Effect of different mucosal and acrylic resin surface treatments in a denture retention model for patients with radiotherapy-induced xerostomia

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of oral moisturizing agents, denture adhesives, and surface treatments on the retention of an acrylic resin test base dislodged from the maxillary alveolar ridges of xerostomic radiotherapy patients. Acrylic resin test bases prepared for 10 edentulous xerostomia patients were subjected to 8 surface treatment methods: method 1 = untreated dry surface; method 2 = use of Biotène oral moisturizer; method 3 = use of Protefix denture adhesive; method 4 = combination of Biotène and Protefix; method 5 = sandblasting of test bases; method 6 = use of Biotène on sandblasted surface; method 7 = use of Protefix on sandblasted surface; method 8 = combination of Protefix and Biotène on sandblasted surface. After each treatment, a tensile testing apparatus was used to dislodge the inserted test bases, and force values (N) were recorded. A significant difference in retentive force was observed between the 4 Protefix groups and those that did not use denture adhesive (P < .001). There were no differences among the 4 combinations of denture adhesive treatments (P > .05). Sandblasting the denture surfaces did not increase retentive forces alone or in combination with any other treatments. Biotène oral moisturizing agent was used in 4 treatment methods, but only had a significant effect on increasing retentive force when used with a nonsandblasted surface (P < .05). Biotène had no effect on retentive force compared to a nonsandblasted surface without moisturizer or when it was used in combination with any other methods. Protefix denture adhesive offered the greatest improvement in retentive force. Sandblasting the intaglio surface did not improve retentive force. Biotène was reported to improve patient comfort but had minimal effect on retentive force; however, Biotène can be assumed to be a more advantageous method of increasing retention compared to sandblasting (P < .05).

Radiation therapy and chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis

Increasing the intensity of radiation therapy and chemotherapy in the management of cancer has increased the incidence of adverse effects, especially oral mucositis.

AIM AND METHODS

a bibliographical review was conducted on the definition of oral mucositis, its clinical findings, the incidence, its etiology, the pathophysiology, associated morbidity, prevention and treatment.

RESULTS

current studies define oral mucositis as a very frequent and painful inflammation with ulcers on the oral mucosa that are covered by a pseudo membrane. The incidence and severity of lesions are influenced by patient and treatment variables. Oral mucositis is a result of two major mechanisms: direct toxicity on the mucosa and myelosuppression due to the treatment. Its pathophysiology is composed of four interdependent phases: an initial inflammatory/vascular phase; an epithelial phase; an ulcerative/bacteriological phase; and a healing phase. It is considered a potential source of life-threatening infection and often is a dose-limiting factor in anticancer therapy. Some interventions have been shown to be potentially effective to prevent and treat oral mucositis. Further intensive research through well-structured clinical trials to obtain the best scientific evidence over the standard therapy of oral mucositis is necessary to attain ideal parameters for radiotherapy and chemotherapy.

DNA damage and cellular death in oral mucosa cells of children who have undergone panoramic dental radiography

BACKGROUND

Despite wide use as a diagnostic tool in medical and dental practice, radiography can induce cytotoxic effects and genetic damage.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate DNA damage (micronucleus) and cellular death (pyknosis, karyolysis and karyorrhexis) in exfoliated buccal mucosa cells taken from healthy children following exposure to radiation during dental radiography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 17 children who had undergone panoramic dental radiography were included.

RESULTS

We found no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05) between micronucleated oral mucosa cells in children before and after exposure to radiation. On the other hand, radiation did cause other nuclear alterations closely related to cytotoxicity including karyorrhexis, pyknosis and karyolysis.

CONCLUSION

Taken together, these results indicate that panoramic dental radiography might not induce chromosomal damage, but may be cytotoxic. Overall, the results reinforce the importance of evaluating the health side effects of radiography and contribute to the micronucleus database, which will improve our understanding and practice of this methodology in children.

