The effects of regular inhaled formoterol, budesonide, and placebo on mucosal inflammation and clinical indices in mild asthma

Inhaled corticosteroids plus long-acting beta2-agonists as a combined therapy in asthma

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the mainstay of asthma treatment. Since 1994, when the first trial showed an equivalent effect of doubling the ICS dose or adding salmeterol, it has repeatedly been shown that the combinations of beclomethasone dipropionate and salmeterol, budesonide and formoterol, or fluticasone propionate and salmeterol have at least the same efficacy as doubling the dose of the ICS in adults, though a conclusive trial in asthmatic children is still lacking. The addition of a long-acting beta(2)-agonist (LABA) to ICS appears more efficacious than adding a short-acting beta(2)-agonist or an antileukotriene, even though available data are sparse. Concurrent (two inhalers) and combination (same inhaler) modes of administration are equivalent from the clinical point of view, as is also true regarding administration via metered dose inhaler or dry powder inhaler. Using a single inhaler might eventually have a positive effect on treatment compliance, but there are no confirmatory data yet. Despite some clues regarding a presumed agonist effect of ICS and LABAs, there are still more doubts than certainties. Even though there are still unanswered questions, the data available strongly suggest that the fixed combination of ICS and LABAs using the same inhaler is an efficacious, safe and practical approach for those asthmatic patients who are not well controlled with low doses of ICS alone.

SR 142801, a tachykinin NK(3) receptor antagonist, prevents beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonist-induced hyperresponsiveness to neurokinin A in guinea-pig isolated trachea

We investigated whether fenoterol was able to enhance contractile responsiveness to neurokinin A (NKA) on the guinea-pig isolated trachea. We then studied the effects of two inhibitors of nuclear factor kappa B (NFkappaB), gliotoxin and pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate, and of the tachykinin NK(1), NK(2) and NK(3) receptor antagonists, SR 140333, SR 48968 and SR 142801 and determined whether tachykinin receptor gene expression was up-regulated in the trachea after exposure to fenoterol. Fenoterol (0.1 microM, 15 h, 21 degrees C) induced an increased contractile response to NKA (mean of difference in maximal tension between control and fenoterol +/- S.E.M; +0.47 +/- 0.14 g, n = 26, P < 0.01). This hyperresponsiveness was strongly reduced by co-incubation with gliotoxin (0.1 microg/ml) or pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate (0.1 mM) and abolished by SR 140333 (0.1 microM) and SR 142801 (0.1 microM). SR 48968 (0.1 microM) diminished the tracheal contractility to NKA but failed to reduce the hyperreactivity induced by fenoterol. Tachykinin NK(1) receptor (NK(1)R), NK(2) receptor (NK(2)R) and NK(3) receptor (NK(3)R) gene expression was analyzed by semiquantitative RT-PCR. Compared to control tissues, NK(1)R and NK(2)R mRNA expression was increased by about 1.6-fold and 1.4-fold, respectively, in tissues treated with fenoterol. We were unable to detect the presence of NK(3)R mRNA in the guinea-pig trachea. In conclusion, fenoterol induces tracheal hyperresponsiveness to NKA and an up-regulation of NK(1)R and NK(2)R gene expression. The hyperresponsiveness implicates the NFkappaB pathway and is abolished by tachykinin NK(1) (SR 140333) and NK(3) (SR 142801) receptor antagonists.

The effects of regular inhaled formoterol and budesonide on preformed Th-2 cytokines in mild asthmatics

In a recent placebo-controlled study in mild atopic asthmatics, we observed a significant decrease in eosinophils in the bronchial submucosa, after 2 months oftreatment with inhaled formoterol and budesonide. Biopsy material from each treatment group; formoterol (24 microg bid), budesonide (400 microg b. i. d.) and placebo has been further assessed to investigatethe role of Th-2 cytokines by immunohistochemistry using Mabs to eosinophils as an index of inflammation, IL-4 and IL-5. Treatment with formoterol significantly reduced the number of eosinophils (EG2+) in the submucosa and epithelium, but this was not paralleled by changes in cytokine immunoreactivity In contrast, treatment with budesonide significantly reduced both the number of eosinophils (EG2+) and immunoreactivity for IL-4 and IL-5 in the submucosa. Thus, while budesonide has effects on cytokines involved in eosinophil recruitmentthis explanation does not apply tothe eosinopaenia observed with the long-acting beta2 adrenoreceptor agonist formoterol.

