SPRINT: an SNP-free toolkit for identifying RNA editing sites

Increased unedited Alu RNA patterns found in cortex extracellular vesicles in Alzheimer's disease resemble hippocampus vasculature Alu RNA editing patterns but not cortex Alu RNA editing patterns

BACKGROUND

Endogenous Alu RNAs form double-stranded RNAs recognized by double-stranded RNA sensors and activate IRF and NF-kB transcriptional paths and innate immunity. Deamination of adenosines to inosines by the ADAR family of enzymes, a process termed A-to-I editing, disrupts double-stranded RNA structure and prevents innate immune activation. Innate immune activation is observed in Alzheimer's disease, the most common form of dementia. We have previously reported loss of A-to-I editing in hippocampus vasculature, but no change in cortex or cortex vasculature, associated with Alzheimer's disease.

OBJECTIVE

Here, we investigated the status of Alu RNA A-to-I editing in cortex extracellular vesicles in Alzheimer's disease.

METHODS

We used existing RNA-seq data sets and the SPRINT software package to determine levels of Alu RNA A-to-I editing in cortex extracellular vesicles in Alzheimer's disease and control groups and compared these editing profiles to those found in both total cortex and hippocampus vasculature.

RESULTS

We find substantial loss of Alu A-to-I editing in cortex extracellular vesicles in Alzheimer's disease. By measuring editing patterns on a gene-by-gene basis, we determined that editing patterns in cortex extracellular vesicles resemble editing patterns in hippocampus vasculature rather than total cortex.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that hippocampus vasculature unedited Alu RNAs are packaged in extracellular vesicles, travel to the cortex, deliver their cargo and stimulate innate immunity and alter other basic biological processes contributing to Alzheimer's disease progression.

Identification of RNA Editing Sites Reveals Functional Modifications with the Addition of Methionine to the Daily Rations of Yaks

Methionine is an amino acid necessary for the growth and development of all animals. Glutathione produced during methionine metabolism can reduce damage to cells caused by oxidative stress. Supplementing restricted amino acids in animals by scientific means will be beneficial to protein synthesis, which will affect the growth and development of animals and will bring huge economic benefits when applied to actual production and life. In this study, we collected three muscle tissues from 24 male Maiwa yaks, which were fattened for three months with different methionine concentrations in their diet. RNA-seq was performed to obtain expression reads. A total of 1116 editing sites were identified by at least two software; the editing site types were mainly T-to-C and A-to-G mutations. We found two significant RNA editing sites presenting high-risk editing types. One was located on the MSRA gene that regulates the reduction of methionine, and the other can make changes to the properties of encoded proteins. This provides further understanding of the mechanism of yak muscle tissue and regulation of gene expression after the addition of methionine to daily rations.

ncRNA Editing: Functional Characterization and Computational Resources

Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) play crucial roles in gene expression regulation, translation, and disease development, including cancer. They are classified by size in short and long non-coding RNAs. This chapter focuses on the functional implications of adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing in both short (e.g., miRNAs) and long ncRNAs. RNA editing dynamically alters the sequence and structure of primary transcripts, impacting ncRNA biogenesis and function. Notable findings include the role of miRNA editing in promoting glioblastoma invasiveness, characterizing RNA editing hotspots across cancers, and its implications in thyroid cancer and ischemia. This chapter also highlights bioinformatics resources and next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies that enable comprehensive ncRNAome studies and genome-wide RNA editing detection. Dysregulation of RNA editing machinery has been linked to various human diseases, emphasizing the potential of RNA editing as a biomarker and therapeutic target. This overview integrates current knowledge and computational tools for studying ncRNA editing, providing insights into its biological significance and clinical applications.

Deletion of ddx4 Ovary-Specific Transcript Causes Dysfunction of Meiosis and Derepress of DNA Transposons in Zebrafish Ovaries

Alternative splicing of ddx4 (DEAD-box helicase 4), a key germline marker gene, has been reported to generate sex-specific transcripts in zebrafish gonads. The biological functions and regulatory mechanisms of the ddx4 ovary-specific transcript (ddx4-L) during oogenesis remain unclear. In this study, we found that ddx4-L mutants, in which ddx4-L was specifically deleted, had enlarged ovaries but laid fewer eggs, along with having a lower fertilization rate compared to WT controls. RNA-seq analysis was performed to detect the changes in gene expression between WT and ddx4-L mutant ovaries. A total of 524 upregulated and 610 downregulated DEGs were identified. GO and GSEA enrichment analyses showed that genes involved in fertilization and reproduction biological processes were significantly downregulated. More specifically, we observed a remarkable reduction in Sycp1, a core component of synaptonemal complex, in ddx4-L mutant ovaries at both the mRNA and protein levels. In addition, the expressions of transposon elements, as well as the events of alternative splicing, alternative polyadenylation, and RNA editing, were analyzed based on the RNA-seq data. We found that the deletion of ddx4-L resulted in derepression of DNA transposons in zebrafish ovaries, possibly causing genome instability. In conclusion, our work demonstrates that the ovary-specific ddx4 transcript plays important roles in oocyte meiosis and DNA transposon repression, which extends our understanding of the biological functions and regulatory mechanisms of sex-specific alternative splicing in zebrafish oogenesis and reproduction.

LoDEI: a robust and sensitive tool to detect transcriptome-wide differential A-to-I editing in RNA-seq data

RNA editing is a highly conserved process. Adenosine deaminase acting on RNA (ADAR) mediated deamination of adenosine (A-to-I editing) is associated with human disease and immune checkpoint control. Functional implications of A-to-I editing are currently of broad interest to academic and industrial research as underscored by the fast-growing number of clinical studies applying base editors as therapeutic tools. Analyzing the dynamics of A-to-I editing, in a biological or therapeutic context, requires the sensitive detection of differential A-to-I editing, a currently unmet need. We introduce the local differential editing index (LoDEI) to detect differential A-to-I editing in RNA-seq datasets using a sliding-window approach coupled with an empirical q value calculation that detects more A-to-I editing sites at the same false-discovery rate compared to existing methods. LoDEI is validated on known and novel datasets revealing that the oncogene MYCN increases and that a specific small non-coding RNA reduces A-to-I editing.

Long-read transcriptomics of Ostreid herpesvirus 1 uncovers a conserved expression strategy for the capsid maturation module and pinpoints a mechanism for evasion of the ADAR-based antiviral defence

Ostreid herpesvirus 1 (OsHV-1), a member of the family Malacoherpesviridae (order Herpesvirales), is a major pathogen of bivalves. However, the molecular details of the malacoherpesvirus infection cycle and its overall similarity to the replication of mammalian herpesviruses (family Orthoherpesviridae) remain obscure. Here, to gain insights into the OsHV-1 biology, we performed long-read sequencing of infected blood clams, Anadara broughtonii, which yielded over one million OsHV-1 long reads. These data enabled the annotation of the viral genome with 78 gene units and 274 transcripts, of which 67 were polycistronic mRNAs, 35 ncRNAs, and 20 natural antisense transcripts (NATs). Transcriptomics and proteomics data indicate preferential transcription and independent translation of the capsid scaffold protein as an OsHV-1 capsid maturation protease isoform. The conservation of this transcriptional architecture across Herpesvirales likely indicates its functional importance and ancient origin. Moreover, we traced RNA editing events using short-read sequencing and supported the presence of inosine nucleotides in native OsHV-1 RNA, consistent with the activity of adenosine deaminase acting on dsRNA 1 (ADAR1). Our data suggest that, whereas RNA hyper-editing is concentrated in specific regions of the OsHV-1 genome, single-nucleotide editing is more dispersed along the OsHV-1 transcripts. In conclusion, we reveal the existence of conserved pan-Herpesvirales transcriptomic architecture of the capsid maturation module and uncover a transcription-based viral counter defence mechanism, which presumably facilitates the evasion of the host ADAR antiviral system.

