1
|
Mourad FH, Maalouf RG, Aoun R, Gustavo Kotze P, Hashash JG. Are the New Biologics Effective in the Management of Postoperative Crohn's Disease? Inflamm Bowel Dis 2024; 30:459-469. [PMID: 36879404 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izad033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 03/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the growing therapeutic armamentarium, at least half of the patients with Crohn's disease will require surgery during their lifetime. Current evidence for the prevention and treatment of postoperative Crohn's disease supports the use of anti-tumor necrosis factor agents with limited data about the use of the newer biologics, vedolizumab and ustekinumab. METHODS We performed a systematic review of available data to determine the efficacy of the newer biologics in the management of postoperative Crohn's disease. We included noncomparative and comparative studies. The main outcomes of interest were clinical and endoscopic postoperative recurrence rates. RESULTS The search strategy identified 1231 citations, with 32 eligible for review. Several studies showed that the postoperative Crohn's disease recurrence rates with the use of the newer biologics were comparable to previously published results with the use of anti-tumor necrosis factor agents, while other studies failed to show their efficacy. It is important to note that the studies were heterogeneous and included a relatively small sample size, making it difficult to draw a definite conclusion about the efficacy of the newer biologics in the management of postoperative Crohn's disease. CONCLUSION The newer biologics do play a role in the management of postoperative Crohn's disease. After our review, we proposed an updated algorithm on the role of newer biologics in the approach to patients with postoperative Crohn's disease. Yet, until we have better-designed studies, their definite positioning remains to be determined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fadi H Mourad
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Rami G Maalouf
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Roni Aoun
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | | | - Jana G Hashash
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
García MJ, Rivero M, Fernández-Clotet A, de Francisco R, Sicilia B, Mesonero F, de Castro ML, Casanova MJ, Bertoletti F, García-Alonso FJ, López-García A, Vicente R, Calvet X, Barreiro-de Acosta M, Ferrer Rosique J, Varela Trastoy P, Nuñez A, Ricart E, Riestra S, Arias García L, Rodríguez M, Arranz L, Pajares R, Mena R, Calafat M, Camo P, Bermejo F, Ponferrada Á, Madrigal RE, Llaó J, Sesé E, Sánchez E, Pineda Mariño JR, González Muñoza C, Carbajo López AY, Julián AB, Villoria Ferrer A, Baston-Rey I, Jara L, Almela P, Codesido L, de la Maza S, Leal C, Caballol B, Pérez-Martínez I, Vinuesa Campo R, Crespo J, Domènech E, Chaparro M, Gisbert JP. Comparative Study of the Effectiveness of Vedolizumab Versus Ustekinumab After Anti-TNF Failure in Crohn's Disease (Versus-CD): Data from the ENEIDA Registry. J Crohns Colitis 2024; 18:65-74. [PMID: 37522878 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2022] [Indexed: 08/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Both vedolizumab and ustekinumab are approved for the management of Crohn's disease [CD]. Data on which one would be the most beneficial option when anti-tumour necrosis factor [anti-TNF] agents fail are limited. AIMS To compare the durability, effectiveness, and safety of vedolizumab and ustekinumab after anti-TNF failure or intolerance in CD. METHODS CD patients from the ENEIDA registry who received vedolizumab or ustekinumab after anti-TNF failure or intolerance were included. Durability and effectiveness were evaluated in both the short and the long term. Effectiveness was defined according to the Harvey-Bradshaw index [HBI]. The safety profile was compared between the two treatments. The propensity score was calculated by the inverse probability weighting method to balance confounder factors. RESULTS A total of 835 patients from 30 centres were included, 207 treated with vedolizumab and 628 with ustekinumab. Dose intensification was performed in 295 patients. Vedolizumab [vs ustekinumab] was associated with a higher risk of treatment discontinuation (hazard ratio [HR] 2.55, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.02-3.21), adjusted by corticosteroids at baseline [HR 1.27; 95% CI: 1.00-1.62], moderate-severe activity in HBI [HR 1.79; 95% CI: 1.20-2.48], and high levels of C-reactive protein at baseline [HR 1.06; 95% CI: 1.02-1.10]. The inverse probability weighting method confirmed these results. Clinical response, remission, and corticosteroid-free clinical remission were higher with ustekinumab than with vedolizumab. Both drugs had a low risk of adverse events with no differences between them. CONCLUSION In CD patients who have failed anti-TNF agents, ustekinumab seems to be superior to vedolizumab in terms of durability and effectiveness in clinical practice. The safety profile is good and similar for both treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María José García
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Universidad de Cantabria, Instituto de Investigación Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain
| | - Montserrat Rivero
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Universidad de Cantabria, Instituto de Investigación Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain
| | - Agnès Fernández-Clotet
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ruth de Francisco
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias (ISPA), Oviedo, Spain
| | - Beatriz Sicilia
- IBD Unit, Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Burgos, Spain
| | - Francisco Mesonero
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - María José Casanova
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-Princesa), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Madrid, Spain
| | - Federico Bertoletti
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Raquel Vicente
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Xavier Calvet
- Gastroenterology Department, Consorci Corporació Sanitària Parc Taulí, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Sabadell, Spain
| | - Manuel Barreiro-de Acosta
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario Clínico de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Juan Ferrer Rosique
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario Fundación de Alcorcón, Alcorcón, Spain
| | | | - Alejandro Nuñez
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Elena Ricart
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sabino Riestra
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias (ISPA), Oviedo, Spain
| | - Lara Arias García
- IBD Unit, Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Burgos, Spain
| | - María Rodríguez
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real, Ciudad Real, Spain
| | - Laura Arranz
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria, Tenerife, Spain
| | - Ramón Pajares
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía, Madrid, Spain
| | - Raquel Mena
- Gastroenterology Department, Consorci Sanitari de Terrasa, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Margalida Calafat
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Badalona, Spain
| | - Patricia Camo
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital General San Jorge, Huesca, Spain
| | - Fernando Bermejo
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ángel Ponferrada
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain
| | - Rosa Eva Madrigal
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Jordina Llaó
- Gastroenterology Department, Althaia Xarxa Assistencial Universitària de Manresa, Manresa, Spain
| | - Eva Sesé
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario Arnau de Vilanova de Lleida, Lleida, Spain
| | - Eugenia Sánchez
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Ana Belén Julián
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Albert Villoria Ferrer
- Gastroenterology Department, Consorci Corporació Sanitària Parc Taulí, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Sabadell, Spain
| | - Iria Baston-Rey
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario Clínico de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Lorena Jara
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario Fundación de Alcorcón, Alcorcón, Spain
| | - Pedro Almela
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Castellón, Castellón, Spain
| | - Laura Codesido
- Gastroenterology Department, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense, Ourense, Spain
| | - Saioa de la Maza
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de Basurto, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Carles Leal
- Gastroenterology Department, Consorci Hospitalari de Vic, Vic, Spain
| | - Berta Caballol
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Isabel Pérez-Martínez
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias (ISPA), Oviedo, Spain
| | - Raquel Vinuesa Campo
- IBD Unit, Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Burgos, Spain
| | - Javier Crespo
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Universidad de Cantabria, Instituto de Investigación Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain
| | - Eugeni Domènech
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Badalona, Spain
| | - María Chaparro
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-Princesa), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier P Gisbert
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-Princesa), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vebr M, Pomahačová R, Sýkora J, Schwarz J. A Narrative Review of Cytokine Networks: Pathophysiological and Therapeutic Implications for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Pathogenesis. Biomedicines 2023; 11:3229. [PMID: 38137450 PMCID: PMC10740682 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11123229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Revised: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a lifelong inflammatory immune mediated disorder, encompassing Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC); however, the cause and specific pathogenesis of IBD is yet incompletely understood. Multiple cytokines produced by different immune cell types results in complex functional networks that constitute a highly regulated messaging network of signaling pathways. Applying biological mechanisms underlying IBD at the single omic level, technologies and genetic engineering enable the quantification of the pattern of released cytokines and new insights into the cytokine landscape of IBD. We focus on the existing literature dealing with the biology of pro- or anti-inflammatory cytokines and interactions that facilitate cell-based modulation of the immune system for IBD inflammation. We summarize the main roles of substantial cytokines in IBD related to homeostatic tissue functions and the remodeling of cytokine networks in IBD, which may be specifically valuable for successful cytokine-targeted therapies via marketed products. Cytokines and their receptors are validated targets for multiple therapeutic areas, we review the current strategies for therapeutic intervention and developing cytokine-targeted therapies. New biologics have shown efficacy in the last few decades for the management of IBD; unfortunately, many patients are nonresponsive or develop therapy resistance over time, creating a need for novel therapeutics. Thus, the treatment options for IBD beyond the immune-modifying anti-TNF agents or combination therapies are expanding rapidly. Further studies are needed to fully understand the immune response, networks of cytokines, and the direct pathogenetic relevance regarding individually tailored, safe and efficient targeted-biotherapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marek Vebr
- Departments of Pediatrics, Faculty Hospital, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University of Prague, 323 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic; (R.P.); (J.S.); (J.S.)