Mucosal secretion changes during radiotherapy in the oral cavity

Mucositis in the oral cavity is a serious complication during radiation therapy for head and neck cancer, causing local discomfort and pain. In severe cases, hospitalization and interruption of radiotherapy may be necessary. The pathogenesis of this mucositis is not clear. With the purpose of getting more understanding of the pathogenesis of the mucositis, we examined the mucosal secretion from ten patients during radiotherapy with an imprint technique. In the secretion we studied the cellular composition and cellular function. In eight of ten treated patients the numbers of granulocytes increased in the secretion after 2 weeks of radiation therapy. The granulocytes, however, did not show any signs of phagocytosis. The patients all developed mucositis. We propose that the granulocytes in the secretion might play an important role in the development of mucositis during radiotherapy.

The impact of concurrent granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor on radiation-induced mucositis in head and neck cancer patients: a double-blind placebo-controlled prospective phase III study by Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9901

PURPOSE

Based on early clinical evidence of potential mucosal protection by granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study to test the efficacy and safety of GM-CSF in reducing the severity and duration of mucosal injury and pain (mucositis) associated with curative radiotherapy (RT) in head-and-neck cancer patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eligible patients included those with head-and-neck cancer with radiation ports encompassing >50% of oral cavity and/or oropharynx. Standard RT ports were used to cover the primary tumor and regional lymphatics at risk in standard fractionation to 60-70 Gy. Concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy was allowed. Patients were randomized to receive subcutaneous injection of GM-CSF 250 microg/m2 or placebo 3 times a week. Mucosal reaction was assessed during the course of RT using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria and the protocol-specific scoring system.

RESULTS

Between October 2000 and September 2002, 130 patients from 36 institutions were accrued. Nine patients (7%) were excluded from the analysis, 3 as a result of drug unavailability. More than 80% of the patients participated in the quality-of-life endpoint of this study. The GM-CSF did not cause any increase in toxicity compared with placebo. There was no statistically significant difference in the average mean mucositis score in the GM-CSF and placebo arms by a t test (p = 0.4006).

CONCLUSION

This placebo-controlled, randomized study demonstrated no significant effect of GM-CSF given concurrently compared with placebo in reducing the severity or duration of RT-induced mucositis in patients undergoing definitive RT for head-and-neck cancer.

Histomorphometry and immunohistochemical features of grade I (WHO) oral radiomucositis

AIMS

The aims of this study were to describe the immunohistopathological and morphometric features of oral mucositis grade I (WHO).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Ten samples of oral mucositis were biopsied and submitted to histopathological, morphometric and immunohistochemical analyses (CD68, Ki-67 and p53). The samples were compared with the buccal mucosa of head and neck cancer patients before radiotherapy (NMCP), normal buccal mucosa (NM) and oral dysplasia (OD).

RESULTS

Epithelial thickness, area and perimeter were decreased in oral mucositis and inflammatory components, increased when compared with NMCP. CD68 immunoreactivity, near to the epithelium, was more evident in oral mucositis than in NMCP (P = 0.01). The Ki-67 counts were higher in oral mucositis than in NM and NMCP (P = 0.001 and P = 0.043, respectively), but without any difference with OD (P = 0.284). The p53 staining was present in all cases of mucositis and oral dysplasia, but negative in NMCP and NM.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral mucositis grade I (WHO) presented epithelial atypia and atrophy, increased inflammatory response, with relevant Ki-67 count and positiveness for p53.

[Sparing normal oral tissues with individual dental stent in radiotherapy for primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients]

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE

With the progression of radiotherapy techniques, the 5-year overall survival rate of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients has increased obviously. As the survival time prolonged, more and more attention was paid to various radiation sequelae and the quality of life of the patients. This study was to explore the role of individual dental stent in sparing normal oral tissues for primary NPC patients in radiotherapy by pushing the tongue and a part of oral mucous membrane away from the radiation fields.

