Discovery and development of pyrotinib: A novel irreversible EGFR/HER2 dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor with favorable safety profiles for the treatment of breast cancer

Opposite and dynamic regulation of the interferon response in metastatic and non-metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

To our current understanding, solid tumors depend on suppressed local immune reactions, often elicited by the interaction between tumor cells and tumor microenvironment (TME) components. Despite an improved understanding of anti-cancer immune responses in the TME, it is still unclear how immuno-suppressive TME are formed and how some cancer cells survive and metastasize.

METHODS

To identify the major adaptations that cancer cells undergo during tumor development and progression, we compared the transcriptome and proteome from metastatic 66cl4 and non-metastatic 67NR cell lines in culture versus their corresponding mouse mammary primary tumors. Using confocal microscopy, RT-qPCR, flow cytometry and western blotting, we studied the signaling pathway and the mechanisms involved. In addition, we used public gene expression data from human breast cancer biopsies to evaluate the correlation between gene expression and clinical outcomes in patients.

RESULTS

We found that type I interferon (IFN-I) response was a key differentially regulated pathway between metastatic and non-metastatic cell lines and tumors. The IFN-I response was active in metastatic cancer cells in culture and markedly dampened when these cells formed primary tumors. Interestingly, the opposite was observed in non-metastatic cancer cells and tumors. Consistent with an active IFN-I response in culture, the metastatic cancer cells displayed elevated levels of cytosolic DNA from both mitochondria and ruptured micronuclei with concomitant activation of cGAS-STING signaling. Interestingly, decreased IFN-I-related gene expression in breast cancer biopsies correlated with an unfavourable prognosis in patients.

CONCLUSION

Our findings show that IFN-I response is dampened in the tumors with the metastatic ability and lower IFN-I expression predicts poor prognosis in triple-negative and HER2 enriched breast cancer patients. This study highlights the possibility of reactivating the IFN-I response as a potential therapeutic strategy in breast cancer. Video Abstract.

Dual targeted therapy with pyrotinib and trastuzumab for HER2-positive advanced colorectal cancer: A phase 2 trial

This trial was initiated to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib in combination with trastuzumab in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive recurrent/metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). In this single-arm, open-label, multicenter, phase 2 trial patients with HER2-positive recurrent/metastatic CRC were enrolled and received oral pyrotinib 400 mg once a day plus intravenous trastuzumab 8 mg/kg loading dose followed by 6 mg/kg once every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response, and safety were assessed as secondary endpoints. From December 2019 to October 2021, a total of 20 patients were enrolled and 18 of them were evaluable for response. All patients were B-rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma (BRAF) wild type. Four patients achieved partial response, with an ORR of 22.2% (4/18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.4-47.6) and DCR of 61.1% (11/18, 95% CI 35.8-82.7), while the ORR and DCR were 33.3% (4/12, 95% CI 13.8-60.9) and 83.3% (10/12, 95% CI 51.6-97.9), respectively, in RAS wild-type patients. At the time of cut-off day, median follow-up was 10.7 months (range 3.8-13.8). The median PFS was 3.4 months (95% CI 1.8-4.3) in the overall population and 4.3 months (95% CI 3.2-8.5) in the RAS wild-type group. The most common adverse event of grade ≥3 was diarrhea (13/20, 65.0%). Pyrotinib combined with trastuzumab showed promising antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile in patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type HER2-positive advanced CRC.

Syringin as TGF-βR1, HER2, EGFR, FGFR4 Kinase, and MMP-2 Inhibitor and Potential Cytotoxic Agent against ER+ Breast Cancer Cells

Background:

Breast cancer is currently the most diagnosed cancer worldwide. Neoplastic cells and components of the tumor microenvironment trigger enzymes and receptors to facilitate cancer advancement. Syringin, a natural phenylpropanoid glycoside, has been reported to possess anti-cancer activity and affinity with numerous druggable targets of breast carcinoma.

Objectives:

This work aims to evaluate the effects of syringin on the growth of breast cancer cells (MCF-7) and normal dermal fibroblast cells (HDFn) and its ability to inhibit the protein targets of breast cancer.

Methods:

Syringin was investigated on cell lines in vitro via MTT assay. Using non-cell-based activity assay kits, its influence on the activity of transforming growth factor-beta receptor type 1 (TGF-βR1), human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), fibroblast growth factor receptor 4 (FGFR4), and matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) was evaluated.

Results:

Syringin exhibited significant cytotoxicity against MCF-7 cells (IC50: 32.11 μM for 24 hours and 21.35 μM for 48 hours) and was non-toxic on healthy HDFn cells (IC50: >100 μM for 24 and 48 hours). It significantly suppressed the activity of cancer and angiogenesis regulating enzymes in vitro with commendable IC50 values on TGF-βR1 kinase (IC50: 6.48 μM), HER2 kinase (IC50: 7.18 μM), EGFR kinase (IC50: 12.38 μM), FGFR4 kinase (IC50: 16.03 μM), and MMP-2 (IC50: 16.07 μM).

Conclusion:

Findings showed the selective toxicity of syringin on breast cancer cells and its potential against pro-angiogenic enzymes. These discoveries strongly indicate the significance and therapeutic potential of syringin in targeted cancer therapy.

HER2-Directed Therapy in Advanced Breast Cancer: Benefits and Risks

Around 20% of breast cancers are associated with amplification or overexpression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). In this setting, anti-HER2-targeted agents are the cornerstone of cancer therapeutic strategies. This includes monoclonal antibodies, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and, recently, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). With the advent of these new alternatives, the decision-making process has become more complex, especially with regard to the treatment sequence possibilities. In spite of the fact that overall survival has significantly improved accordingly, resistance to treatment remains a challenge in HER2-positive breast cancer. The introduction of new agents has created awareness regarding new potential specific adverse events, and consequently, their increasing application pose major challenges in daily patient care. This review describes the therapeutic landscape for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC) and evaluates its benefits and risks in the clinical setting.

HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer with brain metastases responds favorably to pyrotinib and trastuzumab-based treatment: A case report and literature review

For HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients with the brain involved at initial diagnosis, there was no standard regimen before 2022 when the HER2CLIMB trial published its final overall survival analysis, and the prognosis is relatively poor under the current treatment strategy. We herein reported a case of a female patient who was initially diagnosed with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer with brain metastases, receiving pyrotinib and trastuzumab-based systematic therapy after palliative craniocerebral radiotherapy as the first-line systematic therapy. During the treatment, the tumor lesions showed obvious regression, and chemotherapy drugs were gradually removed from the regimen. The patient continued receiving trastuzumab and pyrotinib for HER2-targeted therapy. She had achieved more than 26 months of progression-free survival and the disease was stable during the evaluation in April 2022. Radiotherapy followed by dual HER2-targeted therapy of macromolecular monoclonal antibodies trastuzumab and micromolecular TKI pyrotinib plus chemotherapy could be an alternative option for this subtype of patients and need to be further verified by future clinical trials.

Privileged Scaffolds in Drug Discovery against Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 for Cancer Treatment

HER2 is the membrane receptor tyrosine kinase showing overexpression in several human malignancies, particularly breast cancer. HER2 overexpression causes the activation of Ras- MAPK and PI3K/Akt/ NF-κB cellular signal transduction pathways that lead to cancer development and progression. HER2 is, therefore, presumed as one of the key targets for the development of tumor-specific therapies. Several preclinical have been developed that function by inhibiting the HER2 tyrosine kinase activity through the prevention of the dimerization process. Most HER2 inhibitors act as ATP competitors and prevent the process of phosphorylation, and abort the cell cycle progression and proliferation. In this review, the clinical drug candidates and potent pre-clinical newly developed molecules are described, and the core chemical scaffolds typically responsible for anti-HER2 activity are deciphered. In addition, the monoclonal antibodies that are either used in monotherapy or in combination therapy against HER2-positive cancer are briefly described. The identified key moieties in this study could result in the discovery of more effective HER2-targeted anticancer drug molecules and circumvent the development of resistance by HER2-specific chemotherapeutics in the future.

