The effects of local and regional treatment on the metastatic outcome in prostatic carcinoma with pelvic lymph node involvement

Impact of metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) and pathological vertebral compression fracture (pVCF) in neurological and survival prognosis

BACKGROUND

Metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) and pathological vertebral compression fractures (pVCF) are the most serious debilitating morbidities of spine metastases (SpMs) causing devastating neurological damages. The respective impact of these two metastasis-spreading entities on survival and on neurological damage is debated.

METHODS

A French prospective cohort study collected 279 consecutive patients presenting with SpMs between January 2017 and 2021. We compared 174 patients with MESCC and 105 patients with pVCF.

RESULTS

The median Overall Survival (OS) for the MESCC group was 13.4 months (SD 1.5) vs 19.2 months (SD 2.3) for pVCF patients (p = 0.085). Sixty-five patients (23.3 %) were operated on: 49/65 (75.4 %) in the MESCC group and 16/65 (15.2 %) in the pVCF group, p < 0.0001. At 6 months FU, in the MESCC group, 21/44 (45.4 %) of non-ambulatory patients at onset improved to ambulatory status (Frankel D-E) vs 10/13 (76.9 %) in the pVCF group (p = 0.007). In multivariable analysis with the Cox proportional hazard model, good ECOG-PS and SINS Score 7-12 [HR: 6.755, 95 % CI 2.40-19.00; p = 0.001] were good prognostic factors for preserved ambulatory neurological status. However, SpMs diagnosed synchronously with the primary tumor [HR: 0.397, 95 % CI 0.185-0.853; p = 0.018] and MESCC [HR: 0.058, 95 % CI 0.107-0.456; p = 0.007] were independent risk factors for impaired neurological function.

CONCLUSION

Contrary to pVCF, MESCC causes neurological damage. Nevertheless, neurological recovery remains possible. MESCC and pVCF have no impact on survival. The management of MESCC remains to be clarified and optimized to reduce neurological damage.

ACR-ABS-ASTRO Practice Parameter for Transperineal Permanent Brachytherapy of Prostate Cancer

AIM/OBJECTIVES/BACKGROUND

The American College of Radiology (ACR), American Brachytherapy Society (ABS), and American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) have jointly developed the following practice parameter for transperineal permanent brachytherapy of prostate cancer. Transperineal permanent brachytherapy of prostate cancer is the interstitial implantation of low-dose rate radioactive seeds into the prostate gland for the purpose of treating localized prostate cancer.

METHODS

This practice parameter was developed according to the process described under the heading The Process for Developing ACR Practice Parameters and Technical Standards on the ACR website (https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Practice-Parameters-and-Technical-Standards) by the Committee on Practice Parameters-Radiation Oncology of the Commission on Radiation Oncology, in collaboration with ABS and ASTRO.

RESULTS

This practice parameter provides a framework for the appropriate use of low-dose rate brachytherapy in the treatment of prostate cancer either as monotherapy or as part of a treatment regimen combined with external-beam radiation therapy. The practice parameter defines the qualifications and responsibilities of all involved radiation oncology personnel, including the radiation oncologist, medical physicist, dosimetrist, radiation therapist, and nursing staff. Patient selection criteria and the utilization of supplemental therapies such as external-beam radiation therapy and androgen deprivation therapy are discussed. The logistics of the implant procedure, postimplant dosimetry assessment, and best practices with regard to safety and quality control are presented.

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence to established standards can help to ensure that permanent prostate brachytherapy is delivered in a safe and efficacious manner.

Acute and late toxicity and preliminary outcomes report of moderately hypofractionated helical tomotherapy for localized prostate cancer: a mono-institutional analysis

AIMS

To assess toxicity and clinical outcomes of moderately hypofractionated helical tomotherapy (HT) for the curative treatment of localized prostate cancer (PC).

METHODS

From December 2012 to May 2018, 170 patients were treated with definitive intent for PC. Thirty-four percent were low risk, 30% intermediate risk (IR) and 36% high risk (HR). All patients received 70 Gy in 28 fractions to the prostate; 61.6 Gy were delivered to the seminal vesicles for IR; pelvic lymph nodes irradiation for a total dose of 50.4 Gy was added in the HR subgroup. Toxicity was assessed using CTCAE V4.0, and biochemical failure was defined following Phoenix criteria. Time-to-event data were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 36 months (range 12-78); acute toxicity was as follows: G1 and G2 in 27.6% and 19.4% for GI; 53% and 24% for GU. No G ≥ 3 event was observed. For late toxicity, G ≥ 3 GI and GU rates were, respectively, 3% and 2.4% at 3 years and 3% and 4.8% at 4 years; no G4 occurred. A statistical correlation between acute or late G3 incidence and clinical or dosimetric parameters was not found. At the time of analysis, 2- and 3-year biochemical relapse-free survival rates were 90% and 87.5% and 2- and 3-year overall survival rates were 96.4% and 90%, respectively. The log-rank test revealed no difference between the risk groups in terms of biochemical control (p = 0.16).

CONCLUSIONS

Moderately hypofractionated RT with HT for localized prostate cancer reported excellent outcomes with mild acute and late toxicity incidence, with promising biochemical control rates.

[Multimodal therapy of locally advanced prostate cancer]

Locally advanced prostate cancer (LAPCA) comprises about 5-10 % of all newly diagnosed prostate cancers and is associated with the highest prostate cancer specific mortality (approximately 8-20 %). LAPCA is defined by the presence of extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle invasion, and bladder neck infiltration of pelvic lymph node metastases. It is evident that prognosis can only be improved by interdisciplinary multimodality treatment strategies. Adequate local staging by multiparametric MRI is one of the cornerstones for an individualized, risk-adapted treatment approach. This might consist of extended radical prostatectomy with an extended pelvic lymphadenectomy or intensity-modulated radiation therapy with androgen deprivation as the primary local therapeutic approach. Both treatment strategies may be combined with neoadjuvant or adjuvant radiation therapy or salvage surgery. Combination with neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy and new androgen receptor pathway inhibitors might also be possible. This article summarizes the current treatment strategies for LAPCA.

EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent-update 2013

CONTEXT

The most recent summary of the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines on prostate cancer (PCa) was published in 2011.

OBJECTIVE

To present a summary of the 2013 version of the EAU guidelines on screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent of clinically organ-confined PCa.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A literature review of the new data emerging from 2011 to 2013 has been performed by the EAU PCa guideline group. The guidelines have been updated, and levels of evidence and grades of recommendation have been added to the text based on a systematic review of the literature, which included a search of online databases and bibliographic reviews.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

A full version of the guidelines is available at the EAU office or online (www.uroweb.org). Current evidence is insufficient to warrant widespread population-based screening by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) for PCa. Systematic prostate biopsies under ultrasound guidance and local anesthesia are the preferred diagnostic method. Active surveillance represents a viable option in men with low-risk PCa and a long life expectancy. A biopsy progression indicates the need for active intervention, whereas the role of PSA doubling time is controversial. In men with locally advanced PCa for whom local therapy is not mandatory, watchful waiting (WW) is a treatment alternative to androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), with equivalent oncologic efficacy. Active treatment is recommended mostly for patients with localized disease and a long life expectancy, with radical prostatectomy (RP) shown to be superior to WW in prospective randomized trials. Nerve-sparing RP is the approach of choice in organ-confined disease, while neoadjuvant ADT provides no improvement in outcome variables. Radiation therapy should be performed with ≥ 74 Gy in low-risk PCa and 78 Gy in intermediate- or high-risk PCa. For locally advanced disease, adjuvant ADT for 3 yr results in superior rates for disease-specific and overall survival and is the treatment of choice. Follow-up after local therapy is largely based on PSA and a disease-specific history, with imaging indicated only when symptoms occur.

