Association of asthma control with health care utilization and quality of life

Measures of asthma control

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Over the past decade, the concept of asthma control as distinct from asthma severity has been clearly defined. Well controlled asthma is the goal of therapy in all asthma patients. This review is a comprehensive description of the tools currently available for a methodical assessment of different aspects of asthma control in clinical practice and research.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several questionnaires for assessing asthma control have been extensively validated in adults. In children, validation data are less extensive. Considerable overlap exists between asthma control measures and measures of asthma-specific quality of life. Asthma-specific quality-of-life questionnaires have been used as primary outcome measures in major clinical trials evaluating asthma therapy. Biomarkers that reflect eosinophilic inflammation of the airways are used as intermediate outcome measures to reflect the biological basis of asthma control. There is some controversy, however, over which biomarkers are best incorporated into therapeutic algorithms that attempt to achieve maximal asthma control while minimizing treatment intensity.

SUMMARY

In designing clinical studies to evaluate different asthma therapies, researchers will find this review to be a useful resource in terms of choosing the appropriate tool for assessing asthma control. This is also a valuable resource for a methodical assessment of response to asthma therapy in routine clinical care.

Symptoms, lung function, and perception of asthma control: an exploration into the heterogeneity of the asthma control construct

BACKGROUND

Asthma control is still surprisingly poor, which may be related to factors causing discrepancies between objective lung function measures and subjective symptom reports or discrepancies between objective indicators of asthma control and control perception. Identifying patients prone to such discrepancies may help to understand asthma control problems.

METHODS

Ninety-four persons with asthma participated in this study. We used cluster analysis to identify different subgroups of asthma control, based on a measure of lung function and self-report of daytime and nighttime symptoms, activity limitations, reliever medication use, and perception of asthma control. Subsequently, we explored between-cluster differences in clinical and psychological characteristics.

RESULTS

We identified two homogeneous clusters: a cluster of persons with poorly controlled asthma and a cluster of persons with well-controlled asthma. A third cluster included persons with an intermediate level of asthma control, an absence of nighttime symptoms, and a reduced impact of asthma symptoms on daily activities despite high levels of symptoms and reliever medication use. Members of the poorly controlled asthma cluster showed higher symptom levels, more catastrophic thinking, and activity avoidance beliefs compared with members of other clusters.

CONCLUSION

The clusters we identified crosscut current definitions of asthma severity and asthma control and indicate the importance of affective evaluation of symptoms in explaining poor asthma control.

Does asthma control as assessed by the asthma control test reflect airway inflammation?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The treatment of asthmatic patients is particularly focused on the control of symptoms as well as functional and inflammatory parameters. In our study, we investigated the relationship between the asthma control test (ACT) which evaluates symptoms and airway inflammation and functional parameters.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Stable asthmatic patients admitted to our pulmonary outpatient clinic were enrolled in the study consecutively and underwent the ACT, pulmonary function tests and methacholine bronchial provocation test (MBPT). Additionally, fractional exhaled nitric oxide level (FeNO) and induced sputum cell distribution were assessed. All these parameters were re-evaluated at the third month after adjusting medications of the patients according to baseline ACT scores.

RESULTS

Of the 101 patients screened, we analyzed 83 who proceeded to the follow up visit. At the baseline visit, 8 were totally controlled, 36 partially controlled and 39 uncontrolled according to ACT. At the follow up visit, 10 were totally controlled, 39 partially controlled and 34 uncontrolled. Comparison of the two visits in terms of all parameters revealed significant reductions only in the percentages of patients with MBPT positivity (p = 0.029) and FeNO levels > 20 ppb (p = 0.025) at follow up. The percentages of patients with FeNO > 20 ppb, MBPT positivity, induced sputum eosinophilia or induced sputum neutrophilia did not show significant differences between totally controlled, partially controlled and uncontrolled groups at both baseline and follow up visits.

CONCLUSION

Although the ACT scores did not show significant correlations with the airway inflammation parameters tested in this study, a marked reduction in the percentage of patients with MBPT positivity and FeNO > 20 ppb at follow up may suggest the importance of the control concept in the management of asthma.

Asthma in the elderly: Current understanding and future research needs--a report of a National Institute on Aging (NIA) workshop

Asthma in the elderly is underdiagnosed and undertreated, and there is a paucity of knowledge on the subject. The National Institute on Aging convened this workshop to identify what is known and what gaps in knowledge remain and suggest research directions needed to improve the understanding and care of asthma in the elderly. Asthma presenting at an advanced age often has similar clinical and physiologic consequences as seen with younger patients, but comorbid illnesses and the psychosocial effects of aging might affect the diagnosis, clinical presentation, and care of asthma in this population. At least 2 phenotypes exist among elderly patients with asthma; those with longstanding asthma have more severe airflow limitation and less complete reversibility than those with late-onset asthma. Many challenges exist in the recognition and treatment of asthma in the elderly. Furthermore, the pathophysiologic mechanisms of asthma in the elderly are likely to be different from those seen in young asthmatic patients, and these differences might influence the clinical course and outcomes of asthma in this population.

Assessing asthma control in UK primary care: use of routinely collected prospective observational consultation data to determine appropriateness of a variety of control assessment models

BACKGROUND

Assessing asthma control using standardised questionnaires is recommended as good clinical practice but there is little evidence validating their use within primary care. There is however, strong empirical evidence to indicate that age, weight, gender, smoking, symptom pattern, medication use, health service resource use, geographical location, deprivation, and organisational issues, are factors strongly associated with asthma control. A good control measure is therefore one whose variation is most explained by these factors.

METHOD

Eight binary (Yes = poor control, No = good control) models of asthma control were constructed from a large UK primary care dataset: the Royal College of Physicians 3-Questions (RCP-3Qs); the Jones Morbidity Index; three composite measures; three single component models. Accounting for practice clustering of patients, we investigated the effects of each model for assessing control. The binary models were assessed for goodness-of-fit statistics using Pseudo R-squared and Akaikes Information Criteria (AIC), and for performance using Area Under the Receiver Operator Characteristic (AUROC). In addition, an expanded RCP-3Q control scale (0-9) was derived and assessed with linear modelling. The analysis identified which model was best explained by the independent variables and thus could be considered a good model of control assessment.

RESULTS

1,205 practices provided information on 64,929 patients aged 13+ years. The RCP-3Q model provided the best fit statistically, with a Pseudo R-squared of 18%, and an AUROC of 0.79. By contrast, the composite model based on the GINA definition of controlled asthma had a higher AIC, an AUROC of 0.72, and only 10% variability explained. In addition, although the Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) model had the lowest AIC, it had an AUROC of 71% and only 6% of variability explained. However, compared with the RCP-3Qs binary model, the linear RCP-3Q Total Score Model (Scale 0-9), was found to be a more robust 'tool' for assessing asthma control with a lower AIC (28,6163) and an R-squared of 33%.

CONCLUSION

In the absence of a gold standard for assessing asthma control in primary care, the results indicate that the RCP-3Qs is an effective control assessment tool but, for maximum effect, the expanded scoring model should be used.

Asthma

This article presents the complexity of asthma and its ensuing management. The author details the clinical presentation of asthma, discussing its variability of presentation over time and within and among individuals. Pathophysiology is discussed, including immunohistopathologic features and inflammatory mediators, risk factors, comorbid conditions, natural history, and triggers. Diagnosis is presented in light of the challenging history of patients suspected of the disorder; pulmonary function testing, symptom assessment, impairment assessment, and risk assessment. Categories of asthma severity, controlling triggers, pharmacotherapy, stepwise approaches, and ongoing assessment are discussed, with a review of a clinical trial assessing efficacy of management.

