Randomised controlled trial of aspirin and aspirin plus heparin in pregnant women with recurrent miscarriage associated with phospholipid antibodies (or antiphospholipid antibodies)

Antiphospholipid antibodies in women at risk for preeclampsia

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine whether positive results of tests for any of 5 antiphospholipid antibodies are associated with recurrent preeclampsia among women with a history of preeclampsia in a previous pregnancy.

STUDY DESIGN

Second-trimester serum samples were obtained from 317 women with preeclampsia in a previous pregnancy who were being followed up in a prospective treatment trial. The serum samples were measured by enzyme-linked immunoassay for immunoglobulin G and immunoglobulin M antibodies against 5 phospholipids. Positive results were analyzed with regard to preeclampsia, severe preeclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction, and preterm delivery.

RESULTS

Sixty-two of the 317 women (20%) had recurrent preeclampsia develop, 19 (6%) had severe preeclampsia, and 18 (5.8%) were delivered of infants with growth restriction. Positive results of tests for immunoglobulin G or immunoglobulin M antiphospholipid antibodies were not associated with recurrent preeclampsia. Positive results for immunoglobulin G or immunoglobulin M antibodies at the 99th percentile were also not associated with preterm delivery. Positive results at the 99th percentile for immunoglobulin G antiphosphatidylserine antibody were associated with severe preeclampsia, and positive results at the 99th percentile for immunoglobulin G anticardiolipin, antiphosphatidylinositol, and antiphosphatidylglycerol antibodies were associated with intrauterine growth restriction. The positive predictive values for these outcomes all were approximately 30%.

CONCLUSION

Positive results of testing for antiphospholipid antibodies in the second trimester were not associated with recurrent preeclampsia among women at risk because of a history of preeclampsia. Positive results for immunoglobulin G antiphosphatidylserine antibody were associated with severe preeclampsia, and positive results for immunoglobulin G anticardiolipin, antiphosphatidylinositol, and antiphosphatidylglycerol antibodies were associated with intrauterine growth restriction. However, the positive predictive values for all these associations were modest. Testing for antiphospholipid antibodies during pregnancy is of little prognostic value in the assessment of the risk for recurrent preeclampsia among women with a history of preeclampsia.

Systemic lupus erythematosus

This review covers major advances in clinical issues related to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) published between 1995 and 2000. The classification criteria for both SLE and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) have been updated, and up to 19 different subsets of neuropsychiatric lupus have been defined. New epidemiological data show that the incidence of new cases and the survival of patients with SLE are both increasing. Several randomised controlled trials have defined the role of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, antimalarials, and hormonal treatment in the management of SLE. New data are available for drugs such as ciclosporin and thalidomide. Finally, several new treatments for severe refractory cases, such as mycophenolate mofetil and stem-cell transplantation, are being increasingly used. New data also refer to management of thrombosis in APS and high-risk pregnancies in women with SLE or APS.

Pregnancy in systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease that predominantly affects women of reproductive age. Pregnancy and its outcome is a major concern to most SLE patients. Queries regarding the risk of disease flares during pregnancy, chance of fetal loss, and the safety of various drugs are often raised. With the improvement in the understanding of the pathogenesis of SLE and the judicious use of immunosuppressive drugs, better disease control can now be achieved and SLE patients should not be deprived of the opportunity for bearing children. Prepregnancy counselling and close collaboration with other specialists such as the obstetricians and the perinatologists is essential in optimising the maternal and fetal outcome in lupus pregnancies. In this review, important issues regarding the fertility rate, optimal timing of conception, risk of disease flares during lupus pregnancy, pregnancy course, fetal outcome, safety of various drugs used for disease control during pregnancy and lactation, and contraceptive advice are discussed.

Effect of thrombophylaxis on uterine and fetal circulation in pregnant women with a history of pregnancy complications

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of thromboprophylactic therapy on fetal and maternal Doppler flow parameters in pregnant women with severe complications in previous pregnancies and evidence of acquired or congenital thrombophilia in the current pregnancy.

METHODS

Sixty-five patients with a history of recurrent abortions, intrauterine fetal death, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), and severe early-onset preeclampsia were tested for the presence of acquired or congenital thrombophilia. Those with positive findings were prescribed low-dose aspirin plus low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) (enoxaparin); the remainder received low-dose aspirin only. A Doppler flow study was performed before and after treatment and in the third trimester of pregnancy.

RESULTS

Of the 65 pregnancies, four ended in spontaneous abortion and were excluded from the analysis. Of the 61 women with completed pregnancies, 37 (61%) had evidence of acquired or congenital thrombophilia: 22 (36%) protein S deficiency; 1 (2%) protein C deficiency; 2 (3%) activated protein C resistance (APC-R); 2 (3%) IgG for antiphospholipid antibodies; 1 (2%) circulating anticoagulant; and 9 (15%) a combined defect. This group showed a significant decrease in mean uterine artery pulsatility index (PI) before and after treatment (1.32+/-0.36 vs. 1.04+/-0.23, P=.006), whereas the remaining 24 patients treated with low-dose aspirin only had nonsignificant changes. Pearson's correlation test yielded no correlations of the pregnancy outcome parameters with Doppler flow values in the umbilical or uterine arteries.

