In vitro elimination of autoreactive B cells from rheumatoid arthritis patients by universal chimeric antigen receptor T cells

OBJECTIVES

Autoreactive B cells play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and B cell-depleting therapies using an antibodies, such as rituximab, have been suggested to be effective in RA treatment. However, transient B cell depletion with rituximab is associated with significant safety challenges related to global suppression of the immune system and thus increases the risks of infection and cancer development. To address selective and persistent issues associated with RA therapy, we developed a customised therapeutic strategy employing universal antifluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T cells) combined with FITC-labelled antigenic peptide epitopes to eliminate autoreactive B cell subsets recognising these antigens in RA.

METHODS

For a proof-of-concept study, four citrullinated peptide epitopes derived from citrullinated autoantigens, namely, citrullinated vimentin, citrullinated type II collagen, citrullinated fibrinogen and tenascin-C, and a cyclocitrulline peptide-1 were selected as ligands for targeting autoreactive B cells; Engineered T cells expressing a fixed anti-FITC CAR were constructed and applied as a universal CAR-T cell system to specifically eliminate these protein-specific autoreactive B cells via recognition of the aforementioned FITC-labelled autoantigenic peptide epitopes.

RESULTS

We demonstrated that anti-FITC CAR-T cells could be specifically redirected and kill hybridoma cells generated by immunisation with antigenic peptides, and autoreactive B cell subsets from RA patients via recognition of corresponding FITC-labelled citrullinated peptide epitopes. Additionally, the cytotoxicity of the CAR-T cells was dependent on the presence of the peptides and occurred in a dose-dependent manner.

CONCLUSIONS

The approach described here provides a direction for precise, customised approaches to treat RA and can likely be applied to other systemic autoimmune diseases.

Effect of rituximab or tumour necrosis factor inhibitors on lung infection and survival in rheumatoid arthritis-associated bronchiectasis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate rituximab (RTX) in patients with RA-associated bronchiectasis (RA-BR) and compare 5-year respiratory survival between those treated with RTX and TNF inhibitors (TNFi).

METHODS

A retrospective observational cohort study of RA-BR in RTX or TNFi-treated RA patients from two UK centres over 10 years. BR was assessed using number of infective exacerbation/year. Respiratory survival was measured from therapy initiation to discontinuation either due to lung exacerbation or lung-related deaths.

RESULTS

Of 800 RTX-treated RA patients, 68 had RA-BR (prevalence 8.5%). Post-RTX, new BR was diagnosed in 3/735 patients (incidence 0.4%). At 12 months post-Cycle 1 RTX, 21/68 (31%) patients had fewer exacerbations than the year pre-RTX, 36/68 (53%) remained stable and 11/68 (16%) had increased exacerbations. The rates of exacerbation improved after Cycle 2 and stabilized up to 5 cycles. Of patients who received ≥2 RTX cycles (n = 60), increased exacerbations occurred in 7/60 (12%) and were associated with low IgG, aspergillosis and concurrent alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency. Overall, 8/68 (11.8%) patients discontinued RTX while 15/46 (32.6%) discontinued TNFi due to respiratory causes. The adjusted 5-year respiratory survival was better in RTX-treated compared with TNFi-treated RA-BR patients; HR 0.40 (95% CI 0.17, 0.96); P =0.041.

CONCLUSION

The majority of RTX-treated RA-BR patients had stable/improved pulmonary symptoms in this long-term follow-up. In isolated cases, worsening of exacerbation had definable causes. Rates of discontinuation due to adverse lung outcomes were better for RTX than a matched TNFi cohort. RTX is an acceptable therapeutic choice for RA-BR if a biologic is needed.

Predictive factors of severe infections in patients with systemic necrotizing vasculitides: data from 733 patients enrolled in five randomized controlled trials of the French Vasculitis Study Group

OBJECTIVES

Infections remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality in systemic necrotizing vasculitides (SNV). We aimed to identify factors predicting severe infections (SI) in SNV.

METHODS

Data from five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) enrolling 733 patients were pooled. The primary end point was the occurrence of SI, defined by the need of a hospitalization and/or intravenous anti-infectious treatment and/or leading to death.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 5.2 (interquartile range 3-9.7) years, 148 (20.2%) patients experienced 189 SI, and 98 (66.2%) presented their first SI within the first 2 years. Median interval from inclusion to SI was 14.9 (4.3-51.7) months. Age ≥65 years (hazard ratio (HR) 1.49 [1.07-2.07]; P=0.019), pulmonary involvement (HR 1.82 [1.26-2.62]; P=0.001) and Five Factor Score ≥1 (HR 1.21 [1.03-1.43]; P=0.019) were independent predictive factors of SI. Regarding induction therapy, the occurrence of SI was associated with the combination of GCs and CYC (HR 1.51 [1.03-2.22]; P = 0.036), while patients receiving only GCs were less likely to present SI (HR 0.69 [0.44-1.07]; P = 0.096). Finally, occurrence of SI had a significant negative impact on survival (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

SI in SNV are frequent and impact mortality. Age, pulmonary involvement and Five Factor Score are baseline independent predictors of SI. No therapeutic regimen was significantly associated with SI but patients receiving glucocorticoids and CYC as induction tended to have more SI.

Predicting Infection Risk in Multiple Sclerosis Patients Treated with Ocrelizumab: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Ocrelizumab safety outcomes have been well evaluated in clinical trials and open-label extension (OLE) studies. However, risk factors for infection in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) receiving ocrelizumab have not been extensively studied in the real-world setting.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine factors determining risk of self-reported infections and antimicrobial use in patients receiving ocrelizumab for MS.

METHODS

A retrospective, observational cohort study was conducted in patients receiving ocrelizumab at the Royal Melbourne Hospital. Infection type and number were reported by patients, and the associations of potential clinical and laboratory risk factors with self-reported infection and antimicrobial use were estimated using univariate and multivariable logistic regression models.

RESULTS

A total of 185 patients were included in the study; a total of 176 infections were reported in 89 patients (46.1%), and antimicrobial use was identified in 47 patients (25.3%). In univariate analyses, a higher serum IgA was associated with reduced odds of infection (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.25-0.76). In multivariable analyses, older age (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.88-0.99), higher serum IgA (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.17-0.80) and higher serum IgG (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.67-0.99) were associated with reduced odds of infection. Older age (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.75-0.96) and higher serum IgA (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.07-0.79) were associated with reduced odds of antimicrobial use, whilst longer MS disease duration (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.06-1.41) and higher Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.02-3.86) were associated with increased odds of antimicrobial use.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher serum IgA and IgG and older age were associated with reduced odds of infection. Our findings highlight that infection risk is not uniform in patients with MS receiving ocrelizumab and substantiate the need to monitor immunoglobulin levels pre-treatment and whilst on therapy.

Infectious complications of rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis during targeted and biological therapies: a viewpoint in 2020

Biological therapies have improved the outcomes of several major inflammatory, autoimmune and also neoplastic disorders. Those directed towards cytokines or other soluble mediators, cell-surface molecules or receptors or various components of intracellular signalling pathways may be associated with the occurrence of infections whose diversity depends on the particular immune target. In this context and following a keynote lecture given by one of us at the European League Against Rheumatism meeting on June 2018, a multidisciplinary group of experts deeply involved in the use of targeted and biological therapies in rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis decided to summarise their recent vision of the immunological basis and epidemiology of infections occurring during targeted and biological therapies, and provide useful indications for their management and prevention.

