51
|
Biernacki T, Sandi D, Bencsik K, Vécsei L. Medicinal Chemistry of Multiple Sclerosis: Focus on Cladribine. Mini Rev Med Chem 2020; 20:269-285. [PMID: 31644403 DOI: 10.2174/1389557519666191015201755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2018] [Revised: 04/28/2019] [Accepted: 05/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the recent years, many novel Disease-Modifying Drugs (DMD) have been introduced to the market in the treatment of multiple sclerosis. OBJECTIVES To provide the reader with an up to date, compact review on the pharmacokinetic properties, mechanism of action, and clinical attributes of one of the most recently approved drugs in the therapy of multiple sclerosis, cladribine. CONCLUSION Cladribine tablets proved to be a highly efficient treatment choice for Relapsing- Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS), especially for patients with high disease activity. It is the first DMD for MS with a complex mechanism of action, by inhibiting the adenosine-deaminase enzyme it increases the intracellular levels of deoxyadenosine triphosphate, which with relative selectivity depletes both T- and B-cells lines simultaneously. However long term follow-up safety and effectiveness data are still missing, and clear treatment protocols are lacking beyond the first two treatment years cladribine should prove to be a valuable addition to the therapeutic palette of RRMS, and potentially for Clinically Isolated Syndrome (CIS) as well.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamás Biernacki
- Department of Neurology, Szent-Gyorgyi Albert Clinical Center, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Dániel Sandi
- Department of Neurology, Szent-Gyorgyi Albert Clinical Center, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Krisztina Bencsik
- Department of Neurology, Szent-Gyorgyi Albert Clinical Center, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - László Vécsei
- Department of Neurology, Szent-Gyorgyi Albert Clinical Center, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.,MTA-SZTE Neuroscience Research Group, Szeged, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Pérez-Miralles FC, Río J, Pareto D, Vidal-Jordana À, Auger C, Arrambide G, Castilló J, Tintoré M, Rovira À, Montalban X, Sastre-Garriga J. Adding brain volume measures into response criteria in multiple sclerosis: the Río-4 score. Neuroradiology 2020; 63:1031-1041. [PMID: 33237430 DOI: 10.1007/s00234-020-02604-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 11/10/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Brain volume changes (BVC) on therapy in MS are being considered as predictor for treatment response at an individual level. We ought to assess whether adding BVC as a factor to monitor interferon-beta response improves the predictive ability of the (no) evidence of disease activity (EDA-3) and Río score (RS-3) criteria for confirmed disability progression in a historical cohort. METHODS One hundred one patients from an observational cohort treated with interferon-beta were assessed for different cutoff points of BVC (ranged 0.2-1.2%), presence of active lesions (≥ 1 for EDA/≥ 3 for RS), relapses, and 6-month confirmed disability progression (CDP), measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale, after 1 year. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for predicting confirmed disability progression at 4 years in original EDA (EDA-3) and RS (RS-3) as well as EDA and RS including BVC (EDA-4 and RS-4) were compared. RESULTS Adding BVC to EDA slightly increased sensitivity, but not specificity or predictive values, nor the OR for predicting CDP; only EDA-3 showed a trend for predicting CDP (OR 3.701, p = 0.050). Adding BVC to RS-3 (defined as ≥ 2 criteria) helped to improve sensitivity and negative predictive value, and increased OR for predicting CDP using a cutoff of ≤ - 0.86% (RS-3 OR 23.528, p < 0.001; RS-4 for all cutoffs ranged from 15.06 to 32, p < 0.001). RS-4 showed areas under the curve larger than RS-3 for prediction of disability at 4 years. CONCLUSION Addition of BVC to RS improves its prediction of response to interferon-beta.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco Carlos Pérez-Miralles
- Servei de Neurologia/Neuroimmunologia, Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, P. Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jordi Río
- Servei de Neurologia/Neuroimmunologia, Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, P. Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Deborah Pareto
- Unitat de Ressonància Magnètica (Servei de Radiologia), Hospital universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Àngela Vidal-Jordana
- Servei de Neurologia/Neuroimmunologia, Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, P. Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cristina Auger
- Unitat de Ressonància Magnètica (Servei de Radiologia), Hospital universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Georgina Arrambide
- Servei de Neurologia/Neuroimmunologia, Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, P. Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joaquín Castilló
- Servei de Neurologia/Neuroimmunologia, Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, P. Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mar Tintoré
- Servei de Neurologia/Neuroimmunologia, Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, P. Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Àlex Rovira
- Unitat de Ressonància Magnètica (Servei de Radiologia), Hospital universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Xavier Montalban
- Servei de Neurologia/Neuroimmunologia, Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, P. Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jaume Sastre-Garriga
- Servei de Neurologia/Neuroimmunologia, Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, P. Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Todea RA, Lu PJ, Fartaria MJ, Bonnier G, Du Pasquier R, Krueger G, Bach Cuadra M, Psychogios MN, Kappos L, Kuhle J, Granziera C. Evolution of Cortical and White Matter Lesion Load in Early-Stage Multiple Sclerosis: Correlation With Neuroaxonal Damage and Clinical Changes. Front Neurol 2020; 11:973. [PMID: 33013644 PMCID: PMC7498574 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2020] [Accepted: 07/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Changes in cortical and white matter lesion (CL, WML) load are pivotal metrics to diagnose and monitor multiple sclerosis patients. Yet, the relationship between (i) changes in CL/WML load and disease progression and between (ii) changes in CL/WML load and neurodegeneration at early MS stages is not yet established. In this work, we have assessed the hypothesis that the combined CL and WML load as well as their 2-years evolution are surrogate markers of neurodegeneration and clinical progression at early MS stages. To achieve this goal, we have studied a group of RRMS patients and have investigated the impact of both CL and WML load on neuroaxonal damage as measured by serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL). Next, we have explored whether changes in CL/WML load over 2 years in the same cohort of early-MS are related to motor and cognitive changes. Methods: Thirty-two RRMS patients (<5 years disease duration) underwent: (i) 3T MRI for CL/WML detection and clinical assessment at baseline and 2-years follow-up; and (ii) baseline blood test for sNfL. The correlation between the number and volume of CL/WML and sNfL was assessed by using the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient and a generalized linear model (GLM). A GLM was also used to assess the relationship between (i) the number/volume of new, enlarged, resolved, shrunken, stable lesions and (ii) the difference in clinical scores between two time-points. Results: At baseline, sNfL levels correlated with both total CL count/volume (ρ = 0.6/0.7, Corr-P <0.017/Corr-P < 0.001) and with total WML count/volume (ρ = 0.6/0.6, Corr-P < 0.01 for both). Baseline sNfL levels also correlated with new WML count/volume (ρ = 0.6/0.5, Corr-P < 0.01/Corr-P < 0.05) but not with new CL. Longitudinal changes in CL and WML count and volume were significantly associated with (i) sustained attention, auditory information, processing speed and flexibility (p < 0.01), (ii) verbal memory (p < 0.01); (iii) verbal fluency (p < 0.05); and (iv) hand-motor function (p < 0.05). Discussion: Changes in cortical and white matter focal damage in early MS patients correlate with global neuroaxonal damage and is associated to cognitive performances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramona-Alexandra Todea
- Translational Imaging in Neurology (ThINk) Basel, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Basel University Hospital, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Section of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Po-Jui Lu
- Translational Imaging in Neurology (ThINk) Basel, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Basel University Hospital, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research, and Biomedicine, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Mario Joao Fartaria
- Advanced Clinical Imaging Technology, Siemens Healthcare AG, Lausanne, Switzerland.,Department of Radiology, University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.,Signal Processing Laboratory (LTS 5), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Guillaume Bonnier
- Translational Imaging in Neurology (ThINk) Basel, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Basel University Hospital, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Renaud Du Pasquier
- Service of Neurology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Meritxell Bach Cuadra
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.,Medical Image Analysis Laboratory (MIAL), Centre d'Imagerie BioMédicale (CIBM), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Marios Nikos Psychogios
- Section of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Ludwig Kappos
- Translational Imaging in Neurology (ThINk) Basel, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Basel University Hospital, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research, and Biomedicine, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jens Kuhle
- Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research, and Biomedicine, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Cristina Granziera
- Translational Imaging in Neurology (ThINk) Basel, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Basel University Hospital, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research, and Biomedicine, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Auger C, Rovira À. New concepts about the role of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and follow-up of multiple sclerosis. RADIOLOGIA 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rxeng.2020.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
55
|
Nuevos conceptos sobre el papel de la resonancia magnética en el diagnóstico y seguimiento de la esclerosis múltiple. RADIOLOGIA 2020; 62:349-359. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rx.2020.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2020] [Revised: 06/26/2020] [Accepted: 07/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
56
|
Zacharzewska-Gondek A, Pokryszko-Dragan A, Budrewicz S, Sąsiadek M, Trybek G, Bladowska J. The role of ADC values within the normal-appearing brain in the prognosis of multiple sclerosis activity during interferon-β therapy in the 3-year follow-up: a preliminary report. Sci Rep 2020; 10:12828. [PMID: 32732968 PMCID: PMC7393067 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-69383-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2019] [Accepted: 07/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Predictors of multiple sclerosis (MS) activity during disease-modifying treatment are being extensively investigated. The aim of this study was to assess the prognosis of NEDA (no evidence of disease activity) status during IFN-β (interferon-β) treatment, using apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements obtained at initial MRI (magnetic resonance imaging). In 87 MS patients treated with IFN-β, ADC values were calculated for 13 regions of normal-appearing white and grey matter (NAWM, NAGM) based on MRI performed with a 1.5 T magnet before (MS0, n = 45) or after one year of therapy (MS1, n = 42). Associations were evaluated between ADC, conventional MRI findings, demographic and clinical factors and NEDA status within the following 3 years using logistic, Cox and multinomial logistic regression models. NEDA rates in the MS0 group were 64.4%, 46.5% and 33.3% after the 1st, 2nd and 3rd year of treatment, respectively and in MS1 patients 71.4% and 48.7% for the periods 1st–2nd and 1st–3rd years of treatment, respectively. ADC values in the NAWM regions contributed to loss of NEDA and its clinical and radiological components, with a 1–3% increase in the risk of NEDA loss (p = 0.0001–0.0489) in both groups. ADC measurements may have an additional prognostic value with regard to NEDA status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Zacharzewska-Gondek
- Department of General and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Wroclaw Medical University, 213 Borowska Street, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland.