CONCLUSIONS

Knowledge in the field of PCa is rapidly changing. These EAU guidelines on PCa summarize the most recent findings and put them into clinical practice.

PATIENT SUMMARY

A summary is presented of the 2013 EAU guidelines on screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent of clinically organ-confined prostate cancer (PCa). Screening continues to be done on an individual basis, in consultation with a physician. Diagnosis is by prostate biopsy. Active surveillance is an option in low-risk PCa and watchful waiting is an alternative to androgen-deprivation therapy in locally advanced PCa not requiring immediate local treatment. Radical prostatectomy is the only surgical option. Radiation therapy can be external or delivered by way of prostate implants. Treatment follow-up is based on the PSA level.

A retrospective analysis of the prognosis of prostate cancer patients with lymph node involvement on MR lymphography: who might be cured

Background

The prognosis of prostate cancer patients with lymph node metastases so small they can only be visualized by new imaging techniques as MR lymphography (MRL) is unknown. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognosis of prostate cancer patients with non-enlarged metastatic lymph nodes on MRL and to identify a subgroup of MRL-positive patients who might be candidates for curative treatment.

Methods

The charts of 138 prostate cancer patients without enlarged lymph nodes on CT, in whom a pre-treatment MRL was performed were reviewed. Endpoints were distant metastases-free survival and overall survival. Relation between the following factors and outcome were investigated: T-stage, PSA value at diagnosis, Gleason score, diameter (short axis and long axis) of the largest MRL-positive lymph node, number of MRL-positive lymph nodes, the presence of extra-pelvic nodal disease, and the extent of resection of the positive lymph nodes. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to estimate the survival functions.

Results

Of the 138 patients, 24 (17%) had a positive MRL. Patients with a short axis of the largest positive lymph node of ≤8 mm had a significantly better 5-year distant metastases-free (79% vs 16%) and overall survival (81% vs 36%) than patients with larger positive lymph nodes. This also accounted for patients with a largest long axis of ≤10 mm (71% vs 20% and 73% vs 40%, respectively). Outcome was also better in patients in whom all positive lymph nodes had been resected.

Conclusion

A selection of MRL-positive patients with a good prognosis could be identified, consisting of patients with small positive lymph nodes. In these patients, cure might be pursued.

Use of [11C]choline PET-CT as a noninvasive method for detecting pelvic lymph node status from prostate cancer and relationship with choline kinase expression

PURPOSE

To evaluate the accuracy and biological basis for [(11)C]choline-PET-CT in the nodal staging of high risk localized prostate cancer patients.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Twenty-eight patients underwent dynamic [(11)C]choline-PET-CT of the pelvis and lower abdomen prior to extended laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection (eLPL). The sensitivity and specificity of [(11)C]choline PET, [(11)C]choline PET-CT, and MRI for nodal detection were calculated. Average and maximal standardized uptake values (SUV(ave), SUV(max)) were compared with choline kinase alpha (CHKα) and Ki67 immunohistochemistry scores.

RESULTS

Four hundred and six lymph nodes (LN), in 26 patients, were assessable. Twenty-seven (6.7%) involved pelvic nodes at eLPL were detected in 9 patients. Seventeen of the 27 involved nodes were subcentimeter. The sensitivity and specificity on a per nodal basis were 18.5% and 98.7%, 40.7% and 98.4%, and 51.9% and 98.4% for MRI, [(11)C]choline PET, and [(11)C]choline PET-CT, respectively. Sensitivity was higher for [(11)C]choline PET-CT compared with MRI (P = 0.007). A higher nodal detection rate, including subcentimeter nodes, was seen with [(11)C]choline PET-CT than MRI. Malignant lesions showed CHKα expression in both cytoplasm and nucleus. SUV(ave) and SUV(max) strongly correlated with CHKα staining intensity (r = 0.68, P < 0.0001 and r = 0.63, P = 0.0004, respectively). In contrast, Ki67 expression was generally low in all tumors.

CONCLUSION

This study establishes the relationship between [(11)C]choline PET-CT uptake with choline kinase expression in prostate cancer and allows it to be used as a noninvasive means of staging pelvic LNs, being highly specific and more sensitive than MRI, including the detection of subcentimeter disease.

Evidence-based radiation oncology: Definitive, adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy for non-metastatic prostate cancer

The standard treatment options based on the risk category (stage, Gleason score, PSA) for localized prostate cancer include surgery, radiotherapy and watchful waiting. The literature does not provide clear-cut evidence for the superiority of surgery over radiotherapy, whereas both approaches differ in their side effects. The definitive external beam irradiation is frequently employed in stage T1b-T1c, T2 and T3 tumors. There is a pretty strong evidence that intermediate- and high-risk patients benefit from dose escalation. The latter requires reduction of the irradiated normal tissue (using 3-dimensional conformal approach, intensity modulated radiotherapy, image-guided radiotherapy, etc.). Recent data suggest that prostate cancer may benefit from hypofractionation due to relatively low alpha/beta ratio; these findings warrant confirmation though. The role of whole pelvis irradiation is still controversial. Numerous randomized trials demonstrated a clinical benefit in terms of biochemical control, local and distant control, and overall survival from the addition of androgen suppression to external beam radiotherapy in intermediate- and high-risk patients. These studies typically included locally advanced (T3-T4) and poor-prognosis (Gleason score >7 and/or PSA >20 ng/mL) tumors and employed neoadjuvant/concomitant/adjuvant androgen suppression rather than only adjuvant setting. The ongoing trials will hopefully further define the role of endocrine treatment in more favorable risk patients and in the setting of the dose escalated radiotherapy. Brachytherapy (BRT) with permanent implants may be offered to low-risk patients (cT1-T2a, Gleason score <7, or 3+4, PSA <or=10 ng/mL), with prostate volume of <or=50 ml, no previous transurethral prostate resection and a good urinary function. Some recent data suggest a benefit from combining external beam irradiation and BRT for intermediate-risk patients. EBRT after radical prostatectomy improves disease-free survival and biochemical and local control rates in patients with positive surgical margins or pT3 tumors. Salvage radiotherapy may be considered at the time of biochemical failure in previously non-irradiated patients.

Current status of lymph node-positive prostate cancer: Incidence and predictors of outcome

In early surgical series, the incidence of positive lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer was approximately 40%. In the modern era of screening and improved patient selection, the incidence is now <10%, although most series excluded patients with higher risk disease. The risk of having positive lymph nodes is influenced by disease stage, prostate-specific antigen level, and tumor grade and by the aggressiveness of lymph node dissection. Many of the same factors predict the outcome of these patients. Although the percentage of patients with positive lymph nodes has declined, there remain significant numbers of patients with lymph node-positive prostate cancer, and it remains a therapeutic dilemma.

Disease-specific survival following the brachytherapy management of prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To determine disease-specific survival (DSS) and associated predictive factors after prostate brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 1561 patients underwent brachytherapy for prostate cancer from 1990 to 2004 (median follow-up, 3.8 years). Treatment included brachytherapy alone (n = 634), brachytherapy and hormonal therapy (n = 420), and implant and external beam therapy (n = 507).

RESULTS

The DSS and overall survival rates at 10 years were 96% and 74%, respectively. Gleason score significantly impacted DSS, with 10-year rates of 98%, 91%, and 92% for scores of < or = 6, 7, and > or = 8, respectively (p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that PSA status after treatment had the most significant effect on DSS. Ten-year DSS rates were 100%, 52%, and 98%, respectively for patients without PSA failure (n = 1430), failure with a doubling time (DT) < or = 10 months (n = 64), and failure with a DT > 10 months (n = 67), respectively (p < 0.0001). In patients with PSA failure, DSS rates were 30%, 67%, and 98%, for those with DT < or = 6 months, > 6-10 months, and > 10 months, respectively (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The 10-year DSS rate supports the efficacy of brachytherapy. Patients dying with disease within 10 years after treatment harbor inherently aggressive cancer with high Gleason scores and short DT.

