Texas Medication Algorithm Project, phase 3 (TMAP-3): clinical results for patients with a history of mania

BACKGROUND

The Texas Medication Algorithm Project (TMAP) assessed the clinical and economic impact of algorithm-driven treatment (ALGO) as compared with treatment-as-usual (TAU) in patients served in public mental health centers. This report presents clinical outcomes in patients with a history of mania (BD), including bipolar I and schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, during 12 months of treatment beginning March 1998 and ending with the final active patient visit in April 2000.

METHOD

Patients were diagnosed with bipolar I disorder or schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, according to DSM-IV criteria. ALGO was comprised of a medication algorithm and manual to guide treatment decisions. Physicians and clinical coordinators received training and expert consultation throughout the project. ALGO also provided a disorder-specific patient and family education package. TAU clinics had no exposure to the medication algorithms. Quarterly outcome evaluations were obtained by independent raters. Hierarchical linear modeling, based on a declining effects model, was used to assess clinical outcome of ALGO versus TAU.

RESULTS

ALGO and TAU patients showed significant initial decreases in symptoms (p =.03 and p <.001, respectively) measured by the 24-item Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS-24) at the 3-month assessment interval, with significantly greater effects for the ALGO group. Limited catch-up by TAU was observed over the remaining 3 quarters. Differences were also observed in measures of mania and psychosis but not in depression, side-effect burden, or functioning.

CONCLUSION

For patients with a history of mania, relative to TAU, the ALGO intervention package was associated with greater initial and sustained improvement on the primary clinical outcome measure, the BPRS-24, and the secondary outcome measure, the Clinician-Administered Rating Scale for Mania (CARS-M). Further research is planned to clarify which elements of the ALGO package contributed to this between-group difference.

Texas Medication Algorithm Project, phase 3 (TMAP-3): rationale and study design

BACKGROUND

Medication treatment algorithms may improve clinical outcomes, uniformity of treatment, quality of care, and efficiency. However, such benefits have never been evaluated for patients with severe, persistent mental illnesses. This study compared clinical and economic outcomes of an algorithm-driven disease management program (ALGO) with treatment-as-usual (TAU) for adults with DSM-IV schizophrenia (SCZ), bipolar disorder (BD), and major depressive disorder (MDD) treated in public mental health outpatient clinics in Texas.

DISCUSSION

The disorder-specific intervention ALGO included a consensually derived and feasibility-tested medication algorithm, a patient/family educational program, ongoing physician training and consultation, a uniform medical documentation system with routine assessment of symptoms and side effects at each clinic visit to guide ALGO implementation, and prompting by on-site clinical coordinators. A total of 19 clinics from 7 local authorities were matched by authority and urban status, such that 4 clinics each offered ALGO for only 1 disorder (SCZ, BD, or MDD). The remaining 7 TAU clinics offered no ALGO and thus served as controls (TAUnonALGO). To determine if ALGO for one disorder impacted care for another disorder within the same clinic ("culture effect"), additional TAU subjects were selected from 4 of the ALGO clinics offering ALGO for another disorder (TAUinALGO). Patient entry occurred over 13 months, beginning March 1998 and concluding with the final active patient visit in April 2000. Research outcomes assessed at baseline and periodically for at least 1 year included (1) symptoms, (2) functioning, (3) cognitive functioning (for SCZ), (4) medication side effects, (5) patient satisfaction, (6) physician satisfaction, (7) quality of life, (8) frequency of contacts with criminal justice and state welfare system, (9) mental health and medical service utilization and cost, and (10) alcohol and substance abuse and supplemental substance use information. Analyses were based on hierarchical linear models designed to test for initial changes and growth in differences between ALGO and TAU patients over time in this matched clinic design.

The effects of psychotherapy, nefazodone, and their combination on subjective assessment of disturbed sleep in chronic depression

STUDY OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the study was to compare the effects of psychotherapy, nefazodone, and their combination on subjective measures of sleep in patients with chronic forms of major depression.

DESIGN

Participants were randomized to receive 12 weeks of treatment with one of the three interventions.

SETTING

The study was conducted in parallel at 12 academic institutions and was approved by the Human Subjects Committee at each site.

PARTICIPANTS

484 adult outpatients (65.29% female) who met DSM-IV criteria for one of three chronic forms of major depression.

INTERVENTIONS

Psychotherapy (16-20 sessions) was provided by certified therapists following a standardized treatment manual for Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP), a variant of cognitive psychotherapy developed for chronic depression. Pharmacotherapy consisted of open-label nefazodone, 300-600 mg per day in two divided doses prescribed by psychiatrists. The clinical management visits were limited to 15-20 minutes and followed a standardized protocol. Combination treatment consisted of both therapies.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Depression outcome was determined by the 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression and the 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Rating. Sleep outcome was measured prospectively with daily sleep diaries that were completed a week prior to HRSD assessments at baseline and after 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment. Although nefazodone alone and CBASP alone had comparable impact on global measures of depression outcome, only monotherapy with nefazodone improved early morning awakening and total sleep time. Significant improvements in sleep quality, time awake after sleep onset, latency to sleep onset, and sleep efficiency were present in each of the three treatment groups. These improvements, however, occurred earlier in the course of treatment for participants receiving nefazodone, alone or in combination with CBASP.

CONCLUSIONS

Nefazodone therapy may have a direct impact on disturbed sleep associated with depression beyond what would be expected if the improvements were all a consequence of improved depression.

Using treatment algorithms to bring patients to remission

Many patients treated with antidepressants fail to achieve full remission, and the costs, both social and economic, of response without remission as well as residual symptoms are high. Patients who experience incomplete remission to antidepressant treatment are candidates for a sequential treatment approach involving treatment options such as switching, augmentation, or combination of antidepressants. Recently, the number of alternatives for treatment has increased substantially. Algorithms and treatment guidelines that synthesize current data and research provide clinicians with a structure when changes in treatment strategy are necessary. Guidelines and algorithms are not designed to take away the clinician's autonomy but instead are intended to provide support for treatment decisions, and effective ones allow for a wide degree of flexibility. It can be easily argued that the use of algorithms with the associated decision support tools increases the role of the clinician in assessment of the clinical status and subsequent treatment choices.

Treatment-resistant depression: new therapies on the horizon

Managing patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) remains a major challenge for the practicing physician. Depression is considered treatment-resistant when at least two adequate monotherapy trials with drugs from different pharmacologic classes fail to elicit a therapeutic response. Although determining the stage of TRD may allow concise description of a patient's antidepressant history, management of TRD is better served by recent attempts to create a treatment algorithm that encompasses definitive diagnosis of true TRD and strategies for optimizing available therapies, including consideration of novel treatment options. Present strategies for managing TRD include optimization of the initial drug, substitution of another drug from the same or a different antidepressant class, combination of two antidepressants with different mechanisms of action, and adding an antidepressant drug from another class. Potential nonpharmacologic treatments include vagus nerve stimulation, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, and magnetic seizure therapy as an alternative to electroconvulsive therapy. Several neuropeptides and their receptors have also been identified as potential targets for pharmacologic intervention, including corticotropin-releasing factor and substance P. Other treatments currently under investigation include augmentation of antidepressant therapy with an atypical antipsychotic agent such as olanzapine or risperidone. This kind of therapeutic intervention may prove to be especially useful in treating patients with TRD.

