Single dose oral mefenamic acid for acute postoperative pain in adults

BACKGROUND

Mefenamic acid is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID). It is most often used for treating pain of dysmenorrhoea in the short term (seven days or less), as well as mild to moderate pain including headache, dental pain, postoperative and postpartum pain. It is widely available in many countries worldwide.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy of single dose oral mefenamic acid in acute postoperative pain, and any associated adverse events.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched Cochrane CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Oxford Pain Relief Database for studies to December 2010.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Single oral dose, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of mefenamic acid for relief of established moderate to severe postoperative pain in adults.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Studies were assessed for methodological quality and the data extracted by two review authors independently. Summed total pain relief (TOTPAR) or pain intensity difference (SPID) over 4 to 6 hours was used to calculate the number of participants achieving at least 50% pain relief. These derived results were used to calculate, with 95% confidence intervals, the relative benefit compared to placebo, and the number needed to treat (NNT) for one participant to experience at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours. Numbers of participants using rescue medication over specified time periods, and time to use of rescue medication, were sought as additional measures of efficacy. Information on adverse events and withdrawals was collected.

MAIN RESULTS

Four studies with 842 participants met the inclusion criteria; 126 participants were treated with mefenamic acid 500 mg, 67 with mefenamic acid 250 mg, 197 with placebo, and 452 with lignocaine, aspirin, zomepirac or nimesulide. Participants had pain following third molar extraction, episiotomy and orthopaedic surgery. The NNT for at least 50% pain relief over 6 hours with a single dose of mefenamic acid 500 mg compared to placebo was 4.0 (2.7 to 7.1), and the NNT to prevent use of rescue medication over 6 hours was 6.5 (3.6 to 29). There were insufficient data to analyse other doses or active comparators, or numbers of participants experiencing any adverse events. No serious adverse events or adverse event withdrawals were reported in these studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Oral mefenamic acid 500 mg was effective at treating moderate to severe acute postoperative pain, based on limited data. Efficacy of other doses, and safety and tolerability could not be assessed.

Idiopathic chondrolysis of the hip: a case report

Idiopathic chondrolysis of the hip is a rare condition occurring mainly in adolescents and is characterised by a rapidly progressive destruction of the articular cartilage in the coxofemoral joint. Patients report intense pain, motion restriction and often limping due to shortening of the limb. The aetiology is not elucidated. Medical imaging techniques form the cornerstone for differential diagnosis. Additionally biological markers for inflammation and infections should be studied. Conservative treatment focuses on pain control and preservation of joint mobility. Because published results of surgical treatment are not conclusive and arthroplasty in young patients is controversial, there is up till now no consensus on the treatment algorithm. Some authors advocate conservative treatment until spontaneous fusion. A case of idiopathic chondrolysis conventionally managed is reported.

Tolmetin and salicylate therapy in acute rheumatic fever: Comparison of clinical efficacy and side-effects

BACKGROUND

The arthritis of rheumatic fever is very responsive to treatment with salicylates, but there are many adverse reactions, especially hepatotoxicity, due to aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) therapy. These side-effects change the course and duration of rheumatic fever. Other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs may be equally effective, although no reports are available.

METHODS

We studied 72 patients with rheumatic fever who were admitted to Dr Sami Ulus Children's Hospital between 1995 and 1999. Twenty patients with arthritis were treated with tolmetin (25 mg/kg per day; group I) and 52 patients with arthritis and/or mild carditis were put on aspirin therapy (75-100 mg/kg per day) for 4-6 weeks (group II). Arthritis had disappeared at the same time in both the aspirin and tolmetin groups (P = 0.675).

RESULTS

The erythrocyte sedimentation rates of patients upon admission, at the first week and at the end of therapy were not different in the two groups (P > 0.05). No adverse effect of tolmetin therapy was observed, whereas side-effects of salicylate were observed in 19 patients (36.5%) in the aspirin group. Hepatotoxicity, gastric irritation and salicylism were found in 16, four and three patients, respectively. Renal toxicity and Reye syndrome were not demonstrated. Because of these side-effects of aspirin, therapy had to be stopped for 10-20 days and the duration of hospitalization in this group was lengthened unnecessarily.

CONCLUSION

Tolmetin was safe and effective treatment for arthritic rheumatic fever patients without carditis. Tolmetin can be used particularly in patients who cannot tolerate aspirin.

Gastroprotective effects of amtolmetin guacyl: a new non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug that activates inducible gastric nitric oxide synthase

BACKGROUND

The novel non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug amtolmetin guacyl has been shown to possess markedly reduced ulcerogenic effects and nitric oxide-mediated gastroprotective activity against the damage induced by ethanol in the rat.

AIMS

To investigate, in the rat, the role of nitric oxide and of inducible nitric oxide synthase isoform in the protective effect of amtolmetin guacyl against the gastric damage induced by ethanol.

METHODS

The effects of amtolmetin guacyl on gastric transmucosal potential difference and on gastric mucosal blood flow were investigated in the anaesthetised rat; myeloperoxidase activity, inducible and endothelial nitric oxide synthase protein content were determined in rat gastric mucosal homogenates. The anti-inflammatory drug tolmetin and the bacterial lipopolysaccharide from Escherichia coli were studied for comparison.

RESULTS

In the anaesthetised rat, amtolmetin guacyl, but not tolmetin, reduced by approximately 50% the fall in gastric potential difference and, to a lesser extent, the macroscopic damage induced by ethanol. The effect of amtolmetin guacyl on transmucosal potential difference was prevented by the selective inducible nitric oxide synthase inhibitor 1400W. In amtolmetin guacyl-treated rats, 1400W decreased gastric mucosal blood flow, whereas it was inactive in vehicle- and tolmetin-treated animals. In gastric mucosal homogenates, both amtolmetin guacyl and lipopolysaccharide, but not tolmetin, increased inducible, but not endothelial, nitric oxide synthase protein content, as revealed by Western immunoblotting.

CONCLUSIONS

These data confirm that amtolmetin guacyl is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agent devoid of gastrolesive properties, that can actually reduce the damaging effects of ethanol through the increase in nitric oxide production, via the inducible isoform of nitric oxide synthase.

Ketorolac treatment of pseudophakic cystoid macular edema identified more than 24 months after cataract extraction

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether ketorolac ophthalmic drops prescribed four times a day can be associated with improved visual acuity and prompt resolution of edema for patients with pseudophakic cystoid macular edema identified more than 24 months after cataract surgery.

DESIGN

Prospective, nonrandomized, comparative (subject self-controlled) trial.

PARTICIPANTS

The records of nine patients who had pseudophakic cystoid macular edema more than 24 months after cataract surgery at the time treatment commenced were identified at the Wilmer Retinal Vascular Center from September 1, 1996, through March 1, 1997.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Best-corrected visual acuities measured on a retroilluminated Bailey-Lovie chart approximately every 3 months, contact lens biomicroscopy, and fluorescein angiography following ketorolac.

INTERVENTION

Commercially available ketorolac ophthalmic drops 0.5% were prescribed for the affected eye four times a day for at least 3 months and continued until edema resolved.

RESULTS

Ten eyes of nine patients were identified more than 24 months after cataract extraction (median, 59 months). Seven eyes (70%) improved (mean, +3.2 lines; range, +1 to +13 lines), including six by 2 or more lines 3 months after treatment initiation. Two eyes (20%) were unchanged, and one eye (10%) was 1 line worse. All seven eyes that improved 1 line or more had some or complete angiographic resolution of fluorescein dye leakage. In these seven eyes, ketorolac was discontinued when dye leakage completely resolved or failed to continue to improve on periodic 3-month follow-up examinations. In all seven eyes, recurrence of edema was noted within 3 months after ketorolac was stopped.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic pseudophakic cystoid macular edema identified more than 24 months after cataract surgery can improve with topical ketorolac but probably requires persistent use.