Risk-Adapted Androgen Deprivation and Escalated Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: Does Radiation Dose Influence Outcome of Patients Treated With Adjuvant Androgen Deprivation? A GICOR Study

Purpose

Multicenter study conducted to determine the impact on biochemical control and survival of risk-adapted androgen deprivation (AD) combined with high-dose three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) for prostate cancer. Results of biochemical control are reported.

Patients and Methods

Between October 1999 and October 2001, 416 eligible patients with prostate cancer were assigned to one of three treatment groups according to their risk factors: 181 low-risk patients were treated with 3DCRT alone; 75 intermediate-risk patients were allocated to receive neoadjuvant AD (NAD) 4-6 months before and during 3DCRT; and 160 high-risk patients received NAD and adjuvant AD (AAD) 2 years after 3DCRT. Stratification was performed for treatment/risk group and total radiation dose.

Results

After a median follow-up of 36 months (range, 18 to 63 months), the actuarial biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) at 5 years for all patients was 74%. The corresponding figures for low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk disease were 80%, 73%, and 79%, respectively (P = .847). Univariate analysis showed that higher radiation dose was the only significant factor associated with bDFS for all patients (P = .0004). When stratified for treatment group, this benefit was evident for low-risk patients (P = .009) and, more interestingly, for high-risk patients treated with AAD. The 5-year bDFS for high-risk patients treated with AAD was 63% for radiation doses less than 72 Gy and 84% for those ≥ 72 Gy (P = .003).

Conclusion

The results of combined AAD plus high-dose 3DCRT are encouraging. To our knowledge, this is the first study showing an additional benefit of high-dose 3DCRT when combined with long-term AD for unfavorable disease.

Comparison of external radiation therapy vs radical prostatectomy in lymph node positive prostate cancer patients

INTRODUCTION

Treatment options for lymph node positive prostate cancer are limited. We retrospectively compared patients who underwent external radiotherapy (ERT) to patients treated by radical prostatectomy (RPX).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 102 lymph node positive patients from the RPX series at Ulm University were evaluated. In all, 76 patients received adjuvant androgen withdrawal as part of their primary treatment. In the ERT group, 44 patients were treated at the University of Michigan using a fractionated regimen. Of these, 21 patients received early adjuvant hormonal therapy. Patients with neoadjuvant therapy before RPX or ERT were excluded.

RESULTS

In the RPX group, PSA nadir (nadir < or = 0.2 vs > 0.2 ng/ml) showed a strong association with outcome. In the ERT group, pretreatment PSA was an independent predictor of outcome (P = 0.04) and patients with adjuvant hormonal therapy had a significant longer recurrence-free interval compared to patients without adjuvant therapy (P = 0.004). Comparing only patients with adjuvant hormonal treatment after cancer-specific therapy, the ERT-treated patients had a borderline longer PSA recurrence-free survival time compared to the RPX-treated patients (P = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In case of positive lymph nodes, RPX and ERT might be considered and need to be explained to the patient. For future treatment decisions, the presented findings and a potential survival benefit need to be evaluated in a larger prospective setting.

Farnesyltransferase inhibitor effects on prostate tumor micro-environment and radiation survival

BACKGROUND

Ras activation by mutation, overexpression, or receptor signaling can increase tumor cell survival after irradiation.

METHODS

We examined whether inhibiting Ras activity with farnesyltransferase inhibitors (FTI) altered the radiosensitivity and tumor micro-environment in prostate tumors.

RESULTS

Treatment with FTIs L-744,832 or FTI-277 reduced clonogenic survival of prostate tumor cells expressing oncogenic H-ras after irradiation. PI3-kinase/Akt and MAPK signaling pathways were downregulated by FTIs in these cells. FTI treatment reduced tumor hypoxia and also reduced MMP-9 expression in tumors with activated mutant H-ras. FTI treatment did not, however, increase apoptosis in irradiated intestine, demonstrating that acute radiation injury of this normal tissue was not enhanced by FTIs.

CONCLUSIONS

FTIs can enhance the killing of prostate tumors with activated H-Ras. Together with the absence of increased acute toxicity to normal bowel, these results imply that FTI treatment should be further studied as a possible adjuvant to radiotherapy in the treatment of abdominal cancers with activated Ras signaling.

Combined modality treatment in the management of high-risk prostate cancer

PURPOSE

The efficacy of a multimodality protocol using neoadjuvant and concomitant hormonal therapy, brachytherapy, and three-dimensional conformal external beam radiotherapy (RT) in high-risk prostate cancer was evaluated using biochemical outcomes and posttreatment biopsy results.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between February 1994 and November 1999, 132 high-risk patients were treated with combined hormonal therapy (9 months), permanent radioactive seed brachytherapy, and external beam RT, with follow-up ranging from 36 to 88 months (median, 50 months). The eligibility criteria were any of the following: Gleason score 8-10, initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level >20 ng/mL, clinical Stage T2c-T3, or positive seminal vesicle biopsy, or two or more of the following: Gleason score 7, PSA level >10-20 ng/mL, or Stage T2b. Twenty percent of patients had a positive seminal vesicle biopsy before therapy. Negative laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissections were performed in 44% of patients.

RESULTS

The actuarial overall freedom from PSA failure rate was 86% at 5 years. The freedom from PSA failure rate at 5 years was 97% for those with a Gleason score of < or =6 (35 of 36), 85% for a Gleason score of 7 (50 of 59), and 76% for a Gleason score of 8-10 (28 of 37; p = 0.03). A trend was noted toward worse outcomes in seminal vesicle biopsy-positive patients, with a 5-year freedom from PSA failure rate of 74% vs. 89% for all other patients (p = 0.06). Posttreatment prostate biopsies were performed in 47 patients and were negative in 96% at the first biopsy and 100% at the last biopsy.

CONCLUSION

Trimodality therapy with androgen suppression, brachytherapy, and external beam RT for high-risk prostate cancer results in excellent biochemical and pathologically confirmed local control.

Phase I–II trial evaluating combined intensity-modulated radiotherapy and in situ gene therapy with or without hormonal therapy in treatment of prostate cancer—interim report on PSA response and biopsy data

PURPOSE

There is an evolving role for combining radiotherapy (RT) with gene therapy in the management of prostate cancer. However, the clinical results of this combined approach are much needed. The preliminary results addressing the safety of this Phase I-II study combining RT and gene therapy (adenovirus/herpes simplex virus-thymidine kinase gene/valacyclovir with or without hormonal therapy) in the treatment of prostate cancer have been previously reported. We now report the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response and biopsy data.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This trial was composed of three separate arms. Arm A consisted of low-risk patients (Stage T1-T2a, Gleason score <7, pretreatment PSA <10 ng/mL) treated with combined RT-gene therapy. A mean dose of 76 Gy was delivered to the prostate with intensity-modulated RT. They also received adenovirus/herpes simplex virus-thymidine kinase/valacyclovir gene therapy. Arm B consisted of high-risk patients (Stage T2b-T3, Gleason score >6, pretreatment PSA level >10 ng/mL) treated with combined RT-gene therapy and hormonal therapy (luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist [30-mg Lupron, 4-month depot] and an antiandrogen [flutamide, 250 mg t.i.d. for 14 days]). Arm C consisted of patients with Stage D1 (positive pelvic lymph nodes) who received the same regimen as Arm B with the addition of 45 Gy to the pelvic lymphatics. PSA determination and biopsy were performed before, during, and after treatment. The American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus definition (three consecutive rises in PSA level) was used to denote PSA failure.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients (29 in Arm A, 26 in Arm B, and 4 in Arm C) completed the trial. The median age was 68 years (range, 39-85 years). The median follow-up for the entire group was 13.5 months (range, 1.4-27.8 months). Only Arm A patients were observed to have an increase in PSA on Day 14. The PSA then declined appropriately. All patients in Arm A (median follow-up, 13.4 months) and Arm B (median follow-up, 13.9 months) had biochemical control at last follow-up. Three patients in Arm C (with pretreatment PSA of 335, 19.6, and 2.5 ng/mL and a combined Gleason score of 8, 9, and 9 involving all biopsy cores) had biochemical failure at 3, 3, and 7.7 months. Two patients had distant failure in bone and 1 patient in the para-aortic lymph nodes outside the RT portal. Six to twelve prostate biopsies performed in these 3 patients revealed no evidence of residual carcinoma. In Arm A, biopsy showed no evidence of carcinoma in 66.7% (18 of 27), 92.3% (24 of 26), 91.7% (11 of 12), 100% (8 of 8), and 100% (6 of 6) at 6 weeks, 4 months, 12 months, 18 months, and 24 months after treatment, respectively. In Arm B, no evidence of carcinoma on biopsy was noted in 96% (24 of 25), 90.5% (19 of 21), 100% (14 of 14), 100% (7 of 7), and 100% (2 of 2), respectively, in the same interval after treatment.

