes or voids in 24 hours, but fewer withdrawals due to adverse events with tolterodine (Risk Ratio (RR) 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40 to 0.66, data from eight trials), and less risk of dry mouth (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.71, data from ten trials).Solifenacin versus tolterodine: There were statistically significant differences for quality of life (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.12, 95% CI -0.23 to -0.01, data from three trials), patient reported cure/improvement (RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.39, data from two trials), leakage episodes in 24 hours (weighted mean difference (WMD) -0.30, 95% CI -0.53 to -0.08, data from four studies) and urgency episodes in 24 hours (WMD -0.43, 95% CI -0.74 to -0.13, data from four trials), all favouring solifenacin. There was no difference in withdrawals due to adverse events and dry mouth, but after sensitivity analysis the dry mouth (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.94) was statistically significantly lower with solifenacin when compared to Immediate Release (IR) tolterodine.Fesoterodine versus extended release tolterodine: Three trials contributed to the meta analyses. There were statistically significant differences for quality of life (SMD -0.20, 95% CI -0.27 to -0.14), patient reported cure/improvement (RR 1.11, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.16), leakage episodes (WMD -0.19, 95% CI -0.30 to -0.09), frequency (WMD -0.27, 95% CI -0.47 to -0.06) and urgency episodes (WMD -0.44, 95% CI -0.72 to -0.16) in 24 hours, all favouring fesoterodine, but those taking fesoterodine had higher risk of withdrawal due to adverse events (RR 1.45, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.98) and higher risk of dry mouth (RR 1.80, 95% CI 1.58 to 2.05) at 12 weeks.Different doses of tolterodine: The standard recommended starting dose (2 mg twice daily) was compared with two lower (0.5 mg and 1 mg twice daily), and one higher dose (4 mg twice daily). The effects of 1 mg, 2 mg and 4 mg doses were similar for leakage episodes and micturitions in 24 hours, with greater risk of dry mouth with 2 and 4 mg doses at two to 12 weeks.Different doses of solifenacin: The standard recommended starting dose of 5 mg once daily was compared to 10 mg: while frequency and urgency were less (better) with 10 mg compared to 5 mg, there was a higher risk of dry mouth with 10 mg solifenacin at four to 12 weeks.Different doses of fesoterodine:The recommended starting dose of 4mg once daily was compared to 8 and 12 mg. The clinical efficacy (patient reported cure, leakage episodes, micturition per 24 hours) of 8 mg was better than 4 mg fesoterodine but with a higher risk of dry mouth with 8 mg.There was no statistically significant difference between 4 and 12 mg in the efficacy but the dry mouth was significantly higher with 12 mg at eight to 12 weeks.Extended versus immediate release preparations of oxybutynin and/or tolterodine: There were no statistically significant differences for cure/improvement, leakage episodes or micturitions in 24 hours, or withdrawals due to adverse events, but there were few data. Overall, extended release preparations had less risk of dry mouth at two to 12 weeks.One extended release preparation versus another: There was less risk of dry mouth with oral extended release tolterodine than oxybutynin (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.95), but no difference between transdermal oxybutynin and oral extended release tolterodine although some people withdrew due to skin reaction at the transdermal patch site at 12 weeks.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Where the prescribing choice is between oral immediate release oxybutynin or tolterodine, tolterodine might be preferred for reduced risk of dry mouth. With tolterodine, 2 mg twice daily is the usual starting dose, but a 1 mg twice daily dose might be equally effective, with less risk of dry mouth. If extended release preparations of oxybutynin or tolterodine are available, these might be preferred to immediate release preparations because there is less risk of dry mouth.Between solifenacin and immediate release tolterodine, solifenacin might be preferred for better efficacy and less risk of dry mouth. Solifenacin 5 mg once daily is the usual starting dose, this could be increased to 10 mg once daily for better efficacy but with increased risk of dry mouth.Between fesoterodine and extended release tolterodine, fesoterodine might be preferred for superior efficacy but has higher risk of withdrawal due to adverse events and higher risk of dry mouth.There is little or no evidence available about quality of life, costs, or long-term outcome in these studies. There were insufficient data from trials of other anticholinergic drugs to draw any conclusions.