Development and implementation of computerized clinical guidelines: barriers and solutions

Research indicates that computerized decision support systems (CDSSs) can improve clinical performance and patient outcomes, and yet CDSSs are not in widespread use. Physician guidelines, in general, face barriers in implementation. Guidelines in a computerized format can overcome some of the barriers to conventional text-form guidelines; however, computerized programs have novel aspects that have to be considered, aspects such as technical problems/support and user interface issues that can act as barriers. Though the literature points out that human, organizational, and technical issues can act as barriers in the implementation of CDSSs, studies clearly indicate that there are methods that can overcome these barriers and improve CDSS acceptance and use. These methods come from lessons learned from a variety of CDSS implementation ventures. Notably, most of the methods that improve acceptance and use of a CDSS require feedback and involvement of end-users. Measuring and addressing physician or user attitudes toward the computerized support system has been shown to be important in the successful implementation of a CDSS. This article discusses: 1) the barriers of implementation of guidelines in general and of CDSSs; 2) the importance of the physician's role in development, implementation, and adherence; 3) methods that can improve CDSS acceptance and use; and 4) the types of tools needed to obtain end-user feedback.

Continuation treatment of chronic depression: a comparison of nefazodone, cognitive behavioral analysis system of psychotherapy, and their combination

Little is known about the relative benefits of psychotherapy, medication, and combined treatment as continuation therapies for chronic forms of major depressive disorder (MDD) after a positive response to acute treatment. We hypothesize that combined treatment would demonstrate superior continuation phase outcomes compared to either monotherapy, as evidenced by lower relapse rates and greater rates of improvement from partial to full remission. We report 16-week continuation phase outcomes for 324 patients who had participated in either the acute phase of a randomized multicenter trial of nefazodone, Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP), or combination therapy (COMB) for chronic forms of MDD. Patients entering the continuation phase had either fully or partially remitted after 12 weeks of acute phase treatment. The primary efficacy measure was the 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. For patients in remission at acute phase exit, 73.3% (107/146) maintained their remitted status at endpoint of the continuation phase. Of those having a partial remission at acute phase exit, 52.9% (92/174) achieved full remission by end of continuation. A greater proportion of patients maintained a partial or full remission status on COMB (90%) compared to nefazodone (80%, p=0.011) or to CBASP (82%, p=0.042). These differences reflected greater symptom re-emergence in the partial remission groups on CBASP and nefazodone monotherapy compared to COMB. Continuation treatment assignment was not randomized or blinded. There was no placebo group. Most patients with chronic forms of MDD sustained their acute phase response and more than 50% of partial remitters achieved full remission while continuing treatment with nefazodone, CBASP, or COMB. COMB was associated with less symptom re-emergence during the continuation phase than either monotherapy, particularly for partial remitters.

The DOSE study: a clinical trial to examine efficacy and dose response of exercise as treatment for depression

The Depression Outcomes Study of Exercise (DOSE) was a randomized clinical trial to determine whether exercise is an efficacious treatment for mild to moderate major depressive disorder (MDD) in adults ages 20 to 45 years. The specific hypotheses under investigation were (1) active exercise is an efficacious monotherapy for mild to moderate levels of MDD, and (2) there is a dose-response relation between the exercise amount and reduction in depressive symptoms. The primary outcome measure was the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) collected weekly over 12 weeks. Secondary outcome measures were the Inventory of Depressive Symptoms (clinician and self-report), HRSD scores at 24 weeks, cardiorespiratory fitness, self-efficacy, and quality of life. Eighty men and women who were diagnosed with a Structured Clinical Interview for Depression and who had mild (HRSD 12-16) to moderate (HRSD 17-25) MDD were randomized to one of five doses of exercise: 7.0 kcal/kg/week in 3 days/week; 7.0 kcal/kg/week in 5 days/week; 17.5 kcal/kg/week in 3 days/week; 17.5 kcal/kg/week in 5 days/week; or 3 days/week of stretching and flexibility exercises for 15 to 20 min/session. Participants exercised under supervision in our laboratory over the course of 12 weeks. Symptoms of depression were measured weekly by trained clinical raters blinded to the participant's treatment assignment. The design of the study restricted participant characteristics to mild to moderate MDD and controlled exercise features to permit the evaluation of exercise as a sole treatment for depression. This study is the first to examine dose-response effects of exercise in participants diagnosed with MDD.

Sexual function and satisfaction in the treatment of chronic major depression with nefazodone, psychotherapy, and their combination

BACKGROUND

Changes in sexual interest/satisfaction and function are frequently associated with major depression and the use of some antidepressant treatments. This study compares the effects of antidepressant medication, psychotherapy, and combined treatment on sexual interest/satisfaction and function in patients with chronic major depression.

METHOD

Outpatients with chronic forms of DSM-IV major depressive disorder (N = 681) were randomly assigned to 12 weeks of nefazodone, Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP), or combined nefazodone/CBASP. The Modified Rush Sexual Inventory was used to assess sexual functioning, and the 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression was used to assess depressive symptoms.

RESULTS

At baseline, 65% of men and 48% of women reported some sexual dysfunction. Statistically significant linear improvement in sexual interest/satisfaction was noted across all 3 treatment groups (p < .001). Additionally, significant improvement in sexual function was observed across all 3 treatment groups on a composite measure of female sexual function (p < .001). Controlling for depressive symptoms and gender, combined treatment produced greater improvement in total sexual interest/satisfaction than CBASP alone (p = .007), but was not significantly different from nefazodone alone. Improvement in depressive symptoms was associated with improved sexual interest/satisfaction for men and women and, for men, improved sexual functioning.

CONCLUSION

Chronic depression is associated with high rates of sexual dysfunction. Treatment with nefazodone, CBASP, and combined treatment improved sexual interest/satisfaction, with greatest improvement observed with combined treatment.

Differential effects of nefazodone and cognitive behavioral analysis system of psychotherapy on insomnia associated with chronic forms of major depression

BACKGROUND

The antidepressant nefazodone and the Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) were recently found to have significant, additive effects in a large multicenter study of chronic forms of major depression. As nefazodone-mediated blockade of serotonin-2 receptors may directly relieve insomnia associated with depression, we examined the more specific effects of CBASP and nefazodone, singly and in combination, on sleep disturbances.