| | - Anna Pokryszko-Dragan
- Department and Clinic of Neurology, Wroclaw Medical University, 213 Borowska Street, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Sławomir Budrewicz
- Department and Clinic of Neurology, Wroclaw Medical University, 213 Borowska Street, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Marek Sąsiadek
- Department of General and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Wroclaw Medical University, 213 Borowska Street, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Grzegorz Trybek
- Department of Oral Surgery, Pomeranian Medical University, 72 Powstańców Wielkopolskich Street, 70-111, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Joanna Bladowska
- Department of General and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Wroclaw Medical University, 213 Borowska Street, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Kunchok A, Lechner-Scott J, Granella F, Trojano M, Alroughani R, Sola P, Ferraro D, Lugaresi A, Onofrj M, Ozakbas S, Izquierdo G, Grammond P, Luis Sanchez-Menoyo J, Van Wijmeersch B, Boz C, Pucci E, McCombe P, Grand’Maison F, Spitaleri D, Vucic S, Hupperts R, Jokubaitis V, Sormani MP, Butzkueven H, Kalincik T. Prediction of on-treatment disability worsening in RRMS with the MAGNIMS score. Mult Scler 2020; 27:695-705. [DOI: 10.1177/1352458520936823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Background: The magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis (MAGNIMS) score combines relapses and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions to predict disability outcomes in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) treated with interferon-β. Objective: To validate the MAGNIMS score and extend to other disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). To examine the prognostic value of gadolinium contrast-enhancing (Gd+) lesions. Methods: This RRMS MSBase cohort study ( n = 2293) used a Cox model to examine the prognostic value of relapses, MRI activity and the MAGNIMS score for disability worsening during treatment with interferon-β and three other DMTs. Results: Three new T2 lesions (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.60, p = 0.028) or two relapses (HR = 2.24, p = 0.002) on interferon-β (for 12 months) were predictive of disability worsening over 4 years. MAGNIMS score = 2 (1 relapse and ⩾3 T2 lesions or ⩾2 relapses) was associated with a greater risk of disability worsening on interferon-β (HR = 2.0, p = 0.001). In pooled cohort of four DMTs, similar associations were seen (MAGNIMS score = 2: HR = 1.72, p = 0.001). Secondary analyses demonstrated that the addition of Gd+ to the MAGNIMS did not materially improve its prediction of disability worsening. Conclusion: We have validated the MAGNIMS score in RRMS and extended its application to three other DMTs: 1 relapse and ⩾3 T2 lesions or ⩾2 relapses predicted worsening of disability. Contrast-enhancing lesions did not substantially improve the prognostic score.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Kunchok
- CORe, Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia/Melbourne MS Centre, Department of Neurology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia/The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia/Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jeannette Lechner-Scott
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia/Department of Neurology, John Hunter Hospital, Hunter New England Health, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Franco Granella
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy/Department of Emergency and General Medicine, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - Maria Trojano
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Raed Alroughani
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Amiri Hospital, Kuwait City, Kuwait
| | - Patrizia Sola
- Department of Neuroscience, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, Modena, Italy
| | - Diana Ferraro
- Department of Neuroscience, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, Modena, Italy
| | - Alessandra Lugaresi
- IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy/Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Neuromotorie, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Marco Onofrj
- Clinica Neurologica, Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | - Bart Van Wijmeersch
- Rehabilitation and MS Centre Overpelt, Overpelt, Belgium/Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Cavit Boz
- KTU Medical Faculty, Farabi Hospital, Trabzon, Turkey
| | - Eugenio Pucci
- UOC Neurologia, Azienda Sanitaria Unica Regionale Marche – AV3, Macerata, Italy
| | - Pamela McCombe
- The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia/Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | | | - Daniele Spitaleri
- Azienda Ospedaliera di Rilievo Nazionale San Giuseppe Moscati Avellino, Avellino, Italy
| | - Steve Vucic
- Westmead Hospital, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Vilija Jokubaitis
- Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia/Department of Medicine, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Maria Pia Sormani
- Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Helmut Butzkueven
- Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia/Department of Medicine, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Tomas Kalincik
- CORe, Department of Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia/ Melbourne MS Centre, Department of Neurology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
58
|
Patti F, Chisari CG, D'Amico E, Annovazzi P, Banfi P, Bergamaschi R, Clerici R, Conti MZ, Cortese A, Fantozzi R, Fischetti M, Frigo M, Gatto M, Immovilli P, Leoni S, Malucchi S, Maniscalco G, Marfia GA, Paolicelli D, Perini P, Serrati C, Sola P, Totaro R, Turano G, Valentino P, Zaffaroni M, Zuliani C, Centonze D. Clinical and patient determinants of changing therapy in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (SWITCH study). Mult Scler Relat Disord 2020; 42:102124. [DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2020.102124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2019] [Revised: 03/14/2020] [Accepted: 03/29/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
59
|
Five- and seven-year prognostic value of new effectiveness measures (NEDA, MEDA and six-month delayed NEDA) in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 2020; 414:116827. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2020.116827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2019] [Revised: 03/09/2020] [Accepted: 04/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
60
|
Tsantes E, Curti E, Ganazzoli C, Puci F, Bazzurri V, Fiore A, Crisi G, Granella F. The contribution of enhancing lesions in monitoring multiple sclerosis treatment: is gadolinium always necessary? J Neurol 2020; 267:2642-2647. [DOI: 10.1007/s00415-020-09894-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2020] [Revised: 05/03/2020] [Accepted: 05/05/2020] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
|
61
|
Havas J, Leray E, Rollot F, Casey R, Michel L, Lejeune F, Wiertlewski S, Laplaud D, Foucher Y. Predictive medicine in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2020; 40:101928. [DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2020.101928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2019] [Revised: 12/05/2019] [Accepted: 01/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
62
|
Conway DS, Hersh CM, Harris HC, Hua LH. Duration of natalizumab therapy and reasons for discontinuation in a multiple sclerosis population. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin 2020; 6:2055217320902488. [PMID: 32064117 PMCID: PMC6987494 DOI: 10.1177/2055217320902488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2019] [Accepted: 01/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To determine multiple sclerosis patient characteristics that predict a
shorter duration of natalizumab treatment. Methods The Tysabri Outreach: Unified Commitment to Health database was reviewed to
identify patients treated with natalizumab at our centers. Cox proportional
hazards models were used to evaluate patient characteristics associated with
shorter treatment durations on natalizumab. Associations were also assessed
with respect to specific reasons for stopping natalizumab. Results We identified 554 patients who began and stopped natalizumab treatment during
the observation period. The average disease duration at natalizumab
initiation was 7.6 years, and the average number of infusions was 30. The
multivariable Cox proportional hazards model identified greater age
(P = 0.035), longer disease duration
(P < 0.001), progressive relapsing multiple
sclerosis phenotype (P = 0.003), current smoking
(P = 0.031), and greater depression
(P = 0.026) as significant predictors for natalizumab
discontinuation. Greater disability levels (P = 0.022) and
gadolinium-enhancing lesions on baseline magnetic resonance imaging
(P < 0.001) were significantly associated with
longer natalizumab treatment. Individuals with progressive relapsing
multiple sclerosis had a 14-fold increased hazard of discontinuing
natalizumab due to inflammatory events (P < 0.001) than
those with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis. Smokers had an 80%
increased hazard of discontinuation due to intolerance
(P = 0.008). Conclusions Our results suggest that smoking, depression, and a progressive relapsing
multiple sclerosis phenotype are associated with shorter natalizumab
treatment durations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Devon S Conway
- Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Research, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, USA
| | - Carrie M Hersh
- Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, USA
| | - Haleigh C Harris
- Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, USA
| | - Le H Hua
- Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, USA
| |
Collapse
|
63
|
Rotstein D, Montalban X. Reaching an evidence-based prognosis for personalized treatment of multiple sclerosis. Nat Rev Neurol 2020; 15:287-300. [PMID: 30940920 DOI: 10.1038/s41582-019-0170-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 182] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Personalized treatment is ideal for multiple sclerosis (MS) owing to the heterogeneity of clinical features, but current knowledge gaps, including validation of biomarkers and treatment algorithms, limit practical implementation. The contemporary approach to personalized MS therapy depends on evidence-based prognostication, an initial treatment choice and evaluation of early treatment responses to identify the need to switch therapy. Prognostication is directed by baseline clinical, environmental and demographic factors, MRI measures and biomarkers that correlate with long-term disability measures. The initial treatment choice should be a shared decision between the patient and physician. In addition to prognosis, this choice must account for patient-related factors, including comorbidities, pregnancy planning, preferences of the patients and their comfort with risk, and drug-related factors, including safety, cost and implications for treatment sequencing. Treatment response has traditionally been assessed on the basis of relapse rate, MRI lesions and disability progression. Larger longitudinal data sets have enabled development of composite outcome measures and more stringent standards for disease control. Biomarkers, including neurofilament light chain, have potential as early surrogate markers of prognosis and treatment response but require further validation. Overall, attainment of personalized treatment for MS is complex but will be refined as new data become available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dalia Rotstein
- Division of Neurology, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Xavier Montalban
- Division of Neurology, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. .,Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
64
|
Salem M, Valverde S, Cabezas M, Pareto D, Oliver A, Salvi J, Rovira À, Lladó X. A fully convolutional neural network for new T2-w lesion detection in multiple sclerosis. NEUROIMAGE-CLINICAL 2019; 25:102149. [PMID: 31918065 PMCID: PMC7036701 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.102149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2019] [Revised: 12/23/2019] [Accepted: 12/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
A deep learning model for new T2-w lesions detection in multiple sclerosis is presented. Combining a learning-based registration network with a segmentation one increases the performance. The proposed model decreases false-positives while increasing true-positives. Better performance compared to other supervised and unsupervised state-of-the-art approaches.
Introduction: Longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has an important role in multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis and follow-up. Specifically, the presence of new T2-w lesions on brain MR scans is considered a predictive biomarker for the disease. In this study, we propose a fully convolutional neural network (FCNN) to detect new T2-w lesions in longitudinal brain MR images. Methods: One year apart, multichannel brain MR scans (T1-w, T2-w, PD-w, and FLAIR) were obtained for 60 patients, 36 of them with new T2-w lesions. Modalities from both temporal points were preprocessed and linearly coregistered. Afterwards, an FCNN, whose inputs were from the baseline and follow-up images, was trained to detect new MS lesions. The first part of the network consisted of U-Net blocks that learned the deformation fields (DFs) and nonlinearly registered the baseline image to the follow-up image for each input modality. The learned DFs together with the baseline and follow-up images were then fed to the second part, another U-Net that performed the final detection and segmentation of new T2-w lesions. The model was trained end-to-end, simultaneously learning both the DFs and the new T2-w lesions, using a combined loss function. We evaluated the performance of the model following a leave-one-out cross-validation scheme. Results: In terms of the detection of new lesions, we obtained a mean Dice similarity coefficient of 0.83 with a true positive rate of 83.09% and a false positive detection rate of 9.36%. In terms of segmentation, we obtained a mean Dice similarity coefficient of 0.55. The performance of our model was significantly better compared to the state-of-the-art methods (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Our proposal shows the benefits of combining a learning-based registration network with a segmentation network. Compared to other methods, the proposed model decreases the number of false positives. During testing, the proposed model operates faster than the other two state-of-the-art methods based on the DF obtained by Demons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mostafa Salem
- Research Institute of Computer Vision and Robotics, University of Girona, Spain; Computer Science Department, Faculty of Computers and Information, Assiut University, Egypt.
| | - Sergi Valverde
- Research Institute of Computer Vision and Robotics, University of Girona, Spain
| | - Mariano Cabezas
- Research Institute of Computer Vision and Robotics, University of Girona, Spain
| | - Deborah Pareto
- Magnetic Resonance Unit, Dept of Radiology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Spain
| | - Arnau Oliver
- Research Institute of Computer Vision and Robotics, University of Girona, Spain
| | - Joaquim Salvi
- Research Institute of Computer Vision and Robotics, University of Girona, Spain
| | - Àlex Rovira
- Magnetic Resonance Unit, Dept of Radiology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Spain
| | - Xavier Lladó
- Research Institute of Computer Vision and Robotics, University of Girona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
65
|
Gross RH, Corboy JR. Monitoring, Switching, and Stopping Multiple Sclerosis Disease-Modifying Therapies. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 2019; 25:715-735. [PMID: 31162313 DOI: 10.1212/con.0000000000000738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This article reviews appropriate monitoring of the various multiple sclerosis (MS) disease-modifying therapies, summarizes the reasons patients switch or stop treatment, and provides a framework for making these management decisions. RECENT FINDINGS With the increasing number of highly effective immunotherapies available for MS, the possibility of better control of the disease has increased, but with it, the potential for side effects has rendered treatment decisions more complicated. Starting treatment early with more effective and better-tolerated disease-modifying therapies reduces the likelihood of switching because of breakthrough disease or lack of compliance. Clinical and radiographic surveillance, and often blood and other paraclinical tests, should be performed periodically, depending on the disease-modifying therapy. Helping patients navigate the uncertainty around switching or stopping treatment, either temporarily or permanently, is one of the most important things we do as providers of MS care. SUMMARY Ongoing monitoring of drug therapy is a crucial component of long-term MS care. Switching treatments may be necessary for a variety of reasons. Permanent discontinuation of treatment may be appropriate for some patients with MS, although more study is needed in this area.
