Association Between Midwall Late Gadolinium Enhancement and Sudden Cardiac Death in Patients With Dilated Cardiomyopathy and Mild and Moderate Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction

Comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance characteristics and clinical prognosis in left ventricular noncompaction patients with and without arrhythmia

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) is a rare type of cardiomyopathy, and one of its clinical manifestations is arrhythmia. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is valuable for the diagnosis and prognosis of LVNC. However, studies are lacking on the use of CMR for LVNC patients with arrhythmia. This study aimed to characterize and compare CMR features and prognosis in LVNC patients with and without arrhythmia.

METHODS

Eighty-four LVNC patients diagnosed by CMR were enrolled retrospectively in this study. Clinical data, arrhythmia characteristics, and CMR parameters were collected. Patients were divided into different groups according to the arrhythmia characteristics and CMR manifestations for statistical analysis and comparison. Ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular fibrillation (Vf), ventricular flutter (VFL), III° atrioventricular block (III° AVB), Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome (WPW) and ventricular escape (VE) were defined as malignant arrhythmias and benign arrhythmias included premature ventricular contraction, atrial premature beats, atrial fibrillation, supraventricular tachycardia, supraventricular premature beat, bundle branch block, atrial flutter and sinus tachycardia. The outcome events were defined as a composition event of cardiac death, rehospitalization for heart failure, heart transplantation, and implantation of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD).

RESULTS

Sixty-seven LVNC patients (79.76%) mainly presented with arrhythmia, including premature ventricular beat (33 patients [27.73%]), bundle branch block (14 patients [11.77%]), electrocardiogram waveform changes (18 patients [15.13%]), and ventricular tachycardia (11 patients [9.24%]). The cardiac function and structure parameters had no significant difference among the nonarrhythmia group, benign arrhythmia group, and malignant arrhythmia group. However, the presence of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was higher in the malignant arrhythmia group than in the other two groups (p = 0.023). At a mean follow-up of 46 months, cardiac events occurred in twenty-three patients (46.94%). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that there was no statistically significant difference in prognosis among the nonarrhythmia, benign, and malignant arrhythmia groups, but the patients with arrhythmia and association with LGE + or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 30% had a higher risk than patients with LGE- or LVEF > 30% (LGE +, HR = 4.035, 95% CI 1.475-11.035; LVEF < 30%, HR = 8.131, 95% CI 1.805-36.636; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In LVNC patients, the types of arrhythmias are numerous and unrepresentative, and arrhythmia is not the prognostic factor. Arrhythmia combined with presence of LGE or LVEF < 30% is associated with poor prognosis in LVNC patients.

Mid-wall striae fibrosis predicts heart failure admission, composite heart failure events, and life-threatening arrhythmias in dilated cardiomyopathy

Heart failure (HF) admission is a dominant contributor to morbidity and healthcare costs in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Mid-wall striae (MWS) fibrosis by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging has been associated with elevated arrhythmia risk. However, its capacity to predict HF-specific outcomes is poorly defined. We investigated its role to predict HF admission and relevant secondary outcomes in a large cohort of DCM patients. 719 patients referred for LGE MRI assessment of DCM were enrolled and followed for clinical events. Standardized image analyses and interpretations were conducted inclusive of coding the presence and patterns of fibrosis observed by LGE imaging. The primary clinical outcome was hospital admission for decompensated HF. Secondary heart failure and arrhythmic composite endpoints were also studied. Median age was 57 (IQR 47–65) years and median LVEF 40% (IQR 29–47%). Any fibrosis was observed in 228 patients (32%) with MWS fibrosis pattern present in 178 (25%). At a median follow up of 1044 days, 104 (15%) patients experienced the primary outcome, and 127 (18%) the secondary outcome. MWS was associated with a 2.14-fold risk of the primary outcome, 2.15-fold risk of the secondary HF outcome, and 2.23-fold risk of the secondary arrhythmic outcome. Multivariable analysis adjusting for all relevant covariates, inclusive of LVEF, showed patients with MWS fibrosis to experience a 1.65-fold increased risk (95% CI 1.11–2.47) of HF admission and 1-year event rate of 12% versus 7% without this phenotypic marker. Similar findings were observed for the secondary outcomes. Patients with LVEF > 35% plus MWS fibrosis experienced similar event rates to those with LVEF ≤ 35%. MWS fibrosis is a powerful and independent predictor of clinical outcomes in patients with DCM, identifying patients with LVEF > 35% who experience similar event rates to those with LVEF below this conventionally employed high-risk phenotype threshold.

Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation: Where Are We Now?

The possibilities of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging for myocardial tissue characterization and catheter ablation guidance are accompanied by some fictional concepts. In this review, we present the available facts about CMR-guided catheter ablation procedures as well as promising, however unproven, theoretical concepts. CMR promises to visualize the respective arrhythmogenic substrate and may thereby make it more localizable for electrophysiology (EP)-based ablation. Robust CMR imaging is challenged by motion of the heart resulting from cardiac and respiratory cycles. In contrast to conventional "passive" tracking of the catheter tip by real-time CMR, novel approaches based on "active" tracking are performed by integrating microcoils into the catheter tip that send a receiver signal. Several experimental and clinical studies were already performed based on real-time CMR for catheter ablation of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. Importantly, successful ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus was already performed in patients with typical atrial flutter. However, a complete EP procedure with real-time CMR-guided transseptal puncture and subsequent pulmonary vein isolation has not been shown so far in patients with atrial fibrillation. Moreover, real-time CMR-guided EP for ventricular tachycardia ablation was only performed in animal models using a transseptal, retrograde, or epicardial access-but not in humans. Essential improvements within the next few years regarding basic technical requirements, such as higher spatial and temporal resolution of real-time CMR imaging as well as clinically approved cardiac magnetic resonance-conditional defibrillators, are ultimately required-but can also be expected-and will move this field forward.

Sudden cardiac death in cardiomyopathies: acting upon "acceptable" risk in the personalized medicine era

Patients with cardiomyopathies are confronted with the risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) throughout their lifetime. Despite the fact that SCD is relatively rare, prognostic stratification is an integral part of physician-patient discussion, with the goal of risk modification and prevention. The current approach is based on a concept of "acceptable risk." However, there are intrinsic problems with an algorithm-based approach to risk management, magnified by the absence of robust evidence underlying clinical decision support tools, which can make high- versus low-risk classifications arbitrary. Strategies aimed at risk reduction range from selecting patients for an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) to disqualification from competitive sports. These clinical options, especially when implying the use of finite financial resources, are often delivered from the physician's perspective citing decision-making algorithms. When the burden of intervention-related risks or financial costs is deemed higher than an "acceptable risk" of SCD, the patient's perspective may not be appropriately considered. Designating a numeric threshold of "acceptable risk" has ethical implications. One could reasonably ask "acceptable to whom?" In an era when individual choice and autonomy are pillars of the physician-patient relationship, the subjective aspects of perceived risk should be acknowledged and be part of shared decision-making. This is particularly true when the lack of a strong scientific evidence base makes a dichotomous algorithm-driven approach suboptimal for unmitigated translation to clinical practice.

Resveratrol ameliorates myocardial fibrosis by regulating Sirt1/Smad3 deacetylation pathway in rat model with dilated cardiomyopathy

Background

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of Resveratrol (RSV) in rats with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM).