METHOD

A total of 597 chronically depressed outpatients (DSM-III-R criteria) with at least 1 insomnia symptom were randomly assigned to 12 weeks of treatment with nefazodone (mean final dose = 466 mg/day), CBASP (mean = 16.0 sessions), or the combination (mean dose = 460 mg/day plus a mean of 16.2 CBASP sessions). Continuous and categorical insomnia outcomes, derived from standard clinician- and self-rated assessments, were compared.

RESULTS

Patients receiving nefazodone (either alone or in combination with CBASP) obtained significantly more rapid and greater ultimate improvement in insomnia ratings when compared with those treated with CBASP alone. This difference was maximal by the fourth week of therapy and sustained thereafter. Combined treatment did not result in markedly better insomnia scores than treatment with nefazodone alone on most measures, although patients receiving both CBASP and nefazodone were significantly more likely (p < .001) to achieve > or = 50% decrease in insomnia severity.

CONCLUSION

Despite comparable antidepressant efficacy, monotherapy with nefazodone or CBASP resulted in markedly different effects on the magnitude and temporal course of insomnia symptoms associated with chronic forms of major depression. Patients receiving the combination of psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy benefited from both the larger and more rapid improvements in insomnia associated with nefazodone therapy and the later-emerging effects of CBASP on the overall depressive syndrome.

Efficacy of porcine secretin in children with autism and pervasive developmental disorder

Secretin, a gastrointestinal (GI) hormone, was reported in a preliminary study to improve language and behavior in children with autism/pervasive developmental disorder (PDD) and chronic diarrhea. To determine the efficacy of secretin, we completed a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover (3 weeks) study in children with autism/PDD and various GI conditions using a single dose of intravenous porcine secretin. Children with chronic, active diarrhea showed a reduction in aberrant behaviors when treated with the secretin but not when treated with the placebo. Children with no GI problems are unaffected by either secretin or placebo. The improvement seen with secretin in children with autism/PDD and chronic diarrhea suggests that there may be a subtype of children with autism/PDD who respond to secretin.

Symptomatic and syndromal anxiety in chronic forms of major depression: effect of nefazodone, cognitive behavioral analysis system of psychotherapy, and their combination

BACKGROUND

Limited information is available on treatment response of anxiety symptoms in chronic forms of major depression. Concurrent anxiety disorders are prevalent in chronic depression, but the responsiveness of patients with such comorbidity to different treatments is largely unknown. This study investigated the comparative efficacy of nefazodone, Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP), and their combination in improving anxiety symptoms in patients with chronic forms of major depression, including those with a concurrent anxiety disorder.

METHOD

681 patients with chronic major depressive disorder (DSM-IV criteria) participated in a multicenter study of 12 weeks of acute treatment with nefazodone (N = 226), CBASP (N = 228), or the combination (N = 227). The Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A), the HAM-A psychic anxiety factor, and the anxiety/arousal subscale of the 30-item Inventory for Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report (IDS-SR-30) were used to assess anxiety symptoms.

RESULTS

In the full sample. without controlling for change in depressive symptoms, combination therapy was superior to both monotherapies on all 3 anxiety measures both in the rate of change and at endpoint. When change in depressive symptoms was controlled for, there were no treatment differences in rate of change from baseline to week 12 on any of the 3 anxiety measures. In those patients with a concurrent anxiety disorder, however, the combination was superior to CBASP on the HAM-A and the IDS-SR-30. Nefazodone alone and combination therapy were both superior to CBASP on the HAM-A psychic anxiety factor.

CONCLUSION

For patients with chronic depression, combination therapy is superior to CBASP or nefazodone alone. Among patients with a concurrent anxiety disorder, nefazodone. either alone or in combination with CBASP, improves anxiety symptoms faster than CBASP alone, independent of depressive symptom reduction.

Effect of Hypericum perforatum (St John's wort) in major depressive disorder: a randomized controlled trial

CONTEXT

Extracts of Hypericum perforatum (St John's wort) are widely used for the treatment of depression of varying severity. Their efficacy in major depressive disorder, however, has not been conclusively demonstrated.

OBJECTIVE

To test the efficacy and safety of a well-characterized H perforatum extract (LI-160) in major depressive disorder.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial conducted in 12 academic and community psychiatric research clinics in the United States.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult outpatients (n = 340) recruited between December 1998 and June 2000 with major depression and a baseline total score on the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D) of at least 20.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly assigned to receive H perforatum, placebo, or sertraline (as an active comparator) for 8 weeks. Based on clinical response, the daily dose of H perforatum could range from 900 to 1500 mg and that of sertraline from 50 to 100 mg. Responders at week 8 could continue blinded treatment for another 18 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Change in the HAM-D total score from baseline to 8 weeks; rates of full response, determined by the HAM-D and Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) scores.

RESULTS

On the 2 primary outcome measures, neither sertraline nor H perforatum was significantly different from placebo. The random regression parameter estimate for mean (SE) change in HAM-D total score from baseline to week 8 (with a greater decline indicating more improvement) was -9.20 (0.67) (95% confidence interval [CI], -10.51 to -7.89) for placebo vs -8.68 (0.68) (95% CI, -10.01 to -7.35) for H perforatum (P =.59) and -10.53 (0.72) (95% CI, -11.94 to -9.12) for sertraline (P =.18). Full response occurred in 31.9% of the placebo-treated patients vs 23.9% of the H perforatum-treated patients (P =.21) and 24.8% of sertraline-treated patients (P =.26). Sertraline was better than placebo on the CGI improvement scale (P =.02), which was a secondary measure in this study. Adverse-effect profiles for H perforatum and sertraline differed relative to placebo.

CONCLUSION

This study fails to support the efficacy of H perforatum in moderately severe major depression. The result may be due to low assay sensitivity of the trial, but the complete absence of trends suggestive of efficacy for H perforatum is noteworthy.

Does psychosocial functioning improve independent of depressive symptoms? A comparison of nefazodone, psychotherapy, and their combination

BACKGROUND

Although it is known that antidepressant treatment improves psychosocial functioning, whether such changes occur independent of depressive symptoms is not known. This study compared efficacy of nefazodone, psychotherapy, and their combination in improving psychosocial functioning in chronically depressed outpatients.

METHODS

Patients with chronic forms of major depressive disorder were randomized to 12 weeks of nefazodone, Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP), or combined nefazodone/CBASP. Psychosocial assessments measured overall psychosocial functioning, work functioning, interpersonal functioning, and general health.

RESULTS

Relative to community norms, patients with chronic major depression evidenced substantially impaired psychosocial functioning at baseline. Combined treatment produced significantly greater psychosocial improvement than either CBASP alone or nefazodone alone on all primary measures. Combined treatment remained superior to nefazodone on primary measures of work, social, and overall functioning, and superior to CBASP on social functioning when depressive symptoms were controlled. Unlike the two groups receiving nefazodone, CBASP alone's effect on psychosocial function was relatively independent of symptom change. Psychosocial functioning improved more slowly than depressive symptoms, and moderate psychosocial impairments remained at end point.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined treatment had greater effect than either monotherapy. Change in depressive symptoms did not fully explain psychosocial improvement. Moderate residual psychosocial impairment remained, suggesting the need for continuation/maintenance treatment.