CONCLUSION

This is the first reported trial of its kind in the field of prostate cancer that aims to expand the therapeutic index of RT by combining it with in situ gene therapy. The initial transient PSA rise in the Arm A patients may have been a result of local immunologic response or inflammation elicited by in situ gene therapy. Additional investigation to elucidate the mechanisms is needed. Hormonal therapy may have obliterated this rise in Arm B and C patients. The biopsy data were encouraging and appeared to show no evidence of malignancy earlier than historical data. Combined RT, short-course hormonal therapy, and in situ therapy appeared to provide good locoregional control but inadequate systemic control in patients with positive pelvic lymph nodes. Longer term use of hormonal therapy in addition to gene therapy and RT has been adopted for this group of patients to maximize both locoregional and systemic control.

Pretreatment Nomogram That Predicts 5-Year Probability of Metastasis Following Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer

Purpose: There are several nomograms for the patient considering radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. Because of the questionable clinical implications of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence, its use as an end point has been criticized in several of these nomograms. The goal of this study was to create and to externally validate a nomogram for predicting the probability that a patient will develop metastasis within 5 years after three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (CRT).

Patients and Methods: We conducted a retrospective, nonrandomized analysis of 1,677 patients treated with three-dimensional CRT at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) from 1988 to 2000. Clinical parameters examined were pretreatment PSA level, clinical stage, and biopsy Gleason sum. Patients were followed until their deaths, and the time at which they developed metastasis was noted. A nomogram for predicting the 5-year probability of developing metastasis was constructed from the MSKCC cohort and validated using the Cleveland Clinic series of 1,626 patients.

Results: After three-dimensional CRT, 159 patients developed metastasis. At 5 years, 11% of patients experienced metastasis by cumulative incidence analysis (95% CI, 9% to 13%). A nomogram constructed from the data gathered from these men showed an excellent ability to discriminate among patients in an external validation data set, as shown by a concordance index of 0.81.

Conclusion: A nomogram with reasonable accuracy and discrimination has been constructed and validated using an external data set to predict the probability that a patient will experience metastasis within 5 years after three-dimensional CRT.

Radical prostatectomy for the patient with locally advanced prostate cancer

The proper management of patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the prostate has been contentious and too frequently based on antiquated misconceptions. Non-extirpative treatments, even when combined with neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, are inferior to the surgical removal of the prostate for controlling local progression and distant dissemination of the cancer. Radical prostatectomy combined with early adjunctive hormonal therapy for patients with nodal metastasis is superior to all other forms of therapy and should be considered the standard of care. This approach provides survival rates comparable with patients with clinically organ-confined prostate cancer.

Emerging role of adjuvant hormonal therapy

Recent years have seen a downward shift in the most common disease stage at diagnosis and in the age of patients diagnosed with prostate cancer. Although younger men with clinically localized disease are generally offered radiotherapy or radical prostatectomy, such treatment does not always produce a cure. Adjuvant hormonal therapy (medical or surgical castration) has been shown to extend progression-free survival in both the radiotherapy and surgical settings, and overall survival benefits have also been demonstrated in some studies. However, castration is associated with sexual dysfunction that may be unacceptable, particularly among younger patients. The ongoing bicalutamide (Casodex; AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Wilmington, DE) Early Prostate Cancer program is evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of bicalutamide 150 mg as immediate therapy, either alone or as an adjuvant to therapy of curative intent, in patients with localized or locally advanced prostate cancer. This is the largest clinical trial program in prostate cancer treatment to date, comprising 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies with a total of 8113 patients. At median follow-up period of 3 years and after 922 progression events, the bicalutamide group had a significant reduction of 42% in the risk of objective progression compared with patients who received placebo plus standard care. The risk of prostate-specific antigen progression was also significantly reduced by 59%. As expected, gynecomastia and breast pain were the most frequently reported side effects of bicalutamide therapy. A longer follow-up period will determine whether the reduced risk of progression will translate into cause-specific and overall survival benefit for these patients.

Influence of 3D-CRT pelvic irradiation on outcome in prostate cancer treated with external beam radiotherapy

PURPOSE

The role of pelvic irradiation (PRT) in the treatment of prostate cancer remains unclear. We reviewed our institution's experience with three-dimensional conformal external beam radiotherapy (3D-CRT) during the prostate-specific antigen era to determine the influence of PRT on the risk of biochemical recurrence in patients who have a predicted risk of lymph node involvement.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between March 1985 and January 2001, 1832 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were treated with definitive 3D-CRT. All treatments involved CT planning to ensure coverage of the intended targets. Treatment consisted of prostate-only treatment, prostate and seminal vesicle treatment, or PRT of lymph nodes at risk followed by a boost. To create relatively homogenous analysis groups, each patient's percentage of risk of lymph node (%rLN) involvement was assigned by matching the patient's T stage, Gleason score, and initial prostate-specific antigen level to the appropriate value as described in the updated Partin tables. Three categories of %rLN involvement were defined: low, 0-5%; intermediate, >5-15%; and high, >15%. Biochemical recurrence was defined as the first occurrence of either the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus definition of prostate-specific antigen failure or the initiation of salvage hormonal therapy for any reason.

RESULTS

The risk status (%rLN) could be determined for 709 low-risk, 263 intermediate-risk, and 309 high-risk patients. The actuarial freedom from biochemical recurrence (bNED) and the log-rank test for the similarity of the control and treatment survival functions are reported for each risk group. Multivariate analysis demonstrated a statistically significant benefit for the entire population treated with PRT, with a relative risk reduction of 0.72 (95% confidence interval 0.54-0.97). Although the multivariate analysis could not determine the patient population that would most benefit from PRT, the beneficial effect appeared to be most pronounced within the intermediate-risk group. Univariate analysis revealed that the intermediate-risk patients treated with PRT had an improved 2-year bNED rate, 90.1% vs. 80.6% (p = 0.02), and both low-risk and high-risk patients treated with PRT had statistically similar 2-year bNED rates compared with those who did not receive it.

CONCLUSION

Pelvic 3D-CRT appears to improve bNED in prostate cancer patients. Additional studies are needed to elucidate the %rLN population for which this treatment should be recommended.