Methods

Porcine cardiac myosin was used to set up rat model with DCM. RSV (10 mg/kg in RSV-L group and 50 mg/kg in RSV-H group) or vehicle was administered to rats with DCM once daily from the 28th day till the 90th day after the first immunization. Cardiac function of rats was evaluated by echocardiographic analysis. The deposition of fibrous tissues in the hearts was evaluated by Masson and picrosirius red staining. The mRNA levels of collagen type I (Col I), collagen type III (Col III) and silence information regulator 1 (Sirt1) were measured by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). The interaction of Sirt1 with Smad3 was revealed by coimmunoprecipitation.

Results

The heart weight, heart weight/body weight ratio, left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD) and left ventricular end systolic diameter (LVESD) were significantly increased in rats with DCM, and attenuated by RSV. RSV also positively decreased fibrosis, and the expression of Col I and Col III in the myocardium. The Sirt1 mRNA was significantly decreased in myosin-immunized hearts and was positively increased by RSV. The Sirt1 combined with Smad3 directly. Acetylation of Smad3 (Ac-Smad3) was significantly increased in DCM and was markedly decreased by RSV.

Conclusion

RSV effectively ameliorated myocardial fibrosis and improved cardiac function by regulating Sirt1/Smad3 deacetylation pathway in rat model with DCM.

Multimodality Cardiac Imaging in Cardiomyopathies: From Diagnosis to Prognosis

Cardiomyopathies are a group of structural and/or functional myocardial disorders which encompasses hypertrophic, dilated, arrhythmogenic, restrictive, and other cardiomyopathies. Multimodality cardiac imaging techniques are the cornerstone of cardiomyopathy diagnosis; transthoracic echocardiography should be the first-line imaging modality due to its availability, and diagnosis should be confirmed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance, which will provide more accurate morphologic and functional information, as well as extensive tissue characterization. Multimodality cardiac imaging techniques are also essential in assessing the prognosis of patients with cardiomyopathies; left ventricular ejection fraction and late gadolinium enhancement are two of the main variables used for risk stratification, and they are incorporated into clinical practice guidelines. Finally, periodic testing with cardiac imaging techniques should also be performed due to the evolving and progressive natural history of most cardiomyopathies.

Prognostic Value of T1 Mapping and Feature Tracking by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Patients With Signs and Symptoms Suspecting Heart Failure and No Clinical Evidence of Coronary Artery Disease

Background

The ability of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) by cardiac magnetic resonance for risk stratification in suspected heart failure is limited. We aimed to evaluate the incremental prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance‐assessed extracellular volume fraction (ECV) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) in patients with signs and symptoms suspecting heart failure and no clinical evidence of coronary artery disease.

Methods and Results

A total of 474 consecutive patients (57±21 years of age, 56% men) with heart failure‐related symptoms and absence of coronary artery disease underwent cardiac magnetic resonance. After median follow‐up of 18 months, 59 (12%) experienced the outcome of all‐cause death or heart failure hospitalization (DeathCHF). In univariate analysis, cardiac magnetic resonance‐assessed LVEF, LGE, GLS, and ECV were all significantly associated with DeathCHF. Adjusted for a multivariable baseline model including age, sex, LVEF and LGE, ECV, and GLS separately maintained a significant association with DeathCHF (ECV, hazard ratio [HR], 1.44 per 1 SD increase; 95% CI 1.13–1.84; P=0.003, and GLS, HR, 1.78 per 1 SD increase; 95% CI, 1.06–2.96; P=0.028 respectively). Adding both GLS and ECV to the baseline model significantly improved model discrimination (C statistic from 0.749 to 0.782, P=0.017) and risk reclassification (integrated discrimination improvement 0.046 [0.015–0.076], P=0.003; continuous net reclassification improvement 0.378 [0.065–0.752], P<0.001) for DeathCHF, beyond LVEF and LGE.

Conclusions

In patients with signs and symptoms suspecting heart failure and no clinical evidence of coronary artery disease, joint assessment of GLS and ECV provides incremental prognostic value for DeathCHF, independent of LVEF and LGE.

Myocardial viability testing: all STICHed up, or about to be REVIVED?

Patients with ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction frequently undergo myocardial viability testing. The historical model presumes that those who have extensive areas of dysfunctional-yet-viable myocardium derive particular benefit from revascularization, whilst those without extensive viability do not. These suppositions rely on the theory of hibernation and are based on data of low quality: taking a dogmatic approach may therefore lead to patients being refused appropriate, prognostically important treatment. Recent data from a sub-study of the randomized STICH trial challenges these historical concepts, as the volume of viable myocardium failed to predict the effectiveness of coronary artery bypass grafting. Should the Heart Team now abandon viability testing, or are new paradigms needed in the way we interpret viability? This state-of-the-art review critically examines the evidence base for viability testing, focusing in particular on the presumed interactions between viability, functional recovery, revascularization and prognosis which underly the traditional model. We consider whether viability should relate solely to dysfunctional myocardium or be considered more broadly and explore wider uses of viability testingoutside of revascularization decision-making. Finally, we look forward to ongoing and future randomized trials, which will shape evidence-based clinical practice in the future.

Heart failure with mid-range or mildly reduced ejection fraction

Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) remains the major parameter for diagnosis, phenotyping, prognosis and treatment decisions in heart failure. The 2016 ESC heart failure guidelines introduced a third EF category for an EF of 40-49%, defined as heart failure with mid-range EF (HFmrEF). This category has been largely unexplored compared with heart failure with reduced EF (HFrEF; defined as EF <40% in this Review) and heart failure with preserved EF (HFpEF; defined as EF ≥50%). The prevalence of HFmrEF within the overall population of patients with HF is 10-25%. HFmrEF seems to be an intermediate clinical entity between HFrEF and HFpEF in some respects, but more similar to HFrEF in others, in particular with regard to the high prevalence of ischaemic heart disease in these patients. HFmrEF is milder than HFrEF, and the risk of cardiovascular events is lower in patients with HFmrEF or HFpEF than in those with HFrEF. By contrast, the risk of non-cardiovascular adverse events is similar or greater in patients with HFmrEF or HFpEF than in those with HFrEF. Evidence from post hoc and subgroup analyses of randomized clinical trials and a trial of an SGLT1-SGLT2 inhibitor suggests that drugs that are effective in patients with HFrEF might also be effective in patients with HFmrEF. Although the EF is a continuous measure with considerable variability, in this comprehensive Review we suggest that HFmrEF is a useful categorization of patients with HF and shares the most important clinical features with HFrEF, which supports the renaming of HFmrEF to HF with mildly reduced EF.

Beyond Ejection Fraction: Novel Clinical Approaches Towards Sudden Cardiac Death Risk Stratification in Patients with Dilated Cardiomyopathy

Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) therapy is indicated for patients at risk for sudden cardiac death due to ventricular tachyarrhythmia. The most commonly used risk stratification algorithms use Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) to determine which patients qualify for ICD therapy, even though LVEF is a better marker of total mortality than ventricular tachyarrhythmias mortality. This review evaluates imaging tools and novel biomarkers proposed for better risk stratifying arrhythmic substrate, thereby identifying optimal ICD therapy candidates.

