Effect of proteinuria reduction on prevention of focal glomerulosclerosis by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition is modifiable

BACKGROUND

Proteinuria is associated with a progressive loss of renal function; we recently found that both intrarenal effects of proteinuria and the state of systemic nephrosis play an independent role in proteinuria-induced renal damage. Reduction of proteinuria is an important mechanism underlying the renoprotective effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition (ACEi). Both the reduction of proteinuria and the attenuation of the systemic state of nephrosis may be involved in the renoprotection by ACEi.

METHODS

This article entails a post hoc analysis of a previous study on the renoprotective effect of ACEi lisinopril in adriamycin nephrosis. It was attempted to modify therapeutic efficacy of ACEi by increasing lisinopril dose and by dietary sodium restriction, respectively. In this analysis, we aimed to delineate the contribution of proteinuria reduction and the reduction of other intermediate parameters such as hyperlipidemia and blood pressure on the protection against focal glomerulosclerosis (FGS).

RESULTS

We found that in adriamycin nephrosis, ACEi significantly reduced proteinuria, lipids, and blood pressure and provided protection against FGS. Treatment modification by increasing the lisinopril dose resulted in a further reduction of FGS without significant effects on intermediate parameters (proteinuria, hyperlipidemia, and blood pressure), whereas surprisingly, treatment modification by sodium restriction resulted in a further attenuation of intermediate parameters, without additional protection against FGS.

CONCLUSIONS

The renoprotective benefit of an obtained attenuation of intermediate parameters is modified by other factors. Further optimization of renoprotective therapy requires identification of such factors and explicit consideration of therapeutic efficacy on intermediate parameters as well as hard end points.

Dose of doxorubicin determines severity of renal damage and responsiveness to ACE-inhibition in experimental nephrosis

Nephrosis induced by doxorubicin (adriamycin) is an experimental model of glomerulosclerosis with relative stable proteinuria which is commonly used for pharmacological intervention studies. It is induced by a single or a double dose of doxorubicin, with doses that vary considerably among investigators from 2 to 7.5 mg/kg. Intervention studies with ACE-inhibitors in this model have provided conflicting results. We hypothesized that these discrepancies might be due to different properties of the doxorubicin model, related to the dose of doxorubicin used to induce proteinuria. We tested this hypothesis by inducing doxorubicin nephrosis with 1, 2 and 3 mg/kg, and evaluating the response to intervention with lisinopril. The 1-mg/kg doxorubicin dose did not induce significant proteinuria. The 2- and the 3-mg/ kg dose resulted in a proteinuria of 684+/-215 mg/24 h and 736+/-277 mg/24 h 6 weeks after induction, respectively (Mean+/-SD). Treatment with lisinopril 2 mg/kg/day reduced proteinuria to 160+/-170 mg/24 h(p<0.01) in the 2-mg/kg doxorubicin group, whereas in the 3-mg/kg doxorubicin group, proteinuria did not respond to lisinopril (529+/-264 mg/24 h). In time control rats, proteinuria remained stable. Renal damage developed in both time control groups, with a glomerulosclerosis score of 29+/-22 in the 2-mg/kg group and 84+/-41 in the 3-mg/kg doxorubicin group. Lisinopril resulted in a significantly lower glomerulosclerosis score in the 2-mg/kg doxorubicin group only (16+/-15, p<0.05), whereas the 3-mg/kg group showed no significant reduction (56+/-29, NS). In conclusion, the dose of doxorubicin used to induce nephrosis is an important determinant not only of the severity of the ensuring renal damage, but also of the response to intervention by ACE-inhibition. These findings have an impact on the interpretation of intervention studies in this model.

Risk factors for long-term renal survival after renal transplantation: a role for angiotensin-converting enzyme (insertion/deletion) polymorphism?