METHODS

Irradiation dose and volume of the tongue of a NPC patient before and after wearing dental stent was evaluated. A total of 43 patients were randomized into 2 groups: 19 in trial group and 24 in control group. Trial group wore dental stent during radiotherapy, while control group did not. Patients' weight, taste, oral mucous reaction, and tongue mucous reaction before radiotherapy and every week during radiotherapy were examined.

RESULTS

Dosimetric analysis proved that the irradiation dose and volume of the tongue decreased obviously in trial group. The occurrence rate of grade 1-2 mucositis of the oral cavity was higher in trial group than in control group (73.68% vs. 62.50%), but the occurrence rate of grade 3-4 mucositis was lower in trial group than in control group (26.32% vs. 37.50%, P=0.470). By the completion of radiotherapy, 4 (21.05%) patients in trial group and 19 (79.17%) in control group suffered from taste dysfunction (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Individual dental stent is useful in sparing the oral mucous membrane and preserving taste for primary NPC patients in radiotherapy.

Effect of epidermal growth factor against radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis in rats

PURPOSE

We tested the efficacy of oral recombinant human epidermal growth factor (rhEGF) against radiation-induced oral mucositis in a rat model.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Each of 35 Sprague-Dawley rats, 7 to 8 weeks of age and weighing 178 +/- 5 grams, was irradiated once in the head region with 25 Gy, using a 4-MV therapeutic linear accelerator at a rate of 2 Gy/min. The irradiated rats were randomly divided into four groups: those receiving no treatment (Group 1), those treated with vehicle only three times per day (Group 2), and those treated with 50 microg/mL (Group 3), or 100 microg/mL (Group 4) rhEGF three times per day.

RESULTS

Rats were monitored for survival rate and daily activity, including hair loss, sensitivity, and anorexia. We found that survival rate and oral intake were significantly increased and histologic changes were significantly decreased in the rhEGF-treated rats. There was no difference, however, between rats treated with 50 microg/mL or 100 microg/mL rhEGF.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that orally administered rhEGF decreased radiation-induced oral mucositis in rats.

Efficacy of Wobe-Mugos® E for Reduction of Oral Mucositis after Radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of Wobe-Mugos E (proteolytic enzymes) for amelioration of early side effects of radiotherapy for head-and-neck tumors, particularly oral mucositis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study was a prospective, randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled, triple-blind phase III study with parallel groups. 69 patients with carcinomas of the oropharynx or the oral cavity were enrolled between 1996 and 2000 in five centers; 54 of these were recruited in Dresden. Of the 69 patients, 61 (Dresden: 46) were available for analysis. The proteolytic enzymes tested (Wobe-Mugos E) comprised papain 100 mg, trypsin 40 mg, and chymotrypsin 40 mg.

RESULTS

Wobe-Mugos E was well tolerated. For the maximum mucositis scores, no statistically significant differences were found between the placebo and the verum group. The average mucositis score over weeks 1-6 revealed a significant difference in favor of the placebo arm, based on an earlier onset of mucositis in the Wobe-Mugos E group.

CONCLUSION

The present study failed to demonstrate any effect of treatment with Wobe-Mugos E on radiotherapy side effects in patients treated for head-and-neck tumors. In particular, there was no beneficial effect on radiation-induced early oral mucositis.

Effect of post-exposure administration of keratinocyte growth factor (Palifermin) on radiation effects in oral mucosa in mice