Efficacy of solifenacin for overactive bladder symptoms, symptom bother, and health-related quality of life in patients by duration of self-reported symptoms: a secondary analysis of the VIBRANT study

In this post-hoc analysis of data from patients with overactive bladder (OAB) in VIBRANT patients receiving solifenacin showed statistically significantly greater improvement versus placebo in most outcome measures regardless of OAB symptom duration (less than five years and five years or longer).

Tolerability of solifenacin and oxybutynin immediate release in older (> 65 years) and younger (≤ 65 years) patients with overactive bladder: sub-analysis from a Canadian, randomized, double-blind study

OBJECTIVE

Overactive bladder (OAB) is a common condition whose prevalence increases with age. Antimuscarinic agents are the pharmacologic treatment of choice, but adverse events such as dry mouth may lead to early discontinuation. The purpose of this analysis was to compare the incidence and severity of dry mouth and other adverse events with solifenacin 5 mg/day and oxybutynin immediate release (IR) 15 mg/day in patients ≤ 65 years and >65 years in the Canadian VECTOR study (VEsicare in Comparison To Oxybutynin for oveRactive bladder patients).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

VECTOR was a randomized, multicentre, prospective, double-blind, double-dummy study in 132 subjects with ≥ 1 urgency episode per 24 h, with or without urgency incontinence, and ≥ 8 micturitions per 24 h for ≥ 3 months. After a 2-week washout, patients received solifenacin 5 mg once daily or oxybutynin IR 5 mg tid for 8 weeks. For the current post-hoc analysis, adverse events were evaluated in subgroups of patients ≤ 65 years and >65 years, using a full logistic regression model, multinomial logit regression model and reduced model.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT00431041.

RESULTS

The incidence and severity of dry mouth and other adverse events with solifenacin were similar between younger and older patients. In both age subgroups, solifenacin 5 mg/day was associated with fewer episodes and lower severity of dry mouth, and a lower discontinuation rate, compared with oxybutynin IR 15 mg/day.

CONCLUSIONS

Solifenacin 5 mg/day was better tolerated than oxybutynin IR 15 mg/day in younger (≤ 65 years) and older (> 65 years) subgroups. Solifenacin was equally well tolerated in both age subgroups. Limitations of the analysis were that the study was not preplanned to perform post-hoc subgroup analysis, patients knew that dry mouth was a primary outcome, and the study used fixed doses of each drug.

Relationships between symptoms, symptom bother, and health-related quality of life in patients with overactive bladder taking solifenacin or placebo in the VIBRANT study

AIMS

Studies of antimuscarinics for overactive bladder (OAB) typically use objective and subjective measures to assess efficacy, as each provides unique information about patient outcome. We evaluated the relationships between changes in diary-documented OAB symptoms and other patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures.

METHODS

In VIBRANT, OAB patients received solifenacin (5/10 mg) or placebo for 12 weeks. During the study, patients completed 3-day bladder diaries and other generic and disease-specific PRO measures. Data from both treatment groups were combined (n=738). Categorical changes in diary variables were compared with changes in PRO measures. Partial correlations controlling for treatment and Spearman correlations were also calculated.

RESULTS

Categorical improvements in diary variables were significantly associated with greater improvements in PRO measures. Pair-wise comparisons showed that patients with major symptomatic improvements had significantly greater improvements on PROs vs. those with some or no improvement. Odds ratios ranged from 1.52 to 4.09 (p≤0.002). Linear relationships between changes in PRO measures and diary variables were low to moderate but statistically significant (p<0.001). Partial correlations were highest for diary variables and OAB-Questionnaire Symptom Bother. Spearman correlations ranged from 0.170 to 0.450 (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with OAB, changes in objectively measured symptoms of urgency, incontinence and frequency showed low-to-moderate correlations to changes in PRO measures. While providing evidence for similar change patterns in symptoms and patient perceptions, correlations were not high, lending support to the concept that in OAB clinical trials, both bladder diaries and PRO measures are important independent measures of efficacy.

