Budesonide delivered by Turbuhaler is effective in a dose-dependent fashion when used in the treatment of adult patients with chronic asthma

Inhaled budesonide for adults with mild-to-moderate asthma: a randomized placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial

CONTEXT

Budesonide is an inhaled corticosteroid with high topical potency and low systemic activity recommended in the treatment of chronic asthma.

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of inhaled budesonide via a breath-activated, multi-dose, dry-powder inhaler.

TYPE OF STUDY

Multicenter randomized parallel-group, placebo-controlled, double-blind, clinical trial.

SETTING

Multicenter study in the university units.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult patients with mild-to-moderate asthma that was not controlled using bronchodilator therapy alone.

PROCEDURES

Comparison of budesonide 400 microg administered twice daily via a breath-activated, multi-dose, dry-powder inhaler with placebo, in 43 adult patients (aged 15 to 78 years) with mild-to-moderate asthma (FEV1 71% of predicted normal) that was not controlled using bronchodilator therapy alone.

MAIN MEASUREMENTS

Efficacy was assessed by pulmonary function tests and asthma symptom control (as perceived by the patients) and the use of rescue medication.

RESULTS

Budesonide 400 microg (bid) was significantly more effective than placebo in improving morning peak expiratory flow (mean difference: 67.9 l/min; P < 0.005) and FEV1 (mean difference: 0.60 l; P < 0.005) over the 8-week treatment period. Onset of action, assessed by morning peak expiratory flow, occurred within the first two weeks of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Budesonide via a breath-activated, multi-dose, dry-powder inhaler results in a rapid onset of asthma control, which is maintained over time and is well tolerated in adults with mild-to-moderate asthma.

Dose-dependent effects of inhaled mometasone furoate on airway function and inflammation after allergen inhalation challenge

Comparisons of the potency of different inhaled corticosteroids, delivery devices, and treatment regimens in the management of asthma can only be made when outcome measurements display a dose-dependent effect. These outcomes have been difficult to identify. In this study, we compared in a randomized, double-blind, crossover design, the effects of 6 d treatment with placebo and three doses (50, 100, and 400 microg, twice daily) of mometasone furoate delivered by dry powder inhaler (MF-DPI) on responses after allergen inhalation challenge. Twelve mild asthmatic subjects with dual responses after allergen inhalation were studied. Outcome measurements included early and late asthmatic responses, the change in methacholine airway responsiveness 24 h after challenge, and sputum eosinophilia measured 7 and 24 h after challenge. All three doses of MF-DPI demonstrated similar attenuation of early responses and allergen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness relative to placebo (p < 0.05). The late maximal %fall in FEV(1) after placebo treatment was 23.5% and was significantly reduced in a dose-dependent manner to 12.3%, 11.0%, and 5.9% for the 50-, 100-, and 400-microg twice-daily treatments (p = 0.007). The allergen-induced increase in sputum eosinophilia (x10(4) cells/ml) 24 h after challenge during placebo treatment was 60.2 and was significantly reduced to 24.0, 15.3, and 6.2 for the 50-, 100-, and 400-microg twice-daily treatments. MF-DPI is effective at attenuating allergen-induced early and late responses, airway hyperresponsiveness, and sputum eosinophilia, and dose-response effects exist for the attenuation of the late response.

Dose-response relation of inhaled fluticasone propionate in adolescents and adults with asthma: meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To examine the dose-response relation of inhaled fluticasone propionate in adolescents and adults with asthma.

DESIGN

Meta-analysis of placebo controlled, randomised clinical trials that presented data on at least one outcome measure of asthma and that used at least two different doses of fluticasone.

SETTING

Medline, Embase, and GlaxoWellcome's internal clinical study registers.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

FEV(1), morning and evening peak expiratory flow, night awakenings, beta agonist use, and major exacerbations.

RESULTS

Eight studies, with 2324 adolescents and adults with asthma, met the inclusion criteria. Data on doses of >500 microg/day were limited. The dose-response curve for the raw data began to reach a plateau at around 100-200 microg/day and peaked by 500 microg/day. A negative exponential model for the data, without meta-analysis, indicated that 80% of the benefit at 1000 microg/day was achieved at doses of 70-170 microg/day and 90% by 100-250 microg/day. A quadratic meta-regression showed that the maximum achievable efficacy was obtained by doses of around 500 microg/day. The odds ratio for patients remaining in a study at a dose of 200 microg/day, compared with higher doses, was 0.73 (95% confidence interval 0.49 to 1.08). Comparison of the standardised difference in FEV(1 )for an inhaled dose of 200 microg/day against higher doses showed a difference in FEV(1) of 0.13 of a standard deviation (-0.02 to 0.29).

