Outcome of patients with advanced gastro-intestinal stromal tumours crossing over to a daily imatinib dose of 800 mg after progression on 400 mg

Unravelling the pharmacologic opportunities and future directions for targeted therapies in gastro-intestinal cancers part 2: Neuroendocrine tumours, hepatocellular carcinoma, and gastro-intestinal stromal tumours

Until the 1990s, cytotoxic chemotherapy has been the cornerstone of medical therapy for gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. Better understanding of the cancer cell molecular biology has led to the therapeutic revolution of targeted therapies, i.e. monoclonal antibodies or small molecule inhibitors directed against proteins that are specifically overexpressed or mutated in cancer cells. These agents, being more specific to cancer cells, were expected to be less toxic than conventional cytotoxic agents. However, their effects have sometimes been disappointing, due to intrinsic or acquired resistance mechanisms, or to an activity restricted to some tumour settings, illustrating the importance of patient selection and early identification of predictive biomarkers of response to these therapies. Targeted agents have provided clinical benefit in many GI cancer types. Particularly, some GI tumours are considered chemoresistant and targeted therapies have offered a new therapeutic base for their management. Hence, somatostatin receptor-directed strategies, sorafenib, and imatinib have revolutioned the management of neuroendocrine tumours (NET), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST), respectively, and are now used as first-line treatment in many patients affected by these tumours. However, these agents face problems of resistances and identification of predictive biomarkers from imaging and/or biology. We propose a comprehensive two-part review providing a panoramic approach of the successes and failures of targeted agents in GI cancers to unravel the pharmacologic opportunities and future directions for these agents in GI oncology. In this second part, we will focus on NET, HCC, and GIST, whose treatment relies primarily on targeted therapies.

Complete response to second-line chemotherapy with sunitinib of a gastrointestinal stromal tumor: A case report

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are a type of sarcoma, and the most common mesenchymal tumor of the gastrointestinal tract. Systemic chemotherapy is recommended for unresectable or metastatic GISTs. Imatinib is an oral multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor that is effective as adjuvant chemotherapy for primary high-risk cases, and as palliative chemotherapy for unresectable or metastatic cases. For imatinib-resistant cases, second-line chemotherapy with sunitinib is recommended due to significantly longer median progression-free survival and higher response rates compared with a placebo. A 54-year-old woman presented with persistent upper abdominal pain and anorexia. An upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and computed tomography revealed a submucosal tumor of the stomach with no apparent metastases. The patient underwent total radical gastrectomy, and was diagnosed histologically with high-risk GIST for recurrence, therefore, the patient received adjuvant chemotherapy with imatinib. However, multiple liver and lymph node metastases were detected, and the patient received sunitinib therapy. After four cycles of sunitinib, the liver and lymph node metastases disappeared, and a complete response (CR) was achieved. To date, there have been no cases of CR in the prospective clinical trials examining the effects of sunitinib, or in case reports worldwide. Therefore, this is a very rare case report of a patient with metastatic GISTs who achieved CR with sunitinib as second-line chemotherapy.

Ten-Year Progression-Free and Overall Survival in Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic GI Stromal Tumors: Long-Term Analysis of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Italian Sarcoma Group, and Australasian Gastrointestinal Trials Group Intergroup Phase III Randomized Trial on Imatinib at Two Dose Levels

Purpose

To report on the long-term results of a randomized trial comparing a standard dose (400 mg/d) versus a higher dose (800 mg/d) of imatinib in patients with metastatic or locally advanced GI stromal tumors (GISTs).

Patients and Methods

Eligible patients with advanced CD117-positive GIST from 56 institutions in 13 countries were randomly assigned to receive either imatinib 400 mg or 800 mg daily. Patients on the 400-mg arm were allowed to cross over to 800 mg upon progression.

Results

Between February 2001 and February 2002, 946 patients were accrued. Median age was 60 years (range, 18 to 91 years). Median follow-up time was 10.9 years. Median progression-free survival times were 1.7 and 2.0 years in the 400- and 800-mg arms, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.91; P = .18), and median overall survival time was 3.9 years in both treatment arms. The estimated 10-year progression-free survival rates were 9.5% and 9.2% for the 400- and 800-mg arms, respectively, and the estimated 10-year overall survival rates were 19.4% and 21.5%, respectively. At multivariable analysis, age (< 60 years), performance status (0 v ≥ 1), size of the largest lesion (smaller), and KIT mutation (exon 11) were significant prognostic factors for the probability of surviving beyond 10 years.

Conclusion

This trial was carried out on a worldwide intergroup basis, at the beginning of the learning curve of the use of imatinib, in a large population of patients with advanced GIST. With a long follow-up, 6% of patients are long-term progression free and 13% are survivors. Among clinical prognostic factors, only performance status, KIT mutation, and size of largest lesion predicted long-term outcome, likely pointing to a lower burden of disease. Genomic and/or immune profiling could help understand long-term survivorship. Addressing secondary resistance remains a therapeutic challenge.

Management of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal neoplasm of the gastrointestinal tract. The stomach is the most common site of origin. Management of GISTs changed after the introduction of molecularly targeted therapies. Although the only potentially curative treatment of resectable primary GISTs is surgery, recurrence is common. Patients with primary GISTs at intermediate or high risk of recurrence should receive imatinib postoperatively. Imatinib is also first-line therapy for advanced disease. Cytoreductive surgery might be considered in advanced GIST for patients with stable/responding disease or limited focal progression on tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. GIST requires multidisciplinary management.

GEIS guidelines for gastrointestinal sarcomas (GIST)

Gastrointestinal stromal sarcomas (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumours originating in the digestive tract. They have a characteristic morphology, are generally positive for CD117 (c-kit) and are primarily caused by activating mutations in the KIT or PDGFRA genes(1). On rare occasions, they occur in extravisceral locations such as the omentum, mesentery, pelvis and retroperitoneum. GISTs have become a model of multidisciplinary work in oncology: the participation of several specialties (oncologists, pathologists, surgeons, molecular biologists, radiologists…) has forested advances in the understanding of this tumour and the consolidation of a targeted therapy, imatinib, as the first effective molecular treatment in solid tumours. Following its introduction, median survival of patients with advanced or metastatic GIST increased from 18 to more than 60months. Sunitinib and Regorafenib are two targeted agents with worldwide approval for second- and third-line treatment, respectively, in metastatic GIST.