To Investigate Growth Factor Receptor Targets and Generate Cancer Targeting Inhibitors

Receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) regulates multiple pathways, including Mitogenactivated protein kinases (MAPKs), PI3/AKT, JAK/STAT pathway, etc. which has a significant role in the progression and metastasis of tumor. As RTK activation regulates numerous essential bodily processes, including cell proliferation and division, RTK dysregulation has been identified in many types of cancers. Targeting RTK is a significant challenge in cancer due to the abnormal upregulation and downregulation of RTK receptors subfamily EGFR, FGFR, PDGFR, VEGFR, and HGFR in the progression of cancer, which is governed by multiple RTK receptor signalling pathways and impacts treatment response and disease progression. In this review, an extensive focus has been carried out on the normal and abnormal signalling pathways of EGFR, FGFR, PDGFR, VEGFR, and HGFR and their association with cancer initiation and progression. These are explored as potential therapeutic cancer targets and therefore, the inhibitors were evaluated alone and merged with additional therapies in clinical trials aimed at combating global cancer.

Pyrotinib versus lapatinib therapy for HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer patients after first-line treatment failure: A meta-analysis and systematic review

INTRODUCTION

It is critical to select subsequent treatments for patients after the failure of trastuzumab therapy. Following the failure of standard trastuzumab therapy guidelines in the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology, pyrotinib and capecitabine is a grade I recommended regimen for treating patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Concurrently, in treating patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, lapatinib and capecitabine are also recommended regimens for those who have previously received taxanes, anthracyclines, and trastuzumab therapy. However, there is currently no systematic review and meta-analysis comparing pyrotinib with lapatinib among HER2+ MBC patients. Therefore, this study aims to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis and assess whether pyrotinib is superior to lapatinib in efficacy and safety.

METHODS

Relevant trials were searched in CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases from inception until March 27th, 2022. The primary outcomes were PFS and OS, and the secondary outcomes were ORR and grade ≥3 AEs.

RESULTS

Five relevant studies were included in this study, including 2 RCTs and 3 retrospective cohort studies. Pyrotinib combined with chemotherapy is superior to lapatinib combined with chemotherapy among HER2+ metastatic breast cancer patients, with a significant improvement in PFS (prior trastuzumab therapy) (HR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.39-0.57, p<0.001, I2 = 0%, FEM), PFS (trastuzumab resistance) (HR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.39-0.68, p<0.001, I2 = 40%, FEM) and ORR (RR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.26-1.67, p<0.001, I2 = 8%, FEM), but has higher grade ≥3 diarrhea incidence (RR: 2.68, 95% CI: 1.85-3.90, p<0.001, I2 = 44%, FEM).

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of pyrotinib combined with chemotherapy is superior to lapatinib combined with chemotherapy but has more safety risks.

The role of irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of HER2-Positive metastatic breast cancer

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is the leading cause of cancer death in women. For patients with HER2-positive MBC, after the failure of multiple lines of treatment, there is no optimal line of therapy. A series of clinical trials confirmed that treatment with irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in combination with chemotherapy significantly improves patients' survival outcomes. This review focuses on the pathogenesis of HER2-positive breast cancer, current standard treatments, mechanisms of approved irreversible TKIs, and key clinical trials. The available findings suggest that irreversible pan-HER TKIs, such as pyrotinib and neratinib, in combination with chemotherapy, represent a beneficial salvage therapy for patients with HER2-positive MBC with manageable toxicity. However, further studies are needed to assess the efficacy and safety of this combination therapy.

Real-world efficacy and safety of pyrotinib in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: A prospective real-world study

Background: Pyrotinib, a novel irreversible EGFR/HER2 dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor, shows encouraging anticancer activity and acceptable tolerability in multiple phase II and phase III randomized clinical trials, but the real-world data of pyrotinib, especially the outcomes in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, have been rarely reported. Here, we evaluated the treatment outcomes of pyrotinib in real-world practice in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods: This was a prospective, real-world, observational cohort study. Through the Breast Cancer Information Management System, HER-2 positive MBC patients treated with pyrotinib between 2017/06 and 2020/09 were included. Provider-reported objective response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were considered in the assessment of treatment outcomes. Tumor responses to pyrotinib treatment were calculated using RECIST 1.1. Adverse events were evaluated using clinical records. Results: The trial involved 113 individuals who were receiving pyrotinib treatment, with an average age of 51 years. Complete response, partial response and stable disease were observed in 9 (8.0%), 66 (58.4%), and 17 (15.0%) patients, respectively, while progressive disease was recorded in 20 (17.7%) patients. After a median follow-up of 17.2 months, the median PFS was 14.1. The most common adverse events of any grade were diarrhea (87.6%), vomiting (31.9%), and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (26.6%). Among the patients with brain metastases, the median PFS and OS were 15.2 and 19.8 months, respectively. In addition, pyrotinib has similar efficacy in various subtypes of HER2-positive MBC patients, as shown by the lack of a significant difference of PFS and OS among pyrotinib-treated patients with or without brain metastases, or patients using pyrotinib as first-line, second-line, third-line or beyond therapies. Conclusion: Our real-world results demonstrated equivalent clinical efficacy in HER-2 positive MBC patients compared to phase II and phase III clinical trials with pyrotinib, and promising outcomes in patients with brain metastases.

Neoadjuvant pyrotinib, trastuzumab, and docetaxel for HER2-positive breast cancer (PHEDRA): a double-blind, randomized phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Pyrotinib (an irreversible pan-ErbB inhibitor) plus capecitabine has survival benefits and acceptable tolerability in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. We further assessed addition of pyrotinib to trastuzumab and docetaxel in the neoadjuvant setting.

METHODS

In this multicenter, double-blind, phase 3 study (PHEDRA), treatment-naive women with HER2-positive early or locally advanced breast cancer were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive four neoadjuvant cycles of oral pyrotinib or placebo (400 mg) once daily, plus intravenous trastuzumab (8 mg/kg loading dose, followed by 6 mg/kg) and docetaxel (100 mg/m²) every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was the total pathological complete response (tpCR; ypT0/is and ypN0) rate per independent central review.

RESULTS

Between Jul 23, 2018, and Jan 8, 2021, 355 patients were randomly assigned, 178 to the pyrotinib group and 177 to the placebo group. The majority of patients completed four cycles of neoadjuvant treatment as planned (92.7% and 97.7% in the pyrotinib and placebo groups, respectively). The tpCR rate was 41.0% (95% CI 34.0 to 48.4) in the pyrotinib group compared with 22.0% (95% CI 16.6 to 28.7) in the placebo group (difference, 19.0% [95% CI 9.5 to 28.4]; one-sided P < 0.0001). The objective response rate per investigator was 91.6% (95% CI 86.6 to 94.8) in the pyrotinib group and 81.9% (95% CI 75.6 to 86.9) in the placebo group after the neoadjuvant treatment, resulting in an increase of 9.7% (95% CI 2.7 to 16.6). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were diarrhea (79 [44.4%] in the pyrotinib group and nine [5.1%] in the placebo group), neutropenia (33 [18.5%] and 36 [20.3%]), and decreased white blood cell count (29 [16.3%] and 24 [13.6%]). No deaths were reported during neoadjuvant treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The primary endpoint of the study was met. Neoadjuvant pyrotinib, trastuzumab, and docetaxel significantly improved the tpCR rate compared with placebo, trastuzumab, and docetaxel, with manageable toxicity, providing a new option for HER2-positive early or locally advanced breast cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03588091.