CONCLUSIONS

In adolescent and adult patients with asthma, most of the therapeutic benefit of inhaled fluticasone is achieved with a total daily dose of 100-250 microg, and the maximum effect is achieved with a dose of around 500 microg/day. However, these findings were limited by the lack of data on individual patients and by the paucity of dose-response studies that included doses of >500 microg/day.

Clinical outcome of adding long-acting beta-agonists to inhaled corticosteroids

Current asthma management guidelines state that where a patient is receiving a low to moderate dose of inhaled corticosteroids and is still experiencing symptoms the dose of corticosteroid should be increased and, if necessary, a long-acting bronchodilator should be added. Many studies have now shown that the addition of a beta2-agonist with long-acting properties is more effective at controlling asthma symptoms than increasing the dose of corticosteroid alone. The Formoterol and Corticosteroid Establishing Therapy (FACET) study was a 12-month study comparing exacerbation rates in patients treated with budesonide (100 microg or 400 microg) twice daily alone vs, treatment with budesonide (100 microg or 400 microg) twice daily plus formoterol 9 microg twice daily (delivered dose). The addition of formoterol reduced the rates of mild and severe exacerbations compared with budesonide alone, with the lowest rates seen in patients receiving high-dose budesonide and formoterol. There was no difference in the profile of exacerbations in any groups, indicating formoterol does not mask any signs of inflammation. The addition of formoterol to budesonide was also shown to result in improved lung function (as measured by peak expiratory flow rate and forced expiratory volume in 1 second), night-time awakenings and the use of as-needed medication when compared with an increase in the dose of budesonide. In all cases, increasing the dose of budesonide and addition of formoterol resulted in the most improvement and a significant increase in quality of life, measured by Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), was noted. In conclusion, the addition of formoterol to established treatment with inhaled corticosteroids provides superior asthma control compared with an increase in the dose of corticosteroid alone.

Inhalation therapy of the future--how will it change the way we treat asthma?

Inhalation of drugs has made a great difference in terms of optimizing asthma therapy. The challenge for the next generation of inhalers will be to provide still greater benefits to patients in terms of efficacy, safety, and convenience. Dry powder inhalers (DPIs) are innovative new inhalation devices and comparisons with pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs) show that DPIs are at least as efficient at delivering drugs, and may be a superior delivery device for some drugs. To compare different inhaler devices, drug dose comparisons that lie on the slope of the dose-response curve should be selected, and it is important to analyze the risk:benefit ratio (therapeutic ratio). Some of the new devices contain aerosols with a smaller particle size than current designs. Monodispersed aerosols with a very narrow range of particle sizes may target drug delivery to specific areas of the lung where it is most effective. However, as smaller particles are more easily absorbed into the pulmonary circulation via the alveoli, these formulations may be associated with a higher incidence of systemic side effects. The optimal particle size required to maximize the therapeutic ratio of a molecule may be different for a beta2-agonist than for an inhaled corticosteroid. A greater understanding of this relationship will be required if we are to achieve better drug targeting with future inhalers.

Once-daily budesonide via Turbuhaler improves symptoms in adults with persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of twice-daily budesonide Turbuhaler (Pulmicort Turbuhaler, AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE) for the treatment of mild to severe asthma.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of budesonide Turbuhaler administered once daily each morning with placebo in inhaled corticosteroid-naive adults with persistent asthma.

METHODS

In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study, 177 adults (aged 18 to 70 years) received placebo or once-daily budesonide Turbuhaler (400 microg) for 12 weeks. Efficacy variables included mean changes from baseline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and AM/PM peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), and nighttime/daytime asthma symptom scores, patient discontinuations, use of breakthrough medication (albuterol), forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of FVC (FEF25%-75%), and quality of life assessments. Safety was evaluated based on adverse events, physical examinations, vital signs, and laboratory tests.

RESULTS

Demographic and baseline characteristics were comparable between study groups. The mean percentages of predicted FEV1 at baseline were 71.9 +/- 9.8 in patients receiving budesonide Turbuhaler and 70.6 +/- 11.0 in patients receiving placebo. Mean changes from baseline over the 12-week treatment period in FEV1 were significantly (P = 0.007) improved in patients receiving once-daily budesonide Turbuhaler compared with placebo (0.31 L and 0.17 L, respectively). Significant (P < or = 0.037) improvements over placebo also were observed in AM PEFR, nighttime/daytime asthma symptoms, and albuterol use with budesonide Turbuhaler treatment. Adverse events were generally mild or moderate in intensity and similar between study groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Budesonide Turbuhaler 400 microg administered once daily in the AM is efficacious and safe for inhaled corticosteroid-naive asthmatic adults.

