The Department of Veterans Affairs' NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program

Surgical site infection: the host factor

More than 30 million surgical procedures are performed annually in the United States, and surgical site infections (SSIs) remain a major postoperative complication. Although bacteria contaminate all surgical wounds, not all wounds become infected. In most cases, the host response eradicates the microbes. The patient's (ie, host's) responsiveness, therefore, is an important variable in the equation of factors that influence the rate of infection. Optimizing the patient's physiological condition can help prevent SSIs. Initiatives that show promise in reducing SSI rates include use of supplemental oxygen, maintenance of core body temperature, and rigorous management of blood sugar. Perioperative nurses play an important role as the patient's infection control advocate.

Mortality after nonemergent major surgery performed on Friday versus Monday through Wednesday

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether nonemergent major surgery leads to higher mortality when performed on Friday versus early weekdays.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Adults admitted emergently to acute-care hospitals on weekends experience higher mortality than those admitted on weekdays.

METHODS

Cohort study of 188,212 patients undergoing nonemergent major surgery at 124 Veterans Affairs hospitals from 2000 to 2004. Risk-adjusted 30-day mortality was compared for operations performed on Fridays versus Mondays through Wednesdays. Data were derived from the Veterans Affairs' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Patients were divided into 3 groups: floor (admitted postoperatively to regular floor), ICU (admitted postoperatively to intensive care unit), and outpatient (not admitted postoperatively). A stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to test the effect of day of surgery (Friday vs. Monday-through-Wednesday) on 30-day mortality in the presence of characteristics that were significant in bivariate analysis.

RESULTS

In the floor group (n = 89,786), operations performed on Fridays were associated with a higher 30-day mortality rate than those performed on Mondays through Wednesdays (2.94% vs. 2.18%; odds ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-1.49; P < 0.001). After adjusting for patient characteristics, odds ratio of 30-day mortality for operations on Fridays, when compared with Mondays through Wednesdays, was 1.17 (95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.26; P = 0.003). Within the ICU (n = 14,271) and outpatient (n = 84,155) groups, nonsignificant differences in 30-day mortality were observed for operations on Fridays versus Mondays through Wednesdays.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients admitted to regular hospital floors after nonemergent major surgery, mortality is increased if surgery is performed on Friday versus Monday through Wednesday.

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is safe in the high-risk patient: a NSQIP risk-adjusted analysis

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic colectomy was considered initially to be contraindicated in patients at high risk for operative morbidity and mortality. We hypothesized that this procedure is safe to perform in high-risk patients, stratifying this risk using National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) algorithms.

METHODS

A case-matched, comparative study was performed for high-risk veteran patients who underwent colectomy during the period October 2002-September 2004. Consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy were matched to patients who underwent open colectomy during the same period for age, body mass index (BMI), procedure, and NSQIP-predicted risk. The groups were compared for risk-stratified, 30-day morbidity/mortality, length of stay (LOS), and operating time.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients (23 laparoscopic and 22 open cases) were defined as at high risk for complications (predicted complication >0.15). The rate of major complications was significantly less in the laparoscopic group. There were 4 (18%) cases of postoperative respiratory failure in the open group and none in the laparoscopic group. There was no surgically related mortality in the laparoscopic group, compared with 2 deaths in the open group (P = .5). Median LOS was less in the laparoscopic group (5 days) compared with open (8 days) (P = .001). There were no significant differences in operating time or the number of minor complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the laparoscopic approach to colorectal diseases is safe in the population of patients at high risk for operative morbidity and mortality. Rather, this approach may represent a safer alternative to open access.

Reducing avoidable deaths among veterans: directing private-sector surgical care to high-performance hospitals

OBJECTIVES

We quantified older (65 years and older) Veterans Health Administration (VHA) patients' use of the private sector to obtain 14 surgical procedures and assessed the potential impact of directing that care to high-performance hospitals.

METHODS

Using a merged VHA-Medicare inpatient database for 2000 and 2001, we determined where older VHA enrollees obtained 6 cardiovascular surgeries and 8 cancer resections and whether private-sector care was obtained in high- or low-performance hospitals (based on historical performance and determined 2 years in advance of the service year). We then modeled the mortality and travel burden effect of directing private-sector care to high-performance hospitals.

RESULTS

Older veterans obtained most of their procedures in the private sector, but that care was equally distributed across high- and low-performance hospitals. Directing private-sector care to high-performance hospitals could have led to the avoidance of 376 to 584 deaths, most through improved cardiovascular care outcomes. Using historical mortality to define performance would produce better outcomes with lower travel time.

CONCLUSIONS

Policy that directs older VHA enrollees' private-sector care to high-performance hospitals promises to reduce mortality for VHA's service population and warrants further exploration.

Mortality of Department of Veterans Affairs patients undergoing coronary revascularization in private sector hospitals

OBJECTIVE

A limitation of studies comparing outcomes of Veterans Affairs (VA) and private sector hospitals is uncertainty about the methods of accounting for risk factors in VA populations. This study estimates whether use of VA services is a marker for increased risk by comparing outcomes of VA users and other patients undergoing coronary revascularization in private sector hospitals.

DATA SOURCES

Males 67 years and older undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG; n=687,936) surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI; n=664,124) during 1996-2002 were identified from Medicare administrative data. Patients using VA services during the 2 years preceding the Medicare admission were identified using VA administrative files.

STUDY DESIGN

Thirty-, 90-, and 365-day mortality were compared in patients who did and did not use VA services, adjusting for demographic and clinical risk factors using generalized estimating equations and propensity score analysis.

RESULTS

Adjusted mortality after CABG was higher (p<.001) in VA users compared with nonusers at 30, 90, and 365 days: odds ratio (OR)=1.07 (95 percent confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.11), 1.07 (95 percent CI, 1.04-1.10), and 1.09 (95 percent CI, 1.06-1.12), respectively. For PCI, mortality at 30 and 90 days was similar (p>.05) for VA users and nonusers, but was higher at 365 days (OR=1.09; 95 percent CI, 1.06-1.12). The increased risk of death in VA users was limited to patients with service-connected disabilities or low incomes. Odds of death for VA users were slightly lower using samples matched by propensity scores.

CONCLUSIONS

A small difference in risk-adjusted outcomes for VA users and nonusers undergoing revascularization in private sector hospitals was found. This difference reflects unmeasured severity in VA users undergoing revascularization in private sector hospitals.

Predictors of prolonged length of stay after major elective head and neck surgery

OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS

Longer length of stay (LOS) after elective surgery is associated with an increased use of health care resources and higher costs. The objectives of this study were to determine the perioperative factors that predict a prolonged LOS after elective major head and neck operations and to test the hypothesis that factors related to process of care (intra- and postoperative) independently predict prolonged LOS after adjustment for preoperative patient characteristics.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective hospital-based cohort study.

