SAGA Is a General Cofactor for RNA Polymerase II Transcription

The SAGA core module is critical during Drosophila oogenesis and is broadly recruited to promoters

The Spt/Ada-Gcn5 Acetyltransferase (SAGA) coactivator complex has multiple modules with different enzymatic and non-enzymatic functions. How each module contributes to gene expression is not well understood. During Drosophila oogenesis, the enzymatic functions are not equally required, which may indicate that different genes require different enzymatic functions. An analogy for this phenomenon is the handyman principle: while a handyman has many tools, which tool he uses depends on what requires maintenance. Here we analyzed the role of the non-enzymatic core module during Drosophila oogenesis, which interacts with TBP. We show that depletion of SAGA-specific core subunits blocked egg chamber development at earlier stages than depletion of enzymatic subunits. These results, as well as additional genetic analyses, point to an interaction with TBP and suggest a differential role of SAGA modules at different promoter types. However, SAGA subunits co-occupied all promoter types of active genes in ChIP-seq and ChIP-nexus experiments, and the complex was not specifically associated with distinct promoter types in the ovary. The high-resolution genomic binding profiles were congruent with SAGA recruitment by activators upstream of the start site, and retention on chromatin by interactions with modified histones downstream of the start site. Our data illustrate that a distinct genetic requirement for specific components may conceal the fact that the entire complex is physically present and suggests that the biological context defines which module functions are critical.

Embryonic development critically relies on the differential expression of genes in different tissues. This involves the dynamic interplay between DNA, sequence-specific transcription factors, coactivators and chromatin remodelers, which guide the transcription machinery to the appropriate promoters for productive transcription. To understand how this happens at the molecular level, we need to understand when and how coactivator complexes such as SAGA function. SAGA consists of multiple modules with well characterized enzymatic functions. This study shows that the non-enzymatic core module of SAGA is required for Drosophila oogenesis, while the enzymatic functions are largely dispensable. Despite this differential requirement, SAGA subunits appear to be broadly recruited to all promoter types, consistent with the biochemical integrity of the complex. These results suggest that genetic requirements for different modules depend on the developmental demands.

Dynamic sumoylation of promoter-bound general transcription factors facilitates transcription by RNA polymerase II

Transcription-related proteins are frequently identified as targets of sumoylation, including multiple subunits of the RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) general transcription factors (GTFs). However, it is not known how sumoylation affects GTFs or whether they are sumoylated when they assemble at promoters to facilitate RNAPII recruitment and transcription initiation. To explore how sumoylation can regulate transcription genome-wide, we performed SUMO ChIP-seq in yeast and found, in agreement with others, that most chromatin-associated sumoylated proteins are detected at genes encoding tRNAs and ribosomal proteins (RPGs). However, we also detected 147 robust SUMO peaks at promoters of non-ribosomal protein-coding genes (non-RPGs), indicating that sumoylation also regulates this gene class. Importantly, SUMO peaks at non-RPGs align specifically with binding sites of GTFs, but not other promoter-associated proteins, indicating that it is GTFs specifically that are sumoylated there. Predominantly, non-RPGs with SUMO peaks are among the most highly transcribed, have high levels of TFIIF, and show reduced RNAPII levels when cellular sumoylation is impaired, linking sumoylation with elevated transcription. However, detection of promoter-associated SUMO by ChIP might be limited to sites with high levels of substrate GTFs, and promoter-associated sumoylation at non-RPGs may actually be far more widespread than we detected. Among GTFs, we found that TFIIF is a major target of sumoylation, specifically at lysines 60/61 of its Tfg1 subunit, and elevating Tfg1 sumoylation resulted in decreased interaction of TFIIF with RNAPII. Interestingly, both reducing promoter-associated sumoylation, in a sumoylation-deficient Tfg1-K60/61R mutant strain, and elevating promoter-associated SUMO levels, by constitutively tethering SUMO to Tfg1, resulted in reduced RNAPII occupancy at non-RPGs. This implies that dynamic GTF sumoylation at non-RPG promoters, not simply the presence or absence of SUMO, is important for maintaining elevated transcription. Together, our findings reveal a novel mechanism of regulating the basal transcription machinery through sumoylation of promoter-bound GTFs.

Six general transcription factors (GTFs) assemble at promoters of protein-coding genes to enable recruitment of RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) and facilitate transcription initiation, but little is known about how they are regulated once promoter-bound. Here, we demonstrate that, in budding yeast, some components of GTFs are post-translationally modified by the SUMO peptide specifically when they are assembled at promoters. We determined that the large subunit of TFIIF, Tgf1, is the major target of sumoylation among GTFs and that increasing Tfg1 sumoylation reduces the interaction of TFIIF with RNAPII. Consistent with this, we found that increasing levels of SUMO at promoters of some protein-coding genes, by permanently attaching SUMO to Tfg1, resulted in reduced RNAPII levels associated with those genes. On the other hand, reducing promoter-associated sumoylation, by mutating SUMO-modified residues on Tfg1, also reduced RNAPII occupancy levels. Explaining these apparently contradictory findings, we propose that dynamic sumoylation of promoter-bound GTFs, not merely the presence or absence of SUMO, is important for facilitating rearrangements of promoter-bound GTF components that enhance transcription. Together, our data reveal a novel level of regulating the basal transcription machinery through SUMO modification at promoters of protein-coding genes.

The related coactivator complexes SAGA and ATAC control embryonic stem cell self-renewal through acetyltransferase-independent mechanisms

SAGA (Spt-Ada-Gcn5 acetyltransferase) and ATAC (Ada-two-A-containing) are two related coactivator complexes, sharing the same histone acetyltransferase (HAT) subunit. The HAT activities of SAGA and ATAC are required for metazoan development, but the role of these complexes in RNA polymerase II transcription is less understood. To determine whether SAGA and ATAC have redundant or specific functions, we compare the effects of HAT inactivation in each complex with that of inactivation of either SAGA or ATAC core subunits in mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs). We show that core subunits of SAGA or ATAC are required for complex assembly and mouse ESC growth and self-renewal. Surprisingly, depletion of HAT module subunits causes a global decrease in histone H3K9 acetylation, but does not result in significant phenotypic or transcriptional defects. Thus, our results indicate that SAGA and ATAC are differentially required for self-renewal of mouse ESCs by regulating transcription through different pathways in a HAT-independent manner.

A unique GCN5 histone acetyltransferase complex controls erythrocyte invasion and virulence in the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum

The histone acetyltransferase GCN5-associated SAGA complex is evolutionarily conserved from yeast to human and functions as a general transcription co-activator in global gene regulation. In this study, we identified a divergent GCN5 complex in Plasmodium falciparum, which contains two plant homeodomain (PHD) proteins (PfPHD1 and PfPHD2) and a plant apetela2 (AP2)-domain transcription factor (PfAP2-LT). To dissect the functions of the PfGCN5 complex, we generated parasite lines with either the bromodomain in PfGCN5 or the PHD domain in PfPHD1 deleted. The two deletion mutants closely phenocopied each other, exhibiting significantly reduced merozoite invasion of erythrocytes and elevated sexual conversion. These domain deletions caused dramatic decreases not only in histone H3K9 acetylation but also in H3K4 trimethylation, indicating synergistic crosstalk between the two euchromatin marks. Domain deletion in either PfGCN5 or PfPHD1 profoundly disturbed the global transcription pattern, causing altered expression of more than 60% of the genes. At the schizont stage, these domain deletions were linked to specific down-regulation of merozoite genes involved in erythrocyte invasion, many of which contain the AP2-LT binding motif and are also regulated by AP2-I and BDP1, suggesting targeted recruitment of the PfGCN5 complex to the invasion genes by these specific factors. Conversely, at the ring stage, PfGCN5 or PfPHD1 domain deletions disrupted the mutually exclusive expression pattern of the entire var gene family, which encodes the virulent factor PfEMP1. Correlation analysis between the chromatin state and alteration of gene expression demonstrated that up- and down-regulated genes in these mutants are highly correlated with the silent and active chromatin states in the wild-type parasite, respectively. Collectively, the PfGCN5 complex represents a novel HAT complex with a unique subunit composition including an AP2 transcription factor, which signifies a new paradigm for targeting the co-activator complex to regulate general and parasite-specific cellular processes in this low-branching parasitic protist.