Insights into ADAR gene complement, expression patterns, and RNA editing landscape in Chlamys farreri

Adenosine Deaminases Acting on RNA (ADARs) are evolutionarily conserved enzymes known to convert adenosine to inosine in double-stranded RNAs and participate in host-virus interactions. Conducting a meta-analysis of available transcriptome data, we identified and characterised eight ADAR transcripts in Chlamys farreri, a farmed marine scallop susceptible to Acute viral necrosis virus (AVNV) infections and mortality outbreaks. Accordingly, we identified six ADAR genes in the Zhikong scallop genome, revised previous gene annotations, and traced alternative splicing variants. In detail, each ADAR gene encodes a unique combination of functional domains, always including the Adenosine deaminase domain, RNA binding domains and, in one case, two copies of a Z-DNA binding domain. After phylogenetic analysis, five C. farreri ADARs clustered in the ADAR1 clade along with sequences from diverse animal phyla. Gene expression analysis indicated CF051320 as the most expressed ADAR, especially in the eye and male gonad. The other four ADAR1 genes and one ADAR2 gene exhibited variable expression levels, with CF105370 and CF051320 significantly increasing during early scallop development. ADAR-mediated single-base editing, evaluated across adult C. farreri tissues and developmental stages, was mainly detectable in intergenic regions (83 % and 85 %, respectively). Overall, the expression patterns of the six ADAR genes together with the editing and hyper-editing values computed on scallops RNA-seq samples support the adaptive value of ADAR1-mediated editing, particularly in the pre-settling larval stages.

Bioinformatics for Inosine: Tools and Approaches to Trace This Elusive RNA Modification

Inosine is a nucleotide resulting from the deamination of adenosine in RNA. This chemical modification process, known as RNA editing, is typically mediated by a family of double-stranded RNA binding proteins named Adenosine Deaminase Acting on dsRNA (ADAR). While the presence of ADAR orthologs has been traced throughout the evolution of metazoans, the existence and extension of RNA editing have been characterized in a more limited number of animals so far. Undoubtedly, ADAR-mediated RNA editing plays a vital role in physiology, organismal development and disease, making the understanding of the evolutionary conservation of this phenomenon pivotal to a deep characterization of relevant biological processes. However, the lack of direct high-throughput methods to reveal RNA modifications at single nucleotide resolution limited an extended investigation of RNA editing. Nowadays, these methods have been developed, and appropriate bioinformatic pipelines are required to fully exploit this data, which can complement existing approaches to detect ADAR editing. Here, we review the current literature on the "bioinformatics for inosine" subject and we discuss future research avenues in the field.

RNA editing regulates glutamatergic synapses in the frontal cortex of a molecular subtype of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) is a highly heterogenous neurodegenerative disorder that primarily affects upper and lower motor neurons, affecting additional cell types and brain regions. Underlying molecular mechanisms are still elusive, in part due to disease heterogeneity. Molecular disease subtyping through integrative analyses including RNA editing profiling is a novel approach for identification of molecular networks involved in pathogenesis.

METHODS

We aimed to highlight the role of RNA editing in ALS, focusing on the frontal cortex and the prevalent molecular disease subtype (ALS-Ox), previously determined by transcriptomic profile stratification. We established global RNA editing (editome) and gene expression (transcriptome) profiles in control and ALS-Ox cases, utilizing publicly available RNA-seq data (GSE153960) and an in-house analysis pipeline. Functional annotation and pathway analyses identified molecular processes affected by RNA editing alterations. Pearson correlation analyses assessed RNA editing effects on expression. Similar analyses on additional ALS-Ox and control samples (GSE124439) were performed for verification. Targeted re-sequencing and qRT-PCR analysis targeting CACNA1C, were performed using frontal cortex tissue from ALS and control samples (n = 3 samples/group).

RESULTS

We identified reduced global RNA editing in the frontal cortex of ALS-Ox cases. Differentially edited transcripts are enriched in synapses, particularly in the glutamatergic synapse pathway. Bioinformatic analyses on additional ALS-Ox and control RNA-seq data verified these findings. We identified increased recoding at the Q621R site in the GRIK2 transcript and determined positive correlations between RNA editing and gene expression alterations in ionotropic receptor subunits GRIA2, GRIA3 and the CACNA1C transcript, which encodes the pore forming subunit of a post-synaptic L-type calcium channel. Experimental data verified RNA editing alterations and editing-expression correlation in CACNA1C, highlighting CACNA1C as a target for further study.

CONCLUSIONS

We provide evidence on the involvement of RNA editing in the frontal cortex of an ALS molecular subtype, highlighting a modulatory role mediated though recoding and gene expression regulation on glutamatergic synapse related transcripts. We report RNA editing effects in disease-related transcripts and validated editing alterations in CACNA1C. Our study provides targets for further functional studies that could shed light in underlying disease mechanisms enabling novel therapeutic approaches.

RNA editing in host lncRNAs as potential modulator in SARS-CoV-2 variants-host immune response dynamics

Both host and viral RNA editing plays a crucial role in host's response to infection, yet our understanding of host RNA editing remains limited. In this study of in-house generated RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data of 211 hospitalized COVID-19 patients with PreVOC, Delta, and Omicron variants, we observed a significant differential editing frequency and patterns in long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), with Delta group displaying lower RNA editing compared to PreVOC/Omicron patients. Notably, multiple transcripts of UGDH-AS1 and NEAT1 exhibited high editing frequencies. Expression of ADAR1/APOBEC3A/APOBEC3G and differential abundance of repeats were possible modulators of differential editing across patient groups. We observed a shift in crucial infection-related pathways wherein the pathways were downregulated in Delta compared to PreVOC and Omicron. Our genomics-based evidence suggests that lncRNA editing influences stability, miRNA binding, and expression of both lncRNA and target genes. Overall, the study highlights the role of lncRNAs and how editing within host lncRNAs modulates the disease severity.

ARID1A loss promotes RNA editing of CDK13 in an ADAR1-dependent manner

BACKGROUND

ARID1A, a subunit of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex, is thought to play a significant role both in tumor suppression and tumor initiation, which is highly dependent upon context. Previous studies have suggested that ARID1A deficiency may contribute to cancer development. The specific mechanisms of whether ARID1A loss affects tumorigenesis by RNA editing remain unclear.

RESULTS

Our findings indicate that the deficiency of ARID1A leads to an increase in RNA editing levels and alterations in RNA editing categories mediated by adenosine deaminases acting on RNA 1 (ADAR1). ADAR1 edits the CDK13 gene at two previously unidentified sites, namely Q113R and K117R. Given the crucial role of CDK13 as a cyclin-dependent kinase, we further observed that ADAR1 deficiency results in changes in the cell cycle. Importantly, the sensitivity of ARID1A-deficient tumor cells to SR-4835, a CDK12/CDK13 inhibitor, suggests a promising therapeutic approach for individuals with ARID1A-mutant tumors. Knockdown of ADAR1 restored the sensitivity of ARID1A deficient cells to SR-4835 treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

ARID1A deficiency promotes RNA editing of CDK13 by regulating ADAR1.

Recommendations for detection, validation, and evaluation of RNA editing events in cardiovascular and neurological/neurodegenerative diseases

RNA editing, a common and potentially highly functional form of RNA modification, encompasses two different RNA modifications, namely adenosine to inosine (A-to-I) and cytidine to uridine (C-to-U) editing. As inosines are interpreted as guanosines by the cellular machinery, both A-to-I and C-to-U editing change the nucleotide sequence of the RNA. Editing events in coding sequences have the potential to change the amino acid sequence of proteins, whereas editing events in noncoding RNAs can, for example, affect microRNA target binding. With advancing RNA sequencing technology, more RNA editing events are being discovered, studied, and reported. However, RNA editing events are still often overlooked or discarded as sequence read quality defects. With this position paper, we aim to provide guidelines and recommendations for the detection, validation, and follow-up experiments to study RNA editing, taking examples from the fields of cardiovascular and brain disease. We discuss all steps, from sample collection, storage, and preparation, to different strategies for RNA sequencing and editing-sensitive data analysis strategies, to validation and follow-up experiments, as well as potential pitfalls and gaps in the available technologies. This paper may be used as an experimental guideline for RNA editing studies in any disease context.