A risk score for predicting hospitalization for community-acquired pneumonia in ITP using nationally representative data

Infection is one of the primary causes of death from immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), and the lungs are the most common site of infection. We identified the factors associated with hospitalization for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in nonsplenectomized adults with ITP and established the [corrected] (ACPA) prediction model to predict the incidence of hospitalization for CAP. This was a retrospective study of nonsplenectomized adult patients with ITP from 10 large medical centers in China. The derivation cohort included 145 ITP inpatients with CAP and 1360 inpatients without CAP from 5 medical centers, and the validation cohort included the remaining 63 ITP inpatients with CAP and 526 inpatients without CAP from the other 5 centers. The 4-item ACPA model, which included age, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, initial platelet count, and initial absolute lymphocyte count, was established by multivariable analysis of the derivation cohort. Internal and external validation were conducted to assess the performance of the model. The ACPA model had an area under the curve of 0.853 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.818-0.889) in the derivation cohort and 0.862 (95% CI, 0.807-0.916) in the validation cohort, which indicated the good discrimination power of the model. Calibration plots showed high agreement between the estimated and observed probabilities. Decision curve analysis indicated that ITP patients could benefit from the clinical application of the ACPA model. To summarize, the ACPA model was developed and validated to predict the occurrence of hospitalization for CAP, which might help identify ITP patients with a high risk of hospitalization for CAP.

[Biotherapies in elderly patients]

The ageing of the population leads health professionals to question the tolerance and the effectiveness of the different biotherapies used in autoimmune diseases. Due to the exponential increase of biotherapies and their indications, several studies have been carried out to evaluate their impact on elderly patients suffering from autoimmune disease. However, these studies are still too few to take into account all the different specificities of elderly patients and their comorbidities; prescribers are therefore hesitant with their introduction after 75 years or even 65. More than the age of patients, it is necessary to evaluate the comorbidities before introducing this kind of treatments. Every biotherapy has different indications and contraindications, which must be known to adapt each treatment to each patient. This focus aims to remind of the adaptations and contraindications of the different biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs for geriatric population, and improve their uses since the treatments for these patients are sometimes not enough. Here we resume the methods allowing supervisors to identify errors of clinical reasoning in medical students and interns and we explain remediation techniques adapted to the types of error identified. Access to short illustrative videos of a MOOC (Massive Open On line Course) devoted to the supervision of clinical reasoning constitutes practical help for supervisors who are not expert in the complexity of medical pedagogy at the bedside.

Does Older Age have an Impact on Rituximab Efficacy and Safety? Results from the NOR-DMARD Register

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of rituximab in older vs younger patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

METHODS

Data on 367 patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with rituximab in the Norwegian Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug (NOR-DMARD) register were analysed, comparing patients aged ≥ 65 years (n = 91) with patients aged < 65 years (n = 276). Drug survival was compared using a Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard models. Disease activity, as assessed by the Disease Activity Score based on 28 joints and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) and the Simplified Disease Activity Index, was analysed with linear mixed models. The occurrence of adverse events was analysed by quasi-Poisson regression models.

RESULTS

Drug survival was similar in the two age groups. The proportion of patients who remained taking rituximab over 2 years was 72% in those under aged 65 years vs 74% in those aged ≥ 65 years. No statistically significant association with age was found for drug survival in either the unadjusted (hazard ratio 1.13, p = 0.65) or adjusted Cox proportional hazard analyses for the model with DAS28-ESR as a confounder (effect size 1.11, p = 0.73). Models including the Simplified Disease Activity Index instead of DAS28-ESR yielded similar results. Age was furthermore not significantly associated with disease activity over time, although there was a tendency towards a poorer response in older patients. In the older age group, there was a higher incidence of pneumonia (107 vs 51 per 1000 patient-years) and other serious infections (142 vs 66 per 1000 patient-years).

CONCLUSIONS

Rituximab is a reasonable therapeutic option for older patients with rheumatoid arthritis although vigilance is needed with regard to the infection profile.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01581294.

Factors associated with long-term persistence of rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis In clinical practice: RITAR Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with rituximab (RTX) requires repeated cycles, but there is no well-established retreatment regimen in dose and frequency. The objective was to analyse the persistence of RTX treatment and factors that influence in terms of routine clinical practice.

METHODS

Rituximab in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RITAR Study) is an observational, retrospective study that analyses the persistence of RTX in a cohort from 2003 to 2015. Persistence was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier analysis; curves were compared with the Log-Rank test. Cox regression was used to quantify the risk of discontinuation and multivariate analyses were conducted to determine the factors associated with the persistence of the treatment.

RESULTS

454 cycles of RTX in 114 patients were included. Median survival was 10.0 years and incidence rate of discontinuation was 7.7 per 100 patients/year. Factors associated with persistence were autoantibody positivity and use of RTX in combination with csDMARDs. Sex, age, number of comorbidities, rheumatoid arthritis evolution, number of complications, basal DAS28, basal HAQ, number of lines of treatment, fixed or on demand retreatment and year of RTX starting were not associated. Multivariable models confirmed the relationship between autoantibody positivity, monotherapy and persistence of RTX.

CONCLUSIONS

The persistence of RTX in clinical practice is higher in seropositive patients and in those who are treated with RTX associated with a csDMARD. Dose per cycle and retreatment frequency do not have a decisive role in rituximab persistence.

Immune-mediated encephalitis for the infectious disease specialist

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Autoimmune encephalitis is increasingly recognized and must be distinguished from infectious forms of encephalitis. Moreover, physicians should be aware of infectious triggers of autoimmune encephalitis and of infectious complications associated with treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent epidemiological studies suggest that the incidence of autoimmune encephalitis may rival that of infectious encephalitis. Although distinguishing autoimmune from infectious forms of encephalitis on clinical grounds can be challenging, recently proposed diagnostic criteria can provide some assistance. There has been an explosion in our knowledge of autoimmune encephalitis associated with antibodies to neuronal cell surface antigens, and two of the most common forms, anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis and anti-LGI1 encephalitis, are typically associated with distinctive clinical features. Although tumors have long been known to trigger autoimmune encephalitis, it has been recently recognized that herpes simplex encephalitis may trigger the generation of antineuronal autoantibodies resulting in an autoimmune neurologic relapse. Both first and second-line therapies for autoimmune encephalitis are associated with infectious complications, whereas emerging treatments, including anakinra and tocilizumab, may also result in increased susceptibility to certain infections.

SUMMARY

The diagnosis and management of autoimmune encephalitis is complex, and awareness of diagnostic criteria and modalities, typical clinical syndromes, infectious triggers of disease, and infectious complications of therapies is critical in optimizing care for affected patients.

Tuberculosis and targeted synthetic or biologic DMARDs, beyond tumor necrosis factor inhibitors

Patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARD) have an increased risk for tuberculosis (TB). The use of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) and glucocorticoids in these patients has been associated with an increased prevalence of latent TB reactivation. Over the last few years, several biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), other than TNFi (e.g. rituximab, abatacept, tocilizumab, secukinumab) and targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs) [e.g. apremilast, Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors] have been used for the treatment of patients with ARD. For many of these drugs, especially the newer ones like JAK inhibitors or antibodies against interleukin (IL)-23, most data stem from randomized clinical trials and few are available from real life clinical experience. We sought to review the current evidence for TB risk in patients with ARD treated with tsDMARDs or bDMARDs, other than TNFi. It seems that some of these drugs are associated with a lower TB risk, indirectly compared with TNFi treatment. In fact, it appears that rituximab, apremilast and inhibitors of IL-17 and IL-23 might be safer, while more data are needed for JAK inhibitors. As seen in TNFi, risk for TB is more pronounced in TB-endemic areas. Screening for latent TB must precede initiation of any tsDMARDs or bDMARDs. The growing use of non-TNFi agents has raised the need for more real-life studies that would compare the risk for TB between TNFi and other treatment modalities for ARD. Knowledge about the TB-safety profile of these drugs could help in the decision of drug choice in patients with confirmed latent TB infection or in TB endemic areas.