Chinese consensus guidelines for diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal stromal tumor

In order to further promote the standardization of diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) in China, the members of Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) Expert Committee on GIST thoroughly discussed the key contents of the consensus guidelines, and voted on the controversial issue. In final, the Chinese consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and management of GIST (2017 edition) was formed on the basis of 2013 edition consensus guidelines, which is hereby announced. The consensus included the pathological diagnosis, recurrence risk classification evaluation, targeted agent therapy, surgery and principles of surveillance of GIST.

Sunitinib in the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumor: patient selection and perspectives

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common mesenchymal tumor of the gastrointestinal tract. In advanced setting and after progression to imatinib, the multi-targeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib has clearly demonstrated a clinical benefit in terms of response rate and progression-free survival with an acceptable toxicity profile. The recommended schedule for sunitinib administration is 50 mg per day 4 weeks ON and 2 weeks OFF; however, potential alternative schedules are also reviewed in the present article. Several biomarkers have been explored to better select candidates for sunitinib therapy, such as the value of early changes in standardized uptake value assessed by positron emission tomography with ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose, circulating biomarkers, clinical biomarkers such as the appearance of arterial hypertension during treatment that correlates with better outcomes, and the GIST genotype. GISTs with KIT mutations at exon 9 and the so-called wild-type GISTs seem to better respond to sunitinib. Nonetheless, further investigation is required to confirm these findings as well as to understand the mechanisms of sunitinib resistance such as the development of new KIT mutations or conformational changes in KIT receptor.

Efficacy of Chemotherapy in Patients with Unresectable or Metastatic Pancreatic Acinar Cell Carcinoma: Potentially Improved Efficacy with Oxaliplatin-Containing Regimen

Purpose

Pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma (ACC) is a rare cancer of the exocrine pancreas. Because of its rare incidence, the efficacy of chemotherapy in this patient population has been largely unknown. Therefore, we retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of patients with advanced pancreatic ACC who received chemotherapy.

Materials and Methods

Between January 1997 and March 2015, 15 patients with unresectable or metastatic pancreatic ACC who received systemic chemotherapy were identified in Asan Medical Center, Korea.

Results

The median age was 58 years. Eleven and four patients had recurrent/metastatic and locally advanced unresectable disease. The median overall survival in all patients was 20.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.7 to 26.1). As first-line therapy, intravenous 5-fluorouracil were administered in four patients (27%), gemcitabine in five (33%), gemcitabine plus capecitabine in two (13%), oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFOX) in two (13%), and concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by capecitabine maintenance therapy in two (13%). The objective response rate (ORR) to chemotherapy alone was 23% and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.6 months (95% CI, 2.8 to 8.4). After progression, second-line chemotherapy was administered in eight patients, while four patients received FOLFOX and the other four patients received gemcitabine. The ORR was 38%, and patients administered FOLFOX had significantly better PFS than those administered gemcitabine (median, 6.5 months vs. 1.4 months; p=0.007). The ratio of time to tumor progression (TTP) during first-line chemotherapy to TTP at second-line chemotherapy was significantly higher in patients administered FOLFOX (4.07; range, 0.87 to 8.30) than in those administered gemcitabine (0.12; range, 0.08 to 0.25; p=0.029).

Conclusion

Our results suggest that oxaliplatin-containing regimens may have improved activity against pancreatic ACC.

Asian Consensus Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors originating in the gastrointestinal tract. With the introduction of molecular-targeted therapy for GISTs which has yielded remarkable outcomes, these tumors have become a model of multidisciplinary oncological treatment. Although Western clinical guidelines are available for GISTs, such as those published by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO), the clinical situations in Asian countries are different from those in Western countries in terms of diagnostic methods, surgical approach, and availability of new targeted agents. Accordingly, we have reviewed current versions of several GIST guidelines published by Asian countries (Japan, Korea, China, and Taiwan) and the NCCN and ESMO and discussed the areas of dissensus. We here present the first version of the Asian GIST consensus guidelines that were prepared through a series of meetings involving multidisciplinary experts in the four countries. These guidelines provide an optimal approach to the diagnosis and management of GIST patients in Asian countries.

Successful treatment with personalized dosage of imatinib in elderly patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Imatinib is the standard first-line therapy for metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors. It has markedly improved the prognosis and outcome of patients affected by gastrointestinal stromal tumors, especially in the case of exon 11 KIT mutations. Imatinib-associated adverse events are generally mild to moderate; however, in clinical practice, intolerance caused by chronic toxicities frequently leads to breaks in treatment. This is particularly true in elderly patients in whom age, decline in drug metabolism, and polypharmacy, with a possible drug-drug interaction, may influence the tolerability of imatinib. In the present article, we report our extensive experience with the management of imatinib therapy in a 'real' population, in particular in very elderly patients, discussing whether the use of personalized imatinib dosage could be a safe and advantageous option, enabling continuous administration, thus ensuring effective treatment. Only a few case reports in the literature provide data on outcome with low tailored dosage of imatinib and none of them has been carried out on a Western population. Here, we report four cases treated with low imatinib dosage as a safe and useful option enabling continued treatment with imatinib, improving tolerance, and maintaining good and lasting disease control.