Collapse
|
66
|
Expert opinion: Criteria for second-line treatment failure in patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2019; 36:101406. [DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2019.101406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2019] [Accepted: 09/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
67
|
Doosti-Irani A, Tamtaji OR, Mansournia MA, Ghayour-Mobarhan M, Ferns G, Daneshvar Kakhaki R, Rezaei Shahmirzadi A, Asemi Z. The effects of vitamin D supplementation on expanded disability status scale in people with multiple sclerosis: A critical, systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2019; 187:105564. [PMID: 31669929 DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.105564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2019] [Revised: 07/22/2019] [Accepted: 10/13/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
In this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), the effects of vitamin D supplementation on the scores for the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) are assessed. The following databases were search up to January 2018: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The quality of the relevant extracted data was assessed according to the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Data were pooled by the use of the inverse variance method and expressed as mean difference with 95% Confidence Intervals (95% CI). Six studies were included in this meta-analysis. The findings demonstrated that supplementation with vitamin D alone and vitamin D plus calcium did not affect the EDSS score (WMD -0.11 (-0.33, 0.11); P = 0.32). In addition, subgroup analysis showed that vitamin D supplementation alone, when compared to the use of a placebo, and vitamin D plus calcium supplementation compared with the control did not affect EDSS (WMD -0.13 (-0.30, 0.11); P = 0.29) and (WMD -0.08 (-0.57, 0.41); P = 0.29), respectively. Overall, this meta-analysis indicated that taking vitamin D in people with MS had no significant effect on EDSS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amin Doosti-Irani
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran; Modeling of Noncommunicable Diseases Research Center, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
| | - Omid Reza Tamtaji
- Research Center for Biochemistry and Nutrition in Metabolic Diseases, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran
| | - Mohammad Ali Mansournia
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Majid Ghayour-Mobarhan
- Metabolic Syndrome Research Center, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Gordon Ferns
- Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Division of Medical Education, Falmer, Brighton, Sussex BN1 9 PH, UK
| | - Reza Daneshvar Kakhaki
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran
| | | | - Zatollah Asemi
- Research Center for Biochemistry and Nutrition in Metabolic Diseases, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
68
|
Ontaneda D, Tallantyre E, Kalincik T, Planchon SM, Evangelou N. Early highly effective versus escalation treatment approaches in relapsing multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 2019; 18:973-980. [DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(19)30151-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2018] [Revised: 02/22/2019] [Accepted: 03/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
|
69
|
Paolicelli D, Lucisano G, Manni A, Avolio C, Bonavita S, Brescia Morra V, Capobianco M, Cocco E, Conte A, De Luca G, De Robertis F, Gasperini C, Gatto M, Gazzola P, Lus G, Iaffaldano A, Iaffaldano P, Maimone D, Mallucci G, Maniscalco GT, Marfia GA, Patti F, Pesci I, Pozzilli C, Rovaris M, Salemi G, Salvetti M, Spitaleri D, Totaro R, Zaffaroni M, Comi G, Amato MP, Trojano M. Retrospectively acquired cohort study to evaluate the long-term impact of two different treatment strategies on disability outcomes in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RE.LO.DI.MS): data from the Italian MS Register. J Neurol 2019; 266:3098-3107. [PMID: 31535270 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-019-09531-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2019] [Revised: 09/05/2019] [Accepted: 09/06/2019] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The increase in disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) allows individualization of treatment in relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS); however, the long-term impact of different treatment sequences is not well established. This is particularly relevant for MS patients who may need to postpone more aggressive DMD strategies. OBJECTIVE To evaluate different therapeutic strategies and their long-term outcomes, measured as relapses and confirmed disability progression (CDP), in MS 'real-world' settings. METHODS Multicentre, observational, retrospectively acquired cohort study evaluating the long-term impact of different treatment strategies on disability outcomes in patients with RMS in the Italian MS Register. RESULTS We evaluated 1152 RMS-naïve patients after propensity-score adjustment. Patients included were receiving: interferon beta-1a (IFN-β1a) 44 µg switching to fingolimod (FTY; IFN-switchers; n = 97); FTY only (FTY-stayers; n = 157); IFN-β1a only (IFN-stayers; n = 849). CDP and relapses did not differ between FTY-stayers and IFN-switchers [HR (95% CI) 0.99 (0.48-2.04), p = 0.98 and 0.81 (0.42-1.58), p = 0.55, respectively]. However, IFN-stayers showed increased risk of relapses compared with FTY-stayers [HR (95% CI) 1.46 (1.00-2.12), p = 0.05]. CONCLUSION The ideal treatment option for MS is becoming increasingly complex, with the need to balance benefit and risks. Our results suggest that starting with FTY affects the long-term disease outcome similarly to escalating from IFN-β1a to FTY.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damiano Paolicelli
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neurosciences, and Sense Organs, Multiple Sclerosis Center, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
| | - Giuseppe Lucisano
- Center for Outcomes Research and Clinical Epidemiology, Pescara, Italy
| | - Alessia Manni
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neurosciences, and Sense Organs, Multiple Sclerosis Center, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Carlo Avolio
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Simona Bonavita
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Brescia Morra
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, "Federico II" University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Marco Capobianco
- Department of Neurology and Regional Multiple Sclerosis Centre, University Hospital San Luigi, Orbassano, TO, Italy
| | - Eleonora Cocco
- Department of Medical Science and Public Health, University of Cagliari and Multiple Sclerosis Center, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Antonella Conte
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy.,IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, IS, Italy
| | - Giovanna De Luca
- Neurology Clinic, Multiple Sclerosis Centre, SS Annunziata Hospital, Chieti, Italy
| | | | | | - Maurizia Gatto
- Neurology Unit, "F. Miulli" Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti BA, Italy
| | - Paola Gazzola
- Departemental Center for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Demyelinating Diseases, Sestri Ponente, Genoa, Italy
| | - Giacomo Lus
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy
| | - Antonio Iaffaldano
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neurosciences, and Sense Organs, Multiple Sclerosis Center, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Pietro Iaffaldano
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neurosciences, and Sense Organs, Multiple Sclerosis Center, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Davide Maimone
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, Garibaldi Hospital, Catania, Italy
| | - Giulia Mallucci
- Multiple Sclerosis Center of IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Girolama A Marfia
- Department of Systems Medicine, Multiple Sclerosis Clinical and Research Center, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Patti
- Department "G.F. Ingrassia", Multiple Sclerosis Center, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Ilaria Pesci
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, Ospedale di Vaio (I.P.), Fidenza, PR, Italy
| | - Carlo Pozzilli
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.,Department of Neurology, University La Sapienza, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Rovaris
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Salemi
- Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics, Palermo University, Palermo, Italy
| | - Marco Salvetti
- Department of Neuroscience, Mental Health and Sensory Organs, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.,Istituto Neurologico Mediterraneo (INM) Neuromed, Pozzilli, Isernia, Italy
| | | | - Rocco Totaro
- Department of Neurology, Demyelinating Disease Center, San Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Mauro Zaffaroni
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, Hospital of Gallarate, Gallarate, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Comi
- Department of Neurology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Pia Amato
- Department NEUROFARBA, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,IRCCS and Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy
| | - Maria Trojano
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neurosciences, and Sense Organs, Multiple Sclerosis Center, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
70
|
Boziki M, Lagoudaki R, Melo P, Kanidou F, Bakirtzis C, Nikolaidis I, Grigoriadou E, Afrantou T, Tatsi T, Matsi S, Grigoriadis N. Induction of apoptosis in CD4(+) T-cells is linked with optimal treatment response in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis treated with Glatiramer acetate. J Neurol Sci 2019; 401:43-50. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2019.03.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2018] [Revised: 02/11/2019] [Accepted: 03/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
71
|
Hartung HP, Graf J, Aktas O, Mares J, Barnett MH. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: revisions of the McDonald criteria 2017 – continuity and change. Curr Opin Neurol 2019; 32:327-337. [DOI: 10.1097/wco.0000000000000699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
72
|
Jones LK, Greskovic G, Grassi DM, Graham J, Sun H, Gionfriddo MR, Murray MF, Manickam K, Nathanson DC, Wright EA, Evans MA. Medication therapy disease management: Geisinger's approach to population health management. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2019; 74:1422-1435. [PMID: 28887344 DOI: 10.2146/ajhp161061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Pharmacists' involvement in a population health initiative focused on chronic disease management is described. SUMMARY Geisinger Health System has cultivated a culture of innovation in population health management, as highlighted by its ambulatory care pharmacy program, the Medication Therapy Disease Management (MTDM) program. Initiated in 1996, the MTDM program leverages pharmacists' pharmacotherapy expertise to optimize care and improve outcomes. MTDM program pharmacists are trained and credentialed to manage over 16 conditions, including atrial fibrillation (AF) and multiple sclerosis (MS). Over a 15-year period, Geisinger Health Plan (GHP)-insured patients with AF whose warfarin therapy was managed by the MTDM program had, on average, 18% fewer emergency department (ED) visits and 18% fewer hospitalizations per year than GHP enrollees with AF who did not receive MTDM services, with 23% lower annual total care costs. Over a 2-year period, GHP-insured patients with MS whose pharmacotherapy was managed by pharmacists averaged 28% fewer annual ED visits than non-pharmacist-managed patients; however, the mean annual total care cost was 21% higher among MTDM clinic patients. CONCLUSION The Geisinger MTDM program has evolved over 20 years from a single pharmacist-run anticoagulation clinic into a large program focused on managing the health of an ever-growing population. Initial challenges in integrating pharmacists into the Geisinger patient care framework as clinical experts were overcome by demonstrating the MTDM program's positive impact on patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laney K Jones
- Center for Pharmacy Innovation and Outcomes, Geisinger, Danville, PA
| | | | - Dante M Grassi
- Enterprise Pharmacy, Center for Pharmacy Innovation and Outcomes, Geisinger, Danville, PA
| | - Jove Graham
- Center for Pharmacy Innovation and Outcomes, Geisinger, Danville, PA
| | - Haiyan Sun
- Biomedical and Translational Informatics, Geisinger, Danville, PA
| | | | | | | | | | - Eric A Wright
- Center for Pharmacy Innovation and Outcomes, Geisinger, Danville, PA
| | | |
Collapse
|
73
|
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic neurodegenerative autoimmune disease with a complex clinical course characterized by inflammation, demyelination, and axonal degeneration. Diagnosis of MS most commonly includes finding lesions in at least two separate areas of the central nervous system (CNS), including the brain, spinal cord, and optic nerves. In recent years, there has been a remarkable increase in the number of available treatments for MS. An optimal treatment is usually based on a personalized approach determined by an individual patient's prognosis and treatment risks. Biomarkers that can predict disability progression, monitor ongoing disease activity, and assess treatment response are integral in making important decisions regarding MS treatment. This review describes MS biomarkers that are currently being used in clinical practice; it also reviews and consolidates published findings from clinically relevant potential MS biomarkers in recent years. The work also discusses the challenges of validating and application of biomarkers in MS clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anu Paul
- Department of Neurology, Ann Romney Center for Neurological Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
| | - Manuel Comabella
- Department of Neurology, MS Centre of Catalonia, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona 08035, Spain
| | - Roopali Gandhi
- Department of Neurology, Ann Romney Center for Neurological Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
| |
Collapse
|
74
|
Linker RA, Chan A. Navigating choice in multiple sclerosis management. Neurol Res Pract 2019; 1:5. [PMID: 33324871 PMCID: PMC7650058 DOI: 10.1186/s42466-019-0005-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2018] [Accepted: 11/21/2018] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background With the advent of modern immunotherapies for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and the increasing amount of treatment options on the market, MS has evolved as a treatable disease. Yet, at the same time, new challenges for the treating neurologists arise. Main body This review article covers some of these challenges, including when and how to start treatment, treatment monitoring, and finally considerations on what the increasing choice in treatment options brings to disease management and longer-term planning. Among others, these important issues comprise pregnancy, treatment sequencing, switching or even stopping treatment. Conclusion The ultimate goal for navigating choices in RRMS management is to choose the right drug for the right patient at the right time Throughout the article, there is a strong focus on practical aspects and individual decision making in MS to meet the concept of personalized medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ralf A Linker
- Department of Neurology, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstr. 84, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Andrew Chan
- Ambulantes Neurozentrum, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Freiburgstr. 4, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
75
|
Rothman A, Murphy OC, Fitzgerald KC, Button J, Gordon-Lipkin E, Ratchford JN, Newsome SD, Mowry EM, Sotirchos ES, Syc-Mazurek SB, Nguyen J, Caldito NG, Balcer LJ, Frohman EM, Frohman TC, Reich DS, Crainiceanu C, Saidha S, Calabresi PA. Retinal measurements predict 10-year disability in multiple sclerosis. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2019; 6:222-232. [PMID: 30847355 PMCID: PMC6389740 DOI: 10.1002/acn3.674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2018] [Revised: 08/30/2018] [Accepted: 09/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Optical coherence tomography (OCT)‐derived measures of the retina correlate with disability and cortical gray matter atrophy in multiple sclerosis (MS); however, whether such measures predict long‐term disability is unknown. We evaluated whether a single OCT and visual function assessment predict the disability status 10 years later. Methods Between 2006 and 2008, 172 people with MS underwent Stratus time domain‐OCT imaging [160 with measurement of total macular volume (TMV)] and high and low‐contrast letter acuity (LCLA) testing (n = 150; 87%). All participants had Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) assessments at baseline and at 10‐year follow‐up. We applied generalized linear regression models to assess associations between baseline TMV, peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) thickness, and LCLA with 10‐year EDSS scores (linear) and with clinically significant EDSS worsening (binary), adjusting for age, sex, optic neuritis history, and baseline disability status. Results In multivariable models, lower baseline TMV was associated with higher 10‐year EDSS scores (mean increase in EDSS of 0.75 per 1 mm3 loss in TMV (mean difference = 0.75; 95% CI: 0.11–1.39; P = 0.02). In analyses using tertiles, individuals in the lowest tertile of baseline TMV had an average 0.86 higher EDSS scores at 10 years (mean difference = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.23–1.48) and had over 3.5‐fold increased odds of clinically significant EDSS worsening relative to those in the highest tertile of baseline TMV (OR: 3.58; 95% CI: 1.30–9.82; Ptrend = 0.008). pRNFL and LCLA predicted the 10‐year EDSS scores only in univariate models. Interpretation Lower baseline TMV measured by OCT significantly predicts higher disability at 10 years, even after accounting for baseline disability status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alissa Rothman
- Department of Neurology Johns Hopkins University Baltimore Maryland
| | - Olwen C Murphy
- Department of Neurology Johns Hopkins University Baltimore Maryland
| | | | - Julia Button
- Department of Neurology Johns Hopkins University Baltimore Maryland
| | | | - John N Ratchford
- Department of Neurology Johns Hopkins University Baltimore Maryland
| | - Scott D Newsome
- Department of Neurology Johns Hopkins University Baltimore Maryland
| | - Ellen M Mowry
- Department of Neurology Johns Hopkins University Baltimore Maryland
| | | | | | - James Nguyen
- Department of Neurology Johns Hopkins University Baltimore Maryland
| | | | - Laura J Balcer
- Department of Neurology New York University Langone Medical Center New York New York
| | - Elliot M Frohman
- Department of Neurology and Ophthalmology Dell Medical School University of Texas Austin Austin Texas
| | - Teresa C Frohman
- Department of Neurology and Ophthalmology Dell Medical School University of Texas Austin Austin Texas
| | - Daniel S Reich
- Department of Neurology Johns Hopkins University Baltimore Maryland.,Translational Neuroradiology Unit National Institutes of Health Bethesda Maryland.,Department of Biostatistics Johns Hopkins University Baltimore Maryland
| | | | - Shiv Saidha
- Department of Neurology Johns Hopkins University Baltimore Maryland
| | | |
Collapse
|
76
|
Pandit L. No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA) in Multiple Sclerosis - Shifting the Goal Posts. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2019; 22:261-263. [PMID: 31359933 PMCID: PMC6613429 DOI: 10.4103/aian.aian_159_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
A combined endpoint measure to define no evidence of disease activity (NEDA) is becoming increasingly appealing in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). Initial efforts using a 3 parameter NEDA monitored disease activity using clinical and MRI lesion data. Later refinements, introduced more recently, include brain atrophy measurement and cognitive function analysis in defining NEDA-4. Using these stringent criteria clearly differentiated the usefulness of different disease modifying agents (DMDs) in achieving and sustaining NEDA over time. This in turn has changed attitudes and strategies in management of MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lekha Pandit
- Professor of Neurology, Director of Center for Advanced Neurological Research, KS Hegde Medical Academy, Nitte (Deemed to be University), Mangalore, Karnataka, India
| |
Collapse
|
77
|
Gasperini C, Prosperini L, Tintoré M, Sormani MP, Filippi M, Rio J, Palace J, Rocca MA, Ciccarelli O, Barkhof F, Sastre-Garriga J, Vrenken H, Frederiksen JL, Yousry TA, Enzinger C, Rovira A, Kappos L, Pozzilli C, Montalban X, De Stefano N. Unraveling treatment response in multiple sclerosis: A clinical and MRI challenge. Neurology 2018; 92:180-192. [PMID: 30587516 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000006810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2018] [Accepted: 08/31/2018] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Over the last few decades, the improved diagnostic criteria, the wide use of MRI, and the growing availability of effective pharmacologic treatments have led to substantial advances in the management of multiple sclerosis (MS). The importance of early diagnosis and treatment is now well-established, but there is still no consensus on how to define and monitor response to MS treatments. In particular, the clinical relevance of the detection of minimal MRI activity is controversial and recommendations on how to define and monitor treatment response are warranted. An expert panel of the Magnetic Resonance Imaging in MS Study Group analyzed and discussed published studies on treatment response in MS. The evolving concept of no evidence of disease activity and its effect on predicting long-term prognosis was examined, including the option of defining a more realistic target for daily clinical practice: minimal evidence of disease activity. Advantages and disadvantages associated with the use of MRI activity alone and quantitative scoring systems combining on-treatment clinical relapses and MRI active lesions to detect treatment response in the real-world setting were also discussed. While most published studies on this topic involved patients treated with interferon-β, special attention was given to more recent studies providing evidence based on treatment with other and more efficacious oral and injectable drugs. Finally, the panel identified future directions to pursue in this research field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudio Gasperini
- From the Department of Neurosciences (C.G., L.P.), San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy; Centre d'Esclerosi Multiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Department of Neurology/Neuroimmunology (M.T., J.R., J.S.-G., X.M.), and Magnetic Resonance Unit, Department of Radiology (A.R.), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Biostatistics Unit (M.P.S.), Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.F., M.A.R.), Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (J.P.), West Wing, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford; Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (O.C., F.B.), University College London (O.C.), UK; Amsterdam Neuroscience and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (F.B., H.V.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (J.L.F.), Rigshospitalet Glostrup and University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Neuroradiological Academic Unit (T.A.Y.), Institute of Neurology, London, UK; Department of Neurology (C.E.), Medical University of Graz, Austria; Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Department of Medicine (L.K.), Clinical Research, Biomedicine and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology and Psychiatry (C.P.), Sapienza University, Rome; and Neurology and Neurometabolic Unit, Department of Neurological and Behavioral Sciences (N.D.S.), University of Siena, Italy.