HDACs/mTOR inhibitor synergizes with pyrotinib in HER2-positive pancreatic cancer through degradation of mutant P53

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), as a highly lethal malignancy with high mortality, lacks of effective treatment. Canonical therapeutic targets in PDAC demand further verification among which HER2 receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor pyrotinib as treatment targets has not be decided.

METHODS

Anti-PDAC efficacy of pyrotinib was evaluated both in vitro and in vivo using both cell lines and patient-derived xenografts. By screening a large-scale library of 1453 compounds, we identified HDACs/mTOR inhibitor 1 as a promising candidate to synergize with pyrotinib. The combination therapy was evaluated in vitro and in vivo in multiple cell lines and animal models. Furthermore, RNA-seq analysis was performed to reveal the latent molecular mechanism of combination therapy.

RESULTS

In our study, pyrotinib monotherapy was found to be inefficient to anti-PDAC which exhibited limited anti-proliferation effect in vitro and in vivo. Through therapy combined with HDACs/mTOR inhibitor 1, pyrotinib triggered intense apoptosis in PDAC both in cell lines and animal models. Mechanistic analyses revealed that mutant P53 degradation mediated by HDAC inhibition synergized with HER2 and mTOR inhibition.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, identification of HDACs/mTOR inhibitor as a synergistic inhibitor, provides a potent therapeutic strategy that targets HER2-positive pancreatic cancer.

Pyrotinib-based treatments in HER2-positive breast cancer patients with brain metastases

OBJECTIVES

Extensive application of anti-HER2 targeted therapy improves significantly the HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (BC) prognosis, however, it is still difficult to treat brain metastasis. In current study, we explored effective approaches via combining pyrotinib to treat brain metastasis in patients with HER2-positive advanced BC based upon clinical data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Current study included 61 HER2-positive BC patients with brain metastases (BM) who were treated by pyrotinib-based regimens. The systemic regimens included pyrotinib combined with capecitabine, pyrotinib combined with nab-paclitaxel, and pyrotinib combined with vinorelbine. Patients' progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), clinical benefit rate (CBR) and objective response rate (ORR), as well as drug-related adverse events (AEs) in regard of each combination regimen were analyzed.

RESULTS

Pyrotinib-based systemic therapy resulted in 8.6 months median PFS (mPFS) and 18.0 months median OS (mOS) among the BM patients. Regarding different regimens, the combination of pyrotinib with nab-paclitaxel was superior to the combination with capecitabine and vinorelbine with respect to PFS and OS. The central nervous system (CNS) ORR did not showcase significant difference among 3 regimens, however, nab-paclitaxel combined regimen obtained the best peripheral ORR (84.6%) (p ≤ .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Pyrotinib-based combination therapy is safe for HER2-positive brain metastasis treatment. Compared with vinorelbine or capecitabine, pyrotinib combined with nab-paclitaxel is more effective with less toxicity, which is the preferable regimen for HER2-positive brain metastasis.KEY MESSAGESPresent investigation investigated effective methods through combining pyrotinib to treat brain metastasis with HER2-positive advanced brain cancer. The outcomes verified that pyrotinib-based combination therapy was safe and efficient to treat HER2-positive brain metastasis. Therefore, it is effective to treat brain metastasis applying anti-HER2 targeted therapies although pyrotinib showcases efficiency regarding its treatments for the metastasis.

Design, synthesis, and antitumor study of a series of novel 1-Oxa-4-azaspironenone derivatives

A series of 1-oxa-4-azaspiro[4,5]deca-6,9-diene-3,8-dione derivatives containing structural fragments of conjugated dienone have been synthesized previously by our group, however the Michael addition reaction between conjugated dienone and nucleophilic groups in the body may generate harmful and adverse effects. To reduce harmful side effects, the authors started with p-aminophenol to make 1-oxo-4- azaspirodecanedione derivatives, then utilized the Michael addition and cyclopropanation to eliminate α, β unsaturated olefinic bond and lower the Michael reactivity of the compounds in vivo for optimization. At the same time, heteroatoms are put into the molecules in order to improve the hydrophilicity of the molecules and the binding sites of the molecules and the target molecules, establishing the groundwork for improved antitumor activity. The majority of the compounds had moderate to potent activity against A549 human lung cancer cells, MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells, and Hela human cervical cancer cells. Among them, the compound 6d showed the strongest effect on A549 cell line with IC50 of 0.26 μM; the compound 8d showed the strongest cytotoxicity on MDA-MB-231 cell line with IC50 of 0.10 μM; and the compound 6b showed the strongest activity on Hela cell line with IC50 of 0.18 μM.

Clinical Efficacy of Pyrotinib Combined with Capecitabine in the Second-Line or Above Treatment for HER-2 Positive Advanced Breast Cancer and Its Association with Cell-Free DNA

Purpose

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of pyrotinib combined with capecitabine in the treatment of HER-2 positive breast cancer in real world and its correlation with cfDNA.

Methods

From September 2020 to June 2021, 181 cases of HER-2 positive advanced breast cancer patients who were treated in Jiangsu Cancer Hospital and Nantong Cancer Hospital were analyzed. Patients were given pyrotinib combined with capecitabine or trastuzumab combined with capecitabine. Eighty-one patients who received pyrotinib+capecitabine second-line or above treatment were included in the pyrotinib group, and 100 patients who received trastuzumab+capecitabine second-line or above treatment were included in the trastuzumab group. The objective response rate (ORR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) of the two groups were compared. The follow-up results of the patients were analyzed, and the progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Plasma cfDNA was detected by real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR. The cfDNA levels of patients before and after treatment were compared, and the change of cfDNA levels in patients with different curative effects over time was recorded. The patients were further divided into high cfDNA expression and low cfDNA expression groups, and the PFS of patients with different cfDNA levels was analyzed. COX univariate and multivariate analysis of factors influencing posttreatment survival in patients with HER-2-positive breast cancer were performed.

Results

The ORR of the pyrotinib group (58.02%) was significantly higher than that of the trastuzumab group (42.00%, P = 0.0369). Similarly, the CBR of the pyrotinib group (65.43%) was significantly higher than that of the trastuzumab group (49.00%, P = 0.0347). The incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The results of survival analysis showed that the PFS of the pyrotinib group was 8.02 ± 3.05 months, the PFS of the trastuzumab group was 7.11 ± 3.06 months, and the PFS of the pyrotinib group was significantly longer than that of the trastuzumab group (P = 0.035). The comparison of cfDNA levels between the two groups showed that on the 28th and 56th day of treatment, the cfDNA levels in the pyrotinib group were significantly lower than those in the trastuzumab group (P < 0.05). Long-term follow-up results showed that compared with patients with high cfDNA expression, the PFS of patients with low cfDNA expression was significantly prolonged (P < 0.05). The level of cfDNA is an independent risk factor affecting the prognosis of patients with HER-2-positive breast cancer.

Conclusion

The combined use of pyrotinib and capecitabine has good clinical efficacy and high safety in patients with HER-2 positive breast cancer. The combined use of pyrotinib and capecitabine prolongs the PFS of patients and reduces the level of plasma cfDNA. Changes in cfDNA levels can reflect the therapeutic efficacy of patients with HER-2-positive breast cancer to a certain extent and can be used as a potential indicator for evaluating the prognosis of patients with HER-2-positive breast cancer.

