Second primary cancers related to smoking and treatment of small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer Working Cadre

Non-small cell lung cancer: epidemiology, risk factors, treatment, and survivorship

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality not only in the United States but also around the world. In North America, lung cancer has become more predominant among former than current smokers. Yet in some countries, such as China, which has experienced a dramatic increase in the cigarette smoking rate during the past 2 decades, a peak in lung cancer incidence is still expected. Approximately two-thirds of adult Chinese men are smokers, representing one-third of all smokers worldwide. Non-small cell lung cancer accounts for 85% of all lung cancer cases in the United States. After the initial diagnosis, accurate staging of non-small cell lung cancer using computed tomography or positron emission tomography is crucial for determining appropriate therapy. When feasible, surgical resection remains the single most consistent and successful option for cure. However, close to 70% of patients with lung cancer present with locally advanced or metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. Chemotherapy is beneficial for patients with metastatic disease, and the administration of concurrent chemotherapy and radiation is indicated for stage III lung cancer. The introduction of angiogenesis, epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, and other new anti-cancer agents is changing the present and future of this disease and will certainly increase the number of lung cancer survivors. We identified studies for this review by searching the MEDLINE and PubMed databases for English-language articles published from January 1, 1980, through January 31, 2008. Key terms used for this search included non-small cell lung cancer, adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, bronchioalveolar cell carcinoma, large cell carcinoma, lung cancer epidemiology, genetics, survivorship, surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, bevacizumab, erlotinib, and epidermal growth factor receptor.

Non-small cell lung cancer: epidemiology, risk factors, treatment, and survivorship

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality not only in the United States but also around the world. In North America, lung cancer has become more predominant among former than current smokers. Yet in some countries, such as China, which has experienced a dramatic increase in the cigarette smoking rate during the past 2 decades, a peak in lung cancer incidence is still expected. Approximately two-thirds of adult Chinese men are smokers, representing one-third of all smokers worldwide. Non-small cell lung cancer accounts for 85% of all lung cancer cases in the United States. After the initial diagnosis, accurate staging of non-small cell lung cancer using computed tomography or positron emission tomography is crucial for determining appropriate therapy. When feasible, surgical resection remains the single most consistent and successful option for cure. However, close to 70% of patients with lung cancer present with locally advanced or metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. Chemotherapy is beneficial for patients with metastatic disease, and the administration of concurrent chemotherapy and radiation is indicated for stage III lung cancer. The introduction of angiogenesis, epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, and other new anti-cancer agents is changing the present and future of this disease and will certainly increase the number of lung cancer survivors. We identified studies for this review by searching the MEDLINE and PubMed databases for English-language articles published from January 1, 1980, through January 31, 2008. Key terms used for this search included non-small cell lung cancer, adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, bronchioalveolar cell carcinoma, large cell carcinoma, lung cancer epidemiology, genetics, survivorship, surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, bevacizumab, erlotinib, and epidermal growth factor receptor.

Determination of cadmium in whole blood and scalp hair samples of Pakistani male lung cancer patients by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometer

A large number of epidemiologic studies have been undertaken to identify potential risk factors for cancer, amongst which the association with cadmium has received considerable attention. There is compelling evidence in support of positive associations between cadmium and risk of lung cancer. In present study we measured the concentration of Cd in whole blood and scalp hair samples of 120 male lung cancer patients (smokers) and 150 controls or referents (smokers and nonsmokers) from different cities of Pakistan. Both referents and patients were of same age group (ranged 40-70 years), socio-economic status, localities and dietary habits. The scalp hair and whole blood samples were oxidized by 65% nitric acid: 30% hydrogen peroxide (2:1) ratio in microwave oven. To check the validity of the proposed method, a conventional wet acid digestion method was used to obtain total Cd concentration in certified samples of human hair BCR 397 and Clincheck control-lyophilized human whole blood. All digests were analyzed for Cd concentration by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometer (ETAAS). The results of this study showed that the average Cd concentration was higher in the blood and scalp hair of lung cancer patients at different stages as compared to controls (p<001). The smoker referents have high level of Cd in both biological samples as compared to nonsmoker subjects. These results illustrate that the patients who continued smoking after confirmed diagnosis of lung cancer have 34.2-67.26 and 22.4-57.3% more Cd in blood samples and scalp hair than lung cancer patients who cease smoking. This study is compelling evidence in support of positive associations between cadmium, cigarette smoking and lung cancer risk.

Follow-up and surveillance of the lung cancer patient following curative intent therapy: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guideline (2nd edition)

BACKGROUND

To develop an evidence-based approach to follow-up of patients after curative intent therapy for lung cancer.

METHODS

Guidelines on lung cancer diagnosis and management published between 2002 and December 2005 were identified by a systematic review of the literature, and supplemental material appropriate to this topic was obtained by literature search of a computerized database (Medline) and review of the reference lists of relevant articles.

RESULTS

Adequate follow-up by the specialist responsible for the curative intent therapy should be ensured to manage complications related to the curative intent therapy and should last at least 3 to 6 months. In addition, a surveillance program should be considered to detect recurrences of the primary lung cancer and/or development of a new primary lung cancer early enough to allow potentially curative retreatment. A standard surveillance program for these patients, coordinated by a multidisciplinary tumor board and overseen by the physician who diagnosed and initiated therapy for the original lung cancer, is recommended based on periodic visits with chest imaging studies and counseling patients on symptom recognition. Smoking cessation and, if indicated, facilitation in participation in special programs is recommended for all patients following curative intent therapy for lung cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

The current evidence favors follow-up of complications related to curative intent therapy, and a surveillance program at regular intervals with imaging and review of symptoms. Smoking cessation after curative intent therapy to prevent recurrence of lung cancer is strongly supported by the available evidence.

Tobacco use in women with lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Smoking cessation after a cancer diagnosis is associated with improved clinical outcomes.

PURPOSE

The aims of this study are to determine smoking prevalence, describe patterns of smoking, identify readiness to quit and cessation strategies, identify factors associated with continued smoking among women with lung cancer, and determine smoking prevalence among household members.

METHODS

Data were collected through questionnaires and medical record review from 230 women. Smoking was determined through self-report and biochemical verification with urinary cotinine.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven percent of women reported ever-smoking, and 37% reported smoking at the time of diagnosis. Ten percent of women were smoking at entry to the study, 13% were smoking at 3 months, and 11% at 6 months. Fifty-five percent of smokers planned a quit attempt within the next month. One third of smokers received cessation assistance at diagnosis, and pharmacotherapy was the most common strategy. Significant factors associated with continued smoking included younger age, depression, and household member smoking. Continued smoking among household members was 21%. Twelve percent of household members changed their smoking behavior; 77% quit smoking, but 12% started smoking.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnosis of cancer is a strong motivator for behavioral change, and some patients need additional support to quit smoking. Family members should also be targeted for cessation interventions.