Prognostic Value of Late Enhanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Derived Texture Features in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Patients With Severely Reduced Ejection Fractions

Background: Late enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) images of the left ventricular myocardium contain an enormous amount of information that could provide prognostic value beyond that of late gadolinium enhancements (LGEs). With computational postprocessing and analysis, the heterogeneities and variations of myocardial signal intensities can be interpreted and measured as texture features. This study aimed to evaluate the value of texture features extracted from late enhanced CMR images of the myocardium to predict adverse outcomes in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and severe systolic dysfunction.

Methods: This single-center study retrospectively enrolled patients with DCM with severely reduced left ventricular ejection fractions (LVEFs &lt; 35%). Texture features were extracted from enhanced late scanning images, and the presence and extent of LGEs were also measured. Patients were followed-up for clinical endpoints composed of all-cause deaths and cardiac transplantation. Cox proportional hazard regression and Kaplan–Meier analyses were used to evaluate the prognostic value of texture features and conventional CMR parameters with event-free survival.

Results: A total of 114 patients (37 women, median age 47.5 years old) with severely impaired systolic function (median LVEF, 14.0%) were followed-up for a median of 504.5 days. Twenty-nine patients experienced endpoint events, 12 died, and 17 underwent cardiac transplantations. Three texture features from a gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) (GLCM_contrast, GLCM_difference average, and GLCM_difference entropy) showed good prognostic value for adverse events when analyzed using univariable Cox hazard ratio regression (p = 0.007, p = 0.011, and p = 0.007, retrospectively). When each of the three features was analyzed using a multivariable Cox regression model that included the clinical parameter (systolic blood pressure) and LGE extent, they were found to be independently associated with adverse outcomes.

Conclusion: Texture features related LGE heterogeneities and variations (GLCM_contrast, GLCM_difference average, and GLCM_difference entropy) are novel markers for risk stratification toward adverse events in DCM patients with severe systolic dysfunction.

Prognostic Significance of Nonischemic Myocardial Fibrosis in Patients With Normal LV Volumes and Ejection-Fraction

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to investigate the prognostic significance of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in patients without coronary artery disease and with normal range left ventricular (LV) volumes and ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND

Nonischemic patterns of LGE with normal LV volumes and ejection fraction are increasingly detected on cardiovascular magnetic resonance, but their prognostic significance, and consequently management, is uncertain.

METHODS

Patients with midwall/subepicardial LGE and normal LV volumes, wall thickness, and ejection fraction on cardiovascular magnetic resonance were enrolled and compared to a control group without LGE. The primary outcome was actual or aborted sudden cardiac death (SCD).

RESULTS

Of 748 patients enrolled, 401 had LGE and 347 did not. The median age was 50 years (interquartile range: 38-61 years), LV ejection fraction 66% (interquartile range: 62%-70%), and 287 (38%) were women. Scan indications included chest pain (40%), palpitation (33%) and breathlessness (13%). No patient experienced SCD and only 1 LGE+ patient (0.13%) had an aborted SCD in the 11th follow-up year. Over a median of 4.3 years, 30 patients (4.0%) died. All-cause mortality was similar for LGE+/- patients (3.7% vs 4.3%; P = 0.71) and was associated with age (HR: 2.04 per 10 years; 95% CI: 1.46-2.79; P < 0.001). Twenty-one LGE+ and 4 LGE- patients had an unplanned cardiovascular hospital admission (HR: 7.22; 95% CI: 4.26-21.17; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

There was a low SCD risk during long-term follow-up in patients with LGE but otherwise normal LV volumes and ejection fraction. Mortality was driven by age and not LGE presence, location, or extent, although the latter was associated with greater cardiovascular hospitalization for suspected myocarditis and symptomatic ventricular tachycardia.

Contemporary ICD Use in Patients with Heart Failure

Despite constant breakthroughs in heart failure (HF) therapy, the population of HF patients resume to grow and is linked to increased mortality and morbidity. Ventricular arrhythmias (VA) are one of the leading causes of mortality in HF subjects. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are currently the gold standard in treatment, preventing arrhythmic sudden cardiac death (SCD) episodes. However, the death rates related to HF remain elevated, as not all HF subjects benefit equally. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has emerged as a novel approach for HF patients. These devices have been thoroughly investigated in major randomized controlled studies but continue to be underutilized in various countries. This review discusses the use of ICD in HF populations on top of treatments.

T1 Mapping and Extracellular Volume Fraction in Dilated Cardiomyopathy: A Prognosis Study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to examine the prognostic value of T1 mapping and the extracellular volume (ECV) fraction in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM).

BACKGROUND

Patients with DCM with functional left ventricular remodeling have poorer prognoses. Noninvasive assessment of myocardial fibrosis using T1 mapping and the ECV fraction may improve risk stratification of patients with DCM; however, this has not yet been systematically evaluated.

METHODS

A total of 659 consecutive patients with DCM (498 men; 45 ± 15 years) who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance with T1 mapping and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging with a 1.5-T magnetic resonance scanner were enrolled in this study. Primary endpoints were cardiac-related death and heart transplantation. Secondary endpoints were hospitalization for heart failure, ventricular arrhythmias, and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation. Survival estimates were calculated by Kaplan-Meier curves with the log-rank test.

RESULTS

During a mean follow-up of 66.3 ± 20.9 months, 122 and 205 patients with DCM reached the primary and secondary endpoints, respectively. The presence of LGE had an association with both of the primary and secondary endpoints observed in the patients with DCM (both P < 0.001). The maximum native T1 (HR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.02-1.09) and maximum ECV fraction (HR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.08-1.21) had associations with the primary endpoints in the patients with positive LGE (both P < 0.001), whereas the mean native T1 (HR: 1.13; 95% CI: 1.10-1.36) and mean ECV fraction (HR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.12-1.53) had the best associations in the patients with negative LGE (all P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

T1 mapping and the ECV fraction had prognostic value in patients with DCM and were particularly important in patients with DCM without LGE. Using a combination of T1 mapping, ECV fraction, and LGE provided optimal risk stratification for patients with DCM.

Integration of imaging and circulating biomarkers in heart failure: a consensus document by the Biomarkers and Imaging Study Groups of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology

Circulating biomarkers and imaging techniques provide independent and complementary information to guide management of heart failure (HF). This consensus document by the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) presents current evidence-based indications relevant to integration of imaging techniques and biomarkers in HF. The document first focuses on application of circulating biomarkers together with imaging findings, in the broad domains of screening, diagnosis, risk stratification, guidance of treatment and monitoring, and then discusses specific challenging settings. In each section we crystallize clinically relevant recommendations and identify directions for future research. The target readership of this document includes cardiologists, internal medicine specialists and other clinicians dealing with HF patients.