High or standard initial dose of budesonide to control mild-to-moderate asthma?

Guidelines on the use of inhaled steroids in asthma advocate that the daily dose should be chosen according to the severity of the disease. However, the question of the optimal starting dose remains to be properly addressed, as does the issue of the adjustment in dose required for a given patient. Whether a high initial dose of budesonide (800 microg b.i.d) was more efficacious than a standard dose (200 microg b.i.d) in controlling mild-to-moderate asthma was investigated, and whether the dose could be decreased, based on peak expiratory flow (PEF), symptom-score, beta2-agonist use in a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group 18-week study. One-hundred and sixty-nine patients (mean age 38 yrs, mean forced expiratory volume in one second 74% predicted) were enrolled. No difference was detected between the two groups in improvement in morning PEF (+61 L x min(-1) in the high-dose group, +60 L x min(-1) in the standard-dose group by 16 weeks). Morning and evening PEF values stabilized before the end of the first 4 weeks. No difference between groups was observed in symptom score, beta2-agonist use, number of exacerbation per interval and the best forced expiratory volume in one second achieved. The proportion of subjects being able to decrease the doses of budesonide was similar in both treatment strategies. It is concluded that both high and standard initial doses are equally effective in controlling symptoms and improving lung function in mild-to-moderate asthma.

Onset of bronchodilation of budesonide/formoterol vs. salmeterol/fluticasone in single inhalers

Combinations of inhaled glucocorticoids and long-acting beta2-agonists in the same inhaler device have become available in recent years. In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled and crossover study we have evaluated the onset of action of budesonide and formoterol in a single inhaler (Symbicort Turbuhaler) and that of the fixed combination of salmeterol and fluticasone (Seretide Diskus). Thirty patients with a mean FEV1 of 2.54 l (range: 1.48-4.28) and a mean inclusion reversibility in FEV1 of 19.1% were included. Single doses of budesonide/formoterol 160/4.5 microg and 2x (160/4.5) microg, salmeterol/fluticasone 50/250 microg, or placebo were given. Serial measurements of FEV1 were performed over 3 h. The combination of one or two inhalations of budesonide/formoterol showed a faster onset of action than salmeterol/fluticasone, both evaluated as mean FEV1 at 3 min (2.74, 2.75 and 2.56 l respectively P<0.001 for both doses of budesonide/formoterol), or as average FEV1 from 0 to 15 min (2.80, 2.83 and 2.67 l respectively P<0.001 for both doses of budesonide/formoterol). For placebo, mean FEV1 at 3 min was 2.46 l, and the average FEV1 at 0-15 min was 2.50 l. Furthermore, budesonide/formoterol at both doses resulted in higher FEV1 than salmeterol/fluticasone at 3 h. We conclude that the combination of budesonide/formoterol has a faster onset of action than salmeterol/fluticasone.

Dose-ranging study of mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler in the treatment of moderate persistent asthma using fluticasone propionate as an active comparator

BACKGROUND

Mometasone furoate (MF; Schering-Plough, Madison, NJ), is a glucocorticoid with high local potency and low potential systemic availability.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the relative efficacy and safety of a new formulation of MF, coupled with a recently designed dry powder inhaler (DPI), in the treatment of patients with moderate persistent asthma. Fluticasone propionate administered by Diskhaler (FP Diskhaler, 250 microg twice a day; Glaxo Wellcome, Research Triangle Park, NC) was used as an active control.

DESIGN

A randomized, parallel group, double-blind (for MF-DPI dosage), evaluator-blind (for MF-DPI vs FP) trial.

SETTING

Sixty centers in 20 countries.

PATIENTS

Seven hundred thirty-three patients with moderate persistent asthma on inhaled corticosteroid treatment.

INTERVENTIONS

Discontinuation of previous inhaled corticosteroid and initiation of one of four study treatments: three doses of MF-DPI (100, 200, and 400 microg twice daily) and one of FP (250 microg twice daily >12 weeks).