Oral mucositis is a severe component of the acute radiation syndrome. The present study was initiated to determine the potential of recombinant human keratinocyte growth factor (rHuKGF, Palifermin) to ameliorate oral mucositis in a mouse model after a single radiation exposure. A 3 x 3 mm(2 )area in the center of the lower tongue surface of C3H/Neu mice was irradiated with graded single doses of 25 kV X-rays. Acute mucosal ulceration was used as the quantal end-point for dose-response analyses. Palifermin was applied at a dose of 15 mg/kg on days 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5. For comparison, three injections of 5 or 15 mg/kg on days 1-3 were administered. The ED(50) (dose at which ulceration is expected in 50% of the animals) for irradiation alone was 11.6 +/- 1.2 Gy. Mean latent time was 9.4 +/- 0.2 days; mean ulcer duration was 2.8 +/- 0.2 days. Single injections of rHuKGF did not result in a significant increase in isoeffective radiation doses at any of the administration days. However, the latent time to ulceration was significantly shortened by 1-2 days in all protocols. Repeated administration of rHuKGF (15 mg/kg) resulted a significant increase in ED50 to 16.8 +/- 4.0 Gy (P = 0.0047); the mean latent time was 4.4 +/- 0.9 days. Three injections of 5 mg/kg of Palifermin on days 1-3 yielded an ED50 of 19.4 +/- 1.7 Gy. In this protocol, mean latent time was 6.6 +/- 0.6 days. In conclusion, Palifermin has a potential to reduce the mucositis burden in patients after a single radiation exposure. Repeated injections are required. For three injections, a negative dose-effect of rHuKGF was observed. The optimum dose, number and timing of the administration require further investigation.

A Phase II multi-institutional trial of chemoradiation using weekly docetaxel and erythropoietin for high-risk postoperative head and neck cancer patients

PURPOSE

To determine efficacy and toxicities of postoperative concurrent chemoradiation using docetaxel in high-risk head and neck cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

High-risk patients were enrolled 2-8 weeks after surgery. Treatment included 60 Gy for 6 weeks with weekly docetaxel 25 mg/m(2) and erythropoietin alpha 40,000 U for hemoglobin < or =12 g/dL. Primary endpoints included locoregional control (LC), disease-free survival (DFS), and patterns of failure (POF). Secondary endpoints were toxicity and quality of life.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were enrolled (14 male, 4 female), aged 24-70 years (median, 55 years). Primary site included oropharynx = 7, oral cavity = 8, hypopharynx = 1, and larynx = 2. Pathologic American Joint Committee on Cancer Stage was III = 3 patients, IV = 15 patients. High-risk eligibility included > or =2 positive lymph nodes = 13, extracapsular extension = 10, positive margins = 8 (11 patients with two or more risk factors). Docetaxel was reduced to 20 mg/m(2)/week after 5 patients had prolonged Grade 3 or higher mucositis. Overall, number of doses delivered was 2 of 6 = 1, 3 of 6 = 2, 4 of 6 = 2, 5 of 6 = 4, 6 of 6 = 9 patients. With median follow-up of 30 months (range, 5-66), 10 (56%) patients are alive and have no evidence of disease (NED); POF: three local recurrences (two with distant) and 1 distant only. One-year survival was 76%, median PFS and DFS had not been reached. Three-year LC was 82%. No Grade 3 or higher late toxicities were observed, although a few cases of prolonged mucositis and taste loss (>3 months) were seen, particularly at 25 mg/m(2)/week.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative radiation therapy with weekly docetaxel 20 or 25 mg/m(2)/week for high-risk postoperative head and neck cancer caused intolerable mucosal toxicity, prompting early study termination. Further studies should consider 15 mg/m(2). Actuarial 3-year LC is 82%, similar to cisplatin-based chemoradiation regimens. Distant metastasis remains an important issue requiring additional systemic interventions.

Macroscopic and microscopic effects of GaAIAs diode laser and dexamethasone therapies on oral mucositis induced by fluorouracil in rats

PURPOSE

To present an animal model for mucositis induced by fluorouracil in rats, and test two therapeutic options, the GaAIAs laser and topical dexamethasone, analysing them with regard to the quality and quantity of tissue alterations and comparing them with the phases of mucositis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-five Wistar rats (250 g) were treated with fluorouracil (60 mg/kg) and, in order to mimic the clinical effect of chronic irritation, the palatal mucosa was irritated by superficial scratching with an 18-gauge needle. When all of the rats presented oral ulcers of mucositis, they were randomly allocated to one of three groups: group I was treated with laser (GaAIAs), group II was treated with topical dexamethasone, and group III was not treated. Excisional biopsies of the palatal mucosa were then performed, and the rats were killed. Tissue sections were stained with haematoxylin and eosin for morphological analyses, and with toluidine blue for mast-cell counts.

