DNA vaccines: safety and efficacy issues

Chimeric plant virus particles administered nasally or orally induce systemic and mucosal immune responses in mice

The humoral immune responses to the D2 peptide of fibronectin-binding protein B (FnBP) of Staphylococcus aureus, expressed on the plant virus cowpea mosaic virus (CPMV), were evaluated after mucosal delivery to mice. Intranasal immunization of these chimeric virus particles (CVPs), either alone or in the presence of ISCOM matrix, primed CPMV-specific T cells and generated high titers of CPMV- and FnBP-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) in sera. Furthermore, CPMV- and FnBP-specific IgA and IgG could also be detected in the bronchial, intestinal, and vaginal lavage fluids, highlighting the ability of CVPs to generate antibody at distant mucosal sites. IgG2a and IgG2b were the dominant IgG subclasses in sera to both CPMV and FnBP, demonstrating a bias in the response toward the T helper 1 type. The sera completely inhibited the binding of human fibronectin to the S. aureus FnBP. Oral immunization of the CVPs also generated CPMV- and FnBP-specific serum IgG; however, these titers were significantly lower and more variable than those generated by the intranasal route, and FnBP-specific intestinal IgA was undetectable. Neither the ISCOM matrix nor cholera toxin enhanced these responses. These studies demonstrate for the first time that recombinant plant viruses have potential as mucosal vaccines without the requirement for adjuvant and that the nasal route is most effective for the delivery of these nonreplicating particles.

Activity and safety of DNA plasmids encoding IL-4 and IFN gamma

Cytokine-encoding DNA plasmids can act as 'genetic adjuvants', improving the immune response stimulated by co-administered DNA vaccines. We examined whether plasmids encoding the Th1 cytokine IFN gamma (pIFN gamma) or the Th2 cytokine IL-4 (pIL-4) have long-term effects on immune homeostasis when administered to adult mice, or alter immune maturation in neonates. Both plasmids boosted immunity against a co-administered vaccine, with pIFN gamma promoting the development of a Th1 response (characterized by the production of IgG2a antibodies), and pIL-4 preferentially stimulating a Th2 response (characterized by increased IgG1 antibody production). Both pIFN gamma and pIL-4 influenced the ratio of cells actively secreting Th1 versus Th2 cytokines, consistent with an effect on Th cell maturation. Interestingly, this effect persisted for only a few weeks and was not magnified by repeated plasmid administration. Cytokine-encoding plasmids had no long-term effect on the immune response of newborn or adult mice to subsequent antigenic stimulation, nor did they selectively induce the production of pathogenic anti-DNA autoantibodies. These results suggest cytokine-encoding plasmids may be safe as immune adjuvants.

Control of immune responses by gene immunization

The use of plasmid DNA to elicit immune responses has greatly increased our ability to skew the desired immune response to a particular antigen. DNA immunization elicits potent cell-mediated responses including humoral immunity as well as cytolytic T-lymphocyte immunity. This review will first discuss the overall immune response induced by naked DNA vaccination and will then summarize recent advances in basic research on DNA immunization, which have furthered our understanding of the role of DNA as an adjuvant as well as a carrier of genetic material. Subsequently, we will consider the possible mechanisms by which DNA immunization is able to induce such immune responses and how DNA immunization may be useful in both basic science research and also in future vaccine development in various disease processes. Finally, we will examine the advantages and disadvantages of DNA vaccines as well as safety issues. In conclusion, DNA vaccination shows promise in a number of areas including infectious diseases, allergy and cancer immunotherapies.