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yamamoto T. Editorial: Is vedolizumab the preferred biologic therapy for biologic-naïve patients with ulcerative colitis? Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2023; 58:546-547. [PMID: 37559519 DOI: 10.1111/apt.17628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/11/2023]
Abstract
LINKED CONTENTThis article is linked to Bokemeyer et al paper. To view this article, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17616
Collapse
|
5
|
Macaluso FS, Ventimiglia M, Orlando A. Effectiveness and Safety of Vedolizumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Comprehensive Meta-analysis of Observational Studies. J Crohns Colitis 2023; 17:1217-1227. [PMID: 36913311 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 03/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Many observational studies on the use of vedolizumab [VDZ] in patients with Crohn's disease [CD] and ulcerative colitis [UC] have been published in the past few years. We aimed to comprehensively summarise its effectiveness and safety by pooling data only from observational studies. METHODS PubMed/Medline and Embase were systematically searched for observational studies on patients with CD and UC treated with VDZ through December 2021. The rates of clinical remission and overall adverse events were the primary outcomes. The rates of steroid-free clinical remission, clinical response, mucosal healing, C-reactive protein normalisation, loss of response, VDZ dose escalation, colectomy, serious adverse events, infections, and malignancies were considered as secondary outcomes. RESULTS In all, 88 studies comprising 25 678 patients [13 663 with CD and 12 015 with UC] met the inclusion criteria. In patients with CD, the pooled estimate rates of clinical remission were 36% at induction and 39% at maintenance. In patients with UC, the pooled estimate rates of clinical remission were 40% at induction and 45% at maintenance. The pooled estimate of incidence rate of adverse events was 34.6 per 100 person-years. At multivariable meta-regression analysis, studies with increased male proportion were independently associated with higher rates of clinical remission and steroid-free clinical remission at both induction and maintenance, and clinical response at maintenance in patients with CD. Studies with increased disease duration were independently associated with higher mucosal healing rates at maintenance in patients with UC. CONCLUSIONS Observational studies demonstrated extensively the effectiveness of VDZ, with a reassuring safety profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marco Ventimiglia
- Directorate General of Medical Device and Pharmaceutical Service, Italian Ministry of Health, Rome, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bokemeyer B, Plachta-Danielzik S, di Giuseppe R, Efken P, Mohl W, Krause T, Hoffstadt M, Ehehalt R, Trentmann L, Schweitzer A, Jessen P, Hartmann P, Schreiber S. Real-world effectiveness of vedolizumab compared to anti-TNF agents in biologic-naïve patients with ulcerative colitis: A two-year propensity-score-adjusted analysis from the prospective, observational VEDO IBD -study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2023; 58:429-442. [PMID: 37322825 DOI: 10.1111/apt.17616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Revised: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This observational real-world evidence (RWE) study is based on prospectively collected data from the VEDOIBD registry study. AIM To compare the effectiveness of vedolizumab and anti-TNF agents in biologic-naïve patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) at the end of induction and during maintenance treatment. METHODS Between 2017 and 2020, we enrolled 512 patients with UC starting therapy with vedolizumab or an anti-TNF agent in 45 IBD centres across Germany. We excluded biologic-experienced patients and those with missing partial Mayo (pMayo) outcomes; this resulted in a final sample of 314 (182 on vedolizumab and 132 on an anti-TNF agent). The primary outcome was clinical remission measured using pMayo score; any switch to a different biologic agent was considered an outcome failure (modified ITT analysis). We used propensity score adjustment with inverse probability of treatment weighting to correct for confounding. RESULTS During induction therapy, clinical remission was relatively low and similar in vedolizumab- and anti-TNF-treated patients (23% vs. 30.4%, p = 0.204). However, clinical remission rates after two years were significantly higher for vedolizumab-treated patients than those treated with an anti-TNF agent (43.2% vs. 25.8%, p < 0.011). Among patients treated with vedolzumab, 29% switched to other biologics, versus 54% who had received an anti-TNF agent. CONCLUSION After two years of treatment, vedolizumab resulted in higher remission rates than anti-TNF agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernd Bokemeyer
- Interdisciplinary Crohn Colitis Centre Minden, Minden, Germany
- Competence Network IBD, Kiel, Germany
- Clinic of General Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Wolfgang Mohl
- Center for Gastroenterology Saar MVZ, Saarbruecken, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Stefan Schreiber
- Competence Network IBD, Kiel, Germany
- Clinic of General Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bokemeyer B, Plachta-Danielzik S, di Giuseppe R, Efken P, Mohl W, Hoffstadt M, Krause T, Schweitzer A, Schnoy E, Atreya R, Teich N, Trentmann L, Ehehalt R, Hartmann P, Schreiber S. Real-World Effectiveness of Vedolizumab vs Anti-TNF in Biologic-naïve Crohn's Disease Patients: A 2-year Propensity-score-adjusted Analysis from the VEDOIBD-Study. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2023:izad138. [PMID: 37523666 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izad138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 08/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this observational, real-world evidence, modified intention-to-treat (mITT) study based on prospectively collected data from the VEDOIBD registry was to compare the effectiveness of vedolizumab (VEDO) vs antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) in biologic-naïve Crohn's disease (CD) patients. METHODS Between 2017 and 2020, 557 CD patients starting therapy with VEDO or anti-TNF were consecutively enrolled in 45 IBD centers across Germany. Per study protocol, the analysis excluded biologic-experienced patients and those with a missing Harvey-Bradshaw Index score, resulting in a final sample of 327 biologic-naïve CD patients. Clinical remission was measured using the Harvey-Bradshaw Index at the end of induction therapy and after 1 and 2 years. Switching to a different therapy was considered an outcome failure. Propensity score adjustment with inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to correct for confounding. RESULTS The effectiveness of both VEDO (n = 86) and anti-TNF (n = 241) was remarkably high for induction treatment, but VEDO performed significantly less well than anti-TNF (clinical remission: 56.3% vs 73.9%, P < .05). In contrast, clinical remission after 2 years was significantly better for VEDO compared with anti-TNF (74.2% vs 44.7%; P < .05; odds ratio, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.22-0.94). Remarkably, only 17% of patients switched from VEDO to another biologic vs 44% who received anti-TNF. CONCLUSIONS The results of this prospective, 2-year, real-world evidence study suggest that the choice of VEDO led to higher remission rates after 2 years compared with anti-TNF. This could support the role of VEDO as a first-line biologic therapy in CD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernd Bokemeyer
- Competence Network IBD, Kiel, Germany
- Interdisciplinary Crohn Colitis Centre, Minden, Germany
- Clinic of General Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Wolfgang Mohl
- Center for Gastroenterology Saar MVZ, Saarbruecken, Germany
| | | | | | - Axel Schweitzer
- Gastroenterology Practice at Germania-Campus, Muenster, Germany
| | - Elisabeth Schnoy
- III. Medical Clinic, University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Raja Atreya
- Medical Clinic 1, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Niels Teich
- Gastroenterology Practice Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Stefan Schreiber
- Clinic of General Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lindsay JO, Picker N, Kromer D, Smyth M, Patel H. The incidence of remission and indicators of inadequate response to advanced therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis: results from medical charts in the United Kingdom. Curr Med Res Opin 2023; 39:681-689. [PMID: 36951899 DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2023.2194782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A considerable proportion of patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC) treated with advanced therapies do not achieve remission, even after one year of treatment, and suboptimal response to advanced therapies is frequently observed in clinical practice. This study aims to analyze clinical practice data in the United Kingdom (UK) and assess the rates of clinical remission and inadequate response with advanced therapies among patients with UC. METHODS This retrospective chart review included patients with UC who initiated a new advanced therapy (i.e., adalimumab, infliximab, golimumab, tofacitinib, or vedolizumab) between January 2017 and September 2019 from eight clinics across the UK. At least 12 months of data before and after starting an advanced therapy were required. Remission was assessed using components of the Mayo score. Inadequate response was defined by therapeutic adjustment or emergency treatment. RESULTS Among 238 patients included (female: 46.6%; median age: 42.0 years; median follow-up: 28.8 months), 178 patients (74.8%) were biologic-naïve. At 12 months, 87 patients (53.9%) had achieved remission (median time to remission: 7.6 months); although 29 (33.3%) among them had required therapeutic modifications to achieve remission. At 12 months, 105 patients (44.3%) had at least one indicator of an inadequate response (median time to first indicator of inadequate response: 18.0 months). CONCLUSIONS Nearly half of patients did not achieve remission, and almost half of included patients had an inadequate response within 1 year after treatment initiation. More effective therapies are needed to effectively treat UC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James O Lindsay
- Centre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Eder P, Kłopocka M, Cichoż-Lach H, Talar-Wojnarowska R, Kopertowska-Majchrzak M, Michalak A, Filip R, Waszak K, Stawczyk-Eder K, Janiak M, Skrobot K, Liebert A, Zatorski H, Solarska-Półchłopek A, Krogulecki M, Pękała A, Poniewierka E, Smoła I, Kaczka A, Wojciechowski K, Drygała S, Zagórowicz E. Real-world outcomes of 54-week vedolizumab therapy and response durability after treatment discontinuation in ulcerative colitis: results from a multicenter prospective POLONEZ study. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2023; 16:17562848231151295. [PMID: 36818601 PMCID: PMC9932778 DOI: 10.1177/17562848231151295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/27/2022] [Indexed: 02/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Vedolizumab is a gut-selective anti-lymphocyte trafficking agent used to treat ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease. Objectives We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and durability of the therapeutic effect of vedolizumab after treatment discontinuation in a real-world cohort of patients with UC treated in Poland. Design This was a multicenter, prospective study involving patients with moderate to severely active UC from 12 centers in Poland who qualified for reimbursed treatment with vedolizumab between February and November 2019. Methods The primary endpoints were clinical response (⩾2-point improvement from baseline on partial Mayo score) and clinical remission (partial Mayo score 0-1), including steroid-free remission, at week 54. Other outcomes included response durability at 26 weeks after treatment discontinuation, identification of predictors of response and remission, and safety assessment. Results In all, 100 patients with UC were enrolled (55 biologic naïve and 45 biologic exposed). At baseline, 68% of patients were on corticosteroids and 45% on immunomodulators. Clinical response was observed in 62% of patients, clinical remission in 50%, and steroid-free remission in 42.6% at week 54. Within 26 weeks after treatment discontinuation, 37% of patients who maintained response by week 54 relapsed. The decreased number of liquid stools and rectal bleeding and endoscopic response at week 14 were predictive factors for response at week 54. Time from diagnosis ranging 2-5 years, decreased stool frequency, and non-concomitant use of corticosteroids at baseline and at week 14 were predictive factors for remission at week 54. Partial Mayo score < 3 with no subscale score > 1 at week 54 was a predictive factor for durable response after treatment discontinuation. The rate of serious adverse events related to treatment was 3.63 per 100 patient-years. Conclusion Vedolizumab is effective and safe in UC treatment in Polish patients. However, the relapse rate after the treatment cessation was high. Registration ENCePP (EUPAS34119).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piotr Eder
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dietetics, and
Internal Diseases, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, H. Święcicki
University Hospital, Poznań, Poland
| | - Maria Kłopocka
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutritional
Disorders, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in
Toruń, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Halina Cichoż-Lach
- Department of Gastroenterology, Medical
University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
| | | | | | - Agata Michalak
- Department of Gastroenterology, Medical
University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
| | - Rafał Filip
- Department of Gastroenterology with IBD Unit,
Clinical Hospital No. 2, Rzeszów, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Waszak
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dietetics, and
Internal Diseases, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, H. Święcicki
University Hospital, Poznań, Poland
| | - Kamila Stawczyk-Eder
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dietetics, and
Internal Diseases, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, H. Święcicki
University Hospital, Poznań, Poland
| | - Maria Janiak
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology,
Medical University of Gdansk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Krzysztof Skrobot
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology,
Medical University of Gdansk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Ariel Liebert
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutritional
Disorders, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in
Toruń, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Hubert Zatorski
- Department of Digestive Tract Diseases,
Medical University of Lodz, Łódź, Poland
| | - Anna Solarska-Półchłopek
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Maria
Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw,
Poland,Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and
Clinical Oncology, The Medical Center of Postgraduate Education, Warsaw,
Poland
| | - Michał Krogulecki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Military
Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Anna Pękała
- Department of Gastroenterology with IBD Unit,
Clinical Hospital No. 2, Rzeszów, Poland
| | - Elżbieta Poniewierka
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology,
Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Izabela Smoła
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology,
Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Aleksandra Kaczka
- Department of Gastroenterology, University
Clinical Hospital Military Memorial Medical Academy - Central Veterans’
Hospital, Łódź, Poland
| | | | | | - Edyta Zagórowicz
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Maria
Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw,
Poland,Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and
Clinical Oncology, The Medical Center of Postgraduate Education, Warsaw,
Poland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Attauabi M, Madsen GR, Bendtsen F, Seidelin JB, Burisch J. Vedolizumab as the first line of biologic therapy for ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease - a systematic review with meta-analysis. Dig Liver Dis 2022; 54:1168-1178. [PMID: 34903497 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2021.11.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2021] [Revised: 11/06/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The efficacy and safety of vedolizumab in bio-naïve patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) remain unknown. AIMS To perform a meta-analysis regarding vedolizumab as first line of biological therapy for UC or CD. METHODS A systematic review of Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases per December 2020 was undertaken. Meta-analysis was conducted using random-effects models. RESULTS This systematic review identified 79 eligible studies with 4,520 and 3,494 bio-naïve patients with UC and CD, respectively, and 8,105 and 11,140 bio-exposed patients. Among bio-naïve patients with UC, a total of 40.0% (95%CI 27.0-54.0, I2=86%) and 63.9% (95%CI 47.0-79.2, I2=36%) achieved clinical remission at weeks 14 and 52, respectively. The corresponding rates in CD were 54.0% (95%CI 42.0-66.0, I2=23%), and 61.7% (95%CI 55.2-68.1, I2=0%). Bio-naïvety was associated with a higher probability of clinical remission at week 52 in UC (relative risk (RR)=1.32 (95%CI 1.14-1.53)), while this was only apparent until week 26 in CD (RR=1.60 (95%CI 1.30-1.95)). Finally, bio-naïve UC patients had a lower risk of serious adverse events (RR=0.29 (95%CI 0.09-0.95)). CONCLUSION Vedolizumab was found to have a favorable efficacy and safety profile in bio-naïve patients with UC and CD. The findings have implications in the management of IBD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Attauabi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730 Denmark; Gastrounit, Medical Section, Hvidovre University Hospital, Hvidovre, Kettegaard Alle 30, 2650 Denmark; Copenhagen Center for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Children, Adolescents and Adults, University of Copenhagen, Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Kettegaard Alle 30, 2650 Denmark.
