Value of immunohistochemical detection of DNA mismatch repair proteins in predicting germline mutation in hereditary colorectal neoplasms

Evolving approach and clinical significance of detecting DNA mismatch repair deficiency in colorectal carcinoma

The last two decades have seen significant advancement in our understanding of colorectal tumors with DNA mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency. The ever-emerging revelations of new molecular and genetic alterations in various clinical conditions have necessitated constant refinement of disease terminology and classification. Thus, a case with the clinical condition of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer as defined by the Amsterdam criteria may be one of Lynch syndrome characterized by a germline defect in one of the several MMR genes, one of the yet-to-be-defined "Lynch-like syndrome" if there is evidence of MMR deficiency in the tumor but no detectable germline MMR defect or tumor MLH1 promoter methylation, or "familial colorectal cancer type X" if there is no evidence of MMR deficiency. The detection of these conditions carries significant clinical implications. The detection tools and strategies are constantly evolving. The Bethesda guidelines symbolize a selective approach that uses clinical information and tumor histology as the basis to select high-risk individuals. Such a selective approach has subsequently been found to have limited sensitivity, and is thus gradually giving way to the alternative universal approach that tests all newly diagnosed colorectal cancers. Notably, the universal approach also has its own limitations; its cost-effectiveness in real practice, in particular, remains to be determined. Meanwhile, technological advances such as the next-generation sequencing are offering the promise of direct genetic testing for MMR deficiency at an affordable cost probably in the near future. This article reviews the up-to-date molecular definitions of the various conditions related to MMR deficiency, and discusses the tools and strategies that have been used in detecting these conditions. Special emphasis will be placed on the evolving nature and the clinical importance of the disease definitions and the detection strategies.

Detection of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) deficiencies by immunohistochemistry can effectively diagnose the microsatellite instability (MSI) phenotype in endometrial carcinomas

BACKGROUND

A proportion of endometrial carcinomas (ECs) are associated with deficient DNA mismatch repair (MMR). These tumors are characterized by high levels of microsatellite instability (MSI). Identification of MSI is important in identifying women who should be tested for Lynch syndrome and identifying a phenotype that may have specific prognostic and predictive implications. Genomic characterization of ECs has shown that MSI tumors form a distinct subgroup. The two most common methodologies for MSI assessment have not been compared in EC.

METHODS

Pentaplex mono and di-nucleotide PCR for MSI testing was compared to MMR IHC (presence/absence of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2) in a cohort of patients with EC. Concordance, Kappa statistic, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were obtained on the cross-tabulation of results.

RESULTS

Comparison of both MSI and MMR status was complete for 89 cases. Overall agreement between methods (concordance) was 93.3% (95% CI[85.9%-97.5%]). A one-sided test to determine whether the accuracy is better than the "no information rate," which is taken to be the largest class percentage in the data, is significant (p<0.00001). Unweighted Kappa was 0.84, along with the sensitivity (88.5%), specificity (95.2%), PPV (88.5%), and NPV (95.2%). The balanced accuracy (i.e. the average between sensitivity and specificity) was 92%.

DISCUSSION

We show the equivalence of MSI testing and MMR IHC. We advocate the implementation of MMR IHC in future EC classification schemes, enabling stratification of cases for future clinical trials as well as assisting identification of Lynch syndrome, so that screening and risk reducing interventions can be undertaken.

Comparative study of mutations in SNP loci of K-RAS, hMLH1 and hMSH2 genes in neoplastic intestinal polyps and colorectal cancer

AIM: To clarify the molecular mechanism involved in pathogenesis of colorectal cancer as well as clinical significance of genetic analysis of histological samples.

METHODS: A total of 480 blood and tissue specimens were collected in our hospital from January 2011 to October 2012. In the observation group, there were 120 blood specimens and 120 intestinal tract tissue specimens collected from patients with neoplastic intestinal polyps. In the control group I there were 80 blood specimens and 80 intestinal tract tissue specimens collected from patients with colorectal cancer. In the control group II there were 40 blood specimens and 40 intestinal tract tissue specimens collected from healthy individuals. The gene segments were amplified using PCR and DNA gel electrophoresis along with DNA sequence analysis were employed for the detection of the following single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs): K-RAS codons 12 and 13; hMLH1 (human mutS homolog 1) gene missense mutation at Va1384Asp; hMSH2 (human mutS homolog 2) gene missense mutation at 2783C/A.

RESULTS: The mutation rate of the SNP at Va1384Asp locus of the hMLH1 gene from blood and tissue specimens in the observation group showed no statistical difference from those in the control group I. The mutation rates of SNPs in codons 12 and 13 of K-RAS and at 2783C/A locus of the hMSH2 gene were significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group I (χ² = 15.476, 29.670, 10.811, 16.618, 33.538, 7.898, P < 0.05). The mutation rate of SNP at Va1384Asp locus of the hMLH1 gene was significantly higher in the observation group when compared to the control group II (χ² = 10.486, 4.876, P < 0.05). The mutation rates of SNPs in codons 12 and 13 of K-RAS and at 2783C/A locus of the hMSH2 gene did not show any statistical difference from those in the control group II.

CONCLUSION: There may be important clinical significance and relevance between neoplastic intestinal polyps and colorectal cancer in terms of the mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis.

Advanced colorectal adenomas in patients under 45 years of age are mostly sporadic

BACKGROUND

The presence of advanced adenomas in younger individuals is a criterion for Lynch syndrome (LS). However, the utility of screening advanced adenomas for loss of mismatch repair (MMR) protein expression to identify suspected LS remains unclear.

AIMS

Determine the prevalence of MMR defects to understand whether these patients harbor a defined genetic risk for CRC.

METHODS

The study cohort included adult patients ≤45 years of age with advanced adenomas (villous histology, ≥1 cm in diameter, ≥3 polyps of any size) endoscopically removed between 2001 and 2011. Clinical records were reviewed along with detailed pathological review and immunohistochemical MMR analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 76 (40.1 % male, age 40.6 ± 5.4 years) patients met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Indications for colonoscopy were gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding 39 (51.3 %), CRC in a first-degree relative 17 (22.4 %) and somatic GI symptoms 20 (26.3 %). Index colonoscopy revealed a median of 1 adenoma (range 1-4), mean diameter of 12.9 ± 7.1 mm, 40 (52.6 %) with villous histology. The mean follow-up duration was 3.3 ± 2 years. Recurrent adenomas developed in 24 (31.6 %), of which 8 (10.5 %) were advanced adenomas; none of these patients developed CRC. One of 66 (1.5 %) adenomas available for immunohistochemical (IHC) testing revealed loss of MLH1 and PMS2.

CONCLUSIONS

IHC screening of advanced adenomas from patients younger than 45 years of age identified potential LS in one of 64 patients. The low yield of IHC screening in this population suggests that universal IHC screening of advanced adenomas from patients younger than 45 years of age for MMR defects is not an efficient strategy for identifying LS subjects.

Sebaceous neoplasms and the immunoprofile of mismatch-repair proteins as a screening target for syndromic cases

INTRODUCTION

Muir-Torre syndrome (MTS), a subset of Lynch syndrome, is characterized by concurrent or sequential development of sebaceous neoplasms, and internal malignancies, specifically colorectal carcinoma (CRC), and can be related to mismatch-repair (MMR)-protein deficiency. In CRC context, p16-negativity in MLH1-deficient cases may denote methylation rather than mutation. The prime aim of this study was to evaluate the mismatch-repair (MMR)-protein deficiency and the p16 status among sebaceous neoplasms.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

From January 1990 through October 2012, 26 sebaceous adenomas (SAs) and 6 sebaceous carcinomas (SCs) were accrued. The expression of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 was recorded. MLH1-deficient cases were tested for p16 status.