The role of ADAR1 through and beyond its editing activity in cancer

Adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) editing of RNA, catalyzed by adenosine deaminase acting on RNA (ADAR) enzymes, is a prevalent RNA modification in mammals. It has been shown that A-to-I editing plays a critical role in multiple diseases, such as cardiovascular disease, neurological disorder, and particularly cancer. ADARs are the family of enzymes, including ADAR1, ADAR2, and ADAR3, that catalyze the occurrence of A-to-I editing. Notably, A-to-I editing is mainly catalyzed by ADAR1. Given the significance of A-to-I editing in disease development, it is important to unravel the complex roles of ADAR1 in cancer for the development of novel therapeutic interventions.In this review, we briefly describe the progress of research on A-to-I editing and ADARs in cancer, mainly focusing on the role of ADAR1 in cancer from both editing-dependent and independent perspectives. In addition, we also summarized the factors affecting the expression and editing activity of ADAR1 in cancer.

In silico and experimental approaches for validating RNA editing events in transcriptomes

As a typical RNA virus, SARS-CoV-2 is subjected to RNA editing in host cells. While some researchers believe that a traditional variant calling pipeline retrieves all true-positive RNA editing events from the transcriptome, others argue that conventional methods identify many false-positive sites. Here, I describe several additional in silico and experimental approaches to validate the authenticity of RNA editing in SARS-CoV-2. These approaches include requiring strand-specific sequencing, analysis of hyperedited reads, linkage analysis, orthogonal methods like mass spectrometry, and the use of ADAR-deficient host cells. These findings may improve future analyses on the identification of RNA editing, especially in RNA viruses.

An orthology-based methodology as a complementary approach to retrieve evolutionarily conserved A-to-I RNA editing sites

Adar-mediated adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) mRNA editing is a conserved mechanism that exerts diverse regulatory functions during the development, evolution, and adaptation of metazoans. The accurate detection of RNA editing sites helps us understand their biological significance. In this work, with an improved genome assembly of honeybee (Apis mellifera), we used a new orthology-based methodology to complement the traditional pipeline of (de novo) RNA editing detection. Compared to the outcome of traditional pipeline, we retrieved many novel editing sites in CDS that are deeply conserved between honeybee and other distantly related insects. The newly retrieved sites were missed by the traditional de novo identification due to the stringent criteria for controlling false-positive rate. Caste-specific editing sites are identified, including an Ile>Met auto-recoding site in Adar. This recoding was even conserved between honeybee and bumblebee, suggesting its putative regulatory role in shaping the phenotypic plasticity of eusocial Hymenoptera. In summary, we proposed a complementary approach to the traditional pipeline and retrieved several previously unnoticed CDS editing sites. From both technical and biological aspects, our works facilitate future researches on finding the functional editing sites and advance our understanding on the connection between RNA editing and the great phenotypic diversity of organisms.

Harnessing ADAR-Mediated Site-Specific RNA Editing in Immune-Related Disease: Prediction and Therapeutic Implications

ADAR (Adenosine Deaminases Acting on RNA) proteins are a group of enzymes that play a vital role in RNA editing by converting adenosine to inosine in RNAs. This process is a frequent post-transcriptional event observed in metazoan transcripts. Recent studies indicate widespread dysregulation of ADAR-mediated RNA editing across many immune-related diseases, such as human cancer. We comprehensively review ADARs' function as pattern recognizers and their capability to contribute to mediating immune-related pathways. We also highlight the potential role of site-specific RNA editing in maintaining homeostasis and its relationship to various diseases, such as human cancers. More importantly, we summarize the latest cutting-edge computational approaches and data resources for predicting and analyzing RNA editing sites. Lastly, we cover the recent advancement in site-directed ADAR editing tool development. This review presents an up-to-date overview of ADAR-mediated RNA editing, how site-specific RNA editing could potentially impact disease pathology, and how they could be harnessed for therapeutic applications.

Identification and Interpretation of A-to-I RNA Editing Events in Insect Transcriptomes

Adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing is the most prevalent RNA modification in the nervous systems of metazoans. To study the biological significance of RNA editing, we first have to accurately identify these editing events from the transcriptome. The genome-wide identification of RNA editing sites remains a challenging task. In this review, we will first introduce the occurrence, regulation, and importance of A-to-I RNA editing and then describe the established bioinformatic procedures and difficulties in the accurate identification of these sit esespecially in small sized non-model insects. In brief, (1) to obtain an accurate profile of RNA editing sites, a transcriptome coupled with the DNA resequencing of a matched sample is favorable; (2) the single-cell sequencing technique is ready to be applied to RNA editing studies, but there are a few limitations to overcome; (3) during mapping and variant calling steps, various issues, like mapping and base quality, soft-clipping, and the positions of mismatches on reads, should be carefully considered; (4) Sanger sequencing of both RNA and the matched DNA is the best verification of RNA editing sites, but other auxiliary evidence, like the nonsynonymous-to-synonymous ratio or the linkage information, is also helpful for judging the reliability of editing sites. We have systematically reviewed the understanding of the biological significance of RNA editing and summarized the methodology for identifying such editing events. We also raised several promising aspects and challenges in this field. With insightful perspectives on both scientific and technical issues, our review will benefit the researchers in the broader RNA editing community.

ADAR1 suppression causes interferon signaling and transposable element transcript accumulation in human astrocytes

Neuroinflammation is a central mechanism of brain aging and Alzheimer's disease (AD), but the exact causes of age- and AD-related neuroinflammation are incompletely understood. One potential modulator of neuroinflammation is the enzyme adenosine deaminase acting on RNA 1 (ADAR1), which regulates the accumulation of endogenous double-stranded RNA (dsRNA), a pro-inflammatory/innate immune activator. However, the role of ADAR1 and its transcriptomic targets in astrocytes, key mediators of neuroinflammation, have not been comprehensively investigated. Here, we knock down ADAR1 in primary human astrocytes via siRNA transfection and use transcriptomics (RNA-seq) to show that this results in: (1) increased expression of type I interferon and pro-inflammatory signaling pathways and (2) an accumulation of transposable element (TE) transcripts with the potential to form dsRNA. We also show that our findings may be clinically relevant, as ADAR1 gene expression declines with brain aging and AD in humans, and this is associated with a similar increase in TE transcripts. Together, our results suggest an important role for ADAR1 in preventing pro-inflammatory activation of astrocytes in response to endogenous dsRNA with aging and AD.

FLARE: a fast and flexible workflow for identifying RNA editing foci

BACKGROUND

Fusion of RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) to RNA base-editing enzymes (such as APOBEC1 or ADAR) has emerged as a powerful tool for the discovery of RBP binding sites. However, current methods that analyze sequencing data from RNA-base editing experiments are vulnerable to false positives due to off-target editing, genetic variation and sequencing errors.

RESULTS

We present FLagging Areas of RNA-editing Enrichment (FLARE), a Snakemake-based pipeline that builds on the outputs of the SAILOR edit site discovery tool to identify regions statistically enriched for RNA editing. FLARE can be configured to analyze any type of RNA editing, including C to U and A to I. We applied FLARE to C-to-U editing data from a RBFOX2-APOBEC1 STAMP experiment, to show that our approach attains high specificity for detecting RBFOX2 binding sites. We also applied FLARE to detect regions of exogenously introduced as well as endogenous A-to-I editing.

