Rosiglitazone Evaluated for Cardiac Outcomes and Regulation of Glycaemia in Diabetes (RECORD): study design and protocol

Effect of the addition of rosiglitazone to metformin or sulfonylureas versus metformin/sulfonylurea combination therapy on ambulatory blood pressure in people with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial (the RECORD study)

Background

Hypertension and type 2 diabetes are common co-morbidities. Preliminary studies suggest that thiazolidinediones reduce blood pressure (BP). We therefore used ambulatory BP to quantify BP lowering at 6–12 months with rosiglitazone used in combination with metformin or sulfonylureas compared to metformin and sulfonylureas in people with type 2 diabetes.

Methods

Participants (n = 759) in the multicentre RECORD study were studied. Those taking metformin were randomized (open label) to add-on rosiglitazone or sulfonylureas, and those on sulfonylurea to add-on rosiglitazone or metformin.

Results

24-Hour ambulatory BP was measured at baseline, 6 months and 12 months. At 6 and 12 months, reductions in 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP (sBP) were greater with rosiglitazone versus metformin (difference at 6 months 2.7 [95% CI 0.5–4.9] mmHg, p = 0.015; 12 months 2.5 [95% CI 0.2–4.8] mmHg, p = 0.031). Corresponding changes for ambulatory diastolic BP (dBP) were comparable (6 months 2.7 [95% CI 1.4–4.0] mmHg, p < 0.001; 12 months 3.1 [95% CI 1.8–4.5] mmHg, p < 0.001). Similar differences were observed for rosiglitazone versus sulfonylureas at 12 months (sBP 2.7 [95% CI 0.5–4.9] mmHg, p = 0.016; dBP 2.1 [95% CI 0.7–3.4] mmHg, p = 0.003), but differences were smaller and/or not statistically significant at 6 months (sBP 1.5 [95% CI -0.6 to 3.6] mmHg, p = NS; dBP 1.3 [95% CI 0.0–2.5] mmHg, p = 0.049). Changes in BP were not accompanied by compensatory increases in heart rate, did not correlate with basal insulin sensitivity estimates and were not explained by changes in antihypertensive therapy between the various strata.

Conclusion

When added to metformin or a sulfonylurea, 12-month treatment with rosiglitazone reduces ambulatory BP to a greater extent than when metformin and a sulfonylurea are combined.

Trial registration

NCT00379769

The rough road for rosiglitazone

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Rosiglitazone is effective in lowering blood sugars in patients with type 2 diabetes and may be expected to reduce microvascular complications associated with hyperglycemia. Whereas preliminary studies using surrogate outcomes for cardiovascular disease have suggested the potential for cardioprotective effects, the drug is associated with fluid retention and increased risk of congestive heart failure. Long-term cardiovascular safety remains incompletely understood. In this review the potential for increased ischemic cardiovascular risk associated with rosiglitazone use is discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Meta-analysis of patients participating in controlled clinical trials suggests increased risk of cardiovascular events for patients using rosiglitazone. Considering only clinical trials in patients with type 2 diabetes with patient-level data, a double-masked, randomized design, and using approved doses of rosiglitazone, independent meta-analysis shows that cardiovascular event rates are low, and suggests that increased ischemic cardiovascular risk may be particularly manifest in subgroups of patients with type 2 diabetes who are using nitrates or insulin.

SUMMARY

There continues to be uncertainty about the risk of ischemic heart disease in patients with type 2 diabetes associated with the use of rosiglitazone. Caution should be used in patients with underlying heart disease using nitrates, and when added to ongoing insulin-based therapy.

PPARgamma agonists and coronary atherosclerosis

The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is growing at an alarming rate and reaching epidemic proportions, and cardiovascular disease continues to be one of the leading causes of death in the United States. The key relationship between these two diseases (knowing that T2DM is a strong risk factor for cardiovascular disease) is insulin resistance and the detrimental effect it has on macrovasculature. Thiazolidinediones (TZDs) are peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaagonists that are beneficial in the treatment of T2DM and have the added benefit of modifying lipid profiles. This review discusses the basic science linking insulin resistance to atherosclerosis and describes the major TZD trials in the recent literature. It also addresses the clinical implications of these studies and media scrutiny surrounding the recent controversial report that TZDs may be linked to an increased risk of myocardial infarction.

Reduced plaque formation induced by rosiglitazone in an STZ-diabetes mouse model of atherosclerosis is associated with downregulation of adhesion molecules

Adhesion molecules have been implicated in the development and progression of cardiovascular disease, which is highly prevalent in people with diabetes. Adhesion molecules can mediate adhesion of leukocytes to the endothelium. Furthermore, P-selectin expressed on platelets is able to mediate the adhesion of leukocytes to platelets. In this study, we examine the in-vivo and in-vitro effects of rosiglitazone with particular emphasis on three important adhesion molecules (VCAM-1, ICAM-1 and P-selectin). In the aorta of STZ-diabetic apolipoprotein E-deficient (apoE KO) mice, rosiglitazone significantly reduced both total and arch plaque area. The mechanism for this appeared to be reduced macrophage infiltration into the atherosclerotic plaque which was also associated with reduced mRNA levels for VCAM-1, ICAM-1, MCP-1 and P-selectin in the aorta. In-vitro studies revealed reduced cell adhesion of monocytic cells (THP-1) to fibrinogen and endothelial cells (HUVEC) after incubation with rosiglitazone. Furthermore, the reduction in leukocyte adhesion also correlated with significant reductions in mRNA levels for VCAM-1, ICAM-1 and P-selectin indicating that reduced macrophage infiltration in atherosclerotic plaques may occur as a result of a direct effect of rosiglitazone on adhesion molecules in both monocytes and endothelial cells. Thus, we have shown that rosiglitazone appears to have direct anti-atherosclerotic effects in an animal model of diabetes-associated atherosclerosis which are at least partly due to effects on VCAM-1, ICAM-1, MCP-1 and P-selectin expression which leads to decreased leukocyte adhesion and macrophage infiltration.

