POS0844 EFFECTS OF SERIAL LOCALLY APPLIED WATER-FILTERED INFRARED A RADIATION IN PATIENTS WITH SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS WITH SEVERE RAYNAUD’S SYNDROME RECEIVING PROSTAGLANDINE TREATMENT – A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Background:

More than 95% of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) suffer from Raynaud’s syndrome (RS) leading to digital ulcerations (DU). In severe RS, intravenous application of prostaglandins is required. Moreover, these patients profit from an additional non-pharmacological treatment using hyperthermia to increase vasodilatation and perfusion, and to reduce pain.

Serial locally applied water-filtered infrared A radiation (sl-wIRAR) is a hyperthermia treatment modality using infrared heat radiation in the range of 780-1400nm with high tissue penetration and low thermal load on the skin surface [1]. wIRAR has both, temperature-dependent and non-dependent effects, which do not inherit thermal energy transfer and/or relevant temperature changes [1]. It is therefore not only used in acute and chronic wound healing as it promotes perfusion, alleviates pain and has anti-infectious effects [2], but is also used in oncology [3] and rheumatology [4].

Objectives:

We conducted a randomized controlled trial with a follow-up visit after 2 weeks to evaluate the value of a high-frequent hyperthermia treatment using sl-wIRAR in comparison to a low-frequent hyperthermia treatment (our standard) in SSc patients with severe RS receiving Iloprost treatment.

Methods:

Eligible patients had SSc according to the 2013 ACR/EULAR classification criteria, were 18 to 80 years old and had RS requiring treatment with Iloprost in an in-patient setting. Key exclusion criteria were contraindications to any hyperthermia treatment such as infection or heat insensitivity. The trial was conducted at Campus Kerckhoff of Justus-Liebig University Giessen. Eligible patients were equally randomized to the intervention group (IG) receiving additional sl-wIRAR treatment (2 treatments for 30 min per day for 8 days) plus the standard of care (Iloprost treatment over 8 days plus daily carbon dioxide hand baths of 20 min) and the control group (CG) receiving only the standard of care. Primary outcome was the between-group difference in pain measured on a numeric rating scale (NRS) after intervention. Key secondary outcomes included a change in RS frequency, RS duration, and a change in Interleukin (IL) -6 and VEGF levels.

Results:

From 01.03.2020 to 31.12.2020 49 SSc patients met the inclusion criteria. 42 patients were enrolled (IG: 21, CG: 21). 38 patients (IG:19, CG: 19) completed the full trial period and were analyzed. There was no statistically significant between-group difference in pain levels (NRS) (p=0.284, Z -1.082 (Mann-Whitney U Test)) and thus the primary outcome was not met. Therefore, all p values for secondary outcomes are nominal. Intensity (Visual analogue scale 0-100mm) and duration (min) of RS were reduced in the IG (mean ± standard error) -14.579 ± 7.214 mm (p=0.058) and -2.917 ± 1.510 min (p=0.08), respectively. Intra- and inter-group comparison of IL-6 and VEGF levels showed no relevant change.

Conclusion:

The additive and frequent use of sl-wIRAR in the treatment of SSc patients with RS requiring Iloprost treatment does not improve outcomes regarding pain levels, RS intensity or frequency nor IL-6 and VEGF levels when compared to Iloprost treatment and low-frequent hyperthermia application.

References:

[1]Hoffmann G. Clinical applications of water-filtered infrared-A (wIRA) – a review. Phys Med Rehab Kuror. 2017;27(05):265–274.

[2]Hoffmann G, Harte M, Mercer JB. Heat for wounds – water-fil- tered infrared-a (wIRA) for wound healing – a review. GMS Ger Med Sci. 2016;14:Doc08.

[3]Notter M, Thomsen AR, Nitsche M, et al. Combined wIRA-hyperthermia and hypofractionated re-irradiation in the treatment of locally recurrent breast cancer: evaluation of therapeutic outcome based on a novel size classification. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(3): 606.

[4]Klemm P, Eichelmann M, Aykara I et al. Serial locally applied water-filtered infrared a radiation in axial spondyloarthritis – a randomized controlled trial, International Journal of Hyperthermia, 37:1, 965-970.

Acknowledgements:

We acknowledge the help of Carina Schreiyäck.

This study was in part supported by the Dr. med. h.c. Erwin Braun Foundation, Basel, a charitable, nonprofit Swiss scientific foundation approved by the Swiss Federal Administration. The foundation supports clinical investigation of waterfiltered infrared-A. The foundation was not involved in any content- or decision-related aspect of the study.

This study was prospectively registered at www.drks.de (German Registry of Clinical Studies): DRKS00021098

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

OP0283 DOES TNF-INHIBITION DECREASE THE RISK OF SEVERE COVID-19 IN RMD-PATIENTS?

Background:

Patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMD) might have an increased risk for infection due to their immunomodulatory treatment, secondary to their disease and comorbidities. Recent studies suggest a decreased risk of severe COVID-19 in RMD-patients treated with biologics.

Objectives:

The aim of this study was to assess courses of RMD patients treated with TNF-inhibitors (TNF-I) included in the German COVID-19 registry.

Methods:

In the German physician-reported COVID-19-RMD registry, patients with an RMD and confirmed SARS-CoV-2-infection were documented (data entered between March 30, 2020 and January 30, 2021). We analysed TNF-I treated patients, their course and outcome of the infection. Data were compared to RMD-patients treated with other immunomodulatory drugs (OID) than TNF-I.

Results:

A total of 269 patients were treated with a TNF-I (57% female) compared to 874 patients who were treated with OID (68% female). Median age was 52 years (range: 19-87) in the TNF-I-group versus 58 years (range: 18-91) in the OID-group. Rheumatoid arthritis was the most common diagnosis (38% in TNF-I-group vs. 52% in the OID-group), followed by ankylosing spondylitis (32% vs. 6%), psoriatic arthritis (22% vs. 11%) and other RMD (9% vs. 31%). Adalimumab (35%) and etanercept (35%) were the most frequently used TNF-I (tab. 1). Glucocorticoids (GC) were used in 22% of TNF-I-treated patients and in 42% of the OID-group.

Under TNF-I, stable disease was reported prior to the SARS-CoV-2-infection in 53% of the patients (OID-group: 47%), followed by low disease activity in 35% (OID: 34%), moderate disease activity in 6% (OID: 12%) and high disease activity in 4% (OID: 3%). Most frequent comorbidities were arterial hypertension (29% under TNF-I vs. 35% under OID), diabetes (8% vs. 11%) and cardiovascular diseases (7% vs. 12%).

The most common reported COVID-19 symptoms were dry cough (57% vs. 55%), fever (53% vs. 61%) and fatigue (50% vs. 49%). Hospitalization due to SARS-CoV infection was required in only 12% of the TNF-I-treated cases vs. in 29% in the OID-group. Oxygen treatment was necessary in 5% of the patients under TNF-I compared to 22% under OID and invasive ventilation in 2% in the TNF-I-group compared to 6% under OID. Most notably, no fatal courses of COVID-19 were reported among the 269 RMD-patients treated with TNF-I versus 49 deaths in the 874 cases (5.6%) treated with OID. Focussing on the hospitalizated TNF-I patients, the rate of concomitant GC use (p<0.001) and higher disease activity (p=0.005) was significant higher (tab.1).