CONCLUSIONS

FLARE is a fast and flexible workflow that identifies significantly edited regions from RNA-seq data. The FLARE codebase is available at https://github.com/YeoLab/FLARE .

Nanoparticle Delivery of Immunostimulatory Alu RNA for Cancer Immunotherapy

It was recently found that patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis exhibit widespread loss of adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing, which contributes to the accumulation of immunostimulatory double-stranded Alu RNA in circulating leukocytes and an attendant increase in levels of proinflammatory cytokines (e.g., type I IFNs). A specific Alu RNA (i.e., AluJb RNA) was implicated in activating multiple RNA-sensing pathways and found to be a potent innate immune agonist. Here, we have performed a bioinformatic analysis of A-to-I RNA editing in human melanoma samples and determined that pre-therapy levels of A-to-I RNA editing negatively correlate with survival times, suggesting that an accumulation of endogenous double-stranded Alu RNA might contribute to cancer patient survival. Furthermore, we demonstrated that immunostimulatory Alu RNA can be leveraged pharmacologically for cancer immunotherapy. AluJb RNA was in vitro transcribed and then formulated with endosome-destabilizing polymer nanoparticles to improve intracellular delivery of the RNA and enable activation of RNA-sensing pathways. AluJb RNA/polymer complexes (i.e., Alu-NPs) were engineered to form colloidally stable nanoparticles that exhibited immunostimulatory activity in vitro and in vivo. Finally, the therapeutic potential of Alu-NPs for the treatment of cancer was demonstrated by attenuated tumor growth and prolonged survival in the B16.F10 murine melanoma tumor model. Thus, these data collectively implicate intratumoral Alu RNA as a potentiator of antitumor innate immunity and identify AluJb RNA as a novel nucleic acid immunotherapeutic for cancer.

Significance

Loss of A-to-I editing leads to accumulation of unedited Alu RNAs that activate innate immunity via RNA-sensing pattern recognition receptors. When packaged into endosome-releasing polymer nanoparticles, AluJB RNA becomes highly immunostimulatory and can be used pharmacologically to inhibit tumor growth in mouse melanoma models. These findings identify Alu RNAs as a new class of nucleic acid innate immune agonists for cancer immunotherapy.

Benchmarking RNA Editing Detection Tools

RNA, like DNA and proteins, can undergo modifications. To date, over 170 RNA modifications have been identified, leading to the emergence of a new research area known as epitranscriptomics. RNA editing is the most frequent RNA modification in mammalian transcriptomes, and two types have been identified: (1) the most frequent, adenosine to inosine (A-to-I); and (2) the less frequent, cysteine to uracil (C-to-U) RNA editing. Unlike other epitranscriptomic marks, RNA editing can be readily detected from RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data without any chemical conversions of RNA before sequencing library preparation. Furthermore, analyzing RNA editing patterns from transcriptomic data provides an additional layer of information about the epitranscriptome. As the significance of epitranscriptomics, particularly RNA editing, gains recognition in various fields of biology and medicine, there is a growing interest in detecting RNA editing sites (RES) by analyzing RNA-seq data. To cope with this increased interest, several bioinformatic tools are available. However, each tool has its advantages and disadvantages, which makes the choice of the most appropriate tool for bench scientists and clinicians difficult. Here, we have benchmarked bioinformatic tools to detect RES from RNA-seq data. We provide a comprehensive view of each tool and its performance using previously published RNA-seq data to suggest recommendations on the most appropriate for utilization in future studies.

Lessons from discovery of true ADAR RNA editing sites in a human cell line

BACKGROUND

Conversion or editing of adenosine (A) into inosine (I) catalyzed by specialized cellular enzymes represents one of the most common post-transcriptional RNA modifications with emerging connection to disease. A-to-I conversions can happen at specific sites and lead to increase in proteome diversity and changes in RNA stability, splicing, and regulation. Such sites can be detected as adenine-to-guanine sequence changes by next-generation RNA sequencing which resulted in millions reported sites from multiple genome-wide surveys. Nonetheless, the lack of extensive independent validation in such endeavors, which is critical considering the relatively high error rate of next-generation sequencing, leads to lingering questions about the validity of the current compendiums of the editing sites and conclusions based on them.

RESULTS

Strikingly, we found that the current analytical methods suffer from very high false positive rates and that a significant fraction of sites in the public databases cannot be validated. In this work, we present potential solutions to these problems and provide a comprehensive and extensively validated list of A-to-I editing sites in a human cancer cell line. Our findings demonstrate that most of true A-to-I editing sites in a human cancer cell line are located in the non-coding transcripts, the so-called RNA 'dark matter'. On the other hand, many ADAR editing events occurring in exons of human protein-coding mRNAs, including those that can recode the transcriptome, represent false positives and need to be interpreted with caution. Nonetheless, yet undiscovered authentic ADAR sites that increase the diversity of human proteome exist and warrant further identification.

CONCLUSIONS

Accurate identification of human ADAR sites remains a challenging problem, particularly for the sites in exons of protein-coding mRNAs. As a result, genome-wide surveys of ADAR editome must still be accompanied by extensive Sanger validation efforts. However, given the vast number of unknown human ADAR sites, there is a need for further developments of the analytical techniques, potentially those that are based on deep learning solutions, in order to provide a quick and reliable identification of the editome in any sample.

Biological roles of A-to-I editing: implications in innate immunity, cell death, and cancer immunotherapy

Adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) editing, a key RNA modification widely found in eukaryotes, is catalyzed by adenosine deaminases acting on RNA (ADARs). Such RNA editing destabilizes endogenous dsRNAs, which are subsequently recognized by the sensors of innate immune and other proteins as autologous dsRNAs. This prevents the activation of innate immunity and type I interferon-mediated responses, thereby reducing the downstream cell death induced by the activation of the innate immune sensing system. ADARs-mediated editing can also occur in mRNAs and non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) in different species. In mRNAs, A-to-I editing may lead to missense mutations and the selective splicing of coding regions. Meanwhile, in ncRNAs, A-to-I editing may affect targeting and disrupt ncRNAs maturation, leading to anomalous cell proliferation, invasion, and responses to immunotherapy. This review highlights the biological functions of A-to-I editing, its role in regulating innate immunity and cell death, and its potential molecular significance in tumorigenesis and cancer targeted therapy and immunotherapy.

Pan-cancer investigation of C-to-U editing reveals its important role in cancer development and new targets for cancer treatment

RNA editing is prevalent in the transcriptome and is important for multiple cellular processes. C-to-U RNA editing sites (RES) are relatively rare and understudied in humans, compared to A-to-I editing. However, the functional impact of C-to-U editing in human cancers also remains elusive. Here, we conducted the first comprehensive survey of pan-cancer C-to-U RESs. Surprisingly, we found that the same subset of RESs were associated with multiple features, including patient survival, cancer stemness, tumor mutation burden (TMB), and tumor-infiltrated immune cell compositions (ICC), suggesting an RES-mediated close relationship between these features. For example, editing sites for GALM or IFI6 that led to higher expression were linked to lower survival and more cancer stemness. Also, TMB was found to be lower in prostate cancer cases with ICC-associated RESs in CAVIN1 or VWA8 or higher in prostate cancer cases with thymoma. With experimental support, we also found RESs in CST3, TPI1, or TNC that are linked to immune checkpoint blockade by anti-PD1. We also confirmed through experiments that two C-to-U RESs in CSNK2B or RPS14 had different effects on colon cancer cells. Patients with CSNK2B editing, which increased the expression of the oncogene CLDN18, had a lower response to drugs. On the other hand, drugs worked better on people who had RPS14 editing, which greatly increased ribosome production. In summary, our study demonstrated the important roles of C-to-U RESs across cancers and shed light on personalized cancer therapy.

