Exercise echocardiography is an accurate and cost-efficient technique for detection of coronary artery disease in women

Prognostic effect of coronary flow reserve in women versus men with chest pain syndrome and normal dipyridamole stress echocardiography

The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic effect of coronary flow reserve (CFR) on left anterior descending artery (LAD) in women and men with chest pain of unknown origin and normal stress echocardiogram. The study population consisted of 1,660 patients (906 women, 754 men) with chest pain syndrome, no wall motion abnormality on echocardiogram at rest, and dipyridamole (up to 0.84 mg/kg over 6 minutes) stress echocardiogram negative for wall motion criteria. All had undergone stress echocardiography with combined evaluation of CFR on LAD by Doppler. A CFR value ≤2.0 was considered abnormal. Median duration of follow-up was 19 months (interquartile range 10 to 34). Abnormal CFR was assessed in 171 women (19%) and 147 men (19%, p = 0.80). During follow-up, 80 events (20 deaths, 13 ST-elevation myocardial infarctions, and 47 non-ST-elevation myocardial infarctions) occurred. In addition, 128 patients underwent revascularization and were censored. CFR ≤2.0 on LAD was independently associated with prognosis in women (hazard ratio [HR] 16.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 7.17 to 37.85, p <0.0001) and in men (HR 6.23, 95% CI 3.42 to 11.33, p <0.0001). Antianginal therapy at time of testing (HR 2.11, 95% CI 1.14 to 3.90, p = 0.02) was also a multivariable prognostic predictor in men. Four-year event rate associated with CFR values ≤2.0 and >2.0 were, respectively, 27% and 2% in women (p <0.0001) and 42% and 8% in men (p <0.0001). In conclusion, decreased CFR on LAD is associated with markedly increased risk in women and men with chest pain syndrome and a normal result of dipyridamole stress echocardiography. Conversely, preserved CFR on LAD predicts excellent survival, particularly in women.

Exercise echocardiography

Exercise echocardiography has been used for 30 years. It is now considered a consolidated technique for the diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). Of the stress echocardiography techniques, it represents the first choice for patients who are able to exercise. Given that the cost-effectiveness and safety of stress echocardiography are higher than those of other imaging techniques, its use is likely to be expanded further. Recent research has also proposed this technique for the evaluation of cardiac pathology beyond CAD. Although the role of new technology is promising, the assessment of cardiac function relies on good quality black and white harmonic images.

Customized exercise echocardiography: beyond detection of coronary artery disease

Exercise echocardiography has been established as a reliable diagnostic tool for assessment of myocardial ischemia. However, more recent advances in its technique have expanded its routine clinical use to include quantification of exercise-induced diastolic dysfunction, exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension, and dynamic assessment of mitral and aortic valve function. The indications for exercise echocardiography have increased to include cardiac symptoms such as exertional dyspnea, fatigue, and limited exercise capacity. In light of its expanded capability for evaluating cardiovascular function, we believe that exercise echocardiography should be utilized in a new paradigm of personalized cardiology, in which we regularly investigate individual patient symptoms for endpoints beyond critical myocardial ischemia, for example, exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension. We refer to this refocused use of exercise echocardiography as "customized exercise echocardiography." In this review article, we present current scientific evidence to support our proposed role and discuss the logistical requirements for proper test performance of customized exercise echocardiography.

Coronary heart disease in women: a challenge for the 21st century

Heart disease is the first killer of women in the modern era, regardless of age, race and of ethnicity, although its prevalence rises after menopause. Modern women have professional and housewife responsibilities, consume excess of fat and carbohydrates, smoke, do not exercise regularly and do not have enough time to rest. This situation leads to overweight, dyslipidemia, arterial hypertension, impaired glucose tolerance and diabetes. Women do not often participate in preventive studies and still undergo less intensive and invasive evaluation and treatment for chest pain when compared to men. However, the rate of coronary death is twice higher in women than in men after myocardial infarction and revascularization procedures. The objective of this review is to analyze the main gender differences regarding symptoms, diagnosis, management and prognosis of coronary heart disease and to discuss the influence of hormonal replacement therapy in the prevention of cardiovascular disease in postmenopausal women.

