51
|
Habbel VSA, Zeile M, Stavrou GA, Wacker F, Brüning R, Oldhafer KJ, Rodt T. Correlation between SACE (Subjective Angiographic Chemoembolization Endpoint) score and tumor response and its impact on survival after DEB-TACE in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2019; 44:3463-3479. [PMID: 31332502 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-019-02128-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To asses angiographic and computed tomographic success criteria during and after transcatheter arterial drug-eluting bead chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and its impact on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). METHODS In this retrospective single-center study, 50 patients with unresectable HCC having undergone DEB-TACE from January 2010 to July 2015 were assessed. The angiographic endpoint was classified by Subjective Angiographic Chemoembolization Endpoint (SACE) scale. Relative tumor density in arterial (DArt) and portal venous phase (DPV) computed tomography post- versus pre-DEB-TACE were calculated, respectively. Tumor response according to modified Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) was assessed. Univariate Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis were carried out. RESULTS SACE scores I, II, III, and IV were found in 1 (2%), 20 (40%), 15 (30%), and 14 (28%) patients, respectively. Median OS and PFS were 14.2 and 5.5 months, respectively. Death rates at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years were 24%, 38%, and 52%, respectively. SACE score during DEB-TACE significantly correlated with local and overall mRECIST results (local: p < 0.001, r = 0.49, overall: p = 0.042, r = 0.29) and inversely correlated with DPV (p = 0.005, r = - 0.40). In univariate analysis, progressive disease (PD) according to mRECIST and increase of DArt and DPV were associated with significantly shorter PFS. Modified RECIST independently predicted OS (hazard ratio for complete remission vs. PD = 0.15, 95% confidence interval 0.03-0.68, p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS A direct impact of SACE on PFS or OS could not be shown. However, SACE significantly correlated with local and overall mRECIST tumor response that again significantly predicted OS. We therefore postulate an indirect impact of SACE on OS. Consequently, complete embolization should be attempted.
Collapse
|
52
|
Li N, Jiang Y, Plantefève R, Michaud F, Nosrati Z, Tremblay C, Saatchi K, Häfeli UO, Kadoury S, Moran G, Joly F, Martel S, Soulez G. Magnetic Resonance Navigation for Targeted Embolization in a Two-Level Bifurcation Phantom. Ann Biomed Eng 2019; 47:2402-2415. [PMID: 31290038 DOI: 10.1007/s10439-019-02317-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2019] [Accepted: 06/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
This work combines a particle injection system with our proposed magnetic resonance navigation (MRN) sequence with the intention of validating MRN in a two-bifurcation phantom for endovascular treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A theoretical physical model used to calculate the most appropriate size of the magnetic drug-eluting bead (MDEB, 200 μm) aggregates was proposed. The aggregates were injected into the phantom by a dedicated particle injector while a trigger signal was automatically sent to the MRI to start MRN which consists of interleaved tracking and steering sequences. When the main branch of the phantom was parallel to B0, the aggregate distribution ratio in the (left-left, left-right, right-left and right-right divisions was obtained with results of 8, 68, 24 and 0% respectively at baseline (no MRN) and increased to 84%, 100, 84 and 92% (p < 0.001, p = 0.004, p < 0.001, p < 0.001) after implementing our MRN protocol. When the main branch was perpendicular to B0, the right-left branch, having the smallest baseline distribution rate of 0%, reached 80% (p < 0.001) after applying MRN. Moreover, the success rate of MRN was always more than 92% at the 1st bifurcation in the experiments above.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ning Li
- Polytechnique Montréal, Chemin de Polytechnique, 2500 Chemin de Polytechnique, Montréal, QC, 28 H3T 1J4, Canada.,Laboratory of Clinical Image Processing, Le Centre de recherche du CHUM (CRCHUM), 900 Rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, QC, H2X 0A9, Canada
| | - Yuting Jiang
- Laboratory of Clinical Image Processing, Le Centre de recherche du CHUM (CRCHUM), 900 Rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, QC, H2X 0A9, Canada.,Department of Radiology, Radiation-Oncology and Nuclear Medicine and Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Université de Montréal, 2900 Boulevard Édouard-Montpetit, Montréal, QC, H3T 1J4, Canada
| | - Rosalie Plantefève
- Laboratory of Clinical Image Processing, Le Centre de recherche du CHUM (CRCHUM), 900 Rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, QC, H2X 0A9, Canada
| | - Francois Michaud
- Laboratory of Clinical Image Processing, Le Centre de recherche du CHUM (CRCHUM), 900 Rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, QC, H2X 0A9, Canada.,Department of Radiology, Radiation-Oncology and Nuclear Medicine and Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Université de Montréal, 2900 Boulevard Édouard-Montpetit, Montréal, QC, H3T 1J4, Canada
| | - Zeynab Nosrati
- University of British Columbia, 2405 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Charles Tremblay
- Polytechnique Montréal, Chemin de Polytechnique, 2500 Chemin de Polytechnique, Montréal, QC, 28 H3T 1J4, Canada
| | - Katayoun Saatchi
- University of British Columbia, 2405 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Urs O Häfeli
- University of British Columbia, 2405 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Samuel Kadoury
- Polytechnique Montréal, Chemin de Polytechnique, 2500 Chemin de Polytechnique, Montréal, QC, 28 H3T 1J4, Canada.,Laboratory of Clinical Image Processing, Le Centre de recherche du CHUM (CRCHUM), 900 Rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, QC, H2X 0A9, Canada
| | | | - Florian Joly
- INRIA Paris, 2 rue Simone Iff, 75012, Paris, France
| | - Sylvain Martel
- Polytechnique Montréal, Chemin de Polytechnique, 2500 Chemin de Polytechnique, Montréal, QC, 28 H3T 1J4, Canada
| | - Gilles Soulez
- Laboratory of Clinical Image Processing, Le Centre de recherche du CHUM (CRCHUM), 900 Rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, QC, H2X 0A9, Canada. .,Department of Radiology, Radiation-Oncology and Nuclear Medicine and Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Université de Montréal, 2900 Boulevard Édouard-Montpetit, Montréal, QC, H3T 1J4, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Karalli A, Teiler J, Haji M, Seth E, Brismar TB, Wahlin S, Axelsson R, Stål P. Comparison of lipiodol infusion and drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma in a real-life setting. Scand J Gastroenterol 2019; 54:905-912. [PMID: 31287338 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2019.1632925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Aim: Doxorubicin-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) is reported to improve survival and tolerability when compared with conventional lipiodol-TACE (cTACE) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aim of this study was to evaluate tolerability and long-term survival in patients treated with cTACE or DEB-TACE in a real-life setting. Methods: Incidence of adverse events and overall survival in HCC patients treated with either cTACE or DEB-TACE at Karolinska University Hospital 2004-2012 were analyzed retrospectively. Median follow-up was 7.1 years. Patients were censored when transplanted or at the end of follow-up. Patients receiving both cTACE and DEB-TACE, or treated with resection or ablation post-TACE were excluded from the survival analysis. Results: A total of 202 patients (76 cTACE and 126 DEB-TACE) were eligible for analysis of adverse events, and 179 patients (69 cTACE and 110 DEB-TACE) were included in the survival analysis. cTACE patients were younger and had fewer tumors but higher BCLC stage than DEB-TACE. Child-Pugh and ECOG performance status were similar between groups. Adverse events (abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting, fever, fatigue) were significantly less common in the DEB-TACE group. Median survival was 17.1 months in the cTACE group and 19.1 months in the DEB-TACE (NS). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, portal vein thrombosis and tumor size were associated with increased, and sorafenib treatment post-TACE with decreased mortality. Conclusion: In this retrospective real-life analysis, DEB-TACE had better tolerability compared to cTACE, but overall survival did not differ between the two treatments. Portal vein thrombosis, tumor size and sorafenib treatment after TACE influence survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amar Karalli
- Division of Medical Imaging and Technology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden
| | - Johan Teiler
- Division of Medical Imaging and Technology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden
| | - Mojgan Haji
- Division of Medical Imaging and Technology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden
| | - Elin Seth
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet South Hospital , Stockholm , Sweden
| | - Torkel B Brismar
- Division of Medical Imaging and Technology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden
| | - Staffan Wahlin
- Unit of Gastroenterology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden.,Unit of Liver Diseases, Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital , Stockholm , Sweden
| | - Rimma Axelsson
- Division of Medical Imaging and Technology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden.,Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Functional Unit of Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital , Huddinge , Sweden
| | - Per Stål
- Unit of Gastroenterology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden.,Unit of Liver Diseases, Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital , Stockholm , Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Xiang H, Long L, Yao Y, Fang Z, Zhang Z, Zhang Y. CalliSpheres Drug-Eluting Bead Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Presents With Better Efficacy and Equal Safety Compared to Conventional TACE in Treating Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2019; 18:1533033819830751. [PMID: 30862264 PMCID: PMC6416678 DOI: 10.1177/1533033819830751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the treatment response, survival, liver function,
and adverse event incidence of drug-eluting bead transcatheter arterial chemoembolization
using CalliSpheres microspheres with conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization
in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Seventy-three patients with hepatocellular
carcinoma who received drug-eluting bead transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (using
CalliSpheres microspheres) or conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization
treatment were consecutively enrolled. Treatment response was assessed by modified
Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors at month 1/month 3/month 6; posttreatment,
liver function indexes, and adverse events were recorded. Progression-free survival and
overall survival were also calculated. Objective response rate of patients at months 1, 3,
and 6, disease control rate of patients and objective response rate of nodules at month 3
were increased in drug-eluting bead transcatheter arterial chemoembolization group
compared with conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization group. In addition,
drug-eluting bead transcatheter arterial chemoembolization using CalliSpheres microspheres
was an independent factor for predicting better objective response rate at month 1.
Patients in drug-eluting bead transcatheter arterial chemoembolization group achieved
longer progression-free survival and similar overall survival compared to those in
conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization group; Cox proportional hazards
regression model analyses revealed that drug-eluting bead transcatheter arterial
chemoembolization using CalliSpheres microspheres was associated with better
progression-free survival while it did not affect overall survival. Meanwhile, most of the
occurrences of abnormal liver function indexes were similar between 2 groups, whereas
drug-eluting bead transcatheter arterial chemoembolization group had a higher percentage
of patients with total bile acid ≥2 upper limit of normal compared to conventional
transcatheter arterial chemoembolization group at month 1. Moreover, the adverse event
incidences between 2 groups were similar. In conclusion, drug-eluting bead transcatheter
arterial chemoembolization using CalliSpheres microspheres achieves better treatment
response and progression-free survival while equal safety compared to conventional
transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hua Xiang
- 1 Department of Interventional Radiology & Vascular Surgery, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Lin Long
- 1 Department of Interventional Radiology & Vascular Surgery, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Yuanhui Yao
- 1 Department of Interventional Radiology & Vascular Surgery, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Zhiyong Fang
- 1 Department of Interventional Radiology & Vascular Surgery, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Zhiming Zhang
- 1 Department of Interventional Radiology & Vascular Surgery, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Yongjin Zhang
- 1 Department of Interventional Radiology & Vascular Surgery, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, China
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Gjoreski A, Popova-Jovanovska R, Eftimovska-Rogac I, Vejseli J. Safety Profile and Efficacy of Chemoembolization with Doxorubicin - Loaded Polyethylene Glycol Microspheres in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2019; 7:742-746. [PMID: 30962831 PMCID: PMC6447352 DOI: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2019] [Revised: 02/20/2019] [Accepted: 02/21/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM: This study was designed as a preliminary investigation of safety and efficacy of LifePearl, polyethylene glycol microspheres loaded with doxorubicin for treatment of locally untreatable (i.e., unresectable and not suitable for local thermal ablation) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with locally untreatable HCC (mono- or bilobar disease, ECOG performance status 0-1, Chilg-Pugh score < 11) were analysed for this single arm Unicenter retrospective study. All the information were acquired through our local hospital information system. DEB-TACE was performed with 100-200 microns LifePearl loaded with 75-150 mg of doxorubicin depending on tumour size. One interventional radiologist with experience of more than 350 TACE procedures and one fellow in radiology performed all embolisations. RESULTS: Twenty subjects with 29 tumours were treated (mean age 66.2 years). Child-Pugh status was A for 12 pts. (60%), B for 6 pts. (30%) and C for 2 pts. (10%). Three patients had insignificant ascites. Most patients (70%) underwent < 3 DEB-TACE procedures. Average doxorubicin dose was 71.1 mg per procedure. One patient had procedure-related SAE (acute pancreatitis) within the postembolization period which was induced due to non-target embolisation of the superior pancreaticoduodenal artery. Six-month freedom from procedure-related SAE or death was 95% (one necrotizing pancreatitis). Tumor response or stable disease was achieved in 95% (19/20) of subjects. Freedom from tumor progression or death at 6 months was 95%. One-year survival rate was 90% overall. CONCLUSION: The results from this investigation suggest that LifePearl microspheres, Terumo loaded with doxorubicin can provide an excellent local tumour control with very few side effects in a relatively homogeneous group of patients with locally untreatable HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleksandar Gjoreski
- Department for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, General City Hospital 8th September, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia
| | - Rozalinda Popova-Jovanovska
- University Clinic for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Ss Cyril and Methodius University of Skopje, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia
| | - Irena Eftimovska-Rogac
- Department for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, General City Hospital 8th September, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia
| | - Jusuf Vejseli
- Department for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, General City Hospital 8th September, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Ikeda K. Recent advances in medical management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Res 2019; 49:14-32. [PMID: 30308081 DOI: 10.1111/hepr.13259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2018] [Revised: 09/20/2018] [Accepted: 10/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Transcatheter arterial therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have developed during the last decade. A fine powder formulation of cisplatin and the new platinum agent miriplatin became standard medicines in addition to anthracyclines in transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in Japan. Recent prospective and retrospective studies supported the usefulness of platinum agents as a chemotherapeutic at the time of varied TACE therapy. Although balloon-occluded TACE is an effective therapy for localized HCC and drug-eluting microspheres seemed to show a higher response rate in certain HCCs, the definite advantages of those procedures still remain uncertain. Intermediate stage HCC, or Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B, is regarded as a heterogeneous category with a wide spectrum of tumors and patients, and several subclassifications of the stage have been proposed to show different prognoses; there are also different recommended therapies in each subgroup. Authors have subclassified patients based on combinations of tumor size, tumor number, and liver function, with or without performance status. Because of differences of available medical resources and techniques in treatment procedures between countries, the most ideal and useful subgrouping remains inconclusive at present. Recently, a few systemic chemotherapies proved to be effective for advanced stage HCC in phase III studies: lenvatinib as the first line of therapy, and regorafenib, cabozantinib, and ramucirumab as second-line therapy. Other molecular-targeted and immune-oncological medicines are expected to follow in the near future. Some studies have suggested an advantage of early introduction of molecular-targeted therapy for TACE-resistant HCC in the intermediate stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenji Ikeda
- Department of Hepatology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Posttransplant Hepatic Artery and Biliary Complications in Patients Treated With Transarterial Chemoembolization Before Liver Transplantation. Transplantation 2018; 102:88-96. [PMID: 28885493 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000001936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatic artery complications are feared complications after liver transplantation and may compromise the biliary tract, graft, and patient survival. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare risk of hepatic artery and biliary complications after liver transplantation in patients who underwent neoadjuvant transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) versus no TACE. METHODS Comprehensive searches were performed in Embase, MEDLINE OvidSP, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases to identify studies concerning hepatocellular cancer patients undergoing preliver transplantation TACE. Quality assessment of studies was done by the validated checklist of Downs and Black. Meta-analyses were performed to evaluate the incidence of all hepatic artery complications, hepatic artery thrombosis, and biliary tract complications, using binary random-effect models. RESULTS Fourteen retrospective studies, representing 1122 TACE patients, met the inclusion criteria. Postoperative hepatic artery complications consisted of hepatic artery thrombosis, stenosis, and (pseudo)-aneurysms. Preliver transplantation TACE was significantly associated with occurrence of posttransplant hepatic artery complications (odds ratio, 1.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-2.26; P = 0.02). No significant association between neoadjuvant TACE and hepatic artery thrombosis alone or biliary tract complications was found. CONCLUSIONS Patients treated with TACE before liver transplantation may be at increased risk for development of hepatic artery complications after liver transplantation.
