Early changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover predict the long-term response to alendronate therapy in representative elderly women: a randomized clinical trial

Changes in the RANK ligand/osteoprotegerin system are correlated to changes in bone mineral density in bisphosphonate-treated osteoporotic patients

INTRODUCTION

Since the soluble receptor activator of the NF-kappaB ligand (sRANKL) as well as the endogenous anti-resorptive cytokine osteoprotegerin (OPG) are produced by osteoblasts and given that these cells undergo significant changes during antiresorptive treatment, we hypothesized that treatment with bisphosphonates (BP) would be accompanied by changes in serum OPG and sRANKL levels.

METHODS

In a prospective, randomized controlled trial of previously untreated postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, oral BP therapy (daily doses of either 10 mg alendronate or 5 mg risedronate) in combination with calcium/vitamin D was compared to calcium/vitamin D treatment alone (control group). Follow-up at 2, 6 and 12 months was completed for 56 patients. Standardized spinal X-rays were performed at baseline, and DEXA measurements at the femoral neck and trochanter were made at baseline and after 1 year. Serum OPG and sRANKL levels were measured with a polyclonal antibody-based ELISA system.

RESULTS

After 1 year, there was a non-significant loss in neck and trochanteric bone mineral density (BMD) in the CTR group and a mean increase of 3.3% and 4.6% in the combined BP group (both p<0.0001), respectively. Serum levels of C-terminal telopeptides of type I collagen (sCTX) and osteocalcin decreased by 12% and 10% at 12 months in the CTR group and by 43% and 23% in the combined BP group, respectively (all significant). OPG serum levels in the CTR group decreased significantly by 9% at 2 months (p<0.005) and remained below pre-treatment levels at later time points. Both the alendronate- and risedronate-treated patient groups showed unaltered OPG levels after 2 months, but they had significantly increased serum levels at 6 and 12 months. Levels of sRANKL were unchanged throughout the treatment period. Univariate regression analysis demonstrated that changes in serum OPG levels after 12 months of BP treatment were positively and better correlated to BMD changes (trochanter: r=0.59, p<0.0001; neck: r=0.50, p<0.001) than those of sCTX, which showed the expected negative correlation to BMD change (trochanter: r=-0.35, p=0.03; neck: r=-0.23, p=0.16). With multiple regression analyses at 12 months, R2 values for 1-year changes in trochanteric BMD of 0.33 (OPG alone) and 0.23 (sCTX alone) were significantly improved to the 0.57 when OPG and sCTX changes were combined (p<0.001). Results for the femoral neck were also statistically significant R2=0.35, p<0.001). BMD and OPG changes in the CTR group were not correlated with each other.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that with BP treatment, changes in serum OPG levels, unlike changes in sCTX levels, are positively correlated to changes in BMD response. The BP-related changes in serum OPG levels during treatment could result from effects on osteoclastogenesis and osteoclast apoptosis as well as from a direct stimulatory effect on osteoblastic OPG production. These changes in OPG levels may be used to predict the individual response of patients to BP treatment.

The effects of bone therapy on tibial bone loss in young women with anorexia nervosa

OBJECTIVE

Osteoporosis is recognized as a common medical complication of anorexia nervosa (AN). The purpose of the current study was to investigate the recovery mechanism of osteoporosis in AN and the effect of medical treatment on the skeletal system.

METHOD

We conducted a randomized placebo-controlled study of the effects of etidronate and calcium and vitamin D on bone loss in 41 outpatients with the restricting type of AN (AN-R). We measured the tibial speed of sound (SOS) before and after 3 months of treatment.

RESULTS

The bone mineral density (BMD) of the tibial SOS change in both the etidronate group and the calcium and vitamin D Group was significantly greater (p < .001) than in the control group. Urine-N-telopeptide cross-links of type I collagen (NTx) before and after treatment decreased significantly (p < .01) in the etidronate group.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that both etidronate and calcium and vitamin D are equally efficacious for reversing the degree of osteoporosis in patients with AN.

Comparison of effect of treatment with etidronate and alendronate on lumbar bone mineral density in elderly women with osteoporosis

The purpose of this open-labeled prospective study was to compare the treatment effects of cyclical etidronate and alendronate on the lumbar bone mineral density (BMD), bone resorption, and back pain in elderly women with osteoporosis. Fifty postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, age ranging from 55 to 86 years (mean: 70.7 years), were randomly divided into two groups with 25 patients in each group: the cyclical etidronate group (etidronate 200 mg daily for 2 weeks every 3 months) and the alendronate group (5 mg daily). The BMD of the lumbar spine (L1-L4) measured by DXA, the urinary cross-linked N-terminal telopeptides of type I collagen (NTX) level measured by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and back pain evaluated by the face scale score were assessed at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics including age, body mass index, years since menopause, lumbar BMD, urinary NTX level, and face scale score between the two treatment groups. Etidronate treatment sustained the lumbar BMD following a reduction in the urinary NTX level and improved back pain, while alendronate treatment reduced the urinary NTX level more significantly, resulting in an increase in the lumbar BMD, and similarly improved back pain. No serious adverse events were observed in either group. This study confirmed that alendronate treatment had a greater efficacy than etidronate treatment in increasing the lumbar BMD through the reduction of bone resorption in elderly women with osteoporosis.

Early changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover predict bone mineral density response to antiresorptive therapy in Korean postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

Biochemical markers of bone turnover have been suggested to be useful in monitoring the efficacy of antiresorptive therapy. In this study, we investigated the predictive value of bone turnover markers to determine short-term response in bone mineral density (BMD) and to identify nonresponders in 138 postmenopausal women (mean age 58 years) with osteoporosis given with either hormone thearpy (HT) or alendronate. Urinary type I collagen N-telopeptide (NTx) and serum osteocalcin (OC) at baseline, 3, and 6 months after treatment as well as spine and femoral neck BMD at baseline and 12 months were measured. Significant decreases in both NTx and OC were evident in women on treatment with antiresorptive agents as early as 3 months (p<0.01). Percent change of NTx at 3 months correlated with the percent change of spinal BMD at 12 months of treatment. When bone turnover markers were stratified by tertiles, the average rate of lumbar spine BMD gain increased significantly with increasing tertiles of baseline value (p<0.05) and percent change (p<0.05) of urinary NTx at 3 month of treatment. In terms of BMD response, urinary NTx at 3 months decreased significantly more in BMD responders group than in nonresponders group. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that percent change of NTx at 3 months is an independent predictor to identify BMD nonresponders, defined as those whose BMD gain remained within the precision error range of dual energy X-ray absorptiometer (DXA). We conclude that biochemical markers of bone turnover, especially percent change in urinary NTx levels, can be used to determine BMD response to antiresorptive therapy in Korean postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

In Vitro, Ex Vivo, andIn VivoMethodological Approaches for Studying Therapeutic Targets of Osteoporosis and Degenerative Joint Diseases: How Biomarkers Can Assist?

Although our approach to the clinical management of osteoporosis (OP) and degenerative joint diseases (DJD)-major causes of disability and morbidity in the elderly-has greatly advanced in the past decades, curative treatments that could bring ultimate solutions have yet to be found or developed. Effective and timely development of candidate drugs is a critical function of the availability of sensitive and accurate methodological arsenal enabling the recognition and quantification of pharmacodynamic effects. The established concept that both OP and DJD arise from an imbalance in processes of tissue formation and degradation draws attention to need of establishing in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo experimental settings, which allow obtaining insights into the mechanisms driving increased bone and cartilage degradation at cellular, organ, and organism levels. When addressing changes in bone or cartilage turnover at the organ or organism level, monitoring tools adequately reflecting the outcome of tissue homeostasis become particularly critical. In this context, bioassays targeting the quantification of various degradation and formation products of bone and cartilage matrix elements represent a useful approach. In this review, a comprehensive overview of widely used and recently established in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo set-ups is provided, which in many cases effectively take advantage of the potentials of biomarkers. In addition to describing and discussing the advantages and limitations of each assay and their methods of evaluation, we added experimental and clinical data illustrating the utility of biomarkers for these methodological approaches.