Comparison of ketorolac tromethamine, diclofenac sodium, and moist drops for ocular pain after radial keratotomy

PURPOSE

To compare the 2 most popular commercially available topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the treatment of ocular pain following radial keratotomy (RK).

SETTING

Multicenter clinical trial.

METHODS

Ninety-seven RK patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups: ketorolac tromethamine, diclofenac sodium, and moist drops as a control. The patients used 1 drop of the masked medication and 1 drop of ofloxacin 3 times a day for 3 days prior to surgery. They received 1 drop of the masked medication 1 hour before surgery, immediately after surgery, and 4 times a day thereafter. Patients were given a written questionnaire preoperatively and were also instructed to call a central computerized telephone system to answer prerecorded questions about ocular comfort. The calls were placed 30 minutes and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 24, and 48 hours after surgery.

RESULTS

Two hundred ten statistical values were calculated to compare symptoms in the unoperated eye at baseline with symptoms in the operated eyes at each of 9 postoperative time points. Only 7 of the 210 values (3.3%) were significantly different among patient groups (operated versus unoperated eyes) by psychometric testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Both ketorolac tromethamine and diclofenac sodium were more effective in reducing post-RK discomfort than the control (moist artificial tears). Given the large number of tests and the small number that tested as significant, the significant differences (7 of 210 measurements) observed among the 3 treatment groups probably occurred by chance, although the improved foreign-body sensation, functionality, and compliance scores in the ketorolac group during the first 4 hours might be clinically important.

Synergistic antiallodynic effects of spinal morphine with ketorolac and selective COX1- and COX2-inhibitors in nerve-injured rats

The possible role of spinal prostanoids in the tactile allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia associated with an experimental model of neuropathic pain was investigated. Neuropathic pain was induced by tight ligation of the L5 and L6 spinal nerves. Tactile allodynia was assessed 7 days after the surgery by measuring hindpaw withdrawal threshold to probing with von Frey filaments. Thermal hyperalgesia and nociception were determined by the 52 degrees C warm-water tail-flick test and by applying radiant heat to the plantar aspect of the hindpaw ipsilateral to the ligation. Minimal antiallodynic effect was produced by intrathecal (i.th.) administration of ketorolac or morphine up to the highest testable dose (100 microg) or by the (R)- or (S)-enantiomers of ketorolac (up to 6 microg) when administered alone. However, i.th. administration of a fixed ratio (1:1) of morphine plus racemic ketorolac or of morphine plus the (S)-enantiomer of ketorolac (S-ketorolac) produced a dose- and time-related antiallodynic effect: ED50 114 +/- 35.9 microg (total dose) for morphine plus ketorolac and 70.5 +/- 21.0 microg (total dose) for morphine plus S-ketorolac. The combination of i.th. morphine plus the (R)-enantiomer of ketorolac (R-ketorolac) (up to 200 microg total dose) was without effect. Similar antiallodynic activity was obtained for the co-administration of i.th. morphine and intravenous (i.v.) racemic ketorolac. In order to investigate the role of cyclooxygenase (COX) isozymes, relatively selective COX1 (piroxicam) and COX2 N-[2-cyclohexyloxy-4-nitrophenyl] metanesulfonamide (NS-398) inhibitors were administered i.th. (60 microg) alone or together with i.th. morphine. Piroxicam, NS-398, morphine and vehicle (90% DMSO) were without significant antiallodynic effect when administered alone, but moderate antiallodynic effects were produced by i.th. administration of fixed ratio (1:1) combinations of morphine with 60 microg each (highest soluble dose) of piroxicam (%MPE = 40.8 +/- 10.2) or NS-398 (%MPE = 32.4 +/- 9.5). Further, the combined i.th. administration of morphine, piroxicam and NS-398 in fixed 1:1:1 ratio (60 microg each) resulted in a supraadditive antiallodynic effect (%MPE = 70.4 +/- 10.8). Finally, morphine, but not ketorolac, given i.th. produced dose-dependent anti nociception in either the tail-flick or the paw-flick tests. However, there was no synergy between morphine and ketorolac against thermal nociception in either of the tests. These findings suggest that spinal prostanoids produced via both COX1 and COX2 pathways may play a role in neuropathic pain states and suggest the clinical utility of opioid plus COX-inhibitor combination therapy.

Effect of ketorolac in pediatric sickle cell vaso-occlusive pain crisis

BACKGROUND

Ketorolac is a parenteral, nonsteroidal analgesic that does not have a narcotic's risks of respiratory depression, hypotension, or dependence. Its usefulness in providing pain relief in pediatric patients with acute vaso-occlusive crisis of sickle cell disease has not been studied to date.

METHODS

Twenty-nine patients with sickle cell disease between the ages of 5 and 18 years who presented to The Children's Hospital of Alabama emergency department (ED) with 41 distinct episodes of acute vaso-occlusive pain crisis were enrolled prospectively and randomized to receive either 0.9 mg/kg intravenous (IV) ketorolac or placebo in a double-blind fashion. All patients also received IV fluids and an initial 0.1 mg/kg of IV morphine. Subsequent standardized doses of morphine were given every 2 hours over a 6-hour observation period based upon severity of pain as scored by a 10-cm linear visual analog scale (VAS). Vital signs and pain severity were recorded initially and assessed hourly. Disposition was made at the end of the observation period.

RESULTS

Patients receiving ketorolac and those receiving placebo were of similar age, weight, gender, number of prior ED visits, number of prior hospital admissions, duration of pain prior to presentation, and initial pain score. The total dose of morphine received, reduction in severity of pain as measured by VAS, rate of hospital admission, and rate of return to the ED for discharged patients did not differ significantly between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

We were unable to demonstrate a synergistic analgesic effect for ketorolac in the treatment of pain from acute vaso-occlusive crisis in pediatric sickle cell disease. Further investigations involving larger samples of sickle cell patients may be needed to further define a role for ketorolac in the acute management of sickle cell vaso-occlusive pain.

Comparison of ketorolac-chlorpromazine with meperidine-promethazine for treatment of exacerbations of chronic pain

BACKGROUND

The aim was to compare the efficacy and safety of a combination of intramuscular ketorolac and chlorpromazine for the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic pain with the more commonly used regimen of intramuscular meperidine and promethazine.

METHODS

Use-effective case series were drawn from a real-life, rural emergency department practice, in which 200 consecutive patients coming to a rural emergency department with acute exacerbations of chronic pain syndromes were assigned on an every-other basis in a single-blind fashion to one of the two treatment conditions. Patients were given intramuscular doses of either 60 mg of ketorolac plus 50 mg of chlorpromazine (75 mg of chlorpromazine for patients weighing more than 100 kg), or 50 mg of meperidine plus 25 mg of promethazine (50 mg of promethazine for patients weighing more than 75 kg); patients weighing more than 100 kg were given 1.5 doses. Patients older than 65 years or whose blood pressure at the time of injection was less than 110/70 mmHg were given half-doses. Patients could receive one additional half-dose injection if they had no results within 30 to 60 minutes after the first injection. Patients were assessed on self-report and on a verbal and visual analog scale of pain rating. Temperature, blood pressure, heart rate, and respirations were monitored every 15 minutes.

RESULTS

Both regimens performed well, with more than 90 percent of patients reporting good or excellent improvement on acute exacerbations of chronic pain. Ketorolac-chlorpromazine offered significant advantages compared with meperidine-promethazine when patients rated their pain on a visual analog pain scale (P < 0.05) but not on a verbal scale. Adverse reactions were minimal and consisted of more respiratory tract depression with meperidine and more vertigo or dizziness with chlorpromazine. There was no difference in incidence of hypotension between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of ketorolac and chlorpromazine is a safe and efficacious alternative to meperidine plus promethazine for the treatment of exacerbations of chronic pain in the rural emergency department setting.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% and prednisolone acetate 1% after cataract surgery

PURPOSE

To compare the anti-inflammatory and analgesic efficacy and safety of ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% ophthalmic solution with those of prednisolone acetate 1% in patients having cataract surgery.

