One-year effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab therapy for inflammatory bowel disease: a prospective multicentre cohort study

The outcome of Crohn's disease patients refractory to anti-TNF and either vedolizumab or ustekinumab

AIMS

The aims of this study were to describe outcomes in patients with Crohn's disease who fail anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and either vedolizumab or ustekinumab.

METHODS

Multicenter, retrospective study of 100 patients with Crohn's disease who failed anti-TNF and either vedolizumab or ustekinumab from 2015 to 2019. Using multivariable Cox regression, we sought to identify factors associated with need for surgery.

RESULTS

75 patients received a third line treatment, resulting in 23 (30.7%) clinical remission at week 48. Among the 71 patients included after vedolizumab failure, 46 received ustekinumab, resulting in 46 (28.3%) clinical remission; 13 patients were retreated with an anti-TNF, resulting in 13 (46.2%) clinical remission. Among the 29 patients included after ustekinumab failure, 12 were retreated with an anti-TNF, resulting in 2 (16.7%) clinical remission. The rate of surgery-free survival at 48 weeks was 76.5% (95% confidence interval 68.4% - 85.4%). In multivariable analysis, ileal disease localization (hazard ratio 9.0, 95% confidence interval 1.0-81.9) was associated with a higher risk of surgery.

CONCLUSION

In patients with Crohn's disease who have failed anti-TNF and either vedolizumab or ustekinumab, at week 48, the surgery rate is 23.5% and the remission rate after a third line biologic therapy is 30.7%.

Immunological Variables Associated With Clinical and Endoscopic Response to Vedolizumab in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Vedolizumab [VDZ] is a monoclonal antibody directed against the α4β7 integrin heterodimer, approved for patients with inflammatory bowel diseases [IBD]. This study aimed at identifying immunological variables associated with response to vedolizumab in patients with ulcerative colitis [UC] and Crohn's disease [CD].

METHODS

This is a phase IV explorative prospective interventional trial. IBD patients received open-label VDZ at Weeks 0, 2, 6, and 14. Patients with a clinical response at Week 14 were maintained with VDZ up to Week 54. At Weeks 0 and 14, their peripheral blood was obtained and endoscopy with biopsies was performed. The Week 14 clinical response and remission, Week 54 clinical remission, and Week 14 endoscopic response were evaluated as endpoints of the study. The expression of surface markers, chemokine receptors, and α4β7 heterodimer in peripheral blood and lamina propria lymphocytes was assessed by flow cytometry. A panel of soluble mediators was assessed in sera at baseline and at Week 14 by 45-plex.

RESULTS

A total of 38 IBD patients [20 UC, 18 CD] were included in the study. At Week 14, the clinical response and remission rates were 87% and 66%, respectively. Higher baseline levels of circulating memory Th1 cells were strongly associated with clinical response at Week 14 [p = 0.0001], whereas reduced baseline levels of lamina propria memory Th17 and Th1/17 cells were associated with endoscopic response. Immunological clusters were found to be independently associated with vedolizumab outcomes at multivariable analysis. A panel of soluble markers, including IL17A, TNF, CXCL1, CCL19 for CD and G-CSF and IL7 for UC, associated with vedolizumab-induced Week 54 clinical remission.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this exploratory study uncovered a panel of circulating and mucosal immunological variables associated with response to treatment with vedolizumab.

Efficacy and safety of vedolizumab in elderly patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a matched case-control study

Background

Vedolizumab was demonstrated to be safe and effective in adults with moderately to severely active inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in clinical trials. However, there are limited data regarding its efficacy and safety in elderly patients.

Methods

This was a case–control study comparing the efficacy (measured by rates of mucosal healing and need for IBD surgery) and safety of vedolizumab in IBD among patients ≥65 years of age (the elderly group) vs those <65 years (the control group). The two groups were matched individually on a 1:4 ratio based on gender and type of IBD. Conditional logistic regression was used for stratified analysis to calculate odds ratios and confidence intervals.

Results

We included 25 IBD patients in the elderly group and 100 matched patients in the comparison group. Eighty patients had Crohn’s disease and 45 had ulcerative colitis. At baseline, the groups were comparable with regard to duration of IBD, prior anti-TNF therapy, and prior IBD surgery. The rate of mucosal healing on follow-up endoscopy was comparable between the elderly and control groups (50% vs 53%, P = 0.507). Although more patients in the elderly group required IBD-related surgery while on vedolizumab, the difference did not reach statistical significance (40% vs 19%, P = 0.282). Rates of vedolizumab-related adverse effects—rash, arthralgia, infections, infusion reactions, and dyspnea—were comparable between the two groups (all P > 0.05).

Conclusions

In a real-world setting, vedolizumab was demonstrated to have an efficacy and safety profile among elderly IBD patients that were comparable to younger controls.

Vedolizumab for ulcerative colitis: Real world outcomes from a multicenter observational cohort of Australia and Oxford

BACKGROUND

Vedolizumab (VDZ), a humanised monoclonal antibody that selectively inhibits alpha4-beta7 integrins is approved for use in adult moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC) patients.

AIM

To assess the efficacy and safety of VDZ in the real-world management of UC in a large multicenter cohort involving two countries and to identify predictors of achieving remission.

METHODS

A retrospective review of Australian and Oxford, United Kingdom data for UC patients. Clinical response at 3 mo, endoscopic remission at 6 mo and clinical remission at 3, 6 and 12 mo were assessed. Cox regression models and Kaplan Meier curves were performed to assess the time to remission, time to failure and the covariates influencing them. Safety outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

Three hundred and three UC patients from 14 centres in Australia and United Kingdom, [60% n = 182, anti-TNF naïve] were included. The clinical response was 79% at 3 mo with more Australian patients achieving clinical response compared to Oxford (83% vs 70% P = 0.01). Clinical remission for all patients was 56%, 62% and 60% at 3, 6 and 12 mo respectively. Anti-TNF naive patients were more likely to achieve remission than exposed patients at all the time points (3 mo 66% vs 40% P < 0.001, 6 mo 73% vs 46% P < 0.001, 12 mo 66% vs 51% P = 0.03). More Australian patients achieved endoscopic remission at 6 mo compared to Oxford (69% vs 43% P = 0.01). On multi-variate analysis, anti-TNF naïve patients were 1.8 (95%CI: 1.3-2.3) times more likely to achieve remission than anti-TNF exposed (P < 0.001). 32 patients (11%) had colectomy by 12 mo.

CONCLUSION

VDZ was safe and effective with 60% of UC patients achieving clinical remission at 12 mo and prior anti-TNF exposure influenced this outcome.

Experiences of using vedolizumab in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease in the East Midlands UK - a retrospective observational study

PURPOSE

Clinical trials have demonstrated efficacy of vedolizumab in ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). Further real-world data is needed to inform clinical practice. The primary outcome was to assess corticosteroid-free and clinical remission after vedolizumab initiation. Secondary outcomes included effect on disease activity scores, biochemical markers, concomitant drug use, endoscopic remission, surgical intervention, hospital admissions and adverse events.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A multi-centre retrospective observational study was conducted with patients initiated on vedolizumab across seven UK hospitals 1/11/14-30/11/16. Clinical disease activity was assessed using the partial Mayo Scores (pMS) and Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI). Clinical remission was defined as HBI ≤4 or pMS <2 with a combined stool frequency and rectal bleeding sub score of ≤1. Clinical response was defined as ≥2-point decrease from baseline in pMS and ≥3-point decrease from baseline in HBI.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety-two patients were included in the final analysis. 45% of UC and 10% of CD patients were anti-TNF naive. Over the observation period corticosteroid-free remission rates for UC and CD were 46% and 45%, while clinical remission rates were 52% and 44%, respectively. Time to corticosteroid free remission for UC and CD was 17.6 [IQR: 8.7-29.6] and 14.1 [QR: 6.0-21.7] weeks, respectively. Time to clinical response for UC was 9.4 [IQR: 5.7-15.4] and CD was 9.5 [IQR: 6.1-18.2] weeks. There was a substantial decrease in the concomitant use of immunomodulators and a similar decrease in concomitant corticosteroid use over the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Results in this predominately anti-TNF experienced population mirror other published real-world data, demonstrating good clinical effectiveness and a comparable safety profile.

