The cost of treating community-acquired pneumonia

National study of antibiotic use in emergency department visits for pneumonia, 1993 through 2008

OBJECTIVES

The Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) and American Thoracic Society (ATS) developed guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP); however, there are sparse data on actual rates of antibiotic use in the emergency department (ED) setting.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) for ED visits during 1993 through 2008 for adults with a diagnosis of pneumonia.

RESULTS

During the study period there were an estimated 23,252,000 pneumonia visits, representing 1.8% of all ED visits. The visit rate for pneumonia during this 16-year period may have increased (p trend = 0.055). Overall, 66% of adult patients with a primary diagnosis of pneumonia had documentation of an antibiotic administered while in the ED. There was an increase in antibiotic administration for adults with pneumonia from 1993 through 2008 (49% to 80%; p trend < 0.001). Specifically, there was an increase in use of macrolides from 1993 to 2006 (20% to 30%, p trend < 0.001) and a marked increase in use of quinolones from 0% to 39% from 1993 through 2008 (p trend < 0.001). Penicillin and cephalosporin use remained stable. Use of an antibiotic consistent with 2007 IDSA/ATS guidelines increased from 22% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 16% to 27%) of cases in 1993-1994 to 68% (95% CI = 63% to 73%) of cases in 2007-2008 (p trend < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

ED visit rates for pneumonia increased slightly from 1993 through 2008. Although antibiotic administration in the ED has increased for adults with CAP, guideline-concordant antibiotics may not be consistently administered.

Tele-Dysphagia management: an opportunity for prevention, cost-savings and advanced training

Many patients survive severe stroke because of aggressive management in intensive care units. However, acquiring pneumonia during the post-onset phase significantly reduces both the quality and likelihood of survival. Aspiration pneumonia (AP), a relatively recent addition to the list of the pneumonias, is associated with dysphagia, a swallowing disorder that may cause aspiration of swallowed food or liquids mixed with bacterial pathogens common to saliva, or by aspiration of gastric contents due to emesis or gastroesophageal reflux. While it is within the purview of speech-language pathologists to provide evaluation, treatment, and management of dysphagia, the number of patients with dysphagia is growing faster than the number of qualified dysphagia clinicians. Because dysphagia consultations via telepractice are feasible and relatively accessible from a technological standpoint, they offer a promising strategy to bring the expertise of distant dysphagia experts to patients in underserved areas. Tele-dysphagia management has the potential to increase patients’ survival, enhance the expertise of primary, local clinicians, and reduce healthcare costs. Even a modest reduction in either hospital admissions for aspiration pneumonia, or in the length of stay for AP, could save the US health care system hundreds of millions of dollars each year. Wide spread tele-dysphagia management offers significant opportunities for prevention, cost-savings and advanced training, and is therefore worthy of consideration by stakeholders in the health care system and university training programs.

Risk of death associated with use of PPIs in three cohorts of institutionalized older people in Finland

OBJECTIVES

To (1) explore clinical and demographic characteristics of users and nonusers of PPIs in 3 cohorts of institutionalized older people in Finland, and (2) compare the risk of death associated with use of PPIs in each setting.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional assessment of 3 institutionalized cohorts with 1-year follow-up of all-cause mortality.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

A total of 1389 residents of 69 assisted living facilities (first cohort), 1004 residents of long term care hospitals (second cohort), and 425 residents in acute geriatric wards or in nursing homes (third cohort).

MEASUREMENTS

Demographic, drug use, and diagnostic data were collected during structured assessments conducted by trained nurses or geriatricians. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compute unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between use of PPIs and mortality.

RESULTS

In the assisted living facility, the mortality was 20.2% (n = 74) and 20.4% (n = 208) among users and nonusers of PPIs, respectively (P = 0.94). PPIs were not associated with mortality in unadjusted or adjusted analyses. In the long term care hospitals, use of PPIs was associated with increased mortality (HR, 1.36; 95% CI 1.04-1.77) when adjusted for age, sex, comorbidity, use of SSRIs, and malnutrition. In the acute geriatric wards and nursing homes, use of PPIs was associated with increased mortality (HR, 1.90; 95% CI 1.23-2.94) when adjusted for age, sex, comorbidity, delirium, and use of aspirin and SSRIs.

CONCLUSION

PPIs were not associated with mortality among residents in assisted living facilities, but were associated with increased mortality in settings where residents experienced higher levels of disability and possible susceptibility to adverse drug events.

Evaluation of the IDSA/ATS minor criteria for severe community-acquired pneumonia

INTRODUCTION

Our aim was to evaluate the minor criteria recommended by the 2007 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA)/American Thoracic Society (ATS) as predictors of 30-day mortality, the need for invasive mechanical ventilation, and/or the need for vasopressor support as markers of severity in patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).

METHODS

Patients admitted to 2 academic teaching hospitals over a 4-year period (January 1, 1999 to December 1, 2002) were identified as having CAP. We used modified minor criteria established by the 2007 IDSA/ATS guidelines. The primary outcome measure was 30-day mortality, and the secondary outcome measures were need for invasive mechanical ventilation and/or need for vasopressor support.

RESULTS

About half of the patients in the cohort (n = 352/787 [46%]) had ≥ 1 minor criterion, but only 128 (16.3%) had ≥ 3 minor criteria present at hospital admission. In the multivariable analysis, hypoxemia, multilobar infiltrates, and leukopenia were associated with 30-day mortality (P < 0.05). In addition, hypoxemia and confusion/disorientation were associated with the need for invasive mechanical ventilation and/or vasopressor support (P < 0.05). The presence of ≥ 3 minor criteria was associated with 30-day mortality (odds ratio, 4.82), and the need for invasive mechanical ventilation and/or vasopressor support (odds ratio, 2.59).

CONCLUSION

Our results show that hypoxemia, multilobar infiltrates, and leukopenia were the most predictive minor criteria for 30-day mortality. In contrast, hypoxemia and confusion/disorientation were the 2 individual minor severe criteria that were more likely to require invasive mechanical ventilation and/or vasopressor support. At least 3 2007 IDSA/ATS minor severe criteria were associated with 30-day mortality and need for invasive mechanical ventilation and/or vasopressor support.

Clinical features of spinal infection in individuals older than eighty years

PURPOSE

Japan has one of the most rapidly increasing numbers of elderly individuals; therefore, future trends in spinal infections in the elderly in other countries may be predicted by studying such characteristics in Japan. The purposes of this study were to identify whether the incidence of spinal infection in individuals more than 80 years old is increasing and to define its clinical characteristics.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 98 patients treated in our hospital for spinal infection between 1999 and 2008. Patients were divided into two groups: those admitted to our hospital during the initial five year period, and those admitted during the latter five year period. We evaluated changes in the percentage of individuals over the age of 80 years. To define the clinical characteristics of spinal infection, patients were also divided into another set of two groups: those over 80 years and those around the age of 80 years.