| | - Gorm Roager Madsen
- Gastrounit, Medical Section, Hvidovre University Hospital, Hvidovre, Kettegaard Alle 30, 2650 Denmark; Copenhagen Center for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Children, Adolescents and Adults, University of Copenhagen, Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Kettegaard Alle 30, 2650 Denmark
| | - Flemming Bendtsen
- Gastrounit, Medical Section, Hvidovre University Hospital, Hvidovre, Kettegaard Alle 30, 2650 Denmark; Copenhagen Center for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Children, Adolescents and Adults, University of Copenhagen, Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Kettegaard Alle 30, 2650 Denmark
| | - Jakob Benedict Seidelin
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730 Denmark
| | - Johan Burisch
- Gastrounit, Medical Section, Hvidovre University Hospital, Hvidovre, Kettegaard Alle 30, 2650 Denmark; Copenhagen Center for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Children, Adolescents and Adults, University of Copenhagen, Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Kettegaard Alle 30, 2650 Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Onali S, Pugliese D, Caprioli FA, Orlando A, Biancone L, Nardone OM, Imperatore N, Fiorino G, Cappello M, Viola A, Principi MB, Bezzio C, Aratari A, Carparelli S, Mazzuoli S, Manguso F, Grossi L, Bodini G, Ribaldone D, Mocci G, Miranda A, Minerba L, Favale A, Grova M, Scucchi L, Segato S, Fries W, Castiglione F, Armuzzi A, Fantini MC; IG-IBD. An Objective Comparison of Vedolizumab and Ustekinumab Effectiveness in Crohn's Disease Patients' Failure to TNF-Alpha Inhibitors. Am J Gastroenterol 2022; 117:1279-87. [PMID: 35467558 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2021] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The use of ustekinumab and vedolizumab as second-line therapies in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) in which tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibitors (TNFi) failed is still debated. The aim of this study was to compare, in a large multicenter observational retrospective cohort, the effectiveness of ustekinumab and vedolizumab as second-line therapies, as assessed by clinical and objective outcomes including endoscopy and gastrointestinal imaging. METHODS Clinical response, remission, and steroid-free remission at weeks 26 and 52 were evaluated in a retrospective propensity score-weighted and propensity score-matched cohort of patients in which TNFi failed. Objective response and remission were evaluated by 1 or more techniques among endoscopy, magnetic resonance/computed tomography enteroclysis, and small bowel ultrasound. RESULTS A total of 470 patients with CD (239 treated with ustekinumab and 231 treated with vedolizumab) were included in the study. At week 26, clinical outcomes were similar between the 2 groups. At week 52, clinical remission (ustekinumab 42.5% vs vedolizumab 55.5%, P = 0.01) and steroid-free remission (ustekinumab 40.6% vs vedolizumab 51.1%, P = 0.038) rates were significantly higher in vedolizumab-treated patients. Three hundred two patients (hundred thirty-five treated with ustekinumab and hundred sixty-seven treated with vedolizumab) had an objective evaluation of disease activity at baseline and week 52. At week 52, objective response and remission rates were similar between the 2 groups. Clinical response at week 26 predicted steroid-free remission at week 52 in both ustekinumab-treated and vedolizumab-treated patients. Safety profiles were similar between the 2 groups. DISCUSSION In patients with CD in which TNFi failed, both ustekinumab and vedolizumab showed similar clinical effectiveness after 26 weeks of treatment. At 1 year, vedolizumab was associated with a higher rate of clinical remission when compared with ustekinumab. However, no difference was observed between the 2 groups when objective outcomes were investigated at this time point.
Collapse
|
12
|
Bamias G, Kokkotis G, Gizis M, Kapizioni C, Karmiris K, Koureta E, Kyriakos N, Leonidakis G, Makris K, Markopoulos P, Michalopoulos G, Michopoulos S, Papaconstantinou I, Polymeros D, Siakavellas SI, Triantafyllou K, Tsironi E, Tsoukali E, Tzouvala M, Viazis N, Xourafas V, Zacharopoulou E, Zampeli E, Zografos K, Papatheodoridis G, Mantzaris G. Predictors of Response to Vedolizumab in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: Results from the Greek VEDO-IBD Cohort. Dig Dis Sci 2022; 67:1007-1017. [PMID: 33751325 PMCID: PMC7942521 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-021-06907-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Optimization of treatment with biologics is currently an unmet need for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Real-world studies provide neutral estimates of drug efficacy and safety within unselected patient populations and allow for the recognition of specific characteristics that affect response to therapy. AIMS We aimed to depict the efficacy of vedolizumab in patients with UC in a real-world setting and identify prognosticators of improved outcomes. METHODS Patients with active UC who commenced treatment with vedolizumab were prospectively followed up. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and clinical/endoscopic-reported outcomes were recorded at baseline and at weeks 14 and 54. Predefined endpoints of early and persistent efficacy were analyzed against clinical characteristics to identify prognostic factors for response. RESULTS We included 96 patients (anti-TNF-exposed = 38.5%). At week 14, 73 patients (76%) had clinical response and 54 (56.3%) clinical remission. At week 54, the primary endpoint of vedolizumab persistence was met by 72 patients (75%), whereas steroid-free clinical remission by 59.4%. Among patients who had endoscopy, rates for mucosal healing (Mayo endoscopic score of 0) were 29.8% at week 14 and 44.6% at week 54, respectively. Vedolizumab treatment led to significant improvements in quality of life. Corticosteroid-refractory or anti-TNF-refractory disease, articular manifestations, and high baseline UC-PRO2 were associated with decreased efficacy of vedolizumab in the primary and secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Vedolizumab is characterized by high efficacy and long-term treatment persistence in UC. More aggressive disease, as indicated by refractoriness to steroids or anti-TNFs and elevated baseline PROs, may predict suboptimal response and help pre-treatment prognostic stratification of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgos Bamias
- GI Unit, 3Rd Department of Internal Medicine, Sotiria General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Messogeion 152, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Georgios Kokkotis
- GI Unit, 3Rd Department of Internal Medicine, Sotiria General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Messogeion 152, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Michalis Gizis
- GI Unit, 3Rd Department of Internal Medicine, Sotiria General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Messogeion 152, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Christina Kapizioni
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tzaneion General Hospital, Leoforos Afentouli, 18536 Piraeus, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Karmiris
- Department of Gastroenterology, Venizeleio General Hospital, Leoforos Knosou 44, 71409 Heraklion, Greece
| | - Evgenia Koureta
- Department of Gastroenterology, Laiko General Hospital, Medical School of National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Agiou Thoma 17, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Kyriakos
- Department of Gastroenterology, 401 General Military Hospital of Athens, Leoforos Panagioti Kanellopoulou, 11525 Athens, Greece
| | - Georgios Leonidakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Alexandra General Hospital, Lourou 4-2, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Makris
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tzaneion General Hospital, Leoforos Afentouli, 18536 Piraeus, Greece
| | - Panagiotis Markopoulos
- Department of Gastroenterology, Metaxa Memorial General Hospital, Mpotasi 51, 18537 Piraeus, Greece
| | - Georgios Michalopoulos
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tzaneion General Hospital, Leoforos Afentouli, 18536 Piraeus, Greece
| | - Spyridon Michopoulos
- Department of Gastroenterology, Alexandra General Hospital, Lourou 4-2, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Ioannis Papaconstantinou
- Second Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Aretaieion University Hospital, Leoforos Vasilissis Sofias 76, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Polymeros
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University General Hospital, Rimini 1, 12462 Athens, Greece
| | - Spyros I. Siakavellas
- Department of Gastroenterology, Laiko General Hospital, Medical School of National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Agiou Thoma 17, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University General Hospital, Rimini 1, 12462 Athens, Greece
| | - Eftychia Tsironi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Metaxa Memorial General Hospital, Mpotasi 51, 18537 Piraeus, Greece
| | - Emmanouela Tsoukali
- Department of Gastroenterology, GHA Evaggelismos- Opthalmiatreion Athinon-Polykliniki, Ipsilantou 45-47, 10676 Athens, Greece
| | - Maria Tzouvala
- Department of Gastroenterology, General Hospital Nikaias-Piraeus “Agios Panteleimon” -General Hospital Dytikis Attikis “Agia Varvara”, Dim. Mantouvalou 3, 18454 Athens, Greece
| | - Nikos Viazis
- Department of Gastroenterology, GHA Evaggelismos- Opthalmiatreion Athinon-Polykliniki, Ipsilantou 45-47, 10676 Athens, Greece
| | - Vassileios Xourafas
- GI Unit, 3Rd Department of Internal Medicine, Sotiria General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Messogeion 152, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Eirini Zacharopoulou
- Department of Gastroenterology, General Hospital Nikaias-Piraeus “Agios Panteleimon” -General Hospital Dytikis Attikis “Agia Varvara”, Dim. Mantouvalou 3, 18454 Athens, Greece
| | - Evanthia Zampeli
- Department of Gastroenterology, Alexandra General Hospital, Lourou 4-2, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Zografos
- GI Unit, 3Rd Department of Internal Medicine, Sotiria General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Messogeion 152, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - George Papatheodoridis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Laiko General Hospital, Medical School of National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Agiou Thoma 17, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Gerasimos Mantzaris