Serum tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b in monitoring bisphosphonate treatment with clodronate: a comparison with urinary N-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen and serum type I procollagen amino-terminal propeptide

Osteoclastic tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase activity in serum (S-TRACP 5b) was measured in postmenopausal women ( n =59, mean age 56.1 years) with vertebral osteopenia before and during 2-year treatment with an 800-mg daily dose of clodronate, with a non-amino bisphosphonate. Changes in TRACP 5b were compared with those in urinary excretion of type I collagen amino-terminal telopeptide (U-NTX), corrected for creatinine excretion, a well-established marker of bone resorption, and to serum type I procollagen amino-terminal propeptide (S-PINP), a marker of bone formation. Marker changes 1 year after start of treatment were correlated with changes in bone mineral density (BMD). The least significant change (LSC) for each marker and BMD was calculated from values for subjects receiving placebo. Responders to treatment were those exhibiting a change larger than LSC. In response to clodronate treatment S-TRACP 5b (mean change up to -18%) decreased less than did U-NTX (up to -51%) or S-PINP (up to -46%). Marker changes correlated with changes in lumbar spine and trochanter BMD. The most efficient marker for finding responders to treatment was S-PINP, which changed more than the LSC (32%) in 72% of the subjects at the 1-year time point and in 79% at the 2-year time point. S-TRACP 5b change exceeded the LSC (27%) in 40% and 34% of the subjects at each time point, while U-NTX change exceeded the LSC (55%) in 55% and 40%, respectively. We conclude that, in terms of the proportion of subjects exhibiting any change exceeding the LSC, S-TRACP 5b did not appear to be superior to U-NTX and S-PINP in the follow-up of clodronate treatment. The reason may lie in the mechanism of action of clodronate, which rather than reducing the number of TRACP 5b-secreting osteoclasts, reduces the activity of bone proteolytic enzymes and thus the rate of bone organic matrix degradation. This is seen in decreased amounts of type I collagen breakdown products (U-NTX), and through coupling of bone resorption with bone formation, in a decrease in circulating levels of the marker that reflects new collagen formation (S-PINP).

Potential use of biochemical markers of bone turnover for assessing the effect of calcium supplementation and predicting fracture risk

BACKGROUND

Biochemical markers of bone remodeling have been extensively used (independent of bone mass measurements) to document the efficacy of various anticatabolic and anabolic bone-modifying medications in reducing fracture risk. Nonetheless, their usefulness in determining the effectiveness of osteoporosis prevention and treatment, particularly calcium supplementation, has not been well established.

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the use of biochemical markers of bone remodeling as a measure of the effect of calcium supplementation and the implications for prediction of fracture risk.

METHODS

A generalized search of MEDLINE from 1966 through April 2004 using the terms osteoporosis, fracture risk, and the specific bone biomarkers of interest was conducted to identify articles relating to these biomarkers and their relationship to prediction of fracture risk. A second MEDLINE search for the same period used the terms calcium, biological markers, and fracture risk to identify studies of calcium supplementation and bone biomarkers. In both cases, the reference lists of identified review articles were searched for additional publications.

RESULTS

: Several biochemical markers of bone remodeling have been shown to be positively correlated with bone mineral density and fracture risk. Furthermore, calcium supplementation has been shown to have a significant correlation with levels of a number of these biomarkers (P < 0.05): the markers of bone formation procollagen type I carboxy and amino terminal peptides and serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, and the markers of bone resorption urinary hydroxyproline, urinary pyridinoline, urinary deoxypyridinoline, urinary amino terminal crosslinked telopeptide, and urinary and serum carboxy terminal crosslinked telopeptide.

CONCLUSIONS

Calcium supplementation has a significant effect on a number of biomarkers of bone remodeling, an effect that is, in turn, correlated with decreased fracture risk. Most studies of the efficacy of calcium supplementation in reducing bone remodeling and influencing bone mineral density and fracture risk have involved calcium carbonate, although a few studies have found that other calcium salts may produce similar results.

Early changes in biochemical markers of bone formation predict BMD response to teriparatide in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

The relationship between early changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover and the subsequent BMD response to daily teriparatide therapy in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis was studied. Changes in five biochemical markers, obtained from a subset of women enrolled in the Fracture Prevention Trial, were examined. Early increases in the PICP and the PINP were the best predictors of BMD response to teriparatide in this analysis.

INTRODUCTION

Early reductions in biochemical markers of bone turnover with antiresorptive therapy negatively correlate with subsequent increases in BMD. We undertook this analysis to determine if early changes in biochemical markers with teriparatide therapy predict subsequent increases in BMD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In the Fracture Prevention Trial, 1637 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were randomized to receive daily, self-administered, subcutaneous injections of placebo, teriparatide 20 microg/day, or teriparatide 40 microg/day. Serum concentrations of two bone formation markers (bone-specific alkaline phosphatase [bone ALP] and the carboxy-terminal extension peptide of procollagen type 1 [PICP]) and urinary concentrations of two bone resorption markers (free deoxypyridinoline [DPD] and N-terminal telopeptide [NTX]) were assessed in a trial population subset (n = 520) at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. We also assessed serum concentrations of another bone formation marker, the amino-terminal extension peptide of procollagen type 1 (PINP), in a subset of 771 women at baseline and 3 months. Lumbar spine (LS) BMD was measured by DXA at baseline and 18 months. Femoral neck BMD was measured at baseline and 12 months.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Baseline bone turnover status correlated positively and significantly with BMD response. The highest correlations occurred for the LS BMD response to teriparatide 20 microg/day. Among all studied biochemical markers, increases in PICP at 1 month and PINP at 3 months correlated best with increases in LS BMD at 18 months (0.65 and 0.61, respectively; p < 0.05). The relationships between these two biochemical markers and the LS BMD response were stronger than the corresponding relationships for the femoral neck BMD response. Using receiver operator curve analysis, we determined that the increases in PICP at 1 month and PINP at 3 months were the most sensitive and accurate predictors of the LS BMD response.

Serum cross-linked N-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen for evaluation of renal osteodystrophy in hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Useful markers of bone resorption are needed for hemodialysis patients with renal osteodystrophy. This study investigated the use of a new immunoassay for cross-linked N-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen to assess bone changes in hemodialysis patients.

METHODS

Radial bone mineral density was examined in 178 hemodialysis patients at baseline and after 12 months. Serum levels of N-terminal telopeptide and other markers were measured.

RESULTS

The annual percent change of radial bone mineral density was negatively correlated with the levels of N-terminal telopeptide, intact osteocalcin, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, and intact parathyroid hormone. The annual percent change of radial bone mineral density showed a stronger correlation with N-terminal telopeptide levels than with the other markers, except for intact parathyroid hormone. Also, intact parathyroid hormone and N-terminal telopeptide levels showed a stronger correlation than that of either tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase or cross-linked carboxyterminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen with intact parathyroid hormone.

CONCLUSION

Serum N-terminal telopeptide may be the most useful bone resorption marker in renal osteodystrophy and its use combined with bone formation markers may improve the management of this condition.

Effect of antitumour necrosis factor-alpha therapy on bone turnover in patients with active Crohn's disease: a prospective study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Patients with Crohn's disease are at increased risk of osteoporosis. Disease activity and circulating proinflammatory cytokines are thought to play a role in this process. Infliximab, a chimaeric antitumour necrosis factor-alpha antibody is effective in the treatment of Crohn's disease. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of treatment with infliximab on bone turnover in Crohn's disease patients.