METHODS

The National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program data were accessed for seven head and neck operations: radical neck dissection (RND) (n = 398), modified RND (n = 891), total laryngectomy (n = 431), total laryngectomy with RND (n = 747), hemiglossectomy with unilateral RND (n = 201), composite resection (n = 105), and composite resection with RND (n = 312). Prolonged LOS was defined as exceeding the 75th percentile for the LOS distribution of each operation. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors that predicted prolonged LOS.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight variables were analyzed among 3,050 patients who qualified for inclusion. Preoperative patient characteristics that predicted prolonged LOS were older age, poorer functional status, consumption of more than two drinks of alcohol per day, history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and diabetes mellitus. Intraoperative processes that predicted prolonged LOS were a longer operative time and transfusion of erythrocytes. The postoperative variables that predicted a prolonged LOS were a return to the operating room within 30 days of the index operation and the occurrence of two or more operative complications.

CONCLUSION

Several intraoperative processes and postoperative adverse events contributed additional predictive information for prolonged LOS, after consideration of preoperative patient characteristics.

"ProvenCareSM": a provider-driven pay-for-performance program for acute episodic cardiac surgical care

OBJECTIVE

To test whether an integrated delivery system could successfully implement an evidence-based pay-for-performance program for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.

METHODS

The program consisted of 3 components: (1) establishing implementable best practices; (2) developing risk-based pricing; (3) establishing a mechanism for patient engagement. Surgeons reviewed all class I and IIa "2004 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Guidelines for CABG Surgery" and translated them into 40 verifiable behaviors. These were imbedded within a new ProvenCareSM program and "hardwired" within the electronic health record system, including order sets, templates, and "time outs". Concurrently preoperative, inpatient, and postoperative care within 90 days was packaged into a fixed price. A Patient Compact was developed to highlight the importance of patient activation. All elective CABG patients treated between February 2, 2006 and February 2, 2007 were included (ProvenCareSM Group) and compared with 137 patients treated in 2005 (Conventional Care Group).

RESULTS

Initially, only 59% of patients received all 40 best practice components. At 3 months, program compliance reached 100%, but fell transiently to 86% over the next 3 months. Reliability subsequently increased to 100% and was sustained for the remainder of the study period. The overall trend in reliability was significant at P=0.001. Thirty-day clinical outcomes showed improved trends () but only the likelihood of discharge to home reached statistical significance. Length of stay decreased by 16% and mean hospital charges fell 5.2%.(Table is included in full-text article.)

CONCLUSION

A provider-driven pay-for-performance process for CABG, enabled by an electronic health record system, can reliably deliver evidence-based care, fundamentally alter reimbursement incentives, and may ultimately improve outcomes and reduce resource use.

Quality of pancreatic cancer care at Veterans Administration compared with non-Veterans Administration hospitals

BACKGROUND

National efforts are underway to monitor the quality of patient care at Veterans Administration (VA) hospitals. The objective of this study was to examine treatment utilization and outcomes for localized pancreatic cancer at VA compared with non-VA hospitals.

METHODS

Using the National Cancer Data Base, patients with pretreatment clinical stage I/II pancreatic adenocarcinoma were identified. Treatment utilization and outcomes were assessed at VA compared with academic and community hospitals.

RESULTS

Of 35,009 patients, 2% were seen at VA, 38% at academic, and 54% at community hospitals. VA hospitals were more likely to use surgery (odds ratio 2.20, 95% confidence interval 1.73-2.79) and to administer adjuvant chemotherapy (odds ratio 1.77, confidence interval 1.28-2.46) compared with community hospitals. Adjusted perioperative mortality and 3-year survival rates after surgery were similar at VA and academic hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

For localized pancreatic cancer, patients treated at VA hospitals receive stage-specific treatments and have risk-adjusted perioperative and long-term survival rates that are comparable with those for patients treated at academic centers.

Comparison of mortality risk adjustment using a clinical data algorithm (American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program) and an administrative data algorithm (Solucient) at the case level within a single institution

BACKGROUND

There is great interest in efficiently evaluating health care quality, but there is controversy over the use of administrative versus clinical data methods. We sought to compare actual mortality with risk-adjusted expected mortality in a sample population calculated by two different methods; one based on preexisting administrative records and one based on chart reviews.

STUDY DESIGN

We examined a sample of patients (n = 1,234) undergoing surgical procedures at an academic teaching hospital during 1 year. The first risk-adjustment method was that used by the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, which is based on dedicated medical record review. The second method was that used by Solucient, LLC, which is based on preexisting administrative records.

RESULTS

The ratio of observed to expected mortality for this population set was higher using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program algorithm (1.1; 95% CI, 0.8 to 1.5) than using the Solucient algorithm (0.9; 95% CI, 0.6 to 1.2) but neither estimate was notably different from 1.0. Similarly, when observed to expected mortality ratios were calculated separately for each quartile of mortality, there were no marked differences within quartiles, although minor differences with potential importance were noted. Fit was comparable by age categories, gender, and American Society of Anesthesiologists' categories. A number of actual deaths had higher predicted mortality scores using the Solucient algorithm.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk-adjusted mortality estimates were comparable using administrative or clinical data. Minor performance differences might still have implications. Because of the potential lower cost of using administrative data, this type of algorithm can be an efficient alternative and should continue to be investigated.

Seasonal variation in surgical outcomes as measured by the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP)

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesize that the systems of care within academic medical centers are sufficiently disrupted with the beginning of a new academic year to affect patient outcomes.

METHODS

This observational multiinstitutional cohort study was conducted by analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Patient Safety in Surgery Study database. The 30-day morbidity and mortality rates were compared between 2 periods of care: (early group: July 1 to August 30) and late group (April 15 to June 15). Patient baseline characteristics were first compared between the early and late periods. A prediction model was then constructed, via stepwise logistic regression model with a significance level for entry and a significance level for selection of 0.05.

RESULTS

There was 18% higher risk of postoperative morbidity in the early (n = 9941) versus the late group (n = 10313) (OR 1.18, 95%, CI 1.07-1.29, P = 0.0005, c-index 0.794). There was a 41% higher risk for mortality in the early group compared with the late group (OR 1.41, CI 1.11-1.80, P = 0.005, c-index 0.938). No significant trends in patient risk over time were noted.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggests higher rates of postsurgical morbidity and mortality related to the time of the year. Further study is needed to fully describe the etiologies of the seasonal variation in outcomes.