Combined budesonide/formoterol turbuhaler treatment of asthma

OBJECTIVE

To provide product information; review and analyze the clinical literature studying combination therapy, budesonide, and formoterol in asthmatics; and to define the role for this therapy in asthma treatment.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search (1990-September 2001) was conducted to identify the primary literature. Bibliographies were reviewed for further relevant citations.

STUDY SELECTION/DATA EXTRACTION

All randomized, blinded, controlled studies at least 3 months in duration exploring the efficacy of the combination of budesonide and formoterol (in 1 or separate formulations) compared with other treatments were selected to be included in the review of clinical studies.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The combination of budesonide and formoterol was more effective than increasing the dose of budesonide in patients with moderate or severe persistent asthma and in patients with mild asthma not previously controlled with inhaled corticosteroids. Milder corticosteroid-naïve asthmatics did not derive benefit compared with inhaled corticosteroids alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy in 1 device is a preferred treatment option in patients with moderate to severe persistent asthma and in those with milder asthma not controlled with inhaled corticosteroids. Advantages of this product include rapid onset of action, long duration of action, and a wide dosing range to assist with titration. Further research is required to evaluate this therapy in asthmatic children <5 years old and in patients with oral corticosteroid-dependent asthma. Investigations into the effect of this combination product on other disease outcomes, such as quality of life and productivity, will further define the role for this drug therapy.

Evaluation of different inhaled combination therapies (EDICT): a randomised, double-blind comparison of Seretide (50/250 microg bd Diskus vs. formoterol (12 microg bd) and budesonide (800 microg bd) given concurrently (both via Turbuhaler) in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy safety and cost of Seretide (salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (Salm/FP), 50/250 microg bd) via Diskus with formoterol (Form; 12 microg bd) and budesonide (Bud; 800 microg bd) given concurrently (Form+Bud) via Turbuhaler in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma who were uncontrolled on existing corticosteroid therapy. The study used a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group design, consisting of a 2-week run-in period on current corticosteroid therapy (1000-1600 microg/day of BDP or equivalent) and a 12-week treatment period. Symptomatic patients (n = 428) with FEV1 of 50-85% predicted and increased symptom scores or reliever use during run-in were randomly allocated to receive either Salm/FP (50/250 microg bd) via a single Diskus inhaleror Form+Bud (12+800 microg bd) via separate Turbuhalers. Clinic, diary card and asthma-related health-care resource utilisation data were collected. Improvement in mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEFam was similar in the Salm/FP and Form+Bud groups. Both PEFam and mean evening PEF (PEFpm) increased by a clinically significant amount (>20 L/min) from baseline in both treatment groups. The mean rate of exacerbations (mild, moderate or severe) was significantly lower in the Salm/FP group (0.472) compared with the Form+Bud group (0.735) (ratio = 0.64; P < 0.001), despite the three-fold lower microgram inhaled corticosteroid dose in the Salm/FP group. Patients in the Salm/FP group also experienced significantly fewer nocturnal symptoms, with a higher median percentage of symptom-free nights (P = 0.04), nights with a symptom score <2 (P = 0.03), and nights with no awakenings (P = 0.02). Total asthma-related health-care costs were significantly lower in the Salm/FP group than the Form+Bud group (P<0.05). Both treatments were well tolerated, with a similar low incidence of adverse events. This study showed that in symptomatic patients with moderate-to-severe asthma, Salm/FP (50/250 microg bd), administered in a single convenient device (Diskus), was at least as effective as an approximately three-fold higher microgram corticosteroid dose of Bud (800 microg bd) given concurrently with Form (12 microg bd) in terms of improvement in PEFam, and superior at reducing exacerbations and nights with symptoms or night-time awakenings. Salm/FP was also the less costly treatment due primarily to lower hospitalisation and drug costs.