Acute coronary syndromes: Diagnosis and management, part II

At the most severe end of the spectrum of acute coronary syndromes is ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), which usually occurs when a fibrin-rich thrombus completely occludes an epicardial coronary artery. The diagnosis of STEMI is based on clinical characteristics and persistent ST-segment elevation as demonstrated by 12-lead electrocardiography. Patients with STEMI should undergo rapid assessment for reperfusion therapy, and a reperfusion strategy should be implemented promptly after the patient's contact with the health care system. Two methods are currently available for establishing timely coronary reperfusion: primary percutaneous coronary intervention and fibrinolytic therapy. Percutaneous coronary intervention is the preferred method but is not always available. Antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants are critical adjuncts to reperfusion. This article summarizes the current evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis and management of STEMI. This summary is followed by a brief discussion of the role of noninvasive stress testing in the assessment of patients with acute coronary syndrome and their selection for coronary revascularization.

Prediction of mortality and major cardiac events by exercise echocardiography in patients with normal exercise electrocardiographic testing

OBJECTIVES

We sought to assess the value of exercise echocardiography (EE) for predicting outcome in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease and normal exercise electrocardiogram (ECG) testing.

BACKGROUND

The prognostic value of EE in patients with normal exercise ECG testing has not been characterized.

METHODS

We studied 4,004 consecutive patients (2,358 men, mean age [+/- SD] 59.6 +/- 12.5 years) with interpretable ECG who underwent treadmill EE and did not develop chest pain or ischemic ECG abnormalities during the tests. Wall motion score index (WMSI) was evaluated at rest and with exercise, and the difference (DeltaWMSI) was calculated. Ischemia was defined as the development of new or worsening wall motion abnormalities with exercise. End points were all-cause mortality and major cardiac events (MACE).

RESULTS

Overall, 669 patients (16.7%) developed ischemia with exercise. During a mean follow-up of 4.5 +/- 3.4 years, 313 patients died, and 183 patients had a MACE before any revascularization procedure. The 5-year mortality and MACE rates were 6.4% and 4.2% in patients without ischemia versus 12.1% and 10.1% in those with ischemia, respectively (p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, DeltaWMSI remained an independent predictor of mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.73, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.40 to 5.32, p = 0.003) and MACE (HR: 3.59, 95% CI: 1.42 to 9.07, p = 0.007). The addition of the EE results to the clinical, resting echocardiographic and exercise hemodynamic data significantly increased the global chi-square of the models for the prediction of mortality (p = 0.005) and MACE (p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of EE provides significant prognostic information for predicting mortality and MACE in patients with interpretable ECG and normal exercise ECG testing.

Impact of gender on risk stratification by stress echocardiography

OBJECTIVE

To compare the prognostic value of stress echocardiography results in men and women with known and suspected coronary artery disease.

METHODS

We analyzed the data of 8737 patients (5529 men and 3208 women) who underwent stress echocardiography (exercise in 523 patients, dipyridamole in 6227 patients, dobutamine in 1987) for evaluating known (n=3857) or suspected (n=4880) coronary artery disease. Patients were followed up for the occurrence of overall mortality or nonfatal myocardial infarction.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 25 months, 1218 cardiac events (693 deaths and 525 infarctions) occurred. Moreover, 2263 patients (1731 men [31%] and 532 women [17%]; P<.0001) underwent coronary revascularization and were censored. Stress echocardiography results added prognostic information to that of clinical findings and resting wall motion score index in men and women with both known and suspected coronary artery disease. In patients with known coronary artery disease, women had a higher (P=.01) event rate than men in the presence of ischemia. The annual event rate was worse for nondiabetic women (P=.007) but not diabetic women; age had a neutral prognostic effect in the 2 sexes. In patients with suspected coronary artery disease, men without ischemia had a higher (P<.0001) event rate than women. The annual event rate was worse in men aged less than 65 years (P<.0001) or more than 65 years (P=.04), and those with (P=.03) or without (P<.0001) diabetes.