The Prevalence of Obesity and Postoperative Complications in a Veterans Affairs Medical Center General Surgery Population

Patients who are obese are believed to be at greater risk of developing intraoperative and postoperative complications than their nonobese counterparts. Many studies have shown that there is a higher prevalence of obesity among the Veterans Affairs patient population. We performed a retrospective review of 941 patients presenting to a single Veterans Affairs Medical Center. We aimed to determine the incidence of obesity among the Veterans Affairs Medical Center general surgery patient population as well to compare the frequency of postoperative complications between patients who are obese and nonobese patients undergoing elective general surgery. Body mass index was calculated for all patients; of the 941 patients seen in the clinic, 547 underwent elective surgery. Thirty-three per cent of all clinic patients had a body mass index greater than 30 kg/m2. Twenty-eight per cent of patients who underwent surgery had a body mass index greater than 30 kg/m2. Postoperative complications developed among 5.5 per cent of all surgical patients; 23.3 per cent were obese and 76.7 per cent were nonobese. There was no statistically significant difference between these two groups ( P = 0.54). This study illustrates the increased prevalence of obesity among the Veterans Affairs Medical Center general surgery patient population. In addition, our study suggests that obesity is not an independent risk factor for postoperative complications in patients undergoing elective general surgery.

Multimodality therapy for pancreatic cancer in the U.S. : utilization, outcomes, and the effect of hospital volume

BACKGROUND

Despite decreased perioperative morbidity and mortality and clinical trials suggesting improved outcomes with adjuvant therapy, national practice patterns in the management of pancreatic cancer remain poorly defined. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate multimodality therapy utilization and outcomes relative to hospital type and volume.

METHODS

Using the National Cancer Data Base, stage-specific treatment patterns were analyzed for 301,033 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Logistic regression was used to evaluate treatment utilization. Cox proportional hazards modeling was utilized to evaluate the effect of multimodality therapy on survival.

RESULTS

Stage at presentation did not differ from 1985-1994 to 1995-2003; however, the percentage of patients receiving cancer-directed treatment increased from 45.1% to 51.8% (P < .001). Pancreatectomy for localized disease (AJCC 6th edition stages I and II) increased from 36.9% to 49.3% (P < .001). After resection, the use of adjuvant chemotherapy alone increased from 4.1% to 5.7% (P < .001), but the use of adjuvant radiation alone decreased from 7.0% to 4.6% (P < .001). Adjuvant chemoradiation use increased from 26.8% to 38.7% (P < .001). The use of surgery alone decreased from 62.1% (5213 of 8400 cases) to 49.9% (10,807 of 21,679 cases) (P < .001). Patients with localized pancreatic cancer were more likely to receive pancreatectomy and adjuvant chemoradiation at academic and high-volume centers (P < .001). Survival for localized disease was better after surgery with adjuvant therapy (hazards ratio [HR], 0.44; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.42-0.47) and surgical resection alone (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.52-0.57) compared with no treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

To the authors' knowledge, the current study is the largest study regarding pancreatic cancer performed to date, and the first to investigate national practice patterns for multimodality therapy utilization. Multimodality therapy utilization has increased over time and appears to have a beneficial impact on survival.

Impact of an Absorbent Silver-Eluting Dressing System on Lower Extremity Revascularization Wound Complications

Surgical wounds for lower extremity revascularization are prone to infection and dehiscence. Acticoat Absorbent, an antimicrobial dressing, offers sustained release of ionic silver. We hypothesized that immediate application of Acticoat as a postoperative dressing would reduce wound complications in patients undergoing leg revascularization. All infrainguinal revascularization cases involving leg incisions at a single Veterans Administration Medical Center were identified from July 1, 2002, to September 30, 2005. The control group received conventional dressings, while the treatment group received an Acticoat dressing. Wound complication rates were captured via National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data. Patient characteristics and procedure distributions were similar between groups. The wound complication rate fell 64% with utilization of the Acticoat-based dressing (control 14% [17/118], treatment 5% [7/130]; P = 0.016). An Acticoat-based dressing system offers a potentially useful, cost-effective adjunct to reduce open surgical leg revascularization wound complications.

Classification of adverse events occurring in a surgical intensive care unit

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to describe the preventability and provider specificity of surgical intensive care unit (SICU) deaths and complications compared with those in a cohort of trauma patients.

METHODS

Data were collected on all trauma and SICU admissions from July 1, 2001, to June 30, 2004, from administrative (Trauma Base and Project Impact) and morbidity databases. Services were protocol driven and staffed by in-house attendings. Performance improvement assessments were made by consensus. Deaths and complications were classified as preventable, potentially preventable, or nonpreventable, and provider-specific or not. Statistical significance was established at the P < .05 level.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-eight deaths (5.6% rate), 464 procedure-related, and 694 non-procedure-related complications were noted in 2969 SICU patients compared with 166 deaths (3.6% rate), 178 procedure-related, and 261 non-procedure-related complications in 4,655 trauma patients. Thirty-one percent of SICU deaths were preventable/potentially preventable compared with 14% of trauma deaths, but only 1.9% was attributable to the SICU provider. SICU complications were less frequently preventable/potentially preventable than in trauma patients (52% versus 61%) and less often provider-specific (5% versus 19%).

CONCLUSIONS

SICU complications are deemed preventable less often than in trauma patients and, if so, infrequently incriminate the SICU provider. Preventable and potentially preventable SICU deaths are rarely attributed to SICU care. These data suggest that SICU performance improvement should focus on systems solutions and pre-SICU care.

Perioperative β-blocker therapy and heart rate control during noncardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

Perioperative treatment with beta-blockade is a widely advocated practice. We assessed the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative control of heart rate (HR) in patients who received beta-blockade as recommended during preoperative medicine clearance.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent noncardiac surgery from 2002 to 2004 at the Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Houston, Texas, with recommendations of beta-blockade as part of their risk stratification. Demographic data and comorbid risk factors were collected on patients undergoing general anesthesia. All data were presented as mean +/- SEM. The chi-square test and analysis of variance were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 130 patients referred for preoperative medicine clearance, who were risk-stratified based on comorbid conditions and risk of procedure, had beta-blockade started before elective surgery. Sixty percent (78 of 130) of the patients underwent high-/intermediate-risk surgery. The mean preoperative HR was 74 +/- 1 beat per minute (bpm). The mean intraoperative HR was 69 +/- 1 bpm. The mean postoperative HR was 84 +/- 1 bpm. There was a significant difference in the preoperative and intraoperative HR when compared with the postoperative HR (P < .003). There were no deaths at 30 days postoperatively. Perioperative cardiac morbidity occurred in 5.4% (7 of 130) of all patients (high patient risk, 71%; low patient risk, 29%; P < .05), and did not correlate with procedure risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Beta-blockade is achieved sufficiently in the preoperative and intraoperative settings. However, attention to postoperative HR may be warranted to maintain the benefits of beta-blockade.

Patient Safety and Quality in Surgery

Patient safety and quality of care are inextricably linked. Surgery encompasses such a wide spectrum of diagnosis, treatment, postoperative care, and outpatient follow-up of so many illnesses that quality improvement and patient safety opportunities are numerous and potentially overwhelming. The study of error can be applied across all components of the care process, and offers many points of study to improve patient safety. A fundamental premise is that appropriate and safely delivered health care is less expensive. In our current climate, this emphasis on quality and safety will remain a high priority. Surgeon leadership at all levels is key to our professional viability.

