Adenosine-dopamine interactions revealed in knockout mice

Neurochemical and pharmacological evidence obtained over the past 30 yr has indicated that adenosine and dopamine interact functionally in the basal ganglia and that such interactions have pathophysiological and therapeutic implications. The receptors implicated are adenosine A1 and A2A, and dopamine D1 and D2. There is evidence that dopamine D2 receptor activation in vivo antagonizes tonic activation of adenosine A2A receptors. Thus, acute blockade of dopamine D2 receptors, or disruption of dopamine transmission, unmasks strong adenosine A2A activation. Effects of dopamine D2 blockade are different after adenosine A2A blockade or in A2A knockout mice. Possibly as an adaptation to this increase in adenosine A2A signaling, there is a decreased coupling of A2A receptors to biological effects in dopamine D2 knockout mice. Compared to wild-type mice, adenosine A2A knockout mice show decreased neurodegeneration after treatment with 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) and show improved motor performance in models of Parkinson's disease Adenosine A1 receptors are not specifically located with any dopamine receptor, as is the A2A receptor with D2 receptors. Many A1 receptors are located presynaptically, where they regulate transmitter release. In A1 knockout mice, glutamatergic and dopaminergic transmission is therefore modified.

Susceptibility of the developing brain to acute hypoglycemia involving A1 adenosine receptor activation

It has been suggested that the developing brain is less vulnerable to the adverse effects of hypoglycemia than the mature brain; however, this issue remains controversial. We also do not know the magnitude or duration of hypoglycemia needed to trigger hypoglycemic brain injury during development. To address this issue a series of in vivo and in vitro studies were performed. First, we established an acute model of insulin-induced hypoglycemia in mice by administering 3 U/kg of neutral-protamine Hagadorn insulin subcutaneously. When we examined degenerating neurons in hippocampus and striatum by TUNEL labeling, injury was observed after 4 h of hypoglycemia in postnatal day (P)7 mice, and we observed more cell injury in animals rendered hypoglycemic at P7 than at P21. Studies of hippocampal slice cultures revealed that reduction in glucose concentration induced more neuronal injury in slices prepared from P3 and P7 than from P14 and P21 mice. Treatment of slices with an adenosine A(1) receptor (A(1)AR) antagonist reduced the hypoglycemic damage, whereas agonists increased damage, particularly in slices prepared from very young pups. This suggests a critically important role for A(1)ARs, which was further demonstrated by the reduction of hypoglycemic damage in hippocampal slices prepared from A(1)AR(-/-) mice. Furthermore, insulin-induced hypoglycemia in P7 A(1)AR(-/-) mice did not increase TUNEL-positive cells, but a major increase was seen in A(1)AR(+/-) mice. These observations show that the developing nervous system is indeed sensitive to acute hypoglycemic injury and that A(1)AR activation contributes to damage induced by hypoglycemia, particularly in immature mouse brain.

Evidence against adenosine analogues being agonists at the growth hormone secretagogue receptor

Adenosine and adenosine analogues have been reported to act as agonists or partial agonists at the growth hormone secretagogue receptor 1a (GHSR1a). We have re-examined this question. A concentration-dependent increase in intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca(2+)](i)) was observed in GHSR1a transfected HEK 293-EBNA cells stimulated with adenosine (EC50: 0.2 microM) or 2-chloroadenosine (EC50: 1.1 microM) but also in untransfected HEK 293-EBNA cells stimulated with 2-chloroadenosine (EC50: 0.67 microM) or 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA) (EC50: 0.045 microM). These findings support endogenous expression of adenosine receptors, presumably A(2B) receptors in HEK 293-EBNA cells. In GHSR1a transfected CHO cells, lacking adenosine receptors, the GHSR1a agonist hGhrelin (EC50: 2.4 nM) increased [Ca(2+)](i), but no effects of adenosine, 2-chloroadenosine or NECA were detected. An inverse agonist of GHSR1a, [d-Arg-1, d-Phe-5, d-Trp-7, 9, Leu-11] substance P, reduced hGhrelin effects but adenosine, 2-chloroadenosine or 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine (DPCPX) did not. NECA increased the [Ca(2+)](i) in co-transfected (GHSR1a and A(2B) receptor) CHO cells (EC50: 0.053 microM), but no additive or synergistic effects on [Ca(2+)](i) or cAMP formation were observed after stimulation with NECA in the absence or in the presence of hGhrelin. In binding studies on GHSR1a transfected CHO cell membranes, [(125)I]-hGhrelin binding could be displaced by the GHSR1a agonist MK-0677 (IC50: 0.34 nM), hGhrelin (IC50: 1.5 nM), and the substance P analogue (IC50: 0.64 microM) but not by adenosine or 2-chloroadenosine. We conclude that adenosine and analogues do not act as agonists or partial agonists at the GHSR1a and that cross-talk between the GHSR1a and A(2B) receptors is limited.

