Melanotic Xp11 translocation renal cancers: a distinctive neoplasm with overlapping features of PEComa, carcinoma, and melanoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33:609-619. [PMID: 19065101 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0b013e31818fbdff]

SFPQ::TFE3-rearranged PEComa: Differences and analogies with renal cell carcinoma carrying the same translocation

Among perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasms (PEComas), some tumors have been found to carry rearrangements of the TFE3 gene. Such tumors can rarely occur in the kidney, closely resembling TFE3-rearranged renal cell carcinoma. This study describes one additional case of TFE3-rearranged PEComa, two TFE3-rearranged renal cell carcinomas, and a detailed literature review. All three tumors were composed of nested clear to eosinophilic cells with peculiar morphological findings in each case. By immunohistochemistry, PEComa expressed cathepsin K, HMB45, and CD68 (PG-M1), while labeling negative for PAX8, Melan-A, S100, smooth muscle actin, desmin, CD10, CD13, and keratins 7 and AE1/AE3. Conversely, both TFE3-rearranged renal cell carcinomas were positive for PAX8, HMB45, and CD10, alongside staining negative for CD68 (PG-M1), Melan-A, CD13, and keratins. One of them expressed cathepsin K. TFE3 gene rearrangement was identified in all three cases by FISH, along with SFPQ::TFE3 fusion by molecular analysis. Our cases, combined with a comprehensive literature review, highlight several key differences and similarities: SFPQ::TFE3-rearranged PEComas lack the pseudorosettes frequently observed in SFPQ::TFE3-rearranged renal cell carcinoma, although both may exhibit nested epithelioid morphology. Both tumor types can be positive for cathepsin K and melanogenesis markers and negative for smooth muscle markers. However, PAX8, keratins, and CD10 were expressed in TFE3-rearranged renal cell carcinoma while CD68(PG-M1) was positive in PEComa. Notably, the SFPQ gene is the most common fusion partner in TFE3-rearranged PEComas, while it is the third most frequent one in TFE3-rearranged renal cell carcinoma. Nevertheless, the exon breakpoints are analogous in both tumor types.

TFE3-rearranged PEComa-like neoplasm of the kidney with carcinoma-like morphology and rapid progression: a case report

BACKGROUND

TFE3-rearranged perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa)-like neoplasm is a recently recognized mesenchymal tumor with melanocytic immunophenotype and TFE3 gene rearrangement, but often lacking smooth muscle differentiation. Herein, we present a case of TFE3-rearranged PEComa-like neoplasm of the kidney to expand its clinicopathological characteristics and biological behavior.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 22-year-old female presented with left lumbago for more than 20 days. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan revealed a heterogeneous mass in the upper pole of the left kidney. Nephron-sparing surgery for renal neoplasia was performed. Histology showed carcinoma-like morphology, characterized by nests of large eosinophilic cells with prominent nucleoli and a rich capillary network. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated HMB45, melan-A, and cathepsin K positivity, focal SMA reactivity, and negativity for Pan-CK and PAX8, prompting an initial diagnosis of epithelioid angiomyolipoma/PEComa. Seventeen months post-surgery, rapid recurrence and multiple metastases occurred. A CT-guided needle biopsy revealed similar histological and immunohistochemical characteristics but with increased mitotic activity and necrosis. Subsequent TFE3 immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization confirmed TFE3 gene rearrangement, revising the diagnosis to TFE3-rearranged PEComa-like neoplasm.

CONCLUSIONS

This case enhances our understanding of TFE3-rearranged PEComa-like neoplasm, especially its morphological spectrum and aggressive behavior, which are valuable for diagnosis and prognostic prediction.

Intraspinal ASPSCR1::TFE3 rearranged tumor with nerve differentiation

The ASPSCR1::TFE3 rearrangement has been described in alveolar soft part sarcoma, MiT family translocation renal cell carcinomas as well as perivascular epithelioid cell tumors (PEComas). However, this rearrangement has not been reported in the primary spinal canal. Here, we report a case of an 18-year-old male who had pain in his left lower limb for 2 months. Neuroimaging revealed a lesion in the spinal canal from thoracic 12 to lumbar 1. Histopathological examination showed the tumor consisting of nested architectural pattern with abundant psammomatous calcification. Tumor cells exhibited strong and diffuse positivity for TFE3 and SOX10, patchy positivity for HMB-45 and S100, while other immunomarkers were negatively stained. RNA sequencing confirmed the ASPSCR1::TFE3 gene rearrangement. The Heidelberg DNA methylation classifier classified this case as "Cranial and Paraspinal Nerve Tumor". This case may represent a novel intraspinal neoplasm entity that expands the spectrum of ASPSCR1::TFE3-rearranged neoplasms by unique histopathological features and potential neural differentiation. We named this case as intraspinal ASPSCR1::TFE3 rearranged tumor with SOX10 expression.

Evaluation of 3,606 renal cell tumors for TFE3 rearrangements and TFEB alterations via fluorescence in situ hybridization, next generation sequencing, and GPNMB immunohistochemistry

Molecularly defined renal cell carcinomas include TFE3-rearranged renal cell carcinoma (TFE3-RCC) and TFEB-altered renal cell carcinoma (TFEB-RCC). There is significant morphologic and immunophenotypic overlap between these entities and common renal tumors, such that molecular testing is often required to make the diagnosis. Herein, we reviewed our reference laboratory experience pertaining to TFE3 and TFEB FISH testing, targeted next generation RNA sequencing (NGS), and GPNMB immunohistochemistry (IHC). Most FISH testing (2963/3543, 83.6%) was performed on renal tumors. TFE3 FISH showed rearrangements in 449 of 2467 specimens (18.2%), including 281 (of 1887, 14.9%) renal tumors. TFEB FISH identified an abnormality in 107 of 1076 (9.9%) renal tumors, including 52 (of 107, 48.6%) rearrangements, 41 (of 107, 38.3%) amplifications, or 14 (of 107, 13.1%) with both rearrangements and amplifications. More specifically, TFE3-rearranged, TFEB-rearranged, TFEB-amplified, and TFEB-rearranged/amplified renal tumors occurred in females in 54%, 69.6%, 39.1%, and 40% of cases, respectively. The pediatric and young adult population (aged ≤21 years) included 44 (of 121, 36.3%) TFE3-RCC and 9 (of 50, 18%) TFEB-rearranged RCC. TFE3-RCC fusion partners included RBM10, NONO, ASPSCR1, FUBP1, SFPQ, MAPK1IP1L, and PRCC. TFEB-rearranged RCC fusion partners SYNRG and BYSL were identified. Diffuse GPNMB expression was seen in 92% of TFE3-RCC (24/26; median H-score 275), 100% of TFEB-rearranged RCC (19/19; median H-score 300), and 100% of TFEB-amplified RCC (17/17; 240). Finally, our cohort included 5 eosinophilic TFEB-amplified RCCs with non-focal keratin 20 expression. This large series of TFE3-RCC and TFEB-RCC provides population data regarding these rare tumors and demonstrates the clinical value of targeted FISH strategies. Our results suggest that GPNMB IHC is an effective screen for TFE3-RCC and TFEB-RCC. Additionally, we report a RCC harboring a novel SYNRG::TFEB fusion.