| | - Luca Prosperini
- From the Department of Neurosciences (C.G., L.P.), San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy; Centre d'Esclerosi Multiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Department of Neurology/Neuroimmunology (M.T., J.R., J.S.-G., X.M.), and Magnetic Resonance Unit, Department of Radiology (A.R.), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Biostatistics Unit (M.P.S.), Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.F., M.A.R.), Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (J.P.), West Wing, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford; Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (O.C., F.B.), University College London (O.C.), UK; Amsterdam Neuroscience and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (F.B., H.V.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (J.L.F.), Rigshospitalet Glostrup and University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Neuroradiological Academic Unit (T.A.Y.), Institute of Neurology, London, UK; Department of Neurology (C.E.), Medical University of Graz, Austria; Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Department of Medicine (L.K.), Clinical Research, Biomedicine and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology and Psychiatry (C.P.), Sapienza University, Rome; and Neurology and Neurometabolic Unit, Department of Neurological and Behavioral Sciences (N.D.S.), University of Siena, Italy
| | - Mar Tintoré
- From the Department of Neurosciences (C.G., L.P.), San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy; Centre d'Esclerosi Multiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Department of Neurology/Neuroimmunology (M.T., J.R., J.S.-G., X.M.), and Magnetic Resonance Unit, Department of Radiology (A.R.), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Biostatistics Unit (M.P.S.), Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.F., M.A.R.), Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (J.P.), West Wing, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford; Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (O.C., F.B.), University College London (O.C.), UK; Amsterdam Neuroscience and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (F.B., H.V.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (J.L.F.), Rigshospitalet Glostrup and University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Neuroradiological Academic Unit (T.A.Y.), Institute of Neurology, London, UK; Department of Neurology (C.E.), Medical University of Graz, Austria; Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Department of Medicine (L.K.), Clinical Research, Biomedicine and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology and Psychiatry (C.P.), Sapienza University, Rome; and Neurology and Neurometabolic Unit, Department of Neurological and Behavioral Sciences (N.D.S.), University of Siena, Italy
| | - Maria Pia Sormani
- From the Department of Neurosciences (C.G., L.P.), San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy; Centre d'Esclerosi Multiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Department of Neurology/Neuroimmunology (M.T., J.R., J.S.-G., X.M.), and Magnetic Resonance Unit, Department of Radiology (A.R.), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Biostatistics Unit (M.P.S.), Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.F., M.A.R.), Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (J.P.), West Wing, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford; Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (O.C., F.B.), University College London (O.C.), UK; Amsterdam Neuroscience and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (F.B., H.V.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (J.L.F.), Rigshospitalet Glostrup and University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Neuroradiological Academic Unit (T.A.Y.), Institute of Neurology, London, UK; Department of Neurology (C.E.), Medical University of Graz, Austria; Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Department of Medicine (L.K.), Clinical Research, Biomedicine and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology and Psychiatry (C.P.), Sapienza University, Rome; and Neurology and Neurometabolic Unit, Department of Neurological and Behavioral Sciences (N.D.S.), University of Siena, Italy
| | - Massimo Filippi
- From the Department of Neurosciences (C.G., L.P.), San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy; Centre d'Esclerosi Multiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Department of Neurology/Neuroimmunology (M.T., J.R., J.S.-G., X.M.), and Magnetic Resonance Unit, Department of Radiology (A.R.), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Biostatistics Unit (M.P.S.), Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.F., M.A.R.), Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (J.P.), West Wing, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford; Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (O.C., F.B.), University College London (O.C.), UK; Amsterdam Neuroscience and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (F.B., H.V.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (J.L.F.), Rigshospitalet Glostrup and University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Neuroradiological Academic Unit (T.A.Y.), Institute of Neurology, London, UK; Department of Neurology (C.E.), Medical University of Graz, Austria; Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Department of Medicine (L.K.), Clinical Research, Biomedicine and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology and Psychiatry (C.P.), Sapienza University, Rome; and Neurology and Neurometabolic Unit, Department of Neurological and Behavioral Sciences (N.D.S.), University of Siena, Italy
| | - Jordi Rio
- From the Department of Neurosciences (C.G., L.P.), San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy; Centre d'Esclerosi Multiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Department of Neurology/Neuroimmunology (M.T., J.R., J.S.-G., X.M.), and Magnetic Resonance Unit, Department of Radiology (A.R.), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Biostatistics Unit (M.P.S.), Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.F., M.A.R.), Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (J.P.), West Wing, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford; Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (O.C., F.B.), University College London (O.C.), UK; Amsterdam Neuroscience and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (F.B., H.V.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (J.L.F.), Rigshospitalet Glostrup and University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Neuroradiological Academic Unit (T.A.Y.), Institute of Neurology, London, UK; Department of Neurology (C.E.), Medical University of Graz, Austria; Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Department of Medicine (L.K.), Clinical Research, Biomedicine and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology and Psychiatry (C.P.), Sapienza University, Rome; and Neurology and Neurometabolic Unit, Department of Neurological and Behavioral Sciences (N.D.S.), University of Siena, Italy
| | - Jacqueline Palace
- From the Department of Neurosciences (C.G., L.P.), San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy; Centre d'Esclerosi Multiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Department of Neurology/Neuroimmunology (M.T., J.R., J.S.-G., X.M.), and Magnetic Resonance Unit, Department of Radiology (A.R.), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Biostatistics Unit (M.P.S.), Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.F., M.A.R.), Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (J.P.), West Wing, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford; Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (O.C., F.B.), University College London (O.C.), UK; Amsterdam Neuroscience and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (F.B., H.V.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (J.L.F.), Rigshospitalet Glostrup and University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Neuroradiological Academic Unit (T.A.Y.), Institute of Neurology, London, UK; Department of Neurology (C.E.), Medical University of Graz, Austria; Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Department of Medicine (L.K.), Clinical Research, Biomedicine and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology and Psychiatry (C.P.), Sapienza University, Rome; and Neurology and Neurometabolic Unit, Department of Neurological and Behavioral Sciences (N.D.S.), University of Siena, Italy
| | - Maria A Rocca
- From the Department of Neurosciences (C.G., L.P.), San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy; Centre d'Esclerosi Multiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Department of Neurology/Neuroimmunology (M.T., J.R., J.S.-G., X.M.), and Magnetic Resonance Unit, Department of Radiology (A.R.), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Biostatistics Unit (M.P.S.), Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.F., M.A.R.), Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (J.P.), West Wing, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford; Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (O.C., F.B.), University College London (O.C.), UK; Amsterdam Neuroscience and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (F.B., H.V.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (J.L.F.), Rigshospitalet Glostrup and University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Neuroradiological Academic Unit (T.A.Y.), Institute of Neurology, London, UK; Department of Neurology (C.E.), Medical University of Graz, Austria; Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Department of Medicine (L.K.), Clinical Research, Biomedicine and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology and Psychiatry (C.P.), Sapienza University, Rome; and Neurology and Neurometabolic Unit, Department of Neurological and Behavioral Sciences (N.D.S.), University of Siena, Italy
| | - Olga Ciccarelli
- From the Department of Neurosciences (C.G., L.P.), San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy; Centre d'Esclerosi Multiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Department of Neurology/Neuroimmunology (M.T., J.R., J.S.-G., X.M.), and Magnetic Resonance Unit, Department of Radiology (A.R.), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Biostatistics Unit (M.P.S.), Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.F., M.A.R.), Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (J.P.), West Wing, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford; Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (O.C., F.B.), University College London (O.C.), UK; Amsterdam Neuroscience and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (F.B., H.V.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (J.L.F.), Rigshospitalet Glostrup and University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Neuroradiological Academic Unit (T.A.Y.), Institute of Neurology, London, UK; Department of Neurology (C.E.), Medical University of Graz, Austria; Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Department of Medicine (L.K.), Clinical Research, Biomedicine and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology and Psychiatry (C.P.), Sapienza University, Rome; and Neurology and Neurometabolic Unit, Department of Neurological and Behavioral Sciences (N.D.S.), University of Siena, Italy
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- From the Department of Neurosciences (C.G., L.P.), San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy; Centre d'Esclerosi Multiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Department of Neurology/Neuroimmunology (M.T., J.R., J.S.-G., X.M.), and Magnetic Resonance Unit, Department of Radiology (A.R.), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Biostatistics Unit (M.P.S.), Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.F., M.A.R.), Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (J.P.), West Wing, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford; Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (O.C., F.B.), University College London (O.C.), UK; Amsterdam Neuroscience and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (F.B., H.V.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (J.L.F.), Rigshospitalet Glostrup and University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Neuroradiological Academic Unit (T.A.Y.), Institute of Neurology, London, UK; Department of Neurology (C.E.), Medical University of Graz, Austria; Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Department of Medicine (L.K.), Clinical Research, Biomedicine and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology and Psychiatry (C.P.), Sapienza University, Rome; and Neurology and Neurometabolic Unit, Department of Neurological and Behavioral Sciences (N.D.S.), University of Siena, Italy
| | - Jaume Sastre-Garriga
- From the Department of Neurosciences (C.G., L.P.), San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy; Centre d'Esclerosi Multiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Department of Neurology/Neuroimmunology (M.T., J.R., J.S.-G., X.M.), and Magnetic Resonance Unit, Department of Radiology (A.R.), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Biostatistics Unit (M.P.S.), Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.F., M.A.R.), Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (J.P.), West Wing, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford; Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (O.C., F.B.), University College London (O.C.), UK; Amsterdam Neuroscience and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (F.B., H.V.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (J.L.F.), Rigshospitalet Glostrup and University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Neuroradiological Academic Unit (T.A.Y.), Institute of Neurology, London, UK; Department of Neurology (C.E.), Medical University of Graz, Austria; Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Department of Medicine (L.K.), Clinical Research, Biomedicine and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology and Psychiatry (C.P.), Sapienza University, Rome; and Neurology and Neurometabolic Unit, Department of Neurological and Behavioral Sciences (N.D.S.), University of Siena, Italy
| | - Hugo Vrenken
