Double-blind, placebo-controlled rush immunotherapy with a standardized Alternaria extract

Safety evaluation of rapid build-up schedules with IR-standardized allergen extracts for subcutaneous immunotherapy of allergic respiratory diseases

INTRODUCTION

The conventional schedule used in specific subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) is a slow treatment that often leads to poor compliance or discontinuation of treatment. These disadvantages have led to design administration schedules that shorten the build-up phase without increasing the adverse reactions rate.

AREAS COVERED

This report reviews the available scientific documentation of the safety profile of build-up schedules for SCIT with Alustal Rapid® (a suspension of standardized allergen extracts adsorbed on aluminum hydroxide gel for specific immunotherapy) in the treatment of IgE-mediated rhinitis, conjunctivitis and bronchial asthma to inhaled allergens.

EXPERT OPINION

Cluster and shortened conventional schedules may offer a safe method of SCIT for the treatment of respiratory allergy and reduce the inconvenience associated with conventional schedules by reaching the maintenance dose in less time and with fewer visits; thereby this method could reduce discontinuation rates and increase compliance.

New approaches to managing asthma: a US perspective

Despite remarkable advances in diagnosis and long-term management, asthma remains a serious public health concern. Newly updated expert guidelines emphasize the intra- and inter-individual variability of asthma and highlight the importance of periodic assessment of asthma control. These guidelines update recommendations for step-wise asthma treatment, address the burgeoning field of asthma diagnostics, and stress the importance of a patient and health care professional partnership, including written action plans and self monitoring. The field of asthma therapeutics is expanding rapidly, with promising new treatment options available or in development that may address some of the existing barriers to successful asthma management. These approaches simplify treatment, use combinations of agents in one delivery device that have complementary actions, or target specific pathways involved in asthma patho-physiology. Considerable activity is taking place in asthma pharmacogenetics. This review provides an overview of these new approaches to managing asthma, including their present status and future potential.

Fungal immunotherapy in patients with allergic fungal sinusitis

BACKGROUND

Allergic fungal sinusitis is a disease for which optimal treatment is unclear. Previous studies using fungal immunotherapy reported less recurrence after surgery. There has been concern that traditional high-dose immunotherapy could induce systemic hypersensitivity in patients with this condition.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the safety of high-dose subcutaneous fungal immunotherapy in patients with allergic fungal sinusitis.

METHODS

Safety of high-dose subcutaneous fungal immunotherapy was assessed in 14 patients from our clinic who met diagnostic criteria for allergic fungal sinusitis. Results were compared to a control group of 14 patients with chronic rhinosinusitis without allergic fungal sinusitis who received subcutaneous fungal immunotherapy. We also performed a literature search to identify all previous reports of subcutaneous fungal immunotherapy.

RESULTS

No differences between numbers of immediate local or large local reactions, delayed local reactions, or required dose adjustments were noted between patient and control groups. One patient from each group experienced a mild systemic urticarial reaction to immunotherapy. Similarly, there were no differences in complications in either group that also received immunotherapy with nonfungal allergens. No patient developed evidence of immune complex disease. Eight publications were identified for inclusion in our literature analysis, 7 of which used low-dose subcutaneous immunotherapy. None of these noted complications more serious than local reactions.

CONCLUSION

Our data demonstrate that subcutaneous fungal immunotherapy in patients with allergic fungal sinusitis is unlikely to cause adverse reactions other than those occurring with pollen immunotherapy. Clinical trials of high-dose, traditional immunotherapy with fungal allergens for efficacy may proceed in patients with allergic fungal sinusitis without undue concern.

Clinical evolution of patients with respiratory allergic disease due to sensitisation to Alternaria alternata being treated with subcutaneous immunotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Sensitisation to Alternaria is a cause of respiratory disease in Spain, particularly in childhood, but it is also a significant marker of the severity of this disease. Therefore, the use of an aetiological treatment (allergen specific immunotherapy) is essential, and both subjective and objective clinical parameters should be used to follow up this treatment.

OBJECTIVE

This open-label, uncontrolled, observational, prospective study was designed in order to study the evolution of these patients on allergen specific immunotherapy therapy in daily clinical practice and to assess the use of different monitoring tools.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 99 patients were included. They were monosensitised to this perennial allergen and treated with subcutaneous allergen specific immunotherapy. After one year of follow-up, these patients were assessed for the presence of symptoms, use of medication, clinical incidents, quality of life and asthma control.

RESULTS

After one year of treatment a significant fall was observed in the use of concomitant medication (β2-agonists: p=0.0278, inhaled corticosteroids: p=0.0007, anti-leukotrienes: p=0.0495), nasal symptoms (p=0.0081), quality of life (PAQLQ, p<0.0001) and asthma control (ACQ, p<0.0001). Twenty-one patients had to attend emergency department due to exacerbation of their allergic disease, and only one of them had to be admitted to hospital.

CONCLUSION

respiratory allergic disease due to Alternaria alternata is a disease which is hard to control, and in our daily practice, the use of specific subcutaneous immunotherapy can be of significant benefit in our paediatric patients.

Clinical practice: Allergen-specific immunotherapy in children: facts and FAQs

Allergen-specific immunotherapy (SIT) in its various application forms represents the main treatment approach of IgE-mediated allergic diseases in adults and children. Despite this clear recommendation, many particularities of products, patient characteristics, and product availability in different countries hamper the use of allergen-specific immunotherapy in particular in children. The frequently asked questions by parents, patients, and physicians are the backbone of this review. Thus, the potentials and limitations of allergen-specific immunotherapy in children and adolescents will be highlighted. IgE-mediated allergic diseases are affecting about 20% of the population. They manifest commonly early in life, and hence, the use of SIT should be considered also early in the course of the disease.