Chronic progressive renal function loss is a main cause of long-term graft loss after initially successful renal transplantation. Transplanted kidneys share some risk factors for renal function loss, such as hypertension or proteinuria, with diseased native kidneys. Recently, it has been shown that renal function loss is influenced by the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) (insertion/deletion [I/D]) genotype in renal disease in diseased native kidneys. This study examines whether donor or recipient ACE (I/D) genotype is a risk factor for graft loss after renal transplantation. To avoid bias by acute events, graft survival was studied, with patients dying with a functioning graft censored, starting at 12 mo after transplantation in a cohort of 367 patients transplanted between 1987 and 1994 with at least 2 yr of follow-up. Mean follow-up was 58 mo. ACE (I/D) genotype was determined by PCR on stored donor and recipient lymphocytes. Neither donor nor recipient ACE (I/D) genotype was associated with graft survival. However, Cox proportional hazards analysis identified recipient, but not donor, ACE (I/D) genotype D-allele to be independently associated with a shorter time to graft loss in subgroups of patients at high risk for graft loss defined by a creatinine clearance <50 ml/min (n = 108, P = 0.017) or proteinuria > or =0.5 g/24 h at 12 mo (n = 97, P = 0.0051) after transplantation. In conclusion, recipient ACE (I/D) genotype was associated with time to graft loss in a specific high-risk subgroup of the study population. This suggests that the effect of ACE (I/D) genotype on graft survival only becomes apparent when other risk factors are simultaneously present.

The blunting of the antiproteinuric efficacy of ACE inhibition by high sodium intake can be restored by hydrochlorothiazide

BACKGROUND

Dietary sodium restriction enhances the antiproteinuric and blood pressure lowering effect of ACE inhibition. In clinical practice, however, long-term compliance to a low-sodium diet may be difficult to obtain. We therefore investigated whether the blunting of the antiproteinuric and blood pressure lowering efficacy of ACE inhibition by high sodium intake can be restored by the addition of a diuretic.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seven proteinuric patients with non-diabetic renal disease on chronic ACE inhibition were studied during three consecutive 4-week periods: low sodium (50 mmol/day), high sodium (200 mmol/day) and high sodium plus hydrochlorothiazide (50 mg o.i.d.).

RESULTS

During low sodium intake proteinuria was 3.1 (0.7-5.2) g/day, during high sodium intake proteinuria increased to 4.5 (1.6-9.2) g/day (P < 0.05). Interestingly, addition of hydrochlorothiazide again reduced proteinuria to 2.8 (0.6-5.8) g/day (P < 0.05). Mean arterial blood pressure was 89 (84-96), 98 (91-104) and 89 (83-94) mmHg (P < 0.05) during the three periods, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Addition of hydrochlorothiazide can overcome the blunting of the therapeutic efficacy of ACE inhibition on proteinuria and blood pressure by a high sodium intake.

Exogenous norepinephrine induces an enhanced microproteinuric response in microalbuminuric insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

Exogenous norepinephrine (NE) increases intraglomerular pressure in animal experiments, but it is unknown whether NE induces a microproteinuric response in humans. Moreover, it has not been studied whether possible microproteinuric and renal hemodynamic changes induced by NE are altered in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) complicated by microalbuminuria. Therefore, the microproteinuric and renal hemodynamic responses to exogenous NE infusions were measured in eight matched normoalbuminuric IDDM patients (group D1), microalbuminuric IDDM patients (group D2), and control subjects (group C). As anticipated, mean arterial pressure (MAP)-NE dose-response curves were significantly shifted leftward in groups D1 and D2 compared with group C (P < 0.05), indicating a higher systemic NE responsiveness in IDDM. On separate days, NE or placebo was infused at individually determined NE threshold doses (T; delta MAP = 0 mmHg), 20% pressor doses (20% P; delta MAP = 4 mmHg), and pressor doses (P; delta MAP = 20 mmHg), with measurement of urinary albumin (UalbV), IgG excretion (UIgGV), GFR (by 125I-iothalamate), and effective renal plasma flow (by 131I-hippurate). At NE pressor dose, UalbV and UIgGV rose in all groups (P < 0.05 to 0.01), whereas urinary beta 2-microglobulin was unchanged. The increases in UalbV and UIgGV were more pronounced in the microalbuminuric group than in the other groups (P < 0.05). An NE dose-dependent fall in effective renal plasma flow and rise in filtration fraction were found in all groups (P < 0.05 to 0.001 for all), whereas GFR did not change significantly. The renal hemodynamic dose-response relationship was similar in the groups. In conclusion, exogenous NE acutely promotes glomerular protein leakage, and it is plausible that intraglomerular NE effects contribute to this phenomenon. The microproteinuric response is enhanced in microalbuminuric IDDM despite unaltered renal hemodynamic responsiveness, which may reflect a specific NE response or a general effect of vasopressor stimuli to promote glomerular protein leakage in patients with a preexistent defect in glomerular permselectivity.