Maintenance of Remission Among Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease After Vedolizumab Discontinuation: A Multicentre Cohort Study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

It is unclear whether vedolizumab therapy can be discontinued in patients with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] after achieving steroid-free clinical remission. The aim was to assess the risk of relapse after vedolizumab therapy was discontinued.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study, collecting data from 21 tertiary centres affiliated with the GETAID from January 2017 to April 2019. Consecutive patients with IBD, who were in steroid-free clinical remission for at least 3 months and were treated with vedolizumab for at least 6 months, were included at the time of vedolizumab discontinuation.

RESULTS

A total of 95 patients [58 with Crohn's disease] discontinued vedolizumab after a median duration of therapy of 17.5 [10.6-25.4] months. After a median follow-up period of 11.2 [5.8-17.7] months, 61 [64%] patients experienced disease relapse. The probabilities of relapse-free survival were 83%, 59%, and 36% at 6, 12, and 18 months, respectively. According to the multivariate analysis, a C-reactive protein level less than 5 mg/L at vedolizumab discontinuation (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.33-0.95], p = 0.03) and discontinuation due to patients' elective choice (HR = 0.41, 95% CI [0.21-0.80], p = 0.009) were significantly associated with a lower risk of relapse. Re-treatment with vedolizumab was noted in 24 patients and provided steroid-free clinical remission in 71% and 62.5% at Week 14 and after a median follow-up of 11.0 [5.4-13.3] months, respectively, without any infusion reactions.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective study, two-thirds of patients with IBD treated with vedolizumab experienced relapse within the first year after vedolizumab discontinuation. Re-treatment with vedolizumab was effective in two-thirds of patients.

Good efficacy and safety of vedolizumab in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis in a real-world scenario

BACKGROUND

Data on vedolizumab (VDZ) use in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients are still limited. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of VDZ in a real-life clinical scenario.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data of all consecutive IBD patients who started VDZ from September 2016 to December 2018 at our IBD Unit of the University Hospital of Padua and strictly followed them for 1 year. Clinical benefit (rate of clinical steroid-free remission plus clinical response), endoscopic and histological responses were evaluated over 1 year.

RESULTS

A total of 117 patients who started VDZ for Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) were included in the main analysis (69 CD patients, 48 UC patients). We obtained a clinical benefit in 68.1%, 68.1% and 59.4% of CD patients and in 68.7%, 54.2% and 54.1% of UC patients after induction, and at 30 weeks and 52 weeks, respectively. After 1 year, endoscopy response was observed in 47% of CD and 38.2% of UC patients, while the histological response was 19.6% and 23.5%, respectively. Finally, we found that 20.5% of patients needed treatment optimization, with 33.3% of them failing to respond despite this action. No deaths or serious adverse events requiring hospitalization were observed. The main cause of VDZ interruption was drug inefficacy. During the study, two patients developed new spondylarthritis, and two had a worsening of pre-existing arthralgia.

CONCLUSION

Vedolizumab resulted in being effective and safe in CD as well as in UC patients.

Effect of Vedolizumab on Anemia of Chronic Disease in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Background: Anemia of Chronic Disease (ACD) can negatively influence the clinical course of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of Vedolizumab on ACD in IBD. Methods: Clinical data of 75 IBD patients (25 Crohn’s disease (CD) and 50 Ulcerative Colitis (UC)) receiving Vedolizumab in a tertiary referral IBD center were retrospectively evaluated and the effect of the drug on ACD was ascertained at weeks 14 and 24. Results: ACD was diagnosed in 35 (11 CD and 24 UC) out of 75 (47%) IBD patients. At both week 14 and week 24, improvements and resolutions of ACD were achieved by 13/35 (37%) and 11/35 (31%) patients, respectively. Baseline demographic/clinical characteristics did not differ between patients with ACD improvements/resolutions and those with persistent ACD. Clinical response occurred more frequently in patients who achieved ACD resolution (10/11, 91%) than in those without ACD improvement (5/11, 45%, p = 0.022). When analysis was restricted to anemic patients, ACD resolution was documented in 10/22 patients (45%) achieving clinical response and 1/13 of non-responders (8%; p = 0.02). Conclusions: ACD occurs in half of the IBD patients and, in nearly two thirds of them, Vedolizumab treatment associates with ACD resolution/improvement.

Low Rate of Drug Discontinuation, Frequent Need for Dose Adjustment, and No Association with Development of New Arthralgia in Patients Treated with Vedolizumab: Results from a Tertiary Referral IBD Center

BACKGROUND

Evaluating clinical data on the safety and efficacy of vedolizumab (VDZ) in 'real-world' setting is still desirable. Recent reports have raised concerns that arthralgia may be associated with VDZ.

AIMS

The aim of this study is to present clinical experience with VDZ from a tertiary IBD center.

METHODS

Retrospective chart reviews were performed of consecutive patients exposed to VDZ between 2015 and 2018. Clinical, biomarker, and endoscopic efficacy and safety data were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 130 IBD (75CD, 55UC) patients were included. Median duration of VDZ therapy was 65 weeks. Probability of drug discontinuation was 4.9% and 9.4% at 1 and 2 years. Dose intensification was more frequent in CD compared to UC (at 1 and 2 years: 64.8/87.9% vs. 26.5/35.7%, p < 0.001). Clinical remission rates at 3-, 6- and 12 months were 44.4%, 71.4% and 77.1% in UC, and 9.1%, 26.7% and 29.2% in CD patients, respectively. Prior use of multiple biologic agents was associated with diminished efficacy of VDZ in CD. Three new cases of arthralgia were encountered during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Vedolizumab (VDZ) therapy displayed good drug sustainability and clinical efficacy in a population with severe disease phenotype and high rates of previous anti-TNF failure. Frequent dose intensification was required. The safety profile was good, and no association between newly onset arthralgia and VDZ therapy was observed.

Higher vedolizumab serum levels do not increase the risk of adverse events in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Background: Although its mechanism of action may confer a safety benefit, vedolizumab has still been associated with adverse events (AE). We investigated whether inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients with higher trough vedolizumab serum levels experienced an increased risk of AEs.Methods: This was a retrospective study of 76 IBD patients with at least one measurement of serum vedolizumab available. Vedolizumab levels ranged from <3.5 mcg/mL to 87.2 mcg/mL (median = 15.8 mcg/mL). The primary outcome was the rate of overall AEs. Secondary outcomes included the rates of infections, dermatologic reactions, infusion reactions, and other AEs. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between serum vedolizumab levels and AEs.Results: 19 patients out of 76 reported AEs. In patients with higher vedolizumab levels, there were 10 AEs reported out of 38 patients, which was not significantly different from the 9 AEs reported in 38 patients with lower vedolizumab levels (26.3% vs. 23.7%, p = .79). After adjustment for potential covariates, IBD patients with higher vedolizumab levels did not have higher odds of an AE than patients with lower levels (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.30-2.81). Longer duration of therapy had higher odds of AEs, (OR of 1.04 at 95% CI 1.00-1.09, p = .0494 per additional month). None of the other variables were associated with a greater risk of AEs.Conclusions: There does not appear to be an increased risk of adverse events in IBD patients with higher vedolizumab levels, but duration of therapy may increase the risk of AEs.

Irish data on the safety and efficacy of vedolizumab in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

This study reviews the safety and efficacy of treatment with vedolizumab for patients with inflammatory bowel disease across 9 Irish hospitals. It generates valuable and timely real-world data on treatment outcomes to add to the existing evidence base. Our population represents a refractory cohort with most patients previously exposed to at least one anti-TNFa agent and expressing an inflammatory phenotype. Results are reassuringly similar to larger international studies with additional insights into potential predictors of treatment response. This study further supports the safety and efficacy of vedolizumab in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Key SummaryVedolizumab has growing real world data on its safety and efficacy in the treatment of IBD. Data on predictors of response are lacking. Studies such as VARSITY require new real-world data to help identify the place VDZ will occupy in the treatment algorithm for IBDThis study provides national Irish data on the safety and efficacy of VDZ in the treatment of IBD. It gives insight into various predictors of response for both UC and CD. It strengthens the available body of evidence on the use of VDZ and helps us determine its position on the treatment algorithm.

Effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab induction therapy for 103 patients with ulcerative colitis: a GETAID multicentre real-world cohort study

BACKGROUND

Phase III trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC), but few real-world data are currently available.

AIM

To assess short-term effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in patients with UC.

METHODS

From January to September 2019, all patients with UC treated with ustekinumab in 20 French GETAID centres were retrospectively included. The primary outcome was steroid-free clinical remission (partial Mayo Clinic score ≤2) at weeks 12-16 without a rectal bleeding subscore >1.

RESULTS

Among the 103 patients included, 70% had been previously exposed to ≥2 anti-TNF agents and 85% to vedolizumab. At weeks 12-16, steroid-free clinical remission and clinical remission rates were 35.0% and 39.8% respectively; the absence of rectal bleeding with normal stool frequency was noted in 19.4% of patients. Two patients discontinued ustekinumab before the week 12-16 visit and underwent surgery. In multivariable analysis, a partial Mayo Clinic score >6 at inclusion (18.6% vs 46.7%, P = 0.003) and a history of both exposure to anti-TNF and vedolizumab therapies (27.3% vs 80.0%, P = 0.001) were negatively associated with steroid-free clinical remission at weeks 12-16. Adverse events occurred in 7.8% of patients and serious adverse events in 3.9% of patients.

CONCLUSION

In a cohort of highly refractory patients with UC with multiple prior drug failures, ustekinumab provided steroid-free clinical remission in one-third of cases at weeks 12-16. Clinical severity and previous use of anti-TNF and vedolizumab therapies were associated with ustekinumab failure at weeks 12-16.

Microbiome characterization and re-design by biologic agents for inflammatory bowel disease insights

The therapeutic effect of inflammatory bowel disease has improved in the past decades, but most of patients cannot tolerate, do not respond to drugs, or relapse after treating with conventional therapy. Therefore, new and more effective treatment methods are still needed in treatment of IBD. In this review, we will discuss the relevant mechanisms and the latest research progress of biologics (anti-TNF treatments, interleukin inhibitors, integrin inhibitors, antisense oligonucleotide, and JAK inhibitors) for IBD, focus on the efficacy and safety of drugs for moderate-to-severe IBD, and summarize the clinical status and future development direction of biologics in IBD.

Serum Interleukin-6 and -8 as Predictors of Response to Vedolizumab in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Vedolizumab, a monoclonal antibody directed against integrin α4β7, is an effective treatment for inflammatory bowel diseases. However, a significant number of patients do not achieve steroid-free clinical remission in the first year of treatment. An early identification of these patients is one of the most important challenges for clinicians and offers the possibility of therapeutic optimization in order to personalize biological therapy. The aim of our study was to test the prediction ability of interleukin (IL)-6 and -8 of clinical response after 12 months of therapy with vedolizumab (T2). We performed a prospective, multicentre study in patients affected by inflammatory bowel disease by analysing cytokines level before starting vedolizumab (T0) and after 10 weeks of therapy (T1). In the overall cohort (n = 54), IL-8 decrease > 2.6 pg/mL in the first 10 weeks of therapy was able to predict clinical response (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.70, sensitivity = 66%, specificity = 75%, p = 0.010), negative C-reactive protein (CRP) (AUC = 0.71, sensitivity = 64%, specificity = 80%, p = 0.009) and calprotectin < 250 mg/kg (AUC = 0.69, sensitivity = 64%, specificity = 78%, p = 0.030) after 44 weeks of therapy. In patients with ulcerative colitis (n = 40), baseline IL-8 values > 8.6 pg/mL and a decrease of IL-6 values > 0.4 pg/mL from T0 to T1 were significant and independent predictors of clinical response after 12 months of vedolizumab therapy (odds ratio (OR) = 6.96, 95% CI 1.27–38.22, p = 0.026 and OR = 7.29, 95% CI 1.42–37.50, p = 0.017, respectively). In patients with Crohn’s disease (n = 14), baseline IL-8 values > 8.6 pg/mL and baseline IL-6 values > 1.6 pg/mL allowed the identification of patients achieving negative CRP at T2 (AUC = 0.75, sensitivity = 74%, specificity = 76%, p < 0.001) and patients with faecal calprotectin values < 250 mg/kg at T2 (AUC = 0.71, sensitivity = 78%, specificity = 63%, p = 0.004). In conclusion, our study highlights a potential clinical role of serum cytokine levels for the prediction of clinical and biochemical steroid-free response in patients treated with vedolizumab.

The effectiveness of either ustekinumab or vedolizumab in 239 patients with Crohn's disease refractory to anti-tumour necrosis factor

BACKGROUND

There is no head-to-head trial comparing ustekinumab and vedolizumab in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) refractory to anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF).

AIM

To compare the effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab and vedolizumab in patients with CD refractory to anti-TNF in a multicentre retrospective observational cohort.

METHODS

All consecutive patients with CD refractory or intolerant to anti-TNF who initiated either vedolizumab or ustekinumab were included between May 2014 and August 2018. Clinical remission, steroid-free clinical remission (SFCR) and treatment persistence were assessed at week 48 with intention-to-treat analysis and propensity scores weighted comparison.

RESULTS

A total of 239 patients were included, 107 received ustekinumab and 132 received vedolizumab. At week 48, ustekinumab was associated with a higher clinical remission rate (54.4% vs 38.3%; odds ratios, OR = 1.92, 95% CI [1.09-3.39]) and treatment persistence (71.5% vs 49.7%; OR = 2.54, 95% CI [1.40-4.62]) than vedolizumab. The rate of SFCR did not differ significantly between ustekinumab and vedolizumab (44.7% vs 34.0%; OR = 1.57, 95% CI [0.88-2.79]). Subgroup analyses showed that ustekinumab was associated with a higher clinical remission rates at week 48 in patients with ileal location (OR = 3.49, 95% CI [1.33-9.17) and penetrating behaviour (OR = 6.58, 95% CI [1.91-22.68]). Regardless of the treatment group, combination therapy at initiation was associated with a higher clinical remission rate at week 48 (OR = 1.93, 95% CI [1.09-3.43]).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that ustekinumab is associated with a higher rate of clinical remission and treatment persistence than vedolizumab after 48 weeks of follow-up, in patients with CD refractory or intolerant to anti-TNF. The rate of SFCR was not significantly different.

Ulcerative Colitis Patients Continue to Improve Over the First Six Months of Vedolizumab Treatment: 12-Month Clinical and Mucosal Healing Effectiveness

Background

Vedolizumab (VDZ) is a humanized monoclonal IgG1 antibody which inhibits leukocyte vascular adhesion and migration into the gastrointestinal tract through α4β7 integrin blockade.

Aims

We retrospectively assessed the 12-month, real-world efficacy and safety of VDZ as induction and maintenance therapy in adult patients with ulcerative colitis (UC).

Methods

The rates of clinical remission (CR, partial Mayo score < 2), steroid-free clinical remission (SFCR), and mucosal healing were assessed with nonresponder imputation analysis. Baseline independent predictors of clinical remission were investigated, and adverse events were recorded.

Results

We analyzed outcomes in 74 patients; 32% were anti-TNF naïve, 68% had pancolitis, and 46% were on systemic steroids at baseline. At week six, week 14, six months and one year, the CR rates were 26%, 34%, 39% and 39% respectively, and the SFCR rates were 24%, 31%, 38% and 39%, respectively. Among patients not in CR after induction, the probability of remission at six months was 20%. Sustained SFCR between weeks 14 and 52 and between weeks 22 and 52 was found in 69% and 86% of the patients, respectively. Steroid-free clinical remission at 12 months was significantly associated with remission after the induction phase (OR = 30.4; 95% CI, 6 to 150; P < 0.001). Mucosal healing rate at one year was 39%. The most common side effect was headache (7%).

Conclusions

Increasing remission rates were observed over the first six months of VDZ treatment. One-fifth of patients not in remission post-induction achieved remission by six months of continued therapy. Mucosal healing was associated with higher rates of one-year steroid-free remission and VDZ treatment continuation.

