Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of recombinant canine FVIIa in a study dosing one haemophilia A and one haemostatically normal dog

Recombinant human FVIIa (rhFVIIa) corrects the coagulopathy in hemophilia A and B as well as FVII deficiency. This is also the case in dogs until canine anti-human FVIIa antibodies develop (~2 weeks). Recombinant canine factor VIIa (rcFVIIa), successfully over-expressed by gene transfer in haemophilia dogs, has provided long-term haemostasis (>2 years). However, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) and safety of rcFVIIa after pharmacological administration have not been reported. We therefore wanted to explore the safety, PK and PD of rcFVIIa in dogs. A pilot study was set up to evaluate the safety as well as PK and PD of rcFVIIa after a single intravenous dose of 270 μg kg(-1) to one HA and one haemostatically normal dog and to directly compare rcFVIIa with rhFVIIa in these two dogs. Single doses of rcFVIIa and rhFVIIa were well tolerated. No adverse events were observed. Pharmacokinetic characteristics including half-life (FVIIa activity: 1.2-1.8 h; FVIIa antigen 2.8-3.7 h) and clearance were comparable for rcFVIIa and rhFVIIa. Kaolin-activated thromboelastography approached normal in the HA dog with the improvement being most pronounced after rcFVIIa. This study provided the first evidence that administering rcFVIIa intravenously is feasible, safe, well tolerated and efficacious in correcting the haemophilic coagulopathy in canine HA and that rcFVIIa exhibits pharmacokinetic characteristics comparable to rhFVIIa in haemophilic and haemostatically competent dogs. This strengthens the hypothesis that rcFVIIa can be administered to dogs to mimic the administration of rhFVIIa to humans.

[The "Seville" Consensus Document on Alternatives to Allogenic Blood Transfusion. Sociedades españolas de Anestesiología (SEDAR), Medicina Intensiva (SEMICYUC), Hematología y Hemoterapia (AEHH), Transfusión sanguínea (SETS) Trombosis y Hemostasia (SETH)]

The Consensus Document on Alternatives to Allogenic Blood Transfusion (AABT) has been drawn up by a panel of experts from 5 scientific societies. The Spanish Societies of Anesthesiology (SEDAR), Critical Care Medicine and Coronary Units (SEMICYUC), Hematology and Hemotherapy (AEHH), Blood Transfusion (SETS) and Thrombosis and Hemostasis (SETH) have sponsored and participated in this Consensus Document. Alternatives to blood transfusion have been divided into pharmacological and non-pharmacological, with 4 modules and 12 topics. The main objective variable was the reduction of allogenic blood transfusions and/or the number of transfused patients. The extent to which this objective was achieved by each AABT was evaluated using the Delphi method, which classifies the grade of recommendation from A (supported by controlled studies) to E (non-controlled studies and expert opinion). The experts concluded that most of the indications for AABT were based on middle or low grades of recommendation, "C", "D", or "E", thus indicating the need for further controlled studies.

Safety and pharmacokinetics of a glycoPEGylated recombinant activated factor VII derivative: a randomized first human dose trial in healthy subjects

BACKGROUND

Extensive research is currently ongoing to prolong the half-life of coagulation factors. One of these techniques is glycoPEGylation, which has also been applied to recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa), resulting in a rFVIIa derivative (N7-GP) with a prolonged terminal half-life (t(1/2) ). The main clinical purpose of N7-GP is to provide safe and effective prophylaxis to patients with hemophilia and inhibitors. The prolonged t(1/2) of N7-GP can potentially reduce the dosing frequency and thereby facilitate convenience and compliance, which are two significant barriers to effective prophylaxis.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the safety and pharmacokinetics of single doses of N7-GP in healthy men.

METHODS

 A randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation trial with five cohorts (N7-GP dose of 12.5-100 μg kg(-1) ) was performed. In each cohort, eight subjects were randomized to receive N7-GP (n = 6) or placebo (n = 2).

RESULTS

The mean FVIIa activity was measurable for up to at least 72 h after dosing, and the overall mean t(1/2) for FVIIa activity was 15 h. The pharmacokinetics of N7-GP appeared to be dose-proportional in the dose range investigated. No serious adverse events (including thromboembolic events) were reported. The frequency of adverse events was similar in both the placebo and N7-GP groups. No neutralizing antibodies against N7-GP were detected. A pharmacologic effect was apparent from a dose-dependent statistically significant decrease in the mean prothrombin time in all N7-GP groups as compared with placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

 N7-GP had a plasma half-life of 15 h and a profile that makes it a potential candidate for prophylaxis in patients with hemophilia and inhibitors.

