Cytohistological diagnosis of pancreatic serous cystadenoma: a multimodal approach

Aims

Serous cystadenomata (SCAs) are benign pancreatic cystic neoplasms that present a diagnostic challenge despite many investigational approaches. Notwithstanding the promise of molecular diagnostics, these tests have limited accessibility in day-to-day surgical pathology practices. We aim to corroborate and build on recent evidence which suggests that positive α-inhibin immunohistochemistry (IHC) is a helpful adjunct in the biopsy confirmation of pancreatic SCA.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 22 fine-needle aspirates/biopsies from 14 patients (mean age 65 years, 47–83 years) with pancreatic multicystic lesions radiologically suspicious for SCA (location: 6 body, 2 head, 4 tail, 1 neck, 1 uncinate; cyst size: mean 3.7 cm, 2.0–7.6 cm), as well as an additional 10 pancreatic resection specimens with confirmed SCA; α-inhibin IHC was performed on all cell blocks, biopsy slides and representative resection specimen sections. Where available, associated cyst fluid was analysed for correlative vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) and carcinoembryonic antigen levels.

Results

An α-inhibin IHC sensitivity of 80% was observed in the cases with resection confirmed SCA. Of the fine-needle aspirate/biopsy specimens, 59% (13/22) contained epithelial cells strongly positive for α-inhibin. When selecting for specimens that exhibited distinct strips of epithelium, the α-inhibin strong positivity rate increased to 73% (8/11). VEGF-A values were supportive of false-negative α-inhibin IHC in three cases and true-negative α-inhibin IHC in one case.

Conclusion

This study postulates a diagnostic algorithm to confirm pancreatic SCA which may help to decrease unnecessary follow-up endoscopy/surgical resection and would decrease the associated morbidity, mortality and financial costs in patients with this otherwise benign condition.

Off-label use of common predictive biomarkers in gastrointestinal malignancies: a critical appraisal

The use of immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a companion diagnostic is an increasingly important part of the case workup by pathologists and is often central to clinical decision making. New predictive molecular markers are constantly sought for to improve treatment stratification parallel to drug development. Unfortunately, official biomarker guidelines lag behind, and pathologists are often left hesitating when medical oncologists request off-labelled biomarker testing. We performed a literature review of five commonly requested off-label IHC predictive biomarkers in gastrointestinal tract (GIT) malignancies: HER2, mismatch repair (MMR), PD-L1, BRAF V600E and ROS1. We found that HER2 amplification is rare and poorly associated to IHC overexpression in extracolonic and extragastric GIT cancers; however in KRAS wild type colorectal cancers, which fail conventional treatment, HER2 IHC may be useful and should be considered. For MMR testing, more evidence is needed to recommend reflex testing in GIT cancers for treatment purposes. MMR testing should not be discouraged in patients considered for second line checkpoint inhibitor therapy. With the exception of gastric tumors, PD-L1 IHC is a weak predictor of checkpoint inhibitor response in the GIT and should be replaced by MMR in this context. BRAF inhibitors showed activity in BRAF V600E mutated cholangiocarcinomas and pancreatic carcinomas in non-first line settings. ROS1 translocation is extremely rare and poorly correlated to ROS1 IHC expression in the GIT; currently there is no role for ROS1 IHC testing in GIT cancers. Overall, the predictive biomarker literature has grown exponentially, and official guidelines need to be updated more regularly to support pathologists’ testing decisions.

Comprehensive genomic analysis of metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) reveals a significant proportion of clinical actionable aberrations