Infectious Complications of Biological and Small Molecule Targeted Immunomodulatory Therapies

The past 2 decades have seen a revolution in our approach to therapeutic immunosuppression. We have moved from relying on broadly active traditional medications, such as prednisolone or methotrexate, toward more specific agents that often target a single receptor, cytokine, or cell type, using monoclonal antibodies, fusion proteins, or targeted small molecules. This change has transformed the treatment of many conditions, including rheumatoid arthritis, cancers, asthma, and inflammatory bowel disease, but along with the benefits have come risks. Contrary to the hope that these more specific agents would have minimal and predictable infectious sequelae, infectious complications have emerged as a major stumbling block for many of these agents. Furthermore, the growing number and complexity of available biologic agents makes it difficult for clinicians to maintain current knowledge, and most review articles focus on a particular target disease or class of agent. In this article, we review the current state of knowledge about infectious complications of biologic and small molecule immunomodulatory agents, aiming to create a single resource relevant to a broad range of clinicians and researchers. For each of 19 classes of agent, we discuss the mechanism of action, the risk and types of infectious complications, and recommendations for prevention of infection.

The Use of 20% Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin Replacement Therapy in Patients With B Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma With Humoral Immune Dysfunction After Treatment With Rituximab

BACKGROUND

Rituximab is an anti-CD20 chimeric antibody used to treat autoimmune conditions and B cell neoplasms. We characterized immunoglobulin (Ig) levels and vaccine responses in rituximab-treated B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients. Patients with impaired vaccine responses were offered therapy with 20% subcutaneous (subq) Ig.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with a biopsy-proven diagnosis of B cell NHL who had received rituximab within the past 24 months were eligible for the study and underwent the following immune evaluation: serum IgG, IgM, IgA, IgE, T/B cell lymphocyte panel, and pre/post vaccine IgG titers to diphtheria, tetanus, and streptococcus pneumoniae. Patients were vaccinated with tetanus, diphtheria and pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine. Patients with abnormal vaccine responses were offered prophylactic subq Ig for 52 weeks.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients with NHL were enrolled in the study. The median IgG was 628 mg/dL [interquartile range, 489-718 mg/dL]. Three (20%) of 15 patients responded to diphtheria vaccination, 1 (6.7%) of 15 responded to tetanus vaccination, and 3 (20%) of 15 responded to vaccination to streptococcus pneumoniae. Thirteen (86.7%) of 15 met criteria for humoral immunodeficiency. Ten patients received subq Ig, and experienced a significant increase in serum IgG (P = .008). There were no serious adverse events, and there was a decrease in nonneutropenic infections while on subq Ig therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with NHL treated with rituximab may have significant humoral immunodeficiency as defined by abnormal vaccine responses even in the setting of relatively normal IgG levels. For these patients, subq Ig replacement therapy is well-tolerated and efficacious in improving serum IgG, and may decrease reliance on antibiotics for the treatment of nonneutropenic infections.

Severe infections in patients with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitides receiving rituximab: A meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The efficacy of rituximab (RTX) for remission induction and maintenance in patients with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitides (AAV) is now established, but the safety, particularly concerning severe infection risk, is not well known.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this meta-analysis is to assess the prevalence and incidence of severe infections and the factors explaining heterogeneity in AAV patients treated with RTX.

METHODS

PubMed and Embase were searched up to December 2017. Prevalence and incidence was pooled using a random-effects model in case of significant heterogeneity (I² > 50%). Severe infection was defined as severe when it led to hospitalization, intravenous antibiotics therapy, and/or death. The heterogeneity was explored by subgroup analyses and meta-regression.

RESULTS

The included studies encompassed 1434 patients with a median age of 51.9 years. The overall prevalence and incidence of severe infections was 15.4% (95% CI [8.9; 23.3], I² = 90%, 33 studies) and 6.5 per 100 person-years (PY) (95% CI [2.9; 11.4], I² = 76%, 18 studies), respectively. The most common infections were bacterial (9.4%, 95% CI [5.1; 14.8]). The prevalence of opportunistic infection was 1.5% (95% CI [0.5; 3.1], I² = 58%) including pneumocytis jirovecii infections (0.2%, 95% CI [0.0; 0.6], I² = 0), irrespective of prophylaxis administration. Mortality related to infection was estimated at 0.7% (95% CI [0.2; 1.2], I² = 27%). The RTX cumulative dose was positively associated with prevalence of infections (13 studies, prevalence increase of 4% per 100 mg, p < .0001). The incidence of infection was negatively associated with duration of follow-up (8 studies, incidence decrease of 9% per year, p = .03).

CONCLUSION

Prevalence and incidence of severe infections, mainly bacterial ones, were high in AAV patients treated with RTX. This meta-analysis highlights the need for prospective studies to stratify infectious risk and validate cumulative RTX dose and duration of follow-up as modifying factors.

Post-rituximab immunoglobulin M (IgM) hypogammaglobulinemia

Rituximab is a B cell depleting monoclonal antibody that targets the B cell-specific cell surface antigen CD20 and is currently used to treat several autoimmune diseases. The elimination of mature CD20-positive B lymphocytes committed to differentiate into autoantibody-producing plasma cells is considered to be the major effect of rituximab, that makes it a beneficial biological agent in treating autoimmune diseases. Hypogammaglobulinemia has been reported after rituximab therapy in patients with lymphoma and rheumatoid arthritis. Similar data are scarce for other autoimmune diseases. Low immunoglobulin G (IgG) or hypogammaglobulinemia has attracted the most attention because of its significant role in protective immunity. However, the incidence and clinical implications of low immunoglobulin M (IgM) or hypogammaglobulinemia have not been studied in detail. This review will focus on the frequency and the clinical concerns of low IgM levels that result as a consequence of the administration of rituximab. The etiopathogenic mechanisms underlying post-rituximab IgM hypogammaglobulinemia and its implications are presented. The long-term consequences, if any, are not known or documented. Multiple factors may be involved in whether IgG or IgM decreases secondary to rituximab therapy. It is possible that the autoimmune disease itself may be one of the important factors. The dose, frequency and number of infusions appear to be important variables. Post-rituximab therapy immunoglobulin levels return to normal. During this process. IgM levels take a longer time to return to normal levels when compared to IgG or other immunoglobulins. IgM deficiency persists after B cell repopulation to normal levels has occurred. Laboratory animals and humans deficient in IgM can have multiple infections. Specific pharmacologic agents or biologic therapy that address and resolve IgM deficiency are currently unavailable. If the clinical situation so warrants, then prophylactic antibiotics may be indicated and perhaps helpful. Research in this iatrogenic phenomenon will provide a better understanding of not only the biology of IgM, but also the factor(s) that control its production and regulation, besides its influence if any, on rituximab therapy.

