Pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without distal gastrectomy and extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma, part 2: randomized controlled trial evaluating survival, morbidity, and mortality

Distal bile duct carcinoma: prognostic factors after curative surgery. A series of 112 cases

BACKGROUND

The identification of independent prognostic indicators in distal bile duct carcinomas (DBDCs) has been limited by the small number of tumors and a lack of molecular prognostic markers. Markers assessed in combination may perform better than those considered individually. We conducted this study to identify prognostic predictors of patients with DBDC with special focus on combination of expression of p53 protein and clinicopathological predictors.

METHODS

Between December 1996 and 2002, 112 consecutive patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy in the Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital for distal bile duct carcinomas were identified in a prospectively collected database. The survival of patients was comparable with respect to patient characteristics, clinicopathological factors and degree of p53 protein expression followed by a univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Actual 1, 3, and 5-year survival rates were 85.7, 50.9, and 25.0%, respectively. By Cox proportional hazards survival analysis, the most powerful predictors of survival rate were p53 expression [relative risk (RR) 5.2, 95% CI 4.8-5.6], pancreatic invasion (RR 5.6, 95% CI 4.3-6.9), lymph nodes metastasis (RR 3.9, 95% CI 3.3-4.5), and operative time (RR 1.8, 95% CI 1.5-2.1).

CONCLUSIONS

Overexpression of p53 in DBDC is strongly associated with significantly reduced survival, independently of clinicopathological prognostic factors. The resection margin status provides little independent prognostic information. Longer operative time may have unfavorable effect on prognosis of patients with DBDC.

Indications and techniques of extended resection for pancreatic cancer

INTRODUCTION

The resectability rate and postoperative survival rate for pancreatic carcinoma are poor. Aggressive resection including vascular resection and extended lymphadenectomy represent one strategy for improving survival. This study was carried out to clarify the indications for extended resection, especially vascular resection, for pancreatic carcinoma.

METHODS

From July 1981 to March 2005, we performed curative resection in 289 of 443 patients with pancreatic carcinoma in our department (65.2%). Vascular resection was performed in 201 (69.5%) patients and portal vein resection without arterial resection in 186 patients. Combined portal and arterial resection was performed in 14 patients and arterial resection without portal vein resection in 1. Extended lymphadenectomy including paraaortic lymph nodes was done. The postoperative survival rate was stratified according to operative and pathology findings.

RESULTS

Operative mortality (any death within 30 days after surgery) occurred in 11 of the 289 curative resection patients (3.8%), including 1 of 88 patients without vascular resection (1.1%), 5 of 186 portal vein resection patients without arterial resection (2.7%), and 5 of 14 (35.7%) arterial resection patients undergoing portal vein arterial resection as well. Most patients who survived for 2 to 3 years had carcinoma-free surgical margins.

CONCLUSIONS

The most important indication for vascular resection in patients with pancreatic cancer is the ability to obtain cancer-free surgical margins. Otherwise, vascular resection is contraindicated. Extended lymphadenectomy may be not of benefit.

[The role of neoadjuvant chemoradiation in pancreatic cancer]

Although complete surgical resection, when possible, leads to prolonged survival in pancreatic cancer, if used alone, its results remain sub-optimal. Neoadjuvant strategies are recent in pancreatic cancer: in primary resectable tumors, they ensure that all patients obtain additional treatment to complete surgery; in locally advanced tumors, they allow a better selection of candidates for curative resection. By delaying surgery, neoadjuvant strategies modify the initial diagnostic process and the symptomatic treatment of pancreatic cancer. Several recent phase I-II studies have confirmed the feasibility and efficacy of the association of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, which is well-tolerated and is associated with better local control and survival. Due to the aggressiveness of pancreatic cancers, most recent cytotoxic agents should be associated with modern radiation techniques. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation is under evaluation in pancreatic cancers, and no randomized phase III trials comparing neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapeutic sequences has been reported. Moreover, radiological and pathological evaluations, not only at diagnosis, but also after preoperative chemoradiation, must be standardized to improve the selection of patients who will benefit from this multi-modal treatment.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy with mesentericoportal vein resection for adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head

BACKGROUND

The value of mesentericoportal vein resection (VR) associated with pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic-head adenocarcinoma still remains controversial.

METHODS

From 1989 to 2003, 45 consecutive patients with pancreatic-head adenocarcinoma underwent PD with mesentericoportal VR due to intraoperative macroscopic involvement of the superior mesenteric or portal vein (VR+ group). They were compared with 88 patients who underwent PD for adenocarcinoma without VR over the same time period (VR- group) and matched for age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, pathological diagnosis, and nodal involvement. Preoperative features, intraoperative parameters, postoperative course, and survival were compared between the VR+ group and VR- group. Factors that may influence survival were determined by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Mortality, morbidity, and mean hospital stay did not differ between the two groups (VR+ 4.4%, 56%, and 22.6 days, respectively; VR- 5.7%, 64%, 24.6 days, respectively). In the group VR+, vein invasion was histologically proven in 29 (64%) patients. Three-year global survival and 3-year disease-free survival did not differ between the two groups: VR+ 22% and 14%, respectively; VR- 25% and 21%, respectively (log-rank: P=0.69 and P=0.39, respectively). Neither VR nor histologically proven vein involvement significantly impacted survival duration. On multivariate analysis, tumor-free margin was the most important prognostic factor.

CONCLUSIONS

Vein resection during PD can be performed safely. Patients with adenocarcinoma who require VR during PD have a survival not different from that of patients who undergo standard PD. Macroscopic isolated mesentericoportal vein involvement is not a contraindication for PD in patients with adenocarcinoma provided disease-free margins can be obtained.

Somatostatin analogues in the prevention of pancreas-related complications after pancreatic resection

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

The Achilles' heel of operative pancreatectomies is the pancreaticoenterostomy for proximal resections and the pancreatic parenchymal closure for distal resections. Inhibition of pancreatic exocrine secretions by somatostatin analogues has been suggested to decrease pancreas-specific complications, but this topic remains controversial.

METHODS

We performed a randomized, prospective, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial of the use of perioperative vapreotide, a potent somatostatin analogue, in pancreatic resections for presumed neoplasms in 381 patients without chronic pancreatitis. We also reviewed the literature on the use of somatostatin and its analogues after pancreatectomy.

RESULTS

When compared to the placebo, perioperative vapreotide had no effect on overall pancreas-specific complications (30.4% vs 26.4%), mortality (0% vs 1.4%), overall complications (40% vs 42%), and duration of hospitalization; there were no differences in complications per type of resection with use of vapreotide--proximal versus distal resection. Seven other prospective, randomized trials provide differing results.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study with vapreotide failed to show any benefit when administered perioperatively (and for 7 days postoperatively) on pancreas-specific complications after major pancreatectomy in patients without chronic pancreatitis. The use of perioperative analogues that suppress pancreatic exocrine secretion seems not to be warranted as routine treatment.

Impact of Regional Lymph Node Evaluation in Staging Patients With Periampullary Tumors

BACKGROUND

Two distinct lymph nodes reproducibly assessed by computed tomography for the evaluation of periampullary tumors are the common bile duct (CBD) node and the gastroduodenal artery (GDA) node. We examined whether radiographical enlargement of either lymph node predicts tumor resectability, nodal metastasis, or patient survival.