CONCLUSIONS

Thromboprophylactic therapy transiently improves maternal circulation parameters in patients with thrombophilia at risk of fetal loss and other severe complications of pregnancy, but not in correlation with their pregnancy outcome. Therefore, Doppler examination of maternofetal circulation in the second trimester is not predictive of pregnancy outcome.

Low-molecular-weight heparin during pregnancy

Thromboembolism is an infrequent, yet serious cause of both maternal and fetal morbidity and death during pregnancy and the puerperium. Pregnancy itself increases the risk of thromboembolic complications probably owing to a combination of hypercoagulability and venous stasis due to venous dilation. Recent studies have indicated that some serious obstetric complications are correlated with inherited or acquired thrombophilia. The prevalence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) has been extimated to be 1 per 1000-2000 pregnancies in retrospective studies. Anticoagulant treatment and prophylaxis both before and during pregnancy are based on unfractionated heparin (UH), low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and warfarin. Warfarin is teratogenous if administered between the 6th and the 12th week. LMWH is replacing UH in the prevention and treatment of VTE both outside and more recently during pregnancy with the same indications, and also for obstetric complications. This paper assesses the safety and efficacy of heparin therapy during pregnancy and the puerperium. Its cardiovascular and obstetric indications and regimens and maternal and fetal side-effects are also discussed.

Use of antithrombotic agents during pregnancy

Anticoagulant therapy is indicated during pregnancy for the prevention and treatment of VTE; for the prevention and treatment of systemic embolism in patients with mechanical heart valves; and, often in combination with aspirin, for the prevention of pregnancy loss in women with APLAs or thrombophilia and previous pregnancy losses. Several questions concerning anticoagulant therapy remain unanswered. It appears that LMWH will largely replace UFH. Oral anticoagulants are fetopathic, but the true risks of the warfarin embryopathy and CNS abnormalities remain unknown. There is considerable evidence that warfarin embryopathy occurs only when oral anticoagulants are administered between the sixth week and the 12th week of gestation and that oral anticoagulants may not be fetopathic when administered in the first 6 weeks of gestation. Oral anticoagulant therapy should be avoided in the weeks before delivery because of the risk of serious perinatal bleeding caused by the trauma of delivery to the anticoagulated fetus. The safety of aspirin during the first trimester of pregnancy is still a subject of debate. There is a concern about the efficacy of UFH in the prevention of arterial embolism in pregnant women with mechanical heart valves. Finally, the optimum management of pregnant women with thrombophilia (and prior pregnancy loss and/or prior VTE) is unknown, but trials of anticoagulant therapy are ongoing. Because it is safe for the fetus, LMWH (or UFH) is the anticoagulant of choice during pregnancy for situations in which its efficacy is established. There is some doubt that heparin is effective for the prevention of systemic embolism in patients with mechanical heart valves. Low doses of heparin or poorly controlled heparin therapy are not effective in preventing systemic embolism in patients with mechanical heart valves.

Thyroid antibodies and fetal loss: an evolving story

This article reviews the literature on thyroid antibodies and miscarriage. In 1990, in a study designed to determine the incidence and etiology of postpartum thyroiditis, a serendipitous finding emerged revealing an association between thyroid antibodies and spontaneous miscarriage. Subsequently, four other studies, performed on three different continents, have confirmed the correlation. Six studies have evaluated the relationship between thyroid antibodies and recurrent abortion, defined as three or more spontaneous miscarriages. The majority of the studies (67%) reported a statistically significant increase in the incidence of thyroid antibodies in the recurrent abortion group as compared to controls. Four intervention trials have evaluated the impact of immunosuppressive therapy in women with thyroid antibodies. Although all of the trials revealed a decrease in the incidence of recurrent abortion, each study was limited by methodological concerns. A recently developed murine model of pregnancy has also demonstrated increased fetal loss in female mice immunized with thyroglobulin when mated with allogeneic males. The implications of these data generated over the last decade are discussed.

Thrombophilia: What's a Practitioner to Do?

