A novel anti-inflammatory drug, SDZ ASM 981, for the treatment of skin diseases: in vitro pharmacology

Safety and efficacy of early intervention with pimecrolimus cream 1% combined with corticosteroids for major flares in infants and children with atopic dermatitis

OBJECTIVE

To assess early intervention with pimecrolimus combined with corticosteroid (CS) for major flares in patients with severe atopic dermatitis (AD).

METHODS

In this 6-month, double-blind, multicenter, randomized, vehicle-controlled, parallel-group in 35 US centers, 275 children aged 3 months to 11 years with mild to severe AD applied the study medication twice daily at first signs/symptoms of AD. For major flares not controlled with study medication, a mid-potency CS cream replaced the evening study drug for up to 3 weeks. The percentage of subjects with no major flares was the main outcome measure.

RESULTS

Pimecrolimus reduced the major flare incidence and prolonged flare-free intervals. Significantly more pimecrolimus subjects (52%) had no major flares compared with vehicle subjects (34%; p = 0.007). Pimecrolimus significantly delayed the first flare (median, 53 days vs 13 days; p<0.001), and increased the time between flares (median, 31 days vs 15 days). Additionally, there was earlier pruritus improvement (median, day 3 vs day 6; p = 0.034) in the pimecrolimus group, as well as a reduced need for CS by 37% (p = 0.020) [corrected] Adverse events (AEs) incidence and type were comparable between groups. Combination therapy with pimecrolimus used at half the recommended dose did not shorten the mean flare duration or alter the AE profile.

CONCLUSIONS

Early treatment of signs/symptoms of AD with pimecrolimus cream 1% provided an effective steroid-sparing option that reduced the incidence of major flares.

A randomized study of the safety, absorption and efficacy of pimecrolimus cream 1% applied twice or four times daily in patients with atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Pimecrolimus cream 1% (Elidel), a non-steroid inhibitor of inflammatory cytokines, is effective in the treatment of atopic dermatitis, without corticosteroid-related side effects such as skin atrophy. It is indicated for twice-daily application. More frequent applications might be expected either to enhance efficacy or increase toxicity. This study compared the safety, efficacy and systemic absorption of pimecrolimus administered twice daily (recommended dose) and four times daily early in the treatment of patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis.

METHODS

Adolescent and adult patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis were randomly assigned to a twice daily (BID) treatment group (n = 24) or a four times daily (QID) group (n = 25). During days 1-7, patients in the QID group applied pimecrolimus four times daily, and patients in the BID group applied pimecrolimus twice daily plus vehicle equivalent twice daily. During days 8-21, all patients were required to use pimecrolimus twice daily and had the option to use up to two further daily treatments (pimecrolimus in the QID group and vehicle equivalent in the BID group). Blood sampling occurred 2, 4, and 6 hours after the first morning application on days 1 and 5 and then prior to the first morning application on days 8 and 15, and any time on day 22.

RESULTS

Only 3 (12%) QID patients and 4 (17%) BID patients reported adverse events (primarily mild, transient application-site burning) with no significant difference between treatment groups in the frequency, type, or severity of adverse events. The median daily number of applications in the QID group during days 8-21 when two additional doses were optional remained at four. Pimecrolimus blood levels from a subgroup of 22 patients showed no difference in systemic exposure between the two dosing regimens. All but three (one in the QID group, two in the BID group) patients had blood levels below the limit of quantification; the highest single blood level of pimecrolimus measured in any patient was 1.37 ng/ml (QID group). Both the QID and BID regimens improved the signs and symptoms of atopic dermatitis similarly as measured by improvements in pruritus severity score, Investigator's Global Assessment, Eczema Area and Severity Index, percentage of body surface area affected, and patient's self-assessment of disease control.

CONCLUSIONS

The data suggest that increasing pimecrolimus application from twice daily to four times daily to treat moderate to severe atopic dermatitis for up to 3 weeks does not alter the safety profile nor does it increase the efficacy of treatment. Systemic absorption of pimecrolimus applied BID and QID is minimal and is not different between dosing regimens. Patients and physicians familiar with the potential hazards of overuse of topical corticosteroids should be reassured that if pimecrolimus is applied at twice the recommended BID dose for short periods of time, there is no effect on safety, tolerability, or systemic absorption.

Impact of topical calcineurin inhibitors on quality of life in patients with atopic dermatitis

This review considers randomized trials of topical calcineurin inhibitors in atopic dermatitis that have included quality-of-life (QOL) data. Relatively few trials were identified and several different QOL measures have been used, partly because trial subjects included adults, children, and the parents of affected infants. Tacrolimus 0.1% and 0.03% ointment and pimecrolimus 1% cream were found to be superior to vehicle treatment in terms of QOL for active AD. In adults, tacrolimus 0.1% ointment provided a greater improvement in QOL than the 0.03% strength. Pimecrolimus 1% cream was superior to vehicle treatment for flare prevention in the studies that contained QOL outcomes but no data are available for tacrolimus ointment in this regard. QOL data comparing topical calcineurin inhibitors with other active treatments such as topical corticosteroids are sparse and it would be useful for future randomized trials to include QOL measures as a primary outcome.

Role of topical calcineurin inhibitors in the treatment of seborrheic dermatitis: a review of pathophysiology, safety, and efficacy

Seborrheic dermatitis (SD) is characterized by erythematous pruritic patches and plaques with greasy scale that occur in sebaceous areas. It is common, affecting up to 3% of the population. Past treatments have relied on a wide variety of anti-inflammatory and antifungal agents, but corticosteroids have limited use because of long-term adverse effects. Topical calcineurin inhibitors provide a safe alternative for the treatment of SD, as these drugs block the inflammatory cascade involved in the disease process and pose no risk of skin atrophy. Studies of topical pimecrolimus and tacrolimus in the treatment of SD have found that improvement occurred within 2 weeks, and if SD recurred after stopping treatment, it was significantly less severe. There have been no studies of the comparative efficacy of pimecrolimus versus tacrolimus for the treatment of SD. Common adverse effects of mild burning and irritation have been associated with the use of both of these agents. Safety profile studies are limited to studies of atopic dermatitis, which show no increase in infection rate, photocarcinogenicity, or signs of immunosuppression in patients using topical calcineurin inhibitors for long-term treatment. This article reviews the clinical trials of pimecrolimus and tacrolimus in the treatment of SD, focusing on efficacy and safety.