METHODS

This was a prospective trial. Twenty-four patients with active Crohn's disease were treated with infliximab (5 mg/kg). Bone markers were assayed pre- and post-treatment. Bone formation was measured using serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and total osteocalcin and bone resorption using serum N-telopeptide cross-linked type 1 collagen.

RESULTS

Infliximab therapy caused a significant increase in both markers of bone formation in patients with active Crohn's disease. No significant change in the bone resorption marker serum N-telopeptide cross-linked type 1 was found.

CONCLUSION

Infliximab therapy had a significant beneficial effect on bone metabolism in patients with active Crohn's disease. These findings further support the theory that active ongoing inflammation and high levels of circulating cytokines play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of bone loss in patients with Crohn's disease.

Clinical significance of alendronate in postmenopausal type 2 diabetes mellitus

OBJECTIVES

To examine early changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover and bone mineral density (BMD) in a clinical trial of anti-resorptive agent alendronate versus alfacalcidol in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

12 subjects (mean age; 73.1 +/- 6.3 yrs, duration of diabetes; 13.2 +/- 3.7 yrs) were administered alendronate sodium (5 mg/day) and 12 subjects (mean age; 70.7 +/- 7.8 yrs, duration of diabetes; 12.8 +/- 2.0 yrs) were administered alfacalcidol (0.5 microg/day) for 12 months. Urinary N-telopeptide cross-linked collagen type I (NTx), one of biochemical markers, and radial bone mineral density (BMD) were measured as a marker of bone turnover.

RESULTS

After 12 months, urinary NTx did not change in women with alfacalcidol treatment, however urinary NTx significantly decreased after alendronate treatment. The BMD significantly decreased by 3.33% (p<0.05) in women with alfacalcidol treatment, while the BMD did not decrease in women with alendronate treatment.

CONCLUSION

Alendronate that produces reduction in urinary NTx and inhibition of decrease in BMD may have a clinical significance to reduce the risk of bone fracture in postmenopausal type 2 diabetic women.

Reduction in PINP, a marker of bone metabolism, with raloxifene treatment and its relationship with vertebral fracture risk

In the Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) trial, 7705 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, defined by low bone mineral density and/or prevalent vertebral fractures (VF), were randomized to placebo or raloxifene (60 or 120 mg/day). All women received daily calcium (500 mg) and vitamin D (400-600 IU) supplements. Our previous analyses found that changes in BMD and biochemical markers of bone turnover are poorly predictive of the reduction in VF risk observed with raloxifene. This present study evaluated the effects of raloxifene on type I procollagen N-terminal propeptide (PINP), a new marker of bone turnover. Logistic regression analysis models evaluated the relationships between the changes at 1 year in PINP, serum osteocalcin (OC), bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP), and urinary excretion of type I collagen C-telopeptide fragments normalized to creatinine (CTx/Cr), and the risk of new VF at 3 years for placebo and pooled raloxifene. A subset of 967 women (mean age = 68 years) from the MORE cohort had PINP, OC, BSAP, and CTx evaluated at baseline. Both doses of raloxifene significantly decreased (P < 0.001) all biochemical markers of bone turnover from baseline. Compared to baseline, PINP levels were decreased by medians of 11.0% and 40.8% in the placebo and pooled raloxifene groups, respectively. In addition, the placebo and pooled raloxifene groups decreased serum OC by 8.5% and 31.8%, BSAP by 15.8% and 34.6%, and urinary CTx/Cr excretion by 5.6% and 46.5%, respectively, from baseline. In the pooled raloxifene group, the logistic regression relationship between 3-year VF risk and 1-year percentage change for each biochemical marker was statistically significant with PINP (slope estimate = 0.0085, P = 0.009), OC (slope estimate = 0.0068, P = 0.035), and BSAP (slope estimate = 0.0056, P = 0.039), but not with CTx/Cr (slope estimate = 0.0027, P = 0.192). Furthermore, the percent decrease in PINP at 1 year could account for 28% of the total reduction in vertebral fracture risk. In conclusion, a 1-year decrease in PINP, BSAP, or OC, but not CTx/Cr, may be predictive of the 3-year VF risk reduction with raloxifene therapy in this subset of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Evaluation and measurement of bone mass

Patients taking antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have an increased risk for osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures. Bone mineral density (BMD) is the best predictor of fracture risk. Measurement of BMD allows the identification of patients at risk before they suffer a fracture. The current "gold standard" for the measurement of BMD and diagnosis of osteopenia and osteoporosis is dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Clinicians should be familiar with the ways in which bone mass measurements are reported and should understand how to use BMD measurements in making treatment decisions and monitoring treatment. They should also be aware of current controversies, including the role of peripheral versus central BMD measurements and the use of different reference databases for different patient groups. Laboratory assessment to identify secondary causes of osteoporosis, such as low vitamin D status in patients taking AEDs, is useful, but the role of markers of bone turnover in clinical practice has not been well defined.

Osteoporosis management in the new millennium

The prevalence of osteoporosis in all US postmenopausal women is 17%, and it is as high as 30% in women older than 65. All postmenopausal women should be encouraged to have adequate daily calcium and vitamin D intake, to exercise regularly, and to avoid tobacco and excessive alcohol use. Although the clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of osteoporosis screening tools remain to be established, a rational approach based on current evidence involves using National Osteoporosis Foundation guidelines, Simple Calculated Osteoporosis Risk Estimation, or Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument clinical decision rules to decide when a postmenopausal woman should undergo further evaluation.

Prediction of bone mass density variation by bone remodeling markers in postmenopausal women with vitamin D insufficiency treated with calcium and vitamin D supplementation

The aim of this study was to determine whether early changes in bone markers could predict long-term response in bone mineral density (BMD) after calcium (500 mg) and vitamin D (400 IU) supplementation twice daily in ambulatory elderly women with vitamin D insufficiency (25-hydroxyvitamin D, <12 ng/ml). One hundred and ninety-two women (mean age, 75 +/- 7 yr) were randomized to receive either the supplementation (n = 95) or a placebo (n = 97) in a double-blind, controlled clinical trial for 1 yr. In comparison with the placebo group, supplementation significantly increased BMD, normalized 25-hydroxyvitamin D and significantly decreased intact PTH and bone remodeling markers. The initial values of telopeptide cross-links were correlated with improvement in total body BMD [urinary N-telopeptides (NTX), r = 0.38; C-telopeptides (CTX), r = 0.32; serum CTX, r = 0.28], and the 3-month changes in the same markers were correlated with improvement in total body (urinary N-telopeptides, r = -0.29; serum CTX, r = -0.26) and vertebral BMD (CTX, r = -0.26; all P < 0.05). We concluded that short-term changes in bone resorption markers can predict long-term variations in BMD in elderly women with vitamin D insufficiency receiving calcium and vitamin D supplementation.

Radiotherapy in conjunction with intravenous infusion of 180 mg of disodium pamidronate in management of osteolytic metastases from breast cancer: clinical evaluation, biochemical markers, quality of life, and monitoring of recalcification using assessments of gray-level histogram in plain radiographs

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical improvement and radiographically monitor the effect of local radiotherapy in conjunction with disodium pamidronate (DP) on metastatic osteolytic disease.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Thirty-three patients with osteolytic metastasis from advanced breast cancer received radiotherapy with a 6-MV linear accelerator up to a dose of 30 Gy (3 Gy/fraction, 5 d/wk) combined with 24 monthly sessions of a 180-mg DP infusion. Conventional X-rays were obtained during the first six sessions of DP treatment, retaining the same settings for each exposure. The analysis of the image attributes was based on measuring the first-order statistics of the mean value and energy of gray-level histograms in the osteolytic region.

