1
|
Jiao P, Jia Q, Li S, Shan J, Xu W, Wang Y, Liu Y, Wang M, Song Y, Zhang Y, Yu Y, Wang M, Cai X. Distinct Neural Activities in Hippocampal Subregions Revealed Using a High-Performance Wireless Microsystem with PtNPs/PEDOT:PSS-Enhanced Microelectrode Arrays. BIOSENSORS 2025; 15:262. [PMID: 40277574 PMCID: PMC12026308 DOI: 10.3390/bios15040262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2024] [Revised: 04/15/2025] [Accepted: 04/17/2025] [Indexed: 04/26/2025]
Abstract
Wireless microsystems for neural signal recording have emerged as a solution to overcome the limitations of tethered systems, which restrict the mobility of subjects and introduce noise interference. However, existing microsystems often face data throughput, signal processing, and long-distance wireless transmission challenges. This study presents a high-performance wireless microsystem capable of 32-channel, 30 kHz real-time recording, featuring Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA)-based signal processing to reduce transmission load. The microsystem is integrated with platinum nanoparticles/poly (3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) polystyrene sulfonate-enhanced microelectrode arrays for improved signal quality. A custom NeuroWireless platform was developed for seamless data reception and storage. Experimental validation in rats demonstrated the microsystem's ability to detect spikes and local field potentials from the hippocampal CA1 and CA2 subregions. Comparative analysis of the neural signals revealed distinct activity patterns between these subregions. The wireless microsystem achieves high accuracy and throughput over distances up to 30 m, demonstrating its resilience and potential for neuroscience research. This work provides a compact, adaptable solution for multi-channel neural signal detection and offers a foundation for future applications in brain-computer interfaces.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peiyao Jiao
- State Key Laboratory of Transducer Technology, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; (P.J.); (Q.J.); (S.L.); (J.S.); (W.X.); (Y.W.); (Y.L.); (M.W.); (Y.S.)
- School of Electronic, Electrical and Communication Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Qianli Jia
- State Key Laboratory of Transducer Technology, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; (P.J.); (Q.J.); (S.L.); (J.S.); (W.X.); (Y.W.); (Y.L.); (M.W.); (Y.S.)
- School of Electronic, Electrical and Communication Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Shuqi Li
- State Key Laboratory of Transducer Technology, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; (P.J.); (Q.J.); (S.L.); (J.S.); (W.X.); (Y.W.); (Y.L.); (M.W.); (Y.S.)
- School of Electronic, Electrical and Communication Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Jin Shan
- State Key Laboratory of Transducer Technology, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; (P.J.); (Q.J.); (S.L.); (J.S.); (W.X.); (Y.W.); (Y.L.); (M.W.); (Y.S.)
- School of Electronic, Electrical and Communication Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Wei Xu
- State Key Laboratory of Transducer Technology, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; (P.J.); (Q.J.); (S.L.); (J.S.); (W.X.); (Y.W.); (Y.L.); (M.W.); (Y.S.)
- School of Electronic, Electrical and Communication Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Yu Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Transducer Technology, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; (P.J.); (Q.J.); (S.L.); (J.S.); (W.X.); (Y.W.); (Y.L.); (M.W.); (Y.S.)
- School of Electronic, Electrical and Communication Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Yu Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Transducer Technology, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; (P.J.); (Q.J.); (S.L.); (J.S.); (W.X.); (Y.W.); (Y.L.); (M.W.); (Y.S.)
- School of Electronic, Electrical and Communication Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Mingchuan Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Transducer Technology, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; (P.J.); (Q.J.); (S.L.); (J.S.); (W.X.); (Y.W.); (Y.L.); (M.W.); (Y.S.)
- School of Electronic, Electrical and Communication Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Yilin Song
- State Key Laboratory of Transducer Technology, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; (P.J.); (Q.J.); (S.L.); (J.S.); (W.X.); (Y.W.); (Y.L.); (M.W.); (Y.S.)
- School of Electronic, Electrical and Communication Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Yulian Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China;
| | - Yanbing Yu
- Department of Neurosurgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China;
| | - Mixia Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Transducer Technology, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; (P.J.); (Q.J.); (S.L.); (J.S.); (W.X.); (Y.W.); (Y.L.); (M.W.); (Y.S.)
- School of Electronic, Electrical and Communication Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Xinxia Cai
- State Key Laboratory of Transducer Technology, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; (P.J.); (Q.J.); (S.L.); (J.S.); (W.X.); (Y.W.); (Y.L.); (M.W.); (Y.S.)
- School of Electronic, Electrical and Communication Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gusman JT, Hosman T, Crawford R, Singer-Clark T, Kapitonava A, Kelemen JN, Hahn N, Henderson JM, Hochberg LR, Simeral JD, Vargas-Irwin CE. Multi-gesture drag-and-drop decoding in a 2D iBCI control task. J Neural Eng 2025; 22:026054. [PMID: 39899980 PMCID: PMC11983719 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/adb180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2024] [Revised: 12/17/2024] [Accepted: 02/03/2025] [Indexed: 02/05/2025]
Abstract
Objective. Intracortical brain-computer interfaces (iBCIs) have demonstrated the ability to enable point and click as well as reach and grasp control for people with tetraplegia. However, few studies have investigated iBCIs during long-duration discrete movements that would enable common computer interactions such as 'click-and-hold' or 'drag-and-drop'.Approach. Here, we examined the performance of multi-class and binary (attempt/no-attempt) classification of neural activity in the left precentral gyrus of two BrainGate2 clinical trial participants performing hand gestures for 1, 2, and 4 s in duration. We then designed a novel 'latch decoder' that utilizes parallel multi-class and binary decoding processes and evaluated its performance on data from isolated sustained gesture attempts and a multi-gesture drag-and-drop task.Main results. Neural activity during sustained gestures revealed a marked decrease in the discriminability of hand gestures sustained beyond 1 s. Compared to standard direct decoding methods, the Latch decoder demonstrated substantial improvement in decoding accuracy for gestures performed independently or in conjunction with simultaneous 2D cursor control.Significance. This work highlights the unique neurophysiologic response patterns of sustained gesture attempts in human motor cortex and demonstrates a promising decoding approach that could enable individuals with tetraplegia to intuitively control a wider range of consumer electronics using an iBCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob T Gusman
- Biomedical Engineering Graduate Program, School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America
- School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America
- Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America
- VA Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Office of Research and Development, VA Providence Healthcare System, Providence, RI, United States of America
| | - Tommy Hosman
- School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America
- Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America
- VA Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Office of Research and Development, VA Providence Healthcare System, Providence, RI, United States of America
| | - Rekha Crawford
- Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America
| | - Tyler Singer-Clark
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Anastasia Kapitonava
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Jessica N Kelemen
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Nick Hahn
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America
| | - Jaimie M Henderson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America
- Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America
- Bio-X Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America
| | - Leigh R Hochberg
- School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America
- Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America
- VA Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Office of Research and Development, VA Providence Healthcare System, Providence, RI, United States of America
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
- Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - John D Simeral
- School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America
- Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America
- VA Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Office of Research and Development, VA Providence Healthcare System, Providence, RI, United States of America
| | - Carlos E Vargas-Irwin
- Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America
- VA Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Office of Research and Development, VA Providence Healthcare System, Providence, RI, United States of America
- Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Khan S, Kallis L, Mee H, El Hadwe S, Barone D, Hutchinson P, Kolias A. Invasive Brain-Computer Interface for Communication: A Scoping Review. Brain Sci 2025; 15:336. [PMID: 40309789 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci15040336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2025] [Revised: 03/10/2025] [Accepted: 03/19/2025] [Indexed: 05/02/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The rapid expansion of the brain-computer interface for patients with neurological deficits has garnered significant interest, and for patients, it provides an additional route where conventional rehabilitation has its limits. This has particularly been the case for patients who lose the ability to communicate. Circumventing neural injuries by recording from the intact cortex and subcortex has the potential to allow patients to communicate and restore self-expression. Discoveries over the last 10-15 years have been possible through advancements in technology, neuroscience, and computing. By examining studies involving intracranial brain-computer interfaces that aim to restore communication, we aimed to explore the advances made and explore where the technology is heading. METHODS For this scoping review, we systematically searched PubMed and OVID Embase. After processing the articles, the search yielded 41 articles that we included in this review. RESULTS The articles predominantly assessed patients who had either suffered from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, cervical cord injury, or brainstem stroke, resulting in tetraplegia and, in some cases, difficulty speaking. Of the intracranial implants, ten had ALS, six had brainstem stroke, and thirteen had a spinal cord injury. Stereoelectroencephalography was also used, but the results, whilst promising, are still in their infancy. Studies involving patients who were moving cursors on a screen could improve the speed of movement by optimising the interface and utilising better decoding methods. In recent years, intracortical devices have been successfully used for accurate speech-to-text and speech-to-audio decoding in patients who are unable to speak. CONCLUSIONS Here, we summarise the progress made by BCIs used for communication. Speech decoding directly from the cortex can provide a novel therapeutic method to restore full, embodied communication to patients suffering from tetraplegia who otherwise cannot communicate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shujhat Khan
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, UK
| | - Leonie Kallis
- Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Trinity Ln, Cambridge CB2 1TN, UK
| | - Harry Mee
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, UK
- Department of Rehabilitation, Addenbrookes Hospital, Hills Rd., Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Salim El Hadwe
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, UK
- Bioelectronics Laboratory, Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK
| | - Damiano Barone
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, UK
- Department of Neurosurgery, Houston Methodist, Houston, TX 77079, USA
| | - Peter Hutchinson
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, UK
- Department of Neurosurgery, Addenbrookes Hospital, Hills Rd., Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Angelos Kolias
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, UK
- Department of Neurosurgery, Addenbrookes Hospital, Hills Rd., Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lim MJR, Lo JYT, Tan YY, Lin HY, Wang Y, Tan D, Wang E, Naing Ma YY, Wei Ng JJ, Jefree RA, Tseng Tsai Y. The state-of-the-art of invasive brain-computer interfaces in humans: a systematic review and individual patient meta-analysis. J Neural Eng 2025; 22:026013. [PMID: 39978072 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/adb88e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2025] [Indexed: 02/22/2025]
Abstract
Objective.Invasive brain-computer interfaces (iBCIs) have evolved significantly since the first neurotrophic electrode was implanted in a human subject three decades ago. Since then, both hardware and software advances have increased the iBCI performance to enable tasks such as decoding conversations in real-time and manipulating external limb prostheses with haptic feedback. In this systematic review, we aim to evaluate the advances in iBCI hardware, software and functionality and describe challenges and opportunities in the iBCI field.Approach.Medline, EMBASE, PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched from inception until 13 April 2024. Primary studies reporting the use of iBCI in human subjects to restore function were included. Endpoints extracted include iBCI electrode type, iBCI implantation, decoder algorithm, iBCI effector, testing and training methodology and functional outcomes. Narrative synthesis of outcomes was done with a focus on hardware and software development trends over time. Individual patient data (IPD) was also collected and an IPD meta-analysis was done to identify factors significant to iBCI performance.Main results.93 studies involving 214 patients were included in this systematic review. The median task performance accuracy for cursor control tasks was 76.00% (Interquartile range [IQR] = 21.2), for motor tasks was 80.00% (IQR = 23.3), and for communication tasks was 93.27% (IQR = 15.3). Current advances in iBCI software include use of recurrent neural network architectures as decoders, while hardware advances such as intravascular stentrodes provide a less invasive alternative for neural recording. Challenges include the lack of standardized testing paradigms for specific functional outcomes and issues with portability and chronicity limiting iBCI usage to laboratory settings.Significance.Our systematic review demonstrated the exponential rate at which iBCIs have evolved over the past two decades. Yet, more work is needed for widespread clinical adoption and translation to long-term home-use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mervyn Jun Rui Lim
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jack Yu Tung Lo
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yong Yi Tan
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Hong-Yi Lin
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yuhang Wang
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Dewei Tan
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Eugene Wang
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yin Yin Naing Ma
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Joel Jia Wei Ng
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ryan Ashraf Jefree
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yeo Tseng Tsai
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jung T, Zeng N, Fabbri JD, Eichler G, Li Z, Zabeh E, Das A, Willeke K, Wingel KE, Dubey A, Huq R, Sharma M, Hu Y, Ramakrishnan G, Tien K, Mantovani P, Parihar A, Yin H, Oswalt D, Misdorp A, Uguz I, Shinn T, Rodriguez GJ, Nealley C, Sanborn S, Gonzales I, Roukes M, Knecht J, Yoshor D, Canoll P, Spinazzi E, Carloni LP, Pesaran B, Patel S, Jacobs J, Youngerman B, Cotton RJ, Tolias A, Shepard KL. Stable, chronic in-vivo recordings from a fully wireless subdural-contained 65,536-electrode brain-computer interface device. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2025:2024.05.17.594333. [PMID: 38798494 PMCID: PMC11118429 DOI: 10.1101/2024.05.17.594333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
Minimally invasive, high-bandwidth brain-computer-interface (BCI) devices can revolutionize human applications. With orders-of-magnitude improvements in volumetric efficiency over other BCI technologies, we developed a 50-μm-thick, mechanically flexible micro-electrocorticography (μECoG) BCI, integrating a 256×256 array of electrodes, signal processing, data telemetry, and wireless powering on a single complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) substrate containing 65,536 recording channels, from which we can simultaneously record a selectable subset of up to 1024 channels at a given time. Fully implanted below the dura, our chip is wirelessly powered, communicating bi-directionally with an external relay station outside the body. We demonstrated chronic, reliable recordings for up to two weeks in pigs and up to two months in behaving non-human primates from somatosensory, motor, and visual cortices, decoding brain signals at high spatiotemporal resolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taesung Jung
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Columbia University; New York, NY 10027, USA
| | - Nanyu Zeng
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Columbia University; New York, NY 10027, USA
| | - Jason D. Fabbri
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Columbia University; New York, NY 10027, USA
| | - Guy Eichler
- Department of Computer Science, Columbia University; New York, NY 10027, USA
| | - Zhe Li
- Department of Ophthalmology, Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University; Stanford, CA 94305, USA
- Stanford Bio-X, Stanford University, Stanford University; Stanford, CA 94304, USA
- Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University; Stanford, CA 94304, USA
| | - Erfan Zabeh
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University; New York, NY 10027, USA
| | - Anup Das
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University; New York, NY 10027, USA
| | - Konstantin Willeke
- Department of Ophthalmology, Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University; Stanford, CA 94305, USA
- Stanford Bio-X, Stanford University, Stanford University; Stanford, CA 94304, USA
- Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University; Stanford, CA 94304, USA
- Institute of Computer Science and Campus Institute Data Science, University of Göttingen; Germany
| | - Katie E. Wingel
- Center for Neural Science, New York University; New York, NY 10003, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia PA 19118, USA
| | - Agrita Dubey
- Center for Neural Science, New York University; New York, NY 10003, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia PA 19118, USA
| | - Rizwan Huq
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Columbia University; New York, NY 10027, USA
| | - Mohit Sharma
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Columbia University; New York, NY 10027, USA
| | - Yaoxing Hu
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Columbia University; New York, NY 10027, USA
| | - Girish Ramakrishnan
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Columbia University; New York, NY 10027, USA
| | - Kevin Tien
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Columbia University; New York, NY 10027, USA
| | - Paolo Mantovani
- Department of Computer Science, Columbia University; New York, NY 10027, USA
| | - Abhinav Parihar
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Columbia University; New York, NY 10027, USA
| | - Heyu Yin
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Columbia University; New York, NY 10027, USA
| | - Denise Oswalt
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia PA 19118, USA
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia, PA 19118, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia, PA 19118, USA
| | - Alexander Misdorp
- Department of Computer Science, Columbia University; New York, NY 10027, USA
| | - Ilke Uguz
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Columbia University; New York, NY 10027, USA
| | - Tori Shinn
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia, PA 19118, USA
| | - Gabrielle J. Rodriguez
- Department of Ophthalmology, Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University; Stanford, CA 94305, USA
- Stanford Bio-X, Stanford University, Stanford University; Stanford, CA 94304, USA
- Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University; Stanford, CA 94304, USA
| | - Cate Nealley
- Department of Ophthalmology, Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University; Stanford, CA 94305, USA
- Stanford Bio-X, Stanford University, Stanford University; Stanford, CA 94304, USA
- Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University; Stanford, CA 94304, USA
| | - Sophia Sanborn
- Stanford Bio-X, Stanford University, Stanford University; Stanford, CA 94304, USA
- Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University; Stanford, CA 94304, USA
| | - Ian Gonzales
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University; New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Michael Roukes
- Departments of Physics, Applied Physics, and Bioengineering, Caltech; Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
| | - Jeffrey Knecht
- Lincoln Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Lexington, MA 02421, USA
| | - Daniel Yoshor
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia PA 19118, USA
| | - Peter Canoll
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University; New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Eleonora Spinazzi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University; New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Luca P. Carloni
- Department of Computer Science, Columbia University; New York, NY 10027, USA
| | - Bijan Pesaran
- Center for Neural Science, New York University; New York, NY 10003, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia PA 19118, USA
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia, PA 19118, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia, PA 19118, USA
| | - Saumil Patel
- Department of Ophthalmology, Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University; Stanford, CA 94305, USA
- Stanford Bio-X, Stanford University, Stanford University; Stanford, CA 94304, USA
- Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University; Stanford, CA 94304, USA
| | - Joshua Jacobs
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University; New York, NY 10027, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University; New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Brett Youngerman
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University; New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - R. James Cotton
- Shirley Ryan Ability Labs; Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University; Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Andreas Tolias
- Department of Ophthalmology, Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University; Stanford, CA 94305, USA
- Stanford Bio-X, Stanford University, Stanford University; Stanford, CA 94304, USA
- Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University; Stanford, CA 94304, USA
- Center for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine; Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University; Stanford, CA 94304, USA
| | - Kenneth L. Shepard