Treatment with pimecrolimus cream 1% clears irritant dermatitis of the periocular region, face and neck

BACKGROUND

Irritant dermatitis of the face and neck is particularly prevalent in women > or = 30 years old, who typically present with periocular cutaneous symptoms. Current therapies are limited, indicating a need for rapid, effective alternatives. Pimecrolimus cream 1%, a nonsteroid, cell-selective inhibitor of inflammatory-cytokine release, is effective in the treatment of inflammatory skin diseases, such as chronic irritant dermatitis of the hands, and thus offers a potential therapeutic option for this indication. This study reports on the safety and efficacy of pimecrolimus treatment in patients with irritant periocular dermatitis, extending to the face and neck in some patients.

METHODS

Twenty-seven patients with periocular irritant dermatitis (extending onto the face and neck in eight) were treated twice daily with pimecrolimus cream 1% for 7 d, followed by once-daily application for a further 7 d. Erythema, swelling, and pruritus were assessed at baseline, weeks 1-4 using a 4-point clinical score (0, absent; 1, mild; 2, moderate; and 3, severe).

RESULTS

All patients showed marked improvement within 2-3 d of treatment with disease clearance in 23 of 27 patients within 14 d. In the remaining four patients, mild relapse occurred at weeks 3-4, but improvement was observed following a further 10-d treatment. Side-effects were mild and transient.

CONCLUSION

Pimecrolimus cream 1% provides a new potential option for treatment of irritant dermatitis of the periocular region, head and neck. Further double-blind, controlled studies are required to confirm the efficacy and safety of pimecrolimus cream 1% for this indication.

Pimecrolimus reduces eosinophil activation associated with calcium mobilization

BACKGROUND

Pimecrolimus is a calcineurin inhibitor that inhibits T cell and mast cell activation and effectively treats atopic dermatitis. However, its effects on eosinophils, a cell type implicated in allergic disease pathology, are unknown. Therefore, we examined the effects of pimecrolimus on eosinophil superoxide anion production, degranulation and survival.

METHODS

Purified eosinophils from normal or atopic donors were incubated with serial dilutions of pimecrolimus (microM to nM) and then stimulated with platelet activating factor (PAF), interleukin 5 (IL5), secretory immunoglobulin A (sIgA) or Alternaria alternata (Alt) fungus extract. Eosinophil activation was monitored by cytochrome c reduction resulting from superoxide anion production and by a 2-site immunoassay for eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN) in cellular supernatants, as a marker of degranulation. Eosinophil survival was measured by propidium iodide exclusion using flow cytometry after 4 days in culture.

RESULTS

Normal and atopic eosinophil superoxide anion production induced by PAF, and associated with increased intracellular calcium, was inhibited up to 37% with 1 microM pimecrolimus. However, superoxide anion production induced by IL5 and sIgA was not consistently inhibited. EDN release, which ultimately depends on calcium, was inhibited about 30% with PAF, IL5 and sIgA stimulation for normal and atopic donor eosinophils. Furthermore, calcium-dependent Alt-induced EDN release was inhibited up to 49% with nanomolar pimecrolimus. Finally, increased eosinophil survival promoted by IL5 and sIgA was not influenced by pimecrolimus.

CONCLUSION

Pimecrolimus moderately inhibits eosinophil superoxide anion production and EDN release associated with calcium mobilization, which may contribute to its efficacy in treating atopic dermatitis.

Topical therapy in pediatric atopic dermatitis

With a prevalence of 10% to 20% in the first decade of life, atopic dermatitis (AD) is one of the most common skin disorders in young children. It is a chronic illness with limited therapeutic options. Topical anti-inflammatory agents remain at the core of medical management; however, their efficacy must be balanced with safety concerns, especially as they relate to the pediatric population. This article discusses the principles of topical AD therapy with a detailed review of the differences between topical corticosteroids and topical calcineurin inhibitors. It also includes specialized topical treatment strategies for AD, such as wet wraps and diluted bleach baths, and highlights the most common challenges to patient compliance in atopic dermatitis.

Management of atopic dermatitis in the pediatric population

Atopic dermatitis, one of the most common skin disorders in young children, has a prevalence of 10% to 20% in the first decade of life. It is a chronic illness that requires a multifaceted treatment strategy in the setting of limited therapeutic options. Balancing safety concerns with efficacious treatment is of particular importance in the pediatric population. Parents of patients with atopic dermatitis turn to their primary caregivers for guidance regarding this physically demanding and psychologically stressful condition. In addition to serving as a review of atopic dermatitis, this article delves into the state-of-the-art therapeutic options and includes a detailed review of the differences between topical corticosteroids and topical calcineurin inhibitors. We also discuss new treatment strategies that are being used by atopic dermatitis specialists, such as comprehensive "education-as-intervention" models, wet wraps, bleach baths, and systemic immunomodulatory therapies.

Binding of pimecrolimus and tacrolimus to skin and plasma proteins: implications for systemic exposure after topical application

Pimecrolimus and tacrolimus are calcineurin inhibitors used for the topical treatment of atopic dermatitis. Although structurally similar, they display specific differences including higher lipophilicity and lower skin permeation of pimecrolimus. The aim of the present study was to understand the reason for the differences in skin permeation; in addition, plasma protein binding of the two drugs was analyzed side by side as a basis for comparison of systemic exposure to free drug. Permeation of pimecrolimus and tacrolimus through a silicon membrane was found to be similar; therefore, we assumed that differences in skin permeation could be caused by differences in affinity to skin components. To test this hypothesis, we investigated binding of pimecrolimus and tacrolimus to a preparation of soluble human skin proteins. One binding protein of approximately 15 kDa, probably corresponding to macrophilin12, displayed a similar binding capacity for pimecrolimus and tacrolimus. However, less specific, nonsaturating binding to other proteins was approximately 3-fold higher for pimecrolimus. Because of the high local drug concentration after topical administration, the unspecific, high-capacity binding is probably dominating the permeation through skin. In plasma both drugs bound predominantly to lipoproteins, which may affect disposition differently from albumin binding. The unbound fraction of pimecrolimus in human plasma was approximately 9-fold lower compared with that of tacrolimus (0.4 +/- 0.1 versus 3.7 +/- 0.8%). In conclusion, these results provide an explanation for the observed lower systemic exposure to pimecrolimus than to tacrolimus after topical application and suggest that differences in systemic exposure to free drug might be even more pronounced.