SETTING

Shawnee Mission Eye Care, Shawnee Mission, Kansas, USA.

METHODS

This double-blind, randomized, single-site study comprised 59 healthy men and women with a clinical diagnosis of routine ocular cataract requiring surgical removal. All patients had extracapsular cataract extraction and posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. After surgery, patients were randomized to receive ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% or prednisolone acetate 1%, self-instilled in the treated eye, according to the following schedule: 1 to 2 drops 4 times daily (week 1); 3 times daily (week 2); 2 times daily (week 3); once daily (week 4). Patients were examined postoperatively on days 1, 7, and 28. Intraocular anti-inflammatory efficacy was assessed by lid edema, lid injection, conjunctival injection, corneal edema, ciliary flush, and anterior chamber cells. Analgesic efficacy was assessed by patient self-rated pain severity, pain frequency, total symptom sum, and overall global improvement.

RESULTS

Both treatments produced comparable reductions in intraocular inflammation and pain after cataract surgery and were well tolerated by patients. No adverse events were reported, and there were no significant changes in intraocular pressure in either group. Improvements in visual acuity were also similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% ophthalmic solution was as effective and well-tolerated as prednisolone acetate 1% solution in controlling postoperative inflammation and pain after cataract surgery.

Postoperative pain after lumbar disc surgery: a comparison between parenteral ketorolac and narcotics

OBJECTIVE

Lumbar discectomy is a common elective surgical procedure but many patients still experience postoperative back pain which may delay hospital discharge. We therefore evaluated the efficacy of a parenteral non-steroidal antiinflammatory agent, ketorolac, for the management of post-surgical pain.

METHODS

Fifty three patients undergoing lumbar discectomy at a Medical School affiliated Veterans Administration hospital were randomly assigned to receive either: 1) 30 mg intramuscular ketorolac upon surgical closure and every 6 hours for 36 hours and narcotic analgesics as needed (PRN); or 2) only narcotic analgesics as needed. A blinded observer recorded the average, minimum and maximum postoperative pain intensity using a Numeric Pain Intensity Scale; total postoperative narcotic consumption, complications, length of hospitalization (from surgery to discharge) and outcome at 6 weeks.

RESULTS

The patients who received ketorolac reported significantly lower average (p < 0.001), minimum (p < 0.001), and maximum (p < 0.001) pain scores than patients receiving only narcotic analgesics. Cumulative narcotic doses (standardized to parenteral morphine) were significantly lower in the ketorolac group (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between groups in the frequency of side effects, and no complication specifically associated with ketorolac use was observed. Mean length of hospitalization was significantly shorter (p = 0.05) in patients receiving ketorolac than in patients receiving only narcotics. Six weeks after surgery 5 (19.2%) patients who received only narcotics were troubled by persistent back pain. By contrast, all patients who received ketorolac were free of back pain at follow-up (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that ketorolac, when used with PRN narcotics, is more effective than PRN narcotics alone for postoperative pain following lumbar disc surgery. In addition, this strategy also may contribute to early discharge from hospital after lumbar disc surgery.

Lumbar versus thoracic epidural buprenorphine for postoperative analgesia following coronary artery bypass graft surgery

BACKGROUND

Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is reported to provide effective analgesia following cardiac surgery. We compared the effect of buprenorphine (BN) through the lumbar and thoracic epidural routes for postoperative analgesia following coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG).

METHODS

Forty patients with normal left ventricular ejection fraction scheduled for CABG were randomly divided into two groups, the TEA group (n = 19) and the lumbar epidural analgesia (LEA) group (n = 20). For postoperative pain relief they received epidural BN 0.15 mg at the first demand for pain relief following extubation. A top-up dose of BN 0.15 mg was administered in cases where visual analogue scale (VAS) score was > 3 at 1 h after first dose. Subsequent breakthrough pain was treated with 30 mg intramuscular ketorolac tromethamine (ketorolac). Pain assessed by VAS score on a 0-10 scale, respiratory rate, FEV1, FVC, mean arterial blood pressure, cardiac index, PaO2 and PaCO2 were measured at frequent intervals. Side effects of epidural opioids were noted.

RESULTS

Both groups were comparable in demographic characteristics, had similar VAS scores from 1 to 24 h postoperatively, required similar amounts of intramuscular ketorolac for break-through pain and had comparable pulmonary functions and side effects.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that BN by the lumbar epidural route for analgesia after CABG compares favourably with the same drug through the thoracic route in terms of quality of analgesia and incidence of side effects.

Efficacy and safety profile of ketorolac 0.5% ophthalmic solution in the prevention of surgically induced miosis during cataract surgery

This multicenter, double-masked, randomized, parallel study compared the efficacy and safety profile of ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% ophthalmic solution with that of its vehicle in the maintenance of pupillary mydriasis during cataract surgery. A total of 176 adult patients scheduled to undergo unilateral extracapsular cataract extraction and posterior-chamber intraocular lens implantation received either ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% (n = 89) or vehicle (n = 87), starting 2 hours before surgery. One drop of study medication was instilled every 30 minutes for a total of 4 drops. No epinephrine was used in the intraoperative irrigating solution. Pupil diameter was measured with a caliper at 3 time points during surgery. To ensure participant safety, biomicroscopy, ophthalmoscopy, intraocular pressure, adverse events, and preoperative and postoperative visual acuity and refractive error were also monitored. The mean change in horizontal and vertical pupil diameter from the time of the first incision to after cortical irrigation and aspiration was significantly less with active ketorolac than with vehicle (P < or = 0.014). Consequently, mean pupil diameter after cortical irrigation and aspiration was significantly greater with ketorolac than with vehicle (P < or = 0.030). No significant between-group differences were observed in the change in pupil diameter between the end of surgery and postoperative administration of a miotic agent, safety variables, or occurrence of adverse events. In this study, ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% ophthalmic solution provided effective and well-tolerated inhibition of surgically induced miosis during cataract surgery.

[Use of nonopiate agents for anesthesia in ENT patients at high surgical-anesthesiological risk]

Optimal methods of endotracheal anesthesia using non-opiate drugs of four classes (clofelin, transamine, contrykal, ketanes) have been fundamentally grounded developed and tried in extensive and traumatic operations for ENT malignant and vascular tumors as well as inflammation in patients of high anesthesiological operative risk. The drugs were used in 174 patients including 13 children. 87.9% of the patients had concomitant diseases: blood hypertension, coronary heart disease, chronic nonspecific pulmonary diseases, bronchial asthma, asthmatic bronchitis, diabetes mellitus, anemia. Adequate stable anesthesia was achieved in reduced dosage of conventional anesthesiological agents.

[Ways of improving postoperative analgesia]

Analysis of many-year experience gained in the use of a variety of methods and means for treating the painful syndrome in victims and patients after planned and urgent surgery allowed the authors to determine the optimal approaches to postoperative analgesia. Special attention is paid to introduction of new drugs and methods of analgesia with differentiated approach to prevention and treatment of the painful syndrome. A conclusion on the necessity of pathogenetically based and strictly individual postoperative analgesia is made; such analgesia is often to be multilevel and multicomponent, with consideration for the complex origin of painful reaction (including the components of the painful syndrome) and the armory of available means.

Ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% ophthalmic solution in the treatment of moderate to severe ocular inflammation after cataract surgery: a randomized, vehicle-controlled clinical trial

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% ophthalmic solution (Acular; Allergan, Inc, Irvine, California) in the treatment of moderate to severe anterior segment inflammation developing after unilateral cataract surgery with intraocular lens implantation.

