Optical Coherence Tomography to Optimize Results of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: Results of the Multicenter, Randomized DOCTORS Study (Does Optical Coherence Tomography Optimize Results of Stenting)

Two-year results from Onyx ONE clear in patients with high bleeding risk on one-month DAPT with and without intracoronary imaging

BACKGROUND

Patients with high bleeding risk (HBR) are often treated with abbreviated dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to reduce bleeding risk, however this strategy is associated with an increase in ischemic events, especially if the acute PCI result is suboptimal. We compared clinical outcomes among patients with HBR treated with 1-month DAPT who underwent intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)- or optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided PCI versus those who underwent angiography-guided PCI without intravascular imaging.

METHODS

The Onyx ONE Clear study includes patients with HBR from the Onyx ONE US/Japan and Onyx ONE randomized studies who were treated with the Resolute Onyx zotarolimus-eluting stent. The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiac death (CD) or myocardial infarction (MI) between 1 month and 2 years after PCI. Propensity-score adjustments and matching were performed for differences in baseline and procedural characteristics between groups.

RESULTS

Among the 1507 patients in Onyx ONE Clear, 271 (18.0 %) had IVUS or OCT used during PCI (Imaging-guided group) and 1236 (82.0 %) underwent Angiography-guided PCI (Angio-guided group). Imaging-guided patients were less likely to present with atrial fibrillation, acute coronary syndrome, and left ventricle ejection fraction ≤35 %. Conversely, Imaging-guided patients were more likely to have complex (ACC/AHA type B2/C), longer, and heavily calcified lesions. Between 1 month and 2 years, the composite rate of CD or MI was similar between Imaging-guided and Angio-guided patients (9.9 % vs. 12.4 %, P = 0.33). There was also no difference between groups after adjustment; (P = 0.56). However, CD was significantly lower among Imaging-guided patients (2.7 % vs. 6.1 %, P = 0.048). There were no between-group differences in MI or stent thrombosis. Propensity score matching results were similar.

CONCLUSION

Despite higher lesion complexity, using intravascular imaging guidance for PCI between 1-month and 2-years follow-up had comparable outcomes with angiographic guidance alone in patients with HBR treated with 1-month DAPT. (ClinicalTrials.gov: Identifier: NCT03647475 and NCT03344653).

NON-STANDARD ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS

BARC: Bleeding Academic Research Consortium; DAPT: dual antiplatelet therapy; DES: drug-eluting stent; HBR: high bleeding risk; IVUS: intravascular ultrasound; OCT: optical coherence tomography; SAPT: single antiplatelet therapy.

Effects of Tirofiban in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Diabetes Mellitus undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of early vs. late tirofiban administration in the treatment of patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and diabetes mellitus (DM) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI).

METHODS

120 patients with STEMI and DM treated with pPCI were randomly divided into an observation group (n=60) and a control group (n=60). The observation group and the control group were intravenously injected with a bolus of tirofiban preoperatively or intraoperatively, respectively; both groups were then given an intravenous infusion over 24 h at 0.15 μg/kg/min. Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) grade flow, myocardial perfusion index, and functional heart parameters, as well as major adverse cardiovascular events and bleeding, were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Functional heart parameters, including left ventricular ejection fraction and cardiac output, were significantly improved in the observation group 6 months after discharge. Thrombus aspiration, inflammatory factors, and cardiac troponin I (cTNI) were more significantly decreased in the observation group than in the control group. The sum-ST-segment elevation at 2 h after pPCI treatment in the observation group was better than that in the control group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions and bleeding between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The administration of tirofiban before reperfusion therapy compared with after reperfusion therapy is more effective in reducing the hyperthrombotic load, thrombus aspiration, inflammatory factors, and cTNI and can effectively improve myocardial perfusion and heart function.

Enhanced Stent Imaging System Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Is Linked to Optimize Stent Placement

Stent under-expansion is a predictor of restenosis and stent thrombosis. It remains uncertain whether enhanced stent imaging (ESI) (CLEARstent) guidance can improve stent under-expansion. Our aim was to assess the effect of using ESI on stent under-expansion, after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a single center, cross-sectional observational study. Participants attending our cardiology clinic with stable angina or acute coronary syndrome, from March to September 2020 were recruited. A total of 164 patients who underwent post-PCI ESI (CLEARstent) were compared with 77 age- and sex-matched control patients. Post-procedural minimal lumen diameter (MLD) was calculated. The patients in the ESI-guided PCI group, had a median age of 61 (54-69 IQR 25-75) years and 76.8% (n = 126) were males. The patients in ESI-guided PCI group had a greater minimal lumen diameter compared with the X-ray guided PCI group (βeta coefficient:2.88 (95% CI:2.58-2.99) vs βeta coefficient 2.55 (95% CI 2.34-2.63), P < .001). Our finding supports the use of the ESI system to optimize stent placement as expressed by the MLD.

Clinical impact of OCT-derived suboptimal stent implantation parameters and definitions

AIMS

Despite growing evidence supporting the clinical utility of optical coherence tomography (OCT) guidance during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs), there is no common agreement as to the optimal stent implantation parameters that enhance clinical outcome.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We retrospectively examined the predictive accuracy of suboptimal stent implantation definitions proposed from the CLI-OPCI II, ILUMIEN-IV OPTIMAL PCI, and FORZA studies for the long-term risk of device-oriented cardiovascular events (DoCE) in the population of large all-comers CLI-OPCI project. A total of 1020 patients undergoing OCT-guided drug-eluting stent implantation in the CLI-OPCI registry with a median follow-up of 809 (quartiles 414-1376) days constituted the study population. According to CLI-OPCI II, ILUMIEN-IV OPTIMAL PCI, and FORZA criteria, the incidence of suboptimal stent implantation was 31.8%, 58.1%, and 57.8%, respectively. By multivariable Cox analysis, suboptimal stent implantation criteria from the CLI-OPCI II [hazard ratio 2.75 (95% confidence interval 1.88-4.02), P < 0.001] and ILUMIEN-IV OPTIMAL PCI [1.79 (1.18-2.71), P = 0.006] studies, but not FORZA trial [1.11 (0.75-1.63), P = 0.597], were predictive of DoCE. At long-term follow-up, stent edge disease with minimum lumen area <4.5 mm2 [8.17 (5.32-12.53), P < 0.001], stent edge dissection [2.38 (1.33-4.27), P = 0.004], and minimum stent area <4.5 mm2 [1.68 (1.13-2.51), P = 0.011] were the main OCT predictors of DoCE.

CONCLUSION

The clinical utility of OCT-guided PCI might depend on the metrics adopted to define suboptimal stent implantation. Uncovered disease at the stent border, stent edge dissection, and minimum stent area <4.5 mm2 were the strongest OCT associates of stent failure.

Comparison of Intravascular Imaging, Functional, or Angiographically Guided Coronary Intervention

BACKGROUND

In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), it remains unclear whether intravascular imaging guidance or functional guidance is the best strategy to optimize outcomes and if the results are different in patients with vs without acute coronary syndromes (ACS).

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes with imaging-guided PCI or functionally guided PCI when compared with conventional angiography-guided PCI.

METHODS

We searched PUBMED and EMBASE for randomized controlled trials investigating outcomes with intravascular imaging-guided, functionally guided, or angiography-guided PCI. The primary outcome from this network meta-analysis was trial-defined major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE)-a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion revascularization (TLR). PCI strategies were ranked (best to worst) using P scores.

RESULTS

Our search identified 32 eligible randomized controlled trials and included a total of 22,684 patients. Compared with angiography-guided PCI, intravascular imaging-guided PCI was associated with reduced risk of MACE (relative risk [RR]: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.62-0.82), cardiovascular death (RR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.42-0.75), MI (RR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.66-0.99), stent thrombosis (RR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.31-0.73), and TLR (RR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.57-0.99). Similarly, when compared with angiography-guided PCI, functionally guided PCI was associated with reduced risk of MACE and MI. Intravascular imaging-guided PCI ranked first for the outcomes of MACE, cardiovascular death, stent thrombosis, and TLR. The results were consistent in the ACS and non-ACS cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Angiography-guided PCI had consistently worse outcomes compared with intravascular imaging-guided and functionally guided PCI. Intravascular imaging-guided PCI was the best strategy to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events.