Quantitative EEG amplitude across REM sleep periods in depression: preliminary report

OBJECTIVE

To determine if there are significant differences in the temporal organization of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep microarchitecture between healthy controls and outpatients with major depressive disorder (MDD).

METHODS

Forty age-matched subjects, 20 men and 20 women, half with MDD, were selected from an archive of sleep electroencephalography (EEG) data collected under identical conditions. Each participant spent 2 consecutive nights in the Sleep Study Unit of the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, the first of which served as adaptation. The average amplitude in each of 5 conventional EEG frequency bands was computed for each REM period across the second night. Data were then coded for group and sex.

RESULTS

Aside from REM latency, none of the key sleep macroarchitectural variables differentiated MDD patients from controls. REM latency was longest in men with MDD. Sleep microarchitecture, however, did show a number of between-group differences. In general, slower frequencies declined across REM periods, with a significant REM period effect for delta, theta and alpha amplitude. Group x sex interactions were also obtained for theta and alpha. Beta activity showed a unique temporal profile in each group, supported by a significant REM period x group x sex interaction. In addition, the temporal change in theta amplitude across REM periods was most striking in women with MDD.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that, like during non-REM sleep, EEG amplitude shows a systematic temporal change over successive REM sleep periods and also shows elements that are both disease- and sex-dependent.

Using treatment algorithms for the effective management of treatment-resistant depression

Increasingly, clinicians are looking to evidence-based medicine for information about treatment options. Treatment algorithms have been used with a variety of psychiatric disorders to assist physicians in making treatment decisions. The direct, prescriptive nature of algorithms also makes them suitable for use in treatment-resistant depression. Two major projects, the Texas Medication Algorithm Project and Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression, have begun to address the questions of sequenced treatment options. Future directions for algorithm development and implementation are discussed.

Sensitizing clinicians and patients to the social and functional aspects of remission

Axis I disorders are defined by specific symptom constellations that are frequently accompanied by notable impairments in social functioning. Social role impairments diminish personal fulfillment, satisfaction, and quality of life. It is now clear that these findings suggest a broader definition of remission that involves not only the absence of symptoms but also improvement in psychosocial functioning. Clinicians and patients need to become sensitized to the role of social functioning and quality of life in the assessment of treatment outcomes. Although there has been a recent emphasis on the inclusion of social function and quality of life measures in the definition of and requirements for remission, numerous standardized scales for measuring these factors already exist. In addition, selection of efficacious therapeutic agents proven to promote both elimination of symptoms and return to full social functioning is important. Finally, significant improvement in both symptoms and function may be necessary to prevent not only relapse but also ensure full remission of anxiety and depressive disorders.

Do bupropion SR and sertraline differ in their effects on anxiety in depressed patients?

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effects of bupropion sustained release (SR) and sertraline on anxiety in outpatients with recurrent DSM-IV-defined major depressive disorder.

METHOD

This retrospective analysis was conducted using pooled data from 2 identical, 8-week, acute-phase, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies of bupropion SR (N = 234), sertraline (N = 225), and placebo (N = 233). Symptoms of anxiety and depression were measured using the 14-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A) and the 21-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-21), respectively. Percentage reduction in baseline HAM-A total score for each treatment week was calculated to determine whether the time to onset of anxiolytic activity differed among antidepressant responders to each agent. Central nervous system (CNS) adverse events were tabulated.

RESULTS

Bupropion SR and sertraline were comparably effective, both were superior to placebo in reducing depressive symptoms. and they did not differ in their effect on anxiety symptoms. Antidepressant responders (> 50% reduction in baseline HAM-D-21 score) in both groups showed marked and comparable reductions in HAM-A scores (baseline to exit). There were no differences between bupropion SR and sertraline in the median time (4 weeks) to reach a clinically significant anxiolytic effect (> or = 50% reduction in baseline HAM-A score). CNS adverse events were comparable for bupropion SR and sertraline, except for somnolence, which was more common in sertraline-treated patients.

CONCLUSION

Bupropion SR and sertraline had comparable antidepressant and anxiolytic effects and an equally rapid onset of clinically significant anxiolytic activity. There was no difference in the activating effects between the 2 antidepressants. Selection between these 2 agents cannot be based on either anticipation of differential anxiolytic activity or differential CNS side effect profiles.

Response in relation to baseline anxiety levels in major depressive disorder treated with bupropion sustained release or sertraline

Our objective was to determine if pretreatment anxiety levels were associated with preferential response to bupropion sustained release (n = 122) or sertraline (n = 126) during a 16-week randomized acute phase treatment study. Both agents had comparable antidepressant activity, and comparable anxiolytic effects using the intent-to-treat sample. Baseline anxiety levels were not related to antidepressant efficacy, and they did not differentiate responders to each agent. Time to clinically significant anxiolysis did not differentiate between treatment groups or between responders to each agent. These results contradict the commonly held, but unsubstantiated, belief that in clinically depressed anxious patients, serotonergic antidepressants are especially anxiolytic and that such patients preferentially benefit from the antidepressant or anxiolytic effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Thus, the clinical decision to select between these two agents when treating depressed outpatients cannot rest on either levels of pretreatment anxiety or on anticipation of more rapid or more complete anxiolysis.

Occipital brain perfusion deficits in children with major depressive disorder

Occipital lobe perfusion defects have been identified on regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) SPECT scans of adolescent children and young adults with major depressive disorder (MDD). We reinvestigated a series of rCBF SPECT scans obtained several years ago on drug-naive children with a clinical diagnosis of MDD and on healthy children.

METHODS

To test whether visually apparent abnormalities in rCBF constitute statistically significant differences between patients, given the relatively small sample sizes, we applied the technique of statistical parametric mapping (SPM).

RESULTS

Two groups of patients were identified: 8 with significant posterior flow deficits in the occipital cortex (Brodmann's areas 18 and 19), usually symmetric, and best visualized on paramedian sagittal sections, and 13 without obvious occipital perfusion deficits but with anterior rCBF deficits in a pattern often described in the literature, attaining statistical significance in the right frontal region. Other localizations in the left frontal and bilateral prefrontal regions did not attain significance, but each localization contained statistically significant maxima (z scores). The scan findings of all 18 healthy children were normal.

CONCLUSION

With the aid of SPM, 2 groups of children with significantly different rCBF behavior were identified. The reason for this difference is not known but should be investigated to determine its possible significance to patients with MDD.

Physical activity dose-response effects on outcomes of depression and anxiety

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to examine the scientific evidence for a dose-response relation of physical activity with depressive and anxiety disorders.

METHODS

Computer database searches of MEDLINE, PsychLit, and Internet and personal retrieval systems to locate population studies, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies, and consensus panel judgments were conducted.

