Morning and Evening Home Blood Pressure and Risks of Incident Stroke and Coronary Artery Disease in the Japanese General Practice Population

Blood-Pressure-Monitoring Smartphone Applications: Ushering in a New Era of Wearable Cardiac Devices? Comment on Vischer et al. Comparability of a Blood-Pressure-Monitoring Smartphone Application with Conventional Measurements-A Pilot Study. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 749

Systemic arterial hypertension in adults is generally defined as a systolic blood pressure (SBP) of >140 mmHg and/or a diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of >90 mmHg [...]

Long-term reduction in morning and nighttime blood pressure after renal denervation: 36-month results from SPYRAL HTN-ON MED trial

Elevated morning and nighttime blood pressures (BP) are associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events such as stroke and myocardial infarction. We compared the long-term changes in morning and nighttime BP in patients with uncontrolled hypertension (office systolic BP between 150 and <180 mmHg/diastolic BP ≥ 90 mmHg; mean ambulatory systolic BP (SBP) between 140 and <170 mmHg; 1-3 prescribed antihypertensive medications). Eighty patients were randomized to RDN or sham control. In patients taking at least 3 antihypertensive medications at 36 months (N = 23 RDN group; N = 23 sham group), the 24 h ambulatory SBP as well as morning (7:00-9:00AM) and nighttime (1:00-6:00AM) ambulatory SBP were significantly lower for the RDN group compared to sham control (24 h SBP: -20.2 vs. -10.2, p = 0.0087; morning SBP: -23.9 vs. -8.0 mmHg, p = 0.029; nighttime SBP: -20.8 vs. -7.2 mmHg, p = 0.0011). At 36 months, 24 h SBP was controlled to <130 mmHg in 40% of RDN patients in the morning compared to 6% for the sham group; P = 0.021 and in 80% of the RDN patients at night compared to 39% in the sham group; P = 0.019. Major adverse events through 36 months were rare in both groups, and there were no renal artery re-interventions or vascular complications. Morning and nighttime SBP were significantly lower in patients prescribed at least 3 antihypertensive medications at 36 months in the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED trial for RDN compared with sham control. The results suggest RDN has significant benefit when the risk of cardiovascular events is highest.

Role of housing in blood pressure control: a review of evidence from the Smart Wellness Housing survey in Japan

Current countermeasures for preventing hypertension emphasize only improvements to lifestyle. Recently, improving life environment has attracted attention, in parallel with publication of the WHO Housing and health guidelines. We quantitatively evaluated the relationship between housing thermal environment and blood pressure (BP) in a real-world setting. We conducted a nationwide, prospective intervention study-the Smart Wellness Housing survey-in Japan, as a non-randomized controlled trial. The intervention was the retrofitting of thermal insulation in houses. Participant recruitment was done by construction companies in all 47 prefectures of Japan. Measurements of home BP and indoor temperature at 1.0 m above the floor in the living room, changing room, and bedroom were taken for 2 weeks before and after the intervention each winter (November-March) of FY 2014-2019. As of July 2022, over 2500 households and 5000 participants were registered in the database. We found that (1) about 90% of Japanese lived in cold homes (minimum indoor temperature <18 °C), (2) indoor temperature was non-linearly associated with home BP, (3) morning systolic BP (SBP) was more sensitive than evening SBP to changes in indoor temperature, (4) SBP was influenced by indoor temperature change particularly in older participants and women, (5) unstable indoor temperature was associated with large BP variability, and (6) insulation retrofitting intervention significantly reduced home BP, especially in hypertensive patients. We proposed that the BP reduction effect of the life-environment is comparable to that achievable by lifestyle.

Diagnostic agreement of masked uncontrolled hypertension detected by ambulatory blood pressure and home blood pressure measured by an all-in-one BP monitoring device: The HI-JAMP study

Masked hypertension is defined by office blood pressure (BP) in the controlled-BP range while out-of-office BP measured by ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) and home BP monitoring (HBPM) is in the uncontrolled range. However, diagnosis of masked hypertension may differ if assessed by different out-of-office BP indices. This study aims to investigate the diagnostic agreement of masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUHT) detected by ABPM indices (ABPM-MUHT) and HBPM indices (HBPM-MUHT) using the same all-in-one device (TM2441; A&D Company). The present study enrolled a total of 2322 treated hypertensive patients (males 53.2%, average age 69.2 ± 11.5 years) from the Home-Activity ICT-based Japan Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Prospective (HI-JAMP) Study, who consecutively underwent office BP monitoring, 24-h ABPM (at 30-min intervals), and 5-day HBPM (twice each morning and evening) using the same device. When out-of-office BP control status was assessed only by 24-h average SBP or by the average of morning and evening SBP, the diagnostic agreement of MUHT detected by ABPM and HBPM was 29.7% among the 445 patients with any type of MUHT. When out-of-office BP indices in each time-window were simultaneously assessed, the diagnostic agreement increased to 40-45.7%. Our results indicated the importance of assessing BPs at various times of day, especially morning hours, for perfect hypertension management. Diagnosis of masked hypertension only by an averaged BP index, without considering specific time-windows, might underestimate cardiovascular risk.

New Conversion Formula Between B-Type Natriuretic Peptide and N-Terminal-Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide - Analysis From a Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Although B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal (NT)-proBNP are commonly used markers of heart failure, a simple conversion formula between these peptides has not yet been developed for clinical use.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 9,394 samples were obtained from Nara Medical University, Jichi Medical University, and Osaka University. We randomly selected 70% for a derivation set to investigate a conversion formula from BNP to NT-proBNP using estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and body mass index (BMI); the remaining 30% was used as the internal validation set and we used a cohort study from Nara Medical University as an external validation set. Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed a new conversion formula: log NT-proBNP = 1.21 + 1.03 × log BNP - 0.009 × BMI - 0.007 × eGFR (r2=0.900, P<0.0001). The correlation coefficients between the actual and converted values of log NT-proBNP in the internal and external validation sets were 0.942 (P<0.0001) and 0.891 (P<0.0001), respectively. We applied this formula to samples obtained from patients administered with sacubitril/valsartan. After treatment initiation, NT-proBNP levels decreased and actual BNP levels increased. However, the calculated BNP levels decreased roughly parallel to the NT-proBNP levels.

CONCLUSIONS

This new and simple conversion formula of BNP and NT-proBNP with eGFR and BMI is potentially useful in clinical practice.

The role of blood pressure management in stroke prevention: current status and future prospects

INTRODUCTION

Stroke is the second-leading cause of death worldwide and the second-leading cause of disability-adjusted life-years. It is well known that hypertension is a significant risk factor for cardiovascular events, including stroke.

AREAS COVERED

Recent interventional trials have demonstrated the superiority of intensive blood pressure (BP) control for prevention of cardiovascular events compared to standard BP control. Notably, in the Strategy of Blood Pressure Intervention in Elderly Hypertensive Patients (STEP) trial, intensive BP control showed superiority in the prevention of stroke events in elderly hypertensive patients. Novel medications such as angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors and sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors have the potential to suppress various CVD events including stroke. Non-pharmacological antihypertensive therapies such as renal denervation have demonstrated BP-lowering effects and may be useful for stroke prevention. Additionally, new methods and systems of BP monitoring including various kinds of nighttime BP measurement devices, wearable devices, and methods using information and communication technology can be used to assess the pathophysiology of BP variability as a risk factor and an event trigger of stroke incidence.

EXPERT OPINION

Novel therapies and new technologies for BP evaluation strongly support the development of individualized anticipatory medicine, which should be useful for the prevention of stroke.