Predicting Response to Vedolizumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Vedolizumab is known to be safe, well-tolerated, and effective. However, as personalization becomes an increasingly important aspect of IBD care and in lieu of guidelines to inform clinicians on positioning of biologics, there is a need to reliably predict response to inform patient preferences and shared decision-making. Recent data from clinical trials and real-world evidence have elucidated predictors of clinical and endoscopic response while providing the framework to establish predictive models. Current models are able to predict that those patients with less severe disease, without prior biologic exposure and who demonstrate early response to VDZ have the highest rates of durable clinical and endoscopic response and remission. When incorporating these models into clinical practice, clinicians will be able to identify those patients who are likely to respond before drug initiation as well as early non-responders and response latency after initiation of vedolizumab. In a shift toward personalization of medicine in IBD, the ability of predictive models for vedolizumab to aid pre-biologic and early management will inform both clinician and patient. Ideally this will provide both a personalized and more cost-effective approach, though further studies in cost-analysis in this framework are needed. Though current models are comprehensive of existing data, future research on microbial and translational biomarkers will be additive and necessary to provide full personalization of treatment.

Vedolizumab for perianal Crohn's disease: a multicentre cohort study in 151 patients

BACKGROUND

The management of Crohn's disease patients with perianal lesions and anti-TNF failure is challenging.

AIMS

To assess the effectiveness of vedolizumab in perianal Crohn's disease and the predictors of success in a real-life cohort.

METHODS

We conducted a nationwide multicentre cohort study in patients with perianal Crohn's disease who received vedolizumab. In patients with active perianal Crohn's disease, the success of vedolizumab was defined by clinical success (no draining fistula at clinical examination and no anal ulcers for primary lesions) at 6 months without medical or surgical treatment for perianal Crohn's disease. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of success. In patients with inactive perianal Crohn's disease, recurrence was defined by the occurrence of lesions and/or the need for medical or surgical treatments.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifty-one patients were included. Among them 102 patients had active perianal disease, 33 (32.4%) males, mean age 39.8 years, mean Crohn's disease duration 14.6 years; 101 (99%) had received at least one anti-TNF. The median follow-up time was 52 weeks. Sixty-eight per cent of patients discontinued therapy after a median time of 33 weeks. Vedolizumab success was reached in 23/102 (22.5%). Among patients with setons at initiation, 9/61(15%) had a successful removal. In multivariable analysis, factors associated with success were the number of prior biologic agents (≥3, odds ratio, OR: 0.20, 95% CI 0.04-0.98) and no antibiotics at initiation (OR: 4.76, 95% CI 1.25-18.19). In 49 patients with inactive perianal Crohn's disease, perianal disease recurred in 15/49 (30.6%), 11/49 (22.4%) needed dedicated treatments. Median time to recurrence was 22 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified a low rate of success of vedolizumab in patients with active perianal Crohn's disease, and nearly one third of patients with inactive perianal Crohn's disease had perianal recurrence. Further evaluation is warranted in prospective studies.

Influence of Drug Exposure on Vedolizumab-Induced Endoscopic Remission in Anti-Tumour Necrosis Factor [TNF] Naïve and Anti-TNF Exposed IBD Patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Vedolizumab has demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients with Crohn's disease [CD] and ulcerative colitis [UC]. Endoscopic outcome data are limited, especially in anti-tumour necrosis factor [TNF] naïve patients. The present study compared endoscopic outcome in anti-TNF naïve and exposed patients, and explored if this was affected by drug exposure.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed all patients initiating vedolizumab at our tertiary referral centre since 2015. For UC, endoscopic improvement was defined as a Mayo endoscopic subscore ≤1 at week 14. For CD, endoscopic remission was defined as absence of ulcerations at week 22. Vedolizumab trough concentrations were measured at week 6, week 14 and during maintenance.

RESULTS

A total of 336 patients were identified [53.3% CD], 20% of them being anti-TNF naïve. Endoscopic improvement was achieved by 56.1% of UC patients and endoscopic remission by 39.1% of CD patients. Endoscopic outcomes were significantly better in anti-TNF naïve vs exposed patients [all: 67.2% vs 42.0%, p = 0.0002; UC: 74.4% vs 50.0%, p = 0.02; CD: 57.1% vs 35.8%, p = 0.03]. Achievement of endoscopic end points significantly impacted long-term treatment continuation [p = 9.7 × 10-13]. A better endoscopic outcome was associated with significantly higher drug exposure in both CD and UC.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this observational, single-centre real-life study suggest that vedolizumab may induce endoscopic remission in both CD and UC. Although anti-TNF naïve patients had a significantly better outcome, 42% of anti-TNF exposed patients still benefited endoscopically. A clear exposure-endoscopic response relationship exists, but not all patients will benefit from treatment intensification. Hence, predictive biomarkers remain necessary.

PODCAST

This article has an associated podcast which can be accessed at https://academic.oup.com/ecco-jcc/pages/podcast.

A clinical decision support tool may help to optimise vedolizumab therapy in Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

A clinical decision support tool (CDST) has been validated for predicting treatment effectiveness of vedolizumab (VDZ) in Crohn's disease.

AIM

To assess the utility of this CDST for predicting exposure-efficacy and disease outcomes.

METHODS

Using data from three independent datasets (GEMINI, GETAID and VICTORY), we assessed clinical remission rates and measured VDZ exposure, rapidity of onset of action, response to dose optimisation and progression to surgery by CDST-defined response groups (low, intermediate and high).

RESULTS

A linear relationship existed between CDST-defined groups, measured VDZ exposure, rapidity of onset of action and efficacy in GEMINI through week 52 (P < 0.001 at all time points across three CDST-defined groups). In GETAID, CDST predicted differences in clinical remission at week 14 (AUC = 0.68) and rapidity of onset of action (P = 0.04) between probability groups. The high-probability patients did not benefit from shortening of infusion intervals, and differences in onset of action between the high-intermediate and low-probability groups within GETAID were no longer significant when including low-probability patients who received a week 10 infusion. CDST predicted a twofold increase in surgery risk over 12 months of VDZ therapy among low- to intermediate-probability vs high-probability patients (adjusted HR 2.06, 95% CI 1.33-3.21).

CONCLUSIONS

We further extended the clinical utility of a previously validated VDZ CDST, which accurately predicts at baseline exposure-efficacy relationships and rapidity of onset of action and could be used to help identify patients who would most benefit from interval shortening and those most likely to require surgery while on active therapy.

Real-world evidence of tofacitinib effectiveness and safety in patients with refractory ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Phase III trials demonstrated effectiveness of tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, to induce and maintain remission in patients with moderate-to-severe active ulcerative colitis (UC).

AIMS

We report the real-world effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib in patients with UC in France.

METHODS

From February 2017 to December 2018, we performed a national French cohort study, which included all consecutive patients with an active UC refractory to anti-TNF and vedolizumab, who received tofacitinib. Outcomes were survival without colectomy, survival without tofacitinib discontinuation and steroid-free clinical remission at weeks 14, 24 and 48.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients were included, with a median follow-up of 41.5 (18.5-56.8) weeks. Survival without colectomy was 77% [95% confidence interval (95%CI): 59.3-87.9] at week 24 and 70% (95%CI: 50.9-82.8) at week 48. Survival without treatment discontinuation was 70% (95%CI: 52.6-82.3) at week 24. Steroid-free clinical remission was observed in 13 (34%) patients at week 48. Adverse events occurred in 14 (37%) patients, including 6 severe adverse events and three herpes zoster infections.

CONCLUSION

In a highly refractory UC population, one third of patients treated with tofacitinib achieved steroid-free clinical remission at week 14 and 70% of patients avoided colectomy at one year, with an acceptable safety profile. These data confirm tofacitinib effectiveness in UC, especially after multiple biologic failures.

Assessment of serum cytokines predicts clinical and endoscopic outcomes to vedolizumab in ulcerative colitis patients

AIMS

Vedolizumab (VDZ) prevents migration of activated leucocytes into inflamed mucosa. This study aimed to assess the patterns of serum cytokines in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients at baseline and during VDZ treatment, and to investigate their association with mucosal healing and clinical remission.

METHODS

We enrolled consecutive UC patients eligible for treatment with VDZ. A panel of serum cytokines were measured by fluorescence assay at weeks 0, 6 and 22. Colonoscopy was performed at baseline and week 54, to evaluate mucosal healing. The time trends of serum cytokines were analysed by log-linear mixed effect models, and their prognostic accuracy was evaluated by logistic regression.