Collapse
|
58
|
Zeng J, Li L, Zhang H, Li J, Liu L, Zhou G, Du Q, Zheng C, Yang X. Radiopaque and uniform alginate microspheres loaded with tantalum nanoparticles for real-time imaging during transcatheter arterial embolization. Theranostics 2018; 8:4591-4600. [PMID: 30279724 PMCID: PMC6160769 DOI: 10.7150/thno.27379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2018] [Accepted: 07/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
One restriction to the development and application of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) therapy is the lack of an inherently radiopaque embolic whose location and distribution can be precisely visualized in real time and be used for non-invasive examination after surgery. Methods: A one-step electrospray method was developed to fabricate calcium alginate microspheres loaded with tantalum nanoparticles (Ta@CaAlg). The parameters of electrospraying were assessed. The in vivo X-ray imaging capability and embolic effect of Ta@CaAlg microspheres were evaluated in the renal arteries of normal rabbits by digital radiography and computed tomography. Doxorubicin hydrochloride (Dox) was chosen as a model drug, and the drug loading capacity and release behavior of these microspheres was valuated in vitro.Results: Spherical Ta@CaAlg microspheres with monodisperse sizes ranging from 150 to 1200 μm were fabricated by electrospraying. The results of an in vivo study showed that Ta@CaAlg microspheres possessed the qualities of both embolic agents and contrast media. They could not only feed back the real-time location and distribution of the embolic microspheres but also maintained clear X-ray imaging of embolized sites for up to 4 weeks as assessed by digital radiography and computed tomography. Digital subtraction angiography showed that they had an excellent embolic effect. Ta@CaAlg microspheres could be loaded with Dox to form "3-in-1" embolic microspheres. The maximum Dox loading was 97.3 mg Dox per mL beads and loaded microspheres exhibited pH-dependent release profiles. Conclusion: The X-ray opacity and drug-loading capability of Ta@CaAlg microspheres offers great promise in direct, real-time, in vivo investigation for TACE and long-term non-invasive re-examination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian Zeng
- National Engineering Research Center for Nanomedicine, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 430074, Wuhan, China
| | - Ling Li
- National Engineering Research Center for Nanomedicine, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 430074, Wuhan, China
| | - Hongsen Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 430022, Wuhan, China
| | - Jianye Li
- National Engineering Research Center for Nanomedicine, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 430074, Wuhan, China
| | - Lingli Liu
- National Engineering Research Center for Nanomedicine, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 430074, Wuhan, China
| | - Guofeng Zhou
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 430022, Wuhan, China
| | - Qing Du
- National Engineering Research Center for Nanomedicine, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 430074, Wuhan, China
| | - Chuansheng Zheng
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 430022, Wuhan, China
| | - Xiangliang Yang
- National Engineering Research Center for Nanomedicine, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 430074, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Marcacuzco Quinto A, Nutu OA, San Román Manso R, Justo Alonso I, Calvo Pulido J, Manrique Municio A, García-Sesma Á, Loinaz Segurola C, Martínez Caballero J, Jiménez Romero LC. Complications of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in the treatment of liver tumors. Cir Esp 2018; 96:560-567. [PMID: 30082086 DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2018.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2018] [Revised: 06/03/2018] [Accepted: 06/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is considered a therapeutic option. It is mostly used in hepatocellular carcinoma or liver colorectal, neuroendocrine or melanoma metastases. Although it is considered a safe procedure, TACE presents complications, such as acute cholecystitis, which is the most common. Other procedure-related complications include pulmonary embolism, hepatic abscess, bile duct injury, gastric mucosa injury and, less frequently, acute pancreatitis. The aim of this study is to review the complications following TACE for liver tumors. METHODS We performed a retrospective study including all the TACE procedures performed in a single center during the period between January 2013 and December 2016. RESULTS Out of the 196 patients with liver tumors who had undergone 322 TACE, 258 (80%) were male and 64 (20%) were female. Mean patient age was 66.5years. Major complications after chemoembolization included: decompensation with edema/ascites (6patients), acute cholecystitis (4), acute pancreatitis (3), liver rupture (1), liver abscess (1) and renal failure (1). Postembolization syndrome appeared in 71 (20%) patients. On multivariate analysis, it was observed that concomitant cardiovascular disease (OR: 4.5; 95%CI: 1.2-17; P=.025) is a risk factor for the development of complications. CONCLUSIONS TACE is a safe and effective procedure for liver tumor treatment. The majority of the complications are rare and present a low incidence of mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Marcacuzco Quinto
- Unidad de Cirugía Hepato-Bilio-Pancreática y Trasplante de Órganos Abdominales, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre. Departamento de Cirugía, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, España.
| | - Oana-Anisa Nutu
- Unidad de Cirugía Hepato-Bilio-Pancreática y Trasplante de Órganos Abdominales, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre. Departamento de Cirugía, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, España
| | | | - Iago Justo Alonso
- Unidad de Cirugía Hepato-Bilio-Pancreática y Trasplante de Órganos Abdominales, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre. Departamento de Cirugía, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, España
| | - Jorge Calvo Pulido
- Unidad de Cirugía Hepato-Bilio-Pancreática y Trasplante de Órganos Abdominales, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre. Departamento de Cirugía, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, España
| | - Alejandro Manrique Municio
- Unidad de Cirugía Hepato-Bilio-Pancreática y Trasplante de Órganos Abdominales, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre. Departamento de Cirugía, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, España
| | - Álvaro García-Sesma
- Unidad de Cirugía Hepato-Bilio-Pancreática y Trasplante de Órganos Abdominales, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre. Departamento de Cirugía, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, España
| | - Carmelo Loinaz Segurola
- Unidad de Cirugía Hepato-Bilio-Pancreática y Trasplante de Órganos Abdominales, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre. Departamento de Cirugía, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, España
| | - Javier Martínez Caballero
- Unidad de Cirugía Hepato-Bilio-Pancreática y Trasplante de Órganos Abdominales, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre. Departamento de Cirugía, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, España
| | - Luis Carlos Jiménez Romero
- Unidad de Cirugía Hepato-Bilio-Pancreática y Trasplante de Órganos Abdominales, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre. Departamento de Cirugía, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, España
| |
Collapse
|
60
|
Facciorusso A. Drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: Current state of the art. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24:161-169. [PMID: 29375202 PMCID: PMC5768935 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i2.161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2017] [Revised: 12/16/2017] [Accepted: 12/20/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) represents the current gold standard for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients in intermediate stage. Conventional TACE (cTACE) is performed with the injection of an emulsion of a chemotherapeutic drug with lipiodol into the artery feeding the tumoral nodules, followed by embolization of the same vessel to obtain a synergistic effect of drug cytotoxic activity and ischemia. Aim of this review is to summarize the main characteristics of drug-eluting beads (DEB)-TACE and the clinical results reported so far in the literature. A literature search was conducted using PubMed until June 2017. In order to overcome the drawbacks of cTACE, namely lack of standardization and unpredictability of outcomes, non-absorbable embolic microspheres charged with cytotoxic agents (DEBs) have been developed. DEBs are able to simultaneously exert both the therapeutic components of TACE, either drug-carrier function and embolization, unlike cTACE in which applying the embolic agent is a second moment after drug injection. This way, risk of systemic drug release is minimal due to both high-affinity carrier activity of DEBs and absence of a time interval between injection and embolization. However, despite promising results of preliminary studies, clear evidence of superiority of DEB-TACE over cTACE is still lacking. A number of novel technical devices are actually in development in the field of loco-regional treatments for HCC, but only a few of them have entered the clinical arena. In absence of well-designed randomized-controlled trials, the decision on whether use DEB-TACE or cTACE is still controversial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Facciorusso
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia 71122, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
Wu W, Fang D, Shi D, Bian X, Li L. Effects of marital status on survival of hepatocellular carcinoma by race/ethnicity and gender. Cancer Manag Res 2018; 10:23-32. [PMID: 29379317 PMCID: PMC5757210 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s142019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose It is well demonstrated that being married is associated with a better prognosis in multiple types of cancer. However, whether the protective effect of marital status varied across race/ethnicity and gender in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the roles of race/ethnicity and gender in this relationship. Patients and methods We identified eligible patients from Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database during 2004–2012. Overall and cancer-specific survival differences across marital status were compared by Kaplan–Meier curves. We also estimated crude hazard ratios (CHRs) and adjusted hazard ratios (AHRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for marital status associated with survival by race/ethnicity and gender in Cox proportional hazard models. Results A total of 12,168 eligible patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma were included. We observed that married status was an independent protective prognostic factor for overall and cancer-specific survival. In stratified analyses by race/ethnicity, the AHR of overall mortality (unmarried vs married) was highest for Hispanic (AHR =1.25, 95% CI, 1.13–1.39; P<0.001) and lowest for Asian or Pacific Islander (AHR =1.13; 95% CI, 1.00–1.28; P=0.042). Stratified by gender, the AHR was higher in males (AHR =1.27; 95% CI, 1.20–1.33; P<0.001). Conclusion: We demonstrated that married patients obtained better survival advantages. Race/ethnicity and gender could influence the magnitude of associations between marital status and risk of mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenrui Wu
- State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Daiqiong Fang
- State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Ding Shi
- State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaoyuan Bian
- State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Lanjuan Li
- State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
62
|
Liu Q, Qian Y, Li P, Zhang S, Liu J, Sun X, Fulham M, Feng D, Huang G, Lu W, Song S. 131I-Labeled Copper Sulfide-Loaded Microspheres to Treat Hepatic Tumors via Hepatic Artery Embolization. Theranostics 2018; 8:785-799. [PMID: 29344306 PMCID: PMC5771093 DOI: 10.7150/thno.21491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2017] [Accepted: 11/15/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Transcatheter hepatic artery embolization therapy is a minimally invasive alternative for treating inoperable liver cancer but recurrence is frequent. Multifunctional agents, however, offer an opportunity for tumor eradication. In this study, we were aim to synthesized poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) microspheres encapsulating hollow CuS nanoparticles (HCuSNPs) and paclitaxel (PTX) that were then labeled with radioiodine-131 (131I) to produce 131I-HCuSNPs-MS-PTX. This compound combines the multi-theranostic properties of chemotherapy, radiotherapy and photothermal therapy. In addition, it can also be imaged with single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging and photoacoustic imaging. Methods: We investigated the value of therapeutic and imaging of 131I-HCuSNPs-MS-PTX in rats bearing Walker-256 tumor transplanted in the liver. After the intra-arterial (IA) injection of 131I-HCuSNPs-MS-PTX, 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) micro-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (micro-PET/CT) imaging was used to monitor the therapeutic effect. PET/CT findings were verified by immunohistochemical analysis. SPECT/CT and photoacoustic imaging were performed to demonstrate the distribution of 131I-HCuSNPs-MS-PTX in vivo. Results: We found that embolization therapy in combination with chemotherapy, radiotherapy and photothermal therapy offered by 131I-HCuSNPs-MS-PTX completely ablated the transplanted hepatic tumors at a relatively low dose. In comparison, embolization monotherapy or combination with one or two other therapies had less effective anti-tumor efficacy. The combination of SPECT/CT and photoacoustic imaging effectively confirmed microsphere delivery to the targeted tumors in vivo and guided the near-infrared laser irradiation. Conclusion: Our study suggests that there is a clinical theranostic potential for imaging-guided arterial embolization with 131I-HCuSNPs-MS-PTX for the treatment of liver tumors.