[Non-metastatic prostate cancer treated with exclusive radiotherapy: prognosis of patients according to lymph node radiologic or surgical assessment method. Multivariate retrospective analysis]

PURPOSE

To compare retrospectively the outcome of localized prostate cancers treated by curative external radiotherapy in which the negative lymphatic status was either surgically or radiologically assessed.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From January 1986 to December 1995, 112 patients with localized prostate cancers were found to have no evidence of lymphatic disease in the pelvis. N0 status was assessed either surgically (61 patients, group pN-) or after a CT scan procedure (51 patients, group cN0). The treatment consisted of conventional external radiotherapy using a four-fields box technique to a total dose of 65 Gy. The pelvis was never irradiated.

RESULTS

The two groups did not statistically differ according to age, PSA level, Gleason score, T stage and hormonal therapy. Actuarial NED survival rates were 80% and 60% at five and ten years respectively. At ten years, the actuarial NED survival rates were 78% and 34% in the pN- and cN0 groups respectively (p = 0.003). The multivariate analysis corroborated the positive impact of lymphatic dissection before radiotherapy on disease free survival of T1-T2 patients, but not for T3 stages.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective study suggests the inability of CT scan to accurately evaluate the lymph node status in carcinoma of the prostate. Systematic ilio-obturator nodal dissection is strongly recommended in early stages before curative radiotherapy. Only pN-patients should be included in high dose conformal irradiation trials.

Does age influence the behaviour of localized prostate cancer?

OBJECTIVE

To assess, in a meta-analysis of published studies, whether age influences the behaviour of localized prostate cancer.

METHODS

The Medline database was searched from 1966 to 2000 to identify studies analysing the outcome of localized prostate cancer by age, using disease-specific outcome measures, and having controlled for the established prognostic factors of grade, T stage and, where available, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level.

RESULTS

In all, 34 studies were identified, which included a total of 27 551 patients. The incomplete and heterogeneous nature of the reports precluded any quantitative overview. The findings of these reports are described and methodological shortcomings discussed.

CONCLUSION

The evidence suggests that young age was an adverse prognostic factor in some series of radiation therapy before the advent of PSA assays, when men typically presented clinically with locally advanced disease, but that age has no significant prognostic effect in contemporary series of localized prostate cancer. Possible explanations for this difference are discussed, together with implications for further studies.

Phase I/II trial evaluating combined radiotherapy and in situ gene therapy with or without hormonal therapy in the treatment of prostate cancer--a preliminary report

PURPOSE

To report the preliminary results of a Phase I/II study combining radiotherapy and in situ gene therapy (adenovirus/herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase gene/valacyclovir) with or without hormonal therapy in the treatment of prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Arm A: low-risk patients (T1-T2a, Gleason score <7, pretreatment PSA <10) were treated with combined radio-gene therapy. A mean dose of 76 Gy was delivered to the prostate with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Arm B: high-risk patients (T2b-T3, Gleason score >or=7, pretreatment PSA >or=10) were treated with combined radio-gene therapy and hormonal therapy. Hormonal therapy was comprised of a 4-month leuprolide injection and 2-week use of flutamide. Arm C: Stage D1 (positive pelvic lymph node) patients received the same regimen as Arm B, with the additional 45 Gy to the pelvic lymphatics. Treatment-related toxicity was assessed using Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program common toxicity score and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) toxicity score.

RESULTS

Thirty patients (13 in Arm A, 14 in Arm B, and 3 in Arm C) completed the trial. Median follow-up was 5.5 months. Eleven patients (37%) developed flu-like symptoms (Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program Grade 1) of fatigue and chills/rigors after gene therapy injection but recovered within 24 h. Four patients (13%) and 2 patients (7%) developed Grade 1 and 2 fever, respectively. There was no patient with weight loss. One patient in Arm B developed Grade 3 elevation in liver enzyme, whereas 11 and 2 patients developed Grade 1 and 2 abnormal liver function tests. There was no Grade 2 or above hematologic toxicity. Three patients had transient rise in creatinine. There was no RTOG Grade 3 or above lower gastrointestinal toxicity. Toxicity levels were as follows: 4 patients (13%), Grade 2; 6 patients (20%), Grade 1; and 20 patients (67%), no toxicity. There was 1 patient with RTOG Grade 3 genitourinary toxicity, 12 patients (40%) with Grade 2, 8 patients (27%) with Grade 1, and 9 patients (30%) with no toxicity. No patient dropped out from the trial or had to withhold treatment because of severe toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first trial of its kind in the field of prostate cancer that aims to expand the therapeutic index of radiotherapy by combining in situ gene therapy. Initial experience has demonstrated the safety of this approach. There is no added toxicity to each therapy used alone. Long-term follow-up and larger cohort studies are warranted to evaluate long-term toxicity and efficacy.

Lymph node-positive prostate cancer: evaluation of the results of the combination of androgen deprivation therapy and radiation therapy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the outcome of patients with pathologic stage IV prostate cancer treated with androgen ablation plus external-beam radiation therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty consecutive patients treated between August 1986 and February 1995 with androgen ablation plus radiation therapy for stage IV (T1-4 N1 M0) adenocarcinoma of the prostate were selected for outcome analysis in this retrospective study. Bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed in 56 patients (93%). The 4 remaining patients had pelvic adenopathy on computed tomography, which was confirmed histologically in all patients. The median pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was 28.8 ng/mL (mean, 55 ng/ mL; range, 0.1-428 ng/mL). All patients received radiation therapy to the prostate, and 29 (48%) had pelvic node radiation. Biochemical failure was defined according to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology criteria of 3 successive increases in the PSA level.

RESULTS

The median follow-up duration for surviving patients was 101.1 months (range, 20-134 months). Biochemical failure with (in 2 patients) or without (in 10 patients) clinically evident disease relapse was noted in 12 patients (20%). Four additional patients (7%) had clinical relapse without biochemical failure. Local recurrences were observed in 6 patients (10%), and this clinical impression was confirmed by biopsy in 4 patients. Thirteen patients (22%) died of causes related to prostate cancer. The biochemical relapse-free, clinical disease-free, overall, and cause-specific survival rates at 5 years were 82%, 84%, 76%, and 80%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This observational case series of patients treated with the combination of external-beam radiation therapy and permanent androgen ablation for pathologic stage IV prostate cancer suggests that the addition of androgen deprivation therapy to radiation therapy may improve disease outcome. In the absence of randomized trial results, these observations may be beneficial in clinical decision making.

[Conformal radiotherapy of prostatic cancer: a general review]

Recent progress in radiotherapeutic management of localized prostate cancer is reviewed. Clinical aspects--including dose-effect beyond 70 Gy, relative role of conformal radiation therapy techniques and of early hormonal treatment--are discussed as well as technical components--including patient immobilization, organ motion, prostate contouring, beam arrangement, 3-D treatment planning and portal imaging. The local control and biological relapse-free survival rates appear to be improved by high dose conformal radiotherapy from 20 to 30% for patients with intermediate and high risk of relapse. A benefit of overall survival is expected but not yet demonstrated. Late reactions, especially the rectal toxicity, remain moderate despite the dose escalation. However, conformal radiotherapy demands a high precision at all steps of the procedure.

The current status of adjuvant hormonal therapy combined with radiation therapy for localised prostate cancer

Analysis of the results of treatment of localised prostate cancer with radiation and surgery has identified patients who are at high risk of developing metastatic dissemination. High histologic grade, serum prostate specific antigen above 20 ng/ml, extension beyond the capsule of the prostate, and involvement of lymph nodes are highly predictive of metastatic risk. Antiandrogen therapy has high rates of activity in the treatment of overt metastatic disease prompting its assessment as an adjuvant treatment added to radiation therapy. There are now major prospective randomized trials which have been completed. The current evidence indicates that a large survival benefit ensues when antiandrogen therapy is added to radiation for appropriately selected patients. This adjuvant approach is likely to become the standard of care. Strategies for further enhancement of adjuvant therapy are discussed.

