Antipsychotic polypharmacy in schizophrenia: benefits and risks

Optimization of Antipsychotic and Benzodiazepine Drugs in Patients with Severe Mental Disorders in an Intensive Case Management Program

The Intensive Case Management (ICM) model is a community-based program for people with severe mental illness that may reduce hospitalization and increase retention in care. The aims of this study were to analyze changes in the antipsychotic and benzodiazepine dosage in 106 patients who participated in an Individualized Service Program based on the ICM model for at least 6 months and to assess the change in the number of patients taking a high or very high dose of an antipsychotic drug and the number receiving antipsychotic polytherapy. Both the average daily dose of antipsychotic and benzodiazepine drugs and the number of patients with high doses of antipsychotic and more than one antipsychotic drug decreased significantly. Implementing the ICM program in patients with severe mental illness could help to decrease adverse drug effects and health care expenditures.

Clozapine and all-cause mortality in treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a historical cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Large-scale epidemiological studies have demonstrated a protective effect of clozapine on mortality in people with schizophrenia. Clozapine is reserved for use in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS), but evidence of clozapine's effect on mortality exclusively within TRS samples is inconclusive. Hence, we aimed to investigate the effect of clozapine use on all-cause mortality in TRS patients.

METHODS

A historical patient cohort sample of 2837 patients, who met criteria for TRS between 1 Jan 2008 and 1 Jan 2016, were selected from the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (SLAM) electronic health records (EHR). The national Zaponex Treatment Access System (ZTAS) mandatory monitoring system linked to the SLAM EHR was used to distinguish which patients were initiated on clozapine (n = 1025). Cox proportional hazard models were used, adjusting for sociodemographics, clinical monitoring, mental and physical illness severity and functional status.

RESULTS

After controlling for potential confounders, the protective effect of clozapine on all-cause mortality was significant (adjusted hazard ratio 0.61; 95% confidence interval 0.38-0.97; P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Clozapine reduces the risk of mortality in patients who meet criteria for TRS. We provide further evidence that improving access to clozapine in TRS is likely to reduce the mortality gap in schizophrenia.

The Use of Cognitive Screening in Pharmacotherapy Trials for Cognitive Impairment Associated With Schizophrenia

There are currently no regulatory approved pharmacological treatments for cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia (CIAS). One possibility is that trial methodology itself is hindering their development. Emerging evidence suggests that patients with schizophrenia may show limited benefit from pro-cognitive interventions if they already exhibit intact cognitive performance, relative to normative thresholds. The aim of this report was to examine the extent to which objectively assessed cognitive performance has been used as an eligibility and/or stratification criterion in CIAS pharmacotherapy trials. On 16^th January 2019, we conducted a systematic search of studies listed on ClinicalTrials.gov to identify randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, add-on pharmacotherapy trials conducted in patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, in which a paper-and-pencil or computerized cognitive task (or battery) was specified as a primary outcome measure. Of the 87 trials that met our inclusion criteria, 10 (11.5%) required the presence of an objectively assessed cognitive deficit as part of their patient eligibility criteria. No studies reported stratifying patients according to the presence or degree of cognitive impairment they exhibited. These results suggest that the vast majority of CIAS trials may have been underpowered due to the inclusion of cognitively "normal" patients. Purposive screening for cognitive impairment could increase CIAS trial success.

Combined treatment with a selective PDE10A inhibitor TAK-063 and either haloperidol or olanzapine at subeffective doses produces potent antipsychotic-like effects without affecting plasma prolactin levels and cataleptic responses in rodents

Activation of indirect pathway medium spiny neurons (MSNs) via promotion of cAMP production is the principal mechanism of action of current antipsychotics with dopamine D₂ receptor antagonism. TAK‐063 [1‐[2‐fluoro‐4‐(1H‐pyrazol‐1‐yl)phenyl]‐5‐methoxy‐3‐(1‐phenyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐5‐yl)pyridazin‐4(1H)‐one] is a novel phosphodiesterase 10A inhibitor that activates both direct and indirect pathway MSNs through increasing both cAMP and cGMP levels by inhibition of their degradation. The activation of indirect pathway MSNs through the distinct mechanism of action of these drugs raises the possibility of augmented pharmacological effects by combination therapy. In this study, we evaluated the potential of combination therapy with TAK‐063 and current antipsychotics, such as haloperidol or olanzapine after oral administration. Combined treatment with TAK‐063 and either haloperidol or olanzapine produced a significant increase in phosphorylation of glutamate receptor subunit 1 in the rat striatum. An electrophysiological study using rat corticostriatal slices showed that TAK‐063 enhanced N‐methyl‐_D‐aspartic acid receptor‐mediated synaptic responses in both direct and indirect pathway MSNs to a similar extent. Further evaluation using pathway‐specific markers revealed that coadministration of TAK‐063 with haloperidol or olanzapine additively activated the indirect pathway, but not the direct pathway. Combined treatment with TAK‐063 and either haloperidol or olanzapine at subeffective doses produced significant effects on methamphetamine‐ or MK‐801‐induced hyperactivity in rats and MK‐801‐induced deficits in prepulse inhibition in mice. TAK‐063 at 0.1 mg/kg did not affect plasma prolactin levels and cataleptic response from antipsychotics in rats. Thus, TAK‐063 may produce augmented antipsychotic‐like activities in combination with antipsychotics without effects on plasma prolactin levels and cataleptic responses in rodents.

What causes medication administration errors in a mental health hospital? A qualitative study with nursing staff

Objective

Medication administration errors (MAEs) are a common risk to patient safety in mental health hospitals, but an absence of in-depth studies to understand the underlying causes of these errors limits the development of effective remedial interventions. This study aimed to investigate the causes of MAEs affecting inpatients in a mental health National Health Service (NHS) hospital in the North West of England.

Methods

Registered and student mental health nurses working in inpatient psychiatric units were identified using a combination of direct advertisement and incident reports and invited to participate in semi-structured interviews utilising the critical incident technique. Interviews were designed to capture the participants’ experiences of inpatient MAEs. All interviews were transcribed verbatim and subject to framework analysis to illuminate the underlying active failures, error/violation-provoking conditions and latent failures according to Reason’s model of accident causation.

Results

A total of 20 participants described 26 MAEs (including 5 near misses) during the interviews. The majority of MAEs were skill-based slips and lapses (n = 16) or mistakes (n = 5), and were caused by a variety of interconnecting error/violation-provoking conditions relating to the patient, medicines used, medicines administration task, health care team, individual nurse and working environment. Some of these local conditions had origins in wider organisational latent failures. Recurrent and influential themes included inadequate staffing levels, unbalanced staff skill mix, interruptions/distractions, concerns with how the medicines administration task was approached and problems with communication.

Conclusions

To our knowledge this is the first published in-depth qualitative study to investigate the underlying causes of specific MAEs in a mental health hospital. Our findings revealed that MAEs may arise due to multiple interacting error and violation provoking conditions and latent ‘system’ failures, which emphasises the complexity of this everyday task facing practitioners in clinical practice. Future research should focus on developing and testing interventions which address key local and wider organisational ‘systems’ failures to reduce error.

QTc interval in patients with schizophrenia receiving antipsychotic treatment as monotherapy or polypharmacy

OBJECTIVE

Antipsychotics are associated with a polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, torsades de pointes, which, in the worst case, can lead to sudden cardiac death. The QT interval corrected for heart rate (QTc) is used as a clinical proxy for torsades de pointes. The QTc interval can be prolonged by antipsychotic monotherapy, but it is unknown if the QTc interval is prolonged further with antipsychotic polypharmaceutical treatment. Therefore, this study investigated the associations between QTc interval and antipsychotic monotherapy and antipsychotic polypharmaceutical treatment in schizophrenia, and measured the frequency of QTc prolongation among patients.

METHODS

We carried out an observational cohort study of unselected patients with schizophrenia visiting outpatient facilities in the region of Central Jutland, Denmark. Patients were enrolled from January of 2013 to June of 2015, with follow-up until June of 2015. Data were collected from clinical interviews and clinical case records.