Safety and pharmacokinetics of subcutaneously administered recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa)

BACKGROUND

 Recombinant activated factor VIIa (rFVIIa) is used to treat bleeds in hemophilia patients with inhibitors. A subcutaneous formulation could potentially improve its half-life and make it suitable for prophylactic treatment.

OBJECTIVES

 A study was conducted to determine the safety of subcutaneously administered rFVIIa in patients with hemophilia and the pharmacokinetic profile (including bioavailability).

PATIENTS/METHODS

 This was a multicenter, open-label, cross-over comparison of single doses of intravenous rFVIIa 90μgkg(-1) and a new formulation of rFVIIa for subcutaneous injection at dose levels of 45, 90, 180, 270 and 360μgkg(-1) . Sixty subjects (12 per dose cohort) with hemophilia A or B were enrolled.

RESULTS

 Subcutaneously administered rFVIIa showed lower mean peak plasma concentrations and prolonged FVII activity (C(max) , 0.44-5.16IU mL(-1) [across doses]; t(1/2) , 12.4h; t(max) , 5.6h) compared with intravenously administered rFVIIa (C(max) , 51.7IUmL(-1) ; t(1/2) , 2.7h; t(max) , <10min). The absolute bioavailability of subcutaneous rFVIIa ranged from 21.1 to 30.1% across dose levels. Dose proportionality was observed within a 2-fold dose increase but not across the full dose range. No thromboembolic events, drug-related serious adverse events, severe injection-site reactions or neutralizing antibodies were reported (primary endpoint). Mild and moderate injection-site reactions were more frequent with subcutaneous than with intravenous injections.

CONCLUSION

 This phase I clinical trial did not identify safety concerns of prolonged exposure to rFVIIa administered subcutaneously in single doses to hemophilia patients.

[The role of recombinant activated factor VII in neuro- surgical and neurocritical patients]

Central nervous system haemorrhage is a severe pathology, as a small amount of bleeding inside the brain can result in devastating consequences. Haemostatic agents might decrease the consequences of intra- cranial bleeding, whichever spontaneous, traumatic, or anticoagulation treatment etiology. Proacogulant recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) has been given after central nervous system bleeding, with an off-label indication. In this update, we go over the drug mechanism of action, its role in the treatment of central nervous system haemorrhage and the published evidences regarding this subject. We carried out a literature review concerning the treatment with rFVIIa in central nervous system haemorrhage, neurocritical pathologies and neurosurgical procedures, searching in MEDLINE and in clinical trials registry: http://clinicaltrials.gov (last review September 2010), as well as performing a manual analysis of collected articles, looking for aditional references. The results of randomized clinical trials do not support the systematic administration of rFVIIa for spontaneous intracranial cerebral haemorrhage. In other central nervous system related haemorrhages, the current available data consist on retrospective studies, expert opinion or isolated case reports.

Off-label recombinant factor VIIa use and thrombosis in children: a multi-center cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To describe the off-label use of recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) in tertiary care pediatric hospitals across the United States and to assess thrombotic events.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective multi-center cohort study using the Pediatric Health Information System administrative database. Children 18 years of age or younger who received rFVIIa between 2000 and 2007 were included. A label admission was defined as an admission with an International Classification of Diseases diagnostic code for hemophilia or factor VII deficiency; admissions without these codes were classified as off-label.

RESULTS

There were 4942 rFVIIa admissions, representing 3764 individual subjects; 74% (3655) of the admissions were off-label. There was a 10-fold increase in the annual rate of off-label admissions from 2000 to 2007 (from 2 to 20.8 per 10 000 hospital admissions, P < .001). The mortality rate in the off-label group was 34% (1258/3655). Thrombotic events occurred in 10.9% (399/3655) of the off-label admissions.

CONCLUSIONS

The off-label use of rFVIIa in hospitalized children is increasing rapidly despite the absence of adequate clinical trials demonstrating safety and efficacy. Thrombotic events are common and mortality is high among patients receiving off-label rFVIIa. Further studies are warranted to determine whether these adverse events are attributable to rFVIIa.