Collapse
|
63
|
Benson AB, D'Angelica MI, Abbott DE, Abrams TA, Alberts SR, Saenz DA, Are C, Brown DB, Chang DT, Covey AM, Hawkins W, Iyer R, Jacob R, Karachristos A, Kelley RK, Kim R, Palta M, Park JO, Sahai V, Schefter T, Schmidt C, Sicklick JK, Singh G, Sohal D, Stein S, Tian GG, Vauthey JN, Venook AP, Zhu AX, Hoffmann KG, Darlow S. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Hepatobiliary Cancers, Version 1.2017. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2017; 15:563-573. [PMID: 28476736 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 245] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The NCCN Guidelines for Hepatobiliary Cancers provide treatment recommendations for cancers of the liver, gallbladder, and bile ducts. The NCCN Hepatobiliary Cancers Panel meets at least annually to review comments from reviewers within their institutions, examine relevant new data from publications and abstracts, and reevaluate and update their recommendations. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel's discussion and most recent recommendations regarding locoregional therapy for treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Al B Benson
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - William Hawkins
- Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine
| | | | - Rojymon Jacob
- University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | - R Kate Kelley
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | - Robin Kim
- Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah
| | | | - James O Park
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
| | | | | | - Carl Schmidt
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
| | | | | | - Davendra Sohal
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
| | | | - G Gary Tian
- St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center
| | | | - Alan P Venook
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
64
|
Popovic P, Leban A, Kregar K, Garbajs M, Dezman R, Bunc M. Computed Tomographic Perfusion Imaging for the Prediction of Response and Survival to Transarterial Chemoembolization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Radiol Oncol 2017. [PMID: 29520201 PMCID: PMC5839077 DOI: 10.1515/raon-2017-0052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate the clinical value of computed tomographic perfusion imaging (CTPI) parameters in predicting the response to treatment and overall survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEBTACE). Patients and methods Between December 2010 and January 2013 eighteen patients (17 men, 1 woman; mean age 69 ± 5.8 years) with intermediate stage HCC underwent CTPI of the liver prior to treatment with DEBTACE. Treatment response was evaluated on follow-up imaging according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Pre-treatment CTPI parameters were compared between patients with complete response and partial response with a Student t-test. We compared survival times with Kaplan-Meier method. Results CTPI parameters of patients with complete response and others did not show statistical significant difference. The mean survival time was 25.4 ± 3.2 months (95%; CI: 18.7-32.1). Survival was statistically significantly longer in patients with hepatic blood flow (BF) lower than 50.44 ml/100 ml/min (p = 0.033), hepatic blood volume (BV) lower than 13.32 ml/100 ml (p = 0.028) and time to peak (TTP) longer than 19.035 s (p = 0.015). Conclusions CTPI enables prediction of survival in patients with intermediate stage HCC, treated with DEBTACE based on the pre-treatment values of BF, BV and TTP perfusion parameters. CT perfusion imaging can’t be used to predict treatment response to DEBTACE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Popovic
- Clinical Institute of Radiology, University Medical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Ana Leban
- General Hospital Dr. Franca Derganca, Šempeter pri Gorici, Slovenia
| | | | - Manca Garbajs
- Clinical Institute of Radiology, University Medical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Rok Dezman
- Clinical Institute of Radiology, University Medical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Matjaz Bunc
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
65
|
Richter G, Radeleff B, Stroszczynski C, Pereira P, Helmberger T, Barakat M, Huppert P. Safety and Feasibility of Chemoembolization with Doxorubicin-Loaded Small Calibrated Microspheres in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Results of the MIRACLE I Prospective Multicenter Study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2017; 41:587-593. [PMID: 29167967 PMCID: PMC5838148 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-017-1839-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2017] [Accepted: 11/13/2017] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Purpose The MIRACLE I pilot study was designed as a preliminary investigation of safety and efficacy of Embozene TANDEM microspheres loaded with doxorubicin for treatment of locally untreatable (i.e., unresectable and not suitable for local thermal ablation) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Materials and Methods Patients with locally untreatable HCC (mono- or bilobar disease, ECOG performance status 0–2, Child–Pugh score < 11) were eligible for this single-arm multicenter study. DEB-TACE was performed with 75 µm Embozene TANDEM loaded with 150 mg of doxorubicin. Results Twenty-five subjects with 41 tumors were treated (mean age 65 years); 16, 52, and 32% had BCLC A, B, and C status, respectively. Child–Pugh status was A for 64%, B for 32%, and C for 4%; 40% had ascites. About 92% had disease localized to one liver lobe. Most (72%) underwent ≤ 2 DEB-TACE procedures. Average doxorubicin dose was 124.5 ± 36.1 mg (median 150 mg) per procedure. Two patients had procedure-related SAE (liver necrosis, worsening of liver insufficiency) within 30 days of the first DEB-TACE procedure. Six-month freedom from procedure-related SAE or death was 68% (one hepatic encephalopathy, five deaths). Tumor response or stable disease was achieved in 95% (20/21) of subjects. Freedom from tumor progression or death at 6 months was 76%. The one-year survival rate was 56% overall and 73% among patients without ascites at baseline. Conclusion MIRACLE I results suggest that Embozene TANDEM microspheres loaded with doxorubicin can provide good local tumor control in a heterogeneous group of patients with locally untreatable HCC. Level of Evidence Level 2b, Individual cohort study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Götz Richter
- 1st Siemens Reference Center for Interventional Radiology and Oncology, Klinikum Stuttgart, Kriegsbergstr 60, 70174, Stuttgart, Germany.
| | - Boris Radeleff
- Klinikum der Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
66
|
Weng L, Akurati S, Donelson RB, Rostamzadeh P, Golzarian J. In vitro evaluation of sunitinib loaded bioresorbable microspheres for potential application in arterial chemoembolization. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2017; 159:705-711. [PMID: 28881297 DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.08.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2017] [Revised: 07/24/2017] [Accepted: 08/22/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Drug-loadable bioresorbable microspheres (BRMS) are designed for treating hypervascular tumors through chemoembolization, thereby reducing systemic side effects via controllable local delivery. The present study investigated the degradation and loading capability of bioresorbable microspheres with an anti-angiogenic agent, sunitinib, and then evaluated the release profiles in different media (PBS, 10μg/mL and 4mg/mL lysozyme solutions), and tested catheter deliverability as well as potential antiangiogenic effects of the loaded microspheres. The dry weight of the BRMS showed a consistent decrease over the period of incubation in a 10μg/mL lysozyme solution with 61.3% mass remaining on day 21. Sunitinib was loaded efficiently onto the microspheres, with smaller sizes exhibiting a slightly faster loading and release rate. At 2h, the loading percentages were 99.28%, 97.95%, and 94.39% for 100-300, 300-500, and 500-700μm microspheres, respectively. At 8h, the percentage of drug released were 78.4±5.8%, 71.7±0.3%, and 67.0±2.9% for 100-300, 300-500, and 500-700μm microspheres under static medium conditions, respectively. Under replacing-medium conditions, the presence of 10μg/mL lysozyme slightly delayed the drug release while 4mg/mL lysozyme significantly facilitated the drug release from the microspheres as compared with PBS solution. Confocal imaging revealed an even distribution of sunitinib throughout the microspheres. Drug loaded microspheres were delivered through microcatheters smoothly without any clogging. Sunitinib retained its efficacy at reducing the viability of human endothelial cells after elution from the microspheres. Thus, these bioresorbable microspheres are promising for arterial chemoembolization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lihui Weng
- Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Mayo B228, 420 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
| | - Srilalitha Akurati
- Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Mayo B228, 420 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| | - Randy B Donelson
- Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Mayo B228, 420 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| | - Parinaz Rostamzadeh
- Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Mayo B228, 420 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| | - Jafar Golzarian
- Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Mayo B228, 420 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| |
Collapse
|
67
|
Zhao J, Zhang H, Wei L, Xie S, Suo Z. Comparing the long-term efficacy of standard and combined minimally invasive procedures for unresectable HCC: a mixed treatment comparison. Oncotarget 2017; 8:15101-15113. [PMID: 27835871 PMCID: PMC5362470 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.13145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2016] [Accepted: 10/12/2016] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
A small proportion of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients are suitable for surgical resections and various minimally invasive procedures have been introduced as alternatives to surgical resections. However, the relative efficacy of minimally invasive procedures remains to be studied in the current literature. Several popular minimally invasive procedures (monotherapy or combined therapies) were selected for comparison and their relative long-term efficacy were determined by using the statistics of hazard ratio (HR) which evaluates the survival status of HCC patients in one, two, three and four years, respectively. Evidence were obtained from the current literature and synthesized by using the approach of conventional pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis (NMA). Moreover, selected minimally invasive procedures were ranked according to their surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) which was produced by NMA in conjunction with the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling method. HCC patients treated by combined minimally invasive procedures, particularly transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) + high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), TACE + radiofrequency ablation (RFA), TACE + radiotherapy (RT) and TACE + Sorafenib (SOR) exhibited a significant decrease in the HR compared to those with standard TACE (HR < 1). The combined minimally invasive procedure of TACE + HIFU appears to be the most preferable therapy. PEI seems to be less favorable than other minimally invasive procedures. Combined minimally invasive procedures may be more preferable than standard minimally invasive procedures. Percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) may not provide adequate efficacy compared to other minimally invasive procedures for unresectable HCC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianghai Zhao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Huaihe Hospital of Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan, 475000, China
| | - Hui Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Huaihe Hospital of Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan, 475000, China
| | - Lunshou Wei
- Department of Gastroenterology, Huaihe Hospital of Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan, 475000, China
| | - Shuping Xie
- Department of Gastroenterology, Huaihe Hospital of Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan, 475000, China
| | - Zhimin Suo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Huaihe Hospital of Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan, 475000, China
| |
Collapse
|
68
|
Kokabi N, Duszak R, Xing M, Howard DH, Applegate KE, Camacho JC, Kim HS. Cancer-directed therapy and potential impact on survivals in nonresected hepatocellular carcinoma: SEER-Medicare population study. Future Oncol 2017; 13:2021-2033. [DOI: 10.2217/fon-2017-0116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: To investigate determinants of receiving cancer-directed therapies and their potential survival impact in nonresected hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) Materials & methods: Nonsurgically resected HCC patients between 2000 and 2010 were stratified by American Joint Committee on Cancer staging and the type of therapy. Predictors of receiving therapy were identified and implication on survival was evaluated. Results: Out of 9239 patients included, those receiving any therapy demonstrated prolonged overall survival with following median overall survival (months): ablation (30.8), Yttrium-90 (15.6), transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (15.5), Sorafenib (5.6), versus no cancer-directed therapy (3.7; p-values <0.001). Overall, 36% of patients received cancer-directed therapy including 47% with stage I/II. Favorable sociodemographic factors predicted receipt of percutaneous locoregional therapies (p-values <0.05). Discussion & Conclusion: There appears to be significant disparity in care of nonresected HCC patients with significant underutilization of cancer-directed therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nima Kokabi
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06519, USA
| | - Richard Duszak
- Department of Radiology & Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Minzhi Xing
- School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - David H Howard
- Department of Health Policy & Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Kimberly E Applegate
- Department of Radiology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, 40536, USA
| | - Juan C Camacho
- Department of Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA
| | - Hyun S Kim
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06519, USA
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06519, USA
| |
Collapse
|
69
|
Lee YK, Jung KS, Kim DY, Choi JY, Kim BK, Kim SU, Park JY, Ahn SH, Han KH, Kim GM, Kim MD, Park SI, Won JY, Lee DY. Conventional versus drug-eluting beads chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: Emphasis on the impact of tumor size. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 32:487-496. [PMID: 27503585 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.13501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/24/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM This study aims to evaluate clinical outcomes of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) using drug-eluting beads (DEB). PATIENTS AND METHODS This study retrospectively compared the clinical outcomes of 250 consecutive patients who underwent DEB-TACE (n = 106) or conventional TACE (cTACE) (n = 144) in a tertiary center between January 2010 and April 2014. The median age of the patients was 62 years and 81.6% were men. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The time to progression (TTP), radiological response rate using modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors criteria at 1 month after treatment, and complication rates within 1 month were also compared. RESULTS The most common etiology was hepatitis B virus infection. The median index tumor size was 2.8 cm, and 150 (60.0%) patients had Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B. Median TTP in the cTACE group was longer than in the DEB-TACE group (13.3 vs10.8 months; P = 0.023). However, DEB-TACE and cTACE groups showed no significant differences for mean OS (46.6 vs 44.9 months; P = 0.660) and disease control rate at 1 month (78.3% vs 86.8%; P = 0.076). The OS, TTP, and disease control rate were also not different between two groups, even when subgrouped by index tumor size. The complication rates within 1 month were higher in the cTACE group (6.6% vs 14.6%; P = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS Drug-eluting beads TACE appears to be a safe intra-arterial therapy. However, it is not superior to cTACE in terms of efficacy. Tumor size might not be a criterion to select treatment modality between cTACE and DEB-TACE in terms of efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Kang Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine and Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyu Sik Jung
- Department of Internal Medicine and Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Do Young Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine and Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Young Choi
- Department of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Beom Kyung Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine and Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung Up Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine and Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jun Yong Park
- Department of Internal Medicine and Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Hoon Ahn
- Department of Internal Medicine and Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kwang-Hyub Han
- Department of Internal Medicine and Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Gyoung Min Kim
- Department of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Man Deuk Kim
- Department of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung Il Park
- Department of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong Yun Won
- Department of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Do Yun Lee
- Department of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
70
|
Chen P, Yuan P, Chen B, Sun J, Shen H, Qian Y. Evaluation of drug-eluting beads versus conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2017; 41:75-85. [PMID: 27350573 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinre.2016.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2016] [Revised: 05/13/2016] [Accepted: 05/20/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It consists of conventional TACE (cTACE) and drug-eluting beads TACE (DEB-TACE). The comparative outcomes of the two methods remain controversial. The study aim to research the optimal TACE strategy for unresectable HCC. METHODS A systematic search of keywords, including 'HCC' and 'drug-eluting beads' was performed including four electronic databases: PubMed, Embase, China Biological Medicine Database (CBM), and Cochrane library databases from the date of inception to December 25, 2015. Review Manager 5.3 was used to calculate the pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95% confident intervals (CIs). RESULTS Sixteen cohort studies (4 RCTs, 3 prospective cohorts, 9 retrospective cohorts) were included comprising a total of 1832 patients: 822 patients with DEB-TACE therapy and 1010 patients undergoing cTACE. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival (OS) rates and 1- and 2-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rates were significantly higher in DEB-TACE group, with pooled RRs of 1.12 (95% CI=1.03-1.23, P=0.007), 1.26 (95% CI=1.03-1.54, P=0.02), 1.69 (95% CI=1.00-2.84, P=0.04), 1.21 (95% CI=1.01-1.44, P=0.03) and 1.68 (95% CI=1.17-2.43, P=0.005). There was no statistical significance in 3-year RFS, tumor response and treatment-related adverse events. CONCLUSION Compared with cTACE, DEB-TACE therapy significantly improved 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates and the 1- and 2-year RFS rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peng Chen
- Department of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230000, China
| | - Peng Yuan
- Department of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230000, China
| | - Bo Chen
- Department of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230000, China
| | - Jingchang Sun
- Department of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230000, China
| | - Hang Shen
- Department of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230000, China
| | - Yeben Qian
- Department of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
71
|
Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma using transarterial chemoembolization: a real-life, single-centre study from Southern Brazil. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 29:225-230. [PMID: 27759574 DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000000764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The main aim of this study was to evaluate the real-life survival rates of patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma treated with transarterial chemoembolization. METHODS A retrospective cohort study involving 95 patients was conducted and the studied variables were analysed according to survival. Treatment response was determined using the Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors assessment. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression were used to analyse survival. RESULTS Most (72.6%) patients were male, with a mean age of 64.8±9.7 years and mean Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score of 10.4±3.0. The median α-fetoprotein (AFP) level was 29.3 ng/ml. Complications were observed in 31.6% of the patients. A target response assessment revealed that 35.8% of patients exhibited complete response, 22.1% a partial response, 27.4% stable disease and 14.7% progressive disease. According to overall response rates, 63.2% exhibited progressive disease. Mean survival time was 32 months. The 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 80, 59, 44 and 29%, respectively. In the multivariate model adjusted for overall response rates, only AFP level more than or equal to 100 ng/ml (hazard ratio=2.35, 95% confidence interval: 1.06-5.18, P=0.035) was associated with death. CONCLUSION Transarterial chemoembolization is an effective therapy; however, AFP levels more than or equal to 100 ng/ml are associated with poorer prognosis.