e15753

Background: Significant progress has been made in the understanding of the genomic landscape of PDAC, but the clinical utility of these data remains uncertain. Methods: As part of the BC Cancer Personalized Oncogenomics (POG) and PanGen studies (NCT02155621, NCT02869802), whole genome analysis and transcriptome sequencing were performed on fresh biopsy and blood sample from 48 mPDAC patients. Genomic findings informed therapy choices including potential eligibility for the CCTG PM.1 molecular basket trial (NCT03297606). Results: Cohort consists of 54.1% male, average age 57.6, 34/48 had ≥2 lines of treatment. 37/48 biopsies were from liver and 27/48 were collected pre-treatment. 8/48 (16.6%) patients had aberrations with strong evidence of clinical actionability. These include 2 germline BRCA2, 1 germline BRCA1, 1 somatic XRCC2 homozygous deletion with strong COSMIC signature 3, all predictive of platinum sensitivity. Patients with XRCC2 deletion and BRCA1 had over 2 years on FOLFIRINOX. Fusions affecting the NRG1 gene were identified in 3/4 patients with KRAS wildtype tumours, which may confer ERRB inhibitor sensitivity. 2/3 NRG1 fusion patients have thus far been treated with the ERBB inhibitor afatinib with radiographic responses noted in both patients. One patient had mismatch repair deficiency, and a high mutational burden, suggestive of immune checkpoint inhibitor sensitivity. Other possible actionable mutations include CCTG PM.1 trial potential eligibility: 4/48 with high homologous recombination defects and 1 germline ATM mutation loss (PARP inhibitor arm), 1/47 ERBB2 amplification (anti-HER2 arm), 2/47 high expression of FGFR1 (Sunitinib arm) and 1/47 with high FLT4 and IGF1R expression (Axitinib arm). Conclusions: More routine use of comprehensive genomic analysis should be considered in mPDAC given finding of high degree of actionability. Importantly, a significant proportion (16.6%) had findings with strong evidence of clinical impact.

Unselected germline screening in pancreatic adenocarcinoma yields high rates of pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants (PV) in hereditary cancer susceptibility genes

1582

Background: Recent literature cites a germline mutation rate of 3.9-15.1% in patients diagnosed with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) depending on breadth of genes tested, pre-selection of high-risk history and population substructure. True incidence of germline mutations in PDAC is unknown in unselected population. Methods: All patients (pts) diagnosed with PDAC in the province of British Columbia, Canada and referred to the Hereditary Cancer Program, were eligible to undergo 30 gene Color saliva kit testing under a research protocol, or clinical multigene testing if they met existing local criteria regardless of whether they signed on to the protocol. Any healthcare provider or patients themselves could refer. Results: 243 pts were referred between August 2016 and October 2018 but 25.1% (61) declined and 9.1% (22) died before testing. Of the 141 pts who consented to research protocol and completed germline testing, median age was 64 (46.1-81.0), 68.8% were European, 1.4% Ashkenazi Jewish heritage, 42% male, 61% non-smoker, 24.1% had personal history of a second cancer and 39% had metastatic disease. Baseline characteristics were similar between the PV positive and uninformative group. 20/25 PV were in known PDAC susceptibility genes with cascade screening implications (ATM (9), BRCA2 (4), BRCA2/ATM (1), CDKN2A (4), and MSH2 (2)). Excluding the 3 PV identified through carrier testing (1) and prior research identification (2), the rate of PV in unselected, unrelated PDAC cohort is 22/138 (15.9%). Utilizing previous NCCN criteria for BRCA1/BRCA2 testing or for familial pancreatic cancer did not appear to select for patients with higher risk of PV positive (12/65 (18.4%) PV positive rate versus 13/76 (17.1%) in those that didn’t meet criteria). Previous criteria would have missed 52% (13/25) PV in ATM (6), BRCA2/ATM (1), BRCA2 (2), MSH2 (2), NBN (1), CHEK2 (1). To date, a third of families with PV identified have accessed cascade testing in 38 relatives. Conclusions: Given the high incidence of 15.9% PV in hereditary cancer susceptibility genes, our data support recommendations for universal germline genetic testing of PDAC pts.

Comprehensive transcriptome analysis reveals link between epigenetic dysregulation, endogenous retrovirus expression and immunogenicity in metastatic colorectal carcinoma