RESULTS

The percentage of patients over 80 years with spinal infection was significantly increasing. There was no significant difference in the gender distribution, prevalence of immunocompromised hosts, common involved levels, or mortality rate between the two age groups. The pathogenic organism was isolated in 78.6%, and of these, the rate of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or epidermidis was 2.46 times higher in the elderly group than in the younger group.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of patients over 80 years with spinal infection is expected to rapidly increase in aging societies. This advanced age group is more susceptible to infection with drug-resistant organisms, which makes infection management more difficult.

Group V phospholipase A2 in bone marrow-derived myeloid cells and bronchial epithelial cells promotes bacterial clearance after Escherichia coli pneumonia

Group V-secreted phospholipase A(2) (GV sPLA(2)) hydrolyzes bacterial phospholipids and initiates eicosanoid biosynthesis. Here, we elucidate the role of GV sPLA(2) in the pathophysiology of Escherichia coli pneumonia. Inflammatory cells and bronchial epithelial cells both express GV sPLA(2) after pulmonary E. coli infection. GV(-/-) mice accumulate fewer polymorphonuclear leukocytes in alveoli, have higher levels of E. coli in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and lung, and develop respiratory acidosis, more severe hypothermia, and higher IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-α levels than GV(+/+) mice after pulmonary E. coli infection. Eicosanoid levels in bronchoalveolar lavage are similar in GV(+/+) and GV(-/-) mice after lung E. coli infection. In contrast, GV(+/+) mice have higher levels of prostaglandin D(2) (PGD(2)), PGF(2α), and 15-keto-PGE(2) in lung and express higher levels of ICAM-1 and PECAM-1 on pulmonary endothelial cells than GV(-/-) mice after lung infection with E. coli. Selective deletion of GV sPLA(2) in non-myeloid cells impairs leukocyte accumulation after pulmonary E. coli infection, and lack of GV sPLA(2) in either bone marrow-derived myeloid cells or non-myeloid cells attenuates E. coli clearance from the alveolar space and the lung parenchyma. These observations show that GV sPLA(2) in bone marrow-derived myeloid cells as well as non-myeloid cells, which are likely bronchial epithelial cells, participate in the regulation of the innate immune response to pulmonary infection with E. coli.

Seven-day antibiotic courses have similar efficacy to prolonged courses in severe community-acquired pneumonia--a propensity-adjusted analysis

There are no studies to guide the optimal duration of therapy in severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). The aim of this study was to determine whether 7 days of antibiotic treatment is equivalent to longer-course therapy in severe CAP. In this prospective observational study, we included patients with severe CAP (CURB65 score 3-5) admitted to the hospital with signs and symptoms consistent with pneumonia. A propensity score, derived through multiple logistic regression, was used to match patients into two groups: treated for 7 days vs. treated for >7 days. Patients who died, were admitted to the intensive-care unit, developed complicated pneumonia, failed to reach clinical stability or had positive cultures for microorganisms requiring prolonged treatment within the first 7 days were excluded. Patients outside the mutual range of the propensity score were also excluded. The primary outcome of this study was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were subsequent requirement for mechanical ventilation and/or inotropic support and the development of complicated pneumonia or re-admission within 30 days. Four hundred and twelve patients were suitable for derivation of the propensity score. After matching on propensity score, 164 patients treated for 7 days were compared with 164 treated for >7 days; they were well matched in terms of age, gender, comorbidities, and physiological parameters. The results showed no significant differences in the primary and the secondary outcomes between the two groups. This study therefore suggests that, in the majority of severe CAP patients who have clinically responded, antibiotics can be safely discontinued at 7 days.

Hospital admission decision for patients with community-acquired pneumonia: variability among physicians in an emergency department

STUDY OBJECTIVE

We examine variability among emergency physicians in rate of hospitalization for patients with pneumonia and the effect of variability on clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We studied 2,069 LDS Hospital emergency department (ED) patients with community-acquired pneumonia who were aged 18 years or older during 1996 to 2006, identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision coding and compatible chest radiographs. We extracted vital signs, laboratory and radiographic results, hospitalization, and outcomes from the electronic medical record. We defined "low severity" as PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio greater than or equal to 280 mm Hg, predicted mortality less than 5% by an electronic version of CURB-65 that uses continuous and weighted elements (eCURB), and less than 3 Infectious Disease Society of America-American Thoracic Society 2007 severe pneumonia minor criteria. We adjusted hospitalization decisions and outcomes for illness severity and patient demographics.

RESULTS

Initial hospitalization rate was 58%; 10.7% of patients initially treated as outpatients were secondarily hospitalized within 7 days. Median age of admitted patients was 63 years; median eCURB predicted mortality was 2.65% (mean 6.8%) versus 46 years and 0.93% for outpatients. The 18 emergency physicians (average age 44.9 [standard deviation 7.6] years; years in practice 8.4 [standard deviation 6.9]) objectively calculated and documented illness severity in 2.7% of patients. Observed 30-day mortality for inpatients was 6.8% (outpatient mortality 0.34%) and decreased over time. Individual physician admission rates ranged from 38% to 79%, with variability not explained by illness severity, time of day, day of week, resident care in conjunction with an attending physician, or patient or physician demographics. Higher hospitalization rates were not associated with reduced mortality or fewer secondary hospital admissions.

CONCLUSION

We observed a 2-fold difference in pneumonia hospitalization rates among emergency physicians, unexplained by objective data.

Inter-rater Agreement for the Clinical Dysphagia Scale

Objective

To investigate the inter-rater agreement for the clinical dysphagia scale (CDS).

Method

Sixty-seven subjects scheduled to participate in a video-fluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) were pre-examined by two raters independently within a 24-hour interval. Each item and the total score were compared between the raters. In addition, we investigated whether subtraction of items showing low agreement or modification of rating methods could enhance inter-rater agreement without significant compromise of validity.

Results

Inter-rater agreement was excellent for the total score (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC): 0.886). Four items (lip sealing, chewing and mastication, laryngeal elevation, and reflex coughing) did not show excellent agreement (ICC: 0.696, 0.377, 0.446, and κ: 0.723, respectively). However, subtraction of each item either compromised validity, or did not improve agreement. When redefining 'history of aspiration' and 'lesion location' items, the inter-rater agreement (ICC: 0.912, 0.888, respectively) and correlation with new videofluoroscopic dysphagia score (PCC: 0.576, 0.577, respectively) were enhanced. The CDS showed better agreement and validity in stroke patients compared to non-stroke patients (ICC: 0.917 vs 0.835, PCC: 0.663 vs 0.414).

Conclusion

The clinical dysphagia scale is a reliable bedside swallowing test. We can improve inter-rater agreement and validity by refining the 'history of aspiration' and 'lesion location' item.