Secondary Hypogammaglobulinemia: An Increasingly Recognized Complication of Treatment with Immunomodulators and After Solid Organ Transplantation

Secondary hypogammaglobulinemia is a common development in patients treated with immunomodulatory agents for autoimmune, connective tissue, and malignant diseases. It has been observed in the medical management of patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell and solid organ transplantation. Some patients have preexisting immunodeficiency associated with these illnesses; immunosuppressive treatment magnifies their immune defect. This article reviews immunosuppressive medications, including biological treatments that cause secondary hypogammaglobulinemia. It summarizes risk factors for rituximab-induced hypogammaglobulinemia, such as preexisting low immunoglobulin G levels, CD19 levels, host factors, and additive effect of all immunomodulatory drugs used. The evaluation and management of secondary hypogammaglobulinemia are discussed.

Alemtuzumab therapy changes immunoglobulin levels in peripheral blood and CSF

Objective

The use of alemtuzumab, a humanized monoclonal anti-CD52 antibody has changed the therapy of highly active relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). Alemtuzumab infusion depletes most lymphocytes in peripheral blood, whereas differential recovery of immune cells, probably those with a less CNS-autoreactive phenotype, is supposed to underlie its long-lasting effects. To determine whether alemtuzumab significantly reduces immunoglobulin levels in blood and CSF of treated patients, we analyzed blood and CSF samples of 38 patients with MS treated with alemtuzumab regarding changes in immunoglobulin levels.

Methods

Blood and CSF samples of patients were collected at the beginning of alemtuzumab treatment and at 12, 24, and 36 months after the first administration of the drug. Specimens were analyzed regarding immunoglobulin concentrations in blood and CSF.

Results

We observed significant and dose-dependent reductions of immunoglobulin levels (IgG, IgM, and IgA) in serum and CSF 12 and 24 months following 2 courses of alemtuzumab. Patients with persistent or returning disease activity who were treated with a third course of alemtuzumab exhibited even further decrease in IgG levels compared with matched controls treated twice. Here, alemtuzumab-treated patients with IgG levels below the lower limits of normal were more susceptible to pneumonia, sinusitis, and otitis, whereas upper respiratory tract and urinary tract infections were not associated therewith.

Conclusions

Our results suggest to monitor IgG levels for safety reasons in patients treated with alemtuzumab—in particular when additional treatment courses are required—and to consider preventive action in critical cases.

Classification of evidence

This study provides Class IV evidence that for patients with RRMS alemtuzumab reduces immunoglobulin levels.

Long-term safety and efficacy of rituximab in 248 adults with immune thrombocytopenia: Results at 5 years from the French prospective registry ITP-ritux

Rituximab is a second-line option in adults with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), but the estimated 5-year response rate, only based on pooled retrospective data, is about 20%, and no studies have focused on long-term safety. We conducted a prospective multicenter registry of 248 adults with ITP treated with rituximab with 5 years of follow-up to assess its long-term safety and efficacy. The median follow-up was 68.4 [53.7-78.5] months. The incidence of severe infections was only 2/100 patient-years. Profound hypogammaglobulinemia (<5 g/L) developed in five patients at 15 to 31 months after the last rituximab infusion. In total, 25 patients died at a median age of 80 [69.5-83.9] years, corresponding to a mortality rate of 2.3/100 patient-years. Only three deaths related to infection that occurred 12 to 14 months after rituximab infusions could be due in part to rituximab. At 60 months of follow-up, 73 (29.4%) patients had a sustained response. On univariate and multivariate analysis, the only factor significantly associated with sustained response was a previous transient response to corticosteroids (P = .022). Overall, 24 patients with an initial response and then relapse received retreatment with rituximab, which gave a response in 92%, with a higher duration of response in 54%. As a result of its safety profile and its sustained response rate, rituximab remains an important option in the current therapeutic armamentarium for adult ITP. Retreatment could be an effective and safe option.

Nutritional status as the risk factor of serious infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Objectives: The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors associated with severe infection in RA patients, with a particular focus on the association of the nutritional status.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 74 patients with RA (male, n = 21; female, n = 53; age 74.2 ± 12.4) admitted to our hospital between 2016 and 2017 for infection (infection group). We also recruited control RA patients (n = 222) who were matched for age, gender and disease duration, with a match ratio of 1:3 (non-infection group). The nutritional condition was assessed based on controlling nutrition status (CONUT) score, and prognostic nutritional index (PNI). The data of the infection group were obtained from the most recent visit prior to the present admission, and non-infection group from the last regular visit in 2017.Results: The respiratory tract was the most frequent site of infection. The BMI and PNI were significantly lower and the CONUT score significantly higher in the infection group than in the non-infection group. A logistic regression analysis revealed that the CONUT score, underlying lung disease and use of prednisolone and biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs were independent and significant risk factors for serious infection.Conclusion: Poor nutritional status increases the risk of serious infection.

Predicting Severe Infection and Effects of Hypogammaglobulinemia During Therapy With Rituximab in Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate predictors of serious infection events (SIEs) during rituximab (RTX) therapy and effects of hypogammaglobulinemia on SIE rates, and humoral response and its persistence after discontinuation of RTX in the treatment of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs).

METHODS

A retrospective longitudinal study of 700 RMD patients treated with RTX in a single center was conducted. Immunoglobulin levels were measured at baseline and at 4-6 months after each treatment cycle. Baseline predictors of SIEs were assessed using multivariable logistic regression; for RTX cycles 2-4, a mixed-effects logistic regression model was used.

RESULTS

A total of 507 patients (72%) had rheumatoid arthritis, 94 (13%) had systemic lupus erythematosus, 49 (7%) had antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis, and 50 (7%) had other RMDs. The number of SIEs recorded was 281 in 176 patients (9.8 per 100 person-years). Predictors of SIEs included non-RTX-specific comorbidities (previous history of SIE, cancer, chronic lung disease, diabetes mellitus, and heart failure), higher corticosteroid dose, and RTX-specific factors, including low IgG (<6 gm/liter) both at baseline and during treatment, RTX-associated neutropenia, higher IgM, and longer time to RTX re-treatment, but not B cell count or depletion status. Of 110 patients with low IgG, SIE rates were higher in those with low IgG at baseline (16.4 per 100 person-years) and in those who acquired low IgG during or after RTX treatment (21.3 per 100 person-years) versus those with normal IgG (9.7 per 100 person-years). Five of 8 patients (63%) had impaired humoral response to pneumococcus and hemophilus following vaccination challenge, and only 4 of 11 patients (36%) had IgG normalized after switching biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.

CONCLUSION

Immunoglobulin levels should be monitored at baseline and before each RTX cycle to identify patients at risk of SIEs. Individualized risk-benefit assessment should be undertaken in those with lower IgG as this is a consistent SIE predictor and may increase infection profiles when RTX is switched to different therapies.