Diagnosis and management of common dermatoses in children: atopic, seborrheic, and contact dermatitis

Atopic, seborrheic, and contact dermatitis can significantly reduce the quality of life of patients and their families. Although differing in specific aspects of their epidemiology, etiology, and pathobiology, all 3 dermatoses are common in the pediatric population, and they share a common treatment approach. Although effective and widely used to manage exacerbations of pediatric dermatitis, the use of topical corticosteroid remains a concern for some physicians and parents because of its potential for systemic absorption and adverse events associated with prolonged use. Newer additions to the dermatitis treatment algorithm, such as the topical calcineurin inhibitors, may provide an effective steroid-sparing treatment option. Adjuvant treatments, such as antihistamines, antifungals, and antibiotics, also can provide benefit in appropriate circumstances. As there is no cure for dermatitis, a comprehensive, multipronged management strategy of preventive measures, such as trigger avoidance and periodic pharmacologic treatment, will provide patients and caregivers with the best opportunity to successfully control the disease.

Sustained efficacy and safety of pimecrolimus cream 1% when used long-term (up to 26 weeks) to treat children with atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis is a chronic, inflammatory condition affecting up to 20% of children. Here, we report the long-term extension study of previously published pivotal phase III studies with pimecrolimus cream 1%. Two identical, 26-week studies (6-week, double-blind, followed by 20-week, open-label phases) were conducted in children aged 2 to 17 years with atopic dermatitis. Pooled efficacy and safety analyses were performed. At day 43, 34.8% pimecrolimus-treated patients versus 18.4% in the vehicle group (p < 0.001) were clear/almost clear (Investigators' Global Assessment 0/1) of disease, with significant differences (p < 0.05) between treatment groups for all double-blind visits in all parameters. Pimecrolimus was significantly more effective (based on the Eczema Area and Severity Index) in treating the face and neck versus the rest of the body (p < 0.0001) and versus vehicle (p < 0.0001) in the double-blind phase. Disease control was sustained in the pimecrolimus group throughout the whole study. Patients treated with vehicle during the double-blind phase experienced rapid, marked improvement when switched to pimecrolimus in the open-label phase. The incidence of adverse events was low and comparable between treatment groups. In conclusion, pimecrolimus cream 1% is effective and well tolerated in the long-term control of children with mild to moderately severe atopic dermatitis.

Role of bacterial pathogens in atopic dermatitis

The skin of atopic dermatitis (AD) patients exhibits a striking susceptibility to colonization and infection with Staphylococcus aureus. This review summarizes our understanding about the role of S. aureus in AD. Indeed, S. aureus colonization is both a cause and a consequence of allergic skin inflammation. The mechanisms that allergic skin inflammation of AD promotes the increase of S. aureus colonization include skin barrier dysfunction, increased synthesis of the extracellular matrix adhesins for S. aureus, and defective innate immune responses due to decreased production of endogenous antimicrobial peptides. On the other hand, the exotoxins secreted by S. aureus are superantigens. Staphylococcal superantigens (SsAgs) may penetrate the skin barrier and contribute to the persistence and exacerbation of allergic skin inflammation in AD through the stimulation of massive T cells, the role of allergens, direct stimulation of antigen-presenting cells and keratinocytes, the expansion of skin-homing cutaneous lymphocyte-associated antigen-positive T cells, and the augmentation of allergen-induced skin inflammation. SsAgs also induce corticosteroid resistance. In therapeutic interventions, anti-inflammatory therapy alone is very effective in reducing S. aureus colonization on the skin, but antibiotic treatment alone is unable to improve the allergic skin inflammation of AD. Therefore, we recommend the combination therapy of anti-inflammatory drugs and antibiotics in the AD patients with secondary bacterial infection, exacerbated AD, or poorly controlled AD. However, when AD is well controlled by anti-inflammatory drugs alone, we do not recommend the antibiotic therapy.

Calcineurin activity and inhibition in skin and (epi)dermal cell cultures

Calcineurin (Cn) is the target of the immunosuppressive drugs cyclosporine A (CsA), tacrolimus (Trl), and pimecrolimus (Prl). Trl and Prl are often used topically for treatment of various skin diseases. The Cn inhibitors CsA and Trl are mostly used for maintenance therapy of transplant patients. Their long-term use, however, causes a dramatic increase in skin cancer risk. By using a newly developed assay for Cn measurement in blood, we were able to demonstrate Cn activity in total skin homogenates. A significantly higher activity was found in epidermis compared to dermis. In skin cell cultures, fibroblasts showed the highest activity as compared to keratinocytes and melanocytes. Of the Cn inhibitors, Trl showed stronger inhibition than CsA and Prl (57 and 55% in fibroblast and keratinocyte cultures, respectively). Also, the lowest IC(50) (the half maximal inhibitory concentration) values were found for Trl (0.5 and 1.3 nM in two different fibroblast cultures). Cn activity and its inhibition can thus be studied in dermatological samples. The effects of Cn inhibition in fibroblasts and keratinocytes may be of influence on the overall functioning of the skin immune system.

Immunology and treatment of atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory disease hypothesized to be the product of complex interactions among the host's environment, susceptibility genes, skin barrier dysfunction, and immune system dysregulation. The objective of this article is to describe the pathobiology and treatment of AD, with particular focus on the role of immune system dysregulation and therapies designed to target this. Literature review indicates that there are immunologic differences between the lesional and non-lesional skin of atopic individuals, and that the non-lesional skin of atopic individuals presents an immunologic profile distinct from that of the skin of healthy individuals. Thus, immune system dysregulation is postulated to be a key contributing factor to the complex etiology of AD. Immunomodulatory agents such as topical corticosteroids (TCSs) and topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs), which address the underlying immunopathology of AD, are the foundation for the pharmacologic treatment of flares. TCSs and TCIs both target the inflammatory response responsible for an AD flare but via two distinct mechanisms of action. Whereas TCSs have a more widespread impact on the immune system, the action of TCIs is targeted to the calcineurin pathway and inhibition of T-cell activation. Together, TCSs and TCIs represent the backbone of a long-term treatment strategy for AD.