Low CURB-65 is of limited value in deciding discharge of patients with community-acquired pneumonia

BACKGROUND

The relationship between clinical judgment and indications of the CURB-65 score in deciding the site-of-care for patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) has not been fully investigated. The aim of this study was to evaluate reasons for hospitalization of CAP patients with CURB-65 score of 0 and 1.

METHODS

An observational, retrospective study of consecutive CAP patients was performed at the Fondazione Cà Granda, Milan, Italy, between January 2005 and December 2006. The medical records of hospitalized patients with CAP having a CURB-65 score of 0 and 1 were identified and reviewed to determine whether there existed a clinical basis to justify hospitalization.

RESULTS

Among the 580 patients included in the study, 218 were classified with a CURB-65 score of 0 or 1. Among those, 127 were hospitalized, and reasons that justified hospitalization were found in 104 (83%) patients. Main reasons for hospitalization included the presence of hypoxemia on admission (35%), failure of outpatient therapy (14%) and the presence of cardiovascular events on admission (9.7%). Used as the sole indicator for inappropriate hospitalization, the CURB-65 score had a poor positive predictive value of 52%.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the CURB-65 has been proposed as a tool to guide the site of care decision by international guidelines, this score is not ideal by itself, and should not be regarded as providing decision support information if a score of 0 and 1 is present. In CAP patients with CURB-65 scores of 0 or 1, further evaluations should be performed and completed by clinical judgment.

Modern Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Is It Cost-Effective and are Outcomes Acceptable?

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is the most important cause of death from infectious diseases in the developed world and is associated with a high economic burden. Researchers have therefore sought ways to improve CAP outcomes while reducing costs. In this review, we highlight the current evidence supporting modern approaches to CAP management, including the use of severity indices to safely increase the proportion of patients treated at home, the use of procalcitonin to decrease antibiotic use, early intravenous to oral switch of antibiotic therapy, streamlining antimicrobials, and approaches to shorten antibiotic treatment duration. Although promising evidence exists for these modern strategies, there is still a considerable lack of high-quality evidence proving noninferiority of clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness.

Discharge Delay in Patients with Community-acquired Pneumonia Managed on a Critical Pathway

INTRODUCTION

It has previously been reported that a critical pathway for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) significantly reduces bed days per patient managed but results in no difference in average length of stay, suggesting that discharge criteria were not successfully implemented. The present study sought to identify factors in the timing of discharge not taken into account by discharge criteria.

METHODS

Patients admitted with CAP and placed on a pneumonia critical pathway were studied. Patients' functional and cognitive status were evaluated using the Barthel Index, Hierarchical Assessment of Balance and Mobility (HABAM) and the Mini-Mental Status Examination. Once discharge criteria were met, the patient, a family member and the treating physician were interviewed to identify other factors contributing to length of stay.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients were enrolled in the study; 12 were discharged when they met discharge criteria and 19 stayed in hospital longer. There were no differences between patients discharged at stability versus those with an increased length of stay in terms of demographics, pneumonia severity score, functional or cognitive status at discharge using the Barthel Index (87.3+/-11.1 versus 83.8+/-8.6, respectively; P=0.46) and MMSE (27.1+/-1.1 versus 27.3+/-1.1, respectively; P=0.64); however, there was a significant difference in HABAM score at the time clinical stability was reached (22.6+/-1.3 versus 17.4+/-3.5, respectively; P=0.03), which correlated with physician and family assessments of patients' readiness for discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

HABAM may be a useful tool to identify patients at risk of remaining in hospital after objective discharge criteria are met. Additional resources may be targeted at these patients to reduce length of stay in CAP.

Fluoroquinolones in the management of community-acquired pneumonia in primary care

A literature search was conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of the respiratory fluoroquinolones (gemifloxacin, levofloxacin and moxifloxacin) and their efficacy and safety in the management of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Data show that CAP is a common presentation in primary care practice, and is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality, particularly in the elderly. Although the causative pathogens differ depending on treatment setting and patient factors, Streptococcus pneumoniae is the primary pathogen in all treatment settings. As a class, the respiratory fluoroquinolones have a very favorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile. Pharmacodynamic criteria suggest that moxifloxacin and gemifloxacin are more potent against S. pneumoniae, which may have the added benefit of reducing resistance selection and enhancing bacterial eradication. The respiratory fluoroquinolones are also generally well tolerated, and are first-line options for outpatient treatment of CAP in patients with comorbidities or previous antibiotic use.

Risk factors and severity scores in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia: prediction of severity and mortality

Morbidity and mortality in patients with moderate to severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a global problem, and CAP is a leading cause of death due to infectious diseases. Prompt initiation of expanded-spectrum antimicrobials is essential for the prevention of unnecessary mortality and complications in patients, particularly in the elderly and other at-risk populations, and the treatment decisions made by practitioners have important implications for healthcare systems when hospitalization is required. Empirical antimicrobial treatment and the appropriate management of CAP patients will initially require the proper assessment of severity and patient risk for increased mortality, as well as risk factors for difficult-to-treat bacteria. This review will examine risk factors and scoring systems that may be predictive of moderate to severe CAP, which is often linked to increased risk of mortality. Understanding and recognizing potential risk factors will allow practitioners to proactively identify patients at the highest risk for severe illness or complications, thereby, guiding site-of-care decisions, as well as the choices for empiric antibiotic regimens. The decision to hospitalize a patient with CAP should include not only a clinical perspective and laboratory and radiographic findings, but also at least one objective tool of risk assessment, all in combination with sound clinical judgment.

Fluoroquinolones in community-acquired pneumonia: guide to selection and appropriate use

Fluoroquinolone use has dramatically increased since the introduction of the first respiratory fluoroquinolone in the late 1990s. Over a relatively brief period of time, the respiratory fluoroquinolones have supplanted other first-line options as the predominant community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) therapy in hospitals. This article discusses the rise of the fluoroquinolone era, debates the comparative effectiveness of fluoroquinolones for CAP therapy, examines fluoroquinolone resistance and adverse drug reactions, and discusses new trends in pneumonia epidemiology and outcomes assessment. Overall, published data suggest that fluoroquinolone monotherapy is associated with improved patient survival compared with β-lactam monotherapy and similar survival to β-lactam plus macrolide combination therapy. Fluoroquinolone monotherapy may be associated with shorter hospital length of stay compared with β-lactam plus macrolide combination therapy, particularly in severe pneumonia or with high-dose therapy. There is insufficient evidence to conclude that any individual fluoroquinolone therapy is better than another with regards to patient mortality. Fluoroquinolones are generally well tolerated and Streptococcus pneumoniae resistance remains low; however, rare but serious adverse effects have been reported. Some members of the fluoroquinolone class have been removed from the market amidst safety concerns. Pneumonia classifications have changed and antipseudomonal fluoroquinolones may have a role in healthcare-associated pneumonia when administered in combination with other antipseudomonal and anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus therapies.