CONCLUSION

Prognosis is at least comparable in men and women with ischemia and in those with coronary artery disease and no ischemia at stress echocardiography. In these clinical settings, availability for major procedures should be similar for both genders.

Observer bias in the interpretation of dobutamine stress echocardiography

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS

Blinded image analysis is typically utilized in published studies evaluating the accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE). However, in clinical settings, practical considerations may limit the use of blinded interpretations and thus the potential for observer bias arises. This study evaluated the relationships between clinical and blinded interpretations of DSE.

METHODS

Wall motion analysis from clinical and blinded DSE interpretations were compared and factors associated with their concordance were investigated in 115 consecutive patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.

RESULTS

Clinical and blinded interpretations agreed on the presence or absence of inducible ischemia in 102 of 115 cases (88.7%: k = 0.76, p < 0.00001). In studies in which the clinical and blinded interpretations were in agreement, there was greater ST-segment depression (STD) in echocardiographically positive compared with negative studies (mean STD 0.73 +/- 0.65 vs. 0.42 +/- 0.67 mm; p = 0.008). In contrast, studies in which there was disagreement had significantly less ST-segment changes (mean STD 0.19 +/- 0.56 mm; p = 0.012) despite comparable results on blinded wall motion analysis. Multiple logistic regression for factors related to the results of clinical and blinded wall motion analysis disclosed that angina pectoris and ST-segment changes were related to clinical interpretations, whereas only angina pectoris was related to the findings on blinded analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical interpretations of echocardiographic images during DSE overall demonstrate good agreement with the results of blinded analysis. Ancillary testing data may influence the analysis of wall motion abnormalities, and thus the potential for observer bias exists unless these interpretations are performed blinded to other clinical data.

Current status of stress echocardiography

Stress echocardiography is a widely applied technique for the evaluation of individuals with known or suspected coronary artery disease. The technique combines echocardiographic imaging with exercise testing or pharmacologic stress. Advances in digital image acquisition and harmonic imaging have substantially improved the quality of echocardiographic images, and have therefore increased general applicability of stress echocardiography.

Stress echocardiography expert consensus statement: European Association of Echocardiography (EAE) (a registered branch of the ESC)

Stress echocardiography is the combination of 2D echocardiography with a physical, pharmacological or electrical stress. The diagnostic end point for the detection of myocardial ischemia is the induction of a transient worsening in regional function during stress. Stress echocardiography provides similar diagnostic and prognostic accuracy as radionuclide stress perfusion imaging, but at a substantially lower cost, without environmental impact, and with no biohazards for the patient and the physician. Among different stresses of comparable diagnostic and prognostic accuracy, semisupine exercise is the most used, dobutamine the best test for viability, and dipyridamole the safest and simplest pharmacological stress and the most suitable for combined wall motion coronary flow reserve assessment. The additional clinical benefit of myocardial perfusion contrast echocardiography and myocardial velocity imaging has been inconsistent to date, whereas the potential of adding - coronary flow reserve evaluation of left anterior descending coronary artery by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography adds another potentially important dimension to stress echocardiography. New emerging fields of application taking advantage from the versatility of the technique are Doppler stress echo in valvular heart disease and in dilated cardiomyopathy. In spite of its dependence upon operator's training, stress echocardiography is today the best (most cost-effective and risk-effective) possible imaging choice to achieve the still elusive target of sustainable cardiac imaging in the field of noninvasive diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

Stress echocardiography from 1979 to present

Stress echocardiography was initially developed in 1979 and has seen substantial success in the evaluation of patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. It has proven applicable to clinical questions of diagnosis, prognosis and follow-up. It has been heavily dependent on technologic advancements, initially digital capturing for side-by-side visualization and, more recently, developments in detailed methods of evaluating myocardial mechanics and contrast echocardiography for perfusion.