RESULTS

Electrocardiograms were available for 65 patients, and 6% had QTc prolongation. We observed no difference in average QTc interval for the whole sample of patients receiving no antipsychotics, antipsychotic monotherapy, or antipsychotic polypharmaceutical treatment (p=0.29). However, women presented with a longer QTc interval when receiving polypharmacy than when receiving monotherapy (p=0.01). A limitation of this study was its small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend an increased focus on monitoring the QTc interval in women with schizophrenia receiving antipsychotics as polypharmacy.

Amisulpride augmentation of clozapine for treatment-refractory schizophrenia: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

A second antipsychotic is commonly added to clozapine to treat refractory schizophrenia, notwithstanding the limited evidence to support such practice.

METHODS

The efficacy and adverse effects of this pharmacological strategy were examined in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12-week randomized trial of clozapine augmentation with amisulpride, involving 68 adults with treatment-resistant schizophrenia and persistent symptoms despite a predefined trial of clozapine.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences between the amisulpride and placebo groups on the primary outcome measure (clinical response defined as a 20% reduction in total Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale score) or other mental state measures. However, the trial under recruited and was therefore underpowered to detect differences in the primary outcome, meaning that acceptance of the null hypothesis carries an increased risk of type II error. The findings suggested that amisulpride-treated participants were more likely to fulfil the clinical response criterion, odds ratio 1.17 (95% confidence interval 0.40-3.42) and have a greater reduction in negative symptoms, but these numerical differences were not statistically significant and only evident at 12 weeks. A significantly higher proportion of participants in the amisulpride group had at least one adverse event compared with the control group (p = 0.014), and these were more likely to be cardiac symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment for more than 6 weeks may be required for an adequate trial of clozapine augmentation with amisulpride. The greater side-effect burden associated with this treatment strategy highlights the need for safety and tolerability monitoring, including vigilance for indicators of cardiac abnormalities, when it is used in either a clinical or research setting.

Is the risk of antipsychotic polypharmacy discontinuation dependent on the agents used?

This study assesses the risks and benefits of switching from two to one antipsychotic among participants on two non-clozapine oral antipsychotics, and among those on combinations involving either clozapine or an injectable antipsychotic. Ninety adult participants with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were assigned to stay on polypharmacy or to switch to monotherapy. Half of these participants were receiving combinations of non-clozapine oral antipsychotics and half were receiving combinations involving either clozapine or an injectable antipsychotic. Participants were assessed every 60 days for one year. We examined differences in symptom and side effect trajectories as a function of group assignment and time for both medication groups. Participants who switched from two to one non-clozapine oral antipsychotic experienced significant increases in symptoms relative to stay participants. They also saw significant side effect benefits. Switch participants on combinations involving clozapine or an injectable antipsychotic did not differ over time from stay participants on either symptom or side effect measures. It appears that patients on these combinations can be safely switched to monotherapy. While there may be symptom related risks associated with switching patients on combinations of non-clozapine oral antipsychotics, there are significant health related benefits. Clozapine or injectable antipsychotic monotherapy are recommended options.

Side effect burden of antipsychotic drugs in real life - Impact of gender and polypharmacy

BACKGROUND

Antipsychotic-associated side effects are well known and represent a significant treatment challenge. Still, few large studies have investigated the overall side effect burden of antipsychotics in real-life settings.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the occurrence of side effects and perceived burden of antipsychotics in a large naturalistic sample, taking polypharmacy and patient characteristics into account.

METHOD

Patients (n=1087) with psychotic disorders were assessed for side effects using the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersøgelser (UKU) side effect rating scale in addition to assessment of clinical and pharmacological data. Statistical analyses were performed controlling for possible confounding factors.

RESULTS

Use of antipsychotics showed significant associations to neurologic and sexual symptoms, sedation and weight gain, and >75% of antipsychotics-users reported side effects. More side effects were observed in patients using several antipsychotics (p=0.002), with increasing total dose (p=0.021) and with antipsychotics in combinations with other psychotropic drugs. Patients and investigators evaluated the side effect burden differently, particularly related to severity, gender and antipsychotics dose. Twice as many females described side effect burden as severe (p=0.004).

CONCLUSION

Patients with psychotic disorders have a high occurrence of symptoms associated with use of antipsychotics, and polypharmacy and female gender are seemingly risk factors for reporting a severe side effect burden. Due to the cross-sectional design evaluation of causality is tentative, and these findings should be further investigated in prospective studies.

Prevalence and correlates of antipsychotic polypharmacy in Hong Kong

BACKGROUND

Antipsychotic polypharmacy (APP) remains a common practice despite inconclusive empirical evidence of additional efficacy and potential exacerbation of side effects. Previous studies suggest APP rate is notably high in East Asia. This paper aims to investigate the prevalence and correlates of APP in Hong Kong.

METHOD

This was a cross-sectional study of 728 patients with psychosis. The demographics and clinical information, including age, gender, diagnosis, hospitalization history, and medication were collected. Chi-square tests and logistic regression analyses were used to study correlates of APP.

RESULTS

The APP rate for psychosis was 24.2% (n = 728) and that for schizophrenia was 26.0% (n = 611), both considerably lower than our previous local data and that from East Asian regions. The most widely used APP prescription fell within the atypical/atypical combination (i.e., Amisulpride/Clozapine and Paliperidone/Olanzapine), and Olanzapine was the most commonly prescribed antipsychotic. At least 75% of APP patients with psychosis took at least one type of atypical antipsychotics in their medical regimen. Typical/typical polypharmacy was associated with older age and use of antiparkinson drugs. Typical/atypical polypharmacy was associated with the use of antiparkinson drugs and anxiolytics, as well as inpatient status. Atypical/atypical polypharmacy was associated with younger age, inpatient status, and the use of mood stabilizers.

CONCLUSION

Overall, our study highlights a relatively low APP rate in Hong Kong when compared to other countries in East Asia. Age, inpatient status and use of antiparkinson drugs, anxiolytics and mood stabilizers were associated with use of APP.

Antipsychotics in people with dementia: frequency of use and rationale for prescribing in a UK mental health service

Aims and method

To determine how often and why antipsychotic medicines are prescribed to people with dementia. A cross-sectional survey of all clinical records was conducted in one National Health Service mental health trust.

Results

Of 946 people with dementia in the trust, 186 (20%) were prescribed an antipsychotic. Prevalence increased with the severity of dementia. The most common indication for initiating treatment was agitation/distress (70%), followed by verbal aggression (45%), psychotic symptoms (44%) and physical aggression (33%). The mean number of indications per patient was 2.6. In 58% of cases, the antipsychotic had been prescribed for more than a year, and a third of patients had not been reviewed in the past 6 months.

Clinical implications

People with dementia who are prescribed antipsychotic drugs generally display a range of challenging behaviours, but most notably are distressed. Systems for ongoing clinical review need improvement.

What leads to high antipsychotic dosing in forensic patients with schizophrenia?

Earlier findings suggest that forensic schizophrenia patients are treated with higher doses of antipsychotics. This practice-based specificity is insufficiently studied, and clinicians' motives regarding this practice remain poorly understood. In this editorial, the authors provide their data on treatment of forensic schizophrenia patients and identify characteristics of psychopathology and previous types of behaviors, including suicidal attempts, as potential reasons for the practice. They also emphasize that "these previous acts" often took place years ago, and suggest that current or recent aggression is unlikely the main reason for dosing, but rather the clinicians' intention to maintain "must remain unaggressive" condition. Therefore, the authors suggest new ideas that may contribute to a better understanding of the specific prescribing patterns in the forensic population and hope that these ideas would be implemented in further well-designed prospective studies.

Current psychotropic medication prescribing patterns in late-life bipolar disorder

OBJECTIVE

Many patients with bipolar disorder are reaching old age, but whether they are receiving evidence-based psychotropic treatment remains unclear. Our objective was to describe current psychotropic prescribing patterns in a large Canadian late-life bipolar sample.

