101
|
DETERMINATION OF MOLECULAR GENETIC MARKERS IN PROGNOSIS OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TREATMENT OF MALIGNANT INTRACEREBRAL BRAIN TUMORS. EUREKA: HEALTH SCIENCES 2019. [DOI: 10.21303/2504-5679.2019.00949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Intracerebral malignant brain tumors remain one of the most complex problems of neuro-oncology. Today, promising results of the use of targeted drugs have been received, which determine the important diagnostic and predictive value of molecular genetic markers of glial and metastatic brain tumors.
Aim: The study of the prevalence of MGMT (O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase) and PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homologue deleted on chromosome 10) gene expression by real time polymerase chain reaction in tumor tissue of gliomas and brain metastases.
Materials and methods: From thirty patients were received tumor material (29 cases of glioma III-IV degree of anaplasia and one case of metastatic brain lesion of adenocarcinoma). The normalized expression of MGMT and PTEN genes was determined by real-time polymerase chain reaction.
Results: In all 30 (100 %) patients with tumor fragments, we determined normalized expression of MGMT and PTEN genes. In most cases, 53 % of the observations (16 out of 30 patients) showed a low normalized expression of MGMT gene (<40 c. u.) and a low normalized PTEN expression rate of 73 % (22 out of 30 patients) (<40 c. u.). The average expression level of the MGMT gene in the range from 40 to 100 c. u. (6/20 % of patients) was considered prognostic favourable for the response to temozolomide chemotherapy.
Conclusions: The study of MGMT gene expression, a chemotherapy marker for temozolomide, indicates a trend toward correlation between expression levels and therapeutic efficacy. The study of the expression of the PTEN gene, the blocker of the PI3K / AKT signal pathway, indicates a different degree of expression of this enzyme in the tumour samples studied. The predictive value of the indicator for target therapy is appropriate in comparison with the EGFR mutation. Further profound analysis of the results is required with increasing number of sampling and observation period.
Collapse
|
102
|
Abstract
Delineating the gross tumor volume (GTV) is a core task within radiation treatment planning. GTVs must be precisely defined irrespective of the region involved, but even more so in a sensitive area such as the brain. As precision medicine cannot exist without precision imaging, the current article aims to discuss the various imaging modalities employed in the radiation treatment planning of brain tumors.Gliomas, meningiomas, and paragangliomas are some of the most challenging tumors and the advancement in diagnostic imaging can significantly contribute to their delineation. For gliomas, irradiation based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and amino-acid positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) may have a higher sensitivity and specificity, which could lead to a better sparing of organs at risk and help distinguish between tumor, edema, and radiogenic alterations. Meningiomas and paragangliomas are often associated with a good prognosis. Therefore, GTV delineation according to MRI and somatostatin receptor ligand-PET/CT plays an essential role in sparing sensitive structures and maintaining a good quality of life for these patients.The combination of multiparametric MRI and PET/CT (possibly in the form of PET/MRI) presently appears to be the optimal approach for target volume delineation. The comparative efficacy of these imaging modalities has to be further evaluated in prospective trials.
Collapse
|
103
|
Tini P, Nardone V, Pastina P, Marampon F, Sebaste L, Cerase A, Tombolini V, Pirtoli L, Mazzei MA. Is a reduction of radiation dose feasible in patients affected by glioblastoma undergoing radio-chemotherapy according to MGMT promoter methylation status without jeopardizing survival? Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2019; 184:105445. [PMID: 31325903 DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.105445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2019] [Revised: 05/21/2019] [Accepted: 07/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore therapeutic results of different radiotherapy (RT) dose schedules combined to Temozolomide (TMZ)-RT treatment in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GB), according to the O (6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) methylation status. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with newly diagnosed GB received either standard (60-59.4 Gy) or reduced (54-52 Gy) dose radiation therapy (RT) with concurrent and adjuvant TMZ between June 2010 and October 2016. We retrospectively evaluated the therapeutic effectiveness of the RT ranges schedules in terms of overall survival (OS) with univariate and multivariate analysis, after analyzing the MGMT methylation status. RESULTS One hundred and seventeen patients were selected for the present analysis out of 146 total treated patients accrued. Seventy-two out of the selected cases received the standard RT-TMZ course (SDRT-TMZ) whereas the remaining 45 underwent the reduced dose schedule (RDRT-TMZ). The analysis according to the MGMT promoter methylation status showed that, in methylated-MGMT GB patients, SDRT-TMZ and RDRT-TMZ groups did not show different median OS (p = ns) according to the two RT schedules, independently by the extent of surgical resection. Instead, a difference in survival outcomes was confirmed in unmethylated-MGMT GB patients with better survival for patients undergoing to SDRT, particularly in sub-total resection. CONCLUSION In our experience, a reduction of radiation dose schedule does not seem to jeopardize survival in methylated-MGMT patients independently by the extent of resection. A therapeutic approach to a standard reduction of RT dose for the methylated subset of patients may be feasible and could deserve prospective trials for validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Tini
- Sbarro Health Research Organization, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Unit of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Siena, Siena, Italy.
| | - Valerio Nardone
- Unit of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Pierpaolo Pastina
- Unit of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Francesco Marampon
- Department of Radiotherapy, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Lucio Sebaste
- Unit of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Alfonso Cerase
- Unit of Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Tombolini
- Department of Radiotherapy, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Luigi Pirtoli
- Department of Biology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Maria Antonietta Mazzei
- Diagnostic Imaging Unit, Department of Medical, Surgical and Neurological Sciences, University of Siena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
104
|
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy F Cloughesy
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program and Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Andrew B Lassman
- Department of Neurology and Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
105
|
Pathological and Molecular Features of Glioblastoma and Its Peritumoral Tissue. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:cancers11040469. [PMID: 30987226 PMCID: PMC6521241 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11040469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 154] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2019] [Revised: 03/19/2019] [Accepted: 03/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is one of the most aggressive and lethal human brain tumors. At present, GBMs are divided in primary and secondary on the basis of the mutational status of the isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) genes. In addition, IDH1 and IDH2 mutations are considered crucial to better define the prognosis. Although primary and secondary GBMs are histologically indistinguishable, they retain distinct genetic alterations that account for different evolution of the tumor. The high invasiveness, the propensity to disperse throughout the brain parenchyma, and the elevated vascularity make these tumors extremely recidivist, resulting in a short patient median survival even after surgical resection and chemoradiotherapy. Furthermore, GBM is considered an immunologically cold tumor. Several studies highlight a highly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment that promotes recurrence and poor prognosis. Deeper insight into the tumor immune microenvironment, together with the recent discovery of a conventional lymphatic system in the central nervous system (CNS), led to new immunotherapeutic strategies. In the last two decades, experimental evidence from different groups proved the existence of cancer stem cells (CSCs), also known as tumor-initiating cells, that may play an active role in tumor development and progression. Recent findings also indicated the presence of highly infiltrative CSCs in the peritumoral region of GBM. This region appears to play a key role in tumor growing and recurrence. However, until recently, few studies investigated the biomolecular characteristics of the peritumoral tissue. The aim of this review is to recapitulate the pathological features of GBM and of the peritumoral region associated with progression and recurrence.
Collapse
|
106
|
Wang Y, Yang J, Wild AT, Wu WH, Shah R, Danussi C, Riggins GJ, Kannan K, Sulman EP, Chan TA, Huse JT. G-quadruplex DNA drives genomic instability and represents a targetable molecular abnormality in ATRX-deficient malignant glioma. Nat Commun 2019; 10:943. [PMID: 30808951 PMCID: PMC6391399 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-08905-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 130] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2018] [Accepted: 02/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Mutational inactivation of ATRX (α-thalassemia mental retardation X-linked) represents a defining molecular alteration in large subsets of malignant glioma. Yet the pathogenic consequences of ATRX deficiency remain unclear, as do tractable mechanisms for its therapeutic targeting. Here we report that ATRX loss in isogenic glioma model systems induces replication stress and DNA damage by way of G-quadruplex (G4) DNA secondary structure. Moreover, these effects are associated with the acquisition of disease-relevant copy number alterations over time. We then demonstrate, both in vitro and in vivo, that ATRX deficiency selectively enhances DNA damage and cell death following chemical G4 stabilization. Finally, we show that G4 stabilization synergizes with other DNA-damaging therapies, including ionizing radiation, in the ATRX-deficient context. Our findings reveal novel pathogenic mechanisms driven by ATRX deficiency in glioma, while also pointing to tangible strategies for drug development. ATRX deficiency is linked to genomic stability in cancer cells. Here, the authors show that ATRX inactivation induces G-quadruplex formation, leading to genome-wide DNA damage, and the use of G-quadruplex stabilisers can be exploited therapeutically in ATRX deficient gliomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuxiang Wang
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Jie Yang
- Department of Radation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Aaron T Wild
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Wei H Wu
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Rachna Shah
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Carla Danussi
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Gregory J Riggins
- Departments of Neurosurgery, Oncology, and Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21231, USA
| | - Kasthuri Kannan
- Department of Pathology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Erik P Sulman
- Department of Radation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.,Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Timothy A Chan
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Jason T Huse
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. .,Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
107
|
Hohmann T, Feese K, Ghadban C, Dehghani F, Grabiec U. On the influence of cannabinoids on cell morphology and motility of glioblastoma cells. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0212037. [PMID: 30753211 PMCID: PMC6372232 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2018] [Accepted: 01/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The mechanisms behind the anti-tumoral effects of cannabinoids by impacting the migratory activity of tumor cells are only partially understood. Previous studies demonstrated that cannabinoids altered the organization of the actin cytoskeleton in various cell types. As actin is one of the main contributors to cell motility and is postulated to be linked to tumor invasion, we tested the following hypothesizes: 1) Can cannabinoids alter cell motility in a cannabinoid receptor dependent manner? 2) Are these alterations associated with reorganizations in the actin cytoskeleton? 3) If so, what are the underlying molecular mechanisms? Three different glioblastoma cell lines were treated with specific cannabinoid receptor 1 and 2 agonists and antagonists. Afterwards, we measured changes in cell motility using live cell imaging and alterations of the actin structure in fixed cells. Additionally, the protein amount of phosphorylated p44/42 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), focal adhesion kinases (FAK) and phosphorylated FAK (pFAK) over time were measured. Cannabinoids induced changes in cell motility, morphology and actin organization in a receptor and cell line dependent manner. No significant changes were observed in the analyzed signaling molecules. Cannabinoids can principally induce changes in the actin cytoskeleton and motility of glioblastoma cell lines. Additionally, single cell motility of glioblastoma is independent of their morphology. Furthermore, the observed effects seem to be independent of p44/42 MAPK and pFAK pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Hohmann
- Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Kerstin Feese
- Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Chalid Ghadban
- Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Faramarz Dehghani
- Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Urszula Grabiec
- Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| |
Collapse
|
108
|
A DFT study of the degradation mechanism of anticancer drug carmustine in an aqueous medium. Struct Chem 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s11224-019-1285-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
109
|