TFE3 -rearranged Head and Neck Neoplasms : Twenty-two Cases Spanning the Morphologic Continuum Between Alveolar Soft Part Sarcoma and PEComa and Highlighting Genotypic Diversity

TFE3 rearrangements characterize histogenetically, topographically, and biologically diverse neoplasms. Besides being a universal defining feature in alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) and clear cell stromal tumor of the lung, TFE3 fusions have been reported in subsets of renal cell carcinoma, perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa), epithelioid hemangioendothelioma and ossifying fibromyxoid tumors. TFE3 -related neoplasms are rare in the head and neck and may pose diagnostic challenges. We herein describe 22 TFE3 fusion neoplasms affecting 11 males and 11 females aged 4 to 79 years (median, 25) and involving different head and neck sites: sinonasal cavities (n = 8), tongue (n = 4), oral cavity/oropharynx (n = 3), salivary glands (n = 2), orbit (n = 2), and soft tissue or unspecified sites (n = 3). Based on morphology and myomelanocytic immunophenotype, 10 tumors qualified as ASPS, 7 as PEComas (3 melanotic; all sinonasal), and 5 showed intermediate (indeterminate) histology overlapping with ASPS and PEComa. Immunohistochemistry for TFE3 was homogeneously strongly positive in all cases. Targeted RNA sequencing/FISH testing confirmed TFE3 fusions in 14 of 16 successfully tested cases (88%). ASPSCR1 was the most frequent fusion partner in ASPS (4 of 5 cases); one ASPS had a rare VCP::TFE3 fusion. The 6 successfully tested PEComas had known fusion partners as reported in renal cell carcinoma and PEComas ( NONO, PRCC, SFPQ , and PSPC1 ). The indeterminate tumors harbored ASPSCR1::TFE3 (n = 2) and U2AF2::TFE3 (n = 1) fusions, respectively. This large series devoted to TFE3-positive head and neck tumors illustrates the recently proposed morphologic overlap in the spectrum of TFE3 -associated mesenchymal neoplasms. While all PEComas were sinonasal, ASPS was never sinonasal and occurred in diverse head and neck sites with a predilection for the tongue. The indeterminate (PEComa-like) category is molecularly more akin to ASPS but shows different age, sex, and anatomic distribution compared with classic ASPS. We report VCP as a novel fusion partner in ASPS and PSPC1 as a novel TFE3 fusion partner in PEComa (detected in one PEComa). Future studies should shed light on the most appropriate terminological subtyping of these highly overlapping tumors.

SFPQ-TFE3 gene fusion reciprocally regulates mTORC1 activity and induces lineage plasticity in a novel mouse model of renal tumorigenesis

The MiT/TFE family gene fusion proteins, such as SFPQ-TFE3 , drive both epithelial (eg, translocation renal cell carcinoma, tRCC) and mesenchymal (eg, perivascular epithelioid cell tumor, PEComa) neoplasms with aggressive behavior. However, no prior mouse models for SFPQ-TFE3 -related tumors exist and the mechanisms of lineage plasticity induced by this fusion remain unclear. Here, we demonstrate that constitutive murine renal expression of human SFPQ-TFE3 using Ksp Cadherin-Cre as a driver disrupts kidney development leading to early neonatal renal failure and death. In contrast, post-natal induction of SFPQ-TFE3 in renal tubular epithelial cells using Pax8 ERT-Cre induces infiltrative epithelioid tumors, which morphologically and transcriptionally resemble human PEComas. As seen in MiT/TFE fusion-driven human tumors, SFPQ-TFE3 expression is accompanied by the strong induction of mTORC1 signaling, which is partially amino acid-sensitive and dependent on increased SFPQ-TFE3 -mediated RRAGC/D transcription. Remarkably, SFPQ-TFE3 expression is sufficient to induce lineage plasticity in renal tubular epithelial cells, with rapid down-regulation of the critical PAX2/PAX8 nephric lineage factors and tubular epithelial markers, and concomitant up-regulation of PEComa differentiation markers in transgenic mice, human cell line models and human tRCC. Pharmacologic or genetic inhibition of mTOR signaling downregulates expression of the SFPQ-TFE3 fusion protein and rescues nephric lineage marker expression and transcriptional activity in vitro. These data provide evidence of a potential epithelial cell-of-origin for TFE3 -driven PEComas and highlight a reciprocal role for SFPQ-TFE3 and mTOR in driving lineage plasticity in the kidney, expanding our understanding of the pathogenesis of MiT/TFE-driven tumors.

TFE3-rearranged nonmelanotic renal PEComa: a case series expanding their phenotypic and fusion landscape

AIMS

A subset of exceptionally rare primary renal perivascular epithelioid cell tumours (PEComas) that harbour Xp11.2 translocation have been reported, but no larger series devoted to this topic have been published.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We describe the clinicopathological and molecular features of 10 renal PEComas, collected from our routine and consultation files. There were five female and five male patients aged 14-65 (median: 32 years). One patient had a history of childhood neuroblastoma, but no patients were known to have a tuberous sclerosis complex or other hereditary disorder. Complete surgical excision was the treatment for all patients. The available follow-up in five patients indicated a favourable outcome in 4/5 cases. Tumour size ranged from 2.8 to 15.2 cm (median, 5.2 cm). Immunohistochemistry revealed consistently strong TFE3 expression in all tumours, whereas PAX8 and keratin cocktails were uniformly negative. Other positive markers included HMB45 (7/9 tumours), CathepsinK (7/9 tumours), and CD117 (KIT) (3/5 tumours). TFE3 rearrangements were detected in 8/9 tumours (by targeted RNA sequencing in seven and by FISH in one). The identified fusion partners included SFPQ (n = 2) and one tumour each with ASPSCR1, ZC3H4, MED15, RBMX, and PRCC. One tumour that lacked TFE3 rearrangement by next-generation sequencing (NGS) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) revealed a large intrachromosomal deletion involving PKD1 and TSC2 by DNA-based NGS.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the morphologic and genetic diversity of TFE3-rearranged primary renal PEComas and underlines the value of surrogate TFE3 immunohistochemistry in identifying them. The lack of PAX8 and keratin expression represents the mainstay for distinguishing these tumours from MiTF-associated renal cell carcinomas. In addition, we report rare (ZC3H4, RBMX) and novel (MED15) TFE3 fusion partners in PEComa.

TFE3-Rearranged Tumors of the Kidney: An Emerging Conundrum

Background: Identical translocations involving the TFE3 gene and various partners have been found in both renal and soft tissue tumors, like alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPSCR1), ossifying fibromyxoid tumor (PHF1), epithelioid hemangioendothelioma, and the clear cell stromal tumor of the lung (YAP1). Methods: Herein, we review in detail the clinicopathologic and molecular data of TFE3-rearranged renal tumors and propose our perspective, which may shed light on this emerging conundrum. Results: Among the kidney tumors carrying TFE3 translocations, most are morphologically heterogeneous carcinomas labeling for the tubular marker PAX8. The others are mesenchymal neoplasms known as PEComas, characterized by epithelioid cells co-expressing smooth muscle actin, cathepsin-K, melanogenesis markers, and sometimes melanin pigment deposition. Over the past 30 years, numerous TFE3 fusion partners have been identified, with ASPL/ASPSCR1, PRCC, SFPQ/PSF, and NONO being the most frequent. Conclusions: It is not well understood why similar gene fusions can give rise to renal tumors with different morpho-immunophenotypes, which may contribute to the recent disagreement regarding their classification. However, as these two entities, respectively, epithelial and mesenchymal in nature, are widely recognized by the pathology community and their clinicopathologic features well established, we overall believe it is still better to retain the names TFE3-rearranged renal cell carcinoma and TFE3-rearranged PEComa.