Atopic dermatitis: understanding the disease and its management

OBJECTIVE

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common, chronic, inflammatory skin disease that can significantly reduce the quality of life of not only patients but also entire families. This review will focus on the currently available non-pharmacologic and pharmacologic treatments for the control and management of AD.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A review of English-language articles from January 1953 to May 2006 was performed within the MEDLINE database. Search terms included, but were not limited to, atopic dermatitis, topical corticosteroids, and topical calcineurin inhibitors. Studies evaluating the diagnosis, physical and psychological burden, and underlying pathophysiology of AD were included. Particular focus was placed on literature presenting key safety and efficacy data from clinical trials involving AD treatment.

RESULTS

Although good skin care and trigger avoidance are fundamental to AD management, most patients also require pharmacologic intervention. Topical therapies comprise the foundation of AD treatment. In particular, topical corticosteroids have been a mainstay in AD treatment for several decades and the newer topical calcineurin inhibitors have become a valuable addition to the therapeutic armamentarium. TCIs are a safe and effective AD treatment; they limit the number of disease flares, extend the time between flares, and provide a steroid-sparing option that may be of particular benefit in the pediatric population. The use of more potent therapies, such as systemic (oral/injected) agents or phototherapy, is typically limited to the treatment of severe, refractory disease. Additionally, owing to the increased risk for bacterial, viral, and fungal infections in patients with AD, topical or systemic antimicrobials are an important component of treatment.

LIMITATIONS

Case reports and small-scale studies were typically not included in this analysis and owing to the limited number of trials evaluating TCSs, consensus statements and comprehensive review articles were used to obtain information pertaining to the use of this treatment in AD.

CONCLUSIONS

AD is a common, chronic disease requiring a long-term management strategy that incorporates preventive measures and a multipronged treatment approach.

Clinical evaluation of pimecrolimus eye drops for treatment of canine keratoconjunctivitis sicca: a comparison with cyclosporine A

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of pimecrolimus oil-based eye drops in alleviating the clinical signs of keratoconjunctivitis sicca (KCS) in dogs and to compare the efficacy with that of cyclosporine A (CsA) ointment. An open-label, multicenter study enrolling 44 dogs previously untreated with CsA was conducted. Dogs were randomly assigned to a treatment group and medicated twice daily for 8 weeks. After that time the mean increase (+/-SEM) in the Schirmer tear test was 9.2+/-1.6 mm/min in the pimecrolimus group and 5.8+/-1.1 mm/min in the CsA group (P=0.085). The improvement in clinical signs of inflammation in eyes treated with pimecrolimus was significantly greater than in eyes treated with CsA (P=0.02). The results show that 1% pimecrolimus oily eye drops are as safe as and more effective than CsA ointment in controlling KCS in dogs.

Safety of topical calcineurin inhibitors for the treatment of atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis is a chronic, highly pruritic, and frequently recurring inflammatory skin disease that can be burdensome to affected individuals as well as to their family members, the health care system, and society as a whole. Immunomodulatory agents, such as topical corticosteroids and topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs), target the underlying immunopathology of atopic dermatitis and are the foundation of pharmacologic treatment for disease exacerbations. Recent recommendations from the United States Food and Drug Administration prompted the addition of a black-box warning and medication guide for tacrolimus ointment and pimecrolimus cream (both TCIs). The recommendations were based on a theoretical risk of malignancy derived from safety profiles, animal data, and reported cases of malignancy from clinical trials and postmarketing safety surveillance of oral calcineurin inhibitors. We know of no data that suggest that TCI use increases the risk of malignancy. Several dermatologic associations have issued statements supporting the safety of TCIs, and independent oncology experts have concluded that reported lymphomas were not related to TCI use. The black-box warning added to the TCI prescribing information also states that no causal link has been established. Effective treatment of atopic dermatitis can help alleviate the burden this disease imposes, and TCIs remain important treatment options.

Evidence-based (S3) guidelines for the treatment of psoriasis vulgaris

Psoriasis vulgaris is a common and often chronic inflammatory skin disease. The incidence of psoriasis in Western industrialized countries ranges from 1 to 2%. Patients afflicted with severe psoriasis vulgaris may experience a significant reduction in quality of life. Despite the large variety of treatment options available, patient surveys have revealed lack of satisfaction with the efficacy of available treatments and a high rate of non-compliance. To optimize the treatment of psoriasis in Germany, the Deutsche Dermatologische Gesellschaft (DDG) and the Berufsverband Deutscher Dermatologen (BVDD) initiated a project to develop evidence-based guidelines for the management of psoriasis. These resulting Guidelines focus on induction therapy in cases of mild, moderate, and severe plaquetype psoriasis in adults. The Guidelines include evidence-based evaluation of the efficacy of all currently available therapeutic options in Germany. In addition, they offer detailed information on how best to administer the various treatments and give information on contraindications, adverse drug reactions, and drug interactions as well as estimates of practicability and cost. The Guidelines were developed following the recommendations of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft wissenschaftlicher medizinischer Fachgesellschaften (AWMF). The therapeutic recommendations were developed by an expert group and finalized during interdisciplinary consensus conferences.

Inhibition of T-cell activation in vitro in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells by pimecrolimus and glucocorticosteroids and combinations thereof

Pimecrolimus is an ascomycin macrolactam derivative that has been recently approved for the topical treatment of atopic dermatitis. In this study we report for the first time on a direct comparison of the inhibitory activity of pimecrolimus and the glucocorticosteroids betamethasone 17-valerate, dexamethasone and hydrocortisone at the level of T-cell proliferation and cytokine production. Stimulated human peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) systems were used that are either sensitive or resistant to calcineurin inhibitors or glucocorticosteroids. Pimecrolimus and the glucocorticosteroids inhibited dose-dependently T-cell proliferation and cytokine production in a sensitive system (anti-CD3 mAb-stimulated PBMC) with the following rank order of potency: pimecrolimus approximately betamethasone 17-valerate approximately dexamethasone > hydrocortisone. In resistant systems (anti-CD3 plus anti-CD28- or Staphylococcal enterotoxin B-stimulated PBMC), pimecrolimus or the glucocorticosteroids alone exerted either no effect, or only a partial inhibitory effect. However, combinations of pimecrolimus with a glucocorticosteroid synergistically and strongly inhibited T-cell proliferation. Taken together, the data indicate that medium potency glucocorticosteroids, such as betamethasone 17-valerate and dexamethasone, are as potent T-cell inhibitors as pimecrolimus. Furthermore, the experimental evidence suggests that combinations of glucocorticosteroids and pimecrolimus could be used clinically to achieve superior therapeutic efficacy, when monotherapy with the individual agents is unsatisfactory.