- Department of Gastroenterology, GHA Evaggelismos- Opthalmiatreion Athinon-Polykliniki, Ipsilantou 45-47, 10676 Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Attauabi M, Vind I, Pedersen G, Bendtsen F, Seidelin JB, Burisch J. Short and long-term effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab in treatment-refractory patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease - a real-world two-center cohort study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 33:e709-18. [PMID: 34101681 DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000002229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Real-world data about sustained clinical remission (SCR) and treatment optimization with vedolizumab for ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) are scarce. We aimed to investigate the short and long-term effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab in a real-world cohort in Denmark. METHODS A retrospective two-center cohort study was conducted between November 2014 and November 2019 with the primary outcomes of clinical remission (CR) at weeks 14, 30, 52 and 104 and SCR defined as CR at week 14 through week 52. RESULTS The study included 182 patients (UC: 97, CD: 85), all previously exposed to at least one biological therapy. Rates of CR at weeks 14, 30, 52 and 104 were 36.6, 35.1, 34.0 and 27.8%, respectively, in UC, and 31.7, 30.1, 26.5 and 22.4% in CD. SCR was achieved in 19.6 and 20.0%, respectively. In UC and CD, optional dosing of vedolizumab at week 10 (odds ratio [OR] = 0.23 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03-1.17), and OR = 0.68 (95% CI, 0.22-2.04)), as well as increase of frequency (OR = .26 (95% CI, 0.01-2.86), and OR = 0.19 (95% CI, 0.01-1.45)), were not associated with CR at week 52. Furthermore, combination treatment with azathioprine was not associated with long-term outcomes. However, dose intensification of vedolizumab successfully restored CR in 65.2 and 57.1% of patients with UC and CD experiencing loss of response. CONCLUSIONS Vedolizumab is effective in achieving and restoring short and long-term CR and SCR in patients with treatment-refractory UC and CD. This study emphasizes that supplementary dosing at week 10, and simultaneous treatment with azathioprine, did not improve long-term outcomes.
Collapse
|
14
|
Olivera PA, Zuily S, Kotze PG, Regnault V, Al Awadhi S, Bossuyt P, Gearry RB, Ghosh S, Kobayashi T, Lacolley P, Louis E, Magro F, Ng SC, Papa A, Raine T, Teixeira FV, Rubin DT, Danese S, Peyrin-Biroulet L. International consensus on the prevention of venous and arterial thrombotic events in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 18:857-873. [PMID: 34453143 PMCID: PMC8395387 DOI: 10.1038/s41575-021-00492-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk of thrombotic events. Therapies for IBD have the potential to modulate this risk. The aims of this Evidence-Based Guideline were to summarize available evidence and to provide practical recommendations regarding epidemiological aspects, prevention and drug-related risks of venous and arterial thrombotic events in patients with IBD. A virtual meeting took place in May 2020 involving 14 international IBD experts and 3 thrombosis experts from 12 countries. Proposed statements were voted upon in an anonymous manner. Agreement was defined as at least 75% of participants voting as 'fully agree' or 'mostly agree' with each statement. For each statement, the level of evidence was graded according to the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) grading system. Consensus was reached for 19 statements. Patients with IBD harbour an increased risk of venous and arterial thrombotic events. Thromboprophylaxis is indicated during hospitalization of any cause in patients with IBD. Disease activity is a modifiable risk factor in patients with IBD, and physicians should aim to achieve deep remission to reduce the risk. Exposure to steroids should be limited. Antitumour necrosis factor agents might be associated with a reduced risk of thrombotic events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pablo A Olivera
- Gastroenterology Section, Department of Internal Medicine, Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciones Clínicas (CEMIC), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Stephane Zuily
- Vascular Medicine Division and Regional Competence Center for Rare Vascular and Systemic Autoimmune Diseases, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Nancy, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
- University of Lorraine, INSERM, DCAC, Nancy, France
| | - Paulo G Kotze
- IBD outpatient clinics, Colorectal Surgery Unit, Catholic University of Paraná (PUCPR), Curitiba, Brazil
| | | | - Sameer Al Awadhi
- Gastroenterology Division, Rashid Hospital, Dubai Health Authority, Dubai, UAE
| | - Peter Bossuyt
- Imelda GI Clinical Research Center, Imelda General Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium
| | - Richard B Gearry
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Subrata Ghosh
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Taku Kobayashi
- Center for Advanced IBD Research and Treatment, Kitasato University, Kitasato Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Edouard Louis
- Department of Gastroenterology, CHU Liège University Hospital, Liège, Belgium
| | - Fernando Magro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto, Portugal
| | - Siew C Ng
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Institute of Digestive Disease, LKS Institute of Health Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Alfredo Papa
- Division of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Catholic University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Tim Raine
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - David T Rubin
- University of Chicago Medicine, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Silvio Danese
- IBD Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
- Department of Gastroenterology and INSERM NGERE U1256, University Hospital of Nancy, University of Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Attauabi M, Höglund C, Fassov J, Pedersen KB, Hansen HB, Wildt S, Jensen MD, Neumann A, Lind C, Jacobsen HA, Popa AM, Kjeldsen J, Pedersen N, Molazahi A, Haderslev K, Aalykke C, Knudsen T, Cebula W, Munkholm P, Bendtsen F, Seidelin JB, Burisch J. Vedolizumab as first-line biological therapy in elderly patients and those with contraindications for anti-TNF therapy: a real-world, nationwide cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. Scand J Gastroenterol 2021; 56:1040-1048. [PMID: 34224299 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2021.1946588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data from real-life populations about vedolizumab as first-line biological therapy for ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) are emerging. OBJECTIVE To investigate the efficacy and safety of vedolizumab in bio-naïve patients with UC and CD. METHODS A Danish nationwide cohort study was conducted between November 2014 and November 2019. Primary outcomes were clinical remission, steroid-free clinical remission, and sustained clinical remission from weeks 14 through 52. RESULTS The study included 56 patients (UC:31, CD:25) who initiated treatment with vedolizumab mainly because of contraindications to anti-TNFs, of whom 54.8 and 24.0%, respectively received systemic steroids at the initiation. Rates of clinical remission at weeks 6, 14, and 52 were 32.0, 48.0, and 40.0%, respectively, in UC, and 36.8, 36.8, and 47.4% in CD. Steroid-free clinical remission at week 52 was achieved among 36.0 and 47.4% of UC and CD patients, while sustained clinical remission was achieved in 32.0 and 36.8%. Lack of remission was associated with being female (68.8 vs. 11.1%, p = .01) in UC and non-structuring, non-penetrating behavior in CD (90.0 vs. 44.4%, p = .03); however, this was not confirmed in multivariate analysis. Discontinuation due to primary non-response occurred in 20.0 and 5.3% of UC and CD patients, respectively, while rates of secondary loss of response were 12.0 and 5.3% after 52 weeks of follow-up. Vedolizumab was well-tolerated as only one UC patient experienced a serious adverse event. CONCLUSION Vedolizumab is effective in the achievement of short-term, long-term, and steroid-free clinical remission in bio-naïve UC and CD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Attauabi
- Gastrounit, Medical Division, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.,Copenhagen Center for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Children, Adolescents and Adults, University of Copenhagen, Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Camilla Höglund
- Department of Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology, OUH Svendborg Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Janne Fassov
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Kenneth Bo Pedersen
- Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Hospital of South West Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark
| | - Heidi Bansholm Hansen
- Department of Gastroenterology, North Zealand University Hospital, Frederikssund, Denmark
| | - Signe Wildt
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Zealand University Hospital, Koege, Denmark
| | - Michael Dam Jensen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology, Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Anders Neumann
- Department of Internal Medicine, Regional Hospital Viborg, Viborg, Denmark
| | - Cecilie Lind
- Department of Internal Medicine, Regional Hospital Viborg, Viborg, Denmark
| | - Henrik Albaek Jacobsen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Ana-Maria Popa
- Department of Medicine, Nykoebing Falster Hospital, Nykoebing Falster, Denmark
| | - Jens Kjeldsen
- Department of Medical Gastroenterology, OUH Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Natalia Pedersen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Slagelse Hospital, Slagelse, Denmark
| | - Akbar Molazahi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Holbaek Hospital, Holbaek, Denmark
| | - Kent Haderslev
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Claus Aalykke
- Department of Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology, OUH Svendborg Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Torben Knudsen
- Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Hospital of South West Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark
| | - Wojciech Cebula
- Department of Medicine, Nykoebing Falster Hospital, Nykoebing Falster, Denmark
| | - Pia Munkholm
- Department of Gastroenterology, North Zealand University Hospital, Frederikssund, Denmark
| | - Flemming Bendtsen
- Gastrounit, Medical Division, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.,Copenhagen Center for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Children, Adolescents and Adults, University of Copenhagen, Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Jakob Benedict Seidelin
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Johan Burisch