RESULTS

Group I specimens showed higher prevalence of ulcers, bacterial biofilm, necrosis and vascularisation, while group II specimens showed higher prevalance of granulation tissue formation. There were no significant statistical differences in the numbers of mast cells and epithelial thickness between groups.

CONCLUSION

For the present model of mucositis, rats with palatal mucositis treated with laser (GaAIAs) showed characteristics compatible with the ulcerative phase of oral mucositis, and rats treated with topical dexamethasone showed characteristics compatible with the healing phase of mucositis. Topical dexamethasone was more efficient in the treatment of rats' oral mucositis than the laser.

Quantitative Analysis of Radiation-Induced DNA Break Repair in a Cultured Oral Mucosal Model

Oral mucositis is a major side effect of radiation therapy. Development of strategies for reduction of this problem calls for quantitative models. The goal of the present study was to test the feasibility of detecting double-strand breaks (DSBs) and DSB repair proteins upon radiation of mucosa in a 3-dimensional culture system using morphology and immunohistochemistry. Human oral keratinocytes and fibroblasts were seeded onto and into an acellular dermal carrier to produce a cultured mucosal substitute (CMS). CMSs were gamma-irradiated with 0, 2, and 12 Gy. One group received 4 Gy through 2 Gy fractions with a 24-h interval. Radiation-induced damage was quantified using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). DSBs and DSB repair proteins were visualized and quantified using antibodies against P53 binding protein 1 (53BP1), MRE11, and RAD51. As in cell culture, CMSs showed intranuclear loci of damage and repair, mostly in the proliferative basal cell layers. Maximum percentages of damaged basal layer keratinocytes were 54.8% using H&E (12 Gy) up to 78.9% (12 Gy) for 53BP1. This study shows the feasibility of DNA repair markers to quantify radiation damage. This is an important step forward in the study of mucositis and the development of treatment and prevention strategies, proving once more the power and clinical importance of tissue engineering.

Comparing pain control and ability to eat and drink with standard therapy vs Gelclair: a preliminary, double centre, randomised controlled trial on patients with radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis

GOAL OF THE WORK: Oral mucositis (OM) is a functionally destructive complication of aggressive head and neck cancer therapy, often resulting in intense pain, an inability to eat and drink and secondary malnutrition and dehydration. The barrier-forming properties of Gelclair have shown promise in relieving such symptoms. The aim of this randomised-controlled trial was to evaluate the efficacy of Gelclair, as compared to standard therapy, as a means of short-term symptom control for patients suffering from radiotherapy-induced OM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty patients, with radiotherapy-induced OM seen in two oncology centres in Devon, were randomised to either standard therapy (Sucralfate and Mucaine) or Gelclair and assessed over 24 h. Both treatments were taken four times during the 24-h period, 30 min before meals.

MAIN RESULTS

No significant difference was found between the Gelclair and standard therapy arms in terms of general pain (F = 1.512, df = 1, 17, ns). There did appear to be a trend towards pain improvement initially after the use of Gelclair, but this did not last for the full 24-h assessment period. There was no significant reduction in pain on speaking (F = 0.261, df = 1, 17, ns) nor an improvement in capacity to eat and drink, although the effects of standard therapy did appear to last longer than the Gelclair.

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that Gelclair is no more effective than current standard practice in relieving the pain associated with radiotherapy-induced OM. Nevertheless, observations from this preliminary study warrant further investigation, with a view to shaping the way forward for head and neck cancer practice on a national level.

Is there a “mucosa-sparing” benefit of IMRT for head-and-neck cancer?