Treating tobacco dependence: review of the best and latest treatment options

Globally, an estimated 85% of lung cancer in men and 47% of lung cancer in women is attributable to tobacco smoking. Tobacco dependence treatment remains the most cost-effective way to prevent morbidity and mortality from lung cancer. Several effective pharmacotherapies are available to treat tobacco dependence. However, the long-term effectiveness of these treatments has been limited because the majority of smokers who attempt to stop smoking eventually relapse. Approaching the treatment of tobacco use and dependence as a chronic disease and the development of innovative drug therapies offer new hope for the treatment of tobacco-dependent patients. The diagnosis of lung cancer provides a teachable moment to motivate patients to attempt tobacco abstinence on which clinicians should capitalize. We review the currently available pharmacologic approaches to the treatment of tobacco dependence.

Smoking Relapse during the First Year after Treatment for Early-Stage Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Non-small-cell lung cancer patients who continue to smoke after cancer diagnosis are more likely to experience disease recurrence, decreased treatment efficacy, and treatment complications. Despite this, many continue to smoke, with estimates ranging from 13% to approximately 60%.

METHODS

Participants were 154 early-stage, non-small-cell lung cancer patients who had smoked within 3 months before surgery. Patients were followed for 12 months after surgery to assess smoking status and duration of continuous abstinence after surgery. Predictors included medical, smoking history, psychosocial, and demographic characteristics.

RESULTS

At some point after surgery, 42.9% of patients smoked; at 12 months after surgery, 36.9% were smoking. Sixty percent of patients who lapsed did so during the first 2 months after surgery. Smoking at follow-up was predicted by shorter quit duration before surgery, more intense Appetitive cravings (expectation of pleasure from smoking), lower income, and having a higher level of education. Time until the first smoking lapse was predicted by shorter quit duration before surgery, more intense Appetitive cravings to smoke, and lower income. Among those who lapsed, greater delay before the lapse was associated with abstinence at the 12-month follow-up assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly half of non-small-cell lung cancer patients return to smoking after surgery if they have recent smoking histories. Most initial lapses happen within 2 months and occur in response to more recent smoking and more intense cravings. Findings suggest that interventions to prevent relapse should target those who wait until cancer surgery to quit smoking and should be started as soon as possible after treatment.

Relapse of Stage I Small Cell Lung Cancer Ten or More Years after the Start of Treatment

Most patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) usually show relapse within 1 or 2 years. Relapses after a 5-year disease-free survival are extremely rare. This report describes two patients with stage I SCLC in whom the disease recurred 10 or more years after the start of initial therapy. Because the recurrence of SCLC was noted in the mediastinal lymph nodes of the same side, we concluded that the patients had a late relapse of SCLC rather than a metachronous lung cancer.

Long-term survivorship in lung cancer: a review

While outcome research in lung cancer has focused mainly on short-term survival and quality of life (QoL), information on long-term (ie, > 5 years postdiagnosis) lung cancer survivorship remains limited. This review addresses the epidemiologic significance of long-term lung cancer (LTLC) survivors, summarizes the current knowledge on their health and QoL, and suggests areas for further research in LTLC survivorship. Based on a small body of literature, lung cancer survivors do not experience the same quantity and QoL as their age-matched peers or as survivors of other cancers. Survival among 5-year survivors of lung cancer relative to the general US population with the same demographic characteristics is approximately 60%, and lung cancer survivors score lowest in health utility among long-term survivors of other cancers. Approximately one-quarter of long-term lung cancer (LTLC) survivors were significantly restricted in physical ability or reported significant depressive symptoms. There is a need to identify and intervene with subgroups of survivors who are at an elevated risk of premature death and diminished QoL. Lung cancer-specific survival alone does not reflect the overall illness burden in LTLC survivors. Patient care in lung cancer survivors should be continuous and comprehensive in considering multiple causes of health deterioration. Multidisciplinary research in epidemiologic, clinical, and basic science approaches is warranted to further our knowledge base for optimal long-term management and to develop the necessary intervention strategies among LTLC survivors.

Randomized phase III trial of low-dose isotretinoin for prevention of second primary tumors in stage I and II head and neck cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Isotretinoin (13-cis-retinoic acid) is a synthetic vitamin A derivative, or retinoid, widely used in the treatment of cystic acne. Preclinical and clinical studies of high-dose isotretinoin in patients with head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) have produced encouraging results. We conducted a phase III randomized trial of low-dose isotretinoin versus placebo in early-stage HNSCC patients to assess its effect on second primary tumor incidence and survival.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 1190 patients who had been treated for stage I or II HNSCC to receive either low-dose isotretinoin (30 mg/day) or placebo for 3 years. The patients were monitored for up to 4 more years. Survival was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox proportional hazards models were used for multivariable survival analysis. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

Isotretinoin did not statistically significantly reduce the rate of second primary tumors (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.83 to 1.35) or increase survival (HR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.81 to 1.32) compared with placebo in patients with early-stage HNSCC. Current smokers had a higher rate of second primary tumors than that of never (HR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.08 to 2.50) or former (HR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.71) smokers. The hazard ratio of death from any cause for current smokers versus never smokers was 2.51 (95% CI = 1.54 to 4.10) and for current smokers versus former smokers was 1.60 (95% CI = 1.23 to 2.07). Major sites of second primary tumors (n = 261) included lung (31%), oral cavity (17%), larynx (8%), and pharynx (5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose isotretinoin was not effective in reducing the rate of second primary tumors or death or smoking-related disease. Smoking statistically significantly increased the rate of second primary tumors and death. Ongoing trials are testing higher doses of isotretinoin as part of combination bioadjuvant therapeutic methods for patients with locally advanced HNSCC.

Successes and failures of the teachable moment

BACKGROUND

Successful cancer treatment can be significantly compromised by continued tobacco use. Because motivation and interest in smoking cessation increase after cancer diagnosis, a window of opportunity exists during which healthcare providers can intervene and assist in the quitting process.