Epigenetic regulation of gene expression plays essential roles in orchestrating the general and parasite-specific cellular pathways in the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. To better understand the epigenetic mechanisms in this parasite, we characterized the histone acetyltransferase GCN5-mediated transcription regulation during intraerythrocytic development of the parasite. Using tandem affinity purification and proteomic characterization, we identified that the PfGCN5-associated complex contains nine core components, including two PHD domain proteins (PfPHD1 and PfPHD2) and an AP2-domain transcription factor, which is divergent from the canonical GCN5 complexes evolutionarily conserved from yeast to human. To understand the functions of the PfGCN5 complex, we performed domain deletions in two subunits of this complex, PfGCN5 and PfPHD1. We found that the two deletion mutants displayed very similar growth phenotypes, including significantly reduced merozoite invasion rates and elevated sexual conversion. These two mutants were associated with dramatic decreases in histone H3K9 acetylation and H3K4 trimethylation, which led to global changes in chromatin states and gene expression. Consistent with the phenotypes, genes significantly affected by the PfGCN5 and PfPHD1 gene disruption include those participating in parasite-specific pathways such as invasion, virulence, and sexual development. In conclusion, this study presents a new model of the PfGCN5 complex for targeting the co-activator complex to regulate general and parasite-specific cellular processes in this low-branching parasitic protist.

The SAGA complex regulates early steps in transcription via its deubiquitylase module subunit USP22

The SAGA coactivator complex is essential for eukaryotic transcription and comprises four distinct modules, one of which contains the ubiquitin hydrolase USP22. In yeast, the USP22 ortholog deubiquitylates H2B, resulting in Pol II Ser2 phosphorylation and subsequent transcriptional elongation. In contrast to this H2B-associated role in transcription, we report here that human USP22 contributes to the early stages of stimulus-responsive transcription, where USP22 is required for pre-initiation complex (PIC) stability. Specifically, USP22 maintains long-range enhancer-promoter contacts and controls loading of Mediator tail and general transcription factors (GTFs) onto promoters, with Mediator core recruitment being USP22-independent. In addition, we identify Mediator tail subunits MED16 and MED24 and the Pol II subunit RBP1 as potential non-histone substrates of USP22. Overall, these findings define a role for human SAGA within the earliest steps of transcription.

Advances in promoter engineering: novel applications and predefined transcriptional control

Synthetic biology continues to progress by relying on more robust tools for transcriptional control, of which promoters are the most fundamental component. Numerous studies have sought to characterize promoter function, determine principles to guide their engineering, and create promoters with stronger expression or tailored inducible control. In this review, we will summarize promoter architecture and highlight recent advances in the field, focusing on the novel applications of inducible promoter design and engineering towards metabolic engineering and cellular therapeutic development. Additionally, we will highlight how the expansion of new, machine learning techniques for modeling and engineering promoter sequences are enabling more accurate prediction of promoter characteristics. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

The Pol II preinitiation complex (PIC) influences Mediator binding but not promoter-enhancer looping

Knowledge of how Mediator and TFIID cross-talk contributes to promoter-enhancer (P-E) communication is important for elucidating the mechanism of enhancer function. We conducted an shRNA knockdown screen in murine embryonic stem cells to identify the functional overlap between Mediator and TFIID subunits on gene expression. Auxin-inducible degrons were constructed for TAF12 and MED4, the subunits eliciting the greatest overlap. Degradation of TAF12 led to a dramatic genome-wide decrease in gene expression accompanied by destruction of TFIID, loss of Pol II preinitiation complex (PIC) at promoters, and significantly decreased Mediator binding to promoters and enhancers. Interestingly, loss of the PIC elicited only a mild effect on P-E looping by promoter capture Hi-C (PCHi-C). Degradation of MED4 had a minor effect on Mediator integrity but led to a consistent twofold loss in gene expression, decreased binding of Pol II to Mediator, and decreased recruitment of Pol II to the promoters, but had no effect on the other PIC components. PCHi-C revealed no consistent effect of MED4 degradation on P-E looping. Collectively, our data show that TAF12 and MED4 contribute mechanistically in different ways to P-E communication but neither factor appears to directly control P-E looping, thereby dissociating P-E communication from physical looping.

Conservation and diversity of the eukaryotic SAGA coactivator complex across kingdoms

The SAGA complex is an evolutionarily conserved transcriptional coactivator that regulates gene expression through its histone acetyltransferase and deubiquitylase activities, recognition of specific histone modifications, and interactions with transcription factors. Multiple lines of evidence indicate the existence of distinct variants of SAGA among organisms as well as within a species, permitting diverse functions to dynamically regulate cellular pathways. Our co-expression analysis of genes encoding human SAGA components showed enrichment in reproductive organs, brain tissues and the skeletal muscle, which corresponds to their established roles in developmental programs, emerging roles in neurodegenerative diseases, and understudied functions in specific cell types. SAGA subunits modulate growth, development and response to various stresses from yeast to plants and metazoans. In metazoans, SAGA further participates in the regulation of differentiation and maturation of both innate and adaptive immune cells, and is associated with initiation and progression of diseases including a broad range of cancers. The evolutionary conservation of SAGA highlights its indispensable role in eukaryotic life, thus deciphering the mechanisms of action of SAGA is key to understanding fundamental biological processes throughout evolution. To illuminate the diversity and conservation of this essential complex, here we discuss variations in composition, essentiality and co-expression of component genes, and its prominent functions across Fungi, Plantae and Animalia kingdoms.

Interplay between transcriptional regulators and the SAGA chromatin modifying complex fine-tune iron homeostasis

The human fungal pathogen Candida albicans responds to iron deprivation by a global transcriptome reconfiguration known to be controlled by the transcriptional regulators Hap43 (also known as Cap2), Sef1, and the trimeric Hap2-Hap3-Hap5 complex. However, the relative roles of these regulators are not known. To dissect this system, we focused on the FRP1 and ACO1 genes, which are induced and repressed, respectively, under iron deprivation conditions. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays showed that the trimeric HAP complex and Sef1 are recruited to both FRP1 and ACO1 promoters. While the HAP complex occupancy at the FRP1 promoter was Sef1-dependent, occupancy of Sef1 was not dependent on the HAP complex. Furthermore, iron deprivation elicited histone H3-Lys9 hyperacetylation and Pol II recruitment mediated by the trimeric HAP complex and Sef1 at the FRP1 promoter. In contrast, at the ACO1 promoter, the HAP trimeric complex and Hap43 promoted histone deacetylation and also limited Pol II recruitment under iron deprivation conditions. Mutational analysis showed that the SAGA subunits Gcn5, Spt7, and Spt20 are required for C. albicans growth in iron-deficient medium and for H3-K9 acetylation and transcription from the FRP1 promoter. Thus, the trimeric HAP complex promotes FRP1 transcription by stimulating H3K9Ac and Pol II recruitment and, along with Hap43, functions as a repressor of ACO1 by maintaining a deacetylated promoter under iron-deficient conditions. Thus, a regulatory network involving iron-responsive transcriptional regulators and the SAGA histone modifying complex functions as a molecular switch to fine-tune tight control of iron homeostasis gene expression in C. albicans.

