Antibody-associated CNS syndromes without signs of inflammation in the elderly

Neurodegeneration and the immune system: lessons from autoimmune encephalitis

The spectrum of autoimmune encephalitis (AE) is expanding to atypical clinical presentations that can mimic neurodegenerative disorders. Among the autoantibodies most frequently associated with manifestations mimicking neurodegenerative disorders-such as dementia, parkinsonism, ataxia and motor neuron disease-IgLON5-, LGI1- and CASPR2-antibodies, predominantly of the IgG4 subclass and associated with specific HLA haplotypes, are the most common. Since these forms of autoimmune encephalitis often lack inflammatory findings in cerebrospinal fluid or magnetic resonance imaging, recognizing clinical 'red flags' suggestive of an autoimmune etiology is crucial for accurate diagnosis and timely initiation of immunotherapy. Interestingly, in these forms of autoimmune encephalitis, both inflammatory and neurodegenerative disease mechanisms may be involved. The neurodegenerative component may result directly from antibody effects (e.g., tau deposition in IgLON5-antibody disease) or arise through other mechanisms (e.g., seizures or exacerbation of pre-existing pathology). Moreover, neuroinflammation has recently emerged as a key contributor to primary neurodegenerative disorders. For instance, microglial activation promotes tau pathology propagation, as observed in Alzheimer's disease and other primary neurodegenerative disorders. While the precise mechanisms linking inflammation and neurodegeneration remain to be fully understood, further research into the interplay between autoimmunity and neurodegeneration may enhance our understanding of disease mechanisms and expand therapeutic opportunities in both autoimmune and neurodegenerative neurological disorders.

Autoimmune and infectious encephalitis: development of a discriminative tool for early diagnosis and initiation of therapy

BACKGROUND

Encephalitis originates from diverse autoimmune and infectious etiologies. Diagnostic challenges arise due to the spectrum of presentation and the frequent absence of specific biomarkers. This study aimed to comprehensively characterize and differentiate autoimmune encephalitis (AE) from infectious encephalitis (IE) in adults, and disentangle clinical, paraclinical, and therapeutic differences.

METHODS

A cohort study spanning 10 years was conducted across three Austrian tertiary care hospitals. Inclusion criteria comprised adults with probable or definite encephalitis. Demographics, clinical features, technical findings, treatment modalities, and outcomes were collected from the electronic patient files. A follow-up was performed via telephone interviews and clinical visits.

RESULTS

Of 149 patients, 17% had AE, 73% IE, and 10% encephalitis of unknown etiology. Significant differences between AE and IE included the prevalence of acute symptomatic seizures (AE: 85% vs. IE: 20%, p < 0.001), fever (8% vs. 72%, p < 0.001), headache (15% vs. 61%, p < 0.001), and focal neurological deficits (56% vs. 23%, p = 0.004), respectively. Paraclinical differences comprised lower CSF pleocytosis in AE compared to IE (median 6 cells/µl vs. 125 cells/µl, p < 0.001). Epileptic discharges on EEG and MRI lesions were more prevalent in AE than IE (50% vs. 14%, p < 0.001; 50% vs. 28%, p = 0.037). The modified Rankin Scale scores at discharge and last follow-up (median duration 2304 days, IQR 1433-3274) indicated favorable outcomes in both groups.

CONCLUSION

This comprehensive analysis provides insights into the epidemiology, clinical, paraclinical, and therapeutic aspects and the outcomes of AE and IE in adults. We developed a diagnostic tool that facilitates early differentiation between AE and IE, aiding in timely therapeutic decision-making.

Overview and Diagnostic Approach in Autoimmune Neurology

OBJECTIVE

The field of autoimmune neurology is rapidly evolving. This article reviews the epidemiology and pathophysiology as well as current approaches to clinical and paraclinical assessment, testing paradigms, and general principles of treatment.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Improved recognition of autoimmune diagnoses among patients who have phenotypically diverse, subacute onset neurologic presentations is facilitated by disease-specific antibody biomarker discovery. These antibodies have varying associations with paraneoplastic causation (from no association to greater than 70% positive predictive value), immunotherapy responses, and outcomes. To simplify assessment in an increasingly complex discipline, neurologic phenotype-specific serum and CSF antibody evaluations are recommended. Clinical trials have led to the approval of monoclonal therapies for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and are underway for N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor and leucine-rich glioma inactivated protein 1 (LGI1) encephalitides.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

Autoimmune neurology is now a mainstream subspecialty, consisting of disorders with diverse presentations detectable using antibody testing of serum and CSF. Early and sustained immunotherapy (eg, corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin [IVIg], plasma exchange) is recommended and may be supplemented by immune suppressants (eg, rituximab or cyclophosphamide) to sustain responses and optimize outcomes.

Paraneoplastic Neurologic Disorders

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the clinical presentations, neural antibody associations, and oncologic accompaniments of paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes and neurologic autoimmunity in the context of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) cancer immunotherapy.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Neural antibody discovery has improved the diagnosis of paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes. Neural antibodies also delineate the underlying disease pathophysiology and thus inform outcomes and treatments. Neural antibodies specific for extracellular proteins have pathogenic potential, whereas antibodies specific for intracellular targets are biomarkers of a cytotoxic T-cell immune response. A recent update in paraneoplastic neurologic syndrome criteria suggests high- and intermediate-risk phenotypes as well as neural antibodies to improve diagnostic accuracy in patients with paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes; a score was created based on this categorization. The introduction of ICI cancer immunotherapy has led to an increase in cancer-related neurologic autoimmunity with distinct clinical phenotypes.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

Paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes reflect an ongoing immunologic response to cancer mediated by effector T cells or antibodies. Paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes can present with manifestations at any level of the neuraxis, and neural antibodies aid diagnosis, focus cancer screening, and inform prognosis and therapy. In patients with high clinical suspicion of a paraneoplastic neurologic syndrome, cancer screening and treatment should be undertaken, regardless of the presence of a neural antibody. ICI therapy has led to immune-mediated neurologic complications. Recognition and treatment lead to improved outcomes.

Seroprevalence of neuronal antibodies in diseases mimicking autoimmune encephalitis

Detection of neuronal antibodies for autoimmune encephalitis and paraneoplastic neurological syndromes relies on commercially available cell-based assays and lineblots. However, lineblots may reveal the presence of neuronal antibodies in patients with various non-autoimmune etiologies. Herein we describe patients with non-autoimmune etiologies (cohort B) and detectable neuronal antibodies and compare them to definite cases of autoimmune encephalitis (cohort A) for differences in clinical data. All patients positive for at least one neuronal antibody were retrospectively evaluated for autoimmune encephalitis and/or paraneoplastic neurological syndrome between 2016 and 2022. 39 cases in cohort B and 23 in cohort A were identified. In cohort B, most common diagnoses were neurodegenerative disorders in 9/39 (23.1%), brain tumors in 6/39 (15.4%) while most common detected antibodies were anti-titin (N10), anti-recoverin (N11), anti-Yo (N8) and all were detected in serum only. Differential aspects between cohort A and B were CSF pleocytosis (14/23 (60.8%) vs 11/35 (31.4%), p = 0.042, respectively), MRI features suggestive of encephalitis (6/23 (26.1%) vs 0 (0%), p = 0.002, respectively) and epilepsy restricted to temporal lobes (14/23 (60.9%) vs 2/30 (6.7%), p = 0.0003, respectively). A large proportion of lineblot results were non-specific when only serum was tested and were frequently found in non-autoimmune neurological conditions.

Atypical neurological manifestations in anti-IgLON5 disease: a case report

Anti-IgLON5 disease is a recently discovered autoimmune encephalopathy with sleep disorder as a hallmark in the majority of reported cases. Additional neurological manifestations include bulbar dysfunction, gait problems, movement disorders, oculomotor abnormalities, and hyperexcitability of the nervous system. At present, an increasing number of publications have dealt with the course and possible treatment options for anti-IgLON5 disease, and its clinical spectrum has expanded wider and more heterogeneous. Here, we report a case of a 66-year-old female with cognitive impairment accompanied by slow reaction, impaired memory, and decreased orientation. A positive cerebral MRI change and serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) antibodies against IgLON5 were found during the diagnostic course. Subsequently the patient received immunotherapy and was generally in good health with no new symptoms during follow-up. Early testing for IgLON5 antibodies should be considered in patients with atypical neurological symptoms such as cognitive impairment, slow reaction, or decreased orientation. In clinical practice, immunotherapy should be considered in all cases of anti-IgLON5 encephalopathies.

Canadian Consensus Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Autoimmune Encephalitis in Adults

Autoimmune encephalitis is increasingly recognized as a neurologic cause of acute mental status changes with similar prevalence to infectious encephalitis. Despite rising awareness, approaches to diagnosis remain inconsistent and evidence for optimal treatment is limited. The following Canadian guidelines represent a consensus and evidence (where available) based approach to both the diagnosis and treatment of adult patients with autoimmune encephalitis. The guidelines were developed using a modified RAND process and included input from specialists in autoimmune neurology, neuropsychiatry and infectious diseases. These guidelines are targeted at front line clinicians and were created to provide a pragmatic and practical approach to managing such patients in the acute setting.