Approaches to stepping up and stepping down care in asthmatic patients

The variability in symptom control is a challenging feature of asthma that necessitates careful monitoring and the need to step up and step down individualized therapeutic regimens over time. This stepwise concept in asthma therapy can be considered in at least 3 contexts. For lack of control that is persistent over long periods of time, an increase in the overall medication or a step-up long-term strategy is indicated. A second approach, the step-up short-term strategy, can be used during a temporary loss of acceptable control, such as at the onset of a viral respiratory tract illness. In these cases a step-up in therapy is usually terminated in 3 to 10 days once asthma control has been satisfactorily achieved. Finally, for treating symptoms related to the variability of asthma on a day-to-day basis, inhaled corticosteroids used concomitantly with a β-agonist have been evaluated, although this treatment is not currently approved in the United States. We will term this particular intervention a step-up intermittent strategy. Here we summarize the existing data regarding these 3 approaches to step up care and step down management, as well as to identify areas where more comparative studies are necessary to provide further guidance to clinicians regarding proper step-up and step-down strategies in the care of asthma.

The role of the primary care physician in helping adolescent and adult patients improve asthma control

Many adolescents and adults with asthma continue to have poorly controlled disease, often attributable to poor adherence to asthma therapy. Failure to adhere to recommended treatment may result from a desire to avoid regular reliance on medications, inappropriate high tolerance of asthma symptoms, failure to perceive the chronic nature of asthma, and poor inhaler technique. Primary care physicians need to find opportunities and methods to address these and other issues related to poor asthma control. Few adolescents or adults with asthma currently have asthma "checkup" visits, usually seeking medical care only with an exacerbation. Therefore, nonrespiratory-related office visits represent an important opportunity to assess baseline asthma control and the factors that most commonly lead to poor control. Tools such as the Asthma Control Test, the Asthma Therapy Assessment Questionnaire, the Asthma Control Questionnaire, and the Asthma APGAR provide standardized, patient-friendly ways to capture necessary asthma information. For uncontrolled asthma, physicians can refer to the stepwise approach in the 2007 National Asthma Education and Prevention Program guidelines to adjust medication use, but they must consider step-up decisions in the context of quality of the patient's inhaler technique, adherence, and ability to recognize and avoid or eliminate triggers. For this review, a literature search of PubMed from 2000 through August 31, 2010, was performed using the following terms (or a combination of these terms): asthma, asthma control, primary care, NAEPP guidelines, assessment, uncontrolled asthma, burden, impact, assessment tools, triggers, pharmacotherapy, safety. Studies were limited to human studies published in English. Articles were also identified by a manual search of bibliographies from retrieved articles and from article archives of the author.

Helping patients attain and maintain asthma control: reviewing the role of the nurse practitioner

Nurse practitioners (NPs) have a unique opportunity as frontline caregivers and patient educators to recognize, assess, and effectively treat the widespread problem of uncontrolled asthma. This review provides a perspective on the role of the NP in implementing the revised National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) Guidelines put forth by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, thereby helping patients achieve and maintain asthma control. A literature search of PubMed was performed using the terms asthma, nurse practitioner, asthma control, burden, impact, morbidity, mortality, productivity, quality of life, uncontrolled asthma, NAEPP guidelines, assessment, pharmacotherapy, safety. Despite the increased morbidity and mortality and impaired quality of life attributable to uncontrolled asthma, the 2007 NAEPP asthma guidelines are greatly underused. NPs have an opportunity to identify patients at risk and provide enhanced care and education for asthma control. Often, NPs can prescribe medication for and manage these patients, but it is necessary to be able to discern which patients require referral to a specialist.

Evaluating the sleep/wake cycle in persons with asthma: Three case scenarios

PURPOSE

To evaluate if wrist actigraphy, a measurement of movement, is an effective tool for assessing sleep/wake patterns and use in clinical practice in persons with asthma.

DATA SOURCES

Data from three individuals with asthma were utilized to develop three case scenarios. The case scenarios illustrated the use of actigraphy as the measurement tool for sleep patterns as they relate to individuals with varying degrees of asthma control.

CONCLUSIONS

The person with poorly controlled asthma had less total sleep time and lower sleep efficiency than the person with well-controlled asthma. The actigraph provided useful information on sleep patterns such as daytime napping, nighttime sleep, and sleep efficiency in persons with varying degrees of asthma control.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Nighttime asthma symptoms are often hard for the nurse practitioner (NP) to assess as they are often subjectively reported by patients. The use of actigraph in the clinical setting can provide useful, objective information on the sleep/wake cycles of persons with asthma to aid the NP in providing optimal management of the disease.

Asthma Severity in patients initiating controller monotherapy versus combination therapy

BACKGROUND

Asthma treatment guidelines recommend medications based on the level of asthma control.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate differences in asthma control between patients who initiated asthma controller monotherapy versus combination therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Children (5-16 years; n = 488) and adults (17-80 years; n = 530) with asthma and no controller therapy in the prior 6 months were included. Telephone surveys were conducted within 5 days of filling a new asthma controller prescription with either the caregiver of children or the adult patient. Demographics, asthma control before therapy, and asthma-related resource use were assessed for patients initiating monotherapy (filling one asthma controller prescription) and combination therapy (filling more than one controller medication or a fixed-dose combination).

RESULTS

Mean pediatric age was 10 years; 53% were male. Mean adult age was 47 years; 25% were male. There were no significant differences in asthma control score between patients receiving monotherapy and combination therapy. Children on combination therapy did not have more nighttime awakening or short-acting β-agonist use but were more likely to have been hospitalized due to asthma attack (p = .05) and have more unscheduled (p = .0374) and scheduled (p = .009) physician visits. Adults on combination therapy were more likely to have been hospitalized due to asthma attack (p < .05) and have regular doctor visits for asthma (p < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Assessment of asthma control scores in the 4 weeks before index medication suggests that asthma severity during a treatment-free period did not differ significantly for patients initiating controller monotherapy versus combination therapy. From these findings, it appears that although physicians may not focus on asthma control when choosing the intensity of initial controller therapy, the intensity of health-care encounters may be an influence.

Patient And phaRmacist Telephonic Encounters (PARTE) in an underserved rural population with asthma: methods and rationale

PURPOSE

Methods used to deliver and test a pharmacy-based asthma care telephonic service for an underserved, rural patient population are described.

SUMMARY

In a randomized controlled trial (RCT), the Patient And phaRmacist Telephonic Encounters (PARTE) project is assessing the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary impact of providing pharmacy-based asthma care service telephonically. The target audience is a low income patient population across a large geographic area served by a federally qualified community health center. Ninety-eight participants have been randomized to either standard care or the intervention group who received consultation and direct feedback from pharmacists via telephone regarding their asthma self-management and medication use. Pharmacists used a counseling framework that incorporates the Indian Health Services 3 Prime Questions and the RIM Technique (Recognition, Identification, and Management) for managing medication use problems. Pharmacists encouraged patients to be active partners in the decision-making process to identify and address the underlying cause of medication use problems. Uniquely, this trial collected process and summative data using qualitative and quantitative approaches. Pharmacists' training, the fidelity and quality of pharmacists' service delivery, and short term patient outcomes are being evaluated. This evaluation will improve our ability to address research challenges and intervention barriers, refine staff training, explore patient perspectives, and evaluate measures' power to provide preliminary patient outcome findings.

CONCLUSION

A mixed method evaluation of a structured pharmacist intervention has the potential to offer insights regarding staff training, service fidelity and short term outcomes using quantitative and qualitative data in an RCT. Results will provide evidence regarding the feasibility and quality of carrying out the study and service delivery from the multiple perspectives of participants, clinicians, and researchers.

Asthma that is not well-controlled is associated with increased healthcare utilization and decreased quality of life

BACKGROUND

Relationships of asthma control to other asthma outcomes have been incompletely documented.

OBJECTIVE

This study examined the relationship between asthma control and health-related quality of life (HRQL) and subsequent healthcare resource utilization.

METHODS

A 1-year online prospective longitudinal survey was conducted in 497 adults and 170 children with asthma treated in the past year. Control was measured by Asthma Control Test™ (ACT) and Childhood ACT™ (C-ACT)™ scores dichotomized into "well-controlled" (scores >19) or "not well-controlled" (scores ≤19), and HRQL was measured using the PedsQL™ 3.0 Asthma Module (children) and the SF-12 Health Survey (adults). Multivariate models were used for analysis.