Fixed vs random effects meta-analysis in rare event studies: the rosiglitazone link with myocardial infarction and cardiac death

Meta-analyses can be powerful tools to combine the results of randomized clinical trials and observational studies to make consensus inferences about a medical issue. It will be demonstrated that a common practice of testing for homogeneity of effect size, and acting upon the inference to decide between fixed vs random effects, can lead to potentially misleading results. A by-product of this paper is a new ratio estimator approach to random effects meta-analysis of a large set of studies with low event rates. As a case study, we shall use the recent Rosiglitazone example, where diagnostic testing failed to reject homogeneity, leading the investigators to use fixed effects. The results for the fixed and random effects analyses are discordant. In the fixed (random) effects analysis, the p-values for myocardial infarction were 0.03 (0.11) while those for cardiac death were 0.06 (0.0017). Had the fixed effects analysis controlled the study error for multiple testing via a Bonferonni correction, the joint 95+ per cent confidence rectangle for the two outcomes would have included odds ratios of (1.0, 1.0). For the Rosiglitazone example, random effects analysis, where all studies receive the same weight, is the superior choice over fixed effects, where two large studies dominate.

Thiazolidinediones-improving endothelial function and potential long-term benefits on cardiovascular disease in subjects with type 2 diabetes

Endothelial dysfunction, which leads to impaired vasodilation, is an early event in the development of atherosclerosis. A number of mechanisms involving, for example, cell adhesion molecules, chemokines, and cytokines, contribute to this inflammatory disease, and insulin resistance plays a cardinal role in accelerating these processes. Hyperglycemia and other metabolic abnormalities that are commonly associated with insulin resistance also contribute to impaired endothelial function. In addition, the important role of the endothelium in damage repair following a cardiovascular event is emerging. The combination of proatherogenic factors in patients with type 2 diabetes results in blunted endothelial function and an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Insulin-sensitizing agents such as thiazolidinediones have demonstrated a number of clinical benefits, including anti-inflammatory and antithrombotic properties, which may impact on the course of atherosclerosis. Recent studies have demonstrated that thiazolidinediones improve endothelial function in subjects with and without type 2 diabetes.

Should We Use PPAR Agonists to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk?

Trials of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) agonists have shown mixed results for cardiovascular prevention. Fibrates are PPAR-alpha agonists that act primarily to improve dyslipidemia. Based on low- and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL and HDL) effects, gemfibrozil may be of greater cardiovascular benefit than expected, fenofibrate performed about as expected, and bezafibrate performed worse than expected. Increases in both cardiovascular and noncardiovascular serious adverse events have been observed with some fibrates. Thiazolidinediones (TZDs) are PPAR-gamma agonists used to improve impaired glucose metabolism but also influence lipids. Pioglitazone reduces atherosclerotic events in diabetic subjects, but has no net cardiovascular benefit due to increased congestive heart failure risk. Rosiglitazone may increase the risk of atherosclerotic events, and has a net harmful effect on the cardiovascular system when congestive heart failure is included. The primary benefit of TZDs appears to be the prevention of diabetic microvascular complications. Dual PPAR-alpha/gamma agonists have had unacceptable adverse effects but more selective agents are in development. PPAR-delta and pan-agonists are also in development. It will be imperative to prove that future PPAR agonists not only prevent atherosclerotic events but also result in a net reduction on total cardiovascular events without significant noncardiovascular adverse effects with long-term use.

Early vascular aging (EVA): consequences and prevention

It has often been recognized that a discrepancy exists during the clinical consultation between the chronological age of a patient on the one hand with the signs and symptoms of biological age that can be recorded on the other hand. In cardiovascular medicine this is obvious when a heavy smoker presents with features of early biological aging, for example skin appearance and impaired lung function. This could also be extrapolated to vascular function as the target for numerous cardiovascular risk factors, thereby increasing the risk of early cardiovascular disease (CVD). Both new and old treatment modalities can play a role for the prevention of early vascular aging, first of all smoking cessation and improved lifestyle in general, but later on also the use of drugs such as statins or agents that block the renin-angiotensin system (RAS). New classes of drugs are currently being tested for CVD prevention, including glitazones and rimonabant, even if adverse effects (heart failure and depression) might restrict their usefulness. Results from ongoing intervention studies will eventually cast new light on possibilities to prevent the development of vascular aging.

Effect of rosiglitazone on factors related to endothelial dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

The effect of the insulin sensitizer rosiglitazone (RSG) on biological markers of endothelial dysfunction in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) was investigated in a 12-week, multi-center, randomized, double-blind study. One hundred and thirty-six subjects aged 40-70 years, with FPG > or = 7.0 and < or = 15.0 mmol/l, previously treated with a single oral anti-diabetic agent or diet/exercise, were randomized to RSG 8 mg/day (n=65) or placebo (PBO, n=71). Results revealed that RSG significantly reduced soluble (s)E-selectin by -10.9% (P=0.004) compared with PBO, but did not significantly alter soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (+0.6%, P=NS). Compared with PBO, RSG also significantly reduced plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (-36.9%, P<0.001), tissue plasminogen activator antigen (-22.7%, P<0.001), FPG (-2.8 mmol/l, P<0.001), fasting fructosamine (-42.0 mg/dl, P<0.001). Post-prandial AUC(0-4h) for free fatty acids (FFAs) reduced by -6.5 mg/dl*h from baseline (P=0.03), a change that positively and significantly correlated with changes in sE-selectin (r=0.22, P=0.05). The incidence of adverse events was similar in the two groups (RSG: 35.4%; PBO: 40.8%); the majority mild or moderate. These data support the hypothesis that, in patients with T2DM, rosiglitazone has beneficial effects on biological markers of endothelial dysfunction. Improvements in insulin sensitivity and decreases in FFAs may play a role in these effects.