Improving Early Recognition of Treatment-Responsive Causes of Rapidly Progressive Dementia: The STAM3 P Score

OBJECTIVE

To improve the timely recognition of patients with treatment-responsive causes of rapidly progressive dementia (RPD).

METHODS

A total of 226 adult patients with suspected RPD were enrolled in a prospective observational study and followed for up to 2 years. Diseases associated with RPD were characterized as potentially treatment-responsive or non-responsive, referencing clinical literature. Disease progression was measured using Clinical Dementia Rating® Sum-of-Box scores. Clinical and paraclinical features associated with treatment responsiveness were assessed using multivariable logistic regression. Findings informed the development of a clinical criterion optimized to recognize patients with potentially treatment-responsive causes of RPD early in the diagnostic evaluation.

RESULTS

A total of 155 patients met defined RPD criteria, of whom 86 patients (55.5%) had potentially treatment-responsive causes. The median (range) age-at-symptom onset in patients with RPD was 68.9 years (range 22.0-90.7 years), with a similar number of men and women. Seizures, tumor (disease-associated), magnetic resonance imaging suggestive of autoimmune encephalitis, mania, movement abnormalities, and pleocytosis (≥10 cells/mm3 ) in cerebrospinal fluid at presentation were independently associated with treatment-responsive causes of RPD after controlling for age and sex. Those features at presentation, as well as age-at-symptom onset <50 years (ie, STAM3 P), captured 82 of 86 (95.3%) cases of treatment-responsive RPD. The presence of ≥3 STAM3 P features had a positive predictive value of 100%.

INTERPRETATION

Selected features at presentation reliably identified patients with potentially treatment-responsive causes of RPD. Adaptation of the STAM3 P screening score in clinical practice may minimize diagnostic delays and missed opportunities for treatment in patients with suspected RPD. ANN NEUROL 2024;95:237-248.

Autoimmune encephalitis related to LGI1 antibodies with negative MRI study: Description of two cases

BACKGROUND

Leucine-rich glioma inactivated 1 (LGI1) antibody-related autoimmune encephalitis is easily misdiagnosed clinically because of its complex and diverse clinical manifestations. We present two cases of LGI1 antibody-related encephalitis with negative imaging findings and perform a literature review on this disease entity.

CASE DESCRIPTION

The first case was that of a 60-year-old man who presented with involuntary movement of the paroxysmal right limb. The second case was that of a 66-year-old man who presented with hearing hallucinations, involuntary shaking of the right limb, and progressive cognitive impairment. Both patients in this study showed negative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results. Routine cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and biochemical examinations showed no significant abnormalities, and positive LGI1 antibodies were detected in both the CSF and serum.

CONCLUSION

Based on our experience and the literature review, we recommend that LGI1 antibody-related encephalitis should be considered when faciobrachial dystonic seizures, acute and subacute-onset seizures, low serum sodium (possibly with low CSF chloride), and cognitive-psychiatric disorders are encountered, even in the absence of specific radiographic and altered CSF findings.

The three pillars in treating antibody-mediated encephalitis

The rapid initiation of immunotherapy has a decisive impact on the course of the disease in patients with antibody-mediated encephalitis (AE). The importance of treating AE with antiseizure medication and antipsychotics is discussed controversially; however, standardized procedures should be ensured, especially for the initiation of treatment in severe disease. Recommendations and guidelines for further interventions in refractory courses are needed. In this review, we contrast the three mainstays of treatment options in patients with AE and attempt to highlight the importance of 1) antiseizure therapy, 2) antipsychotic therapy, and 3) immunotherapy/tumor resection from today's perspective.

Paraneoplastic Neurologic Syndromes

OBJECTIVE

Progress is ongoing in understanding paraneoplastic neurologic disorders, with new syndromes and antibodies being described and more detailed evidence available to guide workup for diagnosis and treatment to improve outcomes. Many excellent reviews have summarized the molecular features of different antibodies, but this article emphasizes the clinical features of each syndrome that may help guide initial diagnosis and treatment, which often should occur before an antibody or cancer is found to confirm the diagnosis.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Recent findings include updated diagnostic criteria with validated sensitivity and specificity, discovery of novel antibodies, and clinical findings that increase the likelihood of an underlying paraneoplastic disorder. Suggestive syndromes that have been recently identified include faciobrachial dystonic seizures and pilomotor auras in anti-leucine-rich glioma inactivated protein 1 encephalitis, extreme delta brush on EEG in N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA)-receptor encephalitis, déjà vu aura in anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 (GAD65) encephalitis, and sleep disturbances in several disorders. In addition, there is confirmed utility of brain positron emission tomography (PET) and CSF markers, including carcinoembryonic antigen and oligoclonal bands, as well as improved tests for the presence of leptomeningeal cancer cells in CSF. Associations of cancer immunotherapies with paraneoplastic syndromes and herpes simplex virus encephalitis (and COVID-19) with NMDA-receptor encephalitis have been described.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

All neurologists should be aware of advances regarding paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes, as patients can present with a wide variety of neurologic symptoms and earlier diagnosis and treatment can improve outcomes.

Paraneoplastic Neurological Syndromes of the Central Nervous System: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment

Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS) include any symptomatic and non-metastatic neurological manifestations associated with a neoplasm. PNS associated with antibodies against intracellular antigens, known as "high-risk" antibodies, show frequent association with underlying cancer. PNS associated with antibodies against neural surface antigens, known as "intermediate- or low-risk" antibodies, are less frequently associated with cancer. In this narrative review, we will focus on PNS of the central nervous system (CNS). Clinicians should have a high index of suspicion with acute/subacute encephalopathies to achieve a prompt diagnosis and treatment. PNS of the CNS exhibit a range of overlapping "high-risk" clinical syndromes, including but not limited to latent and overt rapidly progressive cerebellar syndrome, opsoclonus-myoclonus-ataxia syndrome, paraneoplastic (and limbic) encephalitis/encephalomyelitis, and stiff-person spectrum disorders. Some of these phenotypes may also arise from recent anti-cancer treatments, namely immune-checkpoint inhibitors and CAR T-cell therapies, as a consequence of boosting of the immune system against cancer cells. Here, we highlight the clinical features of PNS of the CNS, their associated tumors and antibodies, and the diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. The potential and the advance of this review consists on a broad description on how the field of PNS of the CNS is constantly expanding with newly discovered antibodies and syndromes. Standardized diagnostic criteria and disease biomarkers are fundamental to quickly recognize PNS to allow prompt treatment initiation, thus improving the long-term outcome of these conditions.

Paraneoplastic Neurologic Disorders

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an overview and highlight recent updates in the field of paraneoplastic neurologic disorders.

RECENT FINDINGS

The prevalence of paraneoplastic neurologic disorders is greater than previously reported and the incidence has been rising over time, due to improved recognition in the era of antibody biomarkers. Updated diagnostic criteria that are broadly inclusive and also contain diagnostic risk for clinical presentations (high and intermediate) and diagnostic antibodies (high, intermediate, and low) have replaced the original 2004 criteria. Antibody biomarkers continue to be characterized (e.g., KLHL-11 associated with seminoma in men with brainstem encephalitis). Some paraneoplastic antibodies also provide insight into likely immunotherapy response and prognosis. The rise of immune checkpoint inhibitors as cancer therapeutics has been associated with newly observed immune-mediated adverse effects including paraneoplastic neurological disorders. The therapeutic approach to paraneoplastic neurologic disorders is centered around cancer care and trials of immune therapy. The field of paraneoplastic neurologic disorders continues to be advanced by the identification of novel antibody biomarkers which have diagnostic utility, and give insight into likely treatment responses and outcomes.

Clinical Correlates of Cerebrospinal Fluid 14-3-3 Protein in Non-Prion Rapid Progressive Dementia

BACKGROUND

The 14-3-3 protein in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is a suitable biomarker for the diagnosis of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD). However, it has also been detected in various non-prion-related rapidly progressive dementia (RPD), which affected its diagnostic performance and clinical utilization.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the general disease distribution with positive 14-3-3 result and to evaluate the association between CSF 14-3-3 protein and the clinical features in patients with non-prion RPD.

METHODS

A total of 150 patients with non-prion RPD were enrolled. The clinical data were collected and CSF 14-3-3 test was performed for all patients. The distribution of various diseases with a positive 14-3-3 result was analyzed and the association of CSF 14-3-3 with clinical features was tested.

RESULTS

The CSF 14-3-3 protein was detected in 23.3% of non-prion RPD patients, and the most frequent diagnoses were autoimmune encephalitis (22.9%) and neurodegenerative disease (22.9%). CSF 14-3-3 protein was more common in older patients (p = 0.028) and those presenting myoclonus (p = 0.008). In subgroup analysis, the positive 14-3-3 test was more common in neurodegenerative disease with a long time from the symptom onset to CSF 14-3-3 test (p = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

CSF 14-3-3 protein could be detected in a broad spectrum of non-prion RPD. In particular, patients with autoimmune encephalitis and rapidly progressive neurodegenerative diseases and those with myoclonus have a greater likelihood of a positive 14-3-3 result. These results could help clinicians interpret the results of CSF 14-3-3 protein more reasonably.