Hadjipanayis CG, Stummer W. 5-ALA and FDA approval for glioma surgery. J Neurooncol 2019; 141:479-486. [PMID: 30644008 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-019-03098-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 235] [Impact Index Per Article: 39.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2018] [Accepted: 01/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA; Gleolan®; photonamic GmbH and Co. KG) for use as an intraoperative optical imaging agent in patients with suspected high-grade gliomas (HGGs) in 2017. This was the first ever optical imaging agent approved as an adjunct for the visualization of malignant tissue during surgery for brain tumors. The approval occurred a decade after European approval and a multicenter, phase III randomized trial which confirmed that surgeons using 5-ALA fluorescence-guided surgery as a surgical adjunct could achieve more complete resections of tumors in HGG patients and better patient outcomes than with conventional microsurgery. Much of the delay in the US FDA approval of 5-ALA stemmed from its conceptualization as a therapeutic and not as an intraoperative imaging tool. We chronicle the challenges encountered during the US FDA approval process to highlight a new standard for approval of intraoperative optical imaging agents in brain tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantinos G Hadjipanayis
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai Beth Israel, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Walter Stummer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
110
|
Sharma AM, Willcock M, Bucher O, Amaratunga T, Khan MN, Loewen SK, Quon H, Essig M, Pitz M. Institutional review of glial tumors treated with chemotherapy: the first description of PCV-related pseudoprogression. Neurooncol Pract 2019; 6:22-29. [PMID: 31385994 PMCID: PMC6656297 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npy012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pseudoprogression refers to areas of enhancement on MRI postadjuvant chemoradiation that arise as a result of treatment-related effects. Pseudoprogression has been well described with temozolomide-based chemoradiation but has not been studied in the setting of procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV) chemotherapy. We reviewed patients treated with PCV to investigate the occurrence of pseudoprogression. METHODS Adults diagnosed with World Health Organization grade II or III gliomas between 2010 and 2015 and treated with PCV or temozolomide were identified. Patient, tumor, treatment, and MRI data were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Pseudoprogression was defined as new enhancement seen on MRI within 6 months of completion of adjuvant radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiation, which improved or remained stable on subsequent scans without therapeutic intervention. If MRI showed areas of new enhancement outside the 6-month post-treatment window, which resolved or remained stable without treatment, or in patients who did not receive adjuvant treatment, it was referred to as "atypical pseudoprogression." RESULTS Fifty-seven patients were identified. Nine (16%) patients were identified as having pseudoprogression on MRI. Two (4%) of these patients were treated with PCV and 7 (12%) were treated with temozolomide. Seventeen (30%) patients had atypical pseudoprogression: 8 (14%) treated with temozolomide, 8 (14%) treated with PCV, and 1 (2%) treated with both types of chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS We describe the first 2 cases of PCV-related pseudoprogression and 17 cases of atypical pseudoprogression. As the re-emergence of adjuvant PCV occurs in clinical practice, the occurrence of classical and atypical pseudoprogression could have a significant impact on clinical decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankur M Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
- Department of Radiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Michael Willcock
- Department of Radiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Oliver Bucher
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Registry, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | | | - M Nazir Khan
- Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Shaun K Loewen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Center, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Harvey Quon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Center, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Marco Essig
- Department of Radiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Marshall Pitz
- Research Institute in Oncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
111
|
Central Nervous System Tumors. Radiat Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-97145-2_1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
112
|
Birch JL, Strathdee K, Gilmour L, Vallatos A, McDonald L, Kouzeli A, Vasan R, Qaisi AH, Croft DR, Crighton D, Gill K, Gray CH, Konczal J, Mezna M, McArthur D, Schüttelkopf AW, McConnell P, Sime M, Holmes WM, Bower J, McKinnon HJ, Drysdale M, Olson MF, Chalmers AJ. A Novel Small-Molecule Inhibitor of MRCK Prevents Radiation-Driven Invasion in Glioblastoma. Cancer Res 2018; 78:6509-6522. [PMID: 30279244 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-18-1697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2018] [Revised: 08/10/2018] [Accepted: 09/17/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive and incurable primary brain tumor that causes severe neurologic, cognitive, and psychologic symptoms. Symptoms are caused and exacerbated by the infiltrative properties of GBM cells, which enable them to pervade the healthy brain and disrupt normal function. Recent research has indicated that although radiotherapy (RT) remains the most effective component of multimodality therapy for patients with GBM, it can provoke a more infiltrative phenotype in GBM cells that survive treatment. Here, we demonstrate an essential role of the actin-myosin regulatory kinase myotonic dystrophy kinase-related CDC42-binding kinase (MRCK) in mediating the proinvasive effects of radiation. MRCK-mediated invasion occurred via downstream signaling to effector molecules MYPT1 and MLC2. MRCK was activated by clinically relevant doses per fraction of radiation, and this activation was concomitant with an increase in GBM cell motility and invasion. Furthermore, ablation of MRCK activity either by RNAi or by inhibition with the novel small-molecule inhibitor BDP-9066 prevented radiation-driven increases in motility both in vitro and in a clinically relevant orthotopic xenograft model of GBM. Crucially, treatment with BDP-9066 in combination with RT significantly increased survival in this model and markedly reduced infiltration of the contralateral cerebral hemisphere.Significance: An effective new strategy for the treatment of glioblastoma uses a novel, anti-invasive chemotherapeutic to prevent infiltration of the normal brain by glioblastoma cells.Cancer Res; 78(22); 6509-22. ©2018 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna L Birch
- Wolfson Wohl Translational Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
| | - Karen Strathdee
- Wolfson Wohl Translational Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Lesley Gilmour
- Wolfson Wohl Translational Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Antoine Vallatos
- Glasgow Experimental MRI Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Laura McDonald
- CRUK Beatson Drug Discovery Programme, Beatson Institute of Cancer Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Ariadni Kouzeli
- Wolfson Wohl Translational Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Richa Vasan
- Wolfson Wohl Translational Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | | | - Daniel R Croft
- CRUK Beatson Drug Discovery Programme, Beatson Institute of Cancer Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Diane Crighton
- CRUK Beatson Drug Discovery Programme, Beatson Institute of Cancer Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Kathryn Gill
- CRUK Beatson Drug Discovery Programme, Beatson Institute of Cancer Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher H Gray
- CRUK Beatson Drug Discovery Programme, Beatson Institute of Cancer Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Jennifer Konczal
- CRUK Beatson Drug Discovery Programme, Beatson Institute of Cancer Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Mokdad Mezna
- CRUK Beatson Drug Discovery Programme, Beatson Institute of Cancer Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Duncan McArthur
- CRUK Beatson Drug Discovery Programme, Beatson Institute of Cancer Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Alexander W Schüttelkopf
- CRUK Beatson Drug Discovery Programme, Beatson Institute of Cancer Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Patricia McConnell
- CRUK Beatson Drug Discovery Programme, Beatson Institute of Cancer Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Mairi Sime
- CRUK Beatson Drug Discovery Programme, Beatson Institute of Cancer Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - William M Holmes
- Glasgow Experimental MRI Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Justin Bower
- CRUK Beatson Drug Discovery Programme, Beatson Institute of Cancer Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Heather J McKinnon
- CRUK Beatson Drug Discovery Programme, Beatson Institute of Cancer Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Martin Drysdale
- CRUK Beatson Drug Discovery Programme, Beatson Institute of Cancer Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Michael F Olson
- CRUK Beatson Institute of Cancer Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Anthony J Chalmers
- Wolfson Wohl Translational Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
113
|
Esparragosa I, Díez-Valle R, Tejada S, Gállego Pérez-Larraya J. Management of diffuse glioma. Presse Med 2018; 47:e199-e212. [DOI: 10.1016/j.lpm.2018.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2017] [Revised: 02/13/2018] [Accepted: 04/04/2018] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
|
114
|
Repka MC, Lei S, Campbell L, Suy S, Voyadzis JM, Kalhorn C, McGrail K, Jean W, Subramaniam DS, Lischalk JW, Collins SP, Collins BT. Long-Term Outcomes Following Conventionally Fractionated Stereotactic Boost for High-Grade Gliomas in Close Proximity to Critical Organs at Risk. Front Oncol 2018; 8:373. [PMID: 30254985 PMCID: PMC6141832 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2018] [Accepted: 08/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose/Objective: High-grade glioma is the most common primary malignant tumor of the CNS, with death often resulting from uncontrollable intracranial disease. Radiation dose may be limited by the tolerance of critical structures, such as the brainstem and optic apparatus. In this report, long-term outcomes in patients treated with conventionally fractionated stereotactic boost for tumors in close proximity to critical structures are presented. Materials/Methods: Patients eligible for inclusion in this single institution retrospective review had a pathologically confirmed high-grade glioma status post-surgical resection. Inclusion criteria required tumor location within one centimeter of a critical structure, including the optic chiasm, optic nerve, and brainstem. Radiation therapy consisted of external beam radiation followed by a conventionally fractionated stereotactic boost. Oncologic outcomes and toxicity were assessed. Results: Thirty patients eligible for study inclusion underwent resection of a high-grade glioma. The median initial adjuvant EBRT dose was 50 Gy with a median conventionally fractionated stereotactic boost of 10 Gy. All stereotactic treatments were given in 2 Gy daily fractions. Median follow-up time for the entire cohort was 38 months with a median overall survival of 45 months and 5-year overall survival of 32.5%. The median freedom from local progression was 45 months, and the 5-year freedom from local progression was 29.7%. Two cases of radiation retinopathy were identified following treatment. No patient experienced toxicity attributable to the optic chiasm, optic nerve, or brainstem and no grade 3+ radionecrosis was observed. Conclusions: Oncologic and toxicity outcomes in high-grade glioma patients with tumors in unfavorable locations treated with conventionally fractionated stereotactic boost are comparable to those reported in the literature. This treatment strategy is appropriate for those patients with resected high-grade glioma in close proximity to critical structures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael C Repka
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Siyuan Lei
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Lloyd Campbell
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Simeng Suy
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Jean-Marc Voyadzis
- Department of Neurosurgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Christopher Kalhorn
- Department of Neurosurgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Kevin McGrail
- Department of Neurosurgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Walter Jean
- Department of Neurological Surgery, George Washington University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Deepa S Subramaniam
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Jonathan W Lischalk
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Sean P Collins
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Brian T Collins
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
115
|
Bas Ayata H, Ceylan C, Kılıç A, Güden M, Engin K. Comparison of Multiple Treatment Planning Techniques for High-Grade Glioma Tumors Near to Critical Organs. Oncol Res Treat 2018; 41:514-519. [PMID: 30086547 DOI: 10.1159/000487642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2017] [Accepted: 02/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
AIM The purpose of this study was to compare 6 treatment planning methods (5-beam coplanar intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), 7-beam coplanar IMRT, 7-beam noncoplanar IMRT, 2 full arc coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), 2 half partial arc coplanar VMAT, and 2 half partial arc noncoplanar VMAT) for high-grade gliomas with planning target volumes (PTVs) overlapping the optic pathway and/or brainstem. PATIENTS AND METHODS 27 previously-treated patients with high-grade gliomas were replanned for treatment with IMRT5, IMRT7, IMRT7-non, VMAT2f, VMAT2h, and VMAT2h-non. In order to perform a comparative study of the treatment outcomes, 3 tumor localizations (right-sided, left-sided, and central tumors) were selected. Patients were administered a PTV dose of 60 Gy in 30 fractions with a maximum permitted dose of 110%. RESULTS Comparison of the 3 IMRT plans and 3 VMAT plans was performed for all 27 patients. The median conformity index was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in all IMRT plans compared to all VMAT plans in the case of right sided tumors. Significant differences were also observed between coplanar and noncoplanar plans in IMRT and VMAT in right-sided tumors (p < 0.05). Differences in brainstem mean doses were only found to be significant between coplanar and noncoplanar plans in centrally-located tumors. In right- and left-sided tumors, the VMAT2f plans demonstrated higher values than all IMRT plans in their mean values for radiation doses to the ipsilateral optic nerves, contralateral optic nerves, ipsilateral lens, ipsilateral eye, contralateral lens, contralateral eye, and contralateral optic nerves, as well in the maximums for the optic chiasm and contralateral optic nerves. Significantly faster treatment times were achieved with all VMAT plans compared to IMRT plans. CONCLUSION IMRT techniques provided better target coverage than VMAT plans. However, VMAT techniques reduced treatment delivery time more than IMRT techniques. Technique selection for tumors located in 3 different localizations should be individualized in accordance with patients' specific parameters.