An Insight into Molecular Targets of Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis

Brain metastasis is one of the major reasons of death in breast cancer (BC) patients, significantly affecting the quality of life, physical activity, and interdependence on several individuals. There is no clear evidence in scientific literature that depicts an exact mechanism relating to brain metastasis in BC patients. The tendency to develop breast cancer brain metastases (BCBMs) differs by the BC subtype, varying from almost half with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (HER2^- ER^- PR^-), one-third with HER2⁺ (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive, and around one-tenth with luminal subclass (ER⁺ (estrogen positive) or PR⁺ (progesterone positive)) breast cancer. This review focuses on the molecular pathways as possible therapeutic targets of BCBMs and their potent drugs under different stages of clinical trial. In view of increased numbers of clinical trials and systemic studies, the scientific community is hopeful of unraveling the underlying mechanisms of BCBMs that will help in designing an effective treatment regimen with multiple molecular targets.

Systemic Therapy Approaches for Breast Cancer Brain and Leptomeningeal Metastases

OPINION STATEMENT

Brain metastasis arising from breast cancer is associated with a poor prognosis. Various systemic chemotherapy and targeted therapies which are effective against breast cancer often fail to provide benefits against brain metastasis. This is mainly due to limited penetration of the therapies across the blood-brain barrier, and divergent evolution of brain metastasis compared to the primary tumor. Thus, brain metastasis is typically treated upfront with local therapies, such as surgery and radiation, followed by systemic therapies. Systemic therapies with CNS permeability are favored in patients with brain metastasis. This paper reviews various systemic therapy options for breast cancer brain metastasis.

Novel Therapies and Strategies to Overcome Resistance to Anti-HER2-Targeted Drugs

The prognosis and quality of life of HER2 breast cancer patients have significantly improved due to the crucial clinical benefit of various anti-HER2 targeted therapies. However, HER2 tumors can possess or develop several resistance mechanisms to these treatments, thus leaving patients with a limited set of additional therapeutic options. Fortunately, to overcome this problem, in recent years, multiple different and complementary approaches have been developed (such as antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs)) that are in clinical or preclinical stages. In this review, we focus on emerging strategies other than on ADCs that are either aimed at directly target the HER2 receptor (i.e., novel tyrosine kinase inhibitors) or subsequent intracellular signaling (e.g., PI3K/AKT/mTOR, CDK4/6 inhibitors, etc.), as well as on innovative approaches designed to attack other potential tumor weaknesses (such as immunotherapy, autophagy blockade, or targeting of other genes within the HER2 amplicon). Moreover, relevant technical advances such as anti-HER2 nanotherapies and immunotoxins are also discussed. In brief, this review summarizes the impact of novel therapeutic approaches on current and future clinical management of aggressive HER2 breast tumors.

Neoadjuvant Efficacy of Three Targeted Therapy Strategies for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Based on the Same Chemotherapy Regimen

(1) Background: The objective of our study was to provide evidence for choosing the optimal neoadjuvant therapy strategies for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive early breast cancer. Three neoadjuvant targeted therapy strategies (H + Py, trastuzumab plus pyrotinib; H, trastuzumab; HP, trastuzumab plus pertuzumab) based on the same chemotherapy regimen (TC, docetaxel and carboplatin) were included in the present study; (2) Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with HER2-positive breast cancer who were treated with neoadjuvant TCH + Py, TCH or TCHP, followed by surgery. The outcome was the pathological complete response (pCR) rate; (3) Results: In total, 545 patients were enrolled. The pCR rate was 55.6% (35/63) in the TCH + Py cohort, 32.7% (93/284) in the TCH cohort, and 56.6% (112/198) in the TCHP cohort. The multivariate analysis showed that patients who received TCH had less possibility to achieve pCR than those who received TCH + Py (odds ratio (OR) = 0.334, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.181−0.619, p < 0.001), while patients who received TCHP had comparable possibility to those who received TCH + Py (OR = 1.043, 95%CI: 0.554−1.964, p = 0.896); (4) Conclusions: TCH + Py provides a better pCR rate compared with TCH, and a comparable pCR rate with TCHP among patients with HER2-positive breast cancer in the neoadjuvant setting. The present study supports a novel potential treatment option for these patients. Further studies need to be explored in the future.

Efficacy and Risk Factors of Pyrrotinib in Second- and Third-Line Treatments for HER2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer

A study to examine the efficacy and risk factors associated with pyrrotinib in the second- and third-line treatment of advanced breast cancer with Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2- (HER2-) positive cells was conducted. Progression-free survival (PFS) was assessed as the primary endpoint, and the objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and safety were secondary endpoints. Across all the patients, the ORR was 48.57%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 94.29%. In the follow-up period, the median PFS was 15 months, and second-line treatment had significantly longer PFS than third-line treatment (P = 0.027). The OS among all the patients was up to 28 months, but the median OS has not yet been reached. Diarrhea (69.57%) was the most important AE, mainly in grades 1 and 2. According to the COX regression analysis, brain metastasis was a risk factor for PFS, while second-line treatment and capecitabine chemotherapy were relevant to a longer PFS correlation among patients. In the second- and third-line treatment, pyrrotinib is still highly effective and safe. Pyrrotinib is a potential ideal salvage treatment plan for patients who failed in first-line treatments.

HER2 in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Pathology, Somatic Alterations, and Perspectives for Novel Therapeutic Schemes

HER2 is an emerging biomarker in colorectal cancer (CRC). This oncogene plays an essential role in regulating cell proliferation, differentiation, migration, and, more in general, tumorigenesis and tumor progression. The most frequent types of HER2 alterations in CRC include gene amplification and missense mutations in 7-8% of CRC, often being mirrored by HER2 protein overexpression, representing founder events in solid tumors, including CRC. There are currently no approved HER2-targeted therapy guidelines for CRC; however, several studies have shown that HER2 can be effectively targeted in meta-static CRC settings. In this review, we discuss the current knowledge of HER2 testing in CRC and the immediate future perspectives for HER2 targeting in the metastatic setting.

Differential effects of ketoconazole, fluconazole, and itraconazole on the pharmacokinetics of pyrotinib in vitro and in vivo

It has been reported that drug-drug interactions (DDIs) can affect the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of various oral drugs. To better understand the effects of azole antifungal drugs (ketoconazole, fluconazole, and itraconazole) on pyrotinib’s pharmacokinetics, DDIs between pyrotinib and three azoles were studied with Sprague-Dawley (SD) rat liver microsomes in vitro. Additionally, in vivo pyrotinib metabolic experiment was also performed. Twenty-four male SD rats were randomly divided into four groups: the ketoconazole (40 mg/kg), fluconazole (40 mg/kg), itraconazole (40 mg/kg), and the control group. UPLC-MS/MS was used for the determination of Pyrotinib’s plasma concentration in rats. In vitro experiments showed that IC₅₀ values of ketoconazole, fluconazole and itraconazole were 0.06, 11.55, and 0.27 μM, respectively, indicating that these drugs might reduce the clearance rate of pyrotinib at different degrees. In rat studies, coadministration of pyrotinib with ketoconazole or fluconazole could dramatically increase the C_max and AUC_(0-t) values and decrease the clearance rate of pyrotinib, especially for ketoconazole. However, coadministration with itraconazole had no impact on the pharmacokinetic characters of pyrotinib. These data indicated that ketoconazole and fluconazole could significantly decrease the metabolism of pyrotinib both in vitro and in vivo. More attentions should be paid when pyrotinib is combined with azole antifungal drugs in clinic although further investigation is still required in future.

Targeted therapy for breast cancer: An overview of drug classes and outcomes

The last 25 years have seen significant growth in new therapeutic options for breast cancer, termed targeted therapies based on their ability to block specific pathways known to drive breast tumor growth and survival. Introduction of these drugs has been made possible through advances in the understanding of breast cancer biology. While the promise of targeted therapy for breast cancer has been clear for some time, the experience of the clinical use of multiple drugs and drug classes allows us to now present a summary and perspective as to the success and impact of this endeavor. Here we will review breast cancer targeted therapeutics in clinical use. We will provide the rationale for their indications and summarize clinical data in patients with different breast cancer subtypes, their impact on breast cancer progression and survival and their major adverse effects. The focus of this review will be on the development that has occurred within classes of targeted therapies and subsequent impact on breast cancer patient outcomes. We will conclude with a perspective on the role of targeted therapy in breast cancer treatment and highlight future areas of development.

Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant pyrotinib plus docetaxel/liposomal doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide for HER2-positive breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

Pyrotinib is a novel EGFR/HER2 dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor developed in China, while its role in neoadjuvant therapy of HER2-positive (HER2⁺) breast cancer lacks evidence. The current study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant pyrotinib plus docetaxel/liposomal doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (TAC) for HER2⁺ breast cancer.

METHODS

A total of 27 HER2⁺ breast cancer patients received neoadjuvant pyrotinib plus TAC for 6 cycles, then surgery was performed. The clinical and pathological responses, and adverse events were evaluated.

RESULTS

Complete response rate, objective response rate, and disease control rate were 0.0%, 44.4% and 100.0% after 2 treatment cycles; 0.0%, 37.0%, and 100.0% after 4 treatment cycles; 37.0%, 37.0%, and 96.3% after 6 treatment cycles; as well as 37.0%, 44.4%, and 100.0% based on the best clinical response. Regarding pathological response, there were 1 (2.7%), 3 (11.1%), 8 (29.6%), 5 (18.5%), and 10 (37.0%) patients realizing Miller-Payne grade (G) 1, G2, G3, G4, and G5, respectively; besides, 10 (37.0%) patients achieved total pathological complete response (pCR), 10 (37.0%) patients realized pCR in breast, and 23 (85.2%) patients achieved pCR in lymph node. Additionally, adverse events included diarrhea (81.5%), dental ulcer (7.4%), and hand-foot syndrome (3.7%); meanwhile, grade 3-4 adverse event consisted of only diarrhea (11.1%).

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant pyrotinib plus TAC treatment is efficient and safe in HER2⁺ breast cancer patients, while further validation is needed.

The Durable Effect of Pyrotinib Plus Trastuzumab and Chemotherapy in HER2-Positive Gastric Cancer With Brain Metastases: A Case Report and Literature Review

Gastric cancer (GC) is a disease with macromolecular phenotypic heterogeneity and poor prognosis, especially for metastatic GC (mGC). Chemotherapy is the first choice for second-line treatment. However, the benefits of second-line chemotherapy are limited, so there is an urgent need for new treatment regimens to improve patient outcomes. A 65-year-old man with mGC was HER-2 positive. Standard trastuzumab, combined with chemotherapy, was given in the first-line therapy and progression-free survival (PFS) was 8 months. Second-line treatment with pyrotinib in combination with trastuzumab and chemotherapy yielded a PFS of 20 months, in sharp contrast to a median survival of 2.9-6.2 months for a majority of advanced GC patients. This case provides a meaningful reference for the second-line treatment of mGC patients with HER-2 positive. This case also provides valuable information on the response to pyrotinib plus trastuzumab of patients with brain metastases and a better understanding of dual target combination therapy applications in the future.

Synthesis and biological evaluation of new series of quinazoline derivatives as EGFR/HER2 dual-target inhibitors

It is generally believed that EGFR/HER2 dual-target inhibitors may overcome the resistance of EGFR TKIs caused by HER2 overexpression. The structure-based synthesis and biological evaluation of quinazoline derivatives as EGFR/HER2 dual-target inhibitors has been studied in this paper. II-1, II-2, III-3, III-4 displayed comparable inhibitory potency against EGFR and HER2 and II-1 showed remarkable antiproliferative activities against NCI-H358/PC-9/Calu-3/NCI-H1781 (EGFR IC₅₀ = 0.30 nM, HER2 IC₅₀ = 6.07 nM, NCI-H358 GI₅₀ = 23.30 nM, PC-9 GI₅₀ = 1.95 nM, Calu-3 GI₅₀ = 23.13 nM NCI-H1781 GI₅₀ = 41.61 nM).

Treatment of breast cancer brain metastases: radiotherapy and emerging preclinical approaches

The breast is one of the common primary sites of brain metastases (BM). Radiotherapy for BM from breast cancer may include whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), but a consensus is difficult to reach because of the wide and varied protocols, indications, and outcomes of these interventions. Overall, dissemination of disease, patient functional status, and tumor size are all important factors in the decision of treatment with WBRT or SRS. Thus far, previous studies indicate that WBRT can improve tumor control compared to SRS, but increase side effects, however no randomized trials have compared the efficacy of these therapies in BM from breast cancer. Therapies targeting long non-coding RNAs and transcription factors, such as MALAT1, HOTAIR, lnc-BM, TGL1, and ATF3, have the potential to both prevent metastatic spread and treat BM with improved radiosensitivity. Given the propensity for HER2+ breast cancer to develop BM, the above-mentioned cell lines may represent an important target for future investigations, and the development of everolimus and pyrotinib are equally important. 

HER2 in Colorectal Cancer: The Long and Winding Road From Negative Predictive Factor to Positive Actionable Target

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is a well-known oncogenic driver in different tumors and an approved therapeutic target in breast and gastroesophageal cancer. In metastatic colorectal cancer, only 3% to 5% of patients present with HER2 alterations: somatic mutations and amplifications. HER2 was first assessed as a biomarker of resistance to anti-EGFR therapy; however, in more recent years, its role as a potential actionable target has emerged. In this article, we discuss the predictive and prognostic value of HER2 in metastatic colorectal cancer, its emerging role as an actionable therapeutic target, and its possible future developments.

Retrospective Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Pyrotinib-Based Therapy for HER2-Positive Nonbreast Advanced Solid Tumors

Background

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is a member of the large ErbB family and an important oncogene in many solid tumors. Pyrotinib has been approved for the treatment of HER2-positive, recurrent, or metastatic breast cancer. However, there are very few clinical studies on pyrotinib in other HER2-positive solid tumors. Therefore, more evidence of clinical research is impendently needed to shepherd pyrotinib-based therapy in HER2-positive nonbreast advanced solid tumors. Patients and Methods. We performed a retrospective analysis of HER2-positive nonbreast advanced solid tumors patients with HER2 amplification or mutations who were administered with pyrotinib-based therapy in Henan Cancer Hospital between July 1, 2019, and December 2, 2021. In our research, 25 eligible patients were included with 16 patients with lung cancer, 6 patients with gastric cancer, 2 patients with colorectal cancer, and 1 patient with cholangiocarcinoma. Progression-free survival (PFS) is our main research end point.

Results

The median PFS was 188 days (95% CI: 83-not reached (NR)), and overall survival (OS) was 250 days (95% CI: 188-NR), respectively. 16 patients with lung cancer had a median PFS of 204 days (95% CI: 55-NR) and 6 patients with gastric cancer had PFS of 142 days (95% CI: 83-NR), respectively. The median OS was 366 days (95% CI: 248-NR) in patients with lung cancer and 179 days (95% CI: 90-NR) in patients with gastric cancer. The median PFS and OS of patients receiving >3 line treatment were lower than those receiving ≤3 line treatment (PFS: 188 days vs 204 days, p = 0.92; OS: 188 days vs 366 days, p = 0.43). All 25 patients can be evaluated. The objective response rate (ORR) was 24%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 68%. Lung cancer ORR was 25%, and gastric cancer ORR was 16.7%. In addition, the DCR of lung cancer was 62.5% and that of gastric cancer was 66.7%. In addition, the ORR and DCR of patients receiving treatment ≤3 lines were higher than those receiving treatment >3 lines (ORR: 35.7% vs 9.1%, p = 0.18; DCR: 71.4% vs 63.6%, p > 0.99). The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were diarrhea (84%), but only 3 patients (12%) reported grade 3 diarrhea with good control.