Echocardiographic Longitudinal Strain Analysis in Heart Failure: Real Usefulness for Clinical Management Beyond Diagnostic Value and Prognostic Correlations? A Comprehensive Review

Heart failure (HF) is a highly prevalent clinical syndrome characterized by considerable phenotypic heterogeneity. The traditional classification based on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is widely accepted by the guidelines and represents the grounds for patient enrollment in clinical trials, even though it shows several limitations. Ejection fraction (EF) is affected by preload, afterload, and contractility, it being problematic to express LV function in several conditions, such as HF with preserved EF (HFpEF), valvular heart disease, and subclinical HF, and in athletes. Over the last two decades, developments in diagnostic techniques have provided useful tools to overcome EF limitations. Strain imaging analysis (particularly global longitudinal strain (GLS)) has emerged as a useful echocardiographic technique in patients with HF, as it is able to simultaneously supply information on both systolic and diastolic functions, depending on cardiac anatomy and physiology/pathophysiology. The use of GLS has proved helpful in terms of diagnostic performance and prognostic value in several HF studies. Universally accepted cutoff values and variability across vendors remain an area to be fully explored, hence limiting routine application of this technique in clinical practice. In the present review, the current role of GLS in the diagnosis and management of patients with HF will be discussed. We describe, by critical analysis of the pros and cons, various clinical settings in HF, and how the appropriate use and interpretation of GLS can provide important clues.

Clinical Risk Prediction in Patients With Left Ventricular Myocardial Noncompaction

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) is a heterogeneous entity with uncertain prognosis.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to develop and validate a prediction model of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and to identify LVNC cases without events during long-term follow-up.

METHODS

This is a retrospective longitudinal multicenter cohort study of consecutive patients fulfilling LVNC criteria by echocardiography or cardiovascular magnetic resonance. MACE were defined as heart failure (HF), ventricular arrhythmias (VAs), systemic embolisms, or all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 585 patients were included (45 ± 20 years of age, 57% male). LV ejection fraction (LVEF) was 48% ± 17%, and 18% presented late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). After a median follow-up of 5.1 years, MACE occurred in 223 (38%) patients: HF in 110 (19%), VAs in 87 (15%), systemic embolisms in 18 (3%), and 34 (6%) died. LVEF was the main variable independently associated with MACE (P < 0.05). LGE was associated with HF and VAs in patients with LVEF >35% (P < 0.05). A prediction model of MACE was developed using Cox regression, composed by age, sex, electrocardiography, cardiovascular risk factors, LVEF, and family aggregation. C-index was 0.72 (95% confidence interval: 0.67-0.75) in the derivation cohort and 0.72 (95% confidence interval: 0.71-0.73) in an external validation cohort. Patients with no electrocardiogram abnormalities, LVEF ≥50%, no LGE, and negative family screening presented no MACE at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

LVNC is associated with an increased risk of heart failure and ventricular arrhythmias. LVEF is the variable most strongly associated with MACE; however, LGE confers additional risk in patients without severe systolic dysfunction. A risk prediction model is developed and validated to guide management.

Heart Failure With Mid-range Ejection Fraction: Every Coin Has Two Sides

This review summarizes current knowledge regarding clinical epidemiology, pathophysiology, and prognosis for patients with HFmrEF in comparison to HFrEF and HFpEF. Although recommended treatments currently focus on aggressive management of comorbidities, we summarize potentially beneficial therapies that can delay the process of heart failure by blocking the pathophysiology mechanism. More studies are needed to further characterize HFmrEF and identify effective management strategies that can reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality of patients with HFmrEF.

Clinical Translation of Three-Dimensional Scar, Diffusion Tensor Imaging, Four-Dimensional Flow, and Quantitative Perfusion in Cardiac MRI: A Comprehensive Review

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is a versatile tool that has established itself as the reference method for functional assessment and tissue characterisation. CMR helps to diagnose, monitor disease course and sub-phenotype disease states. Several emerging CMR methods have the potential to offer a personalised medicine approach to treatment. CMR tissue characterisation is used to assess myocardial oedema, inflammation or thrombus in various disease conditions. CMR derived scar maps have the potential to inform ablation therapy—both in atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. Quantitative CMR is pushing boundaries with motion corrections in tissue characterisation and first-pass perfusion. Advanced tissue characterisation by imaging the myocardial fibre orientation using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), has also demonstrated novel insights in patients with cardiomyopathies. Enhanced flow assessment using four-dimensional flow (4D flow) CMR, where time is the fourth dimension, allows quantification of transvalvular flow to a high degree of accuracy for all four-valves within the same cardiac cycle. This review discusses these emerging methods and others in detail and gives the reader a foresight of how CMR will evolve into a powerful clinical tool in offering a precision medicine approach to treatment, diagnosis, and detection of disease.

CMR-Based Risk Stratification of Sudden Cardiac Death and Use of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator in Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy

Non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) is one of the most important entities for arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD). Previous studies suggest a lower benefit of implantable cardioverter–defibrillator (ICD) therapy in patients with NICM as compared to ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM). Nevertheless, current guidelines do not differentiate between the two subgroups in recommending ICD implantation. Hence, risk stratification is required to determine the subgroup of patients with NICM who will likely benefit from ICD therapy. Various predictors have been proposed, among others genetic mutations, left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left-ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDD), and T-wave alternans (TWA). In addition to these parameters, cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) has the potential to further improve risk stratification. CMR allows the comprehensive analysis of cardiac function and myocardial tissue composition. A range of CMR parameters have been associated with SCD. Applicable examples include late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), T1 relaxation times, and myocardial strain. This review evaluates the epidemiological aspects of SCD in NICM, the role of CMR for risk stratification, and resulting indications for ICD implantation.

Appropriate use criteria for cardiovascular MRI: SIC - SIRM position paper Part 2 (myocarditis, pericardial disease, cardiomyopathies and valvular heart disease)

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has emerged as an accurate diagnostic technique for the evaluation of patients with cardiac disease in the majority of clinical settings, thanks to an established additional diagnostic and prognostic value. This document has been developed by a joined group of experts of the Italian Society of Cardiology (SIC) and Italian Society of Radiology (SIRM) to provide a summary about the current state of technology and clinical applications of CMR, to improve the clinical diagnostic pathways and to promote its inclusion in clinical practice. The writing committee consisted of members and experts of both societies in order to develop a more integrated approach in the field of cardiac imaging. This section 2 will cover myocarditis, pericardial disease, cardiomyopathies and valvular heart disease.

Ventricular arrhythmia risk is associated with myocardial scar but not with response to cardiac resynchronization therapy

AIMS

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk estimation in patients referred for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) remains a challenge. By CRT-mediated improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), many patients loose indication for primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). Increasing evidence shows the importance of myocardial scar for risk prediction. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic impact of myocardial scar depending on the echocardiographic response in patients undergoing CRT.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with indication for CRT were prospectively enrolled. Decision about ICD or pacemaker implantation was based on clinical criteria. All patients underwent delayed-enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Median follow-up duration was 45 (24-75) months. Primary outcome was a composite of sustained ventricular arrhythmia, appropriate ICD therapy, or SCD. A total of 218 patients with LVEF 25.5 ± 6.6% were analysed [158 (73%) male, 64.9 ± 10.7 years]. Myocardial scar was observed in 73 patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) (95% of ICM patients); in 62 with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (45% of these patients); and in all but 1 of 36 (17%) patients who reached the primary outcome. Myocardial scar was the only significant predictor of primary outcome [odds ratio 27.7 (3.8-202.7)], independent of echocardiographic CRT response. A total of 55 (25%) patients died from any cause or received heart transplant. For overall survival, only a combination of the absence of myocardial scar with CRT response was associated with favourable outcome.

