Stepwise process for the development of entecavir resistance in a chronic hepatitis B virus infected patient

Long-term monitoring shows hepatitis B virus resistance to entecavir in nucleoside-naïve patients is rare through 5 years of therapy

Patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection who develop antiviral resistance lose benefits of therapy and may be predisposed to further resistance. Entecavir (ETV) resistance (ETVr) results from HBV reverse transcriptase substitutions at positions T184, S202, or M250, which emerge in the presence of lamivudine (LVD) resistance substitutions M204I/V +/- L180M. Here, we summarize results from comprehensive resistance monitoring of patients with HBV who were continuously treated with ETV for up to 5 years. Monitoring included genotypic analysis of isolates from all patients at baseline and when HBV DNA was detectable by polymerase chain reaction (> or = 300 copies/mL) from Years 1 through 5. In addition, genotyping was performed on isolates from patients experiencing virologic breakthrough (> or = 1 log(10) rise in HBV DNA). In vitro phenotypic ETV susceptibility was determined for virologic breakthrough isolates, and for HBV containing novel substitutions emerging during treatment. The results over 5 years of therapy showed that in nucleoside-naïve patients, the cumulative probability of genotypic ETVr and genotypic ETVr associated with virologic breakthrough was 1.2% and 0.8%, respectively. In contrast, a reduced barrier to resistance was observed in LVD-refractory patients, as the LVD resistance substitutions, a partial requirement for ETVr, preexist, resulting in a 5-year cumulative probability of genotypic ETVr and genotypic ETVr associated with breakthrough of 51% and 43%, respectively. Importantly, only four patients who achieved < 300 copies/mL HBV DNA subsequently developed ETVr.

CONCLUSION

Long-term monitoring showed low rates of resistance in nucleoside-naïve patients during 5 years of ETV therapy, corresponding with potent viral suppression and a high genetic barrier to resistance. These findings support ETV as a primary therapy that enables prolonged treatment with potent viral suppression and minimal resistance.

Antiviral resistance and hepatitis B therapy

The management of chronic hepatitis B currently rests with long-term therapy using oral nucleoside analogs. The major limitation of long-term therapy is antiviral resistance. Antiviral resistance is due to the high rate of mutations that can occur during hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication and the selection of these mutants due to a replication advantage in the presence of the antiviral agent. Indeed, high rates of antiviral resistance have been found with long-term use of lamivudine, in up to 76% of patients treated for 5 years or more. Rates of antiviral resistance are lower with adefovir therapy, approximately 30% at 5 years. Newer more potent nucleoside analogs (tenofovir and entecavir) have proven to have much lower rates of antiviral resistance (<1% after 2 years in treatment-naïve subjects), but the long-term rates of resistance have yet to be fully defined. The appearance of these viral mutations (genotypic resistance) is usually followed by rises in HBV DNA levels (virological breakthrough) and then by rises in serum aminotransferase levels (biochemical breakthrough). The appearance of antiviral resistance can be accompanied by a transient but occasionally severe exacerbation of the underlying liver disease which in some instances has led to acute liver failure. Combinations of nucleoside analogs may offer an approach to preventing antiviral resistance, but the efficacy and safety of this approach have yet to be shown. A future research priority is to identify new agents active against HBV that target different steps in the viral life-cycle and might provide effective means to circumvent the antiviral resistance of nucleoside analogs.

Entecavir shows limited efficacy in HBeAg-positive hepatitis B patients with a partial virologic response to adefovir therapy

BACKGROUND/AIMS

We investigated the efficacy of entecavir in lamivudine-experienced and -naïve patients with persistently high HBV DNA during adefovir treatment.

METHODS

Fourteen chronic hepatitis B patients (57% lamivudine-experienced) with a viral load above 5log(10)copies/mL after 12months of adefovir therapy and thereafter were treated with entecavir 1mg daily.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 15months (range: 8-23months) one of six lamivudine-naïve and none of the eight lamivudine-experienced patients achieved undetectable HBV DNA (<373copies/mL). HBeAg loss occurred in none of the subjects. Two lamivudine-experienced patients demonstrated the rtM204I mutation; no other entecavir-resistant substitutions were detected (rtI169, rtT184, rtS202, and rtM250). Two of three patients with genotypic adefovir resistance at baseline demonstrated a rapid virologic response to entecavir, but undetectable HBV DNA was not achieved. To attain a better antiviral response the dosage of entecavir was increased to 2mg daily in two patients, resulting in further viral load decline for both of them.

