Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis

A Retrospective Study of Intrathecal Pemetrexed Combined With Systemic Therapy for Leptomeningeal Metastasis of Lung Cancer

Objective This retrospective study aimed to investigate the clinical features of lung cancer patients with leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) and explore the clinical efficacy and tolerance of intrathecal pemetrexed (IP) combined with systemic antitumor therapy. Methods Thirty-four lung cancer patients (11 men, 23 women) with LM receiving IP at our hospital were retrospectively reviewed between August 2018 and December 2019. Identified cases showed either positive cerebrospinal fluid cytology or typical findings (leptomeningeal enhancement or ventricle broadening) upon imaging examination. Results Before the diagnosis of LM, 24 (70.6%) patients received EGFR-TKI therapy with or without other agents (antivascular therapy, or chemotherapy), 5 (14.7%) patients received chemotherapy, 1 (2.9%) patient received antivascular therapy, and 3 (8.8%) patients received ALK inhibitors. Fourteen (41.2%) patients did not change the systematic regimen at the beginning of IP, while 20 (58.8%) patients changed to antitumor agents. IP was administered for a median of 3 times (range, 1-12 times). The IP dose was 15, 20, 25, 30, and 40 mg in 8 (23.5%), 21 (58.8%), 2 (5.9%), 2 (5.9%), and 1 (5.9%) patient, respectively. In all IP dose levels, the major adverse events were myelosuppression and elevation of hepatic aminotransferases (EHA). Grade 1/2 myelosuppression occurred in 4 (11.8%) patients. Grade 1/2 EHA also occurred in 4 (11.8%) patients. Grades 3/4 adverse events were not observed. After IP and systematic therapy, the clinical manifestations related to LM in 26 (76.5%) patients improved. In the whole cohort, the median overall survival was 20 months. The median time from the initial IP administration until death or the last follow-up was 3.5 months. Conclusions IP showed controllable toxicity and good efficacy, prolonged the survival time, and improved the quality of life when combined with tailored systemic antitumor therapy in lung cancer patients.

Therapeutic effect of osimertinib plus cranial radiotherapy compared to osimertinib alone in NSCLC patients with EGFR-activating mutations and brain metastases: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The study aimed to compare the efficacy of osimertinib plus cranial radiotherapy (RT) with osimertinib alone in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and brain metastases (BMs).

METHODS

The clinical data of advanced NSCLC patients with BMs who received osimertinib were retrospectively collected. The patients were assigned to one of the two groups according to the therapeutic modality used: the osimertinib monotherapy group or the osimertinib plus RT group.

RESULTS

This was a retrospective study and 61 patients were included from December 2015 to August 2020. Forty patients received osimertinib monotherapy, and twenty-one patients received osimertinib plus RT. Radiotherapy included whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT, n = 14), WBRT with simultaneous integrated boost (WBRT-SIB, n = 5) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS, n = 2). The median number of prior systemic therapies in the two groups was one. Intracranial and systemic ORR and DCR were not significantly different between the two groups. No difference in iPFS was observed between the two groups (median iPFS: 16.67 vs. 13.50 months, P = 0.836). The median OS was 29.20 months in the osimertinib plus RT group compared with 26.13 months in the osimertinib group (HR = 0.895, P = 0.826). In the L858R mutational subgroup of 31 patients, the osimertinib plus RT group had a longer OS (P = 0.046). In the exon 19 deletion mutational subgroup of 30 patients, OS in the osimertinib alone group was longer than that in the osimertinib plus RT group (P = 0.011). The incidence of any-grade adverse events was not significantly different between the osimertinib plus RT group and the osimertinib alone group (47.6% vs. 32.5%, P = 0.762). However, six patients (28.5%) experienced leukoencephalopathy in the osimertinib plus RT group, and 50% (3/6) of the leukoencephalopathy was greater than or equal to grade 3.

CONCLUSION

The therapeutic effect of osimertinib with RT was similar to that of osimertinib alone in EGFR-positive NSCLC patients with BM. However, for patients with the L858R mutation, osimertinib plus RT could provide more benefit than osimertinib alone.

Neoplastic meningitis in solid tumours: updated review of diagnosis, prognosis, therapeutic management, and future directions

Neoplastic meningitis (NM) is a relatively frequent metastatic complication of cancer associated with high levels of neurological morbidity and generally poor prognosis. It appears in 5%-15% of patients with solid tumours, the most frequent being breast and lung cancer and melanoma. Symptoms are caused by involvement of the cerebral hemispheres, cranial nerves, spinal cord, and nerve roots, and are often multifocal or present with signs and symptoms of intracranial hypertension. The main diagnostic tools are the neurological examination, brain and spinal cord contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, and cerebrospinal fluid analysis including cytology, although studies have recently been conducted into the detection of tumour cells and DNA in the cerebrospinal fluid, which increases diagnostic sensitivity. With the currently available therapies, treatment aims not to cure the disease, but to delay and ameliorate the symptoms and to preserve quality of life. Treatment of NM involves a multimodal approach that may include radiotherapy, intrathecal and/or systemic chemotherapy, and surgery. Treatment should be individualised, and is based mainly on clinical practice guidelines and expert opinion. Promising clinical trials are currently being conducted to evaluate drugs with molecular and immunotherapeutic targets. This article is an updated review of NM epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, prognosis, management, and treatment; it is aimed at general neurologists and particularly at neurologists practicing in hospital settings with oncological patients.

Whole-Brain Radiotherapy vs. Localized Radiotherapy after Resection of Brain Metastases in the Era of Targeted Therapy: A Retrospective Study

Simple Summary

The paradigm shift from cytotoxic chemotherapy to molecular targeted therapy dramatically improved the survival and quality of life of cancer patients. In radio-oncological aspects, there also was a paradigm shift from whole-brain radiotherapy to localized radiotherapy including stereotactic radiosurgery. This retrospective study analyzed 124 consecutive patients who had undergone surgical resection of brain metastases. We found targeted therapies to improve overall survival and distant control with decreased incidence of leptomeningeal metastasis. Our data suggest that localized radiotherapy is sufficient after resection of brain metastases when systemic targeted therapy is available.

Abstract

Whether targeted therapy (TT) and radiotherapy impact survival after resection of brain metastases (BM) is unknown. The purpose of this study was to analyze the factors affecting overall survival (OS), local control (LC), distant control (DC), and leptomeningeal metastases (LMM) in patients who had undergone resection of BM. We retrospectively analyzed 124 consecutive patients who had undergone resection of BM between 2004 and 2020. Patient information about age, sex, Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), origin of cancer, synchronicity, tumor size, status of primary cancer, use of TT, extent of resection, and postoperative radiotherapy was collected. Radiation therapy was categorized into whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), localized radiotherapy (local brain radiotherapy or stereotactic radiosurgery (LBRT/SRS)), and no radiation. We identified factors that affect OS, LC, DC, and LMM. In multivariable analysis, significant factors for OS were higher KPS score (≥90) (HR 0.53, p = 0.011), use of TT (HR 0.43, p = 0.001), controlled primary disease (HR 0.63, p = 0.047), and single BM (HR 0.55, p = 0.016). Significant factors for LC were gross total resection (HR 0.29, p = 0.014) and origin of cancer (p = 0.041). Both WBRT and LBRT/SRS showed superior LC than no radiation (HR 0.32, p = 0.034 and HR 0.38, p = 0.018, respectively). Significant factors for DC were use of TT (HR 0.54, p = 0.022) and single BM (HR 0.47, p = 0.004). Reduced incidence of LMM was associated with use of TT (HR 0.42, p = 0.038), synchronicity (HR 0.25, p = 0.028), and controlled primary cancer (HR 0.44, p = 0.047). TT was associated with prolonged OS, improved DC, and reduced LMM in resected BM patients. WBRT and LBRT/SRS showed similar benefits on LC. Considering the extended survival of cancer patients and the long-term effect of WBRT on cognitive function, LBRT/SRS appears to be a good option after resection of BM.