3535

Background: Endogenous retrovirus (ERV) elements represent genomic footprints of ancestral retroviral infections within the human genome. Previous studies have demonstrated increases in ERV mRNA as a result of DNA hypomethylation, and ERV transcription has been associated with increased immunogenicity in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. We performed comprehensive bioinformatics analysis of ERV transcription in metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC), to identify novel links between ERV transcription, epigenetic dysregulation and immunogenicity in metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC). Methods: Tumour samples from 63 patients with mCRC were subjected to RNA sequencing as part of the Personalized OncoGenomics program (POG; NCT02155621) at BC Cancer. Patients were enrolled between 07/2012-07/2017. ERV transcription was quantified across 702,533 distinct loci. Tumors were classified ERV-hi if their total ERV expression (RPKM) was greater than the mean across all samples. High antiviral gene expression tumors (AVG-hi) were designated as having a mean expression of IFIH1, DDX58, TLR3, TANK, TBKBP1, TBK1, IRF3 and IRF7 that was greater than the mean across all samples. All pairwise comparisons of gene expression were subjected to multiple hypothesis correction. Results: Median age was 59 years, with 34 (54%) male and 1 tumor microsatellite unstable. ERV-hi tumors showed increased expression of DNA demethylators TET2 ( q=0.0045) and TET3 ( q<0.0001). Significant overlap existed between ERV-hi and AVG-hi tumors (18/27, p=0.016). Tumors both ERV-hi and AVG-hi trended towards increased PD-L1 expression (p=0.055) and showed a significant increase in survival compared to tumors with high antiviral expression in the absence of high ERV transcription (p=0.0043). Conclusions: Our results suggest DNA demethylation drives increased ERV transcription and ERV-associated immunogenicity in mCRC. Moreover, we provide novel insight into the impact of ERV transcription on the biology of mCRC, highlighting ERV transcription as a potential biomarker and target for precision immunotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02155621.

Population-based screening for BRAF V600E in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) to reveal true prognosis

3579

Background: BRAFV600E ( BRAF) mutations (mts) portend poor prognosis in mCRC and patients (pts) may die before ascertainment. Since 2014, Vancouver Coastal Health (VCH) has performed reflex hereditary screening of CRCs with BRAF and mismatch repair (MMR) immunohistochemistry (IHC). We evaluated this BRAF mt population-based cohort ( BRAFPOP) to establish the true prognosis of BRAF mts in mCRC. Methods: We reviewed all mCRCs from VCH between 4/2014 and 5/2018 for BRAF by IHC (VE1 antibody). Overall survival (OS) from stage IV diagnosis was compared to mCRCs with next generation sequencing (NGS) determined BRAF mts ( BRAFNGS) from BC Cancer & MD Anderson. BRAFNGS OS did not differ by center (p = 0.77). Results: See table for BRAF cohort baseline characteristic comparison. BRAFPOP pts had worse OS than BRAFNGS pts (HR 2.5, 95% CI 1.6 – 3.9, P < 0.0001). Median OS for all BRAF mt pts was 17.9 mos. Both groups had worse OS than wild type pts (P < 0.0001). 52 (81%) of BRAFPOP pts were referred to oncology, 40 (63%) received chemotherapy, and 12 (19%) had NGS BRAF testing. BRAFPOP pts who had NGS testing with BRAF mts had OS comparable to other BRAFNGS pts (P = 0.89) and better OS than BRAFPOP pts that never had NGS testing (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.18-0.76, P = 0.030). Pts with BRAF mts and MMR deficiency (dMMR) (n = 40) had worse OS than MMR proficiency (pMMR, n = 202) (1.6, 95% CI 1.0-2.5, P = 0.011). This was driven by BRAFPOP dMMR pts (HR 1.9, 95% CI 0.9-4.0, P = 0.036) as no difference was seen by MMR in BRAFNGS pts (HR 1.3, 95% CI 0.8-2.2, P = 0.30). Conclusions: Current estimates of prognosis for mCRC with BRAF mts likely underestimate its impact due to referral bias for NGS testing. BRAF mts with dMMR are associated with worse prognosis than pMMR. This appears driven by BRAFPOP pts. [Table: see text]

NRG1 Gene Fusions Are Recurrent, Clinically Actionable Gene Rearrangements in KRAS Wild-Type Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

Gene fusions involving neuregulin 1 (NRG1) have been noted in multiple cancer types and have potential therapeutic implications. Although varying results have been reported in other cancer types, the efficacy of the HER-family kinase inhibitor afatinib in the treatment of NRG1 fusion-positive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is not fully understood.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Forty-seven patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma received comprehensive whole-genome and transcriptome sequencing and analysis. Two patients with gene fusions involving NRG1 received afatinib treatment, with response measured by pretreatment and posttreatment PET/CT imaging.

RESULTS

Three of 47 (6%) patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were identified as KRAS wild type by whole-genome sequencing. All KRAS wild-type tumors were positive for gene fusions involving the ERBB3 ligand NRG1. Two of 3 patients with NRG1 fusion-positive tumors were treated with afatinib and demonstrated a significant and rapid response while on therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This work adds to a growing body of evidence that NRG1 gene fusions are recurrent, therapeutically actionable genomic events in pancreatic cancers. Based on the clinical outcomes described here, patients with KRAS wild-type tumors harboring NRG1 gene fusions may benefit from treatment with afatinib.See related commentary by Aguirre, p. 4589.