Relationship between imatinib trough concentration and outcomes in the treatment of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours in a real-life setting

BACKGROUND

Imatinib has dramatically improved the prognosis of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs). Clinical trial data showed that patients with trough imatinib plasma concentrations (Cmin) below 1100 ng/ml (quartile 1) had shorter time to progression, but no threshold has been defined. The main objective of this study was to investigate in advanced GIST whether a Cmin threshold value associated with a longer progression-free survival (PFS) could be specified. This would be the first step leading to therapeutic drug monitoring of imatinib in GIST.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Advanced GIST patients (n=96) treated with imatinib 400 mg/d (41 stomach, 34 small bowel, and 21 other primary site localisations) were prospectively included in this real-life setting study. Routine plasma level testing imatinib (Cmin) and clinical data of were recorded prospectively.

RESULTS

Small bowel localisation was associated with an increased relative risk of progression of 3.09 versus stomach localisation (p=0.0255). Mean Cmin (±standard deviation) was 868 (±536) ng/ml with 75% inter-individual and 26% intra-patient variability. A Cmin threshold of 760 ng/ml defined by log-rank test was associated with longer PFS for the whole population (p=0.0256) and for both stomach (p=0.043) and small bowel (p=0.049) localisations when analysed separately. Multivariate Cox regression analysis found that Cmin above 760 ng/ml was associated with 65% reduction risk of progression (p=0.0271) in the whole population independently of the anatomical localisation.

CONCLUSION

Concentration of imatinib significantly influences duration of tumour control treatment in GIST patients with a Cmin threshold of 760 ng/ml associated with prolonged PFS in real-life setting.

Retrospective inter- and intra-patient evaluation of trabectedin after best supportive care for patients with advanced translocation-related sarcoma after failure of standard chemotherapy

AIM

Our randomised phase II study showed the clinical benefit of trabectedin compared with best supportive care (BSC) in patients with advanced translocation-related sarcomas after the failure of standard chemotherapy. The aim of the present study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of trabectedin in the identical patients crossed over to trabectedin after disease progression in the BSC arm of the randomised study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a single-arm study of the BSC patients of the randomised study in whom disease progressed. Trabectedin (1.2 mg/m(2)) was administered over 24 h on day 1 of a 21-d treatment cycle. The efficacy and safety of trabectedin after BSC were evaluated and retrospectively compared with the results of the randomised study.

RESULTS

Thirty patients crossed over to trabectedin. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.9-9.1) after crossover compared with 0.9 months (95% CI: 0.9-1.0) at BSC in the randomised study. PFS in the present study was comparable to that of the trabectedin arm in the randomised study. The number of patients with growth modulation index ≥1.33 was 25 (86%). Individual tumour volume was decreased in 11 patients after crossover. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were observed in 27 patients (96.4%). ADRs of grade III-IV were mainly bone marrow suppression and abnormal liver functions.

CONCLUSION

Trabectedin was revealed to be effective and well tolerated in the identical patients crossed over to trabectedin after disease progression in BSC. The present study is registered with the Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center, number JapicCTI-121853.

Alectinib Dose Escalation Reinduces Central Nervous System Responses in Patients with Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Relapsing on Standard Dose Alectinib

The central nervous system (CNS) is an important and increasingly recognized site of treatment failure in anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving ALK inhibitors. In this report, we describe two ALK-positive patients who experienced initial improvements in CNS metastases on standard dose alectinib (600 mg twice daily), but who subsequently experienced recurrences with symptomatic leptomeningeal metastases. Both patients were dose-escalated to alectinib 900 mg twice daily, resulting in repeat clinical and radiographic responses. Our results suggest that dose intensification of alectinib may be necessary to overcome incomplete ALK inhibition in the CNS and prolong the durability of responses in patients with CNS metastases, particularly those with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis.

Bridging academic science and clinical research in the search for novel targeted anti-cancer agents

This review starts with a brief history of drug discovery & development, and the place of Asia in this worldwide effort discussed. The conditions and constraints of a successful translational R&D involving academic basic research and clinical research are discussed and the Singapore model for pursuit of open R&D described. The importance of well-characterized, validated drug targets for the search for novel targeted anti-cancer agents is emphasized, as well as a structured, high quality translational R&D. Furthermore, the characteristics of an attractive preclinical development drug candidate are discussed laying the foundation of a successful preclinical development. The most frequent sources of failures are described and risk management at every stage is highly recommended. Organizational factors are also considered to play an important role. The factors to consider before starting a new drug discovery & development project are described, and an example is given of a successful clinical project that has had its roots in local universities and was carried through preclinical development into phase I clinical trials.

Contemporary Management of Metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Systemic and Locoregional Approaches

The treatment of metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) changed dramatically with the introduction of imatinib into the therapeutic lexicon in 2001. Over the past 15 years, tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the adjuvant and metastatic settings have remained the standard of care for this disease, though alternate classes of agents and new therapeutic targets are being actively explored in clinical trials. Although data are limited, the use of surgical and non-surgical locoregional techniques for the treatment of GIST metastases has increased and given reports of promising and durable responses. Herein we provide an overview of the contemporary therapeutic landscape of metastatic GIST.

The standard diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of gastrointestinal stromal tumors based on guidelines

Although gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are a rare type of cancer, they are the commonest sarcoma in the gastrointestinal tract. Molecularly targeted therapy, such as imatinib therapy, has revolutionized the treatment of advanced GIST and facilitates scientific research on GIST. Nevertheless, surgery remains a mainstay of treatment to obtain a permanent cure for GIST even in the era of targeted therapy. Many GIST guidelines have been published to guide the diagnosis and treatment of the disease. We review current versions of GIST guidelines published by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, by the European Society for Medical Oncology, and in Japan. All clinical practice guidelines for GIST include recommendations based on evidence as well as on expert consensus. Most of the content is very similar, as represented by the following examples: GIST is a heterogeneous disease that may have mutations in KIT, PDGFRA, HRAS, NRAS, BRAF, NF1, or the succinate dehydrogenase complex, and these subsets of tumors have several distinctive features. Although there are some minor differences among the guidelines--for example, in the dose of imatinib recommended for exon 9-mutated GIST or the efficacy of antigen retrieval via immunohistochemistry--their common objectives regarding diagnosis and treatment are not only to improve the diagnosis of GIST and the prognosis of patients but also to control medical costs. This review describes the current standard diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of GISTs based on the recommendations of several guidelines and expert consensus.