Systematic review: benefits and harms of in-hospital use of recombinant factor VIIa for off-label indications

BACKGROUND

Recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa), a hemostatic agent approved for hemophilia, is increasingly used for off-label indications.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the benefits and harms of rFVIIa use for 5 off-label, in-hospital indications: intracranial hemorrhage, cardiac surgery, trauma, liver transplantation, and prostatectomy.

DATA SOURCES

Ten databases (including PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library) queried from inception through December 2010. Articles published in English were analyzed.

STUDY SELECTION

Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts to identify clinical use of rFVIIa for the selected indications and identified all randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies for full-text review.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two reviewers independently assessed study characteristics and rated study quality and indication-wide strength of evidence.

DATA SYNTHESIS

16 RCTs, 26 comparative observational studies, and 22 noncomparative observational studies met inclusion criteria. Identified comparators were limited to placebo (RCTs) or usual care (observational studies). For intracranial hemorrhage, mortality was not improved with rFVIIa use across a range of doses. Arterial thromboembolism was increased with medium-dose rFVIIa use (risk difference [RD], 0.03 [95% CI, 0.01 to 0.06]) and high-dose rFVIIa use (RD, 0.06 [CI, 0.01 to 0.11]). For adult cardiac surgery, there was no mortality difference, but there was an increased risk for thromboembolism (RD, 0.05 [CI, 0.01 to 0.10]) with rFVIIa. For body trauma, there were no differences in mortality or thromboembolism, but there was a reduced risk for the acute respiratory distress syndrome (RD, -0.05 [CI, -0.02 to -0.08]). Mortality was higher in observational studies than in RCTs.

LIMITATIONS

The amount and strength of evidence were low for most outcomes and indications. Publication bias could not be excluded.

CONCLUSION

Limited available evidence for 5 off-label indications suggests no mortality reduction with rFVIIa use. For some indications, it increases thromboembolism.

Recombinant factor VIIa for the prevention and treatment of bleeding in patients without haemophilia

BACKGROUND

Recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) is licensed for use in patients with haemophilia and inhibitory allo-antibodies. It is also increasingly being used for off-license indications to prevent bleeding in operations where blood loss is likely to be high, and/or to stop bleeding that is proving difficult to control by other means.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of rFVIIa when used therapeutically to control active bleeding, or prophylactically to prevent (excessive) bleeding in patients without haemophilia.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Injuries Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE and other specialised databases up to 25 February 2009.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing rFVIIa with placebo, or one dose of rFVIIa with another, in any patient population (except haemophilia). Outcomes were mortality, blood loss or control of bleeding, red cell transfusion requirements, number of patients transfused and thromboembolic adverse events.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed potentially relevant studies for inclusion, extracted data and examined risk of bias. We considered prophylactic and therapeutic rFVIIa studies separately.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-five RCTs were included: 24 were placebo-controlled double-blind RCTs and one compared different doses of rFVIIa.Fourteen trials involving 1137 participants examined the prophylactic use of rFVIIa; 713 received rFVIIa. There was no evidence of mortality benefit (RR 1.06; 95% CI 0.50 to 2.24). There was decreased blood loss (WMD -272 mL; 95% CI -399 to -146) and decreased red cell transfusion requirements (WMD -243 mL; 95% CI -393 to -92) with rFVIIa treatment; however these values were likely overestimated due to the inability to incorporate data from trials showing no difference of rFVIIa treatment compared to placebo. There was a trend in favour of rFVIIa in the number of participants transfused (RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.82 to 1.02). But there was a trend against rFVIIa with respect to thromboembolic adverse events (RR 1.32; 95% CI 0.84 to 2.06).Eleven trials involving 2366 participants examined the therapeutic use of rFVIIa; 1507 received rFVIIa. There were no outcomes where any observed advantage, or disadvantage, of rFVIIa over placebo could not have been observed by chance alone. There was a trend in favour of rFVIIa for reducing mortality (RR 0.89; 95% CI 0.77 to 1.03). However, there was a trend against rFVIIa for increased thromboembolic adverse events (RR 1.21; 95% CI 0.93 to 1.58).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The effectiveness of rFVIIa as a more general haemostatic drug, either prophylactically or therapeutically, remains unproven. The use of rFVIIa outside its current licensed indications should be restricted to clinical trials.