METHODS

The authors conducted a comprehensive literature review to discuss 1) the benefits of smoking cessation in cancer patients, 2) current knowledge regarding smoking cessation interventions targeted to cancer patients, and 3) treatment models and state-of the-art guidelines for intervention with cancer patients who smoke. The authors present clinical cases to illustrate the challenging nature of smoking cessation treatment for cancer patients.

RESULTS

Continued smoking after cancer diagnosis has substantial adverse effects on treatment effectiveness, overall survival, risk of second primary malignancies, and quality of life. Although some encouraging results have been demonstrated with smoking cessation interventions targeted to cancer patients, few empirical studies of such interventions have been conducted. A range of intervention components and state-of-the-art cessation guidelines are available that can be readily applied to cancer patients. Case illustrations highlight the crucial role of healthcare providers in promoting smoking cessation, the harmful impact of nicotine addiction manifested in delayed and failed reconstructive procedures, and unique problems encountered in treating patients who have particular difficulty quitting.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the importance of stopping smoking for all cancer patients, the diagnosis of cancer is underused as a teachable moment for smoking cessation. More research is needed to empirically test cessation interventions for cancer patients, and attention must be given to complex and unique issues when tailoring cessation treatment to these individuals.

Smoking, the missing drug interaction in clinical trials: ignoring the obvious

Tobacco use is universally recognized as the foremost preventable cause of cancer in the United States and globally and is responsible for 30% of all cancer-related deaths in the United States. Tobacco use, including exposure to secondhand smoke has been implicated as a causal or contributory agent in an ever-expanding list of cancers, including lung, oral cavity and pharynx, pancreas, liver, kidney, ureter, urinary bladder, uterine cervix, and myeloid leukemia. In addition to and independent of the etiologic effects of tobacco carcinogens in numerous cancers, there is a growing literature on the direct and indirect effects of smoking on treatment efficacy (short-term and long-term outcomes), toxicity and morbidity, quality of life (QOL), recurrence, second primary tumors (SPT), and survival time as summarized below. Oncology health professionals have called for increased advocacy for tobacco control. Despite the critical relevance of smoking to cancer outcomes, most oncology clinical trials do not collect data on smoking history and status unless the malignancy is widely acknowledged as smoking related (e.g., lung or head and neck cancer). Usually, these data are collected only at trial registration. Changes in smoking status during treatment or follow-up are monitored in very few trials and are infrequently reported in sample descriptions or included in analysis plans as a potential moderator of outcomes. Based on mounting evidence that tobacco use affects cancer treatment outcomes and survival, we recommend that smoking history and status be systematically collected as core data in all oncology clinical trials: at diagnosis, at trial registration, and throughout treatment and follow-up to long-term survival or death. We feel that the inclusion and analysis of such data in clinical trials will add important information to the interpretation of outcomes and the development of scientific knowledge in this area. Smoking status has been called another "vital sign" because of its relevance to a patient's immediate medical condition. We explain the critical value of knowing the smoking status of every patient with cancer at every visit by providing a brief overview of the following research findings: (a) the effects of tobacco use on cancer treatment and outcome; (b) recent findings on the role of nicotine in malignant processes; (c) some unexpected results concerning tobacco status, treatment, and disease outcome; and (d) identifying key questions that remain to be addressed. We provide a suggested set of items for inclusion in clinical trial data sets that also are useful in clinical practice.

The pulmonary status of patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer 15 years after treatment with chemotherapy and chest irradiation

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To describe pulmonary symptoms, signs, pulmonary function, and lung imaging studies in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) 2 to 15 years after receiving treatment with chemotherapy and chest radiotherapy.

DESIGN

Retrospective review of clinical records and radiographic studies of patients treated in three different prospective combined-modality studies.

SETTING

Federal hospital.

PATIENTS

One hundred fifty-six patients with SCLC who were enrolled between 1974 and 1994.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients with limited-stage SCLC treated on prospective therapeutic studies of combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy were identified. Pulmonary symptoms, physical findings, pulmonary function tests, arterial blood gas measurements, and chest imaging studies were assessed at baseline, and at 1 to 2 years, at 3 to 5 years, and at > 5 years following the initiation of treatment.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Initial symptoms included cough in 84 (55%), dyspnea in 59 (39%), and sputum production in 26 (17%). Twenty-three patients lived beyond 5 years (15%) without evidence of recurrence. Seven of these 5-year survivors were without pulmonary symptoms. Pulmonary function test results showed no significant changes in percent predicted values for FVC, FEV(1), and FEV(1)/FVC ratio over the time periods reviewed. The percent predicted values for the diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide decreased from 71% before the start of treatment to 56% (p < 0.032) at 1 to 2 years. Values improved in most patients beyond 5 years after starting treatment. Radiologist interpretations of chest imaging studies were available for 17 of 23 patients surviving > 5 years. Most patients had minimal to no changes in imaging study findings beyond 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term survivors with limited-stage SCLC who were treated with combined chemotherapy and chest radiotherapy have minimal changes in pulmonary symptoms or function from 5 to 15 years after the start of treatment. A concern for late toxicity from combined-modality therapy should not dissuade clinicians from offering therapy with potentially curative result with minimal to no pulmonary dysfunction.

Second primary cancers in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer successfully treated with chemo-radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Patients successfully treated for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain at risk for developing second primary cancer (SPC). The purpose of the current study is to assess the incidence of SPC and the impact of smoking status on the SPC in long-term survivors with stage III NSCLC after chemo-radiotherapy.

METHODS

Using the database from the Japan National Hospital Lung Cancer Study Group between 1985 and 1995, information was obtained on 62 patients who were more than 3 years disease-free survivors. Details of clinical information and most smoking history were available from the questionnaire.

RESULTS

Nine of the 62 patients developed SPC 3.9-12.2 years (median, 6.2 years) after the initiation of the treatment. The site of SPC was 2 lung, 1 esophagus, 2 stomach, 1 colon, 1 breast, 1 skin and 1 leukemia. Among these nine, three cancers occurred inside the radiation field. The relative risk of any SPC was 2.8 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3-5.3]. The risk changed with the passage of time and it increased significantly (5.2 times at or beyond 7 years) after the treatment. In univariate analysis, the patients who were male, had more cumulative smoking and continued smoking, had an increased risk of SPC [relative risk (RR) 2.7, CI 1.1-5.3; RR 3.0, CI 1.2-6.2; RR 5.2, CI 1.6-11.7, respectively]. In multivariate analysis, factors including smoking status and histological type had no effect on the development of a SPC.

CONCLUSION

The patients with stage III NSCLC successfully treated with chemo-radiotherapy were at risk for developing SPC and this risk increased with time.