Genome-wide identification of A-to-I RNA editing events provides the functional implications in PDAC

Introduction

RNA editing, a wide-acknowledged post-transcriptional mechanism, has been reported to be involved in the occurrence and development of cancer, especially the abnormal alteration of adenosine to inosine. However, fewer studies focus on pancreaticcancer. Therefore, we aimed to explore the possible linkages between altered RNA editing events and the development of PDAC.

Method

We characterized the global A-to-I RNA editing spectrum from RNA and matched whole-genome sequencing data of 41 primary PDAC and adjacent normal tissues. The following analyses were performed: different editing level and RNA expression analysis,pathway analysis, motif analysis, RNA secondary structure analysis, alternative splicing events analysis, and survival analysis.The RNA editing of single-cell RNA public sequencing data was also characterized.

Result

A large number of adaptive RNA editing events with significant differences in editing levels were identified, which are mainly regulated by ADAR1. Moreover, RNA editing in tumors has a higher editing level and more abundant editing sites in general. 140genes were screened out since they were identified with significantly different RNA editing events and were significantly different in expression level between tumor and matched normal samples. Further analysis showed a preference that in the tumor-specific group, they are mainly enriched in cancer-related signal pathways, while in the normal tissue-specific group, they are mainly enriched in pancreatic secretion. At the same time, we also found positively selected differentially edited sites in a series of cancer immune genes, including EGF, IGF1R, and PIK3CD. RNA editing might participate in pathogenisis of PDAC through regulating the alternative splicing and RNA secondary structure of important genesto further regulate gene expression and protein synthesis, including RAB27B and CERS4. Furthermore, single cell sequencing results showed that type2 ductal cells contributed the most to RNA editing events in tumors.

Conclusion

RNA editing is an epigenetic mechanism involved in the occurrence and development of pancreatic cancer, which has the potential to diagnose of PDAC and is closely related to the prognosis.

A Bibliometric Study for Plant RNA Editing Research: Trends and Future Challenges

RNA editing is a post-transcriptional process that introduces changes in RNA sequences encoded by nuclear, mitochondrial, or plastid genomes. To understand the research progress of plant RNA editing, we comprehensively analyze the articles on plant RNA editing from 2001 to 2022 through bibliometric methods. Nucleic Acids Research, Plant Journal and Plant cell are the journals that deserve attention with their high production, total local citation scores (TLCS), and h-indexes. The USA, China, and Germany are the top three countries with highly productive publications. Ulm University, Cornell University, and Chinese Acad Sci are excellent cooperative institutions with a high level of influence in the field, and KNOOP V and TAKENAKA M are good partnership. Plant RNA editing researches concentrate on the subject categories of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Plant Sciences, Genetics & Heredity, etc. Plant mitochondria, genome editing and messenger-RNA may be the research hotspots in the future. The main plant RNA editing research tools are JACUSA, SPRINT, and REDO, and the main databases are REDIdb, PED, and dbRES. At present, the research streams are (1) RNA editing sites; (2) Pentapeptide repeat protein (PPR) involved in RNA editing; (3) RNA editing factors. Overall, this article summarizes the research overview of plant RNA editing until 2022 and provides theoretical implications for its possible future directions.

Genome-wide detection of RNA editing events during the hair follicles cycle of Tianzhu white yak

BACKGROUND

The hair coat is available for the yak to live in the harsh environment of the plateau. Besides, improving the hair production of yak is necessary for its textile industry development. Hair grows from hair follicles (HFs). The HFs undergo periodic growth after birth and are regulated by the complex gene regulatory network. However, the molecular mechanism of HFs regeneration in the Tianzhu white yak remains unclear. RNA editing is a post-transcriptional mechanism that regulates gene expression and produces new transcripts. Hence, we investigated the influence of the A-to-I RNA editing events on the HFs cycle of the Tianzhu white yak.

RESULTS

We finally identified 54,707 adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing sites (RESs) from RNA sequencing data of the HFs cycle in the Tianzhu white yak. Annotation results showed RESs caused missense amino acid changes in 7 known genes. And 202 A-to-I editing sites altered 23 target genes of 140 microRNAs. A total of 1,722 differential RESs were identified during the HFs cycle of Tianzhu white yak. GO and KEGG enrichment analysis revealed several signaling pathways and GO terms involved skin development, hair growth, and HFs cycle. Such as genes with differential RNA editing levels were significantly enriched in the peroxisome, metabolic pathways, Notch signaling pathway, and PPAR signaling pathway. Besides, the editing sites in HFs development-related genes FAS, APCDD1, WWOX, MPZL3, RUNX1, KANK2, DCN, DSC2, LEPR, HEPHL1, and PTK2B were suggested as the potential RESs involving HFs development.

CONCLUSION

This study investigated the global A-to-I RNA editing events during the HFs cycle of yak skin tissue and expanded the knowledge of A-to-I RNA editing on the HFs cycle. Furthermore, this study revealed that RNA editing-influenced genes may regulate the HFs cycle by participating in the HFs development-related pathways. The findings might provide new insight into the regulation of RNA editing in hair growth.

Epitranscriptome Analysis of Oxidative Stressed Retinal Epithelial Cells Depicted a Possible RNA Editing Landscape of Retinal Degeneration

Oxidative stress represents one of the principal causes of inherited retinal dystrophies, with many related molecular mechanisms still unknown. We investigated the posttranscriptional RNA editing landscape of human retinal pigment epithelium cells (RPE) exposed to the oxidant agent N-retinylidene-N-retinyl ethanolamine (A2E) for 1 h, 2 h, 3 h and 6 h. Using a transcriptomic approach, refined with a specific multialgorithm pipeline, 62,880 already annotated and de novo RNA editing sites within about 3000 genes were identified among all samples. Approximately 19% of these RNA editing sites were found within 3' UTR, including sites common to all time points that were predicted to change the binding capacity of 359 miRNAs towards 9654 target genes. A2E exposure also determined significant gene expression differences in deaminase family ADAR, APOBEC and ADAT members, involved in canonical and tRNA editing events. On GO and KEGG enrichment analyses, genes that showed different RNA editing levels are mainly involved in pathways strongly linked to a possible neovascularization of retinal tissue, with induced apoptosis mediated by the ECM and surface protein altered signaling. Collectively, this work demonstrated dynamic RNA editome profiles in RPE cells for the first time and shed more light on new mechanisms at the basis of retinal degeneration.

RNA editing underlies genetic risk of common inflammatory diseases

A major challenge in human genetics is to identify the molecular mechanisms of trait-associated and disease-associated variants. To achieve this, quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping of genetic variants with intermediate molecular phenotypes such as gene expression and splicing have been widely adopted1,2. However, despite successes, the molecular basis for a considerable fraction of trait-associated and disease-associated variants remains unclear3,4. Here we show that ADAR-mediated adenosine-to-inosine RNA editing, a post-transcriptional event vital for suppressing cellular double-stranded RNA (dsRNA)-mediated innate immune interferon responses5-11, is an important potential mechanism underlying genetic variants associated with common inflammatory diseases. We identified and characterized 30,319 cis-RNA editing QTLs (edQTLs) across 49 human tissues. These edQTLs were significantly enriched in genome-wide association study signals for autoimmune and immune-mediated diseases. Colocalization analysis of edQTLs with disease risk loci further pinpointed key, putatively immunogenic dsRNAs formed by expected inverted repeat Alu elements as well as unexpected, highly over-represented cis-natural antisense transcripts. Furthermore, inflammatory disease risk variants, in aggregate, were associated with reduced editing of nearby dsRNAs and induced interferon responses in inflammatory diseases. This unique directional effect agrees with the established mechanism that lack of RNA editing by ADAR1 leads to the specific activation of the dsRNA sensor MDA5 and subsequent interferon responses and inflammation7-9. Our findings implicate cellular dsRNA editing and sensing as a previously underappreciated mechanism of common inflammatory diseases.