PURPOSE

To investigate whether intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) allows more mucosal sparing than standard three-field technique (3FT) radiotherapy for early oropharyngeal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Whole-field IMRT plans were generated for 5 patients with early-stage oropharyngeal cancer according to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0022 (66 Gy/30 fractions/6 weeks) guidelines with and without a dose objective on the portion of mucosa not overlapping any PTV. 3FT plans were also generated for the same 5 patients with two fractionation schedules: conventional fractionation (CF) to 70 Gy/35 fractions/7 weeks and concomitant boost (CB) to 72 Gy/40 fractions/6 weeks. Cumulative dose volume histograms (DVHs) of the overall mucosal volume (as per in-house definition) from all trials were compared after transformation into the linear quadratic equivalent dose at 2 Gy per fraction with a time factor correction.

RESULTS

Compared with IMRT without dose objective on the mucosa, a 30-Gy maximum dose objective on the mucosa allows approximately 20% and approximately 12% mean absolute reduction in the percentage of mucosa volume exposed to a dose equivalent to 30 Gy (p < 0.01) and 70 Gy (p < 0.01) at 2 Gy in 3 and 7 weeks, respectively, without detrimental effect on the coverage of other regions of interest. Without mucosal dose objective, IMRT is associated with a larger amount of mucosa exposed to clinically relevant doses compared with both concomitant boost and conventional fractionation; however, if a dose objective is placed, the reverse is true, with up to approximately 30% reduction in the volume of the mucosa in the high-dose region compared with both concomitant boost and conventional fractionation (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy can be potentially provide more mucosal sparing than traditional approaches.

Quantitative evaluation of acute mucosal reaction to interstitial brachytherapy using color histograms

PURPOSE

Color histograms of tongue photographs were used to make a quantitative evaluation of acute mucosal reaction to high-dose-rate fractionated interstitial brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Six patients with oral cavity cancer were analyzed with two methods (color histogram and vinyl plate). Using a photograph of the tongue, we calculated the histogram of each pixel of 1mm(2) of the tongue surface. The results were compared with the physician's inspection and the radiation dose.

RESULTS

The histogram showed a difference between the reactive area (erythema and pseudomembranous mucositis [PM]) and the nonreactive area. The relationship between inspection and the histogram showed a good correlation, although the histogram tended to change earlier than the subjective judgment. The peak time was 12-13 days after delivery of the final fraction of brachytherapy. The minimum dose required to cause PM was 3.3-3.6Gy per fraction (total: 29.7-32.4Gy).

CONCLUSIONS

Our new method of using color histograms for quantitative evaluation is helpful in the analysis of the relationship between mucosal reaction and radiation dose. The minimum dose causing PM was considered to be about 30Gy per nine fractions.

Oral complications of radiotherapy in the head and neck

Radiotherapy is a treatment modality largely used for head and neck malignancies. However, high doses of radiation in large areas, including the oral cavity, maxilla, mandible and salivary glands may result in several undesired reactions. Mucositis, candidosis, disgeusia, radiation caries, osteoradionecrosis, soft tissue necrosis and xerostomia are some of radiotherapy's complications.

Aim

The aim of this study is to briefly review the side effects that may be seen in the oral cavity during or after radiotherapy treatment in the head and neck region.

Basic method used

Review of relevant literature.

Study design

Literature review.

Results

Radiotherapy is still associated with several side effects, significantly affecting patients’ quality of life.

Conclusions

A multidisciplinary treatment, including physicians, dentists, speech therapits, nutritionists, and psychologists, is the best alternative to minimize, or even prevent such reactions.

Double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial on intravenous l-alanyl-l-glutamine in the incidence of oral mucositis following chemoradiotherapy in patients with head-and-neck cancer