METHODS

Ninety-four consecutive patients underwent attempted curative resection of periampullary tumors between September 2001 and June 2003. A single radiologist recorded in a retrospective, blinded fashion the short- and long-axis measurements of the CBD and GDA nodes.

RESULTS

Sixty-one percent (n = 57) of tumors were resectable by pancreaticoduodenectomy. Overall, actual 6-, 12-, and 18-month survival was 87%, 68%, and 63%, respectively. Enlarged radiographical nodal size by either axis was not associated with the presence of metastasis to these lymph nodes or with reduced overall patient survival. Only a CBD node short-axis size >10 mm predicted unresectability (odds ratio, 3.2; P = .036). Liver metastasis and/or carcinomatosis were present in 43% of unresectable patients, and this was associated with decreased survival at both 1 year (25% vs. 77%; P < .001) and 18 months (19% vs. 72%; P <.001). A pathologic diagnosis of metastasis to the GDA node, but not the CBD node, was associated with a similarly decreased survival (1 year: 33% vs. 78%, P = .028; 18 months: 22% vs. 70%, P = .023).

CONCLUSIONS

For presumed periampullary malignancy, a CBD node short-axis size >10 mm predicts tumor unresectability. Metastatic disease to the GDA node, particularly for pancreatic adenocarcinoma, portends a poor prognosis equivalent to that of hepatic or peritoneal spread. Given these findings, radiographical CBD lymph node measurements may guide selection for performing laparoscopic staging with or without ultrasonography in conjunction with GDA nodal biopsy in patients with periampullary malignancy.

Résultats carcinologiques de l'exérèse chirurgicale du cancer glandulaire céphalique du pancréas

INTRODUCTION

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is the only curative treatment for adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head but is associated with a significant early morbidity and a poor long term survival. Therefore, its value is still debated. The aim of this study was to evaluate early and distant results of PD for pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and to identify prognostic factors.

SUMMARY

Seventy-nine patients who underwent PD with curative intent for adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head from 1982 to 2002 were studied retrospectively. The following data were evaluated: operative mortality, long-term survival, prognostic factors (through univariate and multivariate analysis), and characteristics of 5-year survivors.

RESULTS

Mortality rate was 1.3%. Survival at 1, 3 and 5 years was 46%, 26% and 11%. The median survival was 12 months. The prognostic factors were the T stage (T.N.M. classification) and radicality of resection. After multivariate analysis, radicality of resection was the only independent prognostic factor. Five patients survived for more than 5 years. They did not differ of the other patients but none had positive margin or venous invasion.

CONCLUSIONS

These results (low mortality, significant distant survival including some long term survivors) suggest that PD for pancreatic adenocarcinoma must be indicated in most low-risk patients. PD remains the only curative treatment allowing prolonged survival.

Pancreatic Resection for M1 Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Improved safety of pancreatic surgery has led to consideration of more aggressive approaches, such as resection for primary pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with metastatic disease (M1).

METHODS

A total of 29 patients who underwent pancreatic resection with resection of associated metastatic disease (interaortocaval lymph node dissection, liver resection, and/or multiorgan resections) were retrospectively identified from a database of 316 R0/R1 pancreatic resections for PDAC. An explorative data analysis of perioperative and clinicopathological parameters, and overall survival was performed by Kaplan-Meier estimation, log rank test, and Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

The overall in-hospital mortality and morbidity of R0/R1 pancreatic resections for M1 disease (n = 29) was 0% and 24.1%, compared with 4.2% and 35.2% of R0/R1 pancreatic resections for M0 disease (n = 287). The median overall survival time was 13.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.4-20.5), and the estimated 1-year overall survival rate was 58.9% (95% CI, 34.8-76.7) for patients with M1 disease. The median survival in those with metastatic interaortocaval lymph nodes was 27 months (95% CI, 9.6-27.0), whereas it was 11.4 months (95% CI, 7.8-16.5) and 12.9 months (95% CI, 7.2-20.5) for those with liver and peritoneal metastases, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreatic resections with M1 disease can be performed with acceptable safety in highly selected patients. The survival after interaortocaval lymph node resection is comparable to that of other lymph nodes that do not constitute M1 disease. Resection of liver and peritoneal metastases, although safe in this series, cannot be generally recommended until further controlled trials can be conducted.

Delayed gastric emptying is associated with pylorus-preserving but not classical Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy: A review of the literature and critical reappraisal of the implicated pathomechanism

Pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) is nowadays considered the treatment of choice for periampullary tumors, namely carcinoma of the head, neck, or uncinate process of the pancreas, the ampulla of Vater, distal common bile duct or carcinoma of the peri-Vaterian duodenum. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) comprises one of the most troublesome complications of this procedure. A search of the literature using Pubmed/Medline was performed to identify clinical trials examining the incidence rate of DGE following standard Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) vs PPPD. Additionally we performed a thorough in-depth analysis of the implicated pathomechanism underlying the occurrence of DGE after PPPD. In contrast to early studies, the majority of recently performed clinical trials demonstrated no significant association between the occurrence of DGE with either PD or PPPD. PD and PPPD procedures are equally effective operations regarding the postoperative occurrence of DGE. Further randomized trials are required to investigate the efficacy of a recently reported (but not yet tested in large-scale studies) modification, that is, PPPD with antecolic duodenojejunostomy.

Adjuvant intra-arterial 5-fluoruracil, leucovorin, epirubicin and carboplatin with or without systemic gemcitabine after curative resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The role of adjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer remains controversial. Gemcitabine given systemically seems to be effective; intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) has a deep rationale.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The goal was to evaluate the impact of postoperative IAC followed or not by systemic gemcitabine in patients after curative resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. 5-fluoruracil 750 mg sq m(-1), leucovorin 75 mg sq m(-1), epirubicin 45 mg sq m(-1), carboplatin 225 mg sq m(-1) were administered every 3 weeks into celiac axis for three cycles (FLEC regimen), then gemcitabine at the dosage of 1 g sq m(-1) on days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks for 3 months (FLECG regimen).

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients entered the study. The first 24 received only IAC (FLEC regimen), the other 23 received the same intra-arterial regimen followed by systemic gemcitabine (FLECG regimen). After a median follow-up of 16.9 months, 29 patients recurred (61.7%). Median disease free survival (DFS) was 18 months and median overall survival (OS) was 29.7 months. One-year DFS was 59.4% and 1-year OS was 75.5%. Main grade 3 toxicity related to IAC was only nausea/vomiting in 4%; regarding gemcitabine, grade 3 toxicities were anaemia 8%, leukopenia 8%, thrombocitopenia 17%, nausea/vomiting 4%.

CONCLUSIONS

FLEC regimen with or without gemcitabine is active with a very mild toxicity and results are very encouraging in an adjuvant setting.