Conclusion:

High or moderate RMD-disease activity is an important factor associated with severity of COVID-19 including mortality. In this large cohort RMD patients treated with TNF-I show a low hospitalisation rate and no fatal course. This is reassuring for patients and treating rheumatologists to use TNF-I to control RMD disease activity. The use of glucocorticoids and high disease activity seem to counteract possible protective effects of TNF-I.

Table 1.TNF inhibition (269)Other immunomodulation (874)Total patientsRate (%)Total patientsRate (%)Disease activitystable1415340847low933529934Moderate15610812High104293Comorbiditiescardiovascular diseases18710412arterial hypertension772930335bronchial asthma124657COPD/interstitial lung disease1148610chronic renal failure93779Osteoporosis135678Diabetes2289211COVID-19 related symptomsFever1425347855dry cough1525753061Expectoration3112839muscular pain973628032Fatigue1355042449Headache1013823727shortness of breath491824528no symptoms239566COVID-19 outcomeOutpatients2378861971Inpatients321225529need of oxygen treatment18718922invasive ventilation52496fatal course00496TNF inhibitorsAdalimumab9535Infliximab239Certolizumab3312Golimumab249Etanercept9435GC and disease activity in TNF-I treated patientsTNF-I inpatients treated with GC18/3256p< 0.001TNF-I outpatients treated with GC42/23718TNF-I inpatients with high disease activity4/3213TNF-I outpatients with high disease activity6/2376p= 0.005

Acknowledgements:

The authors would like to thank all physicians and personnel involved in the documentation of the cases in our registry.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

POS0015 PREVALENCE OF NEUROPATHIES IN RHEUMATIC AND MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASES

Background:

In rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs), peripheral neurons can be affected, which can result in sensory symptoms like pain, burning, tingling, numbness and motor symptoms like muscle-atrophy or even paresis. More detailed knowledge about the prevalence and the cause of neuropathy (NP) in RMD are urgently needed, especially as RMD patients may develop different subtypes of NP.

Objectives:

The aim of this project was to assess the prevalence and the individual types of NP in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondyloarthritis (SpA) and systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients, and to elucidate the clinical, neurophysiological and neuropathologic features of associated NP.

Methods:

Baseline questionnaires and neurological and physical examination were used to elucidate the presence of neuropathic pain and autonomic dysfunction. Laboratory tests were performed to exclude other causes for NP. Electrophysiological tests were performed to differentiate demyelinating from axonal large fiber (LF)NPs. Additionally, skin biopsies were used to detect an involvement of small fibres (SF).

Results:

A total of 31 patients (median age 64 years (range 43-75)) were included. The majority of patients were female (90%). The mean disease duration was 10 years (1-41 years). More than 50% of the patients were diagnosed with RA, 7 with SpA and 6 with SSc. Of 31 patients, 48% (15/31) had clinical signs of NP and of those, neurophysiological examination showed 14 axonal 2, demyelinating and 4 mixed types. A combined LFNP and SFNP was present in 35% (11/31) of the patients. In 4 patients, only a SFNP was detectable, and in only two patients, no NP was detectable.

Conclusion:

NP was detectable in 94% (29/31) of the RMD patients, with LFNP predominating. This high proportion of NP in RMD suggests a surprisingly high coincidence of both diseases.

Table 1.

Subtypes of NP in RMD

Number of patientsAxonal NP14/31 (45%)Demyelinating NP2/31 (6%)Mixed axonal and demyelinating NP4/31 (12%)Sensory NP9/31 (26%)Sensorimotor NP5/31 (10%)Motor NP1/31 (3%)

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared.

AB0204 THE PROPER STUDY: INTERIM ANALYSIS OF A PAN-EU REAL-WORLD STUDY OF SB5 BIOSIMILAR FOLLOWING TRANSITION FROM REFERENCE ADALIMUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS, AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS, OR PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS

Background:

SB5, a biosimilar to reference adalimumab (ADL), received EU marketing authorisation in August 2017, based on the totality of evidence from pre-clinical and clinical Phase I and III studies that demonstrated bioequivalence, similar efficacy, and comparable safety and immunogenicity to the reference. This real-world study provides data on outcomes of the transition from reference to biosimilar ADL outside the controlled, randomised, clinical trial setting.

Objectives:

To evaluate candidate predictors of persistence on SB5 in EU patients (pts) across multiple indications.

Methods:

This ongoing observational study enrolled 1000 pts with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), ulcerative colitis, or Crohn’s disease who initiated SB5 as part of routine clinical practice following a minimum of 16 weeks’ treatment with reference ADL, at clinics in Belgium, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Spain, and the UK. Data are captured from clinic records retrospectively for the 24 weeks prior to transition, and prospectively and/or retrospectively for 48 weeks following transition. Primary outcome measures include baseline clinical characteristics, disease activity scores and clinical management over time; data on COVID-19 infection has recently been captured. This interim analysis (IA) provides an overview of baseline characteristics, disease scores and dose regimen up to 48 weeks post-initiation of SB5, and COVID-19 infection reported to date, in subjects with RA, axSpA, or PsA enrolled at 35 specialist sites and followed up to the data extract date of 18th December 2020.

Results:

Of the 504 pts included in this IA, 201 have RA, 169 have PsA, and 134 axSpA. At time of data extract, 216 pts had completed 48 weeks on SB5, 73 pts had discontinued SB5, and 8 had discontinued the study.

RA (N=201)axSpA (N=134)PsA (N=169)Mean (SD)Q1, Q3Mean (SD)Q1, Q3Mean (SD)Q1, Q3Age at SB5 initiation (years)60.2 (11.7)53, 6850.5 (13.6)38, 6153.0 (12.2)43, 62Duration of disease (years)13.5 (11.7)4.5, 2018.7 (13.2)9, 2512.7 (9.9)4, 20n%n%n%Women14471.64130.67745.6SB5 Dosing regimen:Baseline 40 mg Q2W14974.112089.615692.3Week 48 40mg Q2W6977.56785.99892.5Baseline Other*5225.91410.4137.7Week 48 Other*2022.41114.187.5Disease Score(paired patients)DAS28FFbHBASDAITender Joint CountSwollen Joint CountBaseline, n, mean (95% CI)692.5 (2.3–2.7)2273.9 (65.6–82.1)422.8 (2.3–3.4)491.8 (0.1–3.0)490.6 (0.2–0.9)Week 48, n, mean (95% CI)692.6 (2.3–2.8)2272.1 (64.0–80.2)423.0 (2.4–3.7)491.9 (0.5–3.3)490.6 (0.1–1.1)Patient diagnosed with COVID-19 at any time on-study, n (%)No14295.39688.114098.6Yes32.010.910.7Unknown42.71211.010.7Imraldi regimen stopped or changed due to COVID-19, regardless of diagnosis, n (%)No13098.510697.2134100Yes21.532.800

SD standard deviation; Q1 1st quartile, Q3 3rd quartile; CI Confidence Interval

*Other includes all other reported doses and/or dosing intervals: 40mg QW, 80mg Q2W, and unspecified frequency

DAS28 Disease Activity Score 28; FFbH Hanover Functional Ability Questionnaire; BASDAI Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index

Conclusion:

This IA provides a first insight into clinical management of pts over 48 weeks, in a contemporary cohort of EU pts with established RA, axSpA and PsA, switched from reference to biosimilar ADL SB5 in clinical practice. The majority of pts showed no meaningful difference in disease score or dose regimen of SB5 by Week 48 post-transition. As of data extract date, the proportion of pts with a known positive COVID-19 test was low (1.3%) and a small minority (1.3%) had SB5 treatment changed or interrupted as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. With follow-up of pts ongoing to Q4 2021, the study will continue to provide pertinent information about clinical outcomes of transition from reference to biosimilar ADL in real-world practice and in indications not investigated in controlled studies.