RESULTS

FEV1 (primary efficacy variable) was evaluated as the mean change from baseline to endpoint (last evaluable visit). All dosage groups showed improvement at endpoint. Only 400 microg twice daily of MF-DPI (+0.19 L) was statistically different from 100 microg twice daily of MF-DPI (+0.07 L; P = 0.02). MF-DPI (200 microg twice daily) and FP Diskhaler groups showed similar improvement (+0.16 L). Greater improvement in most secondary variables (forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of vital capacity, and morning and evening peak expiratory flows) also resulted from treatment with 200 or 400 microg twice daily of MF-DPI or with FP Diskhaler, compared with 100 microg twice daily of MF-DPI. Overall, a total daily 800-microg dose of MF-DPI conferred no significant additional benefit >400 microg of MF-DPI. The incidence of oral candidiasis was 1%, 7%, 10%, and 10% in the 100, 200, and 400 microg twice daily of MF-DPI and FP groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A total daily dose of 400 microg of MF-DPI provides clinical benefit comparable to that observed with a total daily dose of 500 microg of FP Diskhaler.

Efficacy of budesonide Turbuhaler compared with that of beclomethasone dipropionate pMDI in Japanese patients with moderately persistent asthma

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of budesonide Turbuhaler with that of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) pMDI.

METHODOLOGY

Three hundred and fifty adult asthma patients (mean age 52.7 years, mean baseline morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) 294 L/min (< 80% predicted normal)), taking BDP via pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI), 400 microg daily for at least 2 months, were randomized in an open 6 week study to receive daily doses of either budesonide 100 microg or 400 microg twice daily via Turbuhaler or continued treatment with BDP, 100 microg four times daily. The primary efficacy variable was the mean change in morning PEF from baseline to the end of treatment. Outcome was also assessed using symptom scores and investigators' assessments employed in Japanese clinical trials.

RESULTS

At the end of the 6 week treatment period, mean morning PEF improved significantly from baseline in both budesonide groups, 16 L/min and 33 L/min in the 200 microg and 800 microg groups, respectively, but not in the BDP group, 5 L/min. There was no significant difference between 200 microg budesonide and 400 microg BDP treatment in the effect on PEF (P = 0.29), but 800 microg budesonide was significantly superior to BDP (P < 0.001). Final assessment of improvement and usefulness ratings showed that both budesonide treatments were significantly superior to BDP (P < 0.001). All treatments were well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Budesonide Turbuhaler (200 microg) was as effective as 400 microg BDP pMDI. The efficacy of budesonide was improved significantly by increasing the dosage to 800 microg daily. The study design shows the importance of including a higher dose treatment group when comparing two formulations of inhaled corticosteroids in order to determine whether the treatments to be compared are on the steep part of the dose-response curve. Without that information, comparative studies are usually inconclusive.

Budesonide at different doses for chronic asthma

BACKGROUND

Inhaled budesonide (BUD) is available in a range of doses for treating chronic asthma.

OBJECTIVES

To quantitatively assess the efficacy and safety of budesonide at different doses in order to establish whether a clinically significant dose response profile exists.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A search was carried out for Controlled and Randomised Clinical Trials (RCTs) using the Cochrane Airways Group trial register, correspondence with trial authors and the manufacturer.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials in children and adults comparing one dose of budesonide to a second dose in the treatment of chronic asthma. Two reviewers independently assessed articles for inclusion and methodological quality.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

One reviewer extracted data; authors were contacted to clarify missing information. Quantitative analyses where undertaken using Review Manager.

MAIN RESULTS

24 studies were selected for inclusion in the review (3907 subjects). In non-oral steroid treated, mild to moderately severe asthma no clinically worthwhile differences in FEV1, morning PEFR, symptom scores or rescue beta2 agonist use were apparent across a dose range of 200-1600 mcg/d. However, in moderate to severe asthma there was a significant reduction in the likelihood of trial withdrawal due to asthma exacerbation with BUD 800 mcg/d compared to 200 mcg/d: RR 3.93 (95% CI, 1.4 to 10.9). This result was largely weighted by a single large high quality RCT. In a single study in patients receiving oral corticosteroids, clinically significant improvements favouring high dose BUD (1600 mcg/d) over low dose (200 mcg/d) were apparent for FEV1 and morning PEFR. In two studies there was no dose dependent oral steroid sparing effect for BUD 1600 mcg/d v 800 or 400 mcg/d. Statistically significant, dose dependent suppression of 24 hour urinary free cortisol excretion and serum cortisol post synthetic ACTH infusion over the dose range 800-3200 mcg/d were apparent but the clinical significance of these findings is unclear.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Budesonide exhibits a clinically significant dose response effect for improvement in FEV1 in severe asthma and reduction of exacerbations in moderate to severe asthma. No significant dose dependent improvements in FEV1, PEFR or symptoms are evident in non-oral steroid treated asthmatics with mild to moderate disease. Dose dependent alterations in sensitive measures of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal function were evident but the clinical significance of these changes is unclear.