Hypogammaglobulinemia and bacterial infections following pediatric post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder in the rituximab era

INTRODUCTION

Treatment of PTLD using immune-depleting agents such as RTX may be associated with increased risk of infections. The aim of this report was to describe the incidence of hypogammaglobulinemia and bacterial infections in children with PTLD after SOT at a single center since the introduction of RTX.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted over a study period of 2000-2016 in pediatric patients diagnosed with biopsy-proven PTLD based on the WHO histologic criteria. Hypogammaglobulinemia was defined by serum IgG <4 g/L; CPBI was defined by clinically significant infection by an identified pathogenic bacteria isolated from a normally sterile body site.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients were included, comprising 16 LTx and 12 ITx patients, and 17 patients received RTX therapy. Total of 31 episodes of CPBI occurred in 16 patients. Incidence of CPBI was 31.4 infections per 100 patient-years in RTX-treated patients, as compared to 8.4 infections per 100 patient-years in non-RTX-treated patients (P < 0.001). Hypogammaglobulinemia was significantly more prevalent after 6 months (P = 0.001) and 2 years (P = 0.005) in RTX-treated patients, as compared to none in the group that did not receive RTX. Hypogammaglobulinemia (P = 0.047), ITx (P = 0.027), and monomorphic PTLD (P = 0.024) were significantly associated with recurrent (≥2) CPBI and/or CPBI-related deaths within the first year post-PTLD.

CONCLUSION

While RTX is an effective treatment for PTLD, hypogammaglobulinemia can persist for up to 2 years following RTX therapy, which may be associated with the higher cumulative rates of CPBI observed in RTX-treated patients.

A comprehensive review of rituximab therapy in rheumatoid arthritis patients

Rituximab (RTX) is an approved treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients that do not respond adequately to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. However, different new concerns, such as efficacy, optimum dose, safety issues, prediction of response to RTX, and pregnancy outcomes have attracted a lot of attention. The PubMed database was systematically reviewed for the last published articles, new findings, and controversial issues regarding RTX therapy in RA using "Rheumatoid arthritis" AND "rituximab" keywords, last updated on June 18, 2019. From 1812 initial recorders, 162 studies met the criteria. Regarding the optimum dose, low-dose RTX therapy (2 × 500 mg) seems as effective as standard dose (2 × 1000 mg), safer, and more cost-effective. The most common reported safety challenges included de novo infections, false negative serologic tests of viral infections, reactivation of chronic infections, interfering with vaccination outcome, and development of de novo psoriasis. Other less reported side effects are infusion reactions, nervous system disorders, and gastrointestinal disorders. Lower exposure to other biologics, presence of some serological markers (e.g., anti-RF, anti-CCP, IL-33, ESR), specific variations in FCGR3A, FCGR2A, TGFβ1, IL6, IRF5, BAFF genes, and also EBV-positivity could be used to predict response to RTX. Although there is no evidence of the teratogenic effect of RTX, it is recommended that women do not expose themselves to RTX at least 6 months before the conception. Only a reversible reduction of B cell-count in the offspring may be the pregnancy-related outcome. Although RTX is an effective therapeutic option for RA, more studies on optimum doses, prevention of RTX-related side effects, prediction of RTX response, and safety during the pregnancy are required.

Secondary antibody deficiency in neurology

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Induction of lymphocyte depletion is increasingly used as a therapeutic strategy for central and peripheral neuroinflammatory disease. However, there is also a growing recognition of the treatment-related complication of secondary antibody deficiency (SAD). Although the occurrence of hypogammaglobulinaemia is a recognized phenomenon during immunomodulation, robust data on the coexistence of impaired responses to immunization, and significant and/or atypical infections is scarce. Here we review the literature on SAD in anti-CD20 therapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several factors that may increase the incidence of SAD have now been identified, including low levels of immunoglobulins prior to the commencement of B-cell ablation therapy, duration of maintenance therapy, and concurrent or prior use of other immunosuppressing agents such as cyclophosphamide and steroids. Measurement of disease-specific antibodies and vaccine response are likely to be helpful adjuncts to measurement of serum immunoglobulin levels during B-cell depleting therapy. Supportive treatment may include amending the treatment schedule to limit cumulative dose.

SUMMARY

B-cell depleting agents offer considerable therapeutic benefit in neurology. We propose modifications in current practice that include risk stratification and early identification of SAD, with the aim of minimising morbidity and mortality related to this underappreciated condition.

Biologics in the Treatment of Lupus Erythematosus: A Critical Literature Review

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune inflammatory disease affecting multiple organ systems that runs an unpredictable course and may present with a wide variety of clinical manifestations. Advances in treatment over the last decades, such as use of corticosteroids and conventional immunosuppressive drugs, have improved life expectancy of SLE sufferers. Unfortunately, in many cases effective management of SLE is still related to severe drug-induced toxicity and contributes to organ function deterioration and infective complications, particularly among patients with refractory disease and/or lupus nephritis. Consequently, there is an unmet need for drugs with a better efficacy and safety profile. A range of different biologic agents have been proposed and subjected to clinical trials, particularly dedicated to this subset of patients whose disease is inadequately controlled by conventional treatment regimes. Unfortunately, most of these trials have given unsatisfactory results, with belimumab being the only targeted therapy approved for the treatment of SLE so far. Despite these pitfalls, several novel biologic agents targeting B cells, T cells, or cytokines are constantly being evaluated in clinical trials. It seems that they may enhance the therapeutic efficacy when combined with standard therapies. These efforts raise the hope that novel drugs for patients with refractory SLE may be available in the near future. This article reviews the current biological therapies being tested in the treatment of SLE.

Rituximab treatment for multiple sclerosis

Rituximab, a chimeric anti-CD20-antibody, attracts increasing attention as a treatment option for multiple sclerosis (MS). Apart from smaller controlled trials, an increasing number of studies in real-world populations indicate high efficacy based on clinical and neuroradiological outcomes for rituximab in relapsing-remitting MS patients. Additional evidence also demonstrates efficacy of rituximab with treatment of progressive MS phenotypes. In this topical review, we summarize and discuss current evidence on mechanisms of action, efficacy, safety, tolerance and other clinical aspects of rituximab in the treatment of MS. Finally, we will highlight current knowledge gaps and the need for comparative studies with other disease-modifying therapies in MS.

Immunoglobulin replacement for secondary immunodeficiency after B-cell targeted therapies in autoimmune rheumatic disease: Systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

Consensus guidelines are not available for the use of immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IGRT) in patients developing iatrogenic secondary antibody deficiency following B-cell targeted therapy (BCTT) in autoimmune rheumatic disease.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the role of IGRT to manage hypogammaglobulinemia following BCTT in autoimmune rheumatic disease (AIRD).

METHODS

Using an agreed search string we performed a systematic literature search on Medline with Pubmed as vendor. We limited the search to English language papers with abstracts published over the last 10 years. Abstracts were screened for original data regarding hypogammaglobulinemia following BCTT and the use of IGRT for hypogammaglobulinemia following BCTT. We also searched current recommendations from national/international organisations including British Society for Rheumatology, UK Department of Health, American College of Rheumatology, and American Academy of Asthma, Allergy and Immunology.

RESULTS

222 abstracts were identified. Eight papers had original relevant data that met our search criteria. These studies were largely retrospective cohort studies with small patient numbers receiving IGRT. The literature highlights the induction of a sustained antibody deficiency, risk factors for hypogammaglobulinemia after BCTT including low baseline serum IgG levels, how to monitor patients for the development of hypogammaglobulinemia and the limited evidence available on intervention thresholds for commencing IGRT.

CONCLUSION

The benefit of BCTT needs to be balanced against the risk of inducing a sustained secondary antibody deficiency. Consensus guidelines would be useful to enable appropriate assessment prior to and following BCTT in preventing and diagnosing hypogammaglobulinemia. Definitions for symptomatic hypogammaglobulinemia, intervention thresholds and treatment targets for IGRT, and its cost-effectiveness are required.