METHODS

Only patients who exhibited moderate or greater levels of cells and flare 1 day after surgery were included in this multicenter, double-masked, randomly assigned, parallel-group study. Topical ketorolac or vehicle solution (Allergan, Inc) was administered to the treated eye four times daily, starting the day after surgery and continuing for 14 days.

RESULTS

Ketorolac was significantly more effective than the vehicle solution in reducing anterior chamber cells (P < or = .030) and flare (P < or = .025), conjunctival erythema (P < or = .046), ciliary flush (P < or = .006), tearing (P < or = .012), photophobia (P < or = .014), and pain (P < or = .049). Half as many patients from the ketorolac group (14/51) were discontinued from the study for lack of efficacy, compared with the vehicle group (28/51; P = .005). There was no significant difference between ketorolac and the vehicle solution in changes in visual acuity, intraocular pressure, biomicroscopic or ophthalmoscopic variables, or adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% ophthalmic solution is safe and provides substantial anti-inflammatory activity in the treatment of moderate to severe anterior segment inflammation developing after cataract surgery and intraocular lens implantation.

Comparison of the effectiveness of 4 anti-inflammatory drops in relieving photophobia after pupil dilation

PURPOSE

To compare the relative effectiveness of diclofenac, flurbiprofen, ketorolac, and prednisolone acetate in relieving photophobia after pupil dilation for fundus examination.

SETTING

Eye, Ear, Nose, and Throat Hospital, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.

METHODS

This prospective, blind, placebo-controlled study comprised 105 patients randomly assigned to 1 of 10 treatment groups. Five minutes after instillation of dilating drops, each patient received drops of different test medications in the right and left eyes. Light sensitivity and pupil measurement tests were performed over 2 hours after the pharmacological mydriasis. After photostimulation, patients were asked to rate their photosensitivity on numerical and analog scales and to indicate a filter value required to alleviate right-induced discomfort. Test results were analyzed to detect differences among the pain levels associated with each treatment.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the placebo and any active treatment drug at any time during the study.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that mediators other than prostaglandins may have a role in photosensitivity or that increased postmydriatic photosensitivity is a result of higher light levels entering the eye through the dilated pupil.

[Postoperative oxadol analgesia in oncologic patients]

Oxadol (nefopam hydrochloride), a central analgesic, was used for postoperative pain relief in patients operated on the abdominal and pelvic organs for cancer. The analgesic effect of oxadol was sufficient for arresting moderate postoperative pain. Although the drug exerts rather many side effects, none of them notably deteriorated the clinical status of patients.

A double-blind evaluation of the analgesic efficacy and toxicity of oral ketorolac and diclofenac in cancer pain. The TD/10 recordati Protocol Study Group

AIM

To compare the analgesic efficacy and toxicity of the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory analgesic drug, ketorolac (Toradol, Recordati spa, Milan) 10 mg p.o. (t.i.d.) with diclofenac (Voltaren, Novartis Farma, Origglo, VA) 50 mg p.o. (t.i.d.) in cancer patients with moderate to severe chronic pain.

METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN

The study was a multicenter randomized double-blind cross-over trial. Each treatment lasted 7 days, after which the patients crossed over to the other drug. Pain intensity was evaluated by the visual analogue scale (VAS) after the first dose and by the 5-point verbal rating scale (VRS) by the patient and by the physician following the 7-day treatment.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

A total of 138 advanced cancer patients were enrolled in the study. Overall 251 single-dose administrations (117 cross-over observations) and 257 multiple treatments (127 cross-over experiments) were assessable. After a single administration of ketorolac and diclofenac, no significant difference could be observed in analgesic activity, as indicated by the area under the pain-intensity time curve (AUC0-8), in the maximum efficacy, or the duration of efficacy of the two drugs. The Westlake confidence intervals of the AUC0-8 ratio (ketorolac: diclofenac) (1.07; 90% CI, 0.94-1.19), of the maximum efficacy ratio (1.03; 90% CI, 0.92-1.14), and the duration of efficacy ratio (1.05; 90% CI, 0.97-1.11) showed the bioequivalence of the two drugs. Satisfactory pain relief was reported for multiple 7-day treatments, with no significant differences between the two therapies: according to the physician's evaluation, in 93/128 (73%; 95% CI, 65-80%) ketorolac treatments and 91/129 (71%; 95% CI, 63-78%) diclofenac treatments; according to the patient's evaluation, in 83/128 cases (65%; 95% CI, 57-73%) after ketorolac and in 74/129 cases (57%; 95% CI, 49-66%) after diclofenac. Adverse symptoms were acceptable with both drugs. Interestingly, a pronounced sequence effect was found: gastric disturbances after ketorolac were observed mainly (10 out of 15 observed events) when the drug was given to patients pretreated with diclofenac.

I.v. diclofenac and ketorolac for pain after thoracoscopic surgery

We studied intensity of pain, cumulative morphine consumption, ventilatory and renal function, and haemostasis in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and receiving a 2-day i.v. infusion of diclofenac, ketorolac or saline. Plasma concentrations of the two NSAID were also measured. The study was randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled, with 10 patients in each group. Patients experienced mainly moderate pain. Mean consumption of i.v. morphine during the first day after operation was 57 (SEM 11) mg in the placebo group. Diclofenac and ketorolac were equally effective in reducing total morphine consumption (61% and 52%, respectively). Adverse events were similar and minor. Greater variability in plasma concentrations of ketorolac were detected compared with diclofenac.

Efficacy and safety of nonpreserved ketorolac ophthalmic solution in postoperative ocular pain following radial keratotomy

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of nonpreserved ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% ophthalmic solution in relieving pain following radial keratotomy (RK).

SETTING

Multicenter clinical trial.

METHODS

Topical ketorolac was compared with its vehicle in a double-masked, randomized, parallel-group study involving 170 RK patients. Patients were treated with nonpreserved ketorolac 0.5% ophthalmic solution or the vehicle 4 times daily beginning immediately after surgery and continuing for 3 days or until they no longer had ocular pain.

RESULTS

At several intervals, patients treated with ketorolac reported significantly greater pain relief and less pain intensity than patients treated with the vehicle. The time required for patients to first report "complete relief" or "no pain" was shorter in the ketorolac than in the vehicle group (P < or = .006). Patients in the ketorolac group used less escape medication (acetaminophen) (P < or = .001) and had fewer sleep difficulties (P < or = .031), fewer symptoms of ocular discomfort (P < or = .028), and less difficulty performing activities of daily living (P = .048). Patients treated with ketorolac experienced the same low rate of treatment-related adverse events as those treated with the vehicle and exhibited the same improvement in visual acuity and manifest refraction.

CONCLUSIONS

Nonpreserved ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% ophthalmic solution was significantly more effective than, and as safe as, the vehicle in alleviating the postoperative pain associated with RK. This resulted in significant improvements in patient quality of life and less need for oral analgesics, suggesting that topical ketorolac is an appropriate treatment option for ocular pain following RK.

Ketoprofen, diclofenac or ketorolac for pain after tonsillectomy in adults?

We have compared the analgesic and opioid sparing effect of three i.v. non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with placebo in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in 80 adult patients after elective tonsillectomy. A standard anaesthetic was used. After induction of anaesthesia, patients received ketoprofen 100 mg, diclofenac 75 mg or ketorolac 30 mg by i.v. infusion over 30 min. Patients in the placebo group received saline. Ketoprofen and diclofenac infusions were repeated after 12 h and ketorolac infusion at 6 h and 12 h. Oxycodone was used as rescue analgesic. Patients in the ketoprofen group requested 32% less opioid and patients in the diclofenac and ketorolac groups 42% less opioid than those in the placebo group (P < 0.05). There were one, two and six patients in the placebo, diclofenac and ketorolac groups, respectively, but none in the ketoprofen group, who did not request opioid analgesia during the study (P < 0.05, ketorolac vs placebo and ketoprofen). Visual analogue pain scores were similar in all groups. Visual analogue satisfaction scores were significantly higher in the diclofenac group compared with the placebo group. The incidence of nausea was 44-54%. There were no differences in the incidence of other adverse reactions. We conclude that all three non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were superior to placebo after tonsillectomy.