RESULTS

Out of 27 patients included in the analysis, at week 54 mucosal healing was achieved in 12 (44%) and clinical remission in 17 (63%). Mucosal healing was associated with higher interleukin (IL)-8 values at baseline and with significant decrease in IL-6 and IL-8 levels over the first 6 weeks. A significant reduction of IL-6 and IL-8 levels over the first 6 weeks of treatment was associated also with clinical remission. Logistic models including, among the predictors, IL-6 and IL-8 at baseline and their changes over the first 6 weeks of treatment had 83% sensitivity and 87% specificity to predict mucosal healing, and 82% sensitivity and 90% specificity to predict clinical remission.

CONCLUSION

In UC patients, the serum patterns of IL-6 and IL-8 at baseline and over the first 6 weeks of treatment with VDZ could be useful to predict therapeutic outcome.

Extent of Mucosal Inflammation in Ulcerative Colitis Influences the Clinical Remission Induced by Vedolizumab

Randomized controlled clinical trials and real-life observations indicate that less than 50% of patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) respond to vedolizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that blocks the α4β7 integrin. Since α4β7-expressing lymphocytes mainly infiltrate the left colon, we assessed whether localization of CD and UC influences vedolizumab-induced remission. One hundred and eighty-one patients (74 CD and 107 UC) receiving vedolizumab in 3 referral centers were retrospectively evaluated for clinical remission at week 14. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between remitters and non-responders, and multivariable multinomial analysis was performed to identify predictors of remission. Remission was achieved in 17 CD (23%) and 34 UC (32%) patients, respectively. In CD, localization of the lesions did not influence clinical remission. In UC, the remitters had more frequently a distal/left-sided colitis (21/34, 62%) as compared to the non-responders (9/47, 19%), and extensive colitis was more frequent in the non-responders (38/47, 81%) than in the remitters (13/34, 38%). The multivariable multinomial analysis showed that distal/left-sided colitis was associated with a higher probability of clinical remission while extensive colitis was inversely associated with induction of remission. Data indicate that UC patients with distal or left-sided colitis are more likely to achieve remission than patients with extensive colitis following vedolizumab treatment.

Vedolizumab for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Two-Year Results of the Initiative on Crohn and Colitis (ICC) Registry, A Nationwide Prospective Observational Cohort Study: ICC Registry - Vedolizumab

Prospective data of vedolizumab treatment for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) beyond 1 year of treatment is scarce but needed for clinical decision making. We prospectively enrolled 310 patients with IBD (191 with Crohn's disease (CD) and 119 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC)) with a follow‐up period of 104 weeks (interquartile range: 103–104) in a nationwide registry. The corticosteroid‐free clinical remission rate (Harvey Bradshaw Index ≤ 4, Short Clinical Colitis Activity index ≤ 2) at weeks 52 and 104 were 28% and 19% for CD and 27% and 28% for UC, respectively. Fifty‐nine percent maintained corticosteroid‐free clinical remission between weeks 52 and 104. Vedolizumab with concomitant immunosuppression showed comparable effectiveness outcomes compared with vedolizumab monotherapy (week 104: 21% vs. 23%; P = 0.77), whereas 8 of 13 severe infections occurred in patients treated with concomitant immunosuppression. To conclude, the clinical effect was 19% for CD and 28% for UC after 2 years of follow‐up regardless of concomitant immunosuppression.

Dose escalation and switching of biologics in ulcerative colitis: a systematic literature review in real-world evidence

Background: Biologics used to treat ulcerative colitis (UC) may lose their effect over time, requiring patients to undergo dose escalation or treatment switching, and systematic literature reviews of real-world evidence on these topics are lacking. Aim: To summarize the occurrence and outcomes of dose escalation and treatment switching in UC patients in real-world evidence. Methods: Studies were searched through MEDLINE, MEDLINE IN PROCESS, Embase and Cochrane (2006-2017) as well as proceedings from three major scientific meetings. Results: In total, 41 studies were included in the review among which 35 covered dose escalation and 12 covered treatment switching of biologics. Tumor necrosis factor antagonist (anti-TNF) escalation for all patients included at induction ranged from 5% (6 months) to 50% (median 0.67 years) and 15.2% to 70.8% (8 weeks) for anti-TNF induction responders. Mean/median time to dose escalation on anti-TNF ranged from 1.84 to 11 months. The most common switching pattern, infliximab → adalimumab, occurred in 3.8% (median 5.6 years) to 25.5% (mean 3.3 years) of patients. Conclusions: Dose escalation and treatment switching of biologics may be considered as indicators of suboptimal therapy suggesting a lack of long-term remission and response under current therapies.

Evaluation of cytokine levels as putative biomarkers to predict the pharmacological response to biologic therapy in inflammatory bowel diseases

Cytokines play a central role in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel diseases. For this reason, the vast majority of biological therapies are aimed to block pro-inflammatory cytokines or their receptors. Although these drugs have modified the course of the disease due to their efficacy, a high rate of non-response or loss of response over time is still an important issue for clinicians. In this perspective, many studies have been conducted in recent years to individuate a reliable biomarker of therapeutic response. In this review, we discuss the role of cytokines involved in the pathogenesis and in the therapy of inflammatory bowel diseases, and their putative use as pharmacological biomarkers of therapy responsiveness.

Real-world Effectiveness and Safety of Vedolizumab for the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: The Scottish Vedolizumab Cohort

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Vedolizumab is an anti-a4b7 monoclonal antibody that is licensed for the treatment of moderate to severe Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. The aims of this study were to establish the real-world effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study involving seven NHS health boards in Scotland between June 2015 and November 2017. Inclusion criteria included: a diagnosis of ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease with objective evidence of active inflammation at baseline (Harvey-Bradshaw Index[HBI] ≥5/Partial Mayo ≥2 plus C-reactive protein [CRP] >5 mg/L or faecal calprotectin ≥250 µg/g or inflammation on endoscopy/magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]); completion of induction; and at least one clinical follow-up by 12 months. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to establish 12-month cumulative rates of clinical remission, mucosal healing, and deep remission [clinical remission plus mucosal healing]. Rates of serious adverse events were described quantitatively.

RESULTS

Our cohort consisted of 180 patients with ulcerative colitis and 260 with Crohn's disease. Combined median follow-up was 52 weeks (interquartile range [IQR] 26-52 weeks). In ulcerative colitis, 12-month cumulative rates of clinical remission, mucosal healing, and deep remission were 57.4%, 47.3%, and 38.5%, respectively. In Crohn's disease, 12-month cumulative rates of clinical remission, mucosal healing, and deep remission were 58.4%, 38.9%, and 28.3% respectively. The serious adverse event rate was 15.6 per 100 patient-years of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Vedolizumab is a safe and effective treatment for achieving both clinical remission and mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease.

Vedolizumab is effective and safe in real-life treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases outpatients: A multicenter, observational study in primary inflammatory bowel disease centers

BACKGROUND

Italian data currently available in managing ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) patients with vedolizumab (VDZ) are coming just from secondary and tertiary centers. The present study aimed to assess the real-life efficacy and safety of VDZ to achieve remission in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) outpatients in primary gastroenterology centers.

METHODS

Clinical activity was scored according to the Mayo score in UC and to the Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI) in CD. The primary endpoints were the achievement of clinical remission and safety. Secondary endpoints were clinical response to treatment, achievement of mucosal healing (MH), and steroid discontinuation.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-six pts. were enrolled (91 UC and 45 CD pts). During an 18-month median follow-up, clinical remission was present in 63 (46.3%) pts.: in particular, it occurred in 48 (52.7%) patients in UC group and in 15 (33.3%) patients in CD group (p = 0.003). more in UC group. Fecal calprotectin ≥400 μg/g and presence of comorbidities were factors significantly related to the failure of remission in UC and CD, respectively. Ten (7.3%) cases of adverse events were recorded (2 required suspension of treatment). Clinical response was present in 105 (72.2%) pts.: 71 (78.0%) in UC and 34 (75.5%) in CD group. MH occurred in 47 (62.7%) UC and in 9 (50.0%) CD patients. Steroids discontinuation occurred in 92 (67.6%) pts.; 61 (67.0%) UC and 31 (68.9%) CD pts.