Osimertinib Improves Overall Survival in Patients with Leptomeningeal Metastases Associated with EGFR-Mutated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Regardless of Cerebrospinal Fluid T790M Mutational Status

Osimertinib has demonstrated promising efficacy against leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) associated with T790M-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the effect of cerebrospinal fluid's (CSF's) epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutation on osimertinib efficacy remains unclear.Seventy-eight patients were studied with EGFR-mutated NSCLC and LM. Case data were collected and EGFR mutation status of circulating cell-free DNA from paired CSF, and plasma of 23 patients with LM was detected using droplet digital PCR. The median overall survival (mOS) was 8.08 months (95% CI: 6.07-10.09) in the study. Forty-four osimertinib-treated patients had an improved mOS of 13.15 (95% CI: 5.74-20.57) and a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 9.50 months (95% CI: 6.77-12.23) when compared with patients treated with first- or second-generation EGFR-TKI (mOS = 3.00 months (95% CI: 1.32-4.68) and median PFS = 1.50 months (95% CI: 0.00-3.14)). In the osimertinib group, mOS values for CSF with and without T790M mutation were 22.15 months (95% CI: 9.44-34.87) and 13.39 months (95% CI: 7.01-19.76), respectively, with no statistical differences. Regardless of the CSF T790M mutation status, osimertinib demonstrated significant efficacy against LM associated with NSCLC.

Efficacy of osimertinib for preventing leptomeningeal metastasis derived from advanced EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer: a propensity-matched retrospective study

Background

Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is a severe complication of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This retrospective study aimed to investigate the potential use of osimertinib for preventing LM in patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated NSCLC.

Methods

Patients with advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations who underwent tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) therapy for at least 8 weeks between September 2016 and September 2019 were eligible for this study. All included patients were divided into two groups based on whether they received osimertinib, the osimertinib group (patients treated with osimertinib) and the control group (patients not treated with osimertinib). Propensity score matching (PSM, ratio of 1:1) was used to account for differences in baseline characteristics. The cumulative incidence of LM and the overall survival (OS) were evaluated.

Results

A total of 304 patients were included in the study population. Among them, 116 patients received osimertinib, and 188 did not. A total of 112 patients remained in each group after PSM, and the baseline characteristics were not significantly different between the two cohorts. LM developed in 11 patients (9.82%) in the osimertinib group and 24 patients (21.42%) in the control group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19–0.79, p = 0.009). Multivariate analysis indicated that osimertinib was an independent, statistically significant predictor for determining the risk for LM, with an HR of 0.33 (p = 0.042). At present, the OS rate data are too immature for statistical analysis.

Conclusion

Real-world data demonstrate that osimertinib can significantly reduce the incidence of LM in patients with advanced NSCLC harboring common EGFR mutations. Given this result, osimertinib should be encouraged in clinical practice for specific patient populations.

Advances in targeted therapy in non-small cell lung cancer with actionable mutations and leptomeningeal metastasis

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE?: Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is a serious complication of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that is diagnosed in approximately 3%-5% of patients. LM occurs more frequently in patients with NSCLC harbouring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements and is usually accompanied by a poor prognosis, with a median overall survival (OS) of several months if patients receive conventional treatments. However, tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy after LM diagnosis is an independent predictive factor for extended survival. Here, we aim to summarize the latest advances in targeted therapy for LM and provide patients with better treatment options. METHODS: By reviewing the recent progress of targeted therapy in NSCLC with LM, especially the efficacy of newer generation TKIs, we aim to provide clinicians with a reference to further optimize patient treatment plans. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Osimertinib was confirmed to have a several-fold higher CNS permeability than other EGFR-TKIs and was recommended as the preferred choice for patients with EGFR-positive LM whether or not they harboured the T790M mutation. Second-generation ALK-TKIs have a higher rate of intracranial response and can be positioned as front-line drugs in NSCLC with LM. However, the sequence in which ALK-TKIs are administered for effective disease control requires further evaluation. In addition, targeted therapy revealed a potential choice in patients with LM and rare mutations, such as ROS1 and BRAF. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSIONS?: The development of therapeutic agents with greater CNS penetration is vital for the management of CNS metastasis from NSCLC, particularly in the EGFR-mutant and ALK-rearranged subtypes. Systemic therapy with newer generation TKIs is preferred as the initial intervention. This is because newer generation TKIs are designed to penetrate the blood-brain barrier and possess significantly higher intracranial activities. However, their further effectiveness is limited by inadequate blood-brain barrier penetration and acquired drug resistance. Further studies are needed to further understand the mechanisms underlying resistance to treatment.

Leptomeningeal Metastases from Solid Tumors: Recent Advances in Diagnosis and Molecular Approaches

Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) from solid tumors represent an unmet need of increasing importance due to an early use of MRI for diagnosis and improvement of outcome of some molecular subgroups following targeted agents and immunotherapy. In this review, we first discussed factors limiting the efficacy of targeted agents in LM, such as the molecular divergence between primary tumors and CNS lesions and CNS barriers at the level of the normal brain, brain tumors and CSF. Further, we reviewed pathogenesis and experimental models and modalities, such as MRI (with RANO and ESO/ESMO criteria), CSF cytology and liquid biopsy, to improve diagnosis and monitoring following therapy. Efficacy and limitations of targeted therapies for LM from EGFR-mutant and ALK-rearranged NSCLC, HER2-positive breast cancer and BRAF-mutated melanomas are reported, including the use of intrathecal administration or modification of traditional cytotoxic compounds. The efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors in LM from non-druggable tumors, in particular triple-negative breast cancer, is discussed. Last, we focused on some recent techniques to improve drug delivery.

Next Generation Sequencing in the Management of Leptomeningeal Metastases of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Case Report and Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of Leptomeningeal Metastases (LM) from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) is usually based on clinical symptoms, Cerebral-Spinal Fluid (CSF) cytology, and neuro-imaging. However, early diagnosis of LM in NSCLC is challenging due to the low sensitivity of these approaches. The Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) using CSF could help improve the diagnosis of LM and guide its treatment options.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a 39-year-old male NSCLC patient with negative molecular testing results in the lung cancer tissue sample. The patient developed symptoms of LM with the negative CSF cytology and MRI; however, the NGS analysis of CSF revealed an EGFR exon 19 del mutation. The patient attained 6 months of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) by treating with erlotinib and anlotinib before the neurological symptoms appeared again. EGFR Thr790Met was positive in the CSF but negative in his plasma. The patient was then treated with osimertinib therapy and the response was maintained for more than 1 year.

RESULTS & DISCUSSION

This case is the first study reporting the clinical benefit of using the combination of erlotinib and anlotinib for the treatment of LM with the EGFR 19 del, osimertinib with EGFR T790M mutation in CSF, but negative gene mutation in the blood or lung tumor biopsy specimens. Our results support that genetic analysis should be performed with CSF samples in all cases of suspected LM when the results of testing for EGFR/ALK/ROS1 mutation in blood samples or tumor biopsy specimens are negative, as these patients could benefit from treatment of TKIs in a poor prognostic setting.

CONCLUSION

In parallel to current patents, NGS could be applied as a novel strategy in the managing of NSCLC patients with LM.