RESULTS

Observational studies demonstrate that greater amounts of occupational and leisure time physical activity are generally associated with reduced symptoms of depression. Quasi-experimental studies show that light-, moderate-, and vigorous-intensity exercise can reduce symptoms of depression. However, no RCTs have varied frequency or duration of exercise and controlled for total energy expenditure in studies of depression or anxiety. Quasi-experimental and RCTs demonstrate that both resistance training and aerobic exercise can reduce symptoms of depression. Finally, the relation of exercise dose to changes in cardiorespiratory fitness is equivocal with some studies showing that fitness is associated with reduction of symptoms and others that have demonstrated reduction in symptoms without increases in fitness.

CONCLUSION

All evidence for dose-response effects of physical activity and exercise come from B and C levels of evidence. There is little evidence for dose-response effects, though this is largely because of a lack of studies rather than a lack of evidence. A dose-response relation does, however, remain plausible.

Efficacy and safety of mirtazapine in major depressive disorder patients after SSRI treatment failure: an open-label trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of mirtazapine in depressed outpatients who have shown nonresponse or intolerance to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) therapy.

METHOD

In this open-label, 8-week study, the efficacy and safety of mirtazapine among 103 outpatients with DSM-IV major depressive disorder who had failed previous therapy with an SSRI (fluoxetine, paroxetine, or sertraline) were evaluated. The primary efficacy measure was the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-17), and safety assessments included reported adverse events, routine laboratory assessments, physical examinations, and assessments of vital signs. A 4-day washout period followed by mirtazapine treatment was compared with an immediate switch from the SSRI to mirtazapine.

RESULTS

Based on mean HAM-D-17 scores at endpoint and response rates of 48% based on the criterion of > or = 50% reduction in HAM-D-17 score, mirtazapine was found to be an effective treatment for a substantial proportion of patients for whom an SSRI was ineffective and/or poorly tolerated. Mirtazapine was well tolerated, with sedation and appetite increase/weight gain the most commonly reported adverse events. In addition, no difference in efficacy, safety, or tolerability was observed for patients undergoing an immediate switch from an SSRI (after having been tapered to the minimal effective dose) to mirtazapine, compared with those undergoing the imposition of a 4-day drug-free washout.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that an immediate switch to mirtazapine may be a valid therapeutic option among patients who cannot tolerate or do not respond to SSRIs.

Algorithm for the treatment of chronic depression

Chronic depression, which is marked by a course of illness lasting 2 years or more, encompasses 4 subtypes of depressive illness: (1) chronic major depressive disorder, (2) dysthymic disorder, (3) dysthymic disorder with major depressive disorder ("double depression"), and (4) major depressive disorder with poor interepisodic recovery (i.e., in incomplete remission). In the 1990s, chronic depression had a reported prevalence rate of 3% to 5% and accounted for 30% to 35% of all cases of depression in the United States. The authors present an algorithm modified from the Texas Medication Algorithm Project for patients with chronic depression. This treatment algorithm recommends a progression of steps or stages in treating chronic depression. The first stage is monotherapy with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, nefazodone, bupropion sustained release, venlafaxine extended release, mirtazapine, or psychotherapy. Later options include combination therapy, electroconvulsive therapy, atypical antipsychotics, and novel treatments. Utilization of a comprehensive treatment algorithm for chronic major depression should encourage efficient, efficacious treatment.

Regional cerebral blood flow response to oral amphetamine challenge in healthy volunteers

Functional brain imaging is a powerful tool for examining the central nervous system (CNS) response to pharmacologic challenges. Amphetamine is of interest both because of its role as a stimulant of the dopaminergic system and because of its use to alter mood in mood-disordered patients, particularly in patients suffering from depression. In this study, we report the effects of oral D-amphetamine relative to placebo on regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) measured by SPECT in healthy volunteers to characterize the normal CNS response to this primarily dopaminergic stimulant.

METHODS

SPECT was used to assess changes in rCBF induced by amphetamine in 16 healthy volunteers. Subjects received placebo and then 0.4 mg/kg oral amphetamine in a fixed-order single-blind design and were imaged on a triple-head tomograph. Another six healthy volunteers received placebo at both times to assess normal rCBF variability. rCBF changes were assessed with a three-dimensional voxel-based analysis integrated into an automated coregistration system. Data were automatically normalized to whole-brain counts and coregistered. Resultant rCBF changes were evaluated parametrically through the formation of an image whose voxel values were based on the paired t statistic.

RESULTS

Amphetamine increased rCBF in two mesial prefrontal zones (Brodmann's areas 8 and 10), inferior orbital frontal lobe (area 11), brain stem (ventral tegmentum), anteromesial temporal lobe (amygdala), and anterior thalamus. Amphetamine decreased rCBF to motor cortex, visual cortex, fusiform gyrus, posterolateral temporal lobe, and right lateral temporal lobe.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that amphetamine induces focal increases and decreases in rCBF in healthy volunteers in areas primarily innervated by dopamine pathways and in areas with secondary (primarily limbic) affiliations. These data are consistent with glucose metabolic data from autoradiographic studies in animals, in which the largest increases are seen in brain stem, followed by striatum, thalamus, and frontal and sensory cortices. Frontopolar and temporal increases observed in our study appear to be unique to humans.

An ideal trial to test differential onset of antidepressant effect

Although various published clinical studies have suggested that some antidepressants may have a more rapid onset of therapeutic effect than others, none of these trials was adequately designed to measure differential time to onset of effect. Thus, existing data do not support claims that one drug reduces the symptoms of depression faster than another. In this article, we propose a study that would be ideal for measuring comparative onset of antidepressant effect. The key features of this ideal trial include (1) a prospective definition of early onset of action, (2) increased frequency of assessment, (3) a data-analytic approach capable of capturing the dynamic nature of symptomatic change, and (4) various strategies to minimize bias and heterogeneity of response.

Clinical significance of monitoring early symptom change to predict outcome

Even with efforts to develop medication algorithms for the treatment of psychiatric illnesses, there is no single authoritative method that can be used to incorporate multiple factors in the treatment decision process. For this reason, physicians are faced with the often daunting task of sifting through the numerous treatment options for psychiatric illness to develop an approach that will prove the most successful for their patients. Investigating patient patterns of response, particularly during the acute phase of treatment, and bearing them in mind when developing treatment protocols may assist clinicians in optimally managing the degree and course of symptom response. We present here a consideration of the timing and nature of response as well as individual patient predictors, which may impact therapy decisions. Furthermore, we explore the clinical significance of integrating response patterns into the treatment approach. We believe that an analysis of response patterns, in conjunction with the use of other practice guidelines, is a viable method to more effectively navigate critical decision points in the treatment process and ultimately have a dramatic effect on patient outcome.

Which depressed patients respond to nefazodone and when?