Norepinephrine-induced blood pressure rise and renal vasoconstriction are not attenuated by enalapril treatment in microalbuminuric IDDM

BACKGROUND

In non-diabetic subjects, an attenuated systemic norepinephrine (NE) responsiveness may contribute to the mechanisms of action of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor treatment. We determined whether ACE inhibitor treatment influences systemic and renal haemodynamic responsiveness to exogenous NE, as well as urinary albumin excretion during NE, in microalbuminuric insulin-dependent diabetic (IDDM) patients, representing a patient category that benefits by strict blood pressure control.

METHODS

In seven microalbuminuric IDDM patients, systemic and renal responsiveness to NE, infused at individually determined threshold [deltamean arterial pressure (MAP)=0 mmHg], 20% pressor (deltaMAP=4 mmHg) and pressor (deltaMAP=20 mmHg) doses, were compared before and after 8 weeks treatment with enalapril, 10 mg daily. Blood glucose was clamped at 5 mmol/l and insulin was infused at 30 mU/kg/h.

RESULTS

Enalapril decreased MAP (P<0.05) and microalbuminuria (P<0.05), whereas effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) increased (P<0.01) and glomerular filtration rate remained unaltered. The filtration fraction tended to decline (P=0.09). The ACE inhibitor-induced fall in MAP disappeared at NE pressor dose, and the overall mean increase in MAP in response to NE was even higher with than without enalapril (P<0.05). After enalapril, the ERPF remained higher at all NE doses (P<0.05), but the magnitude of the NE-induced fall in ERPF was not altered by ACE inhibition treatment. Overnight urinary albumin excretion fell with ACE inhibition (P<0.05), but this effect was not seen during NE infusion. The angiotensin II/active renin ratio and serum aldosterone levels remained lower with enalapril at all NE doses (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Enalapril does not attenuate systemic and renal vascular responsiveness to exogenous NE in microalbuminuric IDDM despite adequate inhibition of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. These findings suggest that the effect of NE on vasoconstriction is not counteracted effectively by ACE inhibition treatment alone.

Can continuous intraperitoneal infusion of 125I-iothalamate and 131I-hippuran be used for measurement of GFR in conscious rats?

We previously described a method to measure GFR in conscious spontaneously voiding rats. This method circumvents the need for anesthesia and for bladder instrumentation. It's main principle is the correction of renal 125I-iothalamate clearance for incomplete urine collection by the ratio of plasma and renal clearance of co-infused 131I-Hippuran. A disadvantage of this technique is the requirement of an intra-arterial catheter for infusion of the renal function tracers. We therefore tested whether intraperitoneal infusion of 125I-iothalamate and 131I-Hippuran can be used for such a GFR measurement in conscious spontaneously voiding rats. We found that during intraperitoneal administration, stable plasma levels of 131I-Hippuran could be obtained. However, urinary recovery of 131I-Hippuran was incomplete (66 +/- 32%), leading to a significant overestimation of GFR by 140 +/- 13% in comparison with the GFR measured by the intra-arterial technique. Thus intraperitoneal infusion of renal function tracers cannot replace intra-arterial infusion.