Recombinant factor VIIa is associated with an improved 24-hour survival without an improvement in inpatient survival in massively transfused civilian trauma patients

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) is associated with increased survival and/or thromboembolic complications.

INTRODUCTION

Uncontrollable hemorrhage is the main cause of early mortality in trauma. rFVIIa has been suggested for the management of refractory hemorrhage. However, there is conflicting evidence about the survival benefit of rFVIIa in trauma. Furthermore, recent reports have raised concerns about increased thromboembolic events with rFVIIa use.

METHODS

Consecutive massively transfused (> 8 units of red blood cells within 12 h) trauma patients were studied. Data on demographics, injury severity scores, baseline laboratory values and use of rFVIIa were collected. Rate of transfusion in the first 6 h was used as surrogate for bleeding. Study outcomes included 24-hour and in-hospital survival, and thromboembolic events. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine the impact of rFVIIa on 24-hour and in-hospital survival.

RESULTS

Three-hundred and twenty-eight patients were massively transfused. Of these, 72 patients received rFVIIa. As expected, patients administered rFVIIa had a greater degree of shock than the non-rFVIIa group. Using logistic regression to adjust for predictors of death in the regression analysis, rFVIIa was a significant predictor of 24-hour survival (odds ratio (OR) = 2.65; confidence interval 1.26-5.59; p = 0.01) but not of in-hospital survival (OR = 1.63; confidence interval 0.79-3.37; p = 0.19). No differences were seen in clinically relevant thromboembolic events.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite being associated with improved 24-hour survival, rFVIIa is not associated with a late survival to discharge in massively transfused civilian trauma patients.

Safety of recombinant activated factor VII in randomized clinical trials

BACKGROUND

The use of recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) on an off-label basis to treat life-threatening bleeding has been associated with a perceived increased risk of thromboembolic complications. However, data from placebo-controlled trials are needed to properly assess the thromboembolic risk. To address this issue, we evaluated the rate of thromboembolic events in all published randomized, placebo-controlled trials of rFVIIa used on an off-label basis.

METHODS

We analyzed data from 35 randomized clinical trials (26 studies involving patients and 9 studies involving healthy volunteers) to determine the frequency of thromboembolic events. The data were pooled with the use of random-effects models to calculate the odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Among 4468 subjects (4119 patients and 349 healthy volunteers), 401 [corrected] had thromboembolic events (9.0%). [corrected] Rates of arterial thromboembolic events among all 4468 subjects were higher among those who received rFVIIa than among those who received placebo (5.5% vs. 3.2%, P=0.003). Rates of venous thromboembolic events were similar among subjects who received rFVIIa and those who received placebo (5.3% vs. 5.7%). Among subjects who received rFVIIa, 2.9% had coronary arterial thromboembolic events, as compared with 1.1% of those who received placebo (P=0.002). Rates of arterial thromboembolic events were higher among subjects who received rFVIIa than among subjects who received placebo, particularly among those who were 65 years of age or older (9.0% vs. 3.8%, P=0.003); the rates were especially high among subjects 75 years of age or older (10.8% vs. 4.1%, P=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

In a large and comprehensive cohort of persons in placebo-controlled trials of rFVIIa, treatment with high doses of rFVIIa on an off-label basis significantly increased the risk of arterial but not venous thromboembolic events, especially among the elderly. (Funded by Novo Nordisk.).

[Recombinant activated factor VII in the treatment of life threatening post-partum haemorrhage; registry UniSeven in the Czech Republic]

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the data related to the treatment of 80 Czech patients with life threatening postpartum haemorrhage recorded in the clinical registry UniSeven during years 2004-2009.

DESIGN

Retrospective, observational, multicentre study.

SETTINGS

ICU and Obstetrics departments of University and Regional hospitals in Czech Republic.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

UniSeven is an international academic project of Masaryk University in Brno, Czech Republic, focused on recording of clinical data related to "off-label" use of rFVIIa (Novo Seven) in life threatening bleeding. Data of 80 case reports of post partum haemorrhage from the registry was analysed from the clinical (efficacy and safety) as well as laboratory aspects.