BACKGROUND

Retrospective data analyses were conducted of a single-blind trial of 993 outpatients with nonpsychotic major depression (DSM-III-R) treated for 12 weeks with nefazodone to provide a more specific picture of the nature and timing of response or remission to acute-phase treatment.

METHOD

All patients participated in a single-blind, 16-week lead-in to obtain responders eligible for a subsequent double-blind, randomized continuation phase trial. Outcomes were defined by the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D). A > or = 50% reduction from baseline defined response, and a total HAM-D exit score of < or =8 defined remission.

RESULTS

Of all patients who entered the trial, 41.8% (last observation carried forward) responded at or before week 4 (early responders), and an additional 25.2% responded thereafter; 18.3% achieved remission at or before week 4; 33.6% achieved remission after week 4. Thus, 77.3% of those responding ultimately remitted. On average, remission followed response by 2 weeks. The average end-of-treatment dose was 376 mg/day at exit (last observation carried forward). Responders or remitters (as opposed to nonresponders or nonremitters) had lower baseline depressive symptomatology and were more likely to be married or cohabiting.

CONCLUSION

The full symptomatic benefit of antidepressant medication may not be apparent until completion of an 8- to 10-week trial. A high number of responders ultimately attained remission. Baseline demographic and clinical features were not highly predictive of who would or would not benefit from nefazodone. For routine care, a minimal acute-phase trial, using a 50% reduction in baseline symptom severity to define response, should be 8 weeks. Whether ultimate nonresponders can be identified earlier than 8 weeks deserves further study.

A comparison of alternative assessments of depressive symptom severity: a pilot study

This study compared the performance of an itemized symptom self-report (Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-Report; IDS-SR), patient global ratings, and clinician global ratings with an itemized clinician-rated symptom severity measure (Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician-Rated; IDS-C) in detecting treatment effects in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). A total of 28 inpatients (30.8% psychotic) and 34 outpatients (17.9% psychotic) with MDD began treatment that followed the Texas medication algorithm. The clinicians completed the IDS-C and a Physician Global Rating Scale (PhGRS) at each assessment visit, while the patients completed the IDS-SR and a Patient Global Rating Scale (PtGRS). Change scores from the baseline to subsequent weeks were computed for all subjects, utilizing all four measures. The IDS-SR was a significant independent predictor of the response to treatment as compared to the two global ratings. The IDS-SR was as sensitive to change as the IDS-C. While the clinician-rated itemized symptom severity rating scale remains the standard to assess the symptomatic outcome of the treatment of MDD, a self-report of identical symptomatology may be a reasonable alternative for many patients.

Computerizing medication algorithms and decision support systems for major psychiatric disorders

In this article, the authors discuss the rationale for the use of computerized medication algorithms and decision support systems in the treatment of major psychiatric disorders. The field of psychopharmacology has advanced tremendously in the last two decades, with the resulting vast array of new information yielding a marked disparity between actual practice and what is commonly called "best practice." As a remedy, clinical practice guidelines and algorithms have been widely developed. These algorithms are used to disseminate up-to-date information, effect change in physician behavior, and reduce untoward variation in care. Review of the literature reveals advantages and limitations in trying to implement these paper and pencil guidelines and algorithms. Available research also suggests that computerized decision support systems have the potential to overcome such limitations, increase the use of treatment guidelines and algorithms, and improve physician adherence to recommended practices. The advantages of computerized medication algorithms and decision support systems are discussed. Finally, the computer platform elements that are necessary to make such systems effective and user-friendly are described.

Endoscopic band ligation for gastric ulcer bleeding

Endoscopic band ligation is used commonly to treat variceal bleeding. The use of band ligation has been described in selected cases of nonvariceal bleeding. The successful use of endoscopic band ligation, after the failure of standard techniques, to arrest bleeding in two cases of gastric ulcer hemorrhage is reported. Prospective studies are indicated to further evaluate this technique.

A comparison of alternative assessments of depressive symptom severity: a pilot study

This study compared the performance of an itemized symptom self-report (Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-Report; IDS-SR), patient global ratings, and clinician global ratings with an itemized clinician-rated symptom severity measure (Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician-Rated; IDS-C) in detecting treatment effects in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). A total of 28 inpatients (30.8% psychotic) and 34 outpatients (17.9% psychotic) with MDD began treatment that followed the Texas medication algorithm. The clinicians completed the IDS-C and a Physician Global Rating Scale (PhGRS) at each assessment visit, while the patients completed the IDS-SR and a Patient Global Rating Scale (PtGRS). Change scores from the baseline to subsequent weeks were computed for all subjects, utilizing all four measures. The IDS-SR was a significant independent predictor of the response to treatment as compared to the two global ratings. The IDS-SR was as sensitive to change as the IDS-C. While the clinician-rated itemized symptom severity rating scale remains the standard to assess the symptomatic outcome of the treatment of MDD, a self-report of identical symptomatology may be a reasonable alternative for many patients.

A comparison of nefazodone, the cognitive behavioral-analysis system of psychotherapy, and their combination for the treatment of chronic depression

BACKGROUND

Patients with chronic forms of major depression are difficult to treat, and the relative efficacy of medications and psychotherapy is uncertain.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 681 adults with a chronic nonpsychotic major depressive disorder to 12 weeks of outpatient treatment with nefazodone (maximal dose, 600 mg per day), the cognitive behavioral-analysis system of psychotherapy (16 to 20 sessions), or both. At base line, all patients had scores of at least 20 on the 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (indicating clinically significant depression). Remission was defined as a score of 8 or less at weeks 10 and 12. For patients who did not have remission, a satisfactory response was defined as a reduction in the score by at least 50 percent from base line and a score of 15 or less. Raters were unaware of the patients' treatment assignments.

RESULTS

Of the 681 patients, 662 attended at least one treatment session and were included in the analysis of response. The overall rate of response (both remission and satisfactory response) was 48 percent in both the nefazodone group and in the psychotherapy group, as compared with 73 percent in the combined-treatment group. (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Among the 519 subjects who completed the study, the rates of response were 55 percent in the nefazodone group and 52 percent in the psychotherapy group, as compared with 85 percent in the combined-treatment group (P<0.001 for both comparisons). The rates of withdrawal were similar in the three groups. Adverse events in the nefazodone group were consistent with the known side effects of the drug (e.g., headache, somnolence, dry mouth, nausea, and dizziness).

CONCLUSIONS

Although about half of patients with chronic forms of major depression have a response to short-term treatment with either nefazodone or a cognitive behavioral-analysis system of psychotherapy, the combination of the two is significantly more efficacious than either treatment alone.

The Texas Children's Medication Algorithm Project: report of the Texas Consensus Conference Panel on Medication Treatment of Childhood Major Depressive Disorder

OBJECTIVES

To develop consensus guidelines for medication treatment algorithms for childhood major depressive disorder (MDD) based on scientific evidence and clinical opinion when science is lacking. The ultimate goal of this approach is to synthesize research and clinical experience for the practitioner and to increase the uniformity of preferred treatment for childhood MDD. A final goal is to develop an approach that can be tested as to whether it improves clinical outcomes for children and adolescents with MDD.