METHODS

Population-based cross-sectional study of 1443 bipolar disorder patients aged ≥ 66, discharged from a psychiatric hospitalization in Ontario, Canada from 1 April 2006 to 31 March 2012. We described psychotropic medication prescribing within 30 days post-discharge.

RESULTS

Prescription of ≥2 psychotropic medications was highly prevalent (81.5%). The most common medications were atypical antipsychotics (75.3%), benzodiazepines/zopiclone (42.3%), and antidepressants (38.5%), with less frequent use of valproate (35.4%) and lithium (23.4%). Only 1.4% of patients were on lithium monotherapy, while 4.4% and 15.7% of patients were on antidepressant or atypical antipsychotic monotherapy; 8.9% of all patients were using ≥2 atypical antipsychotics.

CONCLUSIONS

In clinical practice, older adults hospitalized with bipolar disorder are often prescribed multiple psychotropic medications upon discharge. In many instances, practices did not reflect bipolar treatment guidelines and may be putting patients at risk for poor physical health and psychiatric outcomes. One such example is the very infrequent use of lithium monotherapy. Future research should examine whether health system-wide protocolized late-life bipolar treatment may optimize prescribing to improve effectiveness and safety. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The use of psychotropic drugs for behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia among residents in long-term care facilities in Japan

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether the use of psychotropic drugs (PDs) was related to behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) focusing on the prevalence, numbers of symptoms, severity, and care burden among the elderly with BPSD living in long-term care facilities in Japan.

METHOD

We conducted a cross-sectional survey among older people with dementia or similar symptoms (n = 312) using a questionnaire for care staff in 10 selected long-term care facilities. A brief questionnaire form of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory was used to assess BPSD.

RESULTS

PDs were used in 45% among all participants and 47.5% among those exhibiting at least one BPSD. We found that use of PDs was associated with greater numbers, severity, and care burden of BPSD. Also, there was significantly more use of PDs among people who had specific BPSD symptoms, such as delusions, anxiety, and disinhibition, compared with those who did not.

CONCLUSION

The use of PDs among residents in long-term care facilities with dementia or similar symptoms was relatively low compared with previous reports from other countries. Nonetheless, the greater numbers, severity, and care burden of BPSD were associated with the use of PDs.

Antipsychotic Polypharmacy among Children and Young Adults in Office-Based or Hospital Outpatient Department Settings

The purpose of the study was three-fold: (1) to estimate the national trends in antipsychotic (AP) polypharmacy among 6- to 24-year-old patients in the U.S.; (2) to identify frequently used AP agents and mental disorder diagnoses related to AP polypharmacy; and (3) to assess the strength of association between AP polypharmacy and patient/provider characteristics. We used publicly available ambulatory health care datasets to evaluate AP polypharmacy in office-based or hospital outpatient department settings to conduct a cross-sectional study. First, national visit rates between 2007 and 2011 were estimated using sampling weights. Second, common diagnoses and drugs used in AP polypharmacy were identified. Third, a multivariate logistic regression model was developed to assess the strength of association between AP polypharmacy and patient and provider characteristics. Between 2007 and 2011, approximately 2% of office-based or hospital outpatient department visits made by 6- to 24-year-old patients included one or more AP prescriptions. Of these visits, 5% were classified as AP polypharmacy. The most common combination of AP polypharmacy was to use two or more second-generation APs. Also, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia were the two most frequent primary mental disorder diagnoses among AP polypharmacy visits. The factors associated with AP polypharmacy were: older age (young adults), black, having one or more non-AP prescriptions, and having schizophrenia or ADHD.

Changes in antipsychotics and other psychotropic drugs during a 30-month lifestyle intervention among outpatients with schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Patients with schizophrenia have high risk of early death from diabetes and cardiovascular diseases, partly because of poor lifestyle and partly because of long-lasting exposure to antipsychotic treatment.

AIMS

To investigate the influence of a lifestyle intervention program on changes in psychotropic medication in a non-selected cohort of patients with schizophrenia.

METHODS

Observational study of outpatients in the Central Denmark Region during a 30-month lifestyle program.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-six patients were enrolled and 130 were available for analysis. Median follow-up time was 15.9 months (range 1-31 months). Nineteen patients (15%) were not treated with antipsychotic drugs during the study period. 54% of the 111 patients exposed to antipsychotics were subject to monotherapy at index and at follow-up. The median defined daily dose (DDD) of antipsychotics was 1.33 at index (interquartile range (IQR) 0.67-2.00) and 1.07 at follow-up (IQR 0.40-1.50). 52% of the patients experienced a decrease in DDD during the study period (median change 0.33; IQR 1.00-0.43). There were no significant differences between the patients with decreased, stable or increased DDD with regard to age, sex, follow-up time and time since diagnosis. The number of prescriptions was significantly higher in the patients who decreased their DDD and the proportion of antipsychotic depot formulation was higher in those who increased their DDD.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients decreased or stabilized their total dose of antipsychotic medication during the study period. Many patients were subject to antipsychotic polypharmacy. The extent of participation in the lifestyle intervention program did not correlate with the changes in dosing of antipsychotic medication.

Evaluation of Concurrent Oral and Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotic Prescribing at the Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System

BACKGROUND

Antipsychotic polypharmacy is defined as the concomitant prescribing of more than 1 antipsychotic medication for an individual patient. Despite clinical guideline recommendations, long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIAs) are often used together with oral antipsychotics (OAPs) to treat a variety of psychiatric illnesses. Little research exists to address this form of antipsychotic polypharmacy, and its role in therapy is poorly understood. The purpose of this evaluation was to determine the prevalence of this prescribing pattern at our facility, identify provider rationale for polypharmacy, and analyze trends. To our knowledge, this study is the first to describe the prevalence of and rationale for concomitant LAIA and OAP prescribing in the veteran population.

METHODS

All patients receiving an LAIA at the time of study initiation were included. Long-acting injectable antipsychotics/oral antipsychotics polypharmacy was defined as the use of both agents outside the manufacturer's recommendations for titration and overlap. Statistical analysis was performed to further evaluate prescribing patterns by agent, dose, and indication.

RESULTS

Long-acting injectable antipsychotics/oral antipsychotics polypharmacy occurred in 28% (22/79) of subjects. Of these, 50% (11/22) were prescribed the same antipsychotic in both dosage forms, of which 73% (8/11) were risperidone. Patients on LAIA/OAP polypharmacy were half as likely to be on a maximum dose LAIA compared with those on monotherapy (13% vs. 26%).

CONCLUSIONS

Although LAIA/OAP polypharmacy occurred less frequently than reported in previous literature, this study highlights the need for further research to better understand this prescribing practice.

Clozapine and long-acting injectable antipsychotic combination: A retrospective one-year mirror-image study

To evaluate efficacy and tolerability of the combination of clozapine with an antipsychotic long-acting injectable (LAI) in multi-episode patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Efficacy and tolerability were assessed in seventeen patients admitted to a hospital in Paris between January 2010 and June 2015, using a one-year mirror-image design. Number and length of hospitalizations significantly decreased after introducing the combination (2.1 vs 0.8, p=0.004 and 155.4days vs 26.6days, p<0.001 respectively). No major adverse events occurred in terms of increased weight, agranulocytosis, hyperglycemia and/or dyslipidemia. This combination can be beneficial and safe in multi-episode patients.

Antipsychotic Use Pattern in Schizophrenia Outpatients: Correlates of Polypharmacy

Background:

This study investigates the antipsychotic use patterns of patients with schizophrenia and its correlations in their daily drug use patterns.

Methods:

Patients with schizophrenia who have regular records at two different community counselling centres (CCS) were included in the study. Information about their medications and sociodemographic data was recorded through face-to-face interviews and supporting information about their drug use patterns was obtained from their relatives/caregivers/nurse. The Clinical Global Impression Scale (severity of illness) and the General Assessment of Functionality scales were also administered.

Results:

Patients with schizophrenia used 2.0 ± 0.81 antipsychotics daily and 3.52 ± 2.55 pills (1–18). Seventy-one percent of the patients used two or more kinds of psychotropic drugs. The most frequently used antipsychotics were quetiapine, a second generation antipsychotic, and haloperidol, a typical antipsychotic. Clinical severity, regular visits to a CCS and use of depot antipsychotics were independent predictors for polypharmacy.