Acknowledgements:

Statistical services gave been provided by FGK Clinical Research GmbH, Munich, Germany. Data management services were provided by Worldwide Clinical trial, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA; funding was provided by Biogen International GmbH.

Disclosure of Interests:

Ulf Müller-Ladner Consultant of: Biogen, Grant/research support from: Biogen, Karl Gaffney Consultant of: AbbVie, Celgene, Gilead, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Celgene, Gilead, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Deepak Jadon Consultant of: AbbVie, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Oxford University Press, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Oxford University Press, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, UCB, Ulrich Freudensprung Shareholder of: Biogen, Employee of: Biogen, Janet Addison Shareholder of: Biogen, Employee of: Biogen

POS0834 LONG-TERM OUTCOME OF SSC ASSOCIATED ILD: IMPROVED SURVIVAL IN PPI TREATED PATIENTS

Background:

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) occurs frequently in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and SSc-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD). PPI use has to been shown to improve survival in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, whereas to date there are no data on the use of PPI in SSc-ILD.

Objectives:

This study was aimed to assess whether use of PPI is associated with progression of SSc-ILD and survival.

Methods:

We retrospectively analysed 1931 patients with SSc and SSc-ILD from the German Network for Systemic Sclerosis (DNSS) database (2003 onwards). Kaplan–Meier analysis compared overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with vs. without GERD (SSc and SSc-ILD), and PPI vs. no PPI use (SSc-ILD only). Progression was defined as a decrease in either % predicted forced vital capacity ≥10% or single-breath diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide ≥15%, or death.

Results:

GERD was not associated with decreased OS or PFS in patients with either SSc or SSc-ILD. In patients with SSc-ILD, PPI use was associated with improved OS vs. no PPI use after 1 year (98.4% [95% confidence interval: 97.6–99.3]; n=760 vs. 90.8% [87.9–93.8]; n=290) and after 5 years (91.4% [89.2–93.8]; n=357 vs. 70.9% [65.2–77.1]; n=106; p<0.0001). PPI use was also associated with improved PFS vs. no PPI use after 1 year (95.9% [94.6–97.3]; n=745 vs. 86.4% [82.9–90.1]; n=278) and after 5 years (66.8% [63.0–70.8]; n=286 vs. 45.9% [39.6–53.2]; n=69; p<0.0001).

Conclusion:

GERD had no effect on survival in SSc or SSc-ILD. PPIs improved survival in patients with SSc-ILD; however, controlled, prospective trials are needed to confirm this finding.

Disclosure of Interests:

Michael Kreuter Speakers bureau: Boehringer, Consultant of: Boehringer, Grant/research support from: Boehringer, Francesco Bonella Speakers bureau: Boehringer, Roche, GSK, Consultant of: Boehringer, Roche, GSK, Grant/research support from: Boehringer, Kuhr Kathrin: None declared, Jörg Henes Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Boehringer, Chugai, Roche, Janssen, Novartis, SOBI, Pfizer and UCB, Consultant of: Boehringer, Celgene, Chugai, Roche, Janssen, Novartis, SOBI, Grant/research support from: Chugai, Roche, Janssen, Novartis, SOBI, Pfizer, Elise Siegert: None declared, Gabriela Riemekasten Speakers bureau: Novartis, Janssen, Roche, GSK, Boehringer, Consultant of: Janssen, Actelion, Boehringer, Norbert Blank Consultant of: Sobi, Novartis, Roche, UCB, MSD, Pfizer, Actelion, Abbvie, Boehringer, Grant/research support from: Novartis, Sobi, Christiane Pfeiffer: None declared, Ulf Müller-Ladner: None declared, Alexander Kreuter Speakers bureau: MSD, Boehringer, InfectoPharm, Paid instructor for: MSD, PETER KORSTEN Consultant of: Glaxo, Abbvie, Pfizer, BMS, Chugai, Sanofi, Lilly, Boehringer, Novartis, Grant/research support from: Glaxo, Aaron Juche: None declared, Marc Schmalzing Speakers bureau: Chugai Roche, Boehringer, Celgene, Medac, UCB, Paid instructor for: Novartis, Abbvie, Astra Zeneca, Chugai Roche, Janssen, Consultant of: Chugai Roche, Hexal Sandoz, Gilead, Abbvie, Janssen, Boehringer, Margitta Worm Speakers bureau: Boehringer, Ilona Jandova Speakers bureau: Boehringer, Novartis, Abbvie, Laura Susok Speakers bureau: MSD, Novartis, BMS, Sunpharma, Consultant of: MSD, Tim Schmeiser Consultant of: Abbvie, Boehringer, Novartis, UCB, Claudia Guenther Paid instructor for: Advisory Board Boehringer January 2020, Employee of: Novartis 2002-2005, Gernot Keyszer Consultant of: Boehringer, Jan Ehrchen Speakers bureau: Boehringer, Janssen, Chugai, Sobi, Employee of: Pfizer, Actelion (now Janssen), Andreas Ramming Speakers bureau: Boehringer, Gilead, Janssen, Pfizer, Roche, Consultant of: Boehringer, Pfizer, Grant/research support from: Novartis, Pfizer, Ina Kötter Speakers bureau: several companies, Consultant of: several companies, Grant/research support from: several companies, Hanns-Martin Lorenz Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Astra Zeneca, Actelion, Alexion Amgen, Bayer Vital, Baxter, Biogen, Boehringer, BMS, Celgene, Fresenius, Genzyme, GSK, Gilead, Hexal, Janssen, Lilly, Medac, MSD, Mundipharm, Mylan, Novartis, Octapharm, Pfizer, Roche Chugai, Sandoz, Sanofi, Shire SOBI, Thermo Fischer, UCB, Grant/research support from: basic research studies: Pfizer, Novartis, Abbvie, Gilead, Lilly, MSD, Roche Chugai, Pia Moinzadeh Speakers bureau: Boehringer, Actelion, Grant/research support from: Actelion, Nicolas Hunzelmann Speakers bureau: Boehringer Janssen, Roche, Sanofi, Consultant of: Boehringer

POS1492-HPR EVALUATION OF A VIRTUAL REALITY-BASED APPLICATION TO EDUCATE HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS AND MEDICAL STUDENTS ABOUT INFLAMMATORY ARTHRITIS

Background:

Inflammatory arthritides (IA), such as rheumatoid arthritis or psoriatic arthritis, are disorders that can be difficult to comprehend for health professionals and students in terms of the heterogeneity of clinical symptoms and pathologies. New didactic approaches using innovative technologies such as Virtual Reality (VR) applications could be helpful to demonstrate disease manifestations as well as joint pathologies in a more comprehensive way. However, the potential of using a VR education concept in IA has not yet been evaluated.