Budesonide for chronic asthma in children and adults

BACKGROUND

Inhaled budesonide is a widely used inhaled corticosteroid for asthma.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this review was to compare the efficacy of budesonide with placebo in the treatment of chronic asthma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Airways Group Trial Register and reference lists of articles was searched. We contacted trialists for additional studies and searched abstracts of major respiratory society meetings (1997-1999).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials in children and adults comparing budesonide to placebo in the treatment of chronic asthma.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed articles for inclusion and methodological quality. One reviewer extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

43 studies met the inclusion criteria (2801 subjects). In non-oral steroid treated asthmatics, budesonide led to significant improvements in a number of measures of airway function. These included FEV1, Weighted Mean Difference (WMD) 3.7% predicted (95% CI 0.1, 7.2%); improvement in morning peak flow (PEF) from baseline WMD 29 L/min (95% CI 22, 36 L/min); improvement in evening PEF from baseline WMD 21 L/min (95% CI 13, 29 L/min). Varying methods of reporting symptoms limited the pooling of studies but all high methodological quality studies demonstrated significant improvements compared to placebo. Health status was not reported. Risk of trial withdrawal due to asthma exacerbation was lower with budesonide compared to placebo, relative risk 0.17 (95% CI 0.09, 0.33). Doses of 500-800 mcg/d appeared to have slightly larger effect sizes than lower doses, but no advantage for high doses were apparent. A single high quality RCT reported significant reductions in daily prednisolone requirement and the number of patients able to discontinue prednisolone completely in budesonide treated subjects compared to placebo. No difference in risk of oropharyngeal soreness/hoarseness or oral Candidiasis was apparent for budesonide compared to placebo. Long-term risk of adrenal insufficiency was not reported.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

This review strongly supports use of budesonide in chronic asthma. Consensus guidelines for chronic asthma suggest titrating inhaled steroid dose to individual requirements. Evidence from this review of trials does not present a case for routine dose titration above 800 mcg/d.

A double-blind, placebo-controlled dose-response study with budesonide Turbuhaler in Japanese asthma patients. Japanese Pulmicort Turbuhaler study group

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the dose-response for inhaled budesonide via Turbuhaler in Japanese patients with mild to moderate asthma.

METHODOLOGY

Inhaled budesonide 100 microg, 200 microg, 400 microg or placebo was administered twice daily via Turbuhaler for 6 weeks, to 267 adult Japanese patients (mean age 51 years) with mild-to-moderate, non-steroid-dependent bronchial asthma, in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel group study. The patients had to be symptomatic for more than 3 days/week and have an average morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) 50-80% of predicted normal value.

RESULTS

The response to budesonide was rapid, all treatments showing a significant improvement in morning PEF after 1 week (P<0.05). During week 6, mean improvements of 15, 45, 53 and 71 L/min were observed for the placebo, 200 microg, 400 microg and 800 microg budesonide groups, respectively. Compared with placebo all improvements in the budesonide groups were statistically significant and a significant dose-response was demonstrated (P<0.001). The difference between the 200 microg and 800 microg doses was significant. Also, for several secondary efficacy variables (e.g. evening PEF, symptom score, treatment score, daily activity score and sleep score) significant dose-responses were shown. Other variables included the investigators' assessments of improvement and usefulness. They also showed statistically significant dose-response relationships and confirmed the rapid onset of action. Budesonide was well tolerated at all tested doses, with a low incidence of adverse events, all of which were minor in severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Budesonide Turbuhaler in the doses 100 microg to 400 microg twice daily was effective, well tolerated and showed a rapid onset of action in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma. Dose-response was demonstrated for several variables of clinical efficacy.

Inhaled budesonide decreases airway inflammatory response to allergen

To define the mechanisms by which inhaled glucocorticosteroid regulates allergen-induced airway inflammation, a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study with inhaled budesonide was conducted in 14 subjects with allergic asthma. After baseline bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), subjects were randomized to budesonide (400 microgram, twice daily) or placebo treatment for 4 wk. At the end of each treatment phase, whole-lung allergen inhalation challenge was performed, followed by BAL 48 h later. Budesonide treatment improved the FEV(1), attenuated both the immediate- and late-phase response to allergen, and prevented the increase in bronchial hyperresponsiveness after allergen challenge. Budesonide treatment also decreased allergen-induced airway eosinophilia. To determine the effects of budesonide on airway cell function, BAL cells were stimulated ex vivo with the T cell mitogen PHA, and cytokine generation was measured by ELISA. Budesonide decreased ex vivo generation of IL-5 and IFN-gamma by BAL cells. Ex vivo IL-5 production was significantly correlated with the number of airway eosinophils (r(s) = 0.61), and levels of eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN) (r(s) = 0.57) and IL-5 (r(s) = 0.52) in BAL fluid. Moreover, PHA-induced IL-5 generation correlated with FEV(1) fall during the late-phase response to allergen (r(s) = 0.60). Budesonide decreased circulating eosinophils and serum levels of IL-5, but did not reduce IL-5 generation by peripheral blood mononuclear cells. The reduction in circulating eosinophils correlated with the decrease in levels of EDN (r(s) = 0.61) in BAL fluid and late response to inhaled allergen (r(s) = 0.51). These findings suggest that long-term treatment with inhaled budesonide reduces airway cell generation of cytokines, specifically IL-5, which then decreases circulating eosinophils and their availability for recruitment to the airway after allergen exposure.