Collapse
|
116
|
Wick W, Osswald M, Wick A, Winkler F. Treatment of glioblastoma in adults. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2018; 11:1756286418790452. [PMID: 30083233 PMCID: PMC6071154 DOI: 10.1177/1756286418790452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2018] [Accepted: 05/24/2018] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
The diagnosis of a glioblastoma is mainly made on the basis of their microscopic appearance with the additional determination of epigenetic as well as mutational analyses as deemed appropriate and taken into account in different centers. How far the recent discovery of tumor networks will stimulate novel treatments is a subject of intensive research. A tissue diagnosis is the mainstay. Regardless of age, patients should undergo a maximal safe resection. Magnetic resonance imaging is the surrogate parameter of choice for follow up. Patients should receive chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide with the radiation schedule adapted to performance status, age and tumor location. The use of temozolomide may be reconsidered according to methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status; patients with an active promoter may be subjected to a trial or further molecular work-up in order to potentially replace temozolomide; patients with an inactive (hypermethylated) MGMT promoter may be counseled for the co-treatment with the methylating and alkylating compound lomustine in addition to temozolomide. Tumor-treating fields are an additive option independent of the MGMT status. Determination of recurrence is still challenging. Patients with clinical or radiographic confirmed progression should be counseled for a second surgical intervention, that is, to reach another macroscopic removal of the tumor bulk or to obtain tissue for an updated molecular analysis. Immune therapeutic approaches may be dependent on tumor types and molecular signatures. In newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma, bevacizumab prolongs progression-free survival without affecting overall survival in an unselected population of glioblastoma patients. Whether or not selection can be made on the basis of molecular or imaging parameters remains to be determined. Some patients may benefit from a second radiotherapy. In our view, the near future will provide support for translating the amazing progress in understanding the molecular background of glioblastoma in to more complex, but promising therapy concepts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang Wick
- Neurology Clinic & National Center for Tumor
Disease, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, D-69120
Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias Osswald
- Neurology Clinic, University of Heidelberg,
Clinical Cooperation Unit (CCU) Neurooncology, German Cancer Consortium
(DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Antje Wick
- Neurology Clinic, University of Heidelberg,
German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ),
Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Frank Winkler
- Neurology Clinic, University of Heidelberg,
Clinical Cooperation Unit (CCU) Neurooncology, German Cancer Consortium
(DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
117
|
DeAngelis LM. The trials of neuro-oncology clinical research. Neuro Oncol 2018; 20:1007-1008. [PMID: 29878174 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noy076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa M DeAngelis
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
118
|
Hachem LD, Mansouri A, Juraschka K, Taslimi S, Pirouzmand F, Zadeh G. Citation classics in neuro-oncology: assessment of historical trends and scientific progress. Neuro Oncol 2018; 19:1158-1172. [PMID: 28531344 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nox053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Citation classics represent the highest cited works in a field and are often regarded as the most influential literature. Analyzing thematic trends in citation classics across eras enables recognition of important historical advances within a field. We present the first analysis of the citation classics in neuro-oncology. Methods The Web of Science database was searched using terms relevant to "neuro-oncology." Articles with >400 citations were identified and the top 100 cited articles were evaluated. Results The top 100 neuro-oncology citation classics consisted of 43 clinical studies (17 retrospective, 10 prospective, 16 randomized trials), 43 laboratory investigations, 8 reviews/meta-analyses, and 6 guidelines/consensus statements. Articles were classified into 4 themes: 13 pertained to tumor classification, 37 to tumor pathogenesis/clinical presentation, 6 to imaging, 44 to therapy (15 chemotherapy, 10 radiotherapy, 5 surgery, 14 new agents). Gliomas were the most common tumor type examined, with 70 articles. There was a significant increase in the number of citation classics in the late 1990s, which was paralleled by an increase in studies examining tumor pathogenesis, chemotherapy, and new agents along with laboratory and randomized studies. Conclusions The majority of citation classics in neuro-oncology are related to gliomas and pertain to tumor pathogenesis and treatment. The rise in citation classics in recent years investigating tumor biology, new treatment agents, and chemotherapeutics may reflect increasing scientific interest in nonsurgical treatments for CNS tumors and the need for fundamental investigations into disease processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laureen D Hachem
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; MacFeeters Adult Brain Tumor Research Program, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alireza Mansouri
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; MacFeeters Adult Brain Tumor Research Program, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kyle Juraschka
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; MacFeeters Adult Brain Tumor Research Program, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shervin Taslimi
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; MacFeeters Adult Brain Tumor Research Program, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Farhad Pirouzmand
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; MacFeeters Adult Brain Tumor Research Program, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gelareh Zadeh
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; MacFeeters Adult Brain Tumor Research Program, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
119
|
Conti S, Vexler A, Edry-Botzer L, Kalich-Philosoph L, Corn BW, Shtraus N, Meir Y, Hagoel L, Shtabsky A, Marmor S, Earon G, Lev-Ari S. Combined acetyl-11-keto-β-boswellic acid and radiation treatment inhibited glioblastoma tumor cells. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0198627. [PMID: 29969452 PMCID: PMC6029770 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2018] [Accepted: 05/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common and most aggressive subtype of malignant gliomas. The current standard of care for newly diagnosed GBM patients involves maximal surgical debulking, followed by radiation therapy and temozolomide chemotherapy. Despite the advances in GBM therapy, its outcome remains poor with a median survival of less than two years. This poor outcome is partly due to the ability of GBM tumors to acquire adaptive resistance to therapy and in particular to radiation. One of the mechanisms contributing to GBM tumor progression and resistance is an aberrant activation of NF-ĸB, a family of inducible transcription factors that play a pivotal role in regulation of many immune, inflammatory and carcinogenic responses. Acetyl-11-keto-β-boswellic acid (AKBA) is a pentacyclic terpenoid extracted from the gum Ayurvedic therapeutic plant Boswellia serrata. AKBA is anti-inflammatory agent that exhibits potent cytotoxic activities against various types of tumors including GBM. One of the mechanisms underlying AKBA anti-tumor activity is its ability to modulate the NF-ĸB signaling pathway. The present study investigated in vitro and in vivo the effect of combining AKBA with ionizing radiation in the treatment of GBM and assessed AKBA anti-tumor activity and radio-enhancing potential. The effect of AKBA and/or radiation on the survival of cultured glioblastoma cancer cells was evaluated by XTT assay. The mode of interaction of treatments tested was calculated using CalcuSyn software. Inducing of apoptosis following AKBA treatment was evaluated using flow cytometry. The effect of combined treatment on the expression of PARP protein was analysed by Western blot assay. Ectopic (subcutaneous) GBM model in nude mice was used for the evaluation of the effect of combined treatment on tumor growth. Immunohistochemical analysis of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor sections was used to assess treatment-related changes in Ki-67, CD31, p53, Bcl-2 and NF-ĸB-inhibitor IĸB-α. AKBA treatment was found to inhibit the survival of all four tested cell lines in a dose dependent manner. The combined treatment resulted in a more significant inhibitory effect compared to the effect of treatment with radiation alone. A synergistic effect was detected in some of the tested cell lines. Flow cytometric analysis with Annexin V-FITC/PI double staining of AKBA treated cells indicated induction of apoptosis. AKBA apoptotic activity was also confirmed by PARP cleavage detected by Western blot analysis. The combined treatment suppressed tumor growth in vivo compared to no treatment and each treatment alone. Immunohistochemical analysis showed anti-angiogenic and anti-proliferative activity of AKBA in vivo. It also demonstrated a decrease in p53 nuclear staining and in Bcl-2 staining and an increase in IĸB-α staining following AKBA treatment both alone and in combination with radiotherapy. In this study, we demonstrated that AKBA exerts potent anti-proliferative and apoptotic activity, and significantly inhibits both the survival of glioblastoma cells in vitro and the growth of tumors generated by these cells. Combination of AKBA with radiotherapy was found to inhibit factors which involved in cell death regulation, tumor progression and radioresistence, therefore it may serve as a novel approach for GBM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sefora Conti
- Laboratory of Herbal Medicine and Cancer Research, Institute of Oncology, Tel-Aviv Medical Center affiliated to the Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Akiva Vexler
- Laboratory of Herbal Medicine and Cancer Research, Institute of Oncology, Tel-Aviv Medical Center affiliated to the Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Liat Edry-Botzer
- Laboratory of Herbal Medicine and Cancer Research, Institute of Oncology, Tel-Aviv Medical Center affiliated to the Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Lital Kalich-Philosoph
- Laboratory of Herbal Medicine and Cancer Research, Institute of Oncology, Tel-Aviv Medical Center affiliated to the Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Benjamin W. Corn
- Institute of Radiotherapy, Tel-Aviv Medical Center affiliated to the Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Natan Shtraus
- Institute of Radiotherapy, Tel-Aviv Medical Center affiliated to the Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Yaron Meir
- Institute of Radiotherapy, Tel-Aviv Medical Center affiliated to the Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Lior Hagoel
- Laboratory of Herbal Medicine and Cancer Research, Institute of Oncology, Tel-Aviv Medical Center affiliated to the Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Alexander Shtabsky
- Pathology Department, Tel-Aviv Medical Center affiliated to the Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Sylvia Marmor
- Pathology Department, Tel-Aviv Medical Center affiliated to the Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Gideon Earon
- Laboratory of Herbal Medicine and Cancer Research, Institute of Oncology, Tel-Aviv Medical Center affiliated to the Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Shahar Lev-Ari
- Laboratory of Herbal Medicine and Cancer Research, Institute of Oncology, Tel-Aviv Medical Center affiliated to the Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
120
|
Gao L, Xu W, Li T, Zheng J, Chen G. Accuracy of 11C-choline positron emission tomography in differentiating glioma recurrence from radiation necrosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97:e11556. [PMID: 30024551 PMCID: PMC6086532 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000011556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Distinguishing glioma recurrence from the necrosis after radiation therapy and/or chemotherapy is a crucial clinical issue, for the different diagnosis will lead to divergent treatments. The accurate judgment is barely achieved by conventional imaging methods. We therefore assume it is of need to exert a meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 11C-choline positron emission tomography (PET), to achieve this goal. MATERIAL AND METHODS We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Chinese Biomedical databases comprehensively to select eligible studies and assessed the quality of each article included (up to May 31, 2018). Fixed-effects models were used. Summary diagnostic accuracy of 11C-choline PET was obtained from pooled analysis. RESULTS Five articles comprising 6 studies with total 118 patients (134 scans) were enrolled for the meta-analysis. There was no heterogeneity or publication bias among the included studies. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78, 0.93) and 0.820 (95% CI: 0.69, 0.91), respectively. The pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 35.50 (95% CI: 11.70, 107.75). The area under the curve was 0.9170 (95% CI: 0.8504, 0.9836), with Q* index equaling to 0.8499. The diagnostic accuracy of each subgroup showed no statistical differences with that of the overall group. CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis indicated 11C-choline has high diagnostic accuracy for the identification of tumor relapse from radiation induced necrosis in gliomas.