Management of thrombophilia is an ever-changing field as new disorders are described and additional clinical experience accrues. This paper addresses three common management issues in the care of patients with thrombophilia. The first two topics are updates for common but perplexing hypercoagulable states and the last topic introduces a new option for optimal management of oral anticoagulant therapy. Dr. Jacob Rand updates and organizes the approach to patients with antiphospholipid syndrome. This syndrome is a common acquired thrombophilic state, but the diagnosis and treatment of patients remains a challenge. Dr. Rand outlines his diagnostic and treatment strategies based on the current understanding of this complicated syndrome. Dr. Barbara Konkle addresses the special concerns of managing women with thrombophilia. Hematologists are often asked to advise on the risks of hormonal therapy or pregnancy in a woman with a personal or family history of thrombosis or with an abnormal laboratory finding. Dr. Konkle reviews the available data on the risks of hormonal therapy and pregnancy in women with and without known underlying thrombophilic risk factors. In Section III, Dr. Gail Macik will discuss a new approach to warfarin management. Several instruments are now available for home prothrombin time (PT) monitoring. Self-testing and self management of warfarin are slowly emerging as reliable alternatives to traditional provider-based care and Dr. Macik reviews the instruments available and the results of studies that support this new management option.

Mutations in coagulation factors in women with unexplained late fetal loss

BACKGROUND

Factor V and prothrombin-gene mutations are independent risk factors for venous thrombosis; it is debated whether a mutation in the gene encoding methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase, an enzyme involved in homocysteine metabolism, also increases the risk of venous thrombosis. Whether any of these mutations is associated with an increased risk of late fetal death is not known.

METHODS

We studied 67 women with a first episode of unexplained late fetal loss (fetal death after 20 weeks or more of gestation) and 232 women who had had one or more normal pregnancies and no late fetal losses. All the women were tested for the presence of three gene mutations. Women with other thrombophilic conditions were excluded from the study.

RESULTS

Eleven of the 67 women with late fetal loss (16 percent) and 13 of the 232 control women (6 percent) had either the factor V or the prothrombin mutation. The relative risks of late fetal loss in carriers of the factor V and prothrombin mutations were 3.2 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.0 to 10.9) and 3.3 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.1 to 10.3), respectively. Thirteen percent of the women whose fetuses died and 20 percent of the control women were homozygous for the mutation in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene (relative risk, 0.8; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.5 to 1.2).

CONCLUSIONS

Both the factor V and the prothrombin mutations are associated with an approximate tripling of the risk of late fetal loss.

Epidemiology and the medical causes of miscarriage

Human reproduction is extraordinarily wasteful. The reasons for this have taxed all of the contributors to this book. As we move into the 21st century it is sobering to reflect on the fact that we have failed to harness the power of the evolving revolution in molecular medical biology to answer the fundamental question: why is the fate of a fertilized egg so hazardous and so unsuccessful? The following account summarizes our limited knowledge of the epidemiology of miscarriage and then moves on to consider some of the medical causes of miscarriage. The contribution of genetic abnormalities to the problem of pregnancy wastage is discussed elsewhere in this volume.

Antithrombotic therapy in high-risk pregnancy

Venous thromboembolism remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality associated with pregnancy and puerperium. Specific risk factors for this disorder can be identified before or during pregnancy and delivery. The heritable defects believed to be associated with venous thrombosis are factor V Leiden mutation; elevated antiphospholipid antibodies; and deficiencies of antithrombin, protein C, and protein S. Women with a history of thromboembolism and thrombophilia should receive antenatal and postpartum thrombosis prophylaxis.

Obstetric management of antiphospholipid syndrome

The obstetric management of women with antiphospholipid (aPL) syndrome remains controversial. Despite recent advances, the controversies have been fueled by our limited understanding of the multi-factorial causes of aPL-associated pregnancy loss and the lack of data from randomized studies. We have escaped from the narrow confines of the concept of aPL pregnancy loss being purely thrombotic in aetiology and attention is now focused on the adverse effects of aPL on embryonic implantation and trophoblast invasion. Combined treatment with aspirin and heparin has been demonstrated in two randomized studies to lead to a high live birth rate in aPL pregnancies. However, successful pregnancies are characterized by a high rate of perinatal complications and some women are refractory to this treatment combination. In addition to addressing these issues, multi-centre studies, which should perhaps be internet based, are needed to identify those aPL that are causative of pregnancy complications and those that are not, the role of IVIG and the long-term follow-up of both mothers with aPL and their babies.

Contemporary issues for spontaneous abortion. Does recurrent abortion exist?

Most of the time, spontaneous abortion is a random event and represents the natural selection process. Although a recurrent factor may be present and may cause one or more abortions for a given couple, such instances are rare. Well-substantiated causes include parental chromosomal abnormalities (e.g., translocation), antiphospholipid syndrome, PCOD, and maternal age greater than 40 years. Müllerian duplication defects are most likely a cause of pregnancy loss for some women. A growing body of evidence refutes the role of corpus luteum defect as a common cause of recurrent abortion. Other causes are numerically infrequent in occurrence. It is likely that cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption contribute to pregnancy wastage. Although some therapies for the causes listed herein have been proven effective by randomized controlled trials, most have not. Given the excellent outcome demonstrated for most couples with unexplained recurrent abortion in the absence of treatment, it is difficult to recommend unproven therapies, especially if they are invasive and expensive. Instead of examining the environment in which pregnancy has occurred or been planned, clinicians have simply counted the number of spontaneous abortions among couples in an attempt to determine who should be evaluated. The former approach would seem most appropriate and proactive.

Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome: implications for nursing practice

Lupus anticoagulant and anticardiolipin are antiphospholipid antibodies. The presence of either or both antiphospholipid antibodies may result in antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, which is typified by recurrent venous or arterial thrombosis, recurrent fetal loss, and thrombocytopenia. Many features of this syndrome are not well understood, including its prevalence, how and why antiphospholipid autoantibodies develop, and their definitive role in disease states. In clinical practice, nurses care for patients and families with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome who require treatment, education, and support.

Thrombophilia in pregnancy

Thrombophilia can be defined as a predisposition to thrombosis. Abnormalities in haemostasis that are associated with clinical thrombophilia include heritable defects, such as mutations in the genes encoding the natural anticoagulants antithrombin, protein C, and protein S, or clotting factors prothrombin and factor V, and acquired defects, such as antiphospholipids. Women with thrombophilic defects have been shown to be at increased risk, not only of pregnancy associated thromboembolism, but also of other vascular complications of pregnancy, including pre-eclampsia and fetal loss. Routine thrombophilia screening of all women attending antenatal clinics is not recommended. Because some thrombophilic defects--for example, type 1 antithrombin deficiency and antiphospholipids--are associated with a high risk of recurrent thrombosis or other pregnancy complications, it is suggested that selected women (those with a personal or confirmed family history of venous thromboembolism or with a history of recurrent fetal loss) are screened for these defects to allow pregnancy management planning.

Low-molecular-weight heparin for thrombophilia in pregnant women

OBJECTIVE

Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is the anticoagulant of choice during pregnancy because it is associated with a low incidence of osteoporosis and thrombocytopenia. Antithrombotic therapy has recently been used to prevent pregnancy loss in high-risk patients with evidence of acquired or congenital thrombophilia. The aim of the present study was to gain further information on the teratogenic potential of LMWH in this patient group.

METHODS

The study population included 46 patients with a history of recurrent abortions, intrauterine fetal death or intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and severe early-onset preeclampsia. Patients with a history of thromboembolism or positive findings for thrombophilia were prescribed LMWH (enoxaparin sodium, 40 mg daily) in combination with low-dose aspirin (100 mg daily) in the first trimester (group 1, n=14) or the second trimester (group 2, n=17); the remaining 15 patients received low-dose aspirin alone (group 3).

RESULTS

No significant differences were noted between the groups in the incidence of congenital malformations or abortions, IUGR or preterm deliveries. One infant in group 1 had familial bilateral postaxial polydactyly of the hands and one in group 3 had patent ductus arteriosus.

CONCLUSION

Despite the small size of the study groups, our results support the assumption that the use of LMWH is safe, at least as a teratogenic agent, in patients with thrombophilia throughout pregnancy.

Treatment of the antiphospholipid antibody syndrome: progress in the last five years?

The gold standard for treatment of the antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS) after thrombosis remains high-intensity warfarin, and, in pregnancy, heparin and aspirin. Exciting developments include the potential role of hydroxychloroquine as a prophylactic drug, stem cell transplantation, and B-cell tolerance. Animal models appear to be a fruitful "proving ground" of new therapies. The introduction of revised classification criteria for APS should aid in appropriate characterization of, and selection of, patients for clinical trials.

Antiphospholipid (Hughes) syndrome in systemic lupus erythematosus

APS is found in 20% to 35% of patients with SLE. PAPS and secondary APS have similar features and aPL specificities. The clinical course of the secondary syndrome is independent of the activity and severity of lupus, but the presence of APS worsens the prognosis of patients with lupus. Some features of SLE may result from thrombosis in patients with APS; thus, these patients require anticoagulation rather than corticosteroids. Novel preliminary classification criteria for APS were formulated during a postconference workshop held in Sapporo, Japan, following the Eight International Symposium on Antiphospholipid Antibodies. Treatment of APS remains empirical because of limited controlled prospective data. There is strong evidence that patients with aPL-associated thrombosis are subject to recurrences and require prophylactic therapy. APS is a treatable cause of recurrent fetal loss in women with SLE. The treatment of choice is anticoagulation with heparin, either standard unfractionated heparin or LMWH. One of the main reasons for the improving outcomes in APS pregnancies is closer obstetric surveillance.