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Columbia University; New York, NY 10027, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University; New York, NY 10027, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University; New York, NY 10032, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zheng J, Li Y, Chen L, Wang F, Gu B, Sun Q, Gao X, Zhou F. Effects of Packet Loss on Neural Decoding Effectiveness in Wireless Transmission. Brain Sci 2025; 15:221. [PMID: 40149743 PMCID: PMC11940804 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci15030221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2025] [Revised: 02/10/2025] [Accepted: 02/19/2025] [Indexed: 03/29/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In brain-computer interfaces, neural decoding plays a central role in translating neural signals into meaningful physical actions. These signals are transmitted to processors for decoding via wired or wireless channels; however, they are often subject to data loss, commonly referred to as "packet loss". Despite their importance, the effects of different types and degrees of packet loss on neural decoding have not yet been comprehensively studied. Understanding these effects is critical for advancing neural signal processing. METHODS This study addresses this gap by constructing four distinct packet loss models that simulate the congestion, distribution, and burst loss scenarios. Using macaque superior arm movement decoding experiments, we analyzed the effects of the aforementioned packet loss types on decoding performance across six parameters (position, velocity, and acceleration in the x and y dimensions). The performance was assessed using the R2 metric and statistical comparisons across different loss scenarios. RESULTS Our results indicate that sudden, consecutive packet loss significantly degraded decoding performance. For the same packet loss probability, burst loss led to the largest decrease in the R2 value. Notably, when the packet loss rate reached 10%, the decoding performance for acceleration dropped to 73% of the original R2 value. On the other hand, when the packet loss rate was within 2%, the neural signal decoding results across all packet loss models remained largely unaffected. However, as the packet loss rate increased, the impact became more pronounced. These findings highlight the varying degrees to which different packet loss models affect decoding outcomes. CONCLUSIONS This study quantitatively evaluated the relationship between packet loss and neural decoding outcomes, highlighting the differential effects of loss patterns on decoding parameters, and it proposed some methods and devices to solve the problem of packet loss. These findings offer valuable insights for the development of resilient neural signal acquisition and processing systems capable of mitigating the impact of packet loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiaqi Zheng
- College of Biomedical Engineering and Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
| | - Yuan Li
- College of Biomedical Engineering and Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
| | - Liangliang Chen
- College of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310007, China
| | - Fei Wang
- College of Biomedical Engineering and Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
- Binjiang Institute of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310053, China
| | - Boxuan Gu
- College of Biomedical Engineering and Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
- Binjiang Institute of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310053, China
| | - Qixiang Sun
- College of Biomedical Engineering and Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
| | - Xiang Gao
- College of Biomedical Engineering and Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
- Binjiang Institute of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310053, China
| | - Fan Zhou
- College of Biomedical Engineering and Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
- Binjiang Institute of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310053, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yang C, Zhang Z, Zhang L, Zhang Y, Li Z, Luo Y, Pan G, Zhao B. Neural Dielet 2.0: A 128-Channel 2mm2mm Battery-Free Neural Dielet Merging Simultaneous Multi-Channel Transmission Through Multi-Carrier Orthogonal Backscatter. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS 2025; 19:226-237. [PMID: 38896527 DOI: 10.1109/tbcas.2024.3416728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
Miniaturization of wireless neural-recording systems enables minimally-invasive surgery and alleviates the rejection reactions for implanted brain-computer interface (BCI) applications. Simultaneous massive-channel recording capability is essential to investigate the behaviors and inter-connections in billions of neurons. In recent years, battery-free techniques based on wireless power transfer (WPT) and backscatter communication have reduced the sizes of neural-recording implants by battery eliminating and antenna sharing. However, the existing battery-free chips realize the multi-channel merging in the signal-acquisition circuits, which leads to large chip area, signal attenuation, insufficient channel number or low bandwidth, etc. In this work, we demonstrate a 2mm2mm battery-free neural dielet, which merges 128 channels in the wireless part. The neural dielet is fabricated with 65nm CMOS process, and measured results show that: 1) The proposed multi-carrier orthogonal backscatter technique achieves a high data rate of 20.16Mb/s and an energy efficiency of 0.8pJ/bit. 2) A self-calibrated direct digital converter (SC-DDC) is proposed to fit the 128 channels in the 2mm2mm die, and then the all-digital implementation achieves 0.02mm area and 9.87W power per channel.
Collapse
|
8
|
O'Mara B, Harrison M, Harley K, Dwyer N. Making Video Games More Inclusive for People Living With Motor Neuron Disease: Scoping Review. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2024; 11:e58828. [PMID: 39714921 PMCID: PMC11704651 DOI: 10.2196/58828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2024] [Revised: 08/31/2024] [Accepted: 10/11/2024] [Indexed: 12/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence suggests that individuals with motor neuron disease (MND), a terminal illness, find enjoyment and social connection through video games. However, MND-related barriers can make gaming challenging, exacerbating feelings of boredom, stress, isolation, and loss of control over daily life. OBJECTIVE We scoped the evidence to describe relevant research and practice regarding what may help reduce difficulties for people with MND when playing video games. METHODS A scoping review was conducted using the Arksey and O'Malley framework, recent scoping review guidance, and engaging with people with lived experience of MND. Peer-reviewed studies were sourced from PubMed and the Swinburne University of Technology Library. Gray literature was identified from government, not-for-profit, commercial, and community websites. Data were extracted and summarized from the collected literature. RESULTS The evidence base, consisting of quantitative and qualitative research, lived experience stories, information resources, reviews, and guidelines, included 85 documents. Only 8 (9%) directly addressed video games and people with MND; however, these studies were limited in depth and quality. The primary technologies examined included customized information and communications technology for communication and control of computing systems (including desktop, laptop, smartphone, tablet, and console systems) and video game software and hardware (including hand controllers and accessibility features, such as difficulty level, speed, and remappable buttons and controls). Common factors in the evidence base highlight barriers and enablers to enjoying video games for people with MND. These include technological, physical, social, and economic challenges. Addressing these requires greater involvement of people with MND in game and technology research and development. Changes to information and communications technology, game software and hardware, policies, and guidelines are needed to better meet their needs. CONCLUSIONS There is a significant gap in understanding the lived experience of people with MND with video games and what makes playing them easier, including appropriate customization of technology and the social experience of games. This gap perpetuates exclusion from gaming communities and recreation, potentially worsening social isolation. Existing evidence suggesting viable options for future research and practice. Video game and information and communications technology research and development must prioritize qualitative and quantitative research with people with MND at an appropriate scale, with a focus on lived experience, use of improved participant engagement techniques, and user-focused design for more inclusive games. Practical work needs to increase awareness of what can help make games more inclusive, including incorporation of accessibility early in the game production process, early incorporation of accessibility in game production, and affordable options for customized interfaces and other devices to play games.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben O'Mara
- Department of Media & Communication, Faculty of Health, Arts & Design, Swinburne University, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Social Impact, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Matthew Harrison
- Melbourne Graduate School of Education, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Kirsten Harley
- Centre for Disability Research and Policy, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Natasha Dwyer
- College of Arts, Business, Law, Education and IT, Victoria University, Footscray Park, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhang Z, Chen Y, Zhao X, Fan W, Peng D, Li T, Zhao L, Fu Y. A review of ethical considerations for the medical applications of brain-computer interfaces. Cogn Neurodyn 2024; 18:3603-3614. [PMID: 39712096 PMCID: PMC11655950 DOI: 10.1007/s11571-024-10144-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 06/15/2024] [Indexed: 12/24/2024] Open
Abstract
The development and potential applications of brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are directly related to the human brain and may have adverse effects on the users' physical and mental health. Ethical issues, particularly those associated with BCIs, including both non-medical and medical applications, have captured societal attention. This article initially reviews the application of three ethical frameworks in BCI technology: consequentialism, deontology, and virtue ethics. Subsequently, it introduces the ethical standards under consideration within the medical objective framework for BCI medical applications. Finally, the paper discusses and forecasts the ethical standards for BCI medical applications. The paper emphasizes the necessity to differentiate between the ethical issues of implantable and non-implantable BCIs, to approach the research on BCI-based "controlling the brain" with caution, and to establish standardized operational procedures and efficacy evaluation methods for BCI medical applications. This paper aims to provide ideas for the establishment of ethical standards in BCI medical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhe Zhang
- Faculty of Marxism, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, 650500 P. R. China
- Brain Cognition and Brain-computer Intelligence Integration Group, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, 650500 P. R. China
| | - Yanxiao Chen
- Brain Cognition and Brain-computer Intelligence Integration Group, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, 650500 P. R. China
- Faculty of Information Engineering and Automation, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, 650500 P. R. China
| | - Xu Zhao
- Faculty of Marxism, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, 650500 P. R. China
| | - Wang Fan
- Brain Cognition and Brain-computer Intelligence Integration Group, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, 650500 P. R. China
- Faculty of Information Engineering and Automation, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, 650500 P. R. China
| | - Ding Peng
- Brain Cognition and Brain-computer Intelligence Integration Group, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, 650500 P. R. China
- Faculty of Information Engineering and Automation, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, 650500 P. R. China
| | - Tianwen Li
- Brain Cognition and Brain-computer Intelligence Integration Group, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, 650500 P. R. China
- Faculty of Science, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, 650500 P. R. China
| | - Lei Zhao
- Brain Cognition and Brain-computer Intelligence Integration Group, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, 650500 P. R. China
- Faculty of Science, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, 650500 P. R. China
| | - Yunfa Fu
- Brain Cognition and Brain-computer Intelligence Integration Group, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, 650500 P. R. China
- Faculty of Information Engineering and Automation, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, 650500 P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wohns N, Dorfman N, Klein E. Caregivers in implantable brain-computer interface research: a scoping review. Front Hum Neurosci 2024; 18:1490066. [PMID: 39545148 PMCID: PMC11560881 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1490066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2024] [Accepted: 10/22/2024] [Indexed: 11/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction While the ethical significance of caregivers in neurological research has increasingly been recognized, the role of caregivers in brain-computer interface (BCI) research has received relatively less attention. Objectives This report investigates the extent to which caregivers are mentioned in publications describing implantable BCI (iBCI) research for individuals with motor dysfunction, communication impairment, and blindness. Methods The scoping review was conducted in June 2024 using the PubMed and Web of Science bibliographic databases. The articles were systematically searched using query terms for caregivers, family members, and guardians, and the results were quantitatively and qualitatively analyzed. Results Our search yielded 315 unique studies, 78 of which were included in this scoping review. Thirty-four (43.6%) of the 78 articles mentioned the study participant's caregivers. We sorted these into 5 categories: Twenty-two (64.7%) of the 34 articles thanked caregivers in the acknowledgement section, 6 (17.6%) articles described the caregiver's role with regard to the consent process, 12 (35.3%) described the caregiver's role in the technical maintenance and upkeep of the BCI system or in other procedural aspects of the study, 9 (26.5%) discussed how the BCI enhanced participant communication and goal-directed behavior with the help of a caregiver, and 3 (8.8%) articles included general comments that did not fit into the other categories but still related to the importance of caregivers in the lives of the research participants. Discussion Caregivers were mentioned in less than half of BCI studies in this review. The studies that offered more robust discussions of caregivers provide valuable insight into the integral role that caregivers play in supporting the study participants and the research process. Attention to the role of caregivers in successful BCI research studies can help guide the responsible development of future BCI study protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolai Wohns
- Department of Philosophy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Natalie Dorfman
- Department of Philosophy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Eran Klein
- Department of Philosophy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
- Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pun TK, Khoshnevis M, Hosman T, Wilson GH, Kapitonava A, Kamdar F, Henderson JM, Simeral JD, Vargas-Irwin CE, Harrison MT, Hochberg LR. Measuring instability in chronic human intracortical neural recordings towards stable, long-term brain-computer interfaces. Commun Biol 2024; 7:1363. [PMID: 39433844 PMCID: PMC11494208 DOI: 10.1038/s42003-024-06784-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 08/26/2024] [Indexed: 10/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Intracortical brain-computer interfaces (iBCIs) enable people with tetraplegia to gain intuitive cursor control from movement intentions. To translate to practical use, iBCIs should provide reliable performance for extended periods of time. However, performance begins to degrade as the relationship between kinematic intention and recorded neural activity shifts compared to when the decoder was initially trained. In addition to developing decoders to better handle long-term instability, identifying when to recalibrate will also optimize performance. We propose a method, "MINDFUL", to measure instabilities in neural data for useful long-term iBCI, without needing labels of user intentions. Longitudinal data were analyzed from two BrainGate2 participants with tetraplegia as they used fixed decoders to control a computer cursor spanning 142 days and 28 days, respectively. We demonstrate a measure of instability that correlates with changes in closed-loop cursor performance solely based on the recorded neural activity (Pearson r = 0.93 and 0.72, respectively). This result suggests a strategy to infer online iBCI performance from neural data alone and to determine when recalibration should take place for practical long-term use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsam Kiu Pun
- Biomedical Engineering Graduate Program, School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
- School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
- Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
| | - Mona Khoshnevis
- Division of Applied Mathematics, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Tommy Hosman
- School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- VA RR&D Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Rehabilitation R&D Service, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Guy H Wilson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Anastasia Kapitonava
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Foram Kamdar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Jaimie M Henderson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute and Bio-X Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - John D Simeral
- School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- VA RR&D Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Rehabilitation R&D Service, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Carlos E Vargas-Irwin
- Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- VA RR&D Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Rehabilitation R&D Service, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA
- Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Matthew T Harrison
- Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- Division of Applied Mathematics, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Leigh R Hochberg
- School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- VA RR&D Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Rehabilitation R&D Service, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ghazizadeh E, Naseri Z, Deigner HP, Rahimi H, Altintas Z. Approaches of wearable and implantable biosensor towards of developing in precision medicine. Front Med (Lausanne) 2024; 11:1390634. [PMID: 39091290 PMCID: PMC11293309 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1390634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2024] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 08/04/2024] Open
Abstract
In the relentless pursuit of precision medicine, the intersection of cutting-edge technology and healthcare has given rise to a transformative era. At the forefront of this revolution stands the burgeoning field of wearable and implantable biosensors, promising a paradigm shift in how we monitor, analyze, and tailor medical interventions. As these miniature marvels seamlessly integrate with the human body, they weave a tapestry of real-time health data, offering unprecedented insights into individual physiological landscapes. This log embarks on a journey into the realm of wearable and implantable biosensors, where the convergence of biology and technology heralds a new dawn in personalized healthcare. Here, we explore the intricate web of innovations, challenges, and the immense potential these bioelectronics sentinels hold in sculpting the future of precision medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elham Ghazizadeh
- Department of Bioinspired Materials and Biosensor Technologies, Faculty of Engineering, Institute of Materials Science, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany
- Department of Medical Biotechnology, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Zahra Naseri
- Department of Medical Biotechnology, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Hans-Peter Deigner
- Institute of Precision Medicine, Furtwangen University, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany
- Fraunhofer Institute IZI (Leipzig), Rostock, Germany
- Faculty of Science, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Hossein Rahimi
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Zeynep Altintas
- Department of Bioinspired Materials and Biosensor Technologies, Faculty of Engineering, Institute of Materials Science, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Li J, She Q, Meng M, Du S, Zhang Y. Three-stage transfer learning for motor imagery EEG recognition. Med Biol Eng Comput 2024; 62:1689-1701. [PMID: 38342784 DOI: 10.1007/s11517-024-03036-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/13/2024]
Abstract
Motor imagery (MI) paradigms have been widely used in neural rehabilitation and drowsiness state assessment. The progress in brain-computer interface (BCI) technology has emphasized the importance of accurately and efficiently detecting motor imagery intentions from electroencephalogram (EEG). Despite the recent breakthroughs made in developing EEG-based algorithms for decoding MI, the accuracy and efficiency of these models remain limited by technical challenges posed by cross-subject heterogeneity in EEG data processing and the scarcity of EEG data for training. Inspired by the optimal transport theory, this study aims to develop a novel three-stage transfer learning (TSTL) method, which uses the existing labeled data from a source domain to improve classification performance on an unlabeled target domain. Notably, the proposed method comprises three components, namely, the Riemannian tangent space mapping (RTSM), source domain transformer (SDT), and optimal subspace mapping (OSM). The RTSM maps a symmetric positive definite matrix from the Riemannian space to the tangent space to minimize the marginal probability distribution drift. The SDT transforms the source domain to a target domain by finding the optimal transport mapping matrix to reduce the joint probability distribution differences. The OSM finally maps the transformed source domain and original target domain to the same subspace to further mitigate the distribution discrepancy. The performance of the proposed method was validated on two public BCI datasets, and the average accuracy of the algorithm on two datasets was 72.24% and 69.29%. Our results demonstrated the improved performance of EEG-based MI detection in comparison with state-of-the-art algorithms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junhao Li
- School of Automation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, 310018, Zhejiang, China
| | - Qingshan She
- School of Automation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, 310018, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Ming Meng
- School of Automation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, 310018, Zhejiang, China
| | - Shengzhi Du
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Tshwane University of Technology, Pretoria, 0001, South Africa