Sample dilution: a methodological pitfall in the measurement of tissue but not serum ace-activity

Many tissue ACE-assays suffer from underestimation of the ACE-activity at low sample dilutions. However, measurement of ACE-activity as the amount of hippuric acid produced by cleavage of the commonly used substrate hippuryl-histidyl-leucine might circumvent this problem. In this study, we investigated whether sample dilution affects the measurement of ACE-activity in rat tissue and serum. We found that serum ACE-activity was not affected by sample dilution. In homogenates of aorta, kidney, left ventricle, and lung, however, ACE-activity increased 1.6-2.8 times with increasing sample dilution until, ultimately, a plateau was reached at dilution factor 100, 50, 20, and 100, respectively. In addition, tissue homogenates inhibited the activity of exogenous ACE, whereas serum did not. These data suggest that the dilution effect probably results from interactions of inhibitory substances from the homogenates with ACE. The implications of these findings are that tissue ACE-activity measurements by any assay should be performed using sample dilution at the plateau. In many studies in the literature, specifications of sample dilution are lacking. Our findings demonstrate that caution is warranted in the interpretation of these studies.

Renal hemodynamic effects of candesartan in normal and impaired renal function in humans

The effects of angiotensin II type I receptor antagonist candesartan cilexitil, 8 mg once daily, were studied after single dose and after five days treatment in 17 hypertensive patients [median mean arterial pressure (MAP) 118 mm Hg, range 84 to 134] with renal function impairment of different severity [glomerular filtration rate (GFR) 60 ml/min, range 11 to 161]. The MAP fell by -8% (-14 to -5) and -11 (-16 to -5)% after single and multiple dose, respectively (both P < 0.02). Effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) increased by 13% (7 to 19) and 10% (3 to 14) after single and multiple dose, respectively (both P < 0.02), while the GFR did not change. Filtration fraction (FF) fell by -11% (-14 to -5) and -12% (-13 to -4) after single and multiple doses, respectively (both P < 0.02). After a single dose the % change in ERPF (r = 0.58) and FF (r = -0.52, both P < 0.05) positively correlated with pretreatment GFR, indicating a more pronounced response in patients with normal GFR. After five days of treatment these correlations were absent, indicating similar renal vasodilation in patients with normal and impaired renal function. Thus, multiple dose candesartan cilexitil had a favorable renal hemodynamic profile, irrespective of pretreatment renal function. Further studies are needed to establish whether this provides long-term renoprotection as well.

A method for accurate measurement of GFR in conscious, spontaneously voiding rats

Renal function measurement by clearance methods relies on accurately timed urine collection. In small experimental animals, renal function measurement is usually performed under anesthesia and/or with the application of bladder catheters to ensure accurate urine collection. To avoid both anesthesia and the need for bladder catheters we developed a method to measure glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in spontaneously voiding conscious rats. GFR was measured as the urinary clearance of constantly infused 125I-iothalamate. To correct for incomplete bladder emptying urinary clearance of 125I-iothalamate was multiplied by the ratio of plasma and urinary clearance of simultaneously infused 131I-hippuran, a correction method that has been previously validated in humans. Reproducibility of the technique was evaluated by analysis of the results of four consecutive clearance periods during the day (intra-assay variation) in a group of 17 rats and of two consecutive clearance periods on two or three separate days in a group of 20 rats (inter-assay variation), all with normal renal function. Application of the correction method reduced the intra-assay coefficient of variation (mean +/- SD) from 37.4 +/- 14.3 to 5.4 +/- 2.3% (P < 0.05). The mean inter-assay coefficient of variation fell slightly from 23.4 +/- 10.3 to 11.0 +/- 7.2% (P < 0.10). In rats with moderately impaired renal function (N = 8) the intra-assay variation fell from 27.9 +/- 20.7 to 2.7 +/- 1.6% (P < 0.05). Our data show that this correction method is a useful technique to assess renal function in conscious, spontaneously voiding rats.

Is the antiproteinuric response to inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system less effective during the night?

BACKGROUND

In glomerular disease proteinuria usually has a circadian pattern with maximum excretion during the day. Blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) results in a 50% reduction of proteinuria as measured in 24-h urine collections. We questioned whether anti-proteinuric treatment by blockade of the RAS is as effective during the day as during the night.

METHODS

We analysed data from two intervention studies on proteinuria in patients with non-diabetic renal disease. In the first study, six hospitalized patients (proteinuria 5.8 +/- 2.9 g/day) were treated with the renin-inhibitor remikiren 600 mg o.d. during 8 days. In the second study eight ambulant patients (proteinuria 7.5 +/- 2.7 g/day) were treated during 6 weeks with the ACE-inhibitor trandolapril 4 mg o.d. Urine was collected in a day- and in a night-time portion.