RESULTS

In 97.5% of our patients the treatment with rFVIIa was able to control the bleeding. In 53 women (66.3%) only one dose of rFVIIa was sufficient to control the bleeding. The rest of the patient received two or more rFVIIa doses. First dose of rFVIIa given to patients who needed more than one dose was significantly lower (96.6 microg/kg) compared to patient succesfully treated with one dose only (110.6 microg/kg; p = 0.048). The mortality rate in our cohort of patients was 2.5%. We have not recorded any thrombembolic event as and adverse event related to the rFVIIa treatment. In 74.3% of patients where rFVIIa was administered before considering the hysterectomy, it was able to avoid hysterectomy what we consider to be a significant improvement of the patients' quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data were also considered during the work up of national guidelines for the treatment of life threatening post-partum haemorrhage in the Czech Republic.

Haemostatic drug therapies for acute spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage

BACKGROUND

Because spontaneous (non-traumatic) intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) volume influences its outcome and a third of ICHs enlarge by a third within 24 hours of onset, early haemostatic drug therapy might improve outcome. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2006.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the clinical effectiveness and safety of haemostatic drug therapies for acute ICH in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) design.

SEARCH STRATEGY

I searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched 26 June 2009), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2009), MEDLINE (1966 to June 2009) and EMBASE (1980 to June 2009). In an effort to identify further published, ongoing and unpublished studies I scanned bibliographies of relevant articles, searched international registers of clinical trials and research, and contacted authors and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

I sought RCTs of any haemostatic drug therapy for acute ICH, compared against placebo or open control, with relevant clinical outcome measures.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently applied the inclusion criteria, reviewed the relevant studies, and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

I found five phase II RCTs and one phase III RCT, involving 1398 adults aged 18 years or over, within four hours of ICH onset: 423 participants received placebo and 975 participants received haemostatic drugs (two received epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA) and 973 received recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa)). Haemostatic drugs did not significantly reduce 90-day case fatality after ICH (risk ratio (RR) 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58 to 1.25), and rFVIIa did not significantly reduce death or dependence on the modified Rankin Scale (grades 4 to 6) within 90 days of ICH (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.15). There was a trend towards more participants on rFVIIa experiencing thromboembolic serious adverse events (RR 1.37, 95% CI 0.74 to 2.55)

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Haemostatic drugs cannot be recommended for the treatment of acute spontaneous ICH in clinical practice, but a large RCT would be justified.

Recombinant activated factor VII for treatment of refractory hemorrhage after surgery for acute aortic dissection

Despite appropriate treatment, surgery for aortic dissection is frequently associated with bleeding problems. In these series we report on the employment of recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) for refractory hemorrhage after emergency surgery for acute type A aortic dissection, used to face the problems of postoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements. Despite the good results of the therapy, a patient presented with thrombosis of the left cavernous sinus. Although a risk of thromboembolic complications has to be considered, rFVIIa is a reasonable rescue option in life-threatening hemorrhage and enlarges our hemostatic armamentarium in surgery for acute aortic dissection.

[Recombinant activated factor VII for perioperative bleeding]

Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) is a new haemostatic drug, originally used for the treatment of patients with hemophilia A and B. At the present time it is used for other bleeding conditions such as the perioperative period. When used prophylactically there is a reduction in the number of bleeding episodes but no changes in the need for blood transfusion or other blood products. The adverse effects are arterial or venous thromboembolic events that are mostly related to the severity of the underlying disease of the patient and the concurrent administration of other haemostatic agents, rather than the use of rFVIIa. Its use is recommended when there is a persistent bleeding after the reposition of blood products and when surgical causes of bleeding have been discarded. The cost of the medication should also be considered before its use.

[Relevance of a single dose of 270 microg/kg recombinant factor VIIa for the treatment of patients with haemophilia and inhibitors - Recommendations from the GTH experts]

Recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa; NovoSeven) is, besides other indications, authorised for the treatment of bleeding episodes in patients with hereditary haemophilia A or B and inhibitors. Based on the results of three clinical studies, marketing authorisation was granted for the single dose of 270 microg/kg body weight rFVIIa for the treatment of mild to moderate bleeding episodes in patients with haemophilia A or B with inhibitors in March 2007. Thereupon, an expert group analysed the relevance of this additional treatment option for clinical routine. Compared with the repeated application of 90 microg/kg body weight rFVIIa, quality of life may be improved if the single dose of 270 microg/kg body weight rFVIIa reduces the number of injections. The single dose has a benefit for those patients who require several rFVIIa applications or who do not respond adequately to low doses. Moreover, patients with poor venous access or patients who fear injections or reject them (especially children) may benefit from the single dose. The prescription of 270 microg/kg body weight rFVIIa as a single dose instead of multiple dosing of 90 microg/kg body weight is basically an individual and indication-related decision.