Overactive bladder syndrome: what is the role of evidence of detrusor overactivity in the cystometric study?

AIM

A prospective study was conducted on 62 female patients with overactive bladder syndrome, to check for differences in clinical profiles, subjective symptoms and urodynamic findings, between patients with or without cystometric evidence of detrusor overactivity (DO). Later both groups of women were assessed for the effect of an antimuscarinic agent, solifenacin succinate (SS), on the considered parameters.

METHODS

Each patient underwent a full history, a physical examination, urinalysis and a urodynamic study. Provocative manoeuvres - cough, postural changes - were used when the cystometric study was performed. Hence two groups of patients were formed, divided according to the presence or absence of DO at the cystometric study: patients with overactive bladder syndrome (OAB) with DO (29), patients with OAB without DO (33). The two groups were compared before and after treatment with SS.

RESULTS

When we compared the two groups, before treatment with SS, we saw statistically significant differences in just a few of the parameters assessed in the clinical profiles: patients with DO had a higher rate of constipation; whereas patients without DO had a higher rate of stress incontinence and a larger number of deliveries. Following treatment with SS, in both groups, significant differences were shown in subjective symptoms and urodynamic findings, with a reduction of the numbers of voids and incontinence episodes and an improved urge score. A significant increase in bladder capacity during the cystometric study was shown only in patients with DO. Whereas no statistically significant improvement was shown in patients without DO. Treatment with SS was connected with delayed involuntary detrusor contractions during cystometry and a reduction of their number and amplitude. Finally, SS did not produce any significant negative effects on detrusor function during voiding.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study suggest that it is important to conduct a urodynamic study in patients with OAB, to check for DO. In our experience, treatment with SS was shown to be effective only in patients with involuntary detrusor contractions at the cystometric study.

Impact of solifenacin on diary-recorded and patient-reported urgency in patients with severe overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms

OBJECTIVE

It is widely recognized that patient perception of overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms can vary considerably from mild to severe bother. This post hoc analysis reports outcomes in patients with severe OAB symptoms at baseline taken from the VESIcare Efficacy and Safety in PatieNts with Urgency Study (VENUS).

METHODS

VENUS was a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of solifenacin (5 or 10 mg/day, flexibly dosed) in OAB patients. The primary endpoint in VENUS was mean change from baseline to study end in urgency episodes/day using 3-day bladder diaries. Secondary endpoints included other diary endpoints (frequency, incontinence, and nocturia), warning time (WT; time between first sensation of urgency to voiding), and patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures of urgency (the Indevus Urgency Severity Scale [IUSS] and Urgency Perception Scale [UPS]) and of symptom bother and health-related quality of life (HRQL) (the Patient Perception of Bladder Condition [PPBC] and Overactive Bladder Questionnaire). For this analysis, severe OAB was defined as baseline PPBC score ≥5 (1 = no problems, 6 = many severe problems).

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT00454896.

RESULTS

In total, 158/707 (22.3%) patients in the full analysis set (FAS) reported severe OAB symptoms. Solifenacin reduced mean urgency episodes/day versus placebo in the severe subgroup (-4.6 vs. -3.1, p = 0.1150), similar to the significant reduction observed in the FAS (-3.9 vs. -2.7, p < 0.0001). Solifenacin also improved the other diary endpoints and PRO measures in the severe subgroup; these changes were consistent with the significant solifenacin- versus placebo-related improvements for the FAS. Treatment-emergent adverse events were mostly mild/moderate, and few patients taking solifenacin or placebo discontinued treatment in the severe subgroup (4.5% vs. 6.5%) or FAS (6.5% vs. 4.6%). Key limitations are that VENUS was not powered to detect treatment differences in subgroups, and that the lack of a standardized definition of OAB symptom severity may limit the generalizability of the findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with severe OAB symptoms showed objective and subjective improvements in symptoms, symptom bother, HRQL, and urgency severity with solifenacin similar to the FAS. Solifenacin was also well-tolerated in this subgroup.