- From the Department of Neurosciences (C.G., L.P.), San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy; Centre d'Esclerosi Multiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Department of Neurology/Neuroimmunology (M.T., J.R., J.S.-G., X.M.), and Magnetic Resonance Unit, Department of Radiology (A.R.), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Biostatistics Unit (M.P.S.), Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.F., M.A.R.), Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (J.P.), West Wing, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford; Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (O.C., F.B.), University College London (O.C.), UK; Amsterdam Neuroscience and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (F.B., H.V.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (J.L.F.), Rigshospitalet Glostrup and University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Neuroradiological Academic Unit (T.A.Y.), Institute of Neurology, London, UK; Department of Neurology (C.E.), Medical University of Graz, Austria; Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Department of Medicine (L.K.), Clinical Research, Biomedicine and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology and Psychiatry (C.P.), Sapienza University, Rome; and Neurology and Neurometabolic Unit, Department of Neurological and Behavioral Sciences (N.D.S.), University of Siena, Italy
| | - Jette L Frederiksen
- From the Department of Neurosciences (C.G., L.P.), San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy; Centre d'Esclerosi Multiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Department of Neurology/Neuroimmunology (M.T., J.R., J.S.-G., X.M.), and Magnetic Resonance Unit, Department of Radiology (A.R.), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Biostatistics Unit (M.P.S.), Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.F., M.A.R.), Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (J.P.), West Wing, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford; Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (O.C., F.B.), University College London (O.C.), UK; Amsterdam Neuroscience and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (F.B., H.V.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (J.L.F.), Rigshospitalet Glostrup and University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Neuroradiological Academic Unit (T.A.Y.), Institute of Neurology, London, UK; Department of Neurology (C.E.), Medical University of Graz, Austria; Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Department of Medicine (L.K.), Clinical Research, Biomedicine and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology and Psychiatry (C.P.), Sapienza University, Rome; and Neurology and Neurometabolic Unit, Department of Neurological and Behavioral Sciences (N.D.S.), University of Siena, Italy
| | - Tarek A Yousry
- From the Department of Neurosciences (C.G., L.P.), San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy; Centre d'Esclerosi Multiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Department of Neurology/Neuroimmunology (M.T., J.R., J.S.-G., X.M.), and Magnetic Resonance Unit, Department of Radiology (A.R.), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Biostatistics Unit (M.P.S.), Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.F., M.A.R.), Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (J.P.), West Wing, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford; Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (O.C., F.B.), University College London (O.C.), UK; Amsterdam Neuroscience and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (F.B., H.V.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (J.L.F.), Rigshospitalet Glostrup and University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Neuroradiological Academic Unit (T.A.Y.), Institute of Neurology, London, UK; Department of Neurology (C.E.), Medical University of Graz, Austria; Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Department of Medicine (L.K.), Clinical Research, Biomedicine and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology and Psychiatry (C.P.), Sapienza University, Rome; and Neurology and Neurometabolic Unit, Department of Neurological and Behavioral Sciences (N.D.S.), University of Siena, Italy
| | - Christian Enzinger
- From the Department of Neurosciences (C.G., L.P.), San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy; Centre d'Esclerosi Multiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Department of Neurology/Neuroimmunology (M.T., J.R., J.S.-G., X.M.), and Magnetic Resonance Unit, Department of Radiology (A.R.), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Biostatistics Unit (M.P.S.), Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.F., M.A.R.), Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (J.P.), West Wing, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford; Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (O.C., F.B.), University College London (O.C.), UK; Amsterdam Neuroscience and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (F.B., H.V.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (J.L.F.), Rigshospitalet Glostrup and University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Neuroradiological Academic Unit (T.A.Y.), Institute of Neurology, London, UK; Department of Neurology (C.E.), Medical University of Graz, Austria; Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Department of Medicine (L.K.), Clinical Research, Biomedicine and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology and Psychiatry (C.P.), Sapienza University, Rome; and Neurology and Neurometabolic Unit, Department of Neurological and Behavioral Sciences (N.D.S.), University of Siena, Italy
| | - Alex Rovira
- From the Department of Neurosciences (C.G., L.P.), San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy; Centre d'Esclerosi Multiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Department of Neurology/Neuroimmunology (M.T., J.R., J.S.-G., X.M.), and Magnetic Resonance Unit, Department of Radiology (A.R.), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Biostatistics Unit (M.P.S.), Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.F., M.A.R.), Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (J.P.), West Wing, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford; Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (O.C., F.B.), University College London (O.C.), UK; Amsterdam Neuroscience and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (F.B., H.V.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (J.L.F.), Rigshospitalet Glostrup and University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Neuroradiological Academic Unit (T.A.Y.), Institute of Neurology, London, UK; Department of Neurology (C.E.), Medical University of Graz, Austria; Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Department of Medicine (L.K.), Clinical Research, Biomedicine and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology and Psychiatry (C.P.), Sapienza University, Rome; and Neurology and Neurometabolic Unit, Department of Neurological and Behavioral Sciences (N.D.S.), University of Siena, Italy
| | - Ludwig Kappos
- From the Department of Neurosciences (C.G., L.P.), San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy; Centre d'Esclerosi Multiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Department of Neurology/Neuroimmunology (M.T., J.R., J.S.-G., X.M.), and Magnetic Resonance Unit, Department of Radiology (A.R.), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Biostatistics Unit (M.P.S.), Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.F., M.A.R.), Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (J.P.), West Wing, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford; Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (O.C., F.B.), University College London (O.C.), UK; Amsterdam Neuroscience and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (F.B., H.V.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (J.L.F.), Rigshospitalet Glostrup and University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Neuroradiological Academic Unit (T.A.Y.), Institute of Neurology, London, UK; Department of Neurology (C.E.), Medical University of Graz, Austria; Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Department of Medicine (L.K.), Clinical Research, Biomedicine and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology and Psychiatry (C.P.), Sapienza University, Rome; and Neurology and Neurometabolic Unit, Department of Neurological and Behavioral Sciences (N.D.S.), University of Siena, Italy
| | - Carlo Pozzilli
- From the Department of Neurosciences (C.G., L.P.), San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy; Centre d'Esclerosi Multiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Department of Neurology/Neuroimmunology (M.T., J.R., J.S.-G., X.M.), and Magnetic Resonance Unit, Department of Radiology (A.R.), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Biostatistics Unit (M.P.S.), Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.F., M.A.R.), Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (J.P.), West Wing, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford; Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (O.C., F.B.), University College London (O.C.), UK; Amsterdam Neuroscience and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (F.B., H.V.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (J.L.F.), Rigshospitalet Glostrup and University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Neuroradiological Academic Unit (T.A.Y.), Institute of Neurology, London, UK; Department of Neurology (C.E.), Medical University of Graz, Austria; Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Department of Medicine (L.K.), Clinical Research, Biomedicine and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology and Psychiatry (C.P.), Sapienza University, Rome; and Neurology and Neurometabolic Unit, Department of Neurological and Behavioral Sciences (N.D.S.), University of Siena, Italy
| | - Xavier Montalban
- From the Department of Neurosciences (C.G., L.P.), San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy; Centre d'Esclerosi Multiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Department of Neurology/Neuroimmunology (M.T., J.R., J.S.-G., X.M.), and Magnetic Resonance Unit, Department of Radiology (A.R.), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Biostatistics Unit (M.P.S.), Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.F., M.A.R.), Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (J.P.), West Wing, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford; Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (O.C., F.B.), University College London (O.C.), UK; Amsterdam Neuroscience and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (F.B., H.V.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (J.L.F.), Rigshospitalet Glostrup and University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Neuroradiological Academic Unit (T.A.Y.), Institute of Neurology, London, UK; Department of Neurology (C.E.), Medical University of Graz, Austria; Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Department of Medicine (L.K.), Clinical Research, Biomedicine and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology and Psychiatry (C.P.), Sapienza University, Rome; and Neurology and Neurometabolic Unit, Department of Neurological and Behavioral Sciences (N.D.S.), University of Siena, Italy
| | - Nicola De Stefano
- From the Department of Neurosciences (C.G., L.P.), San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy; Centre d'Esclerosi Multiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Department of Neurology/Neuroimmunology (M.T., J.R., J.S.-G., X.M.), and Magnetic Resonance Unit, Department of Radiology (A.R.), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain; Biostatistics Unit (M.P.S.), Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.F., M.A.R.), Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (J.P.), West Wing, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford; Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (O.C., F.B.), University College London (O.C.), UK; Amsterdam Neuroscience and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (F.B., H.V.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (J.L.F.), Rigshospitalet Glostrup and University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Neuroradiological Academic Unit (T.A.Y.), Institute of Neurology, London, UK; Department of Neurology (C.E.), Medical University of Graz, Austria; Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Department of Medicine (L.K.), Clinical Research, Biomedicine and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology and Psychiatry (C.P.), Sapienza University, Rome; and Neurology and Neurometabolic Unit, Department of Neurological and Behavioral Sciences (N.D.S.), University of Siena, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
78
|
Persistence and adherence to the new oral disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis: A population-based study. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2018; 27:364-369. [PMID: 30476872 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2018.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2018] [Revised: 11/06/2018] [Accepted: 11/08/2018] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine persistence and adherence to the oral disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS Population-based health administrative databases in British Columbia, Canada were accessed to identify all individuals filling an oral DMT prescription for MS (fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate, teriflunomide) between January 2011 and December 2015. Predictors of persistence and adherence at 6 and 12 months were assessed using logistic regression, with estimates expressed as adjusted odds ratios (aORs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS Of 858 individuals with ≥6 months of follow-up, the mean age at first prescription was 43.0 (SD:10.3) years; 74.2% were women. By 6 months 11.0% (94/858) had discontinued their initial oral DMT; by 12 months the proportion was 19.6% (113/577). Over 6 and 12 months, among those persisting with their oral DMT, 82.5% (630/764) and 81.7% (379/464) exhibited optimal adherence (proportion of days covered ≥80%). Age, sex, calendar year and comorbidity were not associated with persistence or adherence. Individuals with higher neighbourhood-level socioeconomic status had higher odds of discontinuation within 6 months (aOR = 2.2; 95%CI:1.3-3.7). Those who had previously used another DMT had higher odds of optimal adherence (6 months aOR = 2.4;95%CI:1.6-3.6, and 12 months aOR = 2.4; 95%CI:1.5-3.9). CONCLUSION Approximately 1 in 10 individuals discontinued their first oral DMT within 6 months, and 1 in 5 did so within one year. However, among those who did continue drug, a high proportion (>80%) exhibited optimal adherence. Predictors of persistence or adherence with immediate practical application were lacking; this highlights the challenges in optimizing drug therapy.