Stimulation of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) and the expression of selected blood monocyte cytokine genes in diabetic macroangiopathy

Monocytes and macrophages play a key role in the progression of atheromatous changes. The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR gamma) can limit macroangiopathy through the control of cytokine transcription. The objectives of this study were to examine the influence of PPAR gamma and its agonist (rosiglitazone) on the TNFalpha, IL-6, IL-8 and IL-10 gene expression in monocytes of patients with diabetic macroangiopathy and to analyse obtained results in context of selected atherogenic factors ant direct indicators of endothelial lesion. TNFalpha, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10 and PPAR gamma gene expression was assessed in peripheral blood monocytes in 45 patients with type 2 diabetes before and following 22 weeks of rosiglitazone therapy (real-time PCR [Applied Biosystems]). As indicators of endothelial lesion, concentration of thrombomodulin (immunoassay [Diagnostica Stago]) and amount of circulating blood endothelial cells (immunofluorescence method with MoAb CLB-HEC19) were determined. Following rosiglitazone therapy, a statistically significant downward tendency of TNFalpha (p=0.026) and IL-8 (p=0.008) gene expression was noted. Before and following rosiglitazone treatment, PPAR gamma, IL-6 and IL-10 gene expression was undetectable in studied monocytes in vivo. In conclusion, TNFalpha and IL-8 play an important role in monocyte atherogenic activity. Rosiglitazone reduces monocyte proinflammatory readiness by influencing the expression of selected atherogenic cytokines (PPAR gamma-independent pathway).

Prevention of macrovascular disease in patients with diabetes mellitus: opportunities for intervention

Individuals with diabetes mellitus are at considerably higher risk for coronary artery disease compared with individuals without diabetes. In the United States, diabetes is the most prevalent factor putting patients at risk for coronary events. Intensive control of blood glucose has been demonstrated to reduce the risk for cardiovascular disease in patients with type 1 diabetes, but this has yet to be proved in patients with type 2 diabetes. Aggressive management of established cardiovascular risk factors using blood pressure-lowering and lipid-lowering therapies (particularly the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors, or statins) has been conclusively shown to reduce cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes. Patients with type 2 diabetes remain at residual excess risk compared with individuals without diabetes, such that there is still a need for novel therapeutic approaches. Thiazolidinediones (TZDs) may have beneficial effects on cardiovascular disease in diabetes beyond improving blood glucose control. Although the evidence regarding rosiglitazone is yet to mature, completed and ongoing clinical trials with pioglitazone suggest that this TZD may be a novel treatment for managing cardiovascular risk in patients with diabetes. Addition of pioglitazone to existing therapy in high-risk patients with diabetes and atherosclerotic disease improves cardiovascular outcomes, and may be particularly beneficial for patients with previous myocardial infarction or stroke.

Rosiglitazone for type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Diabetes has long been recognised as a strong, independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease, a problem which accounts for approximately 70% of all mortality in people with diabetes. Prospective studies show that compared to their non-diabetic counterparts, the relative risk of cardiovascular mortality for men with diabetes is two to three and for women with diabetes is three to four. The two biggest trials in type 2 diabetes, the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) and the University Group Diabetes Program (UGDP) study did not reveal a reduction of cardiovascular endpoints through improved metabolic control. Theoretical benefits of the peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma (PPAR-gamma) activator rosiglitazone on endothelial function and cardiovascular risk factors might result in fewer macrovascular disease events in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of rosiglitazone in the treatment of type 2 diabetes.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Studies were obtained from computerised searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies were included if they were randomised controlled trials in adult people with type 2 diabetes mellitus and had a trial duration of at least 24 weeks.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Pooling of studies by means of fixed-effects meta-analysis could be performed for adverse events only.

MAIN RESULTS

Eighteen trials which randomised 3888 people to rosiglitazone treatment were identified. Longest duration of therapy was four years with a median of 26 weeks. Published studies of at least 24 weeks rosiglitazone treatment in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus did not provide evidence that patient-oriented outcomes like mortality, morbidity, adverse effects, costs and health-related quality of life are positively influenced by this compound. Metabolic control measured by glycosylated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) as a surrogate endpoint did not demonstrate clinically relevant differences to other oral antidiabetic drugs. Occurrence of oedema was significantly raised (OR 2.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.83 to 2.81). The single large RCT (ADOPT - A Diabetes Outcomes Progression Trial) indicated increased cardiovascular risk. New data on raised fracture rates in women reveal extensive action of rosiglitazone in various body tissues.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

New studies should focus on patient-oriented outcomes to clarify the benefit-risk ratio of rosiglitazone therapy. Safety data and adverse events of all investigations (published and unpublished) should be made available to the public.

Rosiglitazone evaluated for cardiovascular outcomes--an interim analysis

BACKGROUND

A recent meta-analysis raised concern regarding an increased risk of myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes associated with rosiglitazone treatment of type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

We conducted an unplanned interim analysis of a randomized, multicenter, open-label, noninferiority trial involving 4447 patients with type 2 diabetes who had inadequate glycemic control while receiving metformin or sulfonylurea, in which 2220 patients were assigned to receive add-on rosiglitazone (rosiglitazone group), and 2227 to receive a combination of metformin plus sulfonylurea (control group). The primary end point was hospitalization or death from cardiovascular causes.

RESULTS

Because the mean follow-up was only 3.75 years, our interim analysis had limited statistical power to detect treatment differences. A total of 217 patients in the rosiglitazone group and 202 patients in the control group had the adjudicated primary end point (hazard ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89 to 1.31). After the inclusion of end points pending adjudication, the hazard ratio was 1.11 (95% CI, 0.93 to 1.32). There were no statistically significant differences between the rosiglitazone group and the control group regarding myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes or any cause. There were more patients with heart failure in the rosiglitazone group than in the control group (hazard ratio, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.30 to 3.57).