RESULTS

Eighteen (56%) of the 32 specimens with SA or SC displayed MMR-protein deficiency, comprising 17 (65.4%) SAs (MSH2/MSH6 loss in 12, MLH1/PMS2 loss in 3, MSH6 loss only in 2 cases) and 1 (16.7%) SC (MLH1/PMS2 loss). All 4 MLH1 deficient cases were p16-positive.

CONCLUSION

A substantial proportion of sebaceous neoplasms were MMR-protein deficient and thus likely MTS candidates. Given the low prevalence of sebaceous neoplasms in Denmark, immunohistochemistry for the four MMR-proteins is recommended in the initial diagnostic approach. The addition of p16 was none-informative, but evaluation of its utility in larger series is warranted.

Clinical significance of mismatch repair gene expression in sporadic colorectal cancer

Mismatch repair (MMR) genes play an important role in the occurrence and development of sporadic colorectal cancer; however, the effect of MMR genes on clinicopathological features and prognosis remains unclear. The aim of the present study was to observe the clinical significance of MMR gene expression in sporadic colorectal cancer. Clinicopathological data and postoperative samples from 404 patients with sporadic colorectal cancer were obtained from the Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University. The immunohistochemistry PV-9000 two-step method was performed to measure the protein expression of human mutL homolog 1 (hMLH1), human mutS homolog (hMSH) 2, human postmeiotic segregation increased 2 (hPSM2) and hMSH6. Differences in clinicopathological features, family history and survival time subsequent to surgery between groups with normal and aberrant MMR protein (MMRP) expression were compared. A total of 27.23% of all patients showed aberrant nuclear staining of MMRP. Among the patients with aberrant MMRP expression, a higher proportion of patients showed aberrant expression of more than one type of MMRP than aberrant expression of only one type of MMRP. Aberrant expression of hMLH1/hPSM2 was most commonly observed (29/404). In addition, aberrant MMRP expression in colorectal cancer was indicated predominantly in the right hemicolon. Histological type primarily showed mucinous adenocarcinoma. In addition, with increasing body mass index (BMI), the MMRP deficiency rate was also shown to increase gradually. There was a close association between MMRP expression deficiency and family history of cancer (P<0.05). For TNM stage III patients, the Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed that the aberrant MMRP expression group had a three-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate of 66.67%, which was longer than the DFS rate of the normal group (55.41%), with no statistical difference (P>0.05). In conclusion, the immunohistochemistry PV-9000 two-step method can be used to measure MMRP expression in colorectal cancer. Aberrant MMRP expression is closely correlated with tumor location, histological type, BMI and tumor family history in sporadic colorectal cancer. Aberrant MMRP expression may have an effect on the prognosis of stage III patients.

The genetic basis of Lynch syndrome and its implications for clinical practice and risk management

Lynch syndrome is the most common cause of hereditary colon cancer, and accounts for as much as 3% of all colon and endometrial cancers. The identification and management of individuals with Lynch syndrome have evolved over the past 20 years, yet the syndrome remains vastly underdiagnosed. It is important for clinicians to recognize individuals and families who are at risk in order to be able to manage them appropriately and reduce their morbidity and mortality from this condition. This review will touch on the history of Lynch syndrome, the current knowledge of genotype–phenotype correlations, the cancers associated with Lynch syndrome, and management of individuals who are gene carriers.

Heterogenous mismatch-repair status in colorectal cancer

Abstract

Virtual Slides

The virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/1771940323126788

MSH6 mutations are frequent in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer families with normal pMSH6 expression as detected by immunohistochemistry

INTRODUCTION

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is an autosomal dominant condition accounting for 2% to 4% of all colorectal cancer cases worldwide. Families with germ line mutations in 1 of 6 mismatch repair genes are known as Lynch syndrome families. The largest number of mutations has been detected in the mismatch repair genes MLH1 and MSH2, but several mutations in MSH6 have also been demonstrated.

AIM

: Whether HNPCC families are screened for mutations in mismatch repair genes often relies on their immunohistochemical profile. The aim of the present study was to evaluate this approach in Lynch families carrying mutations in MSH6.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Results of the screening of the MSH6 gene in HNPCC families were compared with those obtained on immunohistochemical protein analysis.

RESULTS

In 56 (7%) of 815 families, at least 1 MSH6 mutation, 23 definitively pathogenic mutations and 38 missense mutations or unclassified variants, and several polymorphisms in the MSH6 gene were detected. In families carrying a pathogenic MSH6 mutation, 69.6% of 23 colon adenocarcinomas showed absence of pMSH6 in tumor tissue by immunohistochemical analysis. In 34.5%, all proteins could be detected, whereas in 34.5% pMSH6 was present and pMLH1/pPMS2 was absent.

CONCLUSIONS

If genetic screening of HNPCC families depended on immunohistochemical results, a substantial number of families harboring a pathogenic mutation in MSH6 and the vast majority of families harboring an MSH6 unclassified variant would not be detected.

Recent advances in molecular diagnosis of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is a dominant autosomal genetic syndrome, accounting for 5%-10% of all colorectal cancers. It is caused by inactivating germ-line mutations of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes, including hMLH1, hMSH2, hMSH6, hPMS2, and hPMS1. HNPCC shows a tendency towards early age at onset, multiplicity of tumors, right-sided colon involvement, characteristic tumor pathology, and spectrum of extracolonic tumors. The diagnosis of HNPCC mainly relies on history and genetic linkage analysis. Patients meeting the Amsterdam criteria or Bethesda guidelines should undergo detection of microsatellite instability and immunohistochemistry analysis of hMSH2 and hMLH1 expression. If one of the two detections yields a positive result, molecular genetic testing for germline mutations of MMR genes should be taken into consideration.

Clinico-pathologic Parameters for Prediction of Microsatellite Instability in Colorectal Cancer

PURPOSE

Although the incidence of microsatellite instability (MSI) accounts for 10-15% of cases of colorectal cancer, its clinical application for all colorectal cancers has widened. We attempted to identify clinical and pathological parameters that may be helpful in selection of patients with MSI-high (MSI-H).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 120 resected colorectal cancers were enrolled retrospectively for this MSI study. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and denaturing high performance liquid chromatography and/or real time PCR methods with five markers and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for MLH1 and MSH2 were performed for analysis of cancer and blood specimens. Clinico-pathologic parameters, including IHC, were investigated in order to determine their usefulness as predictive factors of MSI.

RESULTS

Among 120 cases of colorectal cancer, MSI was observed in 15 cases (12.5%), including 11 cases of MSI-H and four cases of MSI-low. Patients with MSI were younger, less than 50 years old, had a family history of cancer, Rt. sided colon cancer and/or synchronous multiple colorectal cancer, mucinous histologic type, and serum carcinoembryonic antigen group in the normal range. Results of multivariate analysis showed Bethesda guidelines, Rt. sided and/or synchronous multiple colorectal cancer, and negative expression of IHC for MLH1, which was consistently associated with MSI-H. MSI-H colorectal tumors have met at least one of these three parameters and their sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 72.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Bethesda guidelines, tumor location, and negative expression of MLH1 protein are important parameters for selection of patients with colorectal cancers for MSI testing. MSI testing is recommended for patients showing any of these three parameters.

[Prognostic marker profiles for risk of distant metastases in colorectal cancer]

In colorectal cancer (CRC) prognostic markers correlating with distant metastasis are of high clinical value. In recent years it could be demonstrated that sporadic CRC with microsatellite instability (MSI) exhibits a very low risk for distant spread. Within this group the medullary subtype represents a morphological prototype. In the new WHO classification other morphological variants, such as mucinous, signet ring cell, serrated, cribriform comedo type and solid-undifferentiated forms are graded according to their microsatellite status. The clinical value of BRAF mutations is also dependent on the microsatellite status. Recent data have shown an ambivalent prognostic impact of BRAF mutations. A BRAF mutation in combination with MSI is associated with a good prognosis, whereas a BRAF mutation in the background of microsatellite stability (MSS) indicates a very poor outcome. Based on the concept of migrating stem cells, combined high scores of CD133 and nuclear β-catenin expression can be additionally used as markers for a high risk of distant metastasis. Hence, an immunohistochemical algorithm can be defined by the combination of three markers (hMLH1, CD133 and β-catenin) which allows CRC with either a very high or a very low risk of distant spread to be identified.