Conclusion:

The rate of polypharmacy use is high in Turkey. There are multiple risk factors related with polipharmacy. New studies should focus risk factors for preventing polypharmacy.

Immediate vs Gradual Discontinuation in Antipsychotic Switching: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

Antipsychotic switching is routine in clinical practice, although it remains unclear which is the preferable switching method: immediate discontinuation of the current antipsychotic or a gradual tapering approach. The first strategy has been implicated in rebound/withdrawal symptoms and emergence/exacerbation of symptoms, whereas the gradual approach is thought to pose a risk of additive or synergistic side effects if employed in the context of a crossover approach.

Methods

MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched. Randomized controlled trials examining immediate vs gradual antipsychotic discontinuation in antipsychotic switching in patients with schizophrenia and/or schizoaffective disorder were selected. Data on clinical outcomes, including study discontinuation, psychopathology, extrapyramidal symptoms, and treatment-emergent adverse events, were extracted.

Results

A total of 9 studies involving 1416 patients that met eligibility criteria were included in the meta-analysis. No significant differences in any clinical outcomes were found between the 2 approaches (all Ps > .05). Sensitivity analyses revealed that the findings remained unchanged in the studies where switching to aripiprazole was performed or where immediate initiation of the next antipsychotic was adopted, while some significant differences were observed in switching to olanzapine or ziprasidone.

Conclusions

These findings indicate that either immediate or gradual discontinuation of the current antipsychotic medication represents a viable treatment option. Clinicians are advised to choose an antipsychotic switching strategy according to individual patient needs. This said, immediate discontinuation may be advantageous both for simplicity and because a stalled cross-titration process in antipsychotic switching could end up in antipsychotic polypharmacy.

A randomized, double-blind, comparison of the efficacy and safety of low-dose olanzapine plus low-dose trifluoperazine versus full-dose olanzapine in the acute treatment of schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE

Antipsychotic polypharmacy is common in clinical practice, but not recommended in guidelines for treating schizophrenia patients. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of low-dose olanzapine plus low-dose trifluoperazine (a first-generation antipsychotic [FGA]) to full-dose olanzapine (a second-generation antipsychotic [SGA]) in the treatment of acute schizophrenia.

METHOD

In this 6-week, double-blind, fixed-dose study, patients were randomized to receive 5mg/day of olanzapine plus 5mg/day of trifluoperazine or 10mg/day of olanzapine for 6weeks. Efficacy measures, including the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and other scales, safety measures, side effect measures, and quality of life were assessed regularly. Response was defined as at least a 30% reduction in the PANSS total score.

RESULTS

Both groups were similar in: 1) baseline characteristics, 2) score changes in all efficacy measures, safety measures, side effect measures, and quality of life, and 3) response rates at each visit. The polypharmacy group with low-dose olanzapine did not have less weight gain and lower lipid levels than the monotherapy group with full-dose olanzapine.

CONCLUSION

Polypharmacy is as efficacious and safe as, but cheaper than, monotherapy in the acute treatment of schizophrenia. Whether our findings can be generalized to other combinations of an appropriate ratio of one FGA to another SGA dosage, which can achieve favorable clinical responses and side effect profiles, needs further investigation.

Adherence, healthcare resource utilization and Medicaid spending associated with once-monthly paliperidone palmitate versus oral atypical antipsychotic treatment among adults recently diagnosed with schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Once-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M) is a long-acting injectable antipsychotic that may increase adherence rates, reduce hospitalizations, and lower medical costs compared to oral atypical antipsychotics (OAAs) among schizophrenia patients. However, the impact of PP1M in recently diagnosed patients remains unknown. The present study compared adherence, healthcare resource utilization and Medicaid spending between schizophrenia patients initiating PP1M versus OAA, among patients recently diagnosed (defined using ages 18-25 years as a proxy) and among the overall population.

METHODS

Medicaid data from five states (09/2008-03/2015) were used to identify adults with schizophrenia initiated on PP1M or OAAs (index date) on or after 09/2009. Outcomes were compared between PP1M and OAA groups following inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Univariate linear and Poisson regression models with nonparametric bootstrap procedures were used to compare the 12-month healthcare resource utilization and costs using rate ratios (RRs) and mean monthly cost differences (MMCDs), respectively.

RESULTS

Overall, patients initiated on PP1M (N = 2053) were younger (mean age: 41 vs. 44 years) and had more baseline antipsychotic use (88% vs. 62%) compared to OAA patients (N = 22,247). IPTW resulted in balanced baseline characteristics. Among recently diagnosed patients, PP1M was associated with better adherence (PDC ≥ 80%: 29% vs. 21%, P < 0.001) on the index medication as well as less use of other psychiatric medications, compared to OAAs. Adherence findings were similar for the overall cohort. Among recently diagnosed patients, lower medical costs associated with PP1M (MMCD = $-466; P = 0.028) outweighed the higher pharmacy costs (MMCD = $322; P < 0.001) resulting in similar total healthcare costs across groups (MMCD = $-144; P = 0.553). Overall, findings were similar but there was a trend toward a lower magnitude of medical cost savings (MMCD = $-286; P < 0.001). Reductions in medical costs were mainly driven by reductions in inpatient days (recently diagnosed RR = 0.85, P = 0.353; overall RR = 0.84, P = 0.004) and in home care visits (recently diagnosed RR = 0.43, P = 0.008; overall RR = 0.78, P = 0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

PP1M patients demonstrated significantly lower medical costs offsetting higher pharmacy costs relative to OAA patients. Recently diagnosed patients using PP1M may have greater medical cost savings relative to OAAs than that observed in the overall population, highlighting the potential economic impact of PP1M in adults recently diagnosed with schizophrenia.

Drug information update. Unconventional treatment strategies for schizophrenia: polypharmacy and heroic dosing

The majority of patients respond to antipsychotic monotherapy at standard doses, but a subset of patients will require more heroic measures that include antipsychotic polypharmacy and high-dose monotherapy. Indeed, research has shown that roughly 30% of patients with psychosis are prescribed multiple antipsychotic medications. We discuss the potential benefits and challenges of these approaches and provide a rationale for why and when they should be utilised.

Antipsychotic prescribing for vulnerable populations: a clinical audit at an acute Australian mental health unit at two-time points

BACKGROUND

Antipsychotics are recognised as a critical intervention for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Guidelines globally endorse the routine practice of antipsychotic monotherapy, at the minimum effective dose. Even in treatment-resistant schizophrenia, clozapine use is endorsed before combining antipsychotics. This aim of this study was to review antipsychotic polytherapy alone, high-dose therapy alone, polytherapy and high-dose prescribing patterns in adults discharged from an inpatient mental health unit at two time-points, and the alignment of this prescribing with clinical guideline recommendations. Additionally, associations with polytherapy and high-dose antipsychotic prescribing, including patient and clinical characteristics, were explored.

METHODS

A retrospective clinical audit of 400 adults (200 patients at two different time-points) discharged with at least one antipsychotic. Preliminary findings and education sessions were provided to physicians between Cohorts. Outcomes (polytherapy alone, high-dose therapy alone, polytherapy and high-dose therapy) were compared between study Cohorts using chi-squared and rank-sum tests. Associations between outcomes and covariates were assessed using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Most patients (62.5%) were discharged on a single antipsychotic within the recommended dose range. There was a clear preference for prescribing second generation antipsychotics, and in this respect, prescribing is aligned with current evidence-based guidelines. However, sub-optimal prescribing practices were identified for both Cohorts in relation to polytherapy and high-dose antipsychotic rates. Involuntary treatment, frequent hospitalisations and previous clozapine use significantly increased the risk of all three prescribing outcomes at discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

In a significant minority, antipsychotic prescribing did not align with clinical guidelines despite increased training, indicating that the education program alone was ineffective at positively influencing antipsychotic prescribing practices. Further consideration should be given when prescribing antipsychotics for involuntary patients, people with frequent hospitalisations, and those who have previously trialled clozapine.