How important is age in defining the prognosis of patients with community-acquired pneumonia?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Given that the population is increasing in age, a better understanding of the relationship between chronological age and health-related outcomes (especially mortality) is needed, for both chronic diseases (e.g. diabetes) and acute illnesses (e.g. pneumonia). Our purpose was to review the impact of age on the prognosis of patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).

RECENT FINDINGS

Many studies in patients with CAP have suggested that chronological age is not necessarily independently associated with mortality. Poorer outcomes in the elderly with CAP have been related to severity of disease, comorbid disease burden, functional status, and frailty, but not to age alone. However, many of these studies suffer from 'over-adjustment' due to the use of unmodified severity scores such as the Pneumonia Severity Index or Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (that already include age) in multivariable analyses. Studies accounting for this over-adjustment suggest that age is, in fact, independently associated with mortality in hospitalized patients with CAP. Other outcomes including hospitalization and readmission rates, hospital length of stay, and cost of care are similarly associated with increasing age. Residual confounding is still a problem in many of the observational studies reviewed.

SUMMARY

Contrary to conventional wisdom, chronological age is independently associated with adverse outcomes in patients with CAP. Until better methods (or more clinically-rich datasets) for observational studies are developed that can avoid over-adjustment and better deal with residual confounding, physicians should take into account both a patient's overall health status and his or her chronological age.

Changing needs of community-acquired pneumonia

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a serious condition associated with significant morbidity and potential long-term mortality. Although the majority of patients with CAP are treated as outpatients, the greatest proportion of pneumonia-related mortality and healthcare expenditure occurs among the patients who are hospitalized. There has been considerable interest in determining risk factors and severity criteria assessments to assist with site-of-care decisions. For both inpatients and outpatients, the most common pathogens associated with CAP include Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, group A streptococci and Moraxella catarrhalis. Atypical pathogens, Gram-negative bacilli, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and viruses are also recognized aetiological agents of CAP. Despite the availability of antimicrobial therapies, the recent emergence of drug-resistant pneumococcal and staphylococcal isolates has limited the effectiveness of currently available agents. Because early and rapid initiation of empirical antimicrobial treatment is critical for achieving a favourable outcome in CAP, newer agents with activity against drug-resistant strains of S. pneumoniae and MRSA are needed for the management of patients with CAP.

One-year outcomes of community-acquired and healthcare-associated pneumonia in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System

BACKGROUND

While studies have demonstrated higher medium-term mortality for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), mortality and costs have not been characterized for healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP) over a 1-year period.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study to evaluate mortality rates and health system costs for patients with CAP or HCAP during initial hospitalization and for 1 year after hospital discharge. We selected 50 758 patients admitted to the Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system between October 2003 and May 2007. Main outcome measures included hospital, post-discharge, and cumulative mortality rates and cost during initial hospitalization and at 12 months following discharge.

RESULTS

Hospital and 1-year HCAP mortality were nearly twice that of CAP. HCAP was an independent predictor for hospital mortality (odds ratio (OR) 1.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.49-1.76) and 1-year mortality (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.87-2.11) when controlling for demographics, comorbidities, pneumonia severity, and factors associated with multidrug-resistant infection, including immune suppression, previous antibiotic treatment, and aspiration pneumonia. HCAP patients consistently had higher mortality in each stratum of the Charlson-Deyo-Quan comorbidity index. HCAP patients incurred significantly greater cost during the initial hospital stay and in the following 12 months. Demographics and comorbid conditions, particularly aspiration pneumonia, accounted for 19-33% of this difference.

CONCLUSION

HCAP represents a distinct category of pneumonia with particularly poor survival up to 1 year after hospital discharge. While comorbidities, pneumonia severity, and risk factors for multidrug-resistant infection may interact to produce even higher mortality compared to CAP, they alone do not explain the observed differences.

Thirty-day readmission rates for Medicare beneficiaries by race and site of care

CONTEXT

Understanding whether and why there are racial disparities in readmissions has implications for efforts to reduce readmissions.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether black patients have higher odds of readmission than white patients and whether these disparities are related to where black patients receive care.

DESIGN

Using national Medicare data, we examined 30-day readmissions after hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction (MI), congestive heart failure (CHF), and pneumonia. We categorized hospitals in the top decile of proportion of black patients as minority-serving. We determined the odds of readmission for black patients compared with white patients at minority-serving vs non-minority-serving hospitals.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Medicare Provider Analysis Review files of more than 3.1 million Medicare fee-for-service recipients who were discharged from US hospitals in 2006-2008.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Risk-adjusted odds of 30-day readmission.

RESULTS

Overall, black patients had higher readmission rates than white patients (24.8% vs 22.6%, odds ratio [OR], 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-1.14; P < .001); patients from minority-serving hospitals had higher readmission rates than those from non-minority-serving hospitals (25.5% vs 22.0%, OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.20-1.27; P < .001). Among patients with acute MI and using white patients from non-minority-serving hospitals as the reference group (readmission rate 20.9%), black patients from minority-serving hospitals had the highest readmission rate (26.4%; OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.28-1.42), while white patients from minority-serving hospitals had a 24.6% readmission rate (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.18-1.29) and black patients from non-minority-serving hospitals had a 23.3% readmission rate (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.16-1.23; P < .001 for each); patterns were similar for CHF and pneumonia. The results were unchanged after adjusting for hospital characteristics including markers of caring for poor patients.

CONCLUSION

Among elderly Medicare recipients, black patients were more likely to be readmitted after hospitalization for 3 common conditions, a gap that was related to both race and to the site where care was received.

CURB-65 pneumonia severity assessment adapted for electronic decision support

BACKGROUND

Accurate severity assessment is crucial to the initial management of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). The CURB-65 (confusion, uremia, respiratory rate, BP, age ≥ 65 years) score contains data that are entered routinely in electronic medical records and are, thus, electronically calculable. The aim of this study was to determine whether an electronically generated severity estimate using CURB-65 elements as continuous and weighted variables better predicts 30-day mortality than the traditional CURB-65.

METHODS

In a retrospective cohort study at a US university-affiliated community teaching hospital, we identified 2,069 patients aged 18 years or older with CAP confirmed by radiographic findings in the ED. CURB-65 elements were extracted from the electronic medical record, and 30-day mortality was identified with the Utah Population Database. Performance of a severity prediction model using continuous and weighted CURB-65 variables was compared with the traditional CURB-65 in the US derivation population and validated in the original 1,048 patients from the CURB-65 international derivation study.

RESULTS

The traditional, binary CURB-65 score predicted mortality in the US cohort with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.82. Our severity prediction model generated from continuous, weighted CURB-65 elements was superior to the traditional CURB-65, with an out-of-bag AUC of 0.86 (P < .001). This finding was validated in the international database, with an AUC of 0.85 for the electronic model compared with 0.80 for the traditional CURB-65 (P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Using CURB-65 elements as continuous and weighted data improved prediction of 30-day mortality and could be used as a real-time, electronic decision support tool or to adjust outcomes by severity when comparing processes of care.