RESULTS

Daytime proteinuria declined from 0.29 +/- 0.15 to 0.22 +/- 0.11 g/h (P < 0.05) during remikiren and from 0.33 +/- 0.14 to 0.16 +/- 0.08 g/h (P < 0.05) during trandolapril. Night-time proteinuria, however, was not significantly reduced from 0.23 +/- 0.11 to 0.19 +/- 0.11 g/h during remikiren and from 0.29 +/- 0.17 to 0.20 +/- 0.12 g/h during trandolapril. Both interventions effectively lowered blood pressure during the day as well as the night.

CONCLUSION

In both studies relative nocturnal therapy resistance to the antiproteinuric effect of RAS blockade was found, despite 24-h efficacy of blood pressure effect. This may have clinical relevance because it contributes to rest-proteinuria and thus may affect long term renal function outcome. It may be worthwhile to explore alternative therapeutic regimens to improve the nocturnal antiproteinuric response.

Titrating for antiproteinuric effect: the clue to renoprotection?

Proteinuria may be involved in the final common pathway of progressive renal function loss. If so, intervention treatment that reduces proteinuria might prevent or retard long-term renal function loss. In renal patients and in experimental renal disease the severity of proteinuria is associated with the rate of long-term renal function loss. Several large trials on the prevention of long-term renal function loss by antihypertensive treatment with ACE inhibitors (ACEi), were recently completed in diabetic and in non-diabetic renal disease. In those studies long-term renal function loss could indeed be retarded by ACEi; these ACEi regimens were associated with a more effective reduction of proteinuria than control regimens. In studies with a single treatment regimen (drug treatment or a protein restricted diet) a more effective reduction of proteinuria is associated with a more favourable long-term course of renal function as well. As reduction of proteinuria is mostly associated with a lower blood pressure (BP) the respective contributions of the fall in BP and in proteinuria are hard to dissect. Remarkably, however, the efficacy of the reduction of proteinuria (but not of BP) at onset of antihypertensive treatment is predictive of long-term renal outcome. Albeit consistent with a causal role of proteinuria reduction in renoprotection these data cannot distinguish between proteinuria as a marker or a mediator of renal damage. In view of the consistent association of antiproteinuric efficacy with long-term renal outcome we suggest that it would be worthwhile to attempt to improve long-term renoprotection by a strategy aimed at enhancing antiproteinuric efficacy. This approach is feasible as antiproteinuric efficacy of ACEi can be enhanced in several ways, ie, by dietary sodium and protein restriction and by adding a diuretic or indomethacin. Such a strategy would require that titration for adequate BP control is followed by titration for a maximal antiproteinuric effect. If this treatment strategy would improve long-term renal outcome, it would not only be a step forward in the clinical treatment of chronic renal failure, but it would also provide compelling evidence for a causal role of proteinuria in the progression of renal disease.

ACE inhibitors and the kidney. A risk-benefit assessment

ACE inhibitors effectively reduce systemic vascular resistance in patients with hypertension, heart failure or chronic renal disease. This antihypertensive efficacy probably accounts for an important part of their long term renoprotective effects in patients with diabetic and non-diabetic renal disease. The renal mechanisms underlying the renal adverse effects of ACE inhibitors--intrarenal efferent vasodilation with a consequent fall in filtration pressure--are held to be involved in their renoprotective effects as well. The fall in filtration pressure presumably contributes to the antiproteinuric effect as well as to long term renoprotection. The former is suggested by the positive correlation between the fall in filtration fraction and the reduction in proteinuria found during ACE inhibition. The latter is suggested by the correlation between the (slight) reduction in glomerular filtration rate at onset of therapy and a more favourable course of renal function in the long term. Such a fall in filtration rate at the onset of ACE inhibitor treatment is reversible after withdrawal, and can be considered the trade-off for long term renal protection in patients with diabetic and nondiabetic chronic renal disease. In conditions in which glomerular filtration is critically dependent on angiotensin II-mediated efferent vascular tone (such as a post-stenotic kidney, or patients with heart failure and severe depletion of circulating volume), ACE inhibition can induce acute renal failure, which is reversible after withdrawal of the drug. Systemic and renal haemodynamic effects of ACE inhibition, both beneficial and adverse, are potentiated by sodium depletion. Consequently, sodium repletion contributes to the restoration of renal function in patients with ACE inhibitor-induced acute renal failure. Our the other hand, co-treatment with diuretics and sodium restriction can improve therapeutic efficacy in patients in whom the therapeutic response of blood pressure or proteinuria is insufficient. Patients at the greatest risk for renal adverse effects (those with heart failure, diabetes mellitus and/or chronic renal failure) also can expect the greatest benefit. Therefore, ACE inhibitors should not be withheld in these patients, but dosages should be carefully titrated, with monitoring of renal function and serum potassium levels.