RESULTS

The 6-month measurements compared with baseline showed statistically significant differences (p < 0.01, Wilcoxon test) in energy of gray-level histogram (-10.8%), mean value of gray-level histogram (+9.5%), pain score (-5.8 points), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status (-2.4 points), urine hydroxyproline/creatinine ratio (-41.7%), urine calcium/creatinine ratio (-58.8%), and bone alkaline phosphatase (-42.4%). Quality of life as determined by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (version 3) also improved. During follow-up, 88% of patients had complete and 12% partial responses (International Union Against Cancer radiologic criteria). On multivariate analysis, greater changes in the mean value of the gray-level histogram and negative nodal status were predictors for a reduction in the number of skeletal complications after therapy. Flu-like syndrome occurred in 13 patients (39%) and was well managed with mild antipyretics.

CONCLUSION

Image-processing in plain radiographs offers an objective way to assess recalcification. The image-processing indexes, along with the measurements of performance status, quality of life, and biochemical markers, improved significantly. Local radiotherapy combined with long-term high-dose DP up to 180 mg is tolerable and has a high therapeutic response.

Biochemical markers for prediction of 4-year response in bone mass during bisphosphonate treatment for prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis

Short-term changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover (bone markers) have been suggested as predictors of long-term response in bone mass during antiresorptive treatment. In the Danish cohort (n = 306) of the Early Postmenopausal Intervention Cohort (EPIC) Study (n = 1609) of oral alendronate (ALN) for prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis, bone markers (urine C-telopeptides of type I collagen (uCTX), urine N-telopeptide cross-links of type I collagen (uNTX), serum total osteocalcin measured by ELISA [total OC (ELISA)], and serum total osteocalcin measured by RIA [total OC (RIA)]) were measured at 6-month intervals. The correlation between 6-month change in uCTX and 4-year change in spine and hip bone mineral density (BMD) was r = -0.41 and r = -0.42, respectively (P < 0.001). The corresponding values for the other bone markers were r = -0.53 and r = -0.42 (uNTX), r = -0.46 and r = -0.47 [total OC (ELISA)], and r = -0.43 and r = -0.41 [total OC (RIA)], all P < 0.001. ROC curves were used to analyse the ability of the bone markers to predict a change in spine BMD greater than 0%. The best performance [defined as the maximum value of (sensitivity plus specificity)] was found at the cut-off values of a -29% change from baseline in uCTX, a -45% change from baseline in uNTX, a -13% change from baseline in total OC (ELISA), and a -15% change from baseline in total OC (RIA). At these values the corresponding sensitivity was 66% (uCTX), 76% (uNTX), 70% [total OC (ELISA)], and 83% [total OC (RIA)]. The specificity was 80% (uCTX), 75% (uNTX), 71% [total OC (ELISA)], and 55% [total OC (RIA)]. The positive predictive value (PPV) was 82% (uCTX), 80% (uNTX), 77% [total OC (ELISA)], and 71% [total OC (RIA)]. The negative predictive value (NPV) was 64% (uCTX), 70% (uNTX), 64% [total OC (ELISA)], and 71% [total OC (RIA)]. In conclusion, the bone markers predicted a change in spine BMD greater than 0% with a high PPV and specificity. There was a trend toward better performance in this respect for the bone resorption markers.

Oral ibandronate: changes in markers of bone turnover during adequately dosed continuous and weekly therapy and during different suboptimally dosed treatment regimens

The aims of the present study were to investigate how changes in the cumulative dose and the frequency of dosing influence the short-term antiresorptive efficacy of oral ibandronate treatment and whether serial measurements of bone markers could provide a useful diagnostic tool for the revelation of noncompliance to established treatments with antiresorptive drugs. Study participants were 200 healthy women 50-70 years old (mean 63.1 years) with a lumbar spine BMD t-score of -1 to -5. Women were randomly allocated to receive treatment with oral ibandronate according to one of the following eight dosing regimes: (1) 2.5 mg daily for 84 days; (2) 20 mg weekly for 84 days; (3) 2.5 mg daily for 28 days + no treatment for 56 days; (4) 2.5 mg daily for 28 days + 2.5 mg weekly for 56 days; (5) 2.5 mg daily for 28 days + 2.5 mg three times weekly for 56 days; (6) 2.5 mg daily for 14 days + 2.5 mg three times weekly for 56 days; (7) 2.5 mg three times weekly for 84 days; (8) no treatment for 168 days. Study parameters were the serum concentration of the C-terminal telopeptide of collagen type I (s-CTX, resorption marker) and N-MID osteocalcin (formation marker) measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Oral treatment with ibandronate 20 mg weekly (cumulative dose 240 mg) resulted in greater final inhibition in s-CTX and area under the curve (AUC) compared to the 2.5 mg daily treatment (cumulative dose 210 mg), indicating that as long as optimal doses are administered the frequency of dosing has secondary importance for overall efficacy. When the cumulative dose was 130 mg or less, the final degree of inhibition was still the function of the cumulative dose, but the overall efficacy estimated by the AUC was also under the influence of the frequency of dosing. These observations suggest that serial measurements of s-CTX may provide a useful diagnostic tool for the early revelation of suboptimal dosing or noncompliance to already optimized therapies with antiresorptive agents.

New anabolic therapies in osteoporosis

Anabolic agents represent an important new advance in the therapy of osteoporosis. Their potential might be substantially greater than the anti-resorptives. Because the anti-resorptives and anabolic agents work by completely distinct mechanisms of action, it is possible that the combination of agents could be significantly more potent than either agent alone. Recent evidence suggests that a plateau in BMD might occur after prolonged exposure to PTH. Anti-resorptive therapy during or after anabolic therapy might prevent this skeletal adaptation. Protocols to consider anabolic agents as intermittent recycling therapy would be of interest. Of all the anabolics, PTH is the most promising. However, there are unanswered questions about PTH. More studies are needed to document an anabolic effect on cortical bone. More large-scale studies are needed to further determine the reduction in nonvertebral fractures with PTH, especially at the hip. In the future, PTH is likely to be modified for easier and more targeted delivery. Oral or transdermal delivery systems may become available. Recently, Gowen et al have described an oral calcilytic molecule that antagonizes the parathyroid cell calcium receptor, thus stimulating the endogenous release of PTH. This approach could represent a novel endogenous delivery system for intermittent PTH administration. Rising expectations that anabolic therapies for osteoporosis will soon play a major role in treating this disease are likely to fuel further studies and the development of even more novel approaches to therapy.

Comparison of change in bone resorption and bone mineral density with once-weekly alendronate and daily risedronate: a randomised, placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of alendronate (ALN) 70 mg once weekly (OW) and risedronate (RIS) 5 mg daily between-meal dosing on biochemical markers of bone turnover and bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a 3-month, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with a double-blind extension to 12 months. The study enrolled 549 postmenopausal women (ALN 219, RIS 222 and placebo (PBO) 108) who were > or =60 years of age at outpatient centres.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary endpoint was reduction in urine N-telopeptides of type 1 collagen (NTx) corrected for creatinine level at 3 months. Secondary parameters included change in BMD at the spine and hip at 6 and 12 months, NTx at 1, 6 and 12 months, and serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP) at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. Adverse experiences (AEs) were recorded throughout the study for an assessment of treatment safety profiles and tolerability.

RESULTS

Over 3 months, ALN produced a significantly greater mean reduction in urine NTx than did RIS (-52% vs -32%, p < 0.001), which was maintained at 12 months. ALN produced a significantly greater mean BMD increase than did RIS at 6 months, and it was maintained at 12 months at the lumbar spine (4.8% vs 2.8%, p < 0.001) and total hip (2.7% vs 0.9%, p < 0.001), as well as at the trochanter and femoral neck. Significant reductions in BSAP with ALN compared to RIS were maintained over the 12 months of treatment. Study size did not allow for meaningful assessment of differences in fracture rates. Tolerability was generally similar between ALN, RIS and PBO, and the incidence of upper GI AEs causing discontinuation and oesophageal AEs was similar in the ALN and RIS groups.