Objectives:

We evaluated the feasibility of a VR application to educate healthcare professionals and medical students about IA.

Methods:

We developed a VR application using IA patients data as well as two- and three-dimensional visualized pathological joints from X-ray and computed tomography generated images (1). This VR application (called Rheumality) allows the user to interact with representative arthritic joint and bone pathologies of IA patients (Figure 1 A, B). In a consensus meeting an online questionnaire was designed to collect basic demographic data (age, sex), profession of the participants, and their feedback on the general impression, knowledge gain and potential areas of application of the VR application. The VR application was subsequently tested and evaluated by healthcare professionals (physicians, researchers, and other healthcare professionals) and medical students at predefined events (two annual rheumatology conferences and academic teaching seminars at two sites in Germany).

Results:

125 individuals participated in this study (56% female, 43% male, 1% non-binary). 59% of the participants were between 18-30 years of age, 18% between 31-40, 10% between 41-50, 8% between 51-60 and 5% were between 61-70. Of the participants, 50 were physicians, five researchers and four other health care professionals, the remaining were medical students (66). The participants rated the application as excellent (Figure 1 C, D), the mean rating of the VR application was 9.0/10 (SD 1.2) and many participants would recommend the use of the application, with a mean recommendation score of 3.2/4 (SD 1.1). A large majority stated that the presentation of pathological bone formation improves the understanding of the disease (120 out of 125 (96%)).

Conclusion:

The data show that IA-targeting innovative teaching approaches based on VR technology are feasible. The use of VR applications enables a disease-specific knowledge visualization and may add a new educational pillar to conventional educational approaches.

References:

[1]Kleyer A et al. Z Rheumatol 78, 112–115 (2019)

Figure 1.

Illustration of the VR application and evaluation results

Two- and three-dimensional visualized pathological joints from X-ray and computed tomography generated images in a patient with long-standing (inadequately treated) RA (A) and a patient with early RA (B). Overall rating (range 0-10) on the VR application divided into four different professional subgroups (C); recommendations of VR application in the four different professional subgroups (D). HC, health care professionals; Boxplot explanation: Crossbars represent medians, whiskers represent 5-95 percentiles (points below the whiskers are drawn as individual points), box always extends from the 25th to 75th percentiles (hinges of the plot).

Disclosure of Interests:

Philipp Klemm Consultant of: Lilly Deutschland GmbH, Arnd Kleyer Speakers bureau: Lilly Deutschland GmbH, Consultant of: Lilly Deutschland GmbH, Grant/research support from: Lilly Deutschland GmbH, Koray Tascilar: None declared, Louis Schuster: None declared, Timo Meinderink: None declared, Florian Steiger: None declared, Uwe Lange: None declared, Ulf Müller-Ladner: None declared, Johannes Knitza Speakers bureau: Lilly Deutschland GmbH, Philipp Sewerin Speakers bureau: Lilly Deutschland GmbH, Paid instructor for: Lilly Deutschland GmbH, Johanna Mucke Consultant of: Lilly Deutschland GmbH, Alexander Pfeil Speakers bureau: Lilly Deutschland GmbH, Paid instructor for: Lilly Deutschland GmbH, Consultant of: Lilly Deutschland GmbH, Georg Schett: None declared, Fabian Hartmann Consultant of: Lilly Deutschland GmbH, Axel Hueber Consultant of: Lilly Deutschland GmbH, Grant/research support from: Lilly Deutschland GmbH, David Simon Speakers bureau: Lilly Deutschland GmbH, Paid instructor for: Lilly Deutschland GmbH, Consultant of: Lilly Deutschland GmbH, Grant/research support from: Lilly Deutschland GmbH

AB0044 ENDOTHELIAL CELL AND RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS SYNOVIAL FIBROBLAST MIGRATION AND ADHESION ARE ALTERED BY ACTIVIN/FOLLISTATIN

Background:

Activin A and follistatin belong to an anti-inflammatory auto-regulatory cycle. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have increased activin A levels in the synovial fluid and tissue. During inflammation, activin A is released systemically, then inducing its antagonist follistatin. This negative feedback is active in different cell types but not RA synovial fibroblasts (SF). Fibroblasts interact with endothelial cells in inflamed tissues inducing angiogenesis.

Objectives:

Evaluation of the role of activin A and follistatin on RASF and endothelial cell interactions.

Methods:

RA synovium was used for RASF isolation, HUVEC were commercially obtained. RASF and HUVEC were stimulated in mono- and coculture. Direct: RASF together with HUVEC; indirect: inserts with HUVEC separated by a membrane from RASF. Stimuli: activin A 15ng/ml, follistatin 500ng/ml, IL-1β 1ng/ml. Proliferation was analyzed by BrdU assay. RASF were Calcein-AM stained. Cells were transferred to 24-well plates after 18h stimulation. After adhesion for 1h, non-adherent cells were removed by shaking 3x for 5 min. Afterwards, fluorescent cells were quantified. For the flow-adhesion assay, HUVEC were cultured on rattail collagen coated capillary slides. HUVEC and RASF were stimulated for 4h with TNFα, TNFα+activin A or TNFα+follistatin. After stimulation, 2x10^6 RASF were resuspended in 20ml medium and sent through the capillaries. Two 1min videos were recorded (18.4ml/h, 30.5ml/h). Settings: TNFα-stimulated RASF on HUVEC stimulated wit TNFα or activin A+TNFα or follistatin+ TNFα. For migration assays, 2% FCS medium with 1x10^5 cells were placed in inserts (8µm membrane) into wells with 10% FCS (control: 2%FCS vs. 2%FCS) and stimulated with, IL-1, IL-1+activinA and IL-1+follistatin. After 16h, migrated cells were quantified. For scratch-assay 4x10^5 cells were cultured overnight, then cells were scratched and stimulated, afterwards 3 pictures per scratch were taken at start, after 10h and every 1.5h. Cells migrating into the scratch area were quantified.

Results:

IL-1 induced activin A in RASF and HUVEC in all settings. IL-1-induced activin A release was reduced by follistatin in HUVEC monoculture and both cocultures compared to IL-1 alone but not in RASF monoculture. IL-1-induced IL-6 release was reduced by activin A in HUVEC and indirect coculture but not in RASF monoculture and direct coculture. Follistatin did not alter IL-6 responses. IL-1 induced VEGF in RASF but not in HUVEC and was not altered by activin A. Short-term adhesion showed no significant influence of activin A or follistatin (n=4). Flow adhesion assay showed reduced adherence/rolling of RASF on HUVEC stimulated with TNFα and activin A (n=4). Migration assays showed that IL-1 decreased migration but without significant difference between the induced effects mediated by IL-1+activinA and IL-1+follistatin (n=4). Scratch assay showed increased migration in dicrect coculture with greater difference between stimulated and unstimulated cells in RASF monoculture and indirect coculture (n=4). Proliferation was not altered by activin A or follistatin.