C-reactive protein for discriminating treatment failure from slow responding pneumonia

BACKGROUND

The management of patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) who fail to improve constitutes a challenge for clinicians. This study investigated the usefulness of C-reactive protein (CRP) changes in discriminating true treatment failure from slow response to treatment.

METHODS

This prospective multicenter observational study investigated the behavior of plasma CRP levels on days 1 and 4 in hospitalized patients with CAP. We identified non-responding patients as those who had not reached clinical stability by day 4. Among them, true treatment failure and slow response situations were defined when initial therapy had to be changed or not after day 4 by attending clinicians, respectively.

RESULTS

By day 4, 78 (27.4%) out of 285 patients had not reached clinical stability. Among them, 56 (71.8%) patients were cured without changes in initial therapy (mortality 0.0%), and in 22 (28.2%) patients, the initial empirical therapy needed to be changed (mortality 40.9%). By day 4, CRP levels fell in 52 (92.9%) slow responding and only in 7 (31.8%) late treatment failure patients (p<0.001). A model developed including CRP behavior and respiratory rate at day 4 identified treatment failure patients with an area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve of 0.87 (CI 95%, 0.78-0.96).

CONCLUSION

Changes in CRP levels are useful to discriminate between true treatment failure and slow response to treatment and can help clinicians in management decisions when CAP patients fail to improve.

Management of community-acquired pneumonia: a review and update

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, affecting approximately 5.6 million patients annually in the USA, where the annual cost exceeds US$12 billion. Optimal management should be based on knowledge of the most likely etiologic pathogens for each patient, based on an assessment of specific risk factors. It is also essential to assess severity of illness, to determine the appropriate site of care, and to order appropriate diagnostic testing. New developments in CAP management have focused on recognizing newly identified pathogens, such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and novel H1N1 influenza, understanding when to utilize new microbiological diagnostic techniques, and how to use biomarkers to direct the appropriate utilization of antibiotics and to define the duration of therapy. This paper reviews recent advances in our knowledge about the diagnosis and optimal management of CAP.

Community-acquired pneumonia in the elderly

BACKGROUND

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a frequent cause of hospitalization and death among the elderly.

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews information on CAP among the elderly, including age-related changes, predisposing risk factors, causes, treatment strategies, and prevention.

METHODS

Searches of MEDLINE (January 1990-November 2009), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (January 1990-November 2009), and Google Scholar were conducted using the terms community-acquired pneumonia, pneumonia, treatment guidelines, and elderly. Additional publications were found by searching the reference lists of the identified articles. Studies that reported diagnostic criteria as well as the treatment outcomes achieved in adult patients with CAP were selected for this review.

RESULTS

Three practice guidelines, 5 reviews, and 43 studies on CAP in the elderly were identified in the literature search. Based on those publications, risk factors that predispose the elderly to pneumonia include comorbid conditions, poor functional and nutritional status, consumption of alcohol, and smoking. The clinical presentation of pneumonia in the elderly (>/=65 years of age) may be subtle, lacking the typical acute symptoms (fever, cough, dyspnea, and purulent sputum) observed in younger adults. Pneumonia should be suspected in all elderly patients who have fever, altered mental status, or a sudden decline in functional status, with or without lower respiratory tract symptoms such as cough, purulent sputum, and dyspnea. Treatment of CAP in the elderly should be guided by the latest recommendations of the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Thoracic Society (IDSA/ATS), along with consideration of local rates and patterns of antimicrobial resistance, as well as individual patient risk factors for acquiring less common or more resistant pathogens. Recommended empiric antimicrobial regimens generally consist of either a beta-lactam plus a macrolide or a respiratory fluoroquinolone alone. Adherence to the IDSA/ATS guidelines has been found to improve in-hospital mortality (adherence vs nonadherence, 8%; 95% CI, 7%-10% vs 17%; 95% CI, 14%-20%; P< 0.01), length of hospital stay (8 days; interquartile range [IQR], 5-15 vs 10 days; IQR, 6-24 days, respectively; P < 0.01), and time to clinical stability in elderly patients with CAP (percentage of stable patients by day 7, 71%; 95% CI, 68%-74% vs 57%; 95% CI, 53%-61%, respectively; P < 0.01). All elderly patients should be vaccinated against pneumococcal disease and influenza based on recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Lifestyle modifications and nutritional support are also important elements in the prevention of pneumonia in the elderly.

CONCLUSION

Adherence to established guidelines, along with customization of antimicrobial therapy based on local rates and patterns of resistance and patient-specific risk factors, likely will improve the treatment outcome of elderly patients with CAP.

Doxycycline vs. levofloxacin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia

BACKGROUND

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) affects 5-10 million adults annually in the United States with approximately 1.1 million hospitalizations. Current guidelines recommend fluoroquinolones as monotherapy for treatment of CAP in general medical wards and doxycycline monotherapy for outpatient therapy only. Fluoroquinolones are expensive and development of bacterial resistance to them has become a concern. Therefore, we studied whether doxycycline is as efficacious as levofloxacin in treatment of CAP in general medical wards.

METHODS

In this prospective double-blinded trial, non-pregnant adults with clinical and radiological evidence of pneumonia requiring hospitalization were enrolled. Patients who were septic, hypoxic requiring intubations, nursing home residents, diagnosed with severe hepatic or renal dysfunction, recently hospitalized or immunocompromised were excluded from the study. Subjects were randomly assigned to either i.v. levofloxacin 500 mg daily or doxycycline 100 mg twice daily. After discharge, patients were followed for 2 months.

RESULTS

There were 30 patients in the levofloxacin group and 35 patients in the doxycycline group. Groups were comparable in both clinical and laboratory profiles. Additionally, efficacy of treatment was not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.844). Length of stay was 5.7 +/- 2.05 days in the levofloxacin group and 4.0 +/- 1.82 days in the doxycycline group (P < 0.0012). Failure rate was similar in both groups (P = 0.893). Total antibiotic cost was $122.07 +/- 15.84 for levofloxacin and $64.98 +/- 24.4 for doxycycline (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study supports doxycycline as an effective and economical alternative therapy for levofloxacin in the empirical treatment of CAP in general medical wards.

Reported pneumonia in patients with COPD: findings from the INSPIRE study

BACKGROUND

Pneumonia is an important complication of COPD and is reported more often in patients receiving inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs). Little is known about the clinical course and factors predisposing to pneumonia in patients with COPD. We investigated patient characteristics and symptoms occurring before pneumonia reports in the Investigating New Standards for Prophylaxis in Reduction of Exacerbations (INSPIRE) study.