Pharmacokinetic profile of a low-molecular weight heparin (reviparin) in pregnant patients. A prospective cohort study

Anticoagulant therapy during pregnancy is problematic. Patients are frequently treated with long-term low-molecular weight heparin despite a lack of evidence for its effectiveness, and in the absence of validated dosing recommendations. The objectives of this investigation were to characterize the safety and pharmacokinetic behavior of a low-molecular weight heparin (reviparin) administered throughout pregnancy. Forty-two patients followed in a tertiary-care rheumatology clinic who received prophylactic doses of reviparin (4900 anti-Xa units subcutaneously once daily) were enrolled in this investigation. Anti-Xa heparin levels, weights, and gestational ages of the patients were obtained on up to four occasions distributed throughout their pregnancy. The achieved anti-Xa heparin levels were highly correlated with the patient's weight, irrespective of the gestational age. No toxicity other than injection site hematomas was observed. The achieved intensity of anticoagulation with reviparin varies during pregnancy in direct proportion to the patient's weight. This variability may mandate dose adjustment in response to changes in a patient's weight during pregnancy, particularly if low-molecular weight heparin is administered at therapeutic doses.

Thromboembolic disease in pregnancy

Recent publications have produced some new estimates of the incidence of pregnancy-related venous thromboembolic disease, and have found increasing evidence of an association between inherited thrombophilias and pregnancy complications and fetal loss. The balance of benefit and risk of thromboprophylaxis remains to be evaluated, and studies are needed to provide a sound basis for clinical practice.

The effect of thrombophylaxis on pregnancy outcome in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss associated with factor V Leiden mutation

OBJECTIVE

To observe the effect of thrombophylaxis on pregnancy in women with a history of unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss also carrying the factor V Leiden mutation.

METHODS

Between 1 January and 31 December 1996, activated protein C (APC) resistance and factor V Leiden mutation were prospectively measured in 56 nonpregnant women, with a history of two or more unexplained recurrent pregnancy losses. During the same study period, seven women carrying the factor V Leiden mutation conceived, and were subsequently followed throughout their pregnancy. Subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin (LMWH, enoxaparin, 40 mg/day) and oral low dose aspirin (100 mg/day) were administered throughout the pregnancies, starting at early first trimester. Ultrasound and Doppler umbilical and fetal middle cerebral arterial flow studies were performed in the second and third trimesters, and the course and outcome of the pregnancies were documented.

RESULTS

Activated protein C resistance and factor V Leiden were found in 20 (36%) and 12 (21%) women of the study, respectively. Five of the seven pregnancies occuring progressed uneventfully to term with normal fetal growth, normal Doppler flow studies and uneventful neonatal outcome. Two of the seven women had early missed abortions.

CONCLUSIONS

Thrombophylaxis, beginning in early pregnancy, in women with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss associated with factor V Leiden mutation, seems to be safe and allow normal fetal development and good neonatal outcome. To prove the efficacy of thrombophylaxis by LMWH and low dose aspirin in this setting prospective controlled studies seem to be justified.

[Aspirin and antiphospholipid syndrome]

INTRODUCTION

Antiphospholipid syndrome is the most frequent cause of acquired thrombophilia. Aspirin may have some indications. CURRENT KONWLEDGE AND KEY POINTS: The usefulness of low doses of aspirin is now well demonstrated in the prevention of obstetric complications associated with antiphospholipid antibodies (especially pregnancy loss). When heparin is combined with low-dose aspirin, the recurrent rate of fetal loss is lower than 30%. In patients with arterial or venous thrombosis, there is a high rate of recurrence during the two first years except if high-dose warfarin was used (i.e., INR > or = 3). The association warfarin-aspirin in secondary prevention of thrombosis may be evaluated in prospective studies. It is not so clear in the literature and in our experience that warfarin is superior to aspirin in stroke recurrence prevention in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies, except in Sneddon's syndrome. There are no guidelines in primary thrombosis prevention in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies. In lupus patients, aspirin may not be sufficient after many years of follow-up in preventing a first episode of thrombosis. Prospective studies may be undertaken. Atherosclerotic patients with antiphospholipid antibodies are particularly exposed to the risk of thrombosis after revascularisation or angioplasty and stent implantation. Aspirin may have a place in those patients but these must be evaluated. FUTUR PROSPECTS AND PROJECTS: Except in prevention of obstetric complications, the usefulness of aspirin in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies must be evaluated in prospective studies.

Pregnancy outcome is not affected by antiphospholipid antibody status in women referred for in vitro fertilization

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of antiphospholipid (aPL) and anti-beta 2 glycoprotein I (anti-beta2-GPI) antibodies in women referred for IVF and to prospectively evaluate the effect of these antibodies on IVF outcome.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

SETTING

A university hospital and IVF unit.

PATIENT(S)

Three hundred eighty consecutive women referred for IVF.

INTERVENTION(S)

Blood samples taken before commencement of IVF cycles were tested for the presence of aPL (lupus anticoagulant [LA], anticardiolipin [aCL], and antiphosphatidyl serine antibodies [aPS]) and anti-beta2-GPI antibodies.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Antibody prevalence, pregnancy rates, and live birth rates.