Effect of combining salmeterol and fluticasone on the progression of airway remodeling

In subjects insufficiently controlled with low to moderate doses of inhaled corticosteroids, adding beta-agonists is clinically more beneficial than increasing the dose of inhaled corticosteroids. In the present study, we investigated the effect of adding salmeterol to fluticasone on allergen-induced airway inflammation and remodeling. Sensitized rats, in which characteristics of remodeling had been induced by ovalbumin exposure every 2 days from Days 14 to 28, were further exposed to ovalbumin or PBS from Days 29 to 42. During the last 2 weeks, before allergen exposure, rats were treated with aerosolized fluticasone propionate (10 mg), salmeterol (1 mg), salmeterol (1 mg) plus fluticasone propionate (10 mg), or placebo. After 4 weeks of ovalbumin exposure, the airways showed inflammatory changes, goblet cell hyperplasia, and enhanced fibronectin and collagen deposition. Salmeterol in monotherapy decreased bronchoalveolar lavage fluid eosinophil number but had no influence on structural changes. Combining salmeterol with fluticasone propionate counteracted goblet cell hyperplasia, but increased the amount of fibronectin and collagen in the airway wall. These effects of salmeterol did not influence airway responsiveness. We conclude that the combination of salmeterol and fluticasone propionate enhances aspects of allergen-induced airway remodeling. This is not accompanied by changes in airway responsiveness.

Antagonism of long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonism

The established place of regular long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonists at step 3 in asthma management guidelines has evolved as a consequence of evidence showing additive effects of salmeterol and formoterol on exacerbation rates, resulting in a putative inhaled corticosteroid sparing effect. There is however, evidence to show that although long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonists facilitate using a lower dose of inhaled corticosteroid, this may occur at the expense of suboptimal anti-inflammatory control. This is likely to be the case especially with fixed dose combination inhalers where it is not possible to properly titrate anti-inflammatory therapy with inhaled corticosteroids without also inadvertently overtreating with unnecessarily high doses of long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonists. Most patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma can be adequately controlled on monotherapy with inhaled corticosteroid in low or medium dosage, which is considerably cheaper than concomitant use of a long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonist. Subsensitivity to long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonists is a predictable pharmacological phenomenon which occurs despite concomitant inhaled corticosteroid therapy and occurs more readily for bronchoprotective than bronchodilator effects. Subsensitivity of salbutamol protection against bronchoconstrictor stimuli occurs in patients receiving concomitant long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonists, which may be due to beta2-adrenoceptor down-regulation or prolonged receptor occupancy. Prospective large scale long-term studies are required to further define the clinical relevance of beta2-adrenoceptor polymorphisms, to look at clinical control outcomes as well as propensity for subsensitivity. It would therefore make more sense to first of all optimize the dose of anti-inflammatory therapy with inhaled corticosteroid and to then consider adding a long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonist for patients who are poorly controlled.

Additive anti-inflammatory effect of formoterol and budesonide on human lung fibroblasts

BACKGROUND

It has been shown that treatment with a long acting beta2 agonist in addition to a glucocorticoid is beneficial in the treatment of asthma. In asthma inflammatory cells, particularly eosinophils, migrate into the pulmonary tissue and airway lumen by means of adhesion molecules expressed on resident tissue cells--that is, fibroblasts--and become activated by cytokines and adhesive interactions. A study was undertaken to determine whether an interaction exists between the long acting beta2 agonist formoterol and the glucocorticoid budesonide on inhibition of adhesion molecule expression, as well as chemo/cytokine production by human lung fibroblasts.

METHODS

Lung fibroblasts were preincubated with therapeutically relevant drug concentrations of 10(-8) M to 10(-10) M. Cells were stimulated with interleukin (IL)-1beta (1 or 10 U/ml) for 8 hours and supernatants were collected for measurement of GM-CSF and IL-8 concentrations. The cells were fixed and subjected to a cell surface ELISA technique to measure the expression of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1.

