Treating rheumatoid arthritis to target: 2014 update of the recommendations of an international task force

Efficacy and safety of selective JAK 1 inhibitor filgotinib in active rheumatoid arthritis patients with inadequate response to methotrexate: comparative study with filgotinib and tocilizumab examined by clinical index as well as musculoskeletal ultrasound assessment (TRANSFORM study): study protocol for a randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter, and non-inferiority clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Administration of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs has dramatically improved even the clinical outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX). Dysregulation of JAK-STAT pathways via overproduction of cytokines, such as interleukin-6, is involved in the pathogenesis of RA. Filgotinib is a selective JAK1 inhibitor pending approval for use in RA. By inhibition of the JAK-STAT pathway, filgotinib is effective in suppressing disease activity and preventing the progression of joint destruction. Similarly, interleukin-6 inhibitors such as tocilizumab also inhibit the JAK-STAT pathways by inhibition of interleukin-6 signaling. We present the protocol for a study that will evaluate whether the effectiveness of filgotinib monotherapy is non-inferior to that of tocilizumab monotherapy in RA patients with an inadequate response to MTX.

METHODS

This study is an interventional, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, and non-inferiority clinical trial with a 52-week follow-up. Study participants will be 400 RA patients with at least moderate disease activity during treatment with MTX. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to administer filgotinib monotherapy or subcutaneous tocilizumab monotherapy switched from MTX. We will evaluate disease activity by measuring clinical disease activity indices and by using musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS). The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients who achieve an American College of Rheumatology 50 response at week 12. Secondary endpoints are changes from baseline in the MSUS scores. We will also comprehensively analyze serum levels of multiple biomarkers, such as cytokines and chemokines.

DISCUSSION

The study results are expected to show the non-inferiority of the effectiveness of filgotinib monotherapy to that of tocilizumab monotherapy in RA patients with inadequate response to MTX. The strength of this study is its prospective evaluation of therapeutic efficacy using not only clinical disease activity indices, but also MSUS, which accurately and objectively evaluates disease activity at the joint level among patients drawn from multiple centers with a standardized evaluation by MSUS. We will evaluate the effectiveness of both drugs by integrating multilateral assessments-clinical disease activity indices, MSUS findings, and serum biomarkers.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Japan Registry of Clinical Trials ( https://jrct.niph.go.jp ) jRCTs071200107. Registered on March 3, 2021.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov NCT05090410. Registered on October 22, 2021.

[Implementation, of multidisciplinary consultations for patients with inflammatory arthritis and treated with subcutaneous biologic DMARDs: Assessment at one year and outlook]

INTRODUCTION

Biologics (bDMARDs) have revolutionized the prognosis of patients with inflammatory arthritis, but are not without serious side effects. The patient must be able to identify them, acquire self-care abilities or skills and adhere to their treatment. Multidisciplinary consultations, including a pharmaceutical consultation could improve the care of these patients. The pharmaceutical presence make it easier to switch to a biosimilar with etended patient support thanks to the community-hospital network. The return on investment is possible thanks to the more frequent use of biosimilars and the pricing of this type of consultation by the "Forfait de Prestation Intermédiaire".

METHODOLOGY

Eligible patients are patients with rheumatoid arthritis or spondyloarthritis, treated with subcutaneous bDMARDs. The criteria assessed were patient's knowledge of their biotherapy using the Biosecure score, their medication adherence using the CQR-5, the total of switch to biosimilars perform and the financial statement of the consultations. An assessment of the actions deployed for the community-hospital network.

RESULTS

Two hundred and ninety-five patients (47.4%) benefited multidisciplinary consultation. The mean score of the Biosecure score was 69.6/100 (moderate knowledge) and 261 patients (88.5%) were highly adherent. 57 patients (73%) accepted the switch to biosimilar. 197 pharmacy were contacted, all of witch for patients who receive the switch. Overall patient's satisfaction was 26.9/28.

CONCLUSION

Multidisciplinary consultations with involvement of the pharmacist should optimized patient care and the management of outpatients treated with bDMARDs. Patients have already expressed their satisfaction with this course of care and the return on investment is positive.

Points to consider for cost-effective use of biological and targeted synthetic DMARDs in inflammatory rheumatic diseases: results from an umbrella review and international Delphi study

OBJECTIVES

To develop evidence-based points to consider for cost-effective use of biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) in the treatment of inflammatory rheumatic diseases, specifically rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis.

METHODS

Following EULAR procedures, an international task force was formed, consisting of 13 experts in rheumatology, epidemiology and pharmacology from seven European countries. Twelve strategies for cost-effective use of b/tsDMARDs were identified through individual and group discussion. For each strategy, PubMed and Embase were systematically searched for relevant English-language systematic reviews and, for six strategies, additionally for randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Thirty systematic reviews and 21 RCTs were included. Based on the evidence, a set of overarching principles and points to consider was formulated by the task force using a Delphi procedure. Level of evidence (1a-5) and grade (A-D) were determined for each point to consider. Individual voting on the level of agreement (LoA; between 0 (completely disagree) and 10 (completely agree)) was performed anonymously.

RESULTS

The task force agreed on five overarching principles. For 10 of 12 strategies, the evidence was sufficient to formulate one or more points to consider, leading to 20 in total, regarding response prediction, drug formulary use, biosimilars, loading doses, low-dose initial therapy, concomitant conventional synthetic DMARD use, route of administration, medication adherence, disease activity-guided dose optimisation and non-medical drug switching. Ten points to consider (50%) were supported by level 1 or 2 evidence. The mean LoA (SD) varied between 7.9 (1.2) and 9.8 (0.4).

CONCLUSION

These points to consider can be used in rheumatology practices and complement inflammatory rheumatic disease treatment guidelines to incorporate cost-effectiveness in b/tsDMARD treatment.

68Ga-FAPI PET/CT for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Prospective Study

Background In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), fibroblast-like synoviocyte cells, which are involved in inflammation of the articular cartilage and bone, overexpress fibroblast activation protein (FAP). This is a feature that could be leveraged to improve imaging assessment of disease. Purpose To determine the performance of gallium 68 (⁶⁸Ga)-labeled FAP inhibitor (FAPI) in assessing joint disease activity of RA and to compare with fluorine 18 (¹⁸F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) imaging. Materials and Methods Twenty participants with RA (15 women; mean age, 55 years ± 10 [SD]) were prospectively enrolled from September 2020 to December 2021 and underwent clinical and laboratory assessment of disease activity and dual-tracer PET/CT (⁶⁸Ga-FAPI and ¹⁸F-FDG) imaging. Imaging-derived variables of PET joint count (the number of joints positive for RA at PET) and PET articular index (a sum of the points of the joints using a three-point scale) were correlated to clinical and laboratory variables of disease activity. Results The combined output of both PET/CT techniques helped detect 244 affected joints, all of which showed positive results at ⁶⁸Ga-FAPI PET/CT. However, fifteen of 244 (6.1%) FAPI-avid joints in six of 20 (30%) participants were not detected at ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT. The maximum standardized uptake value of the most affected joint in each participant was higher in ⁶⁸Ga-FAPI than in ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT (9.54 ± 4.92 vs 5.85 ± 2.81, respectively; P = .001). The maximum standardized uptake values of the joints at both ⁶⁸Ga-FAPI and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT were positively correlated with laboratory evaluation of C-reactive protein levels (r = 0.49 [P = .03] and 0.54 [P = .01], respectively). The PET joint count and PET articular index scores at ⁶⁸Ga-FAPI PET/CT were also positively correlated with most clinical disease activity variables and radiographic progression of joint damage (P < .05). Conclusion In participants with rheumatoid arthritis who underwent gallium 68 fibroblast activation protein inhibitor PET/CT, the extent of joint involvement correlated with clinical and laboratory variables of disease activity and showed a greater amount and degree of affected joints than at fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT. Clinical trial registration no. NCT04514614 © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Williams and Ahlman in this issue.

Long-Term Durability of Certolizumab Pegol in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Over 5 Years: An Analysis of Pooled Clinical Trial Data

INTRODUCTION

There is a paucity of data on how patient characteristics may affect the long-term durability of certolizumab pegol (CZP) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This study therefore aimed to investigate CZP durability and reasons for discontinuation over 5 years between different subgroups of patients with RA.

METHODS

Data were pooled from 27 clinical trials in RA patients. Durability was defined as the percentage of patients randomized to CZP at baseline who were still on CZP treatment at a given timepoint. Post hoc analyses of clinical trial data on CZP durability and reasons for discontinuation among different patient subgroups were conducted using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards modeling. Patient subgroups included: age (18- < 45/45- < 65/ ≥ 65 years), gender (male/female), prior tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) use (yes/no), and disease duration (< 1/1- < 5/5- < 10/ ≥ 10 years).