Update on pancreatic cancer and alcohol-associated risk

Ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas is characterized by extremely aggressive behavior, with an overall 5-year survival of <4%. Because conventional and specifically tailored therapeutic regimens have little impact on patient survival, epidemiological and molecular research aims at identifying and reducing risk factors. Cigarette smoking, obesity, diabetes mellitus, and chronic pancreatitis are amenable to medical prevention or therapy. Heavy alcohol consumption is an inconsistent single risk factor for pancreatic cancer but may promote carcinogenesis by increasing the risk of diabetes mellitus or chronic pancreatitis. For various agents, the key carcinogenic effect is probably an inflammatory response in the pancreatic tissue. On the molecular level, mutations of oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes, as well as various epigenetic alterations, such as overexpression of growth factors and their receptors, are important in tumorigenesis. Complete and safe surgical resection, together with adjuvant therapy, offers prolonged survival, with 5-year survival rates of approximately 25%. However, for unresectable or disseminated disease, which constitutes the vast majority of cases, treatment is palliative. Despite increasing knowledge about the molecular pathology of pancreatic cancer and despite advances in treatment, the overall course of the disease is dismal, and reinforced efforts to reduce incidence and improve outcome are needed desperately.

Recent randomized controlled trials in pancreaticoduodenectomy

OBJECTIVES

To analyze and summarize the recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).

METHODS

A MEDLINE search was performed to identify prospective RCTs on PD published during the last decade. Eligible RCTs were analyzed using the following items: publication year, geographical area, study theme, sample size, and multicenter study. Moreover, the quality of each RCT was evaluated.

RESULTS

Thirty-four articles were eligible for review. One to 6 RCTs have been carried out annually during the recent 10 years. Geographically, 15 trials were performed in Europe, 10 trials in North America, and 9 in Asia. Studies concerning postoperative complications in the early postoperative period such as pancreatic fistula and delayed gastric emptying have been most frequent. Randomized controlled trials comparing anastomotic procedures for the remnant pancreas, standard PD versus PD with extended lymphadenectomy, and PD versus pylorus-preserving PD follow in descending order. The average sample size has been 117, and 10 RCTs had sample size less than 50. The rate of multicenter studies among all RCTs is 21%, with the rate in the most recent 5 years having increased 2-fold compared with that in the earlier period. Concerning the quality of RCTs, calculation of sample size was described in only 14 RCTs and intention to treat analysis was performed in 26 RCTs.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reviewed 34 RCTs on PD performed all over the world. Although the quality of every RCT was not satisfactory, high-grade evidence obtained by these RCTs should be applied in clinical settings to improve surgical quality and quality of life for each patient.

Redefining the R1 resection in pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Resection margin (RM) status in pancreatic head adenocarcinoma is assessed histologically, but pathological examination is not standardized. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of standardized pathological examination on the reporting of RM status.

METHODS

A standardized protocol (SP) for pancreaticoduodenectomy specimen examination, involving multicolour margin staining, axial slicing and extensive tissue sampling, was developed. R1 resection was defined as tumour within 1 mm of the RM. A prospective series reported according to this protocol (SP series, n = 54) was compared with a historical matched series in which a non-standardized protocol was used (NSP series, n = 48).

RESULTS

Implementation of the SP resulted in a higher R1 rate overall, and for pancreatic (22 of 26 85 per cent) compared with ampullary (four of 15) and bile duct (six of 13) cancer. Sampling of the circumferential RM was more extensive in the SP series and correlated with RM status. RM involvement was often multifocal (14 of 32), affecting the posterior RM most frequently (21 of 32). Survival correlated with RM status for the entire SP series (P < 0.001), but not for the NSP series. There was a trend towards better median and actuarial 5-year survival after R0 resection in the SP pancreatic cancer subgroup.

CONCLUSION

Standardized examination influences the reporting of RM status.

Bypass Surgery Versus Palliative Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Patients with Advanced Ductal Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreatic Head, with an Emphasis on Quality of Life Analyses

BACKGROUND

In some centers, palliative resection (PR; partial pancreaticoduodenectomy) is, in selected cases, promoted in preference to double loop bypass (DLB) surgery for advanced pancreatic cancer. This prospective study compares PR with DLB, placing particular focus on patients' quality of life (QoL).

METHODS

From 01/1993 to 09/2004, 167 patients were analyzed in a prospective single center study of palliative surgical treatment of advanced ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. Thirty-eight underwent PR and 129 underwent palliative DLB. Patients undergoing DLB were divided into: (1) locally advanced disease (LAD-subgroup; n = 61; 47%) and (2) metastasized disease (MD-subgroup; n = 68; 53%). QoL was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire supplemented by a pancreatic cancer specific module. QoL data were collected pre-operatively and for up to 12 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Median survival was 7.0 months (95% CI 4.09; 9.91) in PR patients and 6.0 months (95% CI 5.39; 6.61) in patients who received DLB. Mortality and morbidity were, respectively, 7.8 and 58% for PR, and 2.6 and 42% for DLB. QoL decreased more after PR than after DLB. The DLB-group recovered quicker, reaching pre-operative QoL levels after 3 months, and were less impaired when discharged. The LAD-subgroup and the MD-subgroup presented with equal levels of QoL.

CONCLUSIONS

QoL analysis revealed favorable QoL data after DLB. Additionally, the survival rates of the two groups did not differ significantly, but morbidity and mortality rates in the PR group were elevated. Therefore, the use of PR for advanced pancreatic cancer needs to be carefully evaluated.

Quality of life after pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head

BACKGROUND

This study examined quality of life (QoL) after classical partial pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPD) and pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) in patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head, and also evaluated the influence of extended lymphadenectomy (ELA).

METHODS

Between January 1993 and March 2004, QoL was analysed in a prospective single-centre study that included 91 patients. Thirty-four patients underwent PPD and 57 had a PPPD. Seventy patients had an ELA and 21 underwent regional lymphadenectomy (RLA). QoL was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 questionnaire and a pancreatic cancer-specific module. Data were collected before operation and for 24 months after surgery.

RESULTS

The overall 5-year survival rate was 18 percent for all patients and 21 percent in those who had an R0 resection. QoL was impaired for 3-6 months after surgery and then recovered to preoperative levels. There was no significant difference in long-term survival after PPD versus PPPD and ELA versus RLA. Patients who had ELA reported clinically significant higher levels of diarrhoea and pain. PPPD showed a disadvantage in terms of pain.

CONCLUSION

The surgical techniques of resection and reconstruction did not affect QoL, but extended lymphadenectomy was associated with an impairment in QoL.

Extent of lymph node retrieval and pancreatic cancer survival: information from a large US population database

BACKGROUND

Operative therapy of pancreatic cancer is associated with poor survival because of high recurrence rates after pancreatectomy. The effect of lymph node (LN) dissection on survival continues to be debated.

METHODS

A pancreatic cancer data set was created through structured queries to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 1973 to 2000 database. Stage information was created according to 6th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor-node-metastasis criteria, and the effect of LN number on survival was analyzed.

RESULTS

Out of a cohort of 20,631 patients with carcinomas of the exocrine pancreas, surgical details were available for 2,787 patients. Procedures included pancreatoduodenectomies (n = 1848; 66%), radical regional pancreatectomies (n = 516; 19%), other partial resections (n = 316; 11%), and total pancreatectomies (n = 107; 4%). For 1666 of these patients with complete clinicopathologic information, the median age was 66 years (range, 22-96 years), with an equal sex ratio. The median number of total LNs examined was 7 (range, 1-52), of positive LNs was 1 (range, 0-34), and of negative LNs was 6 (range, 0-30). Multivariate survival analysis yielded these prognostic variables: number of LNs examined, number of positive LNs, tumor size, extrapancreatic extension, radiotherapy (all P < .0001), and age (P = .0009). The greatest survival differences were observed for negative LN counts of 10 to 15.