TFE3 -Rearranged PEComa/PEComa-like Neoplasms : Report of 25 New Cases Expanding the Clinicopathologic Spectrum and Highlighting its Association With Prior Exposure to Chemotherapy

Since their original description as a distinctive neoplastic entity, ~50 TFE3 -rearranged perivascular epithelioid cell tumors (PEComas) have been reported. We herein report 25 new TFE3 -rearranged PEComas and review the published literature to further investigate their clinicopathologic spectrum. Notably, 5 of the 25 cases were associated with a prior history of chemotherapy treatment for cancer. This is in keeping with prior reports, based mainly on small case series, with overall 11% of TFE3 -rearranged PEComas being diagnosed postchemotherapy. The median age of our cohort was 38 years. Most neoplasms demonstrated characteristic features such as nested architecture, epithelioid cytology, HMB45 positive, and muscle marker negative immunophenotype. SFPQ was the most common TFE3 fusion partner present in half of the cases, followed by ASPSCR1 and NONO genes. Four of 7 cases in our cohort with meaningful follow-up presented with or developed systemic metastasis, while over half of the reported cases either recurred locally, metastasized, or caused patient death. Follow-up for the remaining cases was limited (median 18.5 months), suggesting that the prognosis may be worse. Size, mitotic activity, and necrosis were correlated with aggressive behavior. There is little evidence that treatment with MTOR inhibitors, which are beneficial against TSC -mutated PEComas, is effective against TFE3 -rearranged PEComas: only one of 6 reported cases demonstrated disease stabilization. As co-expression of melanocytic and muscle markers, a hallmark of conventional TSC -mutated PEComa is uncommon in the spectrum of TFE3 -rearranged PEComa, an alternative terminology may be more appropriate, such as " TFE3 -rearranged PEComa-like neoplasms," highlighting their distinctive morphologic features and therapeutic implications.

Melanotic PEComa: A Rare But Distinctive Subtype Analyzed in a Series of 7 Cases

Perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasms (PEComas) are tumors of uncertain cell lineage that show a strong female predominance. Their hallmark is the presence of combined smooth muscle and melanocytic differentiation. In most cases, melanocytic differentiation is detectable only by immunohistochemistry, but there are rare reports of PEComa with extensive melanin accumulation (so-called "melanotic PEComa"). Here we report a clinicopathologic series of 7 melanotic PEComas that occurred across a wide patient age range of 21 to 82 years (median: 41 y) and with a wide anatomic distribution, including 2 cases in the pelvis and 1 case each in the gallbladder, cervix, eyelid, epidural space, and femur. All tumors were heavily pigmented and, like conventional PEComas, were composed of variably sized neoplastic cells with voluminous granular, or less commonly clear, cytoplasm with prominent nucleoli. All tumors expressed HMB45 by immunohistochemistry, and 6 of 7 showed nuclear TFE3 expression. Where tested, tumors were uniformly negative for Mart-1/Melan-A, S100, desmin, and smooth muscle actin. Molecular analysis identified TFE3 gene rearrangement in 5 of 7 cases, 4 of which were demonstrated by fluorescence in situ hybridization and one by whole-exome RNA sequencing which revealed a SFPQ::TFE3 fusion. The one tumor negative for TFE3 by immunohistochemistry was found instead to harbor a SFPQ::TFEB fusion, the first reported example to our knowledge of TFEB fusion in a PEComa. Clinical follow-up was available for 6 of 7 patients (median: 2.5 y: range: 0.75 to 7 y). The patient whose tumor harbored SFPQ::TFEB died of metastatic disease 9 months after diagnosis. The other tumors behaved in an indolent fashion: 4 patients were alive without evidence of disease at the most recent follow-up and 1 patient died of an unrelated cancer 4 years after diagnosis of the melanotic PEComa. Our results expand the morphologic and molecular spectrum of melanotic PEComa, and awareness of this rare but distinctive subtype is important to ensure accurate diagnosis within the broader family of heavily pigmented neoplasms.

Primary Xp11 translocation PEComa of the testis with SFPQ⁃TFE3 rearrangement: a case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasms (PEComas) are a family of mesenchymal tumors with features of both smooth muscle and melanocytic differentiation. A subset of PEComas demonstrate rearrangements involving the TFE3 (Xp11) locus. Xp11 translocation PEComa is a rare neoplasm with special clinicopathological features and a more aggressive behavior. We recently encountered a case of Xp11 translocation PEComa occurring in the testis, with SFPQ⁃TFE3 rearrangement.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 57-year-old male touched a mass in his testis incidentally. MRI revealed a 10 mm diameter mass in the right testis. The patient underwent radical orchiectomy. Gross examination revealed a well-demarcated mass from the surrounding testicular tissue. Microscopically, the tumor mainly displayed nested or sheet-like architecture separated by delicate fibrovascular septa. The tumor cells exhibited marked nuclear atypia and pleomorphism. Immunohistochemistry showed that the tumor cells were strongly positive for cathepsin-K, HMB45 and TFE3. Molecular analysis revealed SFPQ⁃TFE3 gene fusion. Thus, it was diagnosed as primary Xp11 translocation PEComa of the testis.

CONCLUSIONS

The present case reports primary Xp11 translocation PEComa of the testis for the first time, which to our knowledge has not been described in the literature in this anatomic site, where it could potentially be problematic in diagnosis.

Application of TFE3 Immunophenotypic and TFE3 mRNA Expressions in Diagnosis and Prognostication of Adrenal Cortical Neoplasms and Distinction From Kidney Tumors

We explored the application of TFE3 immunostaining and TFE3 mRNA expression in the differential diagnosis and prognostication of adrenal cortical tumors and distinction of the latter from clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) which show significant morphologic overlap. TFE3 immunostaining was performed on a large cohort of samples including 40 adrenal cortex tissues, 95 adrenocortical adenoma (ACA), 11 adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC), 53 ccRCC, and 18 pheochromocytomas. TFE3 was compared with other immunomarkers melan-A, inhibin-α, synaptophysin, chromogranin A, CAIX and CD10. One hundred percent normal adrenal cortices and 94% ACA were strongly and diffusely stained for TFE3 while no ACC showed diffuse staining. TFE3 is thus useful in distinguishing ACA from ACC. TFE3 is also useful in separating ACC from ccRCC as 64% ACC showed partial, while only 7% of ccRCC showed partial TFE3 staining. Only 1 pheochromocytoma showed focal weak TFE3 staining. Results also demonstrated superiority of TFE3 over other commonly used immunomarkers. TFE3 gene rearrangement testing by fluorescence in situ hybridization showed no rearrangement in 6 TFE3 positive adrenal tumors. TFE3 mRNA were analyzed by the Cancer Genome Atlas database and we found TFE3 mRNA expression correlated with overall patient survival in ACC. Our study showed usefulness of TFE3 in distinguishing ACA from ACC, and ACC from ccRCC. TFE3 is superior over other commonly used immunomarkers for adrenal tumors. In addition, decreased TFE3 immunoexpression and TFE3 mRNA expression may carry poor prognostic implication in adrenal tumors.

Proteogenomic characterization of MiT family translocation renal cell carcinoma

Microphthalmia transcription factor (MiT) family translocation renal cell carcinoma (tRCC) is a rare type of kidney cancer, which is not well characterized. Here we show the comprehensive proteogenomic analysis of tRCC tumors and normal adjacent tissues to elucidate the molecular landscape of this disease. Our study reveals that defective DNA repair plays an important role in tRCC carcinogenesis and progression. Metabolic processes are markedly dysregulated at both the mRNA and protein levels. Proteomic and phosphoproteome data identify mTOR signaling pathway as a potential therapeutic target. Moreover, molecular subtyping and immune infiltration analysis characterize the inter-tumoral heterogeneity of tRCC. Multi-omic integration reveals the dysregulation of cellular processes affected by genomic alterations, including oxidative phosphorylation, autophagy, transcription factor activity, and proteasome function. This study represents a comprehensive proteogenomic analysis of tRCC, providing valuable insights into its biological mechanisms, disease diagnosis, and prognostication.

Laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy in the oblique supine lithotomy integrative position for rare renal malignant perivascular epithelioid cell tumor with renal vein cancerous thrombosis: A case report and literature review

RATIONALE

Perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa) is a mesenchymal tumor that arises from perivascular epithelioid cells and can differentiate into melanocytes and smooth muscle cells. Malignant renal perivascular epithelioid cell tumor is extremely rare. Due to the lack of specific clinical manifestations and imaging features, diagnosing PEComa depends on postoperative pathology and immunohistochemistry. Surgery is the primary treatment for malignant PEComa because the efficacy of radiotherapy and chemotherapy is uncertain. There is still a lack of unified diagnostic criteria and treatment guidelines for renal malignant PEComa, especially with vascular invasion. Hence, the treatment experience depends on a small number of cases reported worldwide.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 68-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital due to intermittent hematuria for over 8 months. The color Doppler ultrasound and computed tomography scan revealed a mass in the lower middle part of the left kidney.