CONCLUSION

Malignant arrhythmic events and SCD depend on the presence of myocardial scar but not on CRT response. All-cause mortality improved only with the combined absence of myocardial scar and CRT response.

Right ventricular insertion site fibrosis in a dilated cardiomyopathy referral population: phenotypic associations and value for the prediction of heart failure admission or death

BACKGROUND

Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is increasingly recognized as a heterogenous disease with distinct phenotypes on late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. While mid-wall striae (MWS) fibrosis is a widely recognized phenotypic risk marker, other fibrosis patterns are prevalent but poorly defined. Right ventricular (RV) insertion (RVI) site fibrosis is commonly seen, but without objective criteria has been considered a non-specific finding. In this study we developed objective criteria for RVI fibrosis and studied its clinical relevance in a large cohort of patients with DCM.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 645 DCM patients referred for LGE-CMR. All underwent standardized imaging protocols and baseline health evaluations. LGE images were blindly scored using objective criteria, inclusive of RVI site and MWS fibrosis. Associations between LGE patterns and CMR-based markers of adverse chamber remodeling were evaluated. Independent associations of LGE fibrosis patterns with the primary composite clinical outcome of heart failure admission or death were determined by multivariable analysis.

RESULTS

The mean age was 56 ± 14 (28% female) with a mean left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) of 37%. At a median of 1061 days, 129 patients (20%) experienced the primary outcome. Any abnormal LGE was present in 306 patients (47%), inclusive of 274 (42%) meeting criteria for RVI site fibrosis and 167 (26%) for MWS fibrosis. All with MWS fibrosis showed RVI site fibrosis. Solitary RVI site fibrosis was associated with higher bi-ventricular volumes [LV end-systolic volume index (78 ± 39 vs. 66 ± 33 ml/m2, p = 0.01), RV end-diastolic volume index (94 ± 28 vs. 84 ± 22 ml/m2 (p < 0.01), RV end-systolic volume index (56 ± 26 vs. 45 ± 17 ml/m2, p < 0.01)], lower bi-ventricular function [LVEF 35 ± 12 vs. 39 ± 10% (p < 0.01), RV ejection fraction (RVEF) 43 ± 12 vs. 48 ± 10% (p < 0.01)], and higher extracellular volume (ECV). Patient with solitary RVI site fibrosis experienced a non-significant 1.4-fold risk of the primary outcome, increasing to a significant 2.6-fold risk when accompanied by MWS fibrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

RVI site fibrosis in the absence of MWS fibrosis is associated with bi-ventricular remodelling and intermediate risk of heart failure admission or death. Our study findings suggest RVI site fibrosis to be pre-requisite for the incremental development of MWS fibrosis, a more advanced phenotype associated with greater LV remodeling and risk of clinical events.

Improved Risk Stratification for Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Death in Patients With Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Risk stratification for ventricular arrhythmias (VA) and sudden death in nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) remains suboptimal.

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to provide an improved risk stratification algorithm for VA and sudden death in DCM.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with DCM who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) at 2 tertiary referral centers. The combined arrhythmic endpoint included appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapies, sustained ventricular tachycardia, resuscitated cardiac arrest, and sudden death.

RESULTS

In 1,165 patients with a median follow-up of 36 months, LGE was an independent and strong predictor of the arrhythmic endpoint (hazard ratio: 9.7; p < 0.001). This association was consistent across all strata of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Epicardial LGE, transmural LGE, and combined septal and free-wall LGE were all associated with heightened risk. A simple algorithm combining LGE and 3 LVEF strata (i.e., ≤20%, 21% to 35%, >35%) was significantly superior to LVEF with the 35% cutoff (Harrell's C statistic: 0.8 vs. 0.69; area under the curve: 0.82 vs. 0.7; p < 0.001) and reclassified the arrhythmic risk of 34% of patients with DCM. LGE-negative patients with LVEF 21% to 35% had low risk (annual event rate 0.7%), whereas those with high-risk LGE distributions and LVEF >35% had significantly higher risk (annual event rate 3%; p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

In a large cohort of patients with DCM, LGE was found to be a significant, consistent, and strong predictor of VA or sudden death. Specific high-risk LGE distributions were identified. A new clinical algorithm integrating LGE and LVEF significantly improved the risk stratification for VA and sudden death, with relevant implications for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator allocation.

Risk stratification for sudden cardiac death in patients with heart failure : Emerging role of imaging parameters

BACKGROUND

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction is a common condition that has a poor prognosis. Accurate selection of patients with ischemic heart disease and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, who are at risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD), remains a challenge. In these cases, current indications for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) rely almost entirely on left ventricular ejection fraction. However, this parameter is insufficient. Recently, noninvasive imaging has provided insight into the mechanism underlying SCD using myocardial deformation on echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging. The aim of this review article was to underline the emerging role of these novel parameters in identifying high-risk patients.

METHODS

A literature search was carried out for reports published with the following terms: "sudden cardiac death," "heart failure," "noninvasive imaging," "echocardiography," "deformation," "magnetic resonance imaging," and "ventricular arrhythmia." The search was restricted to reports published in English.

RESULTS

The findings of this analysis suggest that cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and strain assessment by echocardiography, particularly longitudinal strain, can be promising techniques for cardiovascular risk stratification in patients with heart failure.

CONCLUSION

In future, risk stratification of arrhythmia and patient selection for ICD placement may rely on a multiparametric approach using combinations of imaging modalities in addition to left ventricular ejection fraction.

Cardiac MRI in cardiomyopathies

Heart failure affects 1-2% of the adult population and one of the main contributors to its development is cardiomyopathy. Assessing a patient's risk for adverse events in heart failure is challenging and made more difficult by the heterogenous phenotypic expression of the disease. Cardiac MRI has long been a gold standard measure of myocardial function and anatomy due to its high spatial and temporal resolution. More recently, it has been posited to play a more critical role in the diagnosis and prognosis of cardiomyopathy-related heart failure. Given the limitations of more commonly used imaging modalities, increasing the clinical use of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging could potentially improve the prognosis of specific subgroups of patients at risk of adverse cardiac events.

Etiology and prognosis of patients with unexplained syncope and mid-range left ventricular dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Syncope in patients with mid-range left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) can be due to potentially serious arrhythmic causes. However, there is no clear consensus on the best way to manage these patients.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to determine the causes of syncope and assess the diagnostic yield and safety of a stepwise workup protocol in this population.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational study. A stepwise workup protocol was applied to patients with LVEF 35%-50% and unexplained syncope after the initial assessment (step 1).

RESULTS

One hundred four patients were included {median age 75.6 years; (interquartile range [IQR] 67.6-81.2 years); median LVEF 45% (IQR 40%-48%); median follow-up 2.0 years (IQR 0.7-3.3 years). In 71 patients (68.3%), a diagnosis was reached: 55 (77.5%) in step 2 (hospital admission and electrophysiology study) and 16 (36.5%) in step 3 (implantable cardiac monitor). Arrhythmic causes were the most common etiology (45.2% auriculoventricular block and 9.6% ventricular tachycardia). Sixty patients (57.7%) required the implantation of a cardiac device and 11 had a defibrillation function. Patients diagnosed in step 3 had a higher global risk of recurrence of syncope (hazard ratio 6.5; 95% confidence interval 2.3-18.0). The mortality rate was 8.1 per 100 person-years, and the sudden or unknown death rate was 0.9 per 100 person-years.