- Gastrounit, Medical Division, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.,Copenhagen Center for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Children, Adolescents and Adults, University of Copenhagen, Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Cichoż-Lach H, Michalak A, Kopertowska-Majchrzak M, Eder P, Stawczyk-Eder K, Waszak K, Talar-Wojnarowska R, Zatorski H, Solarska-Półchłopek A, Chmielnicki J, Filip R, Pękala A, Janiak M, Skrobot K, Kasińska E, Krogulecki M, Królikowski P, Kłopocka M, Liebert A, Poniewierka E, Smoła I, Gąsiorowska A, Kaczka A, Wypych J, Wojciechowski K, Drygała S, Zagórowicz E. Characteristics of patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis treated with vedolizumab: results from a Polish multicenter, prospective, observational real-life study (the POLONEZ study). Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2021; 14:17562848211036456. [PMID: 34484422 PMCID: PMC8411627 DOI: 10.1177/17562848211036456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vedolizumab, a humanized antibody targeting the α4β7 integrin, was proven to be effective in the treatment of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC) in randomized clinical trials. The aim of the POLONEZ study is to determine the demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients with UC treated with vedolizumab within the scope of the National Drug Program in Poland and to assess the real-world effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab in the study population. Here we report the demographic and clinical characteristics of these patients. METHODS This prospective study included adult patients eligible for UC treatment with vedolizumab who were recruited from 12 centers in Poland between February and November 2019. Collected data included sex, age, disease duration, presence of extraintestinal manifestations or comorbidities, status of previous biologic treatment, and current concomitant treatment. Disease extent was determined according to the Montreal classification, and disease activity was measured with the Mayo Score. RESULTS A total of 100 (55 biologic-naïve and 45 biologic-exposed) patients were enrolled in the study (51% female, median age 35 years). Among biologic-exposed patients (mostly infliximab-treated), 57% had failed to respond to the therapy. The disease duration was significantly shorter in biologic-naïve (median 5 years) than in biologic-exposed (8 years, p = 0.004) or biofailure patients (7 years, p = 0.04). In the overall population the median Total Mayo Score was 10. Disease extent and activity were similar between the subgroups. CONCLUSIONS Our study indicates that patients treated with vedolizumab in Poland receive the drug relatively early after UC diagnosis, but their disease is advanced. More than half of the patients had not been treated with biologic drugs before initiating vedolizumab. The study was registered in ENCePP database (EUPAS34119). LAY SUMMARY Characteristics of patients treated for ulcerative colitis with vedolizumab in Poland Treatment of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC) with the integrin antagonist vedolizumab became available within the Polish National Drug Program (NDP) in 2018. In this study, for the first time, we provide detailed demographic and clinical characteristics of 100 patients (median age 35 years, 51% female) treated with vedolizumab in Poland, of whom 55 were biologic-naïve and 45 biologic-exposed. The median duration of disease was 6 years. The disease duration was shorter in biologic-naïve than in biologic-exposed patients. Most patients were affected by extensive colitis (52%) or left-sided colitis (42%). Median disease activity was 10 according to the Total Mayo Score. Sixty-eight patients received concomitant systemic corticosteroids and 45 patients received immunomodulators. Our findings indicate that Polish patients receiving vedolizumab have a high disease activity and are treated relatively early after UC diagnosis. This might be due to the criteria for inclusion of a patient in the NDP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Halina Cichoż-Lach
- Department of Gastroenterology, Medical
University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
| | - Agata Michalak
- Department of Gastroenterology, Medical
University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
| | | | - Piotr Eder
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dietetics, and
Internal Diseases, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, H. Święcicki
University Hospital, Poznaņ, Poland
| | - Kamila Stawczyk-Eder
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dietetics, and
Internal Diseases, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, H. Święcicki
University Hospital, Poznaņ, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Waszak
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dietetics, and
Internal Diseases, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, H. Święcicki
University Hospital, Poznaņ, Poland
| | | | - Hubert Zatorski
- Department of Digestive Tract Diseases, Medical
University of Lodz, Łódź, Poland
| | - Anna Solarska-Półchłopek
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Maria
Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw,
Poland,Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and
Clinical Oncology, The Medical Center of Postgraduate Education, Warsaw,
Poland
| | | | - Rafał Filip
- Department of Gastroenterology with IBD Unit,
Clinical Hospital No. 2, Rzeszów, Poland
| | - Anna Pękala
- Department of Gastroenterology with IBD Unit,
Clinical Hospital No. 2, Rzeszów, Poland
| | - Maria Janiak
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology,
Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Krzysztof Skrobot
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology,
Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Ewa Kasińska
- Department of Gastroenterology, Military
Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Michał Krogulecki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Military
Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Piotr Królikowski
- Department of Gastroenterology, Military
Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Maria Kłopocka
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutritional
Disorders, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in
Toruń, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Ariel Liebert
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutritional
Disorders, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in
Toruń, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Elżbieta Poniewierka
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology,
Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Izabela Smoła
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology,
Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Anita Gąsiorowska
- Department of Gastroenterology, University
Clinical Hospital Military Memorial Medical Academy—Central Veterans’
Hospital, Łódź, Poland
| | - Aleksandra Kaczka
- Department of Gastroenterology, University
Clinical Hospital Military Memorial Medical Academy—Central Veterans’
Hospital, Łódź, Poland
| | - Joanna Wypych
- Department of Gastroenterology, Surgery and
Nutrition, Copernicus Hospital, Gdańsk, Poland
| | | | | | - Edyta Zagórowicz
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Maria
Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw,
Poland,Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and
Clinical Oncology, The Medical Center of Postgraduate Education, Warsaw,
Poland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Plevris N, Fulforth J, Siakavellas S, Robertson A, Hall R, Tyler A, Jenkinson PW, Campbell I, Chuah CS, Kane C, Veryan J, Lam WL, Saunders J, Kelly C, Gaya D, Jafferbhoy H, Macdonald JC, Seenan JP, Mowat C, Naismith G, Potts LF, Sutherland DI, Watts D, Arnott I, Bain G, Jones G, Lees CW. Real-world effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab for the treatment of Crohn's disease: the Scottish ustekinumab cohort. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 36:2067-2075. [PMID: 33381875 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.15390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2020] [Revised: 12/06/2020] [Accepted: 12/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Ustekinumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets interleukin-12/23. In Scotland, it was approved for the treatment of moderate to severe Crohn's disease in 2017. The objective of this study was to establish the real-world effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in the treatment of Crohn's disease. METHODS We conducted a retrospective study of patients receiving ustekinumab across eight Scottish National Health Service health boards between 2017 and 2019. Inclusion criteria included a diagnosis of Crohn's disease with symptoms attributed to active disease plus objective signs of inflammation at baseline (C-reactive protein ≥ 5 mg/L or fecal calprotectin ≥ 250 μg/g or inflammation on endoscopy/magnetic resonance imaging) and completion of induction plus at least one clinical follow-up at 8 weeks. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to establish 12-month cumulative rates of clinical remission, mucosal healing, deep remission, and perianal fistula response. Rates of serious adverse events were described quantitatively. RESULTS Our cohort consisted of 216 patients (female sex, 37.9%; median age, 39.0 years, interquartile range [IQR] 28.8-51.8 years; disease duration, 9.9 years, IQR 6.0-16.5 years; prior biologic, 98.6%) with a median follow-up of 35.0 weeks (IQR 17.4-52.0 weeks). Twelve-month cumulative rates of clinical remission, mucosal healing, and deep remission (clinical remission plus mucosal healing) were 32.0%, 32.7%, and 19.3%, respectively. In patients with active perianal disease (n = 37), the 12-month cumulative perianal response rate was 53.1%. The serious adverse event rate was 13.6 per 100 patient-years of follow-up. CONCLUSION Ustekinumab is a safe and effective treatment for the treatment of complex Crohn's disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolas Plevris
- The Edinburgh IBD Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - James Fulforth
- The Edinburgh IBD Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Andrew Robertson
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Hairmyres, East Kilbride, UK
| | - Rebecca Hall
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, UK
| | - Amy Tyler
- Department of Gastroenterology, Raigmore Hospital, Inverness, UK
| | | | - Iona Campbell
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Paisley, UK
| | - Cher Shiong Chuah
- The Edinburgh IBD Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.,Department of Gastroenterology, Victoria Hospital, Kirkcaldy, UK
| | - Claire Kane
- Department of Gastroenterology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Jennifer Veryan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
| | - Wai Liam Lam
- Department of Gastroenterology, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
| | - Jayne Saunders
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Hairmyres, East Kilbride, UK
| | - Christopher Kelly
- Department of Gastroenterology, Forth Valley Royal Hospital, Larbert, UK
| | - Daniel Gaya
- Department of Gastroenterology, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Jonathan C Macdonald
- Department of Gastroenterology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - John Paul Seenan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - Craig Mowat
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, UK
| | - Graham Naismith
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Paisley, UK
| | - Lindsay F Potts
- Department of Gastroenterology, Raigmore Hospital, Inverness, UK
| | | | - David Watts
- Department of Gastroenterology, Forth Valley Royal Hospital, Larbert, UK
| | - Ian Arnott
- The Edinburgh IBD Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Gillian Bain
- Department of Gastroenterology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Gareth Jones
- The Edinburgh IBD Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Charlie W Lees
- The Edinburgh IBD Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.,Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gagnon AL, Beauchesne W, Tessier L, David C, Berbiche D, Lavoie A, Michaud-Herbst A, Tremblay K. Adalimumab, Infliximab, and Vedolizumab in Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis: A Long-Term Retrospective Study in a Tertiary Referral Center. Crohns Colitis 360 2021; 3:otab049. [PMID: 36777273 PMCID: PMC9802068 DOI: 10.1093/crocol/otab049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Biological therapies have changed the landscape of pharmacological management of ulcerative colitis (UC). However, a large proportion of patients do not respond to biologics, lose their response over time, or present adverse drug events. This study aims to assess therapeutic response and treatment persistence to adalimumab, infliximab, and vedolizumab, 3 agents widely used in a tertiary referral center of Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean (Quebec, Canada). Methods We conducted a retrospective population-based study with a thorough review of patients' medical charts. Adults at UC diagnosis, with current or past use of adalimumab, infliximab, or vedolizumab, were included in the study. Clinical data were collected in order to assess response phenotypes and persistence to treatment. Kaplan-Meier curves were performed to assess treatment persistence, and predictors for discontinuation were assessed using Cox regression analyses. Results A total of 134 patients were included in this study. For the cases exposed to adalimumab, infliximab, and vedolizumab, 56.9%, 62.5%, and 47.5% were responders, respectively. Mean persistence rates (95% CI) were 5.5 (4.3-6.6), 10.1 (8.7-11.5), and 3.6 (2.9-4.2) years for adalimumab, infliximab, and vedolizumab, respectively. Increased persistence rates were observed in biologic-naïve patients treated with infliximab in comparison to those with the previous exposition to 2 biologics, but no such effect was observed for adalimumab or vedolizumab. Overall, 61.9% of cases had adverse drug events and of these, 6 led to treatment discontinuation. Conclusion This study presents long-term treatment persistence data with adalimumab, infliximab, and vedolizumab, showing that more than half of cases treated with these biologics remained on treatment at least 24 months after initiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann-Lorie Gagnon
- Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Saguenay–Lac-Saint-Jean (Chicoutimi University Hospital), Research Centre, Saguenay, Quebec, Canada
| | - William Beauchesne
- Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Saguenay–Lac-Saint-Jean (Chicoutimi University Hospital), Research Centre, Saguenay, Quebec, Canada,Parmacology–Physiology Department, Université de Sherbrooke, Saguenay, Quebec, Canada
| | - Laurence Tessier
- Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Saguenay–Lac-Saint-Jean (Chicoutimi University Hospital), Research Centre, Saguenay, Quebec, Canada
| | - Charles David
- Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Saguenay–Lac-Saint-Jean (Chicoutimi University Hospital), Research Centre, Saguenay, Quebec, Canada
| | - Djamal Berbiche
- Centre de Recherche Charles-Le Moyne-Saguenay–Lac-Saint-Jean Sur Les Innovations en Santé (CR-CSIS), Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Quebec, Canada
| | - Alexandre Lavoie
- Pharmacy Department, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Saguenay–Lac-Saint-Jean (Chicoutimi University Hospital), Saguenay, Quebec, Canada
| | - Alban Michaud-Herbst
- Gastroenterology Department, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Saguenay–Lac-Saint-Jean (Chicoutimi University Hospital), Saguenay, Quebec, Canada
| | - Karine Tremblay
- Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Saguenay–Lac-Saint-Jean (Chicoutimi University Hospital), Research Centre, Saguenay, Quebec, Canada,Parmacology–Physiology Department, Université de Sherbrooke, Saguenay, Quebec, Canada,Address correspondence to: Karine Tremblay, PhD, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Saguenay–Lac-Saint-Jean, 225, St-Vallier Street, Pavillon des Augustines, Saguenay, QC G7H 7P2, Canada ()
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Eriksson C, Rundquist S, Lykiardopoulos V, Udumyan R, Karlén P, Grip O, Söderman C, Almer S, Hertervig E, Marsal J, Gunnarsson J, Malmgren C, Delin J, Strid H, Sjöberg M, Öberg D, Bergemalm D, Hjortswang H, Halfvarson J. Real-world effectiveness of vedolizumab in inflammatory bowel disease: week 52 results from the Swedish prospective multicentre SVEAH study. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2021; 14:17562848211023386. [PMID: 34276808 PMCID: PMC8255566 DOI: 10.1177/17562848211023386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prospectively and systematically collected real-world data on vedolizumab are scarce. We aimed to assess the long-term clinical effectiveness of vedolizumab in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS This study was a prospective, observational, multicentre study. Overall, 286 patients with active IBD were included (Crohn's disease, n = 169; ulcerative colitis, n = 117). The primary outcomes were clinical response at week 12 and clinical remission at week 52, based on the Harvey Bradshaw Index and the partial Mayo Clinic score. Secondary outcomes included clinical remission at week 12, clinical response at week 52, corticosteroid-free clinical remission at week 52, changes in biochemical measures, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). RESULTS At baseline, 88% of the patients were exposed to anti-TNF and 41% of the patients with Crohn's disease had undergone ⩾1 surgical resection. At week 12, clinical response was 27% and remission 47% in Crohn's disease; corresponding figures in ulcerative colitis were 52% and 34%. Clinical response, remission and corticosteroid-free remission at week 52 were 22%, 41% and 40% in Crohn's disease and 49%, 47% and 46% in ulcerative colitis, respectively. A statistically significant decrease in median faecal-calprotectin and C-reactive protein was observed at 12 and 52 weeks in patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. The HRQoL measures Short Health Scale and EuroQol 5-Dimensions improved in both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis patients (p < 0.001). Clinical disease activity at baseline was inversely associated with clinical remission at week 52. CONCLUSION Vedolizumab proved effective for the treatment of refractory IBD in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Vyron Lykiardopoulos
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Ruzan Udumyan
- Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Per Karlén
- Department of Internal Medicine, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Olof Grip
- Department of Gastroenterology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | | | - Sven Almer
- Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden,IBD-Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Erik Hertervig
- Department of Gastroenterology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Jan Marsal
- Department of Gastroenterology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Jenny Gunnarsson
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kungälv Hospital, Kungälv, Sweden
| | | | - Jenny Delin
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ersta Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Hans Strid
- Department of Internal Medicine, Södra Älvsborgs Hospital, Borås, Sweden
| | - Mats Sjöberg
- Department of Internal Medicine, Skaraborgs Hospital, Lidköping, Sweden
| | - David Öberg
- Department of Internal Medicine, Sunderby Hospital, Sunderbyn, Sweden
| | - Daniel Bergemalm
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Henrik Hjortswang
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden,Department of Health, Medicine, and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Jonas Halfvarson
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Marafini I, Troncone E, Rocchetti I, Monteleone G. Respiratory Tract Infections in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients Taking Vedolizumab: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Front Pharmacol 2021; 11:585732. [PMID: 33551798 PMCID: PMC7862105 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.585732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has raised concerns about the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) and patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) taking immunosuppressants or biologics. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the risk of respiratory infections in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with vedolizumab. We searched PubMed, EMBASE and Scopus to identify randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing vedolizumab to placebo in patients with IBD. Outcomes were the rate of respiratory tract infections (RTI), upper respiratory tract infections (URTI) and lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) among patients receiving vedolizumab as compared with placebo. Pooled rates were reported as Odds Ratios (OR) with 95% Confidence Interval (CI). Eight RCT involving 3,287 patients (1873 CD and 1415 UC) were analyzed; 2,493 patients received vedolizumab and 794 received placebo. The rates of RTI and URTI were statistically higher in vedolizumab-treated patients compared to placebo [OR = 1.63; 95% CI (1.07–2.49); OR = 1.64 95% CI (1.07–2.53) respectively]. UC patients, but not CD patients, receiving vedolizumab had a higher risk to develop RTI and URTI [OR = 1.98; 95% CI (1.41–2.77); OR = 2.02; 95% CI (1.42–2.87)] compared to placebo-treated patients. The number of LRTI was small in both treatment groups. Data confirm the good safety profile of vedolizumab even though RTI were more frequent in patients receiving vedolizumab and the risk of URTIs was significantly higher in patients with UC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Marafini
- Chair of Gastroenterology, Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Edoardo Troncone
- Chair of Gastroenterology, Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Irene Rocchetti
- Statistical Office, Superior Council of Judiciary, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Monteleone
- Chair of Gastroenterology, Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Pauwels RWM, de Vries AC, van der Woude CJ. Fecal calprotectin is a reliable marker of endoscopic response to vedolizumab therapy: A simple algorithm for clinical practice. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 35:1893-1901. [PMID: 32291796 PMCID: PMC7687080 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.15063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2019] [Revised: 02/18/2020] [Accepted: 03/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM The association of fecal calprotectin (FC) and endoscopic response in inflammatory bowel disease patients during vedolizumab (VDZ) treatment is largely unknown. The aim of this study is to assess the diagnostic value of FC to predict endoscopic response. METHODS Patients with active endoscopic disease at baseline were included. Endoscopies and FC tests were performed at baseline and week 16. Patients with a confirmed endoscopic response at week 16 continued VDZ maintenance therapy, and endoscopy and FC tests were performed at week 52. Endoscopic response was defined as endoscopic Mayo score reduction of ≥ 1, SES-CD of ≥ 50%, or Rutgeerts' score of ≥ 1. Correlations were assessed using Spearman and receiver operating characteristic statistics. RESULTS A total of 114 patients, 46 ulcerative colitis and 68 Crohn's disease patients (44 men, median age 40 years), were included after the start of VDZ; 85% was anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha refractory. Endoscopic response was observed in 60 (53%) patients at week 16; the response sustained in 73% at week 52. FC decreased significantly from 819 at baseline to 154 μg/g at week 16. FC at weeks 16 and 52 were significantly correlated to (sustained) endoscopic response (r = -0.62 / r = -0.67, P < 0.001). FC < 200 μg/g indicates endoscopic response (area under the curve = 0.89, positive predictive value = 94%), whereas FC > 450 μg/g indicates endoscopic non-response after induction (negative predictive value = 83%). An increase in FC level of > 400 μg/g after induction indicates endoscopic loss of response (area under the curve = 0.97, negative predictive value = 96%). CONCLUSION This prospective study demonstrates a significant correlation between FC and endoscopic response to VDZ. FC < 200 μg/g prognosticate endoscopic response, and FC > 450 μg/g endoscopic non-response. An increase in FC of > 400 μg/g after induction indicates endoscopic loss of response. This simple FC algorithm may guide clinical decisions on the continuation and optimization of VDZ in inflammatory bowel disease patients.