The HOPE Asia network 2022 up-date consensus statement on morning hypertension management

Morning hypertension is an important clinical target in the management of hypertension for perfect 24-h blood pressure (BP) control. Morning hypertension is generally categorized into two types: "morning surge" type and "sustained nocturnal and morning hypertension" type. The "morning surge" type is characterized by an exaggerated morning blood pressure surge (MBPS), and the "sustained nocturnal and morning hypertension" type with continuous hypertension from nighttime to morning (non-dipper/riser type). They can be detected by home and ambulatory blood pressure measurements (HBPM and ABPM). These two forms of morning hypertension both increase the risk of cardiovascular and renal diseases, but may occur via different pathogenic mechanisms and are associated with different conditions. Morning hypertension should be treated to achieve a morning BP level of < 135/85 mmHg, regardless of the office BP. The second target morning BP levels is < 125/75 mmHg for high-risk patients with morning hypertension and concomitant diseases. Morning hypertension is more frequently found in Asians, than in Westerners. Thus, the management of morning hypertension is especially important in Asia. The detection of morning hypertension and the individual home BP-guided treatment approach targeting morning BP in combination with ABPM, and the optimal treatment of morning hypertension would reduce cardiovascular events in Asia.

Seasonal Variation in Day-by-Day Home Blood Pressure Variability and Effect on Cardiovascular Disease Incidence

BACKGROUND

Although day-by-day home blood pressure (BP) variability (BPV) has been associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, it remains unclear whether this association differs from season to season. The present study aimed to assess seasonal variation in day-by-day home BP variability and its association with CVD risk.

METHODS

We analyzed the data from a nationwide, prospective observational study, the J-HOP study (Japan Morning Surge-Home Blood Pressure), in which 14 consecutive days of home BP monitoring were conducted. The values of SD (SD_{systolic BP [SBP]}), coefficient of variation_SBP, and average real variability_SBP of home SBP were used as indices of day-by-day home BPV.

RESULTS

Among 4231 participants (mean age, 64.9±10.9 years, 46.7% male, 91.5% hypertensives), all 3 day-by-day home BPV indices were lower in summer than winter after adjusting for confounding factors. In winter, SD_SBP, coefficient of variation_SBP, and average real variability_SBP were significantly associated with increased risk of CVD events (coronary artery disease, stroke, heart failure, and aortic dissection; adjusted hazard ratio [95%CI] per 1-SD of SD_SBP, 1.26 [1.02-1.54]; coefficient of variation_SBP, 1.24 [1.02-1.52]; average real variability_SBP, 1.44 [1.17-1.77]). These relationships were also observed in the analysis of quartiles of BPV parameters (adjusted hazard ratio [95%CI] compared to the first quartile, fourth quartile of SD_SBP 2.26 [1.06-4.85]; coefficient of variation_SBP 2.96 [1.43-6.15]; average real variability_SBP 2.73 [1.25-5.93]). In other seasons, however, there were no significant associations between day-by-day home BPV and CVD event risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that day-by-day home BPV measured in winter is more strongly associated with future CVD incidence than that measured in other seasons.

Standardized home blood pressure monitoring: Rationale behind the 722 protocol

Home blood pressure (HBP) has been recognized as a prognostic predictor for cardiovascular events, and integrated into the diagnosis and management of hypertension. With increasing accessibility of oscillometric blood pressure devices, HBP monitoring is easy to perform, more likely to obtain reliable estimation of blood pressures, and feasible to document long-term blood pressure variations, compared to office and ambulatory blood pressures. To obtain reliable HBP estimates, a standardized HBP monitoring protocol is essential. A consensus regarding the optimal duration and frequency of HBP monitoring is yet to be established. Based on the current evidence, the "722" protocol, which stands for two measurements on one occasion, two occasions a day (morning and evening), and over a consecutive of 7 days, is most commonly used in clinical studies and recommended in relevant guidelines and consensus documents. HBP monitoring based on the "722" protocol fulfills the minimal requirement of blood pressure measurements to achieve agreement of blood pressure classifications defined by office blood pressures and to predict cardiovascular risks. In the Taiwan HBP consensus, the frequency of repeating the "722" protocol of HBP monitoring according to different scenarios of hypertension management, from every 2 weeks to 3 months, is recommended. It is reasonable to conclude that the "722" protocol for HBP monitoring is clinically justified and can serve as a basis for standardized HBP monitoring.

Simple predictive score for nocturnal hypertension and masked nocturnal hypertension using home blood pressure monitoring in clinical practice

OBJECTIVE

The decision whether to measure night-time blood pressure (BP) is challenging as these values cannot be easily evaluated because of problems with measurement devices and related stress. Using the nationwide, practice-based Japan Morning Surge-Home BP Nocturnal BP study data, we developed a simple predictive score that physicians can use to diagnose nocturnal hypertension.

METHODS

We divided 2765 outpatients (mean age 63 years; hypertensive patients 92%) with cardiovascular risks who underwent morning, evening, and night-time home BP (HBP) measurements (0200, 0300, and 0400 h) into a calibration group ( n  = 2212) and validation group ( n  = 553). We used logistic-regression models in the calibration group to identify the predictive score for nocturnal hypertension (night-time HBP ≥120/70 mmHg) and then evaluated the score's predictive ability in the validation group.

RESULTS

In the logistic-regression model, male sex, increased BMI) (≥25 kg/m 2 ), diabetes, elevated urine-albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) (≥30 mg/g Cr), elevated office BP (≥140/90 mmHg) and home (average of morning and evening) BP (≥135/85 mmHg) had positive relationships with nocturnal hypertension. The predictive scores for nocturnal hypertension were 1 point (male, BMI, and UACR); 2 points (diabetes); 3 points (office BP ≥140/90 mmHg); 6 points (home BP ≥135/85 mmHg); total 14 points. Over 75% of the nocturnal hypertension cases in the validation group showed at least 10 points [AUC 0.691, 95% CI (0.647-0.735)]. We also developed a score for masked nocturnal hypertension, that is, nocturnal hypertension despite controlled daytime HBP.

CONCLUSION

We developed a simple predictive score for nocturnal hypertension that can be used in clinical settings and for diagnoses.

Association of home and office systolic and diastolic hypertension with glucose metabolism in a general population: the Ohasama study

OBJECTIVE

This study was performed to investigate the association of hypertension subtypes with glucose metabolism among the Japanese general population.

METHODS

The study involved 646 residents (mean age: 62.4 years) without treatment for hypertension or a history of diabetes from Ohasama, a rural Japanese community, who underwent an oral glucose tolerance test. Hypertension subtypes [normotension, isolated systolic hypertension (ISH), isolated diastolic hypertension (IDH), and systolic and diastolic hypertension (SDH)] were defined on the basis of home and office SBP and DBP (HBP and OBP, respectively). The estimated means of blood glucose related indices among the groups were compared by analysis of covariance adjusted for possible confounding factors.

RESULTS

Blood glucose related indices were not different among the morning HBP-defined hypertension subtypes. Participants with evening HBP-defined ISH had a significantly higher estimated mean BG at 120 min, higher homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and lower Matsuda-DeFronzo index than participants with NT (all P < 0.021). Participants with OBP-defined SDH had a significantly higher estimated mean fasting blood glucose; blood glucose at 30, 60 and 120 min; and HOMA-IR and a lower Matsuda-DeFronzo index than participants with NT (all P < 0.0025).

CONCLUSION

The blood glucose related indices were different among hypertension subtypes. Participants with evening HBP-defined ISH and OBP-defined SDH had higher blood glucose levels and insulin resistance than participants with correspondingly defined normotension, while those with morning HBP did not. These findings suggest the importance of measuring evening HBP and office blood pressure for early detection of coexisting hypertension and diabetes.