Collapse
|
72
|
Should we routinely use DEBTACE for unresectable HCC? cTACE versus DEBTACE: a single-center survival analysis. Updates Surg 2017; 69:67-73. [PMID: 28097502 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-017-0414-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2016] [Accepted: 01/02/2017] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Conventional trans-arterial chemoembolization (cTACE) for intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) achieves a partial response in up to 72% of patients and improves median survival. Drug-eluting-beads-TACE (DEBTACE) improves treatment efficacy and tolerance as compared to cTACE. Our aim was to retrospectively evaluate our experience in the treatment of intermediate/advanced HCC with cTACE versus DEBTACE. Overall survival (OS) was the first endpoint. We retrospectively considered our department register data between 2006 and 2012. A total of 82 non-surgical patients, who underwent cTACE or DEBTACE, with a minimum of 12 months follow-up, met the inclusion criteria. Patients received a standard chemotherapy dose (50 mg). Radiological response was evaluated by CT after 30 days and re-treatment was considered. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS software. 54 patients received cTACE and 28 DEBTACE. In the DEBTACE group the median survival times was 22.7 months (CI 11.6-33.8), while in the cTACE group it was 21.8 months (CI 15.7-27.9). The survival analysis at log-rank (p = 0.708) and Wilcoxon (p = 0.661) tests demonstrated no differences between DEBTACE and cTACE. The probability of death in function of time was significantly associated only to the Child-Pugh score. A Child A score was shown to be protective instead of Child B (OR 0.583; IC 95% = 0.344-0.987). DEBTACE for treating HCC is comparable to cTACE in terms of effectiveness, but seems to be better tolerated. Both treatments can be performed in case of tumor recurrence without substantial increase in procedural complications and risk of liver failure. We do confirm that there are no differences between the two techniques in terms of survival and that it is mainly affected by the reserved liver function proper of each patient.
Collapse
|
73
|
Brown KT, Do R, Gönen M, Covey AM, Getrajdman GI, Sofocleous CT, Jarnagin WR, D'Angelica MI, Allen PJ, Erinjeri JP, Brody LA, O'Neill GP, Johnson K, Garcia AR, Beattie CM, Zhao B, Solomon SB, Schwartz LH, DeMatteo RP, Abou-Alfa GK. Reply to A. Braillon, M. Boulin et al, and J.-H. Zhong et al. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35:258-259. [PMID: 28056199 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.69.7961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Karen T Brown
- Karen T. Brown and Richard Do, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Mithat Gönen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, and Constantinos T. Sofocleous, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, and Peter J. Allen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Joseph P. Erinjeri and Lynn A. Brody, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Gerald P. O'Neill, Kristian Johnson, Alessandra R. Garcia, and Christopher M. Beattie, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Binsheng Zhao, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Stephen B. Solomon, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Lawrence H. Schwartz, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Ronald P. DeMatteo, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Richard Do
- Karen T. Brown and Richard Do, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Mithat Gönen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, and Constantinos T. Sofocleous, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, and Peter J. Allen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Joseph P. Erinjeri and Lynn A. Brody, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Gerald P. O'Neill, Kristian Johnson, Alessandra R. Garcia, and Christopher M. Beattie, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Binsheng Zhao, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Stephen B. Solomon, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Lawrence H. Schwartz, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Ronald P. DeMatteo, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Mithat Gönen
- Karen T. Brown and Richard Do, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Mithat Gönen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, and Constantinos T. Sofocleous, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, and Peter J. Allen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Joseph P. Erinjeri and Lynn A. Brody, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Gerald P. O'Neill, Kristian Johnson, Alessandra R. Garcia, and Christopher M. Beattie, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Binsheng Zhao, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Stephen B. Solomon, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Lawrence H. Schwartz, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Ronald P. DeMatteo, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Anne M Covey
- Karen T. Brown and Richard Do, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Mithat Gönen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, and Constantinos T. Sofocleous, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, and Peter J. Allen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Joseph P. Erinjeri and Lynn A. Brody, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Gerald P. O'Neill, Kristian Johnson, Alessandra R. Garcia, and Christopher M. Beattie, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Binsheng Zhao, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Stephen B. Solomon, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Lawrence H. Schwartz, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Ronald P. DeMatteo, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - George I Getrajdman
- Karen T. Brown and Richard Do, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Mithat Gönen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, and Constantinos T. Sofocleous, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, and Peter J. Allen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Joseph P. Erinjeri and Lynn A. Brody, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Gerald P. O'Neill, Kristian Johnson, Alessandra R. Garcia, and Christopher M. Beattie, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Binsheng Zhao, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Stephen B. Solomon, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Lawrence H. Schwartz, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Ronald P. DeMatteo, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Constantinos T Sofocleous
- Karen T. Brown and Richard Do, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Mithat Gönen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, and Constantinos T. Sofocleous, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, and Peter J. Allen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Joseph P. Erinjeri and Lynn A. Brody, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Gerald P. O'Neill, Kristian Johnson, Alessandra R. Garcia, and Christopher M. Beattie, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Binsheng Zhao, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Stephen B. Solomon, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Lawrence H. Schwartz, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Ronald P. DeMatteo, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - William R Jarnagin
- Karen T. Brown and Richard Do, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Mithat Gönen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, and Constantinos T. Sofocleous, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, and Peter J. Allen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Joseph P. Erinjeri and Lynn A. Brody, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Gerald P. O'Neill, Kristian Johnson, Alessandra R. Garcia, and Christopher M. Beattie, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Binsheng Zhao, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Stephen B. Solomon, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Lawrence H. Schwartz, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Ronald P. DeMatteo, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Michael I D'Angelica
- Karen T. Brown and Richard Do, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Mithat Gönen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, and Constantinos T. Sofocleous, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, and Peter J. Allen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Joseph P. Erinjeri and Lynn A. Brody, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Gerald P. O'Neill, Kristian Johnson, Alessandra R. Garcia, and Christopher M. Beattie, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Binsheng Zhao, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Stephen B. Solomon, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Lawrence H. Schwartz, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Ronald P. DeMatteo, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Peter J Allen
- Karen T. Brown and Richard Do, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Mithat Gönen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, and Constantinos T. Sofocleous, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, and Peter J. Allen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Joseph P. Erinjeri and Lynn A. Brody, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Gerald P. O'Neill, Kristian Johnson, Alessandra R. Garcia, and Christopher M. Beattie, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Binsheng Zhao, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Stephen B. Solomon, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Lawrence H. Schwartz, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Ronald P. DeMatteo, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Joseph P Erinjeri
- Karen T. Brown and Richard Do, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Mithat Gönen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, and Constantinos T. Sofocleous, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, and Peter J. Allen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Joseph P. Erinjeri and Lynn A. Brody, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Gerald P. O'Neill, Kristian Johnson, Alessandra R. Garcia, and Christopher M. Beattie, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Binsheng Zhao, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Stephen B. Solomon, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Lawrence H. Schwartz, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Ronald P. DeMatteo, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Lynn A Brody
- Karen T. Brown and Richard Do, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Mithat Gönen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, and Constantinos T. Sofocleous, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, and Peter J. Allen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Joseph P. Erinjeri and Lynn A. Brody, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Gerald P. O'Neill, Kristian Johnson, Alessandra R. Garcia, and Christopher M. Beattie, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Binsheng Zhao, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Stephen B. Solomon, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Lawrence H. Schwartz, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Ronald P. DeMatteo, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Gerald P O'Neill
- Karen T. Brown and Richard Do, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Mithat Gönen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, and Constantinos T. Sofocleous, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, and Peter J. Allen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Joseph P. Erinjeri and Lynn A. Brody, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Gerald P. O'Neill, Kristian Johnson, Alessandra R. Garcia, and Christopher M. Beattie, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Binsheng Zhao, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Stephen B. Solomon, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Lawrence H. Schwartz, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Ronald P. DeMatteo, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Kristian Johnson
- Karen T. Brown and Richard Do, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Mithat Gönen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, and Constantinos T. Sofocleous, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, and Peter J. Allen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Joseph P. Erinjeri and Lynn A. Brody, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Gerald P. O'Neill, Kristian Johnson, Alessandra R. Garcia, and Christopher M. Beattie, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Binsheng Zhao, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Stephen B. Solomon, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Lawrence H. Schwartz, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Ronald P. DeMatteo, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Alessandra R Garcia
- Karen T. Brown and Richard Do, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Mithat Gönen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, and Constantinos T. Sofocleous, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, and Peter J. Allen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Joseph P. Erinjeri and Lynn A. Brody, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Gerald P. O'Neill, Kristian Johnson, Alessandra R. Garcia, and Christopher M. Beattie, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Binsheng Zhao, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Stephen B. Solomon, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Lawrence H. Schwartz, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Ronald P. DeMatteo, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Christopher M Beattie
- Karen T. Brown and Richard Do, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Mithat Gönen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, and Constantinos T. Sofocleous, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, and Peter J. Allen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Joseph P. Erinjeri and Lynn A. Brody, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Gerald P. O'Neill, Kristian Johnson, Alessandra R. Garcia, and Christopher M. Beattie, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Binsheng Zhao, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Stephen B. Solomon, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Lawrence H. Schwartz, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Ronald P. DeMatteo, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Binsheng Zhao
- Karen T. Brown and Richard Do, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Mithat Gönen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, and Constantinos T. Sofocleous, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, and Peter J. Allen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Joseph P. Erinjeri and Lynn A. Brody, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Gerald P. O'Neill, Kristian Johnson, Alessandra R. Garcia, and Christopher M. Beattie, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Binsheng Zhao, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Stephen B. Solomon, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Lawrence H. Schwartz, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Ronald P. DeMatteo, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Stephen B Solomon
- Karen T. Brown and Richard Do, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Mithat Gönen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, and Constantinos T. Sofocleous, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, and Peter J. Allen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Joseph P. Erinjeri and Lynn A. Brody, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Gerald P. O'Neill, Kristian Johnson, Alessandra R. Garcia, and Christopher M. Beattie, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Binsheng Zhao, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Stephen B. Solomon, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Lawrence H. Schwartz, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Ronald P. DeMatteo, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Lawrence H Schwartz
- Karen T. Brown and Richard Do, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Mithat Gönen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, and Constantinos T. Sofocleous, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, and Peter J. Allen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Joseph P. Erinjeri and Lynn A. Brody, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Gerald P. O'Neill, Kristian Johnson, Alessandra R. Garcia, and Christopher M. Beattie, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Binsheng Zhao, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Stephen B. Solomon, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Lawrence H. Schwartz, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Ronald P. DeMatteo, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Ronald P DeMatteo