The SAGA chromatin-modifying complex: the sum of its parts is greater than the whole

In this review, Soffers and Workman discuss the initial discovery of the canonical SAGA complex, the subsequent studies that have shaped our view on the internal organization of its subunits into modules, and the latest structural work that visualizes the modules and provides insights into their function.

There are many large protein complexes involved in transcription in a chromatin context. However, recent studies on the SAGA coactivator complex are generating new paradigms for how the components of these complexes function, both independently and in concert. This review highlights the initial discovery of the canonical SAGA complex 23 years ago, our evolving understanding of its modular structure and the relevance of its modular nature for its coactivator function in gene regulation.

SAGA and SAGA-like SLIK transcriptional coactivators are structurally and biochemically equivalent

The SAGA-like complex SLIK is a modified version of the Spt-Ada-Gcn5-Acetyltransferase (SAGA) complex. SLIK is formed through C-terminal truncation of the Spt7 SAGA subunit, causing loss of Spt8, one of the subunits that interacts with the TATA-binding protein (TBP). SLIK and SAGA are both coactivators of RNA polymerase II transcription in yeast, and both SAGA and SLIK perform chromatin modifications. The two complexes have been speculated to uniquely contribute to transcriptional regulation, but their respective contributions are not clear. To investigate, we assayed the chromatin modifying functions of SAGA and SLIK, revealing identical kinetics on minimal substrates in vitro. We also examined the binding of SAGA and SLIK to TBP and concluded that interestingly, both protein complexes have similar affinity for TBP. Additionally, despite the loss of Spt8 and C-terminus of Spt7 in SLIK, TBP prebound to SLIK is not released in the presence of TATA-box DNA, just like TBP prebound to SAGA. Furthermore, we determined a low-resolution cryo-EM structure of SLIK, revealing a modular architecture identical to SAGA. Finally, we performed a comprehensive study of DNA-binding properties of both coactivators. Purified SAGA and SLIK both associate with ssDNA and dsDNA with high affinity (K_D = 10–17 nM), and the binding is sequence-independent. In conclusion, our study shows that the cleavage of Spt7 and the absence of the Spt8 subunit in SLIK neither drive any major conformational differences in its structure compared with SAGA, nor significantly affect HAT, DUB, or DNA-binding activities in vitro.

The Spt7 subunit of the SAGA complex is required for the regulation of lifespan in both dividing and nondividing yeast cells

Spt7 belongs to the suppressor of Ty (SPT) module of the Spt-Ada-Gcn5-acetyltransferase (SAGA) complex and is known as the yeast ortholog of human STAF65γ. Spt7 lacks intrinsic enzymatic activity but is responsible for the integrity and proper assembly of the SAGA complex. Here, we determined the role of the SAGA Spt7 subunit in cellular aging. We found that Spt7 was indispensable for a normal lifespan in both dividing and nondividing yeast cells. In the quiescent state of cells, Spt7 was required for the control of overall mRNA levels. In mitotically active cells, deletion of the SPT module had little effect on the recombination rate within heterochromatic ribosomal DNA (rDNA) loci, but loss of Spt7 profoundly elevated the plasmid-based DNA recombination frequency. Consistently, loss of Spt7 increased spontaneous Rad52 foci by approximately two-fold upon entry into S phase. These results provide evidence that Spt7 contributes to the regulation of the normal replicative lifespan (RLS) and chronological lifespan (CLS), possibly by controlling the DNA recombination rate and overall mRNA expression. We propose that the regulation of SAGA complex integrity by Spt7 might be involved in the conserved regulatory pathway for lifespan regulation in eukaryotes.

A high-resolution protein architecture of the budding yeast genome

The genome-wide architecture of chromatin-associated proteins that maintains chromosome integrity and gene regulation is not well defined. Here we use chromatin immunoprecipitation, exonuclease digestion and DNA sequencing (ChIP-exo/seq)1,2 to define this architecture in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We identify 21 meta-assemblages consisting of roughly 400 different proteins that are related to DNA replication, centromeres, subtelomeres, transposons and transcription by RNA polymerase (Pol) I, II and III. Replication proteins engulf a nucleosome, centromeres lack a nucleosome, and repressive proteins encompass three nucleosomes at subtelomeric X-elements. We find that most promoters associated with Pol II evolved to lack a regulatory region, having only a core promoter. These constitutive promoters comprise a short nucleosome-free region (NFR) adjacent to a +1 nucleosome, which together bind the transcription-initiation factor TFIID to form a preinitiation complex. Positioned insulators protect core promoters from upstream events. A small fraction of promoters evolved an architecture for inducibility, whereby sequence-specific transcription factors (ssTFs) create a nucleosome-depleted region (NDR) that is distinct from an NFR. We describe structural interactions among ssTFs, their cognate cofactors and the genome. These interactions include the nucleosomal and transcriptional regulators RPD3-L, SAGA, NuA4, Tup1, Mediator and SWI-SNF. Surprisingly, we do not detect interactions between ssTFs and TFIID, suggesting that such interactions do not stably occur. Our model for gene induction involves ssTFs, cofactors and general factors such as TBP and TFIIB, but not TFIID. By contrast, constitutive transcription involves TFIID but not ssTFs engaged with their cofactors. From this, we define a highly integrated network of gene regulation by ssTFs.

Architectural Mediator subunits are differentially essential for global transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Mediator is a modular coactivator complex involved in the transcription of the majority of RNA polymerase II-regulated genes. However, the degrees to which individual core subunits of Mediator contribute to its activity have been unclear. Here, we investigate the contribution of two essential architectural subunits of Mediator to transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We show that acute depletion of the main complex scaffold Med14 or the head module nucleator Med17 is lethal and results in global transcriptional downregulation, though Med17 removal has a markedly greater negative effect. Consistent with this, Med17 depletion impairs preinitiation complex (PIC) assembly to a greater extent than Med14 removal. Co-depletion of Med14 and Med17 reduced transcription and TFIIB promoter occupancy similarly to Med17 ablation alone, indicating that the contributions of Med14 and Med17 to Mediator function are not additive. We propose that, while the structural integrity of complete Mediator and the head module are both important for PIC assembly and transcription, the head module plays a greater role in this process and is thus the key functional module of Mediator in this regard.

Understanding transcription across scales: From base pairs to chromosomes

The influence of genome organization on transcription is central to our understanding of cell type specification. Higher-order genome organization is established through short- and long-range DNA interactions. Coordination of these interactions, from single atoms to entire chromosomes, plays a fundamental role in transcriptional control of gene expression. Loss of this coupling can result in disease. Analysis of transcriptional regulation typically involves disparate experimental approaches, from structural studies that define angstrom-level interactions to cell-biological and genomic approaches that assess mesoscale relationships. Thus, to fully understand the mechanisms that regulate gene expression, it is critical to integrate the findings gained across these distinct size scales. In this review, I illustrate fundamental ways in which cells regulate transcription in the context of genome organization.

Transcription shapes genome-wide histone acetylation patterns

Histone acetylation is a ubiquitous hallmark of transcription, but whether the link between histone acetylation and transcription is causal or consequential has not been addressed. Using immunoblot and chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing in S. cerevisiae, here we show that the majority of histone acetylation is dependent on transcription. This dependency is partially explained by the requirement of RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) for the interaction of H4 histone acetyltransferases (HATs) with gene bodies. Our data also confirms the targeting of HATs by transcription activators, but interestingly, promoter-bound HATs are unable to acetylate histones in the absence of transcription. Indeed, HAT occupancy alone poorly predicts histone acetylation genome-wide, suggesting that HAT activity is regulated post-recruitment. Consistent with this, we show that histone acetylation increases at nucleosomes predicted to stall RNAPII, supporting the hypothesis that this modification is dependent on nucleosome disruption during transcription. Collectively, these data show that histone acetylation is a consequence of RNAPII promoting both the recruitment and activity of histone acetyltransferases.