Diagnostic strategies for heart disease in women: an update on imaging techniques for optimal management

Significant progress has been made toward increasing awareness of the risks of heart disease in women and in the area of sex-specific cardiovascular research. Yet, coronary artery disease remains the leading cause of death of women in the western world. Over the last decade, the increased research focus of women at risk for ischemic heart disease has helped in defining and delineating some of the sex-specific factors, which have adversely affected the accuracy of imaging techniques in women. A focused body of clinical research has been published over the last few years, and there now exists a growing body of evidence on the diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of contemporary cardiovascular imaging techniques in women. Recent publications specifically addressing this issue [namely the 2005 American Heart Association Statement on Cardiac Imaging in Women, and the 2006 Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) study] are now changing the existing paradigm of ischemic heart disease from one representing a "man's disease," to one including sex-specific algorithms. In this article we review the literature regarding the diagnostic and prognostic evaluation of coronary artery disease in women with respect to imaging.

Dobutamine stress echocardiography for the detection of coronary artery disease in women

Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) has good diagnostic accuracy for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, in most published diagnostic studies, patients are predominantly men. In women, diagnostic accuracy may be lower because of a lower prevalence and extent of CAD, a higher incidence of dobutamine stress-induced hypotension (resulting in less stress or even nondiagnostic test results), smaller left ventricular chamber size, and the beneficial effects of estrogens on the induction of myocardial ischemia. To determine the diagnostic accuracy of DSE in women, 14 diagnostic studies published through 2006 were identified through a Medline search. For a total of 901 patients, the weighted mean sensitivity and specificity were 72% and 88%, respectively. In 7 studies directly comparing results in women and men, conflicting results were reported. However, pooled data showed nearly identical values for sensitivity and specificity in women and men. Additionally, in 6 studies directly comparing DSE results in women with those of stress nuclear scintigraphy, DSE was as sensitive and more specific to detect CAD (90% vs 70%, p <0.0001). The excellent specificity of DSE in women was also confirmed by excellent normalcy rates, ranging from 92% to 100% in women, with a <5% pretest probability of CAD. In conclusion, despite some theoretical limitations, DSE has reasonable sensitivity and excellent specificity for the detection of CAD in women. Considering the diagnostic problems of exercise electrocardiography and nuclear scintigraphy in women, stress echocardiography may be the stress modality of choice in women because of its superior diagnostic specificity.

Dobutamine stress echocardiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in women with chest pain: comparison with different noninvasive tests

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of coronary artery disease(CAD) in women remains elusive. The classical diagnostic armamentarium has been found to be very limited. Dobutamine stress echocardiography has emerged as a powerful test in assessing CAD in the general population, but most studies failed to include women.

HYPOTHESIS

The accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography in the diagnosis of CAD in women with chest pain is high and superior to dipyridamole echocardiography, exercise electrocardiography, and sestamibi single-photon emission tomography (MIBI-SPECT) scintigraphy.

METHODS

We studied 99 consecutive women with chest pain and no previous history of CAD who underwent dobutamine echocardiography and coronary angiography. We also compared these results with those of dipyridamole echocardiography in 63 patients. exercise stress testing in 83 (48 conclusive), and MIBI-SPECT scintigraphy during dobutamine infusion in 54.

RESULTS

Significant CAD was found in 42 women. Sensitivity and specificity of dobutamine stress echocardiography were 69 and 89%, respectively. Dipyridamole echocardiography showed similar accuracy (sensitivity 72% and specificity 94%). Finally, sensitivity of exercise test and MIBI-SPECT was similar (76 and 88%, respectively) and specificity was lower (53 and 57%, respectively). After excluding patients known to have a high incidence of false positive results, MIBI-SPECT specificity rose up to 80%.

