Infectious complications of treatment with biologic agents

[A case of recurrent breast cancer with life-threatening multiple lung metastasis markedly responding to CMF as third-line chemotherapy]

A 35-year-old woman with taxane and anthracycline-resistant recurrent breast cancer with multiple lung metastasis and carcinomatous lymphangitis was treated with CMF as third-line chemotherapy. A complete response was achieved,and the toxicities were tolerable. We thought that CMF could be a useful regimen as third-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer.

Immunosuppression related to collagen-vascular disease or its treatment

Collagen-vascular diseases are associated with immune dysregulation and inflammation, leading to tissue destruction or compromise. Immunosuppression is more commonly associated with the drugs used to treat these disorders than with the diseases themselves. The newest agents being used to treat collagen-vascular diseases are the tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha inhibitors. U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved TNF-alpha inhibitors have differing effects on the immune system, reflecting their potency and mechanisms of action. They are particularly effective in breaking down granulomatous inflammation, which makes them effective treatment for sarcoidosis and Wegener's granulomatosis. This same property makes them likely to break down the host defense mechanism that normally contains pathogens such as mycobacteria and fungi in a dormant state, namely the physical and immunologic barrier formed by granulomas in the lung and elsewhere. The most common infection reported with the TNF-alpha inhibitors has been tuberculosis, which may manifest as pulmonary and/or extrapulmonary disease, with the latter being more common and severe than usual. Histoplasma capsulatum, Aspergillus, Cryptococcus neoformans, and Listeria monocytogenes have also been described in a number of cases, and their frequency is discussed.

Inhibition of IFN-gamma as a method of treatment of various autoimmune diseases, including skin diseases

We pioneered anticytokine therapy (ACT) for autoimmune diseases (ADs). In 1974, we proposed that hyperproduced interferon (IFN) can bring AD and anti-IFN can be therapeutic. In 1989, we proposed removing tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha together with certain types of IFN to treat various ADs. We found IFN in patients with different ADs and conducted the first clinical trial of ACT in 1975. Anti-IFN-gamma and anti-TNF-alpha work in similar ways, but the latter brings serious complications in some patients. We obtained good, sometimes striking, therapeutic effects treating many different Th-1-mediated ADs with anti-IFN-gamma, including rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis (MS), corneal transplant rejection, and various autoimmune skin diseases such as psoriasis, alopecia areata, vitiligo, acne vulgaris, and others. Anti-IFN-gamma was in some ways superior to anti-TNF-alpha, which was ineffective in MS. Anti-IFN-gamma therapy holds great promise for treating many Th-1 ADs, especially skin diseases.

Infections associated with tumor necrosis factor-alpha antagonists

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) is a proinflammatory cytokine involved in a wide range of important physiologic processes. This cytokine has a pathologic role in some diseases, and TNF-alpha antagonists are effective in treating inflammatory conditions. Given the putative role of TNF-alpha in host defense against tuberculosis and other infections, the risk of infection with TNF-alpha antagonists is a concern. Therefore, we searched the literature for reports of tuberculosis and other infections associated with TNF-alpha-antagonist therapy. Although tuberculosis was rarely reported in randomized clinical comparisons of these antagonists, case reports and submissions to the MedWatch program of the United States Food and Drug Administration have been numerous. Most instances were associated with infliximab, but etanercept and adalimumab may also be associated with an increased risk of tuberculosis. Histoplasmosis, listeriosis, aspergillosis, coccidioidomycosis, and candidiasis have been associated with TNF-alpha antagonists, but the causative relationship is not clear. Potential recipients of these drugs should be rigorously screened with skin testing, detailed questioning about recent travel and potential tuberculosis exposure, assessment for symptoms such as cough and weight loss, and chest radiography to minimize their risk of acquiring or reactivating tuberculosis. As with other immunosuppressant drugs, TNF-alpha antagonists should not be given to patients with active infection.

Infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with biologic agents

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the incidence rates of serious and nonserious infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who start treatment with a biologic agent, and to compare these rates with those in patients with RA who receive conventional treatment.

METHODS

Patients enrolled in the German biologics register between May 2001 and September 2003 were included. Treating rheumatologists assessed adverse events and serious adverse events. All adverse events and serious adverse events experienced within 12 months after study entry were analyzed. Propensity score methods were applied to estimate which part of a rate increase was likely to be attributable to differences in patient characteristics.