CHI3L1 in the CSF is a potential biomarker for anti-leucine-rich glioma inactivated 1 encephalitis

Objective

Anti-leucine-rich glioma inactivated 1(LGI1) encephalitis is one rare autoimmune encephalitis which is accompanied by inflammatory responses. (Anti-leucine-rich glioma inactivated 1 (anti-LGI1) encephalitis is an autoimmune disease mediated by inflammatory responses.)This study aimed to investigate the Chitinase 3-like 1(CHI3L1) in anti-LGI1encephalitis patients and evaluate its association with modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score in anti-LGI1 encephalitis at admission and 6 months follow-up.(This study looked into the relationship between Chitinase 3-like 1 (CHI3L1) and the modified Ranking Scale (mRS) score in anti-LGI1 encephalitis patients at admission and 6 months later.).

Methods

Thirty-five patients with anti-LGI1 encephalitis and 22 patients with non-inflammatory neurological disease were enrolled in this study. (We enrolled 35 patients with anti-LGI1 encephalitis and 22 patients with non-inflammatory neurological disease.)Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum levels of CHI3L1 were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. (We quantified CHI3L1 in the serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by performing an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.)Patients were evaluated for mRS score at admission and at 6 months follow-up.(We recorded the mRS score of the patients at admission and 6 months later.).

Results

CHI3L1 levels in CSF and serum were highly elevated in patients with anti-LGI1 encephalitis at admission compared those with the controls.(At admission, patients with anti-LGI1 encephalitis had elevated CHI3L1 levels in the CSF and serum.) Additionally, patients presenting with cognitive impairment had significantly higher CSF CHI3L1 levels and mRS scores than those without cognitive impairment symptoms. Patients presenting with only faciobrachial dystonic seizures at admission had lower CSF CHI3L1 levels than those with other symptoms. Finally, CSF CHI3L1 levels were positively correlated with CSF lactate levels.

Conclusion

CHI3L1 level in CSF is correlated with the severity and prognosis of anti-LGI1 encephalitis. (CSF CHI3L1 levels are correlated with the severity and prognosis of anti-LGI1 encephalitis.).

Epilepsy, Immunity and Neuropsychiatric Disorders

Several studies have focused on the emerging role of immunity and inflammation in a wide range of neurological disorders. Autoimmune diseases involving central nervous system share well defined clinical features including epileptic seizures and additional neuropsychiatric symptoms, like cognitive and psychiatric disturbances. The growing evidence about the role of immunity in the pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying these conditions lead to the concept of autoimmune epilepsy. This relatively-new term has been introduced to highlight the etiological and prognostic implications of immunity in epileptogenesis. In this review, we aim to discuss the role of autoimmunity in epileptogenesis and its clinical, neurophysiological, neuroimaging and therapeutic implications. Moreover, we wish to address the close relationship between immunity and additional symptoms, particularly cognitive and psychiatric features, which deeply impact clinical outcomes in these patients. To assess these aspects, we first analyzed Rasmussen's encephalitis. Subsequently, we have covered autoimmune encephalitis, particularly those associated with autoantibodies against surface neuronal antigens, as these autoantibodies express a direct immune-mediated mechanism, different from those against intracellular antigens. Then, we discussed the connection between systemic immune disorders and neurological manifestations. This review aims to highlight the need to expand knowledge about the role of inflammation and autoimmunity in the pathophysiology of neurological disorders and the importance to early recognize these clinical entities. Indeed, early identification may result in faster recovery and a better prognosis.

Case report: A longitudinal study of an unusual rapidly progressive dementia case

It is daunting to determine the etiology of rapidly progressive dementia (RPD), which includes metabolic, neoplastic, infectious, autoimmune, neurodegenerative and other conditions. Herein, we illustrate an unusual case of a patient primarily exhibiting RPD, overlapping sleep dysfunction, psychosis and abnormal movement, which was finally defined as anti-IgLON5 disease, a novel and rare autoimmune encephalopathy. Furthermore, we longitudinally described his cognitive and psychological performance in detail, and determined that early initiation of immunotherapy in this patient did not result in a good outcome. These data highlight anti-IgLON5 disease as a possible differential diagnosis in patients with RPD.

Autoimmune Encephalitis Misdiagnosis in Adults

Importance

Autoimmune encephalitis misdiagnosis can lead to harm.

Objective

To determine the diseases misdiagnosed as autoimmune encephalitis and potential reasons for misdiagnosis.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective multicenter study took place from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2020, at autoimmune encephalitis subspecialty outpatient clinics including Mayo Clinic (n = 44), University of Oxford (n = 18), University of Texas Southwestern (n = 18), University of California, San Francisco (n = 17), University of Washington in St Louis (n = 6), and University of Utah (n = 4). Inclusion criteria were adults (age ≥18 years) with a prior autoimmune encephalitis diagnosis at a participating center or other medical facility and a subsequent alternative diagnosis at a participating center. A total of 393 patients were referred with an autoimmune encephalitis diagnosis, and of those, 286 patients with true autoimmune encephalitis were excluded.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Data were collected on clinical features, investigations, fulfillment of autoimmune encephalitis criteria, alternative diagnoses, potential contributors to misdiagnosis, and immunotherapy adverse reactions.

Results

A total of 107 patients were misdiagnosed with autoimmune encephalitis, and 77 (72%) did not fulfill diagnostic criteria for autoimmune encephalitis. The median (IQR) age was 48 (35.5-60.5) years and 65 (61%) were female. Correct diagnoses included functional neurologic disorder (27 [25%]), neurodegenerative disease (22 [20.5%]), primary psychiatric disease (19 [18%]), cognitive deficits from comorbidities (11 [10%]), cerebral neoplasm (10 [9.5%]), and other (18 [17%]). Onset was acute/subacute in 56 (52%) or insidious (>3 months) in 51 (48%). Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain was suggestive of encephalitis in 19 of 104 patients (18%) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pleocytosis occurred in 16 of 84 patients (19%). Thyroid peroxidase antibodies were elevated in 24 of 62 patients (39%). Positive neural autoantibodies were more frequent in serum than CSF (48 of 105 [46%] vs 7 of 91 [8%]) and included 1 or more of GAD65 (n = 14), voltage-gated potassium channel complex (LGI1 and CASPR2 negative) (n = 10), N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor by cell-based assay only (n = 10; 6 negative in CSF), and other (n = 18). Adverse reactions from immunotherapies occurred in 17 of 84 patients (20%). Potential contributors to misdiagnosis included overinterpretation of positive serum antibodies (53 [50%]), misinterpretation of functional/psychiatric, or nonspecific cognitive dysfunction as encephalopathy (41 [38%]).

Conclusions and Relevance

When evaluating for autoimmune encephalitis, a broad differential diagnosis should be considered and misdiagnosis occurs in many settings including at specialized centers. In this study, red flags suggesting alternative diagnoses included an insidious onset, positive nonspecific serum antibody, and failure to fulfill autoimmune encephalitis diagnostic criteria. Autoimmune encephalitis misdiagnosis leads to morbidity from unnecessary immunotherapies and delayed treatment of the correct diagnosis.

Seizures, Epilepsy, and NORSE Secondary to Autoimmune Encephalitis: A Practical Guide for Clinicians

The most recent International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) classification has included "immune etiology" along with other well-known causes of epilepsy. This was possible thanks to the progress in detection of pathogenic neural antibodies (Abs) in a subset of patients, and resulted in an increased interest in identifying potentially treatable causes of otherwise refractory seizures. Most autoimmune encephalitides (AE) present with seizures, but only a minority of cases evolve to long-term epilepsy. The risk of epilepsy is higher for patients harboring Abs targeting intracellular antigens (T cell-mediated and mostly paraneoplastic, such as Hu, CV2/CRMP5, Ma2, GAD65 Abs), compared with patients with neuronal surface Abs (antibody-mediated and less frequently paraneoplastic, such as NMDAR, GABAbR, LGI1, CASPR2 Abs). To consider these aspects, conceptual definitions for two entities were provided: acute symptomatic seizures secondary to AE, and autoimmune-associated epilepsy, which reflect the different pathophysiology and prognoses. Through this manuscript, we provide an up-to-date review on the current state of knowledge concerning diagnosis and management of patients with Ab-mediated encephalitis and associated epilepsy. Special emphasis is placed on clinical aspects, such as brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) specificities, electroencephalographic (EEG) findings, cancer screening and suggestions for a rational therapeutic approach.

Biomarkers of neurodegeneration in neural autoantibody-associated psychiatric syndromes: A retrospective cohort study

Background

Autoantibody-associated psychiatric syndromes are a novel disease entity that is not fully understood. Several lines of evidence suggest that neurodegenerative processes are involved here. We are investigating whether autoantibody-positive psychiatric syndromes differ from those that are autoantibody-negative in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) neurodegeneration markers.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed data from 167 psychiatric patients at the University Medical Center Göttingen from 2017 to 2020. We divided this patient cohort into two, namely antibody-positive and antibody-negative. We compared various clinical features, neurodegeneration markers, and their autoantibody status in CSF and serum. We then compared both cohorts' neurodegeneration markers to a representative Alzheimer cohort. We subdivided the patients into their diverse psychiatric syndromes according to the manual to assess and document psychopathology in psychiatry (the AMDP), and compared the neurodegeneration markers.