Conclusion

These results show that in HER2-positive nonbreast advanced solid tumors, the treatment based on pyrotinib regimen has good antitumor activity and acceptable safety. This retrospective study aims to promote larger clinical studies to further clarify the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib in the treatment of nonbreast solid tumors.

Treatment with pyrotinib-based therapy in lapatinib-resistant HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: a multicenter real-world study

Background:

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are effective for treating human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer. However, therapies subsequent to TKI progression remain controversial, and effective treatments for TKI resistance are urgently needed. We evaluate the practice of exchange of TKIs, which involves treatment with a different TKI following prior TKI failure. Specifically, this study investigated the efficacy of pyrotinib-based therapy in lapatinib-resistant HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (NCT04899128).

Methods:

This real-world study included 76 patients diagnosed with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer who received pyrotinib-based therapy after lapatinib progression at four Chinese institutions between August 2018 and March 2020. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and toxicity profiles were reported.

Results:

All patients received pyrotinib-based therapy in two or later line therapy. The median PFS was 8.0 months (95% CI 5.1–10.9). OS has not reached. The ORR and CBR were 17.1% and 60.5%, respectively. The median PFS was 7.1 months (95% CI 5.633–8.567) and intracranial ORR was 42.9% in patients who had brain metastasis (n = 14). Patients who benefited from lapatinib ⩾ 6.0 months prior exhibited a longer PFS (10.6 versus 6.0 months, p = 0.034, stratified hazard ratio (HR) 0.534, 95% CI 0.293–0.975). The most common adverse effects were diarrhea (n = 34, 44.7%) and hand-foot syndrome (n = 10, 13.2%).

Conclusion:

Pyrotinib-based therapy has the potential to improve survival in patients with lapatinib-resistant HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, including those with brain metastases. Pyrotinib could provide a clinically significant increase in PFS for patients who benefited from prior lapatinib.

Discovery of SPH5030, a Selective, Potent, and Irreversible Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor for HER2-Amplified and HER2-Mutant Cancer Treatment

Small-molecule irreversible tyrosine kinase inhibitors as high potent agents have led to improvements in disease-free and overall survival in patients with HER2-amplified cancer. The approved irreversible HER2 inhibitors, neratinib and pyrotinib, both lack HER2 selectivity, leading to off-target adverse events in patients. The development of HER2 mutation during treatment also hampers the progress of the treatment. We used a molecular hybridization strategy for structural optimizations, in conjunction with in vitro and in vivo drug-like property screening, to obtain a clinical candidate SPH5030. Overall, SPH5030 showed excellent activities against four frequent kinds of HER2 mutants and high relative HER2 selectivity compared with neratinib and pyrotinib, good pharmacokinetic characteristics with desirable bioavailabilities, and significant in vivo antitumor efficacy in xenograft mouse models, especially in a HER2 mutation A775_G776insYVMA xenograft mouse model with its potency much higher than those of neratinib and pyrotinib.

Pyrotinib plus capecitabine for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer and brain metastases (PERMEATE): a multicentre, single-arm, two-cohort, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer have a high risk of developing brain metastases. Efficacious treatment options are scarce. We investigated the activity and safety of pyrotinib plus capecitabine in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer and brain metastases.

METHODS

We did a multicentre, single-arm, two-cohort, phase 2 trial in eight tertiary hospitals in China. Patients aged 18 years or older who had radiotherapy-naive HER2-positive brain metastases (cohort A) or progressive disease after radiotherapy (cohort B), with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, received pyrotinib 400 mg orally once daily, and capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 orally twice daily for 14 days, followed by 7 days off every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was confirmed intracranial objective response rate by investigator assessment according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (version 1.1). Activity and safety were analysed in patients with at least one dose of study drug. The study is ongoing, but recruitment is complete. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03691051.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 29, 2019, and July 10, 2020, we enrolled 78 women: 51 (86%) of 59 patients in cohort A and 18 (95%) of 19 patients in cohort B had previous exposure to trastuzumab. Median follow-up duration was 15·7 months (IQR 9·7-19·0). The intracranial objective response rate was 74·6% (95% CI 61·6-85·0; 44 of 59 patients) in cohort A and 42·1% (20·3-66·5; eight of 19 patients) in cohort B. The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-emergent adverse event was diarrhoea (14 [24%] in cohort A and four [21%] in cohort B). Two (3%) patients in cohort A and three (16%) in cohort B had treatment-related serious adverse events. No treatment-related deaths occurred.

INTERPRETATION

To our knowledge, this is the first prospective study showing the activity and safety of pyrotinib plus capecitabine in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer and brain metastases, especially in radiotherapy-naive population. This combination deserves further validation in a randomised, controlled trial.

FUNDING

National Cancer Centre Climbing Foundation Key Project of China, Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals.

TRANSLATION

For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Case Report: Durable Clinical Response to Third-Line Pyrotinib After Resistance to Trastuzumab in a Gastric Cancer Patient

Background

Trastuzumab plus chemotherapy remains the standard first-line treatment strategy for HER2-positive gastric cancer (GC). Trastuzumab resistance, on the other hand, remains a significant issue. There are a few effective anti-HER2 agents for patients who develop resistance to trastuzumab.

Case Presentation

A 49-year-old female was diagnosed with stage IV GC with liver and lung metastasis in July 2017. She underwent gastrostomy, and the immunohistochemistry (IHC) result of postoperative tissue demonstrated HER2 (3+). She received first-line treatment of trastuzumab (440 mg), oxaliplatin (200 mg), and S-1 (40 mg). After treatment for 6 months, the patient achieved complete response (CR) with PFS up to 21 months. After progression, she subsequently received trastuzumab (440 mg) plus oxaliplatin (200 mg) as second-line treatment. However, the patient developed resistance to trastuzumab after 12 months of treatment. She started to receive third-line treatment of irinotecan (200 mg d1) and capecitabine (60 mg bid) plus pyrotinib (400 mg/day). After 2 months of treatment, the tumor is evaluated as partial response with PFS of 12 months.

Conclusions

We presented a patient with HER2-positive GC who benefited from the pyrotinib-based treatment after two lines of trastuzumab-based therapies failed. Further research is required to validate such conclusions.

Understanding and overcoming tumor heterogeneity in metastatic breast cancer treatment

Rational development of targeted therapies has revolutionized metastatic breast cancer outcomes, although resistance to treatment remains a major challenge. Advances in molecular profiling and imaging technologies have provided evidence for the impact of clonal diversity in cancer treatment resistance, through the outgrowth of resistant clones. In this Review, we focus on the genomic processes that drive tumoral heterogeneity and the mechanisms of resistance underlying metastatic breast cancer treatment and discuss implications for future treatment strategies.

Neoadjuvant pyrotinib plus trastuzumab and nab-paclitaxel for HER2-positive early or locally advanced breast cancer: an exploratory phase II trial

BACKGROUND

The anti-tumor activity and acceptable tolerability of pyrotinib plus chemotherapy have been demonstrated in phase III trials in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer (BC). In this study, we assessed the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant pyrotinib plus trastuzumab and albumin-bound paclitaxel in women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive early or locally advanced BC.

METHODS

In this single-arm exploratory phase II trial, patients with untreated human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive BC (stage IIA-IIIC) received pyrotinib 400 mg once daily, trastuzumab 4 mg/kg loading dose, followed by 2 mg/kg once a week, and albumin-bound paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 once a week for four 21-day cycles before surgery. The primary endpoint of the study was total pathological complete response (pCR) rate, defined as no microscopic invasive tumor remnants in the breast and axillary lymph nodes. The secondary endpoints were investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) and adverse event profiles.