| | - Yingchun Zhang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX, 77204, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rosenthal IA, Bashford L, Bjånes D, Pejsa K, Lee B, Liu C, Andersen RA. Visual context affects the perceived timing of tactile sensations elicited through intra-cortical microstimulation. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.05.13.593529. [PMID: 38798438 PMCID: PMC11118490 DOI: 10.1101/2024.05.13.593529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
Intra-cortical microstimulation (ICMS) is a technique to provide tactile sensations for a somatosensory brain-machine interface (BMI). A viable BMI must function within the rich, multisensory environment of the real world, but how ICMS is integrated with other sensory modalities is poorly understood. To investigate how ICMS percepts are integrated with visual information, ICMS and visual stimuli were delivered at varying times relative to one another. Both visual context and ICMS current amplitude were found to bias the qualitative experience of ICMS. In two tetraplegic participants, ICMS and visual stimuli were more likely to be experienced as occurring simultaneously when visual stimuli were more realistic, demonstrating an effect of visual context on the temporal binding window. The peak of the temporal binding window varied but was consistently offset from zero, suggesting that multisensory integration with ICMS can suffer from temporal misalignment. Recordings from primary somatosensory cortex (S1) during catch trials where visual stimuli were delivered without ICMS demonstrated that S1 represents visual information related to ICMS across visual contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabelle A Rosenthal
- Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
- T&C Chen Brain-machine Interface Center, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
- Lead Contact
| | - Luke Bashford
- Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
- T&C Chen Brain-machine Interface Center, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
- Biosciences Institute, Newcastle University, UK
| | - David Bjånes
- Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
- T&C Chen Brain-machine Interface Center, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
| | - Kelsie Pejsa
- Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
- T&C Chen Brain-machine Interface Center, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
| | - Brian Lee
- Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
- USC Neurorestoration Center, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - Charles Liu
- Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
- USC Neurorestoration Center, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
- Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center, Downey, CA 90242, USA
| | - Richard A Andersen
- Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
- T&C Chen Brain-machine Interface Center, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ali YH, Bodkin K, Rigotti-Thompson M, Patel K, Card NS, Bhaduri B, Nason-Tomaszewski SR, Mifsud DM, Hou X, Nicolas C, Allcroft S, Hochberg LR, Au Yong N, Stavisky SD, Miller LE, Brandman DM, Pandarinath C. BRAND: a platform for closed-loop experiments with deep network models. J Neural Eng 2024; 21:026046. [PMID: 38579696 PMCID: PMC11021878 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ad3b3a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Revised: 01/27/2024] [Accepted: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/07/2024]
Abstract
Objective.Artificial neural networks (ANNs) are state-of-the-art tools for modeling and decoding neural activity, but deploying them in closed-loop experiments with tight timing constraints is challenging due to their limited support in existing real-time frameworks. Researchers need a platform that fully supports high-level languages for running ANNs (e.g. Python and Julia) while maintaining support for languages that are critical for low-latency data acquisition and processing (e.g. C and C++).Approach.To address these needs, we introduce the Backend for Realtime Asynchronous Neural Decoding (BRAND). BRAND comprises Linux processes, termednodes, which communicate with each other in agraphvia streams of data. Its asynchronous design allows for acquisition, control, and analysis to be executed in parallel on streams of data that may operate at different timescales. BRAND uses Redis, an in-memory database, to send data between nodes, which enables fast inter-process communication and supports 54 different programming languages. Thus, developers can easily deploy existing ANN models in BRAND with minimal implementation changes.Main results.In our tests, BRAND achieved <600 microsecond latency between processes when sending large quantities of data (1024 channels of 30 kHz neural data in 1 ms chunks). BRAND runs a brain-computer interface with a recurrent neural network (RNN) decoder with less than 8 ms of latency from neural data input to decoder prediction. In a real-world demonstration of the system, participant T11 in the BrainGate2 clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00912041) performed a standard cursor control task, in which 30 kHz signal processing, RNN decoding, task control, and graphics were all executed in BRAND. This system also supports real-time inference with complex latent variable models like Latent Factor Analysis via Dynamical Systems.Significance.By providing a framework that is fast, modular, and language-agnostic, BRAND lowers the barriers to integrating the latest tools in neuroscience and machine learning into closed-loop experiments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yahia H Ali
- Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
| | - Kevin Bodkin
- Department of Neuroscience, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Mattia Rigotti-Thompson
- Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
| | - Kushant Patel
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, Davis, CA, United States of America
| | - Nicholas S Card
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, Davis, CA, United States of America
| | - Bareesh Bhaduri
- Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
| | - Samuel R Nason-Tomaszewski
- Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
| | - Domenick M Mifsud
- Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
| | - Xianda Hou
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, Davis, CA, United States of America
| | - Claire Nicolas
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Shane Allcroft
- School of Engineering and Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America
| | - Leigh R Hochberg
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
- School of Engineering and Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
- Veterans Affairs Rehabilitation Research & Development Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI, United States of America
| | - Nicholas Au Yong
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
| | - Sergey D Stavisky
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, Davis, CA, United States of America
| | - Lee E Miller
- Department of Neuroscience, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States of America
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, United States of America
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States of America
- Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - David M Brandman
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, Davis, CA, United States of America
| | - Chethan Pandarinath
- Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pun TK, Khoshnevis M, Hosman T, Wilson GH, Kapitonava A, Kamdar F, Henderson JM, Simeral JD, Vargas-Irwin CE, Harrison MT, Hochberg LR. Measuring instability in chronic human intracortical neural recordings towards stable, long-term brain-computer interfaces. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.02.29.582733. [PMID: 38496552 PMCID: PMC10942277 DOI: 10.1101/2024.02.29.582733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
Intracortical brain-computer interfaces (iBCIs) enable people with tetraplegia to gain intuitive cursor control from movement intentions. To translate to practical use, iBCIs should provide reliable performance for extended periods of time. However, performance begins to degrade as the relationship between kinematic intention and recorded neural activity shifts compared to when the decoder was initially trained. In addition to developing decoders to better handle long-term instability, identifying when to recalibrate will also optimize performance. We propose a method to measure instability in neural data without needing to label user intentions. Longitudinal data were analyzed from two BrainGate2 participants with tetraplegia as they used fixed decoders to control a computer cursor spanning 142 days and 28 days, respectively. We demonstrate a measure of instability that correlates with changes in closed-loop cursor performance solely based on the recorded neural activity (Pearson r = 0.93 and 0.72, respectively). This result suggests a strategy to infer online iBCI performance from neural data alone and to determine when recalibration should take place for practical long-term use.
Collapse
|
17
|
Mokienko O. Brain-Computer Interfaces with Intracortical Implants for Motor and Communication Functions Compensation: Review of Recent Developments. Sovrem Tekhnologii Med 2024; 16:78-89. [PMID: 39421626 PMCID: PMC11482094 DOI: 10.17691/stm2024.16.1.08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Brain-computer interfaces allow the exchange of data between the brain and an external device, bypassing the muscular system. Clinical studies of invasive brain-computer interface technologies have been conducted for over 20 years. During this time, there has been a continuous improvement of approaches to neuronal signal processing in order to improve the quality of control of external devices. Currently, brain-computer interfaces with intracortical implants allow completely paralyzed patients to control robotic limbs for self-service, use a computer or a tablet, type text, and reproduce speech at an optimal speed. Studies of invasive brain-computer interfaces regularly provide new fundamental data on functioning of the central nervous system. In recent years, breakthrough discoveries and achievements have been annually made in this sphere. This review analyzes the results of clinical experiments of brain-computer interfaces with intracortical implants, provides information on the stages of this technology development, its main discoveries and achievements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O.A. Mokienko
- Senior Researcher, Mathematical Neurobiology of Learning Laboratory; Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology of Russian Academy of Sciences, 5a Butlerova St., Moscow, 117485, Russia; Senior Researcher, Engineering Center; N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, 1 Ostrovityanova St., Moscow, 117997, Russia; Researcher, Brain–Computer Interface Group of Institute for Neurorehabilitation and Restorative Technologies; Research Center of Neurology, 80 Volokolamskoye Shosse, Moscow, 125367, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Holt MW, Robinson EC, Shlobin NA, Hanson JT, Bozkurt I. Intracortical brain-computer interfaces for improved motor function: a systematic review. Rev Neurosci 2024; 35:213-223. [PMID: 37845811 DOI: 10.1515/revneuro-2023-0077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/23/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023]
Abstract
In this systematic review, we address the status of intracortical brain-computer interfaces (iBCIs) applied to the motor cortex to improve function in patients with impaired motor ability. This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 Guidelines for Systematic Reviews. Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) and the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) were used to assess bias and quality. Advances in iBCIs in the last two decades demonstrated the use of iBCI to activate limbs for functional tasks, achieve neural typing for communication, and other applications. However, the inconsistency of performance metrics employed by these studies suggests the need for standardization. Each study was a pilot clinical trial consisting of 1-4, majority male (64.28 %) participants, with most trials featuring participants treated for more than 12 months (55.55 %). The systems treated patients with various conditions: amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, stroke, spinocerebellar degeneration without cerebellar involvement, and spinal cord injury. All participants presented with tetraplegia at implantation and were implanted with microelectrode arrays via pneumatic insertion, with nearly all electrode locations solely at the precentral gyrus of the motor cortex (88.88 %). The development of iBCI devices using neural signals from the motor cortex to improve motor-impaired patients has enhanced the ability of these systems to return ability to their users. However, many milestones remain before these devices can prove their feasibility for recovery. This review summarizes the achievements and shortfalls of these systems and their respective trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew W Holt
- Department of Natural Sciences, University of South Carolina Beaufort, 1 University Blvd, Bluffton, 29909, USA
| | | | - Nathan A Shlobin
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Jacob T Hanson
- Rocky Vista University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Englewood, CO 80112, USA
| | - Ismail Bozkurt
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Yuksek Ihtisas University, 06530 Ankara, Türkiye
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Park Ankara Hospital, 06680 Ankara, Türkiye
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Verzhbinsky IA, Rubin DB, Kajfez S, Bu Y, Kelemen JN, Kapitonava A, Williams ZM, Hochberg LR, Cash SS, Halgren E. Co-occurring ripple oscillations facilitate neuronal interactions between cortical locations in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2024; 121:e2312204121. [PMID: 38157452 PMCID: PMC10769862 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2312204121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024] Open
Abstract
How the human cortex integrates ("binds") information encoded by spatially distributed neurons remains largely unknown. One hypothesis suggests that synchronous bursts of high-frequency oscillations ("ripples") contribute to binding by facilitating integration of neuronal firing across different cortical locations. While studies have demonstrated that ripples modulate local activity in the cortex, it is not known whether their co-occurrence coordinates neural firing across larger distances. We tested this hypothesis using local field-potentials and single-unit firing from four 96-channel microelectrode arrays in the supragranular cortex of 3 patients. Neurons in co-rippling locations showed increased short-latency co-firing, prediction of each other's firing, and co-participation in neural assemblies. Effects were similar for putative pyramidal and interneurons, during non-rapid eye movement sleep and waking, in temporal and Rolandic cortices, and at distances up to 16 mm (the longest tested). Increased co-prediction during co-ripples was maintained when firing-rate changes were equated, indicating that it was not secondary to non-oscillatory activation. Co-rippling enhanced prediction was strongly modulated by ripple phase, supporting the most common posited mechanism for binding-by-synchrony. Co-ripple enhanced prediction is reciprocal, synergistic with local upstates, and further enhanced when multiple sites co-ripple, supporting re-entrant facilitation. Together, these results support the hypothesis that trans-cortical co-occurring ripples increase the integration of neuronal firing of neurons in different cortical locations and do so in part through phase-modulation rather than unstructured activation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilya A. Verzhbinsky
- Neurosciences Graduate Program, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA92093
- Medical Scientist Training Program, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA92093
| | - Daniel B. Rubin
- Department of Neurology, Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA02114
| | - Sophie Kajfez
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA92093
| | - Yiting Bu
- Department of Neurosciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA92093
| | - Jessica N. Kelemen
- Department of Neurology, Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA02114
| | - Anastasia Kapitonava
- Department of Neurology, Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA02114
| | - Ziv M. Williams
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA02114
| | - Leigh R. Hochberg
- Department of Neurology, Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA02114
- Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Department of Veterans Affairs, Providence, RI02908
- Carney Institute for Brain Science and School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI02912
| | - Sydney S. Cash
- Department of Neurology, Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA02114
| | - Eric Halgren
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA92093
- Department of Neurosciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA92093
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abbaspourazad H, Erturk E, Pesaran B, Shanechi MM. Dynamical flexible inference of nonlinear latent factors and structures in neural population activity. Nat Biomed Eng 2024; 8:85-108. [PMID: 38082181 PMCID: PMC11735406 DOI: 10.1038/s41551-023-01106-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023]
Abstract
Modelling the spatiotemporal dynamics in the activity of neural populations while also enabling their flexible inference is hindered by the complexity and noisiness of neural observations. Here we show that the lower-dimensional nonlinear latent factors and latent structures can be computationally modelled in a manner that allows for flexible inference causally, non-causally and in the presence of missing neural observations. To enable flexible inference, we developed a neural network that separates the model into jointly trained manifold and dynamic latent factors such that nonlinearity is captured through the manifold factors and the dynamics can be modelled in tractable linear form on this nonlinear manifold. We show that the model, which we named 'DFINE' (for 'dynamical flexible inference for nonlinear embeddings') achieves flexible inference in simulations of nonlinear dynamics and across neural datasets representing a diversity of brain regions and behaviours. Compared with earlier neural-network models, DFINE enables flexible inference, better predicts neural activity and behaviour, and better captures the latent neural manifold structure. DFINE may advance the development of neurotechnology and investigations in neuroscience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamidreza Abbaspourazad
- Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Eray Erturk
- Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Bijan Pesaran
- Departments of Neurosurgery, Neuroscience, and Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Maryam M Shanechi
- Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- Thomas Lord Department of Computer Science, Alfred E. Mann Department of Biomedical Engineering, Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Zhang J, Li J, Huang Z, Huang D, Yu H, Li Z. Recent Progress in Wearable Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) Devices Based on Electroencephalogram (EEG) for Medical Applications: A Review. HEALTH DATA SCIENCE 2023; 3:0096. [PMID: 38487198 PMCID: PMC10880169 DOI: 10.34133/hds.0096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
Importance: Brain-computer interface (BCI) decodes and converts brain signals into machine instructions to interoperate with the external world. However, limited by the implantation risks of invasive BCIs and the operational complexity of conventional noninvasive BCIs, applications of BCIs are mainly used in laboratory or clinical environments, which are not conducive to the daily use of BCI devices. With the increasing demand for intelligent medical care, the development of wearable BCI systems is necessary. Highlights: Based on the scalp-electroencephalogram (EEG), forehead-EEG, and ear-EEG, the state-of-the-art wearable BCI devices for disease management and patient assistance are reviewed. This paper focuses on the EEG acquisition equipment of the novel wearable BCI devices and summarizes the development direction of wearable EEG-based BCI devices. Conclusions: BCI devices play an essential role in the medical field. This review briefly summarizes novel wearable EEG-based BCIs applied in the medical field and the latest progress in related technologies, emphasizing its potential to help doctors, patients, and caregivers better understand and utilize BCI devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiayan Zhang
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Integrated Circuits, Beijing, China
- National Key Laboratory of Advanced Micro and Nano Manufacture Technology, School of Integrated Circuits,
Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Junshi Li
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Integrated Circuits, Beijing, China
- National Key Laboratory of Advanced Micro and Nano Manufacture Technology, School of Integrated Circuits,
Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Zhe Huang
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Integrated Circuits, Beijing, China
- National Key Laboratory of Advanced Micro and Nano Manufacture Technology, School of Integrated Circuits,
Peking University, Beijing, China
- Shenzhen Graduate School,
Peking University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Dong Huang
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Integrated Circuits, Beijing, China
- National Key Laboratory of Advanced Micro and Nano Manufacture Technology, School of Integrated Circuits,
Peking University, Beijing, China
- School of Electronics,
Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Huaiqiang Yu
- Sichuan Institute of Piezoelectric and Acousto-optic Technology, Chongqing, China
| | - Zhihong Li
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Integrated Circuits, Beijing, China
- National Key Laboratory of Advanced Micro and Nano Manufacture Technology, School of Integrated Circuits,
Peking University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Boulingre M, Portillo-Lara R, Green RA. Biohybrid neural interfaces: improving the biological integration of neural implants. Chem Commun (Camb) 2023; 59:14745-14758. [PMID: 37991846 PMCID: PMC10720954 DOI: 10.1039/d3cc05006h] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/24/2023]
Abstract
Implantable neural interfaces (NIs) have emerged in the clinic as outstanding tools for the management of a variety of neurological conditions caused by trauma or disease. However, the foreign body reaction triggered upon implantation remains one of the major challenges hindering the safety and longevity of NIs. The integration of tools and principles from biomaterial design and tissue engineering has been investigated as a promising strategy to develop NIs with enhanced functionality and performance. In this Feature Article, we highlight the main bioengineering approaches for the development of biohybrid NIs with an emphasis on relevant device design criteria. Technical and scientific challenges associated with the fabrication and functional assessment of technologies composed of both artificial and biological components are discussed. Lastly, we provide future perspectives related to engineering, regulatory, and neuroethical challenges to be addressed towards the realisation of the promise of biohybrid neurotechnology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marjolaine Boulingre
- Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Roberto Portillo-Lara
- Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Rylie A Green
- Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Shah NP, Avansino D, Kamdar F, Nicolas C, Kapitonava A, Vargas-Irwin C, Hochberg L, Pandarinath C, Shenoy K, Willett FR, Henderson J. Pseudo-linear Summation explains Neural Geometry of Multi-finger Movements in Human Premotor Cortex. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.10.11.561982. [PMID: 37873182 PMCID: PMC10592742 DOI: 10.1101/2023.10.11.561982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