RESULTS

Among 6927 patients, the durability of CZP was 39.7% at 5 years. Patients aged ≥ 65 years had a 33% greater risk of CZP discontinuation than patients 18- < 45 years (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.33 [1.19-1.49]) and patients with prior TNFi use had a 24% greater risk of discontinuing CZP than patients without (1.24 [1.12-1.37]). Conversely, greater durability was observed among patients who had a baseline disease duration of ≥ 1 year. Durability did not differ in the gender subgroup. Of the 6927 patients, the most common reason for discontinuation was inadequate levels of efficacy (13.5%); followed by adverse events (11.9%); consent withdrawn (6.7%); lost to follow-up (1.8%); protocol violation (1.7%); other reasons (9.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

CZP durability was comparable with durability data on other bDMARDs in RA patients. Patient characteristics that were associated with greater durability included younger age, TNFi-naïvety, and disease duration ≥ 1 year. Findings may be helpful in informing clinicians on a patient's likelihood of discontinuing CZP, based on their baseline characteristics.

Paradigm guiding to tapering or discontinuation of biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Results from a local prospective study

OBJECTIVE

We prospectively conduct the current study to figure out predicting factors whether biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) can be discontinued or tapered in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study population encompassed 126 consecutive RA patients on b/tsDMARDs for at least 1 year. Remission was defined as a Disease Activity Score of 28 joints (DAS28) - erythrocyte sedimentation rate <2.6. The b/tsDMARD dosing interval was increased in patients in remission for at least 6 months. In patients in whom the b/tsDMARD dosing interval could be increased by 100% for at least 6 months, the b/tsDMARD was stopped at the end of this period. Disease relapse was defined as deterioration from remission to moderate or high disease activity.

RESULTS

The mean duration of b/tsDMARD treatment for all patients was 2.54 ± 1.55 years. Logistic regression analysis did not identify any independent predictor of treatment discontinuation. Independent predictors for tapering in b/tsDMARD treatment are no switch to another therapy and lower baseline DAS28 scores (respectively, P = .029, .024). Time to relapse after tapering was shorter in patients requiring corticosteroids when the 2 groups were compared with the log-rank test (2.83 vs 10.8 months; P = .05).

CONCLUSION

It seems a reasonable approach to consider b/tsDMARD tapering in patients with remission period of >3.5 months, lower baseline DAS28 scores and without requiring corticosteroid use. Unfortunately, no predictor has been found to predict b/tsDMARD discontinuation.

Approaches to optimising access to NICE-approved biologic anti-TNFs for patients with rheumatoid arthritis with moderately active disease

BACKGROUND

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease that is associated with joint pain and stiffness. Biologics represent some of the most effective treatments for RA, but previous guidance from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has limited their use to patients with severely active disease. This has meant patients with moderately active RA have been treated as if they have an acceptable disease state, despite many cases where the inflammation has a major impact on joint damage, mobility, pain and quality of life. However, recent guideline changes (NICE TA715) have approved the use of three biologics - adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab - for the treatment of moderately active RA.

MAIN BODY

In response to these changes, we have held discussions with medical teams from across the UK to consider the main implications for implementation of these new recommendations, as well as any differences in approach that may exist at a local level. Several key challenges were identified. These included establishing methods of educating both physicians and patients concerning the new availability of the biologic treatments, with suggestions of various organisations that could be approached to circulate informative material. Identifying which patients with moderately active RA stand to benefit was another discussion topic. Relying solely on scoring systems like Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints (DAS28) was acknowledged to have limitations, and alternative complementary approaches such as ultrasound, as well as assessing a patient's co-morbidities, could also be useful tools in determining those who could benefit from biologics. An additional challenge for the process of patient identification has been the increase in the use of telemedicine consultations in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. More use of patient-reported outcomes was raised as one possible solution, and the importance of maintaining up-to-date databases on patient disease scores and treatment history was also stressed.

CONCLUSION

While challenges exist in education and identifying patients who may benefit from the use of biologics, the NICE TA715 recommendations hold great potential in addressing an unmet need for the treatment of moderate RA.

Continuation, reduction, or withdrawal of tofacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis achieving sustained disease control: a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a chronic systemic autoimmune disease, is characterized by synovitis and progressive damage to the bone and cartilage of the joints, leading to disability and reduced quality of life. This study was a randomized clinical trial comparing the outcomes between withdrawal and dose reduction of tofacitinib in patients with RA who achieved sustained disease control.

METHODS

The study was designed as a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Eligible patients who were taking tofacitinib (5 mg twice daily) and had achieved sustained RA remission or low disease activity (disease activity score in 28 joints [DAS28] ≤3.2) for at least 3 months were enrolled at six centers in Shanghai, China. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to one of three treatment groups: continuation of tofacitinib (5 mg twice daily); reduction in tofacitinib dose (5 mg daily); and withdrawal of tofacitinib. Efficacy and safety were assessed up to 6 months.

RESULTS

Overall, 122 eligible patients were enrolled, with 41 in the continuation group, 42 in the dose-reduction group, and 39 in the withdrawal group. After 6 months, the percentage of patients with a DAS28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) of <3.2 was significantly lower in the withdrawal group than that in the reduction and continuation groups (20.5%, 64.3%, and 95.1%, respectively; P  < 0.0001 for both comparisons). The average flare-free time was 5.8 months for the continuation group, 4.7 months for the dose reduction group, and 2.4 months for the withdrawal group.

CONCLUSION

Withdrawal of tofacitinib in patients with RA with stable disease control resulted in a rapid and significant loss of efficacy, while standard or reduced doses of tofacitinib maintained a favorable state.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chictr.org, ChiCTR2000039799.

Radiological assessment and surgical management of cervical spine involvement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

The purpose of the present systematic review was to describe the diagnostic evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis in the cervical spine to provide a better understanding of the indications and options of surgical intervention. We performed a literature review of Pub-med, Embase, and Scopus database. Upon implementing specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, all eligible articles were identified. A total of 1878 patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) were evaluated for cervical spine involvement with plain radiographs. Atlantoaxial subluxation (AAS) ranged from 16.4 to 95.7% in plain radiographs while sub-axial subluxation ranged from 10 to 43.6% of cases. Anterior atlantodental interval (AADI) was found to between 2.5 mm and 4.61 mm in neutral and flexion position respectively, while Posterior Atlantodental Interval (PADI) was between 20.4 and 24.92 mm. 660 patients with RA had undergone an MRI. A pannus diagnosis ranged from 13.33 to 85.36% while spinal cord compression was reported in 0-13% of cases. When it comes to surgical outcomes, Atlanto-axial joint (AAJ) fusion success rates ranged from 45.16 to 100% of cases. Furthermore, the incidence of postoperative subluxation ranged from 0 to 77.7%. With regards to AADI it is evident that its value decreased in all studies. Furthermore, an improvement in Ranawat classification was variable between studies with a report improvement frequency by at least one class ranging from 0 to 54.5%. In conclusion, through careful radiographic and clinical evaluation, cervical spine involvement in patients with RA can be detected. Surgery is a valuable option for these patients and can lead to improvement in their symptoms.

Treat to target and tight control: Could be a new approach in the treatment of sarcoidosis?

Sarcoidosis is a chronic granulomatous disease with multisystemic involvement. Although it is accepted as a benign disease, it can sometimes cause life-threatening organ (heart, brain) involvement that determines the prognosis of the disease. There are conflicting opinions about the treatment of the disease. In the generally accepted treatment approach the "step-by-step" model has gained weight. According to this approach, corticosteroids (CS) drugs alone are preferred in the first step in patients who require treatment. In the second step, immunosuppressive drugs (IS) are used in patients who do not respond to CS and/or have contraindications to CS use, and biologics (TNF-alpha inhibitors) are used in the third step. This treatment approach may be valid in cases with mild sarcoidosis. However, although sarcoidosis is considered a benign and self-limiting disease in some major organ involvement, the "step-by-step" approach may be a treatment option that puts the patient's life in danger. In such selected patients, much more rigorous, early and combined treatment approaches that definitely include CS, IS or biologic drugs may be required. In selected sarcoidosis patients with high risk, early diagnosis, "treat-to-target" (T2T) and "tight control" follow-up of patients seems to be a rational approach. This article reviews the "step-down" treatment regimens in light of recent literature data and hypothesizes that the T2T model may be a probable new treatment approach in patients with sarcoidosis.