CONCLUSIONS

Our interim findings from this ongoing study were inconclusive regarding the effect of rosiglitazone on the overall risk of hospitalization or death from cardiovascular causes. There was no evidence of any increase in death from either cardiovascular causes or all causes. Rosiglitazone was associated with an increased risk of heart failure. The data were insufficient to determine whether the drug was associated with an increase in the risk of myocardial infarction. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00379769 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Metformin/rosiglitazone combination pill (Avandamet) for the treatment of patients with Type 2 diabetes

More than 150 million people worldwide have diabetes, the prevalence of which is increasing so rapidly that the number of adults with diabetes in the world will rise to 300 million by the year 2025. In the US, approximately 21 million people have diabetes and in some areas of the country, the prevalence is as high as 50%. The pathophysiologic hallmarks consist of insulin resistance and progressive pancreatic beta-cell dysfunction. An increased metabolic demand for insulin due to increased insulin resistance usually precedes the development of hyperglycemia. At early stages, pancreatic beta cells compensate for insulin resistance by hypersecretion of insulin. However, the period of beta-cell compensation is followed by beta-cell failure, in which the pancreas fails to secrete sufficient insulin and diabetes ensues. Biguanides and thiazolidinediones (TZDs) are two unique classes of oral antidiabetic agents that are the most commonly used medications to improve insulin sensitivity. They have no direct effect on beta-cell function, although some indirect mechanisms of actions may help to preserve beta-cell function or slow beta-cell apoptosis. Their glucose-lowering effect results from improving insulin sensitivity in a complementary fashion: metformin reduces hepatic glucose production and TZDs increase skeletal muscle glucose use. The combination of metformin and rosiglitazone in a single pill (Avandamet), was approved by the FDA in October 2002 for the treatment of diabetes. As insulin resistance is a pathophysiologic cornerstone of diabetes and cardiovascular disease, the use of Avandamet represents an optimal approach to the treatment of diabetes. This manuscript reviews the pharmacology, safety and benefits of the combination pill Avandamet.

Effect of rosiglitazone on the risk of myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes

BACKGROUND

Rosiglitazone is widely used to treat patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, but its effect on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality has not been determined.

METHODS

We conducted searches of the published literature, the Web site of the Food and Drug Administration, and a clinical-trials registry maintained by the drug manufacturer (GlaxoSmithKline). Criteria for inclusion in our meta-analysis included a study duration of more than 24 weeks, the use of a randomized control group not receiving rosiglitazone, and the availability of outcome data for myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes. Of 116 potentially relevant studies, 42 trials met the inclusion criteria. We tabulated all occurrences of myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes.

RESULTS

Data were combined by means of a fixed-effects model. In the 42 trials, the mean age of the subjects was approximately 56 years, and the mean baseline glycated hemoglobin level was approximately 8.2%. In the rosiglitazone group, as compared with the control group, the odds ratio for myocardial infarction was 1.43 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03 to 1.98; P=0.03), and the odds ratio for death from cardiovascular causes was 1.64 (95% CI, 0.98 to 2.74; P=0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Rosiglitazone was associated with a significant increase in the risk of myocardial infarction and with an increase in the risk of death from cardiovascular causes that had borderline significance. Our study was limited by a lack of access to original source data, which would have enabled time-to-event analysis. Despite these limitations, patients and providers should consider the potential for serious adverse cardiovascular effects of treatment with rosiglitazone for type 2 diabetes.

Preventing macrovascular complications in type 2 diabetes mellitus: glucose control and beyond

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus are at increased risk for macrovascular disease complications. Hyperglycemia and atherosclerotic disease clearlyare associated, andbiologic intermediates mediated by hyperglycemia exist. Our understanding of the pathobiology linking hyperglycemia and atherosclerotic disease continues to evolve. Modulation of the advanced glycation end product (AGE) receptor for AGE (RAGE)/soluble RAGE (sRAGE) system, the thromboxane receptor, and C-peptide comprise just a few of the plausible links between dysglycemia and atherosclerosis. It seems intuitive, therefore, that therapeutic management of blood glucose in patients with diabetes should reduce macrovascular disease and related deaths. However, studies of glucose-lowering therapies performed to date yield qualitatively and quantitatively different results. No definitive proof of the concept is yet available, although it remains probable, with investigations presently under way. Numerous interventions extending beyond glucose control, including lifestyle modification, pharmacologic therapy with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins), aspirin, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, as well as aggressive blood pressure control independent of blood pressure levels, have proved to be of cardiovascular benefit in the high-risk population of patients with diabetes. Thus, all of these interventions should be used in addition to glucose management in all patients with diabetes who are at increased risk for cardiovascular disease.

Rosiglitazone RECORD study: glucose control outcomes at 18 months

AIMS

To compare glucose control over 18 months between rosiglitazone oral combination therapy and combination metformin and sulphonylurea in people with Type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

RECORD, a multicentre, parallel-group study of cardiovascular outcomes, enrolled people with an HbA(1c) of 7.1-9.0% on maximum doses of metformin or sulphonylurea. If on metformin they were randomized to add-on rosiglitazone or sulphonylurea (open label) and if on sulphonylurea to rosiglitazone or metformin. HbA(1c) was managed to < or = 7.0% by dose titration. A prospectively defined analysis of glycaemic control on the first 1122 participants is reported here, with a primary outcome assessed against a non-inferiority margin for HbA(1c) of 0.4%.

RESULTS

At 18 months, HbA(1c) reduction on background metformin was similar with rosiglitazone and sulphonylurea [difference 0.07 (95% CI -0.09, 0.23)%], as was the change when rosiglitazone or metformin was added to sulphonylurea [0.06 (-0.09, 0.20)%]. At 6 months, the effect on HbA(1c) was greater with add-on sulphonylurea, but was similar whether sulphonylurea was added to rosiglitazone or metformin. Differences in fasting plasma glucose were not statistically significant at 18 months [rosiglitazone vs. sulphonylurea -0.36 (-0.74, 0.02) mmol/l, rosiglitazone vs. metformin -0.34 (-0.73, 0.05) mmol/l]. Increased homeostasis model assessment insulin sensitivity and reduced C-reactive protein were greater with rosiglitazone than metformin or sulphonylurea (all P < or = 0.001). Body weight was significantly increased with rosiglitazone compared with sulphonylurea [difference 1.2 (0.4, 2.0) kg, P = 0.003] and metformin [difference 4.3 (3.6, 5.1) kg, P < 0.001].