How does the motor cortex combine simple movements (such as single finger flexion/extension) into complex movements (such hand gestures or playing piano)? Motor cortical activity was recorded using intracortical multi-electrode arrays in two people with tetraplegia as they attempted single, pairwise and higher order finger movements. Neural activity for simultaneous movements was largely aligned with linear summation of corresponding single finger movement activities, with two violations. First, the neural activity was normalized, preventing a large magnitude with an increasing number of moving fingers. Second, the neural tuning direction of weakly represented fingers (e.g. middle) changed significantly as a result of the movement of other fingers. These deviations from linearity resulted in non-linear methods outperforming linear methods for neural decoding. Overall, simultaneous finger movements are thus represented by the combination of individual finger movements by pseudo-linear summation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Donald Avansino
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | - Claire Nicolas
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anastasia Kapitonava
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Carlos Vargas-Irwin
- VA RR&D Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Rehabilitation R&D Service, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA
- Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Leigh Hochberg
- VA RR&D Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Rehabilitation R&D Service, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA
- School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Chethan Pandarinath
- Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Krishna Shenoy
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Bio-X Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Francis R Willett
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Jaimie Henderson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University
- Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Bio-X Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Tian T, Zhang S, Yang M. Recent progress and challenges in the treatment of spinal cord injury. Protein Cell 2023; 14:635-652. [PMID: 36856750 PMCID: PMC10501188 DOI: 10.1093/procel/pwad003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Spinal cord injury (SCI) disrupts the structural and functional connectivity between the higher center and the spinal cord, resulting in severe motor, sensory, and autonomic dysfunction with a variety of complications. The pathophysiology of SCI is complicated and multifaceted, and thus individual treatments acting on a specific aspect or process are inadequate to elicit neuronal regeneration and functional recovery after SCI. Combinatory strategies targeting multiple aspects of SCI pathology have achieved greater beneficial effects than individual therapy alone. Although many problems and challenges remain, the encouraging outcomes that have been achieved in preclinical models offer a promising foothold for the development of novel clinical strategies to treat SCI. In this review, we characterize the mechanisms underlying axon regeneration of adult neurons and summarize recent advances in facilitating functional recovery following SCI at both the acute and chronic stages. In addition, we analyze the current status, remaining problems, and realistic challenges towards clinical translation. Finally, we consider the future of SCI treatment and provide insights into how to narrow the translational gap that currently exists between preclinical studies and clinical practice. Going forward, clinical trials should emphasize multidisciplinary conversation and cooperation to identify optimal combinatorial approaches to maximize therapeutic benefit in humans with SCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ting Tian
- Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Protein Science, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Structural Biology, Beijing Frontier Research Center for Biological Structure, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
| | - Sensen Zhang
- Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Protein Science, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Structural Biology, Beijing Frontier Research Center for Biological Structure, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
| | - Maojun Yang
- Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Protein Science, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Structural Biology, Beijing Frontier Research Center for Biological Structure, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
- Cryo-EM Facility Center, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ali YH, Bodkin K, Rigotti-Thompson M, Patel K, Card NS, Bhaduri B, Nason-Tomaszewski SR, Mifsud DM, Hou X, Nicolas C, Allcroft S, Hochberg LR, Yong NA, Stavisky SD, Miller LE, Brandman DM, Pandarinath C. BRAND: A platform for closed-loop experiments with deep network models. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.08.08.552473. [PMID: 37609167 PMCID: PMC10441362 DOI: 10.1101/2023.08.08.552473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
Artificial neural networks (ANNs) are state-of-the-art tools for modeling and decoding neural activity, but deploying them in closed-loop experiments with tight timing constraints is challenging due to their limited support in existing real-time frameworks. Researchers need a platform that fully supports high-level languages for running ANNs (e.g., Python and Julia) while maintaining support for languages that are critical for low-latency data acquisition and processing (e.g., C and C++). To address these needs, we introduce the Backend for Realtime Asynchronous Neural Decoding (BRAND). BRAND comprises Linux processes, termed nodes , which communicate with each other in a graph via streams of data. Its asynchronous design allows for acquisition, control, and analysis to be executed in parallel on streams of data that may operate at different timescales. BRAND uses Redis to send data between nodes, which enables fast inter-process communication and supports 54 different programming languages. Thus, developers can easily deploy existing ANN models in BRAND with minimal implementation changes. In our tests, BRAND achieved <600 microsecond latency between processes when sending large quantities of data (1024 channels of 30 kHz neural data in 1-millisecond chunks). BRAND runs a brain-computer interface with a recurrent neural network (RNN) decoder with less than 8 milliseconds of latency from neural data input to decoder prediction. In a real-world demonstration of the system, participant T11 in the BrainGate2 clinical trial performed a standard cursor control task, in which 30 kHz signal processing, RNN decoding, task control, and graphics were all executed in BRAND. This system also supports real-time inference with complex latent variable models like Latent Factor Analysis via Dynamical Systems. By providing a framework that is fast, modular, and language-agnostic, BRAND lowers the barriers to integrating the latest tools in neuroscience and machine learning into closed-loop experiments.
Collapse
|
26
|
Maiseli B, Abdalla AT, Massawe LV, Mbise M, Mkocha K, Nassor NA, Ismail M, Michael J, Kimambo S. Brain-computer interface: trend, challenges, and threats. Brain Inform 2023; 10:20. [PMID: 37540385 PMCID: PMC10403483 DOI: 10.1186/s40708-023-00199-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 07/01/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Brain-computer interface (BCI), an emerging technology that facilitates communication between brain and computer, has attracted a great deal of research in recent years. Researchers provide experimental results demonstrating that BCI can restore the capabilities of physically challenged people, hence improving the quality of their lives. BCI has revolutionized and positively impacted several industries, including entertainment and gaming, automation and control, education, neuromarketing, and neuroergonomics. Notwithstanding its broad range of applications, the global trend of BCI remains lightly discussed in the literature. Understanding the trend may inform researchers and practitioners on the direction of the field, and on where they should invest their efforts more. Noting this significance, we have analyzed 25,336 metadata of BCI publications from Scopus to determine advancement of the field. The analysis shows an exponential growth of BCI publications in China from 2019 onwards, exceeding those from the United States that started to decline during the same period. Implications and reasons for this trend are discussed. Furthermore, we have extensively discussed challenges and threats limiting exploitation of BCI capabilities. A typical BCI architecture is hypothesized to address two prominent BCI threats, privacy and security, as an attempt to make the technology commercially viable to the society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Baraka Maiseli
- Department of Electronics and Telecommunications Engineering, College of Information and Communication Technologies, University of Dar es Salaam, 14113, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
| | - Abdi T Abdalla
- Department of Electronics and Telecommunications Engineering, College of Information and Communication Technologies, University of Dar es Salaam, 14113, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Libe V Massawe
- Department of Electronics and Telecommunications Engineering, College of Information and Communication Technologies, University of Dar es Salaam, 14113, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Mercy Mbise
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, College of Information and Communication Technologies, University of Dar es Salaam, 14113, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Khadija Mkocha
- Department of Electronics and Telecommunications Engineering, College of Information and Communication Technologies, University of Dar es Salaam, 14113, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Nassor Ally Nassor
- Department of Electronics and Telecommunications Engineering, College of Information and Communication Technologies, University of Dar es Salaam, 14113, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Moses Ismail
- Department of Electronics and Telecommunications Engineering, College of Information and Communication Technologies, University of Dar es Salaam, 14113, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - James Michael
- Department of Electronics and Telecommunications Engineering, College of Information and Communication Technologies, University of Dar es Salaam, 14113, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Samwel Kimambo
- Department of Electronics and Telecommunications Engineering, College of Information and Communication Technologies, University of Dar es Salaam, 14113, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Dong Y, Wang S, Huang Q, Berg RW, Li G, He J. Neural Decoding for Intracortical Brain-Computer Interfaces. CYBORG AND BIONIC SYSTEMS 2023; 4:0044. [PMID: 37519930 PMCID: PMC10380541 DOI: 10.34133/cbsystems.0044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Brain-computer interfaces have revolutionized the field of neuroscience by providing a solution for paralyzed patients to control external devices and improve the quality of daily life. To accurately and stably control effectors, it is important for decoders to recognize an individual's motor intention from neural activity either by noninvasive or intracortical neural recording. Intracortical recording is an invasive way of measuring neural electrical activity with high temporal and spatial resolution. Herein, we review recent developments in neural signal decoding methods for intracortical brain-computer interfaces. These methods have achieved good performance in analyzing neural activity and controlling robots and prostheses in nonhuman primates and humans. For more complex paradigms in motor rehabilitation or other clinical applications, there remains more space for further improvements of decoders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuanrui Dong
- School of Mechatronical Engineering and Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Intelligent Robots,
Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
| | - Shirong Wang
- School of Mechatronical Engineering and Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Intelligent Robots,
Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
| | - Qiang Huang
- School of Mechatronical Engineering and Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Intelligent Robots,
Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
| | - Rune W. Berg
- Department of Neuroscience,
University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 2200, Denmark
| | - Guanghui Li
- Department of Neuroscience,
University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 2200, Denmark
| | - Jiping He
- School of Mechatronical Engineering and Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Intelligent Robots,
Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Verzhbinsky IA, Rubin DB, Kajfez S, Bu Y, Kelemen JN, Kapitonava A, Williams ZM, Hochberg LR, Cash SS, Halgren E. Co-occurring ripple oscillations facilitate neuronal interactions between cortical locations in humans. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.05.20.541588. [PMID: 37292943 PMCID: PMC10245779 DOI: 10.1101/2023.05.20.541588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Synchronous bursts of high frequency oscillations ('ripples') are hypothesized to contribute to binding by facilitating integration of neuronal firing across cortical locations. We tested this hypothesis using local field-potentials and single-unit firing from four 96-channel microelectrode arrays in supragranular cortex of 3 patients. Neurons in co-rippling locations showed increased short-latency co-firing, prediction of each-other's firing, and co-participation in neural assemblies. Effects were similar for putative pyramidal and interneurons, during NREM sleep and waking, in temporal and Rolandic cortices, and at distances up to 16mm. Increased co-prediction during co-ripples was maintained when firing-rate changes were equated, and were strongly modulated by ripple phase. Co-ripple enhanced prediction is reciprocal, synergistic with local upstates, and further enhanced when multiple sites co-ripple. Together, these results support the hypothesis that trans-cortical co-ripples increase the integration of neuronal firing of neurons in different cortical locations, and do so in part through phase-modulation rather than unstructured activation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilya A. Verzhbinsky
- Neurosciences Graduate Program, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
- Medical Scientist Training Program, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Daniel B. Rubin
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Sophie Kajfez
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Yiting Bu
- Department of Neurosciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Jessica N. Kelemen
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Anastasia Kapitonava
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Ziv M. Williams
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114
- Program in Neuroscience, Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115
| | - Leigh R. Hochberg
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Department of Veterans Affairs, Providence, RI 02908, USA
- Carney Institute for Brain Science and School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA
| | - Sydney S. Cash
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Eric Halgren
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
- Department of Neurosciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Carrillo-Ruiz JD, Carrillo-Márquez JR, Beltrán JQ, Jiménez-Ponce F, García-Muñoz L, Navarro-Olvera JL, Márquez-Franco R, Velasco F. Innovative perspectives in limbic surgery using deep brain stimulation. Front Neurosci 2023; 17:1167244. [PMID: 37274213 PMCID: PMC10233042 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1167244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Limbic surgery is one of the most attractive and retaken fields of functional neurosurgery in the last two decades. Psychiatric surgery emerged from the incipient work of Moniz and Lima lesioning the prefrontal cortex in agitated patients. Since the onset of stereotactic and functional neurosurgery with Spiegel and Wycis, the treatment of mental diseases gave attention to refractory illnesses mainly with the use of thalamotomies. Neurosis and some psychotic symptoms were treated by them. Several indications when lesioning the brain were included: obsessive-compulsive disorder, depression, and aggressiveness among others with a diversity of targets. The indiscriminately use of anatomical sites without enough scientific evidence, and uncertainly defined criteria for selecting patients merged with a deficiency in ethical aspects, brought a lack of procedures for a long time: only select clinics allowed this surgery around the world from 1950 to the 1990s. In 1999, Nuttin et al. began a new chapter in limbic surgery with the use of Deep Brain Stimulation, based on the experience of pain, Parkinson's disease, and epilepsy. The efforts were focused on different targets to treat depression and obsessive-compulsive disorders. Nevertheless, other diseases were added to use neuromodulation. The goal of this article is to show the new opportunities to treat neuropsychiatric diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José Damián Carrillo-Ruiz
- Stereotactic, Functional & Radiosurgery Unit of Neurosurgery Service, Mexico General Hospital, Mexico City, Mexico
- Research Direction, Mexico General Hospital, Mexico City, Mexico
- Neuroscience Coordination, Psychology Faculty, Anahuac University, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - José Rodrigo Carrillo-Márquez
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Anahuac University, Mexico City, Mexico
- Alpha Health Sciences Leadership Program, Anahuac University, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Jesús Quetzalcóatl Beltrán
- Stereotactic, Functional & Radiosurgery Unit of Neurosurgery Service, Mexico General Hospital, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Fiacro Jiménez-Ponce
- Stereotactic, Functional & Radiosurgery Unit of Neurosurgery Service, Mexico General Hospital, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Luis García-Muñoz
- Stereotactic, Functional & Radiosurgery Unit of Neurosurgery Service, Mexico General Hospital, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - José Luis Navarro-Olvera
- Stereotactic, Functional & Radiosurgery Unit of Neurosurgery Service, Mexico General Hospital, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - René Márquez-Franco
- Stereotactic, Functional & Radiosurgery Unit of Neurosurgery Service, Mexico General Hospital, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Francisco Velasco
- Stereotactic, Functional & Radiosurgery Unit of Neurosurgery Service, Mexico General Hospital, Mexico City, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Bhatt S, Masterson E, Zhu T, Eizadi J, George J, Graupe N, Vareberg A, Phillips J, Bok I, Dwyer M, Ashtiani A, Hai A. Wireless in vivo Recording of Cortical Activity by an Ion-Sensitive Field Effect Transistor. SENSORS AND ACTUATORS. B, CHEMICAL 2023; 382:133549. [PMID: 36970106 PMCID: PMC10035629 DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2023.133549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Wireless brain technologies are empowering basic neuroscience and clinical neurology by offering new platforms that minimize invasiveness and refine possibilities during electrophysiological recording and stimulation. Despite their advantages, most systems require on-board power supply and sizeable transmission circuitry, enforcing a lower bound for miniaturization. Designing new minimalistic architectures that can efficiently sense neurophysiological events will open the door to standalone microscale sensors and minimally invasive delivery of multiple sensors. Here we present a circuit for sensing ionic fluctuations in the brain by an ion-sensitive field effect transistor that detunes a single radiofrequency resonator in parallel. We establish sensitivity of the sensor by electromagnetic analysis and quantify response to ionic fluctuations in vitro. We validate this new architecture in vivo during hindpaw stimulation in rodents and verify correlation with local field potential recordings. This new approach can be implemented as an integrated circuit for wireless in situ recording of brain electrophysiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suyash Bhatt
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
- Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
| | - Emily Masterson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
| | - Tianxiang Zhu
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
| | - Jenna Eizadi
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
| | - Judy George
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
| | - Nesya Graupe
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
| | - Adam Vareberg
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
| | - Jack Phillips
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
| | - Ilhan Bok
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
- Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
| | - Matthew Dwyer
- Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
| | - Alireza Ashtiani
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
| | - Aviad Hai
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
- Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
- Wisconsin Institute for Translational Neuroengineering (WITNe), Madison, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Branco MP, Geukes SH, Aarnoutse EJ, Ramsey NF, Vansteensel MJ. Nine decades of electrocorticography: A comparison between epidural and subdural recordings. Eur J Neurosci 2023; 57:1260-1288. [PMID: 36843389 DOI: 10.1111/ejn.15941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Revised: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/28/2023]
Abstract
In recent years, electrocorticography (ECoG) has arisen as a neural signal recording tool in the development of clinically viable neural interfaces. ECoG electrodes are generally placed below the dura mater (subdural) but can also be placed on top of the dura (epidural). In deciding which of these modalities best suits long-term implants, complications and signal quality are important considerations. Conceptually, epidural placement may present a lower risk of complications as the dura is left intact but also a lower signal quality due to the dura acting as a signal attenuator. The extent to which complications and signal quality are affected by the dura, however, has been a matter of debate. To improve our understanding of the effects of the dura on complications and signal quality, we conducted a literature review. We inventorized the effect of the dura on signal quality, decodability and longevity of acute and chronic ECoG recordings in humans and non-human primates. Also, we compared the incidence and nature of serious complications in studies that employed epidural and subdural ECoG. Overall, we found that, even though epidural recordings exhibit attenuated signal amplitude over subdural recordings, particularly for high-density grids, the decodability of epidural recorded signals does not seem to be markedly affected. Additionally, we found that the nature of serious complications was comparable between epidural and subdural recordings. These results indicate that both epidural and subdural ECoG may be suited for long-term neural signal recordings, at least for current generations of clinical and high-density ECoG grids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariana P Branco
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Simon H Geukes
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Erik J Aarnoutse
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Nick F Ramsey
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mariska J Vansteensel