Results

Antibody-associated psychiatric syndromes do not appear to reveal significantly greater neurodegeneration than their antibody-negative psychiatric syndromes. 71% of antibody-positive patients fulfilled the criteria for a possible and 22% for a definitive autoimmune encephalitis. Our autoantibody-positive patient cohort's relative risk to develop an possible autoimmune encephalitis was 9%. We also noted that phosphorylated tau protein 181 (ptau 181) did not significantly differ between antibody-associated psychiatric syndromes and our Alzheimer cohort. The psycho-organic syndrome usually exhibits the most prominent neurodegeneration markers, both in antibody-positive and antibody-negative psychiatric patients.

Discussion

We did not find hints for neurodegenerative processes in our antibody-positive versus AD cohort considering total tau or amyloid markers. However, our findings indicate that the neurodegeneration marker ptau181 does not differ significantly between antibody-positive and Alzheimer cohorts, further suggesting axonal neurodegeneration in antibody-positive patients as AD patients have an elevated ptau181. The evidence we uncovered thus suggests that axonal neurodegeneration might affect patients suffering from autoantibody-associated psychiatric syndromes.

Confusion and Hallucination in a Geriatric Patient. Pitfalls of a Rare Differential: Case Report of an Anti-LGI1-Encephalitis

Background

Confusion and hallucinations in geriatric patients are frequent symptoms and typically associated with delirium, late-life psychosis or dementia syndromes. A far rarer but well-established differential in patients with rapid cognitive deterioration, acute psychosis, abnormal movements and seizures is autoimmune encephalitis. Exemplified by our case we highlight clinical and economic problems arising in management of geriatric patients with cognitive decline and psychotic symptoms.

Case Presentation

A 77-year-old female caucasian patient with an unremarkable medical history was hospitalized after a fall in association with diarrhea and hyponatremia. Upon adequate therapy, disorientation and troubled short-term memory persisted. Within a week the patient developed visual hallucinations. Basic blood and urine samples and imaging (cranial computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging) were unremarkable. With progressive cognitive decline, amnestic impairment, word finding difficulty and general apathy, psychiatric and neurologic expertise was introduced. Advanced diagnostics did not resolve a final diagnosis; an electroencephalogram showed unspecific generalized slowing. Extended clinical observation revealed visual hallucinations and faciobrachial dystonic seizures. A treatment with anticonvulsants was initiated. Cerebrospinal fluid ultimately tested positive for voltage-gated potassium channel LGl1 (leucine-rich-inactivated-1) antibodies confirming diagnosis of autoimmune anti-LGI1 encephalitis. Immediate immunotherapy (high-dose glucocorticoids and administration of intravenous immunoglobulin G) led to a rapid improvement of the patient’s condition. After immunotherapy was tapered, the patient had one relapse and completely recovered with reintroduction of glucocorticoids and initiation of therapy with rituximab.

Conclusion

Rapidly progressive dementia in geriatric patients demands a structured and multidisciplinary diagnostic approach. Accurate management and financially supportable care is a major issue in rare diseases such as anti-LGI1-encephalitis. Education and awareness about autoimmune encephalitis of all physicians treating a geriatric population is important in order to involve expertise and establish treatment within reasonable time.

Life after autoantibody-mediated encephalitis: optimizing follow-up and management in recovering patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Timely diagnosis and treatment is essential to optimize outcomes in patients with antibody-mediated encephalitis (AME); yet even with early diagnosis and treatment, long-term outcomes may still fall short of expectations. Identifying patients at greater risk of adverse outcomes is key to personalizing care, supporting accurate counseling of patients and family members, and informing therapeutic decisions in patients with AME. This review considers long-term outcomes in recovering patients, including approaches to measure and manage common sequelae that influence life after AME.

RECENT FINDINGS

Cognitive impairment, fatigue, and sleep disturbances affect most recovering AME patients. This realization highlights the need for outcome measures that encompass more than motor function. Standardized questionnaires, surveys, and clinical assessment tools may be adapted to support comprehensive and reproducible clinical assessments and to identify patients who may benefit from additional therapies.

SUMMARY

Good outcomes continue to be reported in recovering patients, emphasizing the high potential for recovery following AME. However, cognitive, behavioral, and physical sequelae may limit the potential for great outcomes following AME. Multidisciplinary follow-up is needed to recognize and treat sequelae that compromise long-term recovery and limit quality of life in recovering patients.

Rapidly Progressive Dementia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article presents a practical approach to the evaluation of patients with rapidly progressive dementia.

RECENT FINDINGS

The approach presented in this article builds upon the standard dementia evaluation, leveraging widely available tests and emergent specific markers of disease to narrow the differential diagnosis and determine the cause(s) of rapid progressive decline. The discovery of treatment-responsive causes of rapidly progressive dementia underscores the need to determine the cause early in the symptomatic course when treatments are most likely to halt or reverse cognitive decline.

SUMMARY

A pragmatic and organized approach to patients with rapidly progressive dementia is essential to mitigate diagnostic and therapeutic challenges and optimize patient outcomes.

Factors predicting neuronal surface antibodies in the elderly with new-onset and unknown seizures

Objective

To investigate risk factors of neuronal surface antibodies (NSAbs) and develop a nomogram that could identify patients at the odds of NSAbs among the elderly (aged 60 years or older) with new‐onset seizures of unknown etiology.

Methods

Clinical data for aged ≥60 years diagnosed with new‐onset seizures of unknown etiology were retrospectively reviewed. A nomogram based on multivariable logistic regression was constructed. Model performance of nomogram was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC), calibration curve, decision curve analysis (DCA), and clinical impact curve (CIC). Meanwhile, it was internally validated by bootstrap validation in current cohort.

Results

Of 147 patients included in final analysis, 68 (46.3%) had NSAbs‐mediated encephalitis. Six factors were identified: duration of seizures less than 3 months (OR:14.259; 95% CI: 4.480–45.386), focal‐onset seizures (OR:12.457; 95% CI: 2.710–57.261), psychiatric deficits (OR:10.063; 95% CI: 3.231–31.343), sleep disorders (OR:3.091; 95% CI: 1.011–9.454), hyponatremia (OR:6.252; 95% CI: 1.445–27.043), and medial temporal lobe (MTL) lesions on MRI (OR:4.102; 95% CI: 1.382–12.169). The nomogram had a good discrimination with an AUC of 0.916 and with a corrected AUC of 0.881 after the bootstrapping validation, our model also exhibited a better predictive performance than scoring systems commonly used clinically. Additionally, the calibration curve showed that predicted NSAbs‐positive rates of nomogram were closely aligned with actual observed results. Moreover, the nomogram achieved well on clinical utility by using the DCA and CIC.

Interpretation

Our nomogram may provide a convenient and useful tool for identifying the elderly with new‐onset seizures of unknown etiology who are at risk of NSAbs‐mediated encephalitis, which would allow these patients receive earlier immunotherapy.

LGI1 antibody-associated encephalitis without evidence of inflammation in CSF and brain MRI

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore the frequency and distinct characteristics of adult patients with LGI1 antibody-associated encephalitis in the absence of inflammatory abnormalities in both routine CSF analysis and brain MRI.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of adult patients with antibodies targeting LGI1 and then screened patients with no evidence of inflammation in brain MRI and normal results in routine CSF analysis, including white blood cell count, protein concentration, IgG, and oligoclonal bands.

RESULTS

Among 80 patients with LGI1 antibody-associated encephalitis in our center, 31 (38.8%) fulfilled the screening criteria. For these patients, the onset age was 57.0 ± 14.7 years, and 19 (61.3%) were female. Viral prodrome occurred in 5 patients (16.1%). Faciobrachial dystonic seizures (FBDS) were the most predominant symptom (38.7%), followed by seizure onset (22.6%) and memory deficits (19.4%). The sensitivity of antibody detection in serum was higher than CSF (96.8% vs. 48.4%, p < 0.001). Most patients (30/31, 96.8%) benefited from the first-line immunotherapy, and 23 patients (74.2%) achieved complete recovery, yet 3 patients (9.7%) had clinical relapses in 2-year follow-up after discharge. The patients had a higher prevalence of females (61.9% vs. 26.7%, p = 0.003) and were more frequently associated with FBDS during the disease course (38.7% vs. 10.2%, p = 0.004). However, there was no difference in treatment outcomes and recurrence ratio between the two groups (p = 0.144 and p = 0.515). Moreover, we divided all 80 patients into four groups according to antibody titer levels in serum and CSF at the time of diagnosis, respectively. WBC and protein concentrations in CSF showed no difference among the four groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The absence of evidence of inflammation in routine CSF analysis and brain MRI did not rule out anti-LGI1 associated encephalitis. FBDS and the subacute onset of cognitive dysfunction should push forward with autoantibody testing for patients even without inflammatory abnormalities. The routine inflammatory indicators in CSF seemed to be unrelated to antibody titer levels.