Fractional flow reserve versus intravascular imaging to guide decision-making for percutaneous coronary intervention in intermediate lesions: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Both fractional flow reserve (FFR) and intravascular imaging (IVI) have been used to guide the decision-making for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in intermediate coronary stenosis. Nevertheless, studies that directly compared the prognostic significance of these two strategies are scarce.

AIMS

The aim of this meta-analyses was to evaluate the impact of FFR versus IVI to guide the decision-making in PCI for intermediate stenosis on clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and relevant database from inception date to September 2022 for observational studies and randomized clinical trials (RCTs) which compared FFR and IVI-based decision-making in PCI for intermediate stenosis. The primary outcome was a composite of major adverse cardiac event (MACE). Pooled risk ratios (RR) were calculated using random effects models and heterogeneity were evaluated with the I2 statistic.

RESULTS

We identified 5 studies (3 RCTs and 2 observational studies) with 3208 patients. The follow-up duration ranged from 12 to 24 months. Among five studies, four compared FFR with intravascular ultrasound while one compared FFR with optical coherence tomography. There was no statistically difference between FFR and IVI in the incidence of MACE (RR: 1.19; 95% confidence interval: 0.85-1.68; p = 0.31) and its individual components. These results were consistent regardless of various cut-off value of PCI across the studies. Compared with IVI, FFR was associated with a lower PCI rate (37.0% vs. 60.3%; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The decision to perform PCI for intermediate stenosis guided by FFR or IVI showed a similar clinical outcome. The use of FFR significantly reduced the need for PCI.

Intravascular imaging guided versus coronary angiography guided percutaneous coronary intervention: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the absolute treatment effects of intravascular imaging guided versus angiography guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with coronary artery disease, considering their baseline risk.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases up to 31 August 2023.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized controlled trials comparing intravascular imaging (intravascular ultrasonography or optical coherence tomography) guided versus coronary angiography guided percutaneous coronary intervention in adults with coronary artery disease.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Random effect meta-analysis and GRADE (grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation) were used to assess certainty of evidence. Data included rate ratios and absolute risks per 1000 people for cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, target vessel revascularization, and target lesion revascularization. Absolute risk differences were estimated using SYNTAX risk categories for baseline risks at five years, assuming constant rate ratios across different cardiovascular risk thresholds.

RESULTS

In 20 randomized controlled trials (n=11 698), intravascular imaging guided percutaneous coronary intervention was associated with a reduced risk of cardiac death (rate ratio 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.39 to 0.72), myocardial infarction (0.81, 0.68 to 0.97), stent thrombosis (0.44, 0.27 to 0.72), target vessel revascularization (0.74, 0.61 to 0.89), and target lesion revascularization (0.71, 0.59 to 0.86) but not all cause death (0.81, 0.64 to 1.02). Using SYNTAX risk categories, high certainty evidence showed that from low risk to high risk, intravascular imaging was likely associated with 23 to 64 fewer cardiac deaths, 15 to 19 fewer myocardial infarctions, 9 to 13 fewer stent thrombosis events, 28 to 38 fewer target vessel revascularization events, and 35 to 48 fewer target lesion revascularization events per 1000 people.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with coronary angiography guided percutaneous coronary intervention, intravascular imaging guided percutaneous coronary intervention was associated with significantly reduced cardiac death and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease. The estimated absolute effects of intravascular imaging guided percutaneous coronary intervention showed a proportional relation with baseline risk, driven by the severity and complexity of coronary artery disease.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42023433568.

A polydiolcitrate-MoS2 composite for 3D printing Radio-opaque, Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds

Implantable polymeric biodegradable devices, such as biodegradable vascular stents or scaffolds, cannot be fully visualized using standard X-ray-based techniques, compromising their performance due to malposition after deployment. To address this challenge, we describe composites of methacrylated poly(1,12 dodecamethylene citrate) (mPDC) and MoS2 nanosheets to fabricate novel X-ray visible radiopaque and photocurable liquid polymer-ceramic composite (mPDC-MoS2). The composite was used as an ink with micro continuous liquid interface production (μCLIP) to fabricate bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS). Prints exhibited excellent crimping and expansion mechanics without strut failures and, importantly, required X-ray visibility in air and muscle tissue. Notably, MoS2 nanosheets displayed physical degradation over time in a PBS environment, indicating the potential for producing bioresorbable devices. mPDC-MoS2 is a promising bioresorbable X-ray-visible composite material suitable for 3D printing medical devices, particularly vascular scaffolds or stents, that require non-invasive X-ray-based monitoring techniques for implantation and evaluation. This innovative composite system holds significant promise for the development of biocompatible and highly visible medical implants, potentially enhancing patient outcomes and reducing medical complications.

Intracoronary imaging in PCI for acute coronary syndrome: Insights from British Cardiovascular Intervention Society registry

BACKGROUND

While previous studies have demonstrated the superiority of ICI-guided PCI over an angiography-based approach, there are limited data on all-comer ACS patients. This study aimed to identify the characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of patients undergoing intracoronary imaging (ICI) guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

METHODS

All patient undergoing PCI for ACS in England and Wales between 2006 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed and stratified according to ICI utilization. The outcomes assessed were in-hospital all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) using multivariable logistic regression models.

RESULTS

598,921 patients underwent PCI for ACS, of which 41,716 (7.0 %) had ICI which was predominantly driven by IVUS use (5.6 %). ICI use steadily increased from 1.4 % in 2006 to 13.5 % in 2019. Adjusted odds of mortality (OR 0.69, 95%CI 0.58-0.83) and MACCE (OR 0.77, 95%CI 0.73-0.83) were significantly lower in the ICI group. The association between ICI and improved outcomes varied according to vessel treated with both left main stem (LMS) and LMS/left anterior descending (LAD) PCI associated with significantly lower odds of mortality (OR 0.34, 95%CI 0.27-0.44, OR 0.51 95%CI 0.45-0.56) and MACCE (OR 0.44 95%CI 0.35-0.54, OR 0.67 95%CI 0.62-0.72) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although ICI use has steadily increased, less than one in seven patients underwent ICI-guided PCI. The association between ICI use and improved in-hospital outcomes was mainly observed in PCI procedures involving LMS and LAD.

Diagnosis and Prognostic Value of the Underlying Cause of Acute Coronary Syndrome in Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided Emergency Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Background The prognostic impact of optical coherence tomography-diagnosed culprit lesion morphology in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has not been systematically examined in real-world settings. Methods and Results This investigator-initiated, prospective, multicenter, observational study was conducted at 22 Japanese hospitals to identify the prevalence of underlying ACS causes (plaque rupture [PR], plaque erosion [PE], and calcified nodules [CN]) and their impact on clinical outcomes. Patients with ACS diagnosed within 24 hours of symptom onset undergoing emergency percutaneous coronary intervention were enrolled. Optical coherence tomography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention recipients were assessed for underlying ACS causes and followed up for major adverse cardiac events (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, heart failure, or ischemia-driven revascularization) at 1 year. Of 1702 patients with ACS, 702 (40.7%) underwent optical coherence tomography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention for analysis. PR, PE, and CN prevalence was 59.1%, 25.6%, and 4.0%, respectively. One-year major adverse cardiac events occurred most frequently in patients with CN (32.1%), followed by PR (12.4%) and PE (6.2%) (log-rank P<0.0001), primarily driven by increased cardiovascular death (CN, 25.0%; PR, 0.7%; PE, 1.1%; log-rank P<0.0001) and heart failure trend (CN, 7.1%; PR, 6.8%; PE, 2.2%; log-rank P<0.075). On multivariate Cox regression analysis, the underlying ACS cause was associated with 1-year major adverse cardiac events (CN [hazard ratio (HR), 4.49 [95% CI, 1.35-14.89], P=0.014]; PR (HR, 2.18 [95% CI, 1.05-4.53], P=0.036]; PE as reference). Conclusions Despite being the least common, CN was a clinically significant underlying ACS cause, associated with the highest future major adverse cardiac events risk, followed by PR and PE. Future studies should evaluate the possibility of ACS underlying cause-based optical coherence tomography-guided optimization.

Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided or Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The OCTIVUS Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) or optical coherence tomography (OCT) showed superior clinical outcomes compared with angiography-guided PCI. However, the comparative effectiveness of OCT-guided and IVUS-guided PCI regarding clinical outcomes is unknown.