Immunohistochemical testing of conventional adenomas for loss of expression of mismatch repair proteins in Lynch syndrome mutation carriers: a case series from the Australasian site of the colon cancer family registry

Debate continues as to the usefulness of assessing adenomas for loss of mismatch repair protein expression to identify individuals with suspected Lynch syndrome. We tested 109 polyps from 69 proven mutation carriers (35 females and 34 males) belonging to 49 Lynch syndrome families. All polyps were tested by immunohistochemistry for four mismatch repair proteins MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2. Detailed pathology review was performed by specialist gastrointestinal pathologists. The majority of polyps (86%) were conventional adenomas (n=94), with 65 tubular and 28 tubulovillous adenomas and a single villous adenoma. The remaining 15 lesions (14%) were serrated polyps. Overall, loss of mismatch repair expression was noted for 78/109 (72%) of polyps. Loss of mismatch repair expression was seen in 74 of 94 (79%) conventional adenomas, and 4 of 15 (27%) serrated polyps from mismatch repair gene mutation carriers. In all instances, loss of expression was consistent with the underlying germline mutation. Mismatch repair protein expression was lost in 27 of 29 adenomas with a villous component compared with 47 of 65 adenomas without this feature (93 vs 73%; P=0.028). A strong trend was observed for high-grade dysplasia. Mismatch repair deficiency was observed in 12 of 12 conventional adenomas with high-grade dysplasia compared with 60 of 79 with low-grade dysplasia (100 vs 76%; P=0.065). We were unable to demonstrate a significant association between conventional adenoma size or site and mismatch repair deficiency. All (4/4 or 100%) of the serrated polyps demonstrating mismatch repair deficiency were traditional serrated adenomas from a single family. Diagnostic testing of adenomas in suspected Lynch syndrome families is a useful alternative in cases where cancers are unavailable. The overwhelming majority of conventional adenomas from mutation carriers show loss of mismatch repair protein expression concordant with the underlying germline mutation.

Microsatellite instability and DNA mismatch repair protein deficiency in Lynch syndrome colorectal polyps

Colorectal cancers associated with Lynch syndrome are characterized by deficient DNA mismatch repair (MMR) function. Our aim was to evaluate the prevalence of microsatellite instability (MSI) and loss of MMR protein expression in Lynch syndrome-associated polyps. Sixty-two colorectal polyps--37 adenomatous polyps, 23 hyperplastic polyps, and 2 sessile serrated polyps (SSP)--from 34 subjects with germline MMR gene mutations were tested for MSI using a single pentaplex PCR for five mononucleotide repeat microsatellite markers, and also for expression of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 proteins by immunohistochemistry. High-level MSI (MSI-H) was seen in 15 of 37 (41%) adenomatous polyps, one of 23 (4%) hyperplastic polyps, and one of two (50%) SSPs. Loss of MMR protein expression was seen in 18 of 36 (50%) adenomatous polyps, zero of 21 hyperplastic polyps, and zero of two SSPs. Adenomatous polyps 8 mm or larger in size were significantly more likely to show MSI-H [OR, 9.98; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.52-65.65; P = 0.02] and deficient MMR protein expression (OR, 3.17; 95% CI, 1.20-8.37; P = 0.02) compared with those less than 8 mm in size. All (six of six) adenomatous polyps 10 mm or larger in size showed both MSI-H and loss of MMR protein expression by immunohistochemistry. Our finding that the prevalence of MMR deficiency increases with the size of adenomatous polyps suggests that loss of MMR function is a late event in Lynch syndrome-associated colorectal neoplasia. Although testing large adenomatous polyps may be of value in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with suspected Lynch syndrome, the absence of an MMR-deficient phenotype in an adenoma cannot be considered as a strong evidence against Lynch syndrome, as it is with colorectal carcinomas.

The genetic counselor: an important surgical ally in the optimal care of the cancer patient

Genetic counselors and surgeons both have important roles in the care of patients with hereditary cancer predisposition syndromes. Surgeons have the initial responsibility to identify and refer high-risk patients. Genetic counselors' specialized skill sets are then used in the risk assessment and genetic evaluation of such patients and their at-risk family members, and this may be performed in multiple settings. As discussed in this article, these roles and the processes of genetic counseling and genetic testing may be enhanced through multiple surgeon and genetic counselor collaborations. Continued medical management of patients and families with hereditary cancer predisposition syndromes becomes the responsibility of patients and their multiple health care providers. Box 7 provides a list of resources to assist in finding a local genetic counselor. Because there are various opportunities for surgeons and genetic counselors to collaborate, the authors urge surgeons to recognize the importance of, identify, and work in partnership with a local genetic counselor because that relationship sets the stage for optimal care of the cancer patient.

Preoperative diagnosis of Lynch syndrome with DNA mismatch repair immunohistochemistry on a diagnostic biopsy

BACKGROUND

DNA mismatch repair immunohistochemistry on tumor tissue is a simple, readily available, and cost-effective method of identifying patients with Lynch syndrome in the postoperative setting. The aim of the study was to assess whether the mismatch repair status of a colorectal cancer can be confirmed by mismatch repair immunohistochemistry on preoperative biopsy.

DESIGN

Germline positive patients with Lynch syndrome were identified from a prospectively collected Familial Cancer Clinic database. Preoperative colorectal cancer biopsy specimens were obtained from the source pathology provider to generate a cohort of matched preoperative and postoperative specimens. The specimens were sectioned and stained for 4 mismatch repair proteins (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2). An age-matched cohort to compare specimens was selected from Bethesda positive but mismatch repair immunohistochemistry negative patients. All slides were reviewed by a single blinded pathologist. The Wilson method was used to calculate a true underlying proportion of patients for whom the preoperative result matched the postoperative test result with a 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

Of 128 germline positive mutation carriers, 40 patients (mean age 41, SD 11.3) had colorectal resections. Thirty-three preoperative specimens were retrievable and were matched with biopsies from 33 controls. The germline mutations included in the study were 8 MLH1, 19 MSH2, 3 MSH6, and 2 PMS2. In patients where germline positive status was known, sensitivity was 100% (95% CI 89.2-100) and specificity was 100% (95% CI 89.2-100). Identical sensitivity and specificity were observed in 33 age-matched patients. The sensitivity of the endoscopic biopsy in predicting germline status was 94.9% (95% CI 80.4-98.3).

CONCLUSION

The mismatch repair disease status of a colorectal cancer can be reliably confirmed by mismatch repair immunohistochemistry on a diagnostic colorectal cancer biopsy sample before definitive surgery. Ascertaining a diagnosis of Lynch syndrome before definitive surgery can influence surgical planning.

Analysis of DNA mismatch repair proteins expression and BRAF V600E mutation in a subset of early- and late-onset colorectal carcinoma patients in Mexico

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

A third of colorectal carcinomas (CRC) affect patients <50 years of age. Fifteen percent of CRC cases with microsatellite instability are due to inherited germ-line mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes. The rest have an epigenetic hypermethylation of the MLH1 promoter in whom the BRAF V600E mutation is a common hallmark. Immunohistochemistry helps to classify colorectal cancers with 100% specificity and 92% sensitivity. We undertook this study to determine if age is a risk factor for defective MMR protein expression and BRAF mutations in our population and to compare these results with the histopathological tumor features.

METHODS

Immunohistochemistry for MLH1 and MSH2 and RT-PCR BRAF V600E mutation was performed on tissue specimens from 57 patients <50 years of age. Data on age, gender, tumor location, histology, depth of infiltration, and the presence of metastatic lymph nodes were collected. Forty eight patients >50 years of age were used as a control group. A statistical analysis using ANOVA, χ(2), and Spearman's rho test were performed.