RESULTS

HRQL scores were significantly lower for adults (mean decrease 3.4) and children (mean decrease 12.8) whose asthma was not well-controlled compared to patients with well-controlled asthma. Adults with asthma that was not well-controlled at baseline had a threefold greater risk of an asthma-related doctor visit and a 10-fold greater risk of an emergency department (ED) visit for asthma in the subsequent 9 months (odds ratio (OR) = 3.3 and OR = 11.3, respectively). Children with asthma that was not well-controlled had a nearly fivefold increased risk for subsequent asthma-related doctors' and ED visits (OR = 4.8 and OR = 4.9, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Both adults and children with not well-controlled asthma had significantly lower quality of life and were more likely to require an office or ED visit for asthma compared to patients with higher ACT scores. Therefore, it is important to continually assess asthma control and adjust controller therapy accordingly.

Insights into severe asthma control as assessed by guidelines, pulmonologist, patient, and partner

INTRODUCTION

The most recent guidelines on asthma management advocate a treatment strategy based on control of the disease rather than severity, a switch based on reported evidence.

AIMS

This observational, questionnaire-based study set out to investigate how control of the disease is assessed by the physician as well as the patient and his/her live-in partner and to compare these assessments with an assessment made according to the guidelines.

METHODS

In 169 patients with severe, persistent asthma on at least a high-dose inhaled corticosteroid plus an inhaled long-acting β2-agonist, control of the disease was assessed by the pulmonologist, the patient, and the patient's live-in partner. These assessments were compared with an assessment based on the guidelines. Results. Both patients and partners tended to judge disease control as better than their pulmonologists who, in turn, estimated control as acceptable in 58% of their patients in whom the guidelines would advocate more aggressive treatment. The most common guidelines criteria defining inadequate control in the "uncontrolled" 87.4% of this population were "limitation of physical activity" (72.3%) and "FEV₁" ≤ 85% of personal best" (63.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

To assess control in severe asthma, the patient's opinion is of limited value, as is that of their partners. Although a guidelines-based strategy has been shown to be effective in clinical trials conducted on large-scale populations in which mild or moderate disease is predominant, more aggressive treatment to achieve definitive control may not be appropriate in the 10% of asthma sufferers with severe disease; in everyday practice, lung specialists appear to implement such a strategy.

Validity and reliability evidence of the Asthma Control Test--ACT in Greece

BACKGROUND

The dimensionality of the Asthma Control Test (ACT) was examined in two counterview studies. Up to now, the ACT has not been validated for the Greek asthma patients.

OBJECTIVE

The present study was designed to examine the validity and reliability of the ACT responses in Greek asthma outpatients under a specialist's care.

STUDY DESIGN

Following evidence for sample-specific validity, the ACT (n = 100) was examined through construct, cross-sectional, convergent, and discriminant validity as well as internal consistency and test-retest reliability [root mean squared error of approximation (RMSEA)].

RESULTS

A one-factor solution fit the data [χ(2) (chi-square) = 3.899, df (degrees of freedom) 5, ns, RMSEA <0.001]. The ACT showed a high internal consistency (Cronbach alpha = 0.72) and a high 2 months test-retest reliability (IR = 0.85) for the total sample. Significant differences were found between the five categories of asthma control patients (not controlled at all, poorly controlled, somewhat controlled, well controlled, and completely controlled), according to the specialists' rating, for the ACT (p < .001). Significant differences were found between patients with and without asthma control (p = .001), patients of different gender (p = .05), educational status (p = .05), mean year income (p = .01), body mass index (p = .05), follow-up visits (p = .01), as well as among patients of different age (p < .001) and severity (p < .001). An ACT score of 19 or less provided optimum balance of sensitivity (98.46) and specificity (88.57) for screening 'not controlled' asthma. Cross-sectional validity testing showed moderate correlation of the ACT score with FEV1% predicted (r = 0.57, p < .001) and disability (r = -0.42, p < .001) and moderately high correlation with dyspnea (r = -0.71, p < .001). Convergent validity testing showed that the ACT score was correlated with the specialists' rating (r = 0.89, p < .001).

CONCLUSION

The ACT is valid and reliable in Greek outpatients with asthma under a specialist's care.

Asthma: are we monitoring the correct measures?

The prevalence of asthma, a common chronic inflammatory disease of the airways, has risen sharply over the past 25-30 years, with the biggest increase found in children. Currently, more than 22 million Americans have asthma. Asthma also is associated with significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Each year, asthma is responsible for $16 billion in direct and indirect costs due to health care utilization and loss of productivity, with over 14 million missed workdays. Asthma also accounts for almost 1.8 million emergency room visits and almost 500,000 hospitalizations annually. Therefore, assessment and monitoring of disease activity is critical to improve clinical and economic outcomes for patients with asthma. To help in this endeavor, practitioners and payers rely on evidence-based guidelines to classify disease severity, to guide treatment decisions, and to assess the degree of asthma control. In August 2007, the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) updated its guidelines based on greater knowledge of disease pathophysiology and the development of newer therapeutic agents. This includes an increased emphasis on the need to establish disease severity, including the components of impairment and risk, as well as on the level of asthma control. Despite the availability of the NAEPP and other guidelines, asthma control often remains suboptimal. While numerous clinical and patient-reported measures are available, it is clear that the optimal monitoring schema for patients with asthma remains undefined. To clearly establish whether asthma control is attained, multiple measures are required and should include clinical and patient-reported assessments.

Quarterly assessment of short-acting beta(2)-adrenergic agonist use as a predictor of subsequent health care use for asthmatic patients in the United States

PURPOSE

An annual time frame for risk assessment may not account for the variable course of asthma. The purpose of this study was to determine whether excessive short-acting beta(2)-adrenergic agonist (SABA) dispensed quarterly was associated with asthma exacerbations in the subsequent quarter.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort analysis included 93,604 health plan members aged 6-56 years with >or=2 years of continuous enrollment (2003-2007), an asthma diagnosis, and asthma prescription claims. The amount of SABA dispensed in claims (metered-dose inhaler and nebulized) was converted to canister equivalents (CEs) in the first observation quarter and categorized as 0, 0.5-3, and >or=3 (excessive SABA use). Asthma exacerbation risk (hospitalization, emergency department [ED] visit, or oral corticosteroid [OCS] claim in the subsequent quarter) was assessed using logistic regression. Covariates used in the regression models were age, sex, geographic region, comorbidities, specialist consultation, asthma controller medication use, and asthma severity.

RESULTS

The cohort included 33,951 patients aged 6-17 years (36%) and 59,653 aged 18-56 years (64%); 64% had 0 SABA CE, and 5% had >3 SABA CEs. Compared with 0 CE, excessive SABA use (>3 CEs) was associated with an increased likelihood of hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 3.15, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.89-5.27) and an ED/urgent care (UC) visit (adjusted OR: 3.14, 95% CI: 2.32-4.28).

CONCLUSION

The risk of an asthma exacerbation was associated with excessive SABA use in the previous quarter. Assessment of excessive SABA dispensed during a calendar quarter can be used to identify patients at increased exacerbation risk in the subsequent quarter.

Asthma in pregnancy and its pharmacologic treatment

BACKGROUND

Asthma is among the most common serious medical problems in pregnancy, and its prevalence may be increasing. Management is problematic because asthma may harm the fetus, yet little is known about fetal risks of asthma medications.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the prevalence, symptom control, and pharmacologic treatment of asthma in pregnancy.

METHODS

Study participants were a random sample of 3,609 mothers of nonmalformed infants born in Massachusetts between 1998 and 2006. Interviewed within 6 months of delivery, participants were asked specific asthma-related questions and classified as having physician-diagnosed, possible, past, or no asthma; those with physician-diagnosed asthma were classified as having well-controlled, not well-controlled, or poorly controlled asthma. Drug treatments were grouped into corticosteroids, beta(2)-agonists, leukotriene modifiers, combination products, and others.