The Underlying Biology and Therapeutic Vulnerabilities of Leptomeningeal Metastases in Adult Solid Cancers

Metastasis to the central nervous system occurs in approximately 20% of patients with advanced solid cancers such as lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma. While central nervous system metastases most commonly form in the brain parenchyma, metastatic cancer cells may also reside in the subarachnoid space surrounding the brain and spinal cord to form tumors called leptomeningeal metastases. Leptomeningeal metastasis involves cancer cells that reach the subarachnoid space and proliferate in the cerebrospinal fluid compartment within the leptomeninges, a sequela associated with a myriad of symptoms and poor prognosis. Cancer cells exposed to cerebrospinal fluid in the leptomeninges must contend with a unique microenvironment from those that establish within the brain or other organs. Leptomeningeal lesions provide a formidable clinical challenge due to their often-diffuse infiltration within the subarachnoid space. The molecular mechanisms that promote the establishment of leptomeningeal metastases have begun to be elucidated, demonstrating that it is a biological entity distinct from parenchymal brain metastases and is associated with specific molecular drivers. In this review, we outline the current state of knowledge pertaining to the diagnosis, treatment, and molecular underpinnings of leptomeningeal metastasis.

Utility of Cerebrospinal Fluid Cell-Free DNA in Patients with EGFR-Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Leptomeningeal Metastasis

BACKGROUND

Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is a fatal complication of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) as a medium for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation testing in clinical practice.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We prospectively enrolled patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC who underwent CSF sampling for suspected LM. The supernatant of CSF after routine cytology examination was collected. The diagnosis of LM was established according to EANO-ESMO criteria. CSF and plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) were retrieved for EGFR mutation testing.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients with a median age of 62.7 years were enrolled. The median duration from initial diagnosis to CSF sampling was 23.0 months and most patients (94.1%) had received at least one EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Adenocarcinoma cells were found in 37 CSF samples (72.5%), and 48 (94.1%) patients had confirmed or probable LM. Thirty-five of these 48 patients (72.9%) had valid EGFR mutation-testing results using CSF cfDNA and tended to have higher white blood cell counts and positive cytology in their CSF compared to those with invalid mutation testing results. The overall detection rate of EGFR mutation in CSF cfDNA was 68.8%, and the T790M detection rate was 14.6%. In 37 patients with paired CSF and plasma samples, the concordance rate of the EGFR mutation results was 29.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC with LM, CSF supernatant is a valuable source for EGFR mutation testing and may provide important information.

Cell-free DNA from cerebrospinal fluid can be used to detect the EGFR mutation status of lung adenocarcinoma patients with central nervous system metastasis

Background

EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have revolutionized the therapeutic approach for EGFR mutated patients. However, acquired resistance to EGFR-TKI therapy is unavoidable. Repeat biopsy cannot be used, and peripheral blood detection shows a low positive rate in cases of brain-only disease progression.

Methods

Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (ddPCR) was performed on the plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples of 79 lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients with EGFR mutations and central nervous system (CNS) metastasis. The differences in the EGFR mutation status between the paired plasma and CSF samples were assessed, and the role of CSF testing as a predictor of overall survival was evaluated.

Results

The CSF of patients with neurological symptoms, EGFR-TKI treatment, or leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) had a significantly higher positive rate of EGFR mutation compared to the plasma samples (P=0.001, P=0.035, P=0.019, respectively). Moreover, EGFR mutation status in CSF was consistent with neurological symptoms and LM (kappa =0.455, P<0.001; kappa =0.508, P<0.001; respectively). For the patients with brain metastasis, EGFR mutation-positive rate in CSF samples was lower than that in plasma samples (28.3% vs. 64.2%, P<0.001), while the patients with LM had the opposite result (84.6% vs. 38.5%, P=0.004). Moreover, patients with EGFR mutation in their CSF experienced worse survival [hazard ratio (HR) =2.93, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.45–5.92; P=0.003, P _adjust <0.0001].

Conclusions

The EGFR mutation status of CSF was different from that of plasma and is correlated with patient prognosis. CSF could be helpful in detecting the EGFR mutation status of patients, particularly in cases of LM.

Determination of selpercatinib, a RET kinase inhibitor, in rat plasma and its application to a pharmacokinetic study

Selpercatinib (LOXO-292) is a selective and potent RET inhibitor. A highly sensitive, rapid and specific high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for quantification of selpercatinib in rat plasma is reported. The method was validated in terms of selectivity, linearity, accuracy and precision, extraction recovery and matrix effect, stability and carryover as per the US Food and Drug Administration guidelines for bioanalytical method validation. Selpercatinib was detected by an electrospray ionization interface under selective reaction monitoring conditions in the positive ion mode. The calibration curve was linear over the concentration range from 1 to 2000 ng/ml with r²  = 0.9951. The intra- and inter-batch accuracy values ranged from 97.45 to 100.97% and from 98.70 to 100.74% with coefficients of variation of 2.45-6.99% and 5.89-7.99%, respectively. The extraction recovery and IS-normalized matrix factor were acceptable for the bioanalysis of selpercatinib. Additionally, selpercatinib was found to be stable under the detected conditions. It showed linear pharmacokinetic characteristics following oral administration to rats at 2.0-18.0 mg/kg. The results showed that the novel method for detecting selpercatinib in rat plasma could be successfully applied for quantification of selpercatinib in biosamples from nonclinical studies.

Osimertinib combined with bevacizumab for leptomeningeal metastasis from EGFR-mutation non-small cell lung cancer: A phase II single-arm prospective clinical trial

Background

Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is associated with poor prognosis in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of osimertinib combined with bevacizumab for LM from epidermal growth factor receptor mutation (EGFRm) NSCLC.

Methods

We conducted a phase II single‐arm prospective clinical trial of EGFRm NSCLC with LM treated with osimertinib combined with bevacizumab. LM response assessment was based on the modified RANO LM radiological criteria; CNS and extra‐CNS response was evaluated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. The primary end points included LM progression‐free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR); the secondary end points included safety and LM overall survival (OS).

Results

A total of 14 patients were included in the study, with a median age of 61 years, and they were predominantly female (64%). EGFR mutations were reported in exons 19 del (n = 7) and 21 L858R (n = 7). When LM was diagnosed, 12 (85.7%) patients had clinical symptoms, 71.4% (10/14) of patients were diagnosed with LM by cytology, and five (35.7%) patients had a performance status (PS) score > 2. The median LM PFS was 9.3 months (95% CI: 8.2–10.4), and the LM ORR was 50%. The safety findings in the present study were consistent with the known profile of osimertinib with bevacizumab; the median LM OS was 12.6 months, and the one‐year survival rate was 35.7%.

Conclusions

Osimertinib combined with bevacizumab is an appropriate treatment option for patients with LM from EGFRm NSCLC.

Key points

Significant findings of the study

To date, there is no prospective clinical study on the treatment of osimertinib combined with bevacizumab in EGFRm NSCLC with LM.

What this study adds

The median LM PFS was 9.3 months (95% CI: 8.2–10.4), and the LM ORR was 50%, the median LM OS was 12.6 months, and the one‐year survival rate was 35.7%. Osimertinib combined with bevacizumab is an appropriate treatment option for patients with LM from EGFRm NSCLC.

Efficacy of afatinib for pulmonary adenocarcinoma with leptomeningeal metastases harboring an epidermal growth factor receptor complex mutation (exon 19del+K754E): A case report

RATIONALE

Liquid biopsy of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and sequencing of cell-free DNA has rarely been used to identify epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, which can guide the design of precise, personalized treatment for patients with leptomeningeal metastasis from lung adenocarcinoma.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 42-year-old woman with lung adenocarcinoma and leptomeningeal metastasis was admitted to our hospital on March 31, 2019. She exhibited no response to treatment with gefitinib, osimertinib, or chemoradiotherapy and was in critical condition, with an expected survival of <4 weeks.