Psoriasis of the nail: anatomy, pathology, clinical presentation, and a review of the literature on therapy

Psoriasis is a chronic skin disease that affects millions of people throughout the world. Even though cutaneous signs and symptoms are the most common clinical manifestations, the nails can be involved in up to 50% of cases, and their involvement remains an important yet often overlooked aspect of the disease. There is a broad spectrum of nail dystrophies associated with psoriasis, ranging from the common pitting and loosening of the nail plate to the less frequent discoloration and splinter hemorrhages seen in the nail bed. This article discusses the normal anatomy and embryology of the nail unit as well as the current understanding of the pathogenesis of the disease. It also provides an extensive review of the existing literature with respect to psoriatic nail therapy. Although there have been many recent advances in the treatment of the cutaneous form of the disease-most notably in the field of immunotherapies-the options for nail psoriasis are far more limited. While a number of treatment alternatives currently exist for nail disease, the general paucity of clear evidence regarding these choices often makes it difficult to select the most efficient, safe, and optimal treatment for the patient. Even though the current literature has shown some support for the use of topical, intralesional, radiation, systemic, and combination therapies for nail psoriasis, the available studies lack sufficient power to extrapolate a standardized therapeutic regimen. Therefore, until better-documented evidence validating the treatment options emerges within the literature, clinicians and patients are left with a vague and relatively unproven approach to psoriatic nail disease.

Topical immunomodulation: modes of action with clinical correlation

Many classes and preparations of immunomodulators are available to the clinician, serving as stimulatory or inhibitory influences on a variety of disease states. To maximize their efficacy, it is important for the clinician to take a step back from the usual routine of treating symptoms and consider the immune processes that took place to create inflammation, tumors, or responses to infections. From there, after considering the short-term and long-term consequences of the treatment, one can match the immune profile of the disease to the treatment. Most importantly, immunomodulators provide the opportunity to do what is best for the patient at that time, as well as for control of the future of the disease, whether it is acute or chronic.

A Double-Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study Comparing Topical Immunomodulating Agents and Corticosteroids for Treatment of Experimentally Induced Nickel Contact Dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Although topical glucocorticoids are effective for most inflammatory skin disorders, their use is limited by local and systemic side effects. Tacrolimus and pimecrolimus are immunomodulators that provide clinicians with steroid-sparing options in the long-term topical treatment of allergic contact dermatitis.

OBJECTIVE

To obtain pilot data regarding the relative efficacies of pimecrolimus 1% cream, tacrolimus 0.1% ointment, clobetasol propionate 0.05% ointment, and triamcinolone acetonide 0.1% ointment, as compared to control preparations (Vanicream and petrolatum), for treatment of experimentally induced nickel contact dermatitis.

METHODS

Twenty-one volunteers with positive patch test reactions to nickel sulfate 5% at six sites (three on each arm) applied each study medication to one nickel site, respectively, twice daily for 14 days. Study medications were prepared in identical syringes, and the site of application was randomly assigned by a computer-generated randomization schedule. Assessments were performed at 3, 7, 10, and 14 days after randomization.

RESULTS

Most reactions were coded as resolved or as almost resolved by day 14 regardless of treatment. Although most pairwise comparisons were not statistically significant, a clear trend was observed for sites treated with active drug to do better than control sites.

CONCLUSION

Possible explanations for these results include contamination by neighboring medication sites, timing of assessments, and lack of repeated nickel applications.

Atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis is an especially common and frustrating condition, and the prevalence is increasing. The disease can adversely affect the quality of life of patients and caregivers. Significant advances in our understanding of the pathogenesis have led to improvements in therapy. Patient and caregiver education, avoidance of potential triggering factors, optimal skin care, and pharmacotherapy offer the potential for good control for most patients.

Dyshidrosis: Epidemiology, Clinical Characteristics, and Therapy

Dyshidrosis is a common chronic dermatitis of the hands and feet that may cause significant physical discomfort, psychological distress, and occupational impairment. Topics reviewed in this article include epidemiology, clinical findings, quality of life, and therapeutic considerations. Dyshidrosis is often difficult to manage; therefore, extra attention is given in this review article to current treatment options.

Review of pimecrolimus cream 1% for the treatment of mild to moderate atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a pruritic and inflammatory skin disease affecting at least 28 million people in the United States. During an AD flare, the skin becomes inflamed and intensely pruritic. A "major flare" is characterized by persistent or uncontrollable pruritus, intense erythema, extensive excoriation, and potential oozing and crusting. The overall goal of AD treatment is to minimize the frequency and severity of disease flares. Long-term management involves multiple treatment strategies, including identifying and eliminating triggers, routine moisturization, antipruritic therapy, and use of topical anti-inflammatory agents (topical corticosteroids and topical calcineurin inhibitors). Pimecrolimus cream 1% is a topical calcineurin inhibitor developed specifically for patients with AD.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this review was to assess the current literature (clinical trials and postapproval studies) on the efficacy and safety of pimecrolimus cream 1% in the treatment of AD.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using the National Library of Medicine (MEDLINE), EMBASE, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Current Contents, and SciSearch databases (1980-2006) with the search term pimecrolimus. Selected studies comprised randomized, vehicle-controlled trials of topical pimecrolimus cream 1%, focused on efficacy and safety, and complied with the pimecrolimus cream 1% indication (study participants were aged >or=2 years with mild to moderate AD).