CONCLUSIONS

Entecavir monotherapy dosed at 1mg resulted in a slow reduction of viral load in both lamivudine-experienced and -naïve patients with persistently high HBV DNA during adefovir therapy. Increasing the dosage of entecavir led to further HBV DNA decline.

Use of the novel INNO-LiPA line probe assay for detection of hepatitis B virus variants that confer resistance to entecavir therapy

A line probe assay (INNO-LiPA DR, version 3) for the detection of hepatitis B virus mutations that confer resistance to entecavir therapy was evaluated. The INNO-LiPA DR assay is a highly sensitive assay that is easily applicable for the detection and monitoring of entecavir resistance-conferring mutations and is more sensitive than sequencing for the detection of mixed sequences.

In vitro characterization of viral fitness of therapy-resistant hepatitis B variants

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Because of the overlapping of polymerase and envelope genes in the hepatitis B virus (HBV) genome, nucleoside analog therapy can lead to the emergence of complex HBV variants that harbor mutations in both the reverse transcriptase and the envelope proteins. To understand the selection process of HBV variants during antiviral therapy, we analyzed the in vitro fitness (the ability to produce infectious progeny) of 4 mutant viral genomes isolated from one patient who developed resistance to a triple therapy (lamivudine, adefovir, and anti-HBV immunoglobulins).

METHODS

The 4 mutant and the wild-type forms of HBV were expressed from vectors in hepatoma cell lines; replication and viral particle secretion capacities then were analyzed. The impact of envelope gene mutations on infectivity was tested in HepaRG cells using the hepatitis delta virus (HDV) model as a reporter for infection.

RESULTS

The dominant HBV variant characterized from the therapy-resistant patient was found to have the best replicative capacity in vitro in the presence of high concentrations of lamivudine and adefovir. The expression of envelope proteins and secretion of subviral and Dane particles by this mutant was comparable with that of wild-type HBV. HDV particles enveloped by surface proteins from the selected mutant had the highest rates of infection in HepaRG cells compared with other mutants.

CONCLUSIONS

These results illustrate the importance of viral fitness and infectivity as a major determinant of antiviral therapy resistance in patients. Understanding HBV mutant selection in vivo will help to optimize new anti-HBV therapeutic strategies.

Spontaneous HBeAg seroconversion and loss of hepatitis B virus DNA after acute flare due to development of drug resistant mutants during entecavir monotherapy

AIMS

Patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection under entecavir (ETV) treatment develop resistant mutants with viral rebound. Here, we report an interesting case of spontaneous loss of HBV-DNA and seroconversion following an acute flare after the development of ETV-resistant mutants. This patient received ETV after lamivudine breakthrough.

METHODS

Cloning and sequence analysis of the HBV reverse transcriptase (RT) region were performed with seven samples during ETV therapy. In addition, two full-length HBV genomes derived from samples before and after the emergence of ETV resistance were sequenced.

RESULTS

ETV resistant mutants appeared at week 228, with virological and biochemical rebound at the same time. Unexpectedly, HBeAg seroconversion occurred 8 weeks later. The viral load decreased and became undetectable from week 252. Analysis of HBV isolates in the patient at week 124 revealed that wild-type HBV was predominant at that time and ETV resistant mutants were not found among 20 clones. Interestingly, a new mutant type with rtL180M+rtT184L was found alongside rtL180M+rtT184L+rtM204V/I at week 228 and appeared to develop independently, according to the sequence analysis. In contrast to the previously identified ETV resistant mutants, it did not carry the rtM204V/I mutations.

CONCLUSION

The data presented here indicates that the flare following the emergence of ETV resistant mutants may reflect immune-mediated control of HBV infection, leading to a spontaneous loss of HBV-DNA and seroconversion.