Rapidly progressive dementias - aetiologies, diagnosis and management

Rapidly progressive dementias (RPDs) are a group of heterogeneous disorders that include immune-mediated, infectious and metabolic encephalopathies, as well as prion diseases and atypically rapid presentations of more common neurodegenerative diseases. Some of these conditions are treatable, and some must be diagnosed promptly because of their potential infectivity. Prion disease is considered to be the prototypical RPD, but over the past two decades, epidemiological reports and the identification of various encephalitis-mediating antibodies have led to a growing recognition of other encephalopathies as potential causes of rapid cognitive decline. Knowledge of RPD aetiologies, syndromes and diagnostic work-up protocols will help clinicians to establish an early, accurate diagnosis, thereby reducing morbidity and mortality, especially in immune-mediated and other potentially reversible dementias. In this Review, we define the syndrome of RPD and shed light on its different aetiologies and on secondary factors that might contribute to rapid cognitive decline. We describe an extended diagnostic procedure in the context of important differential diagnoses, discuss the utility of biomarkers and summarize potential treatment options. In addition, we discuss treatment options such as high-dose steroid therapy in the context of therapy and diagnosis in clinically ambiguous cases.

The term ‘rapidly progressive dementia’ (RPD) describes a cognitive disorder with fast progression, leading to dementia within a relatively short time. This Review discusses the wide range of RPD aetiologies, as well as the diagnostic approach and treatment options.

Definitions of rapidly progressive dementia (RPD) vary according to the aetiological background and relate to the speed of cognitive decline, time from first symptom to dementia syndrome and/or overall survival.

RPD can occur in rapidly progressive neurodegenerative diseases, such as prion diseases, or in primarily slowly progressive diseases as a consequence of intrinsic factors or concomitant pathologies.

Besides neurodegenerative diseases, inflammatory (immune-mediated and infectious), vascular, metabolic and neoplastic CNS diseases are important and frequent causes of RPD.

To identify treatable causes of RPD, the technical diagnostic work-up must include MRI and analyses of blood and cerebrospinal fluid, and further diagnostics might be indicated in unclear cases.

Therapeutic options for many non-neurodegenerative causes of RPD are already available; disease-modifying therapies for neurodegenerative RPDs are an important focus of current research and could become a treatment option in the near future.

Autoimmune/Paraneoplastic Encephalitis Antibody Biomarkers: Frequency, Age, and Sex Associations

OBJECTIVE

To determine the frequency of detection and the age and sex associations of autoimmune/paraneoplastic encephalitis antibody biomarkers (AE-Abs).

METHODS

There were 42,032 patients tested in the Mayo Clinic Neuroimmunology Laboratory between January 2018 and December 2019 for AE-Abs in serum or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), including NMDA-R-IgG, AMPA-R-IgG, GABA_B-R-IgG, CASPR2-IgG, LGI1-IgG, GAD65-IgG, CRMP5-IgG, amphiphysin-IgG, PCA1/2/Tr-IgGs, ANNA1/2/3-IgGs, GFAP-IgG, mGluR1-IgG, DPPX-IgG, and MOG-IgG1. Results were examined to determine frequency of antibody positivity. Age and sex associations were examined by multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Adult serum analysis (22,472 patients; 56% female) revealed that 814 (3.6%) were positive: NMDA-R-IgG (24.6%) > GAD65-IgG (21.5%) > LGI1-IgG (20.5%) > others. Of children (5649; 50% female), 251 (4.4%) were positive: NMDA-R-IgG (53.1%) > MOG-IgG1 (32%) > GAD65-IgG (7.1%) > others. Adult CSF analysis (18,745 patients; 54% female) revealed that 796 (4.2%) were positive: NMDA-R-IgG (39.7%) > GAD65-IgG (28.5%) > LGI1-IgG (11.4%) > others. Of children (5136; 50% female), 282 (5.5%) were positive: NMDA-R-IgG (88.1%) > GAD65-IgG (8.7%) > others. Age younger than 20 years was associated with NMDA-R-IgG and MOG-IgG1 (odds ratio [OR], 8.11 and 7.84, respectively; P<.001). Age older than 65 years was associated with GABA_B-R-IgG, LGI1-IgG, CASPR2-IgG, and ANNA1-IgG (OR, 7.33, 14.98, 3.67, and 14.53; P<.001). Women accounted for 60% of NMDA-R-IgG (CSF) and 78% of GAD65-IgG (CSF and serum) cohorts (OR, 1.32 [P=.002] and 2.23 [P<.001], respectively). Men accounted for 62% of the LGI1-IgG cohort (OR, 1.87; P<.001). Age and sex interacted for NMDA-R-IgG, particularly in female patients younger than 20 years (OR, 7.72; P<.001).

CONCLUSION

The most frequent AE-Abs detected were NMDA-R-IgG, GAD65-IgG, LGI1-IgG, and MOG-IgG1. Age and sex associations may suggest paraneoplastic, or aging influences on neurologic autoimmunity.

Immunopsychiatry: An Update on Autoimmune Encephalitis for Neuropsychiatrists

INTRODUCTION

Autoimmune encephalitis (AIE) is a group of immune-mediated inflammatory processes of the brain with marked psychiatric features. Although relatively rare, they might offer difficult differential diagnosis with psychiatric conditions, especially catatonia and psychotic syndromes. Anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis is the most common AIE, presenting with psychiatric syndromes in 90% of cases. The associated psychopathology is complex, pleomorphic and best characterized when there is involvement of a psychiatrist in the assessment.

AREAS COVERED

This text will review the main aspects of AIE to psychiatrists and/or neuropsychiatrists.

EXPERT OPINION

Immune system dysfunction has been implicated in the pathophysiology of psychiatric symptoms and disorders. The use of diagnostic criteria of possible AIE, especially when specific antibodies of AIE are not available, allows early diagnosis and prompt treatment which are associated with better clinical outcomes. The study of the psychiatric aspects of AIE can broaden our knowledge of the underlying mechanisms of various psychiatric manifestations.

Sleep, cerebrospinal fluid, and the glymphatic system: A systematic review

Current theories of the glymphatic system (GS) hypothesize that it relies on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) circulation to disseminate growth factors and remove metabolic waste from the brain with increased CSF production and circulation during sleep; thereby, linking sleep disturbance with elements of CSF circulation and GS exchange. However, our growing knowledge of the relations between sleep, CSF, and the GS are plagued by variability in sleep and CSF measures across a wide array of pathologies. Hence, this review aims to summarize the dynamic relationships between sleep, CSF-, and GS-related features in samples of typically developing individuals and those with autoimmune/inflammatory, neurodegenerative, neurodevelopmental, sleep-related, neurotraumatic, neuropsychiatric, and skull atypicalities. One hundred and ninety articles (total n = 19,129 participants) were identified and reviewed for pathology, CSF circulation and related metrics, GS function, and sleep. Numerous associations were documented between sleep problems and CSF metabolite concentrations (e.g., amyloid-beta, orexin, tau proteins) and increased CSF volumes or pressure. However, these relations were not universal, with marked differences across pathologies. It is clear that elements of CSF circulation/composition and GS exchange represent pathways influenced by sleep; however, carefully designed studies and advances in GS measurement are needed to delineate the nuanced relationships.

Anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis in older adults: A systematic review of case reports

OBJECTIVE

To ascertain the clinical characteristics of anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis (NMDARE) in older patients.

METHOD

A systematic literature review using PubMed and Scopus of all published case reports of NMDARE was undertaken, from database inception to June 2020. From this, cases reporting on patients older than 65 years of age and whose diagnosis was confirmed by the presence of anti-NMDAR antibodies in CSF were selected.

RESULTS

23 case reports fulfilling the study's criteria were found. Median age was 70.1 years (range 65-84), fourteen were female (60.9%), and mostly presented with acute behavioral and cognitive changes (95.7%). Atypical psychosis occurred in eleven patients (47.8%) with a sudden onset and fluctuating clinical pattern of delusions (39.1%), hallucinations (30.4%), and motility disturbances (34.8%) including catatonia (17.4%). Nine patients presented with seizures (39.1%). Pleocytosis in CSF (>5 WBC) was described in twelve cases (52.2%). Eleven cases (47.8%) had abnormal brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans with limbic inflammatory lesions. Thirteen patients had an abnormal EEG (56.5%).

CONCLUSION

NMDARE should be included in the differential diagnosis of older patients who present with new psychiatric episodes, especially when characterized by sudden onset psychotic polymorphic symptomatology, fluctuating course with marked cognitive decline, and with catatonic features.