CONCLUSIONS

Stage-based survival prediction of pancreatic cancer is strongly influenced by total LN counts and numbers of negative LNs obtained. Although the mechanism remains unclear and could reflect confounding factors (margin status and institutional volume), an attempt to resect and examine at least 15 LNs to yield preferably between 10 and 15 negative LNs seems sensible for curative-intent pancreatectomy.

Postoperative acute pancreatitis as a major determinant of postoperative delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy

The aim of this study was to prospectively analyze the possible association of delayed gastric emptying and postoperative pancreatic complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Although hospital mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy is minimal, morbidity is still high; delayed gastric emptying is one of the most frequent complications. Thirty-nine consecutive patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy were included in this study: 14 females and 25 males (median age 65 years; range, 7-82). Delayed gastric emptying was defined as the need for a nasogastric tube or recurrent vomiting that prevented normal feeding on the 10th postoperative day. Blood analysis was performed on postoperative days 4, 6, and 10; Gastrografin examination on day 6; CT scan on days 2 and 5; and drain amylases were measured on day 5. Pancreatitis was defined as pancreatitis changes in CT scan interpreted by an experienced radiologist without knowing other data. Pancreatic fistula was defined according to the recent international recommendations. We had no mortality. Twelve patients (31%) developed delayed gastric emptying. Surgical (9/12 vs. 5/27; P = 0.001) but not medical complications occurred more often in the delayed gastric emptying group. Of the single complications, postoperative CT-detected pancreatitis (6/12 vs. 4/27; P = 0.03) and postoperative pancreatic fistula (5/12 vs. 1/27; P = 0.0007) were significantly associated with delayed gastric emptying compared with the patients without delayed gastric emptying. This pancreatitis was already detected in CT scan on day 2 in most patients (6/10, 60%). In delayed gastric emptying patients, the only parameters in blood analysis that differed significantly from patients without this complication were serum amylase activity (mean +/- SEM, 715 +/- 205 vs. 152 +/- 70 IU/L; P = 0.02), blood leukocyte count (16 +/- 2 vs. 9 +/- 0.6 x 10(9)/L; P = 0.007) and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration (144 +/- 28 vs. 51 +/- 14 mg/L, P = 0.01). Postoperative pancreatic (subclinical) fistula was also associated with postoperative pancreatitis (6/10 vs. 0/29; P = 0.003). Preoperative coronary artery disease (OR = 16; 95% CI, 1.0-241; P = 0.05) and soft pancreatic texture at operation (OR = 9; 95% CI, 1.4-52; P = 0.02) were significant risk factors for the development of postoperative pancreatitis. The diagnosis of delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy often follows postoperative pancreatitis. Delayed gastric emptying is also associated with postoperative pancreatic fistula, for which this pancreatitis seems to be a risk factor. Preoperative coronary artery disease and soft texture of the pancreas are significant risk factors for postoperative CT-detected pancreatitis.

Carcinoma of the papilla of Vater: are endoscopic appearance and endoscopic biopsy discordant?

Carcinoma of the papilla of Vater is classified as periampullary cancer representing 5% of all gastrointestinal tract malignancies. Early and accurate diagnosis is important for those patients with a tumor of the papilla, as the prognosis is more favorable than in other periampullary neoplasms. Endoscopically obtained biopsies from suspicious papillae can detect an early tumor, although even for skilled pathologists it is often difficult to differentiate carcinomas from noninvasive lesions on the basis of forceps biopsies. The purpose of this study was to assess the preoperative diagnostic accuracy of duodenoscopy appearance and biopsy in all cases with suspicion of tumor. Thirty patients with suspicion of carcinoma of the papilla of Vater and with final diagnosis established by pancreatoduodenectomy were included in this retrospective study. In each case, a comparison was made between endoscopic biopsy and duodenoscopic appearance. Duodenoscopic appearance sensitivity and accuracy for malignancy were 86% and 83%, respectively, whereas endoscopic biopsy sensitivity and accuracy were 65% and 67%, respectively. Although preoperative diagnosis of carcinoma of the papilla of Vater is useful for making therapeutic decisions, the diagnostic value of the endoscopic appearance was superior to endoscopic biopsy in this series.

Prognostic Factors in Periampullary and Pancreatic Tumor Resection in Elderly Patients

BACKGROUND

More than half of all patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma are over 70 years of age. Life expectancy for the elderly population is increasing and currently major pancreatic resection provides the only meaningful chance of cure for periampullary and pancreatic tumors. Controversy over what constitutes the correct treatment of these tumors in elderly patients continues to this day. The aim of our study was to determine whether age alone or age plus some prognostic factors constitute contraindications to major pancreatic resections.

METHODS

Between 2000 and 2005, data from 88 consecutive patients who had major pancreatic resection for periampullary or pancreatic tumors were entered into a prospective database. Fifty-three patients under 70 years of age (young patients), and 35 patients 70 years of age or older (elderly patients) were compared with respect to several characteristics and the postoperative course.

RESULTS

Postoperative mortality and morbidity, length of hospital stay, and long-term survival were similar in the two groups. In the elderly group, the mortality rate was significantly higher in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and the morbidity rate was significantly higher in patients with ASA 3 than in patients with ASA 1-2, in whom a pancreaticoduodenectomy or total pancreatectomy had been performed.

CONCLUSIONS

Age alone is not a contraindication for major pancreatic resection. In elderly patients a careful evaluation of the co-morbidities and of the type of surgical procedure is mandatory in order to allow the proper selection of those patients best suited for surgery in specialized centers.

Resected periampullary adenocarcinoma: 5-year survivors and their 6- to 10-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

Many studies have reported 5-year survival data after pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma. This study evaluates 10-year survival in patients surviving 5 years after initial surgery.

METHODS

We reviewed all patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma from April 1970 to July 1999 at a single institution. All 5-year survivors were identified, and their subsequent 5-year survival was compared with the actuarial survival of the general population starting at 70 years of age.

RESULTS

Nine hundred fifteen patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma. Follow-up was complete on 890 patients. There were 201 (23%) 5-year survivors with a median age of 65 years at initial surgery; 51% were male and 92% were Caucasian. For the 5-year survivors, the carcinoma origin was pancreatic in 46%, ampullary in 25%, distal bile duct in 17%, and duodenal in 12%. For all 5-year survivors, the subsequent 5-year actuarial survival rate was 65%, with a median survival after achieving the 5-year landmark of 7.9 additional years. The subsequent 5-year survival by site of tumor origin was 55% for pancreatic, 66% for ampullary, 74% for bile duct, and 85% for duodenal cancer. For the age-matched population, the 5-year survival rate was 87% (P<.001 when compared with those with all periampullary cancers).

CONCLUSIONS

While the 5-year survival rate for all patients with resected periampullary adenocarcinoma is only 23%, these data imply that attainment of the 5-year survival landmark carries with it an improved survival for the subsequent 5 years. While the survival rate was less than that of the age-matched population, 65% of 5-year survivors survived 5 more years, bringing them to the 10-year postresection landmark.