METHODS

In this prospective, multicenter, open-label, pragmatic trial, we randomly assigned 2008 patients with significant coronary artery lesions undergoing PCI in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either an OCT-guided or IVUS-guided PCI. The primary end point was a composite of death from cardiac causes, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization at 1 year, which was powered for noninferiority of the OCT group compared with the IVUS group. Safety outcomes were also assessed.

RESULTS

At 1 year, primary end point events occurred in 25 of 1005 patients (Kaplan-Meier estimate, 2.5%) in the OCT group and in 31 of 1003 patients (Kaplan-Meier estimate, 3.1%) in the IVUS group (absolute difference, -0.6 percentage points; upper boundary of one-sided 97.5% CI, 0.97 percentage points; P<0.001 for noninferiority). The incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy was similar (14 patients [1.4%] in the OCT group versus 15 patients [1.5%] in the IVUS group; P=0.85). The incidence of major procedural complications was lower in the OCT group than in the IVUS group (22 [2.2%] versus 37 [3.7%]; P=0.047), although imaging procedure-related complications were not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with significant coronary artery lesions, OCT-guided PCI was noninferior to IVUS-guided PCI with respect to the incidence of a composite of death from cardiac causes, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization at 1 year. The selected study population and lower-than-expected event rates should be considered in interpreting the trial.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov; Unique number: NCT03394079.

Impact of Post-PCI FFR Stratified by Coronary Artery

BACKGROUND

Low fractional flow reserve (FFR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Hitherto, this assessment has been independent of the epicardial vessel interrogated.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to assess the predictive capacity of post-PCI FFR for target vessel failure (TVF) stratified by coronary artery.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and individual patient-level data meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials and observational studies with protocol-recommended post-PCI FFR assessment. The difference in post-PCI FFR between left anterior descending (LAD) and non-LAD arteries was assessed using a random-effect models meta-analysis of mean differences. TVF was defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically driven target vessel revascularization.

RESULTS

Overall, 3,336 vessels (n = 2,760 patients) with post-PCI FFR measurements were included in 9 studies. The weighted mean post-PCI FFR was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.87-0.90) and differed significantly between coronary vessels (LAD = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.85 to 0.88 vs non-LAD = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.91-0.94; P < 0.001). Post-PCI FFR was an independent predictor of TVF, with its risk increasing by 52% for every reduction of 0.10 FFR units, and this was mainly driven by TVR. The predictive capacity for TVF was poor for LAD arteries (AUC: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.47-0.58) and moderate for non-LAD arteries (AUC: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.59-0.73; LAD vs non-LAD arteries, P = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

The LAD is associated with a lower post-PCI FFR than non-LAD arteries, emphasizing the importance of interpreting post-PCI FFR on a vessel-specific basis. Although a higher post-PCI FFR was associated with improved prognosis, its predictive capacity for events differs between the LAD and non-LAD arteries, being poor in the LAD and moderate in the non-LAD vessels.

State-of-art review: intravascular imaging in percutaneous coronary interventions

The history of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) reflects the relentless pursuit of innovation in interventional cardiology. These intravascular imaging technologies have played a pivotal role in our understanding of coronary atherosclerosis, vascular pathology, and the interaction of coronary stents with the vessel wall. Two decades of clinical investigations demonstrating the clinical efficacy and safety of intravascular imaging modalities have established these technologies as staples in the contemporary cardiac catheterization lab's toolbox and earning their place in revascularization clinical practice guidelines. In this comprehensive review, we will delve into the historical evolution, mechanisms, and technical aspects of IVUS and OCT. We will discuss the expanding evidence supporting their use in complex percutaneous coronary interventions, emphasizing their crucial roles in optimizing patient outcomes and ensuring procedural success. Furthermore, we will explore the substantial advances that have propelled these imaging modalities to the forefront of contemporary interventional cardiology. Finally, we will survey the latest developments in the field and explore the promising future directions that have the potential to further revolutionize coronary interventions.

Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Rationale and Design of the ATLAS-OCT Study

Even after successful revascularization with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), subsequent adverse events still occur. Previous studies have suggested potential benefits of intravascular imaging, including optical coherence tomography (OCT). However, the feasibility of OCT-guided primary PCI has not been systematically examined in these patients. The ATLAS-OCT (ST-elevation Acute myocardial infarcTion and cLinicAl outcomeS treated by Optical Coherence Tomography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention) trial was designed to investigate the feasibility of OCT guidance during primary PCI for STEMI in experienced centers with expertise on OCT-guided PCI as a prospective, multicenter registry of consecutive patients with STEMI who underwent a primary PCI. The sites' inclusion criteria are as follows: (1) acute care hospitals providing 24/7 emergency care for STEMI, and (2) institutions where OCT-guided PCI is the first choice for primary PCI in STEMI. All patients with STEMI who underwent primary PCI at participating sites will be consecutively enrolled, irrespective of OCT use during PCI. The primary end point will be the rate of successful OCT imaging during the primary PCI. As an ancillary imaging modality to angiography, OCT provides morphologic information during PCI for the assessment of plaque phenotypes, vessel sizing, and PCI optimization. Major adverse cardiac events, defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization at 1 year, will also be recorded. The ATLAS-OCT study will clarify the feasibility of OCT-guided primary PCI for patients with STEMI and further identify a suitable patient group for OCT-guided primary PCI.

Intravascular Ultrasound vs. Fractional Flow Reserve for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Optimization in Long Coronary Artery Lesions

BACKGROUND

intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) have both been shown to be superior to angiography in optimizing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, there is still a lack of comparative studies between PCI optimization using physiology and intravascular imaging head-to-head. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of FFR and IVUS PCI optimization strategies on the functional PCI result (assessed with FFR) immediately post-PCI and at 9-12 months after the treatment of long coronary lesions.

METHODS

This was a single-center study comparing post-PCI FFR between two different PCI optimization strategies (FFR and IVUS). The study included 154 patients who had hemodynamically significant long lesions, necessitating a stent length of 30 mm or more. The procedural outcomes were functional PCI result immediately post-PCI and at 9-12 months after treatment. Clinical outcomes included target vessel failure (TVF) and functional target vessel restenosis rate during follow-up.

RESULTS

Baseline clinical characteristics and FFR (0.65 [0.55-0.71]) did not differ significantly between the two groups and the left anterior descending artery was treated in 82% of cases. The FFR optimization strategy resulted in a significantly shorter stented segment (49 mm vs. 63 mm, p = 0.001) compared to the IVUS optimization strategy. Although the rates of optimal functional PCI result (FFR > 0.9) did not significantly differ between the FFR and IVUS optimization strategies, a proportion of patients in the FFR group (12%) experienced poor post-PCI functional outcome with FFR values ≤ 0.8, which was not observed in the IVUS group. At the 9-12 month follow-up, 20% of patients in the FFR group had target-vessel-related myocardial ischemia, compared to 6% in the IVUS group. The rates of TVF and functional target vessel restenosis during follow-up were also numerically higher in the FFR optimization group.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of FFR PCI optimization strategy in the treatment of long coronary artery lesions is associated with a higher incidence of poor functional PCI result and larger myocardial ischemia burden at follow-up compared to the IVUS optimization strategy. However, this discrepancy did not translate into a statistically significant difference in clinical outcomes. This study highlights the importance of using IVUS to optimize long lesions functional PCI outcomes.

Comparison of intravascular ultrasound, optical coherence tomography, and conventional angiography-guided percutaneous coronary interventions: A systematic review, network meta-analysis, and meta-regression

BACKGROUND

Intracoronary imaging modalities, including intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT), provide valuable supplemental data unavailable on coronary angiography (CA) and have shown to improve clinical outcomes. We sought to compare the clinical efficacy of IVUS, OCT, and conventional CA-guided percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI).

METHODS

Frequentist and Bayesian network meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials were performed to compare clinical outcomes of PCI performed with IVUS, OCT, or CA alone.

RESULTS

A total of 28 trials comprising 12,895 patients were included. IVUS when compared with CA alone was associated with a significantly reduced risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (risk ratio: [RR] 0.74, 95% confidence interval: [CI] 0.63-0.88), cardiac death (RR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.43-0.94), target lesion revascularization (RR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.57-0.80), and target vessel revascularization (RR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.50-0.81). No differences in comparative clinical efficacy were found between IVUS and OCT. Rank probability analysis bestowed the highest probability to IVUS in ranking as the best imaging modality for all studied outcomes except for all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSION

Compared with CA, the use of IVUS in PCI guidance provides significant benefit in reducing MACE, cardiac death, and revascularization. OCT had similar outcomes to IVUS, but more dedicated studies are needed to confirm the superiority of OCT over CA.