- Karen T. Brown and Richard Do, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Mithat Gönen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, and Constantinos T. Sofocleous, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, and Peter J. Allen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Joseph P. Erinjeri and Lynn A. Brody, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Gerald P. O'Neill, Kristian Johnson, Alessandra R. Garcia, and Christopher M. Beattie, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Binsheng Zhao, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Stephen B. Solomon, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Lawrence H. Schwartz, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Ronald P. DeMatteo, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Ghassan K Abou-Alfa
- Karen T. Brown and Richard Do, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Mithat Gönen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, and Constantinos T. Sofocleous, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, and Peter J. Allen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Joseph P. Erinjeri and Lynn A. Brody, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Gerald P. O'Neill, Kristian Johnson, Alessandra R. Garcia, and Christopher M. Beattie, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Binsheng Zhao, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Stephen B. Solomon, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Lawrence H. Schwartz, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Ronald P. DeMatteo, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
74
|
Kouri BE, Abrams RA, Al-Refaie WB, Azad N, Farrell J, Gaba RC, Gervais DA, Gipson MG, Kolbeck KJ, Marshalleck FE, Pinchot JW, Small W, Ray CE, Hohenwalter EJ. ACR Appropriateness Criteria Radiologic Management of Hepatic Malignancy. J Am Coll Radiol 2016; 13:265-73. [PMID: 26944037 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2015.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2015] [Accepted: 12/04/2015] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Management of primary and secondary hepatic malignancy is a complex problem. Achieving optimal care for this challenging population often requires the involvement of multiple medical and surgical disciplines. Because of the wide variety of potential therapies, treatment protocols for various malignancies continue to evolve. Consequently, development of appropriate therapeutic algorithms necessitates consideration of medical options, such as systemic chemotherapy; surgical options, such as resection or transplantation; and loco-regional therapies, such as thermal ablation and transarterial embolization techniques. This article provides a review of treatment strategies for the three most common subtypes of hepatic malignancy treated with loco-regional therapies: hepatocellular carcinoma, neuroendocrine metastases, and colorectal metastases. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every three years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian E Kouri
- Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
| | | | - Waddah B Al-Refaie
- Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, American College of Surgeons
| | - Nilofer Azad
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, American Society of Clinical Oncology
| | - James Farrell
- Interventional Endoscopy and Pancreatic Diseases, New Haven, Connecticut, American Gastroenterological Association
| | - Ron C Gaba
- University of Illinois Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - Matthew G Gipson
- University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | | | | | | | - William Small
- Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois
| | - Charles E Ray
- University of Illinois Hospital and Health Science System, Chicago, Illinois
| | | |
Collapse
|
75
|
Weng L, Tseng HJ, Rostamzadeh P, Golzarian J. In vitro comparative study of drug loading and delivery properties of bioresorbable microspheres and LC bead. JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE. MATERIALS IN MEDICINE 2016; 27:174. [PMID: 27752972 DOI: 10.1007/s10856-016-5786-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2016] [Accepted: 09/29/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Drug loadable bioresorbable microspheres (BRMS) are specially designed for the treatment of hypervascular tumors through arterial embolization. These microspheres consist of carboxymethyl chitosan crosslinked with carboxymethyl cellulose, and are available at different size ranges varying from 50 to 900 µm in diameter. Similar to commercially available non-resorbable drug eluting microspheres, LC Bead® microspheres (LCB), BRMS were capable of loading more than 99 % of doxorubicin, an anticancer drug, from the solution within 2 h with highly similar kinetics (difference factor f 1 = 0.36; similarity factor f 2 = 97.99). Doxorubicin loaded BRMS exhibited the highest elution rate in the 30 % ethanol aqueous solution saturated with potassium chloride, and the elution time depended on the ratio between the amount of loaded BRMS and the volume of elution media. After injection through microcatheters, BRMS have a higher recovery rate of the microsphere weight than LCB (90.96 vs. 79.63 %, P = 0.026). Although loaded BRMS eluted more drug into the injection medium than loaded LCB (8.63 vs. 3.80 %, P = 0.0015), there was no significant difference in the drug delivery rate between BRMS and LCB (83.88 vs. 86.65 %, P = 0.504). This study compares the loading capability as well as the drug delivery rate of BRMS and a commercial product under a condition simulating a transcatheter arterial chemoembolization procedure and demonstrates the potential of drug loaded BRMS for the treatment of hypervascular tumors such as hepatocellular carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lihui Weng
- Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Hsiang-Jer Tseng
- Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Parinaz Rostamzadeh
- Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Jafar Golzarian
- Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
76
|
Nhu QM, Knowles H, Pockros PJ, Frenette CT. Pulmonary complications of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Respirol 2016; 6:69-75. [PMID: 27904836 PMCID: PMC5125773 DOI: 10.5320/wjr.v6.i3.69] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2016] [Revised: 07/20/2016] [Accepted: 08/18/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is an effective palliative intervention that is widely accepted for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Post-TACE pulmonary complications resulting in acute lung injury (ALI) or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are rare events. Pulmonary complications after TACE are thought to be related to chemical injury subsequent to the migration of the infused ethiodized oil or chemotherapeutic agent to the lung vasculature, facilitated by arteriovenous (AV) shunts within the hyper-vascular HCC. We review herein the literature on pulmonary complications related to TACE for HCC. Post-TACE pulmonary complications have included pulmonary oil embolism, interstitial pneumonitis, chemical pneumonitis, ALI, ARDS, lipoid pneumonia, acute eosinophilic and neutrophilic pneumonia, bilious pleuritis, pulmonary abscess, pulmonary tumor embolism, and possibly pulmonary metastasis with HCC. The risk factors associated with post-TACE pulmonary complications identified in the literature include large hyper-vascular HCC with AV shunts, large-volume Lipiodol infusion, and embolization via the right inferior phrenic artery. However, the absence of known risk factors is not a guarantee against serious complications. An astute awareness of the potential post-TACE pulmonary complications should expedite appropriate therapeutic interventions and increase potential for early recovery.
Collapse
|
77
|
Popovic P, Stabuc B, Jansa R, Garbajs M. Survival of patients with intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma treated with superselective transarterial chemoembolization using doxorubicin-loaded DC Bead under cone-beam computed tomography control. Radiol Oncol 2016; 50:418-426. [PMID: 27904450 PMCID: PMC5120574 DOI: 10.1515/raon-2015-0045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2015] [Accepted: 08/19/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate treatment response, adverse events and survival rates of patients with intermediate stage HCC treated with superselective doxorubicin-loaded DC Bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEBDOX) under cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) control. Patients and methods Between October 2010 and June 2012, 35 consecutive patients with intermediate stage HCC (32 male, 3 female; average age, 67.5 ± 7.8 years; 22 patients Child-Pugh class A, 8 class B, 5 without cirrhosis) were treated with DEBDOX TACE. Portal vein thrombosis was observed in 6 (17.1%) patients. DEBDOX TACE was performed by superselective catheterization of feeding vessels followed by embolization with 100-300 μm microspheres loaded with 50-100 mg of doxorubicin. In all cases, CBCT was used during chemoembolization. Tumor response rates were defined according to mRECIST criteria. Results Overall, 120 procedures were performed (mean, 3.2 per patients). We treated 97 lesions with an average diameter of 4.9 ± 1.9 cm. There were 32 minor and 2 (1.6%) major complications (one liver abscess and one cerebrovascular insult). After a mean follow-up of 27.7 ± 10.5 months, 94.3% of patients achieved an objective response to treatment (42.4% complete response and 57.6% partial response). Mean time to progression was 10.9 ± 5.3 months. Mean overall survival was 33.9 months (95% CI; 28.9 – 38.9 months), with 1- and 2- year survival of 97.1% and 65.7%, respectively. Conclusions Superselective DEBDOX TACE performed under CBCT control is a safe and effective method with high rates of tumor response and overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Popovic
- Clinical Institute of Radiology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Borut Stabuc
- Gastroenterology Department, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Rado Jansa
- Gastroenterology Department, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Manca Garbajs
- Clinical Institute of Radiology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
78
|
Dasse KD, Lander MJ, Novelli PM. Chemoembolization With Drug-Eluting Beads for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Adv Pract Oncol 2016; 7:764-778. [PMID: 29670812 PMCID: PMC5902156 DOI: 10.6004/jadpro.2016.7.7.8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Kathy Diener Dasse
- Department of Pharmacy Services, University of Michigan Health Systems, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Michael J Lander
- Pharmacy Services, Mayo Clinic - St. Mary's Hospital, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Paula M Novelli
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
79
|
Nine-year experience of doxorubicin-eluting beads chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2016; 15:493-498. [PMID: 27733318 DOI: 10.1016/s1499-3872(16)60133-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chemoembolization with doxorubucin-eluting beads (DEB) has been used to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) since 2007. This study compared the efficacy and survival between transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with DEB and conventional approach (cTACE) in HCC treatment. METHODS This retrospective case-control study compared the overall survival and tumor response of HCC patients to cTACE (n=190) and DEB (n=143) by the reassessment of computed tomography and serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP). Multivariate analysis was used to determine the factors affecting tumor response. RESULTS The median post-treatment to pre-treatment AFP level was 0.8 for a DEB session (n=258) and 1.0 for a cTACE session (n=452), showing a significantly greater decrease in AFP after DEB (P<0.05). More patients in the DEB group achieved objective response (complete and partial) compared with those in the cTACE group (P<0.05). Objective tumor response after DEB vs cTACE was 34.8% vs 15.4% in 0-3 months (P=0.001), 37.1% vs 20.0% in 3-6 months (P<0.05), and 50.0% vs 30.0% in 6-12 months (P=0.093). DEB predicted a 3.604 times odds of achieving at least one objective tumor response in a patient when compared to cTACE (P<0.0001). The median survival from first transcatheter therapy of patients having undergone at least once DEB was 12.53 months, while those having received cTACE only was 10.53 months (P=0.086). A tendency of improved survival appeared to maintain until >80 months after the first TACE session in the DEB group. CONCLUSION DEB is a safe alternative to cTACE in HCC patients with better therapeutic efficacy.
Collapse
|
80
|
Zhang JF, Liu JM, Zhang N, Du C, Zheng Q. Trans-arterial Chemo-Embolization in Treating Elderly Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2016; 16:7201-4. [PMID: 26514512 DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.16.7201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Trans-arterial Chemo- Embolization (TACE) in treating Elderly patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma (EHPC). METHODS Clinical studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of TACE on response and safety for patients with EHPC were identified by using a predefined search strategy. Pooled response rate of treatment were calculated. RESULTS In TACE based regimen, clinical studies which including patients with EHPC were considered eligible for the evaluation of response. And, in these TACE based treatments, pooled analysis suggested that, in all 288 patients whose response could be assessed, the pooled reponse rate was 29.5%(85/288) in TACE based treatment. The most commonly encountered TACE-related morbidity was liver function impairment. No grade III or IV renal or liver toxicity were observed. No treatment related death occurred in EHPC patients with TACE based treatments. CONCLUSION This evidence based analysis suggests that TACE based treatments are associated with mild response rate and accepted toxicities for treating patients with EHPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian-Feng Zhang
- The Second People's Hospital of Nanjing, Nanjing, China E-mail :
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
81
|
Kokabi N, Ludwig JM, Camacho JC, Xing M, Mittal PK, Kim HS. Baseline and Early MR Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Quantification as a Predictor of Response of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma to Doxorubicin Drug-Eluting Bead Chemoembolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2016; 26:1777-86. [PMID: 26603497 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.08.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2015] [Revised: 08/10/2015] [Accepted: 08/18/2015] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate baseline and early apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) derived from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) as a predictor of objective response (OR) and survival in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with doxorubicin drug-eluting bead (DEB) transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. MATERIALS AND METHODS In a prospective study, 57 patients underwent DEB chemoembolization. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and DWI were performed at baseline and 1 and 3 months after DEB chemoembolization. OR was evaluated per modified Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (mRECIST) and European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) guidelines. Baseline ADCs of tumors that showed OR at 1 and 3 months were compared with nonresponding tumor ADCs by two-sample t test and receiver operating characteristic curves. Additionally, ADC changes at 30 days were correlated with OR. Finally, Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to compare survival between patients with lesions demonstrating more restricted baseline diffusion and others. RESULTS At 1 month, 33 patients (60%) showed OR (21 complete responses and 12 partial responses). At baseline, tumors with OR at 1 month showed significantly more restricted diffusion (0.731 × 10(−3) mm2/s) compared with others (1.057 × 10(−3) mm2/s; P = .031). No difference between response rates at 1 and 3 months according to mRECIST and EASL was observed. For an area under the curve of 0.965, the sensitivity and specificity of predicting objective tumor response at 1 month using a baseline HCC ADC of 0.83 × 10(−3) mm2/s were 91% and 96%, respectively. In addition, patients with lesions with a baseline ADC < 0.83 × 10(−3) mm2/s showed prolonged survival compared with others (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS In unresectable HCC, a baseline ADC < 0.83 × 10(−3) mm2/s is a predictor of survival and treatment response at 1 and 3 months after DEB chemoembolization with high sensitivity and specificity.