Base excision repair deficiency signatures implicate germline and somatic MUTYH aberrations in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and breast cancer oncogenesis

We report a case of early-onset pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in a patient harboring biallelic MUTYH germline mutations, whose tumor featured somatic mutational signatures consistent with defective MUTYH-mediated base excision repair and the associated driver KRAS transversion mutation p.Gly12Cys. Analysis of an additional 730 advanced cancer cases (N = 731) was undertaken to determine whether the mutational signatures were also present in tumors from germline MUTYH heterozygote carriers or if instead the signatures were only seen in those with biallelic loss of function. We identified two patients with breast cancer each carrying a pathogenic germline MUTYH variant with a somatic MUTYH copy loss leading to the germline variant being homozygous in the tumor and demonstrating the same somatic signatures. Our results suggest that monoallelic inactivation of MUTYH is not sufficient for C:G>A:T transversion signatures previously linked to MUTYH deficiency to arise (N = 9), but that biallelic complete loss of MUTYH function can cause such signatures to arise even in tumors not classically seen in MUTYH-associated polyposis (N = 3). Although defective MUTYH is not the only determinant of these signatures, MUTYH germline variants may be present in a subset of patients with tumors demonstrating elevated somatic signatures possibly suggestive of MUTYH deficiency (e.g., COSMIC Signature 18, SigProfiler SBS18/SBS36, SignatureAnalyzer SBS18/SBS36).

Cell of origin affects tumour development and phenotype in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly aggressive tumour thought to arise from ductal cells via pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN) precursor lesions. Modelling of different genetic events in mice suggests both ductal and acinar cells can give rise to PDAC. However, the impact of cellular context alone on tumour development and phenotype is unknown.

DESIGN

We examined the contribution of cellular origin to PDAC development by inducing PDAC-associated mutations, Kras^G12D expression and Trp53 loss, specifically in ductal cells (Sox9CreER;Kras^LSL-G12D;Trp53^flox/flox ('Duct:KP^cKO ')) or acinar cells (Ptf1a^CreER;Kras^LSL-G12D;Trp53^flox/flox ('Acinar:KP^cKO ')) in mice. We then performed a thorough analysis of the resulting histopathological changes.

RESULTS

Both mouse models developed PDAC, but Duct:KP^cKO mice developed PDAC earlier than Acinar:KP^cKO mice. Tumour development was more rapid and associated with high-grade murine PanIN (mPanIN) lesions in Duct:KP^cKO mice. In contrast, Acinar:KP^cKO mice exhibited widespread metaplasia and low-grade as well as high-grade mPanINs with delayed progression to PDAC. Acinar-cell-derived tumours also had a higher prevalence of mucinous glandular features reminiscent of early mPanIN lesions.

CONCLUSION

These findings indicate that ductal cells are primed to form carcinoma in situ that become invasive PDAC in the presence of oncogenic Kras and Trp53 deletion, while acinar cells with the same mutations appear to require a prolonged period of transition or reprogramming to initiate PDAC. Our findings illustrate that PDAC can develop in multiple ways and the cellular context in which mutations are acquired has significant impact on precursor lesion initiation, disease progression and tumour phenotype.

DALM, rest in peace: a pathologist's perspective on dysplasia in inflammatory bowel disease in the post-DALM era

There are few abbreviations in surgical pathology that are associated with as much immediate recognition, frustration, and confusion as DALM (dysplasia-associated lesion or mass). DALM is used to describe endoscopically visible dysplastic lesions in the surveillance of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. However, the diagnosis of DALM has been complicated by the inconsistent criteria and use of terminology for describing dysplasia in inflammatory bowel disease, and a tendency to relate DALM with the need for colectomy. Fortunately, advancements in both endoscopic visualization and local excision capability have allowed for a more defined management of dysplasia in inflammatory bowel disease. In 2015, the Surveillance for Colorectal Endoscopic Neoplasia Detection and Management in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients International Consensus Recommendations (SCENIC) Development Panel, a panel of predominantly expert gastroenterologists and endoscopists in surveillance of inflammatory bowel disease, published a consensus statement. One recommendation was to abandon DALM-related terminology in favor of endoscopic descriptors modified from the Paris endoscopic classification. Recommendations on surveillance and management of dysplastic lesions were also provided. Nevertheless, interval carcinomas and metachronous neoplasia remain persistent issues. This review aims to provide an update on the post-DALM terminology and management recommendations for inflammatory bowel disease-associated dysplasia necessary for a meaningful communication between pathologists and clinicians.