Efficacy of ketorolac tromethamine versus meperidine in the ED treatment of acute renal colic

To compare the efficacy of intramuscular ketorolac and meperidine in the emergency department (ED) treatment of renal colic, a prospective, controlled, randomized, double-blind trial was conducted in an academic ED with 76,000 annual visits. Participants were volunteer ED patients with a diagnosis of ureterolithiasis confirmed by intravenous pyelogram. Subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive a single intramuscular injection of either 60 mg ketorolac or 100 to 150 mg meperidine, based on weight. Of the 70 patients completing the trial, 33 received ketorolac and 37 received meperidine. Demographic characteristics and baseline pain scores of both groups were comparable (P = NS, Mann Whitney U). Ketorolac was significantly (P < .05) more effective than meperidine in reducing renal colic at 40, 60, and 90 minutes as measured on a 10-cm visual analogue scale. Similar proportions of patients in each group were given rescue analgesia and admitted. Of patients who were discharged home without rescue, those treated with ketorolac left the ED significantly earlier than those treated with meperidine (3.46 v 4.33 h, P < .05). These results show that intramuscular ketorolac as a single agent for renal colic is more effective than meperidine and promotes earlier discharge of renal colic patients from the ED.

Oral granisetron for strabismus surgery in children

PURPOSE

To determine the efficacy of oral granisetron in preventing postoperative vomiting (POV) following strabismus repair in children.

METHODS

In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 73 pediatric patients received either placebo, 20 micrograms.kg-1 or 40 micrograms.kg-1 granisetron po 20 min before induction of anesthesia. No premedication was given, induction was with halothane and all children breathed spontaneously via a laryngeal mask airway. Maintenance was with isoflurane without the use of opioids. Ketorolac and acetaminophen were used for analgesia. The number of episodes and the severity of vomiting and retching were recorded for the first 24 hr postoperatively, as was the use of rescue antiemetics.

RESULTS

Granisetron 20 micrograms.kg-1 and 40 micrograms.kg-1 were more effective than placebo in reducing the incidence of POV during the first 24 hr (29% in both the granisetron groups vs 84% in the placebo group, P < 0.05). In addition, the number of children experiencing severe vomiting (> or = 3 episodes) was reduced in the granisetron 20 micrograms.kg-1 and 40 micrograms.kg-1 groups compared with placebo (4%, 8% and 48% respectively, P < 0.05). Patients in the granisetron group were discharged home earlier (105 min vs 124 min, P = 0.04). There was no difference in the incidence of POV between the two granisetron groups.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative oral granisetron in a dose of 20 micrograms.kg-1 provided effective prophylaxis against POV in children undergoing stabismus repair.

Intravenous analgesia

Pain and its treatment are known to have adverse effects on the organism, including deterioration in myocardial, diaphragmatic, and small bowel function. The provision of adequate intravenous analgesia, and the choice of agent, can ameliorate or exacerbate these manifestations of the stress response. The choice of agent, opioid or non-opioid, has in some respects become more difficult as more information has become available regarding the merits and adverse effects of each. Increased awareness of the frequency of hypoxemia secondary to the opioids' ability to cause an obstructive sleep apnea picture, and the cost efficiency of ketorolac through a reduction in opioid toxicity, contrast with recent studies which suggest that the gastrotoxic and nephrotoxic effects of ketorolac may occur earlier than previously suspected. The suitability of using the dissociative anesthetic agent ketamine in critically ill patients remains to be proven. Ketamine provides intense analgesia at subanesthetic doses. Its centrally mediated sympathomimetic action encourages hemodynamic stability, and it is relatively devoid of respiratory depressant activity. Increasing experience with ketamine outside the operating room has resulted in its successful use in cases of severe bronchospasm and status epilepticus.

A comparison of ketorolac tromethamine/oxycodone versus patient-controlled analgesia with morphine in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction patients

Effective postoperative analgesia with minimal side effects remains an important goal in enabling increasingly complex surgical procedures to be performed on an outpatient basis. In this study, we examined the efficacy of postoperative analgesia in 90 patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a patellar tendon autograft, with a 24-hour hospital stay. Patients were randomized to receive either intramuscular ketorolac supplemented by oral oxycodone, or intravenous morphine via patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device, for postoperative analgesia. Patients were monitored for 2 hours in the recovery room, then every 4 hours until discharge, for the presence of complications of nausea, vomiting, urinary retention, pruritus, and dizziness. Pain was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) on the morning of postoperative day one. All patients were discharged by 24 hours after surgery. Ten (20%) of the patients receiving ketorolac/oxycodone versus 31 (79%) of those receiving PCA morphine experienced postoperative complications (P < .05). Postoperative nausea, vomiting, and urinary retention were each significantly more common in the PCA morphine group (P < .05). The incidence of pruritus and dizziness was low overall. There was no significant difference between groups in the severity of postoperative pain as assessed using a VAS. We conclude that ketorolac/oxycodone may provide comparable analgesia with fewer undesirable side effects than PCA morphine in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Patients receiving ketorolac/oxymorphone may have a better quality recovery and more rapid discharge.

The opioid-sparing effects of intravenous ketorolac as an adjuvant analgesic in cancer pain: application in bone metastases and the opioid bowel syndrome

Side effects of morphine are common when given in titrated doses to control severe pain in advanced cancer. We report a case series of acutely ill cancer patients suffering from pain, complications of advanced disease, and opioid side effects. They were treated with intravenous (i.v.) ketorolac along with i.v. morphine using repeated dosing. Excellent pain relief with improvement in the opioid bowel syndrome was achieved. We found it possible to switch from IV ketorolac to oral ketorolac along with oral morphine for long-term pain control. Ketorolac can be well tolerated in high-dose, long-term use even in this frail patient population. An algorithm is presented for the suggested use of ketorolac as a morphine sparing agent. Potential methods for studying ketorolac further in this role are discussed.

Effect of intra-articular versus systemic anti-inflammatory drugs in a rabbit model of temporomandibular joint inflammation

PURPOSE

In an attempt to better understand the time course of inflammatory mediator production or release in inflammatory joint disease, a rabbit model of acute temporomandibular joint (TMJ) inflammation was established. This model was used to evaluate the effects of specific anti-inflammatory agents administered either systemically (intraperitoneal, IP) or locally (intra-articular, IA) on the modulation of in vivo tissue levels of two prototypic inflammatory mediators, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and bradykinin (BK).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An experimental model of inflammation was created by administering carrageenan (carra) into one joint and an equivalent volume of saline (control) into the contralateral joint of 42 male New Zealand White rabbits. The development of hyperthermia was assessed by placement of a microthermister probe into the joint space. The inflammatory mediators, immunoreactive PGE2 (iPGE2) and BK (iBK), were recovered with microdialysis probes, and samples were assayed in conjunction with specific pharmacologic interventions. In the first part of the study, the time course for the release or production of iBK and iPGE2 was determined. In the second part, the effects of IP versus IA administration of dexamethasone and a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, ketorolac tromethamine, were compared. Dexamethasone and ketorolac were administered at 3 hours and 1 hour, respectively, before the peak release of the inflammatory mediators.