Chromatin Modifiers in Transcriptional Regulation: New Findings and Prospects

Histone-modifying and remodeling complexes are considered the main coregulators that affect transcription by changing the chromatin structure. Coordinated action by these complexes is essential for the transcriptional activation of any eukaryotic gene. In this review, we discuss current trends in the study of histone modifiers and chromatin remodelers, including the functional impact of transcriptional proteins/ complexes i.e., "pioneers"; remodeling and modification of non-histone proteins by transcriptional complexes; the supplementary functions of the non-catalytic subunits of remodelers, and the participation of histone modifiers in the "pause" of RNA polymerase II. The review also includes a scheme illustrating the mechanisms of recruitment of the main classes of remodelers and chromatin modifiers to various sites in the genome and their functional activities.

The biochemical and genetic discovery of the SAGA complex

One of the major advances in our understanding of gene regulation in eukaryotes was the discovery of factors that regulate transcription by controlling chromatin structure. Prominent among these discoveries was the demonstration that Gcn5 is a histone acetyltransferase, establishing a direct connection between transcriptional activation and histone acetylation. This breakthrough was soon followed by the purification of a protein complex that contains Gcn5, the SAGA complex. In this article, we review the early genetic and biochemical experiments that led to the discovery of SAGA and the elucidation of its multiple activities.

SAGA-CORE subunit Spt7 is required for correct Ubp8 localization, chromatin association and deubiquitinase activity

Background

Histone H2B deubiquitination is performed by numerous deubiquitinases in eukaryotic cells including Ubp8, the catalytic subunit of the tetrameric deubiquitination module (DUBm: Ubp8; Sus1; Sgf11; Sgf73) of the Spt-Ada-Gcn5 acetyltransferase (SAGA). Ubp8 is linked to the rest of SAGA through Sgf73 and is activated by the adaptors Sus1 and Sgf11. It is unknown if DUBm/Ubp8 might also work in a SAGA-independent manner.

Results

Here we report that a tetrameric DUBm is assembled independently of the SAGA–CORE components SPT7, ADA1 and SPT20. In the absence of SPT7, i.e., independent of the SAGA complex, Ubp8 and Sus1 are poorly recruited to SAGA-dependent genes and to chromatin. Notably, cells lacking Spt7 or Ada1, but not Spt20, show lower levels of nuclear Ubp8 than wild-type cells, suggesting a possible role for SAGA–CORE subunits in Ubp8 localization. Last, deletion of SPT7 leads to defects in Ubp8 deubiquitinase activity in in vivo and in vitro assays.

Conclusions

Collectively, our studies show that the DUBm tetrameric structure can form without a complete intact SAGA–CORE complex and that it includes full-length Sgf73. However, subunits of this SAGA–CORE influence DUBm association with chromatin, its localization and its activity.

High-Resolution Genome-Wide Occupancy in Candida spp. Using ChEC-seq

To persist in their dynamic human host environments, fungal pathogens must sense and adapt by modulating their gene expression to fulfill their cellular needs. Understanding transcriptional regulation on a global scale would uncover cellular processes linked to persistence and virulence mechanisms that could be targeted for antifungal therapeutics. Infections associated with the yeast Candida albicans, a highly prevalent fungal pathogen, and the multiresistant related species Candida auris are becoming a serious public health threat. To define the set of a gene regulated by a transcriptional regulator in C. albicans, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-based techniques, including ChIP with microarray technology (ChIP-chip) or ChIP-DNA sequencing (ChIP-seq), have been widely used. Here, we describe a new set of PCR-based micrococcal nuclease (MNase)-tagging plasmids for C. albicans and other Candida spp. to determine the genome-wide location of any transcriptional regulator of interest using chromatin endogenous cleavage (ChEC) coupled to high-throughput sequencing (ChEC-seq). The ChEC procedure does not require protein-DNA cross-linking or sonication, thus avoiding artifacts related to epitope masking or the hyper-ChIPable euchromatic phenomenon. In a proof-of-concept application of ChEC-seq, we provided a high-resolution binding map of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex, a master regulator of fungal fitness in C. albicans, in addition to the transcription factor Nsi1 that is an ortholog of the DNA-binding protein Reb1 for which genome-wide occupancy was previously established in Saccharomyces cerevisiae The ChEC-seq procedure described here will allow a high-resolution genomic location definition which will enable a better understanding of transcriptional regulatory circuits that govern fungal fitness and drug resistance in these medically important fungi.IMPORTANCE Systemic fungal infections caused by Candida albicans and the "superbug" Candida auris are becoming a serious public health threat. The ability of these yeasts to cause disease is linked to their faculty to modulate the expression of genes that mediate their escape from the immune surveillance and their persistence in the different unfavorable niches within the host. Comprehensive knowledge on gene expression control of fungal fitness is consequently an interesting framework for the identification of essential infection processes that could be hindered by chemicals as potential therapeutics. Here, we expanded the use of ChEC-seq, a technique that was initially developed in the yeast model Saccharomyces cerevisiae to identify genes that are modulated by a transcriptional regulator, in pathogenic yeasts from the genus Candida This robust technique will allow a better characterization of key gene expression regulators and their contribution to virulence and antifungal resistance in these pathogenic yeasts.

Drosophila Zinc Finger Protein CG9890 Is Colocalized with Chromatin Modifying and Remodeling Complexes on Gene Promoters and Involved in Transcription Regulation

In this work, we conducted a genome-wide study of the zinc finger protein CG9890 and showed that it is localized mostly on the promoters of active genes. The CG9890 binding sites are low-nucleosome-density regions and are colocalized with the chromatin modifying and remodeling complexes SAGA and dSWI/SNF, as well as with the ORC replication complex. The CG9890 protein was shown to be involved in the regulation of the expression of some genes on the promoters of which it is located, with the ecdysone cascade genes accounting for a significant percentage of these genes. Thus, the CG9890 protein is a new member of the transcriptional network which is localized on active promoters, interacts with the main transcription and replication complexes, and is involved in the regulation of both basal and inducible transcription.

Advances and Opportunities in Epigenetic Chemical Biology

The study of epigenetics has greatly benefited from the development and application of various chemical biology approaches. In this review, we highlight the key targets for modulation and recent methods developed to enact such modulation. We discuss various chemical biology techniques to study DNA methylation and the post-translational modification of histones as well as their effect on gene expression. Additionally, we address the wealth of protein synthesis approaches to yield histones and nucleosomes bearing epigenetic modifications. Throughout, we highlight targets that present opportunities for the chemical biology community, as well as exciting new approaches that will provide additional insight into the roles of epigenetic marks.

Prp5-Spt8/Spt3 interaction mediates a reciprocal coupling between splicing and transcription

Transcription and pre-mRNA splicing are coupled to promote gene expression and regulation. However, mechanisms by which transcription and splicing influence each other are still under investigation. The ATPase Prp5p is required for pre-spliceosome assembly and splicing proofreading at the branch-point region. From an open UV mutagenesis screen for genetic suppressors of prp5 defects and subsequent targeted testing, we identify components of the TBP-binding module of the Spt–Ada–Gcn5 Acetyltransferase (SAGA) complex, Spt8p and Spt3p. Spt8Δ and spt3Δ rescue the cold-sensitivity of prp5-GAR allele, and prp5 mutants restore growth of spt8Δ and spt3Δ strains on 6-azauracil. By chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP), we find that prp5 alleles decrease recruitment of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) to an intron-containing gene, which is rescued by spt8Δ. Further ChIP-seq reveals that global effects on Pol II-binding are mutually rescued by prp5-GAR and spt8Δ. Inhibited splicing caused by prp5-GAR is also restored by spt8Δ. In vitro assays indicate that Prp5p directly interacts with Spt8p, but not Spt3p. We demonstrate that Prp5p's splicing proofreading is modulated by Spt8p and Spt3p. Therefore, this study reveals that interactions between the TBP-binding module of SAGA and the spliceosomal ATPase Prp5p mediate a balance between transcription initiation/elongation and pre-spliceosome assembly.