DIAGNOSIS

Rare renal malignant perivascular epithelioid cell tumor with renal vein cancerous thrombosis.

INTERVENTIONS

A laparoscopic radical left nephroureterectomy in the oblique supine lithotomy position was performed.

OUTCOMES

The operation process went smoothly, and no pulmonary embolism occurred after the operation. The final pathological diagnosis was a renal malignant perivascular epithelioid cell tumor. After a 12-month follow-up, no recurrence or metastasis was found.

LESSONS

Renal malignant PEComa is an extremely rare mesenchymal tumor diagnosed mainly based on pathology. Surgery is currently the effective treatment for malignant PEComa. For the surgical treatment of malignant renal PEComa with vascular invasion, laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy in the oblique supine lithotomy integrative position has many benefits, as exemplified by our current case.

PEComa-like Neoplasms Characterized by ASPSCR1-TFE3 Fusion: Another Face of TFE3-related Mesenchymal Neoplasia

Identical TFE3-related gene fusions may be found in renal cell carcinoma and mesenchymal neoplasms such as alveolar soft part sarcoma and TFE3-rearranged perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa). Among mesenchymal neoplasms, the ASPSCR1-TFE3 gene fusion has previously been described only in alveolar soft part sarcoma. We report 3 unusual mesenchymal neoplasms harboring the ASPSCR1-TFE3 gene fusion, the morphologic phenotype of which more closely matches PEComa rather than alveolar soft part sarcoma. All 3 neoplasms occurred in females ranging in age from 18 to 34 years and were located in the viscera (kidney, bladder, and uterus). All 3 contained nests of epithelioid cells bounded by fibrovascular septa. However, all were associated with hyalinized stroma, tight nested architecture, mixed spindle cell and epithelioid pattern, clear cytoplasm, and lacked significant discohesion. Overall, morphologic features closely resembled PEComa, being distinct from the typical alveolar soft part sarcoma phenotype. While none of the neoplasms labeled for HMB45, cytokeratin, or PAX8 all showed positivity for TFE3 and cathepsin K, and all except 1 were positive for smooth muscle actin. One patient developed a liver metastasis 7 years after nephrectomy. These cases bridge the gap between 2 TFE3-rearranged neoplasms, specifically alveolar soft part sarcoma and Xp11 translocation PEComa, highlighting the relatedness and overlap among Xp11 translocation neoplasms. While most TFE3-rearranged neoplasms can be confidently placed into a specific diagnostic category such as alveolar soft part sarcoma, PEComa, or Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinoma, occasional cases have overlapping features, highlighting the potential role that the cell of origin and the specific gene fusion play in the phenotype of these neoplasms.

Chameleon TFE3-translocation RCC and How Gene Partners Can Change Morphology: Accurate Diagnosis Using Contemporary Modalities

Translocation renal cell carcinoma (tRCC) with TFE3 gene rearrangements has been born as a distinct entity 20 years ago. These relatively rare tumors were notable among other RCC subtypes because of their disproportionally high incidence among children and young adults. Initial reports were focused on describing unifying morphologic criteria and typical clinical presentation. Follow-up studies of ancillary immunohistochemical and hybridization techniques provided additional diagnostic tools allowing recognition of tRCC tumors in practice. However, a growing body of literature also expanded the clinicomorphologic spectrum of tRCCs, to include a significant morphologic overlap with other RCC variants thus blurring the diagnostic clarity of this entity. More recent molecular studies utilizing next-generation sequencing technology accelerated recognition of numerous novel gene partners fusing at different breakpoints with the TFE3 gene. Accumulating data indicates that morphologic and clinical heterogeneity of tRCC could be explained by fusion subtypes, and knowledge of TFE3 partnering genes may be important in predicting tumor behavior. Herein we provided a comprehensive analysis of ∼400 tRCC cases with known TFE3 fusion partners, estimated their relative incidence and summarized clinicomorphologic features associated with most common fusion subtypes. Our data was based on an extensive literature review and had a special focus on comparing immunohistochemistry, fluorescent in situ hybridization and contemporary molecular studies for the accurate diagnosis of tRCC.

Nevus, melanoma or something else? Mesenchymal neoplasms with melanocytic differentiation

The overwhelming majority of cutaneous neoplasms with melanocytic differentiation are nevi, melanomas and more rarely melanocytomas. Nevertheless, there is also a group of mesenchymal neoplasms with genuine melanocytic differentiation which can create diagnostic difficulties with significant repercussions. These can rarely present as primary or metastatic cutaneous lesions. Theones that are relevant to a dermatopathologist include malignant melanotic nerve sheath tumor, perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasm and clear cell sarcoma. This work will provide a thorough review of clinical presentation, morphologic and immunohistochemical features as well as molecular pathogenesis of these tumors. We hope to familiarize the general dermatopathology readership with a group of neoplasms of mesenchymal lineage exhibiting melanocytic differentiation and ultimately avoid diagnostic misadventures. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Translocation carcinomas of the kidney

The MiT subfamily of transcription factors includes TFE3, TFEB, TFEC, and MITF. Gene fusions involving two of these transcription factors have been well-characterized in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The TFE3-rearranged RCC (also known as Xp11 translocation RCC) was first officially recognized in the 2004 World Health Organization (WHO) renal tumor classification. The TFEB-rearranged RCC, which typically harbor a t(6;11)(p21;q12) translocation which results in a MALAT1-TFEB gene fusion, were first officially recognized in the 2016 WHO renal tumor classification. These two subtypes of translocation RCC have many similarities. Both disproportionately involve young patients, although adult translocation RCC overall outnumber pediatric cases. Both often have unusual and distinctive morphologies; the TFE3-rearranged RCCs frequently have clear cells with papillary architecture and abundant psammoma bodies, while the TFEB-rearranged RCCs frequently have a biphasic appearance with both small and large epithelioid cells and nodules of basement membrane material. However, the morphology of these two neoplasms can overlap, with one mimicking the other or other more common renal neoplasms. Both of these RCC underexpress epithelial immunohistochemical markers, such as cytokeratin and epithelial membrane antigen, relative to most other RCC. Unlike other RCC, both frequently express the cysteine protease cathepsin k and often express melanocytic markers like HMB45 and Melan A. Finally, TFE3 and TFEB have overlapping functional activity as these two transcription factors frequently heterodimerize and bind to the same targets. Therefore, these two neoplasms are now grouped together under the heading of "MiT family translocation RCC." Approximately 50 renal cell carcinomas with gene fusions involving the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene have now been reported. While those with a Vinculin-ALK fusion have distinctive features (predilection to affect children with sickle cell trait and to show solid architecture with striking cytoplasmic vacuolization), other ALK-fusion RCCs have more varied clinical presentations and pathologic features. This review summarizes our current knowledge of these recently described RCC.

Immunohistochemical expression of PAX8, PAX2, and cytokeratin in melanomas

BACKGROUND

Deviations from the classic melanocytic immunophenotype in melanoma can present a diagnostic challenge. PAX8 and PAX2 are common markers for renal or Müllerian differentiation. While most PAX8+ or PAX2+ carcinomas are seldom confused with melanoma, some cases may show a more ambiguous immunophenotype, especially when MiTF family altered renal cell carcinoma (MiTF-RCC) is in the differential diagnosis. Neither PAX8 nor PAX2 expression has been reported in melanoma to date. We aimed to better characterize PAX8, PAX2, and cytokeratin immunoreactivity in a large series of melanomas.

METHODS

Tissue microarrays consisting of 263 melanomas were immunostained for PAX8, PAX2, and cytokeratin and graded by an h-score.