Assessing the Quality of Surgical Care

Because of better educated patients, more demanding payers, and regulatory agencies, safety and quality have become prominent criteria for evaluating surgical care. Providers are increasingly asked to document these areas, and patients are using this documentation to select surgeons and hospitals. Payers are using the data to direct patients to providers, and potentially to adjust reimbursement rates. Therefore, health care policy makers, health service researchers, and others are aggressively developing and implementing quality indicators for surgical practice. Given the complex interplay of structure, process, and outcomes, assessment of surgical quality presents a daunting task. We must firmly establish the links between these elements to validate current and future metrics, while engendering "buy-in'' on the part of surgeons.

Pancreatic resection in Veterans Affairs and selected university medical centers: results of the patient safety in surgery study

BACKGROUND

Pancreatectomy is a high-risk, technically demanding operation associated with substantial perioperative morbidity and mortality. This study aims to describe the 30-day morbidity and mortality for pancreatectomy and to compare outcomes between private-sector and Veterans Affairs hospitals using multiinstitutional data.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective review of patients who underwent pancreatic resection for neoplasia at private-sector (PS) and Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals participating in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Patient Safety in Surgery Study in fiscal years 2002 to 2004. The variables reviewed were demographics, preoperative medical conditions, intraoperative variables, and outcomes. Using logistic regression to control for differences in patient comorbidities, 30-day mortality and morbidity rates between PS and VA hospitals were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 1,069 patients underwent pancreatectomy for neoplasia at 97 participating hospitals. Six hundred ninety-two patients were treated at PS hospitals and 377 at VA hospitals. The average number of patients treated at each hospital was 11.0, with a range of 1 to 83 during the 3-year study period. There were 842 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (CPT 4815x) and 227 who underwent distal/subtotal pancreatectomy (CPT 4814x). Significant differences were observed between PS patients and VA patients with regard to comorbidities and patient demographics. The 30-day unadjusted morbidity rate was 33.8% overall, 42.2% at VA hospitals versus 29.1% at PS hospitals (p < 0.0001). Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratio (OR) for postoperative morbidity comparing VA with PS hospitals was 1.781 (95% CI, 1.369-2.318) and 1.581 (95% CI, 1.064-2.307). The 30-day unadjusted operative mortality rate was 3.8% overall, 6.4% at VA hospitals and 2.5% at PS hospitals (p = 0.0015). Unadjusted and adjusted OR for postoperative mortality was 2.909 (95% CI, 1.525-5.549) and 2.533 (95% CI, 1.020-6.290), respectively. Similar outcomes were observed when looking at pancreaticoduodenectomy (CPT 4815x) when analyzed independent of other types of pancreatic resections.

CONCLUSION

Pancreatectomies are high-risk operations with substantial perioperative morbidity and mortality. Risk-adjusted outcomes for patients treated at PS hospitals were found to be superior to those for patients treated at VA hospitals in the study.

Adrenergic Receptor Genotype but Not Perioperative Bisoprolol Therapy May Determine Cardiovascular Outcome in At-risk Patients Undergoing Surgery with Spinal Block

Background:

Neuraxial blockade is used as primary anesthetic technique in one third of surgical procedures. The authors tested whether bisoprolol would protect patients at risk for cardiovascular complications undergoing surgery with spinal block.

Methods:

The authors performed a double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial to compare the effect of bisoprolol with that of placebo on 1-yr composite outcome including cardiovascular mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina, congestive heart failure, and cerebrovascular insult. Bisoprolol was given orally before and after surgery for a maximum of 10 days. Adrenergic receptor polymorphisms and safety outcome measures of bisoprolol therapy were also determined.

Results:

A total of 224 patients were enrolled. Spinal block could not be established in 5 patients. One hundred ten patients were assigned to the bisoprolol group, and 109 patients were assigned to the placebo group. The mean duration of treatment was 4.9 days in the bisoprolol group and 5.1 days in the placebo group. Bisoprolol therapy reduced mean heart rate by 10 beats/min. The primary outcome was identical between treatment groups and occurred in 25 patients (22.7%) in the bisoprolol group and 24 patients (22.0%) in the placebo group during the 1-yr follow-up (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.55–1.69; P = 0.90). However, carriers of at least one Gly allele of the β1-adrenergic receptor polymorphism Arg389Gly showed a higher number of adverse events than Arg homozygous (32.4% vs. 18.7%; hazard ratio, 1.87; 95% confidence interval, 1.04–3.35; P = 0.04).

Conclusions:

Perioperative bisoprolol therapy did not affect cardiovascular outcome in these elderly at-risk patients undergoing surgery with spinal block.

Employee working conditions and healthcare system performance: the Veterans Health Administration experience

OBJECTIVE

The authors explored the association between health care employees' perceptions of their organizations and objective measures of system performance.

METHODS

A national survey of employees conducted in 2001 by the Veterans Administration (VA) assessed employee perceptions of hospital organizational characteristics. The authors analyzed cross-sectional associations between these perceptions and objective measures of health care system performance--employee and patient care outcomes.

RESULTS

Employee perceptions of organizational climate (indicators of the organizational culture) were strongly related to overall satisfaction and measures of system performance. Overall, change in perceptions of organizational climate by 1 standard deviation (SD) was potentially associated with changes of 2% to 35% in selected outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Organizational climate, policies, and resultant working conditions in health care institutions appear to be strong drivers of system performance. Interventions directed toward improving care quality and safety should address these factors.

Pay for performance: rationale and potential implications for urology

PURPOSE

Pay for performance represents a new paradigm for physician reimbursement based on the value based purchasing of health care services. Government and private payers have expressed an interest in moving toward this system with several pay for performance programs already in place. The rationale behind this initiative and what it means for the practicing urologist are discussed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MEDLINE and Internet based research focusing on the topics of health care quality, measures used to implement pay for performance, and private and public sector experience with pay for performance to date were reviewed.

RESULTS

Health care quality can be assessed through 3 types of measures, including structure, process and outcome. Structure measures involve the environment where services are provided, whereas process measures capture how a particular provider delivers health care. Outcome assessment involves the results of the services provided. These measures are best used when they are used in coordination with each other, and when they are risk adjusted. Most pay for performance systems in use today are based on these measures. However, there are little data that show whether this reimbursement paradigm actually improves the quality of heath care provided.

CONCLUSIONS

Many questions remain regarding the implementation of a pay for performance system in the field of urology. Government and private payers are motivated to implement pay for performance. However, specific evidence based metrics for urology that fairly and accurately define quality are currently lacking. Given that implementation of a nationwide pay for performance system appears to be inevitable, urology involvement in the development and implementation of these health care quality metrics is essential.