Renal 131I-hippurate clearance overestimates true renal blood flow in the instrumented conscious dog

We evaluated renal 131I-hippurate clearance (ERPFhip) as a measure of renal blood flow (RBF) in chronically instrumented conscious dogs. When adjusted for renal hippurate extraction (Ehip, 0.77 +/- 0.01) and hematocrit (Hct, 39.7 +/- 1%), calculated RBFhip (656 +/- 37 ml/min) markedly exceeded renal blood flow measured with renal artery blood flow probes (RBFprobe, 433 +/- 27 ml/min). The discrepancy could not be explained by flow probe calibration, because in vivo comparison of flow probe values with renal venous outflow showed only a slight underestimation of renal blood flow (slope 0.93, 95% confidence interval 0.89-0.97). Redistribution of hippurate from erythrocytes into renal venous plasma during or shortly after blood sampling led to an underestimation of Ehip by 4 +/- 1% and thus could only explain a small part of the difference. Extrarenal hippurate clearance was excluded, because the amount of 131I-hippurate cleared from plasma equaled that appearing in the urine (303 +/- 17 and 307 +/- 17 ml/min). Applying these corrections, we found that RBFhip still exceeded RBFprobe by 37 +/- 3%. These data indicate that renal blood flow measured by the hippurate clearance technique markedly overestimates true renal blood flow. Because other errors were excluded, a combination of sampling of nonrenal blood and intrarenal hippurate extraction from erythrocytes might play a role.

Renal hemodynamics after lung transplantation. A prospective study

Renal function impairment is common after solid organ transplantation, due to the nephrotoxicity of cyclosporine. Moreover, in patients with severe respiratory failure, renal function is often impaired. This renal function impairment may predispose patients to further renal function impairment after lung transplantation. Therefore, renal hemodynamics were measured in 44 patients before lung transplantation and 1, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30 months after transplantation. After transplantation, a decline in renal function occurred, with a progressive fall in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 33 +/- 4% at 12 months and 42 +/- 9% at 30 months. Effective renal blood flow fell by 22 +/- 5% at 12 months and remained stable thereafter. Changes in effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) were less pronounced than those of effective renal blood flow, due to a fall in hematocrit after transplantation. Blood pressure and renal vascular resistance increased significantly, consistent with the effects of cyclosporine. Prior to transplantation, renal function impairment with intense renal vasoconstriction had been found in a subset of the patients. Remarkably, the decrease in renal function after transplantation was less pronounced in patients with renal function impairment prior to transplantation, as indicated by significant negative correlations between pretransplantation GFR and the percentage change in GFR after transplantation, and pretransplantation ERPF and the percentage change in ERPF after transplantation. This suggests that the net course of renal hemodynamics after lung transplantation is the result of the opposed effects of cyclosporine nephrotoxicity and the favorable effects of the normalization of respiratory status. In conclusion, after lung transplantation a decline in renal function occurs that is less pronounced in patients with renal function impairment and intense renal vasoconstriction prior to transplantation. Such a renal function impairment, therefore, should not be considered a contraindication to lung transplantation.