Embryonic tissue differentiation is characterized by transitions in cell cycle dynamic-associated core promoter regulation

The core-promoter, a stretch of DNA surrounding the transcription start site (TSS), is a major integration-point for regulatory-signals controlling gene-transcription. Cellular differentiation is marked by divergence in transcriptional repertoire and cell-cycling behaviour between cells of different fates. The role promoter-associated gene-regulatory-networks play in development-associated transitions in cell-cycle-dynamics is poorly understood. This study demonstrates in a vertebrate embryo, how core-promoter variations define transcriptional output in cells transitioning from a proliferative to cell-lineage specifying phenotype. Assessment of cell proliferation across zebrafish embryo segmentation, using the FUCCI transgenic cell-cycle-phase marker, revealed a spatial and lineage-specific separation in cell-cycling behaviour. To investigate the role differential promoter usage plays in this process, cap-analysis-of-gene-expression (CAGE) was performed on cells segregated by cycling dynamics. This analysis revealed a dramatic increase in tissue-specific gene expression, concurrent with slowed cycling behaviour. We revealed a distinct sharpening in TSS utilization in genes upregulated in slowly cycling, differentiating tissues, associated with enhanced utilization of the TATA-box, in addition to Sp1 binding-sites. In contrast, genes upregulated in rapidly cycling cells carry broad distribution of TSS utilization, coupled with enrichment for the CCAAT-box. These promoter features appear to correspond to cell-cycle-dynamic rather than tissue/cell-lineage origin. Moreover, we observed genes with cell-cycle-dynamic-associated transitioning in TSS distribution and differential utilization of alternative promoters. These results demonstrate the regulatory role of core-promoters in cell-cycle-dependent transcription regulation, during embryo-development.

Deacetylation of H4 lysine16 affects acetylation of lysine residues in histone H3 and H4 and promotes transcription of constitutive genes

Histone modification map of H4 N-terminal tail residues in Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals the prominence of lysine acetylation. Previous reports have indicated the importance of lysine acetylation in maintaining chromatin structure and function. H4K16, a residue with highly regulated acetylation dynamics has unique functions not overlapping with the other H4 N- terminal acetylable residues. The present work unravels the role of H4K16 acetylation in regulating expression of constitutive genes. H4K16 gets distinctly deacetylated over the coding region of constitutively expressed genes. Deacetylation of H4K16 reduces H3K9 acetylation at the cellular and gene level. Reduced H3K9 acetylation however did not negatively correlate with active gene transcription. Significantly, H4K16 deacetylation was found to be associated with hypoacetylated H4K12 throughout the locus of constitutive genes. H4K16 and K12 deacetylation is known to favour active transcription. Sas2, the HAT mutant showed similar patterns of hypoacetylated H3K9 and H4K12 at the active loci, clearly implying that the modifications were associated with deacetylation state of H4K16. Deacetylation of H4K16 was also concurrent with increased H3K56 acetylation in the promoter region and ORF of the constitutive genes. Combination of all these histone modifications significantly reduced H3 occupancy, increased promoter accessibility and enhanced RNAPII recruitment at the constitutively active loci. Consequently, we found that expression of active genes was higher in H4K16R mutant which mimic deacetylated state, but not in H4K16Q mimicking constitutive acetylation. To summarize, H4K16 deacetylation linked with H4K12 and H3K9 hypoacetylation along with H3K56 hyperacetylation generate a chromatin landscape that is conducive for transcription of constitutive genes.

Cell cycle roles for GCN5 revealed through genetic suppression

The conserved acetyltransferase Gcn5 is a member of several complexes in eukaryotic cells, playing roles in regulating chromatin organization, gene expression, metabolism, and cell growth and differentiation via acetylation of both nuclear and cytoplasmic proteins. Distinct functions of Gcn5 have been revealed through a combination of biochemical and genetic approaches in many in vitro studies and model organisms. In this review, we focus on the unique insights that have been gleaned from suppressor studies of gcn5 phenotypes in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Such studies were fundamental in the early understanding of the balance of counteracting chromatin activities in regulating transcription. Most recently, suppressor screens have revealed roles for Gcn5 in early cell cycle (G₁ to S) gene expression and regulation of chromosome segregation during mitosis. Much has been learned, but many questions remain which will be informed by focused analysis of additional genetic and physical interactions.

What do the structures of GCN5-containing complexes teach us about their function?

Transcription initiation is a major regulatory step in eukaryotic gene expression. It involves the assembly of general transcription factors and RNA polymerase II into a functional pre-initiation complex at core promoters. The degree of chromatin compaction controls the accessibility of the transcription machinery to template DNA. Co-activators have critical roles in this process by actively regulating chromatin accessibility. Many transcriptional coactivators are multisubunit complexes, organized into distinct structural and functional modules and carrying multiple regulatory activities. The first nuclear histone acetyltransferase (HAT) characterized was General Control Non-derepressible 5 (Gcn5). Gcn5 was subsequently identified as a subunit of the HAT module of the Spt-Ada-Gcn5-acetyltransferase (SAGA) complex, which is an experimental paradigm for multifunctional co-activators. We know today that Gcn5 is the catalytic subunit of multiple distinct co-activator complexes with specific functions. In this review, we summarize recent advances in the structure of Gcn5-containing co-activator complexes, most notably SAGA, and discuss how these new structural insights contribute to better understand their functions.

The Gcn5 complexes in Drosophila as a model for metazoa

The histone acetyltransferase Gcn5 is conserved throughout eukaryotes where it functions as part of large multi-subunit transcriptional coactivator complexes that stimulate gene expression. Here, we describe how studies in the model insect Drosophila melanogaster have provided insight into the essential roles played by Gcn5 in the development of multicellular organisms. We outline the composition and activity of the four different Gcn5 complexes in Drosophila: the Spt-Ada-Gcn5 Acetyltransferase (SAGA), Ada2a-containing (ATAC), Ada2/Gcn5/Ada3 transcription activator (ADA), and Chiffon Histone Acetyltransferase (CHAT) complexes. Whereas the SAGA and ADA complexes are also present in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, ATAC has only been identified in other metazoa such as humans, and the CHAT complex appears to be unique to insects. Each of these Gcn5 complexes is nucleated by unique Ada2 homologs or splice isoforms that share conserved N-terminal domains, and differ only in their C-terminal domains. We describe the common and specialized developmental functions of each Gcn5 complex based on phenotypic analysis of mutant flies. In addition, we outline how gene expression studies in mutant flies have shed light on the different biological roles of each complex. Together, these studies highlight the key role that Drosophila has played in understanding the expanded biological function of Gcn5 in multicellular eukaryotes.