RESULTS

Absent MMR protein expression was more prevalent in patients <50 years of age. No BRAF V600E mutations were detected in either group. Medullary and mucinous types were more prevalent among young patients, whereas intestinal type was more frequent in older patients (p = 0.0008). No differences were found regarding clinicopathological stages between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

We found an association between young age and defective MMR expression. No V600E BRAF mutations were detected in either group.

A two-antibody mismatch repair protein immunohistochemistry screening approach for colorectal carcinomas, skin sebaceous tumors, and gynecologic tract carcinomas

Mismatch repair protein immunohistochemistry is a widely used method for detecting patients at risk for Lynch syndrome. Recent data suggest that a two-antibody panel approach using PMS2 and MSH6 is an effective screening protocol for colorectal carcinoma, but there are limited data concerning this approach for extraintestinal tumors. The purpose of this study was to review the utility of a two-antibody panel approach in colorectal carcinoma and extraintestinal tumors. We evaluated mismatch repair protein expression in two cohorts: (1) a retrospective analysis of intestinal and extraintestinal tumors (n=334) tested for mismatch repair protein immunohistochemistry and (2) a prospectively accrued series of intestinal, gynecologic tract, and skin sebaceous neoplasms (n=98). A total of 432 cases were analyzed, including 323 colorectal, 50 gynecologic tract, 49 skin sebaceous, and 10 other neoplasms. Overall, 102/432 tumors (24%) demonstrated loss of at least one mismatch repair protein. Concurrent loss of MLH1 and PMS2 was the most common pattern of abnormal expression (50/432, 12%) followed by concurrent loss of MSH2 and MSH6 (33/432, 8%). Of 55 cases with abnormal PMS2 expression, 5 (9%) demonstrated isolated loss of PMS2 expression. Of 47 cases with abnormal MSH6 expression, 14 (30%) demonstrated isolated loss of MSH6 expression. Isolated loss of MLH1 or MSH2 was not observed. Colorectal carcinomas more frequently demonstrated abnormal expression of PMS2 (39/59, 66%). Skin sebaceous neoplasms more frequently demonstrated abnormal expression of MSH6 (18/24, 75%, respectively). A total of 65 tumors with abnormal mismatch repair protein expression were tested for microsatellite instability (MSI): 47 (72%) MSI high, 9 (14%) MSI low, and 9 (14%) microsatellite stable (MSS). Abnormal MSH6 expression accounted for 14/18 (78%) cases that were MSS or MSI low. Our findings confirm the utility of a two-antibody approach using PMS2 and MSH6 in colorectal carcinoma and indicate that this approach is effective in extraintestinal neoplasms associated with Lynch syndrome.

Promoter methylation status of hMLH1, hMSH2, and MGMT genes in colorectal cancer associated with adenoma-carcinoma sequence

PURPOSE

Epigenetic silencing of the DNA mismatch repair genes has been poorly described in colorectal carcinomas showing the classic adenoma-carcinoma pathway of carcinogenesis. The aim of this study was to investigate the methylation status of MutL homolog 1 (hMLH1), MutS homolog 2 (hMSH2), and O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) in a series of colorectal carcinomas that contain both adenomas and carcinomas.

METHODS

Promoter methylation of hMLH1, hMSH2, and MGMT was evaluated in normal mucosa, adenoma, and carcinoma samples from 112 colorectal cancer patients. Methylation was assessed by bisulfite modification and methylation-specific PCR. Expression of the gene products was also examined by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Of the 112 adenomas, methylation was detected for hMLH1 (2, 1.8%), hMSH2 (9, 8.0%), and MGMT (38, 33.9%). In the carcinoma samples, methylation was seen in hMLH1 (2, 1.8%), hMSH2 (15, 13.4%), and MGMT (53, 47.3%). In normal mucosa, hMSH2 (6, 5.4%) and MGMT (12, 10.7%) were methylated, whereas hMLH1 was not. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed abnormal hMLH1 (14, 12.5%), hMSH2 (11, 9.8%), and MGMT (53, 47.3%) expression with a significant correlation between aberrant MGMT methylation and a loss of MGMT expression.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that CpG island methylation in hMSH2 and MGMT, but not hMLH1, is closely related to carcinogenesis in colorectal carcinomas presenting with a conventional adenoma-carcinoma sequence. Therefore, the detection of hMSH2 and MGMT methylation may have clinical significance in the evaluation of colon cancer patients and in tumor-specific management of the disease.

Diagnosing hereditary colorectal cancer

Although progress in the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) has resulted in improved median survival, most patients with metastatic CRC still die of their disease, and essentially all patients with early-stage disease must undergo surgical resection and subsequently face the possibility of adjuvant chemotherapy. As effective screening and prevention strategies for CRC have been developed, identification of individuals with a hereditary predisposition to developing CRC is especially important and provides the opportunity to reduce disease burden in this high-risk population. Increased awareness and improved diagnostic techniques for hereditary CRC syndromes have facilitated more frequent diagnosis and management of a small number of highly penetrant syndromes within families. However, known high-penetrance genetic predisposition syndromes account for a minority of all familial CRC, leaving much of the genetic basis of CRC unexplained. Recent advances in high-throughput genotyping have made possible genome-wide association studies, which have identified novel genetic variants associated with modest increases in CRC risk. While these associations have helped to identify potentially important pathways in CRC carcinogenesis, at the current time, the clinical use of such genetic risk variants in colon cancer risk stratification remains limited.

Challenging cases encountered in colorectal cancer screening for Lynch syndrome reveal novel findings: nucleolar MSH6 staining and impact of prior chemoradiation therapy

Many pathology laboratories have developed specific screening protocols to detect patients with Lynch syndrome. With recent recommendations to test all patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer for Lynch syndrome, the volume of testing will increase, and the most economic and reliable screening test will prevail. Although the detection of microsatellite instability by polymerase chain reaction and the detection of loss of the mismatch repair proteins by immunohistochemistry can each be used as a screening tool, each methodology has its strengths and weaknesses. During the time of our study, we used both polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry to screen for Lynch syndrome in colorectal cancer specimens. We encountered 21 cases that posed significant interpretive challenges. A previously unpublished pattern of nucleolar MSH6 staining and potential spurious results induced by chemoradiation therapy are described. We feel that it is important to report these cases so that potential pitfalls in screening for Lynch syndrome can be avoided.

A comparative study of quantitative immunohistochemistry and quantum dot immunohistochemistry for mutation carrier identification in Lynch syndrome

Aims

Lynch Syndrome is caused by mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. Mutation carrier identification is facilitated by immunohistochemical detection of the MMR proteins MHL1 and MSH2 in tumour tissue and is desirable as colonoscopic screening reduces mortality. However, protein detection by conventional immunohistochemistry (IHC) is subjective, and quantitative techniques are required. Quantum dots (QDs) are novel fluorescent labels that enable quantitative multiplex staining. This study compared their use with quantitative 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) IHC for the diagnosis of Lynch Syndrome.

Methods

Tumour sections from 36 mutation carriers and six controls were obtained. These were stained with DAB on an automated platform using antibodies against MLH1 and MSH2. Multiplex QD immunofluorescent staining of the sections was performed using antibodies against MLH1, MSH2 and smooth muscle actin (SMA). Multispectral analysis of the slides was performed. The staining intensity of DAB and QDs was measured in multiple colonic crypts, and the mean intensity scores calculated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of staining performance for the identification of mutation carriers were evaluated.

Results

For quantitative DAB IHC, the area under the MLH1 ROC curve was 0.872 (95% CI 0.763 to 0.981), and the area under the MSH2 ROC curve was 0.832 (95% CI 0.704 to 0.960). For quantitative QD IHC, the area under the MLH1 ROC curve was 0.812 (95% CI 0.681 to 0.943), and the area under the MSH2 ROC curve was 0.598 (95% CI 0.418 to 0.777).