CONCLUSION

Dobutamine stress echocardiography and dipyridamole echocardiography bear a high diagnostic accuracy in women with chest pain. MIBI-SPECT is also a useful tool after excluding subgroups with a high incidence of false positive results.

Usefulness of a novel ultrasound transducer for continuous monitoring treadmill exercise echocardiography to assess coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

The feasibility of a novel ultrasound probe, which can be attached to the left ventricular (LV) apex chest wall and allows free rotation around its long axis direction for the continuous monitoring of LV wall motion, was tested.

METHODS AND RESULTS

There were 36 subjects who had coronary artery disease (CAD). By attaching a novel ultrasound probe to the chest wall, the LV apical views were recorded during treadmill exercise stress echocardiography (Echo). The continuous monitoring of LV wall motion was satisfactorily feasible in 30 of 36 patients. The visualization rate of the overall LV segments was higher at rest (90%) compared to that during peak exercise (77%). The segments were better visualized in apical portions (90-100%) than in mid (77-96%) or basal portions (68-87%). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for detecting CAD were 61, 100 and 77%, respectively. The wall motion score index 3 and 6 min after exercise decreased significantly compared to those at peak exercise. The number of segments with dyssynergy was highest at the peak exercise. Ischemic ST-T depression on electrocardiography was observed only at peak stress periods.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous monitoring treadmill exercise Echo using a novel ultrasound probe seems feasible for the non-invasive and physiological assessment of CAD.

Noninvasive diagnosis of coronary artery disease in women

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality and significant morbidly among women in the United States. The frequent absence of antecedent symptoms, the potential for an initial fatal cardiac event and the limitations of currently available noninvasive diagnostic tests pose challenges to healthcare practitioners as they try to optimally risk stratify patients. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to discuss the accuracy of noninvasive tests for CAD diagnosis in women.

A meta-analytic comparison of echocardiographic stressors

BACKGROUND

The relative performance of alternative stressors for stress echocardiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) is not well established.

METHODS

All studies published between 1981 to December 2001 who met inclusion criteria were included in this analysis. We performed a summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) analysis and calculated weighted mean of the likelihood ratio and sensitivity/specificity. A covariate analysis using meta-regression methods was also performed.

RESULTS

Forty-four studies presented data on Exercise, 11 on Adenosine, 80 on Dobutamine, 40 on Dipyridamole, 16 on transatrial pacing transesophageal echocardiography (Tap-TEE), and 7 on transatrial pacing transthorasic echocardiography (Tap-TTE). SROC analysis showed that the following order of most discriminatory to least: Tap-TEE, Exercise, Dipyridamole, Dobutamine and Adenosine. Weighted means sensitivity/specificity were Exercise: 82.6/84.4%, Adenosine: 68.4/80.9%, Dobutamine: 79.6/85.1%, Dipyridamole: 71.0/92.2%, Tap-TTE: 90.7/86.1%, and Tap-TEE: 86.2/91.3%. Covariate analysis showed that the discriminatory power of Exercise decreased with increasing mean age.

CONCLUSIONS

Tap-TEE is a very accurate test for both ruling in and ruling out CAD although its invasiveness may limit its clinical acceptability. Exercise is a well-balanced satisfactory test for both ruling in and ruling out but performance might be lower for the elderly. Dobutamine offers a reasonable compromise for Exercise. Dipyridamole might be good for ruling in but not for ruling out CAD. The incapability in ruling-out CAD was a major problem in clinical application of the stress. Adenosine was the least useful stressor in diagnosing CAD.

The use of stress echocardiography for prognostication in coronary artery disease: an overview

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Stress echocardiography has a high accuracy for the detection of coronary artery disease. Additionally, it provides clinically useful prognostic information, such as resting left ventricular function, myocardial viability, stress-induced ischemia, vascular extent of wall motion abnormalities, and changes in end-systolic volume and ejection fraction with stress.

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

The timing, extent, and severity of the stress-induced wall motion abnormalities are important determinants of long-term prognosis. Previous studies have shown the efficacy of stress echocardiography in predicting long-term cardiac events in mixed patient groups and the value of this test in selected patient subsets.