CONCLUSION

In this study, ALN 70 mg OW produced a 50% greater reduction in bone resorption as measured by urine NTx and significantly greater increases in lumbar spine and hip BMD than did RIS 5 mg daily. The treatments had similar safety profiles and were generally well-tolerated. Additional studies are needed comparing OW ALN with OW RIS, which became available after the commencement of the present study.

Tolerability of once-weekly alendronate in patients with osteoporosis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract tolerability of once-weekly oral alendronate, 70 mg, and placebo.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a 12-week multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. The first patient initiated treatment on June 5, 2000, and the last patient completed treatment on March 1, 2001. The study enrolled 450 postmenopausal women and men with osteoporosis (224 took alendronate, 226 took placebo) who were ambulatory and community dwelling at 48 outpatient study centers in the United States. By design, approximately half of the patients were naive to bisphosphonates. The primary end point was upper GI tract tolerability based on the incidence of any upper GI tract adverse events. Secondary end points included the number of discontinuations due to drug-related upper GI tract adverse events and the change from baseline in bone resorption, assessed by the urinary N-telopeptide-creatinine ratio at 12 weeks. A subgroup analysis of the primary and secondary end points was performed on the patients stratified by prior bisphosphonate use. The safety and tolerability of the weekly alendronate and placebo regimens were captured as clinical and laboratory adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 11% of the alendronate patients and 13% of the placebo patients reported an upper GI tract adverse event. Discontinuations due to drug-related upper GI tract adverse events occurred in 3% of alendronate patients and 1% of placebo patients. The differences between the treatment groups for the primary and secondary end points were not significant. For the primary end point, the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval of the difference was well within the prespecified 14% comparability bound (-2.2%; 95% confidence interval, -8.3% to 3.9%). The overall incidence of upper GI tract adverse events was lower in the subgroup of patients with prior bisphosphonate exposure (8%) than in those who were bisphosphonate naive (16%). However, regardless of prior bisphosphonate exposure, the incidence of upper GI tract adverse events was similar between the alendronate and placebo patients. The urinary N-telopeptide-creatinine ratio showed a significant decrease in the alendronate patients (72% of baseline, P<.001) compared with a slight increase in the placebo patients (106% of baseline) at week 12.

CONCLUSION

In this 3-month study, the incidence of upper GI tract adverse events in patients treated with once-weekly alendronate, 70 mg, was comparable to that with placebo.

Meta-analyses of therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis. II. Meta-analysis of alendronate for the treatment of postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVE

To review the effect of alendronate on bone density and fractures in postmenopausal women.

DATA SOURCE

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Current Contents, and the Cochrane Controlled trials registry from 1980 to 1999, and we examined citations of relevant articles and proceedings of international meetings.

STUDY SELECTION

We included 11 trials that randomized women to alendronate or placebo and measured bone density for at least 1 yr.

DATA EXTRACTION

For each trial, three independent reviewers assessed the methodological quality and abstracted data.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The pooled relative risk (RR) for vertebral fractures in patients given 5 mg or more of alendronate was 0.52 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.43-0.65]. The RR of nonvertebral fractures in patients given 10 mg or more of alendronate was 0.51 (95% CI 0.38-0.69), an appreciably greater effect than for the 5 mg dose. We found a similar reduction in RR across nonvertebral fracture types; in particular, RR reductions for fractures traditionally thought to be "osteoporotic," such as hip and forearm, were very similar to RR reductions for "nonosteoporotic" fractures. Individual studies showed similar results, reflected in the P values of the test of heterogeneity (P = 0.99 for vertebral and 0.88 for nonvertebral fractures). Alendronate produced positive effects on the percentage change in bone density, which increased with both dose and time. After 3 yr of treatment with 10 mg of alendronate or more, the pooled estimate of the difference in percentage change between alendronate and placebo was 7.48% (95% CI 6.12-8.85) for the lumbar spine (2-3 yr), 5.60% (95% CI 4.80-6.39) for the hip (3-4 yr), 2.08% (95% CI 1.53-2.63) for the forearm (2-4 yr), and 2.73% (95% CI 2.27-3.20) for the total body (3 yr). Heterogeneity of the treatment effect of alendronate was not consistently explained by any of our a priori hypotheses; in particular, the effect was very similar in prevention and treatment studies. The pooled RR for discontinuing medication due to adverse effects for 5 mg or greater of alendronate was 1.15 (95% CI 0.93-1.42). The pooled RR for discontinuing medication due to gastro-intestinal (GI) side effects for 5 mg or greater was 1.03 (0.81-1.30, P = 0.83), and the pooled RR for GI adverse effects with continuation of medication was 1.03 (0.98 to 1.07) P = 0.23.

CONCLUSIONS

Alendronate increases bone density in both early postmenopausal women and those with established osteoporosis while reducing the rate of vertebral fracture over 2-3 yr of treatment. Reductions in nonvertebral fractures are evident among postmenopausal women without prevalent fractures and have bone mineral density (BMD) levels below the World Health Organization threshold for osteoporosis. The impact on fractures appears consistent across all fracture types, casting doubt on traditional distinctions between osteoporotic and nonosteoporotic fractures.

Osteoporosis: prevention and diagnostic work-up

Prevention of osteoporosis has assumed a paramount role in the decrease of osteoporotic fractures and the associated medical costs. A thorough diagnostic work-up of the patient with osteoporosis helps the physician exclude secondary causes of bone loss and acquire useful data for staging the disease, and contributes to planning the correct therapeutic management.

Genetics of osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is a common multifactorial disorder of reduced bone mass. The disorder in its most common form is generalized, affecting the elderly, both sexes, and all racial groups. Multiple environmental factors are involved in the pathogenesis. Genes also play a major role as reflected by heritability of many components of bone strength. Quantitative phenotypes in bone strength in the normal population do not conform to a monogenetic mode of inheritance. The common form of osteoporosis is generally considered to be a polygenic disorder arising from the interaction of common polymorphic alleles at quantitative trait loci, with multiple environmental factors. Finding the susceptibility genes underlying osteoporosis requires identifying specific alleles that coinherit with key heritable phenotypes in bone strength. Because of the close correspondence among mammalian genomes, identification of the genes underlying bone strength in mammals such as the mouse is likely to be of major assistance in human studies. Identification of susceptibility genes for osteoporosis is one of several important approaches toward the long-term goal of understanding the molecular biology of the normal variation in bone strength and how it may be modified to prevent osteoporosis. As with all genetic studies in humans, these scientific advances will need to be made in an environment of legal and ethical safeguards that are acceptable to the general public.

Short-term vitamin A supplementation does not affect bone turnover in men

Limited data in humans and animals indicate that excess vitamin A stimulates bone resorption and inhibits bone formation, effects that over time might lead to bone loss and fracture. Thus, it is possible that vitamin A supplementation is a currently unrecognized risk factor for the development of osteoporosis. To further evaluate this possibility, a prospective, randomized, single-blind study of vitamin A supplementation was conducted in 80 healthy men age 18-58 y. One half received 7576 microg (25,000 IU) of retinol palmitate daily with their evening meal; the others took a placebo. Blood was collected from fasting subjects and serum prepared at baseline and after 2, 4 and 6 wk of supplementation. Serum bone specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP) and N-Telopeptide of type 1 collagen (NTx) were measured at all time points. Serum osteocalcin (Oc) was measured at baseline and after 6 wk of supplementation. BSAP, NTx and Oc did not differ between the supplemented and placebo-treated groups over the course of the study. In conclusion, short-term vitamin A supplementation at this dosage in healthy men does not alter serum markers of skeletal turnover. Thus, it is unlikely that short-term administration of vitamin A would contribute to the development of osteoporosis. Whether long-term vitamin A supplementation might have adverse skeletal effects remains to be determined.