CONCLUSION

In patients with mid-range left ventricular dysfunction and syncope of unknown cause, a systematic diagnostic strategy based on electrophysiology study and/or implantable cardiac monitor implantation allows a diagnosis to be reached in a high proportion of cases and guides the treatment. Arrhythmia is the most common cause of syncope in this population, particularly auriculoventricular block.

Multimodality imaging predictors of sudden cardiac death

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is the worst clinical event occurring in the clinical context of cardiomyopathies. Current guidelines recommend using LV ejection fraction as the only imaging-derived parameter to identify patients who may benefit from ICD implantation in cardiomyopathies with reduced ejection fraction; however, a relevant proportion of high-risk population is left with unmet therapeutic goal. In case of dilated, hypertrophic, or arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathies, there is still a room for more sensitive and specific risk markers for identifying a cluster at higher risk of SCD. In this paper, we reviewed the evidence supporting the use of advanced echocardiography, CMR, and nuclear cardiology for SCD stratification in patients with the most common cardiomyopathies. The added value of these modalities may be explained on the basis of tissue characterization, especially scar detection, a central player in the pathogenesis of arrhythmias. Therefore, integration of these modalities to our everyday clinical practice may help in dealing with the gray zones where current guidelines are still ineffective for patient selection.

Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Heart Failure

Purpose of Review

The purpose of this review is to summarize the application of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in the diagnostic and prognostic evaluation of patients with heart failure (HF).

Recent Findings

CMR is an important non-invasive imaging modality in the assessment of ventricular volumes and function and in the analysis of myocardial tissue characteristics. The information derived from CMR provides a comprehensive evaluation of HF. Its unique ability of tissue characterization not only helps to reveal the underlying etiologies of HF but also offers incremental prognostic information.

Summary

CMR is a useful non-invasive tool for the diagnosis and assessment of prognosis in patients suffering from heart failure.

The alcohol-induced cardiomyopathy: A cardiovascular magnetic resonance characterization

BACKGROUND

Alcoholic cardiomyopathy(ACM) is part of the non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy(NI-DCM) spectrum. Little is known about cardiovascular magnetic resonance(CMR) features in ACM patients. The aim of this study is to describe CMR findings and their prognostic impact in ACM patients.

METHODS

Consecutive ACM patients evaluated in five referral CMR centres from January 2005 to December 2018 were enrolled. CMR findings and their prognostic value were compared to idiopathic NI-DCM(iNI-DCM) patients. The main outcome was a composite of death/heart transplantation/life-threatening arrhythmias.

RESULTS

Overall 114 patients (52 with ACM and 62 with iNI-DCM) were included. ACM patients were more often males compared to iNI-DCM (90% vs 64%, respectively, p ≤ 0.001) and were characterized by a more pronounced biventricular adverse remodelling than iNI-DCM, i.e. lower LVEF (31 ± 12% vs 38 ± 11% respectively, p = 0.001) and larger left ventricular end-diastolic volume (116 ± 40 ml/m² vs 67 ± 20 ml/m² respectively, p < 0.001). Similarly to iNI-DCM, late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), mainly midwall, was present in more than 40% of ACM patients but, conversely, it was not associated with adverse outcome(p = 0.15). LGE localization was prevalently septal (87%) in ACM vs lateral in iNI-DCM(p < 0.05). Over a median follow-up of 42 months [Interquartile Range 24-68], adverse outcomes were similar in both groups(p = 0.67).

CONCLUSIONS

ACM represents a specific phenotype of NI-DCM, with severe morpho-functional features at the onset, but similar long-term outcomes compared to iNI-DCM. Despite the presence and pattern of distribution of LGE was comparable, ACM and iNI-DCM showed a different LGE localization, mostly septal in ACM and lateral in iNI-DCM, with different prognostic impact.

Cardiac magnetic resonance fingerprinting: Trends in technical development and potential clinical applications

Quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance has emerged in recent years as an approach for evaluating a range of cardiovascular conditions, with T1 and T2 mapping at the forefront of these developments. Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting (cMRF) provides a rapid and robust framework for simultaneous quantification of myocardial T1 and T2 in addition to other tissue properties. Since the advent of cMRF, a number of technical developments and clinical validation studies have been reported. This review provides an overview of cMRF, recent technical developments, healthy subject and patient studies, anticipated technical improvements, and potential clinical applications. Recent technical developments include slice profile and pulse efficiency corrections, improvements in image reconstruction, simultaneous multislice imaging, 3D whole-ventricle imaging, motion-resolved imaging, fat-water separation, and machine learning for rapid dictionary generation. Future technical developments in cMRF, such as B0 and B1 field mapping, acceleration of acquisition and reconstruction, imaging of patients with implanted devices, and quantification of additional tissue properties are also described. Potential clinical applications include characterization of infiltrative, inflammatory, and ischemic cardiomyopathies, tissue characterization in the left atrium and right ventricle, post-cardiac transplantation assessment, reduction of contrast material, pre-procedural planning for electrophysiology interventions, and imaging of patients with implanted devices.

The value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and programmed ventricular stimulation in patients with ventricular noncompaction and ventricular arrhythmias

INTRODUCTION

Left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) is associated with ventricular arrhythmias (VA) including premature ventricular complexes, and ventricular tachycardia (VT). The value of imaging with delayed enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (DE-CMR) and programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) for risk stratification in patients with VA and LVNC is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine whether DE-CMR and PVS are beneficial for risk stratification and whether CMR helps to identify VA target sites.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Consecutive patients with LVNC undergoing ablation for VAs were included, all patients had preprocedure DE-CMR. A total of 23 patients (7 women, 46 ± 14 years, ejection fraction 35 ± 14) were included and followed for 2.9 ± 2.2 years. DE-CMR scar was present in 12/23 patients (52%). PVS was performed in 20/23 patients, 8/10 patients (80%) with scar were inducible for VT compared to 0/10 (0%) patients without scar (p < .001). VA target sites in patients with scarring were located adjacent to areas of scarring in all but 1 patient and ablation was successful in 15/23 patients (65%). Patients with scar had worse survival free of VT than those without scar (log rank p = .01) and patients with inducible VT had worse survival free of VT than those who were noninducible (log rank p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of CMR defined scar in patients with LVNC was associated with inducible VT and worse outcomes. Inducibility for VT was associated with VT recurrence. Furthermore, CMR is beneficial in localizing the arrhythmogenic substrate in LVNC and therefore can aid in procedural planning.

Relationship of LVEF and Myocardial Scar to Long-Term Mortality Risk and Mode of Death in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Nonischemic cardiomyopathy is a leading cause of reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and is associated with high mortality risk from progressive heart failure and arrhythmias. Myocardial scar on cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging is increasingly recognized as a risk marker for adverse outcomes; however, left ventricular dysfunction remains the basis for determining a patient's eligibility for primary prophylaxis with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. We investigated the relationship of LVEF and scar with long-term mortality and mode of death in a large cohort of patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy.