Collapse
|
82
|
Ludwig JM, Zhang D, Xing M, Kim HS. Meta-analysis: adjusted indirect comparison of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization versus 90Y-radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur Radiol 2016; 27:2031-2041. [PMID: 27562480 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-016-4548-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2015] [Revised: 07/29/2016] [Accepted: 08/08/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate comparative effectiveness of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) versus Yttrium-90 (90Y)-radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS Studies comparing conventional (c)TACE versus 90Y-radioembolization or DEB-TACE for HCC treatment were identified using PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases. The adjusted indirect meta-analytic method for effectiveness comparison of DEB-TACE versus 90Y-radioembolization was used. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare baseline characteristics. A priori defined sensitivity analysis of stratified study subgroups was performed for primary outcome analyses. Publication bias was tested by Egger's and Begg's tests. RESULTS Fourteen studies comparing DEB-TACE or 90Y-radioembolization with cTACE were included. Analysis revealed a 1-year overall survival benefit for DEB-TACE over 90Y-radioembolization (79 % vs. 54.8 %; OR: 0.57; 95 %CI: 0.355-0.915; p = 0.02; I-squared: 0 %; p > 0.5), but not for the 2-year (61 % vs. 34 %; OR: 0.65; 95%CI: 0.294-1.437; p = 0.29) and 3-year survival (56.4 % vs. 20.9 %; OR: 0.713; 95 % CI: 0.21-2.548; p = 0.62). There was significant heterogeneity in the 2- and 3-year survival analyses. The pooled median overall survival was longer for DEB-TACE (22.6 vs. 14.7 months). There was no significant difference in tumour response rate. CONCLUSION DEB-TACE and 90Y-radioembolization are efficacious treatments for patients suffering from HCC; DEB-TACE demonstrated survival benefit at 1-year compared to 90Y-radioembolization but direct comparison is warranted for further evaluation. KEY POINTS • This meta-analysis shows greater 1-year survival benefit for DEB-TACE over 90 Y-radioembolization. • DEB-TACE has a favourable 2- & 3-year survival benefit trend over 90 Y-radioembolization. • No significant difference for tumour response was detected. • Direct comparison of these methods for a more robust evaluation is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes M Ludwig
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, 330 Cedar Street, TE 2-224, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA
| | - Di Zhang
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, 130 De Soto Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA
| | - Minzhi Xing
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, 330 Cedar Street, TE 2-224, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA
| | - Hyun S Kim
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, 330 Cedar Street, TE 2-224, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA. .,Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
83
|
Zou JH, Zhang L, Ren ZG, Ye SL. Efficacy and safety of cTACE versus DEB-TACE in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis. J Dig Dis 2016; 17:510-517. [PMID: 27384075 DOI: 10.1111/1751-2980.12380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2015] [Revised: 01/12/2016] [Accepted: 07/04/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Conflicting results of the efficacy and safety of conventional transarterial chemo-embolization (cTACE) vs drug-eluting bead (DEB)-TACE have been reported. This meta-analysis aimed to update and re-evaluate the efficacy and safety of cTACE compared with those of DEB-TACE in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS Literature search was performed by two investigators independently in PubMed, MEDLINE and EMBASE to screen studies published from January 1990 to March 2015. Studies of parallel group designs comparing cTACE and DEB-TACE for HCC were reviewed. Complete response, partial response, objective response, disease control, overall survival and survival time were collected to evaluate the efficacy of each therapy. RESULTS DEB-TACE increased the complete response rate [odds ratio (OR) 1.38, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.89], overall survival rate (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.01-1.98) and survival time [weighted mean difference (WMD) 6.65, 95% CI 6.15-7.14) with less common adverse events (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.41-0.84). However, DEB-TACE had a similar partial response rate (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.67-1.49), objective response rate (OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.94-1.56), disease control rate (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.81-1.58) and serious adverse events (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.50-1.49) compared with cTACE. CONCLUSIONS DEB-TACE has a higher complete response rate and a higher overall survival rate in patients with HCC than cTACE; however, the results should be interpreted with caution. Furthermore, DEB-TACE is safer and has less common adverse events than cTACE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Huai Zou
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lan Zhang
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zheng Gang Ren
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Sheng Long Ye
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
84
|
Cost-effectiveness of doxorubicin-eluting beads versus conventional trans-arterial chemo-embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. Dig Liver Dis 2016; 48:798-805. [PMID: 27263056 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2016.03.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2015] [Revised: 03/18/2016] [Accepted: 03/30/2016] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Doxorubicin-loaded drug-eluting beads TACE (DEB-TACE) has been developed to maximize the therapeutic efficacy of conventional trans-catheter arterial chemo-embolization (cTACE) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, its cost-effectiveness (CE) still needs to be assessed. AIMS To investigate the CE of DEB-TACE versus cTACE. METHODS Results from a meta-analysis of the pertinent literature were used to construct a CE Markov simulation model which followed a hypothetical cohort of HCC patients who underwent DEB-TACE or cTACE, covering the entire post-TACE lifespan until death. Costs were assessed from the health-care provider perspective. RESULTS Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 11 observational studies, including 1860 patients (883 DEB-TACE and 977 cTACE), were used for the construction of the model. Considering only survival rates from RCTs (heterogeneity: 0%), DEB-TACE returned 4.0 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and TACE returned 3.3 QALYs (effect size=1.288). Total costs of cTACE were €10,389 and those of DEB-TACE were €11,418 (effect size=0.791). DEB-TACE was found more cost-effective than cTACE when a minimum willingness-to-pay of about €2000-3500/QALY was accepted, mainly depending on shorter in-hospital stay and better quality of life. CONCLUSIONS Direct incremental costs of DEB-TACE can be acceptable in respect to cTACE, relying on financial resources available from the payer perspective.
Collapse
|
85
|
Sanoff HK, Chang Y, Stavas JM, Stürmer T, Lund J. Effectiveness of Initial Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Among Medicare Beneficiaries. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2016; 13:1102-10. [PMID: 26358794 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2015.0135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Optimal administration of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), the standard approach for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), requires clinical and technical expertise. We sought to evaluate whether TACE retains its effectiveness when administered across a broad range of health care settings. Furthermore, as the use of yttrium(90) (Y(90)) radioembolization has been increasing, we explored the comparative effectiveness of Y(90) as an alternative to TACE. METHODS Patients with HCC diagnosed from 2004 through 2009 treated initially with TACE or Y(90) were identified from the SEER-Medicare linkage. Key covariates included prediagnosis α-fetoprotein (AFP) screening, complications of cirrhosis, and tumor extent. Effect of treatment, patient, and health care system factors on overall survival (OS) was evaluated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards. Stratified OS estimates are provided. Propensity score (PS) weighting was used to compare effectiveness of Y(90) with TACE. RESULTS Of 1528 patients who underwent intra-arterial embolization, 577 received concurrent chemotherapy (eg, TACE). Median OS was 21 months (95% CI, 18-23) following TACE and 9 months (95% CI, 1-41) following Y(90). Refined survival estimates stratified by stage, AFP screening, and liver comorbidity are presented. The 90-day mortality rate after TACE was 21% to 25% in patients with extrahepatic spread or vascular invasion. In the PS-weighted analysis, Y(90) was associated with inferior survival, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.39 (95% CI, 1.02-1.90). CONCLUSIONS The effectiveness of TACE is generalizable to Medicare patients receiving care in a variety of treatment settings. However, early posttreatment mortality is high in patients with advanced disease. We found no evidence of improved outcomes with Y(90) compared with TACE. Survival estimates from this large cohort can be used to provide prognostic information to patients considering palliative TACE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanna K Sanoff
- From UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and the Division of Hematology/Oncology, Division of Vascular-Interventional Radiology, and Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. From UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and the Division of Hematology/Oncology, Division of Vascular-Interventional Radiology, and Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - YunKyung Chang
- From UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and the Division of Hematology/Oncology, Division of Vascular-Interventional Radiology, and Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Joseph M Stavas
- From UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and the Division of Hematology/Oncology, Division of Vascular-Interventional Radiology, and Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Til Stürmer
- From UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and the Division of Hematology/Oncology, Division of Vascular-Interventional Radiology, and Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. From UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and the Division of Hematology/Oncology, Division of Vascular-Interventional Radiology, and Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Jennifer Lund
- From UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and the Division of Hematology/Oncology, Division of Vascular-Interventional Radiology, and Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. From UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and the Division of Hematology/Oncology, Division of Vascular-Interventional Radiology, and Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
86
|
Baur J, Ritter CO, Germer CT, Klein I, Kickuth R, Steger U. Transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads versus conventional transarterial chemoembolization in locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepat Med 2016; 8:69-74. [PMID: 27382341 PMCID: PMC4920234 DOI: 10.2147/hmer.s105395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose In hepatocellular carcinoma patients with large or multinodal tumors, where curative treatment options are not feasible, transarterial therapies play a major role. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with drug-eluting beads (DEB-TACE) is a promising new approach due to higher intratumoral and lower systemic concentration of the chemotherapeutic agent compared to conventional TACE (cTACE). Patients and methods In a retrospective analysis, 32 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who received either DEB or a cTACE were compared regarding survival time, disease recurrence, and side effects such as pain and fever. Results No significant differences could be detected between the cTACE and DEB-TACE groups with regard to mean hospital stay, appearance of postinterventional fever, or 30-day mortality. However, the application of intravenous analgesics as postinterventional pain medication was needed more often in patients treated with DEB-TACE (57.1% vs 12.5%, P=0.0281). The overall median survival after the initial procedure was 10.8 months in the cTACE group and 9.2 months in the DEB-TACE group, showing no significant difference. Conclusion No survival benefit for patients treated with either DEB-TACE or cTACE was observed. Surprisingly, a higher rate of postinterventional pain could be detected after DEB-TACE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Baur
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular, and Pediatric Surgery
| | | | | | - Ingo Klein
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular, and Pediatric Surgery
| | - Ralph Kickuth
- Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Ulrich Steger
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular, and Pediatric Surgery
| |
Collapse
|
87
|
Affiliation(s)
- Dawn Bannerman
- Graduate Program in Biomedical Engineering, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Wankei Wan
- Graduate Program in Biomedical Engineering, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
88
|
Facciorusso A, Di Maso M, Muscatiello N. Drug-eluting beads versus conventional chemoembolization for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis. Dig Liver Dis 2016; 48:571-7. [PMID: 26965785 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2016.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 157] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2015] [Revised: 01/16/2016] [Accepted: 02/12/2016] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the promising results of earlier studies, a clear superiority of drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization over conventional chemoembolization in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma patients has not been established yet. AIMS To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the two treatments in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma patients. METHODS Computerized bibliographic search on the main databases was performed. One-year, two-year, three-year survival rates were analyzed. Hazard ratios from Kaplan-Meier curves were extracted in order to perform an unbiased comparison of survival estimates. Objective response and severe adverse event rate were analyzed too. RESULTS Four randomized-controlled trials and 8 observational studies with 1449 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Non-significant trends in favor of drug-eluting beads chemoembolization were observed as for 1-year (odds ratio: 0.76, 0.48-1.21, p=0.25), 2-year (odds ratio: 0.68, 0.42-1.12, p=0.13) and 3-year survival (odds ratio: 0.57, 0.32-1.01, p=0.06). Meta-analysis of plotted hazard ratios confirmed this trend (hazard ratio: 0.86, 0.71-1.03, p=0.10). Pooled data of objective response showed no significant difference between the two treatments (odds ratio: 1.21, 0.69-2.12, p=0.51). No statistically significant difference in adverse events was registered (odds ratio: 0.85, 0.60-1.20, p=0.36). CONCLUSIONS Our results stand for a non-superiority of drug-eluting beads chemoembolization with respect to conventional chemoembolization in hepatocarcinoma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Facciorusso
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
| | - Marianna Di Maso
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Nicola Muscatiello
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
89
|
Locoregional cancer therapy using polymer-based drug depots. Drug Discov Today 2016; 21:640-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2016.02.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2015] [Revised: 02/02/2016] [Accepted: 02/22/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
90
|
Brown KT, Do RK, Gonen M, Covey AM, Getrajdman GI, Sofocleous CT, Jarnagin WR, D'Angelica MI, Allen PJ, Erinjeri JP, Brody LA, O'Neill GP, Johnson KN, Garcia AR, Beattie C, Zhao B, Solomon SB, Schwartz LH, DeMatteo R, Abou-Alfa GK. Randomized Trial of Hepatic Artery Embolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Doxorubicin-Eluting Microspheres Compared With Embolization With Microspheres Alone. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34:2046-53. [PMID: 26834067 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.64.0821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 304] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Transarterial chemoembolization is accepted therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). No randomized trial has demonstrated superiority of chemoembolization compared with embolization, and the role of chemotherapy remains unclear. This randomized trial compares the outcome of embolization using microspheres alone with chemoembolization using doxorubicin-eluting microspheres. MATERIALS AND METHODS At a single tertiary referral center, patients with HCC were randomly assigned to embolization with microspheres alone (Bead Block [BB]) or loaded with doxorubicin 150 mg (LC Bead [LCB]). Random assignment was stratified by number of embolizations to complete treatment, and assignments were generated by permuted blocks in the institutional database. The primary end point was response according to RECIST 1.0 (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) using multiphase computed tomography 2 to 3 weeks post-treatment and then at quarterly intervals, with the reviewer blinded to treatment allocation. Secondary objectives included safety and tolerability, time to progression, progression-free survival, and overall survival. This trial is currently closed to accrual. RESULTS Between December 2007 and April 2012, 101 patients were randomly assigned: 51 to BB and 50 to LCB. Demographics were comparable: median age, 67 years; 77% male; and 22% Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage A and 78% stage B or C. Adverse events occurred with similar frequency in both groups: BB, 19 of 51 patients (38%); LCB, 20 of 50 patients (40%; P = .48), with no difference in RECIST response: BB, 5.9% versus LCB, 6.0% (difference, -0.1%; 95% CI, -9% to 9%). Median PFS was 6.2 versus 2.8 months (hazard ratio, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.91 to 2.05; P = .11), and overall survival, 19.6 versus 20.8 months (hazard ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.76; P = .64) for BB and LCB, respectively. CONCLUSION There was no apparent difference between the treatment arms. These results challenge the use of doxorubicin-eluting beads for chemoembolization of HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen T Brown
- Karen T. Brown, Richard K. Do, Mithat Gonen, Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, Constantinos T. Sofocleous, William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, Peter J. Allen, Joseph P. Erinjeri, Lynn A. Brody, Gerald P. O'Neill, Kristian N. Johnson, Alessandra R. Garcia, Christopher Beattie, Stephen B. Solomon, Ronald DeMatteo, and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Binsheng Zhao and Lawrence H. Schwartz, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons; and Karen T. Brown, Richard K. Do, Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, Constantinos T. Sofocleous, William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, Peter J. Allen, Joseph P. Erinjeri, Lynn A. Brody, Stephen B. Solomon, Ronald DeMatteo, and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY.