Kin28 depletion increases association of TFIID subunits Taf1 and Taf4 with promoters in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Transcription of eukaryotic mRNA-encoding genes by RNA polymerase II (Pol II) begins with assembly of the pre-initiation complex (PIC), comprising Pol II and the general transcription factors. Although the pathway of PIC assembly is well established, the mechanism of assembly and the dynamics of PIC components are not fully understood. For example, only recently has it been shown that in yeast, the Mediator complex normally occupies promoters only transiently, but shows increased association when Pol II promoter escape is inhibited. Here we show that two subunits of TFIID, Taf1 and Taf4, similarly show increased occupancy as measured by ChIP upon depletion or inactivation of Kin28. In contrast, TBP occupancy is unaffected by depletion of Kin28, thus revealing an uncoupling of Taf and TBP occupancy during the transcription cycle. Increased Taf1 occupancy upon Kin28 depletion is suppressed by depletion of TBP, while depletion of TBP in the presence of Kin28 has little effect on Taf1 occupancy. The increase in Taf occupancy upon depletion of Kin28 is more pronounced at TFIID-dominated promoters compared to SAGA-dominated promoters. Our results support the suggestion, based on recent structural studies, that TFIID may not remain bound to gene promoters through the transcription initiation cycle.

SAGA and TFIID: Friends of TBP drifting apart

Transcription initiation constitutes a major checkpoint in gene regulation across all living organisms. Control of chromatin function is tightly linked to this checkpoint, which is best illustrated by the SAGA coactivator. This evolutionary conserved complex of 18-20 subunits was first discovered as a Gcn5p-containing histone acetyltransferase, but it also integrates a histone H2B deubiquitinase. The SAGA subunits are organized in a modular fashion around its central core. Strikingly, this central module of SAGA shares a number of proteins with the central core of the basal transcription factor TFIID. In this review I will compare the SAGA and TFIID complexes with respect to their shared subunits, structural organization, enzymatic activities and chromatin binding. I will place a special emphasis on the ancestry of SAGA and TFIID subunits, which suggests that these complexes evolved to control the activity of TBP (TATA-binding protein) in directing the assembly of transcription initiation complexes.

Gene Deregulation and Underlying Mechanisms in Spinocerebellar Ataxias With Polyglutamine Expansion

Polyglutamine spinocerebellar ataxias (polyQ SCAs) include SCA1, SCA2, SCA3, SCA6, SCA7, and SCA17 and constitute a group of adult onset neurodegenerative disorders caused by the expansion of a CAG repeat sequence located within the coding region of specific genes, which translates into polyglutamine tract in the corresponding proteins. PolyQ SCAs are characterized by degeneration of the cerebellum and its associated structures and lead to progressive ataxia and other diverse symptoms. In recent years, gene and epigenetic deregulations have been shown to play a critical role in the pathogenesis of polyQ SCAs. Here, we provide an overview of the functions of wild type and pathogenic polyQ SCA proteins in gene regulation, describe the extent and nature of gene expression changes and their pathological consequences in diseases, and discuss potential avenues to further investigate converging and distinct disease pathways and to develop therapeutic strategies.

The yeast exoribonuclease Xrn1 and associated factors modulate RNA polymerase II processivity in 5' and 3' gene regions

mRNA levels are determined by the balance between mRNA synthesis and decay. Protein factors that mediate both processes, including the 5'-3' exonuclease Xrn1, are responsible for a cross-talk between the two processes that buffers steady-state mRNA levels. However, the roles of these proteins in transcription remain elusive and controversial. Applying native elongating transcript sequencing (NET-seq) to yeast cells, we show that Xrn1 functions mainly as a transcriptional activator and that its disruption manifests as a reduction of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) occupancy downstream of transcription start sites. By combining our sequencing data and mathematical modeling of transcription, we found that Xrn1 modulates transcription initiation and elongation of its target genes. Furthermore, Pol II occupancy markedly increased near cleavage and polyadenylation sites in xrn1Δ cells, whereas its activity decreased, a characteristic feature of backtracked Pol II. We also provide indirect evidence that Xrn1 is involved in transcription termination downstream of polyadenylation sites. We noted that two additional decay factors, Dhh1 and Lsm1, seem to function similarly to Xrn1 in transcription, perhaps as a complex, and that the decay factors Ccr4 and Rpb4 also perturb transcription in other ways. Interestingly, the decay factors could differentiate between SAGA- and TFIID-dominated promoters. These two classes of genes responded differently to XRN1 deletion in mRNA synthesis and were differentially regulated by mRNA decay pathways, raising the possibility that one distinction between these two gene classes lies in the mechanisms that balance mRNA synthesis with mRNA decay.

Universal promoter scanning by Pol II during transcription initiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

BACKGROUND

The majority of eukaryotic promoters utilize multiple transcription start sites (TSSs). How multiple TSSs are specified at individual promoters across eukaryotes is not understood for most species. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a pre-initiation complex (PIC) comprised of Pol II and conserved general transcription factors (GTFs) assembles and opens DNA upstream of TSSs. Evidence from model promoters indicates that the PIC scans from upstream to downstream to identify TSSs. Prior results suggest that TSS distributions at promoters where scanning occurs shift in a polar fashion upon alteration in Pol II catalytic activity or GTF function.

RESULTS

To determine the extent of promoter scanning across promoter classes in S. cerevisiae, we perturb Pol II catalytic activity and GTF function and analyze their effects on TSS usage genome-wide. We find that alterations to Pol II, TFIIB, or TFIIF function widely alter the initiation landscape consistent with promoter scanning operating at all yeast promoters, regardless of promoter class. Promoter architecture, however, can determine the extent of promoter sensitivity to altered Pol II activity in ways that are predicted by a scanning model.

CONCLUSIONS

Our observations coupled with previous data validate key predictions of the scanning model for Pol II initiation in yeast, which we term the shooting gallery. In this model, Pol II catalytic activity and the rate and processivity of Pol II scanning together with promoter sequence determine the distribution of TSSs and their usage.

The histone H4 basic patch regulates SAGA-mediated H2B deubiquitination and histone acetylation

Histone H2B monoubiquitylation (H2Bub1) has central functions in multiple DNA-templated processes, including gene transcription, DNA repair, and replication. H2Bub1 also is required for the trans-histone regulation of H3K4 and H3K79 methylation. Although previous studies have elucidated the basic mechanisms that establish and remove H2Bub1, we have only an incomplete understanding of how H2Bub1 is regulated. We report here that the histone H4 basic patch regulates H2Bub1. Yeast cells with arginine-to-alanine mutations in the H4 basic patch (H4_2RA) exhibited a significant loss of global H2Bub1. H4_2RA mutant yeast strains also displayed chemotoxin sensitivities similar to, but less severe than, strains containing a complete loss of H2Bub1. We found that the H4 basic patch regulates H2Bub1 levels independently of interactions with chromatin remodelers and separately from its regulation of H3K79 methylation. To measure H2B ubiquitylation and deubiquitination kinetics in vivo, we used a rapid and reversible optogenetic tool, the light-inducible nuclear exporter, to control the subcellular location of the H2Bub1 E3 ligase, Bre1. The ability of Bre1 to ubiquitylate H2B was unaffected in the H4_2RA mutant. In contrast, H2Bub1 deubiquitination by SAGA-associated Ubp8, but not by Ubp10, increased in the H4_2RA mutant. Consistent with a function for the H4 basic patch in regulating SAGA deubiquitinase activity, we also detected increased SAGA-mediated histone acetylation in H4 basic patch mutants. Our findings uncover that the H4 basic patch has a regulatory function in SAGA-mediated histone modifications.

Targeting the SAGA and ATAC Transcriptional Coactivator Complexes in MYC-Driven Cancers

Targeting epigenetic regulators, such as histone-modifying enzymes, provides novel strategies for cancer therapy. The GCN5 lysine acetyltransferase (KAT) functions together with MYC both during normal development and in oncogenesis. As transcription factors, MYC family members are difficult to target with small-molecule inhibitors, but the acetyltransferase domain and the bromodomain in GCN5 might provide alternative targets for disruption of MYC-driven functions. GCN5 is part of two distinct multiprotein histone-modifying complexes, SAGA and ATAC. This review summarizes key findings on the roles of SAGA and ATAC in embryo development and in cancer to better understand the functional relationships of these complexes with MYC family members, as well as their future potential as therapeutic targets.