RESULTS

Physician-diagnosed asthma was present in 502 women (13.9%) and possible asthma in an additional 578(16.0%). Higher rates of asthma were observed among women who were younger, white, obese, and less well educated, had lower income, and smoked during pregnancy. Secular changes were unremarkable: leukotriene modifiers were used by only 3.4% of asthmatic women; inhaled steroid use increased only from 19.0% during 1997-1999 to 23.3% in 2003-2005, whereas use of inhaled beta(2)-agonists exceeded 50% in both periods. Less than 40% of women with poorly controlled asthma symptoms reported use of a controller medication.

CONCLUSIONS

High rates of asthma and asthma symptoms, together with the low rates of use of controller medications, underscore the need to better understand the risks and safety of asthma medications during pregnancy.

Status of asthma control in pediatric primary care: results from the pediatric Asthma Control Characteristics and Prevalence Survey Study (ACCESS)

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the prevalence of uncontrolled asthma in pediatric patients with asthma visiting their primary care provider for any medical reason.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a cross-sectional survey conducted at 29 pediatric care sites across the United States. Children age 4-17 years with self- or caregiver-reported asthma completed the Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) or the Asthma Control Test (ACT) and responded to demographic and health-related questions. Uncontrolled asthma was defined as a C-ACT or ACT score <or=19.

RESULTS

A total of 2429 children with a diagnosis of asthma (or caregivers) completed the survey. The prevalence of uncontrolled asthma was 46%. The prevalence of uncontrolled asthma was 35% in patients seen for a nonrespiratory complaint versus 54% in those seen for a respiratory complaint. Children seen for a non-respiratory-related complaint with uncontrolled asthma were more likely to have missed 1 or more school days in the previous 4 weeks compared with children with controlled asthma (53% vs 24%).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings highlight the impact of uncontrolled asthma not only in children seen for respiratory complaints, but also in those seen for nonrespiratory complaints. Pediatric care providers should consider evaluating asthma control on a regular basis regardless of the reason for the visit.

Validation of a questionnaire (CARAT10) to assess rhinitis and asthma in patients with asthma

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test (CARAT) was developed to be used in the concurrent management of these diseases, as recommended by the Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines. However, it was necessary to statistically identify and remove redundant questions and to evaluate the new version's factor structure, internal consistency and concurrent validity.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study 193 adults with allergic rhinitis and asthma from 15 outpatient clinics in Portugal were included. The CARAT questionnaire was reduced using descriptive analysis, exploratory factor analysis and internal consistency. Spearman's correlations were used to compare the CARAT scores with a medical evaluation and other measures of control, including the Asthma Control Questionnaire and symptoms' visual analogue scales. The performance against physician rating of control was summarized using the area under the curve (AUC) from receiver operating characteristic analysis. In addition, CARAT was compared with the physician's decision to reduce, maintain or increase treatment.

RESULTS

The reduced version has 10 questions and 2 factors (CARAT10). The Cronbach's alpha was 0.85. All correlation coefficients of CARAT10 and factors with the different measures of control met the a priori predictions, ranging from 0.58 to 0.79. The AUC was 0.82. For the physician's decision groups of reduce, maintain or increase treatment, the mean (IC95%) scores of CARAT10 were 24 (21.4;26.6), 21 (19.4;21.9) and 15 (13.6;16.5), respectively.

CONCLUSION

CARAT10 has high internal consistency and good concurrent validity, making it useful to compare groups in clinical studies.

Quality of life in relation to upper and lower respiratory conditions among retired 9/11-exposed firefighters with pulmonary disability

PURPOSE

To examine health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and World Trade Center (WTC) cough syndrome conditions in male firefighters who retired due to a 9/11-related pulmonary disability.

METHODS

From 3/1/2008 to 1/31/2009, we contacted 275 disability-retired firefighters and compared their HRQoL and current aerodigestive conditions to those from WTC-exposed non-disabled retired and active firefighters. Relationships between HRQoL and explanatory variable(s) were examined using multivariable linear regression models.

RESULTS

Mean physical component summary (PCS) scores were lowest in disabled retirees compared with non-disabled retirees and actives: 36.4 (9.6), 49.4 (8.7), and 53.1 (5.1), respectively (P < 0.0001). Mean mental component summary (MCS) scores were closer: 44.5 (11.9), 48.1 (8.5), and 48.7 (7.4), respectively (P < 0.0001). In multivariable models, after adjustment for many factors, PCS scores were not associated with early WTC arrival, but were inversely associated with disability retirement and all WTC cough syndrome conditions. MCS scores were inversely associated with early WTC arrival and most WTC cough syndrome conditions, but were not associated with disability retirement.

CONCLUSION

WTC cough syndrome conditions predict lower HRQoL scores even 8 years after exposure, independent of retirement status. These data suggest that monitoring physical conditions of individuals with occupational exposures might help identify those at risk for impaired HRQoL.

Asthma control and activity limitations: insights from the Real-world Evaluation of Asthma Control and Treatment (REACT) study

BACKGROUND

Uncontrolled asthma remains prevalent in the United States and confers a substantial burden on the health care system.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the association between uncontrolled asthma and activity limitations in a nationally representative sample of patients with moderate-to-severe-treated asthma and to assess the degree to which demographics and comorbidities were associated with activity limitations.

METHODS

Patients who participated in the Real-world Evaluation of Asthma Control and Treatment study were surveyed regarding type and degree of activity limitations in 4 categories: outdoor activity, physical activity, daily activity, and environmental triggers. Information about asthma control, demographics, and comorbidities was collected. Multivariable regression was used to assess the association between uncontrolled asthma and activity limitations while adjusting for demographic characteristics and comorbid conditions.

RESULTS

Uncontrolled asthma was associated with a greater than 2-fold risk of outdoor (odds ratio [OR], 2.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.90-3.51) or physical (OR, 2.62; 95% CI, 1.90-3.61) activity limitations and a 66% increased risk of daily activity limitations (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.09-2.51). Comorbidities associated with activity limitation included hives, chronic sinusitis, arthritis, gastroesophageal reflux disease, hypercholesterolemia, and depression. The observed associations between uncontrolled asthma and activity limitation remained significant after controlling for demographic characteristics and comorbid conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with patients with controlled asthma, those with uncontrolled asthma are at higher risk for limitations in outdoor activity, physical activity, and daily activity. To help patients achieve optimal health, asthma management should include routine assessment of activity limitations and assessment and coordinated care for comorbid conditions.

Adherence, asthma control, generic and disease-specific quality-of-life instruments in asthma

Prior studies have investigated the association between generic health-related quality of life and medication adherence. The objective of this study was to assess the association between medication adherence and health-related quality of life using both a disease-specific and generic metric in a community setting. Overall, the authors' study findings show no association between adherence and health-related quality of life, supporting the results by Cote and colleagues that factors other than medication adherence are important in explaining health-related quality of life. Furthermore, adherence was not significantly associated with asthma severity, although the strong association between asthma control and health-related quality of life, and asthma control and adherence indicates that asthma control is an important vital sign.

Impact of asthma control on sleep, attendance at work, normal activities, and disease burden

BACKGROUND

The 2007 Expert Panel Report 3 asthma treatment guidelines place substantial emphasis on understanding the effectiveness of treatment strategies on outcomes such as disease control.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of asthma control on patient-reported outcomes and disease burden in a real-world setting.

METHODS

Patients aged 18 to 64 years with moderate to severe asthma defined by medical and pharmaceutical use were asked to participate in a cross-sectional survey of asthma care, control, and burden. Patients were included if they had an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification code for asthma, a prescription for an Expert Panel Report 3-defined controller medication (or combinations), and 24-month pre-index continuous eligibility. Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were excluded. Survey respondent data were linked to commercial health claims information to create the research database. The Asthma Therapy Assessment Questionnaire (ATAQ) was used as the measure of control. The ATAQ scores range from 0 to 4, with 0 indicating no asthma control problems.