Conclusions

Despite the advantage of QD staining to enable several markers to be measured simultaneously, it is of lower utility than DAB IHC for the identification of MMR mutation carriers. Automated DAB IHC staining and quantitative slide analysis may enable high-throughput IHC.

DNA mismatch repair enzyme immunohistochemistry in colorectal cancer: a comparison of biopsy and resection material

BACKGROUND

Microsatellite instability (MSI) in colorectal cancer (CRC) may be predicted using mismatch repair protein (MMRP) immunohistochemistry (immunostaining), allowing focused genetic investigations and potentially influencing therapeutic interventions. Most laboratories perform immunostaining on surgical resection specimens. Endoscopic biopsy specimens are an alternative tissue source for immunostaining. Given the sensitivity of immunostaining to the degree of tissue fixation, endoscopic biopsy material may produce superior staining, based on faster and more thorough fixation. Moreover, in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, endoscopic biopsies may be more useful than surgical resection specimens by allowing assessment of MMR status prior to chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy induced changes in tumours. This study examines whether immunostaining for MMRP expression in CRC is as reliable on endoscopic biopsy material as on surgical resection specimens.

METHODS

Immunostaining for MLH1, PMS2, MSH2 and MHS6 was performed on 112 unselected CRC cases with both endoscopic biopsy and surgical resection material available. A single observer blindly examined intensity and distribution of staining and assessed MMRP expression. Two consultant histopathologists reviewed challenging cases. Endoscopic biopsies and surgical resections were compared using non-parametric statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Immunostaining for all four MMRPs on all 112 cases produced conclusive (i.e., fully interpretable) results in endoscopic biopsies. In surgical resection specimens, 10 stains from nine cases were inconclusive (stains for two MMRPs were inconclusive in one case). In cases where conclusive immunostaining was achieved, there was complete agreement in MMRP status between the endoscopic biopsy and corresponding surgical resection specimens. Overall, MMRP loss was identified in 13% of cases; 11% MLH1, 12% PMS2, 1% MSH2, and 1% MSH6. Immunostaining intensity was significantly higher (p < 0.0005) and the distribution of staining was significantly more uniform (p < 0.0005) on endoscopic biopsy than on surgical resection.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic biopsy provides equal accuracy and easier interpretation of MMRP expression immunostaining compared to surgical resection specimens.

Microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer

Approximately 20 percent of right-sided colon cancers and 5 percent of left-sided colon and rectal cancers have a deficient DNA mismatch repair system. This results in the widespread accumulation of mutations to nucleotide repeats, some of which occur within the coding regions of cancer-related genes such as TGFβRII and BAX. A standardized definition for microsatellite instability (MSI) based on the presence of deletions to mononucleotide repeats is gaining widespread acceptance in both research and the clinic. Colorectal cancer (CRC) with MSI are characterized histologically by an abundance of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, poor differentiation and a signet ring or mucinous phenotype. In younger patients these tumors usually develop along the chromosomal instability pathway, in which case the mismatch repair genes are inactivated by germline mutation, somatic mutation and loss of heterozygosity. In older patients MSI CRC usually develops against a background of widespread hypermethylation that includes methylation-induced silencing of the mismatch repair gene MLH1. The overall biological and clinical phenotype of MSI CRC that arise in these two pathways is likely to be different and may account for some of the discordant results reported in the literature relating to the clinical properties of these tumors. The available evidence indicates that MSI is unlikely to be a clinically useful marker for the prognostic stratification of early-stage CRC. The predictive value of MSI for response to 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy remains controversial, while for other agents the predictive value is difficult to assess because they are used in combination regimens. The MSI phenotype is being actively investigated for novel therapeutic approaches based on the principle of synthetic lethality. Finally, the MSI status of CRC is an extremely useful marker for population-based screening programs that aim to identify individuals and families with the hereditary cancer condition known as Lynch syndrome.

Clinical and histomolecular endometrial tumor characterization of patients at-risk for Lynch syndrome in South of Brazil

Lynch syndrome is an autosomal dominant cancer predisposition syndrome caused by germline mutations in one of the mismatch repair (MMR) genes: MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2. Clinically, Lynch syndrome is characterized by early onset (45 years) of colorectal cancer (CRC), as well as extra-colonic cancer. Male and female carriers of Lynch syndrome-associated mutations have different lifetime risks for CRC and in women endometrial cancer (EC) may be the most common tumor. Whenever Amsterdam criteria are not fulfilled, the currently recommended laboratory screening strategies involve microsatellite instability testing and immunohistochemistry staining of the tumor for the major MMR proteins. The aim of this study was to estimate the frequency of MMR deficiencies in women diagnosed with EC who are at-risk for Lynch syndrome. Thirty women diagnosed with EC under the age of 50 years and/or women with EC and a first degree relative diagnosed with a Lynch syndrome-associated tumor were included. To assess MMR deficiencies four methods were used: multiplex PCR, Single Strand Conformation Polymorphism, Immunohistochemistry and Methylation Specific-Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification. Twelve (40%) patients with EC fulfilling one of the inclusion criteria had results indicative of MMR deficiency. The identification of 5 women with clear evidence of MMR deficiency and absence of either Amsterdam or Bethesda criteria among 10 diagnosed with EC under the age of 50 years reinforces previous suggestions by some authors that these women should be considered at risk and always screened for Lynch syndrome after informed consent.

Semiquantitative assessment of immunohistochemistry for mismatch repair proteins in Lynch syndrome

AIMS

To assess semiquantitative immunohistochemistry as used in the diagnosis of Lynch syndrome.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Tumour sections from 51 mutation carriers and 17 controls were stained with antibodies against MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2. Intensity of immunoreactivity and percentage positivity were recorded on scales of 0-3 and 0-4, respectively. These scores were multiplied for a score of 0-12 per slide. Receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curves of staining performance for the identification of mutation carriers were evaluated, and optimum cut-offs calculated. The area under the MLH1 ROC curve was 0.981 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.952, 1.000]. The area under the MSH2 ROC curve was 0.899 (95% CI 0.796, 1.000). For MLH1 staining, a score<or=4 gives a sensitivity of 100.0% (95% CI 84.0, 100.0) and a specificity of 91.5% (95% CI 79.6, 97.6) for identifying MLH1 mutation carriers. For MSH2 staining, a score<or=4 gives a sensitivity of 87.5% (95% CI 61.7, 98.4) and specificity of 88.5% (95% CI 76.5, 95.6) for identifying MSH2 mutation carriers.

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports a semiquantitative slide assessment method. Protein expression may occur in the context of known pathogenic mutations, a potential pitfall in the screening process.

Interobserver variability in the evaluation of mismatch repair protein immunostaining

Immunohistochemical staining for mismatch repair proteins has during recent years been established as a routine analysis in many pathology laboratories with the aim to identify tumors linked to the hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome. Despite widespread application, data on reliability are lacking. We therefore evaluated interobserver variability among 6 pathologists, 3 experienced gastrointestinal pathologists and 3 residents. In total, 225 immunohistochemically stained colorectal cancers were evaluated as having normal, weak, loss of, or nonevaluable mismatch repair protein staining. Full consensus was achieved in 51% of the stainings for MLH1, 61% for PMS2, 83% for MSH2, and 45% for MSH6. Weak stainings were the main cause of reduced consensus, whereas contradictory evaluations with normal as well as loss of staining were reported in 2% to 6% of the tumors. Interobserver variability was considerable, though experienced pathologists and residents reached the same level of consensus. Because results from immunohistochemical mismatch repair protein stainings are used for decisions on mutation analysis and as an aid in the interpretation of gene variants of unknown significance in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer, the interobserver variability identified highlights the need for quality assessment programs, including guidelines for classification of different expression patterns.