METHODS

This study is a prospective, longitudinal outcomes registry of 1020 consecutive patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy who underwent clinical cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of LVEF and scar at 3 centers.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 5.2 (interquartile range, 3.8, 6.6) years, 277 (27%) patients died. On survival analysis, LVEF ≤35% and scar were strongly associated with all-cause (log-rank test P=0.002 and P<0.001, respectively) and cardiac death (P=0.001 and P<0.001, respectively). Whereas scar was strongly related to sudden cardiac death (SCD; P=0.001), there was no significant association between LVEF ≤35% and SCD risk (P=0.57). On multivariable analysis including established clinical factors, LVEF and scar are independent risk markers of all-cause and cardiac death. The addition of LVEF provided incremental prognostic value but insignificant discrimination improvement by C-statistic for all-cause and cardiac death, but no incremental prognostic value for SCD. Conversely, scar extent demonstrated significant incremental prognostic value and discrimination improvement for all 3 end points. On net reclassification analysis, the addition of LVEF resulted in no significant improvement for all-cause death (11.0%; 95% CI, -6.2% to 25.9%), cardiac death (9.8%; 95% CI, -5.7% to 29.3%), or SCD (7.5%; 95% CI, -41.2% to 42.9%). Conversely, the addition of scar extent resulted in significant reclassification improvement of 25.5% (95% CI, 11.7% to 41.0%) for all-cause death, 27.0% (95% CI, 11.6% to 45.2%) for cardiac death, and 40.6% (95% CI, 10.5% to 71.8%) for SCD.

CONCLUSIONS

Myocardial scar and LVEF are both risk markers for all-cause and cardiac death in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy. However, whereas myocardial scar has strong and incremental prognostic value for SCD risk stratification, LVEF has no incremental prognostic value over clinical measures. Scar assessment should be incorporated into patient selection criteria for primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement.

Prognostic Value of Nonischemic Ringlike Left Ventricular Scar in Patients With Apparently Idiopathic Nonsustained Ventricular Arrhythmias

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular (LV) scar on late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiac magnetic resonance has been correlated with life-threatening arrhythmic events in patients with apparently idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). We investigated the prognostic significance of a specific LV-LGE phenotype characterized by a ringlike pattern of fibrosis.

METHODS

A total of 686 patients with apparently idiopathic nonsustained VA underwent contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance. A ringlike pattern of LV scar was defined as LV subepicardial/midmyocardial LGE involving at least 3 contiguous segments in the same short-axis slice. The end point of the study was time to the composite outcome of all-cause death, resuscitated cardiac arrest because of ventricular fibrillation or hemodynamically unstable ventricular tachycardia and appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 28 patients (4%) had a ringlike pattern of scar (group A), 78 (11%) had a non-ringlike pattern (group B), and 580 (85%) had normal cardiac magnetic resonance with no LGE (group C). Group A patients were younger compared with groups B and C (median age, 40 vs 52 vs 45 years; P<0.01), more frequently men (96% vs 82% vs 55%; P<0.01), with a higher prevalence of family history of sudden cardiac death or cardiomyopathy (39% vs 14% vs 6%; P<0.01) and more frequent history of unexplained syncope (18% vs 9% vs 3%; P<0.01). All patients in group A showed VA with a right bundle-branch block morphology versus 69% in group B and 21% in group C (P<0.01). Multifocal VAs were observed in 46% of group A patients compared with 26% of group B and 4% of group C (P<0.01). After a median follow-up of 61 months (range, 34-84 months), the composite outcome occurred in 14 patients (50.0%) in group A versus 15 (19.0%) in group B and 2 (0.3%) in group C (P<0.01). After multivariable adjustment, the presence of LGE with ringlike pattern remained independently associated with increased risk of the composite end point (hazard ratio, 68.98 [95% CI, 14.67-324.39], P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with apparently idiopathic nonsustained VA, nonischemic LV scar with a ringlike pattern is associated with malignant arrhythmic events.

Developing and validating models to predict sudden death and pump failure death in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction

BACKGROUND

Sudden death (SD) and pump failure death (PFD) are leading modes of death in heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Risk stratification for mode-specific death may aid in patient enrichment for new device trials in HFpEF.

METHODS

Models were derived in 4116 patients in the Irbesartan in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction trial (I-Preserve), using competing risks regression analysis. A series of models were built in a stepwise manner, and were validated in the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM)-Preserved and Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT) trials.

RESULTS

The clinical model for SD included older age, men, lower LVEF, higher heart rate, history of diabetes or myocardial infarction, and HF hospitalization within previous 6 months, all of which were associated with a higher SD risk. The clinical model predicting PFD included older age, men, lower LVEF or diastolic blood pressure, higher heart rate, and history of diabetes or atrial fibrillation, all for a higher PFD risk, and dyslipidaemia for a lower risk of PFD. In each model, the observed and predicted incidences were similar in each risk subgroup, suggesting good calibration. Model discrimination was good for SD and excellent for PFD with Harrell's C of 0.71 (95% CI 0.68-0.75) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.75-0.82), respectively. Both models were robust in external validation. Adding ECG and biochemical parameters, model performance improved little in the derivation cohort but decreased in validation. Including NT-proBNP substantially increased discrimination of the SD model, and simplified the PFD model with marginal increase in discrimination.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical models can predict risks for SD and PFD separately with good discrimination and calibration in HFpEF and are robust in external validation. Adding NT-proBNP further improved model performance. These models may help to identify high-risk individuals for device intervention in future trials.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

I-Preserve: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00095238; TOPCAT: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00094302; CHARM-Preserved: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00634712.

Emerging Techniques for Risk Stratification in Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy: JACC Review Topic of the Week

Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a common condition, which carries significant mortality from sudden cardiac death and pump failure. Left ventricular ejection fraction has conventionally been used as a risk marker for sudden cardiac death, but has performed poorly in trials. There have been significant advances in the areas of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and genetics, which are able to provide useful rick prediction in DCM. Biomarkers and cardiopulmonary exercise testing are well validated in the prediction of risk in heart failure; however, they have been tested less specifically in the DCM setting. This review will discuss these methods with a view toward multiparametric risk assessment in DCM with the hope of creating parametric risk models to predict sudden cardiac death and pump failure in the DCM population.

Incremental value of Late Gadolinium Enhancement by Cardiac MRI in risk stratification of heart failure patients with moderate and severe LV dysfunction

Objective

This is a prospective study of patients with LVEF ≤40%, with the objective of correlating CV events to LGE detected and quantified by CMRI.

Methods

Heart Failure (HF) patients with LVEF <40% who underwent CMRI were included. LGE volume of ≥6% of the myocardial volume was considered significant. Data of appropriate ICD shocks, CV hospitalizations and mortality were recorded.

Results

There were 133 HF (72 ICM & 62 NIDCM) patients with a mean age of 54 ± 12 years, mean LVEF of 34 ± 6% and a follow up of 24 ± 3 months. Totally 46 CV events were recorded in 30 patients, 44 in LGE +ve & 2 in LGE -ve groups (HR 17.8, 95% CI-8.03-39.3, P = 0.000095). All the 7 deaths were in LGE +ve group. CV events were 22 (30.5%) in ICM group and 8 (13.1%) in NIDCM group (p = 0.03). All the 22 ICM patients and 6 of the 8 NIDCM with CV events were LGE +ve. The distribution of CV events amongst LGE +ve and LGE -ve were 35 vs 0 (ICM) and 9 vs 2 (NIDCM); p < 0.005.CV events in LVEF ≤ 30% group, were seen in 19 (47.5%) vs 1 (5.8%) in LGE +ve vs LGE -ve and no of events were 29 vs 1 (p = 0.003). In those with LVEF >30% the corresponding figures were 9 (22.5%) vs 1 (2.8%) and 15 vs 1 respectively (p = 0.02).