RESULTS

A total of 1,199 patients (73% women) completed the survey and had their claims data linked for analysis. Age, sex, and comorbidity index measures did not differ between respondents and nonrespondents. Only 12.2% of respondents scored 0 on the ATAQ, 77.0% scored 1 or 2, and 10.8% scored 3 or 4. The ATAQ scores were moderately correlated with patient-rated severity. Decreasing levels of asthma control were associated with greater prevalences of sleep problems, depression, functional impairment, and effect on work and regular activities.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 88% of patients with moderate to severe asthma were not fully controlled despite anti-inflammatory drug treatment. Lack of asthma control is associated with substantial patient burden.

Validation of the Arabic version of the asthma control test

PURPOSE

Asthma control test (ACT) has been devised to assess the degree of asthma control in out-patients setting. The aim of this study is to validate the Arabic version of ACT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients completed the Arabic version of ACT during regular visit to one of two asthma specialists. Spirometry was obtained. The asthma specialist rated asthma control using a 5-point scale and indicated modification in management as step up, same or step down of asthma treatment.

RESULTS

40 patients completed the study, the mean age was 32.6 + 14.0 years, mean FEV1 was 2.7 + 1.0 L (89.2% + 23.6% of predicted). The mean ACT score was 15.9 + 5.8; mean of specialist asthma control rating was 3.4 + 1.0. The internal consistency reliability of the 5-item ACT survey was alpha = 0.92. The correlation was moderate between ACT and specialists rating (r = 0.482, P = 0.002) and between ACT and treatment modification (r = -0.350, P = 0.027). The correlation between FEV1 and ACT was low (r = 0.185, P = 0.259). ACT distinguished between patients with different specialist rating (F = 3.37, P = 0.02) and the need to change therapy (F = 3.62, P = 0.037). The areas under the curve (ROC) for ACT, FEV1, and ACT and FEV1 as independent variables were 0.720, 0.721, and 0.766 respectively. All results were comparable to the initial work for development of ACT.

CONCLUSION

The Arabic version of the ACT is a valid tool to assess asthma control. ACT correlates better with asthma specialist rating of asthma control than with FEV1.

Weekly self-monitoring and treatment adjustment benefit patients with partly controlled and uncontrolled asthma: an analysis of the SMASHING study

BACKGROUND

Internet-based self-management has shown to improve asthma control and asthma related quality of life, but the improvements were only marginally clinically relevant for the group as a whole. We hypothesized that self-management guided by weekly monitoring of asthma control tailors pharmacological therapy to individual needs and improves asthma control for patients with partly controlled or uncontrolled asthma.

METHODS

In a 1-year randomised controlled trial involving 200 adults (18-50 years) with mild to moderate persistent asthma we evaluated the adherence with weekly monitoring and effect on asthma control and pharmacological treatment of a self-management algorithm based on the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ). Participants were assigned either to the Internet group (n = 101) that monitored asthma control weekly with the ACQ on the Internet and adjusted treatment using a self-management algorithm supervised by an asthma nurse specialist or to the usual care group (UC) (n = 99). We analysed 3 subgroups: patients with well controlled (ACQ <or= 0.75), partly controlled (0.75>ACQ <or= 1.5) or uncontrolled (ACQ>1.5) asthma at baseline.

RESULTS

Overall monitoring adherence was 67% (95% CI, 60% to 74%). Improvements in ACQ score after 12 months were -0.14 (p = 0.23), -0.52 (p < 0.001) and -0.82 (p < 0.001) in the Internet group compared to usual care for patients with well, partly and uncontrolled asthma at baseline, respectively. Daily inhaled corticosteroid dose significantly increased in the Internet group compared to usual care in the first 3 months in patients with uncontrolled asthma (+278 microg, p = 0.001), but not in patients with well or partly controlled asthma. After one year there were no differences in daily inhaled corticosteroid use or long-acting beta2-agonists between the Internet group and usual care.

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly self-monitoring and subsequent treatment adjustment leads to improved asthma control in patients with partly and uncontrolled asthma at baseline and tailors asthma medication to individual patients' needs.

Construction of the Pediatric Asthma Impact Scale (PAIS) for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)

BACKGROUND

Recently, the National Institutes of Health Roadmap for Medical Research initiative led a large-scale effort to develop the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). PROMIS's main goal was to develop a set of item banks and computerized adaptive tests for the clinical research community. Asthma, as the most common chronic childhood disease, was chosen for a disease-specific pediatric item bank.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this research is to present the details of the psychometric analyses of the asthma domain items.

METHODS

Item response theory (IRT) analyses were conducted on a 34-asthma item bank. Test forms containing PROMIS Pediatric Asthma domain items were completed by 622 children ages 8 to 12. Items were subsequently evaluated for local dependence, scale dimensionality, and differential item functioning.

RESULTS

A 17-item pool and an 8-item short form for the new PROMIS Pediatric Asthma Impact Scale (PAIS) were generated using IRT. The recommended 8-item short form contains the item set that provides the maximum test information at the mean (50) on the T-score metric. If more score precision is required, the complete 17-item pool is recommended and may be used in toto or as the basis of a computerized adaptive test (CAT). A shorter test form can also be created and scored on the same scale.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study presents the PROMIS Pediatric Asthma Impact Scale (PAIS) developed with IRT, and provides the initial calibration data for the items.

Correlation of plasma complement split product levels with allergic respiratory disease activity and relation to allergen immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

Allergens, including dust mite and grass pollen, and mast cell tryptase are known to generate the complement split products (CSPs) C5a and C3a, which can then trigger allergic inflammation. The relation of these anaphylatoxin levels to clinical allergic disease responses is not known.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the relationship of plasma CSP levels to allergic respiratory disease variables in an adult cohort.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was used to assess the association of plasma C5a desArg and C3a desArg levels with clinical allergic respiratory disease variables. Furthermore, a time course of the effect of routine allergen immunotherapy on plasma CSP levels and cutaneous and pulmonary responses was determined.

RESULTS

Adult plasma C5a desArg levels correlate with asthma severity as determined by a physician (P = .01) and by Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire scores (P < .01). Change in plasma C5a desArg levels 1 hour after immunotherapy is associated with baseline rhinoconjunctivitis symptom severity (P = .03), change in total mean wheal diameter (P = .05), and total dust mite dosage (P = .04). Change in plasma C3a desArg levels 3 hours after immunotherapy correlates with change in total mean wheal diameter induced by dust mite (P = .01). Change in plasma CSP levels after immunotherapy did not correlate with change in spirometric outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma C5a desArg levels reflect allergic respiratory disease severity as assessed by physicians and correlate with Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire scores. Changes in CSP levels after immunotherapy reflect cutaneous allergic responses, especially to dust mite allergen.

Shared treatment decision making improves adherence and outcomes in poorly controlled asthma

RATIONALE

Poor adherence to asthma controller medications results in poor treatment outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To compare controller medication adherence and clinical outcomes in 612 adults with poorly controlled asthma randomized to one of two different treatment decision-making models or to usual care.

METHODS

In shared decision making (SDM), nonphysician clinicians and patients negotiated a treatment regimen that accommodated patient goals and preferences. In clinician decision making, treatment was prescribed without specifically eliciting patient goals/preferences. The otherwise identical intervention protocols both provided asthma education and involved two in-person and three brief phone encounters.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Refill adherence was measured using continuous medication acquisition (CMA) indices-the total days' supply acquired per year divided by 365 days. Cumulative controller medication dose was measured in beclomethasone canister equivalents. In follow-up Year 1, compared with usual care, SDM resulted in: significantly better controller adherence (CMA, 0.67 vs. 0.46; P < 0.0001) and long-acting beta-agonist adherence (CMA, 0.51 vs. 0.40; P = 0.0225); higher cumulative controller medication dose (canister equivalent, 10.9 vs. 5.2; P < 0.0001); significantly better clinical outcomes (asthma-related quality of life, health care use, rescue medication use, asthma control, and lung function). In Year 2, compared with usual care, SDM resulted in significantly lower rescue medication use, the sole clinical outcome available for that year. Compared with clinician decision making, SDM resulted in: significantly better controller adherence (CMA, 0.67 vs. 0.59; P = 0.03) and long-acting beta-agonist adherence (CMA, 0.51 vs. 0.41; P = 0.0143); higher cumulative controller dose (CMA, 10.9 vs. 9.1; P = 0.005); and quantitatively, but not significantly, better outcomes on all clinical measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Negotiating patients' treatment decisions significantly improves adherence to asthma pharmacotherapy and clinical outcomes. Clinical trials registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00217945 and NCT00149526).