Once-daily mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler in the treatment of patients with persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

Although inhaled glucocorticoids are recommended for all stages of persistent asthma, compliance with long-term therapy is often poor, leading to significant morbidity and mortality. A simplified, once-daily dosing regimen may foster improved compliance.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily (AM) administration of mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler (MF DPI) 200 microg and 400 microg with placebo in patients with asthma previously maintained only on short-acting inhaled beta-adrenergic receptor agonists.

METHODS

This was a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study. The mean change from baseline to endpoint (last treatment visit) for FEV1 was the primary efficacy variable.

RESULTS

At endpoint, both doses of MF DPI were significantly more effective than placebo (P < or = .05) in improving FEV1. Based on morning peak expiratory flow rate, once-daily MF DPI 400 microg was more effective than placebo (P < or = .001) at endpoint. Both active treatments also demonstrated improvement at endpoint in asthma symptom scores, physician-evaluated response to therapy and use of rescue medication. Although both MF DPI dosages were efficacious, MF DPI 400 microg provided additional improvement in some measures of pulmonary function (eg, morning PEFR) when these agents were administered once daily in the morning. Both doses of MF DPI were well tolerated and treatment-related adverse events occurred at a similar incidence among the three treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate that once-daily (AM) MF DPI provides a convenient and effective treatment option for patients with mild or moderate persistent asthma.

Inhaled corticosteroid therapy in newly detected mild asthma

Inhaled corticosteroids are the most effective medications currently available to treat symptomatic asthma, and are free of clinically relevant unwanted effects, when used at the doses needed to provide optimal control in most patients with asthma. Inhaled corticosteroids also improve the physiological abnormalities of variable airflow obstruction and airway hyperresponsiveness that characterise asthma. Inhaled corticosteroids are also cost-beneficial when compared with other treatments, even in patients with milder asthma who are treated in primary care. For these reasons, inhaled corticosteroids are now being considered as first-line therapy for patients with regular daily asthma symptoms. Inhaled corticosteroids are, however, often not utilised until other treatments have been demonstrated not to provide optimal asthma control. Available evidence from both children and adults with asthma suggests that the benefits achieved from inhaled corticosteroids are reduced when their introduction as therapy is delayed for several years after persistent symptoms develop. For this reason, corticosteroids should be started soon after a diagnosis is made and persistent symptoms develop. It is not yet known, however, whether inhaled corticosteroids should be used in asthmatic patients who have very mild and infrequent symptoms and who have normal airway calibre most of the time. The current consensus statements do not recommend regular treatment in such patients. Airway biopsies from these asthmatic patients do show evidence of airway inflammation and structural changes; however, we do not yet know whether they lose lung function more rapidly than individuals without asthma, or whether the morbidity associated with very mild asthma warrants the use of regular treatment. This issue is being addressed in a large, multinational, placebo-controlled trial. The results of this study (available in 3 more years) will resolve this persisting question about inhaled corticosteroid use in mild asthma.

Dose-response evaluation of the therapeutic index for inhaled budesonide in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma

PURPOSE

Inhaled corticosteroids have beneficial effects on pulmonary function and inflammation in patients with asthma, but they also cause systemic adverse effects, such as adrenal suppression. We evaluated the therapeutic index of inhaled corticosteroids in asthmatic patients by comparing their dose-response effects on lung function, surrogate markers of airway inflammation, and tests of adrenal function.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

After a 10-day placebo run-in, we evaluated the effects of 200 microg, 400 microg, and 800 microg of inhaled budesonide, each dose given twice daily sequentially for 3 weeks in 26 patients, aged 35 +/- 12 years (mean +/- SD), with mild-to-moderate asthma. Measurements were made of bronchial reactivity, exhaled nitric oxide (a marker of airway inflammation), spirometry, serum eosinophilic cationic protein concentration, and 10-hour overnight urinary cortisol excretion. Plasma cortisol levels were measured at 8 AM and after stimulation with human corticotropin releasing factor.