DIAGNOSIS

Next-generation sequencing of CSF and peripheral blood samples identified an EGFR complex mutation (exon19del+K754E).

INTERVENTIONS

On April 10, 2019, the patient started oral afatinib (40 mg po qd), but she developed a grade III oral mucosal reaction 1 week later. The afatinib dose was reduced to 30 mg po qd.

OUTCOMES

At the follow-up examination on May 15, 2019, the patient reported relief from headaches. Enhanced magnetic resonance imaging revealed a reduction in abnormal leptomeningeal enhancement, and the CSF pressure and carcinoembryonic antigen levels were also reduced. The patient continued to respond to afatinib treatment (30 mg once daily) with minimal adverse effects.

LESSONS

This is the first case report of clinical improvement after afatinib treatment in a patient with lung adenocarcinoma and leptomeningeal metastasis harboring an EGFR complex mutation (exon19del+K754E), and thus provides a clinical reference for treatment with afatinib of cancers harboring EGFR compound mutations.

First-line osimertinib for leptomeningeal metastasis from lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR mutation as the initial and solitary site of postoperative recurrence

Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) from lung cancer has poor prognosis, and effective therapy has not been established. We present the case of a 54-year-old man with LM from lung adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR L858R point mutation, who received osimertinib as first-line therapy. He had previously undergone left lower lobectomy and lymph node dissection for lung adenocarcinoma. Five years and 9 months after the operation, he developed symptoms of dizziness, lightheadedness, and headache. Magnetic resonance imaging showed high signal intensity in the cerebral sulcus and meninges, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology indicated adenocarcinoma with EGFR L858R point mutation, which suggested LM. After CSF drainage and administration of corticosteroid and glycerol, the patient received osimertinib (80 mg/day) as first-line therapy. These symptoms including dizziness, lightheadedness, and headache were relieved and the MRI appearance was normal, and he survived for 19 months with no disease progression. Osimertinib is considered to be an effective therapeutic option for LM from lung adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR mutation.

[Management of Drug Therapy for Leptomeningeal Metastasis of Sensitive Driver Gene Positive Non-small Cell Lung Cancer]

Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is one of the serious complications of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), although the incidence is not high, the clinical symptoms are severe and the prognosis is poor. LM is prone to occur in patients with positive driver gene than negative. At present, the treatment of LM mainly includes molecular targeted therapy, systemic chemotherapy, whole brain radiotherapy, intrathecal chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Although there are many treatments, the efficacy of LM is still unsatisfactory. This article reviews the drug therapy of sensitive driver gene positive NSCLC LM.

CSF cell-free DNA EGFR testing using DdPCR holds promise over conventional modalities for diagnosing leptomeningeal involvement in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

EGFR mutant NSCLC patients have leptomeningeal (LM) involvement in more than 9% cases.

MATERIAL & METHODS

We conducted a study evaluating the diagnostic utility of cfDNA EGFR testing in CSF using DdPCR while comparing it against MRI and CSF cytology. We also looked for known EGFR mutations in the CSF sample. These mutations were also tested in paired plasma samples. We further compared which constituent of CSF (pellet/supernatant) had better yield.

RESULTS

21 patients comprised the study. Of these 17 patients were diagnosed to have LM involvement based on conventional criteria. All modalities had 100 % specificity and positive predictive value. However, MRI and CSF cytology had a poor negative predictive value. cfDNA had the highest sensitivity (92.3 %), negative predictive value (75 %), accuracy (94.1 %), and net comparative benefit. Paired plasma samples were available for 19 patients. Primary EGFR mutation was detectable in the CSF sample in 16/19 patients; however, the plasma sample was positive only in 7/19 patients. 3 samples were negative for primary EGFR mutation in both CSF and plasma. None of the CSF samples showed positivity for T790M mutation which could however be observed in two patients in plasma samples. Both supernatant and pellet were analysed for cfDNA mutation analysis in 18/21 patients. The intraclass correlation coefficient regarding the percentage fraction tumor-derived DNA of cfDNA observed was 0.83(95 % CI 0.29 to 0.95) between both samples.

CONCLUSION

EGFR detection in CSF has a potential role in diagnosing LM involvement. T790 M resistance mutations are uncommon in CSF post first and second-generation TKIs. Both supernatant and pellet samples can be used for the extraction of cell-free DNA in CSF.

Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for leptomeningeal metastasis from NSCLC in the era of targeted therapy: a retrospective study

Background and purpose

Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is a rare but detrimental complication in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is used to eliminating cancer cells or microscopic foci, it is becoming less favorable due to the concerns over neurocognitive toxicity. This study aimed to re-evaluate the role of WBRT in the setting of modern targeted therapy.

Materials and methods

From December 2014 to March 2019, 80 NSCLC patients with cytologically and/or radiologically proven LM diagnosis were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

The median OS (mOS) after diagnosis of LM was 8.0 (95%CI: 4.4 to 11.6) months, and the one-year OS was 39.4%. The mOS for EGFR-mutated LM patients was 12.6 (3.0 to 22.2) months versus only 4.1 (2.8 to 5.4) for patients with wild-type EGFR (P < 0.001). Younger patients (< 53.5 yrs.) appeared to have a better OS than older patients (≥53.5 yrs.) (12.6 vs. 6.1, P = 0.041). No survival benefits were found in EGFR-mutated patients who received WBRT (P = 0.490). In contrast, mOS was significantly prolonged in wild-type EGFR patients with WBRT versus non-WBRT (mOS: 8.0 vs. 2.1, P = 0.002). Multivariate analysis indicated that WBRT (P = 0.025) and younger age (P = 0.048) were independent prognostic factors that predicted prolonged survival for wild-type EGFR LM patients from NSCLC.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrated that WBRT has clear survival advantages for patients with wild-type EGFR, and molecular biological stratification of LM patients for WBRT is highly recommended.

Neurologic complications of lung cancer

Lung cancer and its associated treatments can cause various neurologic complications, including brain and leptomeningeal metastases, epidural spinal cord compression, cerebrovascular events, and treatment-related neurotoxicities. Lung cancer care has significantly changed in the last 5 to 10 years, with novel therapies that have affected aspects of neurologic complication management. Herein, the authors review the potential neurologic complications of lung cancer, including important clinical and therapeutic aspects of care.

Leptomeningeal Metastases in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Optimal Systemic Management in NSCLC With and Without Driver Mutations

OPINION STATEMENT

As a devastating complication of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the incidence of leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is rising, largely due to overall longer survival of NSCLC, especially in patients with targetable molecular driver mutations. There is no clear consensus on the optimal management of LM. This review will cover recent advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of LM in NSCLC. In LM without oncogene drivers, systemic chemotherapy, intrathecal therapy, and radiation have modestly improved the clinical outcomes. Emerging data have also suggested encouraging activity of immunotherapy. At the same time, in LM with sensitizing EGFR mutations, osimertinib should be considered regardless of T790M status. Pulse erlotinib, afatinib, and newer agents with improved CNS penetration have also shown benefits. Moreover, accumulating evidences support potential benefits of molecularly targeted therapy in ALK-rearranged and other oncogene-driven NSCLC with LM. Future studies are warranted to better define the underlying mechanism, to optimize the clinical management, and to improve patient outcomes.

Detection of genes mutations in cerebrospinal fluid circulating tumor DNA from neoplastic meningitis patients using next generation sequencing

Background

This study profiled the somatic genes mutations and the copy number variations (CNVs) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from patients with neoplastic meningitis (NM).