Overall asthma control: the relationship between current control and future risk

BACKGROUND

Asthma guidelines emphasize both maintaining current control and reducing future risk, but the relationship between these 2 targets is not well understood.

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective analysis of 5 budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy (Symbicort SMART Turbuhaler(*)) studies assessed the relationship between asthma control questionnaire (ACQ-5) and Global Initiative for Asthma-defined clinical asthma control and future risk of instability and exacerbations.

METHODS

The percentage of patients with Global Initiative for Asthma-defined controlled asthma over time was assessed for budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy versus the 3 maintenance therapies; higher dose inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), same dose ICS/long-acting beta(2)-agonist (LABA), and higher dose ICS/LABA plus short-acting beta(2)-agonist. The relationship between baseline ACQ-5 and exacerbations was investigated. A Markov analysis examined the transitional probability of change in control status throughout the studies.

RESULTS

The percentage of patients achieving asthma control increased with time, irrespective of treatment; the percentage Controlled/Partly Controlled at study end was at least similar to budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy versus the 3 maintenance therapies: higher dose ICS (56% vs 45%), same dose ICS/LABA (56% vs 53%), and higher dose ICS/LABA (54% vs 54%). Baseline ACQ-5 score correlated positively with exacerbation rates. A Controlled or Partly Controlled week predicted at least Partly Controlled asthma the following week (>or=80% probability). The better the control, the lower the risk of an Uncontrolled week. The probability of an exacerbation was related to current state and was lower with budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Current control predicts future risk of instability and exacerbations. Budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy reduces exacerbations versus comparators and achieves at least similar control.

Patterns of inhaled corticosteroid use and asthma control in the Childhood Asthma Management Program Continuation Study

BACKGROUND

Daily controller medication use is recommended for children with persistent asthma to achieve asthma control.

OBJECTIVE

To examine patterns of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use and asthma control in an observational study of children and adolescents with mild-to-moderate asthma (the Childhood Asthma Management Program Continuation Study).

METHODS

We assessed patterns of ICS use during a 12-month period (consistent, intermittent, and none) and asthma control (well controlled vs poorly controlled). Multivariate logistic regression examined the association between pattern of ICS use and asthma control.

RESULTS

Of 914 patients enrolled, 425 were recommended to continue receiving ICS therapy in the Childhood Asthma Management Program Continuation Study. Of these patients, 46% reported consistent ICS use and 20% reported no ICS use during year 1. By year 4, consistent ICS use decreased to 20%, whereas no ICS use increased to 57%; poorly controlled asthma was reported in 18% of encounters. In multivariate models controlling for age, sex, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, and asthma severity assessment, patients reporting consistent ICS use during a 12-month period were more likely to report poor asthma control (odds ratio, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-2.1) compared with those reporting no ICS use.

CONCLUSIONS

In this observational study of children and adolescents with mild-to-moderate asthma, most did not report continued use of ICS. Patients recommended to continue receiving ICS therapy and reporting consistent ICS use were less likely to report well-controlled asthma even after controlling for markers of asthma severity. Although residual confounding by severity cannot be ruled out, many children and adolescents may not achieve well-controlled asthma despite consistent use of ICS.

Was it Easy to Use an Asthma Control Test (ACT) in Different Clinical Practice Settings in a Tertiary Hospital in Singapore?

Introduction: TheAsthmaControlTestTM (ACT) is a 5-item self-administered tool designed to assess asthma control. It is said to be simple, easy and can be administered quickly by patients in the clinical practice setting. This stated benefit has yet to be demonstrated in our local clinical practice setting. The aim was to identify factors associated with difficulty in the administration of the ACT in different clinical practice settings in a tertiary hospital in Singapore. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective study performed from April to June 2008. All patients diagnosed with asthma and referred to an asthma nurse from the in-patient and out-patient clinical practice setting in Tan Tock Seng Hospital were enrolled. Results: Four hundred and thirty-four patients were asked to complete the ACT tool. In the univariate model, we found that age, clinical setting and medical history to be significantly associated with the completion of the ACT. The odds of completion decreased by a factor of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.89 to 0.94) for every year’s increase in age, and this was statistically significant (P <0.001). Similarly, the odds ratio of completion for those with more than 3 medical conditions by history were 0.59 (95% CI, 0.48 to 0.71) as compared to those with less than 3 medical conditions by history, and this was also significant (P <0.001). In the multivariate model, we only found age to be an independent and significant factor. After adjusting for age, none of the other variables initially significant in the univariate model remained significant. Conclusion: The results show that the ACT was simple and easy to be administered in younger-aged patients. Key words: Administer, Guidelines, Interpretation, Questionnaire

The association between asthma control and health care utilization, work productivity loss and health-related quality of life

OBJECTIVE

To determine the association between asthma control and health outcomes.

METHODS

Cross-sectional data on asthmatic patients were from the 2006 U.S. National Health and Wellness Survey. Asthma control was determined by the Asthma Control Test. Outcomes assessed included work productivity loss/activity impairment, health-related quality of life, and resource utilization. Effects of asthma control on outcomes were determined with linear and Poisson regression models.

RESULTS

There were 2767 uncontrolled asthmatics and 2912 controlled asthmatics. Adjusting for confounders, controlled asthmatics reported (P < 0.001) higher physical and mental health-related quality of life scores (SF-8); fewer emergency room visits, hospitalization days, and medical provider visits; lower levels of overall work productivity loss and activity impairment.

CONCLUSION

Results indicate that asthma control is associated with better health outcomes. Management with therapies optimizing asthma control may reduce direct and indirect costs of treatment.

Consistently very poorly controlled asthma, as defined by the impairment domain of the Expert Panel Report 3 guidelines, increases risk for future severe asthma exacerbations in The Epidemiology and Natural History of Asthma: Outcomes and Treatment Regimens (TENOR) study

BACKGROUND

Identification of patients at risk for asthma exacerbations can assist physicians in addressing disease management and improve asthma-related health outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate whether level of impairment, as defined by the 2007 asthma guidelines, predicts risk for future asthma exacerbations.

METHODS

The study included children aged 6 to 11 years (n = 82) and adolescent/adult patients aged 12 years and older (n = 725) from The Epidemiology and Natural History of Asthma: Outcomes and Treatment Regimens study with data representing all components of the impairment domain of the asthma guidelines at baseline, month 12, and month 24. Patients were categorized into 2 cohorts: (1) consistently very poorly controlled (VPC) asthma from baseline through 2 years of follow-up and (2) improved from VPC asthma at baseline (including patients who improved to not well-controlled or well-controlled asthma), with improvement maintained through 2 years of follow-up. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs for risk of asthma exacerbations at month 30 were generated by using multivariable logistic regression by age group.

RESULTS

After adjustment, children with consistently VPC asthma over the 2-year period demonstrated a 6-fold increased risk of hospitalization, emergency department visit, or corticosteroid burst (OR, 6.4; 95% CI, 1.2-34.5) compared with the improved group. Adolescent/adult patients with consistently VPC asthma were more likely to have a corticosteroid burst (OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.7-4.8) or have a hospitalization, emergency department visit, or corticosteroid burst (OR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.9-5.3).