Effect of vitamin D on bone mineral density of elderly patients with osteoporosis responding poorly to bisphosphonates

BACKGROUND

Bisphosphonates are indicated in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. However, bone mineral density (BMD) continues to decline in up to 15% of bisphosphonate users. While randomized trials have evaluated the efficacy of concurrent bisphosphonates and vitamin D, the incremental benefit of vitamin D remains uncertain.

METHODS

Using data from the Canadian Database of Osteoporosis and Osteopenia (CANDOO), we performed a 2-year observational cohort study. At baseline, all patients were prescribed a bisphosphonate and counseled on vitamin D supplementation. After one year, patients were divided into two groups based on their response to bisphosphonate treatment. Non-responders were prescribed vitamin D 1000 IU daily. Responders continued to receive counseling on vitamin D.

RESULTS

Of 449 patients identified, 159 were non-responders to bisphosphonates. 94% of patients were women. The mean age of the entire cohort was 74.6 years (standard deviation = 5.6 years). In the cohort of non-responders, BMD at the lumbar spine increased 2.19% (p < 0.001) the year after vitamin D was prescribed compared to a decrease of 0.55% (p = 0.36) the year before. In the cohort of responders, lumbar spine BMD improved 1.45% (p = 0.014) the first year and 1.11% (p = 0.60) the second year. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant the first year (p < 0.001) but not the second (p = 0.60). Similar results were observed at the femoral neck but were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

In elderly patients with osteoporosis not responding to bisphosphonates, vitamin D 1000 IU daily may improve BMD at the lumbar spine.

Changes of biochemical bone markers during the menopausal transition

We present data on the changes of the bone formation markers osteocalcin (OC), bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (bone ALP) and bone sialoprotein (BSP), as well as the resorption markers pyridinoline (PYD), deoxypyridinoline (DPD), C- and N-terminal telopeptide cross-linked collagen type I (CTX, NTX), and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase type 5b (TRACP) at five time points during the course of two years in healthy premenopausal, perimenopausal and early postmenopausal women. The prospective study showed that CTX (p<0.001), NTX (p=0.001) and TRACP (p=0.001), as well as bone ALP (p=0.009) and OC (p=0.052), were significantly increased already in the transition period from peri- to postmenopause. The pyridinium crosslinks indicated an increased collagen degradation rate already in the perimenopause (PYD, p=0.017; DPD, p=0.054). Significant inverse correlations with the two years changes of the bone mineral density were found for bone ALP, CTX, OC and DPD in the perimenopausal group. The measurement of a comprehensive panel of biochemical bone markers clearly shows that metabolic changes in bone metabolism appear pronounced in the perimenopause, a period still presenting satisfactory estrogen supply. Thus, the perimenopause is an important phase for a contingent development of osteoporosis.

Potent and selective inhibition of human cathepsin K leads to inhibition of bone resorption in vivo in a nonhuman primate

Cathepsin K is a cysteine protease that plays an essential role in osteoclast-mediated degradation of the organic matrix of bone. Knockout of the enzyme in mice, as well as lack of functional enzyme in the human condition pycnodysostosis, results in osteopetrosis. These results suggests that inhibition of the human enzyme may provide protection from bone loss in states of elevated bone turnover, such as postmenopausal osteoporosis. To test this theory, we have produced a small molecule inhibitor of human cathepsin K, SB-357114, that potently and selectively inhibits this enzyme (Ki = 0.16 nM). This compound potently inhibited cathepsin activity in situ, in human osteoclasts (inhibitor concentration [IC]50 = 70 nM) as well as bone resorption mediated by human osteoclasts in vitro (IC50 = 29 nM). Using SB-357114, we evaluated the effect of inhibition of cathepsin K on bone resorption in vivo using a nonhuman primate model of postmenopausal bone loss in which the active form of cathepsin K is identical to the human orthologue. A gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) was used to render cynomolgus monkeys estrogen deficient, which led to an increase in bone turnover. Treatment with SB-357114 (12 mg/kg subcutaneously) resulted in a significant reduction in serum markers of bone resorption relative to untreated controls. The effect was observed 1.5 h after the first dose and was maintained for 24 h. After 5 days of dosing, the reductions in N-terminal telopeptides (NTx) and C-terminal telopeptides (CTx) of type I collagen were 61% and 67%, respectively. A decrease in serum osteocalcin of 22% was also observed. These data show that inhibition of cathepsin K results in a significant reduction of bone resorption in vivo and provide further evidence that this may be a viable approach to the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Role of biochemical markers in the management of osteoporosis

Several serum and urine biochemical markers of bone resorption and formation have been developed. Biochemical bone markers have been used as intermediate end-points in all major studies of anti-osteoporotic therapies. Bone resorption markers, in particular, may add an independent, predictive value to the assessment of bone loss and fracture risk. There are also potential advantages in monitoring anti-osteoporotic treatment in the short-term in addition to bone densitometry, to rapidly identify non-responders to therapy, or non-compliance. Despite these recent advances, until now bone markers have simply been very useful research tools, with their clinical utility being limited by intra-individual and diurnal variability. However, the probability of the true bone mineral density response to hormone replacement therapy for the individual patient may be predicted using algorithms based on a spectrum of cut-off bone marker levels with varying false positive and negative rates. Thus, the transition of biochemical bone markers into everyday clinical practice may be rapidly approaching.

Cost effectiveness of nasal calcitonin in postmenopausal women: use of Cochrane Collaboration methods for meta-analysis within economic evaluation

OBJECTIVE

To assess the cost effectiveness of nasal calcitonin (Miacalcin) compared with no therapy, alendronate or etidronate in the treatment of postmenopausal women with previous osteoporotic fracture.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Meta-analysis followed by economic analysis.

PERSPECTIVE

A Canadian provincial Ministry of Health.

METHODS

The meta-analysis of randomised controlled clinical trials was based on the recommendations of the Cochrane Collaboration. Economic analysis was conducted within a Markov model using probabilities and costs derived from Canadian sources.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis found evidence of the positive effect of both nasal calcitonin and alendronate in reducing the risks of hip, wrist and vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women. However, there was a lack of evidence of the effect of etidronate on hip and wrist fractures. For a 65-year-old woman, with 5 years' therapy, the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained for nasal calcitonin was 46,500 Canadian dollars ($Can) compared with no therapy and $Can32,600 compared with etidronate (1998 values). Comparison with alendronate was highly sensitive to the inclusion of one specific trial.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the results of the analysis, based on current evidence, nasal calcitonin can be considered at the margins of being cost effective when compared with no therapy. Compared with active therapy, nasal calcitonin can be considered more cost effective than etidronate, but its cost effectiveness versus alendronate is inconclusive.

A functional polymorphic variant in the interleukin-6 gene promoter associated with low bone resorption in postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVE

To examine functional interleukin-6 (IL-6) -174 G-->C allelic variants in relation to bone turnover and bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women.

METHODS

Four hundred thirty-four healthy women living in the community (mean +/- SD age 71.7 +/- 5.7 years) were genotyped for the IL-6 -174 G-->C polymorphism. Serum levels of C-telopeptide of type I collagen (CTx), a marker of bone resorption, and osteocalcin (OC), a marker of bone formation, were determined. BMD at the hip and forearm was measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.

RESULTS

CTx levels differed significantly (P = 0.006) among IL-6 genotypes (mean +/- SEM 0.275 +/- 0.02 ng/ml, 0.325 +/- 0.01 ng/ml, and 0.356 +/- 0.02 ng/ml in women with the CC genotype [n = 68], the GC genotype [n = 204], and the GG genotype [n = 162], respectively). Compared with the GG group, age-adjusted odds ratios for high bone resorption were 0.65 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.41-1.0, P = 0.06) and 0.37 (95% CI 0.18-0.73, P = 0.0047) in GC and CC subjects, respectively. In contrast, OC levels did not differ by genotype. BMD at the hip and forearm was 1.5-5% higher in CC subjects compared with GG subjects (P not significant). When the cohort was divided according to the median age (70.5 years), BMD was significantly decreased in older compared with younger postmenopausal women with the GG and GC genotypes (-9.6% on average; P < 0.01), but not in those with the CC genotype (-5.1% on average; P not significant).