Structure of SAGA and mechanism of TBP deposition on gene promoters

SAGA (Spt-Ada-Gcn5-acetyltransferase) is a 19-subunit complex that stimulates transcription via two chromatin-modifying enzymatic modules and by delivering the TATA box binding protein (TBP) to nucleate the pre-initiation complex on DNA, a pivotal event in the expression of protein-encoding genes¹. Here we present the structure of yeast SAGA with bound TBP. The core of the complex is resolved at 3.5 Å resolution (0.143 Fourier shell correlation). The structure reveals the intricate network of interactions that coordinate the different functional domains of SAGA and resolves an octamer of histone-fold domains at the core of SAGA. This deformed octamer deviates considerably from the symmetrical analogue in the nucleosome and is precisely tuned to establish a peripheral site for TBP, where steric hindrance represses binding of spurious DNA. Complementary biochemical analysis points to a mechanism for TBP delivery and release from SAGA that requires transcription factor IIA and whose efficiency correlates with the affinity of DNA to TBP. We provide the foundations for understanding the specific delivery of TBP to gene promoters and the multiple roles of SAGA in regulating gene expression.

Two roles for the yeast transcription coactivator SAGA and a set of genes redundantly regulated by TFIID and SAGA

Deletions within genes coding for subunits of the transcription coactivator SAGA caused strong genome-wide defects in transcription and SAGA-mediated chromatin modifications. In contrast, rapid SAGA depletion produced only modest transcription defects at 13% of protein-coding genes - genes that are generally more sensitive to rapid TFIID depletion. However, transcription of these 'coactivator-redundant' genes is strongly affected by rapid depletion of both factors, showing the overlapping functions of TFIID and SAGA at this gene set. We suggest that this overlapping function is linked to TBP-DNA recruitment. The remaining 87% of expressed genes that we term 'TFIID-dependent' are highly sensitive to rapid TFIID depletion and insensitive to rapid SAGA depletion. Genome-wide mapping of SAGA and TFIID found binding of both factors at many genes independent of gene class. Promoter analysis suggests that the distinction between the gene classes is due to multiple components rather than any single regulatory factor or promoter sequence motif.

PPARβ/δ recruits NCOR and regulates transcription reinitiation of ANGPTL4

In the absence of ligands, the nuclear receptor PPARβ/δ recruits the NCOR and SMRT corepressors, which form complexes with HDAC3, to canonical target genes. Agonistic ligands cause dissociation of corepressors and enable enhanced transcription. Vice versa, synthetic inverse agonists augment corepressor recruitment and repression. Both basal repression of the target gene ANGPTL4 and reinforced repression elicited by inverse agonists are partially insensitive to HDAC inhibition. This raises the question how PPARβ/δ represses transcription mechanistically. We show that the PPARβ/δ inverse agonist PT-S264 impairs transcription initiation by decreasing recruitment of activating Mediator subunits, RNA polymerase II, and TFIIB, but not of TFIIA, to the ANGPTL4 promoter. Mass spectrometry identifies NCOR as the main PT-S264-dependent interactor of PPARβ/δ. Reconstitution of knockout cells with PPARβ/δ mutants deficient in basal repression results in diminished recruitment of NCOR, SMRT, and HDAC3 to PPAR target genes, while occupancy by RNA polymerase II is increased. PT-S264 restores binding of NCOR, SMRT, and HDAC3 to the mutants, resulting in reduced polymerase II occupancy. Our findings corroborate deacetylase-dependent and -independent repressive functions of HDAC3-containing complexes, which act in parallel to downregulate transcription.

Genomic methods in profiling DNA accessibility and factor localization

Recent advancements in next-generation sequencing technologies and accompanying reductions in cost have led to an explosion of techniques to examine DNA accessibility and protein localization on chromatin genome-wide. Generally, accessible regions of chromatin are permissive for factor binding and are therefore hotspots for regulation of gene expression; conversely, genomic regions that are highly occupied by histone proteins are not permissive for factor binding and are less likely to be active regulatory regions. Identifying regions of differential accessibility can be useful to uncover putative gene regulatory regions, such as enhancers, promoters, and insulators. In addition, DNA-binding proteins, such as transcription factors that preferentially bind certain DNA sequences and histone proteins that form the core of the nucleosome, play essential roles in all DNA-templated processes. Determining the genomic localization of chromatin-bound proteins is therefore essential in determining functional roles, sequence motifs important for factor binding, and regulatory networks controlling gene expression. In this review, we discuss techniques for determining DNA accessibility and nucleosome positioning (DNase-seq, FAIRE-seq, MNase-seq, and ATAC-seq) and techniques for detecting and functionally characterizing chromatin-bound proteins (ChIP-seq, DamID, and CUT&RUN). These methods have been optimized to varying degrees of resolution, specificity, and ease of use. Here, we outline some advantages and disadvantages of these techniques, their general protocols, and a brief discussion of their development. Together, these complimentary approaches have provided an unparalleled view of chromatin architecture and functional gene regulation.

Chaperone-mediated ordered assembly of the SAGA and NuA4 transcription co-activator complexes in yeast

Transcription initiation involves the coordinated activities of large multimeric complexes, but little is known about their biogenesis. Here we report several principles underlying the assembly and topological organization of the highly conserved SAGA and NuA4 co-activator complexes, which share the Tra1 subunit. We show that Tra1 contributes to the overall integrity of NuA4, whereas, within SAGA, it specifically controls the incorporation of the de-ubiquitination module (DUB), as part of an ordered assembly pathway. Biochemical and functional analyses reveal the mechanism by which Tra1 specifically interacts with either SAGA or NuA4. Finally, we demonstrate that Hsp90 and its cochaperone TTT promote Tra1 de novo incorporation into both complexes, indicating that Tra1, the sole pseudokinase of the PIKK family, shares a dedicated chaperone machinery with its cognate kinases. Overall, our work brings mechanistic insights into the assembly of transcriptional complexes and reveals the contribution of dedicated chaperones to this process.

Transcription initiation involves the coordinated assembly and activity of large multimeric complexes. Here the authors report on the chaperone-mediated ordered assembly of the SAGA and NuA4 transcription co-activator complexes in fission yeast, providing insight into the de novo assembly of transcriptional complexes and the contribution of dedicated chaperones to this process.

The Novel ReNu Region of TAF12 Regulates Gcn5 Nucleosomal Acetylation

The post-translational acetylation of the histone components of chromatin mediates numerous DNA-templated events, including transcriptional activation, DNA repair, and genomic replication. The conserved SAGA (Spt-Ada-Gcn5 Acetyltranferase) and SLIK (SAGA-Like) Histone Acetyltransferase (HAT) complexes are required for transcriptional activation of a subset of yeast genes and contain multiple subunits including the histone fold-containing TBP- Associated Factors (TAFs): 6, 9, 10, and 12. These TAFs are also components of the TFIID complex and are consequently involved in most RNA polymerase II-transcription in yeast. Here we identify a novel conserved region of TAF12, termed ReNu, outside of its histone fold, which is required for SAGA and SLIK-directed nucleosomal acetylation. We demonstrate that this region is not required for chromatin association, but show that this region plays an important role for histone H3 acetylation at specific SAGA and SLIK-regulated promoters. Our data suggests that the ReNu region of TAF12 regulates Gcn5 acetylation of specific substrates within the SAGA super-family of HAT complexes.