CONCLUSION

VDZ is effective and safe in IBD outpatients, especially in UC patients.

Best practices on immunomodulators and biologic agents for ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease in Asia

The Asia-Pacific Working Group on Inflammatory Bowel Disease was established in Cebu, Philippines, under the auspices of the Asia-Pacific Association of Gastroenterology with the goal of improving inflammatory bowel disease care in Asia. This consensus is carried out in collaboration with Asian Organization for Crohn's and Colitis. With biologic agents and biosimilars becoming more established, it is necessary to conduct a review on existing literature and establish a consensus on when and how to introduce biologic agents and biosimilars in conjunction with conventional treatments for ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease in Asia. These statements also address how pharmacogenetics influences the treatments of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease and provides guidance on response monitoring and strategies to restore loss of response. Finally, the review includes statements on how to manage treatment alongside possible hepatitis B and tuberculosis infections, both common in Asia. These statements have been prepared and voted upon by members of inflammatory bowel disease workgroup employing the modified Delphi process. These statements do not intend to be all-encompassing, and future revisions are likely as new data continue to emerge.

Three-year effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab therapy for inflammatory bowel disease: a prospective multi-centre cohort study

BACKGROUND

Cohort studies have described the short-term effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab in treating patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), but data beyond 1 year are lacking.

AIM

To assess the effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab after 162 weeks in patients with UC and CD.

METHODS

Between June and December 2014, 294 patients including 173 patients with CD and 121 with UC were treated with vedolizumab induction therapy. Among them, 149 continued to be treated with vedolizumab beyond week 54 (78 patients with CD and 71 with UC). Disease activity was assessed using the Harvey-Bradshaw Index for CD and the partial Mayo Clinic score for UC. The primary outcome was steroid-free clinical remission at week 162, computed for the whole population included at week 0.

RESULTS

Steroid-free clinical remission rates at week 162 were 19.9% and 36.1% in patients with CD and UC respectively. Vedolizumab dose optimisation to 300 mg every 4 weeks instead of 300 mg every 8 weeks was at investigator's discretion and occurred in 58.7% and 52.1% of patients with CD and UC respectively. The 1-, 2- and 3-year persistence rates of vedolizumab were 48.5%, 31.4% and 26.3% respectively, in patients with CD and 61.0%, 49.9% and 42.9% respectively, in patients with UC. No new safety signal was identified.

CONCLUSION

Vedolizumab is able to maintain steroid-free clinical remission in patients with UC and CD up to week 162. Loss of response resulting in discontinuation of vedolizumab occurred in 10% of patients per year.

Real-World Experience with Tofacitinib in IBD at a Tertiary Center

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Many inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients do not respond to medical therapy. Tofacitinib is a first-in-class, partially selective inhibitor of Janus kinase, recently approved for treating patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). We describe our experience with the use of tofacitinib for treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe IBD.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, observational study of the use of tofacitinib in IBD. Patients with medically resistant IBD were treated orally with 5 mg or 10 mg twice daily. Clinical response and adverse events were assessed at 8, 26, and 52 weeks. Objective response was assessed endoscopically, radiologically, and biochemically.

RESULTS

58 patients (53 UC, 4 Crohn's, 1 pouchitis) completed at least 8 weeks of treatment with tofacitinib. 93% of the patients previously failed treatment with anti-TNF. At 8 weeks of treatment, 21 patients (36%) achieved a clinical response, and 19 (33%) achieved clinical remission. Steroid-free remission at 8 weeks was achieved in 15 patients (26%). Of the 48 patients followed for 26 weeks, 21% had clinical, steroid-free remission. Of the 26 patients followed for 12 months, 27% were in clinical, steroid-free remission. Twelve episodes of systemic infections were noted, mostly while on concomitant steroids. One episode of herpes zoster infection was noted during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort of patients with moderate-to-severe, anti-TNF resistant IBD, tofacitinib induced clinical response in 69% of the patients. 27% were in clinical, steroid-free remission by 1 year of treatment. Tofacitinib is an effective therapeutic option for this challenging patient population.

Positioning biologics and new therapies in the management of inflammatory bowel disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Since the advent of anti-tumour necrosis factor agents, knowledge of their optimal use and their pitfalls has grown exponentially. However, the range of therapeutic agents available to clinicians and patients is expanding, creating challenging decisions about which drugs to use at any given time point. The present review aims to provide a framework within which positioning decisions can be made in the context of limited comparative effectiveness data.

RECENT FINDINGS

The present review will summarize the current literature emphasizing how best to use biologic agents, and will provide suggestions as to how they should be positioned. Recent trials comparing efficacy and safety will be considered as will their strengths and weaknesses.

SUMMARY

On reading this review, clinicians should have an understanding of the optimal use of currently approved biologic agents and tofacitinib and how they might be positioned in relation to one another.

Novel Pharmacological Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Beyond Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are chronic conditions of the gastrointestinal tract in which dysregulated immune responses cause persistent inflammation of the gut mucosa. Biologic therapy with anti-TNF blockers has revolutionized the therapeutic management of IBD for their remarkable efficacy and potential impact on disease course and for many years has represented the sole treatment option for patients refractory or intolerant to conventional therapy. In recent years, more molecules, both biologically and chemically synthetized, have been developed as potential therapeutic options for IBD that target different molecular pathways aside from TNF blockade, and which have been proposed as targets for novel drugs. This is particularly relevant for the present, as well as future, management of IBD, considering that some patients are refractory to anti-TNF. This review will summarize the pharmacological options, either currently available or in the pipeline, for market approval to treat IBD, besides anti-TNF strategies, based on their mechanism(s) of action. We will also analyze the current evidence for effectiveness and safety, as well as offer perspective, regarding the potential implementation for such therapies in the future.

Best practices on immunomodulators and biologic agents for ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease in Asia

The Asia-Pacific Working Group on inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) was established in Cebu, Philippines, under the auspices of the Asian Pacific Association of Gastroenterology with the goal of improving IBD care in Asia. This consensus is carried out in collaboration with Asian Organization for Crohn’s and Colitis. With biologic agents and biosimilars becoming more established, it is necessary to conduct a review on existing literature and establish a consensus on when and how to introduce biologic agents and biosimilars in the conjunction with conventional treatments for ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD) in Asia. These statements also address how pharmacogenetics influence the treatments of UC and CD and provide guidance on response monitoring and strategies to restore loss of response. Finally, the review includes statements on how to manage treatment alongside possible hepatitis B and tuberculosis infections, both common in Asia. These statements have been prepared and voted upon by members of IBD workgroup employing the modified Delphi process. These statements do not intend to be all-encompassing and future revisions are likely as new data continue to emerge.

Mechanisms of molecular resistance and predictors of response to biological therapy in inflammatory bowel disease

Biological therapy has led to marked improvements in treatment of patients with inflammatory bowel disease, and an increasing number of drugs has been approved for treatment. However, only a subgroup of patients responds to therapy, highlighting the need to identify biomarkers for therapeutic response to allow personalised medicine in inflammatory bowel disease. Potential markers of response to biological therapy have been identified; however, studies also suggest that changes in the composition of immune cell infiltrates in response to therapeutic pressure lead to molecular resistance to these drugs. For instance, the cytokine interleukin 23 has been identified as a driver of evasion of apoptosis in response to anti-tumour necrosis factor drugs in patients with Crohn's disease, leading to expansion of apoptosis-resistant T cells and drug resistance. In this Review, we examine the concept of molecular resistance to biological therapy and discuss implications for future therapy.