Deciphering protective immunity against tuberculosis: implications for vaccine development

INTRODUCTION

The development of more effective tuberculosis (TB) vaccines is essential for the global control of TB. Recently, there have been major advances in the field, but an important hindrance remains the lack of correlates of protection against TB. This requires each vaccine candidate to undergo clinical efficacy trials based on data from animal protection studies, but the results from animal models do not necessarily predict efficacy in humans.

AREAS COVERED

In this review we summarize our current knowledge of immune mechanisms that may contribute to protective immunity against TB following vaccination and relate these to protective efficacy in animal models and recent clinical trials. Although some initial trials did not reproduce protection against TB in humans, recent trials have demonstrated promising efficacy for three vaccine approaches.

EXPERT OPINION

Although CD4⁺ T lymphocytes are essential for protection against TB, there is no clear correlation between conventional CD4⁺ or CD8⁺ T cell responses and protective efficacy of TB vaccines. Recent attention has focused on other immune responses, including donor unrestricted T cells, B lymphocytes, and antibodies. Prospective studies on samples from vaccinated individuals protected in recent trials will allow evaluation of these alternative immune mechanisms as potential correlates of protection.

Rituximab in neurological disease: principles, evidence and practice

Rituximab is a widely used B-cell-depleting monoclonal antibody. It is unlicensed for use in neurological disorders and there are no treatment guidelines. However, as a rapidly acting, targeted therapy with growing evidence of efficacy and tolerability in several neuroinflammatory disorders, it is an attractive alternative to conventional immunomodulatory medications. This practical review aims to explain the basic principles of B-cell depletion with therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. We present the evidence for using rituximab in neurological diseases, and describe the practical aspects of prescribing, including dosing, monitoring, safety, treatment failure and its use in special circumstances such as coexisting viral hepatitis, pregnancy and lactation. We provide an administration guide, checklist and patient information leaflet, which can be adapted for local use. Finally, we review the safety data of rituximab and ocrelizumab (a newer and recently licensed B-cell-depleting therapy for multiple sclerosis) and suggest monitoring and risk reduction strategies.

Comparative effectiveness of rituximab, abatacept, and tocilizumab in adults with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to TNF inhibitors: prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness and safety of three non-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) α inhibitors (rituximab, abatacept, and tocilizumab) in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

DESIGN

Population based prospective study.

SETTING

53 university and 54 non-university clinical centres in France.

PARTICIPANTS

3162 adults (>18 years) with rheumatoid arthritis according to 1987 American College of Rheumatology criteria, enrolled in one of the three French Society of Rheumatology registries; who had no severe cardiovascular disease, active or severe infections, or severe immunodeficiency, with follow-up of at least 24 months.

INTERVENTION

Initiation of intravenous rituximab, abatacept, or tocilizumab for rheumatoid arthritis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The primary outcome was drug retention without failure at 24 months. Failure was defined as all cause death; discontinuation of rituximab, abatacept, or tocilizumab; initiation of a new biologic or a combination of conventional disease modifying antirheumatic drugs; or increase in corticosteroid dose >10 mg/d compared with baseline at two successive visits. Because of non-proportional hazards, treatment effects are presented as life expectancy difference without failure (LED_wf), which measures the difference between average duration of survival without failure.

RESULTS

Average durations of survival without failure were 19.8 months for rituximab, 15.6 months for abatacept, and 19.1 months for tocilizumab. Average durations were greater with rituximab (LED_wf 4.1, 95% confidence interval 3.1 to 5.2) and tocilizumab (3.5, 2.1 to 5.0) than with abatacept, and uncertainty about tocilizumab compared with rituximab was substantial (-0.7, -1.9 to 0.5). No evidence was found of difference between treatments for mean duration of survival without death, presence of cancer or serious infections, or major adverse cardiovascular events.

CONCLUSION

Among adults with refractory rheumatoid arthritis followed-up in routine practice, rituximab and tocilizumab were associated with greater improvements in outcomes at two years compared with abatacept.

B cell depletion in the treatment of multiple sclerosis

INTRODUCTION

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the central nervous system. The latest development of B-cell depletion by anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies has been a large step forward in the treatment of this devastating disease.

AREAS COVERED

In this manuscript, we review mechanisms of action, efficacy, safety, and tolerance of anti-CD20 therapies for MS, including rituximab, ocrelizumab, and ofatumumab.

EXPERT OPINION

B-cell depletion efficiently suppresses acute inflammatory disease activity in relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), and may slowdown progression in primary progressive MS (PPMS). The treatment is generally well tolerated, with manageable adverse events related to infusion reactions and infections. Ocrelizumab, a humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, is the first therapy to be approved for the treatment of both RRMS and PPMS.

Association of Immunoglobulin Levels, Infectious Risk, and Mortality With Rituximab and Hypogammaglobulinemia

IMPORTANCE

Rituximab is an anti-CD20 chimeric antibody used in a wide variety of clinical indications. There has not been widespread adoption of consistent immune monitoring before and after rituximab therapy. However, there is a subset of patients who develop prolonged, symptomatic hypogammaglobulinemia following rituximab, and monitoring before and after rituximab therapy could help to identify these patients and initiate measures to prevent excess morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the current levels of screening for hypogammaglobulinemia (specifically, low immunoglobulin G), infectious risks associated with hypogammaglobulinemia, and variables associated with an increased risk of mortality.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A cohort study was conducted of 8633 patients receiving rituximab from January 1, 1997, to December 31, 2017, at a large, tertiary referral center (Partners HealthCare System).

EXPOSURES

Rituximab administration.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome measures were immunoglobulin measurements, infectious complications, and mortality. Cox regression analysis was used to examine the results of infectious complications on survival, adjusted for age, sex, and indication for rituximab use.

RESULTS

Of the 8633 patients who received rituximab in the large, academic, health care system, 4479 satisfied inclusion criteria, with a mean (SD) age of 59.8 (16.2) years; 2280 patients (50.9%) were women. Most patients (3824 [85.4%]) did not have immunoglobulin levels checked before rituximab therapy. Of those who had levels determined, hypogammaglobulinemia was noted in 313 (47.8%) patients before initiation of rituximab. Following rituximab administration, worsening hypogammaglobulinemia was noted. There was an increase in severe infections after rituximab use in the study cohort (from 17.2% to 21.7%; P < .001). In the survival analysis, increased mortality was associated with increasing age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.02; P < .001), male sex (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.02-1.28; P = .02), and severe infectious complications in the 6 months before (HR, 3.14; 95% CI, 2.77-3.55; P < .001) and after (HR, 4.97; 95% CI, 4.41-5.60; P < .001) the first rituximab infusion. A total of 201 patients (4.5%) received immunoglobulin replacement following rituximab, and among these patients, higher cumulative immunoglobulin replacement dose was associated with a reduced risk of serious infectious complications (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96-0.99; P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Many patients are not being screened or properly identified as having hypogammaglobulinemia both before and after rituximab administration. Monitoring of immunoglobulin levels both before and after rituximab therapy may allow for earlier identification of risk for developing significant infection and identify patients who may benefit from immunoglobulin replacement, which may in turn help to avoid excess morbidity and mortality.

Experience With the Use of Rituximab for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis in a Tertiary Hospital in Spain: RITAR Study

Supplemental digital content is available in the text.

There is evidence supporting that there are no relevant clinical differences between dosing rituximab 1000 mg or 2000 mg per cycle in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in clinical trials, and low-dose cycles seem to have a better safety profile. Our objective was to describe the pattern of use of rituximab in real-life practice conditions.