SUMMARY

This review attempts to define the role of stress echocardiography for prognostication in coronary artery disease, pointing out the ability of this technique to identify low-risk and high-risk subsets among patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease and thus guide patient management decisions.

Coronary heart disease in women: what do we know now?

Coronary heart disease is the single leading cause of death in women in the USA, and there is growing recognition that gender-specific efforts must be made to fully understand and appropriately treat the disease in the female population. While increasing attention is being focused on the prevalence of cardiovascular disease in women so that preventive as well as treatment efforts can be marshaled to combat this epidemic, much remains to be carried out. Although risk factors for coronary heart disease are generally similar between men and women, the magnitude of various factors may differ between the genders. Emerging data suggest that coronary heart disease may be a different entity in women compared with men, requiring different preventive, diagnostic and treatment strategies.

Stress Echocardiography

Stress echocardiography is commonly employed for the clinical management of known or suspected coronary artery disease. This review discusses the accuracy of the technique, which is equivalent to that of competing imaging techniques, as well as its overall role in patient management. The utilization of stress echocardiographic modalities in clinical presentations, such as chest pain, congestive heart failure, and valvular heart disease, and preoperative risk assessment, as well as determining myocardial viability, are discussed.

Defining Low Risk for Coronary Heart Disease among Women with Chest Pain Syndrome: A Prospective Evaluation

BACKGROUND

A better understanding of the clinical manifestations of coronary disease in women may lead to earlier recognition and better outcomes.

METHODS

One hundred fifty-eight women coming to primary care physicians, emergency rooms, or cardiology clinics with undefined chest pain and at least two risk factors underwent detailed clinical evaluation of risk factor profile and symptom characteristics as well as stress testing. The significance of the presenting symptoms was evaluated on the basis of clinical events during an average 26.2 months of follow-up. Noncardiac pain was diagnosed on the basis of spontaneous resolution of symptoms, establishment of an alternative diagnosis, or negative coronary angiography. Cardiac chest pain was established by the development of cardiac clinical events or angiographic demonstration of coronary disease.

RESULTS

Noncardiac chest pain was established in 128 (81%) patients. The remaining 30 (19%) either were found to have had cardiac chest pain or remain symptomatic without definitive diagnosis. Multivariate analysis revealed that noncardiac chest pain was best predicted by a combination of nondiabetic status and negative stress testing. The clinical characteristics of the chest pain syndrome were not significant contributors.

CONCLUSIONS

In nondiabetic women with chest pain syndrome and at least two other cardiac risk factors, a negative stress test predicts a benign course in over 2 years of follow-up.

Impact of gender on risk stratification by exercise and dobutamine stress echocardiography: long-term mortality in 4234 women and 6898 men

AIMS

Prior research is limited with regard to the diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of commonplace cardiac imaging modalities in women. The aim of this study was to examine 5-year mortality in 4234 women and 6898 men undergoing exercise or dobutamine stress echocardiography at three hospitals.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate time to cardiac death in this multi-centre, observational registry. Of the 11 132 patients, women had a greater frequency of cardiac risk factors (P<0.0001). However, men more often had a history of coronary disease including a greater frequency of echocardiographic wall motion abnormalities (P<0.0001). During 5 years of follow-up, 103 women and 226 men died from ischaemic heart disease (P<0.0001). Echocardiographic estimates of left ventricular function (P<0.0001) and the extent of ischaemic wall motion abnormalities (P<0.0001) were highly predictive of cardiac death. Risk-adjusted 5-year survival was 99.4, 97.6, and 95% for exercising women with no, single, and multi-vessel ischaemia (P<0.0001). For women undergoing dobutamine stress, 5-year survival was 95, 89, and 86.6% for those with 0, 1, and 2-3 vessel ischaemia (P<0.0001). Exercising men had a 2.0-fold higher risk at every level of worsening ischaemia (P<0.0001). Significantly worsening cardiac survival was noted for the 1568 men undergoing dobutamine stress echocardiography (P<0.0001); no ischaemia was associated with 92% 5-year survival as compared with death rates of >/=16% for men with ischaemia on dobutamine stress echocardiography (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Echocardiographic measures of inducible wall motion abnormalities and global and regional left ventricular function are highly predictive of long-term outcome for women and men alike.