RESULTS

Between May 17, 2019 and November 26, 2019, a total of 21 patients were enrolled. The total pCR rate was 57.1% (12/21), whereas 23.8% (5/21) and 19.0% (4/21) of patients had minimal and moderate residual disease (RD), respectively. The ORR reached 100% (21/21) at the end of the neoadjuvant therapy. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events were observed in 42.9% (9/21) of patients, including decreased neutrophil count [7 (33.3%)], diarrhoea [6 (28.6%)], decreased white blood cell count [5 (23.8%)], and vomiting [2 (9.5%)]. Adverse event-related dose reduction and interruption of pyrotinib occurred in 6 (28.6%) and 11 (52.4%) patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive early or locally advanced BC, neoadjuvant pyrotinib plus trastuzumab and albumin-bound paclitaxel effectively promoted total pCR rate with an acceptable safety profile (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04152057).

Therapeutic Landscape of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Breast Cancer

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer (HER2+BC) is a common malignancy that is prone to recurrence and metastasis in the early stages, resulting in a poor prognosis for patients. Many studies have suggested that targeted therapy promotes clinical outcomes in HER2+BC. With the introduction of trastuzumab in 1998, the prognosis of patients with early HER2+BC has improved significantly. However, owing to obstinate drug resistance and adverse events, the addition of new agents in standardized treatment has become a research hotspot. These promising agents include antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and anti-HER2 combined therapies. This article provides a brief description of the biology of BC and the expression of HER2, with the aim to provide an overview of the therapeutic landscape of HER2+BC by reviewing research results and introducing the latest evidence to provide a reference for clinical treatment.

Pyrotinib treatment enhances the radiosensitivity in HER2-positive brain metastatic breast cancer patients

Brain metastasis is a common cause of death in HER2-positive breast cancer patients. Currently, it is mainly treated by whole-brain radiotherapy. Pyrotinib is an irreversible pan-ErbB inhibitor, which has demonstrated promising tumor-suppressing activity and acceptable tolerance in previous phase trials. In the present study, we evaluated the efficacy of pyrotinib on HER2-positive brain metastatic breast cancer patients treated with whole-brain radiotherapy. A total of 20 such patients were separated into pyrotinib plus capecitabine and capecitabine-only groups in a 1:1 ratio. All patients met either the primary or secondary endpoints. Oral admission of pyrotinib together with radiotherapy can significantly increase the overall response rate, progression-free survival, time to progression and duration of response of HER2+ brain metastatic breast cancer patients, without causing extra adverse events. In addition, pyrotinib can enhance the radiosensitivity of in-vitro cultured HER2+ breast cancer cell lines. The outcome of our study suggests that pyrotinib might be an effective medication to enhance the tumor radiosensitivity of HER2-positive brain metastatic breast cancer patients.

Clinical study of drug-drug interaction between omeprazole and pyrotinib after meal

AIMS

We aimed to investigate the effect of omeprazole on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of pyrotinib and determine the safety of this combination in healthy Chinese volunteers.

METHODS

Eighteen healthy volunteers were enrolled in this single-dose and self-controlled study. Pyrotinib (400 mg per oral) was administered 30 minutes after the standard meal. Omeprazole was administered from day 6 (D6) to D10 (40 mg, per oral). On D10, the subjects took omeprazole under fasting conditions, followed by pyrotinib 30 minutes after the standard meal. Blood samples for PK analyses in each phase were collected for analysing the drug concentration. Safety was assessed via clinical laboratory tests and physical examinations.

RESULTS

Compared with a single dose of pyrotinib, pyrotinib coadministered with omeprazole showed no significant difference in exposure, elimination, half-life and apparent clearance rate. The mixed-effects model revealed that the least-squares geometric mean ratios of area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)_0-t , AUC_0-∞ and maximum plasma concentration (C_max, 90% confidence intervals) of pyrotinib alone and pyrotinib coadministered with omeprazole were 0.94 (0.82, 1.08), 0.94 (0.83, 1.08) and 0.91 (0.806, 1.038), respectively, indicating the absence of significant differences in AUC_0-t , AUC_0-∞ and C_max . During the treatment period, 6 subjects (33.3%) reported 8 adverse events during pyrotinib monotherapy and omeprazole administration, respectively; 10 subjects (55.6%) reported 34 adverse events in the combined administration phase.

CONCLUSION

Omeprazole, a proton-pump inhibitor, did not significantly impact the PK properties of pyrotinib, and a good safety profile was observed on coadministration.

Clinical observation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with pyrotinib plus trastuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer: a cohort study

BACKGROUND

Pyrotinib is a new small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). However, the efficacy of pyrotinib in neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer is unknown. This paper is a population-based cohort study, and the purpose is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib plus trastuzumab in a neoadjuvant setting for HER2-positive early or locally advanced breast cancers, and to compare it with that of pertuzumab plus trastuzumab.

METHODS

This cohort study included 166 patients with HER2-positive breast cancer who received neoadjuvant therapy and underwent surgery. Case groups: Group I: 63 patients received pyrotinib + trastuzumab; Group II: 50 patients received pertuzumab + trastuzumab. The control group consisted of 53 patients treated with trastuzumab alone in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Univariate logistic regression analysis was applied. Enumeration data were processed by Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

The total pathological complete response (tpCR) rate of Group I was 63.49% (40/63); the breast pathological complete response (bpCR) rate was 76.19% (48/63); and the objective response rate (ORR) was 100% (63/63). Compared with the tpCR rate of 54.00% (27/50), bpCR rate of 58.00% (29/50), and ORR 100% (50/50) of Group II, there was no statistical difference. Regarding adverse events (AEs), diarrhea (n=56, 88.89%) was the most frequent in the group I, including 7 participants who developed grade 3 diarrhea (11.11%), followed by leukopenia (n=48, 76.19%). In the meantime, there was only 1 patient experienced grade IV thrombocytopenia. Hormone receptor (HR)-negative patients were more likely to reach tpCR as compared to HR-positive patients (61.54% vs. 37.50%, P=0.002, 95% CI: 1.423 to 4.997), and the tpCR rate of tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) stage III 37.04% (20/54) was significantly lower than that of stage II 54.46% (61/112), which was statistically significant (P=0.048, 95% CI: 1.064 to 4.041). No recurrence or metastasis was found during short-term follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Pyrotinib plus trastuzumab combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy showed good short-term efficacy in HER2-positive breast cancer, and the AEs developed were all manageable. More sample data is required to further support the comparison with pertuzumab plus trastuzumab.

Pyrotinib in vitro metabolite profiling via rat, dog and human hepatocytes using liquid chromatography-quadrupole/orbitrap mass spectrometry

RATIONALE

Pyrotinib is an irreversible EGFR/HER2 inhibitor that has shown antitumor activity and tolerance in the treatment of breast cancer. Studies focused on its metabolic pathways and major metabolites are insufficient. In the evaluation of drug safety and therapeutic use, metabolite characterization is critical. The metabolism of pyrotinib in vitro was studied utilizing rat, dog and human hepatocytes in this study.

METHODS

Pyrotinib (10 μM) was incubated with hepatocytes in Williams' E medium. The metabolites were examined and profiled using ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography coupled with quadrupole/orbitrap high-resolution mass spectrometry. The metabolite structures were deduced by comparing their precise molecular weights, fragment ions and retention times with those of the parent drug.

RESULTS

A total of 16 metabolites, including 6 novel ones, were discovered and structurally described under the present conditions. Oxidation, demethylation, dehydrogenation, O-dealkylation and glutathione (GSH) conjugation were all involved in the metabolism of pyrotinib in hepatocytes. The most predominant metabolic route was identified as GSH conjugation (M5).

CONCLUSIONS

This study generated valuable metabolite profiles of pyrotinib in several species, which will aid in the understanding of the drug's disposition in various species and in evaluating the contribution of metabolites to overall effectiveness and toxicity of pyrotinib.