RESULTS

When used in appropriately identified pediatric and adult patients with mild to moderate AD, pimecrolimus cream 1% improved the signs and symptoms of AD and delayed time to a major flare. The most commonly seen adverse events in clinical trials were application-site reactions (10.4%-14.5%) and nasopharyngitis (10.1%-28.9%), headache (13.9%-23.0%), cough (11.6%-19.3%), pyrexia (7.5%-15.4%), influenza (3.0%-14.6%), and bronchitis (0.4%-13.2%), which overall were not significantly different from patients treated with vehicle cream. Pimecrolimus cream 1% was not associated with skin atrophy (supporting its use on sensitive areas of the skin such as the face, neck, and skinfolds). In addition, a review of the literature identified no reports of cumulative irritation or photosensitivity potential, no substantial increases in the incidence of common bacterial and viral skin infections compared with vehicle cream (placebo), and no effects on the systemic immune system, including delayed-type hypersensitivity.

CONCLUSION

Pimecrolimus cream 1% is a valuable treatment option for mild to moderate AD in adults and children aged >or=2 years.

Safety of topical calcineurin inhibitors in atopic dermatitis: evaluation of the evidence

Topical calcineurin inhibitors (pimecrolimus, Elidel, East Hanover, NJ; and tacrolimus, Protopic, Tokyo, Japan) have been approved for the use in atopic dermatitis since the year 2000. These compounds represent a relatively safe class of topical anti-inflammatory, nonsteroidal therapy. However, in January of 2006, the US Food and Drug Administration issued a black box warning on these compounds about possible concerns of increased long-term malignancy risk due to systemic immunosuppression. To date, studies from clinical trials, systemic absorption, and post-marketing surveillance show no evidence for this systemic immunosuppression or increased risk for any malignancy.

Safety, efficacy, and dosage of 1% pimecrolimus cream for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in daily practice

INTRODUCTION

Although several controlled clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy and good tolerability of 1% pimecrolimus cream for the treatment of atopic dermatitis, the results of these trials may not apply to real-life usage. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a pimecrolimus-based regimen in daily practice.

METHODS

This was a 6-month, open-label, multicenter study in 947 patients aged >or=3 months with atopic dermatitis of all severities. The investigators incorporated 1% pimecrolimus cream into patients' standard treatment protocols on the basis of their clinical diagnosis. Use of topical corticosteroids was allowed at the discretion of the physician. Safety and tolerability were evaluated by monitoring adverse events. Efficacy was evaluated by recording changes in the Investigators' Global Assessment scores and pruritus scores at each visit.

RESULTS

No clinically unexpected adverse events were reported. The discontinuation rate for adverse events was 2.3%. The disease improvement rate was 53.7% at week 1 and 66.9% at week 24. The pimecrolimus-based regimen was particularly effective for the treatment of lesions involving the face (improvement rate: 61.9% at week 1 and 76.7% at week 24). The greatest therapeutic response was experienced by pediatric patients with mild or moderate disease. Nonetheless, 64% and 65% of infants and children, respectively, with severe/very severe facial disease at baseline were clear/almost clear of signs of atopic dermatitis on their face at week 24. In patients aged <18 years, most of the improvement occurred within the first week of treatment, while in adults a progressive improvement was observed over the entire study period. Worsening of disease by the end of the study occurred in 9.5% of patients and was most frequent in adults (12.6%). The discontinuation rate for unsatisfactory therapeutic effect was 4.8%. The mean number of treatment days was 135.6 (SD 53.2). The mean drug consumption (non-US centers only) was 4.2 g per treatment day. Drug consumption decreased over time as disease improved. In total, 47% of patients who completed the study never used topical corticosteroids over 6 months.

CONCLUSION

In daily practice, incorporation of 1% pimecrolimus cream into patients' standard treatment regimen is well tolerated and improves atopic dermatitis in approximately two-thirds of patients. Disease improvement is particularly evident on the face. The greatest therapeutic response is experienced by pediatric patients with mild or moderate disease. In these patients, most of the improvement is observed within 1 week from the start of treatment.

Discovery of Topical Calcineurin Inhibitors and Pharmacological Profile of Pimecrolimus

Using a newly developed model of allergic contact dermatitis in pigs, calcineurin inhibitors of the tacrolimus and ascomycin type were shown to have a highly anti-inflammatory action after topical application. These findings provided the first pharmacological evidence of the efficacy of this novel class of topical agents in the treatment of inflammatory skin diseases, and, thus, their potential to become the first alternative to corticosteroids in more than 40 years. As a result of a large research program into ascomycins, pimecrolimus (Elidel(R), SDZ ASM 981) was selected for development due to its favorable pharmacology and safety profile, alongside tacrolimus (Protopic(R), FK 506). In vitro, pimecrolimus inhibits the transcription and release of pro-inflammatory cytokines in T cells. Similar to the corticosteroids, betamethasone-17-valerate and dexamethasone, pimecrolimus is effective at nanomolar concentrations. Targeting mainly T cells, pimecrolimus has, however, a more specific mode of action. Moreover, in contrast to corticosteroids, pimecrolimus has no effect on Langerhans' cells, the professional antigen- presenting dendritic cells of the skin that are crucial for local immunosurveillance. When applied topically, pimecrolimus exerts a high and selective anti-inflammatory activity in the skin, shows minimal percutaneous absorption, and has a low potential to affect systemic immunoreactions. Pimecrolimus cream 1% has proven to be well tolerated, safe, and highly effective in clinical studies in patients with atopic dermatitis.

Pimecrolimus and tacrolimus differ in their inhibition of lymphocyte activation during the sensitization phase of contact hypersensitivity

BACKGROUND

As reported previously, oral administration of the calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) pimecrolimus and tacrolimus resulted in equipotent inhibition of the elicitation phase of contact hypersensitivity (CHS) in mice. The sensitization phase was inhibited by tacrolimus but was unaffected by pimecrolimus, even at higher doses.

OBJECTIVE

The kinetics of lymph node hyperplasia and up-regulation of T and B cell activation antigens were analyzed to obtain a better understanding of the divergent CNI profile in CHS.

METHODS

Lymph node (LN) cells of CNI-untreated and treated mice were examined with flow cytometry at various time points after sensitization with oxazolone. LN hyperplasia and drug levels were also determined.