RESULTS

PAX8 expression was seen in 7.9% of melanomas and was significantly associated with spindle cytomorphology. PAX2 was positive in one (0.4%) melanoma. Cytokeratin positivity was seen in three (1.2%) cases and was associated with metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

PAX8 is expressed in a subset of melanomas and may be strong/extensive. As PAX8 positivity does not exclude a diagnosis of melanoma, it should be used in conjunction with other immunohistochemical markers, such as cytokeratin and PAX2, when melanoma, MiTF-RCC, and other PAX8+ tumors are in the differential diagnosis.

[Oncocytic tumours of the kidney-new differential diagnoses]

BACKGROUND

Recent developments in differential diagnosis have led to new knowledge about oncocytic renal neoplasms.

OBJECTIVES

Overview of differential diagnosis of oncocytic tumours.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a literature search on oncocytic renal tumours and mapped known tumour types. Possible differential diagnoses are discussed.

RESULTS

Besides the tumour types already acknowledged by the 2016 WHO classification, there is new evidence regarding the group of hard-to-classify oncocytic neoplasms. Findings point to immunohistochemical and molecular characteristics that may lead to the establishment of new entities in the future. In addition, important differential diagnosis can now be identified, facilitating specific therapies for oncocytic renal tumours.

CONCLUSION

A correct diagnosis of oncocytic renal tumours not only improves prognostic assessment (and, if necessary, specific therapies) but is also clinically relevant regarding a possible association with hereditary tumour syndromes.

Eosinophilic Solid and Cystic Renal Cell Carcinoma With Melanin Pigment-Expanding the Morphological Spectrum

Eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma (ESC-RCC) is an emerging entity in renal neoplasia with distinctive histopathological findings and a generally favorable prognosis. The presence of melanin pigment in a renal tumor typically prompts the observer to consider the microphthalmia-associated transcription family translocation renal cell carcinomas. We present a renal tumor occurring in a 19-year-old male patient which had the typical morphology of ESC-RCC but showed the additional finding of focal melanin pigment. This tumor showed strong and diffuse positive immunolabeling with paired box gene 8 and cytokeratin 20, and was negative with epithelial membrane antigen, carbonic anhydrase 9, CD117, cytokeratin 7, and transcription factor E3. Human melanoma black-45 showed focal positivity, but Melan-A was negative. Next-generation sequencing revealed a mutation in the TSC2 gene (c.4490C > G, p.[Pro1497Arg] and c.1257 + 1del) and break apart fluorescence in-situ hybridization with TFE3 and TFEB probes was negative. In this case report, we present the novel finding of melanin pigment occurring in a genetically proven and otherwise typical ESC-RCC, and briefly discuss the differential diagnostic considerations.

Pathology and systemic therapy of non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma: an overview

Introduction: Non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) represents a highly heterogenous group of kidney cancer entities. As most clinical trials predominantly include patients with clear cell RCC (ccRCC), nccRCC treatment guidelines are mainly extrapolated from recommendations in ccRCC. Here, we review and elucidate current data on the pathologic classification and treatment of nccRCC.Areas covered: This article gives an overview of the WHO classification of RCC, showing the histological diversity of nccRCC and focusing particularly on entities first characterized since 2016, their specific molecular behavior and their role as indicators for hereditary cancer syndromes. In this context, we discuss the available data on nccRCC treatment oprtions such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors, mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and immune checkpoint inhibitors.Expert opinion: Although nccRCCs are relatively uncommon, entities of this type account for a subgroup of up to 20-25% of all RCCs. Advances in histopathology and molecular genetics, together with evidence gained from retrospective and prospective clinical data, have improved understanding of these tumors in recent years. Nevertheless, selective trials of current and novel therapies including new targeted agents in patients with nccRCC are urgently needed to further improve treatment guidelines.

[Histological subtypes of renal cell carcinoma : Overview and new developments]

BACKGROUND

The classification of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has changed remarkably in recent years.

OBJECTIVES

This is a short overview of the classification of RCC, focusing on new developments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search was performed resulting in an overview of the classification of RCC. Emerging entities were discussed in detail.

RESULTS

Apart from the RCC subtypes in the WHO classification of 2016, several emerging entities came up over the last few years that are characterized by typical morphology, immunophenotype, and especially specific genetic alterations.

CONCLUSION

Precise classification of RCC is the key to better prognostic assessment with potential tumor-specific therapy and plays an important role in the recognition of possible association with hereditary tumor syndromes.

The Differential Diagnosis of Medullary-Based Renal Masses

CONTEXT.—

Renal malignancies can be divided into cortical- and medullary-based tumors, the latter of which classically infiltrate the renal parenchyma by extending between nonneoplastic structures. Although high-grade cortical tumors can rarely exhibit the same growth pattern, the infiltrative morphology should elicit a differential diagnosis to be considered in each case. However, these diagnoses can be challenging to distinguish, especially on small renal biopsy samples.

OBJECTIVE.—

To provide an overview of the clinical, gross, and microscopic findings; genetic and molecular alterations; and immunohistochemical evaluation of medullary-based renal tumors and other tumor types with overlapping morphologies and growth patterns.

DATA SOURCES.—

Literature review and personal observations were used to compile the information in this review.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Collecting duct carcinoma is a prototypical medullary-based tumor, and although diagnostic criteria exist, it remains a diagnosis of exclusion, especially with ancillary techniques aiding the recognition of established as well as more recently described neoplasms. Other medullary-based malignancies included in the differential diagnosis include renal medullary carcinoma/renal cell carcinoma unclassified with medullary phenotype, fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma, and upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Moreover, other rare entities should be excluded, including metastatic carcinoma, lymphoma, and melanoma. In addition to potential prognostic differences, accurate diagnoses can have important surgical and clinical management implications.

Angiomyolipoma of the kidney: from simple hamartoma to complex tumour

Angiomyolipoma is the most common mesenchymal tumour of the kidney, even if for a long time it has been viewed as a hamartoma rather than a neoplasm. It belongs to a family of neoplasms, named PEComa, characterised by the constant presence of perivascular epithelioid cells that co-express smooth muscle and melanogenesis markers. Angiomyolipoma can occur in patients with tuberous sclerosis, a hereditary syndrome due to the alteration of TSC1 or TSC2 genes, or sporadically. Angiomyolipoma and its variants are indolent tumours; however, some epithelioid angiomyolipomas/pure epithelioid PEComas are aggressive, and criteria for malignancy have been proposed to identify those cases. Although typical angiomyolipoma is a straightforward diagnosis, pathologists should be aware of the wide morphological spectrum of its variants which could be tricky in routine clinical practice and could require immunohistochemical analysis for resolution. The differential diagnosis may range from an inflammatory process (for instance xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis) to the most common renal cancers and sarcomas. The immunoexpression of melanogenesis markers (HMB45 and Melan-A) and cathepsin K is extremely helpful in the majority of cases. Recently, a subset of epithelioid angiomyolipoma/pure epithelioid PEComa harbouring TFE3 gene fusions has been described, raising questions about its relationship with the family of perivascular epithelioid cell tumour. The activation of the mTOR pathway due to genetic alterations of tuberous sclerosis complex in TSC1 or TSC2 genes in angiomyolipoma has also been reported as well as the subsequent therapeutic implications.

Targetable gene fusions and aberrations in genitourinary oncology

Gene fusions result from either structural chromosomal rearrangement or aberrations caused by splicing or transcriptional readthrough. The precise and distinctive presence of fusion genes in neoplastic tissues and their involvement in multiple pathways central to cancer development, growth and survival make them promising targets for personalized therapy. In genitourinary malignancies, rearrangements involving the E26 transformation-specific family of transcription factors have emerged as very frequent alterations in prostate cancer, especially the TMPRSS2-ERG fusion. In renal malignancies, Xp11 and t(6;11) translocations are hallmarks of a distinct pathological group of tumours described as microphthalmia-associated transcription factor family translocation-associated renal cell carcinomas. Novel druggable fusion events have been recognized in genitourinary malignancies, leading to the activation of several clinical trials. For instance, ALK-rearranged renal cell carcinomas have shown responses to alectinib and crizotinib. Erdafitinib has been tested for the treatment of FGFR-rearranged bladder cancer. Other anti-fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) compounds are showing promising results in the treatment of bladder cancer, including infigratinib and pemigatinib, and all are currently in clinical trials.