Mortality of Department of Veterans Affairs patients admitted to private sector hospitals for 5 common medical conditions

Whether prior use of Veterans Affairs services is a marker for increased mortality was evaluated by using Medicare data for men aged 67 years and older admitted for acute myocardial infarction, chronic heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pneumonia, or stroke during 1996 to 2002. Patients using Veterans Affairs services during the 2 years preceding hospital admission were identified using Veterans Affairs encounter data, and 30-day mortality was compared in patients who did and did not use Veterans Affairs services, adjusting for patient risk factors. For most Veterans Affairs users, the odds of death were similar or slightly less than the odds of death for nonusers. For acute myocardial infarction, pneumonia, and stroke, the risk of death was slightly higher for Veterans Affairs users with low income. Results using propensity-matched samples were similar. The use of Veterans Affairs services is not a strong marker of unmeasured severity among patients in private sector hospitals.

Comparison of Risk-Adjusted 30-Day Postoperative Mortality and Morbidity in Department of Veterans Affairs Hospitals and Selected University Medical Centers: Vascular Surgical Operations in Women

BACKGROUND

Women with peripheral vascular disease requiring vascular operations are less well studied than their male counterparts. The surgical outcomes of female vascular patients in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and private sector hospitals have not previously been compared, and their preoperative risk profile, postoperative morbidity, and mortality need to be better elucidated.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients undergoing vascular operations at 14 private sector and 128 VA hospitals, from October 2001 through September 2004, had their preoperative characteristics, operative data, and 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality compared, as part of the Patient Safety in Surgery (PSS) Study. Logistic regression analysis was performed to develop predictive models for morbidity and mortality, which allowed for a comparison of risk-adjusted outcomes between the two hospital groups.

RESULTS

There were 458 vascular surgical operations performed in women in the VA, and 3,535 vascular operations were performed in women in the private sector. Eighteen of 45 preoperative comorbidities and laboratory variables differed considerably between the institutions, and 16 of 18 were adverse among the private sector patients. The unadjusted 30-day mortality rate was higher in the private sector compared with the VA (5.2% versus 2.4%, p=0.008); the unadjusted morbidity rate was higher in the private sector compared with the VA sector (23.4% versus 13.3%, p < 0.0001). After risk adjustment, there was no marked difference between the VA and the private sector in mortality (p=0.12), but the difference in morbidity rates remained pronounced, with an odds ratio of 0.60 for VA versus private sector (95% CI=0.44, 0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with their VA counterparts, women undergoing vascular operations at private sector hospitals had a higher incidence of preoperative comorbidities; after risk adjustment, mortality did not differ substantially. Despite risk adjustment, the incidence of postoperative morbidity in the VA patients was considerably lower, suggesting unidentified differences in the hospital populations, their processes of care, or both.

Financial implications of pancreas transplant complications: a business case for quality improvement

We quantified the financial implications of surgical complications following pancreas transplantation. We reviewed medical and financial records of 49 pancreas transplant recipients at the University of Michigan Health System (UMHS) between 1/6/2002 and 11/22/2004. The association of donor, transplant recipient and financial variables was assessed. The median costs to UMHS of procedures and follow-up were $92,917 for recipients without surgical complications versus $108,431 when a surgical complication occurred, a difference of $15,514 (p = 0.03). Median reimbursement by the payer was $17,363 higher in patients with a surgical complication (p = 0.001). Similar trends (higher insurer costs) were noted when stratifying by payer (public and private) and specific procedure (SPK and PAK). All parties (patient, physician, payer and medical center) should benefit from quality improvement, with payers having a financial interest in pancreas transplant surgical quality initiatives.

Liver Resection in Veterans Affairs and Selected University Medical Centers: Results of the Patient Safety in Surgery Study

BACKGROUND

A congressional mandate, which led to the formation of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, is now being fulfilled with the publication of general and vascular surgical outcomes comparisons between Veterans Affairs (VA) and university medical centers. A series of National Surgical Quality Improvement Program articles evaluate the effect of hospital type (VA versus university hospitals) on procedure-specific outcomes. This article focuses on liver resections.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a prospective cohort study of a sample of patients undergoing liver resections at 128 VA medical centers compared with 14 university medical centers from October 1, 2001, to September 30, 2004. Preoperative and intraoperative characteristics were evaluated to identify possible variables related to morbidity and mortality and possible confounders of the hospital effect. These variables were then used to identify the effect that the hospital setting might have on surgical outcomes after liver resections.

RESULTS

Data from 237 liver resections at VA hospitals were compared with 783 procedures performed at university hospitals. The unadjusted 30-day morbidity rate tended to be higher in the VA (university 22.6% versus VA 27.9%; p = 0.10). After risk adjustment, results were equivalent (odds ratio = 0.94; p = 0.77). Unadjusted 30-day mortality rate was significantly higher in VA hospitals (6.8% versus 2.6%; p = 0.002). After risk adjustment, there was no longer a significant difference in mortality between the two hospital systems (odds ratio = 1.62; p = 0.33).

CONCLUSIONS

For liver resections, the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and Patient Safety in Surgery Study data suggest that there is no significant difference in risk-adjusted morbidity or mortality rates between VA and the university medical centers.

Relationship of Processes and Structures of Care in General Surgery to Postoperative Outcomes: A Descriptive Analysis

BACKGROUND

The systematic collection of quantitative data on structures and processes from surgical services participating in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) has not been a focus to date. Efficient collection of useful measures of structures and processes may improve understanding of surgical outcomes and strategies for improving the quality of surgical care, as NSQIP continues to expand. The purpose of this article was to describe results of a quantitative survey designed to measure surgical care structures and processes within NSQIP sites.

STUDY DESIGN

A cross-sectional survey was mailed to 123 Department of Veteran Affairs (VA) and 14 private sector sites participating in the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)-funded Patient Safety in Surgery (PSS) Study. The survey included questions about organizational structures and processes of preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative general surgical care services. For this study, we included only data from 90 VA sites that returned a survey (73% response rate). We used descriptive statistics and examined the bivariate association of structures and processes items or scales with risk-adjusted observed-to-expected (O/E) ratios of surgical morbidity and mortality.

RESULTS

Examination of frequency or means and standard deviations of items and scales revealed substantial variation in the structures and processes of surgical care services in participating VA sites, with correlation analyses demonstrating that, of 35 process and structure variables, there was a statistically significant relationship with the hospital's observed-to-expected ratio for 14 variables for morbidity, but only 4 variables for mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

This descriptive analysis provides support for the potential importance of measuring organizational structures and processes of care in addition to risk-adjusted morbidity and mortality.

Adrenalectomy in Veterans Affairs and Selected University Medical Centers: Results of the Patient Safety in Surgery Study

BACKGROUND

Data from the Patient Safety in Surgery Study were used to compare preoperative risk factors, intraoperative variables, and surgical outcomes of adrenalectomy procedures performed in 81 Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals with those performed in 14 private-sector (PS) hospitals.

STUDY DESIGN

This study is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data on all patients undergoing adrenalectomy in the VA and PS for fiscal years 2002 through 2004. Bivariate analysis compared VA and PS preoperative risk factors, intraoperative variables, and 30-day morbidity and mortality. Regression risk-adjustment analysis was used to compare 30-day postoperative morbidity in the VA and PS.