Collapse
|
121
|
Thomas AA, Abrey LE, Terziev R, Raizer J, Martinez NL, Forsyth P, Paleologos N, Matasar M, Sauter CS, Moskowitz C, Nimer SD, DeAngelis LM, Kaley T, Grimm S, Louis DN, Cairncross JG, Panageas KS, Briggs S, Faivre G, Mohile NA, Mehta J, Jonsson P, Chakravarty D, Gao J, Schultz N, Brennan CW, Huse JT, Omuro A. Multicenter phase II study of temozolomide and myeloablative chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplant for newly diagnosed anaplastic oligodendroglioma. Neuro Oncol 2018; 19:1380-1390. [PMID: 28472509 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nox086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Anaplastic oligodendroglioma (AO) and anaplastic oligoastrocytoma (AOA) are chemotherapy-sensitive tumors with prolonged survival after radiochemotherapy. We report a prospective trial using induction temozolomide (TMZ) followed by myeloablative high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with autologous stem-cell transplant (ASCT) as a potential strategy to defer radiotherapy. Methods Patients with AO/AOA received 6 cycles of TMZ (200 mg/m2 × 5/28 day). Responding patients were eligible for HDC (thiotepa 250 mg/m2/day × 3 days, then busulfan 3.2 mg/kg/day × 3 days), followed by ASCT. Genomic characterization was performed using next-generation sequencing. Results Forty-one patients were enrolled; 85% had 1p/19q codeleted tumors. After induction, 26 patients were eligible for HDC-ASCT and 21 agreed to proceed. There were no unexpected adverse events or toxic deaths. After median follow-up of 66 months, 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) for transplanted patients was 86%, 5-year PFS 60%, and no patient has died. Among all 1p/19q codeleted patients (N = 33), 5-year PFS was 50% and 5-year overall survival (OS) 93%, with median time to radiotherapy not reached. Next-generation sequencing disclosed typical oligodendroglioma-related mutations, including IDH1, TERT, CIC, and FUBP1 mutations in 1p/19q codeleted patients, and glioblastoma-like signatures in 1p/19q intact patients. Aside from IDH1, potentially oncogenic/actionable mutations were variable, depicting wide molecular heterogeneity within oligodendroglial tumors. Conclusions TMZ followed by HDC-ASCT can be safely administered to patients with newly diagnosed 1p/19q codeleted AO. This strategy was associated with promising PFS and OS, suggesting that a chemotherapy-based approach may delay the need for radiotherapy and radiation-related toxicities. Raw data for further genomic and meta-analyses are publicly available at http://cbioportal.org/study?id=odg_msk_2017, accessed 6 January 2017. Clinicaltrials.gov registry NCT00588523.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alissa A Thomas
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York,USA; Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA; NorthShore University, Evanston, Illinois,USA; University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Lauren E Abrey
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York,USA; Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA; NorthShore University, Evanston, Illinois,USA; University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Robert Terziev
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York,USA; Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA; NorthShore University, Evanston, Illinois,USA; University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jeffrey Raizer
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York,USA; Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA; NorthShore University, Evanston, Illinois,USA; University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Nina L Martinez
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York,USA; Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA; NorthShore University, Evanston, Illinois,USA; University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Peter Forsyth
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York,USA; Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA; NorthShore University, Evanston, Illinois,USA; University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Nina Paleologos
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York,USA; Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA; NorthShore University, Evanston, Illinois,USA; University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Matthew Matasar
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York,USA; Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA; NorthShore University, Evanston, Illinois,USA; University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Craig S Sauter
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York,USA; Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA; NorthShore University, Evanston, Illinois,USA; University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Craig Moskowitz
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York,USA; Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA; NorthShore University, Evanston, Illinois,USA; University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Stephen D Nimer
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York,USA; Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA; NorthShore University, Evanston, Illinois,USA; University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Lisa M DeAngelis
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York,USA; Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA; NorthShore University, Evanston, Illinois,USA; University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Thomas Kaley
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York,USA; Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA; NorthShore University, Evanston, Illinois,USA; University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sean Grimm
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York,USA; Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA; NorthShore University, Evanston, Illinois,USA; University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - David N Louis
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York,USA; Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA; NorthShore University, Evanston, Illinois,USA; University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - J Gregory Cairncross
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York,USA; Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA; NorthShore University, Evanston, Illinois,USA; University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Katherine S Panageas
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York,USA; Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA; NorthShore University, Evanston, Illinois,USA; University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Samuel Briggs
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York,USA; Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA; NorthShore University, Evanston, Illinois,USA; University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Geraldine Faivre
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York,USA; Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA; NorthShore University, Evanston, Illinois,USA; University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Nimish A Mohile
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York,USA; Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA; NorthShore University, Evanston, Illinois,USA; University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jayesh Mehta
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York,USA; Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA; NorthShore University, Evanston, Illinois,USA; University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Philip Jonsson
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York,USA; Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA; NorthShore University, Evanston, Illinois,USA; University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Debyani Chakravarty
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York,USA; Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA; NorthShore University, Evanston, Illinois,USA; University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jianjiong Gao
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York,USA; Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA; NorthShore University, Evanston, Illinois,USA; University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Nikolaus Schultz
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York,USA; Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA; NorthShore University, Evanston, Illinois,USA; University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Cameron W Brennan
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York,USA; Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA; NorthShore University, Evanston, Illinois,USA; University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jason T Huse
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York,USA; Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA; NorthShore University, Evanston, Illinois,USA; University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Antonio Omuro
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York,USA; Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA; NorthShore University, Evanston, Illinois,USA; University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
122
|
Shah JL, Li G, Shaffer JL, Azoulay MI, Gibbs IC, Nagpal S, Soltys SG. Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Glioblastoma. Neurosurgery 2018; 82:24-34. [PMID: 28605463 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyx115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2016] [Accepted: 05/23/2017] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma is the most common primary brain tumor in adults. Standard therapy depends on patient age and performance status but principally involves surgical resection followed by a 6-wk course of radiation therapy given concurrently with temozolomide chemotherapy. Despite such treatment, prognosis remains poor, with a median survival of 16 mo. Challenges in achieving local control, maintaining quality of life, and limiting toxicity plague treatment strategies for this disease. Radiotherapy dose intensification through hypofractionation and stereotactic radiosurgery is a promising strategy that has been explored to meet these challenges. We review the use of hypofractionated radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L Shah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University Cancer Center, Stanford, California
| | - Gordon Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University Cancer Center, Stanford, California
| | - Jenny L Shaffer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University Cancer Center, Stanford, California
| | - Melissa I Azoulay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University Cancer Center, Stanford, California
| | - Iris C Gibbs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University Cancer Center, Stanford, California
| | - Seema Nagpal
- Department of Neurology, Division of Neuro-Oncology, Stanford University Cancer Center, Stanford, California
| | - Scott G Soltys
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University Cancer Center, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
123
|
Using Smaller-Than-Standard Radiation Treatment Margins Does Not Change Survival Outcomes in Patients with High-Grade Gliomas. Pract Radiat Oncol 2018; 9:16-23. [PMID: 30195927 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2018.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2017] [Revised: 04/10/2018] [Accepted: 06/04/2018] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The number of studies that evaluate treatment margins for high grade gliomas (HGG) are limited. We hypothesize that patients with HGG who are treated with a gross tumor volume (GTV) to planning tumor volume (PTV) expansion of ≤1 cm will have progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates similar to those treated in accordance with standard protocols by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group or European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Furthermore, the PFS and OS of subgroups within the study population will have equivalent survival outcomes with GTV1-to-PTV1 margins of 1.0 cm and 0.4 cm. METHODS AND MATERIALS Treatment plans and outcomes for patients with pathologically confirmed HGG were analyzed (n = 267). Survival (PFS and OS) was calculated from the time of the first radiation treatment and a χ2 test or Fisher exact test was used to calculate the associations between margin size and patient characteristics. Survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier and compared using the log-rank test. All analyses were performed on the univariate level. RESULTS The median PFS and OS times were 10.6 and 19.1 months, respectively. By disease, the median PFS and OS times were 8.6 and 16.1 months for glioblastoma and 26.7 and 52.5 months for anaplastic glioma. The median follow-up time was 18.3 months. The treatment margin had no effect on outcome and the 1.0 cm GTV1-PTV1 margin subgroup (n = 212) showed median PFS and OS times of 10.7 and 19.1 months, respectively, and the 0.4 cm margin subgroup (n = 55) 10.2 and 19.3 months, respectively. In comparison with the standard treatment with 2 cm to 3 cm margins, there was not a significant difference in outcomes. CONCLUSIONS There is no apparent difference in survival when utilizing smaller versus larger margins as defined by the guidelines of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Although there remains no class I evidence that outcomes after treatment with smaller margins are identical to those after treatment with larger margins, this large series with long-term follow up suggests that a reduction of the margins is safe and further investigation is warranted.