Left ventricular mass as a predictor of cardiovascular events in the era of hypertension management using home blood pressure measurement: the J-HOP study

Target organ damage (TOD) is associated with a risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) independent of blood pressure (BP); however, this association has been observed based on the assessment of office BP. We studied 1641 patients (mean age 64.8 ± 11.7 years) with CVD risk factors who underwent home BP measurement over a 14-day period and evaluated TOD at baseline and then performed follow-up examination of the J-HOP (Japan Morning Surge-Home Blood Pressure) study results. During the median follow-up of 6.6 ± 3.5 years, 115 participants experienced a CVD event. After adjustment for CVD risk factors, including office systolic BP, the adjusted hazard ratios expressing the risk of CVD events were 1.30 (95% confidence interval, 1.15-1.52), 1.27 (1.04-1.56), and 1.25 (1.11-1.40) per one-SD increase in log-transformed urinary albumin creatinine ratio (UACR, 0.57 mg/gCre), brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV, 342 cm/s) and left ventricular mass index (LVMI, 26.6 g/m²) assessed by echocardiography, respectively. Even after adding home systolic BP as a covariate, these associations remained except for the association with baPWV (all P < 0.05). The C-statistic for the base model including office and home systolic BP for the risk of CVD events was 0.783 (95% CI: 0.743, 0.824), which significantly increased to 0.795 (95% CI: 0.757, 0.834) after adding LVMI, and changed slightly but not significantly with the addition of UACR or baPWV. Adding UACR, baPWV, or both to the model including LVMI did not improve CVD event prediction. In the modern era of hypertension management using home BP measurement, TOD indicators, especially LVMI, provide superior CVD event prediction independent of and beyond home BP.

Differences of blood pressure measured at clinic versus at home in the morning and in the evening in Europe and Asia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Numerous studies have indicated that there might be great differences among different populations in Europe and Asia in terms of home morning and evening blood pressure (BP). Thus, the authors performed a systematic review to determine the quantitative differences of BP measured at clinic versus at home in the morning and in the evening in Europe and Asia. PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched up to October 2021. Studies that compared clinic BP with home morning and (or) home evening BP in European and Asian populations were included. A random effect model was applied to pool the differences between clinic BP and home morning/evening BP. Thirty‐five studies, for a total of 49 432 patients, were included in this meta‐analysis. Mean clinic systolic blood pressure (SBP) values were significantly higher than home morning SBP values by 3.79 mmHg (95% CI, 2.77–4.80). The differences were much larger in Europe [(6.53 mmHg (95% CI, 4.10–8.97)] than in Asia [(2.70 mmHg (95% CI, 1.74–3.66)], and the region was a significant predictor for the differences. Mean clinic SBP values were also significantly higher than home evening SBP values by 6.59 mmHg (95% CI, 4.98–8.21). The differences were much smaller in Europe [5.85 mmHg (95% CI, 3.24–8.45)] than in Asia [7.13 mmHg (95% CI, 4.92–9.35)], while age and clinic SBP might contribute to it. Our findings showed that the difference between clinic and home morning SBP was much larger in European than Asian populations, whereas the difference between clinic and home evening SBP was the opposite. The differing characteristics of the region, ethnic, age, and clinic BP might explain the diversities.

Association of morning hypertension with chronic kidney disease progression and cardiovascular events in patients with chronic kidney disease and hypertension

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Associations of morning hypertension with chronic kidney disease are rarely investigated in prospective studies. We aim to investigate the predictive value of uncontrolled morning hypertension (UMH) to chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression and cardiovascular (CV) events in patients with CKD and hypertension.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this prospective two-center observational study, 304 hypertensive patients with CKD were enrolled. Time to total mortality, CKD progression and CV events was recorded; Kaplan-Meier survival function estimates and Multivariable Cox proportional hazard model were used to investigate associations between UMH and outcomes. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board (http://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org; TCTR20180313004). After a follow-up for median 30 months, 23 (7.6%) patients died, 34 (11.2%) had CKD progression, and 95 (31.3%) occurred new-onset CV events, respectively. UMH was shown to be a strong predictor of CKD progression [hazard ratio (HR) 2.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.22-4.94] and CV events (HR 1.69, 95% CI 1.12-2.53). When morning hypertension was analyzed as a continuous variable, morning systolic blood pressure (per 10 mmHg) was also shown to be predictive to CKD progression (HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.07-1.53, P < 0.01) and CV events (HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.03-1.28, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

UMH is strongly associated with CKD progression and CV events in patients with CKD and hypertension. UMH in CKD patients deserves further attentions.

Association of Night-to-Night Adherence of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure With Day-to-Day Morning Home Blood Pressure and Its Seasonal Variation in Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Background

The aim of this study was to investigate the association between night‐to‐night adherence to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy and both home blood pressure (BP) level on the following day and seasonal variation in home BP in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

Methods and Results

We analyzed 105 participants who had been diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea (average apnea‐hypopnea index, 49.7±18.4 per hour) and who were already receiving CPAP therapy. Home BP (twice every morning and evening) and CPAP adherence data were automatically transmitted to a server for 1 year. A mixed‐effects model for repeated measures analysis was used to examine associations of night‐to‐night good CPAP adherence with day‐to‐day home BP within the same patient after adjusting for covariates. The average number of days in which patients achieved both CPAP adherence and morning or evening home BP measurement was 206.6±122.7 days (21 487 readings) and 191.2±126.3 days (20 170 readings), respectively. Good CPAP adherence (>4 hours per night of use) was achieved on the evening or morning before home BP measurements (86.8% and 86.9%, respectively). After adjustment for confounders, good CPAP adherence was negatively associated with morning home systolic BP (β, −0.663; P=0.004) and diastolic BP (β, −0.829; P<0.001). Morning home systolic BP in winter in the individuals with good CPAP adherence was significantly lower than that in individuals without such adherence (P<0.05). These associations were not found in evening home BP.

Conclusions

Good adherence to CPAP therapy was negatively associated with morning home BP on the following day in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. The association was remarkable in the winter season.

Predictive power of home blood pressure in the evening compared with home blood pressure in the morning and office blood pressure before treatment and in the on-treatment follow-up period: a post hoc analysis of the HOMED-BP study

The predictive power of home blood pressure (BP) in the evening compared with home BP in the morning and office BP has been controversial. The predictive power of evening BP was compared to that of morning BP and office BP. The likelihood ratio test between one model containing a single BP index with traditional risk factors and a similar model further containing another BP index was used to assess whether the additional BP index significantly improved the adequacy of the model. Of 3266 patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension who were on antihypertensive medications (men 50.6%, age 59.5 ± 10.0 years), 58 experienced a major adverse cardiovascular event during a median follow-up of 7.1 years. The hazard ratios for a one standard deviation increment of evening home systolic/diastolic BP were 1.26 (0.98-1.62)/1.43 (1.09-1.88) in the baseline untreated period and 1.46 (1.17-1.81)/1.63 (1.26-2.11) during the on-treatment follow-up period. When evening BP at baseline and that during follow-up were included in the same model, only the latter significantly improved the prediction models (P = 0.006/0.005 for systolic/diastolic BP). Then, evening home BP vs. morning BP during follow-up was tested. The former did not improve the prediction models (P > 0.2), but the latter significantly improved the models (P ≤ 0.048). Similarly, when evening home BP and office BP during follow-up were analyzed, only the former significantly improved the prediction models (P ≤ 0.015). In conclusion, evening BP could be a more potent predictor than office BP, but it was inferior compared to morning BP in the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertensive patients.

Seven-action approaches for the management of hypertension in Asia - The HOPE Asia network

Asia is a large continent and there is significant diversity between countries and regions. Over the last 30 years, absolute blood pressure (BP) levels in Asia have increased to a greater extent than those in other regions. In diverse Asia‐Pacific populations, for choosing an Asia‐specific approach to hypertension management is important to prevent target organ damage and cardiovascular diseases. In this consensus document of HOPE Asia Network, we introduce seven action approaches for management of hypertension in Asia.

