Comparison of Biologics and Oral Treatments for Plaque Psoriasis: A Meta-analysis

Psoriasis severity in moderate to severe psoriatic Greek patients routinely treated with systemic treatment: a cross-sectional and retrospective chart review study (CRYSTAL-Greece)

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the systemic treatment patterns and current state of moderate-to-severe psoriasis patients in real-world settings in Greece.

METHODS

CRYSTAL-Greece was a multicenter, cross-sectional and retrospective chart review study assessing Psoriasis Area and Index (PASI), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and EuroQol-5-Dimensions 5-Levels (EQ-5D-5L). Eligible patients were consented adults (18-75 years old) on continuous treatment with any approved systemic therapy regimen for ≥24 weeks.

RESULTS

280 eligible patients were enrolled between 07APR2020 and 30NOV2020. Current treatment at the study visit was biologic monotherapy in 78.2% of patients, non-biologic monotherapy in 16.1%, and conventional systemic + biologic in 5.7%. Median absolute PASI score was 1.8; of patients, 36.8%/64.6%/83.9% had PASI ≤ 1/≤3/≤5. Rates of absolute PASI > 5 were 13.7% and 28.9% in the biologic and non-biologic monotherapy subgroups, respectively. Median DLQI score was 2.0, with 18.9% of patients having DLQI > 5 (16.0% and 26.7% in the biologic and non-biologic monotherapy subgroups, respectively). The correlation between DLQI and absolute PASI was low positive (Spearman rho = 0.432; p < 0.001). Most affected EQ-5D-5L dimensions were anxiety/depression (58.6%) and pain/discomfort (28.6%).

CONCLUSION

A considerable proportion of patients still do not achieve complete or almost complete skin clearance, while one fifth of the population experience at least moderate impairment of quality of life.

Cardiovascular disease risk in patients with psoriasis receiving biologics targeting TNF-α, IL-12/23, IL-17, and IL-23: A population-based retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis is associated with various cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). The aim of this study was to compare the risk of CVD in patients with psoriasis who were prescribed biologics or oral therapies, and to assess the association between different classes of biologics and CVD risk.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

This retrospective cohort study utilized the TriNetX Global Collaborative Network (2014-2025). Patients with psoriasis newly prescribed biologics (BIO-cohort) and those newly initiating oral anti-psoriatic drugs without biologic exposure (Non-BIO-cohort) were enrolled. A propensity score-matched analysis was conducted, accounting for age, sex, race, comorbidities, body mass index, serum lipid profile, and inflammatory marker levels. Cardiovascular risk was compared between the BIO- and Non-BIO-cohorts using Cox regression to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). After matching, each cohort comprised 12,732 patients, with approximately 50% being female, a mean age of 57 years, and 55% identifying as White. The 5-year cumulative incidence of any CVDs was significantly lower in the BIO-cohort (10.68%; 95% CI [10.03%, 11.36%]) than in the Non-BIO-cohort (16.17%; 95% CI: [15.34%, 17.05%]) (p < 0.001). The BIO-cohort had attenuated risks of any CVDs (HR 0.621; 95% CI [0.571, 0.676]), cerebrovascular diseases (HR 0.616; 95% CI [0.519, 0.731]), arrhythmias (HR 0.632; 95% CI [0.565, 0.706]), inflammatory heart diseases (HR 0.566; 95% CI [0.360, 0.891]), ischemic heart diseases (HR 0.579; 95% CI [0.465, 0.721]), heart failure (HR 0.637; 95% CI [0.521, 0.780]), non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (HR 0.654; 95% CI [0.466, 0.918]), thrombotic disorders (HR 0.570; 95% CI [0.444, 0.733]), peripheral arterial occlusive diseases (HR 0.501; 95% CI [0.383, 0.656]), and major adverse cardiac events (HR 0.697; 95% CI [0.614, 0.792]). Receiving only anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α (HR 0.886; 95% CI [0.807, 0.973]), anti-interleukin (IL)-17 (HR 0.724; 95% CI [0.599, 0.875]), or anti-IL-23 (HR 0.739; 95% CI [0.598, 0.914]) was associated with reduced risks of any CVDs, whereas no significant association was observed for only anti-IL-12/23 (HR 0.915; 95% CI [0.742, 1.128]). This risk reduction remained consistent across various subgroups, including age (≤45 or >45 years), sex (male or female), regions of research data (the United States, Europe, Middle East and Africa, and Asia-Pacific), and comorbidities (psoriatic arthritis, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, overweight or obesity). Eight sensitivity analyses, such as extending the washout period or tightening medication definitions, validated our findings. The main limitation of our study is the observational design, which can only establish associations, not causation.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with psoriasis prescribed biologics exhibited a lower risk of CVDs versus those on oral therapy. Anti-TNF-α, anti-IL-17, and anti-IL-23 were associated with decreased cardiovascular hazards, while anti-IL-12/23 was not.

Use and Cost of First-Line Biologic Medications to Treat Plaque Psoriasis in the US

Importance

Plaque psoriasis is increasingly managed using anti-inflammatory biologic medications, including tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and interleukin (IL) 12/23, IL-17, and IL-23 inhibitors. How these differently priced biologics are used has implications for the overall cost of care in the US.

Objective

To measure trends in the use and cost of first-line biologic treatments for plaque psoriasis from 2007 to 2021.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This was a cross-sectional study using a national commercial claims dataset (2007-2021) of biologic medication-naive patients with plaque psoriasis who initiated a biologic medication from 1 of 4 mechanistic classes, including 4 TNF-α inhibitors, 1 IL-12/IL-23 inhibitors, 3 IL-17 inhibitors, and 3 IL-23 inhibitors. Data analyses were performed from August 2023 to October 2024.

Exposures

Patient demographic characteristics (sex, age, geographic location, insurance type) and clinical characteristics (comorbidities, previous nonbiologic treatments for plaque psoriasis).

Outcomes

Trends in the proportion of patients initiating each biologic medication and the average estimated annual treatment costs over time, using commercial estimates of net prices accounting for average manufacturer rebates. Logistic regression was used to evaluate demographic and clinical characteristics associated with initiating TNF-α vs IL inhibitors. Estimated savings were calculated for patients who had initiated the lowest-cost treatment within each class.

Results

Among 76 781 patients with plaque psoriasis who initiated biologic medications, 50.4% were female and 49.6% male, 71.8% were age 30 to 59 years, and 30% had concurrent inflammatory arthritis. From 2007 to 2021, the proportion of patients initiating IL rather than TNF-α inhibitors increased; in 2021, 42% initiated IL-23 inhibitors and 21% initiated IL-17 inhibitors. The average annual treatment cost increased from $21 236 in 2007 to $47 125 in 2021. In 2021, costs ranged from $12 413 (infliximab) to $70 043 (risankizumab). If patients initiated the lowest-cost medication in each class, the average annual treatment cost would have been 44% lower in 2021 ($26 363). Patients who were male, older, residing in the Northeast, and did not have comorbid arthritis or inflammatory bowel disease had higher odds of initiating IL inhibitors than TNF-α inhibitors.

Conclusions and Relevance

This cross-sectional study found that from 2007 to 2021, treatment costs increased for biologic medications used to treat plaque psoriasis. Substantial savings are available if more patients and physicians use the lowest-cost options and/or if drug prices were better aligned with the comparative effectiveness and safety of each medication.

Efficacy and safety of risankizumab for the treatment of patients with plaque type psoriasis

Risankizumab (Skyrizi®, Abbvie, North Chicago, IL, USA) is a humanized immunoglobulin (Ig) G1 monoclonal antibody targeting the p19 subunit of IL-23, thereby inhibiting IL-23-dependent releasing of proinflammatory cytokines in plaque psoriasis. Risankizumab is licensed is most countries for the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, and in Japan for generalized pustular psoriasis, erythrodermic psoriasis and palmoplantar pustulosis. Risankizumab showed higher efficacy and favorable safety profiles in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, compared with adalimumab, secukinumab and ustekinumab in several randomized controlled phase 3 pivotal studies and among real-life data in large retrospective studies. Furthermore, its high efficacy even in patients with prior biologic failure, better drug survival, less need for biologic switch and longer drug-free remission durations have also been shown in real-life settings and in long-term follow-up. In addition, reports of both reduced dosing and increased (bolus) dosing exist which increase our ability to use risankizumab more flexibly in an era of personalized medicine. Also, the use of risankizumab in several special population, such as elderly, Asian people, erythrodermic psoriasis, patients with high induction doses, pregnancy and human immunodeficiency virus group are discussed.

Treatment With Schistosoma Japonicum Peptide SJMHE1 and SJMHE1-Loaded Hydrogel for the Mitigation of Psoriasis

Purpose

Harnessing helminth-induced immunomodulation offers a novel therapeutic avenue for autoimmune and inflammatory diseases; however, research on helminths against psoriasis remains limited. This study evaluates the effects of the peptide SJMHE1 from Schistosoma japonicum (S. japonicum) on the inflammatory response in imiquimod (IMQ)-induced psoriasis mice and LPS-stimulated keratinocytes, as well as the efficacy of SJMHE1-loaded hydrogel on psoriasis in mice.

Methods

SJMHE1 was administered to mice with IMQ-induced psoriasis via topical administration or subcutaneous injection, and effects were evaluated by detecting the skin inflammation of mice. LPS-stimulated HaCaT cells were used to assess the regulatory effects of SJMHE1 in vitro. Additionally, the effects of Poloxamer 407 (P407)-loaded SJMHE1 were evaluated in mice with IMQ-induced psoriasis through topical application.