Reprogrammed siTNFα/neutrophil cytopharmaceuticals targeting inflamed joints for rheumatoid arthritis therapy

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease characterized by severe synovial inflammation and cartilage damage. Despite great progress in RA therapy, there still lacks the drugs to completely cure RA patients. Herein, we propose a reprogrammed neutrophil cytopharmaceuticals loading with TNFα-targeting-siRNA (siTNFα) as an alternative anti-inflammatory approach for RA treatment. The loaded siTNFα act as not only the gene therapeutics to inhibit TNFα production by macrophages in inflamed synovium, but also the editors to reprogram neutrophils to anti-inflammatory phenotypes. Leveraging the active tendency of neutrophils to inflammation, the reprogrammed siTNFα/neutrophil cytopharmaceuticals (siTNFα/TP/NEs) can rapidly migrate to the inflamed synovium, transfer the loaded siTNFα to macrophages followed by the significant reduction of TNFα expression, and circumvent the pro-inflammatory activity of neutrophils, thus leading to the alleviated synovial inflammation and improved cartilage protection. Our work provides a promising cytopharmaceutical for RA treatment, and puts forward a living neutrophil-based gene delivery platform.

Busting the myth of methotrexate chronic hepatotoxicity

Methotrexate is a key component of the treatment of inflammatory rheumatic diseases and the mainstay of therapy in rheumatoid arthritis. Hepatotoxicity has long been a concern for prescribers envisaging long-term treatment with methotrexate for their patients. However, the putative liver toxicity of methotrexate should be evaluated in the context of advances in our knowledge of the pathogenesis and natural history of liver disease, especially non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Notably, patients with NAFLD are at increased risk for methotrexate hepatotoxicity, and methotrexate can worsen the course of NAFLD. Understanding the mechanisms of acute hepatotoxicity can facilitate the interpretation of elevated concentrations of liver enzymes in this context. Liver fibrosis and the mechanisms of fibrogenesis also need to be considered in relation to chronic exposure to methotrexate. A number of non-invasive tests for liver fibrosis are available for use in patients with rheumatic disease, in addition to liver biopsy, which can be appropriate for particular individuals. On the basis of the available evidence, practical suggestions for pretreatment screening and long-term monitoring of methotrexate therapy can be made for patients who have (or are at risk for) chronic liver disease.

Female reproductive status and exogenous sex hormone use in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with tocilizumab and csDMARDs

OBJECTIVES

Sex is well known to influence risk, severity and treatment outcomes of RA, although the underlying causes are uncertain. The aim of this research was to examine whether factors influencing female sex hormones (reproductive status and exogenous sex hormone use) are associated with the efficacy of DMARDs.

METHODS

Individual participant data were pooled from five phase 3 clinical trials where RA patients were treated with tocilizumab and/or conventional synthetic DMARDs. The primary outcome was the time to first remission according to the Simplified Disease Activity Index. The relationship between menopausal status or use of exogenous sex hormones and the time of first remission was assessed via Cox proportional analysis. Analysed data included sex, baseline menopausal status (premenopausal, perimenopausal, early postmenopausal and postmenopausal), participant age, body mass index, race, number of previous DMARDs and baseline disease activity.

RESULTS

Analysis included 4474 female patients, of whom 2817 (62.9%) were postmenopausal, 202 (4.5%) were early postmenopausal, 1021 (22.8%) were premenopausal and 414 (9.2%) were perimenopausal. Of these, 221 (7.8%), 13 (6.4%), 255 (25%) and 47 (11.4%), respectively, were taking exogenous sex hormones. In the pooled analysis, perimenopausal status was associated with reduced remission compared with premenopausal status [adjusted HR 0.78 (95% CI 0.61, 0.99)]. Sex hormone use was associated with significantly higher remission [adjusted HR 1.20 (95% CI 1.01, 1.43)].

CONCLUSION

Perimenopausal women were less likely to achieve remission compared with premenopausal RA patients. The use of exogenous sex hormones appeared to be associated with more frequent remission in female RA patients, particularly those who were perimenopausal and early postmenopausal, although further research is required to confirm and identify the drivers for this observation and how it interacts with menopausal status.

Rheumatoid Neuropathy: A Brief Overview

Rheumatoid arthritis is an autoimmune disease commonly found in humans. It is characterized by stiffness and swelling of the joints, along with fatigue and malaise. Rheumatoid neuropathy is a neuropathy that arises as a complication of rheumatoid arthritis. The primary objective of this review article is to provide a detailed account of the various aspects of this neurological complication ranging from its incidence, clinical features, and diagnosis. After searching through various published review articles and textbooks, rheumatoid neuropathy is one of the most common complications of rheumatoid arthritis. Out of all types of neuropathies. the most observed is entrapment neuropathy. Carpel tunnel syndrome is the most common type of entrapment neuropathy. There seems to be a greater predilection of rheumatoid neuropathy in females compared to males. A direct relation exists between rheumatoid factor and the occurrence of neuropathy. Some clinical features of rheumatoid neuropathy include stiffness in hands and feet, burning and tingling, stabbing pain, occasional weakness, and numbness in several cases. The common modalities of diagnosis are history, clinical examination, blood test, magnetic resonance imaging, nerve conduction study, and tissue biopsy. From the above-mentioned modalities, nerve conduction studies must be chosen as they can detect latent cases quickly and effective treatment can be initiated immediately. Finally, we outline the treatment plan for the disease which can be divided into medical and surgical management. Medical management consists of symptomatic treatment such as analgesics, anticonvulsants, and antidepressants, while surgical management is the last resort and consists of nerve compression.

American College of Rheumatology/EULAR Remission Criteria for Rheumatoid Arthritis: 2022 Revision

OBJECTIVE

In 2011, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and EULAR endorsed provisional criteria for remission in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), both Boolean- and index-based. Based on recent studies indicating that a higher threshold for the patient global assessment (PtGA) may improve agreement between the 2 sets of criteria, our goals were to externally validate a revision of the Boolean remission criteria using a higher PtGA threshold and to validate the provisionally endorsed index-based criteria.

METHODS

We used data from 4 randomized trials comparing biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs to methotrexate or placebo. We tested the higher proposed PtGA threshold of 2 cm (Boolean2.0) (range 0-10 cm) compared to the original threshold of 1 cm (Boolean1.0). We analyzed agreement between the Boolean- and index-based criteria (Simplified Disease Activity Index [SDAI] and Clinical Disease Activity Index [CDAI]) for remission and examined how well each remission definition predicted later good physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ] score ≤0.5) and radiographic nonprogression.

RESULTS

Data from 2,048 trial participants, 1,101 with early RA and 947 with established RA, were included. The proportion of patients with disease in remission at 6 months after treatment initiation increased when using Boolean2.0 compared to Boolean1.0, from 14.8% to 20.6% in early RA and 4.2% to 6.0% in established RA. Agreement between Boolean2.0 and the SDAI or CDAI remission criteria was better than for Boolean1.0, particularly in early disease. Boolean2.0, SDAI, and CDAI remission criteria had similar positive likelihood ratios (LRs) to predict radiographic nonprogression and a HAQ score of ≤0.5 (positive LR 3.8-4.3). The omission of PtGA (BooleanX) worsened the prediction of good functional outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Using the Boolean 2.0 criteria classifies more patients as achieving remission and increases the agreement with index-based remission criteria without jeopardizing predictive value for radiographic or functional outcomes. This revised Boolean definition and the previously provisionally endorsed index-based criteria were endorsed by ACR and EULAR.

American College of Rheumatology/EULAR remission criteria for rheumatoid arthritis: 2022 revision

OBJECTIVE

In 2011, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and EULAR endorsed provisional criteria for remission in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), both Boolean-based and index-based. Based on recent studies indicating that a higher threshold for the patient global assessment (PtGA) may improve agreement between the two sets of criteria, our goals were to externally validate a revision of the Boolean remission criteria using a higher PtGA threshold and to validate the provisionally endorsed index-based criteria.

METHODS

We used data from four randomised trials comparing biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs to methotrexate or placebo. We tested the higher proposed PtGA threshold of 2 cm (Boolean2.0) (range 0-10 cm) compared with the original threshold of 1 cm (Boolean1.0). We analysed agreement between the Boolean-based and index-based criteria (Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)) for remission and examined how well each remission definition predicted later good physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score≤0.5) and radiographic non-progression.

RESULTS

Data from 2048 trial participants, 1101 with early RA and 947 with established RA, were included. The proportion of patients with disease in remission at 6 months after treatment initiation increased when using Boolean2.0 compared with Boolean1.0, from 14.8% to 20.6% in early RA and 4.2% to 6.0% in established RA. Agreement between Boolean2.0 and the SDAI or CDAI remission criteria was better than for Boolean1.0, particularly in early disease. Boolean2.0, SDAI, and CDAI remission criteria had similar positive likelihood ratios (LRs) to predict radiographic nonprogression and a HAQ score of ≤0.5 (positive LR 3.8-4.3). The omission of PtGA (BooleanX) worsened the prediction of good functional outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Using the Boolean 2.0 criteria classifies, more patients as achieving remission and increases the agreement with index-based remission criteria without jeopardising predictive value for radiographic or functional outcomes. This revised Boolean definition and the previously provisionally endorsed index-based criteria were endorsed by ACR and EULAR.