METHODS

This was a 2-year, double-blind, double-dummy parallel study of 1,323 patients randomized to salmeterol/fluticasone propionate 50/500 μg bid (SFC) or tiotropium 18 μg once daily (Tio). Baseline demographics, including serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, were measured, and daily record cards (DRCs) were completed.

RESULTS

We identified 87 pneumonia reports from adverse event records (SFC=62; Tio=25) in 74 patients (SFC=50; Tio=24), compared with 2,255 exacerbations (SFC=1,185; Tio=1,070). Pneumonia was more common in patients with severe dyspnea and in those with a baseline CRP level>10 mg/L. Numbers of de novo pneumonias (events that were not preceded by symptoms of an exacerbation) were similar between treatment groups, but pneumonia was more likely after either a treated or untreated unresolved exacerbation in patients receiving ICSs (SFC=32; Tio=7). Similar results were seen when analysis was confined to radiologically confirmed events.

CONCLUSIONS

Pneumonia is much less frequent than exacerbation in COPD. The excess of events with ICS treatment appears to be associated with protracted symptomatic exacerbations. Earlier identification and treatment of these events to prevent pneumonia merits further investigation.

TRIAL REGISTRY

ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT00361959; Study No.: SC040036; URL: clinicaltrials.gov.

The effects of incorporating a pneumonia severity index into the admission protocol for community-acquired pneumonia

BACKGROUND

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a common reason for admissions in the emergency department (ED). However, patient disposition is not always standardized.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of incorporating a pneumonia severity index (PSI) on admission rates and medical costs in CAP patients presenting to the ED.

METHODS

From April 2008 to March 2009, CAP patients presenting to the ED were prospectively screened and low-risk CAP patients (PSI I, II, or III) were enrolled (after group). Discharge and outpatient care were recommended for this group in the absence of other medical conditions requiring hospitalization. Data from low-risk CAP patients from May 2003 to October 2006 were also collected for comparative analysis (before group).

RESULTS

There were 365 and 174 patients in the before and after groups, respectively. The admission rate of the after group was significantly lower than that of the before group (30.4% vs. 68.2%, p < 0.01). The subsequent admission rates after ED discharge due to CAP were similar (3.2% vs. 7.7%, p = 0.10). The ultimate admission rate in the after group was significantly lower than that in the before group (32.5% vs. 70.7%, p < 0.01). Direct medical costs per patient for the before and after groups were $US 1532 and $US 1186, respectively (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporation of the PSI into the admission protocol for ED patients with CAP significantly reduced the admission rates and medical costs.

The value of prognostic indices for pneumonia

One of the most important decisions in the management of community-acquired pneumonia is deciding the care site, which affects morbidity, mortality, and costs. Clinical judgment alone is difficult and imprecise. The Pneumonia Severity Index score and the CURB-65 (confusion, urea nitrogen, respiratory rate, blood pressure, 65 years of age and older) score are validated prognostic indices to predict mortality, and they can identify low-risk patients who may be eligible for outpatient management. However, limitations of the scoring systems preclude their isolated use, and they can only be recommended as an aid to guide hospital admission decisions. The Pneumonia Severity Index score is slightly better at identifying the lowest risk patients, whereas CURB-65 is much simpler to use. As an adjunct to clinical judgment, we consider CURB-65 to be the most useful prognostic index for identifying low-risk patients.

Community acquired bacterial pneumonia

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a common and potentially life-threatening illness that continues to be a major medical problem. Among infectious diseases, CAP is the leading cause of death in the world and is associated with a substantial economic burden to health are systems around the globe.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

Recently identified clinical and biochemical tools promise to improve the assessment of CAP severity. Various prognostic scoring systems and predictive biomarkers have been proposed as tools to aid clinicians in key management decisions. This review provides a summary of current evidence about the use of prognostic scoring systems and biomarkers in the management of patients presenting with CAP. According to the existing guidelines, until more accurate and rapid diagnostic methods are available, the initial treatment for most patients with CAP will remain empirical. Some novel antibiotic and nonantibiotic therapies have recently been tested; some empirical antimicrobial regimens are still being debated. This review summarizes the recent advances in the field of therapy and novel approaches. We searched PubMed for English-language references published from 1997 to 2009 using combinations of the following terms: 'community acquired pneumonia', 'community acquired bacterial pneumonia', 'therapy', 'antibiotics', 'antimicrobials', 'prognostic scoring systems', 'biomarkers', 'diagnostic testing', 'guidelines' 'etiological diagnosis'.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

A thorough description about recent advances in the field of therapy and novel approaches of CAP, as well as a summary of current evidence about the use of prognostic scoring systems and biomarkers in the management of patients presenting with CAP, is presented.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Recent developments have made significant contributions to the management of CAP patients. However, various hot topics remain open and urgently require prospective studies in order to optimize the outcomes of CAP.

Health economics of use fluoroquinolones to treat patients with community-acquired pneumonia

Respiratory diseases account for approximately 10% of all hospital admissions in the United States. Pneumonia constitutes 35% of these cases, with an average length of stay (LOS) of 5.1 days. It is estimated that $8.4 billion to $10 billion of all annual US hospital expenditures are attributable to community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). As such, medical decisions, including empiric antibiotic choice, potentially exert an impact on hospital LOS and associated costs. In this review, we focus on the empiric antibiotic choices and associated costs of treatment for hospitalized patients with CAP, focusing on the use of fluoroquinolone therapy as recommended by the CAP guidelines.

Procalcitonin levels predict bacteremia in patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a prospective cohort trial

BACKGROUND

Guidelines recommend blood culture sampling from hospitalized patients with suspected community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). However, the yield of true-positive results is low. We investigated the benefit of procalcitonin (PCT) on hospital admission to predict blood culture positivity in CAP.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study with a derivation and validation set including 925 patients with CAP who underwent blood culture sampling on hospital admission.

RESULTS

A total of 73 (7.9%) patients had true bacteremia (43 of 463 in the derivation cohort, 30 of 462 in the validation cohort). The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of PCT in the derivation and validation cohorts was similar (derivation cohort, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.78-0.89; validation cohort, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.72-0.88). Overall, PCT was a significantly better predictor for blood culture positivity than WBC count, C-reactive protein, and other clinical parameters. In multivariate regression analysis, only antibiotic pretreatment (adjusted odds ratio, 0.25; P < .05) and PCT serum levels (adjusted odds ratio, 3.72; P < .001) were independent predictors. Overall, a PCT cutoff of 0.1 microg/L would enable reduction of the total number of blood cultures by 12.6% and still identify 99% of the positive blood cultures. Similarly, 0.25 microg/L and 0.5 microg/L cutoffs would enable reduction of blood cultures by 37% and 52%, respectively, and still identify 96% and 88%, respectively, of positive blood cultures.