One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies

OBJECTIVE

To trace the evolution of pancreaticoduodenectomy from the decade of the 1960s through the first decade of the new Millenium, through the experience of one surgeon doing 1000 consecutive operations.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

A regional resection of the head of the pancreas was first performed successfully by Kausch in 1909. The operation was popularized by Whipple in 1935, who reported 3 pancreaticoduodenectomies. Because of a hospital mortality of approximately 25%, the operation was performed infrequently until the 1980s. From the 1980s on, experience with this complex alimentary tract operation increased, and high-volume centers developed. This resulted in a significant drop in hospital mortality and allowed institutions and individuals to gain large experiences.

METHODS

Between March 1969 and May 2003, 1000 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies were performed by a single surgeon. A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed to determine the management and outcome of these patients, as well as to document the evolution of this operative procedure over 5 decades.

RESULTS

The median operative time decreased significantly over the decades, being 8.8 hours in the 1970s and 5.5 hours during the 2000s. Postoperative length of stay dropped from a median of 17 days in the 1980s to 9 days in the 2000s. There were only 10 postoperative/hospital deaths, for a mortality of 1%. A total of 405 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas. Overall 5-year survival was 18%; for the lymph node-negative patients, it was 32%; and for node-negative, margin-negative patients, it was 41%.

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreaticoduodenectomy has become a commonly performed operation in many tertiary care centers. Operative time, blood loss, and length of stay have dropped substantially. The operation has become safe, with a low hospital mortality. It has become an effective operation for pancreatic cancer in those patients in whom their tumor is margin negative and node negative.

Early removal of prophylactic drains reduces the risk of intra-abdominal infections in patients with pancreatic head resection: prospective study for 104 consecutive patients

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was designed to determine whether the period of drain insertion influences the incidence of postoperative complications.

BACKGROUND DATA

The significance of prophylactic drains after pancreatic head resection is still controversial. No report discusses the association of the period of drain insertion and postoperative complications.

METHODS

A total of 104 consecutive patients who underwent pancreatic head resection were enrolled in this study. To assess the value of prophylactic drains, we prospectively assigned the patients into 2 groups: group I underwent resection from January 2000 to January 2002 (n = 52, drain to be removed on postoperative day 8); group II underwent resection from February 2002 to December 2004 (n = 52, drain to be removed on postoperative day 4). Postoperative complications in the 2 groups were compared.

RESULTS

The rate of pancreatic fistula was significantly lower in group II (3.6%) than in group I (23%) (P = 0.0038). The rate of intra-abdominal infections, including intra-abdominal abscess and infected intra-abdominal collections, was significantly reduced in group II (7.7%) compared with group I (38%) (P = 0.0003). Eighteen of 52 (34.6%) patients in group I had an inserted drain beyond 8 days, whereas only 2 of 52 (3.7%) patients in group II had an inserted drain beyond 4 days (P = 0.0002). Cultures of drainage fluid were positive in 16 of 52 (30.8%) patients in group I, and in 2 of 52 (3.7%) patients in group II (P = 0.0002). Intraoperative bleeding (> 1500 mL), operative time (> 420 minutes, and the period of drain insertion were significant risk factors for intra-abdominal infections (P = 0.043, 0.025, 0.0003, respectively). The period of drain insertion was the only independent risk factor for intra-abdominal infections by multivariate analysis (odds ratio, 6.7).

CONCLUSION

Drain removal on postoperative day 4 was shown to be an independent factor in reducing the incidence of complications with pancreatic head resection, including intra-abdominal infections.

Oncological problems in pancreatic cancer surgery

Despite the development of more sophisticated diagnostic techniques, pancreatic carcinoma has not yet been detected in the early stage. Surgical resection provides the only chance for cure or long-term survival. The resection rate has increased due to recent advances in surgical techniques and the application of extensive surgery. However, the postoperative prognosis has been poor due to commonly occurring liver metastasis, local recurrence and peritoneal dissemination. Recent molecular-biological studies have clarified occult metastasis, micrometastasis and systemic disease in pancreatic cancer. Several oncological problems in pancreatic cancer surgery are discussed in the present review.

Systematic review of outcome of synchronous portal-superior mesenteric vein resection during pancreatectomy for cancer

BACKGROUND

Tumour clearance during pancreatectomy may be facilitated by resection of the portal-superior mesenteric vein, but this is associated with increased perioperative risk. There is no consensus about which patients benefit from portal-superior mesenteric vein resection.

METHODS

A systematic appraisal was carried out of the literature on portal-superior mesenteric vein resection during pancreatectomy to identify recurrent themes to guide management. A computerized search of the Medline and Embase databases found 52 non-duplicated studies providing relevant data in 1646 patients. Pooled data were examined for information on outcome categories relating to operation, complications, histopathology and overall outcome.

RESULTS

The median (range) number of patients with portal-superior mesenteric vein resection per cohort was 23 (4-172). Median operating time was 513 (168-1740) min and blood loss 1750 (300-26000) ml. Postoperative morbidity ranged from 9 to 78 per cent with a median per cohort of 42 per cent. There were 73 perioperative deaths (5.9 per cent of 1235 for whom mortality data were provided). Median survival was 13 months, and 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 50, 16 and 7 per cent respectively. Specimen histopathology confirmed positive nodes in 67.4 per cent.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest collective report to date on portal-superior mesenteric vein resection in pancreatectomy. The high rate of nodal metastases and low 5-year survival rates suggest that by the time of tumour involvement of the portal vein cure is unlikely, even with radical resection.

Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for benign and malignant diseases

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopy still is not universally accepted as an alternative approach for pancreatoduodenectomy. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy for benign and malignant lesions of the pancreas, and to examine whether this procedure obtains adequate margins and follows oncologic principles. To the best of the authors' knowledge, their series of laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomies is the largest reported to date.

METHODS

A prospective study of laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy was undertaken between March 1999 and June 2005. The study enrolled 25 patients (16 women and 9 men) with a mean age of 62 +/- 14 years. All the operations were performed in a single institution.

RESULTS

The operations were performed without serious complications. Three patients underwent conversion to open surgery. For 13 patients, the anastomosis was performed intracorporeally. For the remaining 9 patients, the resection was performed laparoscopically, with the reconstruction performed through a small midline incision. There was no intraoperative mortality. The mean operating time was 287 +/- 39 min, and the mean blood loss was 107 +/- 48 ml. The mean time to the first bowel movement was 6 +/- 1.5 days, and the mean time to independent self-care was 4.8 +/- 0.8 days. Seven patients experienced postoperative complications. One patient died of a cardiac event 3 days after uncomplicated surgery. The mean hospital stay was 16.2 +/- 2.7 days. All resected margins were tumor free. The mean number of retrieved lymph nodes for the malignant lesions was 18 +/- 5.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy for selected cases of benign and malignant lesions performed by highly skilled laparoscopic surgeons is feasible and safe. This method can obtain adequate margins and follow oncological principles. Larger series and longer follow-up periods are needed to establish the current results.

Complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy: the problem of current definitions

Pancreaticoduodenectomy nowadays represents a complex procedure and a challenge for the surgeon. Even though mortality is reported to be below 5% for experienced surgeons, morbidity is still around 30%-50%, often leading to prolongation of hospital stay, demanding postoperative investigations and procedures, and outpatient monitoring of the patients with complications. In the literature there is no agreement on the definitions of postoperative complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy, leading to a wide range of complication rates in different specialist units, particularly regarding the source of every complication, postoperative pancreatic fistula, and others such as delayed gastric emptying. Some authors have demonstrated that applying different definitions in homogeneous, single-center series, the incidence of a complication varied with statistical significance, implying the impossibility of correctly comparing different experiences. It seems essential to organize a Consensus Meeting among expert surgeons to prepare world-wide accepted definitions. The aim of this article is to review the current controversial definitions and to suggest a new clinical-based approach to the problem of the feasibility and reliability of the definitions themselves.