Complex dynamics of hepatitis B virus resistance to adefovir

In patients with hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B, adefovir dipivoxil administration selects variants bearing reverse transcriptase rtN236T and/or rtA181V/T substitutions in 29% of cases after 5 years. The aim of this study was to characterize the dynamics of adefovir-resistant variant populations during adefovir monotherapy in order to better understand the molecular mechanisms underlying hepatitis B virus resistance to this class of nucleotide analogues. Patients included in a 240-week clinical trial of adefovir monotherapy who developed adefovir resistance-associated substitutions were studied. The dynamics of hepatitis B virus populations were analyzed over time, after generating nearly 4,000 full-length reverse transcriptase sequences, and compared with the replication kinetics of the virus during therapy. Whatever the viral kinetics pattern, adefovir resistance was characterized by exclusive detection of a dominant wild-type, adefovir-sensitive variant population at baseline and late and gradual selection by adefovir of several coexisting resistant viral populations, defined by the presence of amino acid substitutions at position rt236, position rt181, or both. The gain in fitness of one or the other of these resistant populations during adefovir administration was never associated with the selection of additional amino acid substitutions in the reverse transcriptase.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that adefovir administration selects poorly fit preexisting or emerging viral populations with low-level adefovir resistance, which subsequently compete to fill the replication space. Viral kinetics depends on the initial virological response to adefovir. Lamivudine add-on restores some antiviral efficacy, but adefovir-resistant variants remain predominant. Whether these adefovir resistance-associated substitutions may confer cross-resistance to tenofovir in vivo will need to be determined.

Management and prevention of drug resistance in chronic hepatitis B

The management of hepatitis B virus resistance to antivirals has evolved rapidly in recent years. The definition of resistance is now well established, with the importance of partial response and the improvement of assays to detect genotypic resistance and virological breakthrough. Data on phenotypic resistance have allowed to define the cross-resistance profile for the main resistant mutants, providing a rationale for treatment adaptation. Clinical studies have shown that an early treatment intervention in case of a virological breakthrough or a partial response with the addition of a second drug having a complementary cross-resistance profile allows one to maintain the majority of patients in clinical remission. The prevention of resistance should rely on the use of the most potent antivirals with a high genetic barrier to resistance as a first-line therapy. The future perspectives are to design strategies to hasten the HBsAg clearance, which should become a new treatment endpoint, to prevent drug resistance and to decrease the incidence of complications of chronic hepatitis B.

[Combination therapy in chronic hepatitis B]

The HBV genome variability is responsible for the complexitiy of the viral quasi-species and its evolution during the course of the infection. During antiviral therapy, the persistence of infected cells is another important determinant involved in the selection of drug resistant strains. The development of nucleoside analogs with complementary resistance profiles has provided the rationale for add-on strategies in case of virologic breakthrough. The current trend is to add antivirals earlier, before the rebound of viral load, especially in case of partial virologic response. Clinical trials are required to determine if a de novo combination of nucleoside analogs provides an added benefit compared to an early add-on strategy. However, de novo combination is recommended in patients whose liver functions cannot tolerate treatment failure, and in patients with a high risk of developing viral resistance because of a complex viral quasi-species prior to therapy.

Management of patients with decompensated hepatitis B virus associated [corrected] cirrhosis

1. Hepatitis B virus replication is associated with a severe outcome in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. 2. Viral suppression induced by antivirals results in a clinical improvement that allows liver transplantation to be delayed or avoided. 3. Early treatment intervention is mandatory in patients with decompensated cirrhosis because of the delay in the restoration of liver functions. 4. Lamivudine is no longer the drug of choice because the initial enthusiasm has been tempered by the high rate of resistance development. 5. Early add-on therapy with adefovir allows us to rescue lamivudine resistance, but its use may be limited by nephrotoxicity. 6. Studies are ongoing with the newer generation of antivirals (telbivudine, tenofovir, entecavir, and emtricitabine) in monotherapy or in combination to determine the best strategy for achieving rapid and prolonged suppression of viral replication. These improved strategies should enhance treatment success enough to obtain clinical stabilization, to delay or prevent the need for transplantation, and to reduce the risk of hepatitis B virus recurrence on the graft.AASLD.