CONCLUSIONS

Consistently VPC asthma, as defined by the impairment domain of the 2007 asthma guidelines, is strongly predictive of future asthma exacerbations.

Assessment of asthma control in primary care

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of uncontrolled asthma in patients who are visiting their primary care provider for any reason.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This multisite, cross-sectional survey was conducted between January 25 and May 2, 2008. Participants aged > or =18 years were recruited from 35 primary care provider sites. Eligible participants presented to the office for any acute medical, routine, follow-up, or nonmedical reason; had a self-reported physician diagnosis of asthma; used medication to treat asthma in the past year; and had no history of COPD. They completed the Asthma Control Test dagger (ACT) and provided information including demographics, health behaviors, medical history, and asthma medication use. Uncontrolled asthma was defined as ACT score < or =19.

RESULTS

The overall weighted prevalence of uncontrolled asthma in 2238 patients in primary care was 58% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56-0.60). Among asthma patients seeking care for a respiratory complaint, 72% (95% CI, 0.68-0.75) had uncontrolled asthma compared to 48% (95% CI, 0.45-0.51) of asthma patients presenting for a non-respiratory reason.

CONCLUSIONS

At the population level, over half of patients with asthma under primary care management had uncontrolled asthma at the time of an office visit. Surprisingly, nearly 50% of patients with asthma who presented for office visits not associated with respiratory-related complaints had uncontrolled asthma. The study results may be influenced by a seasonal effect of upper respiratory infections and by the insurance status of the study respondents. However identifying patients with uncontrolled asthma is important and remains a challenge. Therefore, health care providers should consider evaluating asthma control on a regular basis, regardless of reason for visit.

Measuring asthma control is the first step to patient management: a literature review

Asthma control is recognized as a critical aspect of the evaluation and management of the disease. Here we evaluate and compare existing instruments for measuring asthma control in an attempt to evaluate their clinical utility. Based on a literature review, we identified validated instruments used to assess asthma control in adults. We examined the specific measurement properties and the strengths and weaknesses of each instrument, and evaluated a single instrument, the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), more closely as an example, evaluating its applicability in the clinical setting. Our review identified five validated instruments designed to measure asthma control: the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), Asthma Control Scoring System (ACSS), Asthma Control Test (ACT), Asthma Therapy Assessment Questionnaire (ATAQ), and the Lara Asthma Symptom Scale (LASS). None of the instruments covered all relevant control characteristics, but most were aligned with guideline definitions of control. All instruments demonstrated validity and responsiveness, with some measure of reliability. All instruments were short and easily administered, easy to interpret, and all had evidence to support their use in clinical decision making.

Close correlation between anxiety, depression, and asthma control

BACKGROUND

We investigated the correlation between patients' characteristics, including anxiety and depression, and the level of asthma control evaluated by asthma control test (ACT), a self-administered validated questionnaire.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study on asthmatic outpatients of three Italian hospitals. Demographic data, spirometry, anxiety and depression scores as well as the level of asthma control from 315 patients were collected.

RESULTS

Patients with poorly controlled asthma were more frequently women, older, with a worse pulmonary function, obese, more anxious and/or more depressed. Four different independent factors associated with poor asthma control evaluated by ACT have been found: FEV(1)<60% (odds ratio, OR: 6.52), anxiety (OR: 3.76), age > or =65 years (OR: 2.69), and depression (OR: 2.45). The presence of anxiety and depression was associated with a higher healthcare utilization. Finally, we found a high level of agreement between ACT and multidimensional GINA approach in evaluating asthma control, with a concordance in 239 patients (81% of the population).

CONCLUSION

There is a close correlation between anxiety and depression, and a poor asthma. A better understanding of this association may have major clinical implications, mainly in patients with poor controlled asthma in whom the presence of anxiety and depression should be investigated.

Determinants of Quality of Life Among People with Asthma: Findings from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System

Asthma is a major contributor to impaired quality of life in the U.S. population. Little is known about population-based determinants of quality of life among people with asthma, however. Using data from the 2000 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, we examined the associations between selected sociodemographic, behavioral, and other determinants and quality of life among 12,111 participants with current asthma. In multiple logistical regression models, three variables--employment status, smoking status, and physical activity--were significantly associated with all measures of impaired quality of life (poor or fair health, > or = 14 physically unhealthy days, > 14 mentally unhealthy days, > or = 14 activity limitation days, or > or = 14 physically or mentally unhealthy days). Education was significantly and inversely related to impaired quality of life for all measures except activity limitation days. Men were less likely than women to report having > or = 14 physically unhealthy days, > or = 14 mentally unhealthy days, or > or = 14 physically or mentally unhealthy days. Compared with whites, Hispanics were more likely to report being in poor or fair health, and African Americans were less likely to report having > or = 14 physically unhealthy days or > or = 14 physically or mentally unhealthy days. In addition, participants with lower incomes were more likely to report impaired quality of life for three measures (general health status, > or = 14 physically unhealthy days, and activity limitation days). The heaviest participants were more likely to be in poor or fair health or to report having more > or = 14 physically unhealthy days, or > or = 14 physically or mentally unhealthy days. Insurance coverage and the time since their last routine checkup were not significantly associated with any of the quality-of-life measures. These results show that three potentially modifiable factors (smoking status, physical activity, body mass index) are associated with quality of life among persons with asthma. Furthermore, among people with asthma, the elderly, women, poorly educated, and low-income participants are especially likely to experience impaired quality of life.

Does higher body mass index contribute to worse asthma control in an urban population?

BACKGROUND

Epidemiologic findings support a positive association between asthma and obesity.

OBJECTIVE

Determine whether obesity or increasing level of body mass index (BMI) are associated with worse asthma control in an ethnically diverse urban population.

METHODS

Cross-sectional assessment of asthma control was performed in patients with asthma recruited from primary care offices by using 4 different validated asthma control questionnaires: the Asthma Control and Communication Instrument (ACCI), the Asthma Control Test (ACT), the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), and the Asthma Therapy Assessment Questionnaire (ATAQ). Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between obesity and increasing BMI level and asthma control.

RESULTS

Of 292 subjects with a mean age of 47 years, the majority were women (82%) and African American (67%). There was a high prevalence of obesity with 63%, with only 15% normal weight. The mean score from all 4 questionnaires showed an average suboptimal asthma control (mean score/maximum possible score): ACCI (8.3/19), ACT (15.4/25), ACQ (2.1/6), and ATAQ (1.3/4). Regression analysis showed no association between obesity or increasing BMI level and asthma control using all 4 questionnaires. This finding persisted even after adjusting for FEV(1), smoking status, race, sex, selected comorbid illnesses, and long-term asthma controller use.

CONCLUSION

Using 4 validated asthma control questionnaires, we failed to find an association between obesity and asthma control in an urban population with asthma. Weight loss may not be an appropriate strategy to improve asthma control in this population.

Managing asthma in primary care: putting new guideline recommendations into context

Many patients with asthma are treated in the primary care setting. The primary care physician is therefore in a key position to recognize poorly controlled asthma and to improve asthma management for these patients. However, current evidence continues to show that, for a substantial number of patients, asthma control is inadequate for a wide variety of reasons, both physician-related and patient-related. The most recently updated treatment guidelines from the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program were designed to help clinicians, including primary care physicians, manage asthma more effectively with an increased focus on achieving and maintaining good asthma control over time. The current review is intended to assist primary care physicians in improving asthma control among their patients; this review clarifies the new guidelines and provides a specialist's perspective on diagnosis, appropriate therapy, disease control surveillance, and appropriate referral when necessary. This discussion is based primarily on the new guidelines and the references cited therein, supplemented by the author's own clinical experience.