Outcomes of Surgical and Chemotherapeutic Treatments of Goblet Cell Carcinoid Tumors of the Appendix

BACKGROUND

Goblet cell carcinoids (GCCs) of the appendix are rare mucinous neoplasms, for which optimal therapy is poorly described. We examined prognostic clinical and treatment factors in a population-based cohort.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with GCC from 1984 to 2014 were identified from the British Columbia Cancer Agency and the Vancouver Lower Mainland Pathology Archive.

RESULTS

Of 88 cases with confirmed appendiceal GCCs, clinical data were available in 86 cases (annual population incidence: 0.66/1,000,000). Median age was 54 years (range 25-91) and 42 patients (49%) were male. Metastasis at presentation was the strongest predictor of overall survival (OS), with median OS not reached for stage I-III patients, and measuring 16.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 9.1-29] for stage IV patients. In 67 stage I-III patients, 51 (76%) underwent completion hemicolectomy and 9 (17%) received adjuvant 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. No appendicitis at initial presentation and Tang B histology were the only prognostic factors, with inferior 5-year recurrence-free survival (53 vs. 83% with appendicitis, p = 0.02; 45% Tang B vs. 89% Tang A, p < 0.01). Of 19 stage IV patients, 10 (62.5%) received 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy and 11 (61%) underwent multiorgan resection (MOR) ± hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Low mitotic rate and MOR ± HIPEC were associated with improved 2-year OS, but only MOR ± HIPEC remained significant on multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 5.4, 95% CI 1.4-20.9; p = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

In this population-based cohort, we demonstrate excellent survival outcomes in stage I-III appendiceal GCCs and clinical appendicitis. Hemicolectomy remains the standard treatment. In metastatic disease, outcomes remain poor, although MOR ± HIPEC may improve survival.

Tumor budding as a standardized parameter in gastrointestinal carcinomas: more than just the colon

Tumor budding, defined as single cells or clusters of less than five cells, is thought to be a histomorphologic marker of an aggressive tumor behavior mimicking the embryologic epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and has been well established in the past two decades as a poor prognostic factor in colorectal carcinoma. Slow uptake in routine reporting of this important pathologic prognostic feature was in part due to differing methods of assessment of budding reported in the literature, but has recently been clarified at a consensus conference on tumor budding in colorectal carcinoma. Tumor budding is also increasingly being reported as a useful pathologic prognostic feature in other gastrointestinal carcinomas, including esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma, gastric intestinal-type adenocarcinoma, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, and ampullary adenocarcinoma. In this review, we will summarize the studies on tumor budding in gastrointestinal carcinomas, with a focus on the methods of assessment used and the potential clinical applications of the findings.

Successful targeting of the NRG1 pathway indicates novel treatment strategy for metastatic cancer

Background

NRG1 fusion-positive lung cancers have emerged as potentially actionable events in lung cancer, but clinical support is currently limited and no evidence of efficacy of this approach in cancers beyond lung has been shown.

Patients and methods

Here, we describe two patients with advanced cancers refractory to standard therapies. Patient 1 had lung adenocarcinoma and patient 2 cholangiocarcinoma. Whole-genome and transcriptome sequencing were carried out for these cases with select findings validated by fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Results

Both tumors were found to be positive for NRG1 gene fusions. In patient 1, an SDC4-NRG1 gene fusion was detected, similar gene fusions having been described in lung cancers previously. In patient 2, a novel ATP1B1-NRG1 gene fusion was detected. Cholangiocarcinoma is not a disease type in which NRG1 fusions had been described previously. Integrative genome analysis was used to assess the potential functional significance of the detected genomic events including the gene fusions, prioritizing therapeutic strategies targeting the HER-family of growth factor receptors. Both patients were treated with the pan HER-family kinase inhibitor afatinib and both displayed significant and durable response to treatment. Upon progression sites of disease were sequenced. The lack of obvious genomic events to describe the disease progression indicated that broad transcriptomic or epigenetic mechanisms could be attributed to the lack of prolonged response to afatinib.