Conclusion

Demonstration of significant LGE by CMRI indicates high risk occurrence of CV events (CV hospitalization, appropriate shocks and total mortality) in NIDCM & ICM patients with LVEF < 40%.

Manganese-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in dilated cardiomyopathy and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

AIMS

The aim of this study is to quantify altered myocardial calcium handling in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy using magnetic resonance imaging.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 10) or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n = 17) underwent both gadolinium and manganese contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and were compared with healthy volunteers (n = 20). Differential manganese uptake (Ki) was assessed using a two-compartment Patlak model. Compared with healthy volunteers, reduction in T1 with manganese-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging was lower in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy [mean reduction 257 ± 45 (21%) vs. 288 ± 34 (26%) ms, P < 0.001], with higher T1 at 40 min (948 ± 57 vs. 834 ± 28 ms, P < 0.0001). In patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, reductions in T1 were less than healthy volunteers [mean reduction 251 ± 86 (18%) and 277 ± 34 (23%) vs. 288 ± 34 (26%) ms, with and without fibrosis respectively, P < 0.001]. Myocardial manganese uptake was modelled, rate of uptake was reduced in both dilated and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in comparison with healthy volunteers (mean Ki 19 ± 4, 19 ± 3, and 23 ± 4 mL/100 g/min, respectively; P = 0.0068). In patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, manganese uptake rate correlated with left ventricular ejection fraction (r2 = 0.61, P = 0.009). Rate of myocardial manganese uptake demonstrated stepwise reductions across healthy myocardium, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy without fibrosis and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with fibrosis providing absolute discrimination between the healthy myocardium and fibrosed myocardium (mean Ki 23 ± 4, 19 ± 3, and 13 ± 4 mL/100 g/min, respectively; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The rate of manganese uptake in both dilated and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy provides a measure of altered myocardial calcium handling. This holds major promise for the detection and monitoring of dysfunctional myocardium, with the potential for early intervention and prognostication.

Factors predictive for delayed enhancement in cardiac resonance imaging in patients undergoing catheter ablation of premature ventricular complexes

Background

Patients undergoing ablation of premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) can have cardiac scar. Risk factors for the presence of scar are not well defined.

Objectives

To determine the prevalence of scarring detected by delayed enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (DE-CMR) in patients undergoing ablation of PVCs, to create a risk score predictive of scar, and to explore correlations between the scoring system and long-term outcomes.

Methods

DE-CMR imaging was performed in consecutive patients with frequent PVCs referred for ablation. The full sample was used to develop a prediction model for cardiac scar based on demographic and clinical characteristics, and internal validation of the prediction model was done using bootstrap samples.

Results

The study consisted of 333 patients (52% male, aged 53.2 ± 14.5 years, preablation ejection fraction 50.9% ± 12.2%, PVC burden 20.7 ± 13.14), of whom 112 (34%) had DE-CMR scarring. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed age (odds ratio [OR] 1.02 [1.01–1.04]/year, P = .019) and preablation ejection fraction (OR 0.92 [0.89–0.94]/%, P < .001) to be predictive of scar. A weighted risk score incorporating age and ejection fraction was used to stratify patients into low-, medium-, and high-risk groups. Scar prevalence was around 86% in the high-risk group and 12% in the low-risk group; high-risk patients had worse survival free of arrhythmia.

Conclusions

Cardiac scar was present in one-third of patients referred for PVC ablation. A weighted risk score based simply on patient age and preprocedural ejection fraction can help discriminate between patients at high and low risk for the presence of cardiac scar and worse arrhythmia outcomes.

Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Heritable Cardiomyopathies

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance represents the imaging modality of choice for the investigation of patients with heritable cardiomyopathies. The combination of gold-standard volumetric analysis with tissue characterization can deliver precise phenotypic evaluation of both cardiac morphology and the underlying myocardial substrate. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance additionally has an established role in risk-stratifying patients with heritable cardiomyopathy and an emerging role in guiding therapies. This article explores the application and utility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance techniques with specific focus on the major heritable cardiomyopathies.

Cardiac MRI: technical basis

Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is an effective method for noninvasively imaging the heart which in the last two decades impressively enhanced spatial and temporal resolution and imaging speed, broadening its spectrum of applications in cardiovascular disease. CMR imaging techniques are designed to noninvasively assess cardiovascular morphology, ventricular function, myocardial perfusion, tissue characterization, flow quantification and coronary artery disease. These intrinsic features yield CMR suitable for diagnosis, follow-up and longitudinal monitoring after treatment of cardiovascular diseases. The aim of this paper is to review the technical basis of CMR, from cardiac imaging planes to cardiac imaging sequences.

Artificial intelligence in cardiac radiology

Artificial intelligence (AI) is entering the clinical arena, and in the early stage, its implementation will be focused on the automatization tasks, improving diagnostic accuracy and reducing reading time. Many studies investigate the potential role of AI to support cardiac radiologist in their day-to-day tasks, assisting in segmentation, quantification, and reporting tasks. In addition, AI algorithms can be also utilized to optimize image reconstruction and image quality. Since these algorithms will play an important role in the field of cardiac radiology, it is increasingly important for radiologists to be familiar with the potential applications of AI. The main focus of this article is to provide an overview of cardiac-related AI applications for CT and MRI studies, as well as non-imaging-based applications for reporting and image optimization.

Reduction in mortality from implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy patients is dependent on the presence of left ventricular scar

Aims

In patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM), the mortality benefit of a primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) has been challenged. Left ventricular (LV) scar identified by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is associated with a high risk of malignant arrhythmia in NICM. We aimed to determine the impact of LV scar on the mortality benefit from a primary prevention ICD in NICM.

Methods and results

We recruited 452 consecutive heart failure patients [New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II/III] with NICM and LV ejection fraction ≤35% from a state-wide CMR service. All patients fulfilled European Society of Cardiology guidelines for primary prevention ICD implantation; however, the decision to implant was at the treating physician's discretion. Baseline clinical and CMR data were recorded prospectively and heart failure mortality risk (MAGGIC score) was calculated. The primary study outcome measurement was all-cause mortality based on presence or absence of ICD, stratified by LV scar. Median follow-up was 37.9 months and there was no difference in MAGGIC score between those who did and did not receive a primary prevention ICD (19.30 ± 5.46 vs. 18.90 ± 5.67, P = 0.50). In patients without LV scar, ICD implantation was not associated with improved mortality [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.22, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.53-2.78, P = 0.64]. In patients with LV scar, ICD implantation was independently associated with reduced mortality (HR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.26-0.77, P = 0.003).

Conclusions

In patients with NICM, primary prevention ICD implantation is only associated with reduced mortality in patients with LV scar. This may enable more effective selection of NICM patients for ICD implantation compared with current guidelines.