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Rubin DB, Ajiboye AB, Barefoot L, Bowker M, Cash SS, Chen D, Donoghue JP, Eskandar EN, Friehs G, Grant C, Henderson JM, Kirsch RF, Marujo R, Masood M, Mernoff ST, Miller JP, Mukand JA, Penn RD, Shefner J, Shenoy KV, Simeral JD, Sweet JA, Walter BL, Williams ZM, Hochberg LR. Interim Safety Profile From the Feasibility Study of the BrainGate Neural Interface System. Neurology 2023; 100:e1177-e1192. [PMID: 36639237 PMCID: PMC10074470 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000201707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2022] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are being developed to restore mobility, communication, and functional independence to people with paralysis. Though supported by decades of preclinical data, the safety of chronically implanted microelectrode array BCIs in humans is unknown. We report safety results from the prospective, open-label, nonrandomized BrainGate feasibility study (NCT00912041), the largest and longest-running clinical trial of an implanted BCI. METHODS Adults aged 18-75 years with quadriparesis from spinal cord injury, brainstem stroke, or motor neuron disease were enrolled through 7 clinical sites in the United States. Participants underwent surgical implantation of 1 or 2 microelectrode arrays in the motor cortex of the dominant cerebral hemisphere. The primary safety outcome was device-related serious adverse events (SAEs) requiring device explantation or resulting in death or permanently increased disability during the 1-year postimplant evaluation period. The secondary outcomes included the type and frequency of other adverse events and the feasibility of the BrainGate system for controlling a computer or other assistive technologies. RESULTS From 2004 to 2021, 14 adults enrolled in the BrainGate trial had devices surgically implanted. The average duration of device implantation was 872 days, yielding 12,203 days of safety experience. There were 68 device-related adverse events, including 6 device-related SAEs. The most common device-related adverse event was skin irritation around the percutaneous pedestal. There were no safety events that required device explantation, no unanticipated adverse device events, no intracranial infections, and no participant deaths or adverse events resulting in permanently increased disability related to the investigational device. DISCUSSION The BrainGate Neural Interface system has a safety record comparable with other chronically implanted medical devices. Given rapid recent advances in this technology and continued performance gains, these data suggest a favorable risk/benefit ratio in appropriately selected individuals to support ongoing research and development. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00912041. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE This study provides Class IV evidence that the neurosurgically placed BrainGate Neural Interface system is associated with a low rate of SAEs defined as those requiring device explantation, resulting in death, or resulting in permanently increased disability during the 1-year postimplant period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel B Rubin
- From the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) (D.B.R., L.B., S.S.C., C.G., R.M., M.M., L.R.H.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Neurosurgery (Z.M.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (D.B.R., S.S.C., L.R.H.), Boston, MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.A., R.F.K.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service (A.B.A., R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S., B.L.W.), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN) (M.B., J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Legs and Walking Lab (D.C.), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL; Department of Neuroscience (J.P.D.), Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), School of Engineering (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Neurological Surgery (E.N.E.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; European University of Cyprus (G.F.), Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Neurosurgery (J.M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), Bio-X Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), and Departments of Neurobiology (K.V.S.), Electrical Engineering (K.V.S.), and Bioengineering (K.V.S.), Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Neurology Section (S.T.M.), VA Providence Health Care System, Providence, RI; Department of Neurology (S.T.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Sargent Rehabilitation Center (J.A.M.), Warwick, RI; Section of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago; Department of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (J.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University (K.V.S.); Center for Neurological Restoration (B.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Program in Neuroscience (Z.M.W.), Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| | - A Bolu Ajiboye
- From the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) (D.B.R., L.B., S.S.C., C.G., R.M., M.M., L.R.H.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Neurosurgery (Z.M.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (D.B.R., S.S.C., L.R.H.), Boston, MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.A., R.F.K.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service (A.B.A., R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S., B.L.W.), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN) (M.B., J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Legs and Walking Lab (D.C.), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL; Department of Neuroscience (J.P.D.), Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), School of Engineering (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Neurological Surgery (E.N.E.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; European University of Cyprus (G.F.), Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Neurosurgery (J.M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), Bio-X Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), and Departments of Neurobiology (K.V.S.), Electrical Engineering (K.V.S.), and Bioengineering (K.V.S.), Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Neurology Section (S.T.M.), VA Providence Health Care System, Providence, RI; Department of Neurology (S.T.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Sargent Rehabilitation Center (J.A.M.), Warwick, RI; Section of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago; Department of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (J.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University (K.V.S.); Center for Neurological Restoration (B.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Program in Neuroscience (Z.M.W.), Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Laurie Barefoot
- From the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) (D.B.R., L.B., S.S.C., C.G., R.M., M.M., L.R.H.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Neurosurgery (Z.M.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (D.B.R., S.S.C., L.R.H.), Boston, MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.A., R.F.K.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service (A.B.A., R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S., B.L.W.), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN) (M.B., J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Legs and Walking Lab (D.C.), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL; Department of Neuroscience (J.P.D.), Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), School of Engineering (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Neurological Surgery (E.N.E.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; European University of Cyprus (G.F.), Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Neurosurgery (J.M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), Bio-X Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), and Departments of Neurobiology (K.V.S.), Electrical Engineering (K.V.S.), and Bioengineering (K.V.S.), Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Neurology Section (S.T.M.), VA Providence Health Care System, Providence, RI; Department of Neurology (S.T.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Sargent Rehabilitation Center (J.A.M.), Warwick, RI; Section of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago; Department of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (J.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University (K.V.S.); Center for Neurological Restoration (B.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Program in Neuroscience (Z.M.W.), Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Marguerite Bowker
- From the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) (D.B.R., L.B., S.S.C., C.G., R.M., M.M., L.R.H.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Neurosurgery (Z.M.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (D.B.R., S.S.C., L.R.H.), Boston, MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.A., R.F.K.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service (A.B.A., R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S., B.L.W.), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN) (M.B., J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Legs and Walking Lab (D.C.), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL; Department of Neuroscience (J.P.D.), Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), School of Engineering (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Neurological Surgery (E.N.E.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; European University of Cyprus (G.F.), Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Neurosurgery (J.M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), Bio-X Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), and Departments of Neurobiology (K.V.S.), Electrical Engineering (K.V.S.), and Bioengineering (K.V.S.), Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Neurology Section (S.T.M.), VA Providence Health Care System, Providence, RI; Department of Neurology (S.T.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Sargent Rehabilitation Center (J.A.M.), Warwick, RI; Section of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago; Department of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (J.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University (K.V.S.); Center for Neurological Restoration (B.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Program in Neuroscience (Z.M.W.), Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Sydney S Cash
- From the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) (D.B.R., L.B., S.S.C., C.G., R.M., M.M., L.R.H.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Neurosurgery (Z.M.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (D.B.R., S.S.C., L.R.H.), Boston, MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.A., R.F.K.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service (A.B.A., R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S., B.L.W.), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN) (M.B., J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Legs and Walking Lab (D.C.), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL; Department of Neuroscience (J.P.D.), Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), School of Engineering (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Neurological Surgery (E.N.E.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; European University of Cyprus (G.F.), Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Neurosurgery (J.M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), Bio-X Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), and Departments of Neurobiology (K.V.S.), Electrical Engineering (K.V.S.), and Bioengineering (K.V.S.), Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Neurology Section (S.T.M.), VA Providence Health Care System, Providence, RI; Department of Neurology (S.T.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Sargent Rehabilitation Center (J.A.M.), Warwick, RI; Section of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago; Department of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (J.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University (K.V.S.); Center for Neurological Restoration (B.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Program in Neuroscience (Z.M.W.), Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - David Chen
- From the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) (D.B.R., L.B., S.S.C., C.G., R.M., M.M., L.R.H.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Neurosurgery (Z.M.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (D.B.R., S.S.C., L.R.H.), Boston, MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.A., R.F.K.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service (A.B.A., R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S., B.L.W.), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN) (M.B., J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Legs and Walking Lab (D.C.), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL; Department of Neuroscience (J.P.D.), Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), School of Engineering (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Neurological Surgery (E.N.E.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; European University of Cyprus (G.F.), Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Neurosurgery (J.M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), Bio-X Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), and Departments of Neurobiology (K.V.S.), Electrical Engineering (K.V.S.), and Bioengineering (K.V.S.), Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Neurology Section (S.T.M.), VA Providence Health Care System, Providence, RI; Department of Neurology (S.T.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Sargent Rehabilitation Center (J.A.M.), Warwick, RI; Section of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago; Department of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (J.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University (K.V.S.); Center for Neurological Restoration (B.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Program in Neuroscience (Z.M.W.), Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - John P Donoghue
- From the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) (D.B.R., L.B., S.S.C., C.G., R.M., M.M., L.R.H.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Neurosurgery (Z.M.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (D.B.R., S.S.C., L.R.H.), Boston, MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.A., R.F.K.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service (A.B.A., R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S., B.L.W.), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN) (M.B., J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Legs and Walking Lab (D.C.), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL; Department of Neuroscience (J.P.D.), Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), School of Engineering (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Neurological Surgery (E.N.E.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; European University of Cyprus (G.F.), Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Neurosurgery (J.M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), Bio-X Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), and Departments of Neurobiology (K.V.S.), Electrical Engineering (K.V.S.), and Bioengineering (K.V.S.), Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Neurology Section (S.T.M.), VA Providence Health Care System, Providence, RI; Department of Neurology (S.T.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Sargent Rehabilitation Center (J.A.M.), Warwick, RI; Section of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago; Department of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (J.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University (K.V.S.); Center for Neurological Restoration (B.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Program in Neuroscience (Z.M.W.), Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Emad N Eskandar
- From the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) (D.B.R., L.B., S.S.C., C.G., R.M., M.M., L.R.H.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Neurosurgery (Z.M.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (D.B.R., S.S.C., L.R.H.), Boston, MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.A., R.F.K.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service (A.B.A., R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S., B.L.W.), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN) (M.B., J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Legs and Walking Lab (D.C.), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL; Department of Neuroscience (J.P.D.), Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), School of Engineering (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Neurological Surgery (E.N.E.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; European University of Cyprus (G.F.), Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Neurosurgery (J.M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), Bio-X Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), and Departments of Neurobiology (K.V.S.), Electrical Engineering (K.V.S.), and Bioengineering (K.V.S.), Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Neurology Section (S.T.M.), VA Providence Health Care System, Providence, RI; Department of Neurology (S.T.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Sargent Rehabilitation Center (J.A.M.), Warwick, RI; Section of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago; Department of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (J.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University (K.V.S.); Center for Neurological Restoration (B.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Program in Neuroscience (Z.M.W.), Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Gerhard Friehs
- From the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) (D.B.R., L.B., S.S.C., C.G., R.M., M.M., L.R.H.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Neurosurgery (Z.M.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (D.B.R., S.S.C., L.R.H.), Boston, MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.A., R.F.K.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service (A.B.A., R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S., B.L.W.), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN) (M.B., J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Legs and Walking Lab (D.C.), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL; Department of Neuroscience (J.P.D.), Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), School of Engineering (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Neurological Surgery (E.N.E.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; European University of Cyprus (G.F.), Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Neurosurgery (J.M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), Bio-X Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), and Departments of Neurobiology (K.V.S.), Electrical Engineering (K.V.S.), and Bioengineering (K.V.S.), Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Neurology Section (S.T.M.), VA Providence Health Care System, Providence, RI; Department of Neurology (S.T.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Sargent Rehabilitation Center (J.A.M.), Warwick, RI; Section of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago; Department of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (J.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University (K.V.S.); Center for Neurological Restoration (B.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Program in Neuroscience (Z.M.W.), Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Carol Grant
- From the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) (D.B.R., L.B., S.S.C., C.G., R.M., M.M., L.R.H.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Neurosurgery (Z.M.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (D.B.R., S.S.C., L.R.H.), Boston, MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.A., R.F.K.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service (A.B.A., R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S., B.L.W.), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN) (M.B., J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Legs and Walking Lab (D.C.), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL; Department of Neuroscience (J.P.D.), Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), School of Engineering (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Neurological Surgery (E.N.E.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; European University of Cyprus (G.F.), Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Neurosurgery (J.M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), Bio-X Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), and Departments of Neurobiology (K.V.S.), Electrical Engineering (K.V.S.), and Bioengineering (K.V.S.), Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Neurology Section (S.T.M.), VA Providence Health Care System, Providence, RI; Department of Neurology (S.T.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Sargent Rehabilitation Center (J.A.M.), Warwick, RI; Section of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago; Department of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (J.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University (K.V.S.); Center for Neurological Restoration (B.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Program in Neuroscience (Z.M.W.), Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jaimie M Henderson
- From the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) (D.B.R., L.B., S.S.C., C.G., R.M., M.M., L.R.H.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Neurosurgery (Z.M.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (D.B.R., S.S.C., L.R.H.), Boston, MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.A., R.F.K.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service (A.B.A., R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S., B.L.W.), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN) (M.B., J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Legs and Walking Lab (D.C.), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL; Department of Neuroscience (J.P.D.), Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), School of Engineering (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Neurological Surgery (E.N.E.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; European University of Cyprus (G.F.), Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Neurosurgery (J.M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), Bio-X Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), and Departments of Neurobiology (K.V.S.), Electrical Engineering (K.V.S.), and Bioengineering (K.V.S.), Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Neurology Section (S.T.M.), VA Providence Health Care System, Providence, RI; Department of Neurology (S.T.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Sargent Rehabilitation Center (J.A.M.), Warwick, RI; Section of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago; Department of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (J.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University (K.V.S.); Center for Neurological Restoration (B.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Program in Neuroscience (Z.M.W.), Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Robert F Kirsch