RESULTS

Formoterol exerted an additive effect on the inhibition of IL-1beta stimulated ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 upregulation and GM-CSF production by budesonide in concentrations of 10(-9) M and above (p<0.05). IL-8 production was not influenced by formoterol.

CONCLUSION

Formoterol exerts an additive effect on the anti-inflammatory properties of budesonide. In vitro data support the finding that the combination of budesonide and formoterol in asthma treatment strengthens the beneficial effect of either drug alone.

Low dose inhaled budesonide and formoterol in mild persistent asthma: the OPTIMA randomized trial

The optimal treatment for mild asthma is uncertain. We assessed the effects of adding a long-acting inhaled beta-agonist, formoterol, to low doses of an inhaled corticosteroid, budesonide, for 1 yr in subjects with mild asthma, receiving no or only a small dose of inhaled corticosteroid. The 698 corticosteroid free patients (Group A) were assigned to twice daily treatment with 100 microg budesonide, 100 microg budesonide plus 4.5 microg formoterol, or placebo. The 1,272 corticosteroid-treated patients (Group B) were assigned to twice daily treatment with 100 microg budesonide, 100 microg budesonide plus 4.5 microg formoterol, 200 microg budesonide, or 200 microg budesonide plus 4.5 microg formoterol. The main outcome variables were time to the first severe asthma exacerbation and poorly controlled asthma days. In Group A, budesonide alone reduced the risk for severe exacerbations by 60% and poorly controlled days by 48%; adding formoterol increased lung function with no change in other end points. By contrast, in Group B, adding formoterol reduced the risk for the first severe exacerbation and for poorly controlled days by 43 and 30%, respectively. Thus, in corticosteroid-free patients, low dose inhaled budesonide alone reduced severe exacerbations and improved asthma control, and in patients already receiving inhaled corticosteroid, adding formoterol was more effective than doubling the corticosteroid dose.

Effect of a long-acting beta2-agonist over three months on airway wall vascular remodeling in asthma

There are few data regarding the potential effects of antiasthma treatment on indices of airway remodeling, such as the increased subepithelial airway vascularity in patients with asthma. We studied 45 symptomatic subjects with asthma who were receiving treatment with low dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) (range 200-500 microg twice a day) and 28 normal subjects without asthma as a control population. Subjects underwent bronchoscopy with airway biopsy and subjects with asthma were then randomized to receive supplementary inhaled salmeterol 50 microg twice a day, fluticasone propionate 100 microg twice a day, or placebo for 3 mo in addition to their baseline ICS. Biopsy of the airway was then repeated. The biopsies were analyzed for vascular structures in the subepithelial lamina propria. Sufficient biopsy material was available for analysis of vascularity in 34 of the subjects with asthma and 28 of the normal subjects. We confirmed that airways of subjects with asthma had a significant increase in the number of vessels/mm2 of lamina propria compared with airways of normal subjects (524 +/- 137 vessels/mm2, n = 34 versus 425 +/- 130 vessels/mm2, n = 28; p = 0.004). There was a decrease in the density of vessels of lamina propria after treatment only in the salmeterol group compared with baseline (before, 535 +/- 153 vessels/mm2 versus after, 400 +/- 142 vessels/mm2; n = 12; p = 0.04). There was no significant change within the fluticasone (n = 11) or placebo (n = 11) treatment groups, but also no significant differences between the groups. Notably, no treatment was associated with increased airway wall vascularity. The demonstrated fall in vessel number within the salmeterol-treated group may suggest an advantageous effect of long-acting beta2-agonists on this manifestation of airway remodeling over the 3-mo time scale of this study, which is complementary to the action of ICS on airway vascularity.