Sublingual immunotherapy with house dust extract for house dust-mite allergic rhinitis in children

BACKGROUND

House dust extract is used in conventional immunotherapy for house dust-mite (HDM) allergic rhinitis in Japan. However, an alternative administration route is desired. The aims of the present double blind, placebo-controlled trial were to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) with house dust extract in pediatric patients with HDM allergic rhinitis.

METHODS

The study population comprised 31 subjects (21 males and 10 females) aged from 7 to 15 years old. Twenty patients (the active group) received house dust extract and 11 received placebo via sublingual administration. Extract or placebo (1 ml) was administered at 10-fold dilution once weekly for 40 weeks. During the study period, the subjects recorded their daily nasal symptoms and use (dose and frequency) of other medications in a nasal allergy diary.

RESULTS

The symptom scores in the active group began to decrease about 24 weeks after initiation of treatment and significant differences between the active and placebo groups were observed after 30 weeks. The average scores for the last four weeks of the study were significantly lower than those for the first four weeks in the active group but not in the placebo group. The only local adverse effect was a bitter taste reported by one patient. There were no other local or systemic adverse effects associated with SLIT.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that SLIT with house dust extract for more than 30 weeks is safe and effective treatment for HDM allergic rhinitis in children.

Efficacy of sublingual specific immunotherapy in patients with respiratory allergy to Alternaria alternata: a randomised, assessor-blinded, patient-reported outcome, controlled 3-year trial

BACKGROUND

Alternaria alternata (AA) sensitisation is a common cause of respiratory allergies such as rhinitis and asthma. So far there are no controlled double-blind trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of specific sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in AA allergies.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of SLIT treatment in terms of clinical improvement and rescue medication usage in patients with confirmed AA respiratory allergy.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A randomised, parallel group study in 52 subjects was conducted (32 men, mean age 20 ± 9 years) with clinically- and laboratory-confirmed AA respiratory allergies (allergic rhinitis with or without mild-to-moderate asthma). Patients were randomly assigned to SLIT treatment (SLITone Alternaria, ALK-Abellò, Denmark) one vial per day without up-dosing for 3 consecutive years (n = 34) or to a control group (n = 18) with a random allocation ratio of 2:1. Clinical improvement was assessed by evaluating patient-reported outcome (PRO) using a 6 cm visual analogue scale (0: extreme worsening; 3: no change; 6: extreme improvement). The VAS score was evaluated every year with an intra- and inter-group comparison. Rescue medication score (MS) was assessed by evaluating symptomatic drug consumption.

RESULTS

After 3 years the VAS score was 4.7 ± 0.8 in the SLIT group and 2 ± 1.6 in the control group (p = 0.0002). Clinical improvement was observed in 33 out of 34 subjects in the SLIT group (97%) and in 5 out of 18 in the control group (27%) (p = 0.0001; Fisher's exact test). The MS significantly (p = 0.0001) decreased in the SLIT group from 4.3 to 1.7 at the end of 3 years' treatment. In the control group MS increased from 3.4 to 4.0 by the end of the trial. No serious adverse events were observed in the either group. Six patients in the SLIT group (17%) reported side-effects, in general mild and transient. One patient prematurely discontinued the treatment due to gastrointestinal discomfort.

CONCLUSION

The current study has shown that a 3-year course of SLIT is efficacious and well-tolerated in subjects with AA respiratory allergies.

Asthma related to Alternaria sensitization: an analysis of skin-test and serum-specific IgE efficiency based on the bronchial provocation test

BACKGROUND

It is difficult to find a causal relationship between exposure to Alternaria spores and the development of asthma symptoms in sensitized individuals due to the complexity of clinical situations in which positive diagnostic tests are often found.

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the diagnostic efficiency of skin testing (ST) and serum-specific IgE to Alternaria, based on the results of a bronchial specific challenge with Alternaria extracts.

METHODS

Seventy-four asthmatic patients sensitized to Alternaria underwent a specific bronchial challenge with this mould. Skin-testing weal sizes, serum-specific IgE values (CAP-system) and bronchial challenge results were analysed by receiver operating characteristics curves (ROC curves) and logistic regression. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated for different cut-off points.

RESULTS

Bronchial challenges to Alternaria elicited a positive result in 45 patients (61%). Skin prick testing almost perfectly predicted the outcome of bronchoprovocation tests (area under the ROC curve of 0.957), whereas intradermal skin testing had moderate efficacy. A negative result for skin prick test (SPT) showed a 4% probability of a positive bronchial challenge in the logistic regression analysis. However, weals around 5.5 mm in diameter had 90% probability of a positive challenge. Quantification of serum-specific IgE correctly classified 86% of the cases. In the logistic regression analysis, a CAP value 16 kU(A)/L predicted a positive bronchial challenge result with 99% accuracy, whereas for a CAP value <0.35 kU(A)/L, this probability was 33%.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Most asthmatic patients with positive SPT results to Alternaria would have a positive bronchial challenge. As atmospheric mould levels may vary significantly with the weather conditions, sensitized patients should be instructed on the risk situations, environmental control measures and the importance of correct medication compliance. Immunotherapy with Alternaria could also be taken into account as a valid therapeutic option.