RESULT(S)

Of the total 380 women, 89 tested persistently positive for aPL (23.4%). None of 176 women tested for IgG aPS antibodies had a positive titer. Only 3.3% (11 of 329) tested positive for anti-beta2-GPI antibodies. Pregnancy rate, live birth rate, gestational age at delivery, and birth weight were not affected by aPL status.

CONCLUSION(S)

Although women referred for IVF have a high prevalence of aPL, these antibodies do not affect the outcome of treatment. Screening women undergoing IVF for aPL is not justified.

The anti-phospholipid antibody syndrome (Hughes syndrome): therapeutic aspects

Despite the enormous amount of work focused on the pathogenesis and clinical manifestations of the Hughes or anti-phospholipid syndrome (APS), there is little published on management. Usually, the diagnosis of APS is made after the first thrombotic event, when a thrombophilia screen is performed. These patients have a high risk of recurrent thromboses and current therapy centres on the use of thromboprophylaxis with warfarin. However, a number of clinical questions keep recurring: do arterial and venous thrombosis require the same intensity of anti-coagulation? When should warfarin be stopped? Should patients who develop thrombosis when other risk factors (oral contraceptive pill, prolonged resting etc.) are present be treated like those without any risk factors but the presence of anti-phospholipid antibodies (aPL)? How to manage a patient with recurrent thrombosis despite a high intensity anti-coagulation (International normalized ratio (INR) between 3.0-4.0)? Since many of the patients with aPL are fertile women, a substantial group of patients are diagnosed after recurrent pregnancy loss. Low-dose aspirin for those patients without previous thrombosis and aspirin plus heparin for patients with a history of thrombotic events are the current therapeutic options. However, some questions remain unanswered: does the addition of heparin to low-dose aspirin in women with first trimester recurrent miscarriage but without previous thrombosis improve foetal outcome over and above aspirin alone? Which is the best therapeutic regime during pregnancy for patients with aPL-associated stroke? When should high-dose intravenous gammaglobulin be considered? Finally, very little is known about the risk of thrombosis in individuals positive for aPL but still free of thrombosis. Should these individuals receive any treatment? If so, which one? In this review we attempt to address some of these questions taking into account available data from retrospective and prospective studies and our own clinical experience.

A multicenter, placebo-controlled pilot study of intravenous immune globulin treatment of antiphospholipid syndrome during pregnancy. The Pregnancy Loss Study Group

OBJECTIVE

Treatment with heparin and low-dose aspirin improves fetal survival among women with antiphospholipid syndrome. Despite treatment, however, these pregnancies are frequently complicated by preeclampsia, fetal growth restriction, and placental insufficiency, often with the result of preterm birth. Small case series suggest that intravenous immune globulin may reduce the rates of these obstetric complications, but the efficacy of this treatment remains unproven. This pilot study was undertaken to determine the feasibility of a multicenter trial of intravenous immune globulin and to assess the impact on obstetric and neonatal outcomes among women with antiphospholipid syndrome of the addition of intravenous immune globulin to a heparin and low-dose aspirin regimen.

STUDY DESIGN

This multicenter, randomized, double-blind pilot study compared treatment with heparin and low-dose aspirin plus intravenous immune globulin with heparin and low-dose aspirin plus placebo in a group of women who met strict criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome. All patients had lupus anticoagulant, medium to high levels of immunoglobulin G anticardiolipin antibodies, or both. Patients with a single live intrauterine fetus at </=12 weeks' gestation were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous immune globulin (1 g/kg body weight) or an identical-appearing placebo for 2 consecutive days each month until 36 weeks' gestation in addition to a heparin and low-dose aspirin regimen. Maternal characteristics, obstetric complications, and neonatal outcomes were compared with the Student t test and the Fisher exact test as appropriate.

RESULTS

Sixteen women were enrolled during a 2-year period; 7 received intravenous immune globulin and 9 were given placebo. The groups were similar with respect to age, gravidity, number of previous pregnancy losses, and gestational age at the initiation of treatment. Obstetric outcomes were excellent in both groups, with all women being delivered of live-born infants after 32 weeks' gestation. The rates of antepartum complications such as preeclampsia, fetal growth restriction, and placental insufficiency (as manifested by fetal growth restriction or fetal distress) were similar between the 2 groups. Gestational age at delivery (intravenous immune globulin group, 34.6 +/- 1.1 weeks; placebo group, 36.7 +/- 2.1 weeks) and birth weights (intravenous immune globulin group, 2249.7 +/- 186.1 g; placebo group; 2604.4 +/- 868.9 g) were similar between the 2 groups. There were fewer cases of fetal growth restriction (intravenous immune globulin group, 0%; placebo group, 33%) and neonatal intensive care unit admission (intravenous immune globulin group, 20%; placebo group, 44%) among the infants in the intravenous immune globulin group than those in the placebo group, but these differences were not significant.