[Combination of radiotherapy and hormonotherapy in locally advanced cancers of the prostate]

The long-term results of external irradiation in locally advanced prostate cancer are poor: relapses are local or distant from infra-clinical disease present at diagnosis. Three clinical randomized trials have shown that hormonotherapy with LH-RH analogue with or without antiandrogen has improved: disease-free survival, local recurrence-free survival and metastasis-free survival (P < 0.001). The EORTC trial 22863 has shown a significant improvement of the overall survival (P = 0.001), with an LH-RH analogue (goserilin acetate, Zoladex) was administered the first day of irradiation and then every 4 weeks for 3 years; for the RTOG trial 85-31 the same LH-RH analogue was administered during the last week of irradiation and given until relapse increases survival of patients with poor differentiated tumours with a Gleason score ranging from 8 to 10 (P = 0.03). Adjuvant hormonal treatment with an LH-RH analogue is recommended, but the optimal duration of the treatment remains unclear.

[Locally advanced prostate carcinoma (T2b-T4 N0) without and with clinical evidence of local progression (Tx N+) with lymphatic metastasis. Is radiotherapy for pelvic lymphatic metastasis indicated or not?]

BACKGROUND

There is a greater controversy regarding the indication of radiotherapy of the pelvic lymphatics in patients with suspected lymph node metastases in locally advanced prostate cancer (T2b-4 N0) on the one hand and in patients with pathologically proven lymph node metastases in locoregional advanced prostate cancer (Tx pN+) on the other hand following definitive radiotherapy and radical prostatectomy. This paper investigates the possible indications for radiotherapy of the pelvic lymphatics in the light of data from the literature.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Because data from several retrospective studies concerning radiotherapy of the pelvic lymphatics indicated a better outcome, the RTOG conducted 2 prospective randomised studies (RTOG 75-06, 77-06) to address these questions. However, the results of these studies showed no better survival or cause specific survival for patients treated for the paraaortal or pelvic lymphatics and therefore, radiotherapy of the pelvic lymphatics was no more advocated. A reanalysis showed several problems of the study design and it was concluded that the studies couldn't prove the question of elective radiotherapy of the pelvic lymphatics. In RTOG 77-06 patients with T1b/T2 tumors were investigated. Therefore, there is no prospective study investigating the elective radiotherapy in patients with T3-tumors, who are at high risk of pelvic lymph node metastases.

RESULTS

Today there is no indication for treating the paraaortal lymphatics in patients with locoregional advanced prostate cancer. Many radiotherapists perform the elective radiotherapy of pelvic lymphatics when the risk of metastases is above 15 to 20% because retrospective data indicate a better outcome. On the other hand, many others don't treat them because RTOG 75-06 and 77-06 didn't demonstrate a better outcome. Laparoscopic lymphadenectomy with low morbidity seems to be helpful as in pN0 patients radiotherapy is not necessary. Where performing laparoscopic pelvine lymphadenectomy is impossible the probability of the frequency of lymph node metastases can be estimated using the clinical tumor stage, the Gleason-score and the pretherapeutic PSA. In case of proven metastases (pN+) some retrospective data indicate that patients with micrometastasis could profit from aggressive treatment. In case of proven metastases and extirpation by lymphadenectomy it seems that patients with hormonal therapy and radiotherapy have a longer tumor-free interval. However, there are no data from randomized trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Every radiotherapist has to make his own decision for radiotherapy of the pelvic lymphatics as there is no standard treatment. Two randomised studies are open and recruiting patients. These are one study of the ARO, investigating patients with histologically proven lymph node metastases and one study of the RTOG (RTOG 9413), investigating patients with an estimated risk of lymph node metastases > 15%. In case of radiotherapy of the pelvic lymphatics a dose of 45 Gy for suspected metastases and 50.4 Gy for proven metastases is recommended.

Androgen ablation in addition to radiation therapy for prostate cancer: is there true benefit?

Prostate cancer patients may now be identified as having a high risk of failing single-modality treatment based on pretreatment prostate specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score, and palpable stage. In particular, a PSA greater than 20 ng/mL portends a biochemical failure rate of 50% to 80% when radiation therapy, surgery, or androgen ablation is administered individually. A number of randomized trials as well as retrospective data show that failure rates are significantly reduced by combining androgen ablation and radiation. The improved results, however, are complicated by the ability to salvage radiation alone-treated patients with androgen ablation and the possibility of less effective salvage (or no effective salvage in the case of permanent androgen ablation) for patients treated with androgen ablation plus radiation. Thus, survival, which is obscured by high rates of intercurrent deaths in this elderly population, is the most important end point in such studies. Two randomized trials, one from the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and one from the European Organization for Research on Treatment for Cancer (EORTC), of radiation therapy plus adjuvant (as opposed to neoadjuvant) androgen ablation have reported survival gains over radiation therapy alone. In contrast, one neoadjuvant trial from the RTOG failed to show a survival benefit when androgen ablation was added to radiation therapy. In this study, however, androgen ablation was administered for only 4 to 5 months, which may be insufficient. The weight of the evidence to date indicates a true benefit with androgen ablation plus radiation therapy over radiation therapy alone. There are clearly many unanswered questions concerning the optimal timing of androgen ablation and radiation therapy (neoadjuvant versus adjuvant), length of time that androgen ablation should be administered (6 months versus 3 years versus permanent), type of androgen ablation (total androgen ablation or not), and appropriate patient population (definition of high risk). The planned future clinical trials will address many of these issues; however, the full potential of this approach requires an understanding of the fundamental mechanisms involved.

Results of laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients at high risk for nodal metastases from prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy (LPLND) can be performed safely and with minimal morbidity in the staging of prostate cancer. Its utility in evaluating patients at high risk for metastatic disease before primarily nonsurgical treatment modalities was evaluated.

METHODS

Twenty-four consecutive patients who underwent LPLND between June 1993 and July 1996 were studied. These patients were considered poor surgical candidates based on several risk factors, as follows: elevation of serum PSA >20 in 19 patients (79%); elevation of serum acid phosphatase in 4 patients (17%); digital rectal examination findings indicative of extraprostatic extension or seminal vesical involvement in 14 patients (58%); and poorly differentiated tumors on prostate biopsy in 19 patients (79%). Nineteen patients (79%) had two or more of these risk factors. Median PSA for the entire series of patients was 35.2 ng/mL (range 7.9 to 133 ng/mL), and median Gleason score was 7 (range 5 to 9). Preoperative CT or MRI was negative for pelvic lymph node metastases in 17 of 23 patients (79%), and bone scan was negative in all 24 patients.

RESULTS

Unilateral (n = 2) or bilateral (n = 22) LPLND was performed in all patients. Six patients (25%) had lymph node metastases detected laparoscopically. Five of the six patients had palpable extraprostatic extension (T3a/b) or invasion of a seminal vesical (T3c), and in four of these patients the site of the metastatic lymph nodes was ipsilateral to the palpable prostate abnormality. None of the risk factors was independently predictive of lymph node metastases within this series of patients. An average of 10.8 +/- 6.5 lymph nodes was removed at a mean operative time of 174 +/- 10 minutes for patients undergoing bilateral LPLND. Estimated blood loss was minimal for 20 of 22 patients (92%) undergoing LPLND alone, and there were no complications requiring open exploration. Mean postoperative hospital stay was 1.2 +/- 0.5 days for patients undergoing LPLND alone.

CONCLUSIONS

LPLND can be used efficiently to identify patients with nodal metastases from select high-risk patients. This, in turn, can exclude such patients from noncurative local and regional therapy.