Role of noninvasive testing in the clinical evaluation of women with suspected coronary artery disease: Consensus statement from the Cardiac Imaging Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, American Heart Association

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality for women in the United States. Coronary heart disease, which includes coronary atherosclerotic disease, myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndromes, and angina, is the largest subset of this mortality, with >240,000 women dying annually from the disease. Atherosclerotic coronary artery disease (CAD) is the focus of this consensus statement. Research continues to report underrecognition and underdiagnosis of CAD as contributory to high mortality rates in women. Timely and accurate diagnosis can significantly reduce CAD mortality for women; indeed, once the diagnosis is made, it does appear that current treatments are equally effective at reducing risk in both women and men. As such, noninvasive diagnostic and prognostic testing offers the potential to identify women at increased CAD risk as the basis for instituting preventive and therapeutic interventions. Nevertheless, the recent evidence-based practice program report from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality noted the paucity of women enrolled in diagnostic research studies. Consequently, much of the evidence supporting contemporary recommendations for noninvasive diagnostic studies in women is extrapolated from studies conducted predominantly in cohorts of middle-aged men. The majority of diagnostic and prognostic evidence in cardiac imaging in women and men has been derived from observational registries and referral populations that are affected by selection and other biases. Thus, a better understanding of the potential impact of sex differences on noninvasive cardiac testing in women may greatly improve clinical decision making. This consensus statement provides a synopsis of available evidence on the role of the exercise ECG and cardiac imaging modalities, both those in common use as well as developing technologies that may add clinical value to the diagnosis and risk assessment of the symptomatic and asymptomatic woman with suspected CAD.

Stress echocardiography versus myocardial SPECT for risk stratification of patients with coronary artery disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Diagnostic testing using noninvasive imaging has become an integral part of risk stratification in patients with coronary artery disease. It is important to understand the integral strengths and weaknesses between the different modalities of stress testing and to apply accurately the type of test the clinical scenario demands.

RECENT FINDINGS

There have been tremendous advances made in the field of cardiac imaging. Both myocardial perfusion imaging and stress echocardiographic techniques continue to evolve and play an important role in the assessment of patients with coronary artery disease.

SUMMARY

In this review the authors discuss the relative merits of both stress echocardiography and myocardial single photon emission computed tomographic imaging for diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with coronary artery disease.

'Add women & stir'--the biomedical approach to cardiac research!

In conditions shared by women and men, the biomedical model of disease assumes that illness-symptoms and outcomes are biologically and socially 'neutral'. Consequently, up until a decade ago, white middle-aged men were the model subjects in most funded cardiac trials, with the assumption that whatever the findings, the results would also hold true for women. This 'add women and stir' approach has resulted in imbalances in cardiac care and an image of coronary artery disease, which portrays a middle-aged male as its victim. Moreover, cardiac health care has been designed with the male anatomy and male experience of illness in mind, and health promotional measures have been targeted towards men. Women have received these health promotional messages to protect the hearts of men, and have been less likely to modify their own lifestyles in a cardio-protective manner. However, the biological and social differences that exist between women and men, must surely invalidate such biased biomedical assertions, and signify a need to delve beyond the realm of biomedical reductionism for greater insights and understanding. This review examines how scientific reductionism has failed to explore the impact of coronary artery disease on the lives of women and how the gendered image of this disease has privileged the normative frame.