Collapse
|
22
|
van Rheenen PF, Aloi M, Assa A, Bronsky J, Escher JC, Fagerberg UL, Gasparetto M, Gerasimidis K, Griffiths A, Henderson P, Koletzko S, Kolho KL, Levine A, van Limbergen J, Martin de Carpi FJ, Navas-López VM, Oliva S, de Ridder L, Russell RK, Shouval D, Spinelli A, Turner D, Wilson D, Wine E, Ruemmele FM. The Medical Management of Paediatric Crohn's Disease: an ECCO-ESPGHAN Guideline Update. J Crohns Colitis 2020; 15:jjaa161. [PMID: 33026087 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaa161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 205] [Impact Index Per Article: 51.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aimed to provide an evidence-supported update of the ECCO-ESPGHAN guideline on the medical management of paediatric Crohn's disease [CD]. METHODS We formed 10 working groups and formulated 17 PICO-structured clinical questions [Patients, Intervention, Comparator, and Outcome]. A systematic literature search from January 1, 1991 to March 19, 2019 was conducted by a medical librarian using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central databases. A shortlist of 30 provisional statements were further refined during a consensus meeting in Barcelona in October 2019 and subjected to a vote. In total 22 statements reached ≥ 80% agreement and were retained. RESULTS We established that it was key to identify patients at high risk of a complicated disease course at the earliest opportunity, to reduce bowel damage. Patients with perianal disease, stricturing or penetrating behaviour, or severe growth retardation should be considered for up-front anti-tumour necrosis factor [TNF] agents in combination with an immunomodulator. Therapeutic drug monitoring to guide treatment changes is recommended over empirically escalating anti-TNF dose or switching therapies. Patients with low-risk luminal CD should be induced with exclusive enteral nutrition [EEN], or with corticosteroids when EEN is not an option, and require immunomodulator-based maintenance therapy. Favourable outcomes rely on close monitoring of treatment response, with timely adjustments in therapy when treatment targets are not met. Serial faecal calprotectin measurements or small bowel imaging [ultrasound or magnetic resonance enterography] are more reliable markers of treatment response than clinical scores alone. CONCLUSIONS We present state-of-the-art guidance on the medical treatment and long-term management of children and adolescents with CD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick F van Rheenen
- Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Beatrix Children's Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marina Aloi
- Pediatric Gastroenterology and Liver Unit, Maternal and Child Health Department, Sapienza - University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Amit Assa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nutrition and Liver Diseases, Schneider Children's Medical Center, Petach Tikvah, Affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel
| | - Jiri Bronsky
- Paediatric Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Paediatrics, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Johanna C Escher
- Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ulrika L Fagerberg
- Department of Pediatrics/Centre for Clinical Research, Västmanland Hospital, Västeras and Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Marco Gasparetto
- Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Barts Health Trust, The Royal London Children's Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Anne Griffiths
- Department of Paediatrics, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Paul Henderson
- Child Life and Health, University Of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Sibylle Koletzko
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Pediatrics, Gastroenterology and Nutrition, School of Medicine Collegium Medicum University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland
| | - Kaija-Leena Kolho
- Department of Paediatrics, Children´s Hospital, University of Helsinki and Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Arie Levine
- Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition Unit, Wolfson Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Israel
| | - Johan van Limbergen
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Amsterdam UMC - location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Víctor Manuel Navas-López
- Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition Unit, IBIMA, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Málaga, Spain
| | - Salvatore Oliva
- Pediatric Gastroenterology and Liver Unit, Maternal and Child Health Department, Sapienza - University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Lissy de Ridder
- Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Richard K Russell
- Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Dror Shouval
- Pediatric Gastroenterology Unit, Edmond and Lily Safra Children's Hospital, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Antonino Spinelli
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano Milano, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Dan Turner
- Paediatric Gastroenterology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
| | - David Wilson
- Child Life and Health, University Of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Eytan Wine
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Edmonton Pediatric IBD Clinic (EPIC), Departments of Pediatrics & Physiology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Frank M Ruemmele
- Assistance Publique- Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, Pediatric Gastroenterology, Paris, France
- Faculté de Médecine, Université Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Aardoom MA, Jongsma MME, de Vries A, Wolthoorn J, de Ridder L, Escher JC. Vedolizumab Trough Levels in Children With Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Refractory Inflammatory Bowel Disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2020; 71:501-7. [PMID: 32639455 DOI: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000002833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) can be successfully treated with vedolizumab. Studies in adult IBD patients have shown that differences in response to vedolizumab may be related to variability in vedolizumab trough levels, but in children with pediatric-onset IBD data regarding vedolizumab trough levels are not available. Thus far, the role of trough levels in pediatric-onset IBD treatment remains unclear. We aimed to investigate predictors of vedolizumab trough levels in pediatric-onset IBD patients. METHODS Data from anti-tumor necrosis factor refractory pediatric-onset IBD patients who received vedolizumab were collected retrospectively. Vedolizumab trough levels were measured in serum samples collected before each infusion. A linear mixed model was conducted to analyze factors that influence trough levels. RESULTS Twenty-six pediatric-onset IBD patients (14 ulcerative colitis [UC]), 9 Crohn Disease [CD], 3 IBD-unclassified [IBD-U]) received 258 vedolizumab infusions. Mean vedolizumab trough level at week 6 was 29.9 μg/mL (SD 17.8), and 11.5 μg/mL (SD 4.9) during maintenance therapy. CD patients had significantly lower trough levels than IBD-U patients (β 15.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.1 to 29.2; P = 0.036). Higher fecal calprotectin (β -0.009; 95% CI -0.02 to -0.003; P = 0.007) and C-reactive protein levels (β -0.4; 95% CI -0.72 to -0.04; P = 0.027) were associated with lower trough levels, whereas shortening of time between infusions led to higher trough levels (β -0.77; 95% CI -0.9 to 0.64; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In this group of pediatric-onset IBD patients, trough levels were significantly lower in CD patients compared with UC/IBD-U patients. Higher levels of inflammatory markers were associated with lower vedolizumab trough levels.
Collapse
|
24
|
Macaluso FS, Fries W, Renna S, Viola A, Muscianisi M, Cappello M, Guida L, Siringo S, Camilleri S, Garufi S, Privitera AC, Belluardo N, Giangreco E, Bertolami C, Vassallo R, Rizzuto G, Orlando R, Ventimiglia M, Orlando A. Effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab in biologically naïve patients: A real-world multi-centre study. United European Gastroenterol J 2020; 8:1045-1055. [PMID: 32772830 DOI: 10.1177/2050640620948802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Biologically naïve patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with vedolizumab (VDZ) are largely underrepresented in real-world cohorts. A multi-centre, observational cohort study was performed on the effectiveness and safety of VDZ in biologically naïve subjects with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). METHODS Data of consecutive biologically naïve patients with CD and UC treated with VDZ from July 2016 to December 2019 were extracted from the cohort of the Sicilian Network for Inflammatory Bowel Disease. RESULTS A total of 172 consecutive patients (CD: N = 88; UC: N = 84; median age 66.0 years) were included, with a median follow-up of 58.8 weeks. After 14 weeks, a clinical response was reported in 68.2% of patients with CD and 67.9% of patients with UC treated with VDZ, including 45.5% patients in the CD group and 46.4% patients in the UC group who achieved steroid-free remission. After 52 weeks, a clinical response was reported in 77.4% of CD and in 73.8% of UC patients treated with VDZ, including 59.7% patients in the CD group and 60.7% patients in the UC group who achieved steroid-free remission. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates the effectiveness and safety of VDZ as a first-line biological, particularly among elderly patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Walter Fries
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, AOU Policlinico 'G. Martino', Messina, Italy
| | - Sara Renna
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, AOOR 'Villa Sofia-Cervello', Palermo, Italy
| | - Anna Viola
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, AOU Policlinico 'G. Martino', Messina, Italy
| | - Marco Muscianisi
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, AOU Policlinico 'G. Martino', Messina, Italy
| | - Maria Cappello
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, AOU Policlinico 'G. Giaccone', Palermo, Italy
| | - Laura Guida
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, AOU Policlinico 'G. Giaccone', Palermo, Italy
| | | | | | - Serena Garufi
- Gastroenterology Unit, AOOR 'S. Elia-M. Raimondi', Caltanissetta, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | - Roberto Vassallo
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, AO 'Buccheri La Ferla Fatebenefratelli', Palermo, Italy
| | - Giulia Rizzuto
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, AOOR 'Villa Sofia-Cervello', Palermo, Italy
| | - Rosalba Orlando
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, AOOR 'Villa Sofia-Cervello', Palermo, Italy
| | - Marco Ventimiglia
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, AOOR 'Villa Sofia-Cervello', Palermo, Italy
| | - Ambrogio Orlando
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, AOOR 'Villa Sofia-Cervello', Palermo, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
White JR, Din S, Ingram RJM, Foley S, Alam MA, Robinson R, Francis R, Tucker E, Jalal M, Elphick D, Atallah E, Norman A, Amin M, Sajjad A, Heggs N, Meadowcroft S, Moran GW. Experiences of using vedolizumab in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease in the East Midlands UK - a retrospective observational study. Scand J Gastroenterol 2020; 55:907-916. [PMID: 32657179 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2020.1790647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Clinical trials have demonstrated efficacy of vedolizumab in ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). Further real-world data is needed to inform clinical practice. The primary outcome was to assess corticosteroid-free and clinical remission after vedolizumab initiation. Secondary outcomes included effect on disease activity scores, biochemical markers, concomitant drug use, endoscopic remission, surgical intervention, hospital admissions and adverse events. MATERIALS AND METHODS A multi-centre retrospective observational study was conducted with patients initiated on vedolizumab across seven UK hospitals 1/11/14-30/11/16. Clinical disease activity was assessed using the partial Mayo Scores (pMS) and Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI). Clinical remission was defined as HBI ≤4 or pMS <2 with a combined stool frequency and rectal bleeding sub score of ≤1. Clinical response was defined as ≥2-point decrease from baseline in pMS and ≥3-point decrease from baseline in HBI. RESULTS One hundred ninety-two patients were included in the final analysis. 45% of UC and 10% of CD patients were anti-TNF naive. Over the observation period corticosteroid-free remission rates for UC and CD were 46% and 45%, while clinical remission rates were 52% and 44%, respectively. Time to corticosteroid free remission for UC and CD was 17.6 [IQR: 8.7-29.6] and 14.1 [QR: 6.0-21.7] weeks, respectively. Time to clinical response for UC was 9.4 [IQR: 5.7-15.4] and CD was 9.5 [IQR: 6.1-18.2] weeks. There was a substantial decrease in the concomitant use of immunomodulators and a similar decrease in concomitant corticosteroid use over the study period. CONCLUSIONS Results in this predominately anti-TNF experienced population mirror other published real-world data, demonstrating good clinical effectiveness and a comparable safety profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan R White
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.,Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.,University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Derby Hospital, Derby, UK
| | - Said Din
- University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Derby Hospital, Derby, UK
| | - Richard J M Ingram
- Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Kings Mill Hospital, Sutton-In-Ashfield, UK
| | - Stephen Foley
- Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Kings Mill Hospital, Sutton-In-Ashfield, UK
| | - Mohammad Aftab Alam
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK
| | - Richard Robinson
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK
| | - Rodric Francis
- Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Emily Tucker
- Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Mustafa Jalal
- Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Chesterfield, UK
| | - David Elphick
- Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Chesterfield, UK
| | - Edmond Atallah
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.,United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Lincoln County Hospital, Lincoln, UK
| | - Anthony Norman
- United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Lincoln County Hospital, Lincoln, UK
| | - Muhammad Amin
- Kettering General Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Kettering, UK
| | - Aamir Sajjad
- Kettering General Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Kettering, UK
| | | | | | - Gordon W Moran