Pancreatic cancer in sweden 1980-2000: a population-based study of hospitalized patients concerning time trends in curative surgery and other interventional therapies

Progress has been made during the last few decades in the treatment of patients with pancreatic cancer. In this population-based study, the time trends in curative surgery and the choice of palliative invasive therapies in Sweden over two decades are analyzed. Patients treated for pancreatic carcinoma in Sweden during 1980-2000 were identified in the Swedish Hospital Discharge Register and the Cancer Register. These data were matched with those in the Register of Causes of Death in Sweden. Data were identified and analyzed for 16,758 patients for three periods: 1980-1986 (n = 5775), 1987-1993 (n = 6096), and 1994-2000 (n = 4887). The rate of pancreatic resection increased 7.2%, 10.9%, and 15.1% (P < 0.0001) during the three respective periods. Palliative interventions decreased from 46.8% in the first period to 41.7% in the last period. On comparing the first and the last periods, biliary bypass operations were found to decrease (from 45.9% to 18.1%), as well as gastric bypass procedures (from 33.8% to 22.8%; P < 0.0001). Interventions by percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) remained constant (10%-11%). Endoscopic therapy increased from 10.8% to 49.0%, as did the number of procedures per patient, from 1.3 to 1.7 (P < 0.0001) in the first and last periods, respectively. In 1980, the mean hospital stay was 40 days after resection and 30 days after palliative intervention. In 2000, the corresponding numbers were 26 days and 18 days (P < 0.001), respectively. During the past two decades, the rate of pancreatic resections in Sweden increased significantly. There was also a dramatic drop in palliative open surgery and a simultaneous increase in endoscopic interventions. Hospital stays decreased by more than a third.

The case for adjuvant chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer is a difficult cancer to treat effectively. Only a small proportion of patients are suitable for resection. The long-term survival following resection alone is between 10 and 18%. Adjuvant therapy aims to improve this outcome. There have been five fully reported adjuvant trials in pancreatic cancer. The largest study is the ESPAC-1 trial which demonstrated a significant survival benefit for 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy and no survival benefit for adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. A meta-analysis of these trials has confirmed the survival benefit for chemotherapy and thus adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended as the standard of care following pancreatic resection. There are further large studies which will also help to further define the optimum adjuvant chemotherapy in these patients.

Minimally invasive pancreatic surgery: the new frontier?

Recent advances in minimally invasive pancreatic surgery encompass laparoscopic, retroperitoneoscopic, endoscopic, thoracoscopic, and percutaneous approaches. Applications of endoscopic pancreatic surgery include laparoscopic resection, necrosectomy, drainage of pseudocysts, gastric and biliary bypass, and thoracoscopic splanchnotomy. This review provides an update on laparoscopic pancreatic resections. Over 400 cases of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) and enucleation (LEn) have been reported in the English literature, largely for benign disease. LDP and LEn have been associated with reductions in blood loss, morbidity, and hospital stay and a greater rate of splenic preservation compared with open surgery. Laparoscopic ultrasound is essential for intraoperative localization of insulinomas because failure of localization is the most common cause for conversion to laparotomy. The role of LDP with en bloc splenectomy and laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) for malignancy remains controversial. The majority of LPDs have been performed for malignancy. The short-term results of the limited world experience of 34 reported LPDs appear favorable.

Patterns of recurrence after curative resection of pancreatic cancer, based on autopsy findings

The autopsy findings of patients who died of recurrence after curative resection of pancreatic cancer may afford a reliable guide to increase long-term survival after surgery. Recurrence patterns were analyzed for 27 autopsied patients who had undergone potentially curative resection of pancreatic cancer. The pattern of recurrence was classified as follows: (1) local recurrence, (2) hepatic metastasis, (3) peritoneal dissemination, (4) para-aortic lymph node metastasis, and (5) distant metastasis not including hepatic metastasis, peritoneal dissemination, and para-aortic lymph node metastasis. Of the 27 autopsied patients, recurrence was confirmed for 22 of 24 patients, except for three who died of early postoperative complications. Eighteen (75%) of the 24 patients had local recurrence, 12 (50%) had hepatic metastasis, and 11 (46%) had both. For four patients, local recurrence confirmed by autopsy was undetectable by computed tomography, because the recurrent lesions had infiltrated without forming a tumor mass. Peritoneal dissemination, para-aortic lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis were found for eight (33%), five (21%), and 18 (75%) of the cases, respectively. Twenty patients died of cancer, but local recurrence was judged to be the direct cause of death of only four. Local recurrence frequently occurs, but is rarely a direct cause of death, and most patients died of metastatic disease. Therefore, treatment that focuses on local control cannot improve the survival of patients with resectable pancreatic cancer, and thus, treatment regimens that are effective against systemic metastasis are needed.

Venous resection in pancreatic cancer surgery

Vascular resection and reconstruction at the time of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) adds complexity to an already demanding operation. In this chapter, we review the indications, surgical techniques, and most recent results of venous resection combined with PD. The need for venous resection may not always be apparent on preoperative imaging, and surgeons who perform PD should be familiar with standard techniques necessary for vascular resection and reconstruction. Recent data suggest that with proper patient selection and surgeon experience, vascular resection and reconstruction can be performed safely and does not impact survival duration even in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. The median survival of patients who underwent PD and required vascular resection was 23 months, approximately 1 year longer than the survival of patients with locally advanced, surgically unresectable pancreatic cancer who receive palliative chemotherapy or chemoradiation.

Clinical significance of immunohistochemically detectable lymph node metastasis in adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of immunohistochemically identified lymph node metastasis on survival in patients with carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater.

METHODS

Three hundred and twenty-six regional lymph nodes dissected from pancreatoduodenectomy specimens from 25 patients with ampulla of Vater carcinoma were immunostained with anticytokeratin antibody (CAM 5.2). The clinicopathological significance of immunohistochemically detectable lymph node metastasis was evaluated and compared with that of other potential prognostic factors.

RESULTS

The frequency of lymph node involvement in relation to the total number of dissected lymph nodes increased from 5.5 per cent (18 of 326) using haematoxylin and eosin staining to 9.5 per cent (31 of 326) using cytokeratin immunostaining (P < 0.001). Lymph node involvement was revealed by haematoxylin and eosin staining in eight of 25 patients and by cytokeratin immunostaining in 11 of 25 patients (P = 0.006). Absence of immunohistochemically detectable lymph node metastasis was identified as an independent predictor of improved postoperative survival.

CONCLUSION

Immunostaining of dissected lymph nodes adds additional information to data obtained by conventional haematoxylin and eosin staining when determining the prognosis of patients with carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater.