A randomized pilot study of cognitive-behavioral therapy versus basic health education for smoking cessation among cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Previously, we have linked theoretically based cognitive and emotional variables to the ability of cancer patients to quit smoking.

PURPOSE

In this study, we evaluated the impact of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), which addressed these theoretically derived cognitive and emotional variables linked to tobacco use in this population, for promoting smoking cessation in a sample of cancer patients and assessed longitudinal predictors of smoking cessation.

METHODS

Cancer patients (N=109) were randomized to either the theoretically based CBT intervention or to a general health education (GHE) condition, and all patients received nicotine replacement therapy.

RESULTS

Contrary to our expectation, no significant difference in 30-day point-prevalence abstinence between the CBT and GHE conditions was detected at either a 1-month (44.9 vs. 47.3%, respectively) or 3-month (43.2% vs. 39.2%, respectively) follow-up evaluation. Higher quit motivation and lower cons of quitting were related to smoking cessation.

CONCLUSIONS

Implications for the implementation of smoking cessation behavioral treatments in the oncologic context are discussed, as are directions for future research in this area.

Small-cell lung cancer

Small-cell lung carcinoma is an aggressive form of lung cancer that is strongly associated with cigarette smoking and has a tendency for early dissemination. Increasing evidence has implicated autocrine growth loops, proto-oncogenes, and tumour-suppressor genes in its development. At presentation, the vast majority of patients are symptomatic, and imaging typically reveals a hilar mass. Pathology, in most cases of samples obtained by bronchoscopic biopsy, should be undertaken by pathologists with pulmonary expertise, with the provision of additional tissue for immunohistochemical stains as needed. Staging should aim to identify any evidence of distant disease, by imaging of the chest, upper abdomen, head, and bones as appropriate. Limited-stage disease should be treated with etoposide and cisplatin and concurrent early chest irradiation. All patients who achieve complete remission should be considered for treatment with prophylactic cranial irradiation, owing to the high frequency of brain metastases in this disease. Extensive-stage disease should be managed by combination chemotherapy, with a regimen such as etoposide and cisplatin administered for four to six cycles. Thereafter, patients with progressive or recurrent disease should be treated with additional chemotherapy. For patients who survive long term, careful monitoring for development of a second primary tumour is necessary, with further investigation and treatment as appropriate.

Duration of smoking abstinence as a predictor for non-small-cell lung cancer survival in women

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have attempted to investigate the impact of smoking cessation on lung cancer survival but have been limited by small numbers of former smokers and incomplete data.

METHODS

Over a six-year period, 5229 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) were enrolled in a prospective cohort of whom 2052 were former smokers. Patient's characteristics were obtained from medical records and a baseline interview. Vital status was determined through multiple sources. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the effect of smoking abstinence on post-diagnosis mortality.

RESULTS

For all patients with NSCLC, the median survival among never, former, and current smokers was 1.4 years, 1.3 years, and 1.1 years, respectively (P < 0.01). Female NSCLC patients had a significantly lower risk of mortality with a longer duration of smoking abstinence (RR per 10 years of smoking abstinence = 0.85; 95% CI: 0.75, 0.97). No effect of smoking abstinence on mortality was observed for women with SCLC or for men with either histologic group.

CONCLUSIONS

The identification of smoking history as a prognostic factor in lung cancer survival supports previous research suggesting a direct biologic effect of smoking on survival. However, this effect may vary by sex and type of lung cancer.

Should aggressive surgery ever be part of the management of small cell lung cancer?

CMT with surgery and chemotherapy is feasible, the toxicity is manageable, and postoperative morbidity and mortality rates are acceptable. Patient selection is important, and the results of the LCSG trial indicate that surgical resection will not benefit most patients who have limited SCLC. The chances of long-term survival and cure are strongly correlated with pathologic TNM stage. Consideration of surgery for patients who have SCLC should be limited to those with stage I disease and perhaps some patients with stage II tumors. Therefore, before surgery is undertaken, patients should undergo extensive radiologic staging with CT, MRI, and perhaps even positron emission tomographic scanning and mediastinoscopy, even if the radiologic assessment of the mediastinum is negative. Surgery may be considered for patients with T1-T2 NO SCLC tumors, and whether it is offered as the initial treatment or after induction chemotherapy remains controversial [40,43]. If SCLC is identified unexpectedly at the time of thoracotomy, complete resection and mediastinal lymph node resection should be undertaken, if possible. Chemotherapy is recommended postoperatively for all patients, even those with pathologic stage I tumors. Surgery likely has very little role to play for most patients with stage II disease and virtually no role for patients with stage III tumors. Even though chemotherapy can result in dramatic shrinkage of bulky mediastinal tumors, the addition of surgical resection does not contribute significantly to long-term survival for most patients, as shown conclusively by the LCSG trial. The final group of patients who may benefit from surgical resection are those with combined small cell and non-small cell tumors. If a mixed-histology cancer is identified at diagnosis, the initial treatment should be chemotherapy to control the small cell component of the disease, and surgery should be considered for the non-small cell component. For patients who demonstrate an unexpectedly poor response to chemotherapy, and for patients who experience localized late relapse after treatment for pure small cell tumors, a repeat biopsy should be performed. Surgery may be considered if residual NSCLC is confirmed.

Novel agents and incremental advances in the treatment of head and neck cancer

Cancer of the head and neck is an important medical problem, with approximately 46,500 cases predicted in the United States alone in 2003. Worldwide, more than 600,000 cases are anticipated. While several different histologic subtypes of head and neck cancer are seen in different parts of the world, more than 90% of tumors diagnosed in the United States are squamous cell carcinomas. Major strides in the management of this disease have been made in the last decade. These include, but are not limited to, the evolution of organ preservation, the increasingly well recognized role of concurrent chemoradiation therapy as either definitive therapy for unresectable disease or adjuvant therapy for high-risk surgical disease, and significant improvements in cytotoxic chemotherapy. The role of chemotherapy in this disease has been a subject of debate. Chemotherapy is now routinely included in the multimodality treatment of unresectable disease of the oral pharynx, larynx, and oral cavity. There is now increasing evidence supporting the role of induction chemotherapy in head and neck cancer. As intensified chemotherapy and radiation therapy have improved local control, the increasing incidence of distant metastases has necessitated the need for enhanced systemic control. These approaches are the topics of extensive investigations.

The global epidemic of tobacco and cancer

OBJECTIVES

To provide a global context for understanding the epidemic of tobacco-induced disease, and the need for nursing action.