Collapse
|
124
|
Abrunhosa-Branquinho AN, Bar-Deroma R, Collette S, Clementel E, Liu Y, Hurkmans CW, Feuvret L, Van Beek K, van den Bent M, Baumert BG, Weber DC. Radiotherapy quality assurance for the RTOG 0834/EORTC 26053-22054/NCIC CTG CEC.1/CATNON intergroup trial "concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide chemotherapy in newly diagnosed non-1p/19q deleted anaplastic glioma": Individual case review analysis. Radiother Oncol 2018; 127:292-298. [PMID: 29606522 PMCID: PMC6258055 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2017] [Revised: 03/10/2018] [Accepted: 03/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The EORTC phase III 26053-22054/ RTOG 0834/NCIC CTG CEC.1/CATNON intergroup trial was designed to evaluate the impact on concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide chemotherapy in newly diagnosed non-1p/19q deleted anaplastic gliomas. The primary endpoint was overall survival. We report the results of retrospective individual case reviews (ICRs) for the first patient randomized per institution to detect the compliance with the study protocol. MATERIAL AND METHODS Sixty-nine institutions were required to submit the radiotherapy plan of their first randomized patient. Full digital datasets uploaded to the EORTC server were assessed by three independent and blinded reviewers through the EORTC radiotherapy quality assurance platform. RESULTS Sixty-two (90%) of sixty-nine ICRs were received and assessable. Of the 62 cases, 22 were evaluated as per protocol (35.5%), 11 as acceptable variation (17.7%) and 29 were classified as unacceptable variations (46.8%). Most common unacceptable variations were related to the PTV dose (n = 19, 31%) and delineation (n = 17, 27%) processes. CONCLUSIONS The ICR analysis showed a significant number of unacceptable variations with potential impact on tumor control and/or toxicity profile. Prospective ICRs are encouraged for future studies to prevent and correct protocol violations before start of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- André N Abrunhosa-Branquinho
- EORTC HQ, Brussels, Belgium; Radiotherapy Department, Hospital de Santa Maria - Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, EPE, Portugal.
| | | | | | | | | | - Coen W Hurkmans
- ROG RTQA Strategic Committee, EORTC, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Loïc Feuvret
- Service de Radiothérapie, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Karen Van Beek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Brigitta G Baumert
- Maastricht University Medical Centre and GROW (School for Oncology and Developmental Biology), Maastricht, Netherlands; Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Clinic, Osnabrück & Dept. of Radiation Oncology, University of Müenster, Germany
| | - Damien C Weber
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, Villigen, Switzerland; University Hospital of Zürich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
125
|
Botturi M, Fariselli L. Clinical Results of Unconventional Fractionation Radiotherapy in Central Nervous System Tumors. TUMORI JOURNAL 2018; 84:176-87. [PMID: 9620243 DOI: 10.1177/030089169808400215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Malignant brain tumors (primary and metastatic) are apparently resistant to most therapeutic efforts. Several randomized trials have provided evidence supporting the efficacy of radiation therapy. Attempts at improving the results of external beam radiotherapy include altered fractionation, radiation sensitizers and concomitant chemotherapy. In low-grade gliomas, all clinical studies with radiotherapy have employed conventional dose fractionation regimens. In high-grade gliomas, hypofractionation schedules represent effective palliative regimens in poor prognosis subsets of patients; short-term survival in these patients has not allowed to evaluate late toxicity. In tumors arising within the central nervous system, hyperfractionated irradiation exploits the differences in repair capacity between tumour and late responding normal tissues. It may allow for higher total dose and may result in increased tumor cell kill. Accelerated radiotherapy may reduce the repopulation of tumor cells between fractions. It may potentially improve tumor control for a given dose level, provided that there is no increase in late normal tissue injury. In supratentorial malignant gliomas, superiority of accelerated hyperfractionated over conventionally fractionated schedules was observed in a randomized trial; however, the gain in survival was less than 6 months. At present no other randomized trial supports the preferential choice for altered fractionation irradiation. Also in pediatric brainstem tumors there are no data to confirm the routine use of hyperfractionated irradiation, and significant late sequelae have been reported in the few long-term survivors. Shorter treatment courses with accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy may represent a useful alternative to conventional irradiation for the palliation of brain metastases. Different considerations have been proposed to explain this gap between theory and clinical data. Patients included in dose/effect studies are not stratified by prognostic factors and other treatment-related parameters. This observation precludes any definite conclusion about the relative role of conventional and of altered fractionation. New approaches are currently in progress. More prolonged radiation treatments, up to higher total doses, could delay time to tumor progression and improve survival in good prognosis subsets of patients; altered fractionation may be an effective therapeutic tool to achieve this goal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Botturi
- Radiotherapy Department, Ospedale Niguarda Ca' Granda, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
126
|
Puzzilli F, Ruggeri A, Mastronardi L, Di Stefano D, Lunardi P. Long-Term Survival in Cerebral Glioblastoma. Case Report and Critical Review of the Literature. TUMORI JOURNAL 2018; 84:69-74. [PMID: 9619719 DOI: 10.1177/030089169808400115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Glioblastoma multiforme is the most malignant tumor of the glial series. The average survival of patients with this tumor ranges from 6 to 12 months. The case of a patient who survived for more than 11 years after diagnosis of a temporal-occipital glioblastoma which was treated with surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy is described. The authors deduce that among patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GM), those with a long disease-free interval after initial diagnosis who undergo multimodal therapy, including aggressive tumor removal, are the most likely long-term survivors (LS). Other factors which appeared to be related to longer survival were younger age and high Karnofsky scores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Puzzilli
- Department of Neurological Sciences, University of Rome La Sapienza, Italy
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
127
|
|
128
|
Huang B, Dolecek TA, Chen Q, Garcia CR, Pittman T, Villano JL. Characteristics and survival outcomes associated with the lack of radiation in the treatment of glioblastoma. Med Oncol 2018; 35:74. [PMID: 29667068 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-018-1134-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2018] [Accepted: 04/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Radiation increases survival in glioblastoma (GBM); however, 30% do not receive this treatment. We sought to identify characteristics associated with not receiving radiation and the impact on outcomes. We analyzed the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program (SEER) 18 registries 2000-2013 research database on 30,479 GBM cases that were aged 20 years and older. In total, 21,179 received radiation as first course of therapy, while 8218 did not with 5178 (63%) being 65 years and older. Early decisions on surgery often predicted radiation therapy with 61% having only a biopsy or no surgery at diagnosis. Radiation use as upfront therapy has slowly increased over time at a rate of 0.4% per year; still 25% did not receive radiation in 2013. Cases treated with radiation were more likely to be younger, underwent surgery, lived in a metropolitan area, had higher socioeconomic status, and were in a couple-based relationship. An increased survival in GBM was associated with the use of upfront radiation along with younger age, being of race other than white, undergoing surgery, and a more recent diagnosis. Not receiving radiation therapy adversely affects survival. A trend toward an increased use of radiation was observed although many young adults still do not receive this treatment. Decreased usage of radiation in the elderly and in biopsy-only surgeries was anticipated, but race, gender, and poverty were also statistically significant. Clinicians should be aware of this underutilization, and an increased usage of radiation should improve outcomes for glioblastoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bin Huang
- Division of Cancer Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, 2365 Harrodsburg Road Suite A230, Lexington, KY, 40504, USA.,Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, 800 Rose St., Lexington, KY, 40536-0093, USA
| | - Therese A Dolecek
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Institute for Health Research and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, 809 South Marshfield Avenue, MB 502, M/C 551, Chicago, IL, 60612-7205, USA
| | - Quan Chen
- Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, 800 Rose St., Lexington, KY, 40536-0093, USA
| | - Catherine R Garcia
- Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, 800 Rose St., Lexington, KY, 40536-0093, USA
| | - Thomas Pittman
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Kentucky, MS105 Medical Science Building, Lexington, KY, 40536-0298, USA.,Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, 800 Rose St., Lexington, KY, 40536-0093, USA
| | - John L Villano
- Department of Neurology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA. .,Department of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA. .,Department of Neurosurgery, University of Kentucky, MS105 Medical Science Building, Lexington, KY, 40536-0298, USA. .,Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, 800 Rose St., Lexington, KY, 40536-0093, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
129
|
Corsa P, Parisi S, Raguso A, Troiano M, Perrone A, Cossa S, Munafò T, Piombino M, Spagnoletti G, Borgia F. Temozolomide and Radiotherapy as First-Line Treatment of High-Grade Gliomas. TUMORI JOURNAL 2018; 92:299-305. [PMID: 17036520 DOI: 10.1177/030089160609200407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Aims and background Temozolomide, a novel alkylating agent, has shown promising results in the treatment of patients with high-grade gliomas, when used as single agent as well as in combination with radiation therapy. Materials and methods In this report we retrospectively reviewed the clinical outcome of 128 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of high-grade gliomas referred to our Institutions from April 1994 to November 2001. The first 64 patients were treated with radiotherapy alone and the other 64 with a combination of radiotherapy and temozolomide (31 with radiotherapy and adjuvant temozolomide and 33 with radiotherapy and concomitant temozolomide followed by adjuvant temozolomide). Results Grade 3 hematological toxicity was scored in 9% of 64 patients treated with radiotherapy and temozolomide. No grade 4 hematological toxicity was reported, and the other acute side effects observed were mild or easily controlled with medications. Age, histology and administration of temozolomide were statistically significant prognostic factors associated with better 2-year overall survival. In contrast, we did not observe a significant difference in overall survival between adjuvant and concomitant/adjuvant temozolomide administration. Conclusions We report the favorable results of a schedule combining radiotherapy and temozolomide in the treatment of patients with high-grade gliomas. The literature data and above all the findings of the phase III EORTC-NCIC 26981 trial suggest that actually the schedule can be used routinely in clinical practice. Further clinical studies, using temozolomide in combination with other agents, are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pietro Corsa
- Department of Radiation Therapy of IRCCS, Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, FG, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
130
|
Reni M, Cozzarini C, Panucci MG, Ceresoli GL, Ferreri AJ, Fiorino C, Truci G, Falini A, Tartara F, Terreni MR, Verusio C, Villa E. Irradiation Fields and Doses in Glioblastoma Multiforme: Are Current Standards Adequate? TUMORI JOURNAL 2018; 87:85-90. [PMID: 11401212 DOI: 10.1177/030089160108700204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Aims and background The optimum conventional radiotherapy in glioblastoma multiforme patients has not been clearly defined by prospective trials. To better characterize a standard radiotherapy in glioblastoma multiforme, the impact on survival of different fields and doses was analyzed in a retrospective single center series. Methods One hundred and forty-seven patients with glioblastoma multiforme, submitted to biopsy only (n = 15), subtotal (n = 48) or total resection (n = 82) and who completed the planned postsurgical radiotherapy, were considered. The median age was 57 years, the male/female ratio 1.5/1, and the performance status ≥70 in 76%. Whole brain irradiation, followed by a boost to partial brain, was used in 75 cases with a whole brain dose of 44–50 Gy (median, 46) and a partial brain dose of 56–70 Gy (median, 60 Gy). Partial brain irradiation alone was used in 72 patients with a dose of 56–70 Gy (median, 61 Gy). Ninety-eight patients received 56–60 Gy (median, 59 Gy) to partial brain whereas 49 patients received 61–70 Gy (median, 63 Gy). Results There was an almost significantly longer survival in patients irradiated to the partial brain alone with respect to those also receiving whole brain radiotherapy (P = 0.056). Doses <60 Gy significantly prolonged survival (P = 0.006). Multivariate analysis confirmed that the impact on survival of radiation dose was independent of age, performance status, extent of surgery, field of irradiation and the use of chemotherapy. The extent of irradiation field was not independently related to improved survival. Conclusions Our retrospective findings suggest that we reflect on the adequacy of the current standard irradiation parameters. Well-designed prospective trials are necessary to standardize the radiotherapy control group in patients with glioblastoma multiforme to be compared in phase III trials with innovative therapeutic approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Reni
- Department of Radiochemotherapy, San Raffaele Hospital Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
131
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and lethal primary brain tumor in adults, with a median survival of less than 2 years despite the standard of care treatment of 6 weeks of chemoradiotherapy. We review the data investigating hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) in the treatment of newly diagnosed GBM. RECENT FINDINGS Investigators have explored alternative radiotherapy strategies that shorten treatment duration with the goal of similar or improved survival while minimizing toxicity. HFRT over 1-3 weeks is already a standard of care for patients with advanced age or poor performance status. For young patients with good performance status, HFRT holds the promise of radiobiologically escalating the dose and potentially improving local control while maintaining quality of life. Through the use of shorter radiotherapy fractionation regimens coupled with novel systemic agents, improved outcomes for patients with GBM may be achieved.