Current status of publicly available sarcoma cell lines for use in proteomic studies

Cell lines are valuable resources for proteomic studies and can be used as tools to verify the significance of proteomic findings. Here, the authors overview the current status of the publicly available sarcoma cell lines. The authors surveyed seven major cell banks and found that the diversity observed in the sarcoma cell banks was largely insufficient; sarcoma cell lines are available for only a limited histological subtype. They also observed a number of issues with the pathological diagnosis of the cell lines, limitations in their behavioral diversity, and various unmet needs. Well characterized cell lines with accurate diagnosis based on modern diagnosis criteria should be available from public cell banks. The authors conclude that additional cell lines, along with detailed genetic and pathological analyses, should be prepared and deposited in order to promote sarcoma-specific proteomic research. The authors focused on sarcoma cell lines, but their discussion can be applied to the other cancers.

[Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: diagnostics and therapy]

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are the most frequent mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. The standard therapy is complete surgical resection with safety margins of 1-2 cm. Intraoperative rupture of the tumor capsule must be avoided because this carries a very high risk of tumor spread. A lymph node dissection is not routinely indicated as lymph node metastases very rarely occur with GIST. Smaller GISTs can normally be removed laparoscopically according to the rules of tumor surgery. Depending on the size of the tumor, the mitosis index and the localization of the primary tumor, the risk of recurrence after potentially curative resection is considerable in many cases. Patients with intermediate and high risks according to Miettinen's classification should receive adjuvant treatment with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib. Exceptions are those patients whose tumors exhibit the mutation D842V in exon18 of the PDGFRA gene. According to current European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines this therapy should be continued for 3 years. This leads to a significant improvement in progression-free survival compared to a 1-year therapy, and more important to an improvement in overall survival.

Response to sunitinib of a gastrointestinal stromal tumor with a rare exon 12 PDGFRA mutation

Background

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are commonly driven by activating mutations in either KIT or PDGFRA. Importantly, different mutations within these two genes can lead to very different levels of sensitivity or resistance to kinase inhibitor therapy. Due to rarity, sensitivity or resistance of exon 12 PDGFRA mutant GIST to kinase inhibitor therapy is not well defined.

Case summary

We report the case of a patient with a PDGFRA exon 12 mutated GIST. The patient experienced a very good response to imatinib in the neoadjuvant setting, but then relapsed while still on adjuvant imatinib. In this patient, we report a dramatic response to second line treatment with sunitinib, with complete resolution of two liver lesions at the time of first restaging.

Conclusions

This is the first report detailing a response to treatment with sunitinib of a gastrointestinal stromal tumor with an uncommon exon 12 PDGFRA mutation. Based on the observed efficacy, GIST patients with this rare molecular subtype should be considered for sunitinib therapy.

Systemic therapy options for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors beyond first-line imatinib: a systematic review

ABSTRACT 

This systematic review aims at assessment of the available evidence for systemic therapy options for patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors beyond first-line imatinib. Eligible trials were identified using databases search. In total, 26 studies were eligible and included in the final analysis. Among second-line studies, median progression-free survival ranged from 1.9 to 10 months while median overall survival ranged from 15 to 62 months. Among third-line agents, median progression-free survival ranged from 1.8 to 4.6 months while median overall survival ranged from 8.2 to 19 months. The available data for the second-line suggest that sunitinib is the best option while in the third line, regorafenib is the best option.

Target therapy of unresectable or metastatic dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans with imatinib mesylate: an analysis on 22 Chinese patients

Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is a rare, plaque-like tumor of the cutaneous tissue occurring more on the trunk than the extremities and neck. More than 95% of DFSP present anomalies on the 17q22 and 22q13 chromosomal regions leading to the fusion of COL1A1 and PDGFB genes. Surgery is the optimal treatment for DFSP, but less effective in locally advanced or metastatic patients, as is the case with chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The aim of this study was to assess retrospectively the therapeutic activity and safety of imatinib on 22 Chinese patients with locally inoperative or metastatic DFSP at a single institution.In the collected data of 367 Chinese patients with DFSP, we analyzed retrospectively 22 patients with locally advanced or metastatic DFSP, all of whom received imatinib therapy at 1 center from January 2009 to October 2014. Patients were administered with imatinib at an initial dose of 400 mg and escalated to 800 mg daily after they developed imatinib resistance. The median follow-up time was 36 months, and the median treatment time was 15 months.The results showed that 10 locally advanced DFSP patients and 12 metastatic DFSP patients received imatinib therapy. Apart from 1 patient who developed primary imatinib resistance, 15 patients achieved partial remission (PR), and 6 patients achieved stable disease (SD). Both fibrosarcomatous DFSP and classic DFSP patients demonstrated similar response to imatinib. Median PFS was estimated to be 19 months. Median overall survival (OS) has not been reached, and estimated 1- and 3-year OS rates were 95.5% (21/22) and 77.3% (17/22), respectively. Four out of 10 patients with primarily unresectable DFSP received complete surgical resection after neoadjuvant treatment of imatinib.Imatinib therapy is well tolerated with a safety profile and is the therapy of choice in locally inoperative or metastatic DFSP. Neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced or metastatic DFSP with imatinib improves surgical outcomes and may facilitate resection of difficult tumors.

Assessment of early response to imatinib 800 mg after 400 mg progression by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors

ABSTRACT 

Introduction: Imatinib is the standard first-line therapy for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) shows a faster response than computed tomography in nonpretreated patients. Patients & methods: After disease progression on imatinib 400 mg, 16 patients were exposed to 800 mg. Tumor response was evaluated by FDG PET/CT on days 7 and 37. Primary objective was to correlate early metabolic response (EMR) with progression-free survival (PFS). Results: EMR by FDG PET/CT scan was not predictive of PFS. Median PFS in these patients was 3 months. Overall survival was influenced by gastric primary site (p = 0.05). Conclusion: The assessment of EMR by FDG PET/CT in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor exposed to imatinib 800 mg was not predictive of PFS or overall survival.