Results

Topical administration and subcutaneous injection of SJMHE1 alleviated psoriasis-like skin lesions, improved PASI scores, reduced epidermal thickness and dermal inflammatory cell infiltration, and decreased expression of Ki67, a marker of keratinocyte proliferation or differentiation. SJMHE1 modulated pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokine expression in LPS-treated HaCaT cells, down-regulating NF-κB and STAT3 activation. Both SJMHE1-loaded hydrogel and SJMHE1 treatment alleviated IMQ-induced psoriasis-like skin lesions, improved PASI scores, reduced the number of Ki67-positive epidermal cells, decreased the spleen index and T-cell infiltration, increased the proportion of regulatory T cells (Tregs), and decreased the percentage of Th17 cells, alongside reducing inflammatory cytokine expression and NF-κB and STAT3 activation in skin lesions. Notably, weight changes in the SJMHE1-loaded gel group were less than those in the betamethasone-positive control group on days 6, 7, and 8 post-IMQ administration.

Conclusion

SJMHE1-loaded hydrogel and SJMHE1 treatment inhibited NF-κB and STAT3 activation in skin lesions, improved Th17/Treg balance, and reduced inflammatory cytokine expression in psoriasis mice, thereby ameliorating psoriatic lesion symptoms. Furthermore, SJMHE1-loaded hydrogel exhibited fewer side effects compared to betamethasone, positioning it as a promising strategy against psoriasis.

Indirect Comparison Between Bimekizumab and Brodalumab for the Management of Moderate to Severe Psoriasis: A 36-Week Real-Life Study

INTRODUCTION

Bimekizumab and brodalumab are characterized by a different mechanism of action if compared to the other anti-interleukin (IL)-17s which target IL-17A. Indeed, brodalumab acts on IL-17RA whereas bimekizumab acts on IL-17A, IL-17F, and IL-17AF cytokines. Currently, despite real-life data on the efficacy and safety of bimekizumab and brodalumab have been reported, data comparing these two drugs are absent. However, these data are mandatory to evaluate whether a different target of the same IL can be correlated with a different profile in terms of effectiveness and safety. Moreover, it should be underlined that bimekizumab and brodalumab stood out as the psoriasis treatments with the fastest onset of action, delivering quicker therapeutic responses compared to other drugs acting on IL-17.

METHODS

A monocentric retrospective study was carried out enrolling patients affected by moderate to severe psoriasis undergoing treatment with brodalumab or bimekizumab. At baseline, clinical demographic details were collected. Clinical improvement [Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI), body surface area (BSA)] was collected at weeks 4, 16, and 36. Safety data were analyzed at the same timepoints.

RESULTS

A total of 125 patients were enrolled in the study [bimekizumab: 53 (42.40%); brodalumab: 72 (57.6%)]. Psoriasis severity at baseline was similar between the two cohorts. Both PASI and BSA significantly reduced at each follow-up for both treatment cohorts. The bimekizumab group reached a higher percentage of PASI90/PASI100 response at each timepoint as compared to the brodalumab cohort. In particular, the percentage of PASI100 response was significantly higher in the bimekizumab group as compared to the brodalumab cohort at week 4 (41.5% vs 23.6%, p < 0.05) and at week 16 (67.9% vs 48.6%). Discontinuation for ineffectiveness was higher in the brodalumab cohort (8.3%) as compared to the bimekizumab group (3.8%), without statistical significance. As regards safety, two cases of eczematous reactions (bimekizumab: 2, brodalumab: 0), and five cases of candidiasis (bimekizumab: 4, brodalumab: 1) were collected. Overall, 3 (5.7%) and 1 (1.4%) patients discontinued bimekizumab and brodalumab because of adverse events, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our study confirmed the efficacy and safety of both bimekizumab and brodalumab, up to 36 weeks of treatment. Although both drugs showed a significant improvement of the investigated scores from week 4, some differences in terms of PASI90 and PASI100 responses (higher for bimekizumab at each follow-up, with only PASI100 response significantly higher at week 4 and 16) were registered. No statistical significance was found for safety data and treatment failure.

FRONTIER-2: A phase 2b, long-term extension, dose-ranging study of oral JNJ-77242113 for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis

BACKGROUND

More patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis achieved responses with JNJ-77242113, a targeted oral peptide inhibiting interleukin-23 receptor signaling, versus placebo (PBO) at week (W)16 of the phase 2 FRONTIER-1 study.

OBJECTIVE

FRONTIER-2, a long-term extension of FRONTIER-1, evaluated JNJ-77242113 through 1 year.

METHODS

FRONTIER-1 participants received JNJ-77242113 at doses from 25 mg daily to 100 mg twice daily or PBO through W16. Patients completing FRONTIER-1 could enroll in FRONTIER-2 and continue JNJ-77242113 at the same dose through W52. Those on PBO crossed over to JNJ-77242113 100 mg daily for W16-52. Safety follow-up continued through W56.

RESULTS

Most (89%) FRONTIER-1 patients continued to FRONTIER-2. Across outcomes, response rates were maintained from W16-52. The highest response rates generally occurred with JNJ-77242113 100 mg twice daily. At W52, 76% of patients achieved up to 75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI75) with 100 mg twice daily; rates of clear or almost clear skin were 64% (PASI90), 74% (Investigator's Global Assessment 0/1), 40% (PASI100), and 43% (Investigator's Global Assessment 0). From W16-56, 59% of JNJ-77242113-treated patients had ≥1 adverse events. Serious adverse events, considered unrelated to treatment by investigators, occurred in 4% of patients.

LIMITATIONS

The study was limited by the small number of patients in each treatment group and the descriptive nature of the longer-term data.

CONCLUSION

Rates of skin clearance with JNJ-77242113 were durable to 1 year and no safety signals were identified.

Comparative Analysis of Ixekizumab Effectiveness with and Without Induction Therapy in Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis: A Real-World Study

Background: Ixekizumab, an IL-17A inhibitor, is an effective treatment for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Although clinical trials support the use of an induction phase for optimal results, real-world evidence comparing induction versus maintenance-only regimens is limited. Objectives: This study assessed the real-world effectiveness, safety, and drug survival of ixekizumab with and without an induction phase in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Methods: A multicenter, observational study was conducted with 183 patients treated with ixekizumab over five years at tertiary hospitals in Andalucía, Spain. Patients were divided into two groups: an induction group (160 mg at baseline, followed by 80 mg at weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12, then every 4 weeks) and a non-induction group (80 mg every 4 weeks from initiation). Baseline characteristics, clinical outcomes (PASI [Psoriasis Activity Skin Index] and PGA [Physician Global Assessment] scores), and drug survival were analyzed. Results: The majority of patients were male (64.48% in the induction group, 58.74% in the non-induction group). No significant differences were found in age or BMI [body mass index] between groups. Baseline PASI and PGA scores were higher in the induction group, reflecting greater initial disease severity. Both regimens achieved significant clinical improvements, though the induction group demonstrated faster initial responses. Drug survival was lower in the induction group (p = 0.0033), potentially due to the higher baseline disease burden and severity in these patients. Comorbidities, including metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular risks, and psychiatric conditions, were prevalent, particularly in the induction group. Conclusions: Ixekizumab is effective for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, with induction therapy yielding faster responses. However, lower drug survival in the induction group highlights the influence of initial disease severity on long-term outcomes. Real-world findings support the flexibility of ixekizumab across diverse patient populations, though further research is warranted.

Multi-omics analysis reveals novel causal pathways in psoriasis pathogenesis

BACKGROUND

To elucidate the genetic and molecular mechanisms underlying psoriasis by employing an integrative multi-omics approach, using summary-data-based Mendelian randomization (SMR) to infer causal relationships among DNA methylation, gene expression, and protein levels in relation to psoriasis risk.

METHODS

We conducted SMR analyses integrating genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics with methylation quantitative trait loci (mQTL), expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL), and protein quantitative trait loci (pQTL) data. Publicly available datasets were utilized, including psoriasis GWAS data from the European Molecular Biology Laboratory-European Bioinformatics Institute and the UK Biobank. Heterogeneity in dependent instruments (HEIDI) test and colocalization analyses were performed to identify shared causal variants, and multi-omics integration was employed to construct potential regulatory pathways.

RESULTS

Our analyses identified significant causal associations between DNA methylation, gene expression, protein abundance, and psoriasis risk. We discovered two pathways involving the long non-coding RNA RP11-977G19.11 and apolipoprotein F (APOF). Methylation at sites cg26804944 and cg02705573 was negatively associated with RP11-977G19.11 expression. Reduced expression of RP11-977G19.11 was linked to increased APOF levels, which were positively associated with a higher risk of psoriasis. Methylation at sites cg00172967, cg00294382, and cg24773560 was positively associated with RP11-977G19.11 expression. Elevated expression of RP11-977G19.11 was associated with decreased APOF levels, reducing the risk of psoriasis. Colocalization analysis highlighted APOF as a key protein in psoriasis pathogenesis. Validation using skin tissue, EBV-transformed lymphocytes data and inflammation-related protein panels confirmed the associations of RP11-977G19.11 and APOF with psoriasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our multi-omics analysis provides preliminary evidence for potential molecular mechanisms in psoriasis pathogenesis. Through the integration of GWAS and molecular QTL data, we identify candidate pathways that may be relevant to disease biology. While these findings require extensive experimental validation, they offer a framework for future investigations into the molecular basis of psoriasis.