JAK inhibition in the treatment of inflammatory rheumatic diseases

The most common immune-mediated inflammatory rheumatic diseases, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis and have reached significant advances in recent years with the introduction of biological therapies against cytokines and immune cells, but also against intracellular enzymes, specifically Janus kinases (JAKs). Intracellular JAK signalling is activated by binding of various cytokines or growth factors to the respective cellular receptors, allowing the activation of STAT (Signal Transducers and Activators of Transcription) transcription factors and ultimately the transcription of genes with important roles during the innate and adaptive immune response. Four Janus kinases have been described: JAK1, JAK2, JAK3 and tyrosine kinase-2 (TYK2). Four JAK inhibitors (tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib and filgotinib) are currently approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, and some for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis. JAK inhibitors have varying selectivity against individual kinases. Some JAK inhibitors are being tested in other rarer systemic connective tissue diseases. The general advantages of JAK inhibitors are oral administration, rapid onset of action, and efficacy in monotherapy. The safety profile of JAK inhibitors compared with biologic therapy appears to be comparable, with a higher incidence of herpes zoster, and an increased incidence of major cardiovascular disease, thromboembolic complications, and cancer in at-risk patients is discussed. The aim of this paper will be to summarize the latest findings on JAK inhibitors in approved indications for the most common rheumatic diseases.

Asthma Management in Adults

Management of asthma in adults has advanced in the past 10 years. Central to these advances has been further clarification of type (T) 2 mechanisms of airway inflammation and utilization of T2 biomarkers, that is, eosinophils and fractional exhaled nitric oxide. In addition, epithelial cells are emerging as significant contributors to inflammation through generation of alarmins to initiate local injury as well as downstream pathways. Five new biologics, mepolizumab, benralizumab, reslizumab, dupilumab, and tezepelumab, were approved to join omalizumab and revolutionize severe asthma treatment. These biologics significantly prevent exacerbations to spare systemic corticosteroids use and their side effects. Guidelines attest to the effectiveness of inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting β-agonists (formoterol) for both maintenance and rescue therapy. Focused updates to the Expert Panel Report addressed limited but specific questions relevant to asthma control. Future guidelines should include phenotype/endotype-directed therapeutics to gain more precision-directed treatment.

EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2022 update

OBJECTIVES

To provide an update of the EULAR rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management recommendations addressing the most recent developments in the field.

METHODS

An international task force was formed and solicited three systematic literature research activities on safety and efficacy of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and glucocorticoids (GCs). The new evidence was discussed in light of the last update from 2019. A predefined voting process was applied to each overarching principle and recommendation. Levels of evidence and strengths of recommendation were assigned to and participants finally voted on the level of agreement with each item.

RESULTS

The task force agreed on 5 overarching principles and 11 recommendations concerning use of conventional synthetic (cs) DMARDs (methotrexate (MTX), leflunomide, sulfasalazine); GCs; biological (b) DMARDs (tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab including biosimilars), abatacept, rituximab, tocilizumab, sarilumab and targeted synthetic (ts) DMARDs, namely the Janus kinase inhibitors tofacitinib, baricitinib, filgotinib, upadacitinib. Guidance on monotherapy, combination therapy, treatment strategies (treat-to-target) and tapering in sustained clinical remission is provided. Safety aspects, including risk of major cardiovascular events (MACEs) and malignancies, costs and sequencing of b/tsDMARDs were all considered. Initially, MTX plus GCs is recommended and on insufficient response to this therapy within 3-6 months, treatment should be based on stratification according to risk factors; With poor prognostic factors (presence of autoantibodies, high disease activity, early erosions or failure of two csDMARDs), any bDMARD should be added to the csDMARD; after careful consideration of risks of MACEs, malignancies and/or thromboembolic events tsDMARDs may also be considered in this phase. If the first bDMARD (or tsDMARD) fails, any other bDMARD (from another or the same class) or tsDMARD (considering risks) is recommended. With sustained remission, DMARDs may be tapered but should not be stopped. Levels of evidence and levels of agreement were high for most recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

These updated EULAR recommendations provide consensus on RA management including safety, effectiveness and cost.

Antibody-Mediated Delivery of VEGF-C Promotes Long-Lasting Lymphatic Expansion That Reduces Recurrent Inflammation

The lymphatic vascular system plays a fundamental role in inflammation by draining interstitial fluid, immune cells, antigens, and inflammatory mediators from peripheral tissues. Site-specific delivery of the lymphangiogenic growth factor VEGF-C alleviates acute inflammation in mouse models of psoriasis and chronic colitis by enhancing local drainage. However, it is unclear whether therapeutically induced lymphangiogenesis is transient or long-lasting and whether it might prevent relapses of inflammation. Here, we investigated the long-term effects of targeted VEGF-C delivery in a chronic dermatitis model in mice. Congruent with our previous results, intravenous injection with a VEGF-C fusion protein targeted to the EDA domain of fibronectin initially resulted in reduced inflammation. Importantly, we found that targeted VEGF-C-mediated expansion of lymphatic vessels in the skin persisted for more than 170 days, long after primary inflammation had resolved. Furthermore, the treatment markedly decreased tissue swelling upon inflammatory re-challenge at the same site. Simultaneously, infiltration of leukocytes, including CD4+ T cells, macrophages, and dendritic cells, was significantly reduced in the previously treated group. In conclusion, our data show that targeted delivery of VEGF-C leads to long-lasting lymphatic expansion and long-term protection against repeated inflammatory challenge, suggesting that it is a promising new approach for the treatment of chronic, recurrent inflammatory diseases.

Erosion-free rheumatoid arthritis: clinical and conceptional implications-a BARFOT study

BACKGROUND

Bone erosions may appear early or later during rheumatoid arthritis (RA), causing joint damage and functional impairment. However, in some patients erosions do not occur, even after several years of disease. This study evaluates the prevalence, clinical relevance and possible predictors of erosion-free RA.

METHODS

Six hundred and eight patients from an early RA cohort (BARFOT) having radiographs of hands and feet at inclusion and after 1, 2, 5 and 8 years were studied. Clinical and functional assessments were performed on all these time-points.

RESULTS

In all, 144 patients (24%) did not develop erosions up to 8 years follow-up (Never erosive group), while 464 patients (76%) had erosions on one or more assessments (Ever erosive group). At diagnosis, the patients in the Never erosive group were significantly younger, satisfied fewer ACR criteria, and were less frequently RF- and/or anti-CCP- positive compared with those in the Ever erosive group. The Never erosive patients had consistently more tender joints, lower erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and, from two years and onwards, fewer swollen joints. Absence of rheumatoid factor (RF) and/or anti-CCP were strong independent predictors for erosion-free disease. The erosion-free patients were less frequently treated with DMARDs and/or prednisolone.

CONCLUSIONS

One-quarter of the patients was erosion-free during eight years in this early RA cohort. Erosion-free patients had a less severe disease course as to disease activity and were more often seronegative compared with those with erosive disease. The results suggest that non-erosive RA represents a milder form of RA.

Effectiveness and safety profile of tofacitinib and baricitinib in rheumatoid arthritis patients: results from a 24-month real-life prospective study in Southern-Italy

The primary objectives of the study were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib and baricitinib up to 24 months of follow-up in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated in Southern Italy. Patients' data, activity index, and clinimetric scores were collected at baseline (T0), six (T6), twelve (T12), and twenty-four (T24) months following treatment initiation. At six, twelve, and twenty-four months, adverse events and treatment cessation were also recorded. Sixty-eight patients (mean age: 62.2±10.9 years; mean RA duration: 15±9.6 years) were enrolled over a period of 12 weeks. At baseline, twenty-four patients (35.3%) were treated with tofacitinib, and forty-four patients (64.7%) were treated with baricitinib. The baseline mean disease activity was moderate as measured by DAS28- ESR (5.0±1.0), DAS 28 CRP (4.69±0.94), and SDAI (26.87±10.73) score. Before beginning JAKinhibs therapy, thirty-two patients (61.8%) were taking bDMARDs, while the remaining thirty-six (38.2%) were bDMARDs-naïve. The 24-month retention rate for JAKinhibs was 91.1%. Six months after beginning treatment with JAKinhibs, a statistically significant improvement was observed in all evaluated activity indices and clinimetric scores. Improvement was confirmed during the 12- and 24-month follow-up evaluations. The positive correlation between baseline-T6 SDAI delta and discontinuation of JAKinhibs (p=0.02) suggests that RA worsening in the first six months may be a predictor of therapy withdrawal. Patients with RA responded favorably to tofacitinib and baricitinib in this prospective, real-world study from a single center in Southern Italy. Efficacy was observed despite an underlying persistent and treatment-resistant disease.