Inhibitory effects of Peg-IFNα 2b and imatinib, alone or in combination, on imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumor cell line PC9/GR

AIM: To investigate the inhibition effects of polyethylene glycol interferon α 2b (Peg-IFNα 2b) and imatinib, alone or in combination, on imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) cell line (GIST-R), and to explore the possible mechanism.

METHODS: GIST-R cells were exposed to Peg-IFNα 2b and imatinib, alone or in combination. The rate of reduced proliferation and the combination index (CI) in different treatment groups were detected by MTT assay. The apoptotic rate was detected by flow cytometry. The expression of phosphorylated mammalian target of rapamycin (p-mTOR) and Bcl-2 was analyzed by Western blot.

RESULTS: GIST-R cells presented remarkable resistance to imatinib, and the resistance index (RI) was 46.14. The rate of reduced proliferation in the combination group was significantly higher than those in the Peg-IFNα 2b or imatinib alone groups (P < 0.05). The calculated CI values in the combination group suggested a synergistic effect. Compared with non-treated GIST-R cells, the expression levels of p-mTOR and Bcl-2 proteins in GIST-R cells treated with Peg-IFNα 2b and imatinib significantly decreased (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION: The combination of Peg-IFNα 2b and imatinib generates a synergistic effect in GIST-R cells. This effect may be related with apoptosis and the down-regulation of the expression of p-mTOR.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: who should get imatinib and for how long?

The application of imatinib for the treatment of GIST remains a remarkable illustration of the ability and promise of targeted molecular therapy. It is gradually becoming evident that the benefit of imatinib depends on the complex interplay between mutational variations that govern tumor sensitivity to the drug, and biological variables that drive clinical outcome. Evidence is mounting that only a select fraction of patients in the adjuvant setting may benefit from imatinib. Unfortunately, most patients with metastatic disease develop resistance to imatinib, as occurs in other diseases treated with kinase inhibitors. Thus, although imatinib has demonstrated that kinase inhibitor therapy is an integral component of cancer care, it has also revealed the challenges in treating a dynamic cancer with a static monotherapy. As greater insight is gained into when imatinib does not help, it will uncover the obvious next pathway in cancer treatment, namely individualized, genotype-directed therapy that is modulated according to the genetic and immunologic landscape of the tumor.

GEIS 2013 guidelines for gastrointestinal sarcomas (GIST)

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are the most common mesenchymal soft tissue sarcoma of the gastrointestinal tract. Correct diagnosis with thorough use of pathologic and molecular tools of GIST mutations has been of the foremost importance. GIST are usually (95 %) KIT positive and harbor frequent KIT or platelet-derived growth factor receptor α-activating mutations. This deep molecular understanding has allowed the correct classification into risk groups with implications regarding prognosis, essential use in the development of targeted therapies and even response prediction to this drugs. Treatment has been evolving and an update to include lessons learned from recent trials in advanced disease as well as controversies in the adjuvant setting that are changing daily practice, is reviewed here. An effort from the Spanish Group for Sarcoma Research with investigators from the group has been undertaken to launch this third version of the GIST guidelines and provide a practical means for the different disciplines that treat this complex disease.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common sarcoma of the intestinal tract. Nearly all tumors have a mutation in the KIT or, less often, platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFRA) or B-rapidly Accelerated Fibrosarcoma (BRAF) gene. The discovery of constitutive KIT activation as the central mechanism of GIST pathogenesis, suggested that inhibiting or blocking KIT signaling might be the milestone in the targeted therapy of GISTs. Indeed, imatinib mesylate inhibits KIT kinase activity and represents the front line drug for the treatment of unresectable and advanced GISTs, achieving a partial response or stable disease in about 80% of patients with metastatic GIST. KIT mutation status has a significant impact on treatment response. Patients with the most common exon 11 mutation experience higher rates of tumor shrinkage and prolonged survival, as tumors with an exon 9 mutation or wild-type KIT are less likely to respond to imatinib. Although imatinib achieves a partial response or stable disease in the majority of GIST patients, complete and lasting responses are rare. About half of the patients who initially benefit from imatinib treatment eventually develop drug resistance. The most common mechanism of resistance is through polyclonal acquisition of second site mutations in the kinase domain, which highlights the future therapeutic challenges in salvaging these patients after failing kinase inhibitor monotherapies. More recently, sunitinib (Sutent, Pfizer, New York, NY), which inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) in addition to KIT and PDGFRA, has proven efficacious in patients who are intolerant or refractory to imatinib. This review summarizes the recent knowledge on targeted therapy in GIST, based on the central role of KIT oncogenic activation, as well as discussing mechanisms of resistance.

Reintroduction of imatinib in GIST

PURPOSE

This review examines the clinical evidence showing that imatinib can be prescribed to treat recurrence or progression of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) in patients who interrupted first-line imatinib therapy in the adjuvant or advanced/metastatic setting.

METHODOLOGY

A literature search was performed in PubMed, Web of Knowledge, and Google using the following keywords: rechallenge/reinitiation/reintroduction + gastrointestinal + imatinib and rechallenge/reinitiation/reintroduction + imatinib.

RESULTS

The evidence indicates that the reintroduction of imatinib can benefit patients who experience GIST progression after interrupting treatment of advanced/metastatic disease, as well as patients who experience GIST recurrence after completing prescribed neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapy. Although reintroduction of imatinib may lead to suboptimal outcomes, as evidenced by higher rates of progressive disease compared to initial treatment, imatinib discontinuation does not appear to favor development of imatinib resistance, leaving dose escalation and third- or fourth-line imatinib treatment as viable options for patients.