ACTIONS OF ADENOSINE AT ITS RECEPTORS IN THE CNS: Insights from Knockouts and Drugs

Adenosine and its receptors have been the topic of many recent reviews ( 1 – 26 ). These reviews provide a good summary of much of the relevant literature—including the older literature. We have, therefore, chosen to focus the present review on the insights gained from recent studies on genetically modified mice, particularly with respect to the function of adenosine receptors and their potential as therapeutic targets. The information gained from studies of drug effects is discussed in this context, and discrepancies between genetic and pharmacological results are highlighted.

Adenosine A2A, but not A1, receptors mediate the arousal effect of caffeine

Caffeine, a component of tea, coffee and cola, induces wakefulness. It binds to adenosine A1 and A2A receptors as an antagonist, but the receptor subtype mediating caffeine-induced wakefulness remains unclear. Here we report that caffeine at 5, 10 and 15 mg kg(-1) increased wakefulness in both wild-type mice and A1 receptor knockout mice, but not in A2A receptor knockout mice. Thus, caffeine-induced wakefulness depends on adenosine A2A receptors.

Mice lacking the adenosine A1 receptor have normal spatial learning and plasticity in the CA1 region of the hippocampus, but they habituate more slowly

Using mice with a targeted disruption of the adenosine A1 receptor (A1R), we examined the role of A1Rs in hippocampal long-term potentiation (LTP), long-term depression (LTD), and memory formation. Recordings from the Shaffer collateral-CA1 pathway of hippocampal slices from adult mice showed no differences between theta burst and tetanic stimulation-induced LTP in adenosine A1 receptor knockout (A1R-/-), heterozygote (A1R+/-), and wildtype (A1R+/+) mice. However, paired pulse facilitation was impaired significantly in A1R-/- slices as compared to A1R+/+ slices. LTD in the CA1 region was unaffected by the genetic manipulation. The three genotypes showed similar memory acquisition patterns when assessed for spatial reference and working memory in the Morris water maze tasks at 9 months of age. However, 10 months later A1R-/- mice showed some deficits in the 6-arm radial tunnel maze test. The latter appeared, however, not due to memory deficits but to decreased habituation to the test environment. Taken together, we observe normal spatial learning and memory and hippocampal CA1 synaptic plasticity in adult adenosine A1R knockout mice, but find modifications in arousal-related processes, including habituation, in this knockout model.

Intake inhibition by NPY and CCK-8: A challenge of the notion of NPY as an “Orexigen”

We tested the hypothesis that neuropeptide Y (NPY) interacts with cholecystokinin octapeptide (CCK-8) in inhibition of intake of an intraorally infused solution of sucrose, a test of consummatory ingestive behavior. Both intracerebroventricular infusion of NPY (10 microg) and intraperitoneal injection of CCK-8 (0.5 micro/kg) reduced the intake of a 1M solution of sucrose infused intraorally at a rate of 0.5 ml/min in ovariectomized female rats, but the two peptides did not interact in inhibiting intraoral intake. By contrast, NPY increased intake if the sucrose solution was ingested from a bottle, a test demanding both appetitive and consummatory ingestive responses. CCK-8 inhibited intake in this test and its inhibitory effect was increased by simultaneous treatment with NPY. The activity in the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS), a brainstem relay mediating inhibition of intake, judged by the expression of c-fos-like immunoreactivity, was significantly increased after treatment with CCK-8 or NPY to approximately the same extent. Combined treatment with NPY and CCK-8 did not increase the c-fos-like immunoreactivity in the NTS above treatment with NPY or CCK-8 alone. These results strengthen the hypothesis that NPY, like CCK-8, is an inhibitor of consummatory ingestive behavior and suggest that this inhibition is mediated via the NTS.