CONCLUSIONS

In people with diabetes, rosiglitazone in combination with metformin or sulphonylurea was demonstrated to be non-inferior to the standard combination of metformin + sulphonylurea in lowering HbA(1c) over 18 months, and produces greater improvements in C-reactive protein and basal insulin sensitivity but is also associated with greater weight gain.

PPAR Ligands: Are They Potential Agents for Cardiovascular Disorders?

Peroxisome proliferator activated receptors (PPARs) are members of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily of ligand-activated transcription factors. The PPAR subfamily consists of three members: PPARalpha, PPARgamma, and PPARbeta/delta. Fibrates are acting via PPARalpha, and they are used as lipid-lowering agents. PPARgamma agonists reduce insulin resistance and have been used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. As the knowledge of the pleiotropic effects of these agents advances, further potential indications are being revealed, including a novel role in the management of cardiovascular disorders (CVD). PPARalpha/gamma dual agonists are currently under development and hold considerable promise in the management of type 2 diabetes and provide an effective therapeutic option for treating the multifactorial components of CVD. Several experimental and clinical evidences elucidated the beneficial effects of PPAR ligands in prevention and treatment of various CVD. However, PPARalpha and PPARgamma agonists have been shown to be proinflammatory and proatherogenic in a few studies. Further, PPARgamma ligands have been noted to be involved in the pathogenesis of congestive heart failure. These controversial results obtained from a few studies created further complication in understanding the role of PPARs. The function of PPARdelta and its potential as a cardiovascular therapeutic target are currently under investigation. The present review focuses on the merits and limitations of PPAR agonists with regard to their use in CVD.

Cardiovascular metabolic syndrome - an interplay of, obesity, inflammation, diabetes and coronary heart disease

Cardiovascular disease is currently one of the biggest causes of morbidity and mortality facing humanity. Such a paradigm shift of disease pattern over the last century has only worsened due to the alarming global prevalence of obesity and type 2 diabetes. In recent years there is increasing focus on inflammation as one of the key players in the patho-physiology of these disorders. In addition to these overt risk factors new research is unraveling the significance of a constellation of early metabolic abnormalities that include weight gain, insulin resistance, prehypertension and a specific pattern of dyslipidaemia. There exists a complex interrelationship of these various metabolic disorders and their effect on cardiovascular system. Simplified explanation can be that inflammation increases insulin resistance, which in turn leads to obesity while perpetuating diabetes, high blood pressure, prothrombotic state and dyslipidaemia. While inflammation and insulin resistance have direct adverse effects on cardiac muscle, these metabolic abnormalities as a whole cause causes cardiovascular complications; warranting a multi pronged therapeutic and preventive approach for the 'Cardiovascular Metabolic Syndrome' as an entity.

Thiazolidinediones and vascular damage

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Although the thiazolidinediones were introduced for the treatment of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, it became quickly apparent that these agents modulated many pathways related to vascular physiology and pathophysiology. Given the fact that cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in diabetes, it has become important to know whether these agents have vasculoprotective effects and if so whether these are associated with the prevention of cardiovascular disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

The thiazolidinedione class improves endothelial vasomotion, inhibits inflammatory and procoagulant processes and has powerful antiproliferative and antioxidant effects. Experimentally these agents retard atherosclerosis development in predisposed animals. Clinical studies demonstrate that they increase HDL cholesterol and LDL size, and may lower triglyceride levels. They modestly lower blood pressure, reduce microalbuminuria, arterial stiffness and reduce carotid wall thickening. These effects are generally independent of glucose lowering and in many instances have been shown to occur in nondiabetic subjects. A single clinical endpoint intervention trial of add-on pioglitazone treatment in type 2 diabetic patients with cardiovascular disease suggested on secondary analyses that the agent reduced cardiovascular events.

SUMMARY

The weight of the experimental, subclinical and clinical assessments of the effects of these agents supports the contention that they are vasculoprotective. In the final analysis their use in clinical practice to prevent cardiovascular disease will mostly depend on whether clinical trials consistently demonstrate that they reduced cardiovascular events.

Differential effects of oral hypoglycemic agents on glucose control and cardiovascular risk

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) burden remains the predominant cause of mortality and morbidity in the United States and in most of the developed world. The ongoing twin epidemics of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus provide a groundswell source for sustaining this trend for the foreseeable future (increasing the prevalence of CVD by 2-4 times), unless radical changes are made in public health policy. Oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs) remain a mainstay for management of type 2 diabetes in most practice settings. Although these agents are primarily prescribed to achieve better glycemic control, it is important to evaluate what effects they have on cardiovascular risk and whether there are significant differences in effects among the different OHAs. This review presents the available data on the effects of the various OHAs on cardiovascular risk surrogates and actual events in retrospective and prospective study design settings.