Methods

A total of 62 CSF ctDNA samples were collected from 58 NM patients for the next generation sequencing. The data were bioinformatically analyzed by (Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery) DAVID software.

Results

The most common mutated gene was TP53 (54/62; 87.10%), followed by EGFR (44/62; 70.97%), PTEN (39/62; 62.90%), CDKN2A (32/62; 51.61%), APC (27/62: 43.55%), TET2 (27/62; 43.55%), GNAQ (18/62; 29.03%), NOTCH1 (17/62; 27.42%), VHL (17/62; 27.42%), FLT3 (16/62; 25.81%), PTCH1 (15/62; 24.19%), BRCA2 (13/62; 20.97%), KDR (10/62; 16.13%), KIT (9/62; 14.52%), MLH1 (9/62; 14.52%), ATM (8/62; 12.90%), CBL (8/62; 12.90%), and DNMT3A (7/62; 11.29%). The mutated genes were enriched in the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway by the KEGG pathway analysis. Furthermore, the CNVs of these genes were also identified in these 62 samples. The mutated genes in CSF samples receiving intrathecal chemotherapy and systemic therapy were enriched in the ERK1/2 signaling pathway.

Conclusions

This study identified genes mutations in all CSF ctDNA samples, indicating that these mutated genes may be acted as a kind of biomarker for diagnosis of NM, and these mutated genes may affect meningeal metastasis through PI3K-Akt signaling pathway.

Focal Leptomeningeal Disease with Perivascular Invasion in EGFR-Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

We report a previously undescribed pattern of brain metastases in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and radiation therapy. These highly distinct lesions appear to spread focally within the leptomeninges, with invasion along the perivascular spaces (FLIP). The survival of patients with FLIP was significantly better compared with patients with classic leptomeningeal disease (median survival, 21 versus 3 months; P = .003). It is unclear whether this pattern of growth is unique to epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer.

EGFR: An essential receptor tyrosine kinase-regulator of cancer stem cells

The Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) is frequently expressed at elevated levels in different forms of cancer and expression often correlates positively with cancer progression and poor prognosis. Different mutant forms of this protein also contribute to cancer heterogeneity. A constitutively active form of EGFR, EGFRvIII is one of the most important variants. EGFR is responsible for the maintenance and functions of cancer stem cells (CSCs), including stemness, metabolism, immunomodulatory-activity, dormancy and therapy-resistance. EGFR regulates these pathways through several signaling cascades, and often cooperates with other RTKs to exert further control. Inhibitors of EGFR have been extensively studied and display some anticancer efficacy. However, CSCs can also acquire resistance to EGFR inhibitors making effective therapy even more difficult. To ameliorate this limitation of EGFR inhibitors when used as single agents, it may be of value to simultaneously combine multiple EGFR inhibitors or use EGFR inhibitors with regulators of other important cancer phenotype regulating molecules, such as STAT3, or involved in important processes such as DNA repair. These combinatorial approaches require further experimental confirmation, but if successful would expand and improve therapeutic outcomes employing EGFR inhibitors as one arm of the therapy.

Management of leptomeningeal metastases in non-small cell lung cancer

In leptomeningeal metastasis (LM), malignant lung cancer cells reach the sanctuary site of the leptomeningeal space through haematogenous or lymphatic route and thrive in the leptomeninges because of restricted access of chemotherapeutic agents across the blood brain barrier. The incidence of LM is 3%-5% in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients; the incidence is higher in patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangement or epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. However, the real-world burden of undiagnosed cases may be higher. LM diagnosis is based on clinical, radiological, and cytological testing. Disease management remains a challenge because of low central nervous system penetration of drugs. The prognosis of NSCLC patients with LM is poor with an overall survival (OS) of 3 months with contemporary treatment and <11 months with novel therapies. Therapy goals in this patient population are to improve or stabilize neurologic status, improve quality of life, and prolong survival while limiting the toxicity of chemotherapeutic regimens. We reviewed therapeutic options for management of LM in NSCLC patients with or without genetic mutations. Radiotherapy, systemic, or intrathecal chemotherapy, and personalized molecularly targeted therapy prolong the OS in patients with LM. Newer third generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors have considerable brain penetration property and have been vital in increasing the OS especially in patients with EGFR mutations. Sequential or combination therapy third generation EGFR agents with radiotherapy or chemotherapy might be effective in increasing the quality of life and overall survival.

Number of metastatic organs negatively affects the treatment sequence in patients with EGFR-TKI failure

Background

Several studies have previously demonstrated the survival benefit of both EGFR‐TKI treatment and chemotherapy in patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR mutations. The aim of the present study was to clarify the factors influencing the treatment sequence after failure of EGFR‐TKI therapy, focusing on the number of organs with metastasis (hereafter, metastatic organs).

Methods

Between January 2010 and December 2016, consecutive patients with EGFR‐mutated NSCLC who were started on first‐line EGFR‐TKI were reviewed. The factors influencing withholding systemic chemotherapy and the post‐progression survival (PPS) after failure of EGFR‐TKI were investigated.

Results

A total of 393 patients were started on first‐line EGFR‐TKI during the study period. After excluding patients maintained on EGFR‐TKI or who received osimertinib targeting secondary EGFR T790M, 297 patients were included in the analysis. Among these, 180 (60.6%) received chemotherapy after failure of EGFR‐TKI (TKI‐Ct group), while the remaining 117 (39.4%) received no chemotherapy (TKI‐only group). Multivariate analysis identified older age (≥75 years: odds ratio [OR] = 0.25, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.11–0.43, P < 0.001), poor performance status (PS) (≥2: OR = 0.06, 95% CI: 0.03–0.15, P < 0.001), and three or more metastatic organs (OR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.22–0.80, P = 0.008) as being significantly associated with withholding of chemotherapy after failure of EGFR‐TKI.

Conclusion

A relatively large number of metastatic organs and a poor PS were associated with the withholding of subsequent chemotherapy after failure of EGFR‐TKI in EGFR‐mutated NSCLC patients. Further research for patients with such a poor prognosis should be investigated in the future.

Neoplastic meningitis in solid tumours: Updated review of diagnosis, prognosis, therapeutic management, and future directions

Neoplastic meningitis (NM) is a relatively frequent metastatic complication of cancer associated with high levels of neurological morbidity and generally poor prognosis. It appears in 5%-15% of patients with solid tumours, the most frequent being breast and lung cancer and melanoma. Symptoms are caused by involvement of the cerebral hemispheres, cranial nerves, spinal cord, and nerve roots, and are often multifocal or present with signs and symptoms of intracranial hypertension. The main diagnostic tools are the neurological examination, brain and spinal cord contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, and cerebrospinal fluid analysis including cytology, although studies have recently been conducted into the detection of tumour cells and DNA in the cerebrospinal fluid, which increases diagnostic sensitivity. With the currently available therapies, treatment aims not to cure the disease, but to delay and ameliorate the symptoms and to preserve quality of life. Treatment of NM involves a multimodal approach that may include radiotherapy, intrathecal and/or systemic chemotherapy, and surgery. Treatment should be individualised, and is based mainly on clinical practice guidelines and expert opinion. Promising clinical trials are currently being conducted to evaluate drugs with molecular and immunotherapeutic targets. This article is an updated review of NM epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, prognosis, management, and treatment; it is aimed at general neurologists and particularly at neurologists practicing in hospital settings with oncological patients.