Treat-to-target in rheumatoid arthritis: a real-world study of the application and impact of treat-to-target within the wider context of patient management, patient centricity and advanced therapy use in Europe

BACKGROUND

While treat-to-target (T2T) is endorsed for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), data on the degree of implementation in clinical practice are limited. This study investigated the use of T2T for RA in a real-world setting across Europe.

METHODS

The Adelphi RA Disease-Specific Programme was a point-in-time survey of rheumatologists and their consulting patients with RA conducted between January and October 2020 in Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK. Rheumatologists completed an attitudinal survey, and a record form for their next 10-12 consulting patients, who were invited to voluntarily complete a patient-reported questionnaire. Data collected included clinical characteristics, treatment patterns and attitudes towards T2T.

RESULTS

Overall, 316 rheumatologists provided data for 3120 patients, of whom 1108 completed the questionnaire. While 86.1% of rheumatologists estimated using T2T principles in clinical practice, only 66.6% of patients were reported by their physician to be managed using a T2T approach. Achieving disease remission was the most commonly reported treatment goal identified by rheumatologists (79.7%), followed by symptom control (47.8%) and reducing impact on quality of life (44.5%). 40.8% of rheumatologists and their patients were in agreement that a treatment goal had been set. When there was agreement on treatment goals, we observed better patient satisfaction, engagement and treatment success.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite recommendations, the T2T approach in RA appears to be suboptimally implemented in clinical practice. This highlights the importance of patient-centricity in the decision-making process to define meaningful targets and select appropriate treatments to improve disease outcomes.

The Impact of b/tsDMARD Dose Reduction on Chronic Hepatitis B in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A Two-Center Long-Term Safety Analysis

BACKGROUND

We aimed to investigate the change of hepatitis B virus (HBV) viral loads and HBV reactivation (HBVr) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients after tapering the dose of biological/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs).

METHODS

This two-center analysis retrospectively investigated the virological and biochemical evidence of HBVr in RA patients who underwent b/tsDMARD dose reduction. Serum levels of viral loads were determined using real-time PCR. Serum levels of alanine transaminase (ALT) were determined using spectrophotometry.

RESULTS

Among a total of 40 HBsAg+ RA patients who tapered b/tsDMARDs, 14 (35%) used tocilizumab; 12 (30%) used tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitors; and the rest used either abatacept or tofacitinib. We found that patients who had detectable HBV DNA before tapering achieved a one-log reduction in HBV DNA levels, in contrast to the findings in the other 12 patients who did not taper b/tsDMARDs (no change in HBV DNA levels with time). The incidence of HBVr (increased viral loads with hepatitis) was 4.62 (95%CI: 2.08, 10.28) and 2.26 (95%CI: 0.56, 9.02) events per 100 person-years before and after b/tsDMARD tapering, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The HBV viral load decreased after the tapering of b/tsDMARDs in RA patients with detectable HBV DNA. Dose reduction in b/tsDMARDs might be beneficial.

Added value of multiple autoantibody testing for predicting progression to inflammatory arthritis in at-risk individuals

BACKGROUND

Predicting progression to clinical arthritis in individuals at-risk of developing rheumatoid arthritis is a prerequisite to developing stratification groups for prevention strategies. Selecting accurate predictive criteria is the critical step to define the population at-risk. While positivity for anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) remains the main recruitment biomarker, positivity for other autoantibodies (AutoAbs) identified before the onset of symptoms, may provide additional predictive accuracy for stratification.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a multiple AutoAbs analysis for both the prediction and the time of progression to inflammatory arthritis (IA).

METHODS

392 individuals were recruited based on a new musculoskeletal complaint and positivity for ACPA or rheumatoid factor (RF). ELISAs were performed for ACPA, RF, anti-nuclear Ab, anti-carbamylated protein (anti-CarP) and anti-collagen AutoAbs. Logistic and COX regression were used for analysis.

RESULTS

Progression to IA was observed in 125/392 (32%) of cases, of which 78 progressed within 12 months. The AutoAbs ACPA, RF, anti-CarP were individually associated with progression (p<0.0001) and improved prediction when combined with demographic/clinical data (Accuracy >77%; area under the curve (AUC) >0.789), compared with prediction using only demographic/clinical data (72.9%, AUC=0.760). Multiple AutoAbs testing provided added value, with +6.4% accuracy for number of positive AutoAbs (AUC=0.852); +5.4% accuracy for AutoAbs levels (ACPA/anti-CarP, AUC=0.832); and +6.2% accuracy for risk-groups based on high/low levels (ACPA/RF/anti-CarP, AUC=0.837). Time to imminent progression was best predicted using ACPA/anti-CarP levels (AUC=0.779), while the number of positive AutoAbs was/status/risk were as good (AUC=0.778).

CONCLUSION

We confirm added value of multiple AutoAbs testing for identifying progressors to clinical disease, allowing more specific stratification for intervention studies.

Determinants of health-related quality of life across the spectrum of connective tissue diseases using latent profile analysis: Results from the LEAP cohort

OBJECTIVES

Poor health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) is well recognised in patients with connective tissue diseases (CTD). We hypothesised that subgroups of patients across the spectrum of CTD experience different HR-QoL patterns, and aimed to determine patient-level characteristics associated with these different subgroups.

METHODS

Using the eight continuous domains of the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire we performed data-driven clustering to derive latent profiles (LP) of patients with distinct HR-QoL patterns. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression was used to determine patient-level characteristics associated with each HR-QoL subgroup identified.

RESULTS

309 CTD patients completed the SF-36 questionnaire. The most impaired SF-36 domains in each disease group were vitality, general health and bodily pain. The physical component of the SF-36 was consistently more impaired compared with the mental component, with similar scores across disease groups.Three latent profiles were identified with poor (n = 89; 29%), average (n = 190; 61.4%) and excellent (n = 30; 9.7%) HR-QoL. LP were not associated with diagnostic grouping or autoantibody profiles. Black background (OR 0.22 [95% CI 0.08-0.63]), Indo-Asian background (0.39 [0.19-0.78]), concomitant fibromyalgia (0.40 [0.20-0.78]), sicca symptoms (0.56 [0.32-0.98]) and multi-morbidity (Charlson Comorbidity Index, 0.81 [0.67-0.97]) were associated with the 'poor' HR-QoL LP.

CONCLUSION

Distinct HR-QoL subgroups exist that are not primarily driven by the specific diagnosis or autoantibody profiles. We identified a number of key demographic and clinical factors associated with poor HR-QoL. These factors need to be addressed across the whole CTD spectrum as part of a holistic management approach aimed at improving overall patient outcomes.

Assessment of risk factors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease

OBJECTIVE

To assess the risk factors for interstitial lung disease (ILD) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to evaluate the association of ILD with the use of methotrexate as well as with joint disease activity.

METHODS

A retrospective, cross-sectional study conducted between March and December 2019 at a tertiary healthcare center, in a follow-up of RA patients who had undergone pulmonary function tests (PFT) and chest computed tomography. We evaluated the tomographic characteristics, such as the presence of ILD and its extension, as well as joint disease activity. Functional measurements, such as forced vital capacity (FVC) and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO), were also assessed. After this, a multivariate logistic regression analysis was applied in order to identify risk factors associated with ILD.

RESULTS

We evaluated 1.233 patients, of which 134 were eligible for this study. The majority were female (89.6%), with a mean age of 61 years old and with a positive rheumatoid factor (86.2%). RA-associated ILD (RA-ILD) was detected in 49 patients (36.6%). We found an association of RA-ILD with age ≥= 62 year, male sex, smoking history and fine crackles in lung auscultation and a decreased DLCO. The indicators of being aged ≥ 62 years old and having moderate or high RA disease activity were both independent factors associated with RA-ILD, with an odds ratio of 4.36 and 3.03, respectively. The use of methotrexate was not associated with a higher prevalence of ILD.

CONCLUSION

Age and RA disease activity are important risk factors associated with RA-ILD. Methotrexate was not associated with the development of RA-ILD in the present study.

A systematic comparison of different composite measures (DAS 28, CDAI, SDAI, and Boolean approach) for determining treatment effects on low disease activity and remission in rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND

Some composite measures for determining the treatment effects of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs on remission and low disease activity (LDA) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may produce misleading results if they include an acute phase reactant (APR). To inform the choice of appropriate measure, we performed a systematic comparison of treatment effects using different composite measures.

METHODS

We used data generated for a systematic review of biologics in RA conducted by the Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care and data from systematic reviews of newer biologics and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors provided by sponsors. The studies included had been conducted up to 2020 and investigated comparisons of biologics with placebo and head-to-head comparisons of biologics. Treatment effects on LDA and remission in studies investigating biologics or JAK inhibitors in RA were compared among 4 composite measures: the disease activity score 28 (DAS 28), the simplified disease activity index (SDAI), the Boolean approach (remission only), and the clinical disease activity index (CDAI)-only the latter does not include an APR.