Analysis of montelukast in mild persistent asthmatic patients with near-normal lung function

Few studies have specifically evaluated controller therapy in patients with mild persistent asthma. We used a subgroup analysis to investigate the effects of montelukast, a potent cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist, on adult patients on the milder end of the asthma severity spectrum. We have identified seven double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled studies of adult patients with mild-to-moderate chronic asthma in which montelukast was investigated. Subsets of patients with baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) > 80% and > 75% predicted or further restricted by less than daily rescue beta-agonist use were included as four cohorts (A, B, C, D), and efficacy measures, including change in FEV1 rescue-free days, beta-agonist use, nocturnal awakenings and blood eosinophil counts were evaluated. Cohorts A to D comprised 21%, 8%, 11%, and 4%, respectively, of patients from these studies. Mean pretreatment FEV1 ranged from 81% to 84% predicted and daily beta-agonist use from 2.4 to 4.5 puffs day(-1) in the four cohorts. Pooled results demonstrated a treatment effect for montelukast over placebo in all cohorts, for all endpoints. There was a significant improvement in FEV1 in montelukast-treated patients (7-8% over baseline) compared with placebo (1-4% over baseline, between-group difference P < or = 0.02) for all cohorts. Similarly, the percentage of rescue-free days increased substantially more with montelukast (22-30%) than with placebo (8-13%). This subgroup analysis indicates that montelukast produced improvements in parameters of asthma control in patients with milder persistent asthma that should be confirmed in additional prospective trials.

Evaluation of salmeterol or montelukast as second-line therapy for asthma not controlled with inhaled corticosteroids

OBJECTIVE

To assess the addition of a leukotriene receptor antagonist and a long-acting beta(2)-agonist as second-line therapy in asthma.

DESIGN

Placebo-controlled, double-dummy, crossover study.

SETTING

Outpatient clinic.

PATIENTS

Twenty patients with persistent asthma not controlled with inhaled corticosteroid therapy.

INTERVENTIONS

Montelukast 10 mg once daily, or salmeterol, 50 microg bid, each for 2 weeks with 1-week run-in and washout placebo periods.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Adenosine monophosphate (AMP) bronchial challenge, blood eosinophil count (EOS), exhaled nitric oxide, and lung function after both placebo periods and after the first and last doses of each active treatment. Patients recorded their domiciliary peak expiratory flow (PEF), asthma symptoms, and rescue bronchodilator requirement (RES) twice daily throughout the study. For the primary end point of the provocative concentration of AMP causing a 20% fall in FEV(1), compared to placebo (47.5 +/- 13.0 mg/mL), there were significant differences with the first (114.1 +/- 36.9 mg/mL) and last (94.2 +/- 30.4 mg/mL) doses of montelukast as well as the first (160.1 +/- 64.5 mg/mL) but not the last (70.1 +/- 23.7 mg/mL) dose of salmeterol. Only montelukast produced significant suppression of the EOS. Neither drug affected exhaled nitric oxide levels. There were significant improvements with the first doses of salmeterol for all parameters of lung function. After 2 weeks of treatment, there were significant improvements with both drugs for RES and morning PEF. There were no significant differences between drugs for any end points except EOS.

CONCLUSIONS

Montelukast and salmeterol exhibited significant improvements in asthma control when given as second-line therapy. Montelukast also produced significant effects on AMP challenge and EOS suggesting anti-inflammatory activity.

Comparison of formoterol and terbutaline for as-needed treatment of asthma: a randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Asthma guidelines recommend that long-acting inhaled beta-agonists should be used as maintenance therapy for patients with asthma inadequately controlled on an inhaled corticosteroid. We studied the safety and efficacy of the long-acting beta-agonist formoterol compared with terbutaline, each taken as needed, in patients with moderate to severe asthma.

METHODS

Patients were taking an inhaled corticosteroid (mean dose 870 microg daily) and had a forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) of at least 50% predicted (mean 74%). Those requiring an inhaled beta-agonist three to eight times a day during the study run-in period (362 of 621 who started) were randomly assigned formoterol 4.5 microg or terbutaline 0.5 mg as needed by Turbuhaler in daily doses up to 54 microg and 6 mg, respectively, for 12 weeks in a double-blind, parallel-group study. Analyses were by intention to treat.