RESULTS

For measurements of pulmonary function and exhaled nitric oxide, there was a plateau in the mean response to budesonide between 400 microg (low dose) and 800 microg (medium dose) per day, whereas for eosinophilic cationic protein and bronchial challenge, maximal benefits occurred between 800 and 1,600 microg (high dose) per day. Effects on plasma cortisol levels showed maximal suppression at 1,600 microg of budesonide per day. The proportion of patients with an optimal therapeutic index, in terms of a good airway response (fourfold decrease in bronchial hyperreactivity) and minimal systemic response (overnight urinary cortisol greater than 20 nmol), was similar at low-dose (46%) and at high-dose (52%) budesonide. The proportion of patients with a suboptimal therapeutic index, a good airway response with a marked systemic response (overnight urinary cortisol greater than 20 nmol), increased from 4% at low dose to 38% at high dose.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with mild-to-moderate atopic asthma, there were dose-related effects of budesonide on surrogate markers of inflammation (bronchial hyperreactivity and serum eosinophilic cationic protein), although higher doses were associated with adrenal suppression and a decrease in the therapeutic index.

Once-daily budesonide inhalation suspension for the treatment of persistent asthma in infants and young children

BACKGROUND

Inhaled glucocorticosteroids (GCS) are the most effective long-term controller medications for the treatment of persistent asthma. Currently, however, available delivery devices limit their use in young children. A nebulized formulation of budesonide has been developed to address the needs of infants and young children.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-daily budesonide inhalation suspension in children 6 months to 8 years old with mild persistent asthma not on inhaled GCS.

METHODS

Three hundred fifty-nine children were randomized to receive once-daily budesonide inhalation suspension (0.25 mg, 0.50 mg, or 1.0 mg) or placebo via a Pari LC-Jet Plus nebulizer for 12 weeks. Efficacy assessments included nighttime/daytime asthma symptoms, pulmonary function (subset of patients), rescue medication use, and treatment discontinuations. Safety was based on adverse events and assessment of HPA-axis function.

RESULTS

Demographics, baseline characteristics, asthma symptoms, and pulmonary function were similar across treatment groups. Mean nighttime/daytime asthma symptom scores were 1.19 +/- 0.63 and 1.34 +/- 0.53, respectively. Mean duration of asthma was 36.3 months and mean FEV1 was 81.3% of predicted with 27.7% reversibility. Following 12 weeks of treatment, all budesonide inhalation suspension doses produced significant improvements in nighttime/daytime symptoms (P < or = .049) and significant decreases in rescue medication use (P < or = .038) compared with placebo. Significant improvements (P < or = .044) in FEV1 were observed in the 0.5- and 1.0-mg budesonide inhalation suspension groups. There were no differences between doses of budesonide inhalation suspension. Adverse events and basal and ACTH-stimulated cortisol levels were similar among all groups.

CONCLUSION

Once-daily administration of budesonide inhalation suspension was well tolerated and effective for the treatment of mild persistent asthma in infants and young children not adequately controlled with bronchodilators or non-GCS antiinflammatory treatments.

Dose-ranging study of a new steroid for asthma: mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler

A new formulation of mometasone furoate (MF) for administration by dry powder inhaler (DPI) was evaluated for the treatment of asthma. A 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled dose-ranging study compared the efficacy and safety of three doses of MF DPI (100, 200 and 400 mcg b.i.d) with beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) 168 mcg b.i.d. administered by metered dose inhaler in 365 adult or adolescent patients being treated with inhaled glucocorticoids. The mean change from baseline to endpoint (last treatment visit) for forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) was the primary efficacy variable. Secondary efficacy variables included other objective measures of pulmonary function [forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory flow 25-75% (FEV25-75%.) and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR)] as well as subjective measures of therapeutic response (patients' daily evaluation of asthma symptoms and physicians' evaluation). At endpoint, all four active treatments were significantly more effective than placebo (P < 0.01) in improving FEV1 (MF DPI 5 to 7%, BDP 3%, placebo -6.6%) and all other measures of pulmonary function (FVC: MF DPI 4 to 5%, BDP 2%, placebo -4.7%; FEF25-75%: MF DPI 6 to 18%, BDP 7.5%, placebo -9.5%; PEFR (AM): MF DPI 5 to 10%, BDP 5.7%, placebo -7%). A consistent trend was observed for better improvement in patients treated with MF DPI 200 mcg b.i.d. than with MF DPI 100 mcg b.i.d., with no apparent additional benefit of MF DPI 400 mcg b.i.d. Results for the MF DPI 100 mcg b.i.d. and BDP 168 mcg b.i.d. treatment groups were similar. Patients' and physicians' subjective evaluations of symptoms found similar improvement in the MF DPI 200 and 400 mcg b.i.d. treatment groups, which were slightly better than that in the MF DPI 100 mcg b.i.d. group. Symptoms tended to worsen in the placebo group. MF DPI was well tolerated at all dose levels and the most frequently reported treatment-related adverse effects were headache, pharyngitis and oral candidiasis. No evidence of HPA-axis suppression was detected in any treatment group. In summary, all doses of MF DPI were well tolerated and significantly improved lung function and MF DPI 400 mcg (200 mcg b.i.d.) was the optimal dose in this study of patients with moderate persistent asthma.