Initiation of hepatitis B virus genome replication and production of infectious virus following delivery in HepG2 cells by novel recombinant baculovirus vector

One of the major problems in gaining further insight into hepatitis B virus (HBV)/host-cell interactions is to improve the existing cellular models for the study of HBV replication. The first objective of this study was to improve the system based on transduction of HepG2 cells with a recombinant baculovirus to study HBV replication. A new HBV recombinant baculovirus, Bac-HBV-1.1, in which the synthesis of pre-genomic RNA is driven by a strong mammalian promoter, was generated. Transduction with this new recombinant baculovirus led to higher levels of HBV replication in HepG2 cells compared with levels obtained with previously described baculovirus vectors. The initiation of a complete HBV DNA replication cycle in Bac-HBV-1.1-transduced HepG2 cells was shown by the presence of HBV replicative intermediates, including covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA). Only low levels of cccDNA were detected in the nucleus of infected cells. Data showed that cccDNA resulted from the recycling of newly synthesized nucleocapsids and was bound to acetylated histones in a chromatin-like structure. HBV particles released into the supernatant of transduced HepG2 cells were infectious in differentiated HepaRG cells. Several Bac-HBV-1.1 baculoviruses containing HBV strains carrying mutations conferring resistance to lamivudine and/or adefovir were constructed. Phenotypic analysis of these mutants confirmed the results obtained with the transfection procedures. In conclusion, an improved cell-culture system was established for the transduction of replication-competent HBV genomes. This will be useful for future studies of the fitness of HBV mutants.

Selection of an entecavir-resistant mutant despite prolonged hepatitis B virus DNA suppression, in a chronic hepatitis B patient with preexistent lamivudine resistance: successful rescue therapy with tenofovir

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Entecavir has potent activity against hepatitis B virus. Drug resistance has not been reported in nucleoside-naïve patients and is low in lamivudine-refractory patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A 43-year-old man was treated with lamivudine for hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B. A viral breakthrough owing to a drug-resistant mutant was observed and entecavir 1 mg daily was added. After the viral load had been near the lower detection range of the PCR assay for 30 weeks, lamivudine was discontinued. The serum hepatitis B virus DNA remained low until a second viral breakthrough was observed after 45 weeks of entecavir monotherapy. Treatment was switched from entecavir to tenofovir disoproxil 245 mg daily, which resulted in a decline below 1000 copies/ml. Sequence analysis revealed the presence of rtL180M and rtM204V lamivudine-resistant-associated mutations at the start of entecavir treatment. During entecavir treatment, the rtS202G mutation was selected. Retrospective analysis revealed that during lamivudine treatment three other mutations had been selected as well, namely rtE1D, rtV207L, and rtI220L.

CONCLUSION

We describe the first case of entecavir resistance in a lamivudine-resistant patient with good initial suppression of viral replication for 70 weeks. On the basis of the data from cross-resistance and sensitivity testing in vitro and treatment outcomes, tenofovir proves to be a good treatment option for entecavir-resistant patients.

Hepatitis B: reflections on the current approach to antiviral therapy

This article summarizes the current state of antiviral therapy of hepatitis B with special attention given to areas that remain controversial or poorly defined. Strict adherence to liver association practice guidelines may result in missed opportunities to treat patients with significant underlying liver disease. In particular, recommended ALT thresholds may not appropriately reflect disease activity or degree of fibrosis. There is growing evidence that an alternative treatment paradigm for preventing late-stage disease complications may be indicated in highly viremic patients with early life exposure to hepatitis B. Pegylated interferon therapy is often a better choice for young to middle-aged patients with genotype A and B because of the higher rate of HBeAg seroconversion and a greater chance for HBsAg seroconversion in both HBeAg-positive and -negative patients as compared to nucleoside analogs. Nucleoside analog monotherapy is the current standard of care for many patients. However, long-term monotherapy results in resistance to a variable degree and sequential monotherapy may result in multi-drug resistant virus. Which patients would specifically benefit from early combination therapy also remains poorly defined. The rapidity and robustness of the suppression of HBV DNA while on a nucleoside analog should be monitored relatively early during treatment because it affects treatment outcome and the rate of resistance. While great progress has been made in treating hepatitis B, many important issues require further study.

Recent data on treatment of chronic hepatitis B with nucleos(t)ide analogues

Forty years ago in 1967, Professor Blumberg discovered the Australian Antigen, later known as the hepatitis B surface antigen, and was awarded the Nobel Prize. This discovery enables the diagnosis of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and defines its epidemiology. Viral hepatitis B infection affects global health situation, and chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is particularly serious in the Asia-Pacific region. HBV vaccines created the first breakthrough in HBV prevention. Through universal HBV vaccination program for the newborns, promoted since the mid-1980s, the main route that perpetuates chronic infection from mother to child is curbed. Most children and young adults now have immunity against HBV infection. The next breakthrough comes with therapy for CHB. This prevents progression to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Standard interferon therapy with modest efficacy has been largely replaced by therapy with nuclos(t)ide analogues or pegylated interferons alfa-2a and -2b. Lamivudine was approved by the FDA USA in 1998, followed by adefovir dipivoxil in 2002, entecavir in 2005, and telbivudine in 2006. Clevudine, tenofovir, and many promising candidates are in different stages of development and clinical trial. This paper critically reviews recent data published or presented since the APASL Consensus and Guideline Update of 2005. Clinical efficacy mostly in patients with raised serum alanine aminotransferase will be analyzed.