A Japan nationwide web-based survey of patient preference for renal denervation for hypertension treatment

Renal denervation is a potential alternative to antihypertensive drug therapy. However, data on patient preference for this treatment option are limited and there are no data specifically from Asian patients. This study evaluated patient preference for renal denervation in patients with hypertension from Japan. Patients were a subset of those who participated in a March 2020 online electronic survey of patients with hypertension who had regularly visited medical institutions for treatment, were receiving antihypertensive drug therapy and had home blood pressure recordings available. The survey included a question about patient preference for treatment with renal denervation. A total of 2,392 patients were included (66% male, mean age 59.8 ± 11.6 years, mean duration of hypertension 11.4 ± 9.5 years). Preference for renal denervation was expressed by 755 patients (31.6%), and was higher in males than in females, in younger compared with older patients, in those with higher versus lower blood pressure, in patients who were less adherent versus more adherent to antihypertensive drug therapy, and in those who did rather than did not have antihypertensive drug-related side effects. Significant predictors of preference for renal denervation on logistic regression analysis were younger patient age, male sex, higher home or office systolic blood pressure, poor antihypertensive drug adherence, the presence of heart failure, and the presence of side effects during treatment with antihypertensive drugs. Overall, a relevant proportion of Japanese patients with hypertension expressed a preference for renal denervation. This should be taken into account when making shared decisions about antihypertensive drug therapy.

Home Blood Pressure and Telemedicine: A Modern Approach for Managing Hypertension During and After COVID-19 Pandemic

Hypertension is the most common cardiovascular risk factor for acute cardiovascular outcomes, including acute coronary disease, stroke, chronic kidney disease and congestive heart failure. Despite the fact that it represents the most prevalent risk factor in the general population, mostly in elderly individuals, its awareness is still relatively low, being about one third of patients living with undiagnosed hypertension and high risk of experiencing acute cardiovascular events. In addition, though recent improvement in pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapeutic options, hypertension is largely uncontrolled, with about 35-40% of treated hypertensive patients achieving the recommended therapeutic targets. Among different modern interventions proposed for improving blood pressure control in treated hypertensive patients, a systematic adoption of home BP monitoring has demonstrated to be one of the most effective. Indeed, it improves patients' awareness of the disease and adherence to prescribed medications and allows tailoring and personalizing BP lowering therapies. Home BP monitoring is particularly suitable for telemedicine and mobile-health solutions. Indeed, in specific conditions, when face-to-face interactions between patients and physicians are not allowed or even suspended, as in case of COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine may ensure effective management of hypertension, as well as other cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular comorbidities. This review will summarize strengths and limitations of telemedicine in the clinical management of hypertension with a particular focus on the lessons learned during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Sleep and cardiovascular outcomes in relation to nocturnal hypertension: the J-HOP Nocturnal Blood Pressure Study

There is a lack of data on how nighttime blood pressure (BP) might modify the relationship between sleep duration and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Self-reported sleep duration data were available for 2253/2562 patients from the J-HOP Nocturnal BP study; of these, 2236 had complete follow-up data (mean age 63.0 years, 83% using antihypertensive drugs). CVD outcomes included stroke, coronary artery disease (CAD), and atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD [stroke + CAD]). Associations between sleep duration and nighttime home BP (measured using a validated, automatic, oscillometric device) were determined. During a mean follow-up of 7.1 ± 3.8 years, there were 133 ASCVD events (52 strokes and 81 CAD events). Short sleep duration (<6 versus ≥6 and <9 h/night) was significantly associated with the risk of ASCVD (hazard ratio [HR] 1.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-3.22), especially stroke (HR 2.47, 95% CI 1.08-5.63). When nighttime systolic BP was <120 mmHg, those with a sleep duration <6 versus ≥6 and <9 h/night had a significantly higher risk of ASCVD and CAD events (HR [95% CI] 3.46 [1.52-7.92] and 3.24 [1.21-8.69], respectively). Even patients with "optimal" sleep duration (≥6 and <9 h/night) were at significantly higher risk of stroke when nighttime systolic BP was uncontrolled (HR [95% CI] 2.76 [1.26-6.04]). Adding sleep duration and nighttime BP to a base model with standard CVD risk factors significantly improved model performance for stroke (C-statistic 0.795, 95% CI 0.737-0.856; p = 0.038). These findings highlight the importance of both optimal sleep duration and control of nocturnal hypertension for reducing the risk of CVD, especially stroke. Clinical Trial registration: URL: http://www.umin.ac.jp/icdr/index.html . Unique identifier: UMIN000000894.

Prognostic Impact of Home Blood Pressures for Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes and Mortality in Patients With Resistant Hypertension: A Prospective Cohort Study

[Figure: see text].

Renal denervation based on experimental rationale

Excessive activation of the sympathetic nervous system is one of the pathophysiological hallmarks of hypertension and heart failure. Within the central nervous system, the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) of the hypothalamus and the rostral ventrolateral medulla in the brain stem play critical roles in the regulation of sympathetic outflow to peripheral organs. Information from the peripheral circulation, including serum concentrations of sodium and angiotensin II, is conveyed to the PVN via adjacent structures with a weak blood-brain barrier. In addition, signals from baroreceptors, chemoreceptors and cardiopulmonary receptors as well as afferent input via the renal nerves are all integrated at the level of the PVN. The brain renin-angiotensin system and the balance between nitric oxide and reactive oxygen species in these brain areas also determine the final sympathetic outflow. Additionally, brain inflammatory responses have been shown to modulate these processes. Renal denervation interrupts both the afferent inputs from the kidney to the PVN and the efferent outputs from the PVN to the kidney, resulting in the suppression of sympathetic outflow and eliciting beneficial effects on both hypertension and heart failure.

Relationship between blood pressure repeatedly measured by a wrist-cuff oscillometric wearable blood pressure monitoring device and left ventricular mass index in working hypertensive patients

This study sought to evaluate the relationship between blood pressure (BP) taken by a new wrist-cuff oscillometric wearable BP monitoring device and left ventricular mass index measured by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI-LVMI) in 50 hypertensive patients (mean age 60.5 ± 8.9 years, 92.0% men, 96% treated for hypertension) with regular employment. Participants were asked to self-measure their wearable BPs twice in the morning and evening under a guideline-recommended standardized home BP measurement, and once each at five predetermined times and any additional time points under an ambulatory condition for a maximum of 7 days. In total, 2105 wearable BP measurements (home BP: 747 [morning: 409, evening: 338], ambulatory condition: 1358 [worksite: 942]) were collected over 5.5 ± 1.2 days. The average of all wearable systolic BP (SBP) readings (129.8 ± 11.0 mmHg) was weakly correlated with cMRI-LVMI (r = 0.265, p = 0.063). Morning home wearable SBP average (128.5 ± 13.8 mmHg) was significantly correlated with cMRI-LVMI (r = 0.378, p = 0.013), but ambulatory wearable SBP average (132.5 ± 12.7 mmHg) was not (r = 0.215, p = 0.135). The averages of the highest three values of all wearable SBPs (153.3 ± 13.9 mmHg) and ambulatory wearable SBPs (152.9 ± 13.9 mmHg) were 16 mmHg higher than that of the morning home wearable SBPs (137.0 ± 15.9 mmHg). Those peak values were significantly correlated with cMRI-LVMI (r = 0.320, p = 0.023; r = 0.310, p = 0.029; r = 0.451, p = 0.002, respectively). In conclusion, an increased number of wearable BP measurements, which could detect individual peak BP, might add to the clinical value of these measurements as a complement to the guideline-recommended home BP measurements, but further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Association of treatment-resistant hypertension defined by home blood pressure monitoring with cardiovascular outcome

In diagnosis of treatment-resistant hypertension (TRH), guidelines recommend out-of-office blood pressure (BP) measurements, ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) and home BP monitoring (HBPM). Although evidence of an association between ABPM-evaluated TRH and cardiovascular disease (CVD) prognosis has accumulated, data are sparse regarding HBPM-evaluated TRH. We investigated this issue using data from the nationwide practice-based J-HOP (Japan Morning-Surge Home BP) study, which recruited 4,261 outpatients (mean age 64.9 years; 46.8% men; 91.5% hypertensives) who underwent morning and evening HBPM for 14 days. During 6.2 ± 3.8 years (26,418 person-years) follow-up, 270 total CVDs (stroke, coronary artery disease, aortic dissection, and heart failure) occurred. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) (95% CIs) of uncontrolled TRH, i.e., uncontrolled BP using 3 classes of medications including diuretics or ≥4 classes of medications, for total CVD risk compared to controlled BP using <3 classes were 2.02 (1.38-2.94) and 1.81 (1.23-2.65) in home BP of 135/85 mmHg and 130/80 mmHg, respectively. Additionally, patients with TRH defined by guidelines, i.e., uncontrolled BP using 3 classes of medications including diuretics or controlled/uncontrolled BP using ≥4 classes of medications, also had higher total CVD risk compared to non-TRH under all home BP criteria. Moreover, in patients with uncontrolled apparent-TRH, i.e., TRH defined by office BP, uncontrolled home BP (≥135/85 mmHg) was still associated with atherosclerotic CVD (CVDs except heart failure) risk (adjusted HR [95% CI], 2.38 [1.09-5.19]). This is the first study to demonstrate an independent association between TRH evaluated by HBPM and CVD outcomes.

Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity and prognosis in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Arterial stiffness has been suggested as an independent cardiovascular risk factor. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to quantify the association between brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) and prognosis in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) patients. The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for cohort studies examining the association of high baPWV with prognosis in ASCVD patients. High baPWV was defined by the cutoffs provided by each study. The outcomes of interest were cardiovascular events, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were combined using the random-effects model with inverse variance weighting. We identified 15 studies that were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The overall HRs and 95% CIs of cardiovascular events, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality for high baPWV were 2.55 (1.61-4.03), 2.66 (1.88-3.76), and 1.77 (1.09-2.87), respectively. The association between baPWV and cardiovascular events remained significant, irrespective of determination methods for cutoffs of baPWV, classification of ASCVD, outcome definitions, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale score and average age, independent of age and hypertension. Significantly higher HRs were observed in the subgroups of >3 years follow-up duration (p for interaction: 0.04), cutoff points by ROC curves (p for interaction: 0.04) and an average age of <65 years (p for interaction: 0.01). A 1 standard deviation increase in baPWV was associated with a 1.41-fold (1.24-1.60) increase in the risk of cardiovascular events. High baPWV is independently associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality in ASCVD patients.

A Japan nationwide web-based survey of estimation on patients for renal denervation based on blood pressure level and the number of antihypertensives (J-NEEDs survey)

Catheter‐based renal denervation (RDN) is currently being developed as a new complementary treatment option for hypertension. RDN has not yet received approval in Japan and so the number of possible candidates for RDN in Japan also remains unknown. A total of 10 756 hypertensive patients who regularly visit medical institutions and reported their latest home blood pressure (BP) values were identified from registrants at an online research company. They filled out a survey regarding their prescribed antihypertensives and latest BP values in March 2020 in Japan. The mean age of the patients was 61.3 years old (83.5% male). According to JSH 2019, the prevalence of resistant hypertension (RHT) was estimated to be 1.4% (0.52% having an office BP of 140/90 mm Hg or more while taking three antihypertensives, including diuretics; 0.84% taking four or more antihypertensives regardless of BP level). Assuming the indication for RDN was RHT with morning home systolic BP (HSBP) ≥ 135 mm Hg and office systolic BP (OSBP) ≥ 140 mm Hg, the number of candidates for RDN was estimated to be approximately 340 000 and 372 000, respectively. When hypertensive patients prescribed three or more, two, one, and no antihypertensives were included, the estimated number based on uncontrolled HSBP and OSBP cumulatively increased 2.6, 14.2, 40.6, and 58.0‐fold; 1.8, 8.6, 25.3, and 36.4‐fold, respectively. These findings revealed that a substantial number of hypertensive patients are unable to adequately control their BP level with existing treatments, and new complemental therapies, such as RDN, would alleviate the burden of hypertension in this population.

Home Blood Pressure Monitoring: Current Status and New Developments

Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) is a reliable, convenient, and less costly alternative to ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) for the diagnosis and management of hypertension. Recognition and use of HBPM have dramatically increased over the last 20 years and current guidelines make strong recommendations for the use of both HBPM and ABPM in patients with hypertension. The accuracy and reliability of home blood pressure (BP) measurements require use of a validated device and standardized procedures, and good patient information and training. Key HBPM parameters include morning BP, evening BP, and the morning-evening difference. In addition, newer semi-automatic HBPM devices can also measure nighttime BP at fixed intervals during sleep. Advances in technology mean that HBPM devices could provide additional relevant data (e.g., environmental conditions) or determine BP in response to a specific trigger (e.g., hypoxia, increased heart rate). The value of HBPM is highlighted by a growing body of evidence showing that home BP is an important predictor of target organ damage, and cardiovascular disease (CVD)- and stroke-related morbidity and mortality, and provides better prognostic information than office BP. In addition, use of HBPM to monitor antihypertensive therapy can help to optimize reductions in BP, improve BP control, and reduce target organ damage and cardiovascular risk. Overall, HBPM should play a central role in the management of patients with hypertension, with the goal of identifying increased risk and predicting the onset of CVD events, allowing proactive interventions to reduce risk and eliminate adverse outcomes.

Relationship Between Home Blood Pressure and the Onset Season of Cardiovascular Events: The J-HOP Study (Japan Morning Surge-Home Blood Pressure)

BACKGROUND

The incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) increases during winter. The risk that elevated home blood pressure (BP) poses for CVD events that occur in each of 4 seasons is unclear. We conducted a post hoc analysis using the dataset from a nationwide cohort, the Japan Morning Surge-Home Blood Pressure (J-HOP) study, to assess the association between home BP and winter-onset CVD events.

METHODS

J-HOP participants who had cardiovascular risks conducted morning and evening home BP measurements for a 14-day period and were followed-up for the occurrence of CVD events.

RESULTS

We analyzed 4,258 participants (mean age 64.9 years; 47% male; 92% hypertensives) who were followed-up for an average of 6.2 ± 3.8 years (26,295 person-years). We divided the total of 269 CVD events (10.2/1,000 person-years) by the season of onset as follows: 82 in the winter and 187 in the other seasons (spring, summer, and autumn). In the Cox models adjusted for covariates and the season when home BPs were measured at baseline, morning home systolic BP (SBP) was associated with both winter-onset and other season-onset CVD events: hazard ratio (HR) for winter 1.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06-1.42 per 10 mm Hg; HR for other seasons 1.11, 95% CI 1.00-1.23. Evening home SBP was associated with the other season-onset CVD events (HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.08-1.33 per 10 mm Hg), but not with the winter-onset CVD events.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that compared with evening home BP, morning home BP might be a superior predictor of winter-onset CVD events.

Difference between morning and evening home blood pressure and cardiovascular events: the J-HOP Study (Japan Morning Surge-Home Blood Pressure)

Little is known about the relationship of the difference between morning and evening systolic blood pressure (BP) (MEdif) in home BP with cardiovascular disease (CVD) incidence. To assess this relationship, we used data from the nationwide practice-based J-HOP (Japan Morning Surge-Home BP) study, which recruited 4258 cardiovascular risk participants (mean age 64.9 years; 46.8% men; 79.2% using antihypertensive medications) who underwent morning and evening home BP monitoring using a validated, automated device for 14 consecutive days. During a mean ± SD follow-up of 6.2 ± 3.8 years (26,295 person-years), 269 CVD events occurred. Adjusted Cox models suggested that higher MEdif (≥20 mmHg) was associated with higher CVD risks than was medium MEdif (0-20 mmHg) independent of the average morning and evening (MEave) home systolic BP (SBP) (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.91). We also divided participants into four BP phenotype groups as follows: "both non-elevated" (MEdif < 20 mmHg and MEave SBP < 135 mmHg), "elevated-MEdif" (MEdif ≥ 20 mmHg and MEave SBP < 135 mmHg), "elevated-MEave" (MEdif < 20 mmHg and MEave SBP ≥ 135 mmHg), and "both elevated" (MEdif ≥ 20 mmHg and MEave SBP ≥ 135 mmHg). The cumulative incidence of CVD events was higher in patients with the "elevated-MEdif," "elevated-MEave," and "both elevated" phenotypes than in those with the "both non-elevated" phenotype. After adjusting for covariates, the "both elevated" phenotype was associated with higher CVD risk than the "both non-elevated" phenotype (adjusted HR: 1.64; 95% CI: 1.09-2.46). This is the first study demonstrating a direct correlation between CVD outcomes and the difference between morning and evening home SBP.