CONCLUSION

A multicenter treatment trial of intravenous immune globulin is feasible. In this pilot study intravenous immune globulin did not improve obstetric or neonatal outcomes beyond those achieved with a heparin and low-dose aspirin regimen. Although not statistically significant, the findings of fewer cases of fetal growth restriction and neonatal intensive care unit admissions among the intravenous immune globulin-treated pregnancies may warrant expansion of the study.

Clinical study and follow-up of 100 patients with the antiphospholipid syndrome

OBJECTIVES

To study the clinical characteristics at diagnosis and during follow-up of patients with the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and to analyze the influence of treatment on their outcome.

PATIENTS

One hundred patients with APS were included (86% female and 14% male; mean age, 36 years). Sixty-two percent had primary APS and 38% had APS associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The median length of follow-up was 49 months.

RESULTS

Fifty-three percent of the patients had thromboses, 52% had thrombocytopenia, and 60% of the women had pregnancy losses. Patients with APS associated with SLE had a higher prevalence of hemolytic anemia (P = .02), thrombocytopenia (platelet count lower than 100 x 10(9)/L) (P = .004), antinuclear antibodies (P = .0002), and low complement levels. Fifty-three percent of the patients with thrombosis had recurrent episodes (86% in the same site as the previous thrombotic event). Recurrences were observed in 19% of the episodes treated with long-term oral anticoagulation, in 42% treated prophylactically with aspirin, and in 91% in which anticoagulant/antiaggregant treatment was discontinued (P = .0007). Multivariate analysis showed that prophylactic treatment and older age had an independent predictive value for rethrombosis. Prophylactic treatment during pregnancy (usually with aspirin) increased the live birth rate from 38% to 72% (P = .0002).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with APS have a high risk of recurrent thromboses. Long-term oral anticoagulation seems to be the best prophylactic treatment to prevent recurrences. Prophylactic treatment with aspirin during pregnancy reduced the rate of miscarriages remarkably.

Thrombophilia-associated pregnancy wastage

OBJECTIVE

To critically review the literature regarding inherited thrombophilia and recurrent fetal loss.

DESIGN

English-language literature review.

PATIENT(S)

Women who experienced repeated pregnancy wastage.

INTERVENTION(S)

Aspirin, glucocorticoids, heparin, and IV immunoglobulin for the prevention of miscarriage.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Live birth, miscarriage, preeclampsia, and pregnancy loss.

RESULT(S)

Recurrent fetal loss and other placental vascular pathologies of pregnancy have long been associated with antiphospholipid syndrome, an acquired autoimmune thrombophilic state. The number of known heritable thrombophilic disorders has grown rapidly in recent years with the identification of activated protein C resistance, factor V Leiden mutation, and hyperhomocysteinemia as major causes of thrombosis. Data accumulated over the past 2 years suggest that heritable thrombophilia is associated with an increased risk of fetal loss and preeclampsia. The present review discusses potential pathogenetic mechanisms for this association and evaluates reported therapeutic regimens for the prevention of fetal loss in women with thrombophilia.

CONCLUSION(S)

Placental thrombosis may be the final common pathophysiologic pathway in most women with habitual abortions and repeated pregnancy wastage. Prophylactic antithrombotic therapy is indicated in women with heritable thrombophilia and antiphospholipid syndrome and probably is more effective than the previously used modalities of prednisone, aspirin, and IV immunoglobulin.

Association of reduced selenium status in the aetiology of recurrent miscarriage

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether recurrent miscarriage is associated with reduced selenium status.

DESIGN

Case-control study.

SETTING

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Glasgow Royal Infirmary and Glasgow Royal Maternity Hospital.

POPULATION

Twenty nonpregnant women with a history of unexplained recurrent miscarriage, and 47 nonpregnant parous women with a history of at least one successful pregnancy and no more than one miscarriage.

METHODS

A 7 mL blood sample from each woman was collected into lithium heparin 'vacutainer' tubes. Samples were centrifuged at 3000 g for 15 minutes, and plasma was extracted and stored at -20 degrees C. Selenium concentrations were measured using a fluorescence spectrophotometer. The selenium concentrations in the two groups were compared and the differences examined using the Student's t test.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Plasma selenium concentration (microg/L).

RESULTS

The mean selenium concentration for women with a history of unexplained recurrent miscarriage was 67.7 microg/L (SD 16.4). The selenium level for the women with no history of recurrent miscarriage was 70.3 microg/L (SD 12.7). There was no difference in selenium concentrations between the two groups (P = 0.53).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study there is no association between unexplained recurrent miscarriage and reduced selenium status, implying that reduced selenium status is not a factor in the pathogenesis of recurrent miscarriage. We can find no rationale for a trial of selenium therapy in women with a history of recurrent miscarriage.