FINDINGS

The 362 randomised patients (157 men, 205 women) had a mean age of 47 years. Patients taking formoterol had a longer time to their first severe asthma exacerbation (relative-risk ratio 0.55 [95% CI 0.34-0.89]), took fewer inhalations of study drug, and had larger increases in FEV1 (5%) and morning and evening peak expiratory flow (mean difference in increase 11 L/min and 8 L/min) than those taking terbutaline. No safety issues were identified.

INTERPRETATION

When taken as needed, formoterol 4.5 microg provided better asthma control than terbutaline 0.5 mg in patients requiring moderate doses of relief medication despite inhaled corticosteroid treatment. Safety studies should be extended to a wider population of patients with asthma.

Budesonide inhalation suspension: a review of its use in infants, children and adults with inflammatory respiratory disorders

Budesonide, a topically active corticosteroid, has a broad spectrum of clinically significant local anti-inflammatory effects in patients with inflammatory lung diseases including persistent asthma. In infants and young children with persistent asthma, day- and night-time symptom scores, and the number of days in which beta2-agonist bronchodilators were required, were significantly lower during randomised, double-blind treatment with budesonide inhalation suspension 0.5 to 2 mg/day than placebo in 3 multicentre trials. Significantly fewer children discontinued therapy with budesonide inhalation suspension than with placebo because of worsening asthma symptoms in a study that included children who were receiving inhaled corticosteroids at baseline. Recent evidence indicates that budesonide inhalation suspension is significantly more effective than nebulised sodium cromoglycate in improving control of asthma in young children with persistent asthma. At a dosage of 2 mg/day, budesonide inhalation suspension significantly reduced the number of asthma exacerbations and requirements for systemic corticosteroids in preschool children with severe persistent asthma. In children with acute asthma or wheezing, the preparation was as effective as, or more effective than oral prednisolone in improving symptoms. In children with croup, single 2 or 4mg dosages of budesonide inhalation suspension were significantly more effective than placebo and as effective as oral dexamethasone 0.6 mg/kg or nebulised L-epinephrine (adrenaline) 4mg in alleviating croup symptoms and preventing or reducing the duration of hospitalisation. Early initiation of therapy with budesonide inhalation suspension 1 mg/day appears to reduce the need for mechanical ventilation and decrease overall corticosteroid usage in preterm very low birthweight infants at risk for chronic lung disease. In adults with persistent asthma, budesonide inhalation suspension < or =8 mg/day has been compared with inhaled budesonide 1.6 mg/day and fluticasone propionate 2 mg/day administered by metered dose inhaler. Greater improvements in asthma control occurred in patients during treatment with budesonide inhalation suspension than with budesonide via metered dose inhaler, whereas fluticasone propionate produced greater increases in morning peak expiratory flow rates than nebulised budesonide. Several small studies suggest that the preparation has an oral corticosteroid-sparing effect in adults with persistent asthma and that it may be as effective as oral corticosteroids during acute exacerbations of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The frequency of adverse events was similar in children receiving budesonide inhalation suspension 0.25 to 2 mg/day or placebo in 12-week studies. During treatment with budesonide inhalation suspension 0.5 to 1 mg/day in 3 nonblind 52-week studies, growth velocity in children was generally unaffected; however, a small but statistically significant decrease in growth velocity was detected in children who were not using inhaled corticosteroids prior to the introduction of budesonide inhalation suspension. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function was not affected by short (12 weeks) or long (52 weeks) term treatment with nebulised budesonide. In conclusion, budesonide inhalation suspension is the most widely available nebulised corticosteroid, and in the US is the only inhaled corticosteroid indicated in children aged > or =1 year with persistent asthma. The preparation is suitable for use in infants, children and adults with persistent asthma and in infants and children with croup.