DATA SOURCES

International cancer and tobacco statistics; published articles.

CONCLUSION

Tobacco use is a global problem and a significant issue for cancer control. The efforts of health professionals, especially those concerned about cancer, are needed to confront this epidemic.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Worldwide action of nurses, the largest group of health professionals, is critical in preventing tobacco use, helping with tobacco cessation, and decreasing exposure to second-hand smoke.

The risk of second primary tumors after resection of stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The incidence of second primary lung cancers (SPLC) after resection of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is estimated to be 1% to 4% per patient year. The overall effect of SPLC on survival after resection of stage I NSCLC is unknown. Here we report the incidence, management, and outcome of SPLC in a large prospective cohort of patients who underwent careful follow-up.

METHODS

National Cancer Institute Intergroup Trial NCI #I91-0001 examined the effectiveness of isotretinoin A for chemoprevention of second primary tumors, the primary endpoint in that trial. Prospective data from patients randomly assigned to the placebo arm were analyzed.

RESULTS

Five hundred sixty-nine patients underwent complete resection of pathologic stage I NSCLC. The median follow-up was 5.9 years. Second primary tumors developed in 88 (15%) patients. Of these, 49 (56%) were SPLC (incidence = 1.99/100 patient-years), with a median interval from initial surgery of 4.2 years. Second primary lung cancer never developed in patients who had never smoked (n = 44, p = 0.046; never versus ever smokers). Current smokers had a higher incidence of SPLC than former smokers (hazard ratio = 1.91, p = 0.03). Age, sex, stage, histology, tumor location and initial surgery had no effect on SPLC development. Despite semiannual follow-up with chest radiographs, 12 (24%) patients had metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis of SPLC. Surgical resection was performed in 31 (63%) SPLC patients. Median survival was 4.1 years in those who underwent surgery and 1.4 years in those who did not (p = 0.003). Overall SPLC-related mortality in the original cohort was 3.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who undergo surgery for SPLC can achieve prolonged survival. Despite close follow-up however many patients with SPLC present with advanced disease. That indicates a need for continued lifelong postoperative surveillance.

Longitudinal predictors of continued tobacco use among patients diagnosed with cancer

Even though continued smoking by cancer patients adversely affects survival and quality of life, about one third of patients who smoked prior to their diagnosis continue to smoke after their diagnosis. The implementation of smoking cessation treatments for cancer patients has been slowed by the lack of data on correlates of tobacco use in this population. Thus, this longitudinal study assessed demographic, medical, addiction, and psychological predictors of tobacco use among 74 head, neck, and lung cancer patients. Multivariable binary logistic regression analyses, with outcome categorized as smoker or nonsmoker, indicated that the likelihood that patients would be a smoker was associated with lower levels of perceived risk and a higher level of quitting cons. Multivariable nominal logistic regression, with outcome classified as continuous smoker, continuous quitter, relapser, or follow-up quitter, indicated that: (a). patients categorized as continuous smokers reported significantly lower quitting self-efficacy than follow-up quitters and continuous quitters, (b). relapsers reported a significantly lower level of quitting self-efficacy than either follow-up quitters or continuous quitters, and (c). continuous smokers exhibited a significantly lower level of risk perceptions than continuous abstainers. These findings can be useful for the development and evaluation of treatments to promote smoking cessation among cancer patients.

Thymoma and multiple malignancies: a case of five synchronous neoplasms and literature review

The presence of five discrete synchronous or metachronous primary neoplasms in a single patient is an extremely rare event. This is a report of a patient with a malignant (invasive) thymoma and four other independent primary neoplasms including: gliosarcoma, papillary thyroid cancer, meningioma and metastatic adenocarcinoma of the colon, found synchronously at autopsy. Thymoma patients appear to have an inherent predisposition towards developing additional neoplasms. Other than the thymoma, the presented patient had no obvious risk factors for neoplasia. This case provides evidence for an unusual syndrome of thymoma and multiple primary neoplasms. Further research is required to elucidate the mechanism of this association. Meanwhile, heightened awareness of this association may allow earlier detection and treatment of additional cancers in patients with a history of thymoma.

Teachable moments for promoting smoking cessation: the context of cancer care and survivorship

BACKGROUND

There has been a call for comprehensive cancer care that gives greater consideration to changing lifestyle risk factors such as smoking to improve prognosis and long-term health. Cancer diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship offer challenges and opportunities ("teachable moments") to promote smoking cessation.

METHODS

This review provides a rationale for the importance of smoking cessation programs in the cancer context, highlights practice guidelines for the delivery of these interventions, summarizes the challenges to smoking cessation unique to cancer patients, and recommends approaches to capitalize on the cancer context to promote smoking cessation.

RESULTS

Barriers to smoking cessation by patients with cancer include heavy nicotine dependence, urgency of cessation, fatalistic attitudes about cessation benefits, cancer-related psychological distress, treatment factors, and the presence of smokers in the social network. Opportunities to promote cessation include the transition from inpatient to outpatient care, involvement in cancer patient care by family members who smoke, and distribution of clinical feedback (eg, test results).

CONCLUSIONS

Teachable moments in the cancer context are not being fully utilized to promote smoking cessation. Evidence-based guidelines can assist cancer care teams in promoting cessation.

Brief physician-initiated quit-smoking strategies for clinical oncology settings: a trial coordinated by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

PURPOSE

Although tobacco use by cancer patients increases the risk of relapse, diminishes treatment efficacy, and worsens quality of life, about one third of patients who smoked before their diagnosis continue to smoke. Because patients have regular contact with oncologists, the efficacy of a physician-based smoking cessation treatment was evaluated.

METHODS

Cancer patients (n = 432) were randomly assigned to either usual care or a National Institutes of Health (NIH) physician-based smoking intervention. The primary outcome was 7-day point prevalence abstinence at 6 and 12 months after study entry.

RESULTS

At the 6-month follow-up, there was no significant difference in quit rates between the usual care (11.9%) and intervention (14.4%) groups, and there was no significant difference between the usual care (13.6%) and intervention (13.3%) groups at the 12-month follow-up. Patients were more likely to have quit smoking at 6 months if they had head and neck or lung cancer, began smoking after the age of 16, reported at baseline using a cessation self-help guide or treatment in the last 6 months, and showed greater baseline desire to quit. Patients were more likely to have quit smoking at 12 months if they smoked 15 or fewer cigarettes per day, had head and neck or lung cancer, tried a group cessation program, and showed greater baseline desire to quit. Finally, there was greater adherence among physicians to the NIH model for physician smoking treatment for patients in the intervention versus the usual care group.