Therapeutic effect of zafirlukast as monotherapy in steroid-naive patients with severe persistent asthma

STUDY OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the efficacy of the leukotriene receptor antagonist zafirlukast (Accolate), 20 mg twice daily, as monotherapy in patients with severe persistent asthma (defined by an FEV1 < 60% of predicted before treatment and frequent night-time symptoms).

DESIGN

Data were analyzed from a subgroup of 261 steroid-naive patients (zafirlukast, n = 149; placebo, n = 112) from four randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 13-week trials with similar experimental designs, entry criteria, and clinical assessments.

PATIENTS

These patients were mostly men (57%) older than 30 years (56%) with pulmonary obstruction, ie, FEV1/FVC ratio < 0.7 (79%), and reversible airway disease demonstrated by a 15% increase in FEV1 after inhaled bronchodilator use.

RESULTS

At end point, patients who received zafirlukast monotherapy had significant (p < 0.05) improvements from baseline, and compared with placebo, in FEV1, morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF), daytime asthma symptoms, nighttime awakenings, and beta2-agonist use. A stratified analysis based on the FEV1/FVC ratio showed an interaction between treatment and the amount of airflow obstruction for nighttime awakenings and mornings with asthma. Moreover, 37% of patients in both treatment groups had PEF variability > or = 20% (an indirect measure of airway inflammation). Zafirlukast patients with PEF variability > or = 20% had increases from baseline in the morning and evening PEF of approximately 40 and 11 L/min, respectively. For patients who take zafirlukast and who have a PEF variability of < 20%, the morning and evening PEF increased by 25 and 30 L/min, respectively. Regardless of the degree of PEF variability, zafirlukast significantly (p < 0.05) increased morning and evening PEF compared with placebo.

CONCLUSION

Patients with severe persistent asthma who received zafirlukast as monotherapy had clinically significant improvements across all efficacy measures compared with placebo and significant reductions in PEF variability.

Effect of differing doses of inhaled budesonide on markers of airway inflammation in patients with mild asthma

BACKGROUND

It is desirable to prescribe the minimal effective dose of inhaled steroids to control asthma. To ensure that inflammation is suppressed whilst using the lowest possible dose, a sensitive and specific method for assessing airway inflammation is needed.

METHODS

The usefulness of exhaled nitric oxide (NO), sputum eosinophils, and methacholine airway responsiveness (PC20) for monitoring airway inflammatory changes following four weeks of treatment with an inhaled corticosteroid (budesonide via Turbohaler) were compared. Mild stable steroid naive asthmatic subjects were randomised into two double blind, placebo controlled studies. The first was a parallel group study involving three groups receiving either 100 micrograms/day budesonide (n = 8), 400 micrograms/day budesonide (n = 7), or a matched placebo (n = 6). The second was a crossover study involving 10 subjects randomised to receive 1600 micrograms budesonide or placebo. The groups were matched with respect to age, PC20, baseline FEV1 (% predicted), exhaled NO, and sputum eosinophilia.

RESULTS

There were significant improvements in FEV1 following 400 micrograms and 1600 micrograms budesonide (11.3% and 6.5%, respectively, p < 0.05). This was accompanied by significant reductions in eosinophil numbers in induced sputum (0.7 and 0.9 fold, p < 0.05). However, levels of exhaled NO were reduced following each budesonide dose while PC20 was improved only with 1600 micrograms budesonide. These results suggest that exhaled NO and PC20 may not reflect the control of airway inflammation as accurately as the number of eosinophils in sputum. There were dose dependent changes in exhaled NO, sputum eosinophils, and PC20 to inhaled budesonide but a plateau response of exhaled NO was found at a dose of 400 micrograms daily.

CONCLUSION

Monitoring the number of eosinophils in induced sputum may be the most accurate guide to establish the minimum dose of inhaled steroids needed to control inflammation. This, however, requires further studies involving a larger number of patients.