Exploring the lncRNA localization landscape within the retinal pigment epithelium under normal and stress conditions

BACKGROUND

Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are emerging as a class of genes whose importance has yet to be fully realized. It is becoming clear that the primary function of lncRNAs is to regulate gene expression, and they do so through a variety of mechanisms that are critically tied to their subcellular localization. Although most lncRNAs are poorly understood, mapping lncRNA subcellular localization can provide a foundation for understanding these mechanisms.

RESULTS

Here, we present an initial step toward uncovering the localization landscape of lncRNAs in the human retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) using high throughput RNA-Sequencing (RNA-Seq). To do this, we differentiated human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) into RPE, isolated RNA from nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions, and performed RNA-Seq on both. Furthermore, we investigated lncRNA localization changes that occur in response to oxidative stress. We discovered that, under normal conditions, most lncRNAs are seen in both the nucleus and the cytoplasm to a similar degree, but of the transcripts that are highly enriched in one compartment, far more are nuclear than cytoplasmic. Interestingly, under oxidative stress conditions, we observed an increase in lncRNA localization in both nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions. In addition, we found that nuclear localization was partially attributable to the presence of previously described nuclear retention motifs, while adenosine to inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing appeared to play a very minimal role.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings map lncRNA localization in the RPE and provide two avenues for future research: 1) how lncRNAs function in the RPE, and 2) how one environmental factor, in isolation, may potentially play a role in retinal disease pathogenesis through altered lncRNA localization.

Decoding RNA Editing Sites Through Transcriptome Analysis in Rice Under Alkaline Stress

Ribonucleic acid editing (RE) is a post-transcriptional process that altered the genetics of RNA which provide the extra level of gene expression through insertion, deletions, and substitutions. In animals, it converts nucleotide residues C-U. Similarly in plants, the role of RNA editing sites (RES) in rice under alkaline stress is not fully studied. Rice is a staple food for most of the world population. Alkaline stress cause reduction in yield. Here, we explored the effect of alkaline stress on RES in the whole mRNA from rice chloroplast and mitochondria. Ribonucleic acid editing sites in both genomes (3336 RESs) including chloroplast (345 RESs) and mitochondria (2991 RESs) with average RES efficiency ∼55% were predicted. Our findings showed that majority of editing events found in non-synonymous codon changes and change trend in amino acids was hydrophobic. Four types of RNA editing A-G (A-I), C-T (C-U), G-A, and T-C were identified in treated and untreated samples. Overall, RNA editing efficiency was increased in the treated samples. Analysis of Gene Ontology revealed that mapped genes were engaged in many biological functions and molecular processes. We also checked the expression of pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR), organelle zinc-finger (OZI), and multiple organellar RNA editing factors/RNA editing factor interacting proteins genes in control and treatment, results revealed upregulation of PPR and OZ1 genes in treated samples. This induction showed the role of these genes in RNA editing. The current findings report that RNA editing increased under alkaline stress which may contribute in adaptation for rice by changing amino acids in edited genes (88 genes). These findings will provide basis for identification of RES in other crops and also will be useful in alkaline tolerance development in rice.

Genome-wide investigation and functional analysis of RNA editing sites in wheat

Wheat is an important cereal and half of the world population consumed it. Wheat faces environmental stresses and different techniques (CRISPR, gene silencing, GWAS, etc.) were used to enhance its production but RNA editing (RESs) is not fully explored in wheat. RNA editing has a special role in controlling environmental stresses. The genome-wide identification and functional characterization of RESs in different types of wheat genotypes was done. We employed six wheat genotypes by RNA-seq analyses to achieve RESs. The findings revealed that RNA editing events occurred on all chromosomes equally. RNA editing sites were distributed randomly and 10–12 types of RESs were detected in wheat genotypes. Higher number of RESs were detected in drought-tolerant genotypes. A-to-I RNA editing (2952, 2977, 1916, 2576, 3422, and 3459) sites were also identified in six wheat genotypes. Most of the genes were found to be engaged in molecular processes after a Gene Ontology analysis. PPR (pentatricopeptide repeat), OZ1 (organelle zinc-finger), and MORF/RIP gene expression levels in wheat were also examined. Normal growth conditions diverge gene expression of these three different gene families, implying that normal growth conditions for various genotypes can modify RNA editing events and have an impact on gene expression levels. While the expression of PPR genes was not change. We used Variant Effect Predictor (VEP) to annotate RNA editing sites, and Local White had the highest RESs in the CDS region of the protein. These findings will be useful for prediction of RESs in other crops and will be helpful in drought tolerance development in wheat.

A Systematic Review of Common and Brain-Disease-Specific RNA Editing Alterations Providing Novel Insights into Neurological and Neurodegenerative Disease Manifestations

RNA editing contributes to transcriptome diversification through RNA modifications in relation to genome-encoded information (RNA–DNA differences, RDDs). The deamination of Adenosine (A) to Inosine (I) or Cytidine (C) to Uridine (U) is the most common type of mammalian RNA editing. It occurs as a nuclear co- and/or post-transcriptional event catalyzed by ADARs (Adenosine deaminases acting on RNA) and APOBECs (apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme catalytic polypeptide-like genes). RNA editing may modify the structure, stability, and processing of a transcript. This review focuses on RNA editing in psychiatric, neurological, neurodegenerative (NDs), and autoimmune brain disorders in humans and rodent models. We discuss targeted studies that focus on RNA editing in specific neuron-enriched transcripts with well-established functions in neuronal activity, and transcriptome-wide studies, enabled by recent technological advances. We provide comparative editome analyses between human disease and corresponding animal models. Data suggest RNA editing to be an emerging mechanism in disease development, displaying common and disease-specific patterns. Commonly edited RNAs represent potential disease-associated targets for therapeutic and diagnostic values. Currently available data are primarily descriptive, calling for additional research to expand global editing profiles and to provide disease mechanistic insights. The potential use of RNA editing events as disease biomarkers and available tools for RNA editing identification, classification, ranking, and functional characterization that are being developed will enable comprehensive analyses for a better understanding of disease(s) pathogenesis and potential cures.

REIA: A database for cancer A-to-I RNA editing with interactive analysis

Epitranscriptomic changes caused by adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing contribute to the pathogenesis of human cancers; however, only a small fraction of the millions editing sites detected so far has clear functionality. To facilitate more in-depth studies on the editing, this paper offers REIA (http://bioinfo-sysu.com/reia), an interactive web server that analyses and visualizes the association between human cancers and A-to-I RNA editing sites (RESs). As a comprehensive database, REIA curates not only 8,447,588 RESs from 9,895 patients across 34 cancers, where 33 are from TCGA and 1 from GEO, but also 13 different types of multi-omic data for the cancers. As an interactive server, REIA provides various options for the user to specify the interested sites, to browse their annotation/editing level/profile in cancer, and to compare the difference in multi-omic features between editing and non-editing groups. From the editing profiles, REIA further detects 658 peptides that are supported by mass spectrum data but not yet covered in any prior works.

Landscape of adenosine-to-inosine RNA recoding across human tissues

RNA editing by adenosine deaminases changes the information encoded in the mRNA from its genomic blueprint. Editing of protein-coding sequences can introduce novel, functionally distinct, protein isoforms and diversify the proteome. The functional importance of a few recoding sites has been appreciated for decades. However, systematic methods to uncover these sites perform poorly, and the full repertoire of recoding in human and other mammals is unknown. Here we present a new detection approach, and analyze 9125 GTEx RNA-seq samples, to produce a highly-accurate atlas of 1517 editing sites within the coding region and their editing levels across human tissues. Single-cell RNA-seq data shows protein recoding contributes to the variability across cell subpopulations. Most highly edited sites are evolutionary conserved in non-primate mammals, attesting for adaptation. This comprehensive set can facilitate understanding of the role of recoding in human physiology and diseases.