CONCLUSION

While training physicians to provide smoking cessation treatment to cancer patients can enhance physician adherence to clinical practice guidelines, physician smoking cessation interventions fail to yield significant gains in long-term quit rates among cancer patients.

Follow-up and surveillance of the lung cancer patient following curative-intent therapy

The following two distinctly different issues should be taken into account when planning patient care following curative-intent therapy for lung cancer: adequate follow-up to manage complications related to the curative-intent therapy; and surveillance to detect recurrences of the primary lung cancer and/or development of a new primary lung cancer early enough to allow potentially curative retreatment. Follow-up for complications should be performed by the specialist responsible for the curative-intent therapy and should last 3 to 6 months. Recurrences of the original lung cancer will be more likely during the first 2 years after curative-intent therapy, but there will be an increased lifelong risk of approximately 1 to 2% per year of developing a metachronous, or new primary, lung cancer. A standard surveillance program for these patients is recommended based on periodic visits, with chest-imaging studies and counseling patients on symptom recognition. Whether subgroups of patients with a higher risk of developing a metachronous lung cancer (eg, those patients whose primary lung cancer was radiographically occult or central and those patients surviving for > 2 years after treatment for small cell lung cancer) should have a more intensive surveillance program is presently unclear. The surveillance program should be coordinated by a multidisciplinary tumor board and overseen by the physician who diagnosed and initiated therapy for the original lung cancer. Smoking cessation is recommended for all patients following curative-intent therapy for lung cancer.

Management of small cell lung cancer

Small cell lung carcinoma typically presents as a central endobronchial lesion in chronic cigarette smokers with hilar enlargement and disseminated disease. The diagnostic pathology should be reviewed by a pathologist accomplished in reading pulmonary pathology, and, if any doubt exists in the diagnosis, additional special stains or diagnostic material should be obtained. Patients with extensive stage disease should be managed by combination chemotherapy, whereas patients with limited stage disease should be treated with etoposide/cisplatin plus concurrent chest irradiation. The chemotherapy should be administered for 4 to 6 months and then should be discontinued. Prophylactic cranial irradiation should be given to patients who achieve a complete remission. Patients should be retreated with chemotherapy if they develop a relapse of their small cell lung cancer. The patients who are followed in complete remission should be observed carefully for second cancers, and appropriate therapy should be administered if the cancer reappears.

Second cancers in survivors of childhood cancer

More than 70% of children diagnosed with cancer can now be expected to be long-term survivors. However, the consequences of 'cure' might be considerable for the survivors of cancer: 60-70% of young adults who have survived childhood cancer will develop at least one medical disability as a result of their cancer or, more commonly, as a result of their therapy. Of these, the most devastating is a second cancer.

Correlates of tobacco use among smokers and recent quitters diagnosed with cancer

Smoking after a cancer diagnosis shortens survival time, increases risk of recurrence and the development of another primary tumor, reduces treatment efficacy, and increases treatment complications. Nevertheless, many patients who smoked prior to their illness continue to smoke after diagnosis and treatment. The development of effective smoking cessation interventions for cancer patients has been slowed by the lack of data concerning psychological correlates of smoking in this population. This study, with 74 cancer patients, showed that smoking and lower readiness to quit was associated with: having relatives at home who smoke, a longer time between diagnosis and assessment, completion of medical treatment, greater nicotine dependence, lower self-efficacy, quitting pros, and risk perceptions, and higher quitting cons, fatalistic beliefs, and emotional distress. Thus, smoking cessation treatments for cancer patients should include pharmacotherapy, relapse prevention, and counseling designed to facilitate self-efficacy, quitting pros, and risk awareness and to reduce the quitting cons, fatalism, and distress.

Elderly patients with lung cancer: biases and evidence

Although 60% of those diagnosed with non-small-cell lung cancer are 60 years of age or older, the elderly are often undertreated. Furthermore, those older than age 70 are under-represented in clinical research trials. Tremendous bias exists against treating the elderly; therapeutic nihilism and constrained societal/financial resources conspire to maintain the status quo. In limited stage small cell carcinoma of the lung (SCLC), a pivotal meta-analysis by Pignon et al. showed no obvious benefit for chemoradiation over chemotherapy alone in patients older than 70 years of age. However, more recent trials have revealed a clear-cut benefit for fit elderly patients to receive combined modality therapy versus chemotherapy alone, even though outcome generally remains superior for younger patients. For patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, conflicting results exist. Individual trials evaluating combined modality therapy have shown no impairment in survival for older patients, but retrospective analyses of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group database have demonstrated that increased therapeutic intensity does not translate into improved outcome compared with standard, single daily fraction radiation alone. Weighted survival analyses that deduct time spent with progressive disease or significant toxicity have reinforced this notion. In advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, fit elderly patients who receive platinum-based regimens do as well, or nearly as well, as patients younger than age 70, although the incidence of neutropenia and fatigue is often higher. Platinum doses above 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks to 4 weeks are relatively more toxic in the elderly than are lower doses. Three separate studies from Italy have formally assessed the elderly. One showed superiority for single-agent vinorelbine versus best supportive care regarding survival rates and quality of life. A second showed a marked survival advantage for combination vinorelbine and gemcitabine versus vinorelbine alone. However, a much larger, more credible study demonstrated no benefit for combination vinorelbine and gemcitabine versus the constituent single agents. To date, no elderly-specific trials have addressed the role of taxanes or of platinum-based combination therapy versus non-platinum monotherapy or doublets. Comprehensive evaluation of comorbidities and their influence on outcome have not been conducted, and there are virtually no data for patients older than age 80.

Processes of change related to smoking behavior among cancer patients

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to examine the degree to which transtheoretical model processes of change (methods and strategies for cessation) were associated with smoking status and quitting behavior (ie, intentions and attempts to quit) among patients with head and neck or lung cancer. The relationship between medical variables and processes of change was also explored.

DESCRIPTION OF STUDY

Twenty-nine smokers and 45 abstainers who were recruited from treatment clinics within a comprehensive cancer center completed a brief survey. Multivariate analysis of variance and Pearson correlation procedures were used to evaluate hypothesized relationships.