Diagnostic Performance of Intracoronary Optical Coherence Tomography-Modulated Quantitative Flow Ratio for Assessing Coronary Stenosis

Background

A novel method for fast computation of Murray law-based quantitative flow ratio (μQFR) from coregistered angiography and optical coherence tomography (OCT) was recently developed. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of this OCT-modulated μQFR (OCT-μFR).

Methods

Patients who underwent coronary angiography, OCT, and fractional flow reserve (FFR) were retrospectively enrolled. μQFR was computed from a single angiographic projection. Subsequently, OCT image pullback was coregistered with the angiogram, and OCT-μFR was calculated based on the coregistered data. The same cut-off value of 0.80 was used for OCT-μFR, μQFR, and FFR to define ischemia.

Results

A paired comparison of OCT-μFR and μQFR was performed in 269 vessels from 218 patients. The mean FFR was 0.81 ± 0.11, and 45.0% of vessels had an FFR ≤0.80. OCT-μFR showed a better correlation with FFR than μQFR (r = 0.83 vs 0.76, P = .018) and numerically higher diagnostic performance (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.95 vs 0.92, P = .057). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio for OCT-μFR to identify ischemia-causing stenosis were 89.3%, 93.2%, 91.5%, 91.4%, 13.2, and 0.1, respectively. In addition, OCT-μFR showed significantly higher diagnostic performance compared with μQFR in vessels with suboptimal angiographic image quality (AUC = 0.93 vs 0.87, P = .028) and tandem lesions (AUC = 0.94 vs 0.87, P = .017).

Conclusions

Computation of OCT-μFR was feasible and accurately identified physiologically significant coronary stenosis with simultaneous morphological assessment. In vessels with suboptimal angiographic image quality or tandem lesions, OCT-μFR had a higher diagnostic performance than angiography-based μQFR.

Impact of real-time optical coherence tomography and angiographic coregistration on the percutaneous coronary intervention strategy

Background

The use of optical coherence tomography (OCT) with angiographic coregistration (ACR) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for procedural decision-making is evolving; however, large-scale data in real-world practice are lacking.

Aims

Our study aims to evaluate the real-time impact of OCT-ACR on clinician decision-making during PCI.

Methods

Patients with angiographic diameter stenosis >70% in at least one native coronary artery were enrolled in the study. The pre- and post-PCI procedural strategies were prospectively assessed after angiography, OCT, and ACR.

Results

A total of 500 patients were enrolled in the study between November 2018 and March 2020. Among these, data related to 472 patients with 483 lesions were considered for analysis. Preprocedural OCT resulted in a change in PCI strategy in 80% of lesions: lesion preparation (25%), stent length (53%), stent diameter (36%), and device landing zone (61%). ACR additionally impacted the treatment strategy in 34% of lesions. Postprocedural OCT demonstrated underexpansion (15%), malapposition (14%), and tissue/thrombus prolapse (7%), thereby requiring further interventions in 30% of lesions. No further change in strategy was observed with subsequent postprocedural ACR. Angiographic and procedural success was achieved in 100% of patients, and the overall incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events at 1 year was 0.85%.

Conclusions

The outcomes reflect the real-time impact of OCT-ACR on the overall procedural strategy in patients undergoing PCI. ACR had a significant impact on the treatment strategy and was associated with better clinical outcomes at 1 year after index PCI. OCT-ACR has become a practical tool for improving outcomes in patients with complex lesions.

Applied coronary physiology for planning and guidance of percutaneous coronary interventions. A clinical consensus statement from the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) of the European Society of Cardiology

The clinical value of fractional flow reserve and non-hyperaemic pressure ratios are well established in determining an indication for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). In addition, over the last 5 years we have witnessed a shift towards the use of physiology to enhance procedural planning, assess post-PCI functional results, and guide PCI optimisation. In this regard, clinical studies have reported compelling data supporting the use of longitudinal vessel analysis, obtained with pressure guidewire pullbacks, to better understand how obstructive CAD contributes to myocardial ischaemia, to establish the likelihood of functionally successful PCI, to identify the presence and location of residual flow-limiting stenoses and to predict long-term outcomes. The introduction of new functional coronary angiography tools, which merge angiographic information with fluid dynamic equations to deliver information equivalent to intracoronary pressure measurements, are now available and potentially also applicable to these endeavours. Furthermore, the ability of longitudinal vessel analysis to predict the functional results of stenting has played an integral role in the evolving field of simulated PCI. Nevertheless, it is important to have an awareness of the value and challenges of physiology-guided PCI in specific clinical and anatomical contexts. The main aim of this European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions clinical consensus statement is to offer up-to-date evidence and expert opinion on the use of applied coronary physiology for procedural PCI planning, disease pattern recognition and post-PCI optimisation.

Fractional flow reserve use in coronary artery revascularization: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is recommended in revascularization guidelines for intermediate lesions. However, recent studies comparing FFR-guided PCI with non-physiology-guided revascularization have reported conflicting results. PubMed and Embase were searched for studies comparing FFR-guided PCI with non-physiology-guided revascularization strategies (angiography-guided, intracoronary imaging-guided, coronary artery bypass grafting). Data were pooled by meta-analysis using random-effects model. 26 studies enrolling 78,897 patients were included. FFR-guided PCI as compared to non-physiology-guided coronary revascularization had lower risk of all-cause mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.79 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64-0.99, I² = 53%) and myocardial infarction (MI) (OR 0.74 95% CI 0.59-0.93, I² = 44.7%). However, no differences between groups were found in terms of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) (OR 0.86 95% CI 0.72-1.03, I² = 72.3%) and repeat revascularization (OR 1 95% CI 0.82-1.20, I² = 43.2%). Among patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), FFR-guided PCI as compared to non-physiology-guided revascularization was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality and MI.

Proximal Optimization Technique with an Ultra-Short Balloon as a Bailout Strategy for Stent Protrusion into the Left Main Trunk

A 64-year-old man presented with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Emergent coronary angiography revealed severe stenosis at the proximal left anterior descending artery (LAD). A drug-eluting stent was deployed to land the stent's proximal edge on the LAD ostium. However, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) after stent placement detected a slight stent protrusion from the LAD into the left main trunk (LMT), and the left circumflex artery (LCX) ostium was jailed by stent struts. We decided to perform the proximal optimization technique (POT) using an ultra-short balloon (4 mm in length) on the proximal site of the stent in the hope of dilating jailed struts at the LCX ostium and expanding malapposed struts at the LMT without proximal edge dissection. IVUS after POT confirmed a well-enlarged stent cell at the ostial LCX and adequate stent apposition at the LMT. Angiography showed preserved LCX circulation. At one-year follow-up, angiography showed no in-stent restenosis or LCX ostial stenosis. Optical coherence tomography showed remarkable expansion of the stent struts at the LCX ostium without any restenosis. A single POT with an ultra-short balloon could be a potential bailout strategy in the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions with slight stent protrusion into the proximal main vessel.

Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization

Left main (LM) coronary artery disease accounts for approximately 4-6% of all percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). There has been mounting evidence indicating the non-inferiority of LM PCI as a revascularization option, particularly for those with a low SYNTAX score. The EXCEL and NOBEL trials have shaped current guidelines. The European Society of Cardiology assigned a class 2a (level of evidence B) for isolated LM disease involving the shaft and ostium and a class IIb (level of evidence B) for isolated LM disease involving the bifurcation or additional two- or three-vessel disease and a SYNTAX score <32. However, data on the use of a single stent or an upfront two-stent strategy for distal LM disease are conflicting, wherein the EBC Main trial reported similar outcomes with a stepwise provisional approach and the DKCRUSH-V trial reported better outcomes with an upfront two-stent strategy using the 'double-kissing' crush technique. Although several studies have noted better immediate results with image-guided PCI, there are few data on outcomes in LM disease specifically. In fact, the uptake of imaging in the aforementioned landmark trials was only 40%. More importantly, the role of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) has been less well studied in LM PCI. Indiscriminate use of MCS for LM PCI has been noted in clinical practice. Trials evaluating the benefit of MCS in high-risk PCI demonstrated no benefit. This review highlights contemporary trials as they apply to current practice in LM PCI.