Increased nociceptive response in mice lacking the adenosine A1 receptor

The role of the adenosine A1 receptor in nociception was assessed using mice lacking the A1 receptor (A1R-/-) and in rats. Under normal conditions, the A1R-/- mice exhibited moderate heat hyperalgesia in comparison to the wild-type mice (A1R+/+). The mechanical and cold sensitivity were unchanged. The antinociceptive effect of morphine given intrathecally (i.t.), but not systemically, was reduced in A1R-/- mice and this reduction in the spinal effect of morphine was not associated with a decrease in binding of the mu-opioid ligand DAMGO in the spinal cord. A1R-/- mice also exhibited hypersensitivity to heat, but not mechanical stimuli, after localized inflammation induced by carrageenan. In mice with photochemically induced partial sciatic nerve injury, the neuropathic pain-like behavioral response to heat or cold stimulation were significantly increased in the A1R-/-mice. Peripheral nerve injury did not change the level of adenosine A1 receptor in the dorsal spinal cord in rats and i.t. administration of R-PIA effectively alleviated pain-like behaviors after partial nerve injury in rats and in C57/BL/6 mice. Taken together, these data suggest that the adenosine A1 receptor plays a physiological role in inhibiting nociceptive input at the spinal level in mice. The C-fiber input mediating noxious heat is inhibited more than other inputs. A1 receptors also contribute to the antinociceptive effect of spinal morphine. Selective A1 receptor agonists may be tested clinically as analgesics, particularly under conditions of neuropathic pain.

Luminal adenosine stimulates chloride secretion through A1 receptor in mouse jejunum

Adenosine is known to stimulate chloride secretion by mouse jejunum. Whereas the receptor on the basolateral side is believed to be A2B, the receptor involved in the luminal effect of adenosine has not been identified. We found that jejuna expressed mRNA for all adenosine receptor subtypes. In this study, we investigated the stimulation of chloride secretion by adenosine in jejuna derived from mice lacking the adenosine receptors of A1 (A1R) and A2A (A(2A)R) or control littermates. The jejunal epithelium was mounted in a Ussing chamber, and a new method on the basis of impedance analysis was used to calculate the short-circuit current (I(sc)) values. Chloride secretion was assessed by the I(sc) after inhibition of the sodium-glucose cotransporter by adding phloridzin to the apical bathing solution. The effect of apical adenosine on chloride secretion was lost in jejuna from mice lacking the A1R. There was no difference in the response to basolaterally applied adenosine or to apical forskolin. Furthermore, in jejuna from control mice, the effect of apical adenosine was also abolished in the presence of 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine, a specific A1R antagonist. Responses to adenosine were identical in jejuna from control and A(2A)R knockout mice. This study demonstrates that A1R (and not A(2A)R) mediates the enhancement of chloride secretion induced by luminal adenosine in mice jejunum.

Deletion of the adenosine A1 receptor gene does not alter neuronal damage following ischaemia in vivo or in vitro

Extracellular adenosine is dramatically increased during cerebral ischaemia and is considered to be neuroprotective due to its inhibitory effect on synaptic transmission mediated by the adenosine A1 receptor (A1R). We investigated the importance of the A1R in a mouse model of global ischaemia and in a murine hippocampal slice culture model of in vitro ischaemia, using mice with the A1R gene deleted. In brains from mice lacking the A1R, damage induced by global ischaemia was similar to that in wild-type animals. In contrast, treatment with a selective A1R antagonist [8-cyclo-pentyl theophylline (8-CPT)], administered before the ischaemic insult in naive wild-type mice, exacerbated the neuronal damage following global ischaemia. Although the inhibitory action of adenosine on excitatory neurotransmission in hippocampal slices was lost in A1R knockout mice, there was no difference in damage between slices from wild-type and knockout mice after in vitro ischaemia. The results suggest that some effects of the A1R are compensated for in knockout animals.