RESULTS

As hypothesized, quitters used behavioral processes such as counter-conditioning and reinforcement management significantly more than smokers and used self-reevaluation, an experiential process, significantly less than smokers. Contrary to the hypothesis, however, quit attempts and intentions were associated with both experiential (ie, consciousness raising and self-reevaluation) and behavioral (ie, reinforcement management and self-liberation) processes of change. Use of the processes of change was not influenced by medical variables, including cancer type, illness phase, disease stage, type of current medical treatment, and duration of illness.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

These findings suggest that behavioral counseling to promote smoking cessation for patients with cancer should involve assisting the patient to do the following: develop an awareness of the health risks related to continued smoking; devise and use alternative behaviors; implement the use of reinforcement strategies for cessation successes; and develop a sense of confidence and commitment about quitting as well as healthy lifestyle values. These strategies are discussed within the context of models and guidelines for smoking cessation in clinical practice.

Ten-year follow-up of Southwest Oncology Group 8269: a phase II trial of concomitant cisplatin-etoposide and daily thoracic radiotherapy in limited small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

To report the long-term follow-up of Southwest Oncology Group-8269, a phase II North American cooperative group trial of concurrent cisplatin, etoposide, vincristine (PEV), and thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) for limited small-cell lung cancer (L-SCLC).

METHODS

114 eligible patients from 47 institutions enrolled between April, 1985 and March 1986. Patients had documented L-SCLC. Induction chemotherapy consisted of three cycles of PEV. TRT was administered at 1.8 Gy/fraction in 25 daily fractions to a total dose of 45 Gy, to begin concomitantly. Consolidative chemotherapy included two cycles of vincristine, methotrexate, etoposide, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide. Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) was concurrent with the 3rd cycle of chemotherapy. The PCI dose was 30 Gy in 15 fractions of 2 Gy/fraction.

RESULTS

As of May 2000, 5 of 114 remain alive and progression-free with a minimum follow-up interval of 13.2 years, as of May 2000. The median follow-up interval is 14.2 years. Thirty eight patients died of causes other than SCLC and five patients are still alive and progression-free. Of the remaining 71 patients dying of SCLC, local failure (LF) occurred in 24% (17 patients), distant metastasis (DM) occurred in 35% (25 patients), simultaneous LF and DM occurred in 25% (18 patients), and was indeterminate in 16% (11 patients). Thus, LF was a component of failure in 49%. Twenty patients had the CNS as the initial site of failure. Eleven patients (10%) developed fatal second primary cancers, including two with acute myelogenous leukemia, two with squamous cell lung cancer, one each with breast, pancreas, prostate, renal cell, and myelodysplasia. One patient developed both a melanoma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

CONCLUSION

There are long-term survivors with concomitant TRT and PEV. LF and DM are common. Pattern of failure suggests needs to improve local and systemic control.

Surgical resection of non-small cell carcinoma after treatment for small cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Development of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) in patients previously treated for small cell carcinoma (SCLC/NSCLC) is well described; however, little is known about clinical outcome.

METHODS

A single-institution 20-year review was performed. Patient characteristics and survival for SCLC/ NSCLC patients were compared with those for control patients matched for stage, resection, and previous malignancy.

RESULTS

One thousand four hundred four patients with small cell carcinoma were identified, and 29 underwent therapy for metachronous NSCLC: 11 of 29 patients underwent surgical resection, 10 of these 11 (90%) were stage I. Compared with surgically treated stage I NSCLC patients, SCLC/NSCLC patients were more likely to have squamous histology (70% versus 35%, p = 0.026); and subanatomic resection (90% versus 17.4%, p < 0.0005). The SCLC/NSCLC patients had significantly poorer survival when compared with stage I NSCLC patients undergoing any resection (24.53 versus 74.43 months, p = 0.003) and stage I NSCLC patients receiving wedge resection (24.53 versus 58.39 months, p = 0.006). Survival was similar to NSCLC patients with a history of previous treated extrathoracic solid malignancy.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical resection for SCLC/NSCLC patients is feasible, but poorer prognosis is noted when compared with stage-matched control patients. Surgical candidates should be carefully chosen, and alternative local control modalities considered.

Risk of a new primary cancer among patients with lung cancer of different histological types

The risk of a new primary cancer (NPC) among 77548 Finnish lung cancer patients from 1953 to 1995 was analysed by the histological type of the lung cancer. The relative risks were expressed as standardised incidence ratios (SIR, ratio of the observed and expected numbers of cases). During the follow-up, 1148 NPCs were observed among men and 152 among women. After exclusion of lung cancers, the risk of NPC was elevated in both males (SIR 1.07; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00-1.14) and females (SIR 1.21; 95% CI 1.02-1.42). The excess was larger among lung cancer patients with small-cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma than those with squamous-cell carcinoma. In all major histological groups of lung cancer, significant excess risks were found for cancers of the larynx (SIRs 2.94-4.25), and bladder (SIRs 2.16-2.86). Significantly elevated SIRs were also found for cancers of the stomach (SIR 1.42; 95% CI 1.12-1.76) and kidney (SIR 2.18; 95% CI 1.56-2.97) in squamous-cell carcinoma; for brain tumours (SIR 3.26; 95% CI 1.20-7.09) in small-cell carcinoma; and for cancers of the prostate (SIR 1.68; 95% CI 1.21-2.27) and thyroid (SIR 3.79; 95% CI 1.23-8.85), and brain tumours (SIR 2.34; 95% CI 1.07-4.43) in adenocarcinoma. The risk of contracting NPC at sites where the majority of tumours are adenocarcinomas was elevated among patients with adenocarcinoma of the lung, but not among squamous-cell or small-cell carcinoma patients. In adenocarcinoma, the excess risks of several smoking-related cancers tended to be somewhat lower than those in the other two histological categories. The relative risk of a NPC among patients diagnosed with lung cancer in 1985-1995 was higher than that of patients from earlier periods in all comparable follow-up categories (up to 10 years), possibly suggesting that the increased use of cytostatic drugs had increased the risk of NPC.

Limited stage small cell lung cancer

The management of limited stage small cell lung cancer begins with a firm pathologic diagnosis and careful staging. Patients with adequate pulmonary function, ambulatory performance status, and no evidence of metastatic disease outside a "tolerable" local radiotherapy volume should have consultation from both medical and radiation oncology disciplines for planning of integrated therapy. The chemotherapy prescription recommended is cisplatin plus etoposide at standard doses for four chemotherapy cycles. Thoracic irradiation should be administered concurrently with the first or second cycle of cisplatin and etoposide. Patients with complete response and excellent partial response should receive prophylactic cranial irradiation after completion of all chemotherapy.