- From the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) (D.B.R., L.B., S.S.C., C.G., R.M., M.M., L.R.H.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Neurosurgery (Z.M.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (D.B.R., S.S.C., L.R.H.), Boston, MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.A., R.F.K.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service (A.B.A., R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S., B.L.W.), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN) (M.B., J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Legs and Walking Lab (D.C.), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL; Department of Neuroscience (J.P.D.), Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), School of Engineering (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Neurological Surgery (E.N.E.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; European University of Cyprus (G.F.), Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Neurosurgery (J.M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), Bio-X Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), and Departments of Neurobiology (K.V.S.), Electrical Engineering (K.V.S.), and Bioengineering (K.V.S.), Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Neurology Section (S.T.M.), VA Providence Health Care System, Providence, RI; Department of Neurology (S.T.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Sargent Rehabilitation Center (J.A.M.), Warwick, RI; Section of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago; Department of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (J.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University (K.V.S.); Center for Neurological Restoration (B.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Program in Neuroscience (Z.M.W.), Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Rose Marujo
- From the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) (D.B.R., L.B., S.S.C., C.G., R.M., M.M., L.R.H.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Neurosurgery (Z.M.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (D.B.R., S.S.C., L.R.H.), Boston, MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.A., R.F.K.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service (A.B.A., R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S., B.L.W.), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN) (M.B., J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Legs and Walking Lab (D.C.), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL; Department of Neuroscience (J.P.D.), Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), School of Engineering (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Neurological Surgery (E.N.E.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; European University of Cyprus (G.F.), Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Neurosurgery (J.M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), Bio-X Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), and Departments of Neurobiology (K.V.S.), Electrical Engineering (K.V.S.), and Bioengineering (K.V.S.), Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Neurology Section (S.T.M.), VA Providence Health Care System, Providence, RI; Department of Neurology (S.T.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Sargent Rehabilitation Center (J.A.M.), Warwick, RI; Section of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago; Department of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (J.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University (K.V.S.); Center for Neurological Restoration (B.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Program in Neuroscience (Z.M.W.), Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Maryam Masood
- From the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) (D.B.R., L.B., S.S.C., C.G., R.M., M.M., L.R.H.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Neurosurgery (Z.M.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (D.B.R., S.S.C., L.R.H.), Boston, MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.A., R.F.K.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service (A.B.A., R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S., B.L.W.), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN) (M.B., J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Legs and Walking Lab (D.C.), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL; Department of Neuroscience (J.P.D.), Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), School of Engineering (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Neurological Surgery (E.N.E.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; European University of Cyprus (G.F.), Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Neurosurgery (J.M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), Bio-X Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), and Departments of Neurobiology (K.V.S.), Electrical Engineering (K.V.S.), and Bioengineering (K.V.S.), Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Neurology Section (S.T.M.), VA Providence Health Care System, Providence, RI; Department of Neurology (S.T.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Sargent Rehabilitation Center (J.A.M.), Warwick, RI; Section of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago; Department of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (J.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University (K.V.S.); Center for Neurological Restoration (B.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Program in Neuroscience (Z.M.W.), Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Stephen T Mernoff
- From the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) (D.B.R., L.B., S.S.C., C.G., R.M., M.M., L.R.H.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Neurosurgery (Z.M.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (D.B.R., S.S.C., L.R.H.), Boston, MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.A., R.F.K.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service (A.B.A., R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S., B.L.W.), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN) (M.B., J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Legs and Walking Lab (D.C.), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL; Department of Neuroscience (J.P.D.), Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), School of Engineering (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Neurological Surgery (E.N.E.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; European University of Cyprus (G.F.), Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Neurosurgery (J.M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), Bio-X Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), and Departments of Neurobiology (K.V.S.), Electrical Engineering (K.V.S.), and Bioengineering (K.V.S.), Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Neurology Section (S.T.M.), VA Providence Health Care System, Providence, RI; Department of Neurology (S.T.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Sargent Rehabilitation Center (J.A.M.), Warwick, RI; Section of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago; Department of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (J.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University (K.V.S.); Center for Neurological Restoration (B.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Program in Neuroscience (Z.M.W.), Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jonathan P Miller
- From the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) (D.B.R., L.B., S.S.C., C.G., R.M., M.M., L.R.H.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Neurosurgery (Z.M.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (D.B.R., S.S.C., L.R.H.), Boston, MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.A., R.F.K.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service (A.B.A., R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S., B.L.W.), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN) (M.B., J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Legs and Walking Lab (D.C.), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL; Department of Neuroscience (J.P.D.), Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), School of Engineering (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Neurological Surgery (E.N.E.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; European University of Cyprus (G.F.), Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Neurosurgery (J.M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), Bio-X Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), and Departments of Neurobiology (K.V.S.), Electrical Engineering (K.V.S.), and Bioengineering (K.V.S.), Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Neurology Section (S.T.M.), VA Providence Health Care System, Providence, RI; Department of Neurology (S.T.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Sargent Rehabilitation Center (J.A.M.), Warwick, RI; Section of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago; Department of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (J.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University (K.V.S.); Center for Neurological Restoration (B.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Program in Neuroscience (Z.M.W.), Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jon A Mukand
- From the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) (D.B.R., L.B., S.S.C., C.G., R.M., M.M., L.R.H.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Neurosurgery (Z.M.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (D.B.R., S.S.C., L.R.H.), Boston, MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.A., R.F.K.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service (A.B.A., R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S., B.L.W.), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN) (M.B., J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Legs and Walking Lab (D.C.), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL; Department of Neuroscience (J.P.D.), Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), School of Engineering (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Neurological Surgery (E.N.E.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; European University of Cyprus (G.F.), Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Neurosurgery (J.M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), Bio-X Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), and Departments of Neurobiology (K.V.S.), Electrical Engineering (K.V.S.), and Bioengineering (K.V.S.), Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Neurology Section (S.T.M.), VA Providence Health Care System, Providence, RI; Department of Neurology (S.T.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Sargent Rehabilitation Center (J.A.M.), Warwick, RI; Section of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago; Department of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (J.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University (K.V.S.); Center for Neurological Restoration (B.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Program in Neuroscience (Z.M.W.), Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Richard D Penn
- From the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) (D.B.R., L.B., S.S.C., C.G., R.M., M.M., L.R.H.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Neurosurgery (Z.M.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (D.B.R., S.S.C., L.R.H.), Boston, MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.A., R.F.K.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service (A.B.A., R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S., B.L.W.), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN) (M.B., J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Legs and Walking Lab (D.C.), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL; Department of Neuroscience (J.P.D.), Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), School of Engineering (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Neurological Surgery (E.N.E.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; European University of Cyprus (G.F.), Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Neurosurgery (J.M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), Bio-X Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), and Departments of Neurobiology (K.V.S.), Electrical Engineering (K.V.S.), and Bioengineering (K.V.S.), Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Neurology Section (S.T.M.), VA Providence Health Care System, Providence, RI; Department of Neurology (S.T.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Sargent Rehabilitation Center (J.A.M.), Warwick, RI; Section of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago; Department of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (J.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University (K.V.S.); Center for Neurological Restoration (B.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Program in Neuroscience (Z.M.W.), Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jeremy Shefner
- From the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) (D.B.R., L.B., S.S.C., C.G., R.M., M.M., L.R.H.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Neurosurgery (Z.M.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (D.B.R., S.S.C., L.R.H.), Boston, MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.A., R.F.K.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service (A.B.A., R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S., B.L.W.), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN) (M.B., J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Legs and Walking Lab (D.C.), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL; Department of Neuroscience (J.P.D.), Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), School of Engineering (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Neurological Surgery (E.N.E.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; European University of Cyprus (G.F.), Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Neurosurgery (J.M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), Bio-X Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), and Departments of Neurobiology (K.V.S.), Electrical Engineering (K.V.S.), and Bioengineering (K.V.S.), Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Neurology Section (S.T.M.), VA Providence Health Care System, Providence, RI; Department of Neurology (S.T.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Sargent Rehabilitation Center (J.A.M.), Warwick, RI; Section of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago; Department of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (J.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University (K.V.S.); Center for Neurological Restoration (B.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Program in Neuroscience (Z.M.W.), Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Krishna V Shenoy
- From the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) (D.B.R., L.B., S.S.C., C.G., R.M., M.M., L.R.H.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Neurosurgery (Z.M.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (D.B.R., S.S.C., L.R.H.), Boston, MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.A., R.F.K.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service (A.B.A., R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S., B.L.W.), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN) (M.B., J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Legs and Walking Lab (D.C.), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL; Department of Neuroscience (J.P.D.), Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), School of Engineering (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Neurological Surgery (E.N.E.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; European University of Cyprus (G.F.), Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Neurosurgery (J.M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), Bio-X Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), and Departments of Neurobiology (K.V.S.), Electrical Engineering (K.V.S.), and Bioengineering (K.V.S.), Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Neurology Section (S.T.M.), VA Providence Health Care System, Providence, RI; Department of Neurology (S.T.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Sargent Rehabilitation Center (J.A.M.), Warwick, RI; Section of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago; Department of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (J.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University (K.V.S.); Center for Neurological Restoration (B.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Program in Neuroscience (Z.M.W.), Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - John D Simeral
- From the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) (D.B.R., L.B., S.S.C., C.G., R.M., M.M., L.R.H.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Neurosurgery (Z.M.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (D.B.R., S.S.C., L.R.H.), Boston, MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.A., R.F.K.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service (A.B.A., R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S., B.L.W.), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN) (M.B., J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Legs and Walking Lab (D.C.), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL; Department of Neuroscience (J.P.D.), Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), School of Engineering (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Neurological Surgery (E.N.E.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; European University of Cyprus (G.F.), Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Neurosurgery (J.M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), Bio-X Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), and Departments of Neurobiology (K.V.S.), Electrical Engineering (K.V.S.), and Bioengineering (K.V.S.), Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Neurology Section (S.T.M.), VA Providence Health Care System, Providence, RI; Department of Neurology (S.T.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Sargent Rehabilitation Center (J.A.M.), Warwick, RI; Section of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago; Department of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (J.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University (K.V.S.); Center for Neurological Restoration (B.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Program in Neuroscience (Z.M.W.), Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jennifer A Sweet
- From the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) (D.B.R., L.B., S.S.C., C.G., R.M., M.M., L.R.H.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Neurosurgery (Z.M.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (D.B.R., S.S.C., L.R.H.), Boston, MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.A., R.F.K.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service (A.B.A., R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S., B.L.W.), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN) (M.B., J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Legs and Walking Lab (D.C.), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL; Department of Neuroscience (J.P.D.), Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), School of Engineering (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Neurological Surgery (E.N.E.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; European University of Cyprus (G.F.), Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Neurosurgery (J.M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), Bio-X Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), and Departments of Neurobiology (K.V.S.), Electrical Engineering (K.V.S.), and Bioengineering (K.V.S.), Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Neurology Section (S.T.M.), VA Providence Health Care System, Providence, RI; Department of Neurology (S.T.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Sargent Rehabilitation Center (J.A.M.), Warwick, RI; Section of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago; Department of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (J.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University (K.V.S.); Center for Neurological Restoration (B.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Program in Neuroscience (Z.M.W.), Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Benjamin L Walter
- From the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) (D.B.R., L.B., S.S.C., C.G., R.M., M.M., L.R.H.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Neurosurgery (Z.M.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (D.B.R., S.S.C., L.R.H.), Boston, MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.A., R.F.K.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service (A.B.A., R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S., B.L.W.), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN) (M.B., J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Legs and Walking Lab (D.C.), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL; Department of Neuroscience (J.P.D.), Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), School of Engineering (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Neurological Surgery (E.N.E.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; European University of Cyprus (G.F.), Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Neurosurgery (J.M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), Bio-X Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), and Departments of Neurobiology (K.V.S.), Electrical Engineering (K.V.S.), and Bioengineering (K.V.S.), Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Neurology Section (S.T.M.), VA Providence Health Care System, Providence, RI; Department of Neurology (S.T.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Sargent Rehabilitation Center (J.A.M.), Warwick, RI; Section of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago; Department of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (J.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University (K.V.S.); Center for Neurological Restoration (B.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Program in Neuroscience (Z.M.W.), Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Ziv M Williams
- From the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) (D.B.R., L.B., S.S.C., C.G., R.M., M.M., L.R.H.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Neurosurgery (Z.M.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (D.B.R., S.S.C., L.R.H.), Boston, MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.A., R.F.K.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service (A.B.A., R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S., B.L.W.), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN) (M.B., J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Legs and Walking Lab (D.C.), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL; Department of Neuroscience (J.P.D.), Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), School of Engineering (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Neurological Surgery (E.N.E.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; European University of Cyprus (G.F.), Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Neurosurgery (J.M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), Bio-X Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), and Departments of Neurobiology (K.V.S.), Electrical Engineering (K.V.S.), and Bioengineering (K.V.S.), Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Neurology Section (S.T.M.), VA Providence Health Care System, Providence, RI; Department of Neurology (S.T.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Sargent Rehabilitation Center (J.A.M.), Warwick, RI; Section of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago; Department of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (J.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University (K.V.S.); Center for Neurological Restoration (B.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Program in Neuroscience (Z.M.W.), Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Leigh R Hochberg