Sublingual immunotherapy for Alternaria-induced allergic rhinitis: a randomized placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Respiratory allergy due to Alternaria is a relevant clinical problem, and specific immunotherapy may represent a viable treatment option. Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is safe and effective, but data for Alternaria are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of standardized SLIT in patients sensitized to Alternaria in a randomized, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

METHODS

Patients with rhinitis with or without intermittent asthma and ascertained allergy to Alternaria were enrolled. After a baseline season, SLIT or matched placebo was given for 10 months. Symptoms and rescue medication intake were recorded on diary cards between June and October. Skin prick testing was performed and specific IgE, IgG4, and precipitin levels were measured at baseline and at the end of the study.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients (age range, 14-42 years) were randomized, and 26 completed the study. The baseline characteristics were homogeneous in the 2 groups. After treatment, patients receiving SLIT had a significant improvement in symptoms and a reduction in medication intake vs placebo and vs the run-in season, whereas no change was seen in the placebo group. Skin prick test reactivity significantly decreased only in the SLIT group. No change was seen in specific IgG4 levels in the 2 groups, whereas Alt a 1 specific IgE levels significantly increased in the active group. One patient in the active group reported oral itching and conjunctivitis at the beginning of treatment.

CONCLUSION

SLIT seems effective and safe and may represent a valuable therapeutic option in respiratory allergy due to Alternaria.

Effect of allergen-specific immunotherapy with purified Alt a1 on AMP responsiveness, exhaled nitric oxide and exhaled breath condensate pH: a randomized double blind study

Background

Little information is available on the effect of allergen-specific immunotherapy on airway responsiveness and markers in exhaled air. The aims of this study were to assess the safety of immunotherapy with purified natural Alt a1 and its effect on airway responsiveness to direct and indirect bronchoconstrictor agents and markers in exhaled air.

Methods

This was a randomized double-blind trial. Subjects with allergic rhinitis with or without mild/moderate asthma sensitized to A alternata and who also had a positive skin prick test to Alt a1 were randomized to treatment with placebo (n = 18) or purified natural Alt a1 (n = 22) subcutaneously for 12 months. Bronchial responsiveness to adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) and methacholine, exhaled nitric oxide (ENO), exhaled breath condensate (EBC) pH, and serum Alt a1-specific IgG₄ antibodies were measured at baseline and after 6 and 12 months of treatment. Local and systemic adverse events were also registered.

Results

The mean (95% CI) allergen-specific IgG₄ value for the active treatment group increased from 0.07 μg/mL (0.03-0.11) at baseline to 1.21 μg/mL (0.69-1.73, P < 0.001) at 6 months and to 1.62 μg/mL (1.02-2.22, P < 0.001) at 12 months of treatment. In the placebo group, IgG₄ value increased nonsignificantly from 0.09 μg/mL (0.06-0.12) at baseline to 0.13 μg/mL (0.07-0.18) at 6 months and to 0.11 μg/mL (0.07-0.15) at 12 months of treatment. Changes in the active treatment group were significantly higher than in the placebo group both at 6 months (P < 0.001) and at 12 months of treatment (P < 0.0001). However, changes in AMP and methacholine responsiveness, ENO and EBC pH levels were not significantly different between treatment groups. The overall incidence of adverse events was comparable between the treatment groups.

Conclusion

Although allergen-specific immunotherapy with purified natural Alt a1 is well tolerated and induces an allergen-specific IgG₄ response, treatment is not associated with changes in AMP or methacholine responsiveness or with significant improvements in markers of inflammation in exhaled air. These findings suggest dissociation between the immunotherapy-induced increase in IgG₄ levels and its effect on airway responsiveness and inflammation.

Injection allergen immunotherapy for asthma

BACKGROUND

Allergen specific immunotherapy has long been a controversial treatment for asthma. Although beneficial effects upon clinically relevant outcomes have been demonstrated in randomised controlled trials, there remains a risk of severe and sometimes fatal anaphylaxis. The recommendations of professional bodies have ranged from cautious acceptance to outright dismissal. With increasing interest in new allergen preparations and methods of delivery, we updated the systematic review of allergen specific immunotherapy for asthma.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to assess the effects of allergen specific immunotherapy for asthma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Trials Register up to 2005, Dissertation Abstracts and Current Contents.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials using various forms of allergen specific immunotherapy to treat asthma and reporting at least one clinical outcome.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three authors independently assessed eligibility of studies for inclusion. Two authors independently performed quality assessment of studies.

MAIN RESULTS

Eighty-eight trials were included (13 new trials). There were 42 trials of immunotherapy for house mite allergy; 27 pollen allergy trials; 10 animal dander allergy trials; two Cladosporium mould allergy, two latex and six trials looking at multiple allergens. Concealment of allocation was assessed as clearly adequate in only 16 of these trials. Significant heterogeneity was present in a number of comparisons. Overall, there was a significant reduction in asthma symptoms and medication, and improvement in bronchial hyper-reactivity following immunotherapy. There was a significant improvement in asthma symptom scores (standardised mean difference -0.59, 95% confidence interval -0.83 to -0.35) and it would have been necessary to treat three patients (95% CI 3 to 5) with immunotherapy to avoid one deterioration in asthma symptoms. Overall it would have been necessary to treat four patients (95% CI 3 to 6) with immunotherapy to avoid one requiring increased medication. Allergen immunotherapy significantly reduced allergen specific bronchial hyper-reactivity, with some reduction in non-specific bronchial hyper-reactivity as well. There was no consistent effect on lung function. If 16 patients were treated with immunotherapy, one would be expected to develop a local adverse reaction. If nine patients were treated with immunotherapy, one would be expected to develop a systemic reaction (of any severity).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Immunotherapy reduces asthma symptoms and use of asthma medications and improves bronchial hyper-reactivity. One trial found that the size of the benefit is possibly comparable to inhaled steroids. The possibility of local or systemic adverse effects (such as anaphylaxis) must be considered.