RESULTS

Sensitization induced a higher portion of LN cells expressing the activation antigens CD25, CD69 and CD134 and an increase in activated B cells (B220(+)/CD40(+)) compared to naïve mice. Up-regulation of these markers was completely or profoundly blocked with tacrolimus, whereas pimecrolimus at the three-fold higher dose caused significantly less inhibition. Tacrolimus also completely blocked the sensitization-associated increase of CD11c(+) antigen presenting cells (APC) in LN, whereas pimecrolimus showed significantly less inhibition. In contrast to tacrolimus, LN weight and cellularity were not affected by pimecrolimus at any time point after sensitization. Concentration of tacrolimus in blood and in the draining LN substantially exceeded that of pimecrolimus by factors 6.7-14 and 5.6-5.8, respectively, at the same dose levels.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to tacrolimus, systemic treatment of mice with pimecrolimus only weakly interferes with lymphocyte activation and does not affect hyperplasia of the draining lymph nodes during sensitization.

Pimecrolimus and narrowband UVB as monotherapy or combination therapy in children and adolescents with atopic dermatitis

Topical pimecrolimus and narrowband ultraviolet B (UVB) are both known to be effective in treating atopic dermatitis. We compared the clinical efficacy of monotherapy with either twice daily topical 1% pimecrolimus cream or twice weekly narrowband UVB, and combination therapy in 26 children and adolescents with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis in a half-side manner for 6 weeks. Twenty-four patients completed the study. Monotherapy and combination therapy notably reduced the scores of the Eczema Area and Severity Index ( p = 0.002) and the severity of pruritus ( p < or = 0.004). There was no significant difference in therapeutic efficacy among the treatment regimens at week 6. In conclusion, because of the lack of short-term additive therapeutic efficacy, concomitant use of pimecrolimus and narrowband UVB is inadvisable in treating moderate to severe atopic dermatitis in children and adolescents.

Penetration of ASM 981 in canine skin: a comparative study

ASM 981 has been developed for topical treatment of inflammatory skin diseases. It specifically inhibits the production and release of pro-inflammatory cytokines. We measured the skin penetration of ASM 981 in canine skin and compared penetration in living and frozen skin. To make penetration of ASM 981 visible in dog skin, tritium labelled ASM 981 was applied to a living dog and to defrosted skin of the same dog. Using qualitative autoradiography the radioactive molecules were detected in the lumen of the hair follicles until the infundibulum, around the superficial parts of the hair follicles and into a depth of the dermis of 200 to 500 microm. Activity could not be found in deeper parts of the hair follicles, the dermis or in the sebaceous glands. Penetration of ASM 981 is low in canine skin and is only equally spread in the upper third of the dermis 24 hours after application. Penetration in frozen skin takes even longer than in living canine skin but shows the same distribution.

Pimecrolimus: absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion in healthy volunteers after a single oral dose and supplementary investigations in vitro

The absorption and disposition of pimecrolimus, a calcineurin inhibitor developed for the treatment of inflammatory skin diseases, was investigated in four healthy volunteers after a single oral dose of 15 mg of [(3)H]pimecrolimus. Supplementary information was obtained from in vitro experiments. Pimecrolimus was rapidly absorbed. After t(max) (1-3 h), its blood concentrations fell quickly to 3% of C(max) at 24 h, followed by a slow terminal elimination phase (average t(1/2) 62 h). Radioactivity in blood decreased more slowly (8% of C(max) at 24 h). The tissue and blood cell distribution of pimecrolimus was high. The metabolism of pimecrolimus in vivo, which could be well reproduced in vitro (human liver microsomes), was highly complex and involved multiple oxidative O-demethylations and hydroxylations. In blood, pimecrolimus was the major radiolabeled component up to 24 h (49% of radioactivity area under the concentration-time curve(0-24) h), accompanied by a large number of minor metabolites. The average fecal excretion of radioactivity between 0 and 240 h amounted to 78% of dose and represented predominantly a complex mixture of metabolites. In urine, 0 to 240 h, only about 2.5% of the dose and no parent drug was excreted. Hence, pimecrolimus was eliminated almost exclusively by oxidative metabolism. The biotransformation of pimecrolimus was largely catalyzed by CYP3A4/5. Metabolite pools generated in vitro showed low activity in a calcineurin-dependent T-cell activation assay. Hence, metabolites do not seem to contribute significantly to the pharmacological activity of pimecrolimus.

Effect of pimecrolimus vs. corticosteroids on murine bone marrow-derived dendritic cell differentiation, maturation and function

Pimecrolimus (SDZ ASM981) is a non-steroid member of calcineurin inhibitors recently developed for the treatment of inflammatory skin diseases. In this study, we compared the effect of pimecrolimus and corticosteroids on the differentiation, maturation and function of murine bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (BM-DC). We added pimecrolimus at concentrations of 5-500 ng/ml or 0.5 ng/ml mometasone furoate at different timepoints to the BM-DC culture and checked (i) the number of matured cells, (ii) the expression of activation markers, (iii) the release of cytokines and (iv) the stimulatory capacity of the resulting BM-DC in vivo. Even at the highest concentration, pimecrolimus treatment resulted in only modest effects. In the pimecrolimus-treated culture, we observed a decrease in the numbers of matured cells but no significant effects on the expression of activation markers. The release of some inflammatory cytokines was reduced, but the stimulatory capacity in vivo was not affected. In contrast, mometasone furoate has pronounced effects on BM-DC at a concentration ten to 1000 times lower than those used with pimecrolimus. Furthermore, topical treatment of mice with clobetasole cream 0.05% resulted in almost complete depletion of splenic DC and a severe hyposplenia, while high-dose oral pimecrolimus treatment did not show any effects on the spleen or on splenic DC. These results support that pimecrolimus, unlike corticosteroids, has little effects on dendritic cells. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study of this type with use of BM-DC.

Onset of pruritus relief with pimecrolimus cream 1% in adult patients with atopic dermatitis: a randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Pimecrolimus cream 1% (Elidel, Novartis Pharmaceuticals AG) effectively improves/relieves pruritus associated with atopic dermatitis (AD), but few data are available regarding the timing of relief. The purpose of this study was to investigate the timing of pruritus relief produced with pimecrolimus in adults with mild/moderate AD and moderate/severe pruritus.