CONCLUSION

Compared with the GC and GG IL-6 -174 G-->C genotypes, the CC genotype is associated with lower bone resorption and lesser decrease in bone mass in older postmenopausal women. These results suggest that IL-6 -174 G-->C alleles may be significant determinants of the risk for osteoporosis in elderly subjects.

Early response in biochemical markers predicts long-term response in bone mass during hormone replacement therapy in early postmenopausal women

Based on data from 153 early postmenopausal women who completed a double-blind, randomized 3 year study of graded hormone replacement therapy (HRT) doses or placebo, we investigated the value of bone markers to predict prevention of bone loss. Absolute values of serum and urinary CrossLaps (S-CTX and U-CTX) after 2 weeks of treatment were significantly correlated to 3 year bone mass response (r = -0. 28/-0.35; p < 0.001). These associations were fully expressed at 6 months (r = -0.61/-0.64; p < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic analyses revealed that the predictive capacity of one measurement of a resorption marker after 6 months' treatment performed similarly as assessment of hip bone mass over 3 years in predicting preservation of spinal bone mass over 3 years. Comparable results were obtained using percent change from baseline in resorption markers at both 6 and 12 months, whereas for formation markers percent change was superior to absolute value at 6 months but not at 12 months. Values of accuracy for S-CTX for a cutoff of 1881 pmol/L at 6 months were 85.2% (sensitivity), 74.3% (specificity), 90.5% (positive predictive value), and 63.4% (negative predictive value); U-CTX performed similarly, whereas the values for the formation markers were slightly lower. A cutoff for S-CTX of 1245 pmol/L eliminated false-positive individuals (those who had a decrease below the cutoff but lost bone). In the false-negative group, which was composed of individuals whose S-CTX did not decrease below the cutoff but had preserved bone mass, S-CTX was significantly associated with spinal bone mass response (r = -0. 41; p < 0.01), indicating these women had been treated with a dose that was not at its optimum for their individual bone turnover. For this cutoff, the values were 49.5% (sensitivity), 97.1% (specificity), 98% (positive predictive value), and 40% (negative predictive value). In conclusion, early bone marker measurements predict long-term preservation of bone mass during HRT. Resorption markers seem superior to formation markers, which reflects that the primary effect of HRT is on bone resorption. A strategy with two cutoff levels may optimize the use of bone markers to predict bone mass response. Whether resorption markers can be used to guide individualized treatment remains to be investigated.

The effect of alendronate on bone mass after distal forearm fracture

Fracture and immobilization of an extremity lead to bone loss at the fracture and at adjacent sites. We conducted a 1-year, single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind study to determine whether bone loss would occur in the distal radius after a Colles' fracture and whether this loss could be prevented using an antiresorptive drug (alendronate). Thirty-seven women with a recent fracture of the distal forearm and low bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine were randomized to receive either 10 mg alendronate daily or placebo. BMD of both forearms was measured at baseline and after 3, 6, and 12 months. The results of four women who developed reflex sympathetic dystrophy were not included in the analysis. In the placebo group, there was a significant reduction at 3 months and 6 months in BMD of total radius (p < 0.01), one-third distal radius (p < 0.01), middistal radius (p < 0.05), and ultradistal radius (p < 0.01) on the fractured side. The loss in BMD at one-third distal radius remained significant at month 12 (p < or = 0.001). In the alendronate group BMD of total distal radius, one-third distal radius, and middistal radius at the fractured side remained unchanged. BMD of ultradistal radius increased significantly at months 3, 6, and 12, compared with baseline (p < 0.05). The difference between the two treatment groups was significant at 3 months and 6 months and borderline significant (p = 0.054) after 1 year in total distal radius. In ultradistal radius the differences were significant at all time points. We conclude that BMD of the distal radius of a recently fractured forearm decreases significantly in the 6 months after fracture and the resulting deficit remains evident at least 1 year after fracture. This bone loss can be prevented by alendronate.

Increased urinary N-telopeptide cross-linked type 1 collagen predicts bone loss in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

OBJECTIVE

Reduced bone mineral density (BMD) is common in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but the factors associated with its longitudinal rate of change have not been established. We prospectively assessed the rate of change in BMD, and its association with biochemical markers of bone turnover.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients with Crohn's disease and 14 ulcerative colitis patients age 37.1 +/- 11.6 yr were followed for 2 yr. Lumbar spine (L2-L4) and femoral neck BMD were measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry at baseline and 24 months. Bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin, urinary N-telopeptide crosslinked type 1 collagen (NTx), parathyroid hormone, and 25-hydroxyvitamin-D were determined at baseline.

RESULTS

At baseline, 59% of Crohn's patients and 43% of ulcerative colitis patients were osteoporotic, with spine or femoral neck BMD T-score < -2.5. Spine BMD, and spine and femoral neck T-scores were lower and disease duration was longer in nine patients with ileal resection compared with nonoperated patients (0.84 +/- 0.15 g/cm2 vs 0.96 +/- 0.11 g/cm2, -3.0 +/- 1.5 vs -1.7 +/- 1.3, -3.2 +/- 1.5 vs -2.2 +/- 1.0, respectively; all p < 0.05). At 24 months, 13/36 (36%) and 14/36 (39%) patients experienced spinal and femoral neck bone loss, respectively, with mean annual percent BMD changes of -2.0% and -1.5%, respectively. NTx, a bone resorption marker, inversely correlated with spinal BMD rate of change (r = -0.4, p < 0.05). Using quartiles analysis, patients with the highest NTx (Q4) experienced the greatest decrease in spine BMD compared with patients with the lowest NTx (Q1).

CONCLUSIONS

Spine and femoral neck bone loss continues over time in more than one-third of IBD patients. Increased NTx level predicts spinal bone loss in IBD patients.

Biological variability of serum and urinary N-telopeptides of type I collagen in postmenopausal women

Measurement of N-telopeptides of type I bone collagen (NTX) provides a specific indicator of the current level of bone resorption. The biological intrasubject variability of NTX in urine and serum was studied in 277 postmenopausal women, mean age, 63.6 years +/- 10.2 (+/-SD) years. Second-morning void urine and serum specimens were collected at baseline and for two consecutive days to determine short-term variability (% CV). Long-term variability was determined by comparing NTX results at baseline and two consecutive months. Subjects were instructed to maintain current diet, lifestyle, and medications during the study. The median short-term %CV was 13.1% for urine NTX. This compared with 6.3% for serum NTX. Calculation of long-term %CV showed similar trends, with the %CV for NTX measured in serum (7.5%) lower than when measured in urine (15.6%). Using the least significant change (LSC) calculation, our data show that to be 90% confident that a decrease in NTX after initiation of antiresorptive therapy in an individual patient is not caused by variability alone, a 31 % decrease in urine NTX and a 14% decrease in serum NTX is required. As reported changes in NTX caused by antiresorptive therapy are greater than these calculations; our results support the use of either specimen to measure NTX to monitor the effect of therapy.