METHOD

A consensus conference was held. Participants included academic clinicians and researchers, practicing clinicians, administrators, consumers, and families. The focus was to review and use clinical evidence to recommend specific pharmacological approaches for treatment of MDD in children and adolescents. After a series of presentations of current research evidence and panel discussion, the consensus panel met, agreed on assumptions, and drafted the algorithms. The process initially addressed strategies of treatment and then tactics to implement the strategies.

RESULTS

Consensually agreed-upon algorithms for major depressions (with and without psychosis) and comorbid attention deficit disorders were developed. Treatment strategies emphasized the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. The algorithm consists of systematic strategies for treatment interventions and recommended tactics for implementation of the strategies, including medication augmentation and medication combinations. Participants recommended prospective evaluation of the algorithms in various public sector settings, and many volunteered as sites for such an evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

Using scientific and clinical experience, consensus-derived algorithms for children and adolescents with MDD can be developed.

High grade, synchronous colon cancers after renal transplantation: were immunosuppressive drugs to blame?

Recipients of renal transplants are known to have an increased incidence of cancer, which is believed to be related to the use of immunosuppressive drugs used to prevent rejection. Although the risks of lymphoma and Kaposi's sarcoma are clearly increased in this setting, the association with colon cancer is controversial. We report a 44-yr-old woman, 20 yr post-renal transplant, and with no family history of colorectal cancer or polyps, who was found to have synchronous, poorly differentiated colon cancers associated with extensive abdominal lymph node, bone marrow, and bone (skull) metastasis. The long term immunosuppressive drugs that she had received may have been an important factor in her tumor development and/or progression. Our case and literature review suggest a possible mild, increased risk of colon cancer development in patients after renal transplantation.

Anaplastic and sarcomatoid carcinoma of the small intestine: an unusual tumor

Primary malignant tumors of the small intestine are rare, and sarcomatoid carcinomas have rarely been reported at this site. Anaplastic and sarcomatoid carcinomas are well described in the upper aerodigestive tract, particularly in the esophagus and the larynx. The authors report a case of anaplastic and sarcomatoid carcinoma of the ileum presenting as gastrointestinal bleeding. Their patient and the literature suggest that these tumors are much more aggressive than other small intestinal tumors. The importance of a systematic diagnostic approach in diagnosing these tumors is also discussed.

A SPECT HMPAO study of regional cerebral blood flow in depressed adolescents and normal controls

1. The objective of this study was to compare the relative regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) patterns of a group of adolescents with major depressive disorder (MDD) to a group of normal controls. 2. Seven adolescent patients with symptomatic MDD and 7 age- and gender-matched normal controls, underwent SPECT imaging with 99mTc-HMPAO while unmedicated and in a resting state. These subject's data were normalized to whole brain counts, oriented in Talairach space, and analyzed using a voxel-based, t-image approach. 3. The authors found relative rCBF increases in the depressed group as compared to normals in the right mesial temporal cortex, the right superior-anterior temporal lobe, and the left infero-lateral temporal lobe. We found rCBF decreases in the depressed group as compared to normals in the left parietal lobe, the anterior thalamus and the right caudate. 4. Adolescents with MDD show rCBF abnormalities similar to those found in adult MDD rCBF studies. Further controlled studies with larger numbers of MDD subjects and normal age- and gender-matched controls are necessary before any definitive conclusions can be made from these findings.

Effects of fluoxetine on the polysomnogram in outpatients with major depression

This study investigated the effects of open-label fluoxetine (20 mg/d) on the polysomnogram (PSG) in depressed outpatients (n = 58) who were treated for 5 weeks, after which dose escalation was available (< or = 40 mg/d), based on clinical judgment. Thirty-six patients completed all 10 weeks of acute phase treatment and responded (HRS-D < or = 10). PSG assessments were conducted and subjective sleep evaluations were gathered at baseline and at weeks 1, 5, and 10. Of the 36 subjects who completed the acute phase, 17 were reevaluated after 30 weeks on continuation phase treatment and 13 after approximately 7 weeks (range 6-8 weeks) following medication discontinuation. Acute phase treatment in responders was associated with significant increases in REM latency, Stage 1 sleep, and REM density, as well as significant decreases in sleep efficiency, total REM sleep, and Stage 2 sleep. Conversely, subjective measures of sleep indicated a steady improvement during acute phase treatment. After fluoxetine was discontinued, total REM sleep and sleep efficiency were found to be increased as compared to baseline.

Medication treatment for the severely and persistently mentally ill: the Texas Medication Algorithm Project

This article provides an overview of the issues involved in developing, using, and evaluating specific medication guidelines for patients with psychiatric disorders. The potential advantages and disadvantages, as well as the essential elements in the structure of algorithms, are illustrated by experience to date with the Texas Medication Algorithm Project, a public-academic collaboration. Phase 1 entailed assembling research findings on the efficacy of medications for schizophrenic, bipolar, and major depressive disorders. This knowledge was evaluated for its quality and relevance, integrated with expert clinical judgment as well as input by practicing clinicians, family advocates, and patients. Phase 1 (the design and development of the algorithms) was followed by a feasibility test (Phase 2). Phase 3 is an ongoing evaluation comparing the clinical and economic effects of using specific medication guidelines (algorithms) versus treatment as usual in public sector patients with severe and persistent mental illnesses.

Consensus guidelines in the treatment of major depressive disorder

The number of available antidepressant medications has increased dramatically in the last 10 years. Furthermore, no single medication is a panacea for all depressed patients-a fact underscored by randomized, controlled trial evidence showing that when one medication fails, an alternative may succeed. Thus, a key issue in the treatment of depression is how to optimally orchestrate available medication options to maximally benefit the greatest number of patients most rapidly. One approach is the use of consensus guidelines or medication algorithms. This paper discusses the rationale for and critical issues in the development of medication algorithms, and the timely use of symptom measures to ensure proper implementation. Once developed, guidelines must be appropriately implemented by clinicians, adhered to by patients, and supported by administrators. These three stakeholder groups often need education, incentives, and ongoing support to implement such guidelines. Whether guidelines actually improve outcome is largely uninvestigated, although a recent study of depressed patients in primary care found that using guidelines did improve outcome but at an increased treatment cost. The clinical and economic impact of guideline-driven treatment for the severe and persistently depressed deserves study.

Comparison of technetium-99m-HMPAO and xenon-133 measurements of regional cerebral blood flow by SPECT

This study compares 99mTc-HMPAO count ratios and derived regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) to 133Xe rCBF ratios and true rCBF (ml/min/100 g), respectively.