Recurrent Anti-AMPA Receptor Limbic Encephalitis: A Case Report and Literature Review

Alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptor encephalitis is a relatively rare anti-neuronal surface antigen autoimmune encephalitis (LE). We described a case of a 47-year-old Chinese man having anti-AMPA receptor limbic encephalitis initially presented with cognitive decline, undetectable antibodies, and normal imaging findings in magnetic resonance image (MRI) and then developed into typical autoimmune limbic encephalitis a few months later with a course of multiple relapses. In addition, we found progressive brain atrophy in our case, which was a rare presentation of LE. This report also summarized the characteristics of nine reported cases of anti-AMPA receptor limbic encephalitis with relapse up to date. This case highlighted that autoimmune limbic encephalitis is an important differential diagnosis for patients with typical symptoms even when the MRI and antibodies are normal, and more attention should be paid to the relapse of anti-AMPA receptor encephalitis.

Update on Paraneoplastic Cerebellar Degeneration

Purpose of review: To provide an update on paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration (PCD), the involved antibodies and tumors, as well as management strategies. Recent findings: PCD represents the second most common presentation of the recently established class of immune mediated cerebellar ataxias (IMCAs). Although rare in general, PCD is one of the most frequent paraneoplastic presentations and characterized clinically by a rapidly progressive cerebellar syndrome. In recent years, several antibodies have been described in association with the clinical syndrome related to PCD; their clinical significance, however, has yet to be determined. The 2021 updated diagnostic criteria for paraneoplastic neurologic symptoms help to establish the diagnosis of PCD, direct cancer screening, and to evaluate the presence of these newly identified antibodies. Recognition of the clinical syndrome and prompt identification of a specific antibody are essential for early detection of an underlying malignancy and initiation of an appropriate treatment, which represents the best opportunity to modulate the course of the disease. As clinical symptoms can precede tumor diagnosis by years, co-occurrence of specific symptoms and antibodies should prompt continuous surveillance of the patient. Summary: We provide an in-depth overview on PCD, summarize recent findings related to PCD, and highlight the transformed diagnostic approach.

Frequency and Characterization of Movement Disorders in Anti-IgLON5 Disease

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Anti-IgLON5 disease is a recently described neurologic disease that shares features of autoimmunity and neurodegeneration. Abnormal movements appear to be frequent and important but have not been characterized and are underreported. We describe the frequency and types of movement disorders in a series of consecutive patients with this disease.

METHODS

In this retrospective, observational study, the presence and phenomenology of movement disorders were assessed with a standardized clinical questionnaire. Available videos were centrally reviewed by 3 experts in movement disorders.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients were included. In 41 (57%), the main reason for initial consultation was difficulty walking along with one or several concurrent movement disorders. At the time of anti-IgLON5 diagnosis, 63 (87%) patients had at least 1 movement disorder with a median of 3 per patient. The most frequent abnormal movements were gait and balance disturbances (52 patients [72%]), chorea (24 [33%]), bradykinesia (20 [28%]), dystonia (19 [26%]), abnormal body postures or rigidity (18 [25%]), and tremor (15 [21%]). Other hyperkinetic movements (myoclonus, akathisia, myorhythmia, myokymia, or abdominal dyskinesias) occurred in 26 (36%) patients. The craniofacial region was one of the most frequently affected by multiple concurrent movement disorders (23 patients [32%]) including dystonia (13), myorhythmia (6), chorea (4), or myokymia (4). Considering any body region, the most frequent combination of multiple movement disorders consisted of gait instability or ataxia associated with craniofacial dyskinesias or generalized chorea observed in 31 (43%) patients. In addition to abnormal movements, 87% of patients had sleep alterations, 74% bulbar dysfunction, and 53% cognitive impairment. Fifty-five (76%) patients were treated with immunotherapy, resulting in important and sustained improvement of the movement disorders in only 7 (13%) cases.

DISCUSSION

Movement disorders are a frequent and leading cause of initial neurologic consultation in patients with anti-IgLON5 disease. Although multiple types of abnormal movements can occur, the most prevalent are disorders of gait, generalized chorea, and dystonia and other dyskinesias that frequently affect craniofacial muscles. Overall, anti-IgLON5 disease should be considered in patients with multiple movement disorders, particularly if they occur in association with sleep alterations, bulbar dysfunction, or cognitive impairment.

Autoantibody-associated psychiatric symptoms and syndromes in adults: A narrative review and proposed diagnostic approach

Background

Autoimmune-mediated encephalitis is a disease that often encompasses psychiatric symptoms as its first clinical manifestation’s predominant and isolated characteristic. Novel guidelines even distinguish autoimmune psychosis from autoimmune encephalitis. The aim of this review is thus to explore whether a wide range of psychiatric symptoms and syndromes are associated or correlate with autoantibodies.

Methods

We conducted a PubMed search to identify appropriate articles concerning serum and/or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) autoantibodies associated with psychiatric symptoms and syndromes between 2000 and 2020. Relying on this data, we developed a diagnostic approach to optimize the detection of autoantibodies in psychiatric patients, potentially leading to the approval of an immunotherapy.

Results

We detected 10 major psychiatric symptoms and syndromes often reported to be associated with serum and/or CSF autoantibodies comprising altered consciousness, disorientation, memory impairment, obsessive-compulsive behavior, psychosis, catatonia, mood dysfunction, anxiety, behavioral abnormalities (autism, hyperkinetic), and sleeping dysfunction. The following psychiatric diagnoses were associated with serum and/or CSF autoantibodies: psychosis and schizophrenia spectrum disorders, mood disorders, minor and major neurocognitive impairment, obsessive-compulsive disorder, autism spectrum disorders (ASD), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), anxiety disorders, eating disorders and addiction. By relying on these symptom clusters and diagnoses in terms of onset and their duration, we classified a subacute or subchronic psychiatric syndrome in patients that should be screened for autoantibodies. We propose further diagnostics entailing CSF analysis, electroencephalography and magnetic resonance imaging of the brain. Exploiting these technologies enables standardized and accurate diagnosis of autoantibody-associated psychiatric symptoms and syndromes to deliver early immunotherapy.

Conclusions

We have developed a clinical diagnostic pathway for classifying subgroups of psychiatric patients whose psychiatric symptoms indicate a suspected autoimmune origin.

•

Autoantibodies are associated with a broad spectrum of psychiatric syndromes.

•

More systematic studies are needed to elucidate the significance of autoantibodies.

•

We developed a pathway to identify autoantibody-associated psychiatric syndromes.

Autoimmune Encephalitis Resembling Dementia Syndromes

Objective

As autoimmune encephalitis (AIE) can resemble neurodegenerative dementia syndromes, and patients do not always present as encephalitis, this study evaluates how frequently AIE mimics dementia and provides red flags for AIE in middle-aged and older patients.

Methods

In this nationwide observational cohort study, patients with anti–leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 (LGI1), anti–NMDA receptor (NMDAR), anti–gamma-aminobutyric acid B receptor (GABA_BR), or anti–contactin-associated protein-like 2 (CASPR2) encephalitis were included. They had to meet 3 additional criteria: age ≥45 years, fulfillment of dementia criteria, and no prominent seizures early in the disease course (≤4 weeks).

Results

Two-hundred ninety patients had AIE, of whom 175 were 45 years or older. Sixty-seven patients (38%) fulfilled criteria for dementia without prominent seizures early in the disease course. Of them, 42 had anti-LGI1 (48%), 13 anti-NMDAR (52%), 8 anti-GABA_BR (22%), and 4 anti-CASPR2 (15%) encephalitis. Rapidly progressive cognitive deterioration was seen in 48 patients (76%), whereas a neurodegenerative dementia syndrome was suspected in half (n = 33). In 17 patients (27%; 16/17 anti-LGI1), subtle seizures had been overlooked. Sixteen patients (25%) had neither inflammatory changes on brain MRI nor CSF pleocytosis. At least 1 CSF biomarker, often requested when dementia was suspected, was abnormal in 27 of 44 tested patients (61%), whereas 8 had positive 14-3-3 results (19%). Most patients (84%) improved after immunotherapy.

Conclusions

Red flags for AIE in patients with suspected dementia are: (1) rapidly progressive cognitive decline, (2) subtle seizures, and (3) abnormalities in ancillary testing atypical for neurodegeneration. Physicians should be aware that inflammatory changes are not always present in AIE, and that biomarkers often requested when dementia was suspected (including 14-3-3) can show abnormal results. Diagnosis is essential as most patients profit from immunotherapy.

Antibodies to neuronal surface antigens in patients with a clinical diagnosis of neurodegenerative disorder

OBJECTIVES

Autoimmune encephalitis due to antibodies against neuronal surface antigens (NSA-Ab) frequently presents with cognitive impairment, often as the first and prevalent manifestation, but few studies have systematically assessed the frequency of NSA-Ab in consecutive patients with established neurodegenerative disorders.

METHODS

We studied sera of 93 patients (41F, 52 M), aged 69.2 ± 9.4 years, with neurodegenerative conditions, and of 50 population controls aged over 60 years. Specific NSA-Abs were investigated by antigen-specific cell-based assays (CBAs). After testing, we evaluated the association between the NSA-Abs and clinical, CSF and radiological features.