Intracoronary Imaging and Physiology to Guide PCI: Are We Ready for a Class I Guideline Recommendation?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Over the last decade, there has been a plethora of evidence to support the utilization of intravascular coronary imaging and physiological assessment to guide percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). While there is a class I recommendation for the use of coronary physiology to guide PCI, the use of intravascular coronary imaging remains a class IIa recommendation. Herein, we aimed to review the recent scientific evidence from major trials highlighting the consideration for a future class I guideline recommendation for the use of intracoronary imaging.

RECENT FINDINGS

The benefits of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) to guide and optimize PCI have been demonstrated in several large trials. These trials have demonstrated that IVUS reduces major adverse cardiovascular events. Similarly, intracoronary physiology has been demonstrated to be an important tool to guide revascularization decision-making and been associated with a lower incidence of death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization compared with angiography alone. With existing clinical outcomes data on the benefit of intracoronary physiology and imaging-guided PCI as well as forthcoming data from ongoing trials regarding the use of these modalities, the interventional cardiology community is bound to transition from routine PCI to precision-, image-, and physiology-guided PCI.

Effectiveness and safety of optical coherence tomography-guided PCI in Indian patients with complex lesions: A multicenter, prospective registry

BACKGROUND

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is reported to be a feasible and safe imaging modality for the guidance of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of complex lesions.

METHODS

This multicenter, prospective registry assessed the minimum stent area (MSA) achieved under OCT guidance. A performance goal of 24% improvement in MSA over and above the recommendation set by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions Consensus 2018 (4.5 mm2 MSA for non-left main and 3.5 mm2 for small vessels). The incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy was also assessed. Core lab analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

Five hundred patients (average age: 59.4 ± 10.1 years; 83% males) with unstable angina (36.8%), NSTEMI (26.4%), and STEMI (22%) were enrolled. The primary endpoint was achieved in 93% of lesions with stent diameter ≥2.75 mm (average MSA: 6.44 mm2) and 87% of lesions with stent diameter ≤2.5 mm (average MSA: 4.56 mm2). The average MSA (with expansion ≥80% cutoff) was 6.63 mm2 and 4.74 mm2 with a stent diameter ≥2.75 mm and ≤2.5 mm, respectively. According to the core lab analysis, the average MSA achieved with a stent diameter ≥2.75 mm and ≤2.5 mm was 6.23 mm2 and 3.95 mm2, respectively (with expansion ≥80% cutoff). Clinically significant serum creatinine was noted in two patients (0.45%). Major adverse cardiac events at 1 year were noted in 1.2% (n = 6) of the patients; all were cardiac deaths.

CONCLUSION

PCI under OCT guidance improves procedural and long-term clinical outcomes in patients with complex lesions not just in a controlled trial environment but also in routine clinical practice.

IVUS-guided versus OCT-guided PCI among patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome

BACKGROUND

Intravascular imaging modalities such as intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and, more recently, optical coherence tomography (OCT) improved the visualization of coronary anatomy and plaque pathology. We aimed to compare the procedural and short-term outcomes between IVUS-guided and OCT-guided percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

METHODS

In the present retrospective study, we reviewed the data of 50 patients who had IVUS-guided PCI and 50 patients who had OCT-guided PCI for ACS between January 2020 and June 2021. Intravascular imaging was done before and after stenting. Both groups were compared in terms of minimal luminal area (MLA), stent dimensions, final minimal stent area (MSA) and stent expansion as well as negative angiographic outcomes. Patients were followed for six months to record major adverse cardiac events (MACE).

RESULTS

The patients' mean age was 57 ± 13 years with male predominance (78%). The radiation time and dose were significantly higher among IVUS group. Pre-stenting MLA was significantly higher in IVUS group (2.63 mm vs. 2.22 mm in OCT, P = 0.013). Stent expansion was significantly higher among OCT group (97% vs. 93% in IVUS group, P = 0.001) with no significant difference between both groups regarding MSA [mm²] (8.88 ± 2.87 in IVUS vs. 8.1 ± 2.76 in OCT, P = 0.169). No significant difference between both groups was noted regarding contrast volume, edge dissection, tissue prolapse, and no reflow. The rates of six-month MACE were significantly higher in the IVUS group.

CONCLUSIONS

OCT-guided PCI in ACS is safe and is associated with similar MSA to that of IVUS-guided PCI. Future randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Quantitative flow ratio modulated by intracoronary optical coherence tomography for predicting physiological efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

The combination of coronary imaging assessment and blood flow perturbation estimation has the potential to improve percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) guidance.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate a novel method for fast computation of Murray law-based quantitative flow ratio (μQFR) from coregistered optical coherence tomography (OCT) and angiography (OCT-modulated μQFR, OCT-μQFR) in predicting physiological efficacy of PCI.

METHODS

Patients treated by OCT-guided PCI in the OCT-arm of the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Optical Coherence Tomography to Guide RevasculariZAtion of Intermediate Coronary Stenoses trial (FORZA, NCT01824030) were included. Based on angiography and OCT before PCI, simulated residual OCT-μQFR was computed by assuming full stent expansion to the intended-to-treat segment. Plaque composition was automatically characterized using a validated artificial intelligence algorithm. Actual post-PCI OCT-μQFR pullback was computed based on coregistration of angiography and OCT acquired immediately after PCI. Suboptimal functional stenting result was defined as OCT-μQFR ≤ 0.90.

RESULTS

Paired simulated residual OCT-μQFR and actual post-PCI OCT-μQFR were obtained in 76 vessels from 74 patients. Simulated residual OCT-μQFR showed good correlation (r = 0.80, p < 0.001), agreement (mean difference = -0.02 ± 0.02, p < 0.001), and diagnostic concordance (79%, 95% confidence interval: 70%-88%) with actual post-PCI OCT-μQFR. Actual post-PCI in-stent OCT-μQFR had a median value of 0.02 and was associated with left anterior descending artery lesion location (β = 0.38, p < 0.001), higher baseline total plaque burden (β = 0.25, p = 0.031), and fibrous plaque volume (β = 0.24, p = 0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

This study based on patients enrolled in a prospective OCT-guidance PCI trial shows that simulated residual OCT-μQFR had good correlation, agreement, and diagnostic concordance with actual post-PCI OCT-μQFR. In OCT-guided procedures, OCT-μQFR in-stent pressure drop was low and was significantly predicted by pre-PCI vessel/plaque characteristics.

EXpansion of stents after intravascular lithoTripsy versus conventional predilatation in CALCified coronary arteries

BACKGROUND

Coronary artery calcification is a strong predictor for procedural failure and is independently associated with adverse events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). An important contributor to the impaired outcome is the inability to achieve optimal results due to stent underexpansion or stent deformation/fracture. Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) has emerged as an alternative technique to change the integrity of calcified plaques.

AIMS

Our aim was to investigate if pre-treatment with IVL in severely calcified lesions increases stent expansion, assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT), when compared to predilatation with conventional and/or specialty balloon strategy.

METHODS

EXIT-CALC was a prospective, single-centre, randomised controlled study. Patients with an indication for PCI and severe calcification of the target lesion were allocated to predilatation with conventional angioplasty balloons or pre-treatment with IVL, followed by drug-eluting stenting and mandatory postdilatation. Primary endpoint was stent expansion assessed by OCT. Secondary endpoints were the occurrence of peri-procedural events and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in hospital and during follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients were included. The minimal stent expansion in the IVL-group (n = 19) was 83.9 ± 10.3% and 82.2 ± 11.5% in the conventional group (n = 21) (p = 0.630). Minimal stent area was 6.6 ± 1.5 mm² and 6.2 ± 1.8 mm², respectively (p = 0.406). No peri-procedural, in-hospital and 30-day follow-up MACE were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

In severely calcified coronary lesions we found no significant difference in stent expansion measured by OCT when comparing IVL, as plaque modification, with conventional and/or specialty angioplasty balloons.

Target Lesion Revascularization After Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

BACKGROUND

Several stent expansion criteria derived from the intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) evaluation have been proposed to predict future clinical outcomes, but optimal stent expansion criteria as a guide during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are still controversial. There are no studies evaluating the utility of stent expansion criteria along with the clinical and procedural factors in predicting target lesion revascularization (TLR) after contemporary IVUS-guided PCI.