The clinical use of supine left lateral leg cycle ergometry for exercise electrocardiographic testing in women, as used in exercise echocardiography

BACKGROUND

Two-dimensional exercise echocardiography is commonly performed in the supine (SUP) left lateral posture (SLL) to optimize imaging quality.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the clinical use of SLL cycle ergometry, we determined the metabolic, cardiovascular, and hemodynamic responses during graded leg cycle ergometry in women, performed in SLL, commonly used during exercise echocardiography, and compared our findings with those obtained during upright (UP) and SUP leg cycle ergometry.

METHODS

A total of 21 apparently healthy women performed leg cycle ergometry in 3 distinct postures (UP, SUP, and SLL).

RESULTS

Peak oxygen consumption and peak achieved workload during SLL cycle ergometry were significantly lower compared with UP cycle ergometry, indicating that in SLL physical work capacity would be underestimated compared with that obtained for the UP and SUP postures. The peak heart rate was significantly lower in SLL and the peak systolic blood pressure higher, compared with UP. Maximal rate pressure product was not significantly different among the postures, indicating the equivalent value of SLL with regard to augmenting myocardial oxygen demand during exercise. Stroke volume (calculated from aortic Doppler flow integral) was higher at rest, and increased to a smaller extent during exercise, in the SUP posture and SLL compared with UP. Similar peak values were attained for the 3 postures.

CONCLUSIONS

SLL is not a suitable modality for the assessment of functional status or for the derivation of target heart rates for exercise training in UP posture. However, SLL leg cycle ergometry exercise provokes a comparable stimulus for the detection of coronary artery disease, as it will increase myocardial oxygen demand to the same extent as UP leg cycle exercise.

Coronary heart disease: the female heart is vulnerable

During the past decade, an overall theme has emerged, validating the exploration of gender-based differences in coronary heart disease (CHD) as a basis for clinical strategies to improve outcomes for women. Underrepresentation of women in most of CHD and lack of gender-specific reporting in many clinical trials continue to limit the available knowledge and evidence-based medicine needed to devise optimal managements for women with CHD. Control of conventional coronary risk factors provides comparable cardioprotection for men and women. Current evidence fails to show cardiac protection from menopausal hormone therapy. Clinical presentations of coronary heart disease (CHD) and management strategies differ between the sexes. Underutilization of proven beneficial therapies is a contributor to less-favorable outcomes in women. The contemporary increased application of appropriate diagnostic, therapeutic, and interventional managements has favorably altered the prognosis for women, particularly when the data are adjusted for baseline characteristics. Better education of women during office visits, earlier and more aggressive control of coronary risk factors, and a greater index of suspicion regarding chest pain and its appropriate evaluation may help to reverse the trend of late referral and late intervention. Research indicates that behavioral changes on the part of women and reshaping of practice patterns by their health care providers may dramatically reduce the number of women disabled and killed by CHD each year.

Economic impact of contrast stress echocardiography on the diagnosis and initial treatment of patients with suspected coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the impact of contrast stress echocardiography on resource use in the treatment of patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS

Fifty-nine patients with suspected CAD underwent nuclear perfusion imaging and contrast echocardiography examination. Further treatment was planned after each test and a final treatment was recommended after reviewing the results of both examinations. Medical resources and productivity losses were then collected for a 3-month follow-up period.

RESULTS

Diagnosis was possible in 96.6% of patients with nuclear perfusion imaging and 93.2% with contrast echocardiography, resulting in a cost per successful diagnosis of $637 (Can) and $476 (Can), respectively. For the majority of patients (74%), both tests provided the same result, but for 12 patients nuclear imaging suggested abnormal perfusion, whereas contrast echocardiography indicated normal function and for 2 patients it was the opposite situation. Per-patient costs for the total patient population decreased from $316 (Can) after nuclear perfusion imaging to $250 (Can) when results from both tests were known. Three-month follow-up societal costs were $441 (Can) per patient, with hospitalization contributing 58% of this total cost.

CONCLUSION

Contrast echocardiography has a similar success rate to nuclear perfusion imaging in diagnosing CAD, but has a 28% lower cost and has the potential of additional cost savings through the elimination of further diagnostic tests.