Adenosine A1 receptors are necessary for protection of the murine heart by remote, delayed adaptation to ischaemia

AIMS

Adenosine is involved in classic pre-conditioning (PC) in most species, acting through especially adenosine A1 and A3 receptors. We studied whether the adenosine A1 receptor (A1R) was important for remote, delayed adaptation to ischaemia using a mouse with targeted deletion of the A1R gene.

METHODS

Remote, delayed adaptation was evoked by brain ischaemia (BIPC) through bilateral ligation of the internal carotid arteries. Through microdialysis probes placed in the brain and the abdominal aorta, we found that plasma adenosine increased following carotid artery ligation. Twenty-four hours after ligation, hearts were isolated, Langendorff perfused and subjected to 40 min global ischaemia and 60 min reperfusion. Hearts from sham operated and BIPC animals either with (A1R+/+) or without (A1R-/-) the gene for the adenosine A(1)R were compared with each other.

RESULTS

In wild types, BIPC reduced infarct size and improved functional recovery during reperfusion, but BIPC did not protect hearts of A1R-/- mice. There were no significant differences between sham-operated A1R+/+ and A1R-/- in recovery of function or infarct size. The mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase1/2 (ERK1/2), p38 and c-jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) were phosphorylated during reperfusion of sham treated hearts. The increase in ERK1/2 and p38 phosphorylation detected was attenuated in hearts of BIPC or A1R-/- animals.

CONCLUSION

During BIPC adenosine acting on the A1R appears necessary for myocardial protection. MAPK signalling may possibly be involved in organ protection during the delayed phase of remote, delayed adaptation.

Binding of adenosine receptor ligands to brain of adenosine receptor knock-out mice: evidence that CGS 21680 binds to A1 receptors in hippocampus

The adenosine receptor agonist 2-[ p-(2-carboxyethyl)phenylethylamino]-5'- N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (CGS 21680) is generally considered to be a selective adenosine A(2A) receptor ligand. However, the compound has previously been shown to exhibit binding characteristics that are not compatible with adenosine A(2A) receptor binding, at least in brain regions other than the striatum. We have examined binding of [(3)H]CGS 21680 and of antagonist radioligands with high selectivity for adenosine A(1) or A(2A) receptors to hippocampus and striatum of mice lacking either adenosine A(1) (A1R((-/-))) or A(2A) (A2AR((-/-))) receptors. Both receptor autoradiography and membrane binding techniques were used for this purpose and gave similar results. There were no significant changes in the binding of the A(1) receptor antagonist [(3)H]DPCPX in mice lacking A(2A) receptors, or in the binding of the A(2A) receptor antagonists [(3)H]SCH 58261 and [(3)H]ZM 241385 in mice lacking A(1) receptors. Furthermore, [(3)H]CGS 21680 binding in striatum was abolished in the A2AR((-/-)), and essentially unaffected in striatum from mice lacking A(1) receptors. In hippocampus, however, binding of [(3)H]CGS 21680 remained in the A2AR((-/-)), whereas binding was virtually abolished in the A1R((-/-)). There were no adaptive alterations in A(2A) receptor expression in this region in A1R((-/-)) mice. Thus, most of the [(3)H]CGS 21680 binding in hippocampus is dependent on the presence of adenosine A(1) receptors, but not on A(2A) receptors, indicating a novel binding site or novel binding mode.

Neuromuscular blocking agents block carotid body neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors

Neuromuscular blocking agents predominantly block muscle type nicotinic acetylcholine receptors as opposed to the neuronal type. However, there is growing evidence that neuromuscular blocking agents have affinity to some neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. The carotid body chemoreceptor as the essential oxygen-sensing cell, relies on cholinergic signalling. Atracurium and vecuronium impair carotid body chemoreceptor activity during hypoxia. Here, we characterize atracurium and vecuronium as antagonists at nicotinic receptors of the carotid body chemoreceptor. Isolated rabbit carotid body preparations with carotid sinus nerve were used, and chemoreceptor activities were recorded. There was a concentration-dependent reduction in the chemoreceptor responses to nicotine, with an IC(50) to 50 microg nicotine of 3.64 and 1.64 microM and to 500 microg nicotine of 27.00 microM and 7.29 microM for atracurium and vecuronium, respectively. It is concluded that atracurium and vecuronium depress nicotine-induced chemoreceptor responses of the carotid body in a dose-dependent fashion.