Conclusion:

In direct and indirect coculture of HUVEC with RASF the effect on HUVEC was dominant leading to reduced IL-1-induced activin A release. However, the IL-1-induced IL-6 release in RASF or HUVECs was decreased by activin A in HUVEC monoculture and indirect coculture but not during cell-contact between both cell types. The direct interaction of RASF with HUVEC seems to prevent the reducing activin A effect on IL-6 release in HUVECs. Activin A seems to not to have an impact on short-term cell adhesion but first observations show, that activin A alters selectin-mediated adhesion under flow conditions. The migration assay shows that IL-1-induced effects on cell migration were enhanced by activin A and follistatin. Migration assay shows that IL-1-induced decrease on migration more prominent in indirect coculture and RASF monoculture than in direct coculture although in gap migration in the scratch assay was highest in direct coculture.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

POS1261 DISEASE ACTIVITY AND PAIN LEVELS ARE NOT INFLUENCED BY THE CURRENT COVID19 PANDEMIC IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATIC DISEASES IN GERMANY – DATA FROM THE GERMAN COVID-19 PATIENT SURVEY

Background:

The current pandemic constitutes an entirely new situation for patients as well as physicians. The insecurity of the early phase, shutdowns, increasing infection rate and appearing SARS-CoV2 mutations have created a situation that makes live difficult especially for chronic diseases i.e. patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMD) and their treating physicians. The psychosocial burden that is created by this special situation is completely unknown and is estimated to be higher in patients than in the general population.

Objectives:

In order to measure the impact on our patients, the German COVID19-Rheuma patient survey was set up in April 2020, during Germany’s first shut down.

Methods:

The German COVID19-Rheuma patient survey is a patient reported longitudinal online survey where patients with RMD who registered between April and July 2020 are asked on a monthly base using an online survey on social, personal, medical factors, whether a COVID19 infection occurred, isolation measures were changed and scores regarding stress and anxiety are recorded. Between April and July 2020, 637 patients registered and completed a first survey. Up to January 2021, about 400 patients are still enrolled.

Here we present an interim analysis of the first 6 months regarding patients that were enrolled in April and May during the first shut-down. This first analysis compares the situation in the first lockdown to July, a phase with very low infection numbers in Germany, and to November, the beginning of the second lockdown.

Results:

150 patients (87% female) were enrolled in April/early May 2020. Mean age was 48 years (range 11-89). The majority of patients suffered from rheumatoid arthritis (51%), followed by psoriatic arthritis (17%), other spondyloarthropathies (10%) and connective tissue diseases (10%).

The majority of patients received antirheumatic therapies: 32% glucocorticoids (GC), 31% cDMARDs, 21% TNF inhibitors, 7% Jak inhibitors, and 9% other biologicals. Of the patients treated with GC, 25% were on GC monotherapy.

In the first lockdown, 26% of patients were working remotely and 24% were self-isolating (doubles included). Additionally, 48% were using masks that were not mandatory at that time and 41% were using disinfection in a regular manner. The rates for remote work and self-isolation did not change significantly over time while the mask use increased to 98% with the official obligation to do so. The use of disinfectants increased to 88% in November.

Regarding disease activity, no change in patient global assessment could be observed over time (4.3 ± 2.5 vs. 4.0 ±2.6 and 4.0 ± 2.5). Self-reported pain was also stable over time as were sleep disturbances. While 48.2% of patients who were receiving physiotherapy paused in April, only 10 and 14% did so in July and November, respectively. 11% of the patients paused their medication in the first lockdown, whereas only 2.75% did so in July and 3.4% in November. Contact with the treating rheumatologist was maintained over time in the majority of cases.

Conclusion:

While in the beginning of the pandemic the insecurity was considerable and the concern that the fear for infection would lead to inadequately treated patients with RMDs, we here show for the first time that on the one hand our patients were timely in taking adequate measures to keep themselves safe (e.g. self-isolating, mask use) and adapted to the clinical situation in not pausing their medication. Altogether, in this alert cohort, the pandemic did not lead to an increase of patient-reported disease activity in the first six months.

Acknowledgements:

Thanks goes to all patients who participated in the study.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

OP0075 EVALUATION OF A VIRTUAL REALITY TEACHING CONCEPT FOR MEDICAL STUDENTS DURING THE SARS-COV-2 PANDEMIC

Background:

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted face-to-face teaching of medical students and forced efforts in finding alternative approaches. In order to help maintain high-quality education, a new virtual reality (VR)-based concept for training medical students in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMD) has been developed. This VR training concept is based on the integration of real patient data with two- and three-dimensional visualized pathological joints from X-ray and computed tomography generated images.

Objectives:

To evaluate the practicability and acceptance of the VR training application in the digital curricular education of medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods:

A short refresher lecture on rheumatic diseases (duration 60 minutes) was followed by presenting the VR training concept to the students. The VR training concept included the demonstration of three virtual patients with early rheumatoid arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis psoriatic arthritis regarding the symptoms, current medical problems, disease patterns at the imaging (conventional radiographs and high-resolution computed tomography) and therapy options. The practicability and acceptance of the VR was evaluated by medical students using a survey.

Results:

The study encompassed 237 medical students (163 female, 73 male, one diverse, age range 20 to 40 years). 72 % of the participants rated the virtual teaching as good or very good. 87 % presented an expanded knowledge for rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis through the VR. Moreover, 91 % reported that the lecture provided a deeper understanding of RMD. Furthermore, 60 % of the students asked for additional courses by VR.

Conclusion:

The study highlighted the usefulness of innovative VR tools for teaching medical students digitally about RMD. VR applications can be a complementary educational modality for medical students, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, to provide students with the best possible clinical experience while ensuring that patient, student, and staff safety is not compromised.

Figure 1.

A Screen view of virtual reality included three virtual patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA), RA, and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and B demonstration of structural damage in RA and PsA using hand X-ray and high-resolution quantitative computed tomography images.

Disclosure of Interests:

Alexander Pfeil Speakers bureau: Lilly Pharma Deutschland GmbH, Franz Marcus: None declared, Tobias Hoffmann: None declared, Philipp Klemm Consultant of: Lilly Pharma Deutschland GmbH, Peter Oelzner: None declared, Ulf Müller-Ladner Consultant of: Lilly Pharma Deutschland GmbH, Axel Hueber Consultant of: Lilly Pharma Deutschland GmbH, Uwe Lange: None declared, Gunter Wolf: None declared, Georg Schett: None declared, David Simon Consultant of: Lilly Pharma Deutschland GmbH, Arnd Kleyer Consultant of: Lilly Pharma Deutschland GmbH

POS0316 MODELLING SHORT-TERM FVC CHANGES FROM SENSCIS TO LONG-TERM FVC COURSE IN SSc-ILD DEMONSTRATES CLINICALLY MEANINGFUL REDUCTION OF FVC DECLINE AND SURVIVAL BENEFITS

Background:

Nintedanib has shown to slow FVC decline by 41ml over 52 weeks in systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD). However, the long-term effect of nintedanib treatment on ILD progression and mortality in SSc patients is so far unknown.