Clinicopathological Findings on 28 Cases with XP11.2 Renal Cell Carcinoma

Xp11.2 translocation carcinoma is a distinct subtype of renal cell carcinoma characterized by translocations involving the TFE3 gene. Our study included the morphological, immunohistochemical and clinicopathological examination of 28 Xp11.2 RCCs. The immunophenotype has been assessed by using CA9, CK7, CD10, AMACR, MelanA, HMB45, Cathepsin K and TFE3 immunostainings. The diagnosis was confirmed by TFE3 break-apart FISH in 25 cases. The ages of 13 male and 15 female patients, without underlying renal disease or having undergone chemotherapy ranged from 8 to 72. The mean size of the tumors was 78.5 mm. Forty-three percent of patients were diagnosed in the pT3/pT4 stage with distant metastasis in 6 cases. Histological appearance was branching-papillary composed of clear cells with voluminous cytoplasm in 13 and variable in 15 cases, including one tumor with anaplastic carcinoma and another with rhabdoid morphology. Three tumors were labeled with CA9, while CK7 was negative in all cases. Diffuse CD10 reaction was observed in 17 tumors and diffuse AMACR positivity was described in 14 tumors. The expression of melanocytic markers and Cathepsin K were seen only in 7 and 6 cases, respectively. TFE3 immunohistochemistry displayed a positive reaction in 26/28 samples. TFE3 rearrangement was detected in all the analyzed cases (25/25), including one with the loss of the entire labeled break-point region. The follow-up time ranged from 2 to 300 months, with 7 cancer-related deaths. In summary, Xp11.2 carcinoma is an uncommon form of renal cell carcinoma with a variable histomorphology and rather aggressive clinical course.

Renal Cell Tumors: Molecular Findings Reshaping Clinico-pathological Practice

Over the past 20 years, the number of subtypes of renal epithelial cell neoplasia has grown. This growth has resulted from detailed histological and immunohistochemical characterization of these tumors and their correlation with clinical outcomes. Distinctive molecular phenotypes have validated the unique nature of many of these tumors. This growth of unique renal neoplasms has continued after the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumours. A consequence is that both the pathologists who diagnose the tumors and the clinicians who care for these patients are confronted with a bewildering array of renal cell carcinoma variants. Many of these variants have important clinical features, i.e. familial or syndromic associations, genomics alterations that can be targeted with systemic therapy, and benignancy of tumors previously classified as carcinomas. Our goal in the review is to provide a practical guide to help recognize these variants, based on small and distinct sets of histological features and limited numbers of immunohistochemical stains, supplemented, as necessary, with molecular features.

Superficial malignant ossifying fibromyxoid tumors harboring the rare and recently described ZC3H7B-BCOR and PHF1-TFE3 fusions

Ossifying fibromyxoid tumor (OFMT) is a rare soft tissue neoplasm of uncertain differentiation and intermediate biologic potential. Up to 85% of OFMTs, including benign, atypical, and malignant forms, harbor fusion genes. Most commonly, the PHF1 gene localized to 6p21 is fused with EP400, but other fusion partners, such as MEAF6, EPC1, and JAZF1 have also been described. Herein, we present two rare cases of superficial OFMTs with ZC3H7B-BCOR and the very recently described PHF1-TFE3 fusions. The latter also exhibited moderate to strong diffuse immunoreactivity for TFE3. Reciprocally, this finding expands the entities with TFE3 rearrangements. Accumulation of additional data is necessary to determine if OFMTs harboring these rare fusions feature any reproducible clinicopathologic findings or carry prognostic and/or predictive implications.

Malignant melanotic Xp11 neoplasms exhibit a clinicopathologic spectrum and gene expression profiling akin to alveolar soft part sarcoma: a proposal for reclassification

The classification of the distinct group of mesenchymal neoplasms, first described as 'Xp11 translocation perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa)' and for which the term 'melanotic Xp11 neoplasm' or 'Xp11 neoplasm with melanocytic differentiation' has recently been proposed, remains challenging and controversial. We collected 27 melanotic Xp11 neoplasms, the largest series to date, for a comprehensive evaluation. Fourteen of the cases, together with eight alveolar soft part sarcomas (ASPS), nine conventional PEComas and a control group of seven normal tissues were submitted to RNA sequencing. Follow-up available in 22 patients showed 5-year overall survival and 5-year disease-free survival of 47.6 and 35.7%, respectively, which were similar to ASPS and significantly worse than conventional PEComa. Univariate analysis of location (occurring in the kidney versus not kidney), infiltrative growth pattern, nuclear pleomorphism, mitotic activity ≥2/50 high-power fields (HPF), necrosis and lymphovascular invasion were found to be associated with overall survival and/or disease-free survival. Multivariate analysis identified that location was the only factor found to independently correlate with disease-free survival. More importantly, RNA sequencing-based clustering analysis segregated melanotic Xp11 neoplasm and ASPS from other tumors, including conventional PEComa and Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinoma, and formed a compact cluster representative of the largely similar expression signature. Here we clearly define the true biologic nature of melanotic Xp11 neoplasms which are distinctive malignant mesenchymal tumors, rather than simply PEComa variants with occasionally unpredictable behavior. Meanwhile, melanotic Xp11 neoplasm and ASPS more likely represent phenotypic variants of the same entity, which is distinct from conventional PEComa and Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinoma. Based on these important findings, melanotic Xp11 neoplasm might be reclassified into a distinctive entity together with ASPS, independent from PEComa, in future revisions of the current WHO categories of tumors of soft tissue and bone for the improved reclassification. © 2020 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cytopathology of Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinoma: a report of 5 cases

INTRODUCTION

Xp11.2 translocation-associated RCC (Xp11RCC) defined by molecular alterations involving TFE3 genetic rearrangements constitutes a large percentage of primary renal neoplasms in children, but less than 4% of adult cases. Fewer than 10 single case reports constitute the English cytopathology literature regarding this neoplasm. Our objective is to describe and illustrate the cytopathology of this uncommon renal neoplasm from a series of 5 cases using cytologic imprints, effusion specimens, and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Review was made of our cytopathology and surgical pathology databases. FNA biopsy smears and imprint smears were performed using a standard technique. Effusion samples were processed using liquid-based slides.

RESULTS

Five cytologic specimens from 4 patients with histopathologically confirmed Xp11RCC were identified (mean age: 36 years) over a period of 7 years. All cases contained large cells with voluminous amounts of vacuolated cytoplasm arranged in non-descript clusters and as single forms. A "tigroid" pattern consisting of linear strips of detached cytoplasm was seen in both imprint smear cases and the single FNA case. Psammomatous calcifications, true papillary structures, and hyaline globules were absent in all cases. Four examples were diagnosed as Xp11RCC, but 3 represented metastatic disease, and 1 was diagnosed using both cytology and core needle tissue histopathology. The remaining case was diagnosed nonspecifically as a clear cell malignant neoplasm.

CONCLUSIONS

The cytopathologic features of Xp1RCC are relatively nonspecific, and overlap with other renal cell carcinoma subtypes. A definitive diagnosis is only possible with ancillary immunohistochemistry with or without additional TFE3 fluorescence in situ hybridization.