Clinical Impact of the Maximum Mean Value of Home Blood Pressure on Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Novel Indicator of Home Blood Pressure Variability

[Figure: see text].

Impact of home blood pressure variability on cardiovascular outcome in patients with arterial stiffness: Results of the J-HOP study

This study sought to investigate whether the relation between increased blood pressure (BP) variability and increased arterial stiffness confers a risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) events. We analyzed 2648 patients from a practitioner‐based population (mean ± SD age 64.9 ± 11.4 years: 75.8% taking antihypertensive medication) with at least one cardiovascular risk factor who underwent home BP monitoring in the Japan Morning Surge‐Home Blood Pressure Study. The standard deviation (SD_SBP), coefficient of variation (CV_SBP), and average real variability (ARV_SBP) were assessed as indexes of day‐by‐day home systolic BP (SBP) variability. The authors assessed arterial stiffness by brachial‐ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) and divided patients into lower (< 1800 cm/s, n = 1837) and higher (≥1800 cm/s, n = 811) baPWV groups. During a mean follow‐up of 4.4 years, 95 cardiovascular events occurred (8.1 per 1000 person‐years). In Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for traditional cardiovascular risk factors including average home SBP, the highest quartiles of SD_SBP (hazard ratio [HR], 2.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23‐4.32), CV_SBP (HR, 2.89; 95%CI, 1.59‐5.26) and ARV_SBP (HR, 2.55; 95%CI, 1.37‐4.75) were predictive of CVD events compared to the other quartiles in the higher baPWV group. Moreover, 1SD increases in SD_SBP (HR, 1.44; 95%CI, 1.13‐1.82), CV_SBP (HR, 1.49; 95%CI, 1.16‐1.90) and ARV_SBP (HR, 1.37; 95%CI, 1.09‐1.73) were also predictive of CVD events. These associations remained even after N‐terminal pro‐brain natriuretic peptide was added to the models. However, these associations were not observed in the lower baPWV group. We conclude that arterial stiffness contributes to the association between home BP variability and CVD incidence.

Nighttime home blood pressure as a mediator of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide in cardiovascular events

We tested our hypothesis that the association between N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) events is mediated in part by a pathway of increased nighttime blood pressure (BP) that involves volume overload. We used the data from the Japan Morning Surge-Home Blood Pressure (J-HOP) Nocturnal BP Study, which targeted 2476 Japanese participants who had a history of or risk for CVD (mean age 63.8 ± 10.2 years), along with their measured nighttime BP values assessed by a home BP device (measured at 2:00, 3:00 and 4:00 a.m.) and NT-proBNP levels. At baseline, elevated daytime (average of morning and evening) and nighttime home systolic BP (SBP) were independently associated with log-transformed NT-proBNP levels after adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors. During a median follow-up of 7.2 years, 150 participants experienced a CVD event (62 stroke events and 88 coronary artery disease events). After adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors and nighttime SBP, increased log-transformed NT-proBNP levels were independently associated with CVD events (hazard ratio [HR] per 1 unit, 1.67; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16-2.40). Elevated nighttime home SBP was also independently associated with CVD events after adjustment for cardiovascular risk and log-transformed NT-proBNP (HR per standard deviation, 1.22; 95% CI: 1.001-1.50). The percentage of the association between NT-proBNP and CVD events mediated by nighttime home SBP was 15%. Our findings indicate a physiological pathway in which increased nighttime SBP contributes to the impact of elevated NT-proBNP levels on the incidence of CVD.

Intervention study of the effect of insulation retrofitting on home blood pressure in winter: a nationwide Smart Wellness Housing survey

OBJECTIVE

The WHO's Housing and health guidelines (2018) listed 'low indoor temperatures and insulation' as one of five priority areas, and indicated insulation retrofitting to help mitigate the effect of low indoor temperatures on health. However, there is still not enough evidence for the effect of insulation retrofitting based on an objective index.

METHODS

We conducted a nonrandomized controlled trial comparing home blood pressure (HBP) between insulation retrofitting (942 households and 1578 participants) and noninsulation retrofitting groups (67 households and 107 participants). HBP and indoor temperature were measured for 2 weeks before and after the intervention in winter. To examine the influence of insulation retrofitting on HBP, we used multiple linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

The analyses showed that indoor temperature in the morning rose by 1.4°C after insulation retrofitting, despite a slight decrease in outdoor temperature by 0.2°C. Insulation retrofitting significantly reduced morning home SBP (HSBP) by 3.1 mmHg [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.5-4.6], morning home DBP (HDBP) by 2.1 mmHg (95% CI: 1.1-3.2), evening HSBP by 1.8 mmHg (95% CI: 0.2-3.4) and evening HDBP by 1.5 mmHg (95% CI: 0.4-2.6). In addition, there was a dose-response relationship between indoor temperature and HBP, indicating the effectiveness of a significant improvement in the indoor thermal environment. Furthermore, there was heterogeneity in the effect of insulation retrofitting on morning HSBP in hypertensive patients compared with normotensive occupants (-7.7 versus -2.2 mmHg, P for interaction = 0.043).

CONCLUSION

Insulation retrofitting significantly reduced HBP and was more beneficial for reducing the morning HSBP of hypertensive patients.

Seasonal Variation in Masked Nocturnal Hypertension: The J-HOP Nocturnal Blood Pressure Study

BACKGROUND

Little is known about seasonal variation in nighttime blood pressure (BP) measured by a home device. In this cross-sectional study, we sought to assess seasonal variation in nighttime home BP using data from the nationwide, practice-based Japan Morning Surge-Home BP (J-HOP) Nocturnal BP study.

METHODS

In this study, 2,544 outpatients (mean age 63 years; hypertensives 92%) with cardiovascular risks underwent morning, evening, and nighttime home BP measurements (measured at 2:00, 3:00, and 4:00 am) using validated, automatic, and oscillometric home BP devices.

RESULTS

Our analysis showed that nighttime home systolic BP (SBP) was higher in summer than in other seasons (summer, 123.3 ± 14.6 mmHg vs. spring, 120.7 ± 14.8 mmHg; autumn, 121.1 ± 14.8 mmHg; winter, 119.3 ± 14.0 mmHg; all P<0.05). Moreover, we assessed seasonal variation in the prevalence of elevated nighttime home SBP (≥120 mmHg) in patients with non-elevated daytime home SBP (average of morning and evening home SBP <135 mmHg; n = 1,565), i.e., masked nocturnal hypertension, which was highest in summer (summer, 45.6% vs. spring, 27.2%; autumn, 28.8%; winter, 24.9%; all P<0.05). Even in intensively controlled morning home SBP (<125 mmHg), the prevalence of masked nocturnal hypertension was higher in summer (summer, 27.4% vs. spring, 14.2%; autumn, 8.9%; winter, 9.0%; all P<0.05). The urine albumin-creatinine ratio in patients with masked nocturnal hypertension tended to be higher than that in patients with non-elevated both daytime and nighttime SBP throughout each season.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of masked nocturnal hypertension was higher in summer than other seasons and the difference proved to be clinically meaningful.

Obstructive Sleep Apnea-Induced Neurogenic Nocturnal Hypertension: A Potential Role of Renal Denervation?