Objectives:

Here, the 52-week treatment efficacy of nintedanib was modeled and extrapolated on the long-term FVC course and survival in SSc-ILD patients from the European Scleroderma Trial and Research (EUSTAR) database.

Methods:

SSc patients from the EUSTAR database fulfilling the inclusion criteria of the SENSCIS trial (SSc classification criteria, ILD confirmed by imaging, disease duration of <7 years, FVC≥40%pred, diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) 30-89%pred); and matched for baseline characteristics as well as matched for the 52-week FVC change of SENSCIS patients were included (n=236). Linear mixed models including time, risk factors at baseline (sex, age, dyspnea class, DLCO%, CRP, modified Rodnan skin score, SSc subtype, SSc auto-antibodies, disease duration, synovitis and muscle weakness) were used to estimate the natural FVC course over time. On this natural course of FVC, the observed effect from the SENSCIS trial representing the absolute 52-week difference of FVC decline between the nintedanib and the placebo group was applied as continuous annual effect (SENSCIS effect model). Survival was estimated for both the natural course as well as the SENSCIS effect model using Cox regression.

Results:

Of the 236 included patients, 75% were females, 65% had diffuse cutaneous SSc. Mean age was 50.6 years, mean FVC 78.2%pred and DLCO 56.3%pred at time of inclusion. Mean FVC change after 12±3 months was -2.3 ±6.9%pred. These parameters were largely similar to the characteristics of the SENSCIS population.

In the longitudinal follow up of this population, the natural course of FVC showed a total FVC decline of -16.3%pred over 5 years. With assumed SENSCIS effects (effects of nintedanib treatment reported in SENSCIS), the 5-year FVC decline was reduced to -10.3%pred (Figure 1).

The reduced FVC progression translated into an improved survival. The natural 5-year survival of this SSc-ILD population was 88.2%. When extrapolating also a severe FVC decline early in the course, frequently terminated by early mortality of SSc patients excluding them from long-term outcome assessment, the estimated 5-year survival was reduced to 81.6%. When the SENSCIS effects on FVC were considered, the 5-year extrapolated survival was increased to 86.3% (Figure 2).

Conclusion:

Long-term experience of nintedanib treatment in SSc-ILD patients is lacking so far, therefore we modeled and extrapolated the 52-week treatment efficacy of nintedanib on the long-term FVC course and survival in SSc-ILD patients from the EUSTAR database. We could demonstrate a significant reduction of FVC decline by extrapolating the annual treatment effects of nintedanib from the SENSCIS trial from 1 to 5 years in EUSTAR. Translating these reductions of FVC decline into survival, the 5-year mortality rate was reduced from 18% to 13%.

Disclosure of Interests:

Anna-Maria Hoffmann-Vold Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Actelion, Roche, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Lilly, Consultant of: Actelion, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Bayer, Merck Sharp & Dohme, ARXX, Lilly and Medscape, Grant/research support from: Boehringer Ingelheim, Dörte Huscher: None declared, Paolo Airò Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Consultant of: Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Novartis, Elisabetta Zanatta Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Actelion, GSK, Paid instructor for: GSK, Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, Patricia Carreira Speakers bureau: Actelion, Boehringer Ingellheim, Janssen, GSK, Paid instructor for: Boehringer Ingelheim, Consultant of: AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, VivaCell, Emerald Health Pharmaceuticals, Gesynta Pharma, Sanofi Genzyme, Grant/research support from: Roche, GSK, Yannick Allanore Consultant of: Honorarium received from Boehringer, Medsenic

Sanofi, Menarini, Grant/research support from: Grants received from Alpine, Ose Immunogenetics, Ulf Müller-Ladner Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Alessandro Giollo: None declared, Maria Rosa Pozzi: None declared, CAROLINA SOUZA MULLER Speakers bureau: Boehinger Ingelheim, Janssen, Roche, LIBBS, Bristol-Myers-Squib, Radim Bečvář Consultant of: Actelion, Boehringer Ingelheim, Michele Iudici: None declared, Dominik Majewski Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim - 2 x paid as a speaker, Armando Gabrielli Grant/research support from: Pfizer, CSL Behring, Margarida Alves Employee of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Nils Schoof Employee of: Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Oliver Distler Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Medscape, IQone, Roche, Consultant of: Abbvie, Acceleron Pharma, Amgen, AnaMar, Arxx Therapeutics, Baecon Discovery, Blade Therapeutics, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, ChemomAb, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, CSL Behring, Galapagos NV, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, GSK, Horizon (Curzion) Pharmaceuticals, Inventiva, iQvia, Italfarmaco, Kymera Therapeutics, Lilly, Medac, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Serodapharm, Topadur, Target Bioscience and UCB, Grant/research support from: Kymera Therapeutics, Mitsubishi Tanabe

Associations of baseline use of biologic or targeted synthetic DMARDs with COVID-19 severity in rheumatoid arthritis: Results from the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance physician registry

Objective

To investigate baseline use of biologic or targeted synthetic (b/ts) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and COVID-19 outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods

We analysed the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance physician registry (from 24 March 2020 to 12 April 2021). We investigated b/tsDMARD use for RA at the clinical onset of COVID-19 (baseline): abatacept (ABA), rituximab (RTX), Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi), interleukin 6 inhibitors (IL-6i) or tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi, reference group). The ordinal COVID-19 severity outcome was (1) no hospitalisation, (2) hospitalisation without oxygen, (3) hospitalisation with oxygen/ventilation or (4) death. We used ordinal logistic regression to estimate the OR (odds of being one level higher on the ordinal outcome) for each drug class compared with TNFi, adjusting for potential baseline confounders.

Results

Of 2869 people with RA (mean age 56.7 years, 80.8% female) on b/tsDMARD at the onset of COVID-19, there were 237 on ABA, 364 on RTX, 317 on IL-6i, 563 on JAKi and 1388 on TNFi. Overall, 613 (21%) were hospitalised and 157 (5.5%) died. RTX (OR 4.15, 95% CI 3.16 to 5.44) and JAKi (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.60 to 2.65) were each associated with worse COVID-19 severity compared with TNFi. There were no associations between ABA or IL6i and COVID-19 severity.

Conclusions

People with RA treated with RTX or JAKi had worse COVID-19 severity than those on TNFi. The strong association of RTX and JAKi use with poor COVID-19 outcomes highlights prioritisation of risk mitigation strategies for these people.

Representativeness of Systemic Sclerosis Patients in Interventional Randomized Trials: an analysis of the EUSTAR database

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the extent of and the reasons for ineligibility in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients included in the EUSTAR database, and to determine the association between patient's features and generalizability of study results.