- From the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) (D.B.R., L.B., S.S.C., C.G., R.M., M.M., L.R.H.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Neurosurgery (Z.M.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (D.B.R., S.S.C., L.R.H.), Boston, MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.A., R.F.K.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service (A.B.A., R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S., B.L.W.), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN) (M.B., J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Legs and Walking Lab (D.C.), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL; Department of Neuroscience (J.P.D.), Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), School of Engineering (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Neurological Surgery (E.N.E.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; European University of Cyprus (G.F.), Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Neurosurgery (J.M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), Bio-X Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), and Departments of Neurobiology (K.V.S.), Electrical Engineering (K.V.S.), and Bioengineering (K.V.S.), Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Neurology Section (S.T.M.), VA Providence Health Care System, Providence, RI; Department of Neurology (S.T.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Sargent Rehabilitation Center (J.A.M.), Warwick, RI; Section of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago; Department of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (J.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University (K.V.S.); Center for Neurological Restoration (B.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Program in Neuroscience (Z.M.W.), Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Bergeron D, Iorio-Morin C, Bonizzato M, Lajoie G, Orr Gaucher N, Racine É, Weil AG. Use of Invasive Brain-Computer Interfaces in Pediatric Neurosurgery: Technical and Ethical Considerations. J Child Neurol 2023; 38:223-238. [PMID: 37116888 PMCID: PMC10226009 DOI: 10.1177/08830738231167736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Revised: 02/11/2023] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/30/2023]
Abstract
Invasive brain-computer interfaces hold promise to alleviate disabilities in individuals with neurologic injury, with fully implantable brain-computer interface systems expected to reach the clinic in the upcoming decade. Children with severe neurologic disabilities, like quadriplegic cerebral palsy or cervical spine trauma, could benefit from this technology. However, they have been excluded from clinical trials of intracortical brain-computer interface to date. In this manuscript, we discuss the ethical considerations related to the use of invasive brain-computer interface in children with severe neurologic disabilities. We first review the technical hardware and software considerations for the application of intracortical brain-computer interface in children. We then discuss ethical issues related to motor brain-computer interface use in pediatric neurosurgery. Finally, based on the input of a multidisciplinary panel of experts in fields related to brain-computer interface (functional and restorative neurosurgery, pediatric neurosurgery, mathematics and artificial intelligence research, neuroengineering, pediatric ethics, and pragmatic ethics), we then formulate initial recommendations regarding the clinical use of invasive brain-computer interfaces in children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Bergeron
- Division of Neurosurgery, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | | | - Marco Bonizzato
- Electrical Engineering Department, Polytechnique Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada
- Neuroscience Department and Centre
interdisciplinaire de recherche sur le cerveau et l’apprentissage (CIRCA), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Guillaume Lajoie
- Mathematics and Statistics Department, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada
- Mila - Québec AI Institute, Montréal,
Québec, Canada
| | - Nathalie Orr Gaucher
- Department of Pediatric Emergency
Medicine, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Bureau de l’Éthique clinique, Faculté
de médecine de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Éric Racine
- Pragmatic Research Unit, Institute de
Recherche Clinique de Montréal (IRCM), Montreal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Medicine and Department
of Social and Preventative Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Alexander G. Weil
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department
of Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine (CHUSJ), Département de
Pédiatrie, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Neuroscience, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Brain and Development Research Axis,
CHU Sainte-Justine Research Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Vansteensel MJ, Klein E, van Thiel G, Gaytant M, Simmons Z, Wolpaw JR, Vaughan TM. Towards clinical application of implantable brain-computer interfaces for people with late-stage ALS: medical and ethical considerations. J Neurol 2023; 270:1323-1336. [PMID: 36450968 PMCID: PMC9971103 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-022-11464-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Revised: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
Individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) frequently develop speech and communication problems in the course of their disease. Currently available augmentative and alternative communication technologies do not present a solution for many people with advanced ALS, because these devices depend on residual and reliable motor activity. Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) use neural signals for computer control and may allow people with late-stage ALS to communicate even when conventional technology falls short. Recent years have witnessed fast progression in the development and validation of implanted BCIs, which place neural signal recording electrodes in or on the cortex. Eventual widespread clinical application of implanted BCIs as an assistive communication technology for people with ALS will have significant consequences for their daily life, as well as for the clinical management of the disease, among others because of the potential interaction between the BCI and other procedures people with ALS undergo, such as tracheostomy. This article aims to facilitate responsible real-world implementation of implanted BCIs. We review the state of the art of research on implanted BCIs for communication, as well as the medical and ethical implications of the clinical application of this technology. We conclude that the contribution of all BCI stakeholders, including clinicians of the various ALS-related disciplines, will be needed to develop procedures for, and shape the process of, the responsible clinical application of implanted BCIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariska J Vansteensel
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. Box 85060, 3508 AB, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Eran Klein
- Department of Neurology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
- Department of Philosophy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ghislaine van Thiel
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Department Medical Humanities, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Michael Gaytant
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases/Home Mechanical Ventilation, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Zachary Simmons
- Department of Neurology, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Jonathan R Wolpaw
- National Center for Adaptive Neurotechnologies, Albany Stratton VA Medical Center, Department of Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Theresa M Vaughan
- National Center for Adaptive Neurotechnologies, Albany Stratton VA Medical Center, Albany, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Valencia D, Leone G, Keller N, Mercier PP, Alimohammad A. Power-efficient in vivobrain-machine interfaces via brain-state estimation. J Neural Eng 2023; 20. [PMID: 36645913 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/acb385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Objective.Advances in brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) can potentially improve the quality of life of millions of users with spinal cord injury or other neurological disorders by allowing them to interact with the physical environment at their will.Approach.To reduce the power consumption of the brain-implanted interface, this article presents the first hardware realization of anin vivointention-aware interface via brain-state estimation.Main Results.It is shown that incorporating brain-state estimation reduces thein vivopower consumption and reduces total energy dissipation by over 1.8× compared to those of the current systems, enabling longer better life for implanted circuits. The synthesized application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) of the designed intention-aware multi-unit spike detection system in a standard 180 nm CMOS process occupies 0.03 mm2of silicon area and consumes 0.63 µW of power per channel, which is the least power consumption among the currentin vivoASIC realizations.Significance.The proposed interface is the first practical approach towards realizing asynchronous BMIs while reducing the power consumption of the BMI interface and enhancing neural decoding performance compared to those of the conventional synchronous BMIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Valencia
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, San Diego State University, San Diego, United States of America.,Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, United States of America
| | - Gianluca Leone
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Nicholas Keller
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, San Diego State University, San Diego, United States of America
| | - Patrick P Mercier
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, United States of America
| | - Amir Alimohammad
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, San Diego State University, San Diego, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Bhatt S, Masterson E, Zhu T, Eizadi J, George J, Graupe N, Vareberg A, Phillips J, Bok I, Dwyer M, Ashtiani A, Hai A. Wireless in vivo Recording of Cortical Activity by an Ion-Sensitive Field Effect Transistor. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.01.19.524785. [PMID: 36711824 PMCID: PMC9882301 DOI: 10.1101/2023.01.19.524785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Wireless brain technologies are empowering basic neuroscience and clinical neurology by offering new platforms that minimize invasiveness and refine possibilities during electrophysiological recording and stimulation. Despite their advantages, most systems require on-board power supply and sizeable transmission circuitry, enforcing a lower bound for miniaturization. Designing new minimalistic architectures that can efficiently sense neurophysiological events will open the door to standalone microscale sensors and minimally invasive delivery of multiple sensors. Here we present a circuit for sensing ionic fluctuations in the brain by an ion-sensitive field effect transistor that detunes a single radiofrequency resonator in parallel. We establish sensitivity of the sensor by electromagnetic analysis and quantify response to ionic fluctuations in vitro . We validate this new architecture in vivo during hindpaw stimulation in rodents and verify correlation with local field potential recordings. This new approach can be implemented as an integrated circuit for wireless in situ recording of brain electrophysiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suyash Bhatt
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
- Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
| | - Emily Masterson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
| | - Tianxiang Zhu
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
| | - Jenna Eizadi
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
| | - Judy George
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
| | - Nesya Graupe
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
| | - Adam Vareberg
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
| | - Jack Phillips
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
| | - Ilhan Bok
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
- Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
| | - Matthew Dwyer
- Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
| | - Alireza Ashtiani
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
| | - Aviad Hai
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
- Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Merken L, Schelles M, Ceyssens F, Kraft M, Janssen P. Thin flexible arrays for long-term multi-electrode recordings in macaque primary visual cortex. J Neural Eng 2022; 19. [PMID: 36215972 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac98e2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Objective.Basic, translational and clinical neuroscience are increasingly focusing on large-scale invasive recordings of neuronal activity. However, in large animals such as nonhuman primates and humans-in which the larger brain size with sulci and gyri imposes additional challenges compared to rodents, there is a huge unmet need to record from hundreds of neurons simultaneously anywhere in the brain for long periods of time. Here, we tested the electrical and mechanical properties of thin, flexible multi-electrode arrays (MEAs) inserted into the primary visual cortex of two macaque monkeys, and assessed their magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compatibility and their capacity to record extracellular activity over a period of 1 year.Approach.To allow insertion of the floating arrays into the visual cortex, the 20 by 100µm2shafts were temporarily strengthened by means of a resorbable poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) coating.Main results. After manual insertion of the arrays, theex vivoandin vivoMRI compatibility of the arrays proved to be excellent. We recorded clear single-unit activity from up to 50% of the electrodes, and multi-unit activity (MUA) on 60%-100% of the electrodes, which allowed detailed measurements of the receptive fields and the orientation selectivity of the neurons. Even 1 year after insertion, we obtained significant MUA responses on 70%-100% of the electrodes, while the receptive fields remained remarkably stable over the entire recording period.Significance.Thus, the thin and flexible MEAs we tested offer several crucial advantages compared to existing arrays, most notably in terms of brain tissue compliance, scalability, and brain coverage. Future brain-machine interface applications in humans may strongly benefit from this new generation of chronically implanted MEAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara Merken
- Laboratory for Neuro- and Psychophysiology, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium.,Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Maarten Schelles
- Micro- and Nanosystems (MNS), Electrical Engineering Department (ESAT), KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium.,ReVision Implant NV, Haasrode 3053, Belgium
| | | | - Michael Kraft
- Micro- and Nanosystems (MNS), Electrical Engineering Department (ESAT), KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium.,Leuven Institute for Micro- and Nanotechnology (LIMNI), Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Peter Janssen
- Laboratory for Neuro- and Psychophysiology, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium.,Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Song M, Huang Y, Visser HJ, Romme J, Liu YH. An Energy-Efficient and High-Data-Rate IR-UWB Transmitter for Intracortical Neural Sensing Interfaces. IEEE JOURNAL OF SOLID-STATE CIRCUITS 2022; 57:3656-3668. [PMID: 36743394 PMCID: PMC7614137 DOI: 10.1109/jssc.2022.3212672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
This paper presents an implantable impulse-radio ultra-wideband (IR-UWB) wireless telemetry system for intracortical neural sensing interfaces. A 3-dimensional (3-D) hybrid impulse modulation that comprises phase shift keying (PSK), pulse position modulation (PPM) and pulse amplitude modulation (PAM) is proposed to increase modulation order without significantly increasing the demodulation requirement, thus leading to a high data rate of 1.66 Gbps and an increased air-transmission range. Operating in 6 - 9 GHz UWB band, the presented transmitter (TX) supports the proposed hybrid modulation with a high energy efficiency of 5.8 pJ/bit and modulation quality (EVM< -21 dB). A low-noise injection-locked ring oscillator supports 8-PSK with a phase error of 2.6°. A calibration free delay generator realizes a 4-PPM with only 115 μW and avoids potential cross-modulation between PPM and PSK. A switch-cap power amplifier with an asynchronous pulse-shaping performs 4-PAM with high energy efficiency and linearity. The TX is implemented in 28 nm CMOS technology, occupying 0.155mm2 core area. The wireless module including a printed monopole antenna has a module area of only 1.05 cm2. The transmitter consumes in total 9.7 mW when transmitting -41.3 dBm/MHz output power. The wireless telemetry module has been validated ex-vivo with a 15-mm multi-layer porcine tissue, and achieves a communication (air) distance up to 15 cm, leading to at least 16× improvement in distance-moralized energy efficiency of 45 pJ/bit/meter compared to state-of-the-art.
Collapse
|
39
|
The 2021 yearbook of Neurorestoratology. JOURNAL OF NEURORESTORATOLOGY 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jnrt.2022.100008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
|
40
|
Shi C, Song M, Gao Z, Bevilacqua A, Dolmans G, Liu YH. Galvanic-coupled Trans-dural Data Transfer for High-bandwidth Intra-cortical Neural Sensing. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MICROWAVE THEORY AND TECHNIQUES 2022; 70:4579-4589. [PMID: 36846311 PMCID: PMC7614244 DOI: 10.1109/tmtt.2022.3198100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
A digital-impulse galvanic coupling as a new high-speed trans-dural (from cortex to the skull) data transmission method has been presented in this paper. The proposed wireless telemetry replaces the tethered wires connected in between implants on the cortex and above the skull, allowing the brain implant to be "free-floating" for minimizing brain tissue damage. Such trans-dural wireless telemetry must have a wide channel bandwidth for high-speed data transfer and a small form factor for minimum invasiveness. To investigate the propagation property of the channel, a finite element model is developed and a channel characterization based on a liquid phantom and porcine tissue is performed. The results show that the trans-dural channel has a wide frequency response of up to 250 MHz. Propagation loss due to micro-motion and misalignments is also investigated in this work. The result indicates that the proposed transmission method is relatively insensitive to misalignment. It has approximately 1 dB extra loss when there is a horizontal misalignment of 1mm. A pulse-based transmitter ASIC and a miniature PCB module are designed and validated ex-vivo with a 10-mm thick porcine tissue. This work demonstrates a high-speed and miniature in-body galvanic-coupled pulse-based communication with a data rate up to 250 Mbps with an energy efficiency of 2 pJ/bit, and has a small module area of only 26 mm2.
Collapse
|
41
|
Dastin-van Rijn EM, Provenza NR, Vogt GS, Avendano-Ortega M, Sheth SA, Goodman WK, Harrison MT, Borton DA. PELP: Accounting for Missing Data in Neural Time Series by Periodic Estimation of Lost Packets. Front Hum Neurosci 2022; 16:934063. [PMID: 35874161 PMCID: PMC9301255 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.934063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent advances in wireless data transmission technology have the potential to revolutionize clinical neuroscience. Today sensing-capable electrical stimulators, known as "bidirectional devices", are used to acquire chronic brain activity from humans in natural environments. However, with wireless transmission come potential failures in data transmission, and not all available devices correctly account for missing data or provide precise timing for when data losses occur. Our inability to precisely reconstruct time-domain neural signals makes it difficult to apply subsequent neural signal processing techniques and analyses. Here, our goal was to accurately reconstruct time-domain neural signals impacted by data loss during wireless transmission. Towards this end, we developed a method termed Periodic Estimation of Lost Packets (PELP). PELP leverages the highly periodic nature of stimulation artifacts to precisely determine when data losses occur. Using simulated stimulation waveforms added to human EEG data, we show that PELP is robust to a range of stimulation waveforms and noise characteristics. Then, we applied PELP to local field potential (LFP) recordings collected using an implantable, bidirectional DBS platform operating at various telemetry bandwidths. By effectively accounting for the timing of missing data, PELP enables the analysis of neural time series data collected via wireless transmission-a prerequisite for better understanding the brain-behavior relationships underlying neurological and psychiatric disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan M Dastin-van Rijn
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Nicole R Provenza
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Gregory S Vogt
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States
| | - Michelle Avendano-Ortega
- Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Sameer A Sheth
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Wayne K Goodman
- Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Matthew T Harrison
- Division of Applied Mathematics, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - David A Borton
- School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.,Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.,Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Rehabilitation R&D Service, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Providence, RI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Kim HJ, Ho JS. Wireless interfaces for brain neurotechnologies. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS. SERIES A, MATHEMATICAL, PHYSICAL, AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES 2022; 380:20210020. [PMID: 35658679 DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2021.0020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Wireless interfaces enable brain-implanted devices to remotely interact with the external world. They are critical components in modern research and clinical neurotechnologies and play a central role in determining their overall size, lifetime and functionality. Wireless interfaces use a wide range of modalities-including radio-frequency fields, acoustic waves and light-to transfer energy and data to and from an implanted device. These forms of energy interact with living tissue through distinct mechanisms and therefore lead to systems with vastly different form factors, operating characteristics, and safety considerations. This paper reviews recent advances in the development of wireless interfaces for brain neurotechnologies. We summarize the requirements that state-of-the-art brain-implanted devices impose on the wireless interface, and discuss the working principles and applications of wireless interfaces based on each modality. We also investigate challenges associated with wireless brain neurotechnologies and discuss emerging solutions permitted by recent developments in electrical engineering and materials science. This article is part of the theme issue 'Advanced neurotechnologies: translating innovation for health and well-being'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Han-Joon Kim
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering National University of Singapore, Queenstown, Singapore
| | - John S Ho
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering National University of Singapore, Queenstown, Singapore
- The N.1 Institute for Health National University of Singapore, Queenstown, Singapore