Conclusion

These observations lend further support to the use of pan HER-tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of NRG1 fusion-positive in both cancers of lung and hepatocellular origin and indicate more broadly that cancers found to be NRG1 fusion-positive may benefit from such a clinical approach regardless of their site of origin.

Clinical trial information

Personalized Oncogenomics (POG) Program of British Columbia: Utilization of Genomic Analysis to Better Understand Tumour Heterogeneity and Evolution (NCT02155621).

Molecular characterization of ERBB2-amplified colorectal cancer identifies potential mechanisms of resistance to targeted therapies: a report of two instructive cases

ERBB2 amplification has been identified in ∼5% of KRAS wild-type colorectal cancers (CRCs). A recent clinical trial showed response to HER2-directed therapy in a subset of ERBB2-amplified metastatic CRCs resistant to chemotherapy and EGFR-directed therapy. With the aim of better understanding mechanisms of resistance to HER2-directed and EGFR-directed therapies, we report the complete molecular characterization of two cases of ERBB2-amplified CRC. PCR-free whole-genome sequencing was used to identify mutations, copy-number alterations, structural variations, and losses of heterozygosity. ERBB2 copy number was also measured by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Single-stranded mRNA sequencing was used for gene expression profiling. Immunohistochemistry and protein mass spectrometry were used to quantify HER2 protein expression. The cases showed ERBB2 copy number of 86 and 92, respectively. Both cases were immunohistochemically positive for HER2 according to CRC-specific scoring criteria. Fluorescence in situ hybridization and protein mass spectrometry corroborated significantly elevated ERBB2 copy number and abundance of HER2 protein. Both cases were microsatellite stable and without mutation of RAS pathway genes. Additional findings included altered expression of PTEN, MET, and MUC1 and mutation of PIK3CA The potential effects of the molecular alterations on sensitivity to EGFR and HER2-directed therapies were discussed. Identification of ERBB2 amplification in CRC is necessary to select patients who may respond to HER2-directed therapy. An improved understanding of the molecular characteristics of ERBB2-amplified CRCs and their potential mechanisms of resistance will be useful for future research into targeted therapies and may eventually inform therapeutic decision-making.

Loss of Pten and Activation of Kras Synergistically Induce Formation of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasia From Pancreatic Ductal Cells in Mice

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasias (IPMNs) are precancerous cystic lesions that can develop into pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs). These large macroscopic lesions are frequently detected during medical imaging, but it is unclear how they form or progress to PDAC. We aimed to identify cells that form IPMNs and mutations that promote IPMN development and progression.

METHODS

We generated mice with disruption of Pten specifically in ductal cells (Sox9CreER^T2;Pten^flox/flox;R26R^YFP or Pten^{ΔDuct/ΔDuct} mice) and used Pten^ΔDuct/+ and Pten^+/+ mice as controls. We also generated Kras^G12D;Pten^{ΔDuct/ΔDuct} and Kras^G12D;Pten^ΔDuct/+ mice. Pancreata were collected when mice were 28 weeks to 14.5 months old and analyzed by histology, immunohistochemistry, and electron microscopy. We performed multiplexed droplet digital polymerase chain reaction to detect spontaneous Kras mutations in Pten^{ΔDuct/ΔDuct} mice and study the effects of Ras pathway activation on initiation and progression of IPMNs. We obtained 2 pancreatic sections from a patient with an invasive pancreatobiliary IPMN and analyzed the regions with and without the invasive IPMN (control tissue) by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Mice with ductal cell-specific disruption of Pten but not control mice developed sporadic, macroscopic, intraductal papillary lesions with histologic and molecular features of human IPMNs. Pten^{ΔDuct/ΔDuct} mice developed IPMNs of several subtypes. In Pten^{ΔDuct/ΔDuct} mice, 31.5% of IPMNs became invasive; invasion was associated with spontaneous mutations in Kras. Kras^G12D;Pten^{ΔDuct/ΔDuct} mice all developed invasive IPMNs within 1 month. In Kras^G12D;Pten^ΔDuct/+ mice, 70% developed IPMN, predominately of the pancreatobiliary subtype, and 63.3% developed PDAC. In all models, IPMNs and PDAC expressed the duct-specific lineage tracing marker yellow fluorescent protein. In immunohistochemical analyses, we found that the invasive human pancreatobiliary IPMN tissue had lower levels of PTEN and increased levels of phosphorylated (activated) ERK compared with healthy pancreatic tissue.