Long-term outcome in patients with pTxN+ adenocarcinoma of prostate treated with radical prostatectomy and early androgen ablation

PURPOSE

We assessed retrospectively the outcome after bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical prostatectomy for pathological pTxN+ adenocarcinoma of the prostate when treated with or without adjuvant androgen ablation therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 790 men treated with radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma were found to have pTxN+ disease and treated further with or without androgen ablation therapy. Mean patient age was 64 years (range 40 to 79). Mean followup was 6.5 years, (range up to 25). Clinical stages were T2 or less in 60% of the cases, T3 in 38% and N+ in 2%. Gleason scores were 6 or less in 31% and 7 or greater in 69%. Deoxyribonucleic acid ploidy was diploid in 43%, tetraploid in 39% and aneuploid in 18%. Of the patients 96 (12%) received no androgen ablation therapy, with the remainder getting androgen ablation therapy within 90 days of radical prostatectomy.

RESULTS

Of the patients 186 (24%) died, with 109 (14%) dying of prostatic anedocarcinoma. Overall (and cause specific) survival probabilities at 5, 10 and 15 years were 87 (91), 69 (79) and 39% (60%), respectively. Patients with diploid tumors had better cause specific survival than those with nondiploid tumors (p = 0.009). Patients with diploid tumors were less likely to have progression biochemically, locally or systemically than those with nondiploid tumors (p = 0.038). Androgen ablation therapy had no effect on cause specific survival in nondiploid patients. Diploid patients treated with androgen ablation therapy for up to 10 years had no improvement in disease specific survival compared to those with no androgen ablation therapy. However, cancer death was significantly reduced after 10 years (p <0.002). The local control rate of pTxN+ cases that receive radical prostatectomy and androgen ablation therapy at 15 years is virtually identical to that of stage pT2c cases at our institution (79 +/- 3.0 versus 80% +/- 3.5%, respectively). There were no deaths secondary to radical prostatectomy, and complications were within the experience of that seen in patients with localized disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Radical prostatectomy with androgen ablation therapy is a viable option for patients with pTxN+ disease, particularly in view of excellent local control rates and low morbidity. Patients with diploid tumors have a more favorable outcome than those with nondiploid tumors when treated with androgen ablation therapy.

The use of combined radiation therapy and hormonal therapy in the management of lymph node-positive prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the rate of tumor response and patterns of relapse following combined hormonal-radiation therapy of adenocarcinoma of the prostate and to measure the survival in a group of men with tumor metastatic to pelvic lymph nodes.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

66 patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate with pathologically confirmed pelvic lymph node involvement were treated with combined radiation therapy and hormonal therapy. An additional five patients declined hormonal therapy. The patients treated with combined therapy represented a group with locally advanced disease including 44 patients (67%) with T3 or T4 tumors and 51 patients (80%) had N2 or N3 lymph node metastases. The pelvic lymph nodes were treated to a dose of 45 Gy and the prostate was boosted to a dose of 65 to 71 Gy. Hormonal therapy began up to 2 months before radiation and continued indefinitely. Patients were allowed to select their hormonal therapy and could choose DES (2 patients), orchiectomy (21 patients), LHRH agonist (7 patients) or combined androgen blockade (34 patients).

RESULTS

Median follow-up is 49 months (range 12 to 131 months) and 21 patients have been followed for longer than 5 years. There have been 15 recurrences the entire group including three local recurrences in the prostate, seven patients with distant metastases, four patients with biochemical recurrences without clinical evidence of disease, and one patient where the location was unknown. Two of the PSA recurrences occurred in patients who elected to discontinue hormones after less than 3 years of therapy. The overall survival at 5 and 8 years is 94 and 84%, the clinical disease free survival is 85 and 67%, and the biochemical disease-free survival is 78 and 47%. There was no increased toxicity of the combined modality regimen compared to the expected effects of radiation and hormonal therapy.

CONCLUSION

Combined hormonal and radiation therapy represents an effective treatment option for patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate metastatic to pelvic lymph nodes. Combined modality therapy appears to extend the disease-free survival and allow patients to maintain their independent function.

Improved survival in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy and goserelin

BACKGROUND

We conducted a randomized, prospective trial comparing external irradiation with external irradiation plus goserelin (an agonist analogue of gonadotropin-releasing hormone that reduces testosterone secretion) in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer.

METHODS

From 1987 to 1995, 415 patients with locally advanced prostate cancer were randomly assigned to receive radiotherapy alone or radiotherapy plus immediate treatment with goserelin. The patients had a median age of 71 years (range, 51 to 80). Patients in both groups received 50 Gy of radiation to the pelvis over a period of five weeks and an additional 20 Gy over an additional two weeks as a prostatic boost. Patients in the combined-treatment group received 3.6 mg of goserelin (Zoladex) subcutaneously every four weeks starting on the first day of irradiation and continuing for three years; those patients also received cyproterone acetate (150 mg orally per day) during the first month of treatment to inhibit the transient rise in testosterone associated with the administration of goserelin.

RESULTS

Data were available for analysis on 401 patients. The median follow-up was 45 months. Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival at five years were 79 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 72 to 86 percent) in the combined-treatment group and 62 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 52 to 72 percent) in the radiotherapy group (P=0.001). The proportion of surviving patients who were free of disease at five years was 85 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 78 to 92 percent) in the combined-treatment group and 48 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 38 to 58 percent) in the radiotherapy group (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant treatment with goserelin, when started simultaneously with external irradiation, improves local control and survival in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer.

[Radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy: indications, results and side effects]

BACKGROUND

Radiation therapy following radical prostatectomy in locally progressed prostate carcinoma has become increasingly important in the last few years as both adjuvant therapy in patients with pT3-tumors with or without positive margins and treatment for a PSA increase in local recurrence of disease. The background for this is the knowledge gained by using PSA that up to 60% of the patients with histopathologically confirmed pT3/4 tumors or involvement of the lymph nodes are systemically and/or locally progressive after 3 to 5 years if only surgical or radiation therapy was performed.

RESULTS

A number of studies, albeit exclusively retrospective, substantiated a significantly high local tumor control by radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy. This holds true for adjuvant therapy with a PSA in the "zero range" as well as with a PSA increase from the "zero range", whereby it must be taken into consideration that a certain percentage of treated patients with a PSA in the "zero-range" with or without positive margins actually do not need further therapy. Two retrospective studies demonstrated a significant better lengthening of "freedom from treatment failure" that is local and systemic progression of disease. Lengthening the survival time has, however, not yet been proven. With an increase in the PSA from the "zero range" after radical prostatectomy, there are indications that systemic metastatic spread already occurs with values higher than 2.5 to 4 ng/ml and the radiotherapy no longer has any curative intention.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant RT following radical prostatectomy gives better local control rates and probably better rates of "freedom from treatment failure" in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer with positive margins and probably in patients with negative margins. However, in retrospective studies no advantage in overall survival was shown.

[The conformal radiotherapy of localized prostatic carcinoma: acute tolerance and early efficacy]

AIM

In a prospective trial early effectiveness and acute toxicity of conformal 3D-planned radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer was quantified using dose-volume-histogramms and evaluated with respect of treatment technique.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Thirty-two men (44 to 80 years old) with locally advanced carcinoma of the prostate (stage B2 or C) have been treated by 3D-planned conformal radiotherapy using high energy photons. In 28/32 men treatment technique was a monoaxial bisegmental rotation with irregular fields. With single doses of 2.0 Gy a mean total dose of 63.9 +/- 4.9 Gy according to ICRU was applied within 46 +/- 4 days. Maximum dose was in the mean 105.1% +/- 3.8%. 3D treatment volume was 274.1 +/- 113.4 cm3. Median follow-up is 1.8 years (15 to 34 months). Toxicity was evaluated according to RTOG-EORTC by patient interview and physical examination on a weekly basis during radiotherapy and by regular follow-up.