A Prospective Observational Study of Hypogammaglobulinemia in the First Year After Lung Transplantation

Background

Immunosuppressive therapies have led to improved survival for lung transplant (LT) recipients but these therapies can lead to hypogammaglobulinemia (HGG) and potentially an increased risk of infection. Large prospective studies have not been performed to evaluate the impact of HGG on outcomes for LT recipients.

Methods

This is a single-center prospective observational study of LT recipients. Pretransplant and posttransplant IgG levels were measured and related to infection, rejection, antibiotic use, and immunosuppression use.

Results

One hundred thirty-three LT recipients were prospectively evaluated. Pretransplant IgG values were higher than IgG values at the time of transplant or any time thereafter (all P < 0.0001). Severe HGG (IgG < 400 mg/dL) was highest at the time of transplant (32.4%) while at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months posttransplant the prevalence of severe HGG was 7.4%, 7.5%, 8.9%, and 6.3%, respectively. Severe HGG was associated with 2 or more pneumonias (P = 0.0006) and increased number of antibiotic courses (P = 0.003) compared with the subjects without severe HGG. Pretransplant IgG level and less than 30% of pretransplant protective pneumococcal antibody levels were identified as pretransplant risk factors for severe HGG. In multivariate analysis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as the underlying disease and the use of basiliximab as the induction agent in conjunction with higher prednisone and mycophenolate dosing were most predictive of severe HGG (P = 0.005), whereas the combination of age, severe HGG and number of acute steroid courses were most predictive of total days of pneumonia (P = 0.0001).

Conclusions

Our large prospective study identifies risk factors for severe HGG after LT and demonstrates that LT recipients with severe HGG are at increased risk for recurrent pneumonias and more antibiotic courses.

Patients immunodéprimés, quel pathogène pour quel déficit immunitaire ? (en dehors de l’infection à VIH)

Le nombre de patients immunodéprimés ne cesse d’augmenter en raison de l’amélioration du pronostic global du cancer et de l’utilisation croissante d’immunosuppresseurs tant en transplantation qu’au cours des maladies auto-immunes. Les infections sévères restent la première cause d’admission en réanimation dans cette population et sont dominées par les atteintes respiratoires. On distingue les déficits primitifs, volontiers révélés dans l’enfance, des déficits secondaires (médicamenteux ou non), les plus fréquents. Dans tous les cas, les sujets sont exposés à des infections inhabituelles de par leur fréquence, leur type et leur sévérité. À côté des pyogènes habituels, les infections opportunistes et la réactivation d’infections latentes font toute la complexité de la démarche diagnostique. Celle-ci doit être rigoureuse, orientée par le type de déficit, les antécédents, les prophylaxies éventuelles et la présentation clinicoradiologique. Elle permettra seule de guider le traitement probabiliste et les examens étiologiques, l’absence de diagnostic étant associée à une mortalité élevée.

Doses of rituximab for retreatment in rheumatoid arthritis: influence on maintenance and risk of serious infection

Objective

To investigate maintenance of rituximab (RTX) in RA patients re-treated with reduced doses compared with standard dose in a real life setting.

Methods

The Autoimmunity and Rituximab (AIR) registry is a nationwide prospective observational cohort investigating the long-term safety and efficacy of RTX in RA. The present study included patients from the AIR registry that have been re-treated with RTX after a first course of RTX standard dose (1000 mg × 2). Two groups were defined according to dose of RTX of the first retreatment course (i.e. second course): standard dose group and reduced dose group. Five years' maintenance and rate of serious infections of the retreatment period were compared between standard dose and reduced dose groups. Analyses used the inverse probability of treatment weighting propensity score adjusted method.

Results

Among the 1986 patients from the AIR registry, 1278 were included, 1093 (85.5%) treated with standard dose and 185 (14.5%) with reduced doses. Maintenance of RTX at 5 years in the standard and reduced groups was 55.5 and 53.8%, respectively, and did not significantly differ between groups in adjusted analyses (hazard ratio = 1.03; 95% CI: 0.81, 1.30), but the cumulative RTX dose received for retreatment [1.4 (0.6) vs 2.3 (1.0) g/year, P < 0.001] and the rate of serious infections were significantly lower in the reduced dose group (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.50; 95% CI: 0.27, 0.92; P = 0.02).

Conclusion

Use of reduced doses of RTX for retreatment did not alter the maintenance of RTX at 5 years in RA patients, but allowed a 39% total dose reduction and a lower rate of serious infections.

Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Up to Two Courses of the Rituximab Biosimilar CT-P10 Versus Innovator Rituximab in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results up to Week 72 of a Phase I Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

CT-P10 is a biosimilar of innovator rituximab (RTX), a biological therapy used to treat patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have responded inadequately to anti-tumor necrosis factor agents.

Objective

Our objective was to compare the clinical profile of CT-P10 versus RTX in patients with RA who received up to two courses of treatment and were followed for up to 72 weeks.

Methods

In this multicenter double-blind phase I study, patients were randomized 2:1 to receive CT-P10 1000 mg or RTX 1000 mg at weeks 0 and 2. Based on disease activity, patients could receive a second course of treatment between weeks 24 and 48. Efficacy endpoints, including mean change from baseline in Disease Activity Score using 28 joints (DAS28), safety, immunogenicity, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics were evaluated.

Results

In total, 154 patients were randomized to CT-P10 or RTX (n = 103 and 51, respectively); 137 (n = 92 and 45) completed the first course of treatment, of whom 83 (n = 60 and 23) were re-treated. Improvements from baseline in all efficacy endpoints were highly similar between the CT-P10 and RTX groups over both treatment courses. At week 24 after the second course, mean change from week 0 of the first course in DAS28 erythrocyte sedimentation rate was −2.47 and −2.04 for CT-P10 and RTX, respectively, (p = 0.1866) and in DAS28 C-reactive protein was −2.32 and −2.00, respectively (p = 0.3268). The proportion of patients positive for antidrug antibodies at week 24 after the second treatment course was 20.0% and 21.7% in the CT-P10 and RTX groups, respectively. The safety profile of CT-P10 was comparable to that of RTX, and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties were similar.

Conclusions

In patients with RA, efficacy, safety, and other clinical data were comparable between CT-P10 and RTX after up to two courses of treatment over 72 weeks.

(ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01534884).

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40259-017-0232-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Serious infusion-related reaction after rituximab, abatacept and tocilizumab in rheumatoid arthritis: prospective registry data

Objective

The aim was to evaluate the incidence of serious infusion-related reactions (SIRRs) in RA treated by non-TNF-targeted biologics.

Methods

We analysed data from three independent prospective registers, namely autoimmunity and rituximab, Orencia (abatacept) and RA (ORA) and Registry RoAcTEmra (tocilizumab), promoted by the French Society of Rheumatology and including patients with RA. SIRRs were defined by an occurrence during or within 24 h of an infusion and requiring discontinuation of treatment. Characteristics of patients with SIRRs were extracted from the electronic database.

Results

Among the 4145 patients, SIRRs occurred in 100 patients: 56 patients with the rituximab cohort (2.8% or 0.7/100 patient-years), 15 with the abatacept cohort (1.5% or 0.6/100 patient-years) and 29 with tocilizumab (1.9% or 1/100 patient-years). No fatal SIRR occurred. A previous mild infusion reaction to non-TNF-targeted biologics was observed in a quarter of patients with SIRRs. After pooled multivariate analysis, positive anti-CCP was associated with a higher risk of SIRR (odds ratio = 2.5; 95% CI: 1.01, 6.17). Absence of concomitant treatment with a synthetic DMARD tended to be associated with a higher risk of SIRR (odds ratio = 1.67; 95% CI: 1.00, 2.86).