Efficacy and Safety of Induction Therapy With Calcineurin Inhibitors in Combination With Vedolizumab in Patients With Refractory Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Vedolizumab is used to treat patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), although there is a delay before it is effective. Induction therapy with a calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporine or tacrolimus) in combination with vedolizumab as maintenance therapy could be an option for patients with an active steroid-refractory UC. We assessed the efficacy and safety of this combination.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective observational study, collecting data from 12 referral centers in France that were included in the Groupe d'Etude Thérapeutique des Affections Inflammatoires du tube Digestif. We collected information on 39 patients with an active steroid-refractory UC (31 with active severe UC and 36 failed by treatment with a tumor necrosis factor antagonist) who received a calcineurin inhibitor as induction therapy along with vedolizumab as maintenance therapy. Inclusion date was the first vedolizumab infusion. The outcomes were survival without colectomy, survival without vedolizumab discontinuation, and safety.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up period of 11 months, 11 patients (28%) underwent colectomy. At 12 months, 68% of the patients survived without colectomy (95% CI, 53%-84%) and 44% survived without vedolizumab discontinuation (95% CI, 27%-61%). No deaths occurred and 4 severe adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In a retrospective analysis of 39 patients with an active steroid-refractory UC (most refractory to a tumor necrosis factor antagonist), we found that initial treatment with a calcineurin inhibitor in combination with vedolizumab allowed more than two thirds of patients to avoid colectomy. Further studies are needed to assess the safety of this strategy.

The risk for opportunistic infections in inflammatory bowel disease with biologics: an update

Crohn's disease and Ulcerative Colitis are forms of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), chronic diseases treated with medical and surgical therapy. Patients with IBD are treated with potent immunomodulatory agents, leading to immunosuppression, and the potential for opportunistic infections. In 2014, the ECCO guidelines were released to guide the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of a variety of these opportunistic infections. Since 2014, there have been a number of new agents released as well as a significant expansion in our knowledge of the safety profile of IBD medications. In this article, we review the literature after 2014 regarding opportunistic infections and updates on safety data. Areas covered: We review updates in immunomodulatory therapies for IBD and opportunistic infections since the 2014 ECCO guidelines were published. Expert commentary: The prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of opportunistic infections continue to evolve, as new drugs are approved, and the use of a combination of biologic agents are considered for therapy in clinical trials. What causes some patients to fail to respond to vaccination, or for others to develop severe infections, remains unclear. Improved risk stratification for opportunistic infections in IBD patients and updated ECCO 2014 guidelines would be of significant benefit.

Short and long-term effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab in inflammatory bowel disease: results from the ENEIDA registry

BACKGROUND

Effectiveness of vedolizumab in real world clinical practice is unknown.

AIM

To evaluate the short and long-term effectiveness of vedolizumab in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

METHODS

Patients who received at least 1 induction dose of vedolizumab were included. Effectiveness was defined based on Harvey-Bradshaw index (HBI) in Crohn's disease (CD) and Partial Mayo Score (PMS) in ulcerative colitis (UC). Short-term response was assessed at week 14. Variables associated with short-term remission were identified by logistic regression analysis. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate the long-term durability of vedolizumab treatment. Cox model was used to identify factors associated with discontinuation of treatment and loss of response.

RESULTS

521 patients were included (median follow-up 10 months [interquartile range 5-18 months]). At week 14, 46.8% had remission and 15.7% clinical response. CD (vs UC), previous surgery, higher CRP concentration and disease severity at baseline were significantly associated with impaired response. The rate of vedolizumab discontinuation was 37% per patient-year of follow-up (27.6% in UC and 45.3% in CD, P < 0.01). CD (vs UC), anaemia at baseline, steroids during induction and CRP concentration were associated with lower durability of treatment. Seven per cent of patients developed adverse events, infections being the most frequent.

CONCLUSIONS

Over 60% of IBD patients respond to vedolizumab. Many patients discontinue treatment over time. CD and disease burden impair both short- and long-term response. Vedolizumab seems to be safe in clinical practice.

A review of vedolizumab and ustekinumab for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases

Recent advancement in the understanding of the pathophysiology of inflammatory bowel disease has seen an expansion in therapeutic options. Vedolizumab, a selective α4β7 inhibitor, and ustekinumab, an IL 12/23 p40 inhibitor, have provided the much-awaited out-of-class alternatives for patients who have failed or who are intolerant to anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) therapy. However, questions remain as to how we may best use these novel therapeutic agents. We evaluate the evidence available from randomized controlled trials and postmarketing cohort studies and discuss their safety, efficacy, and limitations, in relation to anti-TNF therapy, in optimizing the treatment outcomes.

Systematic review with meta-analysis: real-world effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Selective patient recruitment can produce discrepancies between clinical trial results and real-world effectiveness.

METHODS

A systematic literature review and meta-analysis were conducted to assess vedolizumab real-world effectiveness and safety in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD). MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for real-world studies of vedolizumab in adult patients with UC/CD reporting clinical response, remission, corticosteroid-free remission, UC/CD-related surgery or hospitalization, mucosal healing, or safety published from May 1, 2014-June 22, 2017. Response and remission rates were combined in random-effects meta-analyses.

RESULTS

At treatment week 14, 32% of UC patients [95% confidence interval (CI) 27-39%] and 30% of CD patients (95% CI 25-34%) were in remission; and at month 12, 46% for UC (95% CI 37-56%) and 30% for CD (95% CI 20-42%). For UC, the rates of corticosteroid-free remission were 26% at week 14 (95% CI 20-34%) and 42% at month 12 (95% CI 31-53%); for CD they were 25% at week 14 (95%, CI 20-31%) and 31% at month 12 (95%, CI 20-45%). At month 12, 33-77% of UC and 6-63% of CD patients had mucosal healing. Nine percent of patients reported serious adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Vedolizumab demonstrated real-world effectiveness in patients with moderate-to-severely active UC or CD, with approximately one-half and one-third of patients, respectively, in remission at treatment month 12. These findings are consistent with clinical trial data and support the long-term benefit-risk profile of vedolizumab.

Real-world clinical, endoscopic and radiographic efficacy of vedolizumab for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Vedolizumab is an α4β7 integrin antagonist with proven efficacy for inducing and maintaining clinical response and remission in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC).

AIM

To evaluate clinical and objective response and remission rates with vedolizumab in a large, real world cohort.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of adult CD and UC patients receiving vedolizumab between 2012 and 2017 was conducted.

PRIMARY OUTCOME

clinical or objective response and remission at 3, 6 and 12 months after induction. Clinical remission was defined by complete, steroid-free absence of symptoms. Objective remission was defined by endoscopic mucosal healing or normalisation of radiographic appearance on contrast-enhanced ultrasound or CT/MR enterography.

RESULTS

The study included 222 vedolizumab patients (122 CD, 100 UC). In CD, clinical remission at 3, 6 and 12 months was achieved in 19.8% (22/111), 22.1% (21/95) and 22.1% (15/68) of patients, respectively. Objective remission occurred in 11.5% (6/52), 21.2% (14/66), and 18.9% (7/37) of patients at 3, 6 and 12 months, respectively. In UC, clinical remission at 3, 6, and 12 months was 51.0% (51/100), 61.8% (55/89) and 61.9% (39/63), respectively. Endoscopic remission occurred in 27.5% (11/40), 41.0% (16/39) and 47.8% (22/46) of patients at 3, 6 and 12 months, respectively. In multivariable analysis, patients with UC as compared to CD, and those with milder disease activity were more likely to achieve objectively defined remission at both 6 and 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Vedolizumab was effective for induction and maintenance of clinical and objective remission, both in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.

Vedolizumab for Ulcerative Colitis: Treatment Outcomes from the VICTORY Consortium

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to quantify the safety and effectiveness of vedolizumab (VDZ) when used for UC, and to identify predictors of response to treatment.

METHODS

Retrospective review (May 2014-December 2016) of VICTORY Consortium data. Adults with follow-up after starting VDZ for clinically active UC were included. Primary effectiveness outcomes were cumulative rates of clinical remission (resolution of all UC-related symptoms) and endoscopic remission (Mayo endoscopic sub-score 0). Key secondary effectiveness outcomes included cumulative rates of corticosteroid-free remission and deep remission (clinical remission and endoscopic remission). Cox proportional hazard analyses were used to identify independent predictors of treatment effectiveness. Non-response imputation (NRI) sensitivity analyses were performed for effectiveness outcomes. Key safety outcomes were rates of serious infection, serious adverse events, and colectomy.