The Association of Interleukin-36 Staining Intensity and Response to Biologic Therapy in Patients With Psoriasis: A Retrospective Immunohistochemical and Chart Review Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

There are limited surrogate biomarkers to identify the active inflammatory pathway in psoriasis to direct treatment with targeted biologic therapies. We investigated the association of interleukin (IL)-36 epidermal expression, a diagnostic marker of psoriasis, with response to biologic therapy in patients with psoriasis.

METHODS

Retrospective immunohistochemical and chart review pilot study.

RESULTS

Patients with psoriasis with low (scores 0-2) vs. high (scores 3-4) IL-36 expression did not have significantly different response rates to tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα), IL-17, and IL-12/23 or IL-23 inhibitors; and similarly, mean IL-36 expression scores did not significantly differ among responders vs. non-responders to each treatment mechanism. However, in patients with psoriasis treated with IL-12/23 or IL-23 inhibitors, there was a marked absolute difference in response rates in those with high vs. low IL-36 (84% vs. 50%, p = 0.12) and in mean IL-36 scores in responders vs. non-responders (3.35 vs. 2.57, p = 0.19).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with psoriasis with high IL-36 expression were more likely to respond to IL-12/23 and IL-23 inhibition than those with low IL-36, though these findings were not statistically significant. Additional studies with larger sample sizes are needed to validate and expand upon these findings.

Limonin alleviates imiquimod-induced psoriasis-like skin inflammation in mice model by downregulating inflammatory responses

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory condition affecting 1-2% of the global population. Phytomedicine, which uses plant-based compounds, is emerging as a promising approach to managing such inflammatory diseases. Limonin, a phytochemical found in citrus fruits and known for its bitter taste, possesses significant pharmacological properties. In this study, we evaluated the anti-psoriatic effects of limonin using a psoriasis-induced mice model. BALB/c mice were treated with imiquimod to induce psoriasis and then administered limonin at doses of 20 and 40 mg/kg/day for 6 days. Tacrolimus ointment served as a positive control. We assessed the hematological profile to determine limonin's impact on leukocytes in the psoriasis model. Additionally, histomorphometric analysis of ear and skin tissues was conducted to evaluate the therapeutic effects of limonin. We further investigated the antioxidant properties of limonin by measuring levels of antioxidants and oxidative stress markers. The anti-inflammatory effects were evaluated by quantifying inflammatory cytokines and signaling proteins. In vitro, the cytotoxicity and anti-inflammatory potential of limonin were assessed using murine macrophage RAW264.7 cells. Our findings showed that limonin significantly reduced leukocyte counts, decreased inflammatory cell infiltration, and improved skin histoarchitecture in psoriasis-induced mice. Limonin also effectively scavenged free radicals and reduced levels of inflammatory cytokines and proteins without causing cytotoxicity in RAW264.7 cells. Overall, our in vivo and in vitro results confirm that limonin is a potent anti-inflammatory agent that effectively ameliorates imiquimod-induced psoriasis.

Cost per response analysis of deucravacitinib versus apremilast and first-line biologics among patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in the United States

BACKGROUND

Understanding the economic value of deucravacitinib and apremilast could assist treatment decision-making for patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the cost per response (CPR) for US patients initiating deucravacitinib versus apremilast for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

METHODS

A CPR model using pharmacy and administration costs was developed from a US payer perspective. Response was defined as a 75% reduction from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) at weeks 16 and 24. Long-term response was defined as the cumulative benefit over 52 weeks, measured as area under the curve; subsequent treatment was included. Scenario analyses explored varying the efficacy measure or choices of subsequent treatments and limiting discontinuation.

RESULTS

The CPR for deucravacitinib versus apremilast was lower at 16 weeks (difference: -$3796 [95% confidence interval (CI): -$6140 to -$1659]) and 24 weeks (difference: -$12,784 [95% CI: -$16,674 to -$9369]). At 52 weeks, the cost per cumulative benefit was lower for patients who initiated deucravacitinib, regardless of initial treatment period duration (16 or 24 weeks).

CONCLUSIONS

Scenario analyses found mainly consistent results. This study showed that the CPR is lower when initiating deucravacitinib versus apremilast in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

Drug survival of biologics in patients with psoriasis: real-world evidence for Greece during the period 2016-2020

BACKGROUND

Drug persistence is a crucial aspect of treatment success in psoriasis.

OBJECTIVES

To record real-world evidence concerning drug survival of biologic agents used for psoriasis treatment and to detect associated modifying factors in Greece.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study based on data extracted from the nationwide Greek prescription system. Included patients had psoriasis, with or without concomitant psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and had initiated biologics between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2020.

RESULTS

We included 8819 patients who received 13 359 treatment lines. Among them, 76.8% of patients were biologic naive and 16.5% were diagnosed with concomitant PsA. The overall median drug survival was 34.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 32.6-36.5]. Drug persistence at 12, 24, 36 and 48 months of follow-up was 71.9%, 57.7%, 49.0% and 43.7%, respectively. Patients receiving brodalumab had the highest drug survival rate in the first 2 years, while secukinumab had the highest rates beyond this period. Overall, drug survival rates were higher in the first treatment line (median 51.1 months, 95% CI 47.1 to not reached) than in the second line and onwards (median 21.7 months, 95% CI 20.0-23.5). Treatment line, PsA status, age and sex were found to significantly affect drug survival rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings confirm previous reports regarding the importance of efficient first-line biologics and the vulnerability of patients to coexistent PsA. The use of antibodies against interleukins confers high drug survival rates. These results will assist clinical management of patients with psoriasis in Greece.

Reappraising the Use of Systemic Immunomodulators for Psoriasis and Eczema in the Military

INTRODUCTION

Psoriasis and atopic dermatitis are chronic, immune-mediated skin disorders that are disqualifying for entrance into the military. Both conditions can cause difficulty wearing body armor and other protective equipment when poorly controlled, limiting a service member's ability to train and deploy worldwide. In addition, these conditions may be exacerbated by military service because of increased exposure to austere environments, extreme temperatures, stress, skin injury, bug bites, and vaccinations Service members have limited treatment options because of restrictions on systemic medications that can be used while deployed. Newer systemic medications-in particular, biologics and oral immunomodulators-have evolved to be both extremely effective and safe. We review more recent treatment options for psoriasis and atopic dermatitis in the context of DoD's regulations guiding entry and retention of personnel with psoriasis and eczema and make recommendations regarding updating DoD policy for systemic treatment options.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Ovid with the last search done in the fall of 2023 from all years to date. These articles were further screened based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. In total, 25 articles were included in this review. An Internet search was also performed on the DoD's regulations guiding entry and retention of personnel with psoriasis and eczema. In addition, we examined medical requirements for deployment to the U.S. Central Command and U.S. European Command.

RESULTS

Currently, U.S. Central Command and U.S. European Command do not allow the use of medications with special storage and handling requirements on deployments. Newer biologics are safe and efficacious but require refrigeration, although other immunomodulators like deucravacitinib and apremilast are oral pills and do not have cold-storage requirements. However, the use of biologics in austere environments may be feasible because of increased intervals between dosing and the ability to store refrigerated medical supplies in most deployed environments. For military service members with psoriasis, risankizumab and deucravacitinib are excellent options given their favorable safety and efficacy profiles. Of the biologics available for atopic dermatitis, dupilumab is the safest and effective systemic medication available. The Janus kinase inhibitors have also demonstrated excellent efficacy in treating atopic dermatitis, but more safety data are needed because of potential adverse events to include heart-related events, blood clots, and cancers.

CONCLUSIONS

Systemic treatments have evolved to become highly specific for both eczema and psoriasis. These newer biologics and immunomodulators may be compatible with use in the deployed setting, especially those that have long dosing intervals and proven efficacy and safety. Of the biologics, dupilumab and risankizumab offer the best efficacy, safety, and dosing intervals for atopic dermatitis and psoriasis, respectively. Deucravcitinib is a recently FDA-approved oral immunomodulator for psoriasis that has an excellent safety profile and efficacy. Allowing the use of these medications on deployments will enable more people with moderate to severe psoriasis and eczema to join and remain in the military while receiving effective treatment.

Psoriasis in Childbearing Age: A Real-Life, Retrospective, Single-Center Study on Anti-IL17 and IL-23 Agents

Background: Psoriasis (PSO) involves about 1-3% of the population, and around 75% of women develop PSO before the age of 40. Official guidelines on the treatment of woman with anti-IL17 and anti-IL23 during this potential childbearing time are not currently available. Objective: To investigate the effectiveness and safety of biologic treatments in women of childbearing age. Methods: At the Dermatology Clinic of the University of Turin, Italy, 172 women aged 20-55 years underwent IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitor therapy for moderate-severe PSO and were followed up to 52 weeks in a real-life, retrospective, single-center study. Results: Overall, 40% of patients achieved PASI 100 at week 16, and 72% at week 52. A similar trend was observed for PASI 90 and PASI < 3 with almost 80% and 90% of patients achieving the target at 52 weeks. As for PASI 100, a statistically significant difference (p = 0.004) was found at 16 weeks, with 23.84% of patients achieving PASI 100, with IL-17 and 15.70% with the IL-23 inhibitor. No statistically significant differences were found at 28 and 52 weeks. No statistically significant differences in PASIs at any time points were recorded across the different biologic agents. Forty-six patients discontinued treatment. The most reported side effects were headache, nausea, asthenia, injection site pain, and rhinitis. Conclusions: This study showed that biologic drugs are effective and safe in women of childbearing age, with negligible side effects.

[Phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors in dermatology : Role in the treatment of skin diseases]

BACKGROUND

Chronic inflammatory skin diseases are of great social and medical importance and require effective drug therapy. Phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitors represent a possible therapeutic option by regulating inflammatory processes. PDEs cause the release of proinflammatory cytokines by interfering with signaling pathways. The PDE4 inhibitors apremilast (treatment of psoriasis and Behçet's disease), roflumilast (treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), and crisaborole (treatment of atopic dermatitis) are currently approved in Europe.

PSORIASIS

Apremilast is used for second-line treatment of plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis and has a favorable side effect profile. Topical PDE4 inhibitors are currently being researched and have not yet been approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA).

ATOPIC DERMATITIS

The topical PDE4 inhibitor crisaborole was approved by the EMA in 2020 as a topical treatment alternative to glucocorticoids and calcineurin inhibitors. Although the substance has shown good tolerability in studies and also alleviates the accompanying itching, it did not find its way onto the German market. BEHçET'S DISEASE: Apremilast is approved for the treatment of Behçet's disease in adults with refractory, severe oral ulcers.

OUTLOOK

Case studies have also demonstrated the efficacy of systemic PDE4 inhibition in other skin diseases (including blistering autoimmune dermatoses, lichen planus, and acantholytic genodermatoses). The substances are also being researched and used to treat extracutaneous inflammatory diseases.

Efficacy of Brodalumab in Patients with Psoriasis and Risk Factors for Treatment Failure: A Review of Post Hoc Analyses

Factors such as obesity, alcohol consumption, and tobacco use are associated with both increased psoriasis severity and inadequate response to systemic and biologic therapies. Obesity is linked to chronic inflammation, which can contribute to psoriasis pathogenesis. Fixed-dose therapies may have reduced efficacy in patients with a higher body mass index, while weight-based dosing can increase the burden of drug-specific side effects. Alcohol and nicotine from tobacco have also been shown to stimulate keratinocyte and immune cell proliferation and production of proinflammatory cytokines. While these risk factors are prevalent among patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis, their influence on treatment outcomes may be overlooked when evaluating therapeutic options. Brodalumab is a fully human interleukin-17 receptor A antagonist approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. In this review, we describe the lifestyle-related risk factors associated with decreased response to treatment. We further summarize the post hoc analyses of brodalumab in participant subgroups with moderate-to-severe psoriasis and a history of prior biologic failure, obesity, and alcohol or tobacco use from two phase 3 clinical trials (AMAGINE-2 and AMAGINE-3; ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01708603 and NCT01708629, respectively). Our review of clinical trial and real-world data suggests that brodalumab is an efficacious and safe treatment option for patients with lifestyle factors that increase the likelihood of treatment failure, allowing them to achieve skin clearance and improve quality of life.

Comparative effectiveness of combined biologic agents versus standard therapies in the treatment of plaque psoriasis: a retrospective analysis

Introduction

Plaque psoriasis is a persistent skin disorder that necessitates efficient management. This study investigates the therapeutic effectiveness and timeline for skin lesion resolution in plaque psoriasis patients treated with combined biologic agents compared to standard therapies.

Methods

Conducted retrospectively between March 2020 and March 2023, the study included 162 patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Participants were divided into two groups: the Control Group, which received standard treatments, and the Combined Biologic Agent Group, which received additional biologic therapy with secukinumab. Participants in the Control Group received standard treatments, while those in the Combined Biologic Agent Group received standard treatments plus secukinumab.

Results

The results showed that the Combined Biologic Agent Group experienced a significantly faster onset of therapeutic effects, with an average time of 3.04 ± 2.25 days compared to 6.12 ± 2.06 days in the Control Group. Additionally, skin lesion resolution occurred more rapidly in the biologic agent group (7.04 ± 2.13 days) than in the control group (14.56 ± 4.73 days). By week 24, the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) scores demonstrated a more substantial reduction in the biologic agent group, decreasing from 26.98 ± 11.28 to 2.48 ± 3.01, whereas the control group showed a reduction from 25.82 ± 10.47 to 10.40 ± 7.63. The overall effectiveness rate was higher in the biologic agent group, with no cases of ineffectiveness, compared to a 20.99% ineffectiveness rate in the control group. Furthermore, there was no recurrence of the disease in the biologic agent group, while the control group experienced an 11.11% recurrence rate. Both groups had a similar incidence of adverse reactions, indicating that the addition of biologic agents does not significantly increase the risk of adverse events.

Discussion

These findings suggest that combined biologic agent therapy offers a more effective and faster treatment option for plaque psoriasis without compromising safety. However, larger-scale clinical trials are necessary to validate these results and establish the long-term benefits and safety of this treatment approach in diverse patient populations.

Assessing the 5-year persistence in positive clinical response with innovative psoriasis treatments: a network meta-analysis of Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis is a chronic skin condition, for which the approval of several biologics has made a dramatic impact. Despite their initial treatment effectiveness, the challenge lies in understanding the long-term responses, as they may diminish over time. Limitations of drug survival analysis warrant the application of additional outcomes to fully capture the performance of a biologic.

OBJECTIVES

To provide a broader perspective on the global landscape of biologic agents' persistence in positive clinical response by comparing innovative therapies over a 5-year period through a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

METHODS

We comprehensively identified studies in PubMed, Embase, Scopus and ClinicalTrials.gov. We defined two outcomes: (i) 'persistence at optimal response' (POR) or 'clinical remission', and (ii) 'persistence at suboptimal response' (PSR) or 'low disease activity'. Outcomes were measured as the proportions of patients with continuous exposure to a biologic who achieved ≥ 90% or 100% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index at the end of the predefined 5-year follow-up period.

RESULTS

Eleven publications, comprising 18 randomized controlled trials and 11 202 patients, met the inclusion criteria and were included in the network meta-analysis. In the ranking analysis, guselkumab exhibited the highest cumulative probability of POR (0.84), followed by ixekizumab (0.82) and risankizumab (0.76). Conversely, etanercept (0.42), brodalumab (0.36), apremilast (0.25) and placebo (0.026) showed the lowest cumulative probabilities of POR. For PSR, guselkumab (0.86), ixekizumab (0.75) and risankizumab (0.71) also ranked highest, while brodalumab (0.42), secukinumab (0.23), etanercept (0.19) and placebo (0.019) presented the lowest PSR probabilities.

CONCLUSIONS

The highest rates of persistence with clear or almost clear skin can be expected with guselkumab, ixekizumab and risankizumab compared with other biologics. The proposed proxy definitions of long-term persistence (POR and PSR) are reliable measures of patients being successfully treated that warrant further exploration and validation.

Pre-treatment plasma retinol binding protein 4 level and its change after treatments predict systemic treatment response in psoriasis patients

BACKGROUND

Retinol binding protein 4 (RBP4) is a mediator of inflammation and related to skin lesion formation, which suggests its engagement in psoriasis pathology and progression. This study intended to explore the change in RBP4 after systemic treatments, and its ability to predict treatment response in psoriasis patients.

METHODS

This prospective study enrolled 85 psoriasis patients and 20 healthy subjects. Plasma RBP4 was detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay at baseline and 12th week (W12) after systemic treatments in psoriasis patients, as well as after enrollment in healthy subjects. Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 and PASI 90 were evaluated at W12 in psoriasis patients.

RESULTS

RBP4 at baseline was higher in psoriasis patients than in healthy subjects [median (interquartile range): 13.39 (9.71-22.92) versus 9.59 (6.57-13.72) µg/mL] (P = 0.003). In psoriasis patients, 50 (58.8%) patients achieved PASI 75 at W12, and 25 (29.4%) patients achieved PASI 90 at W12. RBP4 was decreased at W12 compared to its level at baseline (P < 0.001). Lower RBP4 at baseline predicted achieving PASI 75 at W12 (P = 0.038). Greater RBP4 change (baseline-W12) precited achieving PASI 75 (P = 0.036) and PASI 90 (P = 0.045) at W12. Receiver operating characteristic curves suggested that after adjustment for all clinical features, RBP4 at baseline and RBP4 change (baseline-W12) had an acceptable ability to predict PASI 75 and PASI 90 at W12 with all area under curve values > 0.7.

CONCLUSION

Plasma RBP4 is decreased after systemic treatments, and its low baseline level and greater decline after treatments predict good treatment response in psoriasis patients.

Research trends and hotspots in biologics for plaque psoriasis: A bibliometric study from 2004 to 2023

Background and objective

Biologics have revolutionized the management of plaque psoriasis and are flourishing. We aimed to construct a knowledge structure in this field through bibliometrics, analyze research trends and cutting-edge hotspots to inspire future research directions, and provide valuable references for clinical decisions.

Methods

Publications on biologics for plaque psoriasis in the Web of Science database core collection from 2004 to 2023 were searched. Bibliometric analysis and scientific knowledge mapping were performed with R, CiteSpace, and VOSviewer software.

Results

2,672 articles written by 9,474 authors from 67 countries were included in the study. The number of annual publications has steadily increased over the last 20 years. The most prolific countries, institutions, and authors were the United States, Novartis, and Prof. Reick K., respectively. Reference analysis categorized the research base of the field into 10 main clusters. "Efficacy" and "safety" were the most frequent keywords, and cluster analysis categorized the research in this area into four groups. Burst detection captured current hot keywords including interleukin (IL)-17 inhibitors, IL-23 inhibitors, "drug survival," "discontinuation," "Covid-19," "real-world," and "clinical features."

Conclusion

Global publications on biologics research in plaque psoriasis have grown steadily and rapidly over the past two decades. Efficacy and safety are the highest topics of concern for researchers, and IL-17 inhibitors, IL-23 inhibitors, real-world studies, efficacy prediction, and retreatment after biologics failure or discontinuation are current research hotspots.