Impact of asthma controller medications on clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To comprehensively evaluate clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes associated with various therapeutic classes of asthma controller medications.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This observational study, which used administrative claims data from US commercial health plans, included patients with asthma aged 18 through 64 years who filled a prescription for at least 1 asthma controller medication from September 1, 2003, through August 31, 2005. Outcome metrics included the use of short-acting beta-agonists (SABAs), the use of oral corticosteroids, inpatient (INP)/emergency department (ED) visits, and asthma-related health care costs. A subset of 5000 patients was randomly selected for a survey using the Mini-Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire, and the Asthma Therapy Assessment Questionnaire.

RESULTS

Of 56,168 eligible patients, 823 returned completed questionnaires. Compared with inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), leukotriene modifiers (LMs) were associated with lower odds of INP/ED visits (odds ratio [OR], 0.80; P<.001), lower odds of using 6 or more SABA canisters (OR, 0.81; P<.001), and higher annual cost ($193; P<.001). In the subgroup analysis of adherent patients, LMs were associated with higher odds of INP/ED visits (OR, 1.74; P=.04), lower odds of using 6 or more SABA canisters (OR, 0.46; P<.001), and higher annual cost ($235; P<.001). Inhaled corticosteroids and LMs had a comparable impact on all patient-reported outcomes. For combination therapy, ICS plus a long-acting beta-agonist consistently showed at least equivalent or better outcomes in the use of SABAs and oral corticosteroids, the risk of INP/ED visits, cost, asthma control level, quality of life, and impairment in productivity and activity.

CONCLUSION

Inhaled corticosteroids were associated with a lower risk of INP/ED visits, and a lower cost if adherence was achieved. When adherence cannot be achieved, LMs may be a reasonable alternative. Combination therapy with ICS plus a long-acting beta-agonist was associated with better or equivalent clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes.

Impact of asthma controller medications on clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To comprehensively evaluate clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes associated with various therapeutic classes of asthma controller medications.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This observational study, which used administrative claims data from US commercial health plans, included patients with asthma aged 18 through 64 years who filled a prescription for at least 1 asthma controller medication from September 1, 2003, through August 31, 2005. Outcome metrics included the use of short-acting beta-agonists (SABAs), the use of oral corticosteroids, inpatient (INP)/emergency department (ED) visits, and asthma-related health care costs. A subset of 5000 patients was randomly selected for a survey using the Mini-Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire, and the Asthma Therapy Assessment Questionnaire.

RESULTS

Of 56,168 eligible patients, 823 returned completed questionnaires. Compared with inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), leukotriene modifiers (LMs) were associated with lower odds of INP/ED visits (odds ratio [OR], 0.80; P<.001), lower odds of using 6 or more SABA canisters (OR, 0.81; P<.001), and higher annual cost ($193; P<.001). In the subgroup analysis of adherent patients, LMs were associated with higher odds of INP/ED visits (OR, 1.74; P=.04), lower odds of using 6 or more SABA canisters (OR, 0.46; P<.001), and higher annual cost ($235; P<.001). Inhaled corticosteroids and LMs had a comparable impact on all patient-reported outcomes. For combination therapy, ICS plus a long-acting beta-agonist consistently showed at least equivalent or better outcomes in the use of SABAs and oral corticosteroids, the risk of INP/ED visits, cost, asthma control level, quality of life, and impairment in productivity and activity.

CONCLUSION

Inhaled corticosteroids were associated with a lower risk of INP/ED visits, and a lower cost if adherence was achieved. When adherence cannot be achieved, LMs may be a reasonable alternative. Combination therapy with ICS plus a long-acting beta-agonist was associated with better or equivalent clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes.

Managing asthma in primary care: putting new guideline recommendations into context

Many patients with asthma are treated in the primary care setting. The primary care physician is therefore in a key position to recognize poorly controlled asthma and to improve asthma management for these patients. However, current evidence continues to show that, for a substantial number of patients, asthma control is inadequate for a wide variety of reasons, both physician-related and patient-related. The most recently updated treatment guidelines from the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program were designed to help clinicians, including primary care physicians, manage asthma more effectively with an increased focus on achieving and maintaining good asthma control over time. The current review is intended to assist primary care physicians in improving asthma control among their patients; this review clarifies the new guidelines and provides a specialist's perspective on diagnosis, appropriate therapy, disease control surveillance, and appropriate referral when necessary. This discussion is based primarily on the new guidelines and the references cited therein, supplemented by the author's own clinical experience.

The role of physical activity and body mass index in the health care use of adults with asthma

BACKGROUND

Health care use in patients with asthma is affected by many factors, including sex and ethnicity. The role of physical activity (PA) and body mass index (BMI) (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) in this relationship is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the role of PA and BMI in the health care use of patients with asthma.

METHODS

A sample of adults with asthma (n=6,835) and without asthma (n=78,051) from cycle 3.1 of the Canadian Community Health Survey was identified. Health care use was self-reported as overnight hospital stays (yes or no), length of overnight hospital stay (<4 or > or =4 nights), and physician consultations (<3 or > or =3). Self-reported physical activities were used to derive total energy expenditure and to classify participants as active (>3.0 kcal/kg of body weight per day), moderately active (1.5-3.0 kcal/kg of body weight per day), and inactive (<1.5 kcal/kg of body weight per day). The BMI was categorized as normal weight (18.5-24.9), overweight (25.0-29.9), and obese (30.0-59.9).

RESULTS

Adjusted logistic regression models revealed that patients with asthma were more likely to have an overnight hospital stay (odds ratio [OR], 2.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.95-2.60), 4 or more overnight hospital stays (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.12-1.96), and 3 or more physician consultations (OR, 2.43; 95% CI, 2.18-2.71) compared with patients without asthma (OR, 1.00). Inactive patients with asthma were more likely to have an overnight hospital stay (OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.31-2.16) and 3 or more physician consultations (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.04-1.46) than active patients with asthma (OR, 1.00). Inactive/obese patients with asthma were 2.35 (95% CI, 1.69-3.27) times more likely to have an overnight hospital stay and 2.76 (95% CI, 2.11-3.60) times more likely to have 3 or more physician consultations than active/normal weight patients with asthma (OR, 1.00).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher PA levels are associated with lower health care use in individuals with and without asthma. In those with asthma, PA was a more important factor in overnight hospital stays than BMI, whereas both BMI and PA were important determinants of physician consultations.

Detection of undiagnosed and poorly controlled asthma in a hospital-based outpatient pediatric primary care clinic using a health risk assessment system

OBJECTIVE

To determine the rate of undiagnosed and poorly controlled asthma detected by a computerized health risk assessment (HRA) survey system in an urban pediatric hospital-based outpatient teaching clinic.

METHODS

A software-based HRA system uses survey answer patterns to identify children with (1) probable, (2) uncontrolled, and (3) moderate to severe asthma. Parents of patients > or = 2 years of age were asked by clinic staff to complete the touch screen computer survey before seeing their physician from August 2005 through July 2006.

RESULTS

The HRA survey predicted 26% (282/1,098) to have probable asthma. Of these, 51% (144/282) were controlled and the parents reported a previous diagnosis of asthma; 14% (40/282) were controlled and the parents did not report a previous diagnosis of asthma; 25% (71/282) were uncontrolled and the parents reported a previous diagnosis of asthma; and 10% (27/282) were uncontrolled and no previous diagnosis of asthma was reported by the parents. Among active cases completing the baseline version survey (N = 217), 68% reported emergency department (ED) visits / hospitalizations in the last 2 years (44% > or =2), while 59% reported missed school days during the previous year (23% > or =5 days). Impairment, as defined by the 2007 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NHLBI/NAEPP) asthma guidelines, tended to be higher in patients without a previous diagnosis of asthma, per parental report, but this trend only achieved significance in two measures: daytime symptoms > or =2 days per week in the last 4 weeks (p = 0.028) and more than 5 missed school days in the past year (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

A previously validated HRA system can consistently identify a high rate of undiagnosed and poorly controlled asthma in an urban pediatric hospital-based teaching clinic. The utility of such a system would be to reduce missed opportunities for delivery of care and morbidity for the patients who currently have undiagnosed and/or uncontrolled asthma in the pediatric primary care outpatient setting.