RESULTS

During the 3 years studied, 178 VA patients and 371 PS patients underwent adrenalectomy procedures with a median per site of 2 (range 1-9) and 21 (range 8-70) procedures per VA and PS hospital, respectively. The VA patients had considerably more comorbidities than PS patients. The unadjusted 30-day morbidity rate was significantly higher in VA (16.29%) than PS (6.74%) hospitals (p = 0.0003); after controlling for the higher rate of comorbidities, the adjusted odds ratio for morbidity in the VA versus the PS hospitals was no longer significant (odds ratio = 1.328; 95% CI, 0.488-3.613). Unadjusted mortality rate was VA 2.81%, PS 0.27%, p = 0.0074. The low event rate overall precluded risk adjustment for mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The VA adrenalectomy population has more preoperative risk factors and substantially higher unadjusted 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality rates than the PS population. After risk adjustment, there is no significant difference in morbidity between the VA and the PS. A larger study population is needed to compare risk-adjusted mortality between the VA and PS.

Relationship of Processes and Structures of Care in General Surgery to Postoperative Outcomes: A Qualitative Analysis

BACKGROUND

With increased focus on improving surgical care quality, understanding structures and processes that influence surgical care is timely and important, as is more precise specification of these through improved measurement.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a qualitative study to help design a quantitative survey of structures and processes of surgical care. We audiotaped 44 face-to-face interviews with surgical care leaders and other diverse members of the surgical care team from 6 hospitals (two Veterans Affairs, four private sector). Qualitative interviews were transcribed and analyzed to identify common structures and processes mentioned by interviewees to include on a quantitative survey and to develop a rich description of salient themes on indicators of effective surgical care services and surgical care teams.

RESULTS

Qualitative analyses of transcripts resulted in detailed descriptions of structures and processes of surgical care services that affected surgical care team performance--and how particular structures led to effective and ineffective processes that impacted quality and outcomes of surgical care. Communication and care coordination were most frequently mentioned as essential to effective surgical care services and teams. Informants also described other influences on surgical quality and outcomes, such as staffing, the role of residents, and team composition and continuity.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical care team members reinforced the importance of understanding surgical care processes and structures to improve both quality and outcomes of surgical care. The analysis of interviews helped the study team identify potential measures of structures and processes to include in our quantitative survey.

Comparison of Risk-Adjusted 30-Day Postoperative Mortality and Morbidity in Department of Veterans Affairs Hospitals and Selected University Medical Centers: General Surgical Operations in Men

BACKGROUND

We used data from the Patient Safety in Surgery Study to compare patient populations, operative characteristics, and unadjusted and risk-adjusted 30-day postoperative mortality and morbidity between the Veterans Affairs (VA) (n = 94,098) and private (n = 18,399) sectors for general surgery operations in men.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a prospective cohort study. Trained nurses collected preoperative risk factors, operative variables, and 30-day postoperative mortality and morbidity outcomes in male patients undergoing major general surgery operations at 128 VA medical centers and 14 university medical centers from October 1, 2001, to September 30, 2004. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to identify preoperative predictors of postoperative mortality and morbidity. An indicator variable for VA versus private-sector medical center was added to the model to determine if risk-adjusted outcomes were significantly different in the two systems.

RESULTS

The unadjusted 30-day mortality rate was higher in the VA compared with the private sector (2.62% versus 2.03%, p = 0.0002); unadjusted morbidity rate was lower in the VA compared with the private sector (12.24% versus 13.99%, p < 0.0001). After risk adjustment, odds ratio for mortality for the VA versus private sector was 1.23 (95% CI, 1.08-1.41). For morbidity after risk adjustment, the indicator variable for health-care system just missed statistical significance (p = 0.0585). Thirty-day postoperative mortality was comparable in the VA and private sector for very common operations but was higher in the VA for less common, more complex operations.

CONCLUSIONS

In general surgery operations in men, the VA appeared to have a higher risk-adjusted mortality rate compared with the private sector, but differences in mortality ascertainment in the two sectors might account for some of this effect. The higher mortality in the VA could be the result of higher mortality in the less common, more complex operations. There is a trend toward lower risk-adjusted morbidity in the VA compared with the private sector.

Bariatric Operations in Veterans Affairs and Selected University Medical Centers: Results of the Patient Safety in Surgery Study

BACKGROUND

The objectives of this study were to evaluate outcomes and predictors of morbidity in patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) during the Patient Safety in Surgery (PSS) Study.

STUDY DESIGN

National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data on PSS patients undergoing RYGB were analyzed for unadjusted and adjusted outcomes. Gender groups acted differently and were analyzed separately. Multivariable regression modeling was used to analyze hospital type as a predictor of risk. Stepwise logistic regression was performed to determine patient factors predictive of postoperative morbidity.

RESULTS

A total of 2,438 patients (2,064 private sector [PS], 374 Veterans Affairs [VA]) were identified for analysis. Adjusted odds ratio for postoperative morbidity for VA versus PS female patients was 1.14 (95% CI, 0.63-2.05), and for male patients 2.29 (95% CI, 1.28-4.10). Stepwise logistic regression showed that independent risk factors predictive of morbidity were open procedure, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists class, higher body mass index, diabetes, alcohol consumption, leukocytosis, SGOT > 40 U/L, smoking history, and older age. Importantly, male gender was not significant (p = 0.13) in the regression analysis. Subsequent and unrelated to this study, the VA has restructured its bariatric surgical program, including regionalization of centers, with a substantial lowering of associated mortality and morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

The VA male subset showed higher risk-adjusted postoperative morbidity compared with the PS male subset. The VA and PS female subsets had equivalent risk-adjusted postoperative morbidity. A systematic approach to quality-improvement processes resulted in improved bariatric surgical outcomes in the VA. Male gender might not be an independent risk factor in RYGB patients.

Comparison of data extraction from standardized versus traditional narrative operative reports for database-related research and quality control

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare the completeness and reproducibility of data extracted from a standardized operative report (SOR) with the non-standardized operative report (NSOR).

METHODS

Between July and December 2003, operative data were collected from all laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures performed at the Peter Lougheed Centre Hospital. A standardized format for dictating laparoscopic cholecystectomy operative reports was introduced on October 1, 2003. Non-standardized operative reports dictated in the first 3 months of the study period were compared with SORs dictated in the final 3 months. Two physicians independently extracted data from each operative report into a surgical database.

RESULTS

During the study period, 221 cholecystectomy reports were analyzed (119 SOR and 102 NSOR). Completeness of data extraction for identifying variables (eg, patient name, age, and date of procedure) was similar in the 2 types of reports. However, most other operative and perioperative details were more completely reported in the SOR (95% to 100%) when compared to the NSOR (14% to 100% complete). Furthermore, interobserver agreement between 2 independent data extractors was better for the SOR than the NSOR (0.9972 vs 0.9809, P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Standardized operative reports result in more complete and reliably interpretable operative data compared with NSORs.