Venous Sinus Stenting for Transverse Sinus Stenosis Associated with Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis in a Patient with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutated Lung Cancer: A Case Report

Patient: Male, 57-year-old

Final Diagnosis: Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis

Symptoms: Headache • visual acuity loss

Medication: —

Clinical Procedure: Venous sinus stenting

Specialty: Oncology

Impact of clinicopathologic features on leptomeningeal metastasis from lung adenocarcinoma and treatment efficacy with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor

Background

We investigated the risk factors for leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LMC) and compared clinical efficacies of various treatment modalities including intrathecal (IT) chemotherapy in patients with lung adenocarcinoma harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations.

Methods

Using clinical research data from the Asan Medical Center, we retrospectively analyzed data of patients diagnosed with LMC, confirmed via cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis from January 2008 to December 2017.

Results

We identified 1189 patients with lung adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR mutations. Among these, 9.8% had a median duration of 13.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 6.8–23.6) months from the initial lung cancer diagnosis to LMC occurrence. Younger age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.043, P < 0.001), initial metastatic disease (HR 3.768, P < 0.001), and metastasis to the brain (HR 8.682, P < 0.001) or lung (HR 2.317, P = 0.004) were risk factors associated with LMC. Median survival duration from LMC diagnosis was 3.8 (IQR 1.5–8.6) months. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score ≤ 2 (HR 0.505, P = 0.007) and insertion of Ommaya reservoir (HR 0.445, P = 0.005) were associated with longer survival. EGFR‐tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) conferred survival benefits compared to cytotoxic chemotherapy or best supportive care (HR 2.222, P = 0.018; HR 5.638, P < 0.001, respectively). Although IT chemotherapy showed no survival benefit, it was associated with improved neurologic symptoms and signs and CSF negative conversion.

Conclusions

Younger age, initial diagnosis of metastatic disease, and metastasis to the brain or different lobes were associated with LMC in patients with EGFR‐mutant lung adenocarcinoma. Therapeutic interventions including EGFR‐TKIs, cytotoxic chemotherapy, or Ommaya reservoir, and good performance status were related to favorable survival outcomes.

Key points

Age and disease status were associated with LMC in patients with EGFR‐mutant adenocarcinoma, and EGFR‐TKI, Ommaya reservoir, and good performance status were related to survival benefit.

Osimertinib for Patients With Leptomeningeal Metastases Associated With EGFR T790M-Positive Advanced NSCLC: The AURA Leptomeningeal Metastases Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Osimertinib has shown promising activity in patients with leptomeningeal metastases (LMs) of EGFR-positive NSCLC at 160 mg once daily (qd) (BLOOM; NCT02228369). We report LM activity with osimertinib (80 mg qd) in a retrospective analysis of studies across the AURA program (AURA extension, AURA2, AURA17, and AURA3).

METHODS

Patients with EGFR T790M-positive advanced NSCLC and progression after previous EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy received osimertinib (80 mg qd). Patients with central nervous system (CNS) metastases (including LMs) were eligible if the lesions were neurologically asymptomatic and stable. Patients with evidence of LMs at the study entry were retrospectively included for the analysis; brain scans were assessed for radiologic LM response by neuroradiologically blinded, independent central review per the modified Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology LM criteria. LM objective response rate, duration of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival were assessed. A longitudinal analysis was performed to investigate the relationship between changes from the baseline in non-CNS tumor sizes and LM responses at each visit of patients in AURA LM and BLOOM studies.

RESULTS

For the 22 patients included in the analysis, LM objective response rate was 55% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 32-76). Median LM duration of response was not reached (95% CI: 2.8-not calculable [NC]). Median LM progression-free survival and overall survival were 11.1 months (95% CI: 4.6-NC) and 18.8 months (95% CI: 6.3-NC), respectively. The longitudinal analysis revealed similar non-CNS and LM responses between the patients in AURA LM and BLOOM programs.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with EGFR T790M-positive NSCLC and radiologically detected LM obtained clinical benefit from osimertinib (80 mg qd).

Osimertinib in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Leptomeningeal Metastases: The BLOOM Study

PURPOSE

In this phase I study (BLOOM), osimertinib, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), was evaluated in patients with leptomeningeal metastases (LMs) from EGFR-mutated (EGFRm) advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose disease had progressed on previous EGFR-TKI therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with cytologically confirmed LM received osimertinib 160 mg once daily. Objectives were to assess confirmed objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), pharmacokinetics (PK), and safety. Additional efficacy evaluations included changes from baseline in CSF cytology and neurologic examination. Measurable lesions were assessed by investigator according to RECIST version 1.1. LMs were assessed by neuroradiologic blinded central independent review (BICR) according to Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology LM radiologic criteria and by investigator.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients were enrolled. LM ORR and DoR by neuroradiologic BICR were 62% (95% CI, 45% to 78%) and 15.2 months (95% CI, 7.5 to 17.5 months), respectively. Overall, ORR by investigator was 41% (95% CI, 26% to 58%), and median DoR was 8.3 months (95% CI, 5.6 to 16.5 months). Median investigator-assessed PFS was 8.6 months (95% CI, 5.4 to 13.7 months) with 78% maturity; median OS was 11.0 months (95% CI, 8.0 to 18.0 months) with 68% maturity. CSF tumor cell clearance was confirmed in 11 (28%; 95% CI, 15% to 44%) of 40 patients. Neurologic function was improved in 12 (57%) of 21 patients with an abnormal assessment at baseline. The adverse event and PK profiles were consistent with previous reports for osimertinib.

CONCLUSION

Osimertinib showed meaningful therapeutic efficacy in the CNS and a manageable safety profile at 160 mg once daily in patients with EGFRm NSCLC and LM.

Neurological Death is Common in Patients With EGFR Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Diagnosed With Brain Metastases

Purpose

Brain metastases (BrM) are common in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFRm) mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We sought to determine the rate of neurologic death (ND) in this population.

Methods and Materials

We analyzed data from 198 patients who received a diagnosis of BrM from EGFRm NSCLC between 2004 and 2016, comparing patients whose initial treatment for BrM was stereotactic radiosurgery with or without tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) with or without TKI, or TKI alone. The incidence of ND was determined using a competing risks analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify clinical variables associated with this outcome.

Results

The percentage of patients who initially received stereotactic radiosurgery, whole brain radiation therapy, or TKI alone was 22%, 61%, and 17%, respectively. Median overall survival in these subgroups was 31.1, 14.6, and 24.6 months, respectively (P = .0016). The 5-year incidence of ND among all patients was 40% and did not significantly vary according to treatment group. In a multivariable model, only leptomeningeal disease at any point in a patient’s disease course significantly correlated with ND (hazard ratio 4.75, P <.001).

Conclusions

Among our cohort of patients with BrM from EGFRm NSCLC, the incidence of ND was significantly higher than suggested by previous reports. BrM should be considered a driver of mortality in many patients with EGFRm NSCLC, and treatments providing better control of BrM, lower neurocognitive side effects, and maintenance of quality of life are needed.

Unique genetic profiles from cerebrospinal fluid cell-free DNA in leptomeningeal metastases of EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer: a new medium of liquid biopsy

Background

Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) are more frequent in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. Due to limited access to leptomeningeal lesions, the purpose of this study was to explore the potential role of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) as a source of liquid biopsy in patients with LM.

Patients and methods

Primary tumor, CSF, and plasma in NSCLC with LM were tested by next-generation sequencing. In total, 45 patients with suspected LM underwent lumbar puncture, and those with EGFR mutations diagnosed with LM were enrolled.