Collapse
|
132
|
Lecler A, Charbonneau F, Psimaras D, Metten MA, Gueguen A, Hoang Xuan K, Feuvret L, Savatovsky J. Remote brain microhaemorrhages may predict haematoma in glioma patients treated with radiation therapy. Eur Radiol 2018; 28:4324-4333. [PMID: 29651771 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5356-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2017] [Revised: 01/03/2018] [Accepted: 01/26/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the prevalence of cerebral remote microhaemorrhages (RMH) and remote haematomas (RH) using magnetic resonance susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) among patients treated for gliomas during follow-up. METHODS We conducted a retrospective single centre longitudinal study on 58 consecutive patients treated for gliomas from January 2009 through December 2010. Our institutional review board approved this study. We evaluated the presence and number of RMH and RH found outside the brain tumour on follow-up MR imaging. We performed univariate and bivariate analyses to identify predictors for RMH and RH and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis techniques. RESULTS Twenty-five (43%) and four patients (7%) developed at least one RMH or RH, respectively, during follow-up. The risk was significantly higher for patients who received radiation therapy (49% and 8% versus 0%) (p = 0.02). The risk of developing RH was significantly higher in patients with at least one RMH and a high burden of RMH. The mean age of those presenting with at least one RMH or RH was significantly lower. CONCLUSIONS RMH were common in adult survivors of gliomas who received radiation therapy and may predict the onset of RH during follow-up, mainly in younger patients. KEY POINTS • Brain RMH and RH are significantly more likely to occur after RT. • RMH occur in almost half of the patients treated with RT. • RMH and RH are significantly more frequent in younger patients. • RH occur only in patients with RMH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Augustin Lecler
- Department of Radiology, Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild, 25 rue Manin, 75019, Paris, France.
| | - Frédérique Charbonneau
- Department of Radiology, Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild, 25 rue Manin, 75019, Paris, France
| | - Dimitri Psimaras
- Department of Neurology, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Marie-Astrid Metten
- Clinical Research Unit, Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild, Paris, France
| | - Antoine Gueguen
- Department of Neurology, Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild, Paris, France
| | - Khe Hoang Xuan
- Department of Neurooncology, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Loic Feuvret
- Department of Radiotherapy, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Julien Savatovsky
- Department of Radiology, Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild, 25 rue Manin, 75019, Paris, France.,Imagerie Medicale Paris 13, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
133
|
|
134
|
Hombach-Klonisch S, Mehrpour M, Shojaei S, Harlos C, Pitz M, Hamai A, Siemianowicz K, Likus W, Wiechec E, Toyota BD, Hoshyar R, Seyfoori A, Sepehri Z, Ande SR, Khadem F, Akbari M, Gorman AM, Samali A, Klonisch T, Ghavami S. Glioblastoma and chemoresistance to alkylating agents: Involvement of apoptosis, autophagy, and unfolded protein response. Pharmacol Ther 2018; 184:13-41. [DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2017.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 206] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
135
|
Li D, Hu C, Li H. Survivin as a novel target protein for reducing the proliferation of cancer cells. Biomed Rep 2018; 8:399-406. [PMID: 29725522 DOI: 10.3892/br.2018.1077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2018] [Accepted: 02/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Survivin, also known as baculoviral inhibitor of apoptosis repeat-containing 5, is a novel member of the inhibitor of apoptosis protein family. Survivin is highly expressed in tumors and embryonic tissues and is associated with tumor cell differentiation, proliferation, invasion and metastasis; however, survivin is expressed at low levels in normal terminally differentiated adult tissues. Meanwhile, the expression level of survivin is also a negative prognostic factor for patients with cancer. These unique characteristics of survivin make it an exciting potential therapeutic target for cancer treatment. This review will discuss the biological characteristics of survivin and its potential use as a treatment target to reduce cancer cell proliferation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dongyu Li
- Department of Genetics, College of Agricultural and Life Science, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
| | - Chenghao Hu
- School of Clinical Medicine, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong 261000, P.R. China
| | - Huibin Li
- Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, People's Hospital of Linyi, Linyi, Shandong 276000, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
136
|
Kim EH, Kim YH, Song HS, Jeong YK, Lee JY, Sung J, Yoo SH, Yoon M. Biological effect of an alternating electric field on cell proliferation and synergistic antimitotic effect in combination with ionizing radiation. Oncotarget 2018; 7:62267-62279. [PMID: 27556699 PMCID: PMC5308725 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.11407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2016] [Accepted: 08/09/2016] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Alternating electric fields at an intermediate frequency (100~300 kHz), referred to as tumour-treating fields (TTF), are believed to interrupt the process of mitosis via apoptosis and to act as an inhibitor of cell proliferation. Although the existence of an antimitotic effect of TTF is widely known, the proposed apoptotic mechanism of TTF on cell function and the efficacy of TTF are controversial issues among medical experts. To resolve these controversial issues, a better understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms of TTF on cell function and the differences between the effects of TTF alone and in combination with other treatment techniques is essential. Here, we report experimental evidence of TTF-induced apoptosis and the synergistic antimitotic effect of TTF in combination with ionizing radiation (IR). For these experiments, two human Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) cells (U373 and U87) were treated either with TTF alone or with TTF followed by ionizing radiation (IR). Cell apoptosis, DNA damage, and mitotic abnormalities were quantified after the application of TTF, and their percentages were markedly increased when TTF was combined with IR. Our experimental results also suggested that TTF combined with IR synergistically suppressed both cell migration and invasion, based on the inhibition of MMP-9 and vimentin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eun Ho Kim
- Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Seoul, 01812, Korea
| | - Ye Ho Kim
- Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Seoul, 01812, Korea
| | - Hyo Sook Song
- Department of Bio-Convergence Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, 02841, Korea
| | - Youn Kyoung Jeong
- Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Seoul, 01812, Korea
| | - Ji Young Lee
- Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Seoul, 01812, Korea
| | - Jiwon Sung
- Department of Bio-Convergence Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, 02841, Korea
| | - Seung Hoon Yoo
- Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Seoul, 01812, Korea
| | - Myonggeun Yoon
- Department of Bio-Convergence Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, 02841, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
137
|
Ali AN, Zhang P, Yung WKA, Chen Y, Movsas B, Urtasun RC, Jones CU, Choi KN, Michalski JM, Fischbach AJ, Markoe AM, Schultz CJ, Penas-Prado M, Garg MK, Hartford AC, Kim HE, Won M, Curran WJ. NRG oncology RTOG 9006: a phase III randomized trial of hyperfractionated radiotherapy (RT) and BCNU versus standard RT and BCNU for malignant glioma patients. J Neurooncol 2018; 137:39-47. [PMID: 29404979 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-017-2558-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2017] [Accepted: 06/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
From 1990 to 1994, patients with newly diagnosed malignant gliomas were enrolled and randomized between hyperfractionated radiation (HFX) of 72.0 Gy in 60 fractions given twice daily and 60.0 Gy in 30 fractions given once daily. All patients received 80 mg/m2 of 1,3 bis(2 chloroethyl)-1 nitrosourea on days 1-3 q8 weeks for 1 year. Patients were stratified by age, KPS, and histology. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), with secondary endpoints including progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity. Out of the 712 patients accrued, 694 (97.5%) were analyzable cases (350 HFX, 344 standard arm). There was no significant difference between the arms on overall acute or late treatment-related toxicity. No statistically significant effect for HFX, as compared to standard therapy, was found on either OS, with a median survival time (MST) of 11.3 versus 13.1 months (p = 0.20) or PFS, with a median PFS time of 5.7 versus 6.9 months (p = 0.18). The treatment effect on OS remained insignificant based on the multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 1.16; p = 0.0682). When OS was analyzed by histology subgroup there was also no significant difference between the two arms for patients with glioblastoma multiforme (MST: 10.3 vs. 11.2 months; p = 0.34), anaplastic astrocytoma (MST: 69.8 vs. 50.0 months; p = 0.91) or anaplastic oligodendroglioma (MST: 92.1 vs. 66.5 months; p = 0.33). Though this trial provided many invaluable secondary analyses, there was no trend or indication of a benefit to HFX radiation to 72.0 Gy in any subset of malignant glioma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arif N Ali
- Emory University/Winship Cancer Institute, 1365 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
| | - Peixin Zhang
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - W K Alfred Yung
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yuhchyau Chen
- University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Benjamin Movsas
- Henry Ford Hospital accruals Fox Chase Cancer Center, Detroit, MI, USA
| | | | - Christopher U Jones
- Sutter General Hospital accruals Radiological Associates of Sacramento, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Kwang N Choi
- State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Arnold M Markoe
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | | | | | - Madhur K Garg
- Montefiore Medical Center, Moses Campus, Bronx, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Minhee Won
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Walter J Curran
- Emory University/Winship Cancer Institute, 1365 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| |
Collapse
|
138
|
Radiotherapy Upregulates Programmed Death Ligand-1 through the Pathways Downstream of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor in Glioma. EBioMedicine 2018; 28:105-113. [PMID: 29396299 PMCID: PMC5835577 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.01.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2017] [Revised: 01/22/2018] [Accepted: 01/22/2018] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In the present study, we aimed to investigate the role of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway in the up-regulation of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) caused by radiotherapy (RT). Materials and Methods Tissue microarrays (TMA) consisting of glioma cancer specimens from 64 patients were used to examine the correlation between PD-L1 and EGFR levels. Furthermore, we performed in vitro experiments to assess the role of EGFR pathway in RT-upregulated PD-L1 expression using human glioma cell lines U87 and U251. Results Our data demonstrated that the PD-L1 expression was significantly correlated with EGFR expression in glioma specimens (χ2 = 5.00, P = 0.025). The expressions of PD-L1 at the protein and mRNA levels were both significantly up-regulated by RT (P < 0.05). The expressions of phosphorylated EGFR and janus kinase 2 (JAK2) were also induced by RT (P < 0.05). Besides, inhibition of EGFR pathway could abrogate the RT-triggered PD-L1 up-regulation (P > 0.05). The combination of RT with EGFR inhibitor exhibited the same effect on antitumor immune response compared with the combination of RT with PD-L1 neutralizing antibody (Ab). Conclusions RT could up-regulate the PD-L1 expression through the pathways downstream of EGFR in glioma. The PD-L1 expression was significantly correlated with EGFR expression in glioma specimens. RT promoted the phosphorylation of EGFR to activate the JAK2 pathway, which resulted in the upregulation of PD-L1. Inhibition of EGFR pathway could abrogate the RT-triggered PD-L1 up-regulation.