Inflammation in diabetes mellitus: role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonists

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and/or the metabolic syndrome have considerable cardiovascular risk. Treatment with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) and with antihypertensive and some antihyperglycemic agents reduces this risk, but residual macrovascular morbidity and mortality persist, even in patients assigned to intensive multifactorial intervention programs. Therapeutic strategies that target inflammation and lipid abnormalities not well addressed by statins may offer additional opportunities for improving the prognosis of these patients. Inflammation, a key mechanism of atherogenesis, appears to have particular relevance to diabetic vascular complications, as well as in the development of diabetes itself. Oxidative stress and hyperglycemia also figure among the pathogenic factors that promote cardiovascular complications in patients with the metabolic syndrome and/or diabetes and may augment the ongoing inflammation. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-alpha and PPAR-gamma, members of the nuclear receptor family, form ligand-activated transcription factors that regulate key important metabolic pathways. PPARs have become therapeutic targets through the use of the fibrate class of antidyslipidemic drugs (PPAR-alpha) and the insulin-sensitizing thiazolidinediones (PPAR-gamma). The activation of these PPARs may also suppress inflammation and atherosclerosis. Recent clinical trials (Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes [FIELD], Prospective Pioglitazone Clinical Trial in Macrovascular Events [PROactive]) have considered the impact of these PPAR agonists on cardiovascular disease, with mixed effects that require careful analysis, especially given ongoing trials and additional PPAR agonists in development.

Effects of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors on lipoprotein metabolism and glucose control in type 2 diabetes mellitus

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are central regulators of lipoprotein metabolism and glucose homeostasis that are considered particularly useful for improving glycemic control and comorbidities in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clinical trials of PPAR-alpha agonists have demonstrated efficacy in reducing cardiovascular events; however, these benefits have been confined to subgroups of patients with low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol or high levels of triglycerides. While activators of PPAR-gamma reduce early atherosclerotic lesions and reduce cardiovascular events, these agents have the effect of increasing fluid retention in patients, which results in more hospitalizations for congestive heart failure. Future studies of PPAR-gamma agonists or dual PPAR-alpha/gamma agonists will require further delineation of the risk profile to avoid adverse outcomes in susceptible patients.

Drug Insight: mechanisms of action and therapeutic applications for agonists of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors

Intensive preclinical investigations have delineated a role for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) in energy metabolism and inflammation. PPARs are activated by natural lipophilic ligands such as fatty acids and their derivatives. Normalization of lipid and glucose metabolism is achieved via pharmacological modulation of PPAR activity. PPARs may also alter atherosclerosis progression through direct effects on the vascular wall. PPARs regulate genes involved in the recruitment of leukocytes to endothelial cells, in vascular inflammation, in macrophage lipid homeostasis, and in thrombosis. PPARs therefore modulate metabolic and inflammatory perturbations that predispose to cardiovascular diseases and type 2 diabetes. The hypolipidemic fibrates and the antidiabetic thiazolidinediones are drugs that act via PPARalpha and PPARgamma, respectively, and are used in clinical practice. PPARbeta/delta ligands are currently in clinical evaluation. The pleiotropic actions of PPARs and the fact that chemically diverse PPAR agonists may induce distinct pharmacological responses have led to the emergence of new concepts for drug design. A more precise understanding of the molecular pathways implicated in the response to chemically distinct PPAR agonists should provide new opportunities for targeted therapeutic applications in the management of the metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases.

Update on PPAR agonists: The clinical significance of FIELD and PROACTIVE

The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) family of genes plays a major role in metabolic regulation. Unfortunately, the results of two recent, large event trials of PPAR agonists have been mixed. High rates of crossover to statin use confound the interpretation of the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) trial, which found a less than expected reduction in coronary and stroke events with fenofibrate. Of concern, nonsignificant increases in coronary and sudden deaths, thrombotic events, and pancreatitis occurred in the fenofibrate group. The PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macroVascular Events (PROACTIVE) also found a reduction in coronary and stroke events with pioglitazone compared with placebo in a population with diabetes and cardiovascular disease, but this benefit was counterbalanced by an increase in congestive heart failure as well as symptomatic edema. Further research is needed to determine the role of PPAR agonists in the prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Rosiglitazone in diabetes control in hemodialysis patients with and without viral hepatitis infection: effectiveness and side effects

OBJECTIVE

Thiazolidinedione (TZD) may provide an additional benefit of cardiovascular protection in diabetic patients through targeting of insulin resistance. However, use of a TZD is hampered by possible effects of fluid retention and hepatotoxicity. In this study we aimed to determine whether the risk of TZD-induced fluid retention or hepatic injury is higher in hemodialysis patients with persistent viral hepatitis infection.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a prospective, cohort study on hemodialysis patients. Type 2 diabetic patients with A1C levels of >8% were followed for at least 12 months. Rosiglitazone was initiated at 2-4 mg/day. The primary outcome was the target A1C (<7%) achieved and dosages of rosiglitazone. Secondary outcomes included changes in lipid profile and inflammatory biomarkers. Safety evaluations were number of hypoglycemic episodes, changes in liver transaminase levels, cardiothoracic ratio (CTR), fluid status control during dialysis, and events of symptomatic heart failure.

RESULTS

A total of 78 patients, including 15.4% (n = 12) hepatitis B surface antigen-positive and 16.7% (n = 13) anti-hepatis C virus (HCV)-positive patients, were enrolled. The mean follow-up period was 15.4 +/- 3.8 months. The diabetic response rate (A1C <7%) to rosiglitazone was 86.1%. The serum triglyceride level was reduced (194 +/- 112.5 to 168 +/- 88 mg/dl, P = 0.037) more significantly than the total cholesterol level (178 +/- 42.1 to 174 +/- 46.5 mg/dl, P = 0.13). High-dose rosiglitazone (8 mg/day) reduced the serum level of C-reactive protein and increased the serum adiponectin level significantly. After rosiglitazone, interdialysis weight gain (2.07 +/- 1.6 to 3.2 +/- 1.2 kg, P < 0.01) and mean CTR (48.2 +/- 5.6 to 50.4 +/- 6.2%, P = 0.0213) of individuals increased significantly. Nevertheless, liver aminotransferase (aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase) levels did not show a tendency to increase in patients (n = 25) with viral hepatitis B or C infections.

CONCLUSIONS

Among regular hemodialysis patients with chronic viral hepatitis infections, rosiglitazone may be safely used for diabetes control. However, one must be aware that a possible effect of its use is a deterioration in cardiovascular reserve.