| | - Richard K Do
- Karen T. Brown, Richard K. Do, Mithat Gonen, Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, Constantinos T. Sofocleous, William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, Peter J. Allen, Joseph P. Erinjeri, Lynn A. Brody, Gerald P. O'Neill, Kristian N. Johnson, Alessandra R. Garcia, Christopher Beattie, Stephen B. Solomon, Ronald DeMatteo, and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Binsheng Zhao and Lawrence H. Schwartz, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons; and Karen T. Brown, Richard K. Do, Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, Constantinos T. Sofocleous, William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, Peter J. Allen, Joseph P. Erinjeri, Lynn A. Brody, Stephen B. Solomon, Ronald DeMatteo, and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Mithat Gonen
- Karen T. Brown, Richard K. Do, Mithat Gonen, Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, Constantinos T. Sofocleous, William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, Peter J. Allen, Joseph P. Erinjeri, Lynn A. Brody, Gerald P. O'Neill, Kristian N. Johnson, Alessandra R. Garcia, Christopher Beattie, Stephen B. Solomon, Ronald DeMatteo, and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Binsheng Zhao and Lawrence H. Schwartz, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons; and Karen T. Brown, Richard K. Do, Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, Constantinos T. Sofocleous, William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, Peter J. Allen, Joseph P. Erinjeri, Lynn A. Brody, Stephen B. Solomon, Ronald DeMatteo, and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Anne M Covey
- Karen T. Brown, Richard K. Do, Mithat Gonen, Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, Constantinos T. Sofocleous, William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, Peter J. Allen, Joseph P. Erinjeri, Lynn A. Brody, Gerald P. O'Neill, Kristian N. Johnson, Alessandra R. Garcia, Christopher Beattie, Stephen B. Solomon, Ronald DeMatteo, and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Binsheng Zhao and Lawrence H. Schwartz, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons; and Karen T. Brown, Richard K. Do, Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, Constantinos T. Sofocleous, William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, Peter J. Allen, Joseph P. Erinjeri, Lynn A. Brody, Stephen B. Solomon, Ronald DeMatteo, and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - George I Getrajdman
- Karen T. Brown, Richard K. Do, Mithat Gonen, Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, Constantinos T. Sofocleous, William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, Peter J. Allen, Joseph P. Erinjeri, Lynn A. Brody, Gerald P. O'Neill, Kristian N. Johnson, Alessandra R. Garcia, Christopher Beattie, Stephen B. Solomon, Ronald DeMatteo, and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Binsheng Zhao and Lawrence H. Schwartz, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons; and Karen T. Brown, Richard K. Do, Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, Constantinos T. Sofocleous, William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, Peter J. Allen, Joseph P. Erinjeri, Lynn A. Brody, Stephen B. Solomon, Ronald DeMatteo, and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Constantinos T Sofocleous
- Karen T. Brown, Richard K. Do, Mithat Gonen, Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, Constantinos T. Sofocleous, William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, Peter J. Allen, Joseph P. Erinjeri, Lynn A. Brody, Gerald P. O'Neill, Kristian N. Johnson, Alessandra R. Garcia, Christopher Beattie, Stephen B. Solomon, Ronald DeMatteo, and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Binsheng Zhao and Lawrence H. Schwartz, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons; and Karen T. Brown, Richard K. Do, Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, Constantinos T. Sofocleous, William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, Peter J. Allen, Joseph P. Erinjeri, Lynn A. Brody, Stephen B. Solomon, Ronald DeMatteo, and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - William R Jarnagin
- Karen T. Brown, Richard K. Do, Mithat Gonen, Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, Constantinos T. Sofocleous, William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, Peter J. Allen, Joseph P. Erinjeri, Lynn A. Brody, Gerald P. O'Neill, Kristian N. Johnson, Alessandra R. Garcia, Christopher Beattie, Stephen B. Solomon, Ronald DeMatteo, and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Binsheng Zhao and Lawrence H. Schwartz, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons; and Karen T. Brown, Richard K. Do, Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, Constantinos T. Sofocleous, William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, Peter J. Allen, Joseph P. Erinjeri, Lynn A. Brody, Stephen B. Solomon, Ronald DeMatteo, and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Michael I D'Angelica
- Karen T. Brown, Richard K. Do, Mithat Gonen, Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, Constantinos T. Sofocleous, William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, Peter J. Allen, Joseph P. Erinjeri, Lynn A. Brody, Gerald P. O'Neill, Kristian N. Johnson, Alessandra R. Garcia, Christopher Beattie, Stephen B. Solomon, Ronald DeMatteo, and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Binsheng Zhao and Lawrence H. Schwartz, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons; and Karen T. Brown, Richard K. Do, Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, Constantinos T. Sofocleous, William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, Peter J. Allen, Joseph P. Erinjeri, Lynn A. Brody, Stephen B. Solomon, Ronald DeMatteo, and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Peter J Allen
- Karen T. Brown, Richard K. Do, Mithat Gonen, Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, Constantinos T. Sofocleous, William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, Peter J. Allen, Joseph P. Erinjeri, Lynn A. Brody, Gerald P. O'Neill, Kristian N. Johnson, Alessandra R. Garcia, Christopher Beattie, Stephen B. Solomon, Ronald DeMatteo, and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Binsheng Zhao and Lawrence H. Schwartz, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons; and Karen T. Brown, Richard K. Do, Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, Constantinos T. Sofocleous, William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, Peter J. Allen, Joseph P. Erinjeri, Lynn A. Brody, Stephen B. Solomon, Ronald DeMatteo, and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Joseph P Erinjeri
- Karen T. Brown, Richard K. Do, Mithat Gonen, Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, Constantinos T. Sofocleous, William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, Peter J. Allen, Joseph P. Erinjeri, Lynn A. Brody, Gerald P. O'Neill, Kristian N. Johnson, Alessandra R. Garcia, Christopher Beattie, Stephen B. Solomon, Ronald DeMatteo, and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Binsheng Zhao and Lawrence H. Schwartz, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons; and Karen T. Brown, Richard K. Do, Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, Constantinos T. Sofocleous, William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, Peter J. Allen, Joseph P. Erinjeri, Lynn A. Brody, Stephen B. Solomon, Ronald DeMatteo, and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Lynn A Brody
- Karen T. Brown, Richard K. Do, Mithat Gonen, Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, Constantinos T. Sofocleous, William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, Peter J. Allen, Joseph P. Erinjeri, Lynn A. Brody, Gerald P. O'Neill, Kristian N. Johnson, Alessandra R. Garcia, Christopher Beattie, Stephen B. Solomon, Ronald DeMatteo, and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Binsheng Zhao and Lawrence H. Schwartz, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons; and Karen T. Brown, Richard K. Do, Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, Constantinos T. Sofocleous, William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, Peter J. Allen, Joseph P. Erinjeri, Lynn A. Brody, Stephen B. Solomon, Ronald DeMatteo, and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Gerald P O'Neill
- Karen T. Brown, Richard K. Do, Mithat Gonen, Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, Constantinos T. Sofocleous, William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, Peter J. Allen, Joseph P. Erinjeri, Lynn A. Brody, Gerald P. O'Neill, Kristian N. Johnson, Alessandra R. Garcia, Christopher Beattie, Stephen B. Solomon, Ronald DeMatteo, and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Binsheng Zhao and Lawrence H. Schwartz, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons; and Karen T. Brown, Richard K. Do, Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, Constantinos T. Sofocleous, William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, Peter J. Allen, Joseph P. Erinjeri, Lynn A. Brody, Stephen B. Solomon, Ronald DeMatteo, and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Kristian N Johnson
- Karen T. Brown, Richard K. Do, Mithat Gonen, Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, Constantinos T. Sofocleous, William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, Peter J. Allen, Joseph P. Erinjeri, Lynn A. Brody, Gerald P. O'Neill, Kristian N. Johnson, Alessandra R. Garcia, Christopher Beattie, Stephen B. Solomon, Ronald DeMatteo, and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Binsheng Zhao and Lawrence H. Schwartz, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons; and Karen T. Brown, Richard K. Do, Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, Constantinos T. Sofocleous, William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, Peter J. Allen, Joseph P. Erinjeri, Lynn A. Brody, Stephen B. Solomon, Ronald DeMatteo, and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Alessandra R Garcia
- Karen T. Brown, Richard K. Do, Mithat Gonen, Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, Constantinos T. Sofocleous, William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, Peter J. Allen, Joseph P. Erinjeri, Lynn A. Brody, Gerald P. O'Neill, Kristian N. Johnson, Alessandra R. Garcia, Christopher Beattie, Stephen B. Solomon, Ronald DeMatteo, and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Binsheng Zhao and Lawrence H. Schwartz, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons; and Karen T. Brown, Richard K. Do, Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, Constantinos T. Sofocleous, William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, Peter J. Allen, Joseph P. Erinjeri, Lynn A. Brody, Stephen B. Solomon, Ronald DeMatteo, and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Christopher Beattie
- Karen T. Brown, Richard K. Do, Mithat Gonen, Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, Constantinos T. Sofocleous, William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, Peter J. Allen, Joseph P. Erinjeri, Lynn A. Brody, Gerald P. O'Neill, Kristian N. Johnson, Alessandra R. Garcia, Christopher Beattie, Stephen B. Solomon, Ronald DeMatteo, and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Binsheng Zhao and Lawrence H. Schwartz, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons; and Karen T. Brown, Richard K. Do, Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, Constantinos T. Sofocleous, William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, Peter J. Allen, Joseph P. Erinjeri, Lynn A. Brody, Stephen B. Solomon, Ronald DeMatteo, and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Binsheng Zhao
- Karen T. Brown, Richard K. Do, Mithat Gonen, Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, Constantinos T. Sofocleous, William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, Peter J. Allen, Joseph P. Erinjeri, Lynn A. Brody, Gerald P. O'Neill, Kristian N. Johnson, Alessandra R. Garcia, Christopher Beattie, Stephen B. Solomon, Ronald DeMatteo, and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Binsheng Zhao and Lawrence H. Schwartz, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons; and Karen T. Brown, Richard K. Do, Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, Constantinos T. Sofocleous, William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, Peter J. Allen, Joseph P. Erinjeri, Lynn A. Brody, Stephen B. Solomon, Ronald DeMatteo, and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Stephen B Solomon
- Karen T. Brown, Richard K. Do, Mithat Gonen, Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, Constantinos T. Sofocleous, William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, Peter J. Allen, Joseph P. Erinjeri, Lynn A. Brody, Gerald P. O'Neill, Kristian N. Johnson, Alessandra R. Garcia, Christopher Beattie, Stephen B. Solomon, Ronald DeMatteo, and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Binsheng Zhao and Lawrence H. Schwartz, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons; and Karen T. Brown, Richard K. Do, Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, Constantinos T. Sofocleous, William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, Peter J. Allen, Joseph P. Erinjeri, Lynn A. Brody, Stephen B. Solomon, Ronald DeMatteo, and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Lawrence H Schwartz
- Karen T. Brown, Richard K. Do, Mithat Gonen, Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, Constantinos T. Sofocleous, William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, Peter J. Allen, Joseph P. Erinjeri, Lynn A. Brody, Gerald P. O'Neill, Kristian N. Johnson, Alessandra R. Garcia, Christopher Beattie, Stephen B. Solomon, Ronald DeMatteo, and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Binsheng Zhao and Lawrence H. Schwartz, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons; and Karen T. Brown, Richard K. Do, Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, Constantinos T. Sofocleous, William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, Peter J. Allen, Joseph P. Erinjeri, Lynn A. Brody, Stephen B. Solomon, Ronald DeMatteo, and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Ronald DeMatteo
- Karen T. Brown, Richard K. Do, Mithat Gonen, Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, Constantinos T. Sofocleous, William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, Peter J. Allen, Joseph P. Erinjeri, Lynn A. Brody, Gerald P. O'Neill, Kristian N. Johnson, Alessandra R. Garcia, Christopher Beattie, Stephen B. Solomon, Ronald DeMatteo, and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Binsheng Zhao and Lawrence H. Schwartz, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons; and Karen T. Brown, Richard K. Do, Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, Constantinos T. Sofocleous, William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, Peter J. Allen, Joseph P. Erinjeri, Lynn A. Brody, Stephen B. Solomon, Ronald DeMatteo, and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Ghassan K Abou-Alfa
- Karen T. Brown, Richard K. Do, Mithat Gonen, Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, Constantinos T. Sofocleous, William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, Peter J. Allen, Joseph P. Erinjeri, Lynn A. Brody, Gerald P. O'Neill, Kristian N. Johnson, Alessandra R. Garcia, Christopher Beattie, Stephen B. Solomon, Ronald DeMatteo, and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Binsheng Zhao and Lawrence H. Schwartz, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons; and Karen T. Brown, Richard K. Do, Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, Constantinos T. Sofocleous, William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D'Angelica, Peter J. Allen, Joseph P. Erinjeri, Lynn A. Brody, Stephen B. Solomon, Ronald DeMatteo, and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
91
|
Lewis AL, Dreher MR, O'Byrne V, Grey D, Caine M, Dunn A, Tang Y, Hall B, Fowers KD, Johnson CG, Sharma KV, Wood BJ. DC BeadM1™: towards an optimal transcatheter hepatic tumour therapy. JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE. MATERIALS IN MEDICINE 2016; 27:13. [PMID: 26676859 PMCID: PMC4681748 DOI: 10.1007/s10856-015-5629-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2015] [Accepted: 11/12/2015] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
Clinical use of DC Bead™ loaded with doxorubicin (DEBDOX™) or irinotecan (DEBIRI™), for the treatment of primary and secondary tumours of the liver respectively, is showing great promise. Recently there has been a tendency to select smaller bead size ranges to treat tumours in an effort to allow more drug dose to be administered, improve tumoural penetration and resultant drug delivery and tumour coverage. Herein we describe the development and performance characterisation of a new DC Bead size range (DC BeadM1 (TM), 70-150 μm) capable of an increased bead delivery in the distal vasculature, corresponding to greater tumour coverage and drug dose delivered. Both unloaded and drug loaded DC BeadM1 were shown to have a greater density of distal volume of penetration although the ultimate distal level of penetration was the same as that of the 100-300 µm beads in an in vitro penetration model. Elution of doxorubicin was slower than irinotecan elution, but it was similar when comparing the same drug elution from 70 to 150 µm compared to 100-300 µm beads. Radiopaque versions of 70-150 and 100-300 µm beads were prepared in order to evaluate distribution ex vivo using µ-CT and doxorubicin distribution using epifluorescent microscopy. Liver distribution of the radiopaque versions of the beads was shown to be more distal and efficient at filling smaller vessels with the DC BeadM1 and correspondingly more beads were found per vessel histologically with a larger area of drug coverage with the smaller size range. This study indicates that the smaller (70-150 μm) beads should permit an increased dose of drug to be administered to both hypervascular and hypovascular tumours as compared to 100-300 µm beads.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew L Lewis
- Biocompatibles UK Ltd, a BTG International Group Company, Lakeview, Riverside Way, Watchmoor Park, Camberley, GU15 3YL, UK.