The adenosine A1 receptor contributes to the stimulatory, but not the inhibitory effect of caffeine on locomotion: a study in mice lacking adenosine A1 and/or A2A receptors

Caffeine has biphasic effects on locomotion, and blockade of the adenosine A(2A) receptor (A2AR) is necessary for the stimulatory effect of low doses of caffeine, but not for the locomotor depressant effect observed at high doses. We wanted to elucidate the role of the adenosine A(1) receptor (A1R) in mediating the locomotor effects of increasing doses of caffeine using wild-type mice (A1R(WT)), mice heterozygous for (A1R(HET)), and mice lacking the adenosine A(1) receptor (A1R(KO)). Caffeine had the typical biphasic dose-effect relationship in all three genotypes, but the stimulatory action of caffeine was facilitated in the A1R(KO) mice. In order to investigate the interaction between blockade of A1Rs and A2ARs, mice lacking both receptors (A1R(KO)/A2AR(KO)) were tested. Regardless of A1R genotype, animals lacking A2AR were not stimulated by caffeine, whereas animals heterozygous for A2AR were. As expected, the A1R is not crucial for the stimulatory effect of caffeine, but seems to modulate the effect of caffeine exerted via A2AR blockade. Furthermore, these results suggest that the inhibitory effect of high doses of caffeine is due neither to blockade of the A1R, nor of the A2AR, and an effect independent of these adenosine receptors is likely.

Binding of the prototypical adenosine A(2A) receptor agonist CGS 21680 to the cerebral cortex of adenosine A(1) and A(2A) receptor knockout mice

1. 2-p-(2-carboxyethylphenethylamino-5'-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine) (CGS 21680) is considered the reference compound to study adenosine A(2A) receptors. However, CGS 21680 binding in the cerebral cortex, where adenosine A(1) receptors are predominant, displays a mixed A(2A)/A(1) receptor pharmacology. We now use adenosine A(1) and A(2A) receptor knockout mice to investigate the characteristics of cortical [(3)H]CGS 21680 binding. 2. [(3)H]CGS 21680 binding to the cerebral cortex was strongly reduced in adenosine A(1) receptor knockout mice, but only slightly reduced in A(2A) receptor knockout mice compared with the corresponding wild-type littermates. 3. Another selective A(2A) receptor ligand, [(3)H]-5-amino-7-(2-phenylethyl)-2-(2-furyl)-pyrazolo[4,3-e]-1,2,4-triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidine ([(3)H]SCH 58261), displayed a saturable binding to mouse cortical membranes, albeit with a binding density 20 times lower than that of striatal membranes, and this [(3)H]SCH58261 binding was abolished in both striatal and cortical membranes of A(2A) receptor knockout mice and unchanged in A(1) receptor knockout mice. 4. The presence of A(2A) receptors in cortical neurons was further confirmed by Western blot in mouse cortical nerve terminal membranes. 5. It is concluded that, although A(2A) receptors are present in the cerebral cortex, the purportedly selective A(2A) receptor agonist [(3)H]CGS 21680 binds in the cerebral cortex to an entity that requires the presence of adenosine A(1) receptors. Thus, CGS 21680 should be used with care in all preparations where adenosine A(1) receptors out-number A(2A) receptors.