Trends in antipsychotic prescriptions for Japanese outpatients during 2006-2012: a descriptive epidemiological study

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess the trends in antipsychotic prescriptions for outpatients in Japan, where a community-based approach to mental healthcare is emphasized.

METHODS

This descriptive epidemiological study used claims data from 1038 community pharmacies across Japan. Outpatients who were ≥18 years old and receiving their initial antipsychotic prescription during 2006-2012 were evaluated. The annual trends were reported for monotherapies, polypharmacy, antipsychotic doses, and the concurrent prescription of psychotropic medications.

RESULTS

The 152 592 outpatients included 101 133 (66%) adults (18-64 years old) and 51 459 (34%) older adults (≥65 years old). Among the adults, second-generation antipsychotic monotherapy prescriptions increased from 49% in 2006 to 71% in 2012, first-generation antipsychotic monotherapy prescriptions decreased from 29 to 14%, and antipsychotic polypharmacy decreased from 23 to 15%, respectively. Among the older adults, second-generation antipsychotic monotherapy prescriptions increased from 64 to 82%, first-generation antipsychotic monotherapy prescriptions decreased from 29 to 12%, and antipsychotic polypharmacy decreased from 7 to 6%, respectively. During the study period, >80% of the adults and >90% of the older adults received antipsychotics at risperidone-equivalent doses of <6 mg/day. Anxiolytics/hypnotics, antidepressants, antiparkinson agents, mood stabilizers, and anti-dementia agents were concurrently prescribed with antipsychotics for 70, 33, 20, 20, and 0.3% of the adults and for 43, 16, 19, 8, and 16% of the older adults, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study evaluated large-scale claims-based datasets and found that high-dose prescriptions and antipsychotic polypharmacy among Japanese outpatients were not as prevalent as has been previously thought. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Column switching UHPLC–MS/MS with restricted access material for the determination of CNS drugs in plasma samples

Background: Polypharmacy is a common practice in schizophrenia. Consequently, therapeutic drug monitoring is usually adopted to maintain the concentrations of the drugs in the plasma within a targeted therapeutic range, to maximize therapeutic efficiency and to diminish adverse side effects. Methodology: This study reports on a column switching UHPLC–MS/MS method to determine psychotropic drugs in plasma samples simultaneously. Results: The method was linear from 0.025 to 1.25 ng ml-1 with R2 above 0.9950 and the lack of fit test (p > 0.05). The precision values presented coefficients of variation lower than 12%, and the relative standard error of the accuracy were lower than 14%. Conclusion: The column switching UHPLC–MS/MS method developed herein successfully determined drugs in schizophrenic patients’ plasma samples for therapeutic drug monitoring.

Patterns of antipsychotics' prescription in Portuguese acute psychiatric wards: A cross-sectional study

This study aimed to establish the prescribing patterns of antipsychotics in acute psychiatric wards across Portugal, to determine the prevalence of polypharmacy and "high-doses" treatment, and to identify possible predictors. Twelve acute psychiatric inpatient units and 272 patients were included. The majority (87.5%) was treated with antipsychotics regardless of diagnosis, and 41.6% had at least two antipsychotics prescribed in combination. Age, use of depot antipsychotics, and antipsychotic "high-doses" were significant predictors of antipsychotic polypharmacy. Excluding 'as required' prescriptions, 13.8% of the patients were prescribed "high-doses" of antipsychotics. When antipsychotics 'as required' prescriptions were considered, 49.2% of the patients were on antipsychotic "high-doses". Age, use of depot antipsychotics, previous psychiatric hospitalization and involuntary admission were significant predictors of antipsychotic "high-doses". These results show that in Portugal the antipsychotics prescribing practices in psychiatric inpatient units diverge from those that are universally recommended, entailing important clinical and economic implications. It seems advisable to optimize the prescription of these drugs, in order to prevent adverse effects and improve the quality of the services provided.

Functioning in patients with schizophrenia: a systematic review of the literature using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a reference

PURPOSE

To identify and quantify the main concepts included in published studies focusing on individuals with schizophrenia using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).

METHODS

Searches (limited to those published from 2008 to 2012) were performed in MEDLINE, PsycINFO and CINAHL. Included studies described participants with schizophrenia, were original articles and included only subjects who were at least 18 years of age at study entry. All concepts underlying the measures and the text of the articles were extracted, and they were linked to ICF categories using standardized rules.

RESULTS

From the 3584 abstracts retrieved, 348 were randomly selected, and of these, 206 studies met the inclusion criteria. A total of 17,141 concepts were extracted, 84.8% of which could be linked to 491 ICF categories: 222 (45.21%) of the categories referred to Body Functions, 29 (5.91%) to Body Structures, 186 (37.88%) to Activities and Participation and 54 (11%) to Environmental Factors. Seventy second-level categories were reported in at least 5% of all studies: 30 of these categories referred to Body Functions, 2 to Body Structures, 34 to Activities and Participation and 4 to Environmental Factors.

CONCLUSION

The study has allowed us to identify and quantify the main concepts included in studies focusing on people with schizophrenia using the ICF. The majority of the concepts refer to Body Functions and Activities and Participation, rather than to Body Structures and Environmental Factors.

Efficacy and safety of adjunctive bitopertin versus placebo in patients with suboptimally controlled symptoms of schizophrenia treated with antipsychotics: results from three phase 3, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, multicentre studies in the SearchLyte clinical trial programme

BACKGROUND

Many patients with schizophrenia require high doses of medication for their ongoing psychotic symptoms. Glutamate theories and findings from studies showing efficacy of sarcosine, an endogenous, non-selective glycine-reuptake inhibitor mediated by GlyT1, offer an alternative approach. We undertook the SearchLyte trial programme to examine the efficacy of bitopertin, a selective GlyT1-mediated glycine-reuptake inhibitor, as an adjunctive treatment to ongoing antipsychotic treatment.

METHODS

SearchLyte consisted of three phase 3, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, multicentre studies done in outpatient clinics in Asia, Europe, and North and South America (TwiLyte done at 109 sites, NightLyte at 84, and MoonLyte at 87). Participants were male and female outpatients, aged at least 18 years, meeting DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia with suboptimally controlled positive symptoms despite treatment with antipsychotics. Inclusion criteria included a Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score of at least 70 and antipsychotic treatment stability for the past 12 weeks before randomisation. Key exclusion criteria included meeting criteria for symptomatic remission or previous treatment with a GlyT1 inhibitor or any other investigational drug. After a screening or 4-week prospective stabilisation period, we randomly assigned participants (1:1:1) to a 12-week, double-blind treatment of either placebo or one of two fixed doses of oral, once-daily bitopertin (10 or 20 mg in TwiLyte and NightLyte; 5 or 10 mg in MoonLyte) added to their current antipsychotic medicine. After completion of 12 weeks' treatment, the study design allowed for additional double-blind treatment for 40 weeks to assess maintenance of the effect, followed by a randomised 4-week washout period to assess withdrawal effects. Subsequently, all patients were offered the opportunity to receive bitopertin treatment in a 3-year follow-up. The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean change from baseline in the PANSS Positive Symptom Factor Score (PSFS) at week 12, analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population. The trials were registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (numbers NCT01235520 [TwiLyte], NCT01235585 [MoonLyte], and NCT01235559 [NightLyte]).