| | - Matthew R Dreher
- Biocompatibles UK Ltd, a BTG International Group Company, Lakeview, Riverside Way, Watchmoor Park, Camberley, GU15 3YL, UK
| | - Vincent O'Byrne
- Biocompatibles UK Ltd, a BTG International Group Company, Lakeview, Riverside Way, Watchmoor Park, Camberley, GU15 3YL, UK
| | - David Grey
- Biocompatibles UK Ltd, a BTG International Group Company, Lakeview, Riverside Way, Watchmoor Park, Camberley, GU15 3YL, UK
| | - Marcus Caine
- Biocompatibles UK Ltd, a BTG International Group Company, Lakeview, Riverside Way, Watchmoor Park, Camberley, GU15 3YL, UK
| | - Anthony Dunn
- Biocompatibles UK Ltd, a BTG International Group Company, Lakeview, Riverside Way, Watchmoor Park, Camberley, GU15 3YL, UK
| | - Yiqing Tang
- Biocompatibles UK Ltd, a BTG International Group Company, Lakeview, Riverside Way, Watchmoor Park, Camberley, GU15 3YL, UK
| | - Brenda Hall
- Biocompatibles UK Ltd, a BTG International Group Company, Lakeview, Riverside Way, Watchmoor Park, Camberley, GU15 3YL, UK
| | - Kirk D Fowers
- Biocompatibles UK Ltd, a BTG International Group Company, Lakeview, Riverside Way, Watchmoor Park, Camberley, GU15 3YL, UK
| | - Carmen Gacchina Johnson
- Center for Interventional Oncology, Department of Radiology & Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Karun V Sharma
- Center for Interventional Oncology, Department of Radiology & Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Children's National Medical Center, 1630 Euclid Street NW#1, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Bradford J Wood
- Center for Interventional Oncology, Department of Radiology & Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
92
|
Huynh CT, Nguyen QV, Lym JS, Kim BS, Huynh DP, Jae HJ, Kim YI, Lee DS. Intraarterial gelation of injectable cationic pH/temperature-sensitive radiopaque embolic hydrogels in a rabbit hepatic tumor model and their potential application for liver cancer treatment. RSC Adv 2016. [DOI: 10.1039/c6ra03263j] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiopaque embolic solutions employing cationic poly(amino ester urethane)-based copolymers are injected into a rabbit hepatic tumor artery and form hydrogels in response to local temperature and pH for chemoembolization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cong Truc Huynh
- Theranostic Macromolecules Research Center
- School of Chemical Engineering
- Sungkyunkwan University
- Suwon
- Korea
| | - Quang Vinh Nguyen
- Theranostic Macromolecules Research Center
- School of Chemical Engineering
- Sungkyunkwan University
- Suwon
- Korea
| | - Jae Seung Lym
- Theranostic Macromolecules Research Center
- School of Chemical Engineering
- Sungkyunkwan University
- Suwon
- Korea
| | - Bong Sup Kim
- Theranostic Macromolecules Research Center
- School of Chemical Engineering
- Sungkyunkwan University
- Suwon
- Korea
| | - Dai Phu Huynh
- National Key Lab for Polymer & Composite
- Faculty of Materials Technology
- Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology
- Vietnam National University – Ho Chi Minh City
- Ho Chi Minh City
| | - Hwan Jun Jae
- Department of Radiology
- Seoul National University Hospital
- Seoul
- Korea
| | - Young Il Kim
- Department of Radiology
- Seoul National University Hospital
- Seoul
- Korea
- Department of Radiology
| | - Doo Sung Lee
- Theranostic Macromolecules Research Center
- School of Chemical Engineering
- Sungkyunkwan University
- Suwon
- Korea
| |
Collapse
|
93
|
Kokabi N, Xing M, Duszak R, Duszak R, Howard DH, Applegate KE, Camacho JC, Kim HS. Sociodemographic impact on survival in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a survival epidemiology and end results study. Future Oncol 2015; 12:183-98. [PMID: 26690268 DOI: 10.2217/fon.15.242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM To investigate outcomes in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients stratified by sociodemographic and clinical factors in a population study. MATERIALS & METHODS Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database was used to identify patients diagnosed in 2000-2011. Overall survival (OS) was stratified using patient sociodemographic characteristics and American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) staging. Log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify prognostic factors of OS. RESULTS In patients with AJCC stage I and II unresectable HCC, prolonged OS was correlated with being married, younger age, ethnicity, geographic location, living in large urban areas, being insured and higher income and education levels. CONCLUSION In AJCC stage I and II unresectable HCC patients with favorable sociodemographic factors, prolonged OS maybe in part related to better access to cancer-directed therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nima Kokabi
- Department of Radiology & Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Minzhi Xing
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06519, USA
| | | | - Richard Duszak
- Department of Radiology & Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - David H Howard
- Department of Health Policy & Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Kimberly E Applegate
- Department of Radiology & Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Juan C Camacho
- Department of Radiology & Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Hyun S Kim
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06519, USA.,Yale Cancer Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-8028, USA
| |
Collapse
|
94
|
Yan T, Lu L, Xie C, Chen J, Peng X, Zhu L, Wang Y, Li Q, Shi J, Zhou F, Hu M, Liu Z. Severely Impaired and Dysregulated Cytochrome P450 Expression and Activities in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Implications for Personalized Treatment in Patients. Mol Cancer Ther 2015; 14:2874-86. [PMID: 26516155 PMCID: PMC4674380 DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-15-0274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2015] [Accepted: 09/17/2015] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
This study aims to systematically determine the activities and expressions of cytochrome P450s (CYP) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients to support their optimal use in personalized treatment of HCC. Activities of seven major drug-metabolizing CYP enzymes (CYP1A2, 2A6, 2C8, 2C9, 2D6, 2E1, and 3A4) were determined in tumors and pericarcinomatous tissues harvested from 26 patients with hepatitis B virus-positive HCC using probe substrates. Protein and mRNA levels of these CYPs were also measured using isotope label-free LC/MS-MS method and real-time PCR, respectively. Maximal metabolic velocity (Vmax) of CYP probe substrates was decreased by 2.5- to 30-fold in tumor microsomes, accompanied by a corresponding decrease in their protein and mRNA expression levels. However, Km values and turnover numbers of substrates in tumor microsomes were not changed. High correlations between activities and CYP protein levels were also observed, but the correlation between activities and mRNA levels was often poor. There was a major decrease in the degree of correlation in CYP expression in tumor tissues, suggesting that CYP expression levels are greatly disrupted by the tumorigenic process. Our unprecedented systemic study of the effects of HCC on CYPs demonstrated that activities of CYPs were seriously impaired and their expression patterns were severely altered by HCC. We proposed that determination of the CYP protein expression profile by LC/MS-MS in each patient is a promising approach that can be clinically used for individualized treatment of HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tongmeng Yan
- Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Linlin Lu
- International Institute for Translational Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Cong Xie
- Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Jiamei Chen
- International Institute for Translational Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xiaojuan Peng
- Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Lijun Zhu
- International Institute for Translational Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Ying Wang
- International Institute for Translational Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Qiang Li
- Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Jian Shi
- Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Fuyuan Zhou
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Ming Hu
- Department of Pharmacological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, Houston, Texas.
| | - Zhongqiu Liu
- Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. International Institute for Translational Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
95
|
van Elk M, Ozbakir B, Barten-Rijbroek AD, Storm G, Nijsen F, Hennink WE, Vermonden T, Deckers R. Alginate Microspheres Containing Temperature Sensitive Liposomes (TSL) for MR-Guided Embolization and Triggered Release of Doxorubicin. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0141626. [PMID: 26561370 PMCID: PMC4641710 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2015] [Accepted: 10/09/2015] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The objective of this study was to develop and characterize alginate microspheres suitable for embolization with on-demand triggered doxorubicin (DOX) release and whereby the microspheres as well as the drug releasing process can be visualized in vivo using MRI. Methods and Findings For this purpose, barium crosslinked alginate microspheres were loaded with temperature sensitive liposomes (TSL/TSL-Ba-ms), which release their payload upon mild hyperthermia. These TSL contained DOX and [Gd(HPDO3A)(H2O)], a T1 MRI contrast agent, for real time visualization of the release. Empty alginate microspheres crosslinked with holmium ions (T2* MRI contrast agent, Ho-ms) were mixed with TSL-Ba-ms to allow microsphere visualization. TSL-Ba-ms and Ho-ms were prepared with a homemade spray device and sized by sieving. Encapsulation of TSL in barium crosslinked microspheres changed the triggered release properties only slightly: 95% of the loaded DOX was released from free TSL vs. 86% release for TSL-Ba-ms within 30 seconds in 50% FBS at 42°C. TSL-Ba-ms (76 ± 41 μm) and Ho-ms (64 ± 29 μm) had a comparable size, which most likely will result in a similar in vivo tissue distribution after an i.v. co-injection and therefore Ho-ms can be used as tracer for the TSL-Ba-ms. MR imaging of a TSL-Ba-ms and Ho-ms mixture (ratio 95:5) before and after hyperthermia allowed in vitro and in vivo visualization of microsphere deposition (T2*-weighted images) as well as temperature-triggered release (T1-weighted images). The [Gd(HPDO3A)(H2O)] release and clusters of microspheres containing holmium ions were visualized in a VX2 tumor model in a rabbit using MRI. Conclusions In conclusion, these TSL-Ba-ms and Ho-ms are promising systems for real-time, MR-guided embolization and triggered release of drugs in vivo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merel van Elk
- Department of Pharmaceutics, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Burcin Ozbakir
- Department of Pharmaceutics, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Gert Storm
- Department of Pharmaceutics, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Frank Nijsen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Wim E. Hennink
- Department of Pharmaceutics, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Tina Vermonden
- Department of Pharmaceutics, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Roel Deckers
- Imaging Division, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
96
|
Alginate microgels loaded with temperature sensitive liposomes for magnetic resonance imageable drug release and microgel visualization. Eur Polym J 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
97
|
Trans-arterial chemoembolization with doxorubicin-eluting particles versus conventional trans-arterial chemoembolization in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A study of effectiveness, safety and costs. RADIOLOGIA 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rxeng.2015.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
98
|
Abstract
Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is performed worldwide for patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). TACE has produced survival advantages in two randomized controlled trials and a meta-analysis, and is currently the mainstay of treatment for this stage of HCC. However, there are currently no global guidelines regarding the dose, choice or combination of cytotoxic agents for TACE; therefore, it is difficult to compare data from different TACE studies. In Japan, most of the TACE procedures have been based on iodized oil as conventional TACE, utilizing the microembolic and drug-carrying characteristic of iodized oil. Superselective TACE with lipiodol is the primary TACE procedure that has reported satisfactory levels of local control associated with a lower risk of complications. Conversely, TACE performed using drug-eluting beads has been widely used in western countries, and this has shown similar tumor response and median survival compared to conventional TACE. Moreover, the combination of TACE and molecular targeted agents is now ongoing to evaluate the synergistic effect. In this review, the indication, technical issues, and complications of TACE are reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masakatsu Tsurusaki
- *Masakatsu Tsurusaki, MD, Department of Radiology, Kinki University, Faculty of Medicine, 377-2 Ohnohigashi, Osakasayama, Osaka 589-8511 (Japan), Tel. +81 72 366 0221 (ext. 3133), E-mail
| | | |
Collapse
|
99
|
Zurera L, Espejo J, Lombardo S, Marchal T, Muñoz M, Canis M, Montero J. Histologic study of the effects of chemoembolization with preloaded doxorubicin beads in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. RADIOLOGIA 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rxeng.2015.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
|
100
|
Facciorusso A, Licinio R, Muscatiello N, Di Leo A, Barone M. Transarterial chemoembolization: Evidences from the literature and applications in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. World J Hepatol 2015; 7:2009-2019. [PMID: 26261690 PMCID: PMC4528274 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i16.2009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2015] [Revised: 06/26/2015] [Accepted: 07/27/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the current standard of care for patients with large or multinodular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), preserved liver function, absence of cancer-related symptoms and no evidence of vascular invasion or extrahepatic spread (i.e., those classified as intermediate stage according to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system). The rationale for TACE is that the intra-arterial injection of a chemotherapeutic drug such as doxorubicin or cisplatin followed by embolization of the blood vessel will result in a strong cytotoxic effect enhanced by ischemia. However, TACE is a very heterogeneous operative technique and varies in terms of chemotherapeutic agents, treatment devices and schedule. In order to overcome the major drawbacks of conventional TACE (cTACE), non-resorbable drug-eluting beads (DEBs) loaded with cytotoxic drugs have been developed. DEBs are able to slowly release the drug upon injection and increase the intensity and duration of ischemia while enhancing the drug delivery to the tumor. Unfortunately, despite the theoretical advantages of this new device and the promising results of the pivotal studies, definitive data in favor of its superiority over cTACE are still lacking. The recommendation for TACE as the standard-of-care for intermediate-stage HCC is based on the demonstration of improved survival compared with best supportive care or suboptimal therapies in a meta-analysis of six randomized controlled trials, but other therapeutic options (namely, surgery and radioembolization) proved competitive in selected subsets of intermediate HCC patients. Other potential fields of application of TACE in hepato-oncology are the pre-transplant setting (as downstaging/bridging treatment) and the early stage (in patients unsuitable to curative therapy). The potential of TACE in selected advanced patients with segmental portal vein thrombosis and preserved liver function deserves further reports.
Collapse
|