Impact of outcomes research on the management of vascular surgery patients

Vascular surgery has traditionally relied on prospective, randomized clinical trials, case-control series from single institutions of excellence, and case studies to guide clinical decision-making. However, the use of a number of new clinical research tools has allowed the vascular surgeon to more critically assess the indications for particular operations, the costs of various procedures from both a monetary and quality-of-life standpoint, and the "real world" outcomes that can be expected from practitioners across the United States, not just from centers of excellence. Decision analysis with modeling of cohorts with desired characteristics and vascular disease has allowed for the objective determination of procedural cost-effectiveness and evaluation of patient quality-of-life issues surrounding vascular procedures. The use of large national administrative databases has yielded important information concerning factors associated with improved outcomes after several vascular procedures across the entire United States, especially after relatively uncommon operations, such as thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Administrative data have also enabled us to learn that access to various new endovascular procedures is somewhat limited, especially for the uninsured or poor. Hospital and surgeon volume, as a surrogate marker for quality, has been directly correlated with lower morbidity and mortality as well as differences in perioperative complications after multiple vascular procedures. A certificate of added qualification in General Vascular Surgery has also been shown to improve outcomes in patients undergoing vascular procedures. Finally, pioneered by the Veteran's Affairs administration and championed by the American College of Surgeons, prospectively collected data (National Surgery Quality Improvement Program) from the Veteran's Affairs and private sector hospitals is providing high-quality, risk-adjusted feedback about multiple vascular procedures to the hospital and the individual practitioner. Importantly, the body of literature generated using these new clinical research tools is being monitored by insurers and patients, as well as by the surgeons providing the care. This ultimately will have a direct impact on practice and referral patterns. It is therefore mandatory that vascular surgeons understand these new tools so that we can police our own practices before others, such as insurance companies and hospital administrators, do it for us.

The Patient Safety in Surgery Study: Background, Study Design, and Patient Populations

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this article is to describe the background, design, and patient populations of the Patient Safety in Surgery Study, as a preliminary to the articles in this journal that will report the results of the Study.

STUDY DESIGN

The Patient Safety in Surgery Study was a prospective cohort study. Trained nurses collected preoperative risk factors, operative variables, and 30-day postoperative mortality and morbidity outcomes in patients undergoing major general and vascular operations at 128 Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers and 14 selected university medical centers between October 1, 2001 and September 30, 2004. An Internet-based data collection system was used to input data from the different private medical centers. Semiannual feedback of observed to expected mortality and morbidity ratios was provided to the participating medical centers.

RESULTS

During the 3-year study, total accrual in general surgery was 145,618 patients, including 68.5% from the VA and 31.5% from the private sector. Accrual in vascular surgery totaled 39,225 patients, including 77.8% from the VA and 22.2% from the private sector. VA patients were older and included a larger proportion of male patients and African Americans and Hispanics. The VA population included more inguinal, umbilical, and ventral hernia repairs, although the private-sector population included more thyroid and parathyroid, appendectomy, and operations for breast cancer. Preoperative comorbidities were similar in the two populations, but the rates of comorbidities were higher in the VA. American Society of Anesthesiologists classification tended to be higher in the VA.

CONCLUSIONS

The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program methodology was successfully implemented in the 14 university medical centers. The data from the study provided the basis for the articles in this issue of the Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

Comparison of Risk-Adjusted 30-Day Postoperative Mortality and Morbidity in Department of Veterans Affairs Hospitals and Selected University Medical Centers: General Surgical Operations in Women

BACKGROUND

In 1985, Congress mandated that the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) compare its risk-adjusted surgical results with those in the private sector. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was developed as a result, in the VA system, and subsequently trialed in 14 university medical centers in the private sector. This report examines the results of the comparison between patient characteristics and outcomes of female general surgical patients in the two health care environments.

STUDY DESIGN

Preoperative patient characteristics and laboratory variables, operative variables, and unadjusted postoperative outcomes were compared between VA and the private sector populations. In addition, stepwise logistic regression models were developed for 30-day postoperative mortality and morbidity. Finally, the effect of being treated in a VA or private sector hospital was assessed by adding an indicator variable to the models and testing it for statistical significance.

RESULTS

Data from 5,157 female general surgical VA patients who underwent eligible procedures were compared with those from 27,467 patients in the private sector. Unadjusted 30-day mortality was virtually identical in the two groups (1.3%). The unadjusted morbidity rate was slightly, but notably, higher in the private sector (10.9%) as compared with that observed in the VA (8.5%, p < 0.0001). Predictive models were generated for mortality and morbidity combining both groups; top variables in these models were similar to those described previously in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. The indicator variable for system of care (VA versus private sector) was not statistically significant in the mortality model, but substantially favored the VA in the morbidity model (odds ratio=0.80, 95% CI=0.71, 0.90).

CONCLUSIONS

The data demonstrate that in female general surgical patients, risk-adjusted mortality rates are comparable in the VA and the private sector, but risk-adjusted morbidity is higher in the private sector. Rates of urinary tract infections in the two populations may account for much of the latter difference.

Use of National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Data as a Catalyst for Quality Improvement

BACKGROUND

Semiannually, the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) provides its participating sites with observed-to-expected (O/E) ratios for 30-day postoperative mortality and morbidity. At each reporting period, there is typically a small group of hospitals with statistically significantly high O/E ratios, meaning that their patients have experienced more adverse events than would be expected on the basis of the population characteristics. An important issue is to determine which actions a surgical service should take in the presence of a high O/E ratio.

STUDY DESIGN

This article reviews case studies of how some of the Department of Veterans Affairs and private-sector NSQIP participating sites used the clinically rich NSQIP database for local quality improvement efforts. Data on postoperative adverse events before and after these local quality improvement efforts are presented.

RESULTS

After local quality improvement efforts, wound complication rates were reduced at the Salt Lake City Veterans Affairs medical center by 47%, surgical site infections in patients undergoing intraabdominal surgery were reduced at the University of Virginia by 36%, and urinary tract infections in vascular patients were reduced at the Massachusetts General Hospital by 74%. At some sites participating in the NSQIP, notably the Massachusetts General Hospital and the University of Virginia, the NSQIP has served as the basis for surgical service-wide outcomes research and quality improvement programs.

CONCLUSIONS

The NSQIP not only provides participating sites with risk-adjusted surgical mortality and morbidity outcomes semiannually, but the clinically rich NSQIP database can also serve as a catalyst for local quality improvement programs to significantly reduce postoperative adverse event rates.