FINDINGS

Between Nov 19, 2010, and Dec 12, 2014, we randomly assigned 1794 patients to treatment, of whom 1772 were treated and analysed. MoonLyte was discontinued in September, 2014, on the basis of results from futility analyses. Across studies and treatment arms, most patients completed 12 weeks of treatment (505 in TwiLyte, 517 in NightLyte, and 506 in MoonLyte). Only one study, NightLyte, met the primary endpoint where the PANSS PSFS significantly differed from placebo at week 12, and only in the 10-mg arm: mean difference in score -1·37, 95% CI -2·27 to -0·47; p=0·0028. Improvements from baseline for the bitopertin 20-mg arm in Nightlyte were not significant compared with placebo: -3·77, 95% CI -4·40 to -3·14; p=0·3142. Results from the other two studies also did not differ from placebo (TwiLyte 0·58, 95% CI -0·34 to 1·50, p=0·22 for 10 mg and 0·43, -0·49 to 1·36, p=0·36 for 20 mg; MoonLyte 0·06, 95% CI -0·79 to 0·92, p=0·88 for 5 mg and 0·44, -0·41 to 1·28, p=0·31 for 10 mg). Placebo responses varied across studies and might have contributed to the differences in efficacy between studies. Four deaths occurred during the 12-week treatment period, three in NightLyte (upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage, alcohol poisoning and related head injury, and a completed suicide) and one in MoonLyte (myocardial infarction in a patient with pre-existing risk factors). Only the death by suicide was deemed related to the study drug. The incidence of serious adverse events was low across treatment groups in all three studies; psychiatric disorders were the most frequently reported serious adverse events and the most frequent cause of adverse events leading to discontinuation.

INTERPRETATION

Only one of six active treatment arms across the three studies offered an advantage of adjunctive bitopertin over placebo for the treatment of suboptimally controlled symptoms of schizophrenia. The small improvement associated with bitopertin together with the varying placebo response suggests that adjunctive bitopertin treatment might offer only modest benefit to suboptimal responders to antipsychotics, if any.

FUNDING

F Hoffmann-La Roche.

Do doctors agree on doses of antipsychotic medications?

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to investigate the concordance in attitudes of psychiatrists towards the doses of antipsychotics given to stable outpatients with schizophrenia and to examine the psychiatrists' estimates of equally potent doses of haloperidol and olanzapine.

METHODS

We asked all 22 doctors serving at the psychiatry department of Jönköping County Hospital if they considered the combined dose of antipsychotics for 20 individual patients to be 'low', 'medium' or 'high'. We also asked each doctor to state the dose of haloperidol that they considered to be clinically equivalent to 20 mg/day of olanzapine.

RESULTS

The inter-rater reliability (Krippendorff's alpha (α)) was 0.50, and the mean estimated dose haloperidol considered clinically equivalent to 20 mg/day of olanzapine was 4.45 mg/day.

CONCLUSIONS

The inter-rater reliability (Krippendorff's α) was low, suggesting lack of agreement. The dose of antipsychotics given to a patient might thus be more influenced by which doctor they meet than the severity of the disease. The respondents in this study considered a mean dose of 4.45 mg/day of haloperidol to be clinically equivalent to 20 mg/day of olanzapine. This is a considerably lower dose than was determined by an international consensus study of antipsychotic dosing, and more in line with the available PET studies measuring central dopamine receptor blockage of optimal clinical doses.

Implementation of a clinical practice guideline for schizophrenia in a specialist mental health center: an observational study

Background

In mental health settings, implementation of and adherence to clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) is low. Strategies are needed to overcome barriers and facilitate successful implementation of CPGs into standard care. The goals of this study were to develop a framework for the implementation of a CPG for schizophrenia for hospitalized service users in a mental health care facility, and to monitor adherence to the guideline.

Methods

An eight-step framework was developed based on project management principles: 1) the Appraisal Guideline for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) tool was used to rate and select a CPG; 2) an algorithm was created from the guideline; 3) a gap analysis identified clinical services and processes not conforming with the CPG recommendations; 4) a governance structure was created; 5) a modified Delphi process determined key outcome and process adherence metrics; 6) a project charter was developed; 7) clinical informatics ensured that systems and tools were in place to support the CPG; and 8) therapeutic services were realigned to match the requirements of the CPG within specified fiscal constraints. Percent adherence to the identified process adherence metrics was calculated before (March 2014) and for 12 months after implementation (April 2014-March 2015).

Results

The National Institute of Health and Care Excellence guideline scored highest on AGREE and was used to develop the algorithm. Cognitive behavior therapy for psychosis (CBT-P), art therapy and carer assessments were identified as gaps in care. Clinical global impression – Schizophrenia score was identified as the primary service user outcome variable and antipsychotic polypharmacy, metabolic monitoring, CBT-P referral and supported employment/vocational services referral as the primary process adherence measures. Adherence to guidance for metabolic monitoring (March 2014, 76.7 %; March 2015, 81.6 %), CBT-P referral (March 2014, 6.5 %; March 2015, 11.4 %) and vocational rehabilitation referral (March 2014, 36.6 %; March 2015, 49.1 %) were increased after CPG implementation. There was an initial increase in adherence to antipsychotic monotherapy (March 2014, 53.4 %; November 2014, 62.7 %), which decreased back toward baseline (March 2015, 55.1 %).

Conclusions

The eight-step framework was used to implement a CPG process, though further quality improvements initiatives may be needed to improve adherence.

Clozapine treatment and discontinuation in Iceland: A national longitudinal study using electronic patient records

BACKGROUND

Clozapine is the only drug approved for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. There is evidence that clozapine is underutilized.

AIMS

To evaluate the initiation and discontinuation of clozapine at Landspitali University Hospital in Iceland and the prevalence of antipsychotic polypharmacy in clozapine-treated patients.

METHODS

The study is a part of an ongoing longitudinal study of schizophrenia in Iceland. We identified 201 patients on clozapine or who have been on clozapine by using a keyword search in the electronic health records and by reviewing their medical records.

RESULTS

Mean age at first treatment with clozapine was 37.8 years. Mean follow-up period on clozapine was 11 years. After 20 years of treatment 71.2% of patients were still on clozapine. After one year of treatment 84.4% of patients were still receiving clozapine treatment. We estimate that 11.4% of patients with schizophrenia in Iceland are taking clozapine and that 16% have been treated with clozapine at some point. Polypharmacy is common, since nearly 2/3, 65.6%, of patients taking clozapine use at least one other antipsychotic and 16.9% are also receiving depot injections.

CONCLUSIONS

We need to increase the awareness of psychiatrists in Iceland with regard to treatment with clozapine, since only about half of the estimated population of patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia in Iceland have ever been treated with clozapine. Nearly two thirds of patients who are prescribed clozapine in Iceland remain on it long-term.

Suicide risk and antipsychotic side effects in schizophrenia: nested case-control study

OBJECTIVE

This study explores suicide risk in schizophrenia in relation to side effects from antipsychotic medication.

METHODS

Among patients with a first clinical discharge diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder in Stockholm County between 1984 and 2000 (n = 4000), those who died by suicide within 5 years from diagnosis were defined as cases (n = 84; 54% male). For each case, one individually matched control was identified from the same population. Information on antipsychotic side effects, including extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) and akathisia, as well as prescriptions of anticholinergic medication, was retrieved from clinical records in a blinded fashion. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the association between suicide and side effects as well as anticholinergic medication were estimated using conditional logistic regression.

RESULTS

A lower suicide risk was found in patients with a history of EPS (aOR 0.33, 95% CI 0.12-0.94). There was no statistically significant association between akathisia or anticholinergic medication use and the suicide risk.

CONCLUSIONS

A lower suicide risk identified among patients with EPS could potentially reflect higher antipsychotic adherence, exposure to higher dosage, or polypharmacy among these patients. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Blonanserin Augmentation of Atypical Antipsychotics in Patients with Schizophrenia-Who Benefits from Blonanserin Augmentation?: An Open-Label, Prospective, Multicenter Study

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of atypical antipsychotics (AAPs) with augmentation by blonanserin in schizophrenic patients.

METHODS

aA total of 100 patients with schizophrenia who were partially or completely unresponsive to treatment with an AAP were recruited in this 12-week, open-label, non-comparative, multicenter study. Blonanserin was added to their existing AAP regimen, which was maintained during the study period. Efficacy was primarily evaluated using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) at baseline and at weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12. Predictors for PANSS response (≥20% reduction) were investigated.