METHODS

We searched Clinicaltrials.gov for all records on interventional SSc-RCTs registered from January 2013 to January 2018. Two reviewers selected studies, and information on the main trial features were retrieved. Data from 8046 patients having a visit in the EUSTAR database since 2013 were used to check patient's eligibility. The proportion of potentially eligible patients per trial, and the risk factors for ineligibility were analyzed. Complete-, worst- and best-case analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Of the 37 RCTs included, 43% were conducted in Europe, 35% were industry-funded, and 87% investigated pharmacological treatments. Ninety-one percent of 8046 patients included could have participated in at least one RCT. In complete-case analysis, the median [range] proportion of eligible patients having the main organ complication targeted by each study was 60% [10-100] in the overall sample of trials, ranging from 50% [32-79] for trials on skin fibrosis to 90% [34-77] for those targeting Raynaud's phenomenon. Among the criteria checked, treatment- and safety-related but not demographic were the main barriers to patient's recruitment. Older age, absence of Raynaud's phenomenon, and lower mRSS were independently associated with the failure to fulfill criteria for any of the included studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient's representativeness in SSc-RCTs is highly variable and is driven more by treatment- and safety-related rather than demographic criteria.

A Virtual Reality-Based App to Educate Health Care Professionals and Medical Students About Inflammatory Arthritis: Feasibility Study

Background

Inflammatory arthritides (IA) such as rheumatoid arthritis or psoriatic arthritis are disorders that can be difficult to comprehend for health professionals and students in terms of the heterogeneity of clinical symptoms and pathologies. New didactic approaches using innovative technologies such as virtual reality (VR) apps could be helpful to demonstrate disease manifestations as well as joint pathologies in a more comprehensive manner. However, the potential of using a VR education concept in IA has not yet been evaluated.

Objective

We evaluated the feasibility of a VR app to educate health care professionals and medical students about IA.

Methods

We developed a VR app using data from IA patients as well as 2D and 3D-visualized pathological joints from X-ray and computed tomography–generated images. This VR app (Rheumality) allows the user to interact with representative arthritic joint and bone pathologies of patients with IA. In a consensus meeting, an online questionnaire was designed to collect basic demographic data (age, sex); profession of the participants; and their feedback on the general impression, knowledge gain, and potential areas of application of the VR app. The VR app was subsequently tested and evaluated by health care professionals (physicians, researchers, and other professionals) and medical students at predefined events (two annual rheumatology conferences and academic teaching seminars at two sites in Germany). To explore associations between categorical variables, the χ² or Fisher test was used as appropriate. Two-sided P values ≤.05 were regarded as significant.

Results

A total of 125 individuals participated in this study. Among them, 56% of the participants identified as female, 43% identified as male, and 1% identified as nonbinary; 59% of the participants were 18-30 years of age, 18% were 31-40 years old, 10% were 41-50 years old, 8% were 51-60 years old, and 5% were 61-70 years old. The participants (N=125) rated the VR app as excellent, with a mean rating of 9.0 (SD 1.2) out of 10, and many participants would recommend use of the app, with a mean recommendation score of 3.2 (SD 1.1) out of 4. A large majority (120/125, 96.0%) stated that the presentation of pathological bone formation improves understanding of the disease. We did not find any association between participant characteristics and evaluation of the VR experience or recommendation scores.

Conclusions

The data show that IA-targeting innovative teaching approaches based on VR technology are feasible.

Compensation of Adiponectin-Induced Adenosine Monophosphate-Activated Protein Kinase and p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Signaling in Rheumatoid Arthritis Synovial Fibroblasts

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disorder marked by synovitis, ultimately leading to cartilage and bone destruction. In RA, adiponectin levels are increased in serum and synovial fluid. Adiponectin belongs to the adipokines, a group of highly bioactive substances secreted by adipocytes and other cell types. It has been shown to induce the production of proinflammatory and prodestructive factors by human RA synovial fibroblasts (RASF), suggesting a role in the pathophysiology of the disease. Although adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) are known to be involved in adiponectin signaling in RASF, no literature is available about whether the different adiponectin isoforms affect AMPK and p38 MAPK signaling in the same manner. In this study, we elucidated the signaling mechanisms in RASF, activated in response to selective stimulation with the 2 biologically most potent adiponectin isoforms, and possible approaches to inhibit adiponectin-mediated effects in RASF. All adiponectin isoforms induced p38 MAPK and AMPK phosphorylation to various degrees. Blocking AMPK activation increased p38 MAPK phosphorylation, while blocking p38 MAPK activation increased AMPK phosphorylation, both independent of the effect of adiponectin. Neither AMPKα1 nor AMPKα2 knockdown reduced interleukin (IL)-6/IL-8 release. Targeting transforming growth factor-activated kinase 1 (TAK1), a signaling molecule upstream of p38 MAPK, reduced the IL-6/IL-8 release. Taken together, our study showed that, in the case of adiponectin isoforms, inhibiting the p38 MAPK or the AMPK signaling pathway individually is not sufficient, probably due to compensatory interactions between these pathways. TAK1 might provide an alternative approach by ameliorating the proinflammatory effects of adiponectin in RA. Our results do not suggest that targeting individual adiponectin isoforms specifically in RA would provide a benefit over targeting adiponectin as a whole. However, whether targeting individual adiponectin isoforms would allow minimizing the loss of the beneficial effects of adiponectin within the metabolic and cardiovascular system still needs further investigation.

[The effect of obesity on disease activity of inflammatory rheumatic diseases]

One of the most recent scientific fields is the interaction between the immune system and metabolic processes. These interactions increasingly involve intracellular and extracellular signaling molecules and their receptors as well as molecular mechanisms that are used by both systems. The result of these intensive interactions is characterized by the term "metaflammation" and involves in particular, the ubiquitous adipose tissue present throughout the body. The links identified to date between the immune system and metabolism play a greater role in inflammatory rheumatic joint diseases than previously thought. In general, a markedly high body mass index (BMI) in particular, is associated with increased inflammatory activity and this is independent of the underlying disease entity. A higher BMI at the beginning of an immunomodulatory therapy also causes a more difficult response to the medication. Thus, the current scientific objective is to identify the individual "immuno-metabolic" pathways in order to apply the medications specifically to the site of action. Furthermore, all newer therapeutic agents, especially those specifically acting against individual immunological molecules, should be systematically analyzed with respect to their metabolic concomitant effects and their influence on metabolic comorbidities.

Patient Reported Outcomes in Chronic Inflammatory Diseases: Current State, Limitations and Perspectives

Chronic inflammatory diseases (CID) are emerging disorders which do not only affect specific organs with respective clinical symptoms but can also affect various aspects of life, such as emotional distress, anxiety, fatigue and quality of life. These facets of chronic disease are often not recognized in the therapy of CID patients. Furthermore, the symptoms and patient-reported outcomes often do not correlate well with the actual inflammatory burden. The discrepancy between patient-reported symptoms and objectively assessed disease activity can indeed be instructive for the treating physician to draw an integrative picture of an individual's disease course. This poses a challenge for the design of novel, more comprehensive disease assessments. In this mini-review, we report on the currently available patient-reported outcomes, the unmet needs in the field of chronic inflammatory diseases and the challenges of addressing these.

The Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Fibrosis

BACKGROUND

The different types of pulmonary fibrosis are a subgroup of the interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). They are associated with a chronic and often progressive course.

METHODS

This review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective search in the EMBASE and PubMed databases, with an emphasis on articles published from 2000 to 2020.