The relationship of biochemical markers of bone turnover to bone density changes in postmenopausal women: results from the Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions (PEPI) trial

We assessed the associations of eight bone turnover markers (BTMs) with baseline and 1-year percentage changes in lumbar spine and hip bone mineral density (BMD) of 293 postmenopausal women undergoing treatment with hormone replacement therapy (HRT) or placebo using squared correlation coefficients (R2). In 239 women assigned to treatment with estrogen alone or with with estrogen plus progestins (active treatment), mean percentage changes for all markers decreased significantly and remained below baseline values through 3 years of study, whereas mean percentage changes for 54 women assigned to the placebo group showed no significant change from baseline in any marker. At baseline, age and body mass index (BMI) together accounted for 16% and 25% of the variance in spine and hip BMD, respectively. The telopeptide resorption marker, cross-linked N-telopeptide of type I collagen (NTX), alone accounted for 12% and 8% of variance, respectively. Another telopeptide, carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (Crosslaps), accounted for 8% and 7% of variance, respectively. A bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BALP-2) accounted for 8% of variance at the spine and 5% at the hip. No other marker accounted for more than 5% of total variance at either site; adding either baseline NTX, Crosslaps, or BAP-2 to regressions containing age and BMI increased R2 values at the spine and hip to about 22% and 28%, respectively. In the placebo group, baseline spine BMD accounted for 4% of the variance in 1-year spine BMD percentage change, whereas baseline values for age and BMI accounted for 1% and 0% of the variance, respectively; none of the three accounted for more than 0% of hip BMD percentage change; Crosslaps and NTX contributed 5% and 4% to the variance in 1-year spine BMD percentage change, but other markers accounted for < 2% of variance at the spine. At the hip, another BALP (BALP-1) accounted for 4% of variance, but no other baseline marker except NTX accounted for more than 1% of variance. In the active treatment group, baseline values for age, BMI, and spine BMD together accounted for 13% of the percentage change in spine BMD and for 4% of the BMD change at the hip. No individual or pair of baseline markers significantly enhanced these R2 values, but addition of 1-year percentage changes in some individual markers did significantly increase it. The largest R2 value was obtained by adding the percentage change in BALP-2, which increased the R2 in spine BMD percentage change to 20% and that at the hip to 8%. Adding baseline and change variables for all eight markers to the regression increased R2 to 28% at the spine and 12% at the hip. Restricting the set of analyses to individuals who suppressed marker activity beyond the precision error for the measurement did not improve R2s for the regressions. When baseline marker values were stratified into quartiles, only NTX and osteocalcin showed significant relationships between quartile and change in spine BMD, and these did not reach significance at the hip. When the 1-year change in markers was stratified into quartiles, significant relationships with percentage change in spine BMD were observed only for BALP phosphatases. We conclude that BTMs are not a surrogate for BMD to identify women with low bone mass and that they offer little useful information for predicting BMD changes for individual untreated or HRT-treated postmenopausal women.

Clinical Utility of Biochemical Markers of Bone Remodeling

Remodeling is essential for bone health. It begins with resorption of old bone by osteoclasts, followed by the formation of new bone by osteoblasts. Remodeling is coupled (formation is linked to resorption). After middle age or perhaps beginning earlier, bone loss occurs because resorption exceeds formation. This imbalance is accentuated by estrogen deficiency as well as by many diseases and conditions. Biochemical markers that reflect remodeling and can be measured in blood or urine include resorption markers (e.g., collagen cross-links) and formation markers (e.g., alkaline phosphatase).

Bone markers exhibit substantial short-term and long-term fluctuations related to time of day, phase of the menstrual cycle, and season of the year, as well as diet, exercise, and anything else that alters bone remodeling. These biological factors, in addition to assay imprecision, produce significant intra- and interindividual variability in markers.

Bone marker measurements are noninvasive, inexpensive, and can be repeated often. Unfortunately, most of the studies that provided insight on clinical situations did not focus on markers as a primary endpoint. Bone markers have been useful in clinical practice and have been helpful in understanding the pathogenesis of osteoporosis and the mechanism of action of therapies. In clinical trials, markers aid in selecting optimal dose and in understanding the time course of onset and resolution of treatment effect. Clinical questions that might be answered by bone markers include diagnosing osteoporosis, identifying “fast bone losers” and patients at high risk of fracture, selecting the best treatment for osteoporosis, and providing an early indication of the response to treatment. Additional information is needed to define specific situations and cut points to allow marker results to be used with confidence in making decisions about individual patients.

Bone markers in clinical practice

Although biologic indices of bone turnover are widely accepted as research tools in population-based studies, their clinical utility in the management of the individual patient remains controversial. Their main limitation for a routine clinical use is related to an important biologic variability, which means that large variations (ie, in response to therapy) are needed to consider a difference between two measurements as reflecting a significant biologic change. To date, the most valuable bone markers are serum osteocalcin, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, and the N-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen for bone formation and urinary measurements of the phenazopyridine crosslinks and related telopeptides for bone resorption. New serum assays for both C-telopeptide and N-telopeptide of type 1 collagen seem promising but need extensive validation. Although bone markers provide little information in the diagnosis of osteoporosis, strong evidence now shows that they can predict, albeit imperfectly, the rate of bone loss in menopausal women and the response to some antiresorptive therapies. In some populations, increased bone turnover has been shown to be a strong predictor of fracture risk, independently and to the same extent as low bone density. Whether bone markers are used to monitor the efficacy of (or compliance with) a specific treatment or to identify patients at risk for osteoporosis and thus to target preventive therapy, cost-benefit analysis, and evaluation of the potential improvement in patient outcome are clearly needed before these parameters may be universally accepted as tools to optimize patient care.

Biochemical markers of bone turnover

Biochemical markers of bone turnover that are specific to bone allow study of the subtle changes in bone turnover associated with osteoporosis. They have been evaluated in Paget's disease of the bone and chronic renal failure. This review focuses on the use of biochemical markers of bone turnover in osteoporosis. The data in this review period are numerous and varied due to the growing interest in the use of biochemical markers of bone turnover in clinical practice. The data provide support for the use of the newer bone turnover markers for monitoring treatment of osteoporosis, if care is taken to minimize sources of variability.

Larger increases in bone mineral density during alendronate therapy are associated with a lower risk of new vertebral fractures in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether the incidence of vertebral fractures is related to the magnitude of change in bone mineral density (BMD) during alendronate treatment.

METHODS

Women in this study were age 55-81 years (n = 2,984). While participating in the Fracture Intervention Trial, they received 5 mg/day of alendronate for 2 years followed by 10 mg/day for the remaining 12-30 months of the study. Their BMD was measured at baseline and at 12 and 24 months, and spine radiographs were obtained at baseline and again at 36 or 48 months to identify new vertebral fractures.

RESULTS

After 12 months of alendronate treatment, 35% of participants had increases of > or =3% in total hip BMD, and 21% had either decreased total hip BMD or no change. Women who had larger increases in total hip BMD during the first 12 months had a lower incidence of new vertebral fractures during the entire followup period. Only 3.2% of women with increases of > or =3% in total hip BMD experienced new vertebral fractures, whereas twice as many women (6.3%) whose BMD declined or stayed the same experienced new fractures (adjusted odds ratio 0.45, 95% confidence interval 0.27-0.72). Similar patterns were observed for spine BMD at 12 months, and for both sites using change in BMD at 24 months.

CONCLUSION

Women with increases of > or =3% in BMD during the first 1 or 2 years of alendronate treatment had the lowest incidence of new vertebral fractures. These findings suggest that, among women taking antiresorptive agents, greater increases in BMD are associated with lower risk of new vertebral fractures.

Practical clinical application of biochemical markers of bone turnover: Consensus of an expert panel

Biochemical markers of bone turnover have emerged as powerful tools to aid in managing osteoporosis. The newer bone markers have been intensively studied for more than a decade. As a result, we can now confidently report their clinical utility in assessing risk of rapid bone loss and fracture, and monitoring therapy in postmenopausal women with or at risk of osteoporosis. In this review, we will provide a comprehensive foundation for this utility. While there are still questions remaining to be answered, bone marker technology has matured to play an essential role in patient management. We will describe, in practical terms, how bone markers can be appropriately incorporated into clinical practice today.