Distribution of antinociceptive adenosine A1 receptors in the spinal cord dorsal horn, and relationship to primary afferents and neuronal subpopulations

Adenosine can reduce pain and allodynia in animals and man, probably via spinal adenosine A1 receptors. In the present study, we investigate the distribution of the adenosine A1 receptor in the rat spinal cord dorsal horn using immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridization, radioligand binding, and confocal microscopy. In the lumbar cord dorsal horn, dense immunoreactivity was seen in the inner part of lamina II. This was unaltered by dorsal root section or thoracic cord hemisection. Confocal microscopy of the dorsal horn revealed close anatomical relationships but no or only minor overlap between A1 receptors and immunoreactivity for markers associated with primary afferent central endings: calcitonin gene-related peptide, or isolectin B4, or with neuronal subpopulations: mu-opioid receptor, neuronal nitric oxide synthase, met-enkephalin, parvalbumin, or protein kinase Cgamma, or with glial cells: glial fibrillary acidic protein. A few adenosine A1 receptor positive structures were double-labeled with alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoaxolepropionic acid glutamate receptor subunits 1 and 2/3. The results indicate that most of the adenosine A1 receptors in the dorsal horn are located in inner lamina II postsynaptic neuronal cell bodies and processes whose functional and neurochemical identity is so far unknown. Many adenosine A1 receptor positive structures are in close contact with isolectin B4 positive C-fiber primary afferents and/or postsynaptic structures containing components of importance for the modulation of nociceptive information.

Adenosine A3 receptor-mediated regulation of p38 and extracellular-regulated kinase ERK1/2 via phosphatidylinositol-3′-kinase

The adenosine A(3) receptor generally couples to the G(i) class of heterotrimeric G proteins, thereby decreasing cAMP levels and also mediating signaling via release of betagamma subunits. Here we describe the central role of phosphatidylinositol-3'-kinase (PI3K) for adenosine A(3) receptor-induced intracellular signaling to the stress-activated protein kinase p38 and the extracellular signal-regulated protein kinases ERK1/2. We used Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing the human adenosine A(3) receptor, phospho-specific antibodies and different pharmacological tools to dissect the signaling pathways involving PI3K. The adenosine receptor agonist 5'N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine induced a time- and dose-dependent increase in p38 and ERK1/2 phosphorylation, two signaling pathways that appeared also to be activated in the immortalized microglia cell line N13, which expressed endogenous adenosine A(3) receptors. The 5'N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine-induced effects on p38 and ERK1/2 in CHO cells were blocked by pertussis toxin pretreatment and were sensitive to pharmacological inhibition of PI3K. In addition, inhibition of Rac/Cdc42, small GTPases of the Rho family, by clostridium toxin B, diminished p38 phosphorylation but did not affect ERK1/2. Furthermore, we identified the serine 727 site of signal transducer and activator of transcription STAT3 as a probable downstream target of ERK1/2, and thereby provide evidence that adenosine A(3) receptor mediated ERK1/2 activation has functional consequences.

Adenosine-dopamine interactions: Development of a concept and some comments on therapeutic possibilities

This brief review presents a personal perspective on the historical development of the current knowledge about the biologically important concept of functional antagonism between adenosine A2A and dopamine D2 receptors in caudate-putamen, accumbens, and tuberculum olfactorium. In the 1970s, studies of dopamine actions suggested an unexpected role of adenosine. Developments during the next decade substantiated this finding and demonstrated that a subform of adenosine A2 receptors was enriched in the basal ganglia. Cloning of adenosine receptors provided better tools for cellular localization and showed that A2A receptors are closely associated with D2 receptors. Distinct functional interactions at several levels were discovered, and there is now strong evidence that A2A receptors are tonically active and modified by dopamine acting at D2 receptors. Development of selective antagonists and knockout mice have highlighted the potential usefulness of A2A antagonists in decreasing symptoms and progression of Parkinson's disease-something that has also been vindicated by careful epidemiologic studies. There are issues of efficacy and potential side effects that need to be resolved, but the future looks bright.