RESULTS

The most common type of pulmonary fibrosis is idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Among other relevant types, the most important ones are fibrosing hypersensitivity pneumonitis (fHP) and ILDs associated with systemic diseases, all of which are rare and generally carry a poor prognosis. The essential prerequisite to accurate diagnosis is aninterdisciplinary approach, taking account of the clinical, histological, and radiological aspects. The main complications of pulmonary fibrosis are acute exacerbations and pulmonary hypertension; comorbidities are also of prognostic relevance. Treatment of pulmonary fibrosis depends on the subtype and clinical behavior. For IPF, antifibrotic therapy is indicated; fHP, on the other hand, is mainly treated by antigen avoidance and immune modulation. The predominant mode of treatment for systemic disease-associated pulmonary fibrosis is immune suppression. Antifibrotic agents can also be useful in the treatment of other types of progressivepulmonary fibrosis besides IPF.

CONCLUSION

The differential diagnosis of pulmonary fibrosis, though complex, is clinically essential, as different types of pulmonary fibrosis are treated differently.

The Key Comorbidities in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Narrative Review

Comorbidities in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are often associated with poor health outcomes and increased mortality. Treatment decisions should take into account these comorbidities due to known or suspected associations with certain drug classes. In clinical practice, it is critical to balance potential treatment benefit against the possible risks for comorbidities as well as the articular manifestations of RA. This review summarises the current literature relating to prevalence and risk factors for the important comorbidities of cardiovascular disease, infections, lymphomas and nonmelanoma skin cancers in patients with RA. The impact on patient outcomes and the interplay between these comorbidities and the therapeutic options currently available, including tumour necrosis factor inhibitors and newer biological therapies, are also explored. As newer RA therapies are developed, and patients gain wider and earlier access to advanced therapies, in part due to the emergence of biosimilars, it is important to consider the prevention or treatment of comorbidities as part of the overall management of RA.

Incidence and risk factors for gangrene in patients with systemic sclerosis from the EUSTAR cohort

OBJECTIVE

In patients with SSc, peripheral vasculopathy can promote critical ischaemia and gangrene. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence, incidence and risk factors for gangrene in the EUSTAR cohort.

METHODS

We included patients from the EUSTAR database fulfilling the ACR 1980 or the ACR/EULAR 2013 classification criteria for SSc, with at least one visit recording data on gangrene. Centres were asked for supplementary data on traditional cardiovascular risk factors. We analysed the cross-sectional relationship between gangrene and its potential risk factors by univariable and multivariable logistic regression. Longitudinal data were analysed by Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

1757 patients were analysed (age 55.9 [14.5] years, disease duration 7.9 [10.3] years, male sex 16.7%, 24.6% diffuse cutaneous subset [dcSSc]). At inclusion, 8.9% of patients had current or previous digital gangrene, 16.1% had current digital ulcers (DUs) and 42.7% had ever had DUs (current or previous). Older age, DUs ever and dcSSc were statistically significant risk factors for gangrene in the cross-sectional multivariable model. During a median follow-up of 13.1 months, 16/771 (0.9%) patients developed gangrene. All 16 patients who developed gangrene had previously had DUs and gangrene. Further risk factors for incident gangrene were the dcSSc subset and longer disease duration.

CONCLUSION

In unselected SSc patients, gangrene occurs in about 9% of SSc patients. DUs ever and, to a lesser extent, the dcSSc subset are strongly and independently associated with gangrene, while traditional cardiovascular risk factors could not be identified as risk factors.

Serial whole-body cryotherapy in fibromyalgia is effective and alters cytokine profiles

Introduction

Whole-body cryotherapy (WBC) has shown to be beneficial in the treatment of fibromyalgia (FM). There is cumulative evidence that cytokines play a crucial role in FM. It’s unknown whether clinical effects of WBC can be demonstrated at the molecular level and how long the effects last.

Methods

We compared effects of serial WBC (6 sessions (− 130 °C in 6 weeks) in FM patients and healthy controls (HC). Primary outcome was the change in pain level (visual analogue scale 0–100 mm) after 6 sessions. Secondary outcomes were a change in disease activity (revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire) and pain after 3 sessions and 3 months after discontinued therapy and in cytokine levels (interleukin (IL-)1, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and IL-10). The patients’ opinions on the satisfaction, effectiveness and significance of WBC were evaluated.

Results

Twenty-three FM patients and 30 HC were enrolled. WBC resulted in a significant reduction in pain and disease activity after 3 and 6 sessions. No clinical benefit could be measured 3 months after discontinued treatment. Overall, probands were satisfied with WBC and considered WBC to be important and effective. FM patients had significantly different levels of IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α and IL-10 at each reading point compared to HC. Levels of IL-1, IL-6 and IL-10 were significantly altered over time in FM patients. Compared to HC FM patients showed a significantly different response of IL1, − 6 and − 10 to WBC.

Conclusion

Serial WBC is a fast acting and effective treatment for FM. Proven effects of WBC may be explained by changes in cytokines.

Case report of severe PCR-confirmed COVID-19 myocarditis in a European patient manifesting in mid January 2020

Background

Viral genesis is the most common cause of myocarditis. COVID-19-associated myocarditis seems to be a notable extrapulmonary manifestation, which may result in the need for a different treatment. There has been no positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing of SARS-CoV-2 in heart specimens, thus far.

Case summary

A 48-year-old male patient presented with fever, dyspnoea, and haemoptysis. Laboratory findings showed highly elevated inflammatory and cardiac damage markers. Thoracic computed tomography (CT) revealed bilateral, patchy peripheral ground-glass opacities with a crazy-paving pattern, focal consolidations, and mild pleural effusions. Cardiac imaging with echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) detected a reduced biventricular function. MRI additionally showed myocardial oedema and late gadolinium enhancement. Lung and heart biopsies were performed, revealing alveolitis with necrosis and acute lymphocytic myocarditis. Testing for usual cardiotropic viruses was negative, and no aspects of vasculitis or granuloma could be found. Due to fulfilling the criteria, the patient was diagnosed with rheumatic vasculitis. Treatment with cyclophosphamide and steroids was initiated. Later, the patient reported a history of travel to Tyrol in mid January. Consequently, PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 was performed, which was positive in the heart specimen. Immunosuppressive treatment was discontinued. During a follow-up visit at the end of April, the patient's recovery was stable.

Discussion

In COVID-19 infections, myocardial inflammation can be present as an extrapulmonary manifestation. Positive PCR testing confirms myocardial invasion of the virus. Imaging and laboratory studies correlate with the histopathological findings, and thus should be performed in COVID-19 patients who are suspicious for myocarditis. Supportive treatment with steroids may be useful in these patients.

Role of adipokines in systemic sclerosis pathogenesis

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a chronic autoimmune connective tissue disease with manifestations in multiple organs, including the skin, lung, heart, joints, gastrointestinal tract, kidney, and liver. Its pathophysiology is characterized by inflammation, fibrosis, and vascular damage, with an increased expression of numerous cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors. However, besides these growth factors and cytokines, another group of molecules may be involved in the pathogenesis of SSc: the adipokines. Adipokines are proteins with metabolic and cytokine-like properties, which were originally found to be expressed by adipose tissue. However, their expression is not limited to this tissue, and they can also be found in other organs. Therefore, this review will describe the current knowledge regarding adipokines in the context of SSc and try to elucidate their potential role in the pathogenesis of SSc.