Efficacy of targeted therapy in patients with HER2-positive non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) therapy is an effective treatment for HER2-positive gastric and breast malignancies. However, the efficacy of HER2-targeted therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with HER2 alterations remains controversial. We searched studies on HER2-targeted therapy in NSCLC patients that reported objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and progressionfree survival (PFS) published from database inception to 30 May 2021. A total of 32 trials involving 958 patients were included. The ORRs of HER2-TKIs targeted therapy, humanised monoclonal antibody, trastuzumab-based treatment and antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) (T-DM1) were 22% (95% CI 11-31), 23% (95% CI 20-65), 26% (95% CI 14-39) and 16% (95% CI _6-37), while that of ADC (DS-8201) was 60% (95% CI 35-85). The DCRs of these groups were 59% (95% CI 49-69), 39% (95% CI _9-88), 63% (95% CI 37-89), 31% (95% CI 4-58) and 87% (95% CI 62-112), respectively. In the subgroup analysis, numerically higher ORRs and DCRs were observed in the poziotinib (38%; 75%) and pyrotinib (35%; 83%) groups. The median PFSs of these groups were 5.51 months, 3.09 months, 4.61 months, 2.65 months and 12.04 months, respectively. HER2-targeted therapy can be considered an acceptable treatment strategy for NSCLC patients with HER2 alterations. In particular, ADC (DS-8201), pyrotinib and poziotinib demonstrated promising anti-tumour activity in HER2-positive NSCLC.

Globally Approved EGFR Inhibitors: Insights into Their Syntheses, Target Kinases, Biological Activities, Receptor Interactions, and Metabolism

Targeting the EGFR with small-molecule inhibitors is a confirmed valid strategy in cancer therapy. Since the FDA approval of the first EGFR-TKI, erlotinib, great efforts have been devoted to the discovery of new potent inhibitors. Until now, fourteen EGFR small-molecule inhibitors have been globally approved for the treatment of different types of cancers. Although these drugs showed high efficacy in cancer therapy, EGFR mutations have emerged as a big challenge for these drugs. In this review, we focus on the EGFR small-molecule inhibitors that have been approved for clinical uses in cancer therapy. These drugs are classified based on their chemical structures, target kinases, and pharmacological uses. The synthetic routes of these drugs are also discussed. The crystal structures of these drugs with their target kinases are also summarized and their bonding modes and interactions are visualized. Based on their binding interactions with the EGFR, these drugs are also classified into reversible and irreversible inhibitors. The cytotoxicity of these drugs against different types of cancer cell lines is also summarized. In addition, the proposed metabolic pathways and metabolites of the fourteen drugs are discussed, with a primary focus on the active and reactive metabolites. Taken together, this review highlights the syntheses, target kinases, crystal structures, binding interactions, cytotoxicity, and metabolism of the fourteen globally approved EGFR inhibitors. These data should greatly help in the design of new EGFR inhibitors.

Progress in the Synthesis of Heterocyclic Compounds Catalyzed by Lipases

Heterocyclic compounds are representative of a larger class of organic compounds, and worthy of attention for many reasons, chief of which is the participation of heterocyclic scaffolds in the skeleton structure of many drugs. Lipases are enzymes with catalytic versatility, and play a key role in catalyzing the reaction of carbon–carbon bond formation, allowing the production of different compounds. This article reviewed the lipase-catalyzed aldol reaction, Knoevenagel reaction, Michael reaction, Mannich reaction, etc., in the synthesis of several classes of heterocyclic compounds with important physiological and pharmacological activities, and also prospected the research focus in lipase-catalyzed chemistry transformations in the future.

The Efficacy of Pyrotinib as a Third- or Higher-Line Treatment in HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Exposed to Lapatinib Compared to Lapatinib-Naive Patients: A Real-World Study

Background: Pyrotinib is a novel irreversible pan-ErbB receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Evidence of the efficacy of pyrotinib-based treatments for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in patients exposed to lapatinib is limited.

Methods: Ninety-four patients who received pyrotinib as a third- or higher-line treatment for HER2-positive MBC were included in this retrospective study. The primary and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS). Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis were implemented to balance important patient characteristics between groups.

Results: Thirty (31.9%) patients were pretreated with lapatinib and subsequently received pyrotinib as an anti-HER2 treatment, and 64 (68.1%) patients did not receive this treatment. The OS and PFS indicated a beneficial trend in lapatinib-naive group compared to lapatinib-treated group in either the original cohort (PFS: 9.02 vs 6.36 months, p = 0.05; OS: 20.73 vs 14.35 months, p = 0.08) or the PSM (PFS: 9.02 vs 6.08 months, p = 0.07; OS: 19.07 vs 18.00 months, p = 0.61) or IPTW (PFS: 9.90 vs 6.17 months, p = 0.05; OS: 19.53 vs 15.10 months, p = 0.08) cohorts. Subgroup analyses demonstrated lapatinib treatment-related differences in PFS in the premenopausal subgroup and the no prior trastuzumab treatment subgroup, but no significant differences were observed in OS.

Conclusion: Pyrotinib-based therapy demonstrated promising effects in HER2-positive MBC patients in a real-world study, especially in lapatinib-naive patients, and also some activity in lapatinib-treated patients.

Breast Cancer Treatments: Updates and New Challenges

Breast cancer (BC) is the most frequent cancer diagnosed in women worldwide. This heterogeneous disease can be classified into four molecular subtypes (luminal A, luminal B, HER2 and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC)) according to the expression of the estrogen receptor (ER) and the progesterone receptor (PR), and the overexpression of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Current BC treatments target these receptors (endocrine and anti-HER2 therapies) as a personalized treatment. Along with chemotherapy and radiotherapy, these therapies can have severe adverse effects and patients can develop resistance to these agents. Moreover, TNBC do not have standardized treatments. Hence, a deeper understanding of the development of new treatments that are more specific and effective in treating each BC subgroup is key. New approaches have recently emerged such as immunotherapy, conjugated antibodies, and targeting other metabolic pathways. This review summarizes current BC treatments and explores the new treatment strategies from a personalized therapy perspective and the resulting challenges.

Pyrotinib Treatment in Patients With HER2-positive Metastatic Breast Cancer and Brain Metastasis: Exploratory Final Analysis of Real-World, Multicenter Data

PURPOSE

Patients with HER2-positive (HER2⁺) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) have poor prognoses. Pyrotinib has shown promising antitumor activity in MBC to improve progression-free survival (PFS). However, findings based on real-world data to analyze whether pyrotinib affects overall survival (OS) remain scarce.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

This real-world study is an exploratory analysis of brain metastasis (BM) and the final update of our preceding study of 168 patients with HER2⁺ MBC. PFS, OS, tumor mutation burden (TMB), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and overall response rate (ORR) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Pyrotinib treatment led to a median PFS time of 8.00 months and a median OS of 19.07 months in the 168 participants. High TMB was associated with poor OS (P = 0.0072) and PFS (P = 0.0028). In the 39 patients with BM, the median PFS and OS were 8.67 and 13.93 months, respectively. The surgery/radiation (S/R) group of patients with BM had prolonged survival (PFS: 9.97 vs. 7.73 months P = 0.19; OS: 20.67 vs. 12.43 months P = 0.021) compared with the no surgery/no radiation group (NS/NR). The CBR was 58.6% (S/R) vs. 41.4% (NS/NR), while the ORR was 24.1% (S/R) vs. 31.0% (NS/NR).

CONCLUSIONS

Pyrotinib shows promise as a novel pan-HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) for the treatment of BM and should be evaluated further. Surgical or radiotherapy in combination with pyrotinib was found to statistically improve OS in our cohort. TMB could be an exploratory biomarker for predicting PFS and OS, but its clinical application still needs further verification.