Sequential interleukin-17 inhibitors for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who have an IL-17 inhibitors failure in a resource limited country: An economic evaluation

BACKGROUND

Biologics has been known to be effective for patients with psoriasis. However, optimal treatment pathways and their cost-effectiveness are limited in a resource-limited country. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of different sequential biologics for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

METHOD

A hybrid model from a societal perspective was used. Model inputs were derived from network meta-analysis, clinical trials, and published literature. Three different sequential biologic treatments were assessed; Sequence 1; 1st Interleukin-17 (IL-17) inhibitor (secukinumab) followed by 2nd IL-17 inhibitors (ixekizumab or brodalumab), then 3rd IL-23 inhibitor (guselkumab), Sequence 2; ixekizumab followed by secukinumab or brodalumab, then guselkumab, and Sequence 3; brodalumab followed by ixekizumab or secukinumab, then guselkumab. Methotrexate or ciclosporin was used as standard of care (SoC).

RESULTS

All three different sequential biologic therapies could gain total quality-adjusted life year (QALY), but they had higher cost than SoC. Sequence 1 had the lowest incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) compared to SoC at 621,373 THB/QALY (19,449 $/QALY). ICER for Sequence 2 was 957,258 THB/QALY (29,962 $/QALY), while that for Sequence 3 was 1,332,262 THB/QALY (41,700 $/QALY). Fully incremental analysis indicated that Sequence 3 was dominated by Sequence 1 and Sequence 2. ICER for Sequence 2 was 7,206,104 THB/QALY (225,551 $/QALY) when compared to Sequence 1.

CONCLUSION

At the current willingness-to-pay of 160,000 THB/QALY, no sequential IL-17 inhibitor was cost-effective compared to SoC. Secukinumab followed by ixekizumab or brodalumab then guselkumab (Sequence 1) may be the most appropriate option compared with other treatments.

Dermatologische unerwünschte Arzneimittelwirkungen bei Behandlung mit Biologika – Pathogenese und Management

Biologika sind für verschiedene Entzündungskrankheiten aus Dermatologie, Allergologie, Rheumatologie und Gastroenterologie sowie für zahlreiche maligne Erkrankungen zugelassen. Dermatologische unerwünschte Arzneimittelwirkungen durch Biologika können primären entzündlichen Dermatosen ähneln, unterscheiden sich von ihnen jedoch in ihrer Pathogenese. In diesem Artikel beschreiben wir die fünf verschiedenen Pathomechanismen dermatologischer, unerwünschter Arzneimittelwirkungen durch Biologika. Durch besseres Verständnis dieser Mechanismen erhoffen wir uns wertvolle Einblicke in die Pathogenese primärer Entzündungskrankheiten zu gewinnen. Außerdem geben wir in diesem Artikel Empfehlungen für die Behandlung und das Management der durch Biologika ausgelösten dermatologischen unerwünschten Arzneimittelwirkungen.

Exposure-response relationship of guselkumab and the potential of serum proteomics in identifying predictive biomarker candidates in psoriasis

BACKGROUND

Response to biologics in psoriasis varies in real-world settings. Serum biomarkers could aid biologic selection and dose modifications to improve patient outcomes while encouraging cost-effective care.

OBJECTIVES

To explore the exposure-response relationship for guselkumab (GUS), to define a GUS concentration target for optimal response and to evaluate the potential of serum protein levels as predictive biomarker candidates.

METHODS

This is a prospective, multicentric, cohort study in psoriasis patients treated with GUS. Serum GUS trough concentrations (TCs) collected at multiple timepoints were measured using an in-house immunoassay. Next, proximity extension assay technology (Target 96 Inflammation Panel Olink®) was used to measure serum protein levels in a subcohort including 38 GUS patients (week 0 and week 4), six psoriasis patients naive for systemic treatment and four healthy controls.

RESULTS

Seventy-five patients participated and 400 samples were collected. Guselkumab TCs and clinical response were correlated at week 4, week 12 and in steady-state (≥20 weeks). Optimal responders (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI] ≤ 2) had significantly higher TCs than suboptimal responders from week 4 onwards in treatment. An optimal steady-state TC of 1.6 μg/mL was defined. Although TC and absolute PASI were lower and worse, respectively, in patients weighing ≥90 kg, clinical outcomes referred to desirable to excellent PASI ranges. Therefore, we do not recommend systematically higher GUS doses in obese patients. We could not reveal early differentially expressed proteins to distinguish future optimal from suboptimal responders.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated an exposure-response relationship for GUS and an optimal steady-state TC of 1.6 μg/mL in real-world psoriasis patients. Hereby, we deliver more evidence that therapeutic drug monitoring poses a promising strategy in optimizing GUS treatment. No biomarker candidates were identified through serum proteomics. We propose protein screening should be repeated in larger cohorts to continue the quest for predictive biomarkers.

Dermatologic adverse events caused by biologic treatments - Pathogenesis and management

Biologics are approved for various dermatologic, allergic, rheumatic, and gastroenterologic inflammatory diseases, as well as for numerous malignancies. The dermatologic adverse events from treatment with biologics may resemble primary inflammatory diseases but differ in pathogenesis. In this article, we describe five different pathogenic mechanisms of dermatologic adverse events. By studying these mechanisms, we hope to gain valuable insights into the pathogenesis of primary inflammatory diseases. In addition, in this article, we provide recommendations for the treatment and management of the dermatological adverse events induced by biologics.

The Impact of Statins on Disease Severity and Quality of Life in Patients with Psoriasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis, a chronic autoimmune condition, imposes significant burdens on patients' well-being. While corticosteroid medications are commonly used, their prolonged use presents risks. Statins, known for their immunoregulatory and anti-inflammatory properties, have emerged as potential alternatives. Previous reviews indicated that statins might improve psoriasis symptoms but showed inconsistent results and lacked meta-analyses that generated pooled effect estimates. Therefore, this study addresses this gap by providing a comprehensive overview of the impact of statins on psoriasis severity and quality of life (QoL) for patients with psoriasis.

METHODS

A thorough search of four electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and Science Direct) was conducted for relevant studies published before April 2024.

RESULTS

Seven studies involving 369 patients were included. This meta-analysis showed a statistically significant reduction in PASI scores at week 8 with statin treatment (MD = -1.96, 95% CI [-3.14, -0.77], p = 0.001). However, no statistically significant difference was found between statins and placebo at week 12 (MD = 0.19, 95% CI [-0.18, 0.55]). Additionally, DLQI scores indicated a significant improvement in quality of life with statins compared to placebo (MD = -3.16, 95% CI [-5.55, -0.77]).

CONCLUSIONS

Statins can improve disease severity and quality of life in psoriasis patients, suggesting the potential benefits of statin therapy. However, further research is needed to determine the optimal treatment duration, address outcome heterogeneity, and explore additional benefits such as cholesterol and triglyceride reduction.

Targeted therapy for immune mediated skin diseases. What should a dermatologist know?

BACKGROUND

Molecularly targeted therapies, such as monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and Janus Kinase inhibitors (JAKis), have emerged as essential tools in the treatment of dermatological diseases. These therapies modulate the immune system through specific signaling pathways, providing effective alternatives to traditional systemic immunosuppressive agents. This review aims to provide an updated summary of targeted immune therapies for inflammatory skin diseases, considering their pathophysiology, efficacy, dosage, and safety profiles.

METHODS

The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A systematic search was conducted on PubMed over the past 10 years, focusing on randomized clinical trials, case reports, and case series related to targeted immune therapies in dermatology. Eligibility criteria were applied, and data were extracted from each study, including citation data, study design, and results.

RESULTS

We identified 1360 non-duplicate articles with the initial search strategy. Title and abstract review excluded 1150, while a full-text review excluded an additional 50 articles. The review included 143 studies published between 2012 and 2022, highlighting 39 drugs currently under investigation or in use for managing inflammatory skin diseases.

STUDY LIMITATIONS

The heterogeneity of summarized information limits this review. Some recommendations originated from data from clinical trials, while others relied on retrospective analyses and small case series. Recommendations will likely be updated as new results emerge.

CONCLUSION

Targeted therapies have revolutionized the treatment of chronic skin diseases, offering new options for patients unresponsive to standard treatments. Paradoxical reactions are rarely observed. Further studies are needed to fully understand the mechanisms and nature of these therapies. Overall, targeted immune therapies in dermatology represent a promising development, significantly improving the quality of life for patients with chronic inflammatory skin diseases.

Biologics for Psoriasis

Biologic therapies targeting tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) (infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab, etanercept), the p40 subunit shared by IL-12 and IL-23 (ustekinumab), the p19 subunit of IL-23 (guselkumab, tildrakizumab, risankizumab), IL-17A (secukinumab, ixekizumab), IL-17-RA (brodalumab) and both IL-17A and IL-17F (bimekizumab) have revolutionized the treatment of psoriasis. In both the short and long term, risankizumab had highest Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 scores compared to other oral and injectable biologics. IL-23 inhibitors had lowest rates of short-term and long-term adverse events and most favorable long-term risk-benefit profile compared to IL-17, IL-12/23, and TNF-α inhibitors.

Phototherapy for Psoriasis in the Age of Biologics

Phototherapy has utility as a psoriatic therapy, given its relatively high clinical efficacy, low side effect profile, and lower cost compared to newer effective treatments like biologics and small molecules. Phototherapy has shown Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)-75 and PASI-90 rates comparable to those of biologics and small molecules, with similarly rapid onsets of action, rates of remission, and quality of life scores. Certain patients may particularly benefit from phototherapy, such as those with localized disease or contraindications to systemic immunomodulatory medication. Phototherapy can be more cost-effective than biologics and conveniently administered at home, making it a valuable therapeutic option for the right patient.