Results

A total of 28 patients were enrolled in this cohort; CSF and plasma were available in 26 patients, respectively. Driver genes were detected in 100% (26/26), 84.6% (22/26), and 73.1% (19/26) of samples comprising CSF cell-free DNA (cfDNA), CSF precipitates, and plasma, respectively; 92.3% (24/26) of patients had much higher allele fractions in CSF cfDNA than the other two media. Unique genetic profiles were captured in CSF cfDNA compared with those in plasma and primary tissue. Multiple copy number variations (CNVs) were mainly identified in CSF cfDNA, and MET copy number gain identified in 47.8% (11/23) of patients was the most frequent one, while other CNVs included ERBB2, KRAS, ALK, and MYC. Moreover, loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of TP53 was identified in 73.1% (19/26) CSF cfDNA, which was much higher than that in plasma (2/26, 7.7%; P < 0.001). There was a trend towards a higher frequency of concomitant resistance mutations in patients with TP53 LOH than those without (70.6% versus 33.3%; P = 0.162). EGFR T790M was identified in CSF cfDNA of 30.4% (7/23) of patients who experienced TKI progression.

Conclusion

CSF cfDNA could reveal the unique genetic profiles of LM and should be considered as the most representative liquid biopsy medium for LM in EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

Radiotherapy in Leptomeningeal Disease: A Systematic Review of Randomized and Non-randomized Trials

Background: Leptomeningeal disease (LMD), also known as neoplastic meningitis, leptomeningeal carcinomatosis, or carcinomatous meningitis, is a rare cancer complication occurring in ~5% of cases and ultimately leads to significant morbidity and mortality. In the modern era, incidence of this condition continues to rise with longer survival of patients with advanced and even metastatic disease due to continued improvements in systemic therapies that are providing prolonged control of distant disease, but with limited effect in the central nervous system (CNS). Typical treatment strategies include optimal systemic therapy for the primary disease, as well as neuroaxis directed therapies, which may include intrathecal chemotherapy (ITC) or radiotherapy (RT). Methods: A systematic review of radiotherapy for LMD was performed. Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched from 1946 to 2018 for clinical trials, retrospective/prospective reviews, and case series with ≥2 human subjects that used radiation therapy techniques in the treatment of LMD. The outcome measures of interest included: characteristics of trial participants, inclusion/exclusion criteria, study type, number of participants, primary cancer histology, type of intervention for LMD, survival results if reported, length of follow up, and study conclusion. Results: Of 547 unique citations, 62 studies met the pre-specified eligibility criteria. These studies included 36 retrospective cohorts, 11 prospective series, 12 case series, and a single citation of guidelines, NCDB analysis, and a randomized control trial. Owing to study heterogeneity, meta-analyses of the endpoint data could not be performed. Conclusions: LMD is a devastating complication of cancer with reported survivals ranging from 2 to 4 months. Based on this systematic review, the recommendation for the treatment of LMD is for multimodality discussion of cases and treatment, including the use of radiotherapy, for LMD. However, with continued advances in systemic therapy as well as imaging advances, the landscape of LMD is evolving rapidly and the role of RT will likely also continue to evolve and advance. There is limited high-quality evidence to guide the optimal use of RT for the treatment of LMD, and there is a great need for prospective, histology specific investigation of the role of radiotherapy for LMD in the era of modern systemic therapies.

Osimertinib and other third-generation EGFR TKI in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients

Osimertinib was the first third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) to receive FDA and EMA approval for metastatic EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients that have acquired the EGFR T790M resistance mutation. Clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of osimertinib in this patient population and clinical trials of other third-generation EGFR TKI are currently under way. Additional challenges in this patient population, such as the upfront efficacy of osimertinib, validation of T790M in liquid biopsies as a dynamic predictive marker of efficacy, along with combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors are being explored, representing an extraordinary time of development for EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

Overview of current systemic management of EGFR-mutant NSCLC

Front-line epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR TKI) therapy is the standard of care for lung cancer patients with sensitising EGFR mutations (exon 19 deletion or L858R mutation). Several phase III studies have demonstrated the superiority of gefitinib, erlotinib (first generation of TKIs) or afatinib (second generation) to chemotherapy in progression-free survival and response rates. Drug-related toxicities, such as diarrhoea, acneiform skin rash, mucositis, and paronychia, are frequently encountered in patients who receive EGFR TKIs. Other rare side-effects, such as hepatic impairment and interstitial lung disease, should be identified early and managed carefully. Patients with uncommon EGFR mutations, such as G719X, S768I, and L861Q, may require special selection of EGFR TKIs. The combination of erlotinib plus bevacizumab has been accepted in certain parts of the world as an alternative front-line treatment. This review article summarizes the studies leading to the establishment of EGFR TKIs in EGFR-mutant lung cancer patients. The side-effect profiles of the current EGFR TKIs in these large trials are listed, and the management of uncommon EGFR mutations is discussed. Finally, the potential role of combination front-line treatment is discussed.

Response of Leptomeningeal Metastases in EGFR-Mutated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer to Afatinib in the Absence of Radiotherapy

Palliative radiotherapy is currently the medical standard of care for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with symptomatic CNS and leptomeningeal disease. We report the case of a 62-year-old male patient with EGFR mutation (del19+) NSLC with symptomatic lymph node, bone, CNS, and leptomeningeal metastases. Taking into account on one hand the response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and on the other hand the short- to medium-term side effects of radiotherapy and the lack of timely availability in our healthcare system, the patient was treated with afatinib (40 mg daily) and exhibited a rapid response with improvement of neurological symptoms. The patient presented partial response of extracranial, CNS, and leptomeningeal lesions at 3, 6, and 12 months of treatment, currently completing 16 months of progression-free survival despite presenting mild dermatological and gastrointestinal toxicities. Afatinib is an effective and safe option in patients with NSLC EGFR mutation del19+ with CNS and leptomeningeal compromise avoiding or delaying radiotherapy and its side effects, especially in countries where there is a lack of access to this kind of therapy.

Efficacy of Osimertinib in EGFR-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Leptomeningeal Metastases Pretreated with EGFR-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who develop leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is poor.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical efficacy of osimertinib, a third-generation tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI), in patients with epidermal growth-factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated NSCLCs and LM.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective study of NSCLC patients with osimertinib-treated EGFR-mutated NSCLC and LM.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (mean age, 61.2 years; 70% women) with adenocarcinoma NSCLC were included in the study. EGFR mutations were reported in exons 18 (n = 2), 19 (n = 7), and 21 (n = 11). Before starting osimertinib, patients had received a mean of 2.3 treatment lines. When LM was diagnosed, all patients had clinical symptoms. Sixteen (80%) patients had a performance status ≥2. At osimertinib initiation, 13 (65%) patients harbored the EGFR-T790M-resistance mutation. Osimertinib was started at 80 (n = 17), 160 (n = 2), or 40 mg/day (n = 1). All 13 (100%) patients with the T790M mutation and 4 (57%) of those without it obtained clinical responses. Among the 11 radiologically assessable patients, 9 (82%) responded, with 5 responses reported within 15 days after treatment initiation. Median overall survival and progression-free survival were 18.0 and 17.2 months, respectively, from the start of osimertinib.

CONCLUSIONS

In this non-selected population, osimertinib had remarkable efficacy in NSCLC patients with LM irrespective of the presence of the EGFR-T790M-resistance mutation. Osimertinib efficacy was rapid in several patients, even some with poor performance status.

Whole brain radiation therapy does not improve the overall survival of EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with leptomeningeal metastasis

Background

Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is a devastating and terminal complication of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), especially in patients harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. The role of whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) in the treatment of EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with LM is not conclusive. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the therapeutic effect of WBRT in this setting.