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.,Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kim EM, Randall C, Betancourt R, Keene S, Lilly A, Fowler M, Dellon ES, Herfarth HH. Mucosal Eosinophilia Is an Independent Predictor of Vedolizumab Efficacy in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2020; 26:1232-1238. [PMID: 31633167 PMCID: PMC7365808 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izz251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peripheral and mucosal eosinophilia may be associated with more aggressive disease in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. Vedolizumab blocks T lymphocytes, eosinophil adhesion, and extravasation in the gastrointestinal tract. It is not known if mucosal eosinophilia is a predictor for the therapeutic efficacy of vedolizumab. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study of IBD patients with ileal or colonic biopsies who were off steroids before starting vedolizumab. Biopsies were rereviewed by pathologists, and mean eosinophil density was quantified. Patient characteristics and steroid-free clinical response 6 months after beginning vedolizumab were determined. Features were compared between nonresponders and responders, and multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of clinical response. RESULTS Of 251 IBD patients starting vedolizumab therapy, 65 patients (48% Crohn's disease, 52% ulcerative colitis) met inclusion criteria. All IBD patients not responding to vedolizumab were more likely to have a higher baseline mean eosinophil count (340 ± 156 vs 236 ± 124; P = 0.004), be previously exposed to an anti-TNF (96% vs 56%; P = 0.001), and be male (58% vs 28%; P = 0.02). Mean eosinophil counts were significantly increased in colonic biopsies in UC nonresponders (438 ± 149 vs 299 ± 145; P = 0.01). A similar trend was seen in CD nonresponders. On multivariable analysis, colonic eosinophil density and prior anti-TNF exposure-and the combination of both-were independent predictors of response. CONCLUSION In ulcerative colitis, colonic eosinophilia and prior anti-TNF exposure were independent predictors of 6-month clinical nonresponse to vedolizumab. Mucosal eosinophil density as a novel biomarker should be explored in larger patient cohorts.Aside from the previous anti-TNF exposure, eosinophil density in the colon of patients with UC is a negative predictor for a steroid-free long-term response to vedolizumab. The degree colonic eosinophilia may be a novel biomarker that should be further explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin M Kim
- Multidisciplinary Center for Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Cara Randall
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Renee Betancourt
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Staci Keene
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Amy Lilly
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Mark Fowler
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Evan S Dellon
- Multidisciplinary Center for Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Chapel Hill, NC, USA,Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Hans H Herfarth
- Multidisciplinary Center for Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Chapel Hill, NC, USA,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chapel Hill, NC, USA,Address correspondence to: Hans H. Herfarth, MD, PhD, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Bioinformatics Building, CB#7080, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599 USA. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Powell N, Ibraheim H, Raine T, Speight RA, Papa S, Brain O, Green M, Samaan MA, Spain L, Yousaf N, Hunter N, Eldridge L, Pavlidis P, Irving P, Hayee B, Turajlic S, Larkin J, Lindsay JO, Gore M. British Society of Gastroenterology endorsed guidance for the management of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced enterocolitis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 5:679-697. [PMID: 32553146 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(20)30014-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2019] [Revised: 01/21/2020] [Accepted: 01/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors are a novel class of cancer treatment that have improved outcomes for a subset of cancer patients. They work by antagonising inhibitory immune pathways, thereby augmenting immune-mediated antitumour responses. However, immune activation is not cancer-specific and often results in the activation of immune cells in non-cancer tissues, resulting in off-target immune-mediated injury and organ dysfunction. Diarrhoea and gastrointestinal tract inflammation are common and sometimes serious side-effects of this type of therapy. Prompt recognition of gastrointestinal toxicity and, in many cases, rapid institution of anti-inflammatory or biologic therapy (or both) is required to reverse these complications. Management of organ-specific complications benefits from multidisciplinary input, including engagement with gastroenterologists for optimal management of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced enterocolitis. In this British Society of Gastroenterology endorsed guidance document, we have developed a consensus framework for the investigation and management of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced enterocolitis.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/toxicity
- Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects
- Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use
- Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/toxicity
- Consensus
- Endoscopy/methods
- Endoscopy, Digestive System/methods
- Enterocolitis/chemically induced
- Enterocolitis/drug therapy
- Enterocolitis/metabolism
- Gastroenterology/organization & administration
- Gastrointestinal Diseases/chemically induced
- Gastrointestinal Diseases/diagnostic imaging
- Gastrointestinal Diseases/pathology
- Guidelines as Topic
- Humans
- Infliximab/therapeutic use
- Lactoferrin/metabolism
- Leukocyte L1 Antigen Complex/metabolism
- Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Patient Care Management/methods
- Societies, Medical/organization & administration
- Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/antagonists & inhibitors
- United Kingdom/epidemiology
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nick Powell
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, UK; The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
| | - Hajir Ibraheim
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, UK; The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - Tim Raine
- Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Richard A Speight
- Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK; Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | - Sophie Papa
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK; Department of Medical Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Oliver Brain
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Michael Green
- Department of Histopathology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Mark A Samaan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Polychronis Pavlidis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Centre for Inflammation and Cancer Immunology, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Peter Irving
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Bu'Hussain Hayee
- Department of Gastroenterology, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Samra Turajlic
- The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK; Cancer Dynamics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| | | | - James O Lindsay
- The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK; Centre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Verstockt B, Mertens E, Dreesen E, Outtier A, Noman M, Tops S, Schops G, Van Assche G, Vermeire S, Gils A, Ferrante M. Influence of Drug Exposure on Vedolizumab-Induced Endoscopic Remission in Anti-Tumour Necrosis Factor [TNF] Naïve and Anti-TNF Exposed IBD Patients. J Crohns Colitis 2020; 14:332-341. [PMID: 31504343 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Vedolizumab has demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients with Crohn's disease [CD] and ulcerative colitis [UC]. Endoscopic outcome data are limited, especially in anti-tumour necrosis factor [TNF] naïve patients. The present study compared endoscopic outcome in anti-TNF naïve and exposed patients, and explored if this was affected by drug exposure. METHODS We retrospectively analysed all patients initiating vedolizumab at our tertiary referral centre since 2015. For UC, endoscopic improvement was defined as a Mayo endoscopic subscore ≤1 at week 14. For CD, endoscopic remission was defined as absence of ulcerations at week 22. Vedolizumab trough concentrations were measured at week 6, week 14 and during maintenance. RESULTS A total of 336 patients were identified [53.3% CD], 20% of them being anti-TNF naïve. Endoscopic improvement was achieved by 56.1% of UC patients and endoscopic remission by 39.1% of CD patients. Endoscopic outcomes were significantly better in anti-TNF naïve vs exposed patients [all: 67.2% vs 42.0%, p = 0.0002; UC: 74.4% vs 50.0%, p = 0.02; CD: 57.1% vs 35.8%, p = 0.03]. Achievement of endoscopic end points significantly impacted long-term treatment continuation [p = 9.7 × 10-13]. A better endoscopic outcome was associated with significantly higher drug exposure in both CD and UC. CONCLUSIONS The results of this observational, single-centre real-life study suggest that vedolizumab may induce endoscopic remission in both CD and UC. Although anti-TNF naïve patients had a significantly better outcome, 42% of anti-TNF exposed patients still benefited endoscopically. A clear exposure-endoscopic response relationship exists, but not all patients will benefit from treatment intensification. Hence, predictive biomarkers remain necessary. PODCAST This article has an associated podcast which can be accessed at https://academic.oup.com/ecco-jcc/pages/podcast.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bram Verstockt
- University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,KU Leuven Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), Leuven, Belgium
| | - Evelien Mertens
- University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Erwin Dreesen
- KU Leuven Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Laboratory for Therapeutic and Diagnostic Antibodies
| | - An Outtier
- University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Maja Noman
- University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sophie Tops
- KU Leuven Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Laboratory for Therapeutic and Diagnostic Antibodies
| | - Ganel Schops
- University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gert Van Assche
- University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,KU Leuven Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), Leuven, Belgium
| | - Séverine Vermeire
- University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,KU Leuven Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ann Gils
- KU Leuven Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Laboratory for Therapeutic and Diagnostic Antibodies
| | - Marc Ferrante
- University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,KU Leuven Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Gurram B, Patel AS. Recent advances in understanding and managing pediatric inflammatory bowel disease. F1000Res 2019; 8. [PMID: 31885858 PMCID: PMC6913196 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.19609.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/07/2022] Open
Abstract
The landscape of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease is rapidly evolving. The therapeutic advances seen in the adult arena are rapidly being adopted by pediatric gastroenterologists and evaluated in both controlled trials and real-world experience. Though anti-tumor necrosis factor agents have been the primary therapy over the last decade, recently there has been an expansion of therapeutic targets and alternative mechanism of action drugs with a focus on individualized and personalized therapy. By reviewing epidemiology, pathophysiology, and goals of treatment, we hope to frame the discussion of current and novel therapeutics for the pediatric gastroenterologist. As scientific discovery continues to push the envelope in defining our understanding of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease, the current era of therapeutics gives us hope that a cure may be realized soon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bhaskar Gurram
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Ashish S. Patel
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Bor R, Fábián A, Matuz M, Szepes Z, Farkas K, Miheller P, Szamosi T, Vincze Á, Rutka M, Szántó K, Bálint A, Nagy F, Milassin Á, Tóth T, Zsigmond F, Bajor J, Müllner K, Lakner L, Papp M, Salamon Á, Horváth G, Sarang K, Schäfer E, Sarlós P, Palatka K, Molnár T. Real-life efficacy of vedolizumab on endoscopic healing in inflammatory bowel disease – A nationwide Hungarian cohort study. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2019; 20:205-213. [PMID: 31782939 DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2020.1699529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Renáta Bor
- First Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Anna Fábián
- First Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Mária Matuz
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Zoltán Szepes
- First Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Klaudia Farkas
- First Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Pál Miheller
- First Department of Surgery, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Tamás Szamosi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hungarian Defence Forces Military Hospital, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Áron Vincze
- First Department of Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Mariann Rutka
- First Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Kata Szántó
- First Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Anita Bálint
- First Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Ferenc Nagy
- First Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Ágnes Milassin
- First Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Tibor Tóth
- First Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Ferenc Zsigmond
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hungarian Defence Forces Military Hospital, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Judit Bajor
- First Department of Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Katalin Müllner
- Second Department of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | | | - Mária Papp
- Second Department of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | | | - Gábor Horváth
- Central Hospital of Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén County, Miskolc, Hungary
| | | | - Eszter Schäfer
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hungarian Defence Forces Military Hospital, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Patrícia Sarlós
- First Department of Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Károly Palatka
- Second Department of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Tamás Molnár
- First Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|