Fungal rhinosinusitis: a categorization and definitional schema addressing current controversies

BACKGROUND

Fungal (rhino-) sinusitis encompasses a wide spectrum of immune and pathological responses, including invasive, chronic, granulomatous, and allergic disease. However, consensus on terminology, pathogenesis, and optimal management is lacking. The International Society for Human and Animal Mycology convened a working group to attempt consensus on terminology and disease classification.

DISCUSSION

Key conclusions reached were: rhinosinusitis is preferred to sinusitis; acute invasive fungal rhinosinusitis is preferred to fulminant, or necrotizing and should refer to disease of <4 weeks duration in immunocompromised patients; both chronic invasive rhinosinusitis and granulomatous rhinosinusitis were useful terms encompassing locally invasive disease over at least 3 months duration, with differing pathology and clinical settings; fungal ball of the sinus is preferred to either mycetoma or aspergilloma of the sinuses; localized fungal colonization of nasal or paranasal mucosa should be introduced to refer to localized infection visualized endoscopically; eosinophilic mucin is preferred to allergic mucin; and allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS), eosinophilic fungal rhinosinusitis, and eosinophilic mucin rhinosinusitis (EMRS) are imprecise and require better definition. In particular, to implicate fungi (as in AFRS and EMRS), hyphae must be visualized in eosinophilic mucin, but this is often not processed or examined carefully enough by histologists, reducing the universality of the disease classification. A schema for subclassifying these entities, including aspirin-exacerbated rhinosinusitis, is proposed allowing an overlap in histopathological features, and with granulomatous, chronic invasive, and other forms of rhinosinusitis. Recommendations for future research avenues were also identified.

Epidemiology and Medical Mycology of Fungal Rhinosinusitis

Fungal rhinosinusitis (FRS) refers to a spectrum of disease ranging from benign colonization of the nose and sinuses by pathogenic fungi to acute invasive and fatal inflammation extending to the orbit and brain. FRS is classified into two categories: invasive and noninvasive. Invasive FRS may again be subcategorized into acute invasive (fulminant) FRS, granulomatous invasive FRS, and chronic invasive FRS; while noninvasive FRS is subcategorized into localized fungal colonization, sinus fungal ball and eosinophil related FRS (including allergic fungal rhinosinusitis, eosinophilic fungal rhinosinusitis). This classification is not without controversies, and intermediate and semi-invasive forms may also exist in particular patients. Acute invasive FRS is an increasingly common disease worldwide among the immunocompromised patients and caused most frequently by Rhizopus oryzae, and Aspergillus spp. Granulomatous invasive FRS has mostly been reported from Sudan, India, and Pakistan and is characterized by noncaseating granuloma formation, vascular proliferation, vasculitis, perivascular fibrosis, sparse hyphae in tissue, and isolation of A. flavus from sinus contents. Chronic invasive FRS is an emerging entity occurring commonly in diabetics and patients on corticosteroid therapy, and is characterized by dense accumulation of hyphae, occasional presence of vascular invasion, sparse inflammatory reaction, involvement of local structures, and isolation of A. fumigatus. While localized fungal colonization describes the most benign of all fungal sinusitis in the superficial nasal crusts, sinus fungal ball is a dense mycetoma like aggregate of fungal hyphae in diseased sinuses. Common in southern Europe, especially France, majority of them are sterile on culture while 30-50% may yield Aspergillus spp. The definitions and pathogenesis of the group of syndromes in eosinophil related FRS (AFRS, EFRS) are contentious and a matter of intense research among otolaryngologists, pathologists, immunologists and microbiologists. While dematiaceous fungi are the foremost initiators of these syndromes in the west, Aspergillus flavus is the predominant pathogen in India and the Middle-East.

Controversies surrounding the categorization of fungal sinusitis

Though rhinosinusitis is a common disorder, controversies surround the categorization of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and the role of fungus in CRS. The diagnosis of each category is important for optimum therapy and predicting the course. Based on histopathological findings, fungal rhinosinusitis (FRS) can be broadly divided into two categories: the invasive and non-invasive depending on invasion of the mucosal layer. Three types of FRS are tissue-invasive: acute invasive, chronic invasive, & granulomatous. The two non-invasive FRS disorders are fungal ball, and fungus related eosinophilic rhinosinusitis including allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS). The distinction of granulomatous from chronic invasive type is not beyond controversy as both types have a chronic course and predominant orbital involvement. Maximum confusion surrounds the entity of fungus-related eosinophilic rhinosinusitis, and the definition of AFRS. In the diagnosis of AFRS, the detection of fungi in allergic mucin is considered important, although hyphae are sparse in sinus content. This leads to confusion in definition of this entity, especially with the description of two more closely related entities--eosinophilic fungal rhinosinusitis (EFRS) and eosinophilic mucin rhinosinusitis (EMRS). Recently reports of histologic invasion in possible cases of AFRS were also documented. Currently, there are more questions than answers concerning the categorization of FRS.