Methods

EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with LM, who had previously received treatment at the Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute from July 2014 to March 2018 were reviewed retrospectively. LM was diagnosed by positive CSF cytology and/or leptomeningeal-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

In total, 51 EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients with LM were eligible for analysis, subdivided into 26 in the WBRT group and 25 in the non-WBRT group. No significant differences were observed in intracranial ORR (15.4% vs. 16%, p = 0.952) and DCR (34.7% vs. 28%, p = 0.611) between the two groups. The median iPFS_LM and OS_LM for the entire cohort were 3.3 months (95% CI: 2.77–3.83) and 12.6 months (95% CI: 9.66–15.54), respectively. No difference in iPFS_LM was observed between the WBRT and non-WBRT groups (median 3.9 vs. 2.8 months; HR = 0.506, p = 0.052). The median OS_LM was 13.6 months in the WBRT group, compared with 5.7 months in the non-WBRT group (HR = 0.454, p = 0.022). Multivariate analyses of OS_LM showed that KPS ≥ 80 at the time of LM diagnosis (HR = 0.428, 95% CI: 0.19–0.94; p = 0.034) and the administration of EGFR-TKIs (HR = 0.258, 95% CI: 0.11–0.58; p = 0.001) were independent predictors of survival, but WBRT (HR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.24–1.01; p = 0.54) was not. Toxicities associated with WBRT or other treatment were rare.

Conclusion

For EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients with LM, WBRT did not improve intracranial treatment response and survival statistically.

Multidisciplinary expert opinion on the treatment consensus for patients with EGFR mutated NSCLC with brain metastases

The presence of an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation is associated with higher incidence of brain metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, patients with synchronous brain metastases at diagnosis have generally been excluded from clinical trials. As there is limited clinical evidence for managing this patient population, a multidisciplinary group of Spanish medical and radiation oncologists, and neuro-oncologist with expertise treating brain metastases in lung cancer patients met with the aim of reaching and developing an expert opinion consensus on the management of patients with EGFR mutated NSCLC with brain metastases. This consensus contains 26 recommendations and 20 conclusion statements across 21 questions in 7 areas, as well as a first-line treatment algorithm.

Integrating Osimertinib in Clinical Practice for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treatment

Treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is evolving with the use of precision medicine for patients with sensitizing epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. First- and second-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) remained the standard of care for patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC for about a decade. However, treatment resistance eventually develops for most patients who experience initial response to these agents. The most commonly acquired resistance mechanism is the T790M gatekeeper mutation. Poor drug penetration leading to central nervous system (CNS) relapse and dose-limiting toxicities are other concerns. The third-generation EGFR-TKI osimertinib, initially approved as the second-line treatment for patients with T790-mutant NSCLC, demonstrated survival benefits in TKI-naïve EGFR-mutated patients, especially in patients with CNS metastasis. The FLAURA study has shown statistically significant progression-free survival benefit and prolongation of all post-progression outcome endpoints, time to first subsequent therapy, second subsequent therapy, and second progression on subsequent treatment, along with acceptable toxicity and better quality of life outcomes. These data favor osimertinib in the first-line setting for EGFR-mutated NSCLC. This is an important milestone since sequencing the TKI therapy based on accurate prediction of T790M is clinically challenging. In countries like India, T790M testing is not routinely conducted and two-thirds of patients with NSCLC do not receive any second-line therapy. Osimertinib can be administered pragmatically as a first-line therapy. Mature overall survival data from the FLAURA study will be important and could help define the optimal personalized treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC.Funding: AstraZeneca Pharma India Ltd.

Emerging therapies for non-small cell lung cancer

Recent advances in the field of novel anticancer agents prolong patients' survival and show a promising future. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immunotherapy for lung cancer are the two major areas undergoing rapid development. Although increasing novel anticancer agents were innovated, how to translate and optimize these novel agents into clinical practice remains to be explored. Besides, toxicities and availability of these drugs in specific regions should also be considered during clinical determination. Herein, we summarize emerging agents including tyrosine kinase inhibitors, checkpoint inhibitors, and other potential immunotherapy such as chimeric antigen receptor T cell for non-small cell lung cancer attempting to provide insights and perspectives of the future in anticancer treatment.

The clinical characteristic and prognostic factors of leptomeningeal metastasis in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer-a retrospective study from one single cancer institute

Background

Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is a detrimental complication of advanced non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and the optimal therapeutic approach for LM patients is in shortage. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the clinical features and prognostic factors of NSCLC patients with LM.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of NSCLC patients with LM at the Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute between July 2014 and March 2018. Identified cases had pathology‐proven NSCLC with either positive cerebrospinal fluid cytology or leptomeningeal enhancement by MRI.

Results

One hundred and thirty‐six NSCLC patients (58 men, 78 women) with LM were enrolled in the retrospective study; median age was 55 years (range, 29‐89 years). Fifty‐one patients harbored EGFR mutations, ALK rearrangement was detected in 6 patients. Treatment for LM consisted of EGFR‐TKIs alone in 11 patients, whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) alone in 19 patients, Chemotherapy (ChT) alone in 12 patients, EGFR‐TKIs plus WBRT in 30 patients, WBRT plus ChT in 25 patients, and EGFR‐TKIs plus ChT in 24 patients. The median progression‐free survival was 3.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.178‐4.622), and the median overall survival (OS_LM) was 9.8 months (95% CI:7.5‐12.1). Thirty patients who received WBRT plus EGFR‐TKIs achieved longer survival than those who only received WBRT (median 13.6 vs 8.8 months; P = 0.027), but did not add any survival benefit than those only received EGFR‐TKIs (median 13.6 vs 13.9 months; P = 0.352). A multivariate analysis indicated that KPS ≥ 80 (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.592, 95% CI:0.369‐0.95; P = 0.03) and EGFR‐TKIs (HR = 0.507, 95% CI:0.283‐0.908; P = 0.022) after LM diagnosis were independent favourable predictors of survival, whereas smoking (HR = 1.181, 95% CI:1.009‐3.246; P = 0.047) was an independent predictor of poor survival.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that patients with good performance statuses, non‐smoking patients, and the administration of EGFR‐TKIs might improve clinical outcomes in NSCLC patients with LM.

A molecular graded prognostic assessment (molGPA) model specific for estimating survival in lung cancer patients with leptomeningeal metastases

OBJECTIVES

Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) had increased in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) over the last 10 years. The survival outcome remained overall poor, heterogeneous and was reported in association with genotypes in lung cancer patients with LM. Graded prognostic assessment model integrated with molecular alterations (molGPA) might be accurate for outcome prediction of LM patients, but needs to be established.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively screened 8921 consecutive lung cancer patients from January 2011 to March 2018. A total of 301 patients diagnosed as LM were enrolled, and randomly divided into training and validation sets after stratified by gender and age. A molGPA score for each patient was calculated based on the weighted significant parameters including gene mutations.

RESULT

The median OS for the 301 patients was 9.2 months (95%CI: 7.9-10.5). In the training set, EGFR/ALK positivity, Karnofsky performance score (KPS) score≥60 and absence of extracranial metastasis (ECM) independently predicted better OS. We developed a molGPA model based on above significant prognostic factors. This molGPA model classified LM patients into three prognosis groups of high, intermediate and low risk (molGPA score of 0, 0.5-1.0 and 1.5-2.0, respectively. The median OS of high, intermediate and low risk LM patients in the training set was 0.3, 3.5 and 15.9 months, respectively (p < 0.001). In the validation set, the median OS was 0.9, 5.8 and 17.7 months in the three molGPA subgroups, accordingly (p < 0.001). The C-index of this model in training and validation sets was 0.70 (95%CI: 0.66-0.73) and 0.64 (95%CI: 0.58-0.70) respectively.

CONCLUSION

The LM molGPA model with integration of gene status, KPS and ECM can accurately classify lung cancer patients with LM into diverse prognosis.