Bone density changes in pregnant women treated with heparin: a prospective, longitudinal study

Heparin plus aspirin significantly improves the live birth rate of women with primary antiphospholipid syndrome. Osteopenia is a major concern of long-term heparin therapy. We studied prospectively the bone mineral density (BMD) changes during pregnancy and the puerperium in 123 women with primary antiphospholipid syndrome treated with low-dose aspirin and subcutaneous low-dose heparin (46 women took unfractionated heparin and 77 took low-molecular-weight heparin). Lumbar spine, neck of femur and forearm BMD were measured, using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, at 12 weeks gestation, immediately postpartum and 12 weeks postpartum. The mean heparin duration was 27 weeks (range 22-29). During pregnancy, BMD decreased by 3.7% (P < 0.001) at the lumbar spine and by 0.9% (P < 0.05) at the neck of femur with no significant change at the forearm. Lactation was associated with a significant decrease in the lumbar spine and neck of femur BMD. There was no significant difference in BMD changes between the two heparin preparations. No woman suffered a symptomatic fracture. Long-term heparin treatment during pregnancy is associated with a small but significant decrease in BMD at the lumbar spine and neck of femur. This decrease is similar to that previously reported to occur in untreated pregnancies.

[Value of intravenous immunoglobulins during antiphospholipid syndrome]

BACKGROUND

The antiphospholipid syndrome was individualized 12 years ago. Treatment was initially based on steroids, immunosuppressive drugs and intravenous immunoglobulin therapy. More recently, several retrospective studies have established that in most clinical conditions therapeutic doses of oral vitamin K antagonists (INR > or = 3) are sufficient to control the disease.

THE ROLE OF IMMUNOGLOBULIN THERAPY

However, high dose immunoglobulin therapy is still indicated in a few cases, especially in life-threatening immune peripheral thrombocytopenia, and in recurrent foetal loss: in the latter indication, immunoglobulin therapy alone is efficient in 80% of cases.

FUTURE PROSPECTS

Prospective studies are needed to assess the efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in neurological complications occurring in spite of anticoagulant therapy, and in the context of repeated foetal losses when antithrombotic therapy with aspirin and subcutaneous heparin has failed.

Hypocomplementemia correlates with intrauterine growth retardation in systemic lupus erythematosus

PROBLEM

The aim of this study was to elucidate fetomaternal risks in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)-complicated pregnancy.

METHOD OF STUDY

Pregnancy course, complications, and fetal outcome in 82 pregnancies of 55 patients with SLE were investigated.

RESULTS

These 82 pregnancies resulted in 14 fetal losses and 66 live births. Without clinical manifestation of SLE-flare, 4 of 8 patients who had low serum complement activity during the pregnancies delivered small-for-date neonates. The rate of the intrauterine growth retardation was significantly higher than that observed in pregnancies with normal complement activity. The frequency of premature deliveries (60%) in patients who received more than 15 mg/day of prednisolone was significantly high when compared with pregnancies maintained by 0-15 mg/day (13.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate the preconceptional and perinatal management necessary in SLE and suggest that the pregnancy with hypocomplementemia, the disease activity, and/or a relatively high maintenance dose of corticosteroid should be carefully managed and monitored.

Women's health

Symptoms reliably attributable to menopause are vasomotor symptoms and vaginal dryness. Other symptoms are not directly related to the menopause. HRT or ERT are effective in providing symptom relief and preventing disease prevalent in postmenopausal women. HRT or ERT is beneficial in women with RA. Little data concerns safety in SLE patients, but there are theoretical advantages to using HRT or ERT in women with SLE and two studies that indicate it is safe. Other forms of treatment are available to women who cannot or will not use HRT or ERT.

Normal expression of tissue factor, thrombomodulin, and annexin V in placentas from women with antiphospholipid syndrome

OBJECTIVE

Placentas from pregnancies complicated by antiphospholipid syndrome often show thromboses and infarction, which may result from aberrations in placental coagulant pathways. We tested the hypothesis that alterations in tissue factor, thrombomodulin, and annexin V expressions contribute to poor pregnancy outcome associated with antiphospholipid syndrome.

STUDY DESIGN

Frozen sections from random biopsy samples of the basal plates of placentas from patients with primary antiphospholipid syndrome (n = 9), patients with secondary antiphospholipid syndrome (n = 3), and gestational age-matched control subjects (n = 10) were immunostained for tissue factor, thrombomodulin, and annexin V. Intensity of immunostaining was assessed by means of quantitative image analysis. Annexin V protein expression was evaluated with Western blotting techniques.

RESULTS

Tissue factor was expressed in the perivascular cells of the villous vasculature. Thrombomodulin and annexin V immunostaining was localized to the syncytiotrophoblast. There were no differences in the intensity of immunostaining for tissue factor, thrombomodulin, and annexin V between placentas from women with antiphospholipid syndrome and those from control subjects. Western blot analysis of annexin V expression showed no differences between study patients and control subjects.

CONCLUSION

Alterations in placental coagulant pathways involving tissue factor, thrombomodulin, and annexin V do not contribute to poor pregnancy outcome associated with antiphospholipid syndrome.