METHODS

OPTIVUS-Complex PCI study (Optimal Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) multivessel cohort was a prospective multicenter study enrolling 961 patients undergoing multivessel PCI including left anterior descending coronary artery using IVUS with an intention to meet the prespecified criteria for optimal stent expansion. We compared several stent expansion criteria (minimum stent area [MSA], MSA/distal or average reference lumen area, MSA/distal or average reference vessel area, OPTIVUS criteria, IVUS-XPL [Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance on Outcomes of Xience Prime Stents in Long Lesions] criteria, ULTIMATE [Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Drug Eluting Stents Implantation in "All-Comers" Coronary Lesions] criteria, and modified MUSIC [Multicenter Ultrasound Stenting in Coronaries Study] criteria) as well as clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics between lesions with and without TLR.

RESULTS

Among 1957 lesions, the cumulative 1-year incidence of lesion-based TLR was 1.6% (30 lesions). Hemodialysis, treatment of proximal left anterior descending coronary artery lesions, calcified lesions, small proximal reference lumen area, and small MSA had univariate associations with TLR, while all of the stent expansion criteria except for MSA were not associated with TLR. The independent risk factors of TLR were calcified lesions (hazard ratio, 2.34 [95% CI, 1.03-5.32]; P=0.04) and small proximal reference lumen area (Tertile 1: hazard ratio, 7.01 [95% CI, 1.45-33.93]; P=0.02; and Tertile 2: hazard ratio, 5.40 [95% CI, 1.17-24.90]; P=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

In contemporary IVUS-guided PCI practice, the 1-year incidence of TLR was very low. MSA, but not other stent expansion criteria, had univariate association with TLR. Independent risk factors of TLR were calcified lesions and small proximal reference lumen area, although the findings should be interpreted with caution due to small number of TLR events, limited lesion complexity, and short duration of follow-up.

Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Practical Application

Why is intravascular ultrasounography (IVUS) highly encouraged for the practical guidance of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)? First reason is to understand the mechanism of revascularization. Even if stenoses look similar in angiography, the pathophysiology could be different in each lesion. Second reason is to anticipate possible complications in advance. With prediction and appropriate preparation, most complications can be avoided or managed calmly when they occur. Third reason is to optimize PCI results with interactive IVUS use during the procedure. All these are essential to maximize the results of revascularization while minimizing acute complications, ultimately leading to improved long-term clinical outcomes.

Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Evidence and Clinical Trials

Intracoronary imaging is beneficial to optimize stent implantation and reduce the risk of stent-related complications. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is an intravascular imaging modality that allows for detailed microstructural evaluation during the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Recently, several large-scale registries, randomized trials, and meta-analyses have shown the superiority of OCT to angiography and noninferiority to IVUS with respect to both acute procedural results and mid-term clinical outcomes. This article summarizes the data supporting the application of OCT-guided PCI to several specific situations, introduces important evidence, and discusses the ongoing controversies and limitations of the current evidence base in the field of OCT-guided PCI.

Role of plaque imaging for identification of vulnerable patients beyond the stage of myocardial ischemia

Chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) is a progressive disease, which often first manifests as acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Imaging modalities are clinically useful in making decisions about the management of patients with CCS. Accumulating evidence has demonstrated that myocardial ischemia is a surrogate marker for CCS management; however, its ability to predict cardiovascular death or nonfatal myocardial infarction is limited. Herein, we present a review that highlights the latest knowledge available on coronary syndromes and discuss the role and limitations of imaging modalities in the diagnosis and management of patients with coronary artery disease. This review covers the essential aspects of the role of imaging in assessing myocardial ischemia and coronary plaque burden and composition. Furthermore, recent clinical trials on lipid-lowering and anti-inflammatory therapies have been discussed. Additionally, it provides a comprehensive overview of intracoronary and noninvasive cardiovascular imaging modalities and an understanding of ACS and CCS, with a focus on histopathology and pathophysiology.

Stent expansion evaluated by optical coherence tomography and subsequent outcomes

Regarding stent expansion indices, previous optical coherence tomography (OCT) studies have shown minimal stent area (MSA) to be most predictive of adverse events. We sought to evaluate the impact of various stent expansion and apposition indices by post-stent OCT on clinical outcomes and find OCT-defined optimal stent implantation criteria. A total of 1071 patients with 1123 native coronary artery lesions treated with new-generation drug-eluting stents with OCT guidance and final post-stent OCT analysis were included. Several stent expansion indices (MSA, MSA/average reference lumen area, MSA/distal reference lumen area, mean stent expansion, and stent expansion by linear model [stent volume/adaptive reference lumen volume]) were evaluated for their association with device-oriented clinical endpoints (DoCE) including cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction (MI) or stent thrombosis, and target lesion revascularization. MSA was negatively correlated with the risk of DoCE (hazard ratio [HR] 0.80 [0.68‒0.94]). However, stent expansion by linear model representing the overall volumetric stent expansion was associated with greater risk of DoCE (HR 1.02 [1.00‒1.04]). As categorical criteria, MSA < 5.0 mm² (HR 3.90 [1.99‒7.65]), MSA/distal reference lumen area < 90% (HR 2.16 [1.12‒4.19]), and stent expansion by linear model ≥ 65.0% (HR 1.95 [1.03‒3.89]) were independently associated with DoCE. This OCT study highlights the importance of sufficient stent expansion to achieve adequate, absolute, and relative MSA criteria for improving clinical outcome. It also emphasises that overall volumetric excessive stent expansion may have detrimental effects.

Clinical use of optical coherence tomography during percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary procedures in Southeast Asia: a survey-based expert consensus summary

Optical coherence tomography (OCT), an established intravascular imaging technique, enables rapid acquisition of high-resolution images during invasive coronary procedures to assist physician decision-making. OCT has utility in identifying plaque/lesion morphology (e.g., thrombus, degree of calcification, and presence of lipid) and vessel geometry (lesion length and vessel diameter) and in guiding stent optimisation through identification of malapposition and underexpansion. The use of OCT guidance during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) has demonstrated improved procedural and clinical outcomes in longitudinal registries, although randomised controlled trial data remain pending. Despite growing data and guideline endorsement to support OCT guidance during PCI, its use in different countries is not well established. This article is based on an advisory panel meeting that included experts from Southeast Asia (SEA) and is aimed at understanding the current clinical utility of intracoronary imaging and OCT, assessing the barriers and enablers of imaging and OCT adoption, and mapping a path for the future of intravascular imaging in SEA. This is the first Southeast Asian consensus that provides insights into the use of OCT from a clinician's point of view.

Outcomes of optical coherence tomography guided percutaneous coronary intervention against angiography guided in patients with coronary artery disease: A systematic reviews and meta-analyses

BACKGROUND

Previous studies compared optical coherence tomography (OCT) guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and angiography-guided was still limited. Therefore, we performed comprehensive meta-analyses to investigate the clinical outcomes of OCT-guided compared with angiography-guided PCI to provide a higher level of evidence.

METHODS

A systematic search from electronic databases such as Pubmed, EMBASE, SpringerLink, and Cochrane Library was conducted to obtain original articles comparing OCT and angiography. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE), cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis, target vessel revascularization, stenosis area, PCI procedure time, contrast volume, and procedural side effects were the measured outcomes. The primary end-points were MACE and cardiovascular death.

RESULTS

Total 11 studies included 5814 patients were analyzed, with 3431 using OCT-guided and 2383 using angiography-guided. Pooled estimates of outcomes, presented as odds ratios (OR) [95% confidence intervals], were generated with random-effect models. Regarding clinical outcomes, OCT-guided PCI showed significantly lower rate of MACE (odds ratio [OR] 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38 to 0.72, p < 0.001), cardiovascular death (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.67, p < 0.001), and higher contrast volume (OR 1.6, 95% CI 0.81 to 2.39, p < 0.001). OCT-guided has longer PCI procedure time (OR 2.42, 95% CI 1.33 to 4.42, p = 0.004). OCT-guided has no significant difference in lower risk of periprocedural MI (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.00, p = 0.05), stent thrombosis (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.2 to 2.43, p = 0.56), target vessel repeat revascularization (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.14, p = 0.17), stenosis area (OR -0.63, 95% CI -1.5 to 0.25, p = 0.56), and adverse events related to procedures (OR 1.33, 95% CI 0.8 to 2.19, p = 0.27).