Oral antidiabetic agents as cardiovascular drugs

The increased risk of cardiovascular disease associated with type 2 diabetes is well documented. Lesser degrees of abnormal glucose metabolism including impaired fasting glycaemia and impaired glucose tolerance are also associated with increased cardiovascular risk. Studies showing improved cardiovascular outcomes with oral antidiabetic agents are limited, with the UKPDS demonstrating improved macrovascular outcomes only in a subgroup of obese patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin, and the heavily criticized STOP NIDDM trial showing a reduction in the number of cardiovascular events with the alpha glucosidase inhibitor acarbose. In recent years there has been an increase in the number of oral antidiabetic drugs available to treat the hyperglycaemia of diabetes. Some of these drugs have complex metabolic properties, additional to their antihyperglycaemic effect, improving endothelial function and markers of atherogenesis, with the potential to reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, as supported by the recently published results of the PROACTIVE study. The results of further long-term cardiovascular outcome studies with these newer agents are awaited.

Dual PPAR α/γ Agonists: Promises and Pitfalls in Type 2 Diabetes

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a disease of complex pathogenesis and pleiotropic clinical manifestations. The greatest clinical challenge in this disease is the prevention of the long-term complications, many of which involve cardiovascular outcomes. The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) alpha and gamma isoforms of the family of nuclear transcription factors are pharmaceutical targets for therapeutic intervention because they can potentially ameliorate not only the hyperglycemia of diabetes, but also the dyslipidemia that is characteristic of this disorder (low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high triglycerides, small, dense low-density lipoprotein particles). Novel drugs with dual PPAR alpha and gamma activity have been under clinical development for type 2 diabetes, and they have shown promise in early studies with regard to glucose lowering and improved lipid profile when compared with the PPAR-gamma-specific thiazolidinediones. Unfortunately, the dual PPARs available to date have some of the PPAR-gamma-associated side effect profile, including fluid retention and weight gain, which have limited the further clinical development of higher doses that show improved efficacy. This review will briefly summarize our understanding of the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes, the role of the PPAR family of receptors, and the potential for clinical use of this novel emerging class of agents that serve as dual activators of both PPAR-alpha and PPAR-gamma.

Cardiovascular disease prevention in patients with type 2 diabetes: The role of oral anti-diabetic agents

Multiple risk factor intervention is essential in order to prevent cardiovascular (CV) disease in patients with diabetes. Therefore, to reduce atherothrombotic events, an ideal oral anti-diabetic agent should be able to modulate most, and preferably all, cardiovascular risk factors associated with diabetes. Of the currently available agents, the insulin sensitisers (metformin, thiazolidinediones) seem to have most promise in cardiovascular protection. Metformin has a positive effect on several CV risk factors; outcome studies have shown that this agent reduces cardiac events in overweight subjects with diabetes. In a similar manner, thiazolidinediones (rosiglitazone, pioglitazone) have a wide spectrum of activity, favourably modulating most risk factors, with evidence to suggest a reduction in CV events with this class of drugs. Agents in the sulphonylurea group have beneficial, though inconsistent, effects on some risk factors but outcome studies have failed to show a cardioprotective role for these agents. New classes of drugs to manage type 2 diabetes are currently at various stages of development and their role in prevention of cardiovascular disease awaits evaluation. At present, first-line management of insulin-resistant type 2 diabetes should utilise metformin, with the addition of thiazolidinediones and sulphonylureas to achieve optimal glycaemic control.

Is the metabolic syndrome a real clinical entity and should it receive drug treatment?

Metabolic syndrome represents a cluster of risk factors commonly associated with obesity and diabetes that in turn are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. The worldwide prevalence of metabolic syndrome, obesity, and diabetes is on the rise, leading to serious public health concerns surrounding the downstream consequences in the form of premature cardiovascular disease. In this review, we examine the debate surrounding the characterization and diagnosis of metabolic syndrome and discuss potential treatment options.

Rosiglitazone reduces microalbuminuria and blood pressure independently of glycemia in type 2 diabetes patients with microalbuminuria

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that rosiglitazone combined with metformin provides a greater reduction in microalbuminuria and blood pressure than metformin and glyburide at comparable levels of glycemic control.

METHODS

In a double-blind, parallel-group design 389 participants with type 2 diabetes were followed for 32 weeks.

RESULTS

Urinary albumin: creatinine ratio was significantly reduced at 32 weeks compared with baseline in the rosiglitazone plus metformin group (-22.7%; P < 0.01) but not in the glyburide plus metformin comparator group (-7.1%; P = 0.32). Patients who completed the study (81.5%) demonstrated a treatment difference of -19.5% (P = 0.03), favoring the rosiglitazone group. Rosiglitazone plus metformin reduced both mean 24-h systolic (-3.4 mmHg; P = 0.01) and diastolic (-2.5 mmHg; P < 0.01) ambulatory blood pressure compared with glyburide plus metformin. Addition of rosiglitazone to metformin also reduced levels of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 antigen and activity, C-reactive protein, von Willebrand factor and fibrinogen compared with addition of glyburide.

CONCLUSIONS

Rosiglitazone added to background therapy with metformin provides greater reductions in microalbuminuria and blood pressure as compared with glyburide. These additional improvements in microalbuminuria, blood pressure and cardiovascular biomarkers were observed despite comparable improvements in glycemic control in both groups and may be related to the anti-inflammatory properties of rosiglitazone.

Closing the gap between clinical research and clinical practice: can outcome studies with thiazolidinediones improve our understanding of type 2 diabetes?

Recent clinical research has provided a wealth of information to support optimal management strategies in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). In particular, outcome studies appropriately have had an increasingly important impact on clinical decision-making. Additional, new data are required, however, to close the current gaps in clinical knowledge and improve patient outcomes in T2DM. These outcome studies are particularly important in assessing the long-term benefit of newer agents for which data are available for short-term glycaemic control, effects on lipids and some data on non-traditional cardiovascular risk markers, but outcome data for harder end points relevant to the natural history of T2DM, particularly beta-cell function, are lacking. Outcome studies such as ADOPT and DREAM are investigating the impact of thiazolidinediones (TZDs) on beta-cell function and disease progression in T2DM and impaired glucose tolerance, respectively, the results of which are eagerly anticipated. The primary focus of this article is on TZD outcome studies evaluating beta-cell function and disease progression.