RESULTS

We included 321 UC patients (71% prior TNFα antagonist exposure, median follow-up 10 months). The 12-month cumulative rates of clinical remission and endoscopic remission were 51% and 41%, respectively. Corresponding rates for corticosteroid-free remission and deep remission were 37% and 30%, respectively. Using NRI, 12-month rates were 20% (n = 64/321) for clinical remission, 17% (n = 35/203) for endoscopic remission, 15% (n = 30/195) for corticosteroid-free remission, and 14% (n = 28/203) for deep remission. A majority of the patients without adequate follow-up at 12 months who were deemed non-responders using NRI had already achieved clinical remission (n = 70) or a significant clinical response (n = 36) prior to 12 months. VDZ discontinuation prior to 12 months was observed in 91 patients, for lack of response (n = 56), need for surgery (n = 29), or adverse event (n = 6). On multivariable analyses, prior exposure to a TNFα antagonist was associated with a reduced probability of achieving clinical remission (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.38-0.75) and endoscopic remission (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.29-0.88). Serious adverse events and serious infections were reported in 6% and 4% of patients, respectively. Overall cumulative rates of colectomy over 12 months were 13%, with lower rates observed in patients naive to TNFα antagonist therapy (2%) than those who had been exposed to TNFα antagonists (19%).

CONCLUSION

In this large real-world cohort we observed that VDZ was well tolerated and effective in achieving key clinical outcomes.

Soluble Mucosal Addressin Cell Adhesion Molecule 1 and Retinoic Acid are Potential Tools for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Treated with Vedolizumab: A Proof of Concept Study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Vedolizumab [VDZ], a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting α4β7 integrin, is effective in induction and maintenance therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] who have not adequately responded to standard therapies, and high vedolizumab trough levels [VTLs] have been associated with clinical remission. The α4β7 integrin binds to endothelial MAdCAM-1 and is upregulated by retinoic acid [RA]. The aim of this study was to determine the relationships between soluble MAdCAM-1 [sMAdCAM-1] and RA concentrations during clinical remission with VDZ maintenance therapy.

METHODS

In a retrospective study performed in IBD patients treated with VDZ, we measured VTL, sMAdCAM-1 and RA concentrations.

RESULTS

Among the 62 included patients [38 Crohn's disease], 24 relapsed and 38 stayed in remission from Weeks 10 to 30 after VDZ initiation. During this maintenance therapy, the median values of VTLs and RA were 15.4 µg/mL and 0.97 ng/mL, respectively, whereas sMAdCAM-1 was undetectable [<0.41 ng/mL] in 67.3% of samples. The positive predictive value [PPV] of undetectable sMAdCAM-1 for clinical remission was 80.0%, with a corresponding sensitivity of 74.6%. On multivariate analysis, undetectable sMAdCAM-1 and high VTLs [>19 µg/mL] were independently associated with clinical remission [OR = 7.5, p = 0.006 and OR = 2.2, p = 0.045, respectively]. The combination of sMAdCAM-1 < 0.41 ng/mL and VTL > 19 µg/mL was the best pharmacokinetic profile, with a PPV of 95.2%. Median values of sMAdCAM-1 and RA were significantly higher [p = 0.0001] before VDZ therapy than during the follow-up [sMAdCAM-1: 40.5 vs < 0.41 ng/mL; RA: 1.7 vs 0.97 ng/mL]. Only RA > 1.86 ng/mL before VDZ therapy was predictive of clinical remission during the follow-up (Area Under a Receiver Operating Characteristic curve [AUROC] = 80.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Undetectable sMAdCAM-1 appears strongly associated with clinical remission during VDZ maintenance therapy. Combination of undetectable sMAdCAM-1 with high VTL is also potentially interesting for therapeutic drug monitoring. Baseline RA concentrations are predictive of clinical remission. These findings need to be confirmed in further prospective studies.

The real-world effectiveness of vedolizumab on intestinal and articular outcomes in inflammatory bowel diseases

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of vedolizumab in real-world practice is under evaluation, while its role in inflammatory bowel disease-associated spondyloarthritis is still unclear.

AIMS

To report real-world data about the effectiveness of vedolizumab on intestinal and articular symptoms after 10 and 22 weeks of treatment.

METHODS

Web-based data from the cohort of the Sicilian Network for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (SN-IBD) were extracted to perform a prospective multicentre observational study.

RESULTS

163 patients (84 with Crohn's disease and 79 with ulcerative colitis) were included. At week 10, a steroid-free remission was achieved in 71 patients (43.6%), while at week 22 a steroid-free remission was obtained in 40.8% of patients. A response on articular symptoms was reported after 10 weeks of treatment in 17 out of 43 (39.5%) patients with active spondyloarthritis at baseline, and in 10 out of 22 (45.4%) patients at week 22. The only factor associated with articular response was the coexistence of clinical benefit on intestinal symptoms (at week 10: OR 8.471, p = 0.05; at week 22: OR 5.600, p = 0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

Vedolizumab showed good effectiveness after 10 and 22 weeks of treatment. A subset of patients reported improvement also on articular symptoms, probably as a consequence of the concomitant control of gut inflammation.

Vedolizumab for inflammatory bowel disease: From randomized controlled trials to real-life evidence

The biologic antitumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFα) agents have revolutionised the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, some patients experience primary nonresponse, loss of response, or intolerance. Therefore, introducing a newer class of therapy with a mechanism of action that acts on different inflammatory pathways involved in IBD pathogenesis is appealing. Vedolizumab is a fully humanised monoclonal antibody that selectively targets α4β7 integrin. Based on the results of the pivotal clinical GEMINI trials, vedolizumab was approved for the treatment of adult patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD) refractory or intolerant to either conventional therapy or TNFα inhibitors. This review describes the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of vedolizumab reported in both randomized, controlled, clinical trials and from real-world experience in patients with UC and CD in order to identify its place in treatment algorithms for IBD.

The impact of biologics in surgical outcomes in ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative Colitis (UC) is an immune mediated condition characterized by inflammation of colonic mucosa, associated with progressive damage of the colon and possible complications, such as hemorrhage, perforation and cancer. It is strongly advocated a treat to target approach in patients with UC consisting in an early and aggressive inflammatory control. Some patients can require colectomy for medically refractory disease or to treat colonic neoplasia. Even though the first line biologic therapy targeting the tumor necrosis factor-alfa (TNF-α) is associated with improvement of the inflammation in some patients, others do not respond at first or lose response over time. Novel drugs targeting different inflammatory pathways have been studied in UC, however, it remains unclear whether surgical rates have been reduced in the biological era. Controversy also exists if biological agents impair surgical postoperative complication rates in UC. The aim of this review is to describe all relevant data available and briefly summarize the real impact of biologics in surgical outcomes in ulcerative colitis.

Putative biomarkers of vedolizumab resistance and underlying inflammatory pathways involved in IBD

Objectives

Characterise the circulating inflammatory cytokine pattern among patients failing consecutive anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) and anti-integrin treatments to identify predictors of response.

Methods

A retrospective single-centre cohort study of 28 patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) receiving anti-integrin therapy (vedolizumab) subsequent to the failure of anti-TNF treatment was conducted. Blood samples were obtained immediately prior to initiation of vedolizumab therapy, and the response to treatment was evaluated after completion of the 14-week induction regimen. Multiplex ELISA was applied to quantify 47 preselected plasma proteins based on their putative involvement in the inflammatory process in IBD.

Results

Anti-TNF and vedolizumab non-responders (n=20) had significantly higher levels of circulating interleukin (IL)-6 than anti-TNF non-responders with subsequent response to vedolizumab (n=8): median 9.5 pg/mL versus 5.9 pg/mL, p<0.05. Following stratification by diagnosis, patients with Crohn's disease who failed vedolizumab therapy (n=7) had higher soluble CD40 ligand (sCD40L) than responders (n=4): 153.0 pg/mL versus 45.5 pg/mL, p<0.01; sensitivity 100% (95% CI 59% to 100%), specificity 100% (95% CI 40% to 100%). Osteocalcin was higher among patients with ulcerative colitis responding to vedolizumab (n=4) compared with those not responding (n=13): 4219 pg/mL versus 2823 pg/mL, p=0.01; sensitivity 85% (95% CI 55% to 98%), specificity 100% (95% CI 40% to 100%).

Conclusions

Patients with IBD failing vedolizumab induction and anti-TNF therapy have persistent IL-6 pathway activity, which could be a potential alternative treatment target. sCD40L, osteocalcin and the IL-6 pathway activity might be predictors for response to vedolizumab.