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis demonstrated that OCT-guided PCI is significantly associated with lower MACE, cardiovascular death, and higher contrast volume. It is also associated with a longer duration of PCI. However, it is not associated with MI, stent thrombosis, target vessel revascularization, stenosis area, and adverse events related to procedures.

Safety and efficiency of percutaneous coronary intervention using a standardised optical coherence tomography workflow

BACKGROUND

While intravascular imaging guidance during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improves outcomes, routine intravascular imaging usage remains low, in part due to perceived inefficiency and safety concerns.  Aims: The LightLab (LL) Initiative was designed to evaluate whether implementing a standardised optical coherence tomography (OCT) workflow impacts PCI safety metrics and procedural efficiency.

METHODS

In this multicentre, prospective, observational study, PCI procedural data were collected over 2 years from 45 physicians at 17 US centres. OCT-guided PCI incorporating the LL workflow (N=264), a structured algorithm using routine pre- and post-PCI OCT imaging, was compared with baseline angiography-only PCI (angio) (N=428). Propensity score analysis identified 207 matched procedures. Outcomes included procedure time, radiation exposure, contrast volume, device utilisation, and treatment strategy.

RESULTS

Compared with angiography alone, LL workflow OCT-guided PCI increased the median procedural time by 9 minutes but reduced vessel preparation time (2 min LL workflow vs 3 min angio; p<0.001) and resulted in less unplanned additional treatment (4% LL workflow vs 10% angio; p=0.01). With LL workflow OCT guidance, fewer cineangiography views were needed compared to angiography guidance, leading to decreased radiation exposure (1,133 mGy LL workflow vs 1,269 mGy angio; p=0.02), with no difference in contrast utilisation between groups (p=0.28). Furthermore, LL workflow OCT guidance resulted in fewer predilatation balloons and stents being used, more direct stent placement, and greater stent post-dilatation than angiography-guided PCI.

CONCLUSIONS

The incorporation of a standardised pre- and post-PCI OCT imaging workflow improves procedural efficiency and safety metrics, at a cost of a modestly longer procedure time.

Intravascular Imaging During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

Coronary angiography has historically served as the gold standard for diagnosis of coronary artery disease and guidance of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Adjunctive use of contemporary intravascular imaging (IVI) technologies has emerged as a complement to conventional angiography-to further characterize plaque morphology and optimize the performance of PCI. IVI has utility for preintervention lesion and vessel assessment, periprocedural guidance of lesion preparation and stent deployment, and postintervention assessment of optimal endpoints and exclusion of complications. The role of IVI in reducing major adverse cardiac events in complex lesion subsets is emerging, and further studies evaluating broader use are underway or in development. This paper provides an overview of currently available IVI technologies, reviews data supporting their utilization for PCI guidance and optimization across a variety of lesion subsets, proposes best practices, and advocates for broader use of these technologies as a part of contemporary practice.

Optical coherence tomography and coronary revascularization: from indication to procedural optimization

Angiography alone is the most commonly used imaging modality for guidance of percutaneous coronary interventions. Angiography is limited, however, by several factors, including that it only portrays a low resolution, two-dimensional outline of the lumen and does not inform on plaque composition and functional stenosis severity. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is an intracoronary imaging technique that has superior spatial resolution compared to all other imaging modalities. High-resolution imaging of the vascular wall enables precise measurement of vessel wall and luminal dimensions, more accurately informing about the anatomic severity of epicardial stenoses, and also provides input for computational models to assess functional severity. The very high-resolution images also permit plaque characterization that may be informative for prognostication. Moreover, periprocedural imaging provides valuable information to guide lesion preparation, stent implantation and to evaluate acute stent complications for which iterative treatment might reduce the occurrence of major adverse stent events. As such, OCT represent a potential future all-in-one tool that provides the data necessary to establish the indications, procedural planning and optimization, and final evaluation of percutaneous coronary revascularization.

Current clinical use of intravascular ultrasound imaging to guide percutaneous coronary interventions (update)

There are 3 main reasons to promote the practical application of IVUS during PCI. First reason is to understand the mechanism of vessel dilatation. Even if angiographic stenoses are similar, their pathophysiologies are different. It is important to understand what can happen by dilating coronary artery with balloon/stent, and to develop a strategy to achieve the maximum effect. Second reason is to anticipate possible complications and to reduce them in advance. In that case, we can deal with it as calmly as possible. Third reason is to validate the PCI performed. This should lead to further improvements of the procedures, which in turn will lead to improved short- and long-term prognosis. Then, high-quality PCI could be possible. This review summarizes the standard usage of IVUS in routine clinical practice and the use of IVUS in specific situations, especially complex lesions.

Prevalence, Morphology, and Predictors of Intra-Stent Plaque Rupture in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Optical Coherence Tomography Study

Previous studies have shown that plaque rupture (PR) is the most important cause of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, the potential impact of intra-stent PR on stent failure manifesting as ACS and the optical coherence tomography (OCT) features of these lesions was still less clear. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the characteristics of OCT-defined in-stent PR and identify the potential risk factors for PR in ACS patients. All 213 ACS patients were stratified into two groups according to the occurrence of in-stent PR. The baseline characteristics of all patients were investigated. A multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with the formation of PR. OCT findings showed that 80 patients had in-stent PR, and 133 patients were without PR. Patients who suffered in-stent PR had higher blood lipid levels (P < .050) and longer duration of stent failure (P = .001). Moreover, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) 0/1 flow was more prone to the formation of PR (P = .010), and lesions in the PR group harbored more macrophages and cholesterol crystals (P < .001 and P = .024). On multivariate analysis, presentation of myocardial infarction (MI) and OCT findings of lipidic neointima length showed a 3.6-fold (P = .004) and 1.3-fold (P < .001) higher risk for occurrence of in-stent PR. ACS patients who suffered in-stent PR had a longer duration of stent failure and more ISR occurring in non-culprit vessels. Given the distinguishing features between ACS patients with in-stent PR and non-PR, potential targeted therapy was warranted to improve the prognosis of patients with in-stent PR.

Multi-Scale Reconstruction of Undersampled Spectral-Spatial OCT Data for Coronary Imaging Using Deep Learning

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a cardiovascular condition with high morbidity and mortality. Intravascular optical coherence tomography (IVOCT) has been considered as an optimal imagining system for the diagnosis and treatment of CAD. Constrained by Nyquist theorem, dense sampling in IVOCT attains high resolving power to delineate cellular structures/features. There is a trade-off between high spatial resolution and fast scanning rate for coronary imaging. In this paper, we propose a viable spectral-spatial acquisition method that down-scales the sampling process in both spectral and spatial domain while maintaining high quality in image reconstruction. The down-scaling schedule boosts data acquisition speed without any hardware modifications. Additionally, we propose a unified multi-scale reconstruction framework, namely Multiscale-Spectral-Spatial-Magnification Network (MSSMN), to resolve highly down-scaled (compressed) OCT images with flexible magnification factors. We incorporate the proposed methods into Spectral Domain OCT (SD-OCT) imaging of human coronary samples with clinical features such as stent and calcified lesions. Our experimental results demonstrate that spectral-spatial down-scaled data can be better reconstructed than data that are down-scaled solely in either spectral or spatial domain. Moreover, we observe better reconstruction performance using MSSMN than using existing reconstruction methods. Our acquisition method and multi-scale reconstruction framework, in combination, may allow faster SD-OCT inspection with high resolution during coronary intervention.

Network Meta-analysis of Trials Comparing Intravascular Ultrasound, Optical Coherence Tomography, and Angiography-Guided Technique for Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation

Background

The current advances in coronary imaging with the introduction of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), and more recently, optical coherence tomography (OCT) have overcome the limitations of coronary angiography.

Objective

This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials to report clinical outcomes among patients undergoing drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation either by IVUS- or OCT-guided technique or angiography alone.

Methods

PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched systematically for all relevant published randomized clinical trials from the inception of the respective database to October 15th, 2021. The outcomes of interest assessed in this meta-analysis were major adverse cardiac events, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular mortality. All the endpoints were expressed as odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI. The network diagrams were computed using the OR as an effective measure. All statistical analyses were carried out in R statistical software version 4.0.3.