A novel RBMX-TFE3 gene fusion in a highly aggressive pediatric renal perivascular epithelioid cell tumor

We report an Xp11 translocation perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa) with a novel RBMX-TFE3 gene fusion, resulting from a paracentric X chromosome inversion, inv(X)(p11;q26). The neoplasm occurred in an otherwise healthy 12-year-old boy who presented with a large left renal mass with extension into the inferior vena cava. The patient was found to have multiple pulmonary metastases at diagnosis and died of disease 3 months later. The morphology (epithelioid clear cells with alveolar and nested architecture) and immunophenotype (TFE3 and HMB45 strongly positive; actin, desmin, and PAX8 negative) was typical of an Xp11 translocation PEComa; however, TFE3 rearrangement was initially not detected by routine TFE3 break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Further RNA sequencing revealed a novel RBMX-TFE3 gene fusion, which was subsequently confirmed by fusion assay FISH, using custom design RBMX and TFE3 come-together probes. This report describes a novel TFE3 gene fusion partner, RBMX, in a pediatric renal PEComa patient associated with a fulminant clinical course. As documented in other intrachromosomal Xp11.2 inversions, such as fusions with NONO, RBM10, or GRIPAP1 genes, the TFE3 break-apart might be below the FISH resolution, resulting in a false negative result.

A Rare Partner of TFE3 in the Xp11 Translocation Renal Cell Carcinoma: Clinicopathological Analyses and Detection of MED15-TFE3 Fusion

Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinoma (RCC), a member of the microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MiTF) family, is a rare renal tumor characterized by different translocations involving the TFE3 gene. Here, we reported a case of Xp11 translocation RCC with a rare MED15-TFE3 gene fusion by RNA sequencing. Morphologically, the tumor cells were arranged in a solid and small nest pattern. The cytoplasm was voluminous, flocculent eosinophilic, and vacuolated. The nuclei were round or polygon with fine granular chromatin, and the nucleoli were unconspicuous. Psammoma bodies were observed in mesenchyma. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells were diffuse moderately or strongly positive for CD10, P504S, vimentin, PAX8, RCC, AE1/AE3, and SDHB and focally positive for CK7 and CA IX while negative for cathepsin K, HMB45, Melan-A, Ksp-cadherin, and CD117. The Ki67 proliferation index was approximately 3%. However, TFE3 labeling showed an uncertainly weak nuclear staining and been considered negative. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) demonstrated a positive result that splits signals with a distance of > 2 signal diameters. Subsequently, RNA sequencing confirmed a fusion of MED15 gene exon 11 on chromosome 22 with TFE3 gene exon 6 in the tumor. The patient was alive with no evidence of recurrence. Our report contributes to the understanding on MED15-TFE3 RCC.

MiT family translocation renal cell carcinomas: A 15th anniversary update

Microphthalmia (MiT) family translocation renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) are a heterogeneous category of renal tumors which all express MiT transcription factors, typically from chromosomal translocation and rarely from gene amplification. This tumor family has two major subtypes [i.e., Xp11 translocation RCC and t(6;11) RCC] and several related neoplasms (i.e., TFEB amplification RCC and melanotic Xp11 translocation renal cancers). Increased understanding of the clinical, pathological, molecular and prognostic heterogeneity of these tumors, since their official recognition in 2004, provides the opportunity to identify prognostic biomarkers and to understand the reasons for tumor aggression. We will review the literature from the past 15 years and highlight the need for a greater understanding of the molecular mechanisms underpinning heterogeneous tumor behavior.

Novel MEIS1-NCOA2 Gene Fusions Define a Distinct Primitive Spindle Cell Sarcoma of the Kidney

We describe 2 cases of a distinct sarcoma characterized by a novel MEIS1-NCOA2 gene fusion. This gene fusion was identified in the renal neoplasms of 2 adults (21-y-old male, 72-y-old female). Histologically, the resected renal neoplasms had a distinctively nodular appearance, and while one renal neoplasm was predominantly cystic, the other demonstrated solid architecture, invasion of perirenal fat, and renal sinus vasculature invasion. The neoplasms were characterized predominantly by monomorphic plump spindle cells arranged in vague fascicles with a whorling pattern; however, a more primitive small round cell component was also noted. Both neoplasms were mitotically active and one case showed necrosis. The neoplasms did not have a distinctive immunohistochemical profile, though both labeled for TLE1. The morphologic features are distinct from other sarcomas associated with NCOA2 gene fusions, including mesenchymal chondrosarcoma, congenital/infantile spindle cell rhabdomyosarcoma, and soft tissue angiofibroma. While we have minimal clinical follow-up, the aggressive histologic features of these neoplasms indicate malignant potential, thus warranting classification as a novel subtype of sarcoma.

Microphthalmia family of transcription factors associated renal cell carcinoma

The microphthalmia (MiT) subfamily of transcription factors includes TFE3, TFEB, TFEC, and MITF. In the 2016 World Health Organization classification, MiT family translocation renal cell carcinoma (tRCC) including Xp11 tRCC and t(6;11) RCC, was newly defined as an RCC subtype. Xp11 and t(6;11) RCC are characterized by the rearrangement of the MiT transcription factors TFE3 and TFEB, respectively. Recent studies identified the fusion partner-dependent clinicopathological and immunohistochemical features in TFE3-rearranged RCC. Furthermore, RCC with TFEB amplification, melanotic MiT family translocation neoplasms, was identified may as a unique subtype of MiT family associated renal neoplasms, along with MITF associated RCC. In this review, we will collect available literature of these newly-described RCCs, analyze their clinicopathological and immunohistochemical features, and summarize their molecular and genetic evidences. We expect this review would be beneficial for the understanding of these rare subtypes of RCCs, and eventually promote clinical management strategies.

NEAT1-TFE3 and KAT6A-TFE3 renal cell carcinomas, new members of MiT family translocation renal cell carcinoma

Microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MiT) family translocation renal cell carcinoma harbors variable gene fusions involving either TFE3 or TFEB genes. Multiple 5' fusion partners for TFE3 have been reported, including ASPSCR1, CLTC, DVL2, LUC7L3, KHSRP, PRCC, PARP14, NONO, SFPQ1, MED15, and RBM10. Each of these fusion genes activates TFE3 transcription which can be detected by immunostaining. Using targeted RNA-sequencing, TFE3 fusion gene partners were identified in 5 cases of TFE3 immunohistochemistry positive translocation renal cell carcinoma. Three cases demonstrated known fusions: ASPSCR1-TFE3, MED15-TFE3 and RBM10-TFE3. However, two cases showed unreported NEAT1-TFE3 and KAT6A-TFE3 fusion transcripts. The NEAT1-TFE3 RCC arose in a 59-year-old male; which demonstrated overlapping morphological features seen in NEAT2(MALAT1)-TFEB t(6;11) renal cell carcinoma, including biphasic alveolar/nested tumor cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm. The KAT6A-TFE3 renal cell carcinoma demonstrated typical morphological features of TFE3/Xp11 renal cell carcinoma including papillae, eosinophilic cytoplasm with focal clearing and abundant psammoma bodies. KAT6A gene fusion was reported in some cases of acute myeloid leukemia, which has not been previously reported in solid tumors. This report highlights the genetic complexity of TFE3 translocation renal cell carcinoma; and RNA-sequencing is a powerful approach for elucidating the underlying genetic alterations.

Nuclear TFE3 expression is a diagnostic marker for Desmoid-type fibromatosis

BACKGROUND

Desmoid-type fibromatosis (DTF) is a lesion characterized by clonal proliferation of myofibroblasts, which exhibits an infiltrative growth pattern. It is necessary for them to be distinguished from other fibroblastic and myofibroblastic lesions as well as spindle cell tumors. Altered Wnt signaling can act as a defining characteristic of DTF, with nuclear β-catenin serving as a diagnostic marker for. Transcription factor E3 (TFE3) has been linked to Wnt pathway activation and regulation, and may add value to the diagnosis of DTF. The present study, therefore, sought to assess whether TFE3 is a specific diagnostic marker for DTF.