METHODS

Technetium-99m-HMPAO distribution was evaluated in 14 patients and 5 normal control subjects. Immediately after 133Xe SPECT, subjects received 22 +/- 4mCi 99mTc-HMPAO, and images were acquired 15 min after injection. rCBF (ml/min/100 g, 133Xe) or regional count density (99mTc-HMPAO) were extracted from 24 ROI located 6 cm above the cantho-meatal line. These data were also normalized to global cerebral blood flow (gCBF) for 133Xe or to global count density (gCD) for 99mTc-HMPAO. Technetium-99m-HMPAO ROI data also were expressed in units of ml/min/100 g by relating gCD to gCBF. Comparisons between 133Xe and 99mTc-HMPAO were evaluated using a Bonferroni-corrected paired t-test and by linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

Profile plots demonstrated agreement in the pattern of relative distribution between rCBF ratios (133Xe) and count density ratios (99mTc-HMPAO). Regression analysis indicated a significant correlation (r = 0.78), with a modest slope (0.52) and a large intercept (0.48). A closer correlation (r = 0.92) was found for the comparison between rCBF (133Xe) and derived 99mTc-HMPAO rCBF. The slope was closer to one (0.82) and the intercept closer to zero. This relationship was also examined during high rCBF after a subset of these subjects (n = 7) was injected intravenously with 1 g acetazolamide. Again, profile plots and regression analysis demonstrated agreement in the pattern of distribution (ratios) between 133Xe and 99mTc-HMPAO (r = 0.66). However, the slope was reduced and the intercept increased relative to resting data. Absolute flow correlations showed some improvement relative to the ratio data (r = 0.77).

CONCLUSION

The distribution of 99mTc-HMPAO is linearly related to rCBF measured by 133Xe SPECT, although our data suggest that 99mTc-HMPAO mildly underestimates rCBF above 80 ml/min/100 g. These results are similar to our previous comparison of 99mTc-ECD and 133Xe.

The Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS): psychometric properties

The psychometric properties of the 28- and 30-item versions of the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, Clinician-Rated (IDS-C) and Self-Report (IDS-SR) are reported in a total of 434 (28-item) and 337 (30-item) adult out-patients with current major depressive disorder and 118 adult euthymic subjects (15 remitted depressed and 103 normal controls). Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.92 to 0.94 for the total sample and from 0.76 to 0.82 for those with current depression. Item total correlations, as well as several tests of concurrent and discriminant validity are reported. Factor analysis revealed three dimensions (cognitive/mood, anxiety/arousal and vegetative) for each scale. Analysis of sensitivity to change in symptom severity in an open-label trial of fluoxetine (N = 58) showed that the IDS-C and IDS-SR were highly related to the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. Given the more complete item coverage, satisfactory psychometric properties, and high correlations with the above standard ratings, the 30-item IDS-C and IDS-SR can be used to evaluate depressive symptom severity. The availability of similar item content for clinician-rated and self-reported versions allows more direct evaluations of these two perspectives.

Functional neuroanatomy of obsessive-compulsive disorder

Although obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) was once considered rare, recent epidemiologic data suggest a lifetime prevalence rate of 2% to 3%. The morbidity associated with OCD is quite high compared to other psychiatric conditions. This report reviews neurologic, neuropsychological, and psychosurgical findings relevant to the functional neuroanatomy of OCD. In addition, it describes more recent investigations of OCD using a variety of brain imaging techniques, including computed tomography, positron emission tomography, and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Finally, it examines the results of an ongoing pilot study of high-resolution, full-volume, three-dimensional SPECT imaging in patients with OCD before and after treatment with fluvoxamine.

Benzodiazepines as antidepressants: does GABA play a role in depression?

Benzodiazepines, the most widely prescribed psychotropic drugs, are often used in patients with depressive disorders, either alone or in combination with standard antidepressants. This review evaluates the efficacy of benzodiazepines (alprazolam, diazepam, chlordiazepoxide) as established in acute-phase, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in major depressive disorder. Metaanalyses using intent-to-treat, as well as adequate treatment exposure samples, revealed an overall efficacy of 47-63% and a drug-placebo difference of 0-27% for all benzodiazepines. Alprazolam, the best studied of the benzodiazepines, had a 27.1% (sd = 6.1%) greater response than placebo, which is comparable to standard antidepressants. Alprazolam, in particular, may be a useful treatment option for patients in whom standard antidepressant medications are contraindicated, poorly tolerated, or possibly ineffective. Alprazolam may have a more rapid onset of action for some patients. Benzodiazepines do not primarily affect biogenic amine uptake or metabolism, although they do augment gamma-amino butyric acid (GABA) activity. The antidepressant efficacy of benzodiazepines, which are GABAA receptor agonists, is consistent with the GABA theory of depression.

MAOIs in the contemporary treatment of depression

We review the literature on the effectiveness of the monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) and present metaanalyses of controlled trials comparing the FDA-approved MAOIs with both placebo and comparator tricyclic antidepressants. For outpatients, metaanalyses with intent-to-treat samples revealed generally comparable overall efficacy for phenelzine, isocarboxazid, and tranylcypromine. Drug-placebo differences were 29.5% (+/- 11.1%) (phenelzine; nine studies), 41.3% (+/- 18.0%) (isocarboxazid; three studies), and 22.1% (+/- 25.4%) (tranylcypromine; three studies). For inpatients, phenelzine was 22.3% (+/- 30.7%) (five studies) more effective than placebo, whereas the isocarboxazid-placebo difference was lower (15.3%) (+/- 12.6%). Both phenelzine and isocarboxazid were significantly less effective than comparator tricyclics for inpatients, whereas tranylcypromine has not been adequately studied. Both phenelzine and tranylcypromine appear to be more effective than tricyclics in depressed outpatients with atypical features. Monoamine oxidase inhibitors are also effective treatments for outpatients who have failed to respond to tricyclic antidepressants. Our review also suggests (1) the FDA-approved MAOIs treat a somewhat different group of patients than tricyclics; (2) more severely depressed inpatients may not respond as well to MAOIs as to tricyclics; and (3) because of preferential MAOI responsivity, atypical or anergic depressions may be biologically different than classical depressions.

Does a placebo run-in or a placebo treatment cell affect the efficacy of antidepressant medications?

During the last decade, there has been an increasing use of a placebo run-in period prior to randomization to active treatments, or placebo in randomized controlled trials aimed at establishing acute phase antidepressant drug efficacy in patients with major depression. This procedure is thought to reduce response rates to placebo treatment after randomization, thereby increasing the drug-placebo difference. Metaanalyses of 101 studies reveal that a placebo run-in does not (1) lower the placebo response rate, (2) increase the drug-placebo difference, or (3) affect the drug response rate post-randomization in either inpatients or outpatients for any antidepressant drug group. If there is a post-randomization placebo treatment cell, drug response rates are unchanged or are slightly lower than if there is no placebo treatment cell for outpatients. These results suggest that a pill placebo run-in provides no advantage in acute phase efficacy trials.