RESULTS

Data were available for 512 patients receiving etanercept, 346 patients receiving infliximab, 70 patients receiving anakinra, and 601 control patients treated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. The total number of adverse events per 100 patient-years was 22.6 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 18.7-27.2) among patients receiving etanercept, 28.3 (95% CI 23.1-34.7) among patients receiving infliximab, and 6.8 (95% CI 5.0-9.4) among controls (P < 0.0001). Significant differences in the rate of serious adverse events were also observed. For patients receiving etanercept, those receiving infliximab, and controls, the total numbers of serious adverse events per 100 patient-years were 6.4 (95% CI 4.5-9.1), 6.2 (95% CI 4.0-9.5), and 2.3 (95% CI 1.3-3.9), respectively (P = 0.0016). After adjusting for differences in the case patient mix, the relative risks of serious adverse events were 2.2 (95% CI 0.9-5.4) for patients receiving etanercept and 2.1 (95% CI 0.8-5.5) for patients receiving infliximab, compared with controls.

CONCLUSION

Patients treated with biologic agents have a higher a priori risk of infection. However, our data suggest that this risk is increased by treatment with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors.

PRECLINICAL MODELS OF SHOCK AND SEPSIS: WHAT CAN THEY TELL US?

The goal of translational research is to transform biologic knowledge into new treatments for human disease. Although preclinical models replicate some of the features of the disease process modeled, they invariably fail to reproduce the complexity of human illness, and by their very experimental nature, they are readily manipulated to maximize evidence of efficacy. The result is that successful translation from preclinical models to clinically effective therapy is uncommon, and that clinical trials are often undertaken without a comprehensive and realistic preclinical portfolio of studies to optimize their design. The lethal and morbid human conditions of sepsis and shock are attractive targets for new therapies and enormously challenging processes to translate because they entail considerable clinical heterogeneity, require emergent effective intervention, and are shaped not only by the initial insult, but by approaches to subsequent resuscitation and support. A colloquium jointly sponsored by the Shock Society and the International Sepsis Forum in June 2004 addressed the challenges of translational research in shock and sepsis. Through a comprehensive review of a broad variety of model approaches, and vigorous debate about the merits of differing strategies, a series of common themes emerged. We concluded that there is no single ideal model of shock or sepsis, but rather a large number of complementary models that recapitulate some discrete features of the disorders while minimizing others. Consequently, successful preclinical investigation mandates the use of a panel of preclinical studies consciously designed to address specific questions of relevance to the clinical setting. A corollary of this conclusion is that preclinical studies can shape concepts of disease and can be used to refine decisions regarding optimal patient populations for therapeutic interventional trials. We further recognized that the design and reporting of preclinical studies is highly variable, thereby limiting effective data interpretation and integration between studies. Hence, greater model standardization would aid in interpreting data and in pooling results into systematic data syntheses: such efforts should be promoted and undertaken.

Rheumatoid arthritis: an overview of new and emerging therapies

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, inflammatory, systemic autoimmune disorder characterized by symmetric inflammation of synovial joints leading to progressive erosion of cartilage and bone. The aim of treatment is to mitigate joint destruction, preserve function, and prevent disability. The American College of Rheumatology guidelines for the treatment of RA recommend that newly diagnosed patients with RA begin treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) within 3 months of diagnosis. Methotrexate remains the most commonly prescribed DMARD and is the standard by which recent new and emerging therapies are measured. Increasing knowledge regarding the immunologic basis of RA and advances in biotechnology have resulted in new, targeted biological therapies against proinflammatory cytokines that have dramatically changed the treatment paradigm and outcomes of patients with RA. This article reviews the pharmacological rationale underlying RA therapy, with a focus on currently available biological therapies and new therapies in development.

Infections associated with tumor necrosis factor-alpha antagonists

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha antagonists are promising therapeutic agents for patients with severe autoimmune and rheumatologic conditions. Unfortunately, their use has been associated with an increased rate of tuberculosis, endemic mycoses, and intracellular bacterial infections. Infliximab, 1 of 3 available drugs in this novel class, appears to be associated with the greatest risk of infection, likely because of its long half-life and induction of monocyte apoptosis. Prospective trials are necessary to determine the exact risk associated with these agents, particularly the newer TNF-alpha antagonists. More specific TNF-alpha blockers, which reduce inflammation while maintaining adequate immunity, are needed. In the meantime, a thorough work-up is mandatory for all febrile illness occurring in TNF-alpha blocker recipients. We present 4 patients who developed severe infections during TNF-alpha antagonist therapy, review the literature, and discuss current guidelines for surveillance and prophylaxis.