Factor VIIa and its potential therapeutic use in bleeding-associated pathologies

Recombinant FVIIa (rFVIIa) was developed for treatment of haemophilia patients with inhibitors against FVIII/FIX. The haemostatic efficacy rate of 80-90% including major orthopaedic surgery (dosing of 90-120 microg/kg every other hour [h] for at least the first 24 h) was achieved in these patients. In a home-treatment setting the efficacy rate of haemostasis in mild-moderate bleedings was 92% (average number of 90 microg/kg doses was 2.2). A wide individual variation regarding recovery of rFVIIa (46 +/- 12%; median 43%) as well as of clearance rate (36 +/- 8 ml/kg/h; median 32 ml/kg/h in adults; children 2-3 times higher) has been observed. Thus children may require higher doses than adults. Accordingly the use of a dose of 270 microg/kg in one single injection was approved in the EU. Recent experience indicates that repeated doses of rFVIIa may decrease the number of bleeds in "target joints", and thus may be useful as prophylaxis in severe hemophilia with inhibitors. Pharmacological concentrations of rFVIIa have been shown to enhance the thrombin generation on thrombin activated platelets in a cell-based model. By doing so a tight structured fibrin haemostatic plug resistant against premature lysis is formed. rFVIIa has been shown to induce haemostasis not only in haemophilia but also in other situations characterized by an impaired thrombin generation such as platelet defects, dilution coagulopathy developed as a result of trauma and extensive surgery. A special form of profuse bleeding, that may cause extensive problems is postpartum haemorrhage.

Fatal thrombosis with activated factor VII in a paediatric patient on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Bleeding remains a potential complication for patients requiring extracorporeal life support systems. Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) is one of the drugs used in controlling bleeding. Its use is generally found to be safe. We report a paediatric patient who developed fatal thrombosis with the use of rFVIIa whilst on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and discuss the possible factors that lead to fatal thrombosis.

Efficacy and safety of recombinant activated factor VII for acute intracerebral hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

Intracerebral hemorrhage is the least treatable form of stroke. We performed this phase 3 trial to confirm a previous study in which recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) reduced growth of the hematoma and improved survival and functional outcomes.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 841 patients with intracerebral hemorrhage to receive placebo (268 patients), 20 microg of rFVIIa per kilogram of body weight (276 patients), or 80 microg of rFVIIa per kilogram (297 patients) within 4 hours after the onset of stroke. The primary end point was poor outcome, defined as severe disability or death according to the modified Rankin scale 90 days after the stroke.

RESULTS

Treatment with 80 microg of rFVIIa per kilogram resulted in a significant reduction in growth in volume of the hemorrhage. The mean estimated increase in volume of the intracerebral hemorrhage at 24 hours was 26% in the placebo group, as compared with 18% in the group receiving 20 microg of rFVIIa per kilogram (P=0.09) and 11% in the group receiving 80 microg (P<0.001). The growth in volume of intracerebral hemorrhage was reduced by 2.6 ml (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.3 to 5.5; P=0.08) in the group receiving 20 microg of rFVIIa per kilogram and by 3.8 ml (95% CI, 0.9 to 6.7; P=0.009) in the group receiving 80 microg, as compared with the placebo group. Despite this reduction in bleeding, there was no significant difference among the three groups in the proportion of patients with poor clinical outcome (24% in the placebo group, 26% in the group receiving 20 microg of rFVIIa per kilogram, and 29% in the group receiving 80 microg). The overall frequency of thromboembolic serious adverse events was similar in the three groups; however, arterial events were more frequent in the group receiving 80 microg of rFVIIa than in the placebo group (9% vs. 4%, P=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Hemostatic therapy with rFVIIa reduced growth of the hematoma but did not improve survival or functional outcome after intracerebral hemorrhage. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00127283 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Failure of an Abiomed left ventricular assist device in association with factor VIIa administration

Factor VIIa might be a useful treatment for coagulopathy and massive hemorrhage following implantation of a mechanical circulatory assist device, but there is a theoretical risk of device thrombosis. To date this complication has not been reported. We describe the first case of clotting of a left ventricular assist device immediately after administration of factor VIIa.