CONCLUSIONS

Initial PCT level accurately predicted blood culture positivity in patients with CAP. PCT measurement has the potential to reduce the number of drawn blood cultures in the emergency department and to implement a more targeted allocation of limited health-care resources.

Which patients with lower respiratory tract infections need inpatient treatment? Perceptions of physicians, nurses, patients and relatives

BACKGROUND

Despite recommendations for outpatient management, low risk patients with lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) are often hospitalized. This survey analyzed perceptions of physicians, nurses, patients and relatives about feasibility of outpatient management and required duration of hospital stay.

METHODS

We performed a prospective, observational questionnaire survey in hospitalized patients with LRTI as part of a multicenter trial. Treating physicians and nurses, patients and their relatives were asked on admission and before discharge about feasibility of outpatient treatment over 5 dimensions (medical, nursing, organizational factors, and patients' and relatives' preferences) using continuous scales.

RESULTS

On admission, 12.6% of physicians, 15.1% of nurses, 18.0% of patients and 5.2% of relatives believed that outpatient treatment would be possible. Before hospital discharge, 31.1% of physicians, 32.2% of nurses, 11.6% of patients and 4.1% of relatives thought that earlier discharge would have been feasible. Medical factors were the most frequently perceived motives for inpatient management. These perceptions were similar in all LRTI subgroups and independent of disease severity and associated expected mortality risks as assessed by the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI).

CONCLUSION

Independent of type and severity of respiratory tract infection, the misperceived high severity and expected mortality and morbidity were the predominant reasons why treating physicians, nurses, patients and their relatives unanimously believed that inpatient management was necessary. Better assessment and communication about true expected medical risks might contribute to a pathway to shorten in-hospital days and to introduce a more risk-targeted and individually tailored allocation of health-care resources.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT00350987.

Hospital visits and costs following outpatient treatment of CAP with levofloxacin or moxifloxacin

BACKGROUND

Hospital admissions (inpatient and emergency room) are a major source of medical costs for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) initially treated in the outpatient setting. Current CAP treatment guidelines do not differentiate between outpatient treatment with levofloxacin and moxifloxacin.

OBJECTIVE

Compare health care resource use and medical costs to payers for CAP outpatients initiating treatment with levofloxacin or moxifloxacin.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

CAP episodes were identified in the PharMetrics database between 2Q04 and 2Q07 based on: pneumonia diagnosis, chest X-ray and treatment with levofloxacin or moxifloxacin. Subsequent 30-day risk of pneumonia-related hospital visits and 30-day health care costs to payers for levofloxacin vs. moxifloxacin treatment were estimated after adjusting for pre-treatment demographics, health care resource use and pneumonia-specific risk factors using propensity score and exact factor matching.

RESULTS

A total of 15,472 levofloxacin- and 6474 moxifloxacin-initiated CAP patients were identified. Among 6352 matched pairs, levofloxacin treatment was associated with a 35% reduction in the odds of pneumonia-related hospital visits (odds ratio = 0.65, P = 0.004), lower per-patient costs for pneumonia-related hospital visits (102 dollars vs. 210 dollars, P = 0.001), lower pneumonia-related total costs (medical services and prescription drugs, 363 dollars vs. 491 dollars, P < 0.001) and lower total costs (1308 dollars vs. 1446 dollars, P < 0.001) vs. moxifloxacin over the 30-day observation period.

LIMITATIONS

Although observational analyses of claims data provide large sample sizes and reflect routine care, they do have several inherent limitations. Since randomization of subjects is not possible, adequate statistical techniques must be used to ensure that patient characteristics are well-balanced between treatment groups. In addition, data may be missing or miscoded.

CONCLUSIONS

CAP outpatients initiated with levofloxacin generated substantially lower costs to payers compared to matched patients initiated with moxifloxacin. The cost savings for patients initiated with levofloxacin were largely attributable to reduced rates of pneumonia-related hospitalization or ER visits.

Fluoroquinolones in the management of community-acquired pneumonia

AIMS

Review of the current guidelines for the use of respiratory fluoroquinolones in the management of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).

METHODS

Data were collected from recent clinical trials on fluoroquinolone therapy in patients with CAP and from updated recommendations of antimicrobial therapy in managing CAP, with a focus on current North American guidelines.

RESULTS

Randomised clinical trials of respiratory fluoroquinolones (moxifloxacin, levofloxacin and gemifloxacin) in the treatment of CAP were identified and analysed. The bacteriology of CAP, and susceptibility rates, resistance rates and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of fluoroquinolones against causative pathogens in CAP, and adverse event profiles of these agents were described. Respiratory fluoroquinolones have broad-spectrum antibacterial activities against common causative pathogens in CAP and provide an important treatment option as monotherapy for outpatients with comorbidities and inpatients who are not admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), including those with risk factors of drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. For treatment of ICU patients with severe CAP, it is recommended that fluoroquinolones be used in combination with a beta-lactam. Recent studies also demonstrated a more rapid resolution of clinical symptoms with the use of highly potent respiratory fluoroquinolones.

DISCUSSION

Appropriate use of fluoroquinolone agents may shorten the duration of antimicrobial therapy and the length of hospital stay and contribute to the decreased development of resistance in patients with CAP. Adverse event profiles of these agents should be considered to facilitate the selection of an appropriate fluoroquinolone for appropriate CAP patients.

CONCLUSION

The fluoroquinolone class, specifically those with adequate activity against respiratory pathogens, represents an important and convenient treatment option for patients with CAP.

Comparative analysis of length of stay, total costs, and treatment success between intravenous moxifloxacin 400 mg and levofloxacin 750 mg among hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the length of stay (LOS), costs, and treatment consistency among patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) initially treated with intravenous (IV) moxifloxacin 400 mg or IV levofloxacin 750 mg.

METHODS

Adults with CAP receiving IV moxifloxacin or IV levofloxacin for > or =3 days were identified in the Premier Perspective comparative database. Primary outcomes were LOS and costs. Secondary outcomes included treatment consistency, which was defined as 1) no additional IV moxifloxacin or levofloxacin after > or =1 day off study drug; 2) no switch to another IV antibiotic; and 3) no addition of another IV antibiotic.

RESULTS

A total of 7720 patients met inclusion criteria (6040 receiving moxifloxacin; 1680 receiving levofloxacin). Propensity matching created two cohorts (1300 patients each) well matched for demographic, clinical, hospital, and payor characteristics. Before the patients were matched, mean LOS (5.87 vs. 5.46 days; P = 0.0004) and total costs per patient ($7302 vs. $6362; P < 0.0001) were significantly greater with moxifloxacin. After the patients were matched, mean LOS (5.63 vs. 5.51 days; P = 0.462) and total costs ($6624 vs. $6473; P = 0.476) were comparable in both cohorts. Treatment consistency was higher for moxifloxacin before (81.0% vs. 78.9%; P = 0.048) and after matching (82.8% vs. 78.0%; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

In-hospital treatment of CAP with IV moxifloxacin 400 mg or IV levofloxacin 750 mg was associated with similar hospital LOS and costs in propensity-matched cohorts.