Double-blind, placebo-controlled Alternaria alternata immunotherapy: in vivo and in vitro parameters

Few studies have been published on the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy with fungal extracts, possibly because of difficulties arising from antigenic variability among different strains of fungus. The aim of the study was to analyze changes in the in vivo and in vitro parameters in response to immunotherapy with an Alternaria alternata extract. We studied 28 patients with rhinitis, bronchial asthma, or both caused by Alternaria. The patients were randomized to the active immunotherapy or placebo group, and a conventional schedule of immunotherapy was used. We recorded changes for a year in skin reactivity (skin prick test), conjunctival reactivity (conjunctival provocation test), and in vitro parameters (serum-specific IgE, IgG, IgG1 and IgG4 for A. alternata complete extract and for natural and recombinant Alt a 1). Twenty-three patients completed the study and all attained the maintenance dose. There were no changes in skin reactivity in the active treatment group, and reactivity increased at the end of the study period in the placebo group. Conjunctival sensitivity decreased only in the active treatment group when the maintenance dose was reached. Allergen-specific IgE decreased, and IgG, IgG1 and IgG4 increased in all periods of study in the active treatment group, with no changes in the placebo group. Allergen-specific immunotherapy with the A. alternata extract tested here led to a decrease in conjunctival reactivity and induced a significant immunologic response.

Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of Alternaria alternata immunotherapy: clinical efficacy and safety

Allergen-specific immunotherapy (ASIT) with fungal extracts has been beset by safety and efficacy problems, which result mainly from qualitative and quantitative variations. Little has been published on the safety and efficacy of these extracts. The objective was to analyze the safety and efficacy of ASIT with an Alternaria alternata extract. A total of 28 patients were selected with rhinitis and/or bronchial asthma because of Alternaria allergy and monosensitization to molds. The patients were randomized to an active ASIT or placebo group, both groups on a conventional immunotherapy schedule (increasing weekly doses until maintenance dose and then monthly doses). Adverse reactions were classified with the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology system. Clinical efficacy was analyzed for a year with symptom/medication diary cards, peak expiratory flow (PEF) measures, clinical severity score, severity of symptoms (visual analog scale), subjective evaluation of treatment by the patient and the physician, and a quality of life questionnaire. Twenty-three patients completed the study; all reached the established maintenance dose with only two mild adverse reactions in the whole sample. Significant improvements were found after 6 months in respiratory symptoms in the active treatment group, and in all symptoms in both groups. PEF increased significantly in the active treatment group but not in the placebo group. The severity of asthma decreased in the active treatment group, and the severity of rhinitis decreased in both groups. Visual analog scale scores for severity of symptoms improved in all phases in the active treatment group, but only after 12 months in the placebo group. Physicians judged the disease course as significantly better in the active treatment group. ASIT with the A. alternata extract was safe, with clinical improvements after one year of treatment.

Sublingual immunotherapy in pediatric allergic rhinitis and asthma: efficacy, safety, and practical considerations

Specific allergen immunotherapy (SIT) is the only disease-modifying treatment for allergic rhinitis and asthma. Subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) is the only method with a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved formulation, but safety concerns limit administration to medical facilities. Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT), under investigation in the United States, appears to have a more favorable safety profile, which may expand its use to populations generally not treated with SIT (eg, young children). This paper reviews SLIT studies that were specifically limited to the pediatric population. Most demonstrated evidence of clinical efficacy, but approximately 29% failed to demonstrate efficacy in symptom and medication scores in the first treatment year. Efficacy was seen in a broad range of allergen doses, but optimal dose range has not been established. SLIT appeared to be well tolerated in children as young as 2 years, but serious adverse reactions, including anaphylaxis, were reported. SLIT is a promising immunotherapy that may expand the population receiving SIT because of the convenience of home administration due to its favorable safety profile. However, questions remain unanswered, including optimal therapeutic dose.

Immunotherapy with Alternaria alternata: present and future

The prevalence of fungal allergies is greater than previously believed; consequently, such processes have been underestimated as potential causes of respiratory tract disease. Most patients sensitized to fungi exhibit perennial symptoms, though their intensity increases in the summer and autumn months. Skin reactions to the antigens of Alternaria alternata are associated with a high risk of allergic respiratory conditions in the presence of spores of this fungus -fundamentally in children and young adults- with a special form of presentation as life-threatening asthma. Very few controlled studies have examined the efficacy and safety of fungal extract immunotherapy -the main problem being the lack of standardized extracts for the diagnosis and treatment of such patients. In the year 2005 a tolerance study was made in children in relation to a depot extract containing the predominant antigen of Alternaria, with two different regimens (short and cluster). Tolerance was found to be good, with a 0.95 % incidence of local reactions and a 0.95 % incidence of grade 2 systemic reactions. Few studies involving sublingual immunotherapy have been conducted to date.

The spectrum of fungal allergy

Fungi can be found throughout the world. They may live as saprophytes, parasites or symbionts of animals and plants in indoor as well as outdoor environment. For decades, fungi belonging to the ascomycota as well as to the basidiomycota have been known to cause a broad panel of human disorders. In contrast to pollen, fungal spores and/or mycelial cells may not only cause type I allergy, the most prevalent disease caused by molds, but also a large number of other illnesses, including allergic bronchopulmonary mycoses, allergic sinusitis, hypersensitivity pneumonitis and atopic dermatitis; and, again in contrast to pollen-derived allergies, fungal allergies are frequently linked with allergic asthma. Sensitization to molds has been reported in up to 80% of asthmatic patients. Although research on fungal allergies dates back to the 19th century, major improvements in the diagnosis and therapy of mold allergy have been hampered by the fact that fungal extracts are highly variable in their protein composition due to strain variabilities, batch-to-batch variations, and by the fact that extracts may be prepared from spores and/or mycelial cells. Nonetheless, about 150 individual fungal allergens from approximately 80 mold genera have been identified in the last 20 years. First clinical studies with recombinant mold allergens have demonstrated their potency in clinical diagnosis. This review aims to give an overview of the biology of molds and diseases caused by molds in humans, as well as a detailed summary of the latest results on recombinant fungal allergens.