Thiazolidinediones in patients with diabetes mellitus and heart failure : implications of emerging data

Individuals with diabetes mellitus have an increased risk of developing heart failure, usually as a consequence of coronary artery disease, although a specific diabetic cardiomyopathy, secondary to a microangiopathy, may also exist. The thiazolidinediones, a relatively new class of insulin-sensitizing agents used in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus, have a number of complex metabolic actions on surrogate markers of atherogenesis, supported by the results of the recently published PROACTIVE (PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macroVascular Events) trial. Unfortunately, the use of thiazolidinediones in individuals with diabetes mellitus and heart failure is limited because of a propensity to cause fluid retention. The underlying mechanisms of fluid retention have yet to be fully elucidated, but appear to be a dose-related class effect, exacerbated by combination therapy with insulin, and in some cases may be localized to peripheral edema. In parallel, echocardiographic studies show no significant effect of thiazolidinediones on cardiac structure or function. The design of epidemiologic studies describing an increased risk of developing heart failure in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus prescribed thiazolidinediones has been questioned, and a study of 'new users' of antihyperglycemic treatments found no increased risk of hospitalization for heart failure with thiazolidinedione therapy. There is also increasing evidence for the potential benefits of insulin sensitization in patients with diabetes mellitus and known heart failure, and a large observational study of over 16 000 patients with a principal discharge diagnosis of heart failure found a reduced mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.87; 95% CI 0.80, 0.94) in those prescribed thiazolidinediones. This benefit was offset by an increased risk of readmission with heart failure (HR 1.06; 95% CI 1.00, 1.09). Despite an increase in fluid-related events, recent studies suggest that individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus and heart failure (New York Heart Association grade I/II) can be treated with thiazolidinediones with appropriate monitoring and adjustment of heart failure therapies. These findings would suggest the need for large-scale, prospective trials to investigate the safety and potential benefits of thiazolidinedione use in patients with diabetes mellitus and heart failure.

Thiazolidinediones

Our knowledge and understanding of the role played by peroxisome proliferator-activated gamma receptors in physiology and pathophysiology has expanded dramatically over the past 5 years. Originally described as having important functions in adipogenesis and glucose homeostasis, their pharmacologic agonists, the thiazolidinediones, were introduced as antihyperglycemic, insulin-sensitizing agents for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, it was to some degree inevitable that the thiazolidinediones would be rapidly recognized as having vasculoprotective properties beyond glycemic control that might also be beneficial. First, diabetic complications are vascular in nature, the earliest feature of these is endothelial dysfunction. Second, it is being increasingly appreciated that these complications develop through inflammatory and procoagulant pathways in which increased oxidative stress is considered a major etiologic mechanism, and which are closely linked to the presence of insulin resistance, visceral obesity, and hyperglycemia. Early appreciation that the thiazolidinediones have antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-procoagulant, and antiproliferative properties in addition to their insulin-sensitizing, anti-lipotoxic properties created a marriage of investigative pathways that has not only led to a very large body of literature on the pleiotropic effects of thiazolidinediones, but also to the development of new understandings of the connections between insulin resistance, obesity, and hyperglycemia and the onset of vascular disease. Understandably, most of the focus has been directed at the macrovascular complications of diabetes, since these are the major causes of morbidity and mortality in this population. However, there is evidence that these agents may have benefits for the microvascular complications as well, and their potential role for cardiovascular disease prevention in non-diabetic patients with the metabolic syndrome is a logical extension of the work performed in diabetes. The recently reported results of the effects of pioglitazone versus placebo on cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes support the contention that these agents have vasculoprotective effects.

Insulin-sensitizing antihyperglycemic drugs and mortality after acute myocardial infarction: insights from the National Heart Care Project

OBJECTIVE

Thiazolidinediones (TZDs) and metformin are insulin-sensitizing antihyperglycemic agents with reported benefits on atherosclerosis. Despite extensive use in patients with diabetes and cardiovascular disease, there is a paucity of outcomes data with metformin and none yet with TZDs. We sought to determine the impact of these insulin sensitizers on outcomes in diabetic patients after hospitalization with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 24,953 Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes discharged after hospitalization with AMI between April 1998 and March 1999 or July 2000 and June 2001. The independent association between discharge prescription for metformin, TZD, or both agents and outcomes at 1 year was assessed in multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for patient, physician, and hospital variables. The primary outcome was time to death within 1 year of discharge; secondary outcomes were time to first rehospitalization within 1 year of discharge for AMI, heart failure, and all causes.

RESULTS

There were 8,872 patients discharged on an antihyperglycemic agent, of which 819 were prescribed a TZD, 1,273 metformin, and 139 both drugs. After multivariable analysis, compared with patients prescribed an antihyperglycemic regimen that included no insulin sensitizer, mortality rates were not significantly different in patients treated with either metformin (hazard ratio [HR] 0.92 [95% CI 0.81-1.06]) or a TZD (0.92 [0.80-1.05]) but were lower in those prescribed both drugs (0.52 [0.34-0.82]). The results were similar among patients with heart failure. The prescription of a TZD was associated with a borderline higher risk of all-cause readmission (1.09[1.00-1.20]), predominately due to a higher risk for heart failure readmission (1.17 [1.05-1.30]).

CONCLUSIONS

Individually, prescription of insulin-sensitizing drugs is not associated with a significantly different risk of death in older diabetic patients within 1 year following AMI compared with other antihyperglycemic agents. Combined, however, metformin and TZDs may exert benefit. TZD prescription is associated with a higher risk of readmission for heart failure after myocardial infarction.