Comparison of Risk-Adjusted 30-Day Postoperative Mortality and Morbidity in Department of Veterans Affairs Hospitals and Selected University Medical Centers: Vascular Surgical Operations in Men

BACKGROUND

In response to a Congressional mandate to compare risk-adjusted surgical outcomes from Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals with those from private-sector hospitals, the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was initiated in the VA system and then was developed in a select group of university medical centers in the private sector. This article analyzes risk-adjusted outcomes after vascular surgical operations in men performed at VA hospitals as compared with private-sector hospitals.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a prospective cohort study of a sample of vascular surgical operations in men performed at 128 VA medical centers as compared with 14 university medical centers from October 1, 2001 to September 30, 2004. Patient and operative characteristics, and both unadjusted and risk-adjusted 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

Data from 30,058 vascular operations in men at VA hospitals were compared with 5,174 cases performed at private-sector hospitals. The unadjusted 30-day mortality rate was notably lower in the VA system as compared with the private-sector group (3.4% versus 4.2%, p = 0.004). After risk-adjustment, there was no marked difference in mortality between the two hospital types. The unadjusted 30-day morbidity rate was also considerably lower in the VA hospitals as compared with the private sector (17.3% versus 22.3%, p < 0.0001). After risk-adjustment, morbidity in the VA system remained considerably lower than in the private sector, with an odds ratio of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.78 to 0.92).

CONCLUSIONS

In vascular surgical operations in men, the VA hospitals demonstrated a lower risk-adjusted 30-day morbidity rate than the private-sector group. There is no marked difference in adjusted mortality rates between the two types of institutions.

Early complications and long-term outcome after open surgical treatment of popliteal artery aneurysms: is exclusion with saphenous vein bypass still the gold standard?

BACKGROUND

Popliteal artery aneurysms (PAAs) are rare, but thromboembolic complications may result in limb loss. To define complications and outcomes after open surgical repairs, we reviewed our experience.

METHODS

Clinical data of patients with PAA seen between 1985 and 2004 at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, were reviewed and outcomes in 289 patients with open revascularization were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank tests, chi(2), and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used for analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 358 PAAs were treated in 289 patients, consisting of 281 (97%) men and eight (3%) women. There were 133 (46%) unilateral and 156 (54%) bilateral PAAs with a mean diameter of 2.9 cm (range, 1.5 to 9 cm). Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) was more frequent with bilateral than unilateral PAAs (65% [101/156] vs 42% [56/133] P = .001). There were 144 (40%) asymptomatic limbs (group 1), 140 (39%) had chronic symptoms (group 2), and 74 (21%) had acute ischemia (group 3). Great saphenous vein (GSV) was used in 242 limbs (68%), polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) in 94 (26%), and other types of graft in 22 (6%). Early mortality was 1% (3/358), all in group 3 (4% [3/74]). Six of seven patients with perioperative myocardial infarctions belonged to group 3 (8%). The 30-day graft thrombosis rate was 4%, with 1% in group 1 (1/144), 4% in group 2 (5/140), and 9% in group 3 (7/74). All six early amputations (8%) were in group 3, five with failed bypass (4 PTFE, 1 GSV). Mean follow-up was 4.2 years (range, 1 month to 20.7 years). The 5-year primary and secondary patency rates were 76% and 87%, respectively, higher with GSVs (85% and 94%) than PTFE (50% and 63%, P < .05). Seven recurrent PAAs (2%) required reintervention. The 5-year freedom from reintervention was 100% after endoaneurysmorrhaphy vs 97% after ligations (P = .03). Five-year limb salvage rate was 97% (85% in group 3). There was no limb loss in group 1 and none in group 2 with GSV. In group 3, preoperative thrombolysis reduced the amputation rate in class II patients with marginally threatened limbs (96% vs 69%, P = .02).

CONCLUSION

Acute presentation of PAA continues to carry high mortality and cardiac morbidity; although preoperative thrombolysis appears to improve results, the 8% early and 15% late amputation rates remain ominous. Early elective repair is recommended because these patients had no surgical mortality, a low rate of complications, and asymptomatic patients had no limb loss at 5 years. GSV and endoaneurysmorrhaphy continues to be the gold standard for open repair of PAA.

The American College of Surgeons' closed claims study: new insights for improving care

BACKGROUND

All physicians must be vigilant in the pursuit of safe care for patients. While problems in care are identified, education that provides an understanding of these problems and guidelines for improvement can enhance patient safety. Our objective was to determine problematic aspects of surgical care, including care provided by surgeons before, during, after, and instead of surgery, that negatively affect patient safety.

STUDY DESIGN

Four hundred sixty malpractice claims against general surgeons were reviewed by surgeons (FACS). All claims were closed in 2003 or 2004. The data collection was completed at five medical liability companies representing a nationwide distribution of surgeons. Surgeons also dictated or wrote narratives for each case. The quantitative data and narratives were later analyzed to determine events responsible for unsafe care.

RESULTS

Surgeon-reviewers identified deficiencies in care that fell below accepted standards more often before and after operations than during them. These deficiencies were often the result of a failure to recognize surgical injuries, and many of these deficiencies were preventable. The quality of surgical care was satisfactorily met in 36% of cases. The most common procedures involving patient safety concerns were those involving the biliary tract, intestines, hernias, vascular system, esophagus, and stomach. The most frequent events leading to claims included delayed diagnosis, failure to diagnose, failure to order diagnostic tests, technical misadventure, delayed treatment, and failure to treat. Complications occurring most frequently were organ injuries, adult respiratory distress syndrome, and infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Closed claims reviews provide valuable data that may enhance provider performance through heightened awareness of common unsafe practices. Specifically, opportunities exist to improve surgical care provided during the preoperative and postoperative phases of treatment through continuing medical education to improve patient safety.

Disclosure of individual surgeon's performance rates during informed consent: ethical and epistemological considerations

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the paper is to examine the ethical arguments for and against disclosing surgeon-specific performance rates to patients during informed consent, and to examine the challenges that generating and using performance rates entail.

METHODS

Ethical, legal, and statistical theory is explored to approach the question of whether, when, and how surgeons should disclosure their personal performance rates to patients. The main ethical question addressed is what type of information surgeons owe their patients during informed consent. This question comprises 3 related, ethically relevant considerations that are explored in detail: 1) Does surgeon-specific performance information enhance patient decision-making? 2) Do patients want this type of information? 3) How do the potential benefits of disclosure balance against the risks?

RESULTS

Calculating individual performance measures requires tradeoffs and involves inherent uncertainty. There is a lack of evidence regarding whether patients want this information, whether it facilitates their decision-making for surgery, and how it is best communicated to them. Disclosure of personal performance rates during informed consent has the potential benefits of enhancing patient autonomy, improving patient decision-making, and improving quality of care. The major risks of disclosure include inaccurate and misleading performance rates, avoidance of high-risk cases, unjust damage to surgeon's reputations, and jeopardized patient trust.

CONCLUSION

At this time, we think that, for most conditions, surgical procedures, and outcomes, the accuracy of surgeon- and patient-specific performance rates is illusory, obviating the ethical obligation to communicate them as part of the informed consent process. Nonetheless, the surgical profession has the duty to develop information systems that allow for performance to be evaluated to a high degree of accuracy. In the meantime, patients should be informed of the quantity of procedures their surgeons have performed, providing an idea of the surgeon's experience and qualitative idea of potential risk.