Health effects of mold in children

Mold is ubiquitous, and exposure to mold and its products of metabolism is unavoidable, whether indoors or outdoors. Mold can produce a variety of adverse health outcomes by four scientifically validated pathophysiologic mechanisms: hypersensitivity, toxicity, infection, and irritation. Some adverse health outcomes have been attributed to mold for which mechanisms of injury are not well defined or are implausible. This article discusses these adverse health outcomes, focusing predominantly on those for which valid associations have been established.

Visual analog scales can assess the severity of rhinitis graded according to ARIA guidelines

BACKGROUND

The allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma (ARIA) guidelines provide a new classification of allergic rhinitis, but a quantitative analysis for severity assessment is lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To study whether a visual analog scale (VAS) for global rhinitis symptoms could be used to assess the disease severity according to ARIA.

METHODS

Three thousand fifty-two allergic rhinitis patients seen in primary care were tested. Fifty three per cent had an objective diagnosis of allergy and 58% of the patients were treated. Patients were categorized according to ARIA guidelines. The severity of nasal symptoms was assessed using a VAS. Quality of life was measured using the rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life questionnaire (RQLQ).

RESULTS

Severity had more impact on VAS levels than duration: mild intermittent rhinitis (3.5, 2.4-5.0 cm), mild persistent rhinitis (4.5, 3.2-5.6 cm), moderate/severe intermittent rhinitis (6.7, 5.3-7.7 cm) and moderate/severe persistent rhinitis (7.2, 6.1-8.2 cm). The receiver operating characteristic curve results showed that patients with a VAS of under 5 cm could be classified as 'mild' rhinitis (negative predictive value: 93.5%) and those with a VAS of over 6 cm as 'moderate/severe' rhinitis (positive predictive value: 73.6%). Receiver operating characteristic curves and a logistic regression showed that current treatment and allergy diagnosis have no effect on the assessment of rhinitis severity using VAS. Visual analog scale and the RQLQ global score were significantly correlated (rho = 0.46; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

A simple and quantitative method (VAS) can be used for the quantitative evaluation of severity of allergic rhinitis.

Allergen immunotherapy: where is it now?

The scientific basis and the proof of clinical effectiveness of allergen immunotherapy administered by subcutaneous injection (SCIT) are well established. It is effective treatment for sensitivity to Hymenoptera venom and for allergic rhinitis and allergic asthma. SCIT administered in the proper setting reduces the development of new sensitivities and progression from rhinitis to asthma. Further, the beneficial effects persist long after completion of a course of treatment. Although many people enjoy the benefits of SCIT, extension of its use to the many others who might be candidates for this treatment is limited by its drawbacks of safety concerns and the inconvenience of repeated clinic visits over several years to receive the injections. There are many attempts underway to improve on the safety and convenience while still retaining the benefits of SCIT. These include approaches using current allergen extracts, especially by administering them sublingually. Alternatively, through recombinant technology, extracts are being modified to reduce their allergenicity without reducing their immunogenicity. They are being linked to immunostimulatory DNA sequences that will modify their in vivo processing resulting in an enhanced nonallergic response or they are being incorporated into fusion proteins with inhibitory properties for mast cells and basophils.

Cluster-Immuntherapie bei allergischer Rhinokonjunktivitis

Apart from allergen avoidance, specific immunotherapy (SIT) represents the only potentially curative treatment available to patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. Evidence for its clinical efficacy has been clearly demonstrated in several controlled clinical trials and depends on the allergen to which the patient is sensitive, the quality and total amount of allergen administered, and the SIT schedule. In classic SIT, gradually ascending dosages of the allergen extract are injected subcutaneously (dose-increase period) until the individual maximum dose is reached (dose-maintenance period). Several dosage schedules have been worked out. In cluster immunotherapy, 2-3 injections per day of treatment are given once a week to rapidly reach the maintenance dose. Several cluster schedules have been described. Recent data demonstrate that the frequency and severity of adverse effects in cluster immunotherapy correspond to those in other dosage schedules. As far as safety goes, cluster immunotherapy is an interesting alternative for the dose-increase period. In addition, recent studies reveal that clinical benefits appear sooner with cluster immunotherapy.

Sublingual immunotherapy of allergic diseases

The only disease-modifying treatment that is available for allergic patients is allergen-specific immunotherapy. Two competing application forms are used: subcutaneous immunotherapy, which has been used for > 90 years, and a relatively new immunotherapy where the allergen is applied sublingually. Numerous studies have shown efficacy for subcutaneous immunotherapy and have identified possible mechanisms that are responsible for the observed reduction in allergic responses. In contrast, the efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy has not been documented to the same degree and the responsible immunological mechanisms have not yet been clearly defined. This review focuses on the published clinical and experimental data on sublingual immunotherapy and points at possible mechanisms of how sublingual immunotherapy may differ from subcutaneous immunotherapy in its mode of action, and also discusses the potential advantages and pit falls of both therapies.