Glioma is a highly lethal and common central nervous system tumor with poor 5-year survival rate. It is still urgently necessary to develop more effective therapeutic strategies for glioma. We found radiotherapy up-regulated the PD-L1 expression through the pathways downstream of EGFR in glioma. This finding provides new evidence for the combination of RT with PD-1/PD-L1 or EGFR-TKI inhibitor. That may contribute to the development of new therapeutic strategy for glioma.
Collapse
|
139
|
Nagy M, Schulz-Ertner D, Bischof M, Welzel T, Hof H, Debus J, Combs SE. Long-Term Outcome of Postoperative Irradiation in Patients with Newly Diagnosed WHO Grade III Anaplastic Gliomas. TUMORI JOURNAL 2018; 95:317-24. [DOI: 10.1177/030089160909500308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Patients with anaplastic gliomas have a more favorable overall survival than patients with glioblastomas. In most analyses, WHO grade III and IV tumors are not analyzed separately. The present analysis reports outcome after postoperative radiotherapy in patients with WHO grade III gliomas. Patients and methods Between January 1988 and January 2007, 127 patients with WHO grade III tumors were treated with radiotherapy; the histological classification was pure astrocytoma in 104 patients, oligoastrocytoma in 12 and pure oligodendroglioma in 11 patients. Median age was 48 years. After the primary diagnosis, a biopsy had been performed in 72 patients; subtotal and total resections were performed in 37 and 18 patients, respectively. In all patients radiotherapy was applied with a median dose of 60 Gy in conventional fractionation. The median follow-up time was 18 months. Results Median overall survival was 17 months. Overall survival was significantly influenced by the extent of surgery. Median overall survival was 32 months after complete resection, 36 months after subtotal resection, and 12 months after biopsy. Median overall survival was 7 months for patients with anaplastic astrocytomas, 44 months for patients with mixed tumors, and 47 months for those with pure oligodendrogliomas. Age significantly influenced overall survival. Median progression-free survival was 9 months; the extent of neurosurgical resection significantly influenced progression-free survival. Conclusion Patients with WHO grade III anaplastic astrocytomas, oligodendrogliomas and oligoastrocytomas show favorable overall survival after postoperative radiotherapy compared with glioblastoma patients and should therefore be analyzed separately. Radiochemotherapy might further improve outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Nagy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniela Schulz-Ertner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marc Bischof
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Welzel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Holger Hof
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
140
|
Erpolat OP, Akmansu M, Goksel F, Bora H, Yaman E, Büyükberber S. Outcome of Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Patients Treated by Radiotherapy plus Concomitant and Adjuvant Temozolomide: A Long-Term Analysis. TUMORI JOURNAL 2018; 95:191-7. [DOI: 10.1177/030089160909500210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Aims and background Glioblastoma is the most common primary brain tumor in adults. The standard treatment is surgery and radiotherapy. In this study, the results of radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide are reported. In addition, the efficiency of adjuvant temozolomide is evaluated. Methods and study design Forty-one patients were analyzed. All patients received radiotherapy (2 Gy daily fractionation dose, median 60 Gy total doses) and concomitant temozolomide (at a daily dose of 75 mg/m2/day, 7 days per week) after surgery. Thirty-one patients received an average of 6 cycles (range, 1–8 cycles) of adjuvant temozolomide after radiotherapy, every 28 days for 5 days at a dose of 200 mg/m2/day. The primary end point was overall survival. Results The median overall survival was 16.7 months. The overall survival significantly increased in the adjuvant temozolomide group compared to the group with no adjuvant therapy (18.9 vs 9.8 months). The difference in overall survival between adjuvant temozolomide cycles of ≤ and >3 was significant (8.7 vs 20 months). On multivariate analyses, the important prognostic factors were type of surgery and application of adjuvant temozolomide for at least 4 cycles. Grade III/IV toxicity was seen in 4% and 6.5% of patients during concomitant and adjuvant therapy, respectively. Conclusions The study confirmed the effectiveness of radiotherapy plus temozolomide in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. It was established that the application of adjuvant temozolomide for at least 4 cycles is required to obtain a benefit from adjuvant therapy. However, further studies are needed to confirm these data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ozge Petek Erpolat
- Kutahya Evliya Celebi Governement Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Kutahya, Turkey
| | - Muge Akmansu
- Gazi University Medical School, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Fatih Goksel
- Erzurum Numune Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Erzurum, Turkey
| | - Huseyin Bora
- Gazi University Medical School, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Emel Yaman
- Gazi University Medical School, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | | |
Collapse
|
141
|
Donato V, Papaleo A, Castrichino A, Banelli E, Giangaspero F, Salvati M, Delfini R. Prognostic Implication of Clinical and Pathologic Features in Patients with Glioblastoma Multiforme Treated with Concomitant Radiation plus Temozolomide. TUMORI JOURNAL 2018; 93:248-56. [PMID: 17679459 DOI: 10.1177/030089160709300304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Aims and background Glioblastoma multiforme is the most common and most malignant primary brain tumor in adults. The current standard of care for glioblastoma is surgical resection to the extent feasible, followed by adjuvant radiotherapy plus temozolomide, given concomitantly with and after radiotherapy. This report is a prospective observational study of 43 cases treated in the Department of Radiotherapy, University of Rome La Sapienza, Italy. We examine the relationship between pathologic features and objective response rate in adult patients treated with concomitant radiation plus temozolomide to identify clinical, neuroradiologic, pathologic, and molecular factors with prognostic significance. Methods Forty-three consecutive patients (24 males and 19 females), ages 15-77 years (median, 57) with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme, were included in this trial between 2002 and 2004 at our department. All patients were treated with surgery (complete resection in 81%, incomplete in 19%) followed by concurrent temozolomide (75 mg/m2/day) and radiotherapy (median tumor dose, 60 Gy), followed by temozolomide, 200 mg/m2/day for 5 consecutive days every 28 days. Neurologic evaluations were performed monthly and cranial magnetic resonance bimonthly. We analyzed age, clinical manifestations at diagnosis, seizures, Karnofsky performance score, tumor location, extent of resection, proliferation index (Ki-67 expression), p53, platelet-derived growth factor and epidermal growth factor receptor immunohistochemical expression as prognostic factors in the patients. The Kaplan-Meier statistical method and logrank test were used to assess correlation with survival. Results Fourteen patients (32%) manifested clinical and neuroradiographic evidence of tumor progression within 6 months of surgery. In contrast, 5 patients (12%) showed no disease progression for 18 months from the beginning of treatment. Median overall survival was 19 months. Multivariate analysis revealed that an age of 60 years or older (P <0.03), a postoperative performance score ≤70 (P = 0.04), the nontotal tumor resection (P = 0.03), tumor size >4 cm (P = 0.01) and proliferation index overexpression (P = 0.001) were associated with the worst prognosis. p53, PDGF and EGFR overexpression were not significant prognostic factors associated with survival. Conclusions The results suggest that analysis of prognostic markers in glioblastoma multiforme is complex. In addition to previously recognized prognostic variables such as age and Karnofsky performance score, tumor size, total resection and proliferation index overexpression were identified as predictors of survival in a series of patients with glioblastoma multiforme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vittorio Donato
- Department of Radiotherapy, University of Rome La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
142
|
Kataria T, Basu T, Gupta D, Goyal S, Nasreen S, Bisht SS, Abhishek A, Banerjee S, Narang K, Jha AN, Mohapatra I, Modi JA. Modulated Radiotherapy with Concurrent and Adjuvant Temozolomide for Anaplastic Gliomas: Indian Single-center Data. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2018; 38:495-501. [PMID: 29333019 PMCID: PMC5759071 DOI: 10.4103/ijmpo.ijmpo_200_16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate early clinical outcome for anaplastic gliomas (AG) treated in the era of modulated radiotherapy (RT) and concurrent plus adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) in an Indian setting. Materials and Methods: Fifty-three patients with AGs treated with modulated RT and concurrent (95%) and adjuvant TMZ (90%) were analyzed. About 80% of patients had Karnofsky performance status (KPS) at least 90 with 30% seizure at presentation. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging was available in 65% cases and RT dose was 60 Gy in 30 fractions. First posttreatment imaging was performed at 1 month and then at 3 and 6 months post-RT and then every 3 months. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to estimate disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), and analysis was done using SPSS version 18.0. Results: With median follow-up of 25 months, 2-year DFS and OS were 75% and 88%. There were only 5% symptomatic central nerves system and 8% symptomatic hematological toxicities. At the 1st evaluation, 30.4% had complete response (CR), at 3 months 40%, and at 6 months 43%. At 6 months, only 4% had progressive disease. Forty-six patients were evaluable till the last follow-up with and 55% had stable to CR. On univariate analysis for DFS, KPS at presentation >90 (P = 0.001) and response at 6 months (P = 0.02) were significant and for OS KPS at presentation (P = 0.004) alone. Conclusion: Modulated RT with TMZ among Grade III glioma patients resulted in minimum treatment-related toxicities and encouraging survival. Molecular prognostic markers will determine most favorable groups in future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tejinder Kataria
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Medanta The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - Trinanjan Basu
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Medanta The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - Deepak Gupta
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Medanta The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - Shikha Goyal
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Medanta The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - Shahida Nasreen
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Medanta The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - Shyam S Bisht
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Medanta The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - Ashu Abhishek
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Medanta The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - Susovan Banerjee
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Medanta The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - Kushal Narang
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Medanta The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - Ajaya N Jha
- Division of Neurosurgery, Medanta The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - Ishani Mohapatra
- Department of Pathology, Medanta The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - Jayesh A Modi
- Department of Radiology and Imaging, Medanta The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| |
Collapse
|
143
|
Mann J, Ramakrishna R, Magge R, Wernicke AG. Advances in Radiotherapy for Glioblastoma. Front Neurol 2018; 8:748. [PMID: 29379468 PMCID: PMC5775505 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2017] [Accepted: 12/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
External beam radiotherapy (RT) has long played a crucial role in the treatment of glioblastoma. Over the past several decades, significant advances in RT treatment and image-guidance technology have led to enormous improvements in the ability to optimize definitive and salvage treatments. This review highlights several of the latest developments and controversies related to RT, including the treatment of elderly patients, who continue to be a fragile and vulnerable population; potential salvage options for recurrent disease including reirradiation with chemotherapy; the latest imaging techniques allowing for more accurate and precise delineation of treatment volumes to maximize the therapeutic ratio of conformal RT; the ongoing preclinical and clinical data regarding the combination of immunotherapy with RT; and the increasing evidence of cancer stem-cell niches in the subventricular zone which may provide a potential target for local therapies. Finally, continued development on many fronts have allowed for modestly improved outcomes while at the same time limiting toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin Mann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States
| | - Rohan Ramakrishna
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States
| | - Rajiv Magge
- Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States
| | - A Gabriella Wernicke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
144
|
Zygogianni A, Protopapa M, Kougioumtzopoulou A, Simopoulou F, Nikoloudi S, Kouloulias V. From imaging to biology of glioblastoma: new clinical oncology perspectives to the problem of local recurrence. Clin Transl Oncol 2018; 20:989-1003. [PMID: 29335830 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-018-1831-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2017] [Accepted: 01/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
GBM is one of the most common and aggressive brain tumors. Surgery and adjuvant chemoradiation have succeeded in providing a survival benefit. Although most patients will eventually experience local recurrence, the means to fight recurrence are limited and prognosis remains poor. In a disease where local control remains the major challenge, few trials have addressed the efficacy of local treatments, either surgery or radiation therapy. The present article reviews recent advances in the biology, imaging and biomarker science of GBM as well as the current treatment status of GBM, providing new perspectives to the problem of local recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Zygogianni
- Radiotherapy Unit, 1st Department of Radiology, Medical School, Aretaieion University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - M Protopapa
- Radiotherapy Unit, 1st Department of Radiology, Medical School, Aretaieion University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - A Kougioumtzopoulou
- Radiotherapy Unit, 2nd Department of Radiology, Medical School, ATTIKON University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Rimini 1, 12462, Chaidari, Greece
| | - F Simopoulou
- Radiotherapy Unit, 1st Department of Radiology, Medical School, Aretaieion University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - S Nikoloudi
- Radiotherapy Unit, 1st Department of Radiology, Medical School, Aretaieion University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - V Kouloulias
- Radiotherapy Unit, 2nd Department of Radiology, Medical School, ATTIKON University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Rimini 1, 12462, Chaidari, Greece.