RESULTS

The PANSS total score was significantly decreased at 12 weeks of blonanserin augmentation (-21.0±18.1, F=105.849, p<0.001). Moreover, 51.0% of participants experienced a response at week 12. Premature discontinuation of blonanserin occurred in 17 patients (17.0%); 4 of these patients dropped out due to adverse events. The patients who benefited the most from blonanserin were those with severe symptoms despite a treatment with a higher dose of AAP.

CONCLUSION

Blonanserin augmentation could be an effective strategy for patients with schizophrenia who were partially or completely unresponsive to treatment with an AAP.

Effect of pharmacist intervention on physician prescribing in patients with chronic schizophrenia: a descriptive pre/post study

BACKGROUND

Although pharmacotherapy is one of the most important treatments for schizophrenia, the prominent levels of antipsychotic polypharmacy and high-dose regimens used in Japan are thought to be inconsistent with treatment regimens used in other countries. In this study, we evaluated the effect of pharmacist intervention on physician prescribing in patients with chronic schizophrenia.

METHODS

Participants comprised 52 inpatients at Sawa Hospital (Osaka, Japan), treated with at least one antipsychotic agent, who received pharmacist intervention for 1 year (2012). We compared the dose and the number of antipsychotics prescribed, and the rate of concurrent prescribing of anti-Parkinson, benzodiazepine and mood-stabilizer medication, pre- and post-pharmacist intervention. As an indicator of psychosis symptoms, the rate of seclusion room use was recorded. Additionally, we evaluated the impact of pharmacist intervention on medicine costs. Continuous variables were analyzed by Wilcoxon signed-rank sum tests, and categorical data were analyzed using Fisher's exact tests.

RESULTS

Compared with pre-intervention, the dose (982.6 mg pre vs. 857.6 mg post; p < 0.01) and the number of antipsychotics (2.0 pre vs. 2.0 post; p < 0.05) at 1 year were significantly lower post-intervention. The seclusion room use rate was not significantly different but tended to be lower post-intervention than pre-intervention (p < 0.1). The cost (in USD) for all medicines (10.33 pre vs. 8.76 post; p < 0.05), antipsychotics (8.04 pre vs. 6.48 post; p < 0.05), and psychotropics (9.24 pre vs. 7.68 post; p < 0.01) were significantly lower post-intervention than pre-intervention.

CONCLUSION

Pharmacist intervention has the potential to optimize medication prescribing and reduce medication costs in patients with chronic schizophrenia. It might be suggested that clinical practitioners as well as medical hospital administrators consider the pharmacists' ability to rationalize medication therapy in schizophrenia.

Triiodothyronine accelerates and enhances the antipsychotic effect of risperidone in acute schizophrenia

In acute psychotic schizophrenia patients we investigated if the combination of triiodothyronine (T3) plus risperidone was more effective when compared to risperidone monotherapy. Thirty-two in-patients meeting the DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia and without thyroid disease received risperidone (flexibly adjusted dose for tolerability) and were randomized to additionally receive either T3 (25 μg daily; risperidone plus T3 group) or placebo (risperidone plus placebo group). Treatment lasted until meeting the response to treatment criteria defined as score of ≤ 3 on the Clinical Global Impression Severity and Improvement scales. Acute psychotic episode symptom severity was evaluated using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) at treatment initiation and at the final study assessment. Fourteen patients were randomized to receive risperidone plus T3 and eighteen to receive risperidone plus placebo. The time until treatment response was shorter in the risperidone plus T3 group relative to the risperidone plus placebo group (25.5 ± 4.4 days vs 32.2 ± 8.2 days, respectively; p = 0.001). Moreover, there was a greater reduction of BPRS-total score (p = 0.01) in the risperidone plus T3 group relative to the risperidone plus placebo group. Treatment with T3 was associated with shorter time to treatment response (β = -0.440, p = 0.022) and with greater improvement in BPRS score (β = 0.240, p = 0.053), independent of patients' gender, age, baseline BPRS score and mean risperidone dose. The study confirms that addition of T3 to risperidone was associated with accelerated and enhanced treatment response in acutely psychotic schizophrenic patients.

Psychopharmacological treatment for schizophrenia: less is more

Antipsychotic polypharmacy in the treatment of schizophrenia is more common in China and other Asian countries than in Western countries. The reasons for this are unclear, but it may be related to an unsubstantiated belief among clinicians that multiple medications are more likely to achieve the desired clinical outcome. Antipsychotic medications are the mainstay of treatment for individuals with schizophrenia, but the use of antipsychotic polypharmacy and of high dosages of antipsychotic medication are associated with substantially increased risks without conferring improved clinical outcomes. It is generally accepted that high dosages of antipsychotic medications and the simultaneous use of multiple antipsychotics are associated with an increased prevalence, duration, and severity of adverse drug effects. More recent evidence also suggests that antipsychotic polypharmacy and the associated high overall dosage of antipsychotic medication lead to excessive striatal D2 receptor occupation (resulting in tolerance and drug withdrawal problems) and exacerbation of the impaired synaptic plasticity seen in schizophrenia (magnifying the cognitive impairment associated with the condition). Clinicians need to apply the 'less is more' principle in the psychopharmacological treatment of schizophrenia.

Polypharmacy in pediatric patients and opportunities for pharmacists' involvement

Rates of chronic conditions among pediatrics have been steadily increasing and medications used to treat these conditions have also shown a proportional increase. Most clinical trials focus on the safety of solitary medications in adult patients. However, data from these trials are often times extrapolated for use in pediatric patients who have different pharmacokinetic processes and physical profiles. As research increases and more drugs become available for pediatric use, the issue of polypharmacy becomes more of a concern. Polypharmacy is defined as the practice of administering or using multiple medications concurrently for the treatment of one to several medical disorders. With the increased rates of diagnosed complex disease states as prescribed mediations in pediatric patients, the prevalence and effect of polypharmacy in this patient population is largely a mystery. Polypharmacy falls within the realm of expertise of specialized pharmacists who can undertake medication therapy management services, medical chart reviews, and other services in pediatrics. Pharmacists have the time and knowledge to undertake pertinent interventions when managing polypharmacy and can play a major positive role in preventing adverse events. The aim of this paper is to review the literature on pediatric polypharmacy and provide insight into opportunities for pharmacists to help with management of polypharmacy. Information on adverse events, efficacy, and long-term outcomes with regard to growth and development of children subject to polypharmacy has yet to be published, leaving this realm of patient safety ripe for research.

The risks and benefits of switching patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder from two to one antipsychotic medication: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Despite little evidence to support its use and practice guidelines discouraging the practice, antipsychotic polypharmacy is widely prevalent in schizophrenia. This randomized controlled trial studied the effects of switching patients stable on two antipsychotic medications to one antipsychotic medication.

METHOD

104 adult outpatients with schizophrenia from 7 community mental health centers clinically stable on concurrent treatment with 2 antipsychotics were randomly assigned to stay on polypharmacy or to switch to antipsychotic monotherapy. Participants were followed for 1-year with assessments of symptoms and side effects occurring every 60days (7 total assessments). We examined differences in time trajectories in symptoms (PANSS, CGI) and side effects (EPS, metabolic, other) as a function of group assignment (switch vs. stay) and time, using intention-to-treat analysis.

RESULTS

Participants who switched to antipsychotic monotherapy experienced greater increases in symptoms than stay patients. These differences emerged in the second 6months of the trial. All-cause discontinuation rates over the 1-year trial were higher in the switch-to-monotherapy group than in the stay-on-polypharmacy group (42% vs. 13%; p<0.01). There were no differences in change over time in any of the side effect measures, except that stay patients experienced a greater decrease in Simpson Angus total scores than switch patients.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians should be cautious in switching patients with chronic schizophrenia who are stable on 2 antipsychotics to one antipsychotic. Given the challenges in discontinuing antipsychotic polypharmacy, adequate trials of evidence-based treatments such as clozapine and long-acting injectable antipsychotics should be undertaken in inadequately responsive schizophrenia patients before moving to antipsychotic polypharmacy.

[Maintenance Treatment With Antipsychotics for Adult Patients Diagnosed With Schizophrenia]

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness and security of the antipsychotics available for the management of adult patients with schizophrenia in the maintenance phase. To develop recommendations of treatment for the maintenance phase of the disease.