Treatment of familial pancreatic cancer and its precursors

Approximately 10% of pancreatic cancers are believed to have a familial basis. The familial aggregation of pancreatic cancers provides a unique opportunity to prevent the development of pancreatic cancer, to identify and treat precancerous lesions of the pancreas, and to advance our understanding of the genetic basis for the development of all forms of pancreatic cancer. After appropriate genetic counseling, individuals with a strong family history of pancreatic cancer can now be tested for inherited genetic alterations that are known to increase the risk of pancreatic cancer. These include germline BRCA2, STK11/LKB1, p16/CDKN2A and PRSS1 gene mutations. Individuals with one of these inherited genetic alterations and individuals with a strong family history of pancreatic cancer can be counseled on smoking cessation and possible dietary modifications. Selected individuals, even if they are asymptomatic, can be screened using a combination of endoscopic ultrasound and multidetector computed tomography. Patients found to have a mass lesion in the pancreas would then be candidates for surgical resection. The resection of noninvasive precancers will cure these lesions before they have the opportunity to spread and metastasize. Even with the best early detection efforts, some patients will still be diagnosed with an invasive cancer. Surgical resection of invasive pancreatic cancer is proven to be safe and can provide long-term survival in patients with small, node-negative, and margin-negative cancers. Chemotherapy and radiation therapy are effective in some patients with invasive pancreatic cancer, but these therapies do not usually result in long-term cures. Individuals with a family history of pancreatic cancer may also choose to join a research study such as the National Familial Pancreas Tumor Registry.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma

In spite of the high mortality in pancreatic cancer, significant progress is being made. This review discusses multimodality therapy for patients with pancreatic cancer. Surgical therapy currently offers the only potential monomodal cure for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. However, only 10-20% of patients present with tumors that are amenable to resection, and even after resection of localized cancers, long-term survival is rare. The addition of chemoradiation therapy significantly increases median survival. To achieve long-term success in treating this disease it is therefore increasingly important to identify effective neoadjuvant/adjuvant multimodality therapies. Preoperative chemoradiation for potentially resectable pancreatic cancer has the following advantages: (1) neoadjuvant treatment would eliminate the delay of adjuvant treatment due to postoperative complications; (2) neoadjuvant treatment could avoid unnecessary surgery for patients with metastatic disease evident on restaging after neoadjuvant therapy; (3) down-staging after neoadjuvant therapy may increase the likelihood of negative surgical margins; and (4) neoadjuvant treatment could prevent peritoneal tumor cell implantation and dissemination caused during surgery. This review systematically summarizes the current status, controversies, and prospects of neoadjuvant treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Distribution of lymphatic vessels in the neural plexuses surrounding the superior mesenteric artery

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether lymphatic vessels exist in the neural plexuses surrounding the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and the ultrastructural relationship between neural plexuses and lymphatic vessels.

METHODS

A total of 970 serial sections including the structure surrounding the SMA were obtained from 9 cadavers. They were subjected to conventional hematoxylin/eosin staining and immunostaining for the lymphatic marker D2-40. Epithelial membrane antigen and S100 were also immunostained to identify the perineurium and nerve bundles, respectively.

RESULTS

Thin-walled, erythrocyte-free vessels staining with lymphatic markers (D2-40) were found in the neural plexuses surrounding the SMA along a full circumference. There seemed to be a distribution correlation between lymphatic vessels and neural plexuses. Lymphatic vessels were not identified within the nerve bundles. The plexuses contained no lymph nodes in any sections.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge we report the immunohistochemical visualization of lymphatic vessels in peri-SMA neural plexuses for the first time. Therefore, particular attention should be paid to the lymphatic vessels within neural plexuses as a possible route of invasion and the source of pancreatic cancer recurrence.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without distal gastrectomy and extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma--part 3: update on 5-year survival

The study objective was to update the survival analysis at the 5-year mark of patients undergoing standard versus radical (extended) pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for periampullary adenocarcinoma (cancers of the pancreas, ampulla, common bile duct, and duodenum). A prospective randomized trial was performed (April 1996 through June 2001) comparing survival after pylorus-preserving PD resection (standard) to survival after PD with distal gastrectomy and retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (radical). An interim report (Ann Surg 1999;229:613) and report after closing the trial (Ann Surg 2002;236:355) showed no differences in survival between the standard and radical groups. Two hundred ninety-nine patients were randomized to either the standard or radical group. Five patients were excluded from final analysis because final pathology failed to reveal adenocarcinoma. The 5-year survival of the two groups was evaluated. The median live patient follow-up is now 64 months (5.33 years). For all periampullary cancer patients, those undergoing standard resection had 1- and 5-year survival rates of 78% and 25%, respectively, compared with 76% and 31% (P = 0.57) for those patients in the radical group. For pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients, the 1- and 5-year survival rates in the standard group were 75% and 13%, respectively, compared with 73% and 29% in the radical group (P = 0.13). The increased morbidity rate, longer operative time, and similar survival for radical PD led us to conclude that pylorus-preserving PD without retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy should be the procedure of choice for most patients with resectable periampullary adenocarcinoma. While there is an intriguing trend toward improved survival in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma in the radical group, this trend may be largely accounted for by the higher incidence of microscopically margin positive resections in the standard resection group (21%) compared with a 5% incidence in the radical group (P = 0.002).

A prospective randomized trial comparing standard pancreatoduodenectomy with pancreatoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy in resectable pancreatic head adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

To compare operative morbidity, mortality, quality of life, and survival after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) versus pancreatoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy (PD/ELND) in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

From May 1997 to July 2003 there were 132 patients with biopsy examination-proven or suspected adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head who agreed to participate in a single-institution, prospective, randomized trial. If resectable at operation, patients then were randomized to standard PD (40 patients) or PD/ELND (39 patients). Quality of life was assessed by using the Functional Assessment of Response to Cancer Therapy specific to the pancreas. Morbidity, mortality, and survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

Demographics and pathologic characteristics for both groups were similar. When comparing PD/ELND with standard PD, the median operating time was greater for the PD/ELND group (7.6 h vs 6.2 h, P < .01), blood transfusion more likely (44% vs 22%, P < .05), and the median number of lymph nodes resected was greater (36 vs 15 nodes, P < .01). Morbidity and mortality rates were comparable. Median durations of stay were 11 and 10.5 days (P = NS), respectively. There were no significant differences in 1-year (71% vs 82%), 3-year (25% vs 41%), 5-year (16.5% vs 16.4%), and median (19 vs 26 mo) survival (P = .32). At 4 months postoperatively, diarrhea, body appearance, and bowel control scored lower on the Functional Assessment of Response to Cancer Therapy specific to the pancreas after PD/ELND (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Although a much larger study would have more power to compare statistically the survival between groups, both the decrement in quality of life and similar studies showing no survival difference make PD/ELND unattractive for further prospective investigation.