Small cell carcinoma of the bladder: long term outcome with integrated chemoradiation

BACKGROUND

Small cell carcinoma of the bladder (SCCB) is an uncommon tumor with approximately 8% 5-year survival reported in the literature for patients with disease confined to the pelvis. It exhibits biologic behavior similar to that of small cell carcinoma of the lung (SCLC). The authors sought to determine whether etoposide and cisplatin chemotherapy integrated with local irradiation is associated with improved survival in SCCB, as has been shown in SCLC.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective analysis of stage, treatment, disease free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) among 14 British Columbia Cancer Agency (BCCA) patients treated between 1985 and 1996 for SCCB.

RESULTS

When multiagent chemotherapy was combined with local irradiation, the authors observed a 70% 2-year and 44% 5-year actuarial OS among 10 patients without contraindications to systemic chemotherapy. Actuarial DFS was 70% at 2 and 5 years. The mean survival was 47 months (95% confidence interval, 18.5-76.1 months) and the median survival was 41 months. Nine of these patients had disease confined to the pelvis, and one had metastases to retroperitoneal lymph nodes. Five patients were alive and disease free an average of 82 months following diagnosis. Two patients had died of other causes without evidence of disease at 34 and 48 months following diagnosis. The incidence of second primary transitional cell bladder neoplasms following successful treatment was 60% at 2 years (3 of 5 long term survivors).

CONCLUSIONS

Integrated chemoradiation for patients with limited stage SCCB generates a realistic expectation of long term survival. Prospective trials to confirm these findings are warranted.

Clinical features of patients with stage IIIB and IV bronchioloalveolar carcinoma of the lung

BACKGROUND

The incidence of bronchioloalveolar carcinoma of the lung (BAC), a pathologically distinct type of nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), appears to be rising. In this study, the authors compared data on the clinical presentation and clinical courses of patients with Stage IIIB and IV BAC with data on other types of NSCLC.

METHODS

The authors collected clinical, radiographic, and pathology information about 28 patients with Stage IIIB and IV BAC and 124 patients with other histologic types of NSCLC.

RESULTS

Twelve of 28 BAC patients (43%) were women, compared with 40 of 124 control patients (32%). Nine (32%) of the patients with BAC had never smoked cigarettes, versus 20 controls (16%) (P = 0.02). Eighteen patients (64%) with BAC had bilateral multilobar or multicentric pulmonary involvement, compared with 13 controls (15%) (P < 0.001). Patients with advanced stage (IIIB and IV) BAC had a median survival of 15 months from the time of diagnosis; for patients with other types of Stage IIIB and IV NSCLC, had a median survival of 10 months (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with BAC of the lung have clinical, radiographic, and pathologic characteristics that distinguish them from patients with other types of NSCLC. A greater proportion of women and nonsmokers present with BAC than with other types of NSCLC. Patients with advanced stage BAC are more likely to have bilateral diffuse pulmonary involvement, are less likely to develop brain metastases, and have longer survival than patients with other types of Stage IIIB and IV NSCLC. Further research is warranted to define etiology, molecular abnormalities, and more effective therapeutic interventions.

Second primary cancers in patients with lung carcinoma

BACKGROUND

There are only limited population-based data available regarding the risk of developing a second cancer after a diagnosis of lung carcinoma.

METHODS

Data collected from the Cancer Registry of the Swiss Canton of Vaud (comprised of approximately 600,000 inhabitants) were used to estimate the incidence of a second metachronous primary cancer following a diagnosis of lung carcinoma. Between 1974 and 1996, 5794 cases of lung carcinoma (occurring in 4728 males and 1066 females) were followed actively until the end of 1996.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-five second primary neoplasms were registered (occurring in 146 males and 29 females). Significant excess rates were observed for all cancer sites (standardized incidence ratio [SIR] = 1.2), cancers of the oral cavity and pharynx (SIR = 2.7), and lung (SIR = 1.7). SIRs also were above unity for cancers of the esophagus (SIR = 1.8), pancreas (SIR = 1.5), bladder (SIR = 1.8), kidney (SIR = 2.3), and the female breast (SIR = 2.0). Excess rates for all cancer sites together and tobacco-related neoplasms were systematically higher at a younger age (< 60 years). The overall cumulative risk of lung cancer was 1.8% at 5 years and 4.7% at 10 years and was 5% and 11%, respectively, for any tobacco-related tumor. The estimates were consistent for squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the lung.

CONCLUSIONS

There were substantial excesses of second lung carcinomas as well as other major tobacco-related neoplasms, but not of colorectal carcinoma, prostate carcinoma, or lymphoid neoplasms after the diagnosis of a primary lung carcinoma. This study emphasizes the importance of smoking cessation even after a diagnosis of lung carcinoma.

Second lung cancers in patients after treatment for an initial lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Prospectively and retrospectively identified patient cohorts that were successfully treated for primary lung cancer have been followed to document the rate of development of and the effectiveness of treatment of second lung cancers. This review was performed to assess rates of second lung cancer development, factors associated with the development of these cancers, and the success of their treatment.

METHODS

The MEDLINE database was searched to identify articles published in English concerning lung cancers, second primary cancers, treatment of these cancers, and patient survival.

RESULTS

The risk of developing a second lung cancer in patients who survived resection of a non-small-cell lung cancer is approximately 1%-2% per patient per year. Approximately one half of the patients who develop second non-small-cell lung cancers can have these tumors resected. The median survival from diagnosis of a second lung cancer in these patients is between 1 and 2 years, with a 5-year survival of approximately 20% (range, 4%-32%). The average risk of developing a second lung cancer in patients who survived small-cell lung cancer is approximately 6% per patient per year. For patients who survived small-cell cancer, the risk increases from approximately 2% to greater than 10% per patient per year 10 years after initial treatment. Only 7% (range, 6%-12%) of patients treated for small-cell lung cancer survive 2 years or more. Survivors who continue to smoke cigarettes have an increased risk of developing a second lung cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients surviving an initial lung cancer, the cumulative risk for the development of a second primary lung cancer makes this cancer a common cause of death. The high risk of developing a second lung cancer makes patients with these cancers an important population for study of surveillance strategies and chemoprevention agents.

Second primary tumours in more than 2-year disease-free survivors of small-cell lung cancer in Japan: the role of smoking cessation

Patients with small-cell lung cancer who survive more than 2 years have a significantly increased risk (relative risk of 3.6) of developing a second primary tumour. The cessation of cigarette smoking after successful therapy is associated with a significantly decreased risk of a second primary tumour.