Biologic and small-molecule therapy for treating moderate to severe atopic dermatitis: Mechanistic considerations

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a complex and heterogeneous skin disease for which achieving complete clinical clearance for most patients has proven challenging through single cytokine inhibition. Current studies integrate biomarkers and evaluate their role in AD, aiming to advance our understanding of the diverse molecular profiles implicated. Although traditionally characterized as a TH2-driven disease, extensive research has recently revealed the involvement of TH1, TH17, and TH22 immune pathways as well as the interplay of pivotal immune molecules, such as OX40, OX40 ligand (OX40L), thymic stromal lymphopoietin, and IL-33. This review explores the mechanistic effects of treatments for AD, focusing on mAbs and Janus kinase inhibitors. It describes how these treatments modulate immune pathways and examines their impact on key inflammatory and barrier biomarkers.

"I Was Almost in Disbelief" - Qualitative Analysis of Experiences and Expectations Among Psoriasis Patients Undergoing Biologic Treatment with Secukinumab

Purpose

Psoriasis is a highly debilitating chronic inflammatory disease. Increased understanding of its pathophysiology has enabled development of targeted treatments such as biologics. Several medical treatments have been shown to be influenced by patients' experiences and expectations. However, only little is known about patients' experiences with and expectations towards biologics. Our objectives were to identify patients' treatment experiences and treatment expectations and assess their trajectories over the course of treatment with the IL-17A inhibitor secukinumab. Moreover, we aimed to document effects of psoriasis, factors that influence symptomatology, and prior treatment experiences.

Patients and Methods

We conducted semi-structured interviews with n = 24 patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and employed a qualitative content analysis to derive thematic and evaluative codes. Findings were validated via peer debriefings with experienced dermatologists.

Results

Patients reported burdensome physical and psychological psoriasis symptoms and identified factors that can improve or worsen symptomatology, including stress and self-efficacy. Prior treatment experiences were mostly negative. Past barriers to effective treatment included time constraints or limited access. Concerning secukinumab, patients initially expected complete to partial remission of symptoms and occurrence or absence of side effects. Closer inspection of expectations and experiences revealed three trajectories. For most patients, initial expectations were met and future expectations remained unchanged. For the other patients, however, the experience did not match their initial expectation. One group then adapted their future expectations according to their experience, while the other group did not.

Conclusion

To our knowledge, this is the first qualitative study to assess expectations towards treatment effectiveness and side effects, their trajectories, and interplay with experiences among psoriasis patients. Our findings highlight the value of further research on the subject in order to optimize care for psoriasis patients and to learn more about the trajectories and influence of treatment expectations in general.

Novel pharmacotherapies and breakthroughs in psoriasis treatment: 2024 and beyond

INTRODUCTION

The use of the current available therapies for psoriasis management may sometimes be limited by reduced patients' compliance, safety issues for patients' comorbidities, primary lack of efficacy, loss of effectiveness, development of side effects. In this context, several clinical trials investigating the use of both topical and systemic therapies are ongoing, and other new drugs will be approved soon.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this manuscript is to review current literature and to provide an overview of the current and future trends in psoriasis treatment. A comprehensive review of the English-language medical literature was performed using Pubmed and clinicaltrials.gov databases.

EXPERT OPINION

Although several therapies are currently available for psoriasis' treatment, unmet needs still exist for patients with moderate and severe psoriasis and hence expanding the therapeutic armamentarium is desirable for a more personalized approach. The ongoing development of innovative therapies could provide effective and safe therapies in the future enhancing the therapeutic management of moderate-severe unresponsive psoriasis.

Drug survival of biologics in psoriasis: An Australian multicentre retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Drug survival, which refers to the time from treatment initiation to discontinuation, provides a surrogate measure of the effectiveness of a biologic in a real-world setting (J Invest Dermatol, 2015, 135, 1). The aim of this study was to determine the drug survival of biologics that are currently available in Australia. We also analysed the treatment efficacy of these biologics and reasons for discontinuation.

METHODS

Retrospective data from outpatient Dermatology biologic clinics in Westmead Hospital and Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (Sydney, Australia) from April 2006 to December 2020 were collected. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to calculate drug survival.

RESULTS

A total of 306 patients who underwent 566 treatment courses were analysed. Guselkumab was observed to have the longest drug survival, with cumulative drug survival rates of 94.2% ± 4.0 at 1- and 5-years. This was followed by ixekizumab which had a 1-year survival rate of 87.2% ± 4.5 and 5-year survival rate of 59.4% ± 9.5. Ixekizumab and guselkumab were also noted to have superior treatment efficacy compared with other biologics, with PASI-75 rates of 94.9% and 93.8%, respectively. The most common reasons for treatment discontinuation were a lack of initial efficacy to treatment and a loss of efficacy over time despite an initial response, respectively.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the first Australian study to report on outcomes of multiple new biologics that are currently in use for the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis. Overall, this study provides insight into patterns of care from a local experience that may help guide the management of moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

Tildrakizumab for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in Chinese patients: A 12-week randomized placebo-controlled phase III trial with long-term extension

BACKGROUND

There is a need for effective and safe therapies for psoriasis that provide sustained benefits. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of tildrakizumab, an anti-interleukin-23p19 monoclonal antibody, for treating moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in Chinese patients.

METHODS

In this multi-center, double-blind, phase III trial, patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis were enrolled and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive subcutaneous tildrakizumab 100 mg or placebo at weeks 0 and 4. Patients initially assigned to placebo were switched to receive tildrakizumab at weeks 12, 16, and every 12 weeks thereafter. Patients in the tildrakizumab group continued with tildrakizumab at week 16, and every 12 weeks until week 52. The primary endpoint was the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) response rate at week 12.

RESULTS

At week 12, tildrakizumab demonstrated significantly higher PASI 75 response rates (66.4% [73/110] vs. 12.7% [14/110]; difference, 51.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), 40.72, 62.13]; P <0.001) and Physician's Global Assessment (60.9% [67/110] vs. 10.0% [11/110]; difference, 49.1% [95% CI, 38.64, 59.62]; P <0.001) compared to placebo. PASI 75 response continued to improve over time in both tildrakizumab and placebo-switching to tildrakizumab groups, reaching maximal efficacy after 28 weeks (86.8% [92/106] vs . 82.4% [89/108]) and maintained up to 52 weeks (91.3% [95/104] vs . 87.4% [90/103]). Most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild and not related to tildrakizumab.

CONCLUSION

Tildrakizumab demonstrated durable efficacy through week 52 and was well tolerated in Chinese patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT05108766.

IFN-γ, IL-17A, IL-4, and IL-13: Potential Biomarkers for Prediction of the Effectiveness of Biologics in Psoriasis Patients

Biologics are widely used to treat moderate-to-severe psoriasis. However, we have unmet needs for predicting individual patient responses to biologics before starting psoriasis treatment. We investigate a reliable platform and biomarkers for predicting individual patient responses to biologics. In a cohort study between 2018 and 2023 from a referral center in Taiwan, twenty psoriasis patients with or without psoriatic arthritis who had ever experienced two or more biologics were enrolled. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells obtained from these patients were treated with Streptococcus pyogenes and different biologics. The PASI reduction rate was strongly correlated with the reduction rate in the IL-13 level (p = 0.001) and the ratios of IFN-γ to IL-13 (p < 0.001), IFN-γ to IL-4 (p = 0.019), and IL-17A to IL-13 (p = 0.001). The PASI reduction difference was strongly correlated with the difference in the IFN-γ level (p = 0.002), the difference in the ratios of IFN-γ to IL-4 (p = 0.041), the difference in the ratios of IFN-γ to IL-13 (p = 0.006), the difference in the ratios of IL-17A to IL-4 (p = 0.011), and the difference in the ratios of IL-17A to IL-13 (p = 0.029). The biomarkers IFN-γ, IL-13, IFN-γ/IL4, IFN-γ/IL13, IL-17A/IL-4, and IL-17A/IL-13 are representative of the effectiveness of psoriasis treatment.

Functional Genomics and Insights into the Pathogenesis and Treatment of Psoriasis

Psoriasis is a lifelong, systemic, immune mediated inflammatory skin condition, affecting 1-3% of the world's population, with an impact on quality of life similar to diseases like cancer or diabetes. Genetics are the single largest risk factor in psoriasis, with Genome-Wide Association (GWAS) studies showing that many psoriasis risk genes lie along the IL-23/Th17 axis. Potential psoriasis risk genes determined through GWAS can be annotated and characterised using functional genomics, allowing the identification of novel drug targets and the repurposing of existing drugs. This review is focused on the IL-23/Th17 axis, providing an insight into key cell types, cytokines, and intracellular signaling pathways involved. This includes examination of currently available biological treatments, time to relapse post drug withdrawal, and rates of primary/secondary drug failure, showing the need for greater understanding of the underlying genetic mechanisms of psoriasis and how they can impact treatment. This could allow for patient stratification towards the treatment most likely to reduce the burden of disease for the longest period possible.

OPT-In; Optimized Patient Treatment Outcomes in Plaque Psoriasis: A 3-Year State-Transition Treatment-Sequencing Model in the Italian Setting

INTRODUCTION

There are several treatment options for plaque psoriasis (PsO), but uncertainty remains around the optimal sequencing of treatments. The aims of this study were to investigate how adopting a best-treatment-first treatment sequence impacts patient outcomes and healthcare systems and to quantify the cost of treatment failure to the healthcare system.