Gabay et al. provide a highly-accurate atlas of recoding by A-to-I RNA editing in human, profiled across tissues and cell subpopulations. Most highly edited sites are evolutionary conserved in non-primate mammals, attesting for adaptation.

Alu RNA Structural Features Modulate Immune Cell Activation and A-to-I Editing of Alu RNAs Is Diminished in Human Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Alu retrotransposons belong to the class of short interspersed nuclear elements (SINEs). Alu RNA is abundant in cells and its repetitive structure forms double-stranded RNAs (dsRNA) that activate dsRNA sensors and trigger innate immune responses with significant pathological consequences. Mechanisms to prevent innate immune activation include deamination of adenosines to inosines in dsRNAs, referred to as A-to-I editing, degradation of Alu RNAs by endoribonucleases, and sequestration of Alu RNAs by RNA binding proteins. We have previously demonstrated that widespread loss of Alu RNA A-to-I editing is associated with diverse human diseases including viral (COVID-19, influenza) and autoimmune diseases (multiple sclerosis). Here we demonstrate loss of A-to-I editing in leukocytes is also associated with inflammatory bowel diseases. Our structure-function analysis demonstrates that ability to activate innate immune responses resides in the left arm of Alu RNA, requires a 5’-PPP, RIG-I is the major Alu dsRNA sensor, and A-to-I editing disrupts both structure and function. Further, edited Alu RNAs inhibit activity of unedited Alu RNAs. Altering Alu RNA nucleotide sequence increases biological activity. Two classes of Alu RNAs exist, one class stimulates both IRF and NF-kB transcriptional activity and a second class only stimulates IRF transcriptional activity. Thus, Alu RNAs play important roles in human disease but may also have therapeutic potential.

RNA editing regulates lncRNA splicing in human early embryo development

RNA editing is a co- or post-transcriptional modification through which some cells can make discrete changes to specific nucleotide sequences within an RNA molecule after transcription. Previous studies found that RNA editing may be critically involved in cancer and aging. However, the function of RNA editing in human early embryo development is still unclear. In this study, through analyzing single cell RNA sequencing data, 36.7% RNA editing sites were found to have a have differential editing ratio among early embryo developmental stages, and there was a great reprogramming of RNA editing rates at the 8-cell stage, at which most of the differentially edited RNA editing sites (99.2%) had a decreased RNA editing rate. In addition, RNA editing was more likely to occur on RNA splicing sites during human early embryo development. Furthermore, long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) editing sites were found more likely to be on RNA splicing sites (odds ratio = 2.19, P = 1.37×10-8), while mRNA editing sites were less likely (odds ratio = 0.22, P = 8.38×10-46). Besides, we found that the RNA editing rate on lncRNA had a significantly higher correlation coefficient with the percentage spliced index (PSI) of lncRNA exons (R = 0.75, P = 4.90×10-16), which indicated that RNA editing may regulate lncRNA splicing during human early embryo development. Finally, functional analysis revealed that those RNA editing-regulated lncRNAs were enriched in signal transduction, the regulation of transcript expression, and the transmembrane transport of mitochondrial calcium ion. Overall, our study might provide a new insight into the mechanism of RNA editing on lncRNAs in human developmental biology and common birth defects.

Comprehensive Analysis of Large-Scale Transcriptomes from Multiple Cancer Types

Various abnormalities of transcriptional regulation revealed by RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) have been reported in cancers. However, strategies to integrate multi-modal information from RNA-seq, which would help uncover more disease mechanisms, are still limited. Here, we present PipeOne, a cross-platform one-stop analysis workflow for large-scale transcriptome data. It was developed based on Nextflow, a reproducible workflow management system. PipeOne is composed of three modules, data processing and feature matrices construction, disease feature prioritization, and disease subtyping. It first integrates eight different tools to extract different information from RNA-seq data, and then used random forest algorithm to study and stratify patients according to evidences from multiple-modal information. Its application in five cancers (colon, liver, kidney, stomach, or thyroid; total samples n = 2024) identified various dysregulated key features (such as PVT1 expression and ABI3BP alternative splicing) and pathways (especially liver and kidney dysfunction) shared by multiple cancers. Furthermore, we demonstrated clinically-relevant patient subtypes in four of five cancers, with most subtypes characterized by distinct driver somatic mutations, such as TP53, TTN, BRAF, HRAS, MET, KMT2D, and KMT2C mutations. Importantly, these subtyping results were frequently contributed by dysregulated biological processes, such as ribosome biogenesis, RNA binding, and mitochondria functions. PipeOne is efficient and accurate in studying different cancer types to reveal the specificity and cross-cancer contributing factors of each cancer.It could be easily applied to other diseases and is available at GitHub.

RNA editing restricts hyperactive ciliary kinases

Protein kinase activity must be precisely regulated, but how a cell governs hyperactive kinases remains unclear. In this study, we generated a constitutively active mitogen-activated protein kinase DYF-5 (DYF-5CA) in Caenorhabditis elegans that disrupted sensory cilia. Genetic suppressor screens identified that mutations of ADR-2, an RNA adenosine deaminase, rescued ciliary phenotypes of dyf-5CA We found that dyf-5CA animals abnormally transcribed antisense RNAs that pair with dyf-5CA messenger RNA (mRNA) to form double-stranded RNA, recruiting ADR-2 to edit the region ectopically. RNA editing impaired dyf-5CA mRNA splicing, and the resultant intron retentions blocked DYF-5CA protein translation and activated nonsense-mediated dyf-5CA mRNA decay. The kinase RNA editing requires kinase hyperactivity. The similar RNA editing-dependent feedback regulation restricted the other ciliary kinases NEKL-4/NEK10 and DYF-18/CCRK, which suggests a widespread mechanism that underlies kinase regulation.

RNA editing signatures identify melanoma patients who respond to Pembrolizumab or Nivolumab treatment

•

Global RNA editing levels or ADAR expression do not correlate with response to immunotherapy in melanoma patients.

•

RNA editing signatures within genes can segregate patients that will respond to immunotherapy across patient cohorts.

•

Recurrent RNA editing sites, those that are shared between melanoma patients, provide accurate prognostic predictions.

Immunotherapy has improved the prognosis for many melanoma patients; however, our capacity to predict patient responses and to understand the biological differences between patients who will or will not respond is limited. Gene expression profiling of tumors from patients who respond to immunotherapy has focused on deriving primarily immune-related signatures; however, these have shown limited predictive power. Recent studies have highlighted the role of RNA editing in modulating resistance to immunotherapy. To evaluate the utility of RNA editing activity as a discriminative tool in predicting immunotherapy response, we conducted a retrospective analysis of RNA-sequencing data from melanoma patients treated with Pembrolizumab or Nivolumab. Here, we developed RNA editing signatures that can identify patients who will respond to immunotherapy with very high accuracy and confidence. Our analysis demonstrates that RNA editing is a strong discriminative tool for examining sensitivity of melanoma patients to immunotherapy.

Identification and Analysis of RNA Editing Events in Ovarian Serous Cystadenoma Using RNA-seq Data

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have revealed thousands of A-to-I RNA editing events in primates. These events are closely related to the occurrence and development of multiple cancers, but the origination and general functions of these events in ovarian cancer remain incompletely understood.

OBJECTIVE

To further the determination of molecular mechanisms of ovarian cancer from the perspective of RNA editing.

METHODS

Here, we used the SNP-free RNA editing Identification Toolkit (SPRINT) to detect RNA editing sites. These editing sites were then annotated, and related functional analysis was performed.