RESULTS

49 placebo-controlled studies included 9 different biologics; 48 studies (16,233 patients) investigated LDA and 49 (16,338 patients) investigated remission. 11 active-controlled studies (5996 patients) investigated both LDA and remission and included 5 different head-to-head comparisons of biologics and 5 different comparisons (6 studies) of biologics with JAK inhibitors. Statistically significantly larger treatment effects were found for biologics or JAK inhibitors versus placebo or active control in 16% of pairwise comparisons of composite measures (27 of 168). Most of these larger effects were observed for composite measures with an APR, i.e. the DAS 28 (19 comparisons) followed by the SDAI (n = 7). Larger effects were most frequently detected in favour of interleukin (IL)-6 inhibitors and to a lesser extent for JAK inhibitors versus treatments with different modes of action.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the DAS 28 and SDAI in clinical studies may generate results favouring certain treatments based on their mode of action (e.g. IL-6 inhibitors versus other biologics). To enable unbiased comparative effectiveness research, a composite measure without an APR (i.e. the CDAI) should thus be the measure of choice.

Diagnostic Performance and Clinical Utility of Referral Rules to Identify Primary Care Patients at Risk of an Inflammatory Rheumatic Disease

OBJECTIVE

To determine the diagnostic performance and clinical utility of the Rotterdam Early Arthritis Cohort (REACH) and the Clinical Arthritis Rule (CARE) referral rules in an independent population of unselected patients from primary care.

METHODS

This study consisted of adults who were suspected of the need for referral to a rheumatologist by their general practitioner. Diagnostic accuracy measures and a net benefit approach were used to compare both rules to usual care for recognizing inflammatory arthritis and inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs). Using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method and cross-validation we created an optimal prediction rule for IRD.

RESULTS

This study consisted of 250 patients, of whom 42 (17%) were diagnosed with inflammatory arthritis and 55 (22%) with an IRD 3 months after referral. Considering inflammatory arthritis, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.72 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.64-0.80) for REACH and 0.82 (95% CI 0.75-0.88) for CARE. Considering IRD, the AUC was 0.66 (95% CI 0.58-0.74) for REACH and 0.76 (95% CI 0.69-0.83) for CARE. CARE was of highest clinical value when compared to usual care. The composite referral rule for IRD of 10 parameters included sex, age, joint features, acute onset of symptoms, physical limitations, and duration of symptoms (AUC 0.82 [95% CI 0.75-0.88]).

CONCLUSION

Both validated rules have a net benefit in recognizing inflammatory arthritis as well as IRD compared to usual care, but CARE shows superiority over REACH. Although the composite referral rule indicates a greater diagnostic performance, external validation is needed.

Egyptian evidence-based consensus on clinical practice recommendations for the management of lupus nephritis

Background

Lupus nephritis (LN) affects a substantial number of the patients living with Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), representing a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Patients with lupus nephritis should be referred to a lupus nephritis expert who can confirm the diagnosis, assess the level of disease activity, and offer guidance on treatment and monitoring of the disease, as well as its consequences and side effects. The aim of this guideline was to develop recommendations for the management of adult lupus patients, including lupus nephritis diagnosis, assessment, and monitoring.

Nineteen key clinical questions were identified by scientific committee according to the Patient/Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes and Timing (PICOT) approach. Literature review team performed a systematic review to summarize evidence advocating the benefits and harms of available pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapies for LN. Subsequently, recommendations were formulated. The level of evidence was determined for each section using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine (CEBM) system. A 2-round Delphi process was conducted with 24 experts. All rounds were conducted online. A consensus was achieved on the direction and the strength of the recommendations.

Results

An online questionnaire was sent to an expert panel who participated in the two rounds (response rate 100%). At the end of round 2, a total of 19 recommendation items, categorized into 11 sections to address the main LN categories, were obtained. The percentage of those who agreed with the recommendations (ranks 7–9) ranged from 90.5 to 100%. The phrasing of all 19 clinical standards identified by the scientific committee was agreed upon (i.e., 75% of respondents strongly agreed or agreed).

Conclusion

These recommendations provide an updated consensus on the pharmacological treatment of lupus nephritis and strategies to reach optimal treat to target outcomes in common clinical scenarios, based on a combination of evidence and expert opinion. Best treatment decisions should be tailored to each individual patient situation.

Establishment and verification of a nomogram and a preliminary study on predicting the clinical response of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis patients

Background

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoinflammatory disease, its core treatment principle is to achieve remission as soon as possible. There is no good prediction model that can accurately predict the remission rate of patients to choose a good treatment scheme. Here, we aimed to verify the prognostic value of some inflammatory indicators in RA and establish a prediction model to predict the remission rate after treatment.

Methods

A total of 223 patients were enrolled at Qilu Hospital from June 2014 to June 2020. Baseline clinical data were collected and plasma was obtained to detect the inflammatory indicators. All patients were treated with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). All patients were followed up and were recorded the time to reach the disease activity score-28 with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) of <2.6. A total of 156 patients were randomly assigned to the development cohort, and 67 patients were assigned to the validation cohort. Inflammatory indicators in plasma were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The predictive factors were screeded by using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and Cox regression. The model was created and verified by using the standard method. A total of 6 independent risk factors were analyzed to construct a nomogram to predict the remission rate in 3, 6 and 12 months.

Results

The remission rates after treatment in 3, 6 and 12 months were 38.76%, 58.91%, and 81.40%, respectively. Patient age, C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin (IL)-6, galectin-9 (Gal-9), health assessment questionnaire (HAQ), and DAS28-ESR were included in the prognostic model to predict the remission rate. The resulting model had good discrimination ability in both the development cohort (C-index, 0.729) and the validation cohort (C-index, 0.710). Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration analysis, and decision curve analysis (DCA) showed that the model has significant discriminant power and clinical practicability in predicting the remission rate.

Conclusions

We established a new predictive model and validated it. The model can predict the remission rate in 3, 6 and 12 months after receiving csDMARDs treatment. By using this model, we can facilitate the identification of high-risk patients early and intervene with them as soon as possible.

Tapering biologic DMARDs in rheumatoid arthritis

With the arrival of biologics and the shift toward treat-to-target therapy, the possibility of a sustained clinical response has become an achievable goal for many patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Although biologics have revolutionized the treatment of RA, they are costly, potentially inconvenient, and carry risks of side effects. Whether they can or should be tapered in patients with tight disease control is a matter of clinical uncertainty. The major international rheumatology professional societies have all issued guidelines on this question, but across recommendations, consensus is lacking on how and when to consider therapy de-escalation. Recent evidence suggests that sustained remission or low disease activity is more attainable with dose reduction as opposed to outright discontinuation of biologic therapy, and certain predictors of successful taper have begun to be described. This article will (1) summarize the current evidence base for biologic tapering in RA, (2) outline real-world outcomes findings, (3) review important contextual factors relevant to therapy de-escalation, such as cost-effectiveness considerations and patient perspectives, and (4) conclude by summarizing current guidelines.

New insights into the pathogenesis and management of rheumatoid arthritis

Over the past few decades, understanding of the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has improved substantially. Insights into the cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in RA have enabled the discovery of new therapeutic targets and led to the development of biologics and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. In parallel with the improvement in therapies, the evolution of strategies in the management of RA has also contributed considerably to better outcomes in patients. Major changes include the development of disease activity measures, formulation of the treat-to-target principles as well as increased attention to comorbidities. The presence of comorbidities such as cardiovascular diseases may increase the mortality of RA patients, affect their treatment strategies and result in worse outcomes. Therefore, prevention and management of certain high-risk comorbidities have become increasingly important in the long-term treatment of RA. In this study, we summarized new insights into the pathogenesis and management of rheumatoid arthritis and associated comorbidities, with a special focus on the 2021 update of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) guideline for RA and key reports presented at the 2021 ACR convergence.

An update on thermal imaging in rheumatoid arthritis

This review aims to summarise the recent literature concerning the usage of thermal imaging in the study of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Most RA studies have applied thermal imaging as a static process alone although thermal imaging has been conducted with an additional dynamic/functional component. Algorithms to automate the analysis of thermal imaging in RA have also been described. Several RA thermal imaging studies have demonstrated differences in thermographic findings between RA patients and healthy controls and/or compared thermographic parameters with other clinical/functional/imaging parameters; while fewer studies have assessed the role of thermal imaging in discriminating disease severity in RA. Thermal imaging is a relatively low cost, non-invasive imaging technique offering an objective measurement of joint surface temperature in RA joint inflammation assessment. Although there has been an increasing literature build up on the use of thermography in RA, more validation work is still necessary to delineate the potential role(s) of its use among patients with RA. This timely review focusses on the recent literature concerning thermal imaging, and provides clinicians with an update on its recent development in RA.