METHODS

A 3-year state-transition treatment-sequencing model which identifies all possible treatment sequences in PsO was adapted to the Italian healthcare setting. Treatments considered in the model are those with European Medicines Agency marketing authorization and reimbursement in Italy as of December 2022. Italian market share data (2019-2021) and list prices (2022) informed the current prescribed sequences; these sequences were compared against all possible sequences to determine opportunities for improvement. Both the national perspective in Italy as well as the local perspective from seven regions were considered. The cost of treatment failure was informed through a questionnaire circulated to Italian dermatologists.

RESULTS

Overall, 1284 possible treatment sequences are possible when four lines of treatment are considered for patients with moderate-to-severe PsO in Italy. Within the estimated range of treatment failures across those sequences (0.97-2.56 per patient over 3 years), current prescribing behavior from the national perspective suggests patients will face 1.44 failures on average; this highlights the potential for improvement. For every treatment failure, the cost borne by the Italian National Healthcare Service (NHS) is €676.80. Overall, prescribing more optimized treatment sequences results in a 22.95% reduction in failures with a 2.27% increase in costs. The regional analyses found similar trends.

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest that selecting the most effective treatment sequences for incident patients provides the greatest opportunity to reduce treatment failures and maximize patient outcomes with a modest impact on costs. While regional variations exist, there is room for improvement across the board, which could translate to more efficient local healthcare systems.

Modelling Treatment Sequences in Immunology: Optimizing Patient Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

For some immune-mediated disorders, despite the range of therapies available there is limited evidence on which treatment sequences are best for patients and healthcare systems. We investigated how their selection can impact outcomes in an Italian setting.

METHODS

A 3-year state-transition treatment-sequencing model calculated potential effectiveness improvements and budget reallocation considerations associated with implementing optimal sequences in ankylosing spondylitis (AS), Crohn's disease (CD), non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (NR-AxSpA), plaque psoriasis (PsO), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and ulcerative colitis (UC). Sequences included three biological or disease-modifying treatments, followed by best supportive care. Disease-specific response measures were selected on the basis of clinical relevance, data availability, and data quality. Efficacy was differentiated between biologic-naïve and experienced populations, where possible, using published network meta-analyses and real-world data. All possible treatment sequences, based on reimbursement as of December 2022 in Italy (analyses' base country), were simulated.

RESULTS

Sequences with the best outcomes consistently employed the most efficacious therapies earlier in the treatment pathway. Improvements to prescribing practice are possible in all diseases; however, most notable was UC, where the per-patient 3-year average treatment failure was 37.3% higher than optimal. The results focused on the three most crowded and prevalent immunological sub-condition diseases in dermatology, rheumatology, and gastroenterology: PsO, RA, and UC, respectively. By prescribing from within the top 20% of the most efficacious sequences, the model found a 15.1% reduction in treatment failures, with a 1.59% increase in drug costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Prescribing more efficacious treatments earlier provides a greater opportunity to improve patient outcomes and minimizes treatment failures.

Blood MALT1 expression could help predict treatment outcomes in psoriasis patients, especially in those receiving biologics

INTRODUCTION

Mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue 1 (MALT1) modulates T helper cell differentiation, pro-inflammatory cytokine production, and epidermal hyperplasia to participate in the pathology of psoriasis. This study aimed to explore the correlation of blood MALT1 with treatment outcomes in psoriasis patients.

METHODS

MALT1 was detected in peripheral blood mononuclear cells by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction in 210 psoriasis patients before starting or converting to a new therapy, 50 disease controls, and 50 healthy controls. The psoriasis area severity index (PASI) score was evaluated at month (M)1, M3, and M6 in psoriasis patients.

RESULTS

MALT1 was increased in psoriasis patients versus disease controls and healthy controls (both p < .001); and positively related to body mass index (p = .019) and PASI score (p < .001) in psoriasis patients. PASI75 rate at M1, M3, and M6 was 22.9%, 46.2%, and 71.0%, respectively; while PASI90 rate at M1, M3, and M6 was 3.8%, 29.0%, and 50.5%, respectively, in psoriasis patients. PASI75/90 rates at M1, M3, and M6 were increased in psoriasis patients receiving biologics versus those without (all p < .05). Pretreatment MALT1 was higher in psoriasis patients who achieved PASI75 (p = .001) and PASI90 (p < .001) at M6 compared to those who did not achieve that. Subgroup analyses discovered that pretreatment MALT1 had a stronger ability to predict PASI75 and 90 realizations in psoriasis patients receiving biologics (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.723 and 0.808) versus those without (AUC: 0.594 and 0.675).

CONCLUSION

Blood MALT1 measurement may assist in predicting outcomes in psoriasis patients, especially in those receiving biologics.

Assessing Comparative Efficacy of Biologics for the Treatment of Psoriasis With Nail Involvement: A Systematic Review

Background

Despite recent advances in biologics, there is a lack of significant evidence regarding the comparative efficacy of biologics in treating more resistant features of psoriasis, namely nail psoriasis. A systematic review synthesizing data from multiple studies is efficacious in assessing the comparative efficacy among biologics for the treatment of nail psoriasis.

Objective

To evaluate and compare the efficacy of biologics for the treatment of nail psoriasis.

Methods

Utilizing PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature review was conducted using the Pubmed database on November 16, 2022. Studies selected were phase 3 or 4 randomized clinical trials, clinical studies, or other randomized trials with data on the treatment with biologics for adults with nail psoriasis.

Results

Sixteen studies meeting inclusion criteria were included for analysis. At 24 weeks, the highest mean NAPSI percent improvement achieved at week 24 was by brodalumab (76.9%) followed by etanercept (74%) and ixekizumab (70.5%) while the biologics achieving the greatest proportion of NAPSI 0 were adalimumab (44.6%) and ixekizumab (41%).

Conclusions

This study helps elucidate the comparative efficacy of biologics for the treatment of nail psoriasis. This review suggests that brodalumab and etanercept are associated with the highest percent improvement in nail psoriasis while adalimumab and ixekizumab are associated with the greatest probability of complete nail resolution.

Use of Efficiency Frontiers to Align Prices and Clinical Benefits of Biologic Therapies for Plaque Psoriasis

Importance

The US lacks a systematic approach for aligning drug prices with clinical benefit, and traditional cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) faces political obstacles. The efficiency frontier (EF) method offers policymakers an alternative approach.

Objective

To assess how the EF approach could align prices and clinical benefits of biologic medications for plaque psoriasis and estimate price reductions in the US vs 4 peer countries: Australia, Canada, France, and Germany.

Design and Setting

This health economic evaluation used the EF approach to compare the prices and clinical benefits of 11 biologics and 2 biosimilars for plaque psoriasis in the US, Australia, Canada, France, and Germany. Data were collected from February to March 2023 and analyzed from March to June 2023.

Main Outcome Measures

EFs were constructed based on each biologic's efficacy, measured using the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 response rate, and annual treatment cost as of January 2023; US costs were net of estimated manufacturer rebates. Prices based on the EF were compared with traditional CEA-based prices calculated by the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review at a threshold of $150 000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained.

Results

Among 13 biologics, PASI 90 response rates ranged from 17.9% (etanercept) to 71.6% (risankizumab); US net annual treatment costs ranged from $1664 (infliximab-dyyb) to $79 277 (risankizumab). The median (IQR) net annual treatment cost was higher in the US ($34 965 [$20 493-$48 942]) than prerebate costs in Australia ($9179 [$6691-$12 688]), Canada ($15 556 [$13 017-$16 112]), France ($9478 [$6637-$11 678]), and Germany ($13 829 [$13 231-$15 837]). The US EF included infliximab-dyyb (PASI 90: 57.4%; annual cost: $1664), ixekizumab (PASI 90: 70.8%; annual cost: $33 004), and risankizumab (PASI 90: 71.6%; annual cost: $79 277). US prices for psoriasis biologics would need to be reduced by a median (IQR) of 71% (31%-95%) to align with those estimated using the EF; the same approach would yield smaller price reductions in Canada (41% [6%-57%]), Australia (36% [0%-65%]), France (19% [0%-67%]), and Germany (11% [8%-26%]). Except for risankizumab, the EF-based prices were lower than the prices based on traditional CEA.

Conclusions and Relevance

This economic evaluation showed that for plaque psoriasis biologics, using an EF approach to negotiate prices could lead to substantial price reductions and better align prices with clinical benefits. US policymakers might consider using EFs to achieve prices commensurate with comparative clinical benefits, particularly for drug classes with multiple therapeutic alternatives for which differences can be adequately summarized by a single outcome measurement.