Collapse
|
79
|
Saade C, Bou-Fakhredin R, Yousem DM, Asmar K, Naffaa L, El-Merhi F. Gadolinium and Multiple Sclerosis: Vessels, Barriers of the Brain, and Glymphatics. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018; 39:2168-2176. [PMID: 30385472 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a5773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2017] [Accepted: 06/05/2018] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
The pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis is characterized by a cascade of pathobiologic events, ranging from focal lymphocytic infiltration and microglia activation to demyelination and axonal degeneration. MS has several of the hallmarks of an inflammatory autoimmune disorder, including breakdown of the BBB. Gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging is currently the reference standard to detect active inflammatory lesions in MS. Knowledge of the patterns and mechanisms of contrast enhancement is vital to limit the radiologic differential diagnosis in the staging and evaluation of MS lesion activity. The aim of this review was the following: 1) to outline the pathophysiology of the effect of lymphocyte-driven inflammation in MS, 2) to describe the effects of gadolinium on the BBB and glymphatic system, and 3) to describe gadolinium enhancement patterns and artifacts that can mimic lesions in MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Saade
- From the Diagnostic Radiology Department (C.S., R.B.-F., K.A., L.N., F.E.-M.), American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - R Bou-Fakhredin
- From the Diagnostic Radiology Department (C.S., R.B.-F., K.A., L.N., F.E.-M.), American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - D M Yousem
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (D.M.Y.), Neuroradiology Division, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - K Asmar
- From the Diagnostic Radiology Department (C.S., R.B.-F., K.A., L.N., F.E.-M.), American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - L Naffaa
- From the Diagnostic Radiology Department (C.S., R.B.-F., K.A., L.N., F.E.-M.), American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - F El-Merhi
- From the Diagnostic Radiology Department (C.S., R.B.-F., K.A., L.N., F.E.-M.), American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|
80
|
Malhotra S, Sorosina M, Río J, Peroni S, Midaglia L, Villar LM, Álvarez-Cermeño JC, Schroeder I, Esposito F, Clarelli F, Zettl UK, Lechner-Scott J, Spataro N, Navarro A, Comi G, Montalban X, Martinelli-Boneschi F, Comabella M. NLRP3 polymorphisms and response to interferon-beta in multiple sclerosis patients. Mult Scler 2018; 24:1507-1510. [PMID: 29117789 DOI: 10.1177/1352458517739137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
We aimed to investigate whether NLR family, pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) polymorphisms are associated with the response to interferon-beta (IFNβ) in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. A total of 14 NLRP3 polymorphisms were genotyped in a cohort of 665 relapsing-remitting MS patients recruited across 5 centers and classified into responders and non-responders according to clinical-radiological criteria after 1 year of IFNβ treatment. A meta-analysis failed to demonstrate significant associations between the response to IFNβ and NLRP3 polymorphisms. These findings do not support a role of polymorphisms located in the NLRP3 gene and the response to IFNβ in MS patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sunny Malhotra
- Servei de Neurologia-Neuroimmunologia, Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat) and Institut de Recerca Vall d'Hebron (VHIR), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Melissa Sorosina
- Laboratory of Human Genetics of Neurological Disorders, Institute of Experimental Neurology (INSPE), Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Jordi Río
- Servei de Neurologia-Neuroimmunologia, Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat) and Institut de Recerca Vall d'Hebron (VHIR), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Silvia Peroni
- Laboratory of Human Genetics of Neurological Disorders, Institute of Experimental Neurology (INSPE), Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Luciana Midaglia
- Servei de Neurologia-Neuroimmunologia, Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat) and Institut de Recerca Vall d'Hebron (VHIR), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Luisa M Villar
- Departments of Neurology and Immunology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigacion Sanitaria, Madrid, Spain
| | - José C Álvarez-Cermeño
- Departments of Neurology and Immunology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigacion Sanitaria, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ina Schroeder
- Department of Neurology, Neuroimmunological Section, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Federica Esposito
- Laboratory of Human Genetics of Neurological Disorders, Institute of Experimental Neurology (INSPE), Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy/Department of Neurology, Institute of Experimental Neurology (INSPE), Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Ferdinando Clarelli
- Laboratory of Human Genetics of Neurological Disorders, Institute of Experimental Neurology (INSPE), Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Uwe K Zettl
- Department of Neurology, Neuroimmunological Section, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Jeannette Lechner-Scott
- Department of Neurology, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, Australia/Hunter Medical Research Institute, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Nino Spataro
- Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain/Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Arcadi Navarro
- National Institute for Bioinformatics, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain/Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Giancarlo Comi
- Department of Neurology, Institute of Experimental Neurology (INSPE), Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Xavier Montalban
- Servei de Neurologia-Neuroimmunologia, Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat) and Institut de Recerca Vall d'Hebron (VHIR), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Filippo Martinelli-Boneschi
- Laboratory of Genetics of Complex Disorders and Department of Neurology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy/Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Manuel Comabella
- Servei de Neurologia-Neuroimmunologia, Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat) and Institut de Recerca Vall d'Hebron (VHIR), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
81
|
Bichuetti DB, Franco CA, Elias I, Mendonça ACR, Carvalho LFD, Diniz DS, Tur C, Tintoré M, Oliveira EMLD. Multiple sclerosis risk perception and acceptance for Brazilian patients. ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA 2018; 76:6-12. [PMID: 29364388 DOI: 10.1590/0004-282x20170167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2017] [Accepted: 09/14/2017] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
The perception of multiple sclerosis (MS) severity and risk associated with therapies might influence shared decision making in different countries. We investigated the perception of MS severity and factors associated with risk acceptance in Brazil in 96 patients with relapsing-remitting MS using a standardized questionnaire and compared this with two European cohorts. Multiple sclerosis was perceived as a very severe disease and the risk of developing progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy due to natalizumab was seen as moderate to high. Seventy-six percent considered a risk of 1:1,000, or higher, an impediment for natalizumab use. Older age was the only variable associated with higher risk acceptance and our patients showed a more conservative profile than German and Spanish patients. Our patients perceived MS severity and progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy risk similarly to elsewhere, but their willingness to take risks was more conservative. This should be considered when discussing therapeutic options and it might have an impact on guideline adaptations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Carolina Azze Franco
- Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Disciplina de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brasil
| | - Isaac Elias
- Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Disciplina de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brasil
| | - Andreia C R Mendonça
- Universidade Federal de Goiás, Faculdade Estácio de Sá de Goiás,Centro de Referência e Investigação em Esclerose Múltipla, Goiânia GO, Brasil
| | - Lorraine Fiama Diniz Carvalho
- Universidade Federal de Goiás, Faculdade Estácio de Sá de Goiás,Centro de Referência e Investigação em Esclerose Múltipla, Goiânia GO, Brasil
| | - Denise Sisterolli Diniz
- Universidade Federal de Goiás,Centro de Referência e Investigação em Esclerose Múltipla, Goiânia GO, Brasil
| | - Carmen Tur
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Hospital Universitari Valld'Hebron, Centre of Catalonia, Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis, Barcelona Spain.,University College London, Institute of Neurology, Department of Neuroinflammation, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mar Tintoré
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Hospital Universitari Valld'Hebron, Centre of Catalonia, Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis, Barcelona Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
82
|
Alonso R, Eizaguirre MB, Zavala L, Pita C, Silva B, Garcea O. Changes in the Multiple Sclerosis Treatment Paradigm. What Do We Do Now and What Were We Doing Before? J Clin Neurol 2018; 14:487-491. [PMID: 30198224 PMCID: PMC6172498 DOI: 10.3988/jcn.2018.14.4.487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2017] [Revised: 04/01/2018] [Accepted: 04/05/2018] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The number of disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) available for treating relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis is increasing. Numerous drugs have been approved since 2010 in South America, which has increased the complexity of the treatment algorithm. The aim of this study was to determine the changes in multiple sclerosis treatments relative to the underlying causes and the availability of new DMDs in Argentina. METHODS A descriptive retrospective study was carried out on a group of 59 patients diagnosed with RRMS who use more than one DMD. RESULTS The first treatment switch occurred before 2010 in 27% of the patients and after 2010 in the other 73%. Efficacy was the main reason for switching during both periods. A second treatment switch was required in 25% of the patients, with this occurring after 2010 in 86.6% of them. Interferon was the most-used drug before 2010 and fingolimod was the most-used drug thereafter. CONCLUSIONS We have identified that the tendency for treatment changes has increased following the arrival of new drugs. Efficacy has been the main cause of these changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ricardo Alonso
- Multiple Sclerosis Clinic, Ramos Mejia Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| | | | - Lucía Zavala
- Multiple Sclerosis Clinic, Ramos Mejia Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Cecilia Pita
- Multiple Sclerosis Clinic, Ramos Mejia Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Berenice Silva
- Multiple Sclerosis Clinic, Ramos Mejia Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Orlando Garcea
- Multiple Sclerosis Clinic, Ramos Mejia Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
83
|
|
84
|
Hegen H, Bsteh G, Berger T. 'No evidence of disease activity' - is it an appropriate surrogate in multiple sclerosis? Eur J Neurol 2018; 25:1107-e101. [PMID: 29687559 PMCID: PMC6099351 DOI: 10.1111/ene.13669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2018] [Accepted: 04/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The increasing number of disease‐modifying treatments available for multiple sclerosis has broadened treatment options for patients, but also challenges clinicians to select the best therapy for each individual at the appropriate stage of the disease. Early prediction of treatment response still remains one of the main difficulties in the management of multiple sclerosis patients. The concept of ‘no evidence of disease activity’ (NEDA) has been proposed as a surrogate for treatment response based on the absence of relapses, disability progression and radiological activity. Although there are several apparently logical arguments for the NEDA approach, there are also some major concerns that have to be considered and that are not sufficiently addressed yet. Amongst others, each parameter's limitations are not eliminated solely by its use within a composite score, and the contribution of each parameter to NEDA is not well balanced, as the detection of, for example, a single new magnetic resonance imaging lesion is considered as significant as the occurrence of a severely disabling relapse. NEDA in its current form also neglects underlying pathophysiology of the disease, has not been shown to fulfil formal criteria of a surrogate marker and its prognostic value has not been sufficiently evidenced yet. From a clinical point of view, ‘evidence of disease activity’ seems the more relevant surrogate; however, its implications are even less clear than those of NEDA. Here, existing literature on NEDA is critically reviewed and improvements are discussed that value its potential use in clinical trials and, even more importantly, treatment decision making in daily routine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Hegen
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - G Bsteh
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - T Berger
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
85
|
Maarouf A, Boutière C, Rico A, Audoin B, Pelletier J. How much progress has there been in the second-line treatment of multiple sclerosis: A 2017 update. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2018; 174:429-440. [PMID: 29779849 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2018.01.369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2017] [Revised: 01/24/2018] [Accepted: 01/26/2018] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
In 1993, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first drug specifically for treating multiple sclerosis (MS). More than two decades later, a dozen such treatments are now available. Of these, four are considered second-line treatments for use in escalation strategies and two new drugs are currently undergoing accreditation procedures. Soon, they will provide clinicians with a range of six effective disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) to thwart the inflammatory processes in MS patients with active disease. However, while such a large number of DMTs for MS can help to control early inflammation, any decisions to be made by clinicians have also been made substantially more complex. This complexity is increased by the lack of head-to-head studies comparing these second-line therapies and the benefit-risk profiles for each of these drugs, which are likely to vary among patients. Ultimately, good awareness of the benefits and, more important, the risks of each MS DMT is crucial for the effective management of inflammation in MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Maarouf
- CRMBM UMR 7339 CNRS, Aix Marseille Université, 13005 Marseille, France; AP-HM, Hôpital de la Timone, Pôle d'Imagerie Médicale, CEMEREM, 13005 Marseille, France; AP-HM, Hôpital de la Timone, Pôle de Neurosciences Cliniques, Service de Neurologie, 13005 Marseille, France.
| | - C Boutière
- AP-HM, Hôpital de la Timone, Pôle de Neurosciences Cliniques, Service de Neurologie, 13005 Marseille, France
| | - A Rico
- AP-HM, Hôpital de la Timone, Pôle de Neurosciences Cliniques, Service de Neurologie, 13005 Marseille, France
| | - B Audoin
- CRMBM UMR 7339 CNRS, Aix Marseille Université, 13005 Marseille, France; AP-HM, Hôpital de la Timone, Pôle de Neurosciences Cliniques, Service de Neurologie, 13005 Marseille, France
| | - J Pelletier
- CRMBM UMR 7339 CNRS, Aix Marseille Université, 13005 Marseille, France; AP-HM, Hôpital de la Timone, Pôle de Neurosciences Cliniques, Service de Neurologie, 13005 Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
86
|
Giovannoni G, Soelberg Sorensen P, Cook S, Rammohan KW, Rieckmann P, Comi G, Dangond F, Hicking C, Vermersch P. Efficacy of Cladribine Tablets in high disease activity subgroups of patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis: A post hoc analysis of the CLARITY study. Mult Scler 2018; 25:819-827. [PMID: 29716436 PMCID: PMC6460686 DOI: 10.1177/1352458518771875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Background: In the CLARITY (CLAdRIbine Tablets treating multiple sclerosis orallY) study, Cladribine Tablets significantly improved clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes (vs placebo) in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Objective: Describe two clinically relevant definitions for patients with high disease activity (HDA) at baseline of the CLARITY study (utility verified in patients receiving placebo) and assess the treatment effects of Cladribine Tablets 3.5 mg/kg compared with the overall study population. Methods: Outcomes of patients randomised to Cladribine Tablets 3.5 mg/kg or placebo were analysed for subgroups using HDA definitions based on high relapse activity (HRA; patients with ⩾2 relapses during the year prior to study entry, whether on DMD treatment or not) or HRA plus disease activity on treatment (HRA + DAT; patients with ⩾2 relapses during the year prior to study entry, whether on DMD treatment or not, PLUS patients with ⩾1 relapse during the year prior to study entry while on therapy with other DMDs and ⩾1 T1 Gd+ or ⩾9 T2 lesions). Results: In the overall population, Cladribine Tablets 3.5 mg/kg reduced the risk of 6-month-confirmed Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) worsening by 47% vs placebo. A risk reduction of 82% vs placebo was seen in both the HRA and HRA + DAT subgroups (vs 19% for non-HRA and 18% for non-HRA + DAT), indicating greater responsiveness to Cladribine Tablets 3.5 mg/kg in patients with HDA. There were consistent results for other efficacy endpoints. The safety profile in HDA patients was consistent with the overall CLARITY population. Conclusion: Patients with HDA showed clinical and MRI responses to Cladribine Tablets 3.5 mg/kg that were generally better than, or at least comparable with, the outcomes seen in the overall CLARITY population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gavin Giovannoni