| |
Collapse
|
145
|
Radiation Therapy in High-Grade Gliomas. Radiat Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-52619-5_3-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022] Open
|
146
|
Liang HKT, Lai XS, Wei MF, Lu SH, Wen WF, Kuo SH, Chen CM, Tseng WYI, Lin FH. Intratumoral injection of thermogelling and sustained-release carboplatin-loaded hydrogel simplifies the administration and remains the synergistic effect with radiotherapy for mice gliomas. Biomaterials 2018; 151:38-52. [PMID: 29059540 DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2017] [Revised: 10/04/2017] [Accepted: 10/05/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Carboplatin, an antineoplastic agent, binds DNA and enhances radiotherapy (RT) effects. Carboplatin-loaded hydrogel (oxidized hyaluronic acid/adipic acid dihydrazide) enables the sustained drug release and facilitates the synergistic effect with RT. PURPOSE We investigated the effectiveness and convenience of hydrogel carboplatin combined with RT for mice glioma. MATERIALS AND METHODS Mouse glioma cells (ALTS1C1) were subcutaneously implanted in the right thigh of C57BL/6 mice on Day 0. The mice were categorized by treatments: sham, hydrogel, hydrogel carboplatin, aqueous carboplatin, RT, hydrogel carboplatin/RT, and aqueous carboplatin/RT. Hydrogel carboplatin (300 μg single dose on Day 7) or aqueous carboplatin (100 μg daily dose on Days 7, 8, and 9) was administered via intratumoral injection. RT was delivered a daily dose of 10 Gy on Days 8 and 9. RESULTS For mice administered hydrogel carboplatin/RT versus those administered aqueous carboplatin/RT, the 24-day tumor growth control rate and 104-day recurrence-free survival rate were 100% and 50% versus 100% and 66.7% (p = 0.648), respectively. However, mice receiving other treatments showed tumor progression by Day 24 and died within 40 days of tumor cell implantation. CONCLUSIONS Hydrogel carboplatin simplified intratumoral drug delivery and remained the synergistic effects with RT, which is potential for clinical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hsiang-Kuang Tony Liang
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei 10617, Taiwan; Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital: No. 7, Chung Shan South Rd., Zhongzheng Dist., Taipei 10002, Taiwan; Radiation Science and Proton Therapy Center, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, No. 7, Chung Shan South Rd., Zhongzheng Dist., Taipei 10002, Taiwan; Department of Neurology, National Taiwan University Hospital, No. 7, Chung Shan South Rd., Zhongzheng Dist., Taipei 10002, Taiwan
| | - Xue-Shi Lai
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei 10617, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Feng Wei
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital: No. 7, Chung Shan South Rd., Zhongzheng Dist., Taipei 10002, Taiwan
| | - Szu-Huai Lu
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital: No. 7, Chung Shan South Rd., Zhongzheng Dist., Taipei 10002, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Fen Wen
- Department of Pathology, National Taiwan University Hospital, No. 7, Chung Shan South Rd., Zhongzheng Dist., Taipei 10002, Taiwan
| | - Sung-Hsin Kuo
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital: No. 7, Chung Shan South Rd., Zhongzheng Dist., Taipei 10002, Taiwan; Radiation Science and Proton Therapy Center, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, No. 7, Chung Shan South Rd., Zhongzheng Dist., Taipei 10002, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Oncology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine: No. 1, Jen Ai Rd., Sec. 1, Zhongzheng Dist., Taipei 10051, Taiwan
| | - Chung-Ming Chen
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei 10617, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Yih Isaac Tseng
- Institute of Medical Device and Imaging, National Taiwan University College of Medicine: No. 1, Jen Ai Rd. Sec. 1, Zhongzheng Dist., Taipei 10051, Taiwan
| | - Feng-Huei Lin
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei 10617, Taiwan; Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Nano-medicine, National Health Research Institutes: No. 35, Keyan Rd., Zhunan Town, Miaoli County 35053, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
147
|
|
148
|
Zhou Q, Reekie TA, Abbassi RH, Venkata DI, Font JS, Ryan RM, Rendina LM, Munoz L, Kassiou M. Flexible Analogues of Azaindole DYRK1A Inhibitors Elicit Cytotoxicity in Glioblastoma Cells. Aust J Chem 2018. [DOI: 10.1071/ch18251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
DYRK1A is a novel target for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-dependent glioblastoma and it represents a promising strategy for cancer therapy. DYRK1A inhibition has been found to promote EGFR degradation in glioblastoma cells by triggering endocytosis and lysosomal degradation, thus reducing the self-renewal ability of tumorigenic cells. Using a deconstruction approach of a DYRK1A lead molecule DANDY (1a), a set of novel ring-opened compounds was prepared. Despite showing no activity towards DYRK1A, a reduction in the viability of glioblastoma cells was observed with some of the compounds. This suggests other mechanistic pathways are leading to the apoptosis of glioblastoma cells.
Collapse
|
149
|
Sonabend AM, Zacharia BE, Cloney MB, Sonabend A, Showers C, Ebiana V, Nazarian M, Swanson KR, Baldock A, Brem H, Bruce JN, Butler W, Cahill DP, Carter B, Orringer DA, Roberts DW, Sagher O, Sanai N, Schwartz TH, Silbergeld DL, Sisti MB, Thompson RC, Waziri AE, Ghogawala Z, McKhann G. Defining Glioblastoma Resectability Through the Wisdom of the Crowd: A Proof-of-Principle Study. Neurosurgery 2017; 80:590-601. [PMID: 27509070 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000001374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2015] [Accepted: 05/26/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Extent of resection (EOR) correlates with glioblastoma outcomes. Resectability and EOR depend on anatomical, clinical, and surgeon factors. Resectability likely influences outcome in and of itself, but an accurate measurement of resectability remains elusive. An understanding of resectability and the factors that influence it may provide a means to control a confounder in clinical trials and provide reference for decision making. OBJECTIVE To provide proof of concept of the use of the collective wisdom of experienced brain tumor surgeons in assessing glioblastoma resectability. METHODS We surveyed 13 academic tumor neurosurgeons nationwide to assess the resectability of newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Participants reviewed 20 cases, including digital imaging and communications in medicine-formatted pre- and postoperative magnetic resonance images and clinical vignettes. The selected cases involved a variety of anatomical locations and a range of EOR. Participants were asked about surgical goal, eg, gross total resection, subtotal resection (STR), or biopsy, and rationale for their decision. We calculated a "resectability index" for each lesion by pooling responses from all 13 surgeons. RESULTS Neurosurgeons' individual surgical goals varied significantly ( P = .015), but the resectability index calculated from the surgeons' pooled responses was strongly correlated with the percentage of contrast-enhancing residual tumor ( R = 0.817, P < .001). The collective STR goal predicted intraoperative decision of intentional STR documented on operative notes ( P < .01) and nonresectable residual ( P < .01), but not resectable residual. CONCLUSION In this pilot study, we demonstrate the feasibility of measuring the resectability of glioblastoma through crowdsourcing. This tool could be used to quantify resectability, a potential confounder in neuro-oncology clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam M Sonabend
- Department of Neurological Surgery, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Brad E Zacharia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Michael B Cloney
- Department of Neurological Surgery, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Aarón Sonabend
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Christopher Showers
- Department of Neurological Surgery, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Victoria Ebiana
- Department of Neurological Surgery, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Matthew Nazarian
- Department of Neurological Surgery, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Kristin R Swanson
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Anne Baldock
- University California at San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, California
| | - Henry Brem
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jeffrey N Bruce
- Department of Neurological Surgery, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - William Butler
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Daniel P Cahill
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Bob Carter
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University California at San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, California
| | - Daniel A Orringer
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - David W Roberts
- Division of Neurosurgery, Dartmouth University, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Oren Sagher
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Nader Sanai
- Division of Neurosurgical Oncology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Theodore H Schwartz
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Daniel L Silbergeld
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Michael B Sisti
- Department of Neurological Surgery, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Reid C Thompson
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | | | - Zoher Ghogawala
- Alan and Jacqueline Stuart Spine Research Center, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts
| | - Guy McKhann
- Department of Neurological Surgery, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
150
|
Lillehei KO, Kalkanis SN, Liau LM, Mydland DE, Olson J, Paleologos NA, Ryken T, Johnson T, Scullin E. Rationale and design of the 500-patient, 3-year, and prospective Vigilant ObservatIon of GlIadeL WAfer ImplaNT registry. CNS Oncol 2017; 7:CNS08. [PMID: 29206049 PMCID: PMC5977275 DOI: 10.2217/cns-2017-0036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Implantation of biodegradable wafers impregnated with carmustine (BCNU) is one of the few chemotherapeutic modalities that have been evaluated in Phase III trials and approved by the US FDA for treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma and recurrent glioblastoma. Enrolling up to 500 patients for 3-year follow-up at over 30 sites, the prospective Vigilant ObservatIon of GlIadeL WAfer ImplaNT (VIGILANT) registry (NCT02684838) will evaluate BCNU wafers for treatment of CNS malignancies in contemporary practice and in the new era of molecular tumor analysis. Subgroup analyses will include tumor type, molecular marker status, and treatment combinations. Interim analyses from the VIGILANT registry will be reported until complete results are available in 2024.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin O Lillehei
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Steven N Kalkanis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA
| | - Linda M Liau
- Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, 90095, CA, USA
| | | | - Jeffrey Olson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Nina A Paleologos
- Department of Neurology, Advocate Healthcare, Chicago, IL, 60515, USA
| | - Timothy Ryken
- Department of Neurosurgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA
| | | | - Evan Scullin
- Arbor Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Atlanta, GA, 30328, USA
| |
Collapse
|