RESULTS

Eleven patients had none, 15 mild (RTOG grade 1) and 6 moderate symptoms (RTOG grade 2, mainly diarrhoea, dysuria and polyuria). Acute complications leading to treatment interruption did not occur. In 16 patients symptoms disappeared within 6 weeks after radiotherapy. Only 2 men had symptoms which lasted longer than 3 months and were endoscopically examined. Up to now no late complications were detected. Incidence and severity of toxicity was significantly (p < 0.05) related to the size of treatment volume. Acute toxicity was found to depend statistically significant (p < 0.05) on the proportional volume of bladder and rectum, irradiated with more than 35 Gy. In 81% of the patients with pretherapeutic elevated PSA levels normalisation of PSA was observed. Overall mean PSA levels of 15.7 +/- 22.6 micrograms/l at the beginning of radiotherapy fell to 2.1 +/- 3.7 micrograms/l 6 weeks after irradiation. Only 1 Patient relapsed locally 22 months after radiation therapy.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that due to modern 3D-planned conformal techniques with optimization of treatment dose and improved protection of critical organs such as urinary bladder and rectum, radiotherapy allows an effective and well tolerated therapy of localized prostatic carcinoma.

Correlation of pretherapy prostate cancer characteristics with histologic findings from pelvic lymphadenectomy specimens

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to identify pretherapy factors associated with pelvic lymph node involvement (LNI) in patients with localized prostatic carcinoma (CaP), and to develop a model that would allow for estimation of this risk at the time of initial diagnosis.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between January 1988 and December 1992, 2439 patients with clinical Stage T1a-3cN0-XM0 CaP underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy and bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection as sole initial therapy at a single medical institution. Preoperative factors were evaluated for their association with pelvic LNI in univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. A model was developed that incorporated independent predictive variables, and probability plots were generated to estimate the likelihood of pelvic LNI in the patient with a new diagnosis of localized CaP.

RESULTS

Within clinical tumor stage, three groups (Tla-2a, T2b-c, and T3) were identified in which the observed rate of pelvic LNI was distinctly different. Gleason primary grades were also combined (1-2, 3, and 4-5) because of a similar observation. Univariate analysis identified clinical tumor stage (p < 0.0001), Gleason primary grade (p < 0.0001), and serum prostate-specific antigen (p < 0.0001) as factors associated with pelvic LNI. Each of these variables retained independent significance (p < or = 0.0002) in the multivariate model. Patient age (p = 0.12) and history of prior transurethral resection of the prostate (p = 0.36) were not found to correlate with this endpoint. Probability plots provided an estimate of the likelihood for pelvic LNI according to the combination of pretherapy clinical tumor stage, Gleason primary grade, and serum prostate-specific antigen level.

CONCLUSION

Clinical tumor stage as determined by digital rectal examination, Gleason primary grade of the diagnostic biopsy specimen, and pretherapy serum prostate-specific antigen value can be combined to estimate the probability of pelvic LNI for the patient with a new diagnosis of localized CaP. This information may be of value in directing the pretherapy diagnostic evaluation, as an aid in radiation therapy treatment planning, and in the conduct of clinical research efforts.

Seminal vesicle biopsy and laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection: implications for patient selection in the radiotherapeutic management of prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Seminal vesicle biopsies (SVB) and laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLND) are safe surgical staging procedures for prostate cancer that can yield more accurate information than can be obtained by routine clinical means. This information is critical in patient and treatment selection when planning definitive prostate irradiation. An analysis of the procedural findings was undertaken to better define those patients who might benefit from these procedures.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From June 1990 to February 1994, 120 patients with clinical Stage T1b to T2c prostate cancer with negative bone scan and pelvic computerized tomography (CT) scans underwent transrectal ultrasound guided SVB (three from each side). Of these patients, 99 also underwent LPLND. Twelve patients were excluded from analysis of LPLND findings because they were treated with 3 months of hormonal therapy prior to LPLND. During LPLND, 0 to 18 nodes were removed (median-five nodes) from the right side and 0 to 20 nodes (median-five nodes) were removed from the left side. Prostate specific antigen (PSA) values ranged from 1.6 to 190 ng/ml, with a median value of 11.5. Combined Gleason grades ranged from 2 to 9, with a median of 6.

RESULTS

A positive SVB was found in 18 patients (15%). A logistic regression analysis was performed to test the effect of grade, PSA, and stage on SVB results. Combined grade and PSA were significant predictors of a positive SVB (p < 0.001 and p = 0.024, respectively). Patients with combined grades of 7 or greater had a higher positive SVB rate of 37.5% (12 out of 32) compared to 7% (6 out of 88) for patients with a lower grade (p < 0.0001). Patients with PSA values greater than 10 had a positive SVB rate of 21% (15 out of 70) compared to 6% (3 out of 50) for patients with values up to 10. There was no morbidity associated with SVB. Laparoscopic pelvic lymph node disection detected positive pelvic nodes in nine patients (10%). The effect of a positive SVB, combined Gleason grade, PSA, and stage on the detection of positive nodes were tested using a stepwise logistic regression analysis. Seminal vesicle biopsy was the most significant predictor of positive nodes (p < 0.0001), while combined grade and PSA were also significant predictors (p = 0.0006 and p = 0.005, respectively). Positive nodes were found in 50% (9 out of 18) of patients with positive SVB compared to 0% (0 out of 69) of patients with a negative SVB (p < 0.0001). Positive nodes were found in 35% (8 out of 23) of patients with a combined grade of 7 or greater compared to 2% (1 out of 64) of patients with a combined grade less than 7 (p < 0.0001). Laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection revealed positive nodes in 3% (2 out of 58) of patients with PSA levels < = 20 compared to 24% (7 out of 29) of patients with PSA levels greater than 20 (p = 0.003). Laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection was associated with a hospital stay of one night and a minor complication rate of 4%. There were no major complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Seminal vesicle biopsy should be performed before treatment in all patients, except those with low risk factors, undergoing radiation therapy for prostate cancer, due to its ability to upstage patients, select patients for LPLND, and alter radiotherapeutic management. Laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection should be considered in patients with high risk features, especially in patients with positive SVB where the likelihood of encountering positive nodes is 50%.

Combined hormonal and radiation therapy for lymph node-positive prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of combined radiation and hormonal therapy in patients with prostate cancer metastatic to the pelvic lymph nodes.

METHODS

Fifty consecutive patients with node-positive prostate cancer were evaluated by the Departments of Urology and Radiation Oncology at the University of Pennsylvania and offered combined hormonal and radiation therapy. All patients received pelvic radiation to 45 Gy, with a boost dose to the prostate to 65 to 71 gy. Forty-five of the patients were treated with concurrent hormonal therapy consisting of diethylstilbestrol (2 patients), orchiectomy (18 patients), leuprolide (5 patients), or combined androgen blockade (20 patients); the other 5 patients declined hormonal therapy. Patients represented a group with locally advanced disease with a high incidence of T3 tumors (66%), high grade (74%; Gleason score more than 7), high prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (40%; more than 30.0 ng/mL), and a high incidence of gross (36%) or bilateral (30%) adenopathy and a high incidence of multiply involved lymph nodes (62%).

RESULTS

Median follow-up of patients is 42 months (range, 10 to 102). All 5 patients declining hormonal therapy relapsed within 18 months and only 1 patient survived longer than 3 years. Among patients treated with combined hormonal and radiation therapy, the 6-year survival rate is 82%, the clinical disease-free survival at 6 years is 71%, and the probability of survival free of recurrence, with a PSA less than 0.2 ng/mL, is 62%. Only two PSA recurrences occurred, both in patients who elected to discontinue hormone therapy. There was no synergistic toxicity observed as a result of combined therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined hormonal and radiation therapy offers the potential for extended disease-free survival and may represent an effective treatment option for patients with locally advanced prostate cancer.