Conclusion

In daily practice, SIRRs are slightly more frequent than in clinical trials and rarely life threatening. In common practice, serological status (anti-CCP positivity) and absence of concomitant treatment with a synthetic DMARD increase the risk of SIRR.

A Case of Rituximab-Induced Necrotizing Fasciitis and a Review of the Literature

Necrotizing fasciitis is a fulminant soft tissue infection characterized by rapid progression and high mortality. Rituximab is a generally well-tolerated immunosuppresive medication used for B-cell malignancies and some rheumatological disorders. We report a case of a 69-year-old male with chronic lymphocytic leukemia who suffered necrotizing fasciitis of his left lower extremity secondary to Clostridium septicum 7 weeks after treatment with rituximab. Despite immediate intravenous antimicrobial therapy and emergent fasciotomy with extensive debridement, his hospital course was complicated by septic shock and he required an above-the-knee amputation. Physicians need to be aware of the possibility of necrotizing fasciitis in patients presenting with skin infections after rituximab therapy.

Rituximab in clinical practice: dosage, drug adherence, Ig levels, infections, and drug antibodies

The objective of this study is to explore the following: (1) the impact of two different initial doses and cumulative 2-year dose of rituximab (RTX) on drug adherence and predictors of adherence to treatment in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in an observational clinical setting, (2) immunoglobulin levels (IgG/IgM/IgA) during repeated treatment and their relation to infections, and (3) development of anti-rituximab antibodies (ADA). All RA patients receiving RTX from January 2003 to April 2012 at the department were included. The initiating doses were 500 or 1000 mg intravenously days 1 and 15. Drug adherence was estimated using life-table. Baseline predictors of adherence to treatment were analyzed using Cox regression model. Levels of immunoglobulins were measured at treatment initiation and before retreatment. Serum levels of RTX and ADA were measured in 96 patients at 6 months using ELISA. One hundred fifty-three patients were included. Seventy-four (48%) started treatment with 500 and 79 (52%) with 1000 mg. No difference in drug adherence was seen between the different initial or cumulative RTX doses. Methotrexate (MTX) use and low DAS28 at baseline predicted better drug adherence. Ig levels decreased with repeated treatments but low levels were not associated with infections. 11/96 patients had developed ADA at 6 months. Long-term adherence to RTX in RA patient was not influenced by starting- or cumulative 2-year doses. MTX use and low DAS28 at baseline was positively associated with drug adherence. Decreasing Ig levels during treatment were not associated with risk of infections. Development of ADA may influence treatment efficacy and tolerability.

Long-term efficacy and safety of rituximab in IgG4-related disease: Data from a French nationwide study of thirty-three patients

OBJECTIVES

To assess efficacy and safety of rituximab (RTX) as induction therapy, maintenance of remission and treatment of relapses in a cohort of IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) patients.

METHODS

Nationwide retrospective multicenter study of IgG4-RD patients treated with at least one course of RTX. Clinical, biological and radiological response, relapse rate and drug tolerance were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted and risk factors for relapse studied with a Cox regression model.

RESULTS

Among 156 IgG4-RD patients included in the French database, 33 received rituximab. Clinical response was noted in 29/31 (93.5%) symptomatic patients. Glucocorticoids withdrawal was achieved in 17 (51.5%) patients. During a mean follow-up of 24.8 ±21 months, 13/31 (41.9%) responder patients relapsed after a mean delay of 19 ±11 months after RTX. Active disease, as defined by an IgG4-RD Responder Index >9 before RTX, was significantly associated with relapse (HR = 3.68, 95% CI: 1.1, 12.6) (P = 0.04), whereas maintenance therapy with systematic (i.e. before occurrence of a relapse) RTX retreatment was associated with longer relapse-free survival (41 versus 21 months; P = 0.02). Eight severe infections occurred in 4 patients during follow-up (severe infections rate of 12.1/100 patient-years) and hypogammaglobulinemia ≤5 g/l in 3 patients.

CONCLUSION

RTX is effective for both induction therapy and treatment of relapses in IgG4-RD, but relapses are frequent after B-cell reconstitution. Maintenance therapy with systematic RTX infusions is associated with longer relapse-free survival and might represent a novel treatment strategy. Yet, the high rate of infections and the temporary effect of RTX might be hindrances to such strategy.

Monotherapy with biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis

Current EULAR guidelines state that biologic DMARD (bDMARD) therapy should be administered in combination with MTX or other conventional synthetic (cs) DMARD in RA. Nonetheless, a third of patients for whom a bDMARD agent is prescribed take it in the absence of concurrent csDMARD therapy. While the reasons underlying the low uptake of bDMARD-csDMARD combination therapy in clinical practice have not been well delineated, they may include poor adherence, contraindication to csDMARD therapy and adverse effects, as well as csDMARD withdrawal following remission. The challenges surrounding bDMARD therapy and the benefit/risk ratio of biologic monotherapy when compared with combination with a csDMARD will be discussed. We will provide insights into these important issues, as well as reviewing the evidence base differentiating biologic agents and exploring therapeutic options for patients with rheumatoid arthritis for whom csDMARD therapy is contraindicated or discontinued.

Risk factors predisposing to the development of hypogammaglobulinemia and infections post-Rituximab

Rituximab (RTX) is a monoclonal antibody against CD20, commonly used in the treatment of hematological malignancies and autoimmune diseases. The use of RTX is related to the development of hypogammaglobulinemia and infections. Aim of this review is to summarize the evidence supporting the association of specific risk factors with the development of hypogammaglobulinemia and infections post-RTX. Immunological complications are more common in patients with malignant diseases as compared to non-malignant diseases. Moreover, the use of more than one dose of RTX, maintenance regimens, low pre-treatment basal immunoglobulin levels and the association with Mycophenolate and purine analogues represent risk factors for the development of hypogammaglobulinemia. The number of RTX courses, the evidence of low IgG levels for more than 6 months, the use of G-CSF, the occurrence of chronic lung disease, cardiac insufficiency, extra-articular involvement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, low levels of IgG and older age have been correlated with a higher risk of infections. Even though the heterogeneity of the studies in terms of study population age and underlying disease, RTX schedules as well as differences in pre-treatment or concomitant therapy doesn't allow drawing definitive conclusions, the study of the literature highlight the association of specific risk factors with the occurrence of hypogammaglobulinemia and/or infections. A long term randomized controlled clinical trial could be useful to define a personalized evidence-based risk management plan for patients treated with RTX.

Secondary antibody deficiency and immunoglobulin replacement

Antibody deficiencies can be either primary or secondary, leading to significant morbidity and mortality without appropriate management. Secondary antibody deficiency can be due to various diseases or iatrogenic causes, especially with the use of immunosuppressive agents such as B-cell depleting therapies. Unlike its primary counterpart, little is known regarding the management of secondary antibody deficiency and it remains an underappreciated entity. This is a growing concern with the growing numbers of patients on various immunosuppressant therapies and increasing survivors of autoimmune diseases and haematological malignancies. In this report, we review the diagnosis and management of secondary antibody deficiency, especially after rituximab-induced hypogammaglobulinemia.