- Institute for Health Innovation and Technology, National University of Singapore, Queenstown, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Rubin DB, Hosman T, Kelemen JN, Kapitonava A, Willett FR, Coughlin BF, Halgren E, Kimchi EY, Williams ZM, Simeral JD, Hochberg LR, Cash SS. Learned Motor Patterns Are Replayed in Human Motor Cortex during Sleep. J Neurosci 2022; 42:5007-5020. [PMID: 35589391 PMCID: PMC9233445 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.2074-21.2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2021] [Revised: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Consolidation of memory is believed to involve offline replay of neural activity. While amply demonstrated in rodents, evidence for replay in humans, particularly regarding motor memory, is less compelling. To determine whether replay occurs after motor learning, we sought to record from motor cortex during a novel motor task and subsequent overnight sleep. A 36-year-old man with tetraplegia secondary to cervical spinal cord injury enrolled in the ongoing BrainGate brain-computer interface pilot clinical trial had two 96-channel intracortical microelectrode arrays placed chronically into left precentral gyrus. Single- and multi-unit activity was recorded while he played a color/sound sequence matching memory game. Intended movements were decoded from motor cortical neuronal activity by a real-time steady-state Kalman filter that allowed the participant to control a neurally driven cursor on the screen. Intracortical neural activity from precentral gyrus and 2-lead scalp EEG were recorded overnight as he slept. When decoded using the same steady-state Kalman filter parameters, intracortical neural signals recorded overnight replayed the target sequence from the memory game at intervals throughout at a frequency significantly greater than expected by chance. Replay events occurred at speeds ranging from 1 to 4 times as fast as initial task execution and were most frequently observed during slow-wave sleep. These results demonstrate that recent visuomotor skill acquisition in humans may be accompanied by replay of the corresponding motor cortex neural activity during sleep.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Within cortex, the acquisition of information is often followed by the offline recapitulation of specific sequences of neural firing. Replay of recent activity is enriched during sleep and may support the consolidation of learning and memory. Using an intracortical brain-computer interface, we recorded and decoded activity from motor cortex as a human research participant performed a novel motor task. By decoding neural activity throughout subsequent sleep, we find that neural sequences underlying the recently practiced motor task are repeated throughout the night, providing direct evidence of replay in human motor cortex during sleep. This approach, using an optimized brain-computer interface decoder to characterize neural activity during sleep, provides a framework for future studies exploring replay, learning, and memory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel B Rubin
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114
| | - Tommy Hosman
- Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Department of Veterans Affairs, Providence, Rhode Island 02908
- Carney Institute for Brain Science and School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912
| | - Jessica N Kelemen
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114
| | - Anastasia Kapitonava
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114
| | - Francis R Willett
- Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University, Palo Alto, California 94305
| | - Brian F Coughlin
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114
| | - Eric Halgren
- Departments of Neurosciences and Radiology, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093
| | - Eyal Y Kimchi
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114
| | - Ziv M Williams
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114
- Program in Neuroscience, Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
| | - John D Simeral
- Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Department of Veterans Affairs, Providence, Rhode Island 02908
- Carney Institute for Brain Science and School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912
| | - Leigh R Hochberg
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114
- Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Department of Veterans Affairs, Providence, Rhode Island 02908
- Carney Institute for Brain Science and School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912
| | - Sydney S Cash
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Davis KC, Meschede-Krasa B, Cajigas I, Prins NW, Alver C, Gallo S, Bhatia S, Abel JH, Naeem JA, Fisher L, Raza F, Rifai WR, Morrison M, Ivan ME, Brown EN, Jagid JR, Prasad A. Design-development of an at-home modular brain-computer interface (BCI) platform in a case study of cervical spinal cord injury. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2022; 19:53. [PMID: 35659259 PMCID: PMC9166490 DOI: 10.1186/s12984-022-01026-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2021] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to develop a portable and modular brain-computer interface (BCI) software platform independent of input and output devices. We implemented this platform in a case study of a subject with cervical spinal cord injury (C5 ASIA A). BACKGROUND BCIs can restore independence for individuals with paralysis by using brain signals to control prosthetics or trigger functional electrical stimulation. Though several studies have successfully implemented this technology in the laboratory and the home, portability, device configuration, and caregiver setup remain challenges that limit deployment to the home environment. Portability is essential for transitioning BCI from the laboratory to the home. METHODS The BCI platform implementation consisted of an Activa PC + S generator with two subdural four-contact electrodes implanted over the dominant left hand-arm region of the sensorimotor cortex, a minicomputer fixed to the back of the subject's wheelchair, a custom mobile phone application, and a mechanical glove as the end effector. To quantify the performance for this at-home implementation of the BCI, we quantified system setup time at home, chronic (14-month) decoding accuracy, hardware and software profiling, and Bluetooth communication latency between the App and the minicomputer. We created a dataset of motor-imagery labeled signals to train a binary motor imagery classifier on a remote computer for online, at-home use. RESULTS Average bluetooth data transmission delay between the minicomputer and mobile App was 23 ± 0.014 ms. The average setup time for the subject's caregiver was 5.6 ± 0.83 min. The average times to acquire and decode neural signals and to send those decoded signals to the end-effector were respectively 404.1 ms and 1.02 ms. The 14-month median accuracy of the trained motor imagery classifier was 87.5 ± 4.71% without retraining. CONCLUSIONS The study presents the feasibility of an at-home BCI system that subjects can seamlessly operate using a friendly mobile user interface, which does not require daily calibration nor the presence of a technical person for at-home setup. The study also describes the portability of the BCI system and the ability to plug-and-play multiple end effectors, providing the end-user the flexibility to choose the end effector to accomplish specific motor tasks for daily needs. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02564419. First posted on 9/30/2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin C Davis
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Miami, 1251 Memorial Dr, MEA 204, Coral Gables, Miami, FL, 33146, USA
| | - Benyamin Meschede-Krasa
- Department of Brain and Cognitive Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
- Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA
| | - Iahn Cajigas
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, 1095 NW 14th Terrace, Miami, FL, 33136, USA
| | - Noeline W Prins
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Miami, 1251 Memorial Dr, MEA 204, Coral Gables, Miami, FL, 33146, USA
- Department of Electrical and Information Engineering, University of Ruhuna, Matara, Sri Lanka
| | - Charles Alver
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Miami, 1251 Memorial Dr, MEA 204, Coral Gables, Miami, FL, 33146, USA
| | - Sebastian Gallo
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Miami, 1251 Memorial Dr, MEA 204, Coral Gables, Miami, FL, 33146, USA
| | - Shovan Bhatia
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA
| | - John H Abel
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
- Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA
- Division of Sleep Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Jasim A Naeem
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Miami, 1251 Memorial Dr, MEA 204, Coral Gables, Miami, FL, 33146, USA
| | - Letitia Fisher
- Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami, Miami, FL, 33136, USA
| | - Fouzia Raza
- Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA
| | - Wesley R Rifai
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Miami, 1251 Memorial Dr, MEA 204, Coral Gables, Miami, FL, 33146, USA
| | - Matthew Morrison
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Miami, 1251 Memorial Dr, MEA 204, Coral Gables, Miami, FL, 33146, USA
| | - Michael E Ivan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, 1095 NW 14th Terrace, Miami, FL, 33136, USA
| | - Emery N Brown
- Department of Brain and Cognitive Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
- Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA
| | - Jonathan R Jagid
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, 1095 NW 14th Terrace, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
- Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
| | - Abhishek Prasad
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Miami, 1251 Memorial Dr, MEA 204, Coral Gables, Miami, FL, 33146, USA.
- Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
An H, Nason-Tomaszewski SR, Lim J, Kwon K, Willsey MS, Patil PG, Kim HS, Sylvester D, Chestek CA, Blaauw D. A Power-Efficient Brain-Machine Interface System With a Sub-mw Feature Extraction and Decoding ASIC Demonstrated in Nonhuman Primates. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS 2022; 16:395-408. [PMID: 35594208 PMCID: PMC9375520 DOI: 10.1109/tbcas.2022.3175926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Intracortical brain-machine interfaces have shown promise for restoring function to people with paralysis, but their translation to portable and implantable devices is hindered by their high power consumption. Recent devices have drastically reduced power consumption compared to standard experimental brain-machine interfaces, but still require wired or wireless connections to computing hardware for feature extraction and inference. Here, we introduce a Neural Recording And Decoding (NeuRAD) application specific integrated circuit (ASIC) in 180 nm CMOS that can extract neural spiking features and predict two-dimensional behaviors in real-time. To reduce amplifier and feature extraction power consumption, the NeuRAD has a hardware accelerator for extracting spiking band power (SBP) from intracortical spiking signals and includes an M0 processor with a fixed-point Matrix Acceleration Unit (MAU) for efficient and flexible decoding. We validated device functionality by recording SBP from a nonhuman primate implanted with a Utah microelectrode array and predicting the one- and two-dimensional finger movements the monkey was attempting to execute in closed-loop using a steady-state Kalman filter (SSKF). Using the NeuRAD's real-time predictions, the monkey achieved 100% success rate and 0.82 s mean target acquisition time to control one-dimensional finger movements using just 581 μW. To predict two-dimensional finger movements, the NeuRAD consumed 588 μW to enable the monkey to achieve a 96% success rate and 2.4 s mean acquisition time. By employing SBP, ASIC brain-machine interfaces can close the gap to enable fully implantable therapies for people with paralysis.
Collapse
|
46
|
Costello JT, Nason SR, An H, Lee J, Mender MJ, Temmar H, Wallace DM, Lim J, Willsey MS, Patil PG, Jang T, Phillips JD, Kim HS, Blaauw D, Chestek CA. A low-power communication scheme for wireless, 1000 channel brain-machine interfaces. J Neural Eng 2022; 19. [PMID: 35613546 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac7352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) have the potential to restore motor function but are currently limited by electrode count and long-term recording stability. These challenges may be solved through the use of free-floating "motes" which wirelessly transmit recorded neural signals, if power consumption can be kept within safe levels when scaling to thousands of motes. Here, we evaluated a pulse-interval modulation (PIM) communication scheme for infrared (IR)-based motes that aims to reduce the wireless data rate and system power consumption. APPROACH To test PIM's ability to efficiently communicate neural information, we simulated the communication scheme in a real-time closed-loop BMI with non-human primates. Additionally, we performed circuit simulations of an IR-based 1000-mote system to calculate communication accuracy and total power consumption. MAIN RESULTS We found that PIM at 1kb/s per channel maintained strong correlations with true firing rate and matched online BMI performance of a traditional wired system. Closed-loop BMI tests suggest that lags as small as 30 ms can have significant performance effects. Finally, unlike other IR communication schemes, PIM is feasible in terms of power, and neural data can accurately be recovered on a receiver using 3mW for 1000 channels. SIGNIFICANCE These results suggest that PIM-based communication could significantly reduce power usage of wireless motes to enable higher channel-counts for high-performance BMIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph T Costello
- Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Rd, B10, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-1382, UNITED STATES
| | - Samuel R Nason
- Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Rd B10, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-1382, UNITED STATES
| | - Hyochan An
- Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Rd B10, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-1382, UNITED STATES
| | - Jungho Lee
- Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Rd B10, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-1382, UNITED STATES
| | - Matthew J Mender
- Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Rd B10, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-1382, UNITED STATES
| | - Hisham Temmar
- Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Rd B10, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-1382, UNITED STATES
| | - Dylan M Wallace
- Robotics Institute, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Rd B10, Ann Arbor, 48109-1382, UNITED STATES
| | - Jongyup Lim
- Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Rd B10, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-1382, UNITED STATES
| | - Matthew S Willsey
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan Medical School, 1500 E Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, 48109-0624, UNITED STATES
| | - Parag G Patil
- Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, UNITED STATES
| | - Taekwang Jang
- Department of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, ETH Zurich, ETH Zurich, Rämistrasse 101, Zurich, 8092, SWITZERLAND
| | - Jamie Dean Phillips
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Delaware, Evans Hall, 139 The Green,, Newark, Delaware, 19716-5600, UNITED STATES
| | - Hun-Seok Kim
- Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Rd B10, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-1382, UNITED STATES
| | - David Blaauw
- University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Rd B10, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-1382, UNITED STATES
| | - Cynthia A Chestek
- Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Rd B10, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-1382, UNITED STATES
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Dingle AM, Moxon K, Shokur S, Strauss I. Editorial: Getting Neuroprosthetics Out of the Lab: Improving the Human-Machine Interactions to Restore Sensory-Motor Functions. Front Robot AI 2022; 9:928383. [PMID: 35694207 PMCID: PMC9175017 DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2022.928383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron M. Dingle
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin- Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Karen Moxon
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA, United States
| | - Solaiman Shokur
- École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Ivo Strauss
- Department of Excellence in Robotics and A.I, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Quantum Brain Networks: A Perspective. ELECTRONICS 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/electronics11101528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
We propose Quantum Brain Networks (QBraiNs) as a new interdisciplinary field integrating knowledge and methods from neurotechnology, artificial intelligence, and quantum computing. The objective is to develop an enhanced connectivity between the human brain and quantum computers for a variety of disruptive applications. We foresee the emergence of hybrid classical-quantum networks of wetware and hardware nodes, mediated by machine learning techniques and brain–machine interfaces. QBraiNs will harness and transform in unprecedented ways arts, science, technologies, and entrepreneurship, in particular activities related to medicine, Internet of Humans, intelligent devices, sensorial experience, gaming, Internet of Things, crypto trading, and business.
Collapse
|
49
|
Kiang L, Woodington B, Carnicer-Lombarte A, Malliaras G, Barone DG. Spinal cord bioelectronic interfaces: opportunities in neural recording and clinical challenges. J Neural Eng 2022; 19. [PMID: 35320780 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac605f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Bioelectronic stimulation of the spinal cord has demonstrated significant progress in restoration of motor function in spinal cord injury (SCI). The proximal, uninjured spinal cord presents a viable target for the recording and generation of control signals to drive targeted stimulation. Signals have been directly recorded from the spinal cord in behaving animals and correlated with limb kinematics. Advances in flexible materials, electrode impedance and signal analysis will allow SCR to be used in next-generation neuroprosthetics. In this review, we summarize the technological advances enabling progress in SCR and describe systematically the clinical challenges facing spinal cord bioelectronic interfaces and potential solutions, from device manufacture, surgical implantation to chronic effects of foreign body reaction and stress-strain mismatches between electrodes and neural tissue. Finally, we establish our vision of bi-directional closed-loop spinal cord bioelectronic bypass interfaces that enable the communication of disrupted sensory signals and restoration of motor function in SCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Kiang
- Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore, Singapore, 169608, SINGAPORE
| | - Ben Woodington
- Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Electrical Engineering Division, 9 JJ Thomson Ave, Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1TN, UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND
| | - Alejandro Carnicer-Lombarte
- Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Bioelectronics Laboratory, Cambridge, CB2 0PY, UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND
| | - George Malliaras
- University of Cambridge, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1TN, UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND
| | - Damiano G Barone
- Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Electrical Engineering Division, 9 JJ Thomson Ave, Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, CB2 1TN, UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Huggins JE, Krusienski D, Vansteensel MJ, Valeriani D, Thelen A, Stavisky S, Norton JJS, Nijholt A, Müller-Putz G, Kosmyna N, Korczowski L, Kapeller C, Herff C, Halder S, Guger C, Grosse-Wentrup M, Gaunt R, Dusang AN, Clisson P, Chavarriaga R, Anderson CW, Allison BZ, Aksenova T, Aarnoutse E. Workshops of the Eighth International Brain-Computer Interface Meeting: BCIs: The Next Frontier. BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACES 2022; 9:69-101. [PMID: 36908334 PMCID: PMC9997957 DOI: 10.1080/2326263x.2021.2009654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The Eighth International Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) Meeting was held June 7-9th, 2021 in a virtual format. The conference continued the BCI Meeting series' interactive nature with 21 workshops covering topics in BCI (also called brain-machine interface) research. As in the past, workshops covered the breadth of topics in BCI. Some workshops provided detailed examinations of specific methods, hardware, or processes. Others focused on specific BCI applications or user groups. Several workshops continued consensus building efforts designed to create BCI standards and increase the ease of comparisons between studies and the potential for meta-analysis and large multi-site clinical trials. Ethical and translational considerations were both the primary topic for some workshops or an important secondary consideration for others. The range of BCI applications continues to expand, with more workshops focusing on approaches that can extend beyond the needs of those with physical impairments. This paper summarizes each workshop, provides background information and references for further study, presents an overview of the discussion topics, and describes the conclusion, challenges, or initiatives that resulted from the interactions and discussion at the workshop.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane E Huggins
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States 325 East Eisenhower, Room 3017; Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108-5744, 734-936-7177
| | - Dean Krusienski
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23219
| | - Mariska J Vansteensel
- UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Dept of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Antonia Thelen
- eemagine Medical Imaging Solutions GmbH, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - James J S Norton
- National Center for Adaptive Neurotechnologies, US Department of Veterans Affairs, 113 Holland Ave, Albany, NY 12208
| | - Anton Nijholt
- Faculty EEMCS, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Gernot Müller-Putz
- Institute of Neural Engineering, GrazBCI Lab, Graz University of Technology, Stremayrgasse 16/4, 8010 Graz, Austria
| | - Nataliya Kosmyna
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Media Lab, E14-548, Cambridge, MA 02139, Unites States
| | | | | | - Christian Herff
- School of Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Christoph Guger
- g.tec medical engineering GmbH/Guger Technologies OG, Austria, Sierningstrasse 14, 4521 Schiedlberg, Austria, +43725122240-0
| | - Moritz Grosse-Wentrup
- Research Group Neuroinformatics, Faculty of Computer Science, Vienna Cognitive Science Hub, Data Science @ Uni Vienna University of Vienna
| | - Robert Gaunt
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 3520 5th Ave, Suite 300, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, 412-383-1426
| | - Aliceson Nicole Dusang
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, School of Engineering, Brown University, Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI
- Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Rehabilitation R&D Service, Providence, RI
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | - Ricardo Chavarriaga
- IEEE Standards Association Industry Connections group on neurotechnologies for brain-machine interface, Center for Artificial Intelligence, School of Engineering, ZHAW-Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Switzerland, Switzerland
| | - Charles W Anderson
- Department of Computer Science, Molecular, Cellular and Integrative Neurosience Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523
| | - Brendan Z Allison
- Dept. of Cognitive Science, Mail Code 0515, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, United States, 619-534-9754
| | - Tetiana Aksenova
- University Grenoble Alpes, CEA, LETI, Clinatec, Grenoble 38000, France
| | - Erik Aarnoutse
- UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Department of Neurology & Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|