DNA mismatch repair deficiency in ampullary carcinoma: a morphologic and immunohistochemical study of 54 cases

The significance of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency or microsatellite instability (MSI) in ampullary carcinomas remains to be defined. This study evaluated the MMR status in 54 consecutive ampullary adenocarcinomas by immunohistochemical and morphologic studies. All tumors were moderately (n = 49) or poorly (n = 5) differentiated, with 7 mucinous and 1 signet-ring cell type. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were noted in 36 tumors. Loss of MMR protein by immunohistochemical analysis was identified in 3 (6%), 2 lost MSH6, and 1 lost MLH1/PMS2. One MSH6- case had 3 metachronous colorectal cancers. Five TILs per 10 high-power fields predicted immunohistochemical abnormality in 2 of 3 tumors with a specificity of 80% (41/51); however, none of the 5 tumors that had the highest TIL counts (20-62/10 high-power fields) showed abnormal immunohistochemical results. Thus, MMR deficiency occurs in ampullary carcinoma but appears less frequent than in colorectal carcinoma (CRC). Typical MSI-high histologic features of CRC, such as increased TIL counts, seem to have similar yet subtly different implications in ampullary carcinoma.

In Lynch syndrome adenomas, loss of mismatch repair proteins is related to an enhanced lymphocytic response

AIMS

Lynch syndrome-associated tumours are characterized by the presence of an increased number of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes. This enhanced lymphocytic response may be elicited by genetically altered proteins that may arise as a result of a defective DNA mismatch repair system. The aim was to investigate this hypothesis by correlating loss of mismatch repair proteins and infiltration of lymphocytes in Lynch syndrome-associated adenomas and hyperplastic polyps.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Mismatch repair protein expression and the number of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes were assessed in Lynch syndrome (41 adenomas and nine hyperplastic polyps) and in familial colorectal cancer (nine adenomas and one hyperplastic polyp). Nineteen sporadic adenomas were included as a control group. Twenty of 32 (63%) adenomas with loss of mismatch repair protein expression showed an increase in tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes. Eight adenomas (8/32; 25%) displayed many tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes, whereas most adenomas (12/32; 38%) showed a minor increase. In adenomas with mismatch repair protein expression, both sporadic and Lynch syndrome associated, not one showed an increased number of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes. Hyperplastic polyps in Lynch syndrome patients showed neither loss of mismatch repair expression nor an increase in tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a correlation between the loss of mismatch repair proteins and the infiltration of lymphocytes in Lynch syndrome-associated adenomas.

Immunohistochemistry as first-line screening for detecting colorectal cancer patients at risk for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome: a 2-antibody panel may be as predictive as a 4-antibody panel

The utility of immunohistochemical detection of DNA mismatch repair proteins in screening colorectal cancer for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is being widely investigated. Currently, in both research and clinical settings, a 4-antibody panel that includes the 4 most commonly affected proteins (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2) is being used generally. On the basis of the biochemical properties of these proteins, we hypothesized that a 2-antibody panel, comprising MSH6 and PMS2, would be sufficient to detect abnormalities in all 4 proteins. We tested this hypothesis on a series of 232 colorectal carcinoma samples derived from 2 patient cohorts: (1) a prospectively accrued series of patients who were judged to carry a higher-than-average risk for HNPCC based on the revised Bethesda guidelines (n=190); and (2) a retrospective series of patients who were 40 years of age or younger (n=42). Immunohistochemical stains were regarded as negative (protein lost), when there was no nuclear labeling in tumor cells (with positive internal control). Overall, 70 of the 232 tumors demonstrated loss of at least one protein. The most common abnormality was concurrent loss of MLH1 and PMS2 (observed in 17% of the cases), followed by concurrent loss of MSH2 and MSH6 (6%). All MLH1 and MSH2-abnormal cases were also abnormal for PMS2 and MSH6, respectively, whereas 9 of 50 (18%) PMS2 and 6 of 20 (30%) MSH6-abnormal cases showed only isolated loss of PMS2 or MSH6 (with normal staining for MLH1 and MSH2). As such, our findings provide evidence that a 2-antibody panel (PMS2 and MSH6) is as effective as the current 4-antibody panel in detecting DNA mismatch repair protein abnormalities. Such a cost-effective approach carries significant implication, as immunohistochemistry is being widely used as first-line screening for HNPCC.

DNA mismatch repair and the transition to hormone independence in breast and prostate cancer

The molecular basis for the progression of breast and prostate cancer from hormone dependent to hormone independent disease remains a critical issue in the management of these two cancers. The DNA mismatch repair system is integral to the maintenance of genomic stability and suppression of tumorigenesis. No firm consensus exists regarding the implications of mismatch repair (MMR) deficiencies in the development of breast or prostate cancer. However, recent studies have reported an association between mismatch repair deficiency and loss of specific hormone receptors, inferring a potential role for mismatch repair deficiency in this transition. An updated review of the experimental data supporting or contradicting the involvement of MMR defects in the development and progression of breast and prostate cancer will be provided with particular emphasis on their implications in the transition to hormone independence.

Deficient DNA mismatch repair is common in Lynch syndrome-associated colorectal adenomas

Lynch syndrome is caused by germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. Both microsatellite instability (MSI) testing and immunohistochemical analyses (IHC) of colon cancers are valuable diagnostic strategies for Lynch syndrome. We sought to determine whether these markers of MMR deficiency were also detectable in pre-cancerous colorectal adenomas. Fifteen subjects with a germline MMR gene mutation who had 44 adenomas removed during surveillance colonoscopy were identified. MSI testing and IHC for MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 were performed. MSI was detected in 23 adenomas. There was a significant association between MSI and high-grade dysplasia (P = 0.006) and distal location (P = 0.0008). Loss of MMR protein by IHC was detected in 31 adenomas. A significant association was observed between loss of staining by IHC and high-grade dysplasia (P = 0.04). Among the 40 adenomas in which both MSI tests and IHC were performed, the presence of a germline mutation correlated with an abnormal MSI result in 58% of cases, an abnormal IHC result in 70% of cases, and either an abnormal MSI or IHC result in 73% of cases. The combination of MSI and IHC testing in colorectal adenomas is a sensitive screen for the detection of Lynch syndrome and may be particularly useful when Lynch syndrome is suspected and adenomatous polyps are the only tissues available for analysis.

Population-based detection of Lynch syndrome in young colorectal cancer patients using microsatellite instability as the initial test

Approximately 1-2% of colorectal cancers (CRC) arise because of germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes, referred to as Lynch syndrome. These tumours show microsatellite instability (MSI) and loss of expression of mismatch repair proteins. Pre-symptomatic identification of mutation carriers has been demonstrated to improve survival; however, there is concern that many are not being identified using current practices. We evaluated population-based MSI screening of CRC in young patients as a means of ascertaining mutation carriers. CRC diagnosed in patients aged <60 years were identified from pathology records. No prior information was available on family history of cancer. PCR techniques were used to determine MSI in the BAT-26 mononucleotide repeat and mutation in the BRAF oncogene. Loss of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2 protein expression was evaluated in MSI+ tumours by immunohistochemistry. MSI+ tumours were found in 105/1,344 (7.8%) patients, of which 7 were excluded as possible Lynch syndrome because of BRAF mutation. Of the 98 "red flag" cases that were followed up, 25 were already known as mutation carriers or members of mutation carrier families. Germline test results were obtained for 35 patients and revealed that 22 showed no apparent mutation, 11 showed likely pathogenic mutations and 2 had unclassified variants. The proportion of MSI+ cases in different age groups that were estimated to be mutation carriers was 89% (<30 years), 83% (30-39), 68% (40-49) and 17% (50-59). We recommend MSI as the initial test for population-based screening of Lynch syndrome in younger CRC patients, regardless of family history.

Identifying Lynch syndrome: we are all responsible

PURPOSE

The Amsterdam criteria and Bethesda guidelines are used to identify patients with Lynch syndrome. A family history of Lynch syndrome-related cancers or histopathology suggestive of microsatellite instability should prompt responses by the pathologist and clinician. This study evaluated the impact of microsatellite instability pathology findings on Lynch syndrome evaluation by clinicians.