A prospective randomized trial comparing standard pancreatoduodenectomy with pancreatoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy in resectable pancreatic head adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

To compare operative morbidity, mortality, quality of life, and survival after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) versus pancreatoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy (PD/ELND) in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

From May 1997 to July 2003 there were 132 patients with biopsy examination-proven or suspected adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head who agreed to participate in a single-institution, prospective, randomized trial. If resectable at operation, patients then were randomized to standard PD (40 patients) or PD/ELND (39 patients). Quality of life was assessed by using the Functional Assessment of Response to Cancer Therapy specific to the pancreas. Morbidity, mortality, and survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

Demographics and pathologic characteristics for both groups were similar. When comparing PD/ELND with standard PD, the median operating time was greater for the PD/ELND group (7.6 h vs 6.2 h, P < .01), blood transfusion more likely (44% vs 22%, P < .05), and the median number of lymph nodes resected was greater (36 vs 15 nodes, P < .01). Morbidity and mortality rates were comparable. Median durations of stay were 11 and 10.5 days (P = NS), respectively. There were no significant differences in 1-year (71% vs 82%), 3-year (25% vs 41%), 5-year (16.5% vs 16.4%), and median (19 vs 26 mo) survival (P = .32). At 4 months postoperatively, diarrhea, body appearance, and bowel control scored lower on the Functional Assessment of Response to Cancer Therapy specific to the pancreas after PD/ELND (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Although a much larger study would have more power to compare statistically the survival between groups, both the decrement in quality of life and similar studies showing no survival difference make PD/ELND unattractive for further prospective investigation.

Current practice patterns in pancreatic surgery: results of a multi-institutional analysis of seven large surgical departments in Germany with 1454 pancreatic head resections, 1999 to 2004 (German Advanced Surgical Treatment study group)

Despite decreasing mortality rates, morbidity is still high after pancreatic head resection. Comparative data in the United States and Europe show a relationship between hospital volume and mortality. Treatment strategies vary frequently, partially because of the lack of evidence-based data. We performed a multi-institutional analysis in Germany evaluating current numbers, indications, techniques, and complication rates of pancreatic head resection. Questionnaires were completed by seven high-volume surgical departments regarding quantitative and qualitative aspects of pancreatic head resections in the period from 1999 to 2004 (five prospective and two retrospective institutional databases). A total of 1454 pancreatic head resections (944 for malignancy) were reported. Mean annual hospital volume ranged from 14 to 52 (10 to 43 in malignancy). Mortality was between 1.1% and 4.8%, morbidity was between 24% and 46%, and pancreatic leakage was between 9% and 20%. In malignant disease, all centers perform standard lymphadenectomy and regard arterial infiltration as a contraindication for resection. However, the rate of portal vein resection varied from 0% to 28%. No consensus is seen on the type of surgery for malignancy and chronic pancreatitis. After resection for pancreatic cancer less than one fourth of the patients receive adjuvant therapy. The results of our analysis in Germany confirm that pancreatic head resection can be performed with low mortality in specialized units. Variations in indications, operative technique, and perioperative care may demonstrate the lack of evidence-based data and/or personal and institutional experience. The low number of patients receiving adjuvant therapy after resection of pancreatic cancer suggests that more efforts must be made to establish novel adjuvant therapies under randomized study conditions.

Meta-analysis of the value of somatostatin and its analogues in reducing complications associated with pancreatic surgery

BACKGROUND

The role of somatostatin and its analogues in reducing complications after pancreatic resection is controversial. This is a meta-analysis of the evidence of benefit.

METHODS

A literature search using Medline and ISI Proceedings with exploration of the references identified 22 studies. Of these, ten met the inclusion criteria for data extraction. Estimates of effectiveness were performed using fixed- and random-effects models. The effect was calculated as an odds ratio (OR) with 95 per cent confidence intervals (c.i.) using the Mantel-Haenszel method. Level of significance was set at P < 0.050.

RESULTS

Outcomes for 1918 patients were compared. Somatostatin and its analogues did not reduce the mortality rate after pancreatic surgery (OR 1.17 (0.70 to 1.94); P = 0.545) but did reduce both the total morbidity (OR 0.62 (0.46 to 0.85); P = 0.003) and pancreas-specific complications (OR 0.56 (0.39 to 0.81); P = 0.002). Somatostatin and its analogues reduced the rate of biochemical fistula (OR 0.45 (0.33 to 0.62); P < 0.001) but not the incidence of clinical anastomotic disruption (OR 0.80 (0.44 to 1.45); P = 0.459).

CONCLUSION

Somatostatin and its analogues reduce the incidence of complications after surgery.

Mutant KRAS in the initiation of pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is the most common pancreatic neoplasm. There are approximately 33,000 new cases of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma annually in the United States with approximately the same number of deaths. Surgery represents the only opportunity for cure, but this is restricted to early stage pancreatic cancer. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma evolves from a progressive cascade of cellular, morphological and architectural changes from normal ductal epithelium through preneoplastic lesions termed pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN). These PanIN lesions are in turn associated with somatic alterations in canonical oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. Most notably, early PanIN lesions and almost all pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas involve mutations in the K-ras oncogene. Thus, it is believed that activating K-ras mutations are critical for initiation of pancreatic ductal carcinogenesis. This has been proven through elegant genetically engineered mouse models in which a Cre-activated K-Ras(G12D) allele is knocked into the endogenous K-Ras locus and crossed with mice expressing Cre recombinase in pancreatic tissue. As a result, mechanistic insights are now possible into how K-Ras contributes to pancreatic ductal carcinogenesis, what cooperating events are required, and armed with this knowledge, new therapeutic approaches can be pursued and tested.

Positron emission tomography/computed tomography influences on the management of resectable pancreatic cancer and its cost-effectiveness

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the impact of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) on the management of presumed resectable pancreatic cancer and to assess the cost of this new staging procedure.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

PET using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) is increasingly used for the staging of pancreatic cancer, but anatomic information is limited. Integrated PET/CT enables optimal anatomic delineation of PET findings and identification of FDG-negative lesions on computed tomography (CT) images and might improve preoperative staging.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients with suspected pancreatic cancer who had a PET/CT between June 2001 to April 2004 were entered into a prospective database. Routine staging included abdominal CT, chest x-ray, and CA 19-9 measurement. FDG-PET/CT was conducted according to a standardized protocol, and findings were confirmed by histology. Cost benefit analysis was performed based on charged cost of PET/CT and pancreatic resection and included the time frame of staging and surgery.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients with a median age of 61 years (range, 40-80 years) were included in this analysis. Fifty-one patients had lesions in the head and 8 in the tail of the pancreas. The positive and negative predictive values for pancreatic cancer were 91% and 64%, respectively. PET/CT detected additional distant metastases in 5 and synchronous rectal cancer in 2 patients. PET/CT findings changed the management in 16% of patients with pancreatic cancer deemed resectable after routine staging (P = 0.031) and was cost saving.

CONCLUSIONS

PET/CT represents an important staging procedure prior to pancreatic resection for cancer, since it significantly improves patient selection and is cost-effective.

Duodenal diverticulum mimicking a cystic pancreatic neoplasm

Duodenal diverticula occur very commonly, with a prevalence as high as 22%. They are most frequently located in the second or third portions of the duodenum, and by nature of their proximity to the head of the pancreas, can be mistaken for cystic pancreatic neoplasms by diagnostic imaging. Patients with presumed cystic neoplasms of the pancreas often receive pancreaticoduodenectomies, which at high volume medical centres carry mortality and morbidity rates of 2-4% and 29-44%, respectively. Although most duodenal diverticula are recognized in single or repeat CT scans by the presence of air or contrast medium within the diverticula, we present a case in which serial CTs failed to yield any clue to the diverticulum's true nature and pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed. For presumed cystic lesions adjacent to the duodenum, barium studies, endoscopy, and/or endoscopic ultrasound-guided aspiration should therefore be pursued in addition to all available CT evidence prior to surgery.