RESULTS

The patients included 13/93 (13.8%) who had specific antibodies to neuronal surface antigens: 6 GlyR, 3 GABA_AR (1 also positive for AMPAR), 2 LGI1, 1 CASPR2 and 1 GABA_BR. One of the 50 controls (2%) was positive for NMDAR antibody and the others were negative on all tests (P = 0.020). No difference was observed in antibody frequency between patients presenting with parkinsonism and those presenting with dementia (P = 0.55); however, NSA-Ab were more frequent in those with unclassified forms of dementia (5/13, 38.5%) than in those with unclassified parkinsonism (2/9, 22.2%) or with classified forms of dementia (4/43, 9.3%) or parkinsonism (2/28, 7.1%) (P = 0.03). A logistic regression analysis demonstrated that an unclassified diagnosis (P = 0.02) and an irregular progression (P = 0.024) were predictors of seropositive status.

CONCLUSIONS

NSA-Abs are relatively frequent in patients with neurodegenerative disorders, particularly in those with an irregular disease progression of atypical clinical features, inconsistent with a recognized diagnosis. The significance of these antibodies and their possible primary or secondary roles need to be investigated in prospective studies.

Antibody-Mediated Autoimmune Diseases of the CNS: Challenges and Approaches to Diagnosis and Management

Antibody-mediated disorders of the central nervous system (CNS) are increasingly recognized as neurologic disorders that can be severe and even life-threatening but with the potential for reversibility with appropriate treatment. The expanding spectrum of newly identified autoantibodies targeting glial or neuronal (neural) antigens and associated clinical syndromes (ranging from autoimmune encephalitis to CNS demyelination) has increased diagnostic precision, and allowed critical reinterpretation of non-specific neurological syndromes historically associated with systemic disorders (e.g., Hashimoto encephalopathy). The intracellular vs. cell-surface or synaptic location of the different neural autoantibody targets often helps to predict the clinical characteristics, potential cancer association, and treatment response of the associated syndromes. In particular, autoantibodies targeting intracellular antigens (traditionally termed onconeural autoantibodies) are often associated with cancers, rarely respond well to immunosuppression and have a poor outcome, although exceptions exist. Detection of neural autoantibodies with accurate laboratory assays in patients with compatible clinical-MRI phenotypes allows a definite diagnosis of antibody-mediated CNS disorders, with important therapeutic and prognostic implications. Antibody-mediated CNS disorders are rare, and reliable autoantibody identification is highly dependent on the technique used for detection and pre-test probability. As a consequence, indiscriminate neural autoantibody testing among patients with more common neurologic disorders (e.g., epilepsy, dementia) will necessarily increase the risk of false positivity, so that recognition of high-risk clinical-MRI phenotypes is crucial. A number of emerging clinical settings have recently been recognized to favor development of CNS autoimmunity. These include antibody-mediated CNS disorders following herpes simplex virus encephalitis or occurring in a post-transplant setting, and neurological autoimmunity triggered by TNFα inhibitors or immune checkpoint inhibitors for cancer treatment. Awareness of the range of clinical and radiological manifestations associated with different neural autoantibodies, and the specific settings where autoimmune CNS disorders may occur is crucial to allow rapid diagnosis and early initiation of treatment.

Autoimmune encephalitis: proposed best practice recommendations for diagnosis and acute management

The objective of this paper is to evaluate available evidence for each step in autoimmune encephalitis management and provide expert opinion when evidence is lacking. The paper approaches autoimmune encephalitis as a broad category rather than focusing on individual antibody syndromes. Core authors from the Autoimmune Encephalitis Alliance Clinicians Network reviewed literature and developed the first draft. Where evidence was lacking or controversial, an electronic survey was distributed to all members to solicit individual responses. Sixty-eight members from 17 countries answered the survey. Corticosteroids alone or combined with other agents (intravenous IG or plasmapheresis) were selected as a first-line therapy by 84% of responders for patients with a general presentation, 74% for patients presenting with faciobrachial dystonic seizures, 63% for NMDAR-IgG encephalitis and 48.5% for classical paraneoplastic encephalitis. Half the responders indicated they would add a second-line agent only if there was no response to more than one first-line agent, 32% indicated adding a second-line agent if there was no response to one first-line agent, while only 15% indicated using a second-line agent in all patients. As for the preferred second-line agent, 80% of responders chose rituximab while only 10% chose cyclophosphamide in a clinical scenario with unknown antibodies. Detailed survey results are presented in the manuscript and a summary of the diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations is presented at the conclusion.

Autoimmune Neurology: The Need for Comprehensive Care

Autoimmune neurology is a rapidly developing specialty driven by an increasing recognition of autoimmunity as the cause for a broad set of neurologic disorders and ongoing discovery of new neural autoantibodies associated with recognizable clinical syndromes. The diversity of clinical presentations, unique pathophysiology, and the complexity of available treatments requires a dedicated multidisciplinary team to diagnose and manage patients. In this article, we focus on antibody-associated autoimmune encephalitis (AE) to illustrate broader themes applicable to the specialty. We discuss common diagnostic challenges including the utilization of clinical assessment tools along with the determination of the prognostic significance of certain autoantibodies, with a focus on implications for long-term management. A growing body of literature demonstrates the long-term cognitive, behavioral, and physical sequelae of AE. Dedicated resources are needed to effectively manage these patients. These resources may be best provided by experienced neurology clinics in partnership with other neurologic subspecialists, as well as psychiatrists, neuropsychologists, and physical medicine and rehabilitation providers.

Paraneoplastic disorders of the nervous system

This article on paraneoplastic neurologic disorders provides an update on the diagnostic approach, utility and pitfalls of autoantibody testing and emerging settings in which these disorders are encountered. Recognition of the clinical and neuroimaging features accompanying paraneoplastic neurologic disorders is crucial to select those at highest risk who need neural antibody testing and screening for cancer. Cursory knowledge of the antibody assay methodology being ordered is important as the false positive rate varies by the technique utilized for detection. Antibodies can generally be stratified by the location of the target antigen (intraceullar versus cell-surface/synaptic) which informs frequency of cancer association, treatment response and prognosis. The therapeutic approach generally involves detection of the underlying cancer and combinations of oncologic treatments and immunosuppressant medications. The occurrence of paraneoplastic autoimmune neurologic disorders in novel settings, such as with immune checkpoint inhibitor use, has improved understanding of their pathogenesis and increased the likelihood neurologists will encounter such patients in their practice.

Distinctive clinical presentation and pathogenic specificities of anti-AK5 encephalitis

Limbic encephalitis (LE) with antibodies against adenylate kinase 5 (AK5) has been difficult to characterize because of its rarity. In this study, we identified 10 new cases and reviewed 16 previously reported patients, investigating clinical features, IgG subclasses, human leukocyte antigen (HLA), and CSF proteomic profiles. Patients with anti-AK5 LE were mostly men (20/26, 76.9%) of median age 66 years old (range 48-94). Predominant symptom was severe episodic amnesia in all patients, frequently associated with depression (17/25, 68.0%). Weight loss, asthenia, and anorexia were also highly characteristic, being present in 11/25 (44.0%) patients. Although epilepsy was always lacking at disease onset, seizures developed later in a subset of patients (4/25, 16.0%). All patients presented CSF abnormalities, such as pleocytosis (18/25, 72.0%), oligoclonal bands (18/25, 72.0%), and increased Tau (11/14, 78.6%). Temporal lobe hyper-intensities were almost always present at disease onset (23/26, 88.5%), evolving nearly invariably toward a severe atrophy in subsequent MRIs (17/19, 89.5%). This finding was in line with a poor response to immunotherapy, with only 5/25 (20.0%) patients responding. IgG1 was the predominant subclass, being the most frequently detected and the one with highest titres in nine CSF-serum paired samples. Temporal biopsy from one of our new cases showed massive lymphocytic infiltrates dominated by both CD4+ and CT8+ T-cells, intense granzyme B expression, and abundant macrophages/microglia. HLA analysis in 11 patients showed a striking association with HLA-B*08:01 (7/11, 63.6%; OR = 13.4, 95% CI [3.8-47.4]), C*07:01 (8/11, 72.7%; OR = 11.0, 95% CI [2.9-42.5]), DRB1*03:01 (8/11, 72.7%; OR = 14.4, 95% CI [3.7-55.7]), DQB1*02:01 (8/11, 72.7%; OR = 13.5, 95% CI [3.5-52.0]), and DQA1*05:01 (8/11, 72.7%; OR = 14.4, 95% CI [3.7-55.7]) alleles, which formed the extended haplotype B8-C7-DR3-DQ2 in 6/11 (54.5%) patients (OR = 16.5, 95% CI [4.8-57.1]). Finally, we compared the CSF proteomic profile of five anti-AK5 patients with that of 40 controls and 10 cases with other more common non-paraneoplastic LE (five with antibodies against leucine-rich glioma inactivated 1 and five against contactin-associated protein-like 2), as well as 10 cases with paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (five with antibodies against Yo and five against Ma2). These comparisons revealed, respectively, 31 and seven significantly up-regulated proteins in anti-AK5 LE, mapping to apoptosis pathways and innate/adaptive immune responses. These findings suggest that the clinical manifestations of anti-AK5 LE result from a distinct T-cell mediated pathogenesis, with major cytotoxicity-induced apoptosis leading to a prompt and aggressive neuronal loss, likely explaining the poor prognosis and response to immunotherapy.