RESULTS

The onset of IA hyperthermia, an index of inflammation, was evident by 90 minutes post-carra and reached a maximum of 1.2 degrees C above core temperature by 150 minutes post-carra. Intra-articular levels of iPGE2 and iBK peaked at 240 minutes (3.35+/-1.9 nmol/L) and 270 minutes (0.45+/-0.29 nmol/L), respectively, after the induction of inflammation in the superior joint space. iBK levels within the superior joint space were significantly decreased by dexamethasone and ketorolac. Ketorolac (50 microg) decreased iBK and iPGE2 levels when given IA or IP. With dexamethasone (3 mg), the levels of iBK were significantly reduced, and iPGE2 levels were not changed.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that the rabbit model of TMJ inflammation, with concurrent collection of iBK and iPGE2 via microdialysis, is a reproducible and reliable method to investigate the time course of inflammatory mediator release and their modulation by either the local or systemic administration of anti-inflammatory medications.

Local anaesthetic infiltration for surgical exodontia of third molar teeth: a double-blind study comparing bupivacaine infiltration with i.v. ketorolac

We studied 40 patients undergoing surgical removal of at least two third molar teeth under general anaesthesia. Patients were allocated randomly to one of two groups: group B (n = 20) received bupivacaine up to 2 mg kg-1, infiltrated around the inferior alveolar nerves bilaterally, and group K (n = 20) received ketorolac 10 mg i.v. at the start of surgery. There were no significant differences between the two groups in postoperative pain scores measured at 1 h using a visual analogue scale. Group K had a significantly lower incidence of side effects related to intraoral anaesthesia. Swallowing, speech and oral continence were significantly better. Group K scored higher for overall patient satisfaction, measured using a visual analogue scale. We failed to demonstrate any difference in early postoperative recovery (coughing, laryngospasm, stridor or arterial oxygen desaturation) between the groups. We conclude that the use of 0.5% bupivacaine infiltration was no more effective than a single 10-mg injection of ketorolac while giving rise to a higher rate of "minor" airway complications and lower patient acceptability.

The efficacy of sublingual hyoscyamine sulfate and intravenous ketorolac tromethamine in the relief of ureteral colic

A prospective, randomized, open-label, single-dose study was conducted in an emergency department (ED) of a tertiary care teaching hospital to evaluate the efficacy of hyoscyamine sulfate as compared to ketorolac tromethamine for the reduction of pain from ureteral colic in the ED. Patients were included if they were at least 18 years of age and presented to the ED with an initial history and physical examination consistent with ureteral colic. Ureteral calculi were confirmed by ultrasound or intravenous urogram. Consecutive patients were randomized to either a single sublingual dose of 0.125 mg of hyoscyamine sulfate or a single intravenous dose of 30 mg of ketorolac tromethamine given over 1 minute. After 30 minutes, if analgesia was inadequate, patients were given rescue medication. Baseline pain scores were obtained using a horizontal, 100-mm visual analog scale. Additional pain scores were obtained at 10-minute intervals for 30 minutes. Upon completion of the study, both patients and physicians completed a global assessment score questionnaire. Fifty-four evaluable patients were randomized. Demographics and baseline pain scores were similar for each group. Decreasing trends in pain over time were observed for both treatment groups, with significantly greater pain reduction observed with ketorolac tromethamine as compared to hyoscyamine sulfate. Global evaluations of pain relief revealed better results in the ketorolac tromethamine group than in the hyoscyamine sulfate group, although this result was not statistically significant.

Ketorolac, diclofenac and ketoprofen are equally efficacious for pain relief after total hip replacement surgery

We have compared the efficacy of ketorolac 30 mg i.v. followed by infusion at a rate of 90 mg/15.5 h, with that of diclofenac 75 mg followed by infusion of 75 mg/15.5 h or ketoprofen 100 mg followed by infusion of 100 mg/15.5 h, on postoperative pain in 85 patients after hip replacement surgery under spinal anaesthesia in a prospective, double-blind, randomized study. Supplementary analgesia was administered during the 16-h postoperative period with bolus doses of fentanyl delivered by a patient-controlled analgesia system. Mean total consumption of PCA-administered fentanyl was 890 (SD 400) micrograms in the ketorolac group, 920 (550) micrograms in the diclofenac group and 850 (350) micrograms in the ketoprofen group (ns). Median VAS scores were low over the entire study in each group and there was no significant difference between groups. No serious adverse events were recorded.

Analgesic efficacy and safety of preoperative versus postoperative ketorolac in paediatric tonsillectomy

BACKGROUND

Tonsillectomy is a common procedure in childhood resulting in significant morbidity due to pain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of a single dose of ketorolac i.v. given before or after tonsillectomy, compared to placebo.

METHODS

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was performed in 60 children, 5 to 15 years of age, admitted for tonsillectomy. Patients were allocated to receive ketorolac 1 mg.kg-1 i.v. or placebo. Postoperative pain was assessed by self-report 1.5, 3, 5, and 24 h after surgery.

RESULTS

Pain scores were significantly lower for both ketorolac groups compared to the placebo group 1.5, 3, and 5 h after surgery (P = 0.05). Pain scores were lowest in the preoperative ketorolac group 1.5 to 5 h after surgery, and significantly fewer children in this group had fentanyl 0 to 1.5 hr after surgery. But no significant differences were found between pain scores of the preoperative and postoperative ketorolac groups in the first 24 h after surgery. Acetaminophen consumption during the first 5 h after surgery was significantly less in patients receiving ketorolac (P < 0.05). Patients in the preoperative ketorolac group had a significantly lower incidence of postoperative vomiting (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative bleeding between groups. Three children in the preoperative, 5 children in the postoperative ketorolac group and 5 children in the placebo group experienced postoperative haemorrhage.

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that a single dose of ketorolac 1 mg.kg-1 i.v. administered either before or immediately after surgery improves postoperative analgesia in children after tonsillectomy without evidence of increased incidence of bleeding.

Comparison of ketorolac and diclofenac in the treatment of renal colic

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and adverse effects of ketorolac and diclofenac in the treatment of renal colic.

METHODS

In a double-blind, randomized clinical trial, 57 patients admitted to the emergency room for renal colic, received either 30 mg of ketorolac or 75 mg of diclofenac i.m. (intramuscularly). Evaluations were performed at 1, 2 h and 6 h after treatment. Pain was assessed by a four-point verbal rating scale (VRS) and a visual analogue scale (VAS). Only patients with at least moderate pain according to the VRS were included. Seventy-five milligrams of pethidine i.m. was given as rescue medicine, if insufficient analgesia was achieved. The adverse effects recorded were sedation, nausea and vomiting.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between ketorolac and diclofenac, with respect to pain level over time, the number of patients requiring rescue medicine, or the level of adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

Ketorolac and diclofenac are equally effective in the treatment of renal colic.

Latanoprost-associated cystoid macular edema

PURPOSE

To report two cases in which cystoid macular edema developed after initiation of topical latanoprost for glaucoma.

METHODS

Case reports. One pseudophakic eye in each of two patients treated with latanoprost for glaucoma developed decreased vision and cystoid macular edema. Latanoprost was discontinued, and the cystoid macular edema was treated with topical corticosteroids and ketorolac.

RESULTS

After discontinuing latanoprost and starting corticosteroids and ketorolac, visual acuity improved from counting fingers to 20/60 in one patient's left eye and from 20/100 to 20/25 in the other patient's right eye. The macular edema resolved in both eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

Topical latanoprost may be associated with cystoid macular edema; this may be related to a prostaglandin-like action.