CONCLUSION

Results indicate that after initial start and interruption of imatinib therapy, reintroduction of imatinib therapy is efficacious and provides continued survival benefit in patients with GIST.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors

INTRODUCTION

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common sarcoma of the gastrointestinal tract. Proliferation of GIST is driven by activating mutations in the KIT or PDGFRA genes that found in most sporadic GISTs. Surgery is the main remedial measure for primary GIST, and imatinib is the principal therapeutic of choice for unresectable or metastatic GIST. Imatinib revolutionized treatment for unresectable or metastatic GISTs; however, resistance to imatinib has inevitably developed for most GIST patients.

AREAS COVERED

PubMed was searched to find biological studies of GIST and clinical trials of molecularly targeted agents on unresectable or metastatic GISTs, and the key papers found have been reviewed. In this paper, the standard therapy which includes imatinib, sunitinib and regorafenib for unresectable or metastatic GIST has been reviewed and molecular mechanisms of resistance for tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been postulated and discussed. Treatment measures for resistant GIST and therapeutic choices after the standard therapy have also been described.

EXPERT OPINION

The standard therapy for unresectable or metastatic GISTs is first-line imatinib, second-line sunitinib and third-line regorafenib. After standard therapy, best supportive care or clinical trials is recommended in the guidelines. However, patients may benefit from continuation of TKIs beyond disease progression and from rechallenge of TKIs used previously.

Imatinib: a breakthrough of targeted therapy in cancer

Deregulated protein tyrosine kinase activity is central to the pathogenesis of human cancers. Targeted therapy in the form of selective tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has transformed the approach to management of various cancers and represents a therapeutic breakthrough. Imatinib was one of the first cancer therapies to show the potential for such targeted action. Imatinib, an oral targeted therapy, inhibits tyrosine kinases specifically BCR-ABL, c-KIT, and PDGFRA. Apart from its remarkable success in CML and GIST, Imatinib benefits various other tumors caused by Imatinib-specific abnormalities of PDGFR and c-KIT. Imatinib has also been proven to be effective in steroid-refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease because of its anti-PDGFR action. This paper is a comprehensive review of the role of Imatinib in oncology.

Considering the role of radiation therapy for gastrointestinal stromal tumor

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare mesenchymal tumors arising in the gastrointestinal tract. Over the last decade, the management and prognosis of GISTs has changed dramatically with molecular characterization of the c-kit mutation and the adoption of targeted systemic therapy. Currently, the standard of care for resectable tumors is surgery, followed by adjuvant imatinib for tumors at high risk for recurrence. Inoperable or metastatic tumors are treated primarily with imatinib. Despite excellent initial response rates, resistance to targeted therapy has emerged as a common clinical problem, with relatively few therapeutic solutions. While the treatment of GISTs does not commonly include radiotherapy, radiation therapy could be a valuable contributing modality. Several case reports indicate that radiation can control locally progressive, drug-resistant disease. Further study is necessary to define whether radiation could potentially prevent or delay the onset of drug resistance, or improve outcomes when given in combination with imatinib.

Clinical efficacy and safety of imatinib in the management of Ph(+) chronic myeloid or acute lymphoblastic leukemia in Chinese patients

Imatinib mesylate is considered the standard first-line systemic treatment for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and functions by targeting BCR-ABL tyrosine kinases. Imatinib has substantially changed the clinical management and improved the prognosis of CML and Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphocytic leukemia (Ph⁺ ALL). Here, we review the pharmacology, mode of action, and pharmacokinetics of imatinib; Chinese efficacy studies in CML and Ph⁺ ALL; safety and tolerability; patient-focused perspectives, such as quality of life, patient satisfaction, acceptability, and adherence; and uptake of imatinib.

The timing and probability of treatment switch under cost uncertainty: an application to patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor

BACKGROUND

Cost fluctuations render the outcome of any treatment switch uncertain, so that decision makers might have to wait for more information before optimally switching treatments, especially when the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained cannot be fully recovered later on.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the timing of treatment switch under cost uncertainty.

METHODS

A dynamic stochastic model for the optimal timing of a treatment switch is developed and applied to a problem in medical decision taking, i.e. to patients with unresectable gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST).

RESULTS

The theoretical model suggests that cost uncertainty reduces expected net benefit. In addition, cost volatility discourages switching treatments. The stochastic model also illustrates that as technologies become less cost competitive, the cost uncertainty becomes more dominant. With limited substitutability, higher quality of technologies will increase the demand for those technologies disregarding the cost uncertainty. The results of the empirical application suggest that the first-line treatment may be the better choice when considering lifetime welfare.

CONCLUSIONS

Under uncertainty and irreversibility, low-risk patients must begin the second-line treatment as soon as possible, which is precisely when the second-line treatment is least valuable. As the costs of reversing current treatment impacts fall, it becomes more feasible to provide the option-preserving treatment to these low-risk individuals later on.

Systematic review of the side effects associated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors used in the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumours on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have revolutionised the treatment of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs). Imatinib is approved as first line therapy and sunitinib is used in cases of imatinib resistance or intolerance. Compared with conventional treatments, TKIs are delivered over longer periods of time and are more specific in their targets (i.e., molecularly targeted), thus presenting different side effect profiles. We review the safety profiles of imatinib and sunitinib, documenting a total of 95 side effects including patient based as well as medically defined outcomes. Gastrointestinal complaints, particularly diarrhoea and nausea, oedema, fatigue and haematological disorders, notably anaemia, are amongst the most prevalent side effects. While there is overlap between the side effect profiles of imatinib and sunitinib, important differences emerge in the frequencies of oedema, hypertension, thyroid functioning, muscle and joint pains, as well as skin and oral conditions. Awareness of potential side effects is informative to both clinician and patient in terms of treatment decision making and can have important implications for treatment adherence and clinical outcome.

New drug therapies for advanced renal cell carcinoma

The incidence of renal cell cancer is increasing and surgery is the only curative treatment for patients presenting with localized disease at diagnosis. The treatment of metastatic renal cell cancer is palliative and, until recently, immunotherapy has been the standard treatment approach with response rates between 10 and 20%. An increase in the appreciation of the biology of this disease has resulted in a number of new 'targeted' therapies being developed. Most notable is the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors with significant activity in both treatment-naive and cytokine-refractory renal cell cancer. Drugs targeting angiogenic pathways also appear promising. These agents are being rapidly introduced into clinical practice, but further studies are needed to establish their optimal place in the management of renal cell cancer and, in particular, the role of combination and/or sequential therapy.