Autoimmune Encephalitis in Late-Onset Seizures: When to Suspect and How to Treat

Objective: This study was conducted to elucidate prevalence, clinical features, outcomes, and best treatment in patients with late-onset seizures due to autoimmune encephalitis (AE). Methods: This is a single-institution prospective cohort study (2012-2019) conducted at the Epilepsy Center at the University of Greifswald, Germany. A total of 225 patients aged ≥50 years with epileptic seizures were enrolled and underwent an MRI/CT scan, profiling of neural antibodies (AB) in serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and neuropsychological testing. On the basis of their work-up, patients were categorized into the following three cohorts: definite, suspected, or no AE. Patients with definite and suspected AE were subsequently treated with immunosuppressive therapy (IT) and/or anti-seizure drug (ASD) therapy and were followed up (FU) regarding clinical and seizure outcome. Results: Of the 225 patients, 17 (8%) fulfilled the criteria for definite or suspected AE according to their AB profile and MRI results. Compared with patients with no evidence of AE, those with AE were younger (p = 0.028), had mesial temporal neuropsychological deficits (p = 0.001), frequently had an active or known malignancy (p = 0.006) and/or a pleocytosis (p = 0.0002), and/or had oligoclonal bands in CSF (p = 0.001). All patients with follow-up became seizure-free with at least one ASD. The Modified Rankin scale (mRS) at hospital admission was low for patients with AE (71% with mRS ≤2) and further decreased to 60% with mRS ≤2 at last FU. Significance: AE is an important etiology in late-onset seizures, and seizures may be the first symptom of AE. Outcome in non-paraneoplastic AE was favorable with ASD and IT. AB testing in CSF and sera, cerebral MRI, CSF analysis, and neuropsychological testing for mesial temporal deficits should be part of the diagnostic protocol for AE following late-onset seizures.

Longitudinal CSF Findings in Autoimmune Encephalitis-A Monocentric Cohort Study

Autoimmune encephalitis (AIE) poses a diagnostic challenge due to its heterogeneous clinical presentation, which overlaps with various neurological and psychiatric diseases. During the diagnostic work-up, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is routinely obtained, allowing for differential diagnostics as well as for the determination of antibody subclasses and specificities. In this monocentric cohort study, we describe initial and serial CSF findings of 33 patients diagnosed with antibody-associated AIE (LGI1 (n=8), NMDA (n=7), CASPR2 (n=3), IgLON5 (n=3), AMPAR (n=1), GAD65/67 (n=4), Yo (n=3), Ma-1/2 (n=2), CV2 (n=2)). Routine CSF parameters of 12.1% of AIE patients were in normal ranges, while 60.6% showed elevated protein levels and 45.4% had intrathecal oligoclonal bands (OCBs). Repeated CSF analyses showed a trend towards normalization of initial pathological CSF findings, while relapses were more likely to be associated with increased cell counts and total protein levels. OCB status conversion in anti-NMDARE patients coincided with clinical improvement. In summary, we show that in routine CSF analysis at diagnosis, a considerable number of patients with AIE did not exhibit alteration in the CSF and therefore, diagnosis may be delayed if antibody testing is not performed. Moreover, OCB status in anti-NMDAR AIE patients could represent a potential prognostic biomarker, however further studies are necessary to validate these exploratory findings.

Autoimmune encephalopathies presenting as dementia of subacute onset and rapid progression

The terms autoimmune dementia and autoimmune encephalopathy may be used interchangeably; autoimmune dementia is used here to emphasize its consideration in young-onset dementia, dementia with a subacute onset, and rapidly progressive dementia. Given their potential for reversibility, it is important to distinguish the rare autoimmune dementias from the much more common neurodegenerative dementias. The presence of certain clinical features [e.g. facio-brachial dystonic seizures that accompany anti-leucine-rich-glioma-inactivated-1 (LGI1) encephalitis that can mimic myoclonus] can be a major clue to the diagnosis. When possible, objective assessment of cognition with bedside testing or neuropsychological testing is useful to determine the degree of abnormality and serve as a baseline from which immunotherapy response can be judged. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) head and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis are useful to assess for inflammation that can support an autoimmune etiology. Assessing for neural autoantibody diagnostic biomarkers in serum and CSF in those with suggestive features can help confirm the diagnosis and guide cancer search in paraneoplastic autoimmune dementia. However, broad screening for neural antibodies in elderly patients with an insidious dementia is not recommended. Moreover, there are pitfalls to antibody testing that should be recognized and the high frequency of some antibodies in the general population limit their diagnostic utility [e.g., anti-thyroid peroxidase (TPO) antibodies]. Once the diagnosis is confirmed, both acute and maintenance immunotherapy can be utilized and treatment choice varies depending on the accompanying neural antibody present and the presence or absence of cancer. The target of the neural antibody biomarker may help predict treatment response and prognosis, with antibodies to cell-surface or synaptic antigens more responsive to immunotherapy and yielding a better overall prognosis than those with antibodies to intracellular targets. Neurologists should be aware that autoimmune dementias and encephalopathies are increasingly recognized in novel settings, including post herpes virus encephalitis and following immune-checkpoint inhibitor use.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcome of Neuronal Surface Antibody-Mediated Autoimmune Encephalitis Patients in a National Cohort

Background: In our previous single-center study of autoimmune encephalitis (AE) related autoantibody test results we found positivity in 60 patients out of 1,034 with suspected AE from 2012 through 2018 as part of a Hungarian nationwide program. In our current multicenter retrospective study, we analyzed the clinical characteristics and outcome of AE patients with positive neuronal cell surface autoantibody test results.

Methods: A standard online questionnaire was used to collect demographic and clinical characteristics, laboratory and imaging data, therapy and prognosis of 30 definitive AE patients in four major clinical centers of the region.

Results: In our study, 19 patients were positive for anti-NMDAR (63%), 6 patients (20%) for anti-LGI1, 3 patients for anti-GABABR (10%) and 3 patients for anti-Caspr2 (10%) autoantibodies. Most common prodromal symptoms were fever or flu-like symptoms (10/30, 33%). Main clinical features included psychiatric symptoms (83%), epileptic seizures (73%) and memory loss (50%). 19 patients (63%) presented with signs of central nervous system (CNS) inflammation, which occurred more frequently in elder individuals (p = 0.024), although no significant differences were observed in sex, tumor association, time to diagnosis, prognosis and immunotherapy compared to AE patients without CNS inflammatory markers. Anti-NMDAR encephalitis patients were in more severe condition at the disease onset (p = 0.028), although no significant correlation between mRS score, age, sex and immunotherapy was found. 27% of patients (n = 8) with associated tumors had worse outcome (p = 0.045) than patients without tumor. In most cases, immunotherapy led to clinical improvement of AE patients (80%) who achieved a good outcome (mRS ≤ 2; median follow-up 33 months).

Conclusion: Our study confirms previous publications describing characteristics of AE patients, however, differences were observed in anti-NMDAR encephalitis that showed no association with ovarian teratoma and occurred more frequently among young males. One-third of AE patients lacked signs of inflammation in both CSF and brain MRI, which emphasizes the importance of clinical symptoms and autoantibody testing in diagnostic workflow for early introduction of immunotherapy, which can lead to favorable outcome in AE patients.

Leveraging molecular biomarkers to make the common diagnosis in the uncommon patient

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The factors that predispose to relapse in patients recovering with autoimmune encephalitis (AE) are largely unknown, complicating efforts to distinguish patients with resurgent symptoms who may benefit from additional immune-modulating therapies from those with other causes of impairment.

METHODS

We report a patient with AE with leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 autoantibodies with a typical presentation, but atypical course complicated by treatment-refractory psychoses and progressive cognitive decline. We leveraged emergent molecular biomarkers, including [¹⁸F]florbetapir (amyloid) and [¹⁸F]flortaucipir AV45 (tau) PET neuroimaging, to evaluate for common neurodegenerative causes of impairment. The patient was followed until death and a brain autopsy performed.

RESULTS

No evidence of active inflammation was observed on neuroimaging or cerebrospinal fluid analyses in our patient with resurgent, treatment-refractory cognitive decline. [¹⁸F]Florbetapir and [¹⁸F]flortaucipir retention were increased in cerebral cortices in a pattern consistent with symptomatic Alzheimer's disease. Immunomodulatory therapies were stopped, and appropriate counseling provided to the patient and family. The patient died 2.4 months following [¹⁸F]flortaucipir PET neuroimaging. Brain autopsy confirmed changes typical of Alzheimer's disease without evidence of active inflammation or sequelae of AE, establishing Alzheimer's disease as the likely cause of resurgent symptoms in this patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Symptoms of age-related neurodegenerative illnesses may emerge following AE, particularly in older patients in whom neurodegenerative dementing illnesses are more common. Molecular biomarkers may aid in the evaluation of treatment-refractory patients with resurgent symptoms and signs, influencing management.