Effects of ketorolac tromethamine mouthrinse (0.1%) on crevicular fluid prostaglandin E2 concentrations in untreated chronic periodontitis

The effects of topical ketorolac tromethamine mouthrinse (0.1%) on gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) concentrations were investigated in a 6-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, single center study of 42 patients with moderately advanced chronic adult periodontitis. Following screening, GCF was sampled from 6 sites per subject with filter paper strips and PGE2 levels measured using an enzyme immunoassay kit. Only those subjects with mouth median GCF PGE2 concentrations >30 ng/ml entered the rinsing phase. Eligible subjects were allocated placebo rinse in the first 2-week period (days 0 through 14), either ketorolac rinse (test group, n = 21) or placebo rinse (control group, n = 21) in the second 2-week period (days 14 through 28), and placebo rinse in the third 2-week period (days 28 through 42). Full mouth median GCF PGE2 concentrations were calculated for each subject at days 0, 14, 28, and 42, and group means were compared. From day 0 to day 14, no significant changes in GCF PGE2 concentrations were detected in either study group (P > 0.05). Utilizing mean GCF PGE2 concentrations at days 0 and 14 as covariates, no significant differences were observed in adjusted mean PGE2 levels at days 28 and 42 between the study groups (ANCOVA, P > 0.05). A statistically significant increase in GCF PGE2 levels was noted at days 28 and 42 in the placebo group (P < 0.01), but not in the ketorolac group (P > 0.05), when compared to baseline, however. GCF PGE2 levels were further studied in a subset of volunteers (n = 11) during a 12-hour period following first rinsing with mouthrinse (active or placebo) at day 14. GCF was sampled 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours post-rinsing. Mean PGE2 levels were higher in the placebo subgroup than in the ketorolac subgroup, and increased gradually over the 12-hour period in both subgroups. These data indicate that 1) 14 days of rinsing with 0.1% ketorolac mouthrinse controlled the elevation of GCF PGE2 observed in the placebo group but did not actually reduce GCF PGE2 concentrations and 2) changes in GCF PGE2 levels were not detectable in the 12-hour period following first rinsing with ketorolac.

Ketorolac use in outpatients and gastrointestinal hospitalization: a comparison with other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in Italy

OBJECTIVE

To compare the risk of hospitalization for gastroduodenal ulcer associated with the use of ketorolac and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

METHODS

A cohort and a nested case-control study were carried out. All residents in the region of Umbria (Italy), aged 35-84 years, who had been given at least one NSAID prescription in 1993 and 1994 were identified. Exposure to drugs was ascertained through a drug prescription database. We estimated rate ratios of hospitalization for gastroduodenal ulcer with or without complications in the current, recent or past period according to exposure to different NSAIDs.

RESULTS

Rate ratio estimates, adjusted for age and sex, were 2.8 for any current NSAID and 1.4 for any recent NSAID. The highest rate ratios of lesions of any severity for current NSAID use were observed for piroxicam (RR: 4.6) and ketorolac (RR: 3.4). For gastrointestinal haemorrhage or perforation the highest rate ratios were those for ketorolac (RR: 5.9) and piroxicam (RR: 4.8). Rate ratio estimates did not change after adjustment for concomitant use of gastrotoxic drugs, use of gastroprotective agents not associated with NSAIDs and prior use of NSAIDs.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates the need to adhere to the restrictions relating to the indications and duration of use of ketorolac. At present piroxicam represents a greater public health concern since it is confirmed to be among the most gastrotoxic NSAIDs and is one of the most commonly prescribed NSAIDs in Italy.

Assessment of acrylic bone cement as a local delivery vehicle for the application of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been widely used to reduce the inflammation and pain in patients suffering from arthritis. There is a possible use for these drugs in the treatment of inflammation associated with periodontitis. However, the propensity of NSAIDs to cause serious side effects, including gastrointestinal bleeding, has reduced their usefulness. The local application of NSAIDs can avoid these side effects by delivering low doses of drug directly to the affected site. Three NSAIDs (indomethacin, tolmetin and mefenamic acid) were incorporated into polymethylmethacrylate bone cement (PM MA) strips in a range of concentrations and their cytotoxicity, pattern of drug release and ability to suppress elevated levels of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) in cultured human periodontal ligament fibroblasts (HPLF) assessed. The strips released between 10 and 30% of the total incorporated drug over 7 days, with the highest levels released by strips containing 20% w/w of drug. Strips containing 20% indomethacin and mefenamic acid released in excess of toxic levels in the first 24 h. Strips containing 20, 10 and 5% w/w NSAID significantly (P < 0.05) reduced the level of PGE2 expression by E. coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenged cells, with only the 20% mefenamic acid strip performing significantly better than the other drugs. We conclude that local delivery of NSAIDs using PMMA as a sustained release vehicle is a possible additional tool in the treatment of periodontitis.

Ketorolac versus acetaminophen-codeine in the emergency department treatment of acute low back pain

Acute low back pain is a common problem in the emergency department (ED). Effective management of acute pain enhances early rehabilitation and recovery. Given the importance of inflammatory mediators in pain generation and the adverse effects associated with opioids, it is logical to expect that a non-opioid agent with antiinflammatory and analgesic properties would provide excellent analgesia with fewer adverse effects. This double-blind, randomized, multicenter clinical trial, performed in six university and community hospital EDs, compares the analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of ketorolac to those of acetaminophen-codeine in ED patients with acute musculoskeletal low back pain. Our hypothesis was that ketorolac would provide superior analgesia with fewer adverse effects. One hundred twenty-three patients with acute low back pain were randomized to receive ketorolac (KET, N = 63) or acetaminophen-codeine (ACOD, N = 60). Most (79%) were males, and the mean age was 34.5 years. After baseline clinical assessment, patients were treated with ketorolac (10 mg every 4 to 6 h as needed, up to four daily doses) or acetaminophen-codeine (600 mg-60 mg, respectively, every 4 to 6 h as needed, up to six daily doses) and followed for one week. Pain intensity was assessed on visual analogue and categorical scales. Functional capacity, overall pain relief, and overall medication rating were assessed on categorical scales. Adverse events were documented. Primary outcomes included: 1) Pain intensity differences, based on visual analogue scores, for the 0 to 6 h treatment phase. 2) Incidence of adverse events. Secondary outcomes included analgesic efficacy, functional capacity, and overall subjective drug evaluation at one week. Both drugs provided substantial pain relief, with maximal effect 2.2 h after oral dosing. There were no significant differences in analgesic efficacy, functional capacity, or overall pain relief between the two groups. Sixteen patients (10 KET vs. 6 ACOD, NS) withdrew prematurely because of drug inefficacy. Patients in the ACOD group reported significantly more adverse drug events and serious adverse drug events. Seven patients--all in the ACOD group--withdrew from the study because of adverse drug events. Based on comparable efficacy and a superior adverse event profile, ketorolac was preferable to acetaminophen with codeine for the treatment of acute low back pain in the ED.

Intravenous ketorolac vs intravenous prochlorperazine for the treatment of migraine headaches

OBJECTIVE

To compare i.v. ketorolac with i.v. prochlorperazine as the initial treatment of migraine headaches in the ED.

METHODS

A prospective, double-blind comparison study was performed, using a convenience sample of 64 patients suffering from migraine headaches presenting to the ED at a tertiary care university teaching hospital. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 10 mg of prochlorperazine i.v. or 30 mg of ketorolac i.v.. Patients scored the severity of their headaches using a 10-cm visual analog pain scale. An initial mark was made on the scale at the time of entry into the study and later another mark was made on a new unmarked pain scale 1 hour after medication administration. Changes in pain scores within each treatment group and between groups were analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test.