Dose reduction of biologics in patients with plaque psoriasis: a review

Dose reduction (DR) of first-generation biologics for plaque psoriasis (TNF-alpha inhibitors (i) and interleukin (IL)-12/23i) has been described in a previous scoping review. The literature on the DR of the newest generation of biologics (IL-17/23i) was scarce. The current review provides a literature update on the previous scoping review on the DR of all biologics, including the newest generation, with a focus on the uptake and implementation of DR in practice. The current literature search on DR revealed 14 new articles in addition to those in the previous review. Four of the newly found articles tested DR strategies, mostly focusing on first-generation biologics; only guselkumab (IL-23i) was included in one study. The other 10 studies showed data on regaining response after failure of DR, safety, cost-effectiveness, and uptake and implementation, as well as information about IL-17/23i. The eligibility criteria to start DR included both absolute and relative Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) scores (PASI ≤3/≤5/PASI 75-100) and/or Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) ≤3/≤5, or BSA ≤1/≤2, or Physician Global Assessment (PGA) ≤1/0-2 during a period ranging from 12 weeks to ≥1 year. Most studies used PASI ≤5 and/or DLQI ≤5 or PGA ≤1 for ≥6 months. DR strategies were mostly performed by stepwise interval prolongation in two steps (to 67% of the standard dose, followed by 50%). Some studies of IL-17/23i reduced the dose to ±25%. The tested DR strategies on stepwise or fixed DR on TNF-αi and IL-12/23i (three studies), as well as one "on-demand" dosing study on IL-23i guselkumab, were successful. In the case of relapse of DR on TNF-αi and IL-12/23i, clinical effectiveness was regained by retreatment with the standard dose. All studies showed substantial cost savings with the biologic DR of TNF-αi and IL-12/23i. The identified barriers against the implementation of DR were mainly a lack of guidelines and scientific evidence on effectiveness and safety, and a lack of time and (technical) support. The identified facilitators were mainly clear guidelines, feasible protocols, adequate education of patients and physicians, and cost reduction. In conclusion, DR seems promising, but a research gap still exists in randomized, prospective studies testing DR strategies, especially of IL-17/23i, hampering the completion of guidelines on DR. Taking into account the identified barriers and facilitators most likely results in a more successful implementation of biologic DR in practice.

Emerging roles of SIRT1 activator, SRT2104, in disease treatment

Silent information regulator 1 (SIRT1) is a NAD+-dependent class III deacetylase that plays important roles in the pathogenesis of numerous diseases, positioning it as a prime candidate for therapeutic intervention. Among its modulators, SRT2104 emerges as the most specific small molecule activator of SIRT1, currently advancing into the clinical translation phase. The primary objective of this review is to evaluate the emerging roles of SRT2104, and to explore its potential as a therapeutic agent in various diseases. In the present review, we systematically summarized the findings from an extensive array of literature sources including the progress of its application in disease treatment and its potential molecular mechanisms by reviewing the literature published in databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. We focuses on the strides made in employing SRT2104 for disease treatment, elucidating its potential molecular underpinnings based on preclinical and clinical research data. The findings reveal that SRT2104, as a potent SIRT1 activator, holds considerable therapeutic potential, particularly in modulating metabolic and longevity-related pathways. This review establishes SRT2104 as a leading SIRT1 activator with significant therapeutic promise.

Structural Basis for p19 Targeting by Anti-IL-23 Biologics: Correlations with Short- and Long-Term Efficacy in Psoriasis

IL-23 is central to psoriasis pathogenesis. Biologics targeting IL-23 are important therapies against psoriasis. IL-23 inhibitors risankizumab, tildrakizumab, and guselkumab bind the IL-23 p19 subunit, whereas ustekinumab binds p40; however, the structural composition of the IL-23-binding epitopes and how these molecular properties relate to clinical efficacy are not known. Utilizing epitope data derived from hydrogen-deuterium exchange or crystallographic experiments, we mapped inhibitor epitope locations, hydrophobicity, and surface charge onto the IL-23 surface. Molecular properties of each inhibitor epitope, including solvent-accessible surface area, were correlated to binding affinity, kinetic values, and clinical efficacy scores for plaque psoriasis through linear regression analysis. Each IL-23 inhibitor binds an epitope with a unique size, composition, and location except for a 10-residue overlap region outside of the IL-23 receptor epitope. We observed strong correlations between epitope surface area and KD and koff but not kon. Epitope surface area, KD, and koff were further associated with short-term (10-16 weeks) and long-term (44-60 weeks) clinical efficacy according to PASI-90 responses, with risankizumab demonstrating highest efficacy among IL-23 biologics. In contrast, kon, epitope hydrophobicity, polarity, and charge content did not correlate with efficacy. These data exemplify how molecular principles of medications within a therapeutic class can explain their differential clinical responses.

Deep analysis of skin molecular heterogeneities and their significance on the precise treatment of patients with psoriasis

Background

Psoriasis is a highly heterogeneous autoinflammatory disease. At present, heterogeneity in disease has not been adequately translated into concrete treatment options. Our aim was to develop and verify a new stratification scheme that identifies the heterogeneity of psoriasis by the integration of large-scale transcriptomic profiles, thereby identifying patient subtypes and providing personalized treatment options whenever possible.

Methods

We performed functional enrichment and network analysis of upregulated differentially expressed genes using microarray datasets of lesional and non-lesional skin samples from 250 psoriatic patients. Unsupervised clustering methods were used to identify the skin subtypes. Finally, an Xgboost classifier was utilized to predict the effects of methotrexate and commonly prescribed biologics on skin subtypes.

Results

Based on the 163 upregulated differentially expressed genes, psoriasis patients were categorized into three subtypes (subtypes A-C). Immune cells and proinflammatory-related pathways were markedly activated in subtype A, named immune activation. Contrastingly, subtype C, named stroma proliferation, was enriched in integrated stroma cells and tissue proliferation-related signaling pathways. Subtype B was modestly activated in all the signaling pathways. Notably, subtypes A and B presented good responses to methotrexate and interleukin-12/23 inhibitors (ustekinumab) but inadequate responses to tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors and interleukin-17A receptor inhibitors. Contrastly, subtype C exhibited excellent responses to tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors (etanercept) and interleukin-17A receptor inhibitors (brodalumab) but not methotrexate and interleukin-12/23 inhibitors.

Conclusions

Psoriasis patients can be assorted into three subtypes with different molecular and cellular characteristics based on the heterogeneity of the skin's immune cells and the stroma, determining the clinical responses of conventional therapies.

Regulation of the Immune Cell Repertoire in Psoriasis Patients Upon Blockade of IL-17A or TNFα

INTRODUCTION

Targeting of the proinflammatory cytokine interleukin 17A (IL-17A) or tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) with the monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) ixekizumab or adalimumab, respectively, is a successful therapy for chronic plaque psoriasis. The effects of these treatments on immune cell populations in the skin are largely unknown.

METHODS

In this study, we compared the composition of cutaneous, lesional and non-lesional immune cells and blood immune cells in ixekizumab- or adalimumab-treated patients with psoriasis.

RESULTS

Our data reveal that both treatments efficiently downregulate T cells, macrophages and different subsets of dendritic cells (DCs) in lesional skin towards levels of healthy skin. In contrast to lesional skin, non-lesional areas in patients harbor only few or no detectable DCs compared to the skin of healthy subjects. Treatment with neither ixekizumab nor adalimumab reversed this DC imbalance in non-lesional skin of psoriatic patients.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that anti-IL-17A and anti-TNFα therapy rebalances the immune cell repertoire of lesional skin in psoriatic patients but fails to restore the disturbed immune cell repertoire in non-lesional skin.

Reduced economic disparity in biologics use for psoriasis after introducing the reducing copayment program

Biologics for psoriasis are efficient and safe, but very expensive. We investigated the association of the reducing copayment program (RCP) with changes in biologics use patterns depending on the income levels of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. This nationwide cohort study included patients identified as having moderate-to-severe psoriasis between 2014 and 2020. Logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds ratio for the use of biologics according to income levels. Among 57,139 patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis, 3464 (6.1%) used biologics for psoriasis from 2014 to 2020. After the introduction of RCP in 2017, the proportion of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis using biologics rapidly increased from 5.0% in 2016 to 19.2% in 2020; the increase was more remarkable in patients with the lowest or mid-low income compared to those with Medical Aid. Drug survival of biologics was higher in patients with the highest income before the RCP, but became comparable between those with high and low incomes after RCP introduction. The introduction of RCP was associated with an increased use of biologics in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis of all income levels; however, the effect was more pronounced in low-income patients. The RCP may contribute to alleviating the disparity in access to biologics.

Transcription Factor IRF7 is Involved in Psoriasis Development and Response to Guselkumab Treatment

Purpose

Guselkumab is a highly effective biologic agent for treating psoriasis. This study aimed to explore potential transcription factors involved in psoriasis pathogenesis and response to guselkumab treatment, aiming to provide new therapeutic strategies for psoriasis.

Patients and Methods

We analyzed gene expression and single-cell RNA-seq data from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) that upregulated in psoriasis and downregulated after guselkumab treatment were subjected to enrichment analyses. Single-cell regulatory network inference and clustering (SENIC) and regulon module analyses identified different regulon activities between the lesion and non-lesion skin of psoriasis. Cell-cell communication analysis revealed interactions among specific cell clusters. Transcription factor (TF) regulons were identified from the guselkumab-specific regulon network. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) confirmed the IRF7 regulon in the validation cohort. Finally, the expression level of IRF7 was identified in plaque psoriasis before and after 12 weeks of guselkumab therapy by immunohistochemical experiment.

Results

799 DEGs were downregulated after guselkumab treatment. Enrichment analyses highlighted the interleukin-17 (IL-17) pathway in this gene set. The M2 module exhibited the primary difference in regulon activity. Strong cell-cell interactions were observed between keratinocytes and immune cells. IRF7 regulon had significant roles in psoriasis and treatment response, as validated by GSEA analysis using the IL-17 signaling pathway as a reference. The immunohistochemical analysis unveiled substantial differences in the expression levels of IRF7 in psoriatic skin samples before and after 12 weeks of guselkumab treatment.

Conclusion

IRF7 may be the key player in psoriasis pathogenesis and the therapeutic process involving guselkumab. Targeting IRF7 might offer new therapeutic strategies for psoriasis.