RESULTS

In this study, about 1.7 million RES were detected in each sample, and 98% of these sites were due to A-to-G editing and were mainly distributed in non-coding regions. More than 1,000 A-- to-G RES were detected in CDS regions, and nearly 700 could lead to amino acid changes. Our results also showed that editing in the 3'UTR regions could influence miRNA-target binding. We predicted the network of changed miRNA-mRNA interaction caused by the A-to-I RNA editing sites. We also screened the differential RNA editing sites between ovarian cancer and adjacent normal tissues. We then performed GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis on the genes that contained these differential RNA editing sites. Finally, we identified the potential dysregulated RNA editing events in ovarian cancer samples.

CONCLUSION

This study systematically identified and analyzed RNA editing events in ovarian cancer and laid a foundation to explore the regulatory mechanism of RNA editing and its function in ovarian cancer.

Reduced A-to-I editing of endogenous Alu RNAs in lung after SARS-CoV-2 infection

Due to potential severity of disease caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection, it is critical to understand both mechanisms of viral pathogenesis as well as diversity of host responses to infection. Reduced A-to-I editing of endogenous double-stranded RNAs (dsRNAs), as a result of inactivating mutations in ADAR, produces one form of Aicardi-Goutières Syndrome, with an immune response similar to an anti-viral response. By analyzing whole genome RNA sequencing data, we find reduced levels of A-to-I editing of endogenous Alu RNAs in normal human lung cells after infection by SARS-CoV-2 as well as in lung biopsies from patients with SARS-CoV-2 infections. Unedited Alu RNAs, as seen after infection, induce IRF and NF-kB transcriptional responses and downstream target genes, while edited Alu RNAs as seen in the absence of infection, fail to activate these transcriptional responses. Thus, decreased A-to-I editing may represent an important host response to SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Parental bias in expression and interaction of genes in the equine placenta

Most autosomal genes in the placenta show a biallelic expression pattern. However, some genes exhibit allele-specific transcription depending on the parental origin of the chromosomes on which the copy of the gene resides. Parentally expressed genes are involved in the reciprocal interaction between maternal and paternal genes, coordinating the allocation of resources between fetus and mother. One of the main challenges of studying parental-specific allelic expression (allele-specific expression [ASE]) in the placenta is the maternal cellular remnant at the fetomaternal interface. Horses (Equus caballus) have an epitheliochorial placenta in which both the endometrial epithelium and the epithelium of the chorionic villi are juxtaposed with minimal extension into the uterine mucosa, yet there is no information available on the allelic gene expression of equine chorioallantois (CA). In the current study, we present a dataset of 1,336 genes showing ASE in the equine CA (https://pouya-dini.github.io/equine-gene-db/) along with a workflow for analyzing ASE genes. We further identified 254 potentially imprinted genes among the parentally expressed genes in the equine CA and evaluated the expression pattern of these genes throughout gestation. Our gene ontology analysis implies that maternally expressed genes tend to decrease the length of gestation, while paternally expressed genes extend the length of gestation. This study provides fundamental information regarding parental gene expression during equine pregnancy, a species with a negligible amount of maternal cellular remnant in its placenta. This information will provide the basis for a better understanding of the role of parental gene expression in the placenta during gestation.

Cutting Edge: Reduced Adenosine-to-Inosine Editing of Endogenous Alu RNAs in Severe COVID-19 Disease

Severe COVID-19 disease is associated with elevated inflammatory responses. One form of Aicardi-Goutières syndrome caused by inactivating mutations in ADAR results in reduced adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) editing of endogenous dsRNAs, induction of IFNs, IFN-stimulated genes, other inflammatory mediators, morbidity, and mortality. Alu elements, ∼10% of the human genome, are the most common A-to-I-editing sites. Using leukocyte whole-genome RNA-sequencing data, we found reduced A-to-I editing of Alu dsRNAs in patients with severe COVID-19 disease. Dendritic cells infected with COVID-19 also exhibit reduced A-to-I editing of Alu dsRNAs. Unedited Alu dsRNAs, but not edited Alu dsRNAs, are potent inducers of IRF and NF-κB transcriptional responses, IL6, IL8, and IFN-stimulated genes. Thus, decreased A-to-I editing that may lead to accumulation of unedited Alu dsRNAs and increased inflammatory responses is associated with severe COVID-19 disease.

Discovering RNA Editing Events in Fungi

RNA editing is an important posttranscriptional process that alters the genetic information of RNA encoded by genomic DNA. Adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) editing is the most prevalent type of RNA editing in animal kingdom, catalyzed by adenosine deaminases acting on RNA (ADARs). Recently, genome-wide A-to-I RNA editing is discovered in fungi, involving adenosine deamination mechanisms distinct from animals. Aiming to draw more attention to RNA editing in fungi, here we discuss the considerations for deep sequencing data preparation and the available various methods for detecting RNA editing, with a special emphasis on their usability for fungal RNA editing detection. We describe computational protocols for the identification of candidate RNA editing sites in fungi by using two software packages REDItools and RES-Scanner with RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) and genomic DNA sequencing (DNA-Seq) data.

A-to-I RNA Editing in Cancer: From Evaluating the Editing Level to Exploring the Editing Effects

As an important regulatory mechanism at the posttranscriptional level in metazoans, adenosine deaminase acting on RNA (ADAR)-induced A-to-I RNA editing modification of double-stranded RNA has been widely detected and reported. Editing may lead to non-synonymous amino acid mutations, RNA secondary structure alterations, pre-mRNA processing changes, and microRNA-mRNA redirection, thereby affecting multiple cellular processes and functions. In recent years, researchers have successfully developed several bioinformatics software tools and pipelines to identify RNA editing sites. However, there are still no widely accepted editing site standards due to the variety of parallel optimization and RNA high-seq protocols and programs. It is also challenging to identify RNA editing by normal protocols in tumor samples due to the high DNA mutation rate. Numerous RNA editing sites have been reported to be located in non-coding regions and can affect the biosynthesis of ncRNAs, including miRNAs and circular RNAs. Predicting the function of RNA editing sites located in non-coding regions and ncRNAs is significantly difficult. In this review, we aim to provide a better understanding of bioinformatics strategies for human cancer A-to-I RNA editing identification and briefly discuss recent advances in related areas, such as the oncogenic and tumor suppressive effects of RNA editing.

Adenosine-to-Inosine RNA Editing of Alu Double-Stranded (ds)RNAs Is Markedly Decreased in Multiple Sclerosis and Unedited Alu dsRNAs Are Potent Activators of Proinflammatory Transcriptional Responses

Sensors that detect dsRNA stimulate IFN responses as a defense against viral infection. IFN responses are also well documented in a variety of human autoimmune diseases, including relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS), in which increased IFN responses result from increased levels of double-stranded endogenous Alu RNAs. Mechanisms underlying increases in double-stranded Alu RNAs in MS are obscure. We find widespread loss of adenosine-to-inosine editing of Alu RNAs in MS. Unedited Alu RNAs are potent activators of both IFN and NF-κB responses via the dsRNA sensors, RIG-I, and TLR3. Minor editing of highly active Alu elements abrogates the ability to activate both transcriptional responses. Thus, adenosine-to-inosine editing may also represent an important defense against autoimmune diseases such as MS.

Pan-RNA editing analysis of the bovine genome

RNA editing is an essential process for modifying nucleotides at specific RNA sites during post-transcription in many species. However, its genomic landscape and characters have not been systematically explored in the bovine genome. In the present study, we characterized global RNA editing profiles from 50 samples of cattle and revealed a range of RNA editing profiles in different tissues. Most editing sites were significantly enriched in specific BovB-derived SINEs, especially the dispersed Bov-tAs, which likely forms dsRNA structures similar to the primate-specific Alu elements. Interestingly, ADARB1 (ADAR2) was observed to be predominant in determining global editing in the bovine genome. Common RNA editing sites among similar tissues were associated with tissue-specific biological functions. Taken together, the wide distribution of RNA editing sites and their tissue-specific characters implied the bovine RNA editome should be further explored.