Results

A total of 14 randomized clinical trials were included in our meta-analysis. In patient undergoing DES implantation, angiography alone was associated with higher odds of major adverse cardiac events (OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.17-2.24), target vessel revascularization (OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.21-2.13) and cardiovascular mortality (OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.25-3.11). However, OCT demonstrated similar odds of major adverse cardiac events, cardiovascular mortality, and target vessel revascularization compared with IVUS. The odds of myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality were similar among all the 3 groups.

Conclusions

Although angiography alone was associated with worse outcomes than IVUS in a patient undergoing DES implantation, no difference in outcome was noted between patients undergoing DES implantation with OCT compared with IVUS. Advanced intracoronary imaging use should be encouraged to prevent excess mortality and morbidity.

Optical coherence tomography versus angiography and intravascular ultrasound to guide coronary stent implantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is an adjunct to angiography-guided coronary stent placement. However, in the absence of dedicated, appropriately powered randomized controlled trials, the impact of OCT on clinical outcomes is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of all available studies comparing OCT-guided versus angiography-guided and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided coronary stent implantation.

METHODS

MEDLINE and Cochrane Central were queried from their inception through July 2022 for all studies that sought to compare OCT-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to angiography-guided and IVUS-guided PCI. The primary endpoint was minimal stent area (MSA) compared between modalities. Clinical endpoints of interest were all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and stent thrombosis (ST). Risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies (8 randomized control trials and 5 observational studies) enrolling 6312 participants were included. OCT was associated with a strong trend toward increased MSA compared to angiography (MD = 0.36, p = 0.06). OCT-guided PCI was also associated with a reduction in the incidence of all-cause mortality [RR = 0.59, 95% CI (0.35, 0.97), p = 0.04] and cardiovascular mortality [RR = 0.41, 95% CI (0.21, 0.80), p = 0.009] compared with angiography-guided PCI. Point estimates favored OCT relative to angiography in MACE [RR = 0.75, 95% CI (0.47, 1.20), p = 0.22] and MI [RR = 0.75, 95% CI (0.53, 1.07), p = 0.12]. No differences were detected in ST [RR = 0.71, 95% CI (0.21, 2.44), p = 0.58], TLR [RR = 0.71, 95% CI (0.17, 3.05), p = 0.65], or TVR rates [RR = 0.89, 95% CI (0.46, 1.73), p = 0.73]. Compared with IVUS guidance, OCT guidance was associated with a nonsignificant reduction in the MSA (MD = -0.16, p = 0.27). The rates of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, MACE, MI, TLR, TVR, or ST were similar between OCT-guided and IVUS-guided PCI.

CONCLUSIONS

OCT-guided PCI was associated with reduced all-cause and cardiovascular mortality compared to angiography-guided PCI. These results should be considered hypothesis generating as the mechanisms for the improved outcomes were unclear as no differences were detected in the rates of TLR, TVR, or ST. OCT- and IVUS-guided PCI resulted in similar post-PCI outcomes.

Clinical Relevance of Impaired Physiological Assessment After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-analysis

Background

Despite the optimal angiographic result of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), residual disease at the site of the culprit lesion can lead to major adverse cardiac events. Post-PCI physiological assessment can identify residual stenosis. This meta-analysis aims to investigate data of studies examining post-PCI physiological assessment in relation to long-term outcomes.

Methods

Studies were included in the meta-analysis after performing a systematic literature search on July 1, 2022. The primary end point was the incidence of major adverse cardiac events, vessel-orientated cardiac events, or target vessel failure.

Results

Low post-PCI fractional flow reserve, reported in 7 studies with fractional flow reserve cutoff values between 0.84 and 0.90, including 4017 patients, was associated with an increased rate of the primary end point (hazard ratio [HR], 2.06; 95% CI, 1.37-3.08). One study reported about impaired post-PCI instantaneous wave-free ratio with instantaneous wave-free ratio cutoff value of 0.95 in relation to major adverse cardiac events, showing a significant association (HR, 3.38; 95% CI, 0.99-11.6; P = .04). Low post-PCI quantitative flow ratio, reported in 3 studies with quantitative flow ratio cutoff value between 0.89 and 0.91, including 1181 patients, was associated with an increased rate of vessel-orientated cardiac events (HR, 3.01; 95% CI, 2.10-4.32). Combining data of all modalities, impaired physiological assessment showed an increased rate of the primary end point (HR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.71-3.16) and secondary end points, including death (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.04-1.89), myocardial infarction (HR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.34-5.42) and target vessel revascularization (HR, 2.88; 95% CI, 1.91-4.35).

Conclusions

Impaired post-PCI physiological assessment is associated with increased adverse cardiac events and individual end points, including death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization. Therefore, prospective studies are awaited on whether physiology-based optimization of PCI results in better clinical outcomes.

The MLD MAX OCT algorithm: An imaging-based workflow for percutaneous coronary intervention

Although extensive clinical data support the utility of intravascular imaging to guide and optimize outcomes following percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), clinical adoption remains limited. One of the primary reasons for limited utilization may be a lack of standardization on how to best integrate the data provided by intravascular imaging practically. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) offers a high-resolution intravascular imaging modality with integrated software automation that allows for incorporation of OCT into the routine workflow of PCIs. We suggest use of an algorithm called MLD MAX to incorporate OCT for imaging-guided interventions: the baseline OCT imaging run is intended to facilitate procedural planning and strategizing, consisting of assessment for predominant lesion morphology (M), measurement for stent length (L) and determination of stent diameter (D); the post-PCI OCT imaging run is designated for assessment of need for further optimization of stent result, and consists of analysis for medial dissections (M), adequate stent apposition (A) and stent expansion (X). Incorporation of the MLD MAX algorithm into daily practice guides an efficient and easily-memorable workflow for optimized PCI procedures.

Intravascular Imaging for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Guidance and Optimization: The Evidence for Improved Patient Outcomes

As of this writing, there have been approximately 24 randomized controlled trial publications, 32 meta-analyses, and 85 registries comparing intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) or optical coherence tomography (OCT) versus angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation (or IVUS versus OCT guidance). Although in specific clinical scenarios IVUS or OCT may be preferred, in most drug-eluting stent implantation procedures, either intravascular ultrasound or OCT can be used safely, efficiently, effectively, and interchangeably and will improve patient outcomes compared with stent implantation procedures performed just with angiography guidance.

Combined rotational atherectomy and cutting balloon angioplasty prior to drug-eluting stent implantation in severely calcified coronary lesions: The PREPARE-CALC-COMBO study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of lesion preparation using rotational atherectomy (RA) with consecutive cutting balloon angioplasty (Rota-Cut).

BACKGROUND

Whether the Rota-Cut combination improves stent performance in severely calcified coronary lesions is unknown.

METHODS

PREPARE-CALC-COMBO is a single-arm prospective trial in which 110 patients were treated with a Rota-Cut strategy before implantation of sirolimus-eluting stents and compared with patients treated with modified balloon (MB, scoring or cutting) or RA from a historical cohort (the randomized PREPARE-CALC trial). The study had two primary endpoints: in-stent acute lumen gain (ALG) by quantitative angiographic analysis and stent expansion (SE) on optical coherence tomography.

RESULTS

In-stent ALG was significantly higher with Rota-Cut compared to RA or MB alone (1.92 ± 0.45 mm vs. 1.74 ± 0.45 mm with MB vs. 1.70 ± 0.42 mm with RA; p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). SE was comparable between groups (75.1 ± 13.8% vs. 73.5 ± 13.3 with MB vs. 73.1 ± 12.2 with RA; p = 0.19 and p = 0.39, respectively). The Rota-Cut combination resulted in higher minimal stent area (MSA) (7.1 ± 2.2mm² vs. 6.1 ± 1.7mm²  with MB vs. 6.2 ± 1.9mm² with RA; p = 0.003 and p = 0.004, respectively). In-hospital death occurred in one patient. Target vessel failure at 9 months was low and comparable between groups (8.2% vs. 8% with MB vs. 6% with RA; p = 1 and p = 0.79, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Rota-Cut combination resulted in higher ALG and larger MSA compared with historical control of RA or MB alone, but was not associated with higher SE. Despite extensive lesion preparation, this strategy is safe, feasible, and associated with favorable clinical outcome at 9 months.