Accelerated immunotherapy schedules: review of efficacy and safety

OBJECTIVE

To provide a comprehensive evaluation of accelerated immunotherapy build-up schedules in terms of adverse reactions and clinical efficacy.

DATA SOURCES

Peer-reviewed studies and review articles were selected from the PubMed database for articles published in the years 1976 to 2006 using the following keywords: rush, cluster immunotherapy in combination with allergic rhinitis, asthma, Hymenoptera, and imported fire ant.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies were selected if they provided safety and efficacy information on accelerated allergen immunotherapy schedules. Most of the studies reviewed were double-blind, placebo controlled, but some open-observational studies were included if they provided immunotherapy safety or other information the author thought was relevant.

RESULTS

A wide range of systemic reactions were reported in the literature with inhalant allergens: ranging from 27% to 100% of the patients in rush immunotherapy studies and 0% to 79% of patients in the cluster studies. Predictors of systemic reactions with rush immunotherapy were forced expiratory volume in 1 second less than 80% of predicted and a high degree of skin test reactivity. Premedication clearly reduces the risk of systemic reactions with rush immunotherapy, but the effect on cluster schedules was not as clear.

CONCLUSION

Accelerated immunotherapy build-up schedules in selected patients may provide a rapid alternative to conventional build-up schedules without a significant increase in risk.

The Role of Fungi in Chronic Rhinosinusitis

Collective clinical and bench observations of the past 25 years have expanded interest in the role that fungi may play in developing and perpetuating inflammatory disease of the respiratory tract. As with any new concept, controversy regarding such a process has emerged, but it has served to stimulate increased interest and further study. Review of the current literature appears to offer strong evidence to support both allergic and nonallergic forms of noninvasive fungal inflammation. It remains to be seen whether or these forms of inflammation are inter-related or independent of one another. As investigation focusing upon these new concepts continues, it should lead to better understanding of chronic inflammatory disease of the respiratory tracts.

Evaluation of paediatric tolerance to an extract of Alternaria alternata under two treatment regimes. A multicentre study

In order to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an extract of Alternaria alternata in a paediatric population, a two phase study plan has been elaborated that in the first place consists of a retrospective analysis of tolerance under the standard treatment regimes used by the clinical groups involved. This was achieved by analysing the records of 94 patients that have been treated with this extract, these being consecutive patients included at 7 clinics over a period of 6 months. Two regimes were used: a conventional short regime of 7 doses and a cluster regime. Under neither of these two regimes were any serious reactions registered. The percentage of local reactions was significantly greater using the short conventional regime than with the cluster regime (1.9% and 0.4% respectively, p = .035). In contrast, no significant differences were observed with respect to the systemic reactions (0.5% and 1.2%), these percentages also being similar to those registered with other extracts in which identical regimes have been used. In conclusion, we can confirm that a very satisfactory tolerance profile was observed, with the advantage that through using shorter regimes than the conventional regime of 13 doses, a considerable saving is made both in the number of visits and the doses necessary to reach the maintenance dose.

A prospective safety study of allergen immunotherapy in daily clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Despite its clinical effectiveness, allergen immunotherapy (AIT) remains controversial because serious systemic reactions can occur during its administration. Most of the studies on the safety of AIT are retrospective and use different methods, which frequently depart from daily clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine risk factors for adverse reactions, especially systemic adverse reactions, produced during routine AIT administration.

METHODS

We registered 5,768 consecutive doses of standardized extracts administered to 273 patients in conventional schedules, following the recommendations on safety and data collection of the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology. Of the 273 patients, 236 were asthmatics, 28 had rhinitis and 9 received immunotherapy due to Hymenoptera anaphylaxis.

RESULTS

We examined 143 local reactions (2.48 % of the doses) and 145 systemic reactions (78 immediate and 67 delayed). Risk factors for developing an immediate systemic reaction were asthma severity, sensitization to molds, the most concentrated vials and a fall in peak expiratory flow of more than 15 % or an immediate systemic reaction in the previous dose. Late systemic reactions were significantly more frequent with less concentrated vials and in patients with late local reactions in the previous dose. No serious reactions were registered.

CONCLUSIONS

We believe that AIT is reliable when used with strict safety protocols and administered by specialized staff. Risk factors for adverse reactions to this type of treatment can be identified and reduced by systematic data collection.

Rhinosinusitis: establishing definitions for clinical research and patient care

Background

There is a need for more research on all forms of rhinosinusitis. Progress in this area has been hampered by a lack of consensus definitions and the limited number of published clinical trials.

Objectives

To develop consensus definitions for rhinosinusitis and outline strategies useful in clinical trials.

Methods

Five national societies, The American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology; The American Academy of Otolaryngic Allergy; The American Academy of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery; The American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology; and the American Rhinologic Society formed an expert panel from multiple disciplines. Over two days, the panel developed definitions for rhinosinusitis and outlined strategies for design of clinical trials.

Results

Committee members agreed to adopt the term “rhinosinusitis” and reached consensus on definitions and strategies for clinical research on acute presumed bacterial rhinosinusitis, chronic rhinosinusitis without polyposis, chronic rhinosinusitis with polyposis, and classic allergic fungal rhinosinusitis. Symptom and objective criteria, measures for monitoring research progress, and use of symptom scoring tools, quality-of-life instruments, radiologic studies, and rhinoscopic assessment were outlined for each condition.