- Department of Neurology, Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Per Soelberg Sorensen
- Danish Multiple Sclerosis Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Stuart Cook
- Department of Neurology & Neurosciences, New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - Kottil W Rammohan
- MS Research Center, Department of Neurology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Peter Rieckmann
- Department of Neurology, Hospital for Nervous Diseases, Medical Park Loipl, Bischofswiesen, Germany/University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Giancarlo Comi
- Department of Neurology, Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele and Institute of Experimental Neurology, Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Patrick Vermersch
- University of Lille, CHU Lille, LIRIC-INSERM U995, FHU Imminent, Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
87
|
Dumitrescu L, Constantinescu CS, Tanasescu R. Recent developments in interferon-based therapies for multiple sclerosis. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2018; 18:665-680. [PMID: 29624084 DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2018.1462793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic and disabling immune-mediated disease of the central nervous system. Beta-interferons are the first approved and still the most widely used first-line disease-modifying treatment in MS. AREAS COVERED Here we focus on recent developments in pharmacology and delivery systems of beta-interferons, and discuss their place within current state of the art therapeutic approaches. We briefly review the clinical trials for classical and PEGylated formulations, emphasizing effectiveness, safety concerns, and tolerability. The mechanisms of action of IFN-β in view of MS pathogenesis are also debated EXPERT OPINION Though only modestly efficient in reducing the annualized relapse rate, beta-interferons remain a valid first-line option due to their good long-term safety profile and cost-efficacy. Moreover, they are endogenous class II cytokines essential for mounting an effective antiviral response, and they may interact with putative MS triggering factors such as Epstein-Barr virus infection and human endogenous retroviruses. Recent improvements in formulations, delivery devices and drug regimens tackle the tolerability and adherence issues frequently seen with these drugs, and scientific advances may offer means for a better selection of patients. Although a well-established immunomodulatory treatment, beta-interferons have not said their last word in the management of MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Dumitrescu
- a Department of Clinical Neurosciences , University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila , Bucharest , Romania.,b Department of Neurology , Colentina Hospital , Bucharest , Romania
| | - Cris S Constantinescu
- c Academic Clinical Neurology, Division of Clinical Neuroscience , University of Nottingham , UK
| | - Radu Tanasescu
- a Department of Clinical Neurosciences , University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila , Bucharest , Romania.,b Department of Neurology , Colentina Hospital , Bucharest , Romania.,c Academic Clinical Neurology, Division of Clinical Neuroscience , University of Nottingham , UK
| |
Collapse
|
88
|
Manna I, Iaccino E, Dattilo V, Barone S, Vecchio E, Mimmi S, Filippelli E, Demonte G, Polidoro S, Granata A, Scannapieco S, Quinto I, Valentino P, Quattrone A. Exosome-associated miRNA profile as a prognostic tool for therapy response monitoring in multiple sclerosis patients. FASEB J 2018; 32:4241-4246. [PMID: 29505299 DOI: 10.1096/fj.201701533r] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune pathology leading to neurodegeneration. Because of the complexity and heterogenic etiology of this disease, diagnosis and treatment for individual patients are challenging. Exosome-associated microRNAs (miRNAs) have recently emerged as a new class of diagnostic biomarkers involved in both autoimmune and neurologic disorders. Interesting new evidence has emerged showing that circulating miRNAs are dysregulated in MS body fluids, including serum, plasma, and cerebrospinal fluid. We hypothesized that exosome-associated miRNAs could present a readily accessible blood-based assay for MS disease. We detected expression of miRNAs by quantitative PCR on a small cohort of MS patients. We analyzed circulating exosome-associated miRNAs of MS patients before and after therapy and found that 14 exosome-associated miRNAs were significantly down-regulated, while 2 exosome-associated miRNAs were significantly up-regulated in IFN-β-treated relapsing-remitting MS patients with response to therapy compared to those without response. We identified a serum miRNA panel that could be used to monitor the response to IFN-β therapy. Overall, these data suggest that circulating exosome-associated miRNA profiling could represent an easily detectable biomarker of disease and treatment response.-Manna, I., Iaccino, E., Dattilo, V., Barone, S., Vecchio, E., Mimmi, S., Filippelli, E., Demonte, G., Polidoro, S., Granata, A., Scannapieco, S., Quinto, I., Valentino, P., Quattrone, A. Exosome-associated miRNA profile as a prognostic tool for therapy response monitoring in multiple sclerosis patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ida Manna
- Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology (IBFM), Section of Germaneto, National Research Council (CNR), Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Enrico Iaccino
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Dattilo
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Stefania Barone
- Department of Medical Sciences, Institute of Neurology, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Eleonora Vecchio
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Selena Mimmi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Enrica Filippelli
- Department of Medical Sciences, Institute of Neurology, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Giulio Demonte
- Department of Medical Sciences, Institute of Neurology, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Serena Polidoro
- Department of Medical Sciences, Institute of Neurology, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Alfredo Granata
- Department of Medical Sciences, Institute of Neurology, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Sara Scannapieco
- Department of Medical Sciences, Institute of Neurology, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Ileana Quinto
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Paola Valentino
- Department of Medical Sciences, Institute of Neurology, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Aldo Quattrone
- Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology (IBFM), Section of Germaneto, National Research Council (CNR), Catanzaro, Italy.,Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology (IBFM), Neuroimaging Research Unit, Section of Germaneto, National Research Council (CNR), Catanzaro, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
89
|
Effectiveness and baseline factors associated to fingolimod response in a real-world study on multiple sclerosis patients. J Neurol 2018; 265:896-905. [PMID: 29435643 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-018-8791-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2017] [Revised: 02/05/2018] [Accepted: 02/06/2018] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment choice in multiple sclerosis (MS) is crucial for optimizing risk-benefit profile. OBJECTIVE To assess fingolimod (FTY) effectiveness and identify baseline features associated to disease activity in a large Italian cohort of Relapsing-Remitting (RR) MS patients. METHODS Three-hundred sixty-seven RRMS patients starting FTY treatment at San Raffaele Hospital (Milan-Italy) underwent clinical and MRI evaluations for 2 years. Treatment response was assessed considering the proportion of patients with no evidence of disease activity (NEDA) and recording the time to first relapse. Primary analyses were performed stratifying for Natalizumab (NTZ) treatment in the year before (NO_NTZ vs NTZ group), to account for post-NTZ reactivation. RESULTS Almost half of patients were NEDA after 2 years, 53.4% in the NO_NTZ group and 36.2% in the NTZ group. Despite an opposite trend during the first 6-12 months, at 2-year follow-up the two groups were comparable for relapses and number of new/enlarging T2 and Gd-enhancing lesions. Baseline parameters of higher disease activity (ARR, Gd enhancing lesions and age at onset) were associated with increased likelihood of failing NEDA criteria or with shorter time to relapse (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Our data strengthen FTY effectiveness in everyday clinical practice, even in patients switching from NTZ treatment. Baseline parameters of inflammatory activity are the most important prognostic factors for mid-term disease reactivation also during second-line treatment with FTY, providing hints on how to select therapies towards a more personalized management.
Collapse
|
90
|
Down-regulation of TYK2, CBLB and LMP7 genes expression in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients treated with interferon-beta. J Neuroimmunol 2018; 314:24-29. [PMID: 29157944 DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2017.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2017] [Revised: 11/05/2017] [Accepted: 11/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
This study aimed to examine the expression of TYK2, CBLB and LMP7 genes at both mRNA and protein levels in relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) patients in compare with healthy controls. Seventy-eight RRMS patients treated with IFNβ-1a and 79 age- and ethnic-matched healthy subjects were studied. The mRNA expression levels of TYK2, CBLB and LMP7 in PBMCs were quantified by real-time PCR and plasma concentrations of three molecules were measured by ELISA. Results were compared between patients and controls, IFNβ-responders and non-responders. Forty-nine of 78 patients were classified as IFNβ-responders and 29 cases were non-responders. Significantly down-regulated expression of TYK2, CBLB and LMP7 genes was found in the patients group versus controls (P<0.001). Decreased plasma levels of three molecules were observed in patients compared to controls (P<0.001). IFNβ-responders had significantly higher expressions for CBLB (P=0.001) and LMP7 (P=0.02) than non-responders. Also, we observed increased expressions of LMP7 (P=0.39) and CBLB (P=0.02) genes in patients under 30y and increased expression of TYK2 in patients >40years (P=0.002). Our results suggest that expression analysis of TYK2, CBLB and LMP7 genes could be useful for evaluation of T cells immunity and clinical response to IFNβ-therapy in RRMS patients.
Collapse
|
91
|
The evolution of "No Evidence of Disease Activity" in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2017; 20:231-238. [PMID: 29579629 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2017.12.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2017] [Revised: 12/18/2017] [Accepted: 12/21/2017] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
The availability of effective therapies for patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) has prompted a re-evaluation of the most appropriate way to measure treatment response, both in clinical trials and clinical practice. Traditional parameters of treatment efficacy such as annualized relapse rate, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity, and disability progression have an important place, but their relative merit is uncertain, and the role of other factors such as brain atrophy is still under study. More recently, composite measures such as "no evidence of disease activity" (NEDA) have emerged as new potential treatment targets, but NEDA itself has variable definitions, is not well validated, and may be hard to implement as a treatment goal in a clinical setting. We describe the development of NEDA as an outcome measure in MS, discuss definitions including NEDA-3 and NEDA-4, and review the strengths and limitations of NEDA, indicating where further research is needed.
Collapse
|
92
|
A supervised framework with intensity subtraction and deformation field features for the detection of new T2-w lesions in multiple sclerosis. NEUROIMAGE-CLINICAL 2017; 17:607-615. [PMID: 29234597 PMCID: PMC5716954 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.11.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2017] [Revised: 11/07/2017] [Accepted: 11/14/2017] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis has an important role in multiple sclerosis diagnosis and follow-up. The presence of new T2-w lesions on brain MRI scans is considered a prognostic and predictive biomarker for the disease. In this study, we propose a supervised approach for detecting new T2-w lesions using features from image intensities, subtraction values, and deformation fields (DF). Methods One year apart multi-channel brain MRI scans were obtained for 60 patients, 36 of them with new T2-w lesions. Images from both temporal points were preprocessed and co-registered. Afterwards, they were registered using multi-resolution affine registration, allowing their subtraction. In particular, the DFs between both images were computed with the Demons non-rigid registration algorithm. Afterwards, a logistic regression model was trained with features from image intensities, subtraction values, and DF operators. We evaluated the performance of the model following a leave-one-out cross-validation scheme. Results In terms of detection, we obtained a mean Dice similarity coefficient of 0.77 with a true-positive rate of 74.30% and a false-positive detection rate of 11.86%. In terms of segmentation, we obtained a mean Dice similarity coefficient of 0.56. The performance of our model was significantly higher than state-of-the-art methods. Conclusions The performance of the proposed method shows the benefits of using DF operators as features to train a supervised learning model. Compared to other methods, the proposed model decreases the number of false-positives while increasing the number of true-positives, which is relevant for clinical settings. A new framework for detecting new T2-w lesions in multiple sclerosis is proposed. We train logistic regression classifier with subtraction and deformation features. We analyze the effect of deformation field operators on detecting new T2-w lesions. We show an increase in the accuracy due to the addition of deformation fields. The proposed model decreases false-positives while increasing true-positives.
Collapse
|
93
|
|
94
|
Abstract
Understanding the clinico-radiological paradox is important in the search for more sensitive and specific surrogates of relapses and disability progression (such that they can be used to inform treatment choices in individual people with multiple sclerosis) and to gain a better understanding of the pathophysiological basis of disability in multiple sclerosis (to identify and assess key therapeutic targets). In this brief review, we will consider themes and issues underlying the clinico-radiological paradox and recent advances in its resolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Declan Chard
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) University College London Hospitals (UCLH), Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK.,NMR Research Unit, Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - S Anand Trip
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) University College London Hospitals (UCLH), Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK.,NMR Research Unit, Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
95
|
Blood lymphocyte subsets identify optimal responders to IFN-beta in MS. J Neurol 2017; 265:24-31. [PMID: 29027004 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-017-8625-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2017] [Revised: 08/30/2017] [Accepted: 09/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Response to interferon-beta (IFN-beta) treatment is heterogeneous in multiple sclerosis (MS). We aimed to search for biomarkers predicting no evidence of disease activity (NEDA) status upon IFN-beta treatment in MS. 119 patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) initiating IFN-beta treatment were included in the study, and followed prospectively for 2 years. Neutralizing antibodies (NAb) were explored in serum samples obtained after 6 and 12 months of IFN-beta treatment. Soluble cytokines and blood lymphocytes were studied in basal samples by ELISA and flow cytometry, respectively. 9% of patients developed NAb. These antibodies were more frequent in patients receiving IFN-beta 1b than in those treated subcutaneous (p = 0.008) or intramuscular (p < 0.0001) IFN-beta 1a. No patient showing NAb remained NEDA during follow-up. Basal immunological variables are also associated with patient response. Percentages below 3% of CD19 + CD5 + cells (AUC 0.74, CI 0.63-0.84; OR 10.68, CI 3.55-32.15, p < 0.0001; Likelihood ratio 4.28) or above 2.6% of CD8 + perforin + T cells (AUC 0.79, CI 0.63-0.96; OR 6.11, CI 2.0-18.6, p = 0.0009; Likelihood ratio 5.47) increased the probability of achieving NEDA status during treatment. Basal blood immune cell subsets contribute to identify MS patients with a high probability of showing an optimal response to IFN-beta.