Antiproteinuric effect predicts renal protection by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in rats with established adriamycin nephrosis

1. The mechanism of renal protection by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition is still the subject of debate. Inhibition of proteinuria might play a role. If so, a good antiproteinuric response to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition should predict subsequent protection against renal structural damage. This hypothesis has not been tested in models where treatment is started after the renal disease is well established, i.e. models that mimic the clinical situation. 2. We therefore investigated this hypothesis in 96 male Wistar rats with established adriamycin nephrosis. Reduction of proteinuria was achieved by lisinopril (0, 2, 5 and 10 mg day-1 kg-1) on two different sodium diets (0.3% and 0.05% NaCl). Therapy started 6 weeks after adriamycin (at stable proteinuria) and was continued for 6 weeks. 3. Lisinopril reduced blood pressure by 32 +/- 4% and proteinuria by an average of 72 +/- 7%, with stabilization after 2 weeks. Considerable interindividual differences in antiproteinuric response was found. Glomerulosclerosis score was reduced by 15 +/- 5%. All the effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were enhanced by sodium depletion, but sodium depletion in itself did not affect blood pressure (124 +/- 4 mmHg), proteinuria (664 +/- 68 mg/day) or glomerulosclerosis score (30 +/- 5%). Interestingly, the more proteinuria was reduced initially in an individual rat, the less sclerosis was found in the long term in that rat. 4. In conclusion, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition lowers proteinuria and prevents glomerulosclerosis in established adriamycin nephrosis. These effects are enhanced by sodium depletion. The individual short-term antiproteinuric effect predicts the protection against ultimate glomerular damage. This is consistent with the hypothesis that reduction of proteinuria is a mechanism by which angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors exert renoprotection.

Does the renin-angiotensin system determine the renal and systemic hemodynamic response to sodium in patients with essential hypertension?

Many patients with essential hypertension respond to a high dietary sodium intake with a rise in blood pressure. Experimental evidence suggests that the renal hemodynamic response to sodium determines, at least partially, this rise in blood pressure. Our aim was to clarify the role of the renin-angiotensin system in the renal and systemic adaptation to a change in dietary sodium. We studied changes in mean arterial pressure (MAP) (millimeters of mercury), effective renal plasma flow (ERPF), body weight, and immunoreactive renin in 17 patients with essential hypertension and 15 normotensive control subjects, randomly crossing over between a 3-week sodium-restricted (50 mmol/24 h) and a sodium-replete (200 mmol/24 h) diet period. In addition, the effects of renin inhibition by remikiren (600 mg, single oral dose) were studied during the high sodium period. In normotensive control subjects, high sodium intake had no effect on MAP or body weight, whereas ERPF increased (490 +/- 19 to 535 +/- 21 mL/min, P < .05) and immunoreactive renin decreased (32 +/- 6 to 14 +/- 1 pg/mL). In hypertensive subjects, high sodium intake induced a heterogeneous response of MAP (median change, 2.6 mm Hg; range, -4.7 to +21.2; P = NS) and ERPF (median change, 21 mL/min; range, -33 to +98; P = NS). Body weight increased from 81.3 +/- 1.9 to 82.5 +/- 2.0 kg (P < .05), and immunoreactive renin decreased from 18 +/- 3 to 10 +/- 1 pg/mL (P < .05). Interestingly, the patients with a distinct rise in MAP showed a blunted ERPF response to high sodium intake (r = -.70, P < .01) and an increase in body weight (r = .76, P < .001). Moreover, the increase of ERPF was more pronounced in patients with a larger fall in immunoreactive renin (r = .77, P < .001). After administration of remikiren, a heterogeneous response in ERPF was observed: the patients with the blunted ERPF response to high sodium intake showed the largest ERPF rise (r = .70, P < .01). The remikiren-induced rise in ERPF correlated (r = .68, P < .01) with the fall in MAP (114 +/- 2 to 110 +/- 2 mm Hg). In conclusion, in patients with essential hypertension a rise in blood pressure in response to high sodium intake appears to partially be the result of insufficient renal vasodilatation. This seems to be due to an inadequate (intrarenal?) renin-angiotensin system response to increased sodium intake.