There is a bidirectional, causal relationship between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and hypertension. OSA-related hypertension is characterized by high rates of masked hypertension, elevated nighttime blood pressure, a nondipper pattern of nocturnal hypertension, and abnormal blood pressure variability. Hypoxia/hypercapnia-related sympathetic activation is a key pathophysiological mechanism linking the 2 conditions. Intermittent hypoxia also stimulates the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system to promote hypertension development. The negative and additive cardiovascular effects of OSA and hypertension highlight the importance of effectively managing these conditions, especially when they coexist in the same patient. Continuous positive airway pressure is the gold standard therapy for OSA but its effects on blood pressure are relatively modest. Furthermore, this treatment did not reduce the cardiovascular event rate in nonsleepy patients with OSA in randomized controlled trials. Antihypertensive agents targeting sympathetic pathways or the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system have theoretical potential in comorbid hypertension and OSA, but current evidence is limited and combination strategies are often required in drug resistant or refractory patients. The key role of sympathetic nervous system activation in the development of hypertension in OSA suggests potential for catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation. Although long-term, randomized controlled trials are needed, available data indicate sustained and relevant reductions in blood pressure in patients with hypertension and OSA after renal denervation, with the potential to also improve respiratory parameters. The combination of lifestyle interventions, optimal pharmacological therapy, continuous positive airway pressure therapy, and perhaps also renal denervation might improve cardiovascular risk in patients with OSA.

Guidance on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: A statement from the HOPE Asia Network

Hypertension is an important public health issue due to its association with a number of serious diseases, including cardiovascular disease and stroke. The importance of evaluating hypertension taking into account different blood pressure (BP) profiles and BP variability (BPV) is increasingly being recognized, and is particularly relevant in Asian populations given the specific features of hypertension in the region (including greater salt sensitivity and a high rate of nocturnal hypertension). Ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) is the gold standard for diagnosing hypertension and assessing 24-hour BP and provides data on several important parameters that cannot be obtained using any other form of BP measurement. In addition, ABPM parameters provide better information on cardio- and cerebrovascular risk than office BP. ABPM should be used in all patients with elevated BP, particularly those with unstable office or home BP, or who are suspected to have white-coat or masked hypertension. ABPM is also an important part of hypertension diagnosis and monitoring in high-risk patients. ABPM needs to be performed using a validated device and good practice techniques, and has a role both in hypertension diagnosis and in monitoring the response to antihypertensive therapy to ensure strict BP control throughout the 24-hour period. Use of ABPM in clinical practice may be limited by cost and accessibility, and practical education of physicians and patients is essential. The ABPM evidence and practice points in this document are based on the Hypertension Cardiovascular Outcome Prevention and Evidence (HOPE) Asia Network expert panel consensus recommendations for ABPM in Asia.

Comparison of the antihypertensive efficacy of morning and bedtime dosing on reducing morning blood pressure surge: A protocol for systemic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

It is well known that morning blood pressure surge increases the risk of myocardial events in the first several hours post-awakening. This meta-analysis was performed to compare the antihypertensive efficacy of morning and bedtime dosing on decreasing morning blood pressure surge.

METHODS

Articles in 4 databases about clinical trials of ingestion time of antihypertensive drugs were searched and performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the different effects on morning blood pressure and absolute blood pressure (BP) reduction from baseline of between bedtime administration (experimental group) and morning awaking administration (control group).

RESULTS

The aim of this study is to compare the antihypertensive efficacy of morning and bedtime dosing on decreasing morning blood pressure surge.

CONCLUSIONS

The bedtime will provide evidence support for clinicians and patients for reducing morning blood pressure surge.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study does not require ethical approval.

Comparative effects of topiroxostat and febuxostat on arterial properties in hypertensive patients with hyperuricemia

Elevated serum uric acid is a cardiovascular risk factor in patients with hypertension, even when blood pressure (BP) is well controlled. Xanthine oxidoreductase inhibitors (XORi) reduce serum uric acid levels and have several other potential effects. This multicenter, randomized, open-label study compared the effects of two XORi, topiroxostat and febuxostat, on arterial stiffness, uric acid levels, and BP in hypertensive patients with hyperuricemia. Patients received topiroxostat 40-160 mg/day or febuxostat 10-60 mg/day, titrated to maintain serum uric acid <6 mg/dl, for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in the cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) from baseline to 24 weeks. There were no significant changes in CAVI from baseline to 24 weeks (from 9.13 to 9.16 [feboxustat] and 8.98 to 9.01 [topiroxostat]). Compared with baseline, there were significant reductions in serum uric acid (-2.9 and -2.5 mg/dl; both p < 0.001) and morning home systolic BP (-3.6 and -5.1 mm Hg; both p < 0.01) after 24 weeks' treatment with febuxostat and topiroxostat. BP decreased to the greatest extent in the subgroup of patients with uncontrolled blood pressure at baseline. Topiroxostat, but not febuxostat, significantly decreased plasma xanthine oxidoreductase activity versus baseline. The urinary albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR) decreased significantly from baseline to 24 weeks with topiroxostat (-20.8%; p = 0.021), but not febuxostat (-8.8%; p = 0.362). In conclusion, neither topiroxostat nor febuxostat had any significant effects on arterial stiffness over 24 weeks' treatment.

Atrial fibrillation is associated with cardiovascular events in obese Japanese with one or more cardiovascular risk factors: The Japan Morning Surge Home Blood Pressure (J‐HOP) Study

The impacts of atrial fibrillation (AF) and home blood pressure (BP) on the cardiovascular prognosis of obese individuals have not been clarified. We analyzed the differences in the prognosis (including the effect of the home BP of AF patients with/without obesity) in a Japanese population with cardiovascular risk factors. We enrolled 3,586 patients from the J‐HOP study who had at least one cardiovascular risk factor. We conducted 12‐lead electrocardiography, and the group of AF patients was determined as those whose electrocardiography revealed AF. Obesity was defined as a body mass index >25 kg/m². The primary end points were fatal/nonfatal cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for heart failure, and aortic dissection). Among the obese patients, those with AF (n = 36) suffered more significantly cardiovascular events (log rank 7.17, p = .007) compared to the patients with sinus rhythm (n = 1,282), but among the non‐obese patients, the rates of cardiovascular events were similar (log rank 0.006, p = .94) in the AF patients (n = 48) and sinus rhythm patients (n = 2220). After adjusting for age, sex, office/home BP, smoking, diabetes, and creatinine level, AF was an independent predictor of cardiovascular events in the obese group (hazard ratio [HR] 3.05, 95%CI: 1.17‐7.97, p = .023). Home systolic BP was also a predictor of cardiovascular events in the obese group independent of the risk of AF (per 10 mm Hg: HR 1.36, 95%CI: 1.02‐1.83, p = .039). In conclusion, AF was an independent predictor of cardiovascular events in obese patients after adjusting for home BP.

Different age-related impacts of lean and obesity on cardiovascular prognosis in Japanese patients with cardiovascular risks: The J-HOP (Japan Morning Surge-Home Blood Pressure) Study

The relationship between lean and cardiovascular events has been shown to vary with age, but the relationship between age‐related lean and cardiovascular events in Asia has not been established. We divided patients enrolled in the J‐HOP (Japan Morning Surge‐Home Blood Pressure) study with one or more cardiovascular disease risks into three groups based on their body mass index (BMI): lean (BMI < 21), normal‐weight (21 ≤ BMI <27), and obese (BMI ≥ 27). We stratified the risk of cardiovascular events of lean and obesity compared to normal weight into the patients < 65 years old and those aged ≥ 65 years. A total of 286 cardiovascular disease events were observed during the follow‐up period (73 ± 46 months). Regarding the relationship between BMI and cardiovascular disease risk, both lean and obesity were independent prognostic factors: lean: hazard ratio (HR) 1.43, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02‐2.01, p = .040; obesity: HR 1.55, 95%CI: 1.13‐2.12, p = .006. In patients < 65 years old, the risk of cardiovascular disease of the lean patients was lower than that of the normal‐weight patients (HR 0.39, 95%CI: 0.12‐1.29, p = .124) and the risk of obesity patients was significantly higher (HR 1.77, 95%CI: 1.08‐2.92, p = .024). In the patients aged ≥ 65 years, lean was a significant independent factor of cardiovascular events compared to normal‐weight (lean: HR 1.70, 95%CI: 1.18‐2.47, p = .005). In conclusion, lean was an independent predictor of cardiovascular events in patients aged ≥ 65 years.