METHODS

Microsatellite unstable tumors were identified from a maintained tissue bank, and MLH1 methylation was determined. Clinical information and management recommendations by the pathologist and clinician were collected from the medical record.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients with microsatellite unstable colorectal tumors were identified between 2003 and 2006. Thirteen (25 percent) patients were appropriately referred for additional testing, including eight with documented microsatellite instability histology and five based on history alone. Thirty-seven (73 percent) patients with microsatellite unstable tumors were not detected by pathologists or clinicians, and no additional workup for Lynch syndrome was performed. Two patients met Amsterdam criteria and represent potentially missed Lynch syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

Microsatellite instability-H histology was the driving force for the Lynch syndrome evaluation. Histopathology alone failed to identify all potential Lynch syndrome patients. Omission of an adequate familial risk assessment may lead to missed diagnosis of Lynch syndrome when suspicious histopathology fails to trigger appropriate testing.

Multiplex SNaPshot genotyping for detecting loss of heterozygosity in the mismatch-repair genes MLH1 and MSH2 in microsatellite-unstable tumors

BACKGROUND

In the workup of patients with suspected hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), detection of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) could help pinpoint the mismatch-repair (MMR) gene carrying the germline mutation, but analysis of microsatellite markers has proved unreliable for this purpose. We developed a simple, low-cost method based on single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping and capillary electrophoresis for the assessment of LOH at 2 MMR loci simultaneously.

METHODS

We used the Applied Biosystems SNaPshot Multiplex Kit with meticulously selected primers to assess 14 common SNPs in MLH1 [mutL homolog 1, colon cancer, nonpolyposis type 2 (E. coli)] and MSH2 [mutS homolog 2, colon cancer, nonpolyposis type 1 (E. coli)] and optimized the protocol for DNA isolated from peripheral blood and fresh/frozen or archival microsatellite-unstable tumors from patients with confirmed (n = 42) or suspected (n = 25) HNPCC. The 42 tumors from patients with confirmed MLH1 or MSH2 germline mutations were used to validate the method's diagnostic accuracy against results obtained with DNA sequencing or multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.

RESULTS

The SNaPshot assay provided better detection of certain SNPs than DNA sequencing. The MLH1 and MSH2 SNP marker sets were informative in 82% and 76% of the 67 cases analyzed, respectively. The new assay displayed 100% specificity for detecting LOH and predicted the location of the germline mutation in 40% of the cases (54% of those involving MLH1, 22% in MSH2).

CONCLUSIONS

Our SNP-based method for detecting LOH in MLH1 and MSH2 is simple to perform with instruments available in most clinical genetics laboratories. It can be a valuable addition to protocols now used to guide mutational screening of patients with suspected HNPCC.

Immunohistochemistry versus microsatellite instability testing for screening colorectal cancer patients at risk for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome. Part I. The utility of immunohistochemistry

The utility of immunohistochemical detection of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) protein in screening colorectal tumors for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) syndrome has been the focus of much intensive research over the last 10 years. Particular attention has been given to the relative usefulness of immunohistochemistry (IHC) versus testing of tumor microsatellite instability (MSI). Earlier work that focused on mutL homolog 1 (MLH1) and mutS homolog 2 (MSH2) has created a false impression that IHC has a lower sensitivity than MSI testing in predicting germline mutation. More recent studies that included postmeiotic segregation increased 2 (PMS2) and MSH6, on the other hand, have demonstrated an IHC predictive value that is virtually equivalent to that of MSI testing. Such added value of PMS2 and MSH6 can be explained by the biological and biochemical properties of the MMR proteins. On the premise that IHC with PMS2 and MSH6 is as sensitive as MSI testing, given that IHC is easily available and generally inexpensive and, importantly, identifies the affected gene, it is reasonable to regard IHC as a more optimal first-line screening tool than MSI testing for identifying HNPCC. MSI testing can provide a fallback position in equivocal situations, while remaining an important research tool. However, for IHC to be used as a first-line screening test requires that both pathologists and clinicians be aware that IHC results may be construed as "genetic information," and that appropriate procedures should be established to ensure patient understanding and consent.

Clinical features and mismatch repair genes analyses of Chinese suspected hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer: a cost-effective screening strategy proposal

China has the largest numbers of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) patients based on its population of 1.4 billion. However, the clinical data and mismatch repair (MMR) gene analyses have been limited. Here we performed microsatellite instability (MSI) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) analyses on a series of patients with a high-risk for HNPCC: 61 patients with family histories fulfilling Amsterdam criteria II (ACII-HNPCC) or suspected HNPCC criteria (S-HNPCC), and 106 early onset colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Sixty late-onset CRC patients were used as control. Methylation of the hMLH1 promoter was analyzed on tumors lacking hMLH1 expression. MMR germ-line mutations were screened on patients with tumors classified as MSI-H/L or negative for IHC. We identified 27 germ-line MMR variants in the 167 patients with a high-risk for HNPCC while only one germ-line mutation in hMSH6 was found in the late-onset CRC group. Of those, 23 were pathogenic mutations. The high incidence of gastric and hepatobiliary cancers coupled with the increasing number of small families in China reduces the sensitivity (43.5%, 30.4%) and positive predictive value (PPV) (45.5%, 17.9%) of the ACII- or S-HNPCC criteria. MSI or IHC testing are highly sensitive in detecting pathogenic mutations (sensitivities = 91.3% and 95.6%, respectively), but the PPVs are quite low (25.6% and 27.8%, respectively). Considering that all 12 tumors with pathogenic mutations in hMLH1 also showed promoter unmethylation, the sensitivity of IHC in conjunction with hMLH1 promoter methylation analysis is not reduced, but the PPV was increased from 27.8% to 61.1%, and the total cost was greatly reduced.

Mismatch repair protein expression in Amsterdam II criteria-positive patients in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is characterized genetically by germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) has high sensitivity and specificity for identifying MMR-deficient tumours. This study investigated the clinical presentations and frequency of HNPCC in Taiwan by combined Amsterdam II criteria (AC-II) and IHC.

METHODS

In 1995-2003, 7108 patients with primary colorectal cancer registered in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital's Colorectal Cancer Registry were screened using AC-II. Tumour specimens were analysed for MMR protein expression by IHC, and relevant clinicopathological details were documented.

RESULTS

Some 83 patients fulfilled the AC-II. Clinicopathologically, 43 patients (52 per cent) had proximal tumours, ten (12 per cent) had poorly differentiated cancers, 17 (20 per cent) had mucinous adenocarcinoma and 51 (61 per cent) had stage I-II tumours. Seventeen patients developed second primary colonic and extracolonic cancers over a mean 7.2-year follow-up. Immunohistochemically, 58 patients were MMR protein deficient. They had a significantly earlier age of onset (P < 0.001), more proximal tumour location (P = 0.002), less advanced tumour stage (P = 0.008) and more second primary cancers (P = 0.017) compared with MMR-competent patients.

CONCLUSION

These data show significant differences in clinical features between MMR protein-deficient and MMR competent subgroups.