Diuretic effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition: comparison of low and liberal sodium diet in hypertensive patients

Inhibitors of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) acutely increase sodium excretion. Whether or not continued treatment induces net negative sodium balance is not clear, and may depend on initial sodium balance. We therefore investigated the effects of 8 days of treatment with enalapril, 10 mg b.i.d., on sodium balance in 10 subjects with uncomplicated essential hypertension, in balance on a low (50 mmol sodium/24 h) and a liberal (200 mmol sodium/24 h) sodium intake. Sodium excretion exceeded intake during the first days of treatment, amounting to sodium losses of 101 +/- 24 and 112 +/- 15 mmol in the low and the liberal sodium diets, respectively. The sodium loss was accompanied by a fall in body weight with both regimens. The blood pressure response to enalapril was potentiated by the sodium-restricted diet. The net increase in sodium excretion after enalapril administration, however, was similar for both diets. This was particularly true for individual patients, suggesting an individual response pattern to ACE inhibition.

Moderate sodium restriction in hypertensive subjects: renal effects of ACE-inhibition

It has been suggested that AII-mediated renal mechanisms limit the efficacy of moderate sodium restriction in the lowering of blood pressure (BP) in hypertension. We therefore studied renal hemodynamics and sodium handling in nine essential hypertensives in balance on 200 and on a 50 mmol sodium diet, before and during ACE-inhibition (enalapril 10 mg bid for 8 days) in a cross-over fashion. BP was similar on 50 and 200 mmol Na before enalapril, the fall in BP during enalapril was significantly more pronounced on 50 mmol Na. On 50 mmol Na, GFR and filtered Na were significantly lower, and tubular reabsorption was significantly higher than on 200 mmol Na. GFR increased during enalapril in 50 but not on 200 mmol Na. Consequently, the differences in GFR and filtered load elicited by sodium restriction were no longer present during ACE-inhibition. In contrast, the differences in tubular reabsorption between 50 and 200 mmol Na persisted during enalapril. In conclusion, moderate sodium restriction, not affecting BP, can elicit a renal hemodynamic response. As this response is blunted by ACE-inhibition it is probably mediated by AII. This blunting may contribute to the increased sodium sensitivity of BP during ACE-inhibition. The adaptation of tubular sodium reabsorption is not affected by ACE-inhibition.

Renal effects of ketanserin in essential hypertension

The effects of maintenance treatment with ketanserin 40 mg twice daily on renal haemodynamics were studied in 13 essential hypertensives. To establish whether activation of the renin system modifies the response to ketanserin the patients were studied under three conditions: on a sodium restricted diet combined with hydrochlorothiazide, on a sodium restricted diet without hydrochlorothiazide and on a liberal sodium diet. Blood pressure fell in a proportion of the patients on all three regimens. Neither effective renal plasma flow (ERPF; clearance of 131I-hippuran) nor glomerular filtration rate (GFR; clearance of 125I-iothalamate) was significantly altered by ketanserin on either regimen. Neither the blood pressure response nor the renal response was modified by renin stimulation. The renal response was not related to the fall in blood pressure observed in some patients. Therefore ketanserin probably does not affect renal autoregulation.

Effects of enalaprilic acid on sodium excretion and renal hemodynamics in essential hypertension

The effects of MK 422 (enalaprilic acid) on renal function and electrolyte excretion were assessed in 14 patients with essential hypertension on a sodium intake of 100 mmol/day. Injection of MK 422 led to a prompt fall in blood pressure (p less than 0.01). Effective renal plasma flow increased by 9 +/- 4% (p less than 0.01) within 1 hour, an increase that persisted for a least 5 hours. Glomerular filtration rate did not change, so filtration fraction decreased by 6 +/- 2% (p less than 0.01). Sodium excretion increased with a maximum of 61 +/- 17% (p less than 0.01) after 5 hours, and potassium excretion fell (p less than 0.01). The log of the initial plasma renin activity correlated with the changes in blood pressure (r = 0.59, p less than 0.05) in effective renal plasma flow (r = 0.59, p less than 0.05) and in sodium excretion (r = 0.65, p less than 0.01). All the renal effects of MK 422 could be reversed by infusion with angiotensin II.