High prevalence of masked uncontrolled morning hypertension in elderly non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients: Home blood pressure substudy of the ANAFIE Registry

In the ANAFIE Registry home blood pressure subcohort, we evaluated 5204 patients aged ≥75 years with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) to assess blood pressure (BP) control, prevalence of masked hypertension, and anticoagulant use. Mean clinic (C) and home (H) systolic/diastolic BP(SBP/DBP) was 128.5/71.3 and 127.7/72.6 mm Hg, respectively. Overall, 77.5% of patients had hypertension; of these, 27.7%, 13.4%, 23.4%, and 35.6% had well-controlled, white coat, masked, and sustained hypertension, respectively. Masked hypertension prevalence increased with diabetes, decreased renal function, age ≥80 years, current smoker status, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. By morning/evening average, 59.0% of patients had mean H-SBP ≥ 125 mm Hg; 48.9% had mean C-SBP ≥ 130 mm Hg. Early morning hypertension (morning H-SBP ≥ 125 mm Hg) was found in 65.9% of patients. Although 51.1% of patients had well-controlled C-SBP, 52.5% of these had uncontrolled morning H-SBP. In elderly NVAF patients, morning H-BP was poorly controlled, and masked uncontrolled morning hypertension remains significant.

Insights on home blood pressure monitoring in Asia: Expert perspectives from 10 countries/regions

Hypertension is one of the most powerful modifiable risk factors for cardiovascular disease. It is usually asymptomatic and therefore essential to measure blood pressure regularly for the detection of hypertension. Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) is recognized as a valuable tool to monitor blood pressure and facilitate effective diagnosis of hypertension. It is useful to identify the masked or white-coat hypertension. There is also increasing evidence that supports the role of HBPM in guiding antihypertensive treatment, and improving treatment compliance and hypertension control. In addition, HBPM has also shown prognostic value in predicting cardiovascular events. Despite these benefits, the use of HBPM in many parts of Asia has been reported to be low. An expert panel comprising 12 leading experts from 10 Asian countries/regions convened to share their perspectives on the realities of HBPM. This article provides an expert summary of the current status of HBPM and the key factors hindering its use. It also describes HBPM-related initiatives in the respective countries/regions and presents strategies that could be implemented to better support the use of HBPM in the management of hypertension.

Automatically assessed P-wave predicts cardiac events independently of left atrial enlargement in patients with cardiovascular risks: The Japan Morning Surge-Home Blood Pressure Study

A prolonged P‐wave in electrocardiography (ECG) reflects atrial remodeling and predicts the development of atrial fibrillation (AF). The authors enrolled 810 subjects in the Japan Morning Surge Home Blood Pressure (J‐HOP) study who had ≥1 cardiovascular (CV) risk factor. The duration of P‐wave was automatically analyzed by standard 12‐lead electrocardiogram. Left atrial (LA) enlargement and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) were measured on echocardiography. The primary end points were fatal/nonfatal cardiac events: myocardial infarction, sudden death, and hospitalization for heart failure. The maximum P‐wave duration (Pmax) from the 12 leads was selected for analysis. The authors compared four prolonged P‐wave cutoffs (Pmax = 120, 130, 140, 150 ms) and cardiac events. LA diameter and left ventricular mass index (LVMI) were significantly associated with Pmax (r = 0.08, P = .02 and r = 0.17, P < .001, respectively). When the cutoff level was Pmax 120 or 130 ms, prolonged P‐wave was not associated with cardiac events (P = .45 and P = .10), but when a prolonged P‐wave was defined as Pmax ≥ 140 ms (n = 50) or Pmax ≥ 150 ms (n = 19), the patients in those groups had significantly higher incidence of cardiac events than others (P < .001 and P = .03). A Cox proportional hazards model including age, gender, body mass index, smoking, regular drinker, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, office systolic blood pressure, heart rate, LA enlargement, and LVH revealed that prolonged P‐wave defined as Pmax ≥ 140 ms was independently associated with cardiac events (hazard ratio: 4.23; 95% confidence interval: 1.30–13.77; P = .02). In conclusion, the automatically assessed prolonged P‐wave was associated with cardiac events independently of LA enlargement and LVH in Japanese patients with CV risks.

Association of lower nighttime diastolic blood pressure and hypoxia with silent myocardial injury: The Japan Morning Surge-Home Blood Pressure study

Whether marked nocturnal blood pressure (BP) reduction is associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) is still controversial. In addition, no report has yet discussed the relationship between lower nocturnal BP and CVD, involving modification by nighttime hypoxia. We evaluated 840 patients who had one or more cardiovascular risk factors by measuring their high‐sensitivity cardiac troponin T (Hs‐cTnT), N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide (NT‐pro BNP), and nighttime saturation levels and performing ambulatory BP monitoring. The lowest tertile in nighttime diastolic BP (DBP) (≤66 mmHg) had increased likelihood of the presence of ≥0.014 ng/ml of Hs‐cTnT compared with the second tertile (odds ratio [OR] 1.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01–3.63), and the lowest tertile of minimum blood oxygen saturation (≤81%) had increased likelihood of the presence of ≥0.014 ng/ml of Hs‐cTnT compared with the third tertile (OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.13–4.10). Additionally, the patients with both lowest tertile of nighttime DBP and minimum SpO2 showed increased likelihood of the presence of ≥0.014 ng/ml of Hs‐cTnT compared with those without this combination (OR 2.93, 95% CI 1.40–6.16). On the other hand, these associations were not found in the presence of ≥125 pg/ml of NT‐pro BNP. In the clinical population, each of lower nocturnal DBP and nighttime hypoxia was associated with asymptomatic myocardial injury, which was represented as higher Hs‐cTnT, and coexisting lower nocturnal DBP and nighttime hypoxia had an additive effect on the risk of myocardial injury.

2020 Consensus Statement of the Taiwan Hypertension Society and the Taiwan Society of Cardiology on Home Blood Pressure Monitoring for the Management of Arterial Hypertension

To facilitate the applications of home blood pressure (HBP) monitoring in clinical settings, the Taiwan Hypertension Society and the Taiwan Society of Cardiology jointly put forward the Consensus Statement on HBP monitoring according to up-to-date scientific evidence by convening a series of expert meetings and compiling opinions from the members of these two societies. In this Consensus Statement as well as recent international guidelines for management of arterial hypertension, HBP monitoring has been implemented in diagnostic confirmation of hypertension, identification of hypertension phenotypes, guidance of anti-hypertensive treatment, and detection of hypotensive events. HBP should be obtained by repetitive measurements based on the " 722 " principle, which is referred to duplicate blood pressure readings taken per occasion, twice daily, over seven consecutive days. The " 722" principle of HBP monitoring should be applied in clinical settings, including confirmation of hypertension diagnosis, 2 weeks after adjustment of antihypertensive medications, and at least every 3 months in well-controlled hypertensive patients. A good reproducibility of HBP monitoring could be achieved by individuals carefully following the instructions before and during HBP measurement, by using validated BP devices with an upper arm cuff. Corresponding to office BP thresholds of 140/90 and 130/80 mmHg, the thresholds (or targets) of HBP are 135/85 and 130/80 mmHg, respectively. HBP-based hypertension management strategies including bedtime dosing (for uncontrolled morning hypertension), shifting to drugs with longer-acting antihypertensive effect (for uncontrolled evening hypertension), and adding another antihypertensive drug (for uncontrolled morning and evening hypertension) should be considered. Only with the support from medical caregivers, paramedical team, or tele- monitoring, HBP monitoring could reliably improve the control of hypertension.