CONCLUSIONS

In analyses of mice with ductal cell-specific disruption of Pten, with or without activated Kras, we found evidence for a ductal cell origin of IPMNs. We also showed that PTEN loss and activated Kras have synergistic effects in promoting development of IPMN and progression to PDAC.

CDKN2A founder mutation in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients without cutaneous features of Familial Atypical Multiple Mole Melanoma (FAMMM) syndrome

Background

Approximately 5% to 10% of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a hereditary basis. In most of these defined hereditary cancer syndromes, PDAC is not the predominant cancer type. Traditional criteria for publicly funded genetic testing typically require the presence of a set combination of the predominant syndrome-associated cancer types in the family history.

We report the identification of a CDKN2A pathogenic variant in a PDAC-prone family without the cutaneous features of multiple moles or melanoma that are characteristic of the Familial Atypical Multiple Mole Melanoma (FAMMM) Syndrome identified in a universal testing algorithm for inherited mutations in pancreatic cancer patients.

Case presentation

We present the case of two brothers of English ancestry diagnosed with PDAC within the same 12 month period, at the respective ages of 63 and 64 years of age. Neither brother reported a personal history of multiple moles or melanoma. Family history was positive for two second-degree relatives diagnosed with PDAC but was negative for other cancers or multiple moles in first- and second-degree relatives. Due to the absence of melanoma, this family did not meet provincial criteria for publicly funded genetic testing. Clinical genetic testing offered through a research grant identified a pathogenic variant in the CDKN2A gene c.377 T > A (p.Val126Asp). This variant is a North American founder mutation believed to pre-date colonization.

Conclusions

This case reminds clinicians to consider the possibility of a germline CDKN2A mutation in families with a high prevalence of PDAC, even in the absence of moles or melanoma. This case supports recent guidelines published by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) that genetics referrals are indicated in families with three or more cases of PDAC regardless of other cancer types in the family. A multi-gene panel approach is of particular benefit in diagnosing inherited cancer susceptibility in PDAC-only families.

Molecular characterization of metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) using whole-genome and transcriptome sequencing

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are a genomically and clinically heterogeneous group of pancreatic neoplasms often diagnosed with distant metastases. Recurrent somatic mutations, chromosomal aberrations, and gene expression signatures in PNETs have been described, but the clinical significance of these molecular changes is still poorly understood, and the clinical outcomes of PNET patients remain highly variable. To help identify the molecular factors that contribute to PNET progression and metastasis, and as part of an ongoing clinical trial at the BC Cancer Agency (clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT02155621), the genomic and transcriptomic profiles of liver metastases from five patients (four PNETs and one neuroendocrine carcinoma) were analyzed. In four of the five cases, we identified biallelic loss of MEN1 and DAXX as well as recurrent regions with loss of heterozygosity. Several novel findings were observed, including focal amplification of MYCN concomitant with loss of APC and TP53 in one sample with wild-type MEN1 and DAXX. Transcriptome analyses revealed up-regulation of MYCN target genes in this sample, confirming a MYCN-driven gene expression signature. We also identified a germline NTHL1 fusion event in one sample that resulted in a striking C>T mutation signature profile not previously reported in PNETs. These varying molecular alterations suggest different cellular pathways may contribute to PNET progression, consistent with the heterogeneous clinical nature of this disease. Furthermore, genomic profiles appeared to correlate well with treatment response, lending support to the role of prospective genotyping efforts to guide therapy in PNETs.

SATB2 as an Immunohistochemical Marker for Colorectal Adenocarcinoma: A Concise Review of Benefits and Pitfalls

SATB2 is part of the family of matrix attachment region-binding transcription factors, and has developmental roles in craniofacial, neural, and osteoblastic differentiation. Recently, SATB2 has been shown to be highly expressed in the epithelium of the lower gastrointestinal tract, with a relatively narrow expression profile in malignancies, including colorectal/appendiceal adenocarcinomas, tumors of osteoblastic differentiation, and renal/urothelial carcinomas. SATB2 has gained interest as a relatively specific marker of colorectal differentiation, with potential applications including determining origin of adenocarcinomas of unknown primary and distinguishing primary ovarian mucinous adenocarcinomas from colorectal metastases. Here, we briefly review the biology, expression profile, and potential histologic applications of SATB2.