RESULTS

Prior to treatment, the patients assigned to receive prochlorperazine had a median score of 9.2 cm (mean +/- SD pain score of 8.3 cm +/- 2.1 cm), while the patients receiving ketorolac had a median score of 9.0 (mean pain score of 8.4 cm +/- 1.7 cm). There was no significant difference between the pain scores of the participants in the 2 groups prior to treatment (p = 0.80). One hour after medication administration, the patients in the prochlorperazine group had a median score of 0.5 cm (mean 2.1 +/- 3.2 cm), while those patients receiving ketorolac had a median pain score of 3.9 (mean 4.0 +/- 3.3 cm). The decrease in pain score was significant for both groups of patients (p = 0.0001). The change in pain score for the patients in the prochlorperazine group (median 7.1) was significantly greater than the change in pain score for the patients in the ketorolac group (median 4.0; p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Although both drugs were associated with a significant reduction in pain scores, benefit over a placebo agent was not tested. Furthermore, the patients who received prochlorperazine i.v. for migraine headaches had a statistically significant greater decrease in their pain scores than did those receiving ketorolac i.v.

A double-blind study comparing two single-dose regimens of ketorolac with diclofenac in pain due to cancer

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of two single doses of ketorolac with diclofenac in acute cancer pain.

DESIGN

Double-blind, randomized, clinical study.

SETTING

Hospital-based clinical research center.

SUBJECTS

One hundred eighty patients suffering acute, moderate, or severe cancer pain.

INTERVENTIONS

A single intramuscular injection of ketorolac 10 or 30 mg or diclofenac 75 mg.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Pain intensity was assessed 30 minutes and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 hours after injection or until rescue drug administration. In approximately 70% of patients all treatments provided prompt sustained pain relief throughout the 6-hour observation period. There were no statistically significant differences in any of the analyzed efficacy measures among the three groups.

CONCLUSION

Intramuscular ketorolac 10 mg is adequate to relieve cancer pain, and is equivalent to ketorolac 30 mg and to diclofenac 75 mg.

Preemptive pain control in patients having laparoscopic hernia repair: a comparison of ketorolac and ibuprofen

OBJECTIVES

To determine if nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs provide adequate pain control for patients having laparoscopic hernia repair and to compare the effectiveness of ketorolac tromethamine with ibuprofen in reducing postoperative laparoscopic hernia pain.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Prospective double-blind randomized study at a 100-bed community hospital.

PATIENTS

Seventy patients ranging in age from 16 to 83 years scheduled for elective laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients undergoing laparoscopic hernia repair were enrolled in a double-blind randomized study to compare the 2 treatments. Group 1 received a placebo capsule 1 hour before surgery and ketorolac tromethamine, 60 mg intravenously, at the time of trocar insertion. Group 2 received ibuprofen, 800 mg an hour before surgery, and isotonic sodium chloride solution, 2 mL intravenously, at the time of trocar insertion. In addition, all patients received local infiltration of 30 mL of bupivacaine hydrochloride into their trocar sites. All patients were discharged within 5 hours of the operation and were instructed to take 400 mg of ibuprofen orally every 4 hours for 24 hours whether or not they were experiencing pain. A 24-hour supply of ibuprofen was provided to all study patients. Pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Pain Scale with a maximum pain rating of 100. Assessments were done at the time of and 18 hours after discharge.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Postoperative pain 18 and 24 hours after discharge was assessed using a standardized questionnaire in a telephone interview by a registered nurse from the Outpatient Surgical Unit.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the level of pain experienced by 35 patients who received ketorolac intravenously and 35 who received ibuprofen orally. There was no significant difference between the 2 treatment groups in the amount of pain experienced at discharge and 18 hours after discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

Pain relief from ibuprofen, 800 mg, administered orally an hour before laparoscopic hernia repair was not statistically different from that obtained with intravenous ketorolac, 60 mg, administered intraoperatively when comparing the hospital discharge pain score and the mean and highest pain scores 18 hours after discharge. Ibuprofen offers equivalent pain control at a lower cost and reduced potential for adverse drug events compared with intravenous ketorolac in patients having laparoscopic hernia repair. No patient required narcotic supplementation, and pain control was judged satisfactory by all the patients.

Effect of ketorolac tromethamine (Toradol) on ischemia-reperfusion injury in skeletal muscle

The eicosanoids, leukotriene B4 (LTB4) and thromboxane A2 (TXA2), contribute to neutrophil adhesion and arteriole vasoconstriction, important microcirculatory events in ischemia-reperfusion (I-R) injury. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of ketorolac on I-R injury of skeletal muscle. A videomicroscopic preparation of gracilis muscle in male Wistar rats (n=7) in two experimental groups was evaluated: Group 1-4 hr global ischemia only (19 arterioles, 19 venules), and Group 2-4 hr ischemia plus ketorolac (13 arterioles, 14 venules). Ketorolac (0.86 mg/kg, i.m.) was given 30 min prior to reperfusion. The number of neutrophils, rolling and adherent, was counted in 100-micron venular segments, and arteriole diameters were measured at 5, 15, 30, 60 and 120 min of reperfusion. The I-R-induced increase in neutrophil adhesion was significantly reduced by ketorolac, which significantly increased arteriolar vasodilation in the first 30 min of reperfusion and significantly reduced the I-R-induced vasoconstriction in arterioles at 30 min; this effect was lost at 1 hr of reperfusion. Although ketorolac augments immediate arteriole vasodilation and blocks subsequent vasoconstriction, this effect appears to be transient. These findings suggest that ketorolac may have potential as a treatment for I-R injury.

A multicenter comparison of the ocular efficacy and safety of diclofenac 0.1% solution with that of ketorolac 0.5% solution in patients with acute seasonal allergic conjunctivitis

Only one of several available ophthalmic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is currently FDA approved for use in acute seasonal allergic conjunctivitis (SAC). Sixty patients with SAC and moderate itching and bulbar conjunctival injection were enrolled in a multicenter, randomized, double-masked, parallel-group trial comparing diclofenac sodium (DS) with ketorolac tromethamine (KT). Patients instilled 1 drop four times daily while awake for 14 days. Ocular signs and symptoms were evaluated at one and two weeks. The primary efficacy variables were itching and bulbar conjunctival injection. For both treatments, the ocular allergy sign and symptom scores were comparable at baseline. Both treatments evaluated in this study were well tolerated. Significant clinical and statistical reductions from baseline were observed in the primary efficacy variables. Treatment group differences were observed for the pain/soreness score with an advantage observed for the DS group at 30 minutes and at day 7. Our conclusion is that diclofenac sodium and ketorolac tromethamine acted similarly to reduce the ocular signs and symptoms associated with acute seasonal allergic conjunctivitis. There was a statistically significant advantage for the DS group to be free of symptoms at the day 7 visit as compared to the KT group (20.7% vs. 3.2%).

Analgesic efficacy and safety of nonpreserved ketorolac tromethamine ophthalmic solution following radial keratotomy. Ketorolac Radial Keratotomy Study Group

PURPOSE

To compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of nonpreserved ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% with those of its vehicle in the treatment of postsurgical ocular pain following radial keratotomy.

METHODS

This study employed a multicenter, double-masked, randomized, parallel-group design. Radial keratotomy patients were treated with either nonpreserved ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% or its vehicle four times daily for up to 3 days following surgery. Patients were provided with an escape medication (acetaminophen) for use only as needed for intolerable pain.

RESULTS

Patients treated with ketorolac reported significantly greater pain relief (P < or =.023), less pain intensity (P < or =.047), less use of escape medication (P < or =.001), fewer symptoms of ocular discomfort (P=.024), and fewer sleep disturbances (P < or =.013) than did patients treated with vehicle. No treatment-related adverse events were reported in the ketorolac group, and only one treatment-related adverse event was reported in the vehicle group. Most other safety findings were equivalent in the two treatment groups except that there were significantly less eyelid erythema (P=.026) and eyelid edema (P < or =.001) in the ketorolac group.

CONCLUSIONS

Nonpreserved ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% ophthalmic solution was significantly more effective than, and as safe as, vehicle in the treatment of postoperative pain associated with radial keratotomy. Therefore, topical ketorolac may be a valuable treatment option for the maintenance of patient comfort following refractive surgery.