Complex genetic and epigenetic regulation deviates gene expression from a unifying global transcriptional program

Environmental or genetic perturbations lead to gene expression changes. While most analyses of these changes emphasize the presence of qualitative differences on just a few genes, we now know that changes are widespread. This large-scale variation has been linked to the exclusive influence of a global transcriptional program determined by the new physiological state of the cell. However, given the sophistication of eukaryotic regulation, we expect to have a complex architecture of specific control affecting this program. Here, we examine this architecture. Using data of Saccharomyces cerevisiae expression in different nutrient conditions, we first propose a five-sector genome partition, which integrates earlier models of resource allocation, as a framework to examine the deviations from the global control. In this scheme, we recognize invariant genes, whose regulation is dominated by physiology, specific genes, which substantially depart from it, and two additional classes that contain the frequently assumed growth-dependent genes. Whereas the invariant class shows a considerable absence of specific regulation, the rest is enriched by regulation at the level of transcription factors (TFs) and epigenetic modulators. We nevertheless find markedly different strategies in how these classes deviate. On the one hand, there are TFs that act in a unique way between partition constituents, and on the other, the action of chromatin modifiers is significantly diverse. The balance between regulatory strategies ultimately modulates the action of the general transcription machinery and therefore limits the possibility of establishing a unifying program of expression change at a genomic scale.

How can we understand expression changes observed as a result of environmental or genetic perturbations? This issue has been conventionally answered by examining small groups of genes whose expression becomes qualitatively altered after these perturbations. But this approach is too simplistic, as we now know that extensive variation is typically observed. To explain this variation, recent works proposed a model in which genome-wide changes are explained by the action of a general program of transcription. Our manuscript reasons that given the complexity of eukaryotic transcriptional control, a unifying program of regulation cannot be achievable. Instead, we propose within an integrated framework of resource allocation that a rich structure of deviations from it exists and that by characterizing these deviations we can fully appreciate large-scale expression change.

The Ulp2 SUMO protease promotes transcription elongation through regulation of histone sumoylation

Many eukaryotic proteins are regulated by modification with the ubiquitin-like protein small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO). This linkage is reversed by SUMO proteases, of which there are two in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Ulp1 and Ulp2. SUMO-protein conjugation regulates transcription, but the roles of SUMO proteases in transcription remain unclear. We report that Ulp2 is recruited to transcriptionally active genes to control local polysumoylation. Mutant ulp2 cells show impaired association of RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) with, and diminished expression of, constitutively active genes and the inducible CUP1 gene. Ulp2 loss sensitizes cells to 6-azauracil, a hallmark of transcriptional elongation defects. We also describe a novel chromatin regulatory mechanism whereby histone-H2B ubiquitylation stimulates histone sumoylation, which in turn appears to inhibit nucleosome association of the Ctk1 kinase. Ctk1 phosphorylates serine-2 (S2) in the RNAPII C-terminal domain (CTD) and promotes transcript elongation. Removal of both ubiquitin and SUMO from histones is needed to overcome the impediment to S2 phosphorylation. These results suggest sequential ubiquitin-histone and SUMO-histone modifications recruit Ulp2, which removes polySUMO chains and promotes RNAPII transcription elongation.

Feedback to the central dogma: cytoplasmic mRNA decay and transcription are interdependent processes

Transcription and RNA decay are key determinants of gene expression; these processes are typically considered as the uncoupled beginning and end of the messenger RNA (mRNA) lifecycle. Here we describe the growing number of studies demonstrating interplay between these spatially disparate processes in eukaryotes. Specifically, cells can maintain mRNA levels by buffering against changes in mRNA stability or transcription, and can also respond to virally induced accelerated decay by reducing RNA polymerase II gene expression. In addition to these global responses, there is also evidence that mRNAs containing a premature stop codon can cause transcriptional upregulation of homologous genes in a targeted fashion. In each of these systems, RNA binding proteins (RBPs), particularly those involved in mRNA degradation, are critical for cytoplasmic to nuclear communication. Although their specific mechanistic contributions are yet to be fully elucidated, differential trafficking of RBPs between subcellular compartments are likely to play a central role in regulating this gene expression feedback pathway.

Gcn5 and Rpd3 have a limited role in the regulation of cell cycle transcripts during the G1 and S phases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Activation of cell cycle regulated transcription during the G1-to-S transition initiates S phase entry and cell cycle commitment. The molecular mechanisms involving G1/S transcriptional regulation are well established and have been shown to be evolutionary conserved from yeast to humans. Previous work has suggested that changes to the chromatin state, specifically through histone acetylation, has an important role in the regulation of G1/S transcription in both yeast and human cells. Here we investigate the role of histone acetylation in G1/S transcriptional regulation in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Our work shows that histone acetylation at specific sites at G1/S target gene promoters peaks at the G1-to-S transition, coinciding with their peak transcription levels. Acetylation at G1/S target promoters is significantly reduced upon deletion of the previously implicated histone acetyltransferase Gcn5, but G1/S cell cycle regulated transcription is largely unaffected. The histone deacetylase Rpd3, suggested to have a role in Whi5-dependent repression, is required for full repression of G1/S target genes in the G1 and S phases. However, in the context of transcriptionally active levels during the G1-to-S transition, this seems to play a minor role in the regulation of cell cycle transcription. Our data suggests that histone acetylation might modulate the amplitude of G1/S cell cycle regulated transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, but has a limited role in its overall regulation.

Dot1 promotes H2B ubiquitination by a methyltransferase-independent mechanism

The histone methyltransferase Dot1 is conserved from yeast to human and methylates lysine 79 of histone H3 (H3K79) on the core of the nucleosome. H3K79 methylation by Dot1 affects gene expression and the response to DNA damage, and is enhanced by monoubiquitination of the C-terminus of histone H2B (H2Bub1). To gain more insight into the functions of Dot1, we generated genetic interaction maps of increased-dosage alleles of DOT1. We identified a functional relationship between increased Dot1 dosage and loss of the DUB module of the SAGA co-activator complex, which deubiquitinates H2Bub1 and thereby negatively regulates H3K79 methylation. Increased Dot1 dosage was found to promote H2Bub1 in a dose-dependent manner and this was exacerbated by the loss of SAGA-DUB activity, which also caused a negative genetic interaction. The stimulatory effect on H2B ubiquitination was mediated by the N-terminus of Dot1, independent of methyltransferase activity. Our findings show that Dot1 and H2Bub1 are subject to bi-directional crosstalk and that Dot1 possesses chromatin regulatory functions that are independent of its methyltransferase activity.

SAGA DUBm-mediated surveillance regulates prompt export of stress-inducible transcripts for proteostasis

During stress, prompt export of stress-inducible transcripts is critical for cell survival. Here, we characterize a function of the SAGA (Spt-Ada-Gcn5 acetyltransferase) deubiquitylating module (DUBm) in monitoring messenger ribonucleoprotein (mRNP) biogenesis to regulate non-canonical mRNA export of stress-inducible transcripts. Our genetic and biochemical analyses suggest that there is a functional relationship between Sgf73p of DUBm and the essential mRNA export factor, Yra1p. Under physiological conditions, Sgf73p is critical for the proper chromatin localization and RNA binding of Yra1p, while also quality controlling the biogenesis of mRNPs in conjunction with the nuclear exosome exonuclease, Rrp6p. Under environmental stress, when immediate transport of stress-inducible transcripts is imperative, Sgf73p facilitates the bypass of canonical surveillance and promotes the timely export of necessary transcripts. Overall, our results show that the Sgf73p-mediated plasticity of gene expression is important for the ability of cells to tolerate stress and regulate proteostasis to survive under environmental uncertainty.

Stress-inducible transcripts are quickly exported to preserve cell survival when cells are under stress. Here, the authors suggest that Sgf73p of the SAGA deubiquitylating module monitors messenger ribonucleoprotein biogenesis to regulate non-canonical export of stress-inducible transcripts.