METHODS

Nuclear TFE3 and β-catenin staining was performed on a wide range of tumor types such as DTF (n = 46), nodular fasciitis (n = 14), neurofibroma (n = 5), dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (n = 5), gastrointestinal stromal tumor (n = 10), sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma (n = 2), synovial sarcoma (n = 5), leiomyoma (n = 3) and cutaneous scar tissue (n = 4) using an immunohistochemical approach. In addition, the clinicopathological features and localization of these tumors were summarized. FISH assay was carried out to examine Xp11.2 translocations/TFE3 gene fusions. Statistical difference between immunohistochemical expression of TFE3 and β-catenin was analyzed.

RESULTS

The expression of nuclear TFE3 protein was found in 43 (93.5%) DTF tissue samples, ranging from moderate to intense expression levels. The distribution rates of TFE3 positivity in nodular fasciitis, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, leiomyoma and scar tissue samples were 42.9, 40, 25 and 33%, respectively. All studied samples of neurofibroma, synovial sarcoma, sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans were negative for TFE3.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reveal that TFE3 has a potential to serve as a diagnostic marker capable of assisting in the differential diagnosis of DTF and other spindle cell lesions.

Melanotic Xp11-associated tumor of the sigmoid colon: A case report

BACKGROUND

Melanotic Xp11-associated tumors are rare mesenchymal-derived tumors. So far, most primary melanotic Xp11-associated tumors have been reported in the kidney, and reports of this tumor in the gastrointestinal tract are rare.

CASE SUMMARY

Here we describe the case of a 25-year-old woman who presented with a melanotic Xp11-associated tumor in the sigmoid colon. Colonoscopy revealed a large mucosal bulge in the sigmoid colon, approximately 32 cm inside the anus. The surface was rough with local erosion. The tumor was brittle on biopsy and bled easily. Computed tomography revealed thickening of the rectal wall with edema. Postoperative pathology indicated the likelihood of a perivascular epithelioid cell tumor. Histologically, the tumor comprised plump epithelioid cells with abundant clear to lightly eosinophilic cytoplasm and round nuclei arranged in an alveolar or trabecular pattern. The tumor cells were strongly positive for HMB-45, Melan-A, Cathepsin K, and TFE3 but negative for vimentin, smooth muscle actin, S100 protein, CD10, CK20, and desmin. The tumor cells had a low Ki-67 labeling index (approximately 2%). Fluorescence in situ hybridization revealed TFE3 fracture. Based on these histologic and immunohistochemical features, a diagnosis of melanotic Xp11-associated tumor of the sigmoid colon was made.

CONCLUSION

In summary, we report the clinicopathological features of a primary tumor that is extremely rare in the sigmoid colon and review the clinicopathological characteristics of melanotic Xp11-associated tumors, compatible with the very rare tumor termed “melanotic Xp11 translocation renal cancer” in all aspects.

RETRACTED: Recommandations françaises du Comité de Cancérologie de l’AFU – Actualisation 2018–2020 : prise en charge du cancer du reinFrench ccAFU guidelines – Update 2018–2020: Management of kidney cancer

This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy). Cet article est retiré de la publication à la demande des auteurs car ils ont apporté des modifications significatives sur des points scientifiques après la publication de la première version des recommandations. Le nouvel article est disponible à cette adresse: DOI:10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.004. C’est cette nouvelle version qui doit être utilisée pour citer l’article. This article has been retracted at the request of the authors, as it is not based on the definitive version of the text because some scientific data has been corrected since the first issue was published. The replacement has been published at the DOI:10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.004. That newer version of the text should be used when citing the article.

RNA sequencing of Xp11 translocation-associated cancers reveals novel gene fusions and distinctive clinicopathologic correlations

Both Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinomas and the corresponding mesenchymal neoplasms are characterized by a variety of gene fusions involving TFE3. It has been known that tumors with different gene fusions may have different clinicopathologic features; however, further in-depth investigations of subtyping Xp11 translocation-associated cancers are needed in order to explore more meaningful clinicopathologic correlations. A total of 22 unusual cases of Xp11 translocation-associated cancers were selected for the current study; 20 cases were further analyzed by RNA sequencing to explore their TFE3 gene fusion partners. RNA sequencing identified 17 of 20 cases (85%) with TFE3-associated gene fusions, including 4 ASPSCR1/ASPL-TFE3, 3 PRCC-TFE3, 3 SFPQ/PSF-TFE3, 1 NONO-TFE3, 4 MED15-TFE3, 1 MATR3-TFE3, and 1 FUBP1-TFE3. The results have been verified by fusion fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assays or reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The remaining 2 cases with specific pathologic features highly suggestive of MED15-TFE3 renal cell carcinoma were identified by fusion FISH assay. We provide the detailed morphologic and immunophenotypic description of the MED15-TFE3 renal cell carcinomas, which frequently demonstrate extensively cystic architecture, similar to multilocular cystic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential, and expressed cathepsin K and melanotic biomarker Melan A. This is the first time to correlate the MED15-TFE3 renal cell carcinoma with specific clinicopathologic features. We also report the first case of the corresponding mesenchymal neoplasm with MED15-TFE3 gene fusion. Additional novel TFE3 gene fusion partners, MATR3 and FUBP1, were identified. Cases with ASPSCR1-TFE3, SFPQ-TFE3, PRCC-TFE3, and NONO-TFE3 gene fusion showed a wide variability in morphologic features, including invasive tubulopapillary pattern simulating collecting duct carcinoma, extensive calcification and ossification, and overlapping and high columnar cells with nuclear grooves mimicking tall cell variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Furthermore, we respectively evaluated the ability of TFE3 immunohistochemistry, TFE3 FISH, RT-PCR, and RNA sequencing to subclassify Xp11 translocation-associated cancers. In summary, our study expands the list of TFE3 gene fusion partners and the clinicopathologic features of Xp11 translocation-associated cancers, and highlights the importance of subtyping Xp11 translocation-associated cancers combining morphology, immunohistochemistry, and multiple molecular techniques.

Melanotic Xp11 translocation renal cancer: a report of a distinctive case and a review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Melanotic Xp11 translocation renal cancer (TRC) is a newly described exceedingly rare tumor, and its characterization remains controversial. This study aimed to describe a case of distinctive melanotic Xp11 TRC and to elucidate its clinicopathological and molecular genetic features.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 44-year-old Chinese female presented with a left renal mass. Abdominal ultrasonography and computed tomography (CT) scans revealed a 4.5 cm × 4.0 cm mass in the left kidney. Grossly, the well-demarcated mass was black with moderately firm consistency. Microscopic examination indicated that the tumor was characterized by the presence of nests and cords of polygonal cells with clear and granular eosinophilic cytoplasm, central round to oval nuclei and occasional nucleoli. Intracytoplasmic melanin was observed in approximately 45% of tumor cells. Uniquely, the tumor presented with intranuclear eosinophilic pseudoinclusions and thick-walled stromal blood vessels. IHC showed that tumor cells were diffusely positive for TFE3 and exhibited patchy and weak HMB45 staining. FISH confirmed the presence of TFE3 rearrangement.

CONCLUSION

This case is the twentieth published case of melanotic Xp11 TRC. Moreover, the present patient had a favorable prognosis given that she was disease free at her 113-month postoperative follow-up. Our case adds to the small body of literature on these exceptionally rare tumors and widens their clinicopathological spectrum.

Cancers du rein : évolution de la classification anatomopathologique

Depuis la dernière classification OMS des tumeurs urogénitales en 2004, les progrès en pathologie moléculaire ont permis de démembrer un certain nombre de sous-types histologiques des tumeurs du rein avec des profils histologiques, phénotypiques et moléculaires différents. Cette revue a pour objectif de rappeler les dernières nouveautés concernant l’évolution de la classification OMS des tumeurs du rein et les facteurs pronostiques requis pour ces cancers.