Personalized management: inoperable gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Historically, patients with inoperable gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) had a very poor prognosis because of the highly resistant nature of these tumors to conventional chemotherapy. The rational and progressive development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) since the initial proof-of-concept studies with imatinib mesylate in the late 1990s, all designed to exploit key pathways that lead to GISTs being so oncogenically addicted, have revolutionized the treatment of GIST. Median overall survival has improved from less than a year to at least 5 years in patients with advanced or metastatic disease. Imatinib remains the standard first-line treatment in advanced GIST; however, resistance to imatinib and subsequent other TKIs inevitably develops in most but not all patients. As much as efforts will continue to identify new drugs for patients with disease that becomes refractory to these agents, there has also been a need to focus on optimizing the use of currently available therapies by using a combination of molecular tools to stratify patients more effectively, pharmacodynamic markers and pharmacokinetic modeling to maximize these agents' activity in individual patients, and reappraising the role of surgery in the management of patients with metastatic disease. These all form part of a modern, multidisciplinary approach to the management of GIST patients.

What are the current outcomes of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors: who are the long-term survivors treated initially with imatinib?

The introduction of imatinib to clinical practice revolutionized therapy of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), but its long-term results have been only just collected. We have attempted to identify factors related to the long-term survival. We have analyzed the data of 430 inoperable/metastatic/recurrent GIST patients treated with imatinib in reference centers, assessed the factors influencing the long-term overall survival (OS), and compared the outcomes in three periods of initiation of imatinib therapy during one decade (2001–2003, 2004–2006, 2007–2010). During analyzed time periods, we have found decrease in median largest tumor size at the start of imatinib therapy: 90.5 mm (2001–2003) versus 74 mm (2004–2006) versus 58 mm (2007–2010) (p = 0.002). Median progression-free survival (PFS) on 1st line imatinib was 37.5 months, without differences in PFS between three groups. Median OS was 5.8 years, 8-year OS rate was 43 %, and no difference in OS was demonstrated for patients treated in analyzed time periods. Independent good prognostic factors for longer OS were as follows: surgery of residual disease, initial WHO performance status 0/1, normal baseline albumin level, and the presence of exon 11 KIT mutations. Current median OS in advanced GIST reaches 6 years. The long-term survivors were characterized by smaller maximal tumors at imatinib start, better blood tests results, better performance status, and the surgical removal of residual disease. The latter might reduce the impact of tumor size and equalize the long-term results of therapy during last decade from introduction of imatinib. After introduction of subsequent lines of therapy (as sunitinib), the effect of primary mutational status on the long-term OS is also less visible.

The economic impact of cytoreductive surgery and tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy in the treatment of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours: a Markov chain decision analysis

PURPOSE

The current first-line treatment for patients with recurrent or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) is management with tyrosine kinase inhibition (TKI). There is an undefined role for surgery in the management of these patients. This study uses a cost analysis to examine the economic impact of treating patients with TKI in combination with surgery at different time-points in their treatment trajectories.

METHODS

A Markov chain decision analysis was modelled over a 2-year time horizon to determine costs associated with surgery in combination with imatinib mesylate (IM) or sunitinib malate (SU) in seven scenarios varied by TKI agent, dose and disease status (stable versus localised progressive disease). Rates of disease progression, surgical morbidity, mortality and adverse drug reactions were extracted from the existing literature. Deterministic sensitivity analyses were performed to examine changes in cost due to variations in key variables.

RESULTS

The least-costly scenario was to perform no surgery. The most costly scenario was to perform surgery on patients with localised progressive disease on IM 800 mg. The overall range of costs clustered within approximately $47,000 (USD). Variations in surgical cost, surgical mortality and cost of IM demonstrated thresholds for changing the least-costly scenario within plausible tested ranges.

CONCLUSION

Costs of surgical intervention at different time-points within the treatment course of patients with advanced GIST fluctuate within a relatively narrow range, suggesting that costs arise primarily from the administration of TKI. The decision to pursue cytoreductive surgery should not be based on cost alone. Future studies should incorporate health-state utilities when available.

A phase 1 trial of imatinib, bevacizumab, and metronomic cyclophosphamide in advanced colorectal cancer

Background:

This phase 1 clinical trial was conducted to determine the safety, maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), and pharmacokinetics of imatinib, bevacizumab, and metronomic cyclophosphamide in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC).

Methods:

Patients with refractory stage IV CRC were treated with bevacizumab 5 mg kg⁻¹ i.v. every 2 weeks (fixed dose) plus oral cyclophosphamide q.d. and imatinib q.d. or b.i.d. in 28-day cycles with 3+3 dose escalation. Response was assessed every two cycles. Pharmacokinetics of imatinib and cyclophosphamide and circulating tumour, endothelial, and immune cell subsets were measured.

Results:

Thirty-five patients were enrolled. Maximum-tolerated doses were cyclophosphamide 50 mg q.d., imatinib 400 mg q.d., and bevacizumab 5 mg kg⁻¹ i.v. every 2 weeks. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) included nausea/vomiting, neutropaenia, hyponatraemia, fistula, and haematuria. The DLT window required expansion to 42 days (1.5 cycles) to capture delayed toxicities. Imatinib exposure increased insignificantly after adding cyclophosphamide. Seven patients (20%) experienced stable disease for >6 months. Circulating tumour, endothelial, or immune cells were not associated with progression-free survival.

Conclusion:

The combination of metronomic cyclophosphamide, imatinib, and bevacizumab is safe and tolerable without significant drug interactions. A subset of patients experienced prolonged stable disease independent of dose level.