Impact of hepatitis B virus rtA181V/T mutants on hepatitis B treatment failure

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Recent clinical observations reported the occurrence of amino acid substitutions at position 181 of the HBV polymerase, associated with a viral breakthrough under lamivudine or adefovir therapy. In this study, we characterized the main variants harboring the rtA181T/V mutation isolated from 10 consecutive patients who developed lamivudine and/or adefovir resistance.

METHODS

We performed a clonal analysis of the HBV polymerase gene amplified by PCR from serum samples during viral breakthrough. The main mutants were then tested after transfection of Huh7 cells for their resistance profile to nucleoside analogs.

RESULTS

Clonal analysis revealed the co-localization on the same HBV genome of rtA181T/V with rtN236T, but not with rtM204V/I mutations following lamivudine, adefovir or lamivudine+adefovir breakthrough. In cell culture, the rtA181T/V mutation induced a decreased susceptibility to lamivudine (<10-fold), adefovir (2- to 8-fold) and tenofovir (2- to 3-fold). Interestingly, the association of rtA181T with rtN236T on one clinical isolate genome increased the resistance to these three drugs. All the tested mutants remained sensitive to entecavir.

CONCLUSIONS

Our observations suggest that a single amino acid change at position rt181 may induce cross-resistance to lamivudine and adefovir. These data emphasize the clinical relevance of genotypic and phenotypic analysis in the management of antiviral drug resistance.

Virologic monitoring of hepatitis B virus therapy in clinical trials and practice: recommendations for a standardized approach

Treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is aimed at suppressing viral replication to the lowest possible level, and thereby to halt the progression of liver disease and prevent the onset of complications. Two categories of drugs are used in HBV therapy: the interferons, including standard interferon alfa or pegylated interferon alfa, and specific nucleoside or nucleotide HBV inhibitors that target the reverse-transcriptase function of HBV-DNA polymerase. The reported results of clinical trials have used varying definitions of efficacy, failure, and resistance based on different measures of virologic responses. This article discusses HBV virologic markers and tests, and their optimal use both for planning and reporting clinical trials and in clinical practice.

Successful treatment of an entecavir-resistant hepatitis B virus variant

Emergence of a lamivudine (LAM)-resistant hepatitis B virus (HBV) with amino acid substitutions in the YMDD motif is a well-documented problem during long-term LAM therapy. Entecavir (ETV) is a new drug approved for treatment of HBV infection with or without LAM-resistant mutants. This report describes an ETV-resistant strain of HBV, which emerged after prolonged ETV therapy in a patient who did not respond to LAM therapy. Direct sequence analysis of the ETV-resistant strain showed appearance of amino acid substitution rtS202G in the reverse transcriptase (RT) domain, together with rtL180M + M204V substitution that had developed at the emergence of LAM-resistant mutant. In vitro analysis demonstrated that the rtL180M + M204V + S202G mutant strain displayed a 200-fold and a 5-fold reduction in susceptibility to ETV compared with the wild- type and the rtL180M + M204V mutant strain, respectively. Adefovir was effective against the ETV-resistant strain both in vitro and during the clinical course. In conclusion, this study showed that virological and biochemical breakthrough due to ETV could occur in patients infected with LAM-resistant HBV and confirmed that the addition of rtS202G substitution to the rtL180M + M204V mutant strain is responsible for ETV resistance and we could treat the resistant mutant successfully.