Effects of budesonide and formoterol on eosinophil activation induced by human lung fibroblasts

Budesonide and formoterol are extensively used in current asthma therapy. Budesonide is known as potent antiinflammatory agent and formoterol also appears to have some antiinflammatory properties. We investigated inhibitory effects of these drugs on eosinophil activation in vitro as induced by fibroblast-conditioned medium (FCM). We measured the modulation of expression of clonal designator (CD)11b and L-selectin with flow cytometry after 4 h or 16 h of culture of eosinophils when budesonide or formoterol was applied either directly to the eosinophils while they were stimulated with FCM (direct method) or when each drug was applied to lung fibroblasts from which conditioned medium was then administered to eosinophils (indirect method). In the direct method, budesonide (10(-)(8) M) inhibited the modulation of CD11b (44 [25th to 75th percentiles: 26 to 66]% of control) and L-selectin (30 [-13 to 48]% of control) only after 16 h, and not after 4 h. Formoterol did not directly inhibit the modulation of eosinophil CD11b and L-selectin expression. In the indirect method, both budesonide and formoterol inhibited lung fibroblast activation, resulting in diminished eosinophil activation after 4 h. Budesonide or formoterol at 10(-)(8) M inhibited upregulation of CD11b to 26 [15 to 40]% and 38 [23 to 46]%, respectively, and inhibited L-selectin shedding to 14 [-3 to 50]% and 27 [2 to 62]%, respectively, of control values. These results show that budesonide inhibits eosinophil activation primarily through effects on lung fibroblasts, presumably by inhibiting production of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. After longer incubation periods, budesonide also directly inhibits eosinophil activation. In contrast, formoterol can inhibit eosinophil activation only via inhibitory effects on lung fibroblasts. We did not observe an additional effect of formoterol, beyond the effects induced by budesonide under any circumstance studied. Lung fibroblasts, in addition to eosinophils, may serve as important target cells for antiinflammatory treatment in asthma.

The effect of long-acting beta2-agonists on airway inflammation in asthmatic patients

Early observations suggested that the inhibition by long-acting beta2-agonists (LABAs) of non-specific bronchial hyperresponsiveness following allergen challenge was unrelated to bronchodilation or functional antagonism and might be a reflection of anti-inflammatory activity. Investigation of the effect of LABAs on airway inflammatory responses has demonstrated an inhibition of eosinophil recruitment in allergen challenge studies. Nevertheless, results from biopsy and other studies suggest that the chronic inflammatory process in asthma patients is unaffected by these drugs. There is no evidence from biopsy studies that LABAs are pro-inflammatory or that they mask existing inflammation. The beneficial effects of LABAs in allergen challenge are probably mediated through stabilization of mast cells. Recent evidence suggests that LABAs may reduce numbers of neutrophils and their associated markers; this observation needs to be confirmed in future studies and its relevance to the treatment of asthma determined.

Salmeterol and fluticasone propionate combined in a new powder inhalation device for the treatment of asthma: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Many patients with persistent asthma need both long-acting bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids for optimal asthma control.

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to compare the efficacy and safety of salmeterol 50 microg combined with fluticasone 100 microg (in a combination dry powder product) with that of placebo, fluticasone, or salmeterol alone.

METHODS

A 12-week randomized, double-blind, multicenter study was conducted in 356 patients aged 12 years or older with asthma. After a 14-day screening period, patients were randomized to treatment with salmeterol 50 microg combined with fluticasone 100 microg (combination product), salmeterol 50 microg, fluticasone 100 microg, or placebo administered in the Diskus dry powder inhaler (GlaxoWellcome, UK) twice daily.

RESULTS

Mean change in FEV(1) at end point was significantly (P < or =.003) greater with the combination product (0.51 L) compared with placebo (0.01 L), salmeterol (0.11 L), and fluticasone (0.28 L). The combination product significantly increased (P < or =.013) area under the curve compared with placebo and fluticasone on day 1 and compared with placebo, salmeterol, and fluticasone at week 1 and week 12. Patients in the combination product group were less likely to withdraw from the study because of worsening asthma compared with those in the other groups (P < or =.020). The combination product significantly increased (P < or =.012) morning PEF (combination, 52.5 L/min; placebo, -23.7 L/min; salmeterol, -1.7 L/min; fluticasone, 17.3 L/min) and evening PEF at end point compared with the other groups. The combination product significantly (P < or =.025) reduced symptom scores and albuterol use compared with the other treatments and increased the percentage of nights with no awakenings and the percentage of days with no symptoms compared with placebo and salmeterol. All treatments were equally well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Salmeterol 50 microg and fluticasone 100 microg combined in the Diskus powder delivery device offers significant clinical advantages over salmeterol or fluticasone alone at the same doses.