Routinely assessed morphological features correlate with microsatellite instability status in endometrial cancer

Microsatellite instability (MSI) has been shown to be important in the molecular pathogenesis of both sporadic and inherited endometrial carcinomas of endometrioid type. It is likely prognostically significant as well. The aim of this study was to determine whether MSI phenotype in endometrial carcinoma was associated with specific morphologic patterns and therefore predictable by tumor morphology. The study subjects consisted of 102 patients with nearly equal representation of MSI high (MSI-H; n = 52) and non-MSI-H (n = 50) endometrial tumors. Microsatellite instability was determined by the standard polymerase chain reaction method using the National Cancer Institute-recommended set of 5 markers. The MSI-H and non-MSI-H groups were matched for patient age, race, histologic type (all endometrioid), International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics grade, and disease stage. Assessed morphological features included host inflammatory response (tumor infiltrating lymphocytes [TILs], peritumoral lymphocytes, peritumoral lymphoid follicles, and neutrophilic infiltration), tumor characteristics (cytologic grade, growth pattern, tumor heterogeneity, invasion pattern, metaplastic changes, necrosis, and lymphovascular invasion), and background endometrium (hyperplasia, atrophy, and polyp). Of all the features examined, TIL counts and peritumoral lymphocytes correlated significantly with MSI-H status. Their statistical relationship was strengthened in the presence of a nonpapillary growth pattern and endometrial hyperplasia. On multivariate analysis, TIL counts and peritumoral lymphocytes remained independent predictors for MSI-H status. At a cutoff point of 40 TILs/10 high power fields, TIL counts had a sensitivity of 85% in predicting MSI status in endometrioid endometrial carcinoma, with a specificity of 46%. This specificity increased as higher cutoff points were selected, but sensitivity decreased. Given that analogous features have been encountered in MSI-H colorectal cancers, our findings suggest a similar relationship between tumor phenotype and DNA mismatch repair abnormalities in both endometrial and colorectal tumors. Therefore, morphological patterns encountered in endometrial carcinoma may prove useful in screening tumors under consideration for MSI testing and identifying appropriate patients for referral to a genetic counseling service.

Heterogeneous staining for mismatch repair proteins during population-based prescreening for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer

The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of microsatellite instability (MSI(+)) in tumors from a population-based series of young colorectal cancer patients and its correlation with the loss of expression of mismatch repair (MMR) proteins. The BAT-26 mononucleotide repeat was used to screen for MSI(+) in all colorectal cancers diagnosed in Western Australia throughout a 5-year period in patients <60 years of age. MSI(+) was found in 75 of 1003 (7.5%) cases, of which six contained a concomitant mutation in BRAF and were therefore excluded from further investigations as possible hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Immunohistochemistry was used to evaluate expression of the four major MMR proteins (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2) in the remaining 69 MSI(+) tumors. Complete loss of MLH1 and PMS2 expression or of MSH2 and MSH6 expression was found in 35 (51%) and 17 (25%) cases, respectively, whereas other patterns of complete loss were observed in eight cases (12%). Eight tumors (12%) were initially recorded as showing normal expression, but on review seven were reclassified as having abnormal staining because of heterogeneous patterns of MMR loss. Three of these seven cases had previously been found to have germline mutations. Because of possible misinterpretation of heterogeneous immunohistochemistry staining for MMR protein loss, MSI testing is recommended as the initial screen for population-based detection of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

Utility of immunohistochemistry in predicting microsatellite instability in endometrial carcinoma

Identification of the microsatellite instability (MSI) phenotype in endometrial carcinoma is important given that such tumors are the most common noncolorectal tumors to occur in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome, and may bear prognostic relevance. The objective of this study was to assess the utility of immunohistochemistry (IHC), a simple and fast technique, in detecting MSI in endometrial carcinoma. The study subjects consisted of 90 endometrial carcinoma patients with equal representation of MSI-high (MSI-H) and non-MSI-H tumors. MSI was tested using the standard polymerase chain reaction-based method and the 5 NCI-recommended markers. Overall, IHC with MLH1 and MSH2 antibodies detected 69% of MSI-H tumors with a specificity of 100%. Adding PMS2 and MSH6 to the antibody panel increased the sensitivity to 91% but decreased the specificity to 83%. The most common IHC abnormality in MSI tumors was concurrent loss of MLH1/PMS2. Assessment of staining was straightforward in most cases but not in all. Staining inadequacies existed. Five stains (4 MLH1 and 1 MSH6) were not interpretable because of the lack of any internal positive control. Two percent to 10% of the cases (depending on the antibody assessed) had only focal weak staining; the highest frequency (10%) occurred with MLH1 antibody. PMS2 staining detected 7 MLH1-staining present MSI-H cases, thus partly accounting for the increased sensitivity with the 4-antibody panel. MSH6 staining identified 9 cases with loss of MSH6 alone, 6 of 9 were non-MSI-H, thus partly accounting for the decreased specificity with the 4-antibody panel. In conclusion, our results suggest that IHC is useful in detecting MSI in endometrial carcinoma. Although IHC has a lower sensitivity with more apparent staining inadequacies in detecting MSI in endometrial carcinoma than it does in colorectal carcinoma, its use in endometrial carcinoma may be an important adjunct when screening for hereditary cases. In the future, as prognostic and therapeutic implications of MSI phenotype become better defined, it may be reasonable to perform IHC for mismatch repair proteins in large numbers of endometrial carcinomas.

Single-amplicon MSH2 A636P mutation testing in Ashkenazi Jewish patients with colorectal cancer: role in presurgical management

OBJECTIVE

This study summarizes our initial experience with prospective, single-amplicon (mutation-specific) A636P testing in Ashkenazi Jewish patients at risk for Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

We previously described a founder mutation, MSH2*1906G >C (A636P) that causes HNPCC in 8/1345 (0.59%) of Ashkenazim with colorectal cancer. The mutation was more common in Ashkenazim diagnosed at <or=40 years (7%).

METHODS

Twenty-seven Ashkenazi probands at risk for HNPCC were ascertained. Single-amplicon A636P testing was performed on 21 by polymerase chain reaction of exon 12 of MSH2, followed by direct DNA sequencing. Mutational analysis of the entire open reading frame of MLH1 and MSH2 was performed on 7 by PCR of each exon, followed by heteroduplex analysis using denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography and direct sequencing of exons with variant chromatographs. One patient received both studies,

RESULTS

The A636P mutation was detected in 3/21 (14%) prospectively evaluated patients using single amplicon testing. In 6 patients, the entire open reading frame of MLH1 and MSH2 was analyzed, and 1 additional A636P carrier and 2 carriers of previously unrecognized mutations were identified. The A636P mutation was present in 2 patients who met Amsterdam criteria and in 2 patients who did not.

CONCLUSIONS

Although rare in the general population, A636P mutations are found at increased frequency in Ashkenazim with a personal or family history of colorectal or other HNPCC-associated cancers. This inexpensive and rapid approach may be useful preoperatively in helping determine the extent of colon resection for a subset of patients.

Reduced Pms2 expression in non-neoplastic flat mucosa from patients with colon cancer correlates with reduced apoptosis competence

Pms2 protein is a component of the DNA mismatch repair complex responsible both for post-replication correction of DNA nucleotide mispairs and for early steps in apoptosis. Germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes give rise to hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer, which accounts for about 4% of colon cancers. However, little is known about the expression of mismatch repair proteins in relation to sporadic colon cancer, which accounts for the great majority of colon cancers. Multiple samples were taken from the non-neoplastic flat mucosa of colon resections from patients with no colonic neoplasia, a tubulovillous adenoma, or an adenocarcinoma. Expression of Pms2 was assessed using semiquantitative immunohistochemistry. Apoptosis was assessed in polychrome-stained epoxy sections using morphologic criteria. Samples from patients without colonic neoplasia had moderate to strong staining for Pms2 in cell nuclei at the base of crypts, while samples from 2 of the 3 colons with a tubulovillous adenoma, and from 6 of the 10 colons with adenocarcinomas, showed reduced Pms2 expression. Samples from patients with an adenocarcinoma that had reduced Pms2 expression also exhibited reduced apoptosis capability in nearby tissue samples, evidenced when this paired tissue was stressed ex vivo with bile acid. Reduced Pms2 expression in the colonic mucosa may be an early step in progression to colon cancer. This reduction may cause decreased mismatch repair, increased genetic instability, and/or reduced apoptotic capability. Immunohistochemical determination of reduced Pms2 expression, upon further testing, may prove to be a promising early biomarker of risk of progression to malignancy.