METHODS

Patients were randomized to 7 days of treatment with pimecrolimus (n = 100) or vehicle (n = 98). Pruritus severity was assessed daily on a 4-point scale (0 = absent, 3 = severe), reflecting the previous 24 h experience. Patients who completed this core study were eligible to enter a voluntary 5-week, open-label extension study.

RESULTS

A significant effect was noted within 48 h of treatment, with pruritus improving in 56% of pimecrolimus-treated patients and 34% of vehicle-treated patients (P = 0.003). Pruritus relief was maintained during the remainder of the core and extension phases, and was accompanied by an improvement in the Investigator's Global Assessment score.

CONCLUSION

Pimecrolimus cream 1% significantly reduced pruritus within 48 h.

Cytokine and Anti-Cytokine Therapies for Psoriasis and Atopic Dermatitis

Since the discovery of cytokines as key mediators in inflammation, targeting the cytokine network has represented a promising therapeutic approach. Psoriasis and atopic dermatitis, as T cell-mediated diseases with a strong cytokine component and a high unmet medical need, have moved into the focus of experimental therapies. Whereas pro-inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha are overexpressed in both diseases, a type 1 cytokine pattern predominates in psoriasis and a type 2 cytokine pattern is of pathophysiological importance at least in the initial stages of atopic dermatitis. Strategies for intervention into the cytokine network have included antagonism of pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g. TNFalpha, interleukin [IL]-1, IL-8, IL-12, IL-18, IL-23) with neutralizing antibodies and soluble receptors, application of recombinant cytokines (e.g. IL-4, IL-10, IL-11, interferon [IFN]-gamma) to shift the cytokine balance, and administration of small molecules to modulate cytokine expression or signaling. Results from the clinic have led to novel therapeutic options as well as a better understanding of the pathophysiology of inflammatory skin diseases. This review highlights the various therapeutic strategies, results from the clinic (that are in some cases preliminary), and insights that can be drawn from the more advanced clinical studies and the use of approved cytokine-directed therapies.

Safety and tolerability of 1% pimecrolimus cream among infants: experience with 1133 patients treated for up to 2 years

Pimecrolimus is a calcineurin inhibitor developed for the topical treatment of atopic dermatitis. During the clinical development of 1% pimecrolimus cream, 1133 patients 3 to 23 months of age with mild to severe atopic dermatitis were treated for up to 2 years. The objective of this review is to discuss the safety and tolerability of 1% pimecrolimus cream among infants, on the basis of the combined results from all studies (4 pharmacokinetic studies and 6 clinical trials) conducted among these patients. Pimecrolimus blood concentrations measured for 35 patients were consistently low (< or =1 ng/mL in >80% of samples), irrespective of the disease severity and extent, and remained low during intermittent treatment for up to 1 year. The level of systemic exposure to pimecrolimus among infants was comparable to that observed for older pediatric patients enrolled in the same studies and treated in the same way with 1% pimecrolimus cream, which indicated that young pediatric patients are not at higher risk of significant percutaneous absorption of topically applied pimecrolimus, despite their large skin surface area/body mass ratio. The 6 clinical trials included a total of 1098 infants, who were treated for periods ranging from 4 weeks to 2 years. Most of these patients (60%) had moderate to severe disease at baseline. The most frequently reported adverse events were common childhood disorders such as nasopharyngitis, pyrexia, upper respiratory tract infections, ear infections, and bronchitis. During the double-blind (DB) studies or DB phases of studies, the incidence rates for the most frequently reported adverse events were similar for patients who received 1% pimecrolimus cream and patients who received the vehicle, except for the incidence of teething, which was higher among the pimecrolimus-treated infants (relative risk: 2.02; 95% confidence interval: 1.32-3.27). Treatment with 1% pimecrolimus cream was not associated with an increase in the overall incidence of nonskin infections, compared with the vehicle (relative risk: 1.015; 95% confidence interval: 0.88-1.18). The incidence density (ID) rates for total bacterial, fungal, parasitic, and viral skin infections during the DB studies or DB phases of studies were comparable for patients treated with 1% pimecrolimus cream and patients who received the vehicle. The ID rate of herpes simplex virus infections was 0.8 cases per 1000 patient-months of follow-up monitoring among patients treated with 1% pimecrolimus cream and 1.7 cases per 1000 patient-months of follow-up monitoring among patients who received the vehicle. Considering all 1098 infants treated with 1% pimecrolimus cream in DB trials and open-label studies, the ID rate of clinically diagnosed eczema herpeticum was 1.3 cases per 1000 patient-months of follow-up monitoring. Burning and erythema were the most frequently reported application site reactions, with ID rates of 2.0 and 1.2 cases per 1000 patient-months of follow-up monitoring, respectively. No sign of immunosuppression was found among infants treated intermittently with 1% pimecrolimus cream for up to 2 years; they demonstrated normal immune responses to vaccinations and did not show increases in the incidence of systemic infections or skin infections over time.

Immunomodulation and safety of topical calcineurin inhibitors for the treatment of atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic or chronically relapsing inflammatory skin condition that primarily affects children. Topical corticosteroids have been the mainstay of treatment since the late 1950s. While providing excellent short-term efficacy, topical corticosteroid usage is limited by potential adverse effects, including impairment of the function and viability of Langerhans cells/dendritic cells. The recently introduced topical calcineurin inhibitors pimecrolimus cream 1% (Elidel) and tacrolimus ointment 0.03 and 0.1% (Protopic) exhibit a more selective mechanism of action and do not affect Langerhans cells/dendritic cells. For the immune system of young children 'learning' to mount a balanced Th1/Th2 response, this selective effect has particular benefits. In clinical experience, topical calcineurin inhibitors have been shown to be a safe and effective alternative to topical corticosteroids in almost 7 million patients (>5 million on pimecrolimus; >1.7 million on tacrolimus). Topical pimecrolimus is primarily used in children with mild and moderate AD, whereas tacrolimus is used preferentially in more severe cases. None of the topical calcineurin inhibitors have been associated with systemic immunosuppression-related malignancies known to occur following long-term sustained systemic immunosuppression with oral immunosuppressants (e.g., tacrolimus, cyclosporine A, and corticosteroids) in transplant patients. Preclinical and clinical data suggest a greater skin selectivity and larger safety margin for topical pimecrolimus.