Better Clinical Results in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Treated Under a Multidisciplinary Care Model When Compared with a National Rheumatoid Arthritis Registry

Purpose

To describe clinical characteristics and effectiveness of health care in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) as part of a multidisciplinary care model (MCM) in a specialized rheumatology center, compared with the results of a national registry of RA (NARRA) as evidence of real-world management.

Patients and Methods

We conducted a real-world study (July 1, 2018 to June 30, 2019) based on an analysis of electronic health records of a cohort of RA patients managed with the “Treat-to-Target” strategy in a specialized rheumatology center in Colombia with an MCM, compared with the NARRA that includes different models of usual care.

Results

We have analyzed 7053 subjects with RA treated at a specialized rheumatology center and 81,492 patients from the NARRA. Cohorts were similar in their baseline characteristics, with women in predominance and diagnosis age close to 50 years. At the time of diagnosis, a higher proportion of clinical diagnostic test use and rheumatology consultation access was observed in the specialized rheumatology center than in the national registry (4–6 per year versus three or less). In addition, higher proportions of patients in remission and low disease activity were reported for the specialized rheumatology center, with a >40% amount of data lost in the national registry. Pharmacological management was similar regarding the analgesic use. In the specialized center, Certolizumab was more frequently used than in the NARRA registry; also, there were significant differences in methotrexate, leflunomide, and sulfasalazine use, being higher in the specialized rheumatology center.

Conclusion

The MCM of a specialized center in RA can guarantee comprehensive care, with better access to all the services required to manage the disease. It ensures specialist management and evidence-based care that facilitates the achievement of therapeutic objectives. In addition, better patient records and follow-ups are available to evaluate health outcomes.

Smartphone-Assisted Patient-Initiated Care Versus Usual Care in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis and Low Disease Activity: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

We developed a smartphone application for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) that allows them to self-monitor their disease activity in between clinic visits by answering a weekly Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3. This study was undertaken to assess the safety (noninferiority in the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate [DAS28-ESR]) and efficacy (reduction in number of visits) of patient-initiated care assisted using a smartphone app, compared to usual care.

METHODS

A 12-month, randomized, noninferiority clinical trial was conducted in RA patients with low disease activity and without treatment changes in the past 6 months. Patients were randomized 1:1 to either app-supported patient-initiated care with a scheduled follow-up consultation after a year (app intervention group) or usual care. The coprimary outcome measures were noninferiority in terms of change in DAS28-ESR score after 12 months and the ratio of the mean number of consultations with rheumatologists between the groups. The noninferiority limit was 0.5 difference in DAS28-ESR between the groups.

RESULTS

Of the 103 randomized patients, 102 completed the study. After a year, noninferiority in terms of the DAS28-ESR score was established, as the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of the mean ΔDAS28-ESR between the groups was within the noninferiority limit: -0.04 in favor of the app intervention group (95% CI -0.39, 0.30). The number of rheumatologist consultations was significantly lower in the app intervention group compared to the usual care group (mean ± SD 1.7 ± 1.8 versus 2.8 ± 1.4; visit ratio 0.62 [95% CI 0.47, 0.81]).

CONCLUSION

Patient-initiated care supported by smartphone self-monitoring was noninferior to usual care in terms of the ΔDAS28-ESR and led to a 38% reduction in rheumatologist consultations in RA patients with stable low disease activity.

Nationwide, large-scale implementation of an online system for remote entry of patient-reported outcomes in rheumatology: characteristics of users and non-users and time to first entry

Aims

In May 2020, a nationwide, web-based system for remote entry of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in inflammatory rheumatic diseases was launched and implemented in routine care (DANBIO-from-home). After 1.5 years of use, we explored clinical characteristics of patients who did versus did not use the system, and the time to first entry of PROs.

Methods

All patients followed in DANBIO were informed about DANBIO-from-home by electronic invitations or when attending their clinic. Characteristics of patients who did/did not use DANBIO-from-home in the period after implementation were explored by multivariable logistic regression analyses including demographic and clinical variables (gender, age group, diagnosis, disease duration, use of biological disease-modifying agent (bDMARD), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), Patient Acceptable Symptom Scale (PASS)). Time from launch to first entry was presented as cumulative incidence curves by age group (<40/40–60/61–80/>80 years).

Results

Of 33 776 patients, 68% entered PROs using DANBIO-from-home at least once. Median (IQR) time to first entry was 27 (11–152) days. Factors associated with data entry in multivariate analyses (OR (95% CI)) were: female gender (1.19 (1.12 to 1.27)), bDMARD treatment (1.41 (1.33 to 1.50)), age 40–60 years (1.79 (1.63 to 1.97)), 61–80 years (1.87 (1.70 to 2.07), or age >80 years (0.57 (0.50 to 0.65)) (reference: age <40 years), lower HAQ (0.68 (0.65 to 0.71)) and PASS ‘no’ (1.09 (1.02 to 1.17). Diagnosis was not associated. Time to first entry of PROs was longest in patients <40 years of age (119 (24–184) days) and shortest in the 61–80 years age group (25 (8–139) days).

Conclusion

A nationwide online platform for PRO in rheumatology achieved widespread use. Higher age, male gender, conventional treatment and disability were associated with no use.

Autonomous motivation to reduce sedentary behaviour is associated with less sedentary time and improved health outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis: a longitudinal study

Background

This longitudinal study investigated whether changes in autonomous and controlled motivation to reduce sedentary behaviour were associated with variability in sedentary, standing and stepping time and, in turn, disease activity, systemic inflammation, pain and fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods

People with RA undertook assessments at baseline (T1, n = 104) and 6 months follow-up (T2, n = 54) to determine autonomous and controlled motivation to reduce sedentary behaviour (Behavioural Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire-2), free-living sedentary, standing and stepping time (7 days activPAL3μ wear), Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS-28), systemic inflammation (c-reactive protein [CRP]), pain (McGill Pain Questionnaire) and fatigue (Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue Scale). N = 52 participants provided complete data at T1 and T2. Statistical analyses: In a series of models (A and B), path analyses examined sequential associations between autonomous and controlled motivation to reduce sedentary behaviour with activPAL3μ-assessed behaviours and, in turn, RA outcomes.

Results

Models demonstrated good fit to the data. Model A (sedentary and stepping time): autonomous motivation was significantly negatively associated with sedentary time and significantly positively related to stepping time. In turn, sedentary time was significantly positively associated with CRP and pain. Stepping time was not significantly associated with any health outcomes. Model B (standing time): autonomous motivation was significantly positively associated with standing time. In turn, standing time was significantly negatively related to CRP, pain and fatigue.

Conclusions

Autonomous motivation to reduce sedentary behaviour is associated with sedentary and standing time in RA which may, in turn, hold implications for health outcomes.

Predictive model to identify multiple failure to biological therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Background:

Despite advances in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and the wide range of therapies available, there is a percentage of patients whose treatment presents a challenge for clinicians due to lack of response to multiple biologic and target-specific disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs).

Objective:

To develop and validate an algorithm to predict multiple failure to biological therapy in patients with RA.

Design:

Observational retrospective study involving subjects from a cohort of patients with RA receiving b/tsDMARDs.

Methods:

Based on the number of prior failures to b/tsDMARDs, patients were classified as either multi-refractory (MR) or non-refractory (NR). Patient characteristics were considered in the statistical analysis to design the predictive model, selecting those variables with a predictive capability. A decision algorithm known as ‘classification and regression tree’ (CART) was developed to create a prediction model of multi-drug resistance. Performance of the prediction algorithm was evaluated in an external independent cohort using area under the curve (AUC).

Results:

A total of 136 patients were included: 51 MR and 85 NR. The CART model was able to predict multiple failures to b/tsDMARDs using disease activity score-28 (DAS-28) values at 6 months after the start time of the initial b/tsDMARD, as well as DAS-28 improvement in the first 6 months and baseline DAS-28. The CART model showed a capability to correctly classify 94.1% NR and 87.5% MR patients with a sensitivity = 0.88, a specificity = 0.94, and an AUC = 0.89 (95% CI: 0.74–1.00). In the external validation cohort, 35 MR and 47 NR patients were included. The AUC value for the CART model in this cohort was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.73–0.9).

Conclusion:

Our model correctly classified NR and MR patients based on simple measurements available in routine clinical practice, which provides the possibility to characterize and individualize patient treatments during early stages.