Collapse
|
96
|
Zhang T, Kingwell E, Zhu F, Petkau J, Kastrukoff LF, Marrie RA, Tremlett H, Evans C. Effect of adherence to the first-generation injectable immunomodulatory drugs on disability accumulation in multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal cohort study. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e018612. [PMID: 28965103 PMCID: PMC5640095 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2017] [Revised: 08/22/2017] [Accepted: 08/24/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the association between optimal adherence to the first-generation injectable immunomodulatory drugs (IMDs) for multiple sclerosis (MS) and subsequent disability accumulation. METHODS We accessed prospectively collected linked clinical and administrative health data from British Columbia, Canada. Subjects with MS treated with a first-generation injectable IMD at an MS clinic (1996-2004) were followed until their last clinic visit before 2009. Adherence was estimated using the proportion of days covered (PDC). The primary outcome was disability accumulation, defined as an increase in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score as recorded during each year of follow-up. Generalised estimating equation models, adjusted for baseline sex, age, EDSS and time between scores, were used to measure associations between optimal adherence (≥80% PDC) during the first year of treatment and subsequent disability accumulation. The relationship between early IMD adherence and the secondary outcome, time to sustained EDSS 6, was examined using Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS Among 801 subjects, 598 (74.7%) had optimal adherence over the first year of IMD treatment and 487 (39.0%) demonstrated one or more instances of disability accumulation. Early optimal adherence was not associated with disability accumulation (adjusted OR 0.94; 95% CI 0.78 to 1.15), nor with time to sustained EDSS 6 (adjusted HR 0.91; 95% CI 0.57 to 1.44). CONCLUSION Almost three-quarters of subjects with MS had optimal early adherence to their first-line injectable IMD. There was no evidence that this was associated with disability accumulation in the following years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tingting Zhang
- Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Elaine Kingwell
- Department of Medicine (Neurology) and the Centre for Brain Health, University of British Columbia, Columbia, Canada
| | - Feng Zhu
- Department of Medicine (Neurology) and the Centre for Brain Health, University of British Columbia, Columbia, Canada
| | - John Petkau
- Department of Statistics, University of British Columbia, Columbia, Canada
| | - Lorne F Kastrukoff
- Department of Medicine (Neurology) and the Centre for Brain Health, University of British Columbia, Columbia, Canada
| | - Ruth Ann Marrie
- Departments of Internal Medicine and Community Health Sciences, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Helen Tremlett
- Department of Medicine (Neurology) and the Centre for Brain Health, University of British Columbia, Columbia, Canada
| | - Charity Evans
- College of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
97
|
Diebold M, Sievers C, Bantug G, Sanderson N, Kappos L, Kuhle J, Lindberg RLP, Derfuss T. Dimethyl fumarate influences innate and adaptive immunity in multiple sclerosis. J Autoimmun 2017; 86:39-50. [PMID: 28958667 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaut.2017.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2017] [Revised: 09/18/2017] [Accepted: 09/19/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The mode of action of dimethyl fumarate (DMF), an immunomodulatory treatment for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), has not yet been fully elucidated. While in-vitro experiments and animal studies suggest effects on immune cell survival, proliferation, migration and oxidative stress response, corresponding observations from human studies are lacking. This study aims to characterize ex-vivo and in-vivo effects in a cohort of DMF treated RRMS patients. METHODS Blood samples were collected from twenty well-characterized RRMS patients at baseline and after 3, 6 and 12 months of DMF treatment and an age- and gender-matched cohort of 20 healthy individuals at 0 and 3 months. Leukocyte subpopulations, immunoglobulin levels and cytokine secretion were measured. T cells were assessed for their levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS), metabolic status and their proliferative capacity. Levels of antioxidants were determined in serum by mass spectrometry. Responses of monocyte activation markers as well as NFkB and MAPK pathways to DMF were analysed. RESULTS Upon DMF treatment, all lymphocyte subpopulations dropped significantly over the course of 12 months with cytotoxic and effector T cells being affected most significantly. DMF induced cell death and inhibited proliferation of T cells in-vitro. Interestingly, this anti-proliferative effect decreased under treatment. In-vivo DMF treatment led to decreased T cell glycolysis and higher turn-over of antioxidants. In line with these results a significant increase of cytosolic ROS levels after 3 months treatment was detected in T cells. In-vitro DMF treatment reduced NFkB (p65) translocation to the nucleus and MAPK (p38) levels decreased upon stimulation with monomethyl fumarate (MMF) in-vitro and ex-vivo. Consequently, the expression of co-stimulatory molecules like CD40 and CD150 was decreased in antigen presenting cells both in-vitro and ex-vivo. CONCLUSION This study translates knowledge from in-vitro and animal studies on DMF into the clinical setting. Our data suggest that DMF not only alters lymphocyte composition, but also has profound effects on proliferation and induces oxidative stress in T cells. It also acts on innate immunity by reducing the activation status of antigen presenting cells (APCs) via NFkB and MAPK inactivation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Diebold
- Laboratory of Clinical Neuroimmunology, Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Biomedicine and Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Hebelstrasse 20, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Claudia Sievers
- Laboratory of Clinical Neuroimmunology, Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Biomedicine and Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Hebelstrasse 20, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Glenn Bantug
- Laboratory of Immunobiology, Department of Biomedicine, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Hebelstrasse 20, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Nicholas Sanderson
- Laboratory of Clinical Neuroimmunology, Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Biomedicine and Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Hebelstrasse 20, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Ludwig Kappos
- Laboratory of Clinical Neuroimmunology, Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Biomedicine and Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Hebelstrasse 20, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jens Kuhle
- Laboratory of Clinical Neuroimmunology, Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Biomedicine and Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Hebelstrasse 20, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Raija L P Lindberg
- Laboratory of Clinical Neuroimmunology, Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Biomedicine and Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Hebelstrasse 20, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Tobias Derfuss
- Laboratory of Clinical Neuroimmunology, Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Biomedicine and Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Hebelstrasse 20, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
98
|
Pardo G, Jones DE. The sequence of disease-modifying therapies in relapsing multiple sclerosis: safety and immunologic considerations. J Neurol 2017; 264:2351-2374. [PMID: 28879412 PMCID: PMC5688209 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-017-8594-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2017] [Revised: 08/11/2017] [Accepted: 08/12/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The treatment landscape for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (RMS) has expanded considerably over the last 10 years with the approval of multiple new disease-modifying therapies (DMTs), and others in late-stage clinical development. All DMTs for RMS are believed to reduce central nervous system immune-mediated inflammatory processes, which translate into demonstrable improvement in clinical and radiologic outcomes. However, some DMTs are associated with long-lasting effects on the immune system and/or serious adverse events, both of which may complicate the use of subsequent therapies. When customizing a treatment program, a benefit–risk assessment must consider multiple factors, including the efficacy of the DMT to reduce disease activity, the short- and long-term safety and immunologic profiles of each DMT, the criteria used to define switching treatment, and the risk tolerance of each patient. A comprehensive benefit–risk assessment can only be achieved by evaluating the immunologic, safety, and efficacy data for DMTs in the controlled clinical trial environment and the postmarketing clinical practice setting. This review is intended to help neurologists make informed decisions when treating RMS by summarizing the known data for each DMT and raising awareness of the multiple considerations involved in treating people with RMS throughout the entire course of their disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Pardo
- OMRF Multiple Sclerosis Center of Excellence, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, 820 NE 15th Street, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA.
| | - David E Jones
- Department of Neurology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, PO Box 800394, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA
| |
Collapse
|
99
|
Rovira A, Auger C, Huerga E, Corral JF, Mitjana R, Sastre-Garriga J, Tintoré M, Montalban X. Cumulative Dose of Macrocyclic Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent Improves Detection of Enhancing Lesions in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017; 38:1486-1493. [PMID: 28619842 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a5253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2016] [Accepted: 04/02/2017] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging is currently the reference standard for detecting active inflammatory lesions in patients with multiple sclerosis. The sensitivity of MR imaging for this purpose may vary according to the physicochemical characteristics of the contrast agent used and the acquisition strategy. The purpose of this study was to compare detection of gadolinium-enhancing lesions or active disease following a single or cumulative dose of a macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agent with different image acquisition delays in patients with clinically isolated syndrome or relapsing multiple sclerosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS All patients received a first dose (0.1 mmol/kg) of gadobutrol and, 20 minutes later, a second dose (0.1 mmol/kg), with a cumulative dose of 0.2 mmol/kg. Two contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequences were performed at 5 and 15 minutes after the first contrast administration, and 2 additional T1-weighted sequences at 5 and 15 minutes after the second contrast administration with a 3T magnet. RESULTS One hundred fifteen patients were considered evaluable. A significantly larger number of lesions were detected in scans obtained at 5 and 15 minutes after the second contrast injection compared with scans obtained at 5 and 15 minutes after the first injection (P < .001). The number of patients with active lesions on MR imaging was significantly higher after the second dose administration (52.0%, first dose versus 59.2%, second dose; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Cumulative dosing of a macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agent increases detection of enhancing lesions and patients with active lesions. These data could be considered in the design of MR imaging protocols aimed at detecting active multiple sclerosis lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Rovira
- From the Neuroradiology and Magnetic Resonance Units (A.R., C.A., E.H., J.F.C., R.M.), Department of Radiology
| | - C Auger
- From the Neuroradiology and Magnetic Resonance Units (A.R., C.A., E.H., J.F.C., R.M.), Department of Radiology
| | - E Huerga
- From the Neuroradiology and Magnetic Resonance Units (A.R., C.A., E.H., J.F.C., R.M.), Department of Radiology
| | - J F Corral
- From the Neuroradiology and Magnetic Resonance Units (A.R., C.A., E.H., J.F.C., R.M.), Department of Radiology
| | - R Mitjana
- From the Neuroradiology and Magnetic Resonance Units (A.R., C.A., E.H., J.F.C., R.M.), Department of Radiology
| | - J Sastre-Garriga
- Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (J.S.-G., M.T., X.M.), Department of Neurology/Neuroimmunology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Tintoré
- Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (J.S.-G., M.T., X.M.), Department of Neurology/Neuroimmunology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - X Montalban
- Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (J.S.-G., M.T., X.M.), Department of Neurology/Neuroimmunology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
100
|
Sormani MP, Truffinet P, Thangavelu K, Rufi P, Simonson C, De Stefano N. Predicting long-term disability outcomes in patients with MS treated with teriflunomide in TEMSO. NEUROLOGY-NEUROIMMUNOLOGY & NEUROINFLAMMATION 2017; 4:e379. [PMID: 28680917 PMCID: PMC5489388 DOI: 10.1212/nxi.0000000000000379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2017] [Accepted: 05/30/2017] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To predict long-term disability outcomes in TEMSO core (NCT00134563) and extension (NCT00803049) studies in patients with relapsing forms of MS treated with teriflunomide. METHODS A post hoc analysis was conducted in a subgroup of patients who received teriflunomide in the core study, had MRI and clinical relapse assessments at months 12 (n = 552) and 18, and entered the extension. Patients were allocated risk scores for disability worsening (DW) after 1 year of teriflunomide treatment: 0 = low risk; 1 = intermediate risk; and 2-3 = high risk, based on the occurrence of relapses (0 to ≥2) and/or active (new and enlarging) T2-weighted (T2w) lesions (≤3 or >3) after the 1-year MRI. Patients in the intermediate-risk group were reclassified as responders or nonresponders (low or high risk) according to relapses and T2w lesions on the 18-month MRI. Long-term risk (7 years) of DW was assessed by Kaplan-Meier survival curves. RESULTS In patients with a score of 2-3, the risk of 12-week-confirmed DW over 7 years was significantly higher vs those with a score of 0 (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.96, p = 0.0044). Patients reclassified as high risk at month 18 (18.6%) had a significantly higher risk of DW vs those in the low-risk group (81.4%; HR = 1.92; p = 0.0004). CONCLUSIONS Over 80% of patients receiving teriflunomide were classified as low risk (responders) and had a significantly lower risk of DW than those at increased risk (nonresponders) over 7 years of follow-up in TEMSO. Close monitoring of relapses and active T2w lesions after short-term teriflunomide treatment predicts a differential rate of subsequent DW long term. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER TEMSO, NCT00134563; TEMSO extension, NCT00803049.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Pia Sormani
- Biostatistics Unit (M.P.S.), University of Genoa, Italy; Sanofi Genzyme (P.T., P.R.), Chilly-Mazarin, France; Sanofi Genzyme (K.T.), Cambridge, MA; Fishawack Communications Ltd (C.S.), Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK; and Department of Medicine, Surgery, and Neurosciences (N.D.S.), University of Siena, Italy
| | - Philippe Truffinet
- Biostatistics Unit (M.P.S.), University of Genoa, Italy; Sanofi Genzyme (P.T., P.R.), Chilly-Mazarin, France; Sanofi Genzyme (K.T.), Cambridge, MA; Fishawack Communications Ltd (C.S.), Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK; and Department of Medicine, Surgery, and Neurosciences (N.D.S.), University of Siena, Italy
| | - Karthinathan Thangavelu
- Biostatistics Unit (M.P.S.), University of Genoa, Italy; Sanofi Genzyme (P.T., P.R.), Chilly-Mazarin, France; Sanofi Genzyme (K.T.), Cambridge, MA; Fishawack Communications Ltd (C.S.), Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK; and Department of Medicine, Surgery, and Neurosciences (N.D.S.), University of Siena, Italy
| | - Pascal Rufi
- Biostatistics Unit (M.P.S.), University of Genoa, Italy; Sanofi Genzyme (P.T., P.R.), Chilly-Mazarin, France; Sanofi Genzyme (K.T.), Cambridge, MA; Fishawack Communications Ltd (C.S.), Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK; and Department of Medicine, Surgery, and Neurosciences (N.D.S.), University of Siena, Italy
| | - Catherine Simonson
- Biostatistics Unit (M.P.S.), University of Genoa, Italy; Sanofi Genzyme (P.T., P.R.), Chilly-Mazarin, France; Sanofi Genzyme (K.T.), Cambridge, MA; Fishawack Communications Ltd (C.S.), Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK; and Department of Medicine, Surgery, and Neurosciences (N.D.S.), University of Siena, Italy
| | - Nicola De Stefano
- Biostatistics Unit (M.P.S.), University of Genoa, Italy; Sanofi Genzyme (P.T., P.R.), Chilly-Mazarin, France; Sanofi Genzyme (K.T.), Cambridge, MA; Fishawack Communications Ltd (C.S.), Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK; and Department of Medicine, Surgery, and Neurosciences (N.D.S.), University of Siena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|