Evidence for moxifloxacin in community-acquired pneumonia: the impact of pharmaco-economic considerations on guidelines

OBJECTIVE

In an era of limited resources, policy makers and health care payers are concerned about the costs of treatment in addition to its effectiveness. However, guidelines do not tend to consider the cost-effectiveness of treatment options. This paper aims to conduct an international literature review with a view to assessing the impact of pharmaco-economic considerations of CAP treatment with moxifloxacin on recent guidelines.

METHODS

The pharmaco-economic state of the art of treating CAP with moxifloxacin is assessed and compared with guidelines issued by the European Respiratory Society and by the Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society. Also, evidence on moxifloxacin consumption and antimicrobial resistance, and the impact of resistance on the cost-effectiveness of moxifloxacin is reviewed. Studies were identified by searching PubMed, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination databases, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and EconLit up to January 2009.

RESULTS

The existing pharmaco-economic evidence indicates that moxifloxacin is a cost-effective treatment for CAP. However, data limitations and uncertainty surrounding the evolution of resistance emphasize the need for caution. As recommended by guidelines, the choice of antimicrobial should consider the local frequency of causative pathogens, the local pattern of antimicrobial resistance, and risk factors for resistant bacteria. The pharmaco-economic evidence corroborates the importance of these factors as they have an impact on the cost-effectiveness of treating CAP patients with moxifloxacin.

CONCLUSIONS

CAP guidelines need to take into account pharmaco-economic considerations by balancing the effectiveness of antimicrobial regimens against their costs. The pharmaco-economic value of moxifloxacin is influenced by the causative pathogens involved and resistance patterns. Therefore, it may be advisable to identify patient subgroups in which treatment with moxifloxacin is cost-effective and should be recommended by guidelines.

Estimating the economic impact of a half-day reduction in length of hospital stay among patients with community-acquired pneumonia in the US

BACKGROUND

A recent study suggested that levofloxacin significantly reduces the hospital length of stay (LOS), by 0.5 days (p = 0.02), relative to moxifloxacin in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). The current analysis evaluated the potential economic impact of this half-day reduction in LOS.

METHODS

A cost model was developed to estimate the impact of a half-day reduction in LOS for CAP hospitalizations in the US. CAP incidence, hospitalization rate, and costs were obtained from published studies in PubMed and from publicly available government sources. The average daily cost of hospitalization was estimated for fixed costs, which comprise 59% of total inpatient costs. Costs from prior years were inflated to 2007 US dollars using the consumer price index. A range of cost savings, calculated using inpatient CAP costs from several studies, was extrapolated to the US CAP population.

RESULTS

Using the Centers for Disease Control National Hospital Discharge estimate of 5.3 days LOS for CAP, and an average cost (2007 $US) of $13,009 per CAP hospitalization, a daily fixed cost of $1448 was estimated. The resultant half-day reduction in costs associated with LOS was $724/hospitalization (range $457 to $846/hospitalization). When fixed and variable costs were considered, the estimated savings were $1227.27/episode. The incidence of CAP was estimated to be 1.9% (5.7 million cases/year based on current population census), and the estimated rate of CAP hospitalization was 19.6% (1.1 million annual hospitalizations). At $13,009/CAP-related hospitalization, total fixed inpatient costs of $8.6 billion annually were projected. The half-day reduction in LOS would therefore generate potential annual savings of approximately $813 million (range $513 million to $950 million). When total costs (fixed plus variable) were estimated, the mean savings for a half-day reduction would be approximately $1227/episode (range of $775 to $1434) or $1.37 billion annually in the US CAP population (range of $871 million to $1.6 billion). Limitations include the use of a single study for the estimation of fixed costs but a diversity of sources used for estimates of other variables, and lack of data with respect to the effects on costs of diagnostic-related groups, discounted contracts, and capitated payments.

CONCLUSIONS

A relatively small decrease in LOS in CAP can have a substantial cost impact, with estimated savings of $457 to $846 per episode or $500-$900 million annually. Additional evaluation is warranted for interpreting these cost-savings in the context of current antibiotic prescribing patterns.

Aetiology of, and risk factors for, recurrent community-acquired pneumonia

Recurrent community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) requiring hospitalization is a matter of particular concern. However, current information on its prevalence, aetiology and risk factors is lacking. To address these issues, we performed an observational analysis of a prospective cohort of hospitalized adults with CAP. Recurrence was defined as two or more episodes of CAP 1 month apart within 3 years. Patients with severe immunosuppression or local predisposing factors were excluded. Of the 1556 patients, 146 (9.4%) had recurrent CAP. The most frequent causative organism was Streptococcus pneumoniae, both in patients with recurrent CAP and in those without recurrence. Haemophilus influenzae, other Gram-negative bacilli and aspiration pneumonia were more frequent among patients with recurrent CAP, whereas Legionella pneumophila was rarely identified in this group. Independent factors associated with recurrent CAP were greater age, lack of pneumococcal vaccination, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and corticosteroid therapy. In a sub-analysis of 389 episodes of pneumococcal pneumonia, the only independent risk factor for recurrence was lack of pneumococcal vaccination. Recurrence of CAP is not a rare clinical problem and it occurs mainly in the elderly, patients with COPD, and those receiving corticosteroids. Our study provides support for recommending pneumococcal vaccination for adults at risk of pneumonia, including those with a first episode of CAP.

Healthcare utilization in community-acquired pneumonia episodes of care: a comparison across the continuum of managed care

OBJECTIVE

Compare healthcare utilization and total payments for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) episodes-of-care among 5 health plan designs spanning the continuum of managed care.

RESEARCH DESIGN

Medical and prescription claims analysis of CAP episodes among enrollees of employer-sponsored health plans. Episode characteristics, healthcare utilization, and payments were compared across fee-for-service, Preferred Provider Organizations (PPO), point of service, partial capitation, and Health Maintenance Organizations as defined by the employers. Medstat Episode of Care Grouper Version 2.1.5 was employed to create episodes of CAP care. Categorical and continuous measures of patient and care characteristics across plan designs were compared by chi tests and one-way analysis-of-variance as appropriate. Total per-episode payments for provided services across plan designs were compared using a general linear model with a log-link function and gamma distribution.

RESULTS

Greater average patient age, episode severity, number of office visits, rate of hospitalization, length of stay, and inpatient mortality overall were found within PPO episodes compared with all other plan designs. Total episode payments controlling for age, sex, disease severity, and geography were greatest among PPO episodes and attributed largely to more office visits and longer lengths of hospital stays compared with other plan types.

CONCLUSIONS

As previously shown among other patient populations and conditions, PPO episodes of CAP are associated with greater total payments due in large part to increased resource utilization among the episodes of lowest severity.