Conclusion

The recommendations from this conference should improve accuracy of clinical diagnosis and serve as a starting point for design of rhinosinusitis clinical trials.

Rhinosinusitis: Establishing definitions for clinical research and patient care

Background

There is a need for more research on all forms of rhinosinusitis. Progress in this area has been hampered by a lack of consensus definitions and the limited number of published clinical trials.

Objectives

To develop consensus definitions for rhinosinusitis and outline strategies useful in clinical trials.

Study design

Five national societies, The American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology; The American Academy of Otolaryngic Allergy; The American Academy of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery; The American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology; and the American Rhinologic Society formed an expert panel from multiple disciplines. Over two days, the panel developed definitions for rhinosinusitis and outlined strategies for design of clinical trials.

Results

Committee members agreed to adopt the term “rhinosinusitis” and reached consensus on definitions and strategies for clinical research on acute presumed bacterial rhinosinusitis, chronic rhinosinusitis without polyposis, chronic rhinosinusitis with polyposis, and classic allergic fungal rhinosinusitis. Symptom and objective criteria, measures for monitoring research progress, and use of symptom scoring tools, quality-of-life instruments, radiologic studies, and rhinoscopic assessment were outlined for each condition.

Conclusions

The recommendations from this conference should improve accuracy of clinical diagnosis and serve as a starting point for design of rhinosinusitis clinical trials.

Safety of rush immunotherapy to multiple aeroallergens in an adult population

BACKGROUND

Rush immunotherapy has many potential benefits but a higher incidence of systemic reactions compared with traditional immunotherapy. The safety of rush immunotherapy to multiple aeroallergens has not been widely studied.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the safety of rush immunotherapy to multiple aeroallergens in a primarily adult population and to identify risk factors for systemic reactions.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 65 patients who received rush immunotherapy to multiple aeroallergens in a university-based allergy practice was conducted. All patients were premedicated with prednisone, cetirizine, ranitidine, and zafirlukast or montelukast. Percutaneous skin testing was performed, major allergen content was analyzed in every fourth patient's immunotherapy extract, and systemic reactions were graded.

RESULTS

Systemic reactions were observed in 25 patients (38%). All systemic reactions occurred with the final 3 doses of the protocol. Most (72%) occurred after the final dose of the protocol. Nineteen (76%) of the reactions were mild, 5 (20%) were moderate, and 1 (4%) was severe. Systemic reactions were associated with a higher degree of skin test sensitivity and the presence of weed or dog allergen in the extract (vaccine).

CONCLUSIONS

Rush immunotherapy is associated with a relatively high incidence of systemic reactions, but most reactions are mild and easily treated. The degree of skin sensitivity to the allergens administered and the presence of dog or weed allergen in the extract may be predictors for the development of systemic reactions.

Immunotherapy in fungal allergy

For decades airborne fungal spores have been implicated as causative factors in respiratory allergy. Exposure to high atmospheric spore counts and sensitization to specific fungal allergens have been associated with severe asthma, mainly in young adults. Although the prevalence of sensitization to commercial fungal extracts is approximately 3% in epidemiologic studies, in selected patients, particularly with asthma, the sensitization rate might increase to 30%. Of the estimated number of more than 1 million of different fungal species, approximately 80 fungi have been connected with respiratory allergy. Currently, diagnosis and specific therapy of fungal allergy is hampered by the poor quality of most of the commercially available extracts. Clinical efficacy of specific immunotherapy with fungal extracts has been shown in 79 actively treated patients in four controlled trials, with only two fungal species, namely Alternaria alternata and Cladosporium herbarum. The use of recombinant fungal allergens might create new prospects in diagnosis and specific immunotherapy for fungal allergy.

Implementation of guidelines for seasonal allergic rhinitis: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Allergic rhinitis is a common disease altering quality of life. Its treatment is well established and guidelines have been proposed. However, their efficacy has never been tested. The aim of the study was to validate the guidelines of the International Consensus on Rhinitis in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

METHODS

A multicenter, multinational, open label, parallel, randomized study compared two therapeutic strategies in seasonal allergic rhinitis during a 3-week treatment. General practitioners were randomized into two groups. In the first group of 224 patients, doctors followed guidelines from the International Consensus on Rhinitis. Depending on the severity of nasal and ocular symptoms defined using visual analogue scales, patients received ebastine (an oral antihistamine), triamcinolone acetonide (a topical corticosteroid) and/or ophthalmic nedocromil sodium (a topical ocular cromone). In the second group of 241 patients, general practitioners had a free choice of treatment. The primary efficacy end points were quality of life measured using the standardized rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life questionnaire (RQLQ) and the symptom-medication scores assessed daily with an electronic dairy system.

RESULTS

Adjusted mean total symptom scores over 21 days were 4.93 in the guidelines strategy group compared with 7.48 in the free-choice treatment group (P = 0.0001). Mean total scores in the RQLQ decreased by 2.19 in the guidelines group compared with a decrease of 1.79 in the free-choice treatment group (P = 0.0001). At 21 days, the least square mean difference in improvement in overall scores for RQLQ in the guidelines group compared with the free-choice treatment group was 0.53, which was greater than the minimal important difference.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis often present severe symptoms which are not well recognized or controlled by physicians using their own criteria of severity and treatment. Using a simple method for the evaluation of the severity and a simple therapeutic scheme based on International Guidelines, patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis presented a significant improvement by comparison with those receiving a non-standardized treatment.