Montelukast or salmeterol combined with an inhaled steroid in adult asthma: design and rationale of a randomized, double-blind comparative study (the IMPACT Investigation of Montelukast as a Partner Agent for Complementary Therapy-trial)

Asthma patients who continue to experience symptoms despite taking regular inhaled corticosteroids represent a management challenge. Leukotrienes play a key role in asthma pathophysiology, and since pro-inflammatory leukotrienes are poorly suppressed by corticosteroids it seems rational to add a leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) when a low to moderate dose of inhaled corticosteroids does not provide sufficient disease control. Long acting beta2-agonist (LABA) treatment represents an alternative to LTRAs and both treatment modalities have been shown to provide additional disease control when added to corticosteroid treatment. To compare the relative clinical benefits of adding either a LTRA or a LABA to asthma patients inadequately controlled by inhaled corticosteroids, a randomized, double-blind, multi-centre, 48-week study will be initiated at approximately 120 centres throughout Europe, Latin America, Middle East, Africa and the Asia-Pacific region in early 2000. The study will compare the oral LTRA montelukast with the inhaled LABA salmeterol, each administered on a background of inhaled fluticasone, on asthma attacks, quality of life, lung function, eosinophil levels, healthcare utilization, and safety, in approximately 1200 adult asthmatic patients. The requirements for study enrollment include a history of asthma, FEV1 or PEFR values between 50% and 90% of the predicted value together with > or = 12% improvement in FEV1 after beta-agonist administration, a minimum pre-determined level of asthma symptoms and daily beta-agonist medication. The study will include a 4-week run-in period, during which patients previously taking inhaled corticosteroids are switched to open-label fluticasone (200 microg daily), followed by a 48-week double-blind, treatment period in which patients continuing to experience abnormal pulmonary function and daytime symptoms are randomized to receive montelukast (10 mg once daily) and salmeterol placebo, or inhaled salmeterol (100 microg daily) and montelukast placebo. All patients will continue with inhaled fluticasone (200 microg daily). During the study, asthma attacks, overnight asthma symptoms, and morning peak expiratory flow rate will be assessed using patient diary cards; quality of life will also be assessed using an asthma-specific quality-of life questionnaire. The results of this study are expected to provide physicians with important clinical evidence to help them make a rational and logical treatment choice for asthmatic patients experiencing breakthrough symptoms on inhaled corticosteroids.

A long-term study of the antiinflammatory effect of low-dose budesonide plus formoterol versus high-dose budesonide in asthma

Adding inhaled long-acting beta(2)-agonists to a low dose of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), results in better clinical asthma control than increasing the dose of ICS. However, this approach may mask underlying airway inflammation. In a double-blind parallel-group study, we evaluated the effect of adding formoterol to a low dose of budesonide, compared with a higher dose of budesonide, on the composition of induced sputum. After a 4-wk run-in period of treatment with budesonide (800 microg, twice daily), 60 patients with moderate asthma were randomly assigned to a 1-yr treatment with 400 microg of budesonide plus placebo, twice daily (BUD800), or 100 microg of budesonide plus 12 microg of formoterol, twice daily (BUD200+F). All drugs were administered via Turbuhaler. Budesonide (800 microg, twice daily) during run-in significantly reduced median sputum eosinophils from 4.5 to 0.68%. No significant changes in the proportion of eosinophils, EG2(+) cells, other inflammatory cells, or ECP levels in sputum were observed over the ensuing 1-yr treatment with BUD200+F or BUD800. Clinical asthma control was not significantly different between both groups. In conclusion, no significant differences in sputum markers of airway inflammation were observed during a 1-yr treatment with a low dose of inhaled budesonide plus formoterol compared with a higher dose of budesonide.