[Current data on the treatment of chronic hepatitis B]

Despite the development of new therapeutic options, treatment of chronic hepatitis B remains a clinical challenge because of the need for long-term treatment in most patients. Treatment with pegylated interferon is the only option that allows a defined duration of treatment. Nonetheless, approximately 70% of the patients treated do not have a prolonged treatment response. A variety of nucleoside analog viral polymerase (reverse transcriptase) inhibitors have been developed (lamivudine, adefovir dipivoxil, entecavir, telbivudine); they can be administered orally and are well tolerated. These antiviral agents effectively induce viral suppression, which is accompanied by an improvement in transaminases and hepatic histology. Nonetheless, the rates of HBe and HBs seroconversion remain low with nucleoside analogs, and the absence of these immunologic events necessitates prolonged antiretroviral treatment. Treatment with nucleoside analogs leads to selection of resistant mutant viruses. They therefore require close clinical and virologic follow-up to enable early screening for resistance and adaptation of treatment before the liver disease worsens. The development of these different treatment options has made possible very significant improvements in the management of patients with chronic hepatitis B, by preventing aggravation of liver disease in most of them.

Antiviral-resistant hepatitis B virus: can we prevent this monster from growing?

Despite the recent progress in antiviral therapy of chronic hepatitis B, clinical experience has shown that antiviral drug resistance is inevitable with the administration of nucleoside analog monotherapy. The long-term persistence of the viral genome in infected cells and the high rate of spontaneous mutation is the basis for the selection of HBV mutants that are resistant to polymerase inhibitors. Selection of antiviral-resistant mutations leads to a rise in viral load and progression of liver disease. The incidence of antiviral resistance depends on the potency and genetic barrier to resistance of the antiviral drug, highlighting the importance of the choice if first line therapy. The determination of cross-resistance profile of each drug has allowed the design of rescue therapy for patients with virologic breakthrough. Early diagnosis and treatment intervention allow the majority of patients to maintain in clinical remission despite the occurrence of drug resistance. Clinical studies are ongoing to determine the best strategy to prevent or delay antiviral drug resistance and of its impact on liver disease.

Antiviral therapy of chronic hepatitis B: prevention of drug resistance

The emergence of viral resistance during treatment is becoming an important clinical issue for hepatitis B virus (HBV) antiviral therapy. Considerable progress has been achieved in the efficacy of treatment, with the development of new drugs that allow a sustained suppression of HBV replication, or at least maintain the viral load below a clinically relevant threshold. Although most drugs currently registered for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B are effective in suppressing viral load, long-term therapy is required to avoid viral reactivation and progression of liver disease. Because of the variability of the HBV genome, such long-term treatments are associated with the emergence of resistant viral strains, which may compromise the initial clinical benefit of the treatment.

Emerging drugs for hepatitis B

Chronic hepatitis B remains a treatment challenge despite the availability of new nucleoside analogs. This is due to the persistence of viral infection during therapy, which exposes the patient to the risk of developing antiviral drug resistance. Therefore, new polymerase inhibitors are needed to manage resistance to existing drugs and new trials of combination therapy are required to delay drug resistance. In the future, antiviral agents targeting other steps of the viral life cycle will be needed to achieve antiviral synergy and prevent antiviral drug resistance. Immune modulators are also expected to enhance antiviral response and to achieve sustained response. Discovery of new antiviral drugs and design of new treatment strategies are, therefore, needed to manage this disease, which is still the main cause of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma worldwide.

Antiviral drug-resistant HBV: standardization of nomenclature and assays and recommendations for management

Substantial advances have been made in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B in the past decade. Approved treatments for chronic hepatitis B include 2 formulations of interferon and 4 nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs). Sustained viral suppression is rarely achieved after withdrawal of a 48-week course of NA therapy, necessitating long, and in many cases, indefinite treatment with increasing risk of development of drug resistance. Antiviral resistance and poor adherence are the most important factors in treatment failure of hepatitis B. Thus, there is a need to standardize nomenclature relating to hepatitis B antiviral resistance, and to define genotypic, phenotypic, and clinical resistance to NA therapy.

In vitro activity of 2,4-diamino-6-[2-(phosphonomethoxy)ethoxy]-pyrimidine against multidrug-resistant hepatitis B virus mutants

The susceptibilities of drug-resistant hepatitis B virus (HBV) mutants to lamivudine, adefovir, tenofovir, entecavir, and 2,4-diamino-6-[2-(phosphonomethoxy)ethoxy]-pyrimidine (PMEO-DAPym), a novel acyclic pyrimidine analogue, were assessed in vitro. Most drug-resistant mutants, including multidrug-resistant strains, remained sensitive to tenofovir and PMEO-DAPym. Therefore, the latter molecule deserves further evaluation for the treatment of HBV infection.