PURPOSE

We performed this double-blinded, placebo-controlled study to determine the safety and efficacy of L-alanyl-L-glutamine in the prevention of mucositis in patients with head-and-neck cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Thirty-two patients with head-and-neck cancer were treated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) (radiotherapy daily up to 70 Gy plus cisplatin/5-fluoruracil once a week) and were asked to participate. Twenty-nine patients received the CRT schedule and were double-blindly assigned to receive either intravenous L-alanyl-L-glutamine 0.4 g/kg weight/day or an equal volume of saline (placebo) during chemotherapy days.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients received L-alanyl-L-glutamine and 15 received placebo. Mucositis was assessed by the Objective Mucositis Score (OMS) and the World Health Organization (WHO) grading system. There was a significant difference in incidence of mucositis developed in patients receiving placebo compared with those who received L-alanyl-L-glutamine (p = 0.035). The number of patients with severe objective mucositis (OMS >1.49) was higher in the placebo group compared with the L-alanyl-L-glutamine group (67% vs. 14%, p = 0.007). L-alanyl-L-glutamine patients experienced less pain (three highest Numeric Rating Scale scores of 1.3/10 vs. 6.3/10 respectively, p = 0.008) and need for feeding tubes (14% vs. 60% respectively, p = 0.020) compared with placebo patients. No adverse effects related to the drug or the infusions were noted in either group.

CONCLUSION

For patients with head-and-neck cancer receiving CRT, intravenous L-alanyl-L-glutamine may be an effective preventive measure to decrease the severity of mucositis.

Expression of interleukin 1-beta, transforming growth factor beta-1, and vascular endothelial growth factor in soft tissue over the implant before uncovering

BACKGROUND

Overexpression of inflammatory cytokines interleukin 1-beta (IL-1beta), transforming growth factor beta-1 (TGF-beta1), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) may cause healing impairment following implant insertion, jeopardizing success especially in patients previously irradiated. Limited data is available regarding expression pattern of inflammatory cytokines in peri-implant soft tissue caused by the surgical intervention itself.

STUDY DESIGN

This study examined 21 patients receiving dental implants. Biopsies of peri-implant tissue were harvested at re-entry 4 months after initial surgery. Eight patients underwent probing of untreated mucosa. Three groups were created (group 1: regular peri-implant mucosa; group 2: patients with irradiated peri-implant mucosa, radiation treatment due to oral squamous cell cancer; group 3: control). Immunohistochemical staining was performed for TGFss1, IL-1ss, and VEGF.

RESULTS

Following the placement of dental implants (group 1 vs group 3) a significant increase (P > .05) in TGF-beta1, IL-1beta, and VEGF expression in the peri-implant mucosa was demonstrated. No alteration of this distinct pattern was found for previously irradiated tissue (group 1 vs. group 2).

CONCLUSIONS

The study highlights the fundamental involvement of TGF-beta1, IL-1beta, and VEGF during the regeneration of peri-implant soft tissue structures. The use of extended interim solutions may be one clinical implication of these prolonged tissue remodeling processes.

Evidence for predictive validity of blood assays to evaluate individual radiosensitivity

PURPOSE

An escalation in standard irradiation dose ensuring improved local tumor control is estimated, but this strategy would require the exclusion of the most sensitive individuals from treatment. Therefore, fast and reliable assays for prediction of the individual radiosensitivity are urgently required.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Seven parameters in lymphocytes of 40 patients with leukemia were analyzed before, during, and after total body irradiation (TBI) and in vitro X-ray irradiation. These were: cell proliferation, nuclear damage, activation of cytokines, and numbers of total leukocytes of CD34+ hematopoietic blood stem cells and of CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes. Additionally, antioxidative capacity of blood plasma, uric acid, and hemoglobin levels were measured. Blood samples of 67 healthy donors were used as controls.

RESULTS

In vivo and in vitro irradiations showed comparable results. A dose-response relationship was found for most parameters. Three parameters were associated with severe acute oral mucositis (Grade 3 or 4 vs. Grade 0 to 2): leukocytes fewer than 6200/microL after 4 Gy TBI, a rate of >19% lymphocytes with reduced DNA and protein content ("necroses") after 4 Gy in vitro irradiation, and a small antioxidative capacity in blood plasma (<0.68 mMol) after 8 Gy TBI.

CONCLUSION

Three simple blood assays were associated with oral mucositis that are posed here hypothetically as an early symptom of enhanced radiosensitivity in leukemic patients: leukocyte count, damaged lymphocyte score, and the antioxidative capacity after exposure.