Real-world effectiveness and persistence of reference etanercept versus biosimilar etanercept GP2015 among rheumatoid arthritis patients: A cohort study

Although several randomized clinical trials have confirmed that there is no difference in efficacy between etanercept and its biosimilar versions in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), limited real-world evidence is available. We conducted a cohort study to compare the effectiveness and treatment persistence between the reference etanercept (ETN) and the biosimilar GP2015 in RA patients in a real-life setting. Adults with a diagnosis of RA who initiated treatment with ETN or GP2015, between January 2007 and December 2019, were included. The follow-up period was 52 weeks. The primary outcome was the mean of change in the DAS28-CRP values and the adjusted mean difference from baseline to 52 weeks between ETN and GP2015. Other effectiveness endpoints assessed were the rate of patients who achieved remission or low disease activity (LDA) at week 52, who showed a reduction of DAS28-CRP value greater than or equal to 1.2 from baseline to week 52 and rate of good responder patients (those meeting both effectiveness measures) at week 52. Treatment effectiveness over time (baseline, 26 and 52 weeks) was compared between the ETN and GP2015 groups using mixed effects models. Treatment persistence (probability of maintaining the same treatment over time) was also evaluated and shown using Kaplan–Meier survival curves. A total of 115 RA patients were included (ETN, n = 90; GP2015, n = 25). No differences were observed in the primary outcome: DAS28-CRP score decreased from baseline to week 52 [5.1 to 2.7 (mean of change -2.37) in ETN group and 5.0 to 2.2 (mean of change -2.84) in GP2015 group, p-value = 0.372] and the adjusted mean difference was −0.37 (−1.03 to 0.29). No differences were also observed in the other effectiveness endpoints assessed among patients treated with ETN or GP2015: rate of patients who achieved remission (54.1% vs. 66.7%, p-value = 0.303) and LDA (71.6% vs. 80.9%, p-value = 0.391) at week 52, reduction of DAS28-CRP value greater than or equal to 1.2 from baseline to week 52 (75.6% vs. 80.9%, p-value = 0.613) and rate of good responder patients (58.1% vs. 76.1%, p-value = 0.202). Drug survival was 82% and 80% for ETN and GP2015, respectively (log-rank p-value = 0.804). Etanercept and its biosimilar GP2015 show similar effectiveness and treatment persistence in RA patients in a real-life setting.

Chinese registry of rheumatoid arthritis (CREDIT) V: sex impacts rheumatoid arthritis in Chinese patients

BACKGROUND

The impact of sex on the clinical manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were diversely reported in the literature. The Chinese Registry of rhEumatoiD arthrITis provides a platform for the investigation of this issue in Chinese patients.

METHODS

Demographic and clinical parameters were collected from all enrolled patients with RA and from patients with early RA (disease duration ≤6 months). The differences in data regarding disease activity, comorbidities, and medications for RA were compared between men and women. The proportions of patients who achieved remission and low disease activity were compared at enrollment and during 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up visits.

RESULTS

A total of 11,564 patients were enrolled, 83.6% of whom were female. In all the enrolled patients and patients with early RA, C-reactive protein (CRP, 12.0 vs . 6.7 mg/L), pain visual analogue scale (4.8 vs . 4.5), patient's and physician's global assessment (4.9 vs . 4.5 and 4.9 vs . 4.5), 28-joint disease activity score using DAS28-CRP (4.3 vs . 4.0) simplified disease activity index (21.9 vs . 19.9), and clinical disease activity index (19.3 vs . 18.0) were significantly higher in men than in women. Additionally, the swollen joint count/tender joint count and DAS28 using erythrocyte sedimentation rate were higher in male patients than in female patients with early RA. More female patients with early RA reached the treatment target at baseline than male patients (23.4% vs . 18.2%, assessed by CDAI). At 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months, the proportion of remission and treatment target achievement was similar in both sexes. Coronary artery disease (CAD) and stroke were more frequent in men than in women.

CONCLUSIONS

In Chinese patients with RA, men were found to have more active disease, as well as more cases of CAD and stroke. Therefore, sex should be carefully considered during the personalization of RA treatment.

Scientific Knowledge of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Bibliometric Analysis from 2011 to 2020

Background

Recently, research on rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has made rapid progress and grown rapidly. It is a challenge to comprehensively understand RA research and hotspots. The aim of this study was to explore the current status and research trends of RA through bibliometric analysis and to provide directions for future development.

Methods

Publications on RA from 2011 to 2020 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection database (WoSCC). VOSviewer, CiteSpace and online bibliometric platform were used to analyze publication characteristics, including countries, institutions, journals, authors, core references, and keywords.

Results

A total of 17,037 publications were included. The publications steadily increased over the 10 years. The United States (3648 publications), with the largest proportion of publications and citations, was the largest contributor. Karolinska Institutet (508) and Annals of the Rheumatoid Disease (763) were the most active institution and journal, respectively. Emery P (193) and Tanaka Y (193) were the most prolific authors, and Smolen JS ranked first among the cited authors. The most cited reference focused on recommendations for the management of RA with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. A co-occurrence network analysis revealed four highly connected clusters of keywords in RA research, including etiology, pathology, prognosis, biomarkers and treatment of RA.

Conclusion

The present study shows a systematic and comprehensive overview of the RA-related research in the past 10 years. Clinical trials on the long-term efficiency and safety of JAK inhibitors and other novel targeted drugs may be the potential research directions for future study in this field.

Difficult-to-Treat Rheumatoid Arthritis in Older Adults: Implications of Ageing for Managing Patients

Difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis is a heterogeneous term in which patients may present with difficulties in their management for different reasons. This can ultimately lead to patients being exposed to multiple treatments because of inefficacy (resulting from mechanisms intrinsic to rheumatoid arthritis or from non-inflammatory causes such as chronic pain syndrome or structural damage, among others), toxicity or adverse effects that may be linked to comorbidities. One particular group in which such characteristics may be more patent is older patients. Increasing life expectancy, an ageing population and the late onset of rheumatoid arthritis have led to an increased interest in the particularities of treating older patients. This may pose a challenge for physicians, as ageing has implications for optimal patient treatment owing to the potential presence of comorbidities, the risk of adverse events and perceptions of disease status by both physicians and patients. All of these factors may have implications for classifying and managing patients aged > 65 years as difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis, as these patients could be misclassified. This can occur when a significant proportion may still exhibit signs of active disease but not necessarily be difficult to treat because the treatment criterion has not been fulfilled. Alternatively, patients may be exposed to multiple biologic/targeted disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs because of contraindications and/or comorbid conditions. Treatment-to-target strategies and an adequate assessment of inflammatory rheumatoid arthritis activity in older patients should be undertaken, taking special care with associated comorbidities, polypharmacy and risk profiles. Such an approach can help to ensure appropriate treatment for older adults and avoid the misclassification of difficult-to-treat patients.

"From Where I Stand": using multiple anchors yields different benchmarks for meaningful improvement and worsening in the rheumatoid arthritis flare questionnaire (RA-FQ)

PURPOSE

The Rheumatoid Arthritis Flare Questionnaire (RA-FQ) is a patient-reported measure of disease activity in RA. We estimated minimal and meaningful change from the perspective of RA patients, physicians, and using a disease activity index.

METHODS

Data were from 3- to 6-month visits of adults with early RA enrolled in the Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort. Participants completed the RA-FQ, the Patient Global Assessment of RA, and the Patient Global Change Impression at consecutive visits. Rheumatologists recorded joint counts and MD Global. Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) scores were computed. We compared mean RA-FQ change across categories using patients, physicians, and CDAI anchors.

RESULTS

The 808 adults were mostly white (84%) women (71%) with a mean age of 55 and moderate-high disease activity (85%) at enrollment. At V2, 79% of patients classified their RA as changed; 59% were better and 20% were worse. Patients reporting they were a lot worse had a mean RA-FQ increase of 8.9 points, whereas those who were a lot better had a -6.0 decrease. Minimal worsening and improvement were associated with a mean 4.7 and - 1.8 change in RA-FQ, respectively, while patients rating their RA unchanged had stable scores. Physician and CDAI classified more patients as worse than patients, and minimal and meaningful RA-FQ thresholds differed by group.

CONCLUSION

Thresholds to identify meaningful change vary by anchor used. These data offer new evidence demonstrating robust psychometric properties of the RA-FQ and offer guidance about improvement or worsening, supporting its use in RA care, research, and decision-making.

Emerging therapies for juvenile arthritis: agents in early clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common chronic inflammatory rheumatic condition in childhood. The management of JIA has been revolutionized thanks to the development of new powerful drugs and the possibility to conduct controlled clinical trials with support from legislative initiatives and availability of international collaborative networks. Trials are still needed in children because we now have new drugs related to specific JIA category.

AREAS COVERED

The review is centered on the latest achievements in the field, focusing on new investigational drugs which are currently or have been recently tested for JIA treatment, encompassing agents in early phase of clinical development.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite the tremendous improvement witnessed in the field of JIA treatment in the past 20 years, there are still many unmet needs to be prioritized. Studies on disease pathogenesis will hopefully help in the identification of new treatment targets for individual JIA categories, that could possibly favor a stricter disease control and contribute to solve the issue of refractory JIA. Novel strategies aimed at the prevention of the risk of long-term joint damage are also desirable, as well as the discovery of predictive biomarkers for treatment efficacy and safety in the individual patient.