A comparison between patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumours diagnosed with isolated liver metastases and liver metastases plus sarcomatosis

OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted to compare overall survival (OS) in patients presenting with isolated hepatic metastases with that of patients with synchronous metastatic disease to the liver and sarcomatosis on a background of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs).

METHODS

Patients presenting with metastatic GISTs during 1999-2009 were identified. Survival outcomes were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Of the 193 patients with GISTs, 43 patients presented with isolated hepatic metastases and 16 presented with synchronous metastases to the liver and sarcomatosis. Thirteen patients with metastases to the liver and sarcomatosis underwent surgery, and 34 patients with metastatic disease solely to the liver underwent hepatic resection. The proportion of patients treated with preoperative tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy was similar in both groups. Similar OS was observed in both groups (isolated liver metastases group: 40.5 months; liver metastases and sarcomatosis group: 28.7 months; P = 0.620).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall survival in patients with GIST and metastatic disease to the liver and sarcomatosis is similar to that in patients with isolated metastatic liver disease. Although patients with a greater disease burden might be expected to show worse survival, these data do not reflect this assumption.

Correlation between overall survival and growth modulation index in pre-treated sarcoma patients: a study from the French Sarcoma Group

BACKGROUND

Growth modulation index (GMI), the ratio of two times to progression measured in patients receiving two successive treatments (GMI = TTP2/TTP1), has been proposed as a criterion of phase II clinical trials. Nevertheless, its use has been limited until now.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We carried out a retrospective multicentre study in soft tissue sarcoma patients receiving a second-line treatment after doxorubicin-based regimens to evaluate the link between overall survival and GMI. Second-line treatments were classified as 'active' according to the EORTC-STBSG criteria (3-month progression-free rate >40% or 6-month PFR >14%). Comparisons used chi-squared and log-rank tests.

RESULTS

The population consisted in 106 men and 121 women, 110 patients (48%) received 'active drugs'. Median OS from the second-line start was 317 days. Sixty-nine patients experienced GMI >1.33 (30.4%). Treatments with 'active drug' were not associated with OS improvement: 490 versus 407 days (P = 0.524). Median OS was highly correlated with GMI: 324, 302 and 710 days with GMI <1, GMI = [1.00-1.33], and GMI >1.33, respectively (P < 0.0001). In logistic regression analysis, the sole predictive factor was the number of doxorubicin-based chemotherapy cycles.

CONCLUSION

GMI seems to be an interesting end point that provides additional information compared with classical criteria. GMI >1.33 is associated with significant OS improvement.

Update on imatinib for gastrointestinal stromal tumors: duration of treatment

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common sarcoma of the gastrointestinal tract, with transformation typically driven by activating mutations of c-KIT and less commonly platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA). Successful targeting of c-KIT and PDGFRA with imatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has had a major impact in advanced GIST and as an adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment. If treatment with imatinib fails, further lines of TKI therapy have a role, but disease response is usually only measured in months, so strategies to maximize the benefit from imatinib are paramount. Here, we provide an overview of the structure and signaling of c-KIT coupled with a review of the clinical trials of imatinib in GIST. In doing so, we make recommendations about the duration of imatinib therapy and suggest how best to utilize imatinib in order to improve patient outcomes in the future.

A gist of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A review

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) have been recognized as a biologically distinctive tumor type, different from smooth muscle and neural tumors of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT). They constitute the majority of gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumors of the GIT and are known to be refractory to conventional chemotherapy or radiation. They are defined and diagnosed by the expression of a proto-oncogene protein detected by immunohistochemistry which serves as a crucial diagnostic and therapeutic target. The identification of these mutations has resulted in a better understanding of their oncogenic mechanisms. The remarkable antitumor effects of the molecular inhibitor imatinib have necessitated accurate diagnosis of GIST and their distinction from other gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumors. Both traditional and minimally invasive surgery are used to remove these tumors with minimal morbidity and excellent perioperative outcomes. The revolutionary use of specific, molecularly-targeted therapies, such as imatinib mesylate, reduces the frequency of disease recurrence when used as an adjuvant following complete resection. Neoadjuvant treatment with these agents appears to stabilize disease in the majority of patients and may reduce the extent of surgical resection required for subsequent complete tumor removal. The important interplay between the molecular genetics of GIST and responses to targeted therapeutics serves as a model for the study of targeted therapies in other solid tumors. This review summarizes our current knowledge and recent advances regarding the histogenesis, pathology, molecular biology, the basis for the novel targeted cancer therapy and current evidence based management of these unique tumors.

Antiproliferative effects of continued mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway inhibition following acquired resistance to BRAF and/or MEK inhibition in melanoma

Inhibitors of the mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK), BRAF, and MAP-ERK kinase (MEK) induce tumor regression in the majority of patients with BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma. The clinical benefit of MAPK inhibitors is restricted by the development of acquired resistance with half of those who benefit having progressed by 6 to 7 months and long-term responders uncommon. There remains no agreed treatment strategy on disease progression in these patients. Without published evidence, fears of accelerated disease progression on inhibitor withdrawal have led to the continuation of drugs beyond formal disease progression. We now show that treatment with MAPK inhibitors beyond disease progression can provide significant clinical benefit, and the withdrawal of these inhibitors led to a marked increase in the rate of disease progression in two patients. We also show that MAPK inhibitors retain partial activity in acquired resistant melanoma by examining drug-resistant clones generated to dabrafenib, trametinib, or the combination of these drugs. All resistant sublines displayed a markedly slower rate of proliferation when exposed to MAPK inhibitors, and this coincided with a reduction in MAPK signaling, decrease in bromodeoxyuridine incorporation, and S-phase inhibition. This cytostatic effect was also associated with diminished levels of cyclin D1 and p-pRb. Two short-term melanoma cultures generated from resistant tumor biopsies also responded to MAPK inhibition, with comparable inhibitory changes in proliferation and MAPK signaling. These data provide a rationale for the continuation of BRAF and MEK inhibitors after disease progression and support the development of clinical trials to examine this strategy.