METHODS

A clinical practice guideline was elaborated under the parameters of the Methodological Guide of the Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social to identify, synthesize and evaluate the evidence and make recommendations about the treatment and follow-up of adult patients with schizophrenia. The evidence of NICE guide 82 was adopted and updated. The evidence was presented to the Guideline Developing Group and recommendations, employing the GRADE system, were produced.

RESULTS

18 studies were included to evaluate the effectiveness and / or safety of different antipsychotic drugs first and second generation. Overall, antipsychotics (AP) showed superiority over placebo in relapse rate over 12 months (RR 0.59 95% CI 0.42, 0.82) and hospitalization rate over 24 months of follow-up (RR 0.38 95% 0.27, 0.55); its use is associated with increased risk of treatment dropout (RR 0.53 95% CI 0.46, 0.61) and adverse events such as weight gain, dystonia, extrapyramidal symptoms and sedation. There was no difference in the outcome of re hospitalizations, comparisons on quality of life, negative symptoms or weight gain between AP first and second generation. Continuous or standard dose regimens appear to be superior to intermittent or low doses in reducing the risk of abandonment of treatment regimes.

CONCLUSION

Adult patients diagnosed with schizophrenia should receive maintenance treatment with antipsychotics. The medication of choice will depend on the management of the acute phase, the patient's tolerance to it and the presentation of adverse events.

The impact of antipsychotic polytherapy costs in the public health care in Sao Paulo, Brazil

INTRODUCTION

Guidelines for the treatment of psychoses recommend antipsychotic monotherapy. However, the rate of antipsychotic polytherapy has increased over the last decade, reaching up to 60% in some settings. Studies evaluating the costs and impact of antipsychotic polytherapy in the health system are scarce.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the costs of antipsychotic polytherapy and its impact on public health costs in a sample of subjects with psychotic disorders living in residential facilities in the city of Sao Paulo, Brazil.

METHOD

A cross-sectional study that used a bottom-up approach for collecting costs data in a public health provider's perspective. Subjects with psychosis living in 20 fully-staffed residential facilities in the city of Sao Paulo were assessed for clinical and psychosocial profile, severity of symptoms, quality of life, use of health services and pharmacological treatment. The impact of polytherapy on total direct costs was evaluated.

RESULTS

147 subjects were included, 134 used antipsychotics regularly and 38% were in use of antipsychotic polytherapy. There were no significant differences in clinical and psychosocial characteristics between polytherapy and monotherapy groups. Four variables explained 30% of direct costs: the number of antipsychotics, location of the residential facility, time living in the facility and use of olanzapine. The costs of antipsychotics corresponded to 94.4% of the total psychotropic costs and to 49.5% of all health services use when excluding accommodation costs. Olanzapine costs corresponded to 51% of all psychotropic costs.

CONCLUSION

Antipsychotic polytherapy is a huge economic burden to public health service, despite the lack of evidence supporting this practice. Great variations on antipsychotic costs explicit the need of establishing protocols for rational antipsychotic prescriptions and consequently optimising resource allocation. Cost-effectiveness studies are necessary to estimate the best value for money among antipsychotics, especially in low and middle income countries.

"First do no harm." A systematic review of the prevalence and management of antipsychotic adverse effects

AIMS

We aim to identify the prevalence and management strategies of nine clinically important categories of antipsychotic adverse effects, namely: extrapyramidal symptoms; sedation; weight gain; type II diabetes; hyperprolactinaemia; metabolic syndrome, dyslipidaemia; sexual dysfunction; and cardiovascular effects.

BACKGROUND

Antipsychotic drugs are widely prescribed for schizophrenia and other mental disorders. The adverse effects of antipsychotics are common, with a potential negative impact on adherence and engagement. Despite this, the scientific study of the prevalence or management of adverse antipsychotic effects is a neglected area.

METHOD

A systematic review was undertaken using pre-defined search criteria and three databases, with hand searching of citations and references. Inclusion was agreed on by two independent researchers after review of abstracts or full text. Quality analysis of included studies was conducted using pre-agreed criteria.

RESULTS

In total, 53 studies met inclusion criteria, revealing the following: (1) antipsychotic polypharmacy was associated with increased frequency of adverse effects, and (2) a longer duration of treatment is associated with greater severity (e.g. higher BMI); (3) clozapine was more strongly associated with metabolic disturbance than other antipsychotics in three studies and olanzapine was associated with the most weight gain in three studies; (4) hyperprolactinaemia was more common in women than men, but 50% men noted sexual dysfunction versus 25-50% in women; (5) despite clinical guideline recommendations there is a low rate of baseline testing for lipids and glucose; and (6) seven studies described adverse effect management strategies, but only two examined their efficacy - one found a significant reduction in weight with non-pharmacological group therapy and the other found a significant reduction in dyslipidaemia with statins.

CONCLUSIONS

Antipsychotic adverse effects are diverse and frequently experienced, but are not often systematically assessed. There is a need for further scientific study concerning the management of these side effects.

Reducing the rates of prescribing high-dose antipsychotics and polypharmacy on psychiatric inpatient and intensive care units: results of a 6-year quality improvement programme

BACKGROUND

There is no conclusive evidence that either high doses or combinations of antipsychotics are more effective than standard doses or monotherapy alone. Nonetheless, prescription of both remains prevalent in the UK. In 2006 the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (SLAM) participated in a national survey of prescription of antipsychotic medications, organized by the Prescribing Observatory for Mental Health. Over half of the patients on SLAM inpatient or psychiatric intensive care units were prescribed a high-dose antipsychotic or a combination of antipsychotics. Prescribing high-dose antipsychotics and polypharmacy in SLAM was found to be among the highest in the UK.

AIM

To assess the impact of a 6-year quality improvement programme aimed at reducing the rates of prescribing high-dose antipsychotics and polypharmacy on SLAM inpatients and psychiatric intensive care units.

RESULTS

There was a significant reduction between baseline and final survey in the rates of prescription of both high-dose antipsychotics and polypharmacy on SLAM inpatients and intensive care units (58% versus 10% p < 0.0001 and 57% versus 16%, p < 0.0001 respectively). The proportion of patients at final survey prescribed a high-dose antipsychotic and a combination was substantially lower in SLAM than in the national sample (10% versus 28%, p < 0.0001 and 16% versus 38%, p < 0.0001 respectively).

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

A sustained change in the prescribing culture of an organization can be achieved through a targeted improvement programme.

Evaluation of the individual safe correction of antipsychotic agent polypharmacy in Japanese patients with chronic schizophrenia: validation of safe corrections for antipsychotic polypharmacy and the high-dose method

BACKGROUND

Polypharmacy for schizophrenia treatment is not justified by the available clinical evidence. We evaluated a treatment reduction approach that reduces the dose and number of antipsychotic medications simultaneously prescribed to patients.

METHODS

In a randomized open study of the Safe Correction of Antipsychotic Polypharmacy and High-Dose Prescriptions program funded by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare, we evaluated a drug reduction method consisting of a dose reduction intervention performed on 163 patients with schizophrenia for twelve or 24 weeks. One antipsychotic medication was removed each week from each patient's treatment regimen by reducing the dose by 0 to 50 chlorpromazine equivalents. Data on health-related indices of quality of life, clinical symptoms, and risk of side effects were analyzed using a two-way repeated-measures mixed linear model.

RESULTS

Despite a 23% reduction in antipsychotic dose, no differences in outcomes were observed between the dose reduction and observation groups (effect size = 0.001 - 0.085, P = .24-.97), despite high statistical power (1-β = 0.48-0.97). The findings are limited by the nonuniformity of the participants' treatment history, duration, and dose reduction amount. Dose reduction protocol patients exhibited no difference in psychotic symptoms or adverse events compared with the observation group.

CONCLUSIONS

Importantly, the low dropout rate in our study (6.9% of participants withdrew because of patient factors and 23.8% for all secondary reasons) indicates that our "slowly" method is well tolerated. We hope that this approach will result in therapeutic improvements.