Sleep and its homeostatic regulation in mice lacking the adenosine A1 receptor

Sleep deprivation (SD) increases extracellular adenosine levels in the basal forebrain, and pharmacological manipulations that increase extracellular adenosine in the same area promote sleep. As pharmacological evidence indicates that the effect is mediated through adenosine A1 receptors (A1R), we expected A1R knockout (KO) mice to have reduced rebound sleep after SD. Male homozygous A1R KO mice, wild-type (WT) mice, and heterozygotes (HET) from a mixed 129/C57BL background were implanted during anesthesia with electrodes for electroencephalography (EEG) and electromyography (EMG). After 1 week of recovery, they were allowed to adapt to recording leads for 2 weeks. EEG and EMG were recorded continuously. All genotypes had a pronounced diurnal sleep/wake rhythm after 2 weeks of adaptation. We then analyzed 24 h of baseline recording, 6 h of SD starting at light onset, and 42 h of recovery recording. Neither rapid eye movement sleep (REM sleep) nor non-REM sleep (NREMS) amounts differed significantly between the groups. SD for 6 h induced a strong NREMS rebound in all three groups. NREMS time and accumulated EEG delta power were equal in WT, HET and KO. Systemic administration of the selective A1R antagonist 8-cyclopentyltheophylline (8-CPT) inhibited sleep for 30 min in WT, whereas saline and 8-CPT both inhibited sleep in KO. We conclude that constitutional lack of adenosine A1R does not prevent the homeostatic regulation of sleep.

The G(s)-coupled adenosine A(2B) receptor recruits divergent pathways to regulate ERK1/2 and p38

Adenosine A(2B) receptors have been suggested to influence cell differentiation and proliferation. Human adenosine A(2B) receptors expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells mediate phosphorylation and activation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK1/2). Already low concentrations of agonists such as 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA) are effective. Phosphorylation of the stress-activated protein kinase p38 was also potently induced by NECA (EC(50) 18.5 nM). These NECA-induced effects were mimicked by forskolin and 8-Br-cAMP. Inhibition of cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) using H89 (N-[2-((p-bromocinnamyl)amino)ethyl]-5-isoquinolinesulfonamide)) blocked phosphorylation of the cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) and p38, but did not decrease NECA-induced ERK1/2 phosphorylation. NECA activated the small GTPase Rap1, and this was also not blocked by H89. Inhibition of phosphatidylinositol-3'-kinase (PI3K) by wortmannin inhibited adenosine A(2B) receptor-mediated ERK1/2 phosphorylation and activation of Rap1, without affecting CREB and p38 phosphorylation. A(2B) receptor-stimulated protein kinase B phosphorylation was sensitive to wortmannin, but not to H89. Thus, stimulation of adenosine A(2B) receptors activates both ERK1/2 and p38 via cAMP, but the downstream pathways are markedly different. ERK1/2 activation was dependent on PI3K but not on PKA. p38 activation by NECA was instead independent of PI3K but required cAMP and PKA. The potent activation of both MAPKs suggests a physiological role.

A1 adenosine receptors mediate hypoxia-induced ventriculomegaly

Periventricular leukomalacia is characterized by a reduction in brain matter and secondary ventriculomegaly and is a major cause of developmental delay and cerebral palsy in prematurely born infants. Currently, our understanding of the pathogenesis of this condition is limited. In animal models, features of periventricular leukomalacia can be induced by hypoxia and activation of A1 adenosine receptors (A1ARs). Using mice that are deficient in the A1AR gene (A1AR-/-), we show that A1ARs play a prominent role in the development of hypoxia-induced ventriculomegaly in neonates. Supporting a role for adenosine in the pathogenesis of developmental brain injury, ventriculomegaly was also observed in mice lacking the enzyme adenosine deaminase, which degrades adenosine. Thus, adenosine acting on A1ARs appears to mediate hypoxia-induced brain injury ventriculomegaly during early postnatal development.

Signalling from adenosine receptors to mitogen-activated protein kinases

The purine nucleoside adenosine acts via four distinct adenosine receptor subtypes: the adenosine A(1), A(2A), A(2B), and A(3) receptor. They are all G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) coupling to classical second messenger pathways such as modulation of cAMP production or the phospholipase C (PLC) pathway. In addition, they couple to mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK), which could give them a role in cell growth, survival, death and differentiation. Although each of the adenosine receptors can activate one or more of the MAPKs, the mechanisms appear to differ substantially, both between receptor subtypes in the same cell type and between the same receptor in different cell types.