Outcomes in octogenarians undergoing high-risk cancer operation: a national study

Results of Lung Cancer Surgery for Octogenarians

PURPOSE

Growing number of elderly lung cancer patients reflecting a lengthening life span has become a serious problem. Purpose of this study was to elucidate the short and long-term outcome of the surgery for octogenarians, and to evaluate the role of lung cancer surgery for this high age group.

METHODS

The patients with lung cancer aged 80 years or more who underwent the surgery at our institute from January 1998 through December 2012 were retrospectively analyzed by chart review, and the operative mortality, morbidity and the long-term survival were assessed.

RESULTS

Out of a total of 1107 patients with primary lung cancer who received surgery during the study period, 94 were octogenarians (8.5%). Sixty-nine patients (73.4%) had preoperative co-morbidity including hypertension in 50 (53.2%), coincidence of other malignancy in 35 (37.2%), anti-coagulant therapy in 29 (30.9%). Twenty-six patients (27.7%) had major or minor postoperative morbidity, and one (1.1%) died due to bronchopleural fistula. Overall-5-year survival rate was 57.5%. Univariative and multivariative analysis using Cox proportional hazard model revealed that male gender and non-adenocarcinoma histology were significant risk factors for poor prognosis.

CONCLUSION

Gender and histology should be taken into account in preoperative evaluation of indication for lung cancer in octogenarians.

Is liver transplantation safe and effective in elderly (≥70 years) recipients? A case-controlled analysis

BACKGROUND

Elderly patients are evaluated for liver transplantation (LT) with increasing frequency, but outcomes in this group have not been well defined.

METHODS

A linkage of the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) and the University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC) databases identified 12,445 patients who underwent LT during 2007-2011. Two cohorts were created consisting of, respectively, elderly recipients aged ≥70 years (n = 323) and recipients aged 18-69 years (n = 12,122). A 1:1 case-matched analysis was performed based on propensity scores.

RESULTS

Elderly recipients had lower Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores at LT (median 15 versus 19; P < 0.0001), more often underwent transplantation at high-volume centres (46% versus 33%; P < 0.0001) and more often received grafts from donors aged >60 years (24% versus 15%; P < 0.0001). The two cohorts had similar hospital lengths of stay, in-hospital mortality, hospital costs and 30-day readmission rates. There were no differences in graft survival between the two cohorts (P = 0.10), but elderly recipients had worse longterm overall survival (P = 0.009). However, a case-controlled analysis confirmed similar perioperative hospital outcomes, graft survival and longterm patient survival in the two matched cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly LT recipients accounted for <3% of all LTs performed during 2007-2011. Selected elderly recipients have perioperative outcomes and survival similar to those in younger adults.

Pancreatic resection in patients 80 years or older: a meta-analysis and systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of pancreatic resections in patients 80 years or older.

METHODS

A systematic search of the literature was carried out that compared perioperative outcomes after pancreatic resection in patients 80 years or older with patients younger than 80 years. The primary end points were postoperative mortality and morbidity. The secondary end points were incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula, delayed gastric emptying, bile leak, pneumonia, postoperative infection, cardiologic complications, reoperation, and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Nine studies were found to be suitable for the meta-analysis. The postoperative mortality and morbidity were significantly higher in the group 80 years or older (P < 0.00001 and P = 0.003, respectively) except for patients in whom there were no differences in preoperative comorbidities (P = 0.56 and P = 0.36, respectively). Postoperative cardiac complications were significantly more frequent in patients 80 years or older (P < 0.0001), and the length of hospital stay was significantly longer in octogenarian patients (P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients 80 years or older have an increased incidence of postoperative mortality, morbidity, and cardiac complications and a longer length of hospital stay than do younger patients. Thus, pancreatic resection can be recommended only in a selected group of patients 80 years or older.

An environmental scan of advance care planning decision AIDS for patients undergoing major surgery: a study protocol

BACKGROUND

Patients who undergo major surgery are at risk for perioperative morbidity and mortality. It would be appropriate to initiate advance care planning with patients prior to surgery, but surgeons may experience difficulty initiating such conversations. Rather than focus on changing clinician behavior, advance care planning decision aids can be an innovative vehicle to motivate advance care planning among surgical patients and their families.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this paper is to describe a study protocol for conducting an environmental scan concerning advance care planning decision aids that may be relevant to patients undergoing high-risk surgery.

METHODS/DESIGN

This study will gather information from written or verbal data sources that incorporate professional and lay perspectives: a systematic review, a grey literature review, key informant interviews, and patient and family engagement. It is envisioned that this study will generate three outcomes: a synthesis of current evidence, a summary of gaps in knowledge, and a taxonomy of existing advance care planning decision aids.

DISCUSSION

This environmental scan will demonstrate principles of patient-centered outcomes research, and it will exemplify a pioneering approach for reviewing complex interventions. Anticipated limitations are that information will be gathered from a small sample of patients and families, and that potentially relevant information could also be missing from the environmental scan due to the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Outcomes from the environmental scan will inform future patient-centered research to develop and evaluate a new decision aid.

Pancreatoduodenectomy with portal vein resection is feasible and potentially beneficial for elderly patients with pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and clinical benefit of pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) with portal vein resection (PVR) in elderly patients.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 272 consecutive patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who underwent PD between 2000 and 2012. The patients were categorized into 4 groups: elderly (≥70 years) and younger (<70 years) PD-PVR groups as well as elderly and younger PD groups. Preoperative patient background, postoperative course, and overall survival were compared.

RESULTS

Among the patients who underwent PD-PVR, the elderly group had significantly higher prevalence of comorbidity compared with the younger group (77% and 52%, respectively; P = 0.003), whereas there were no differences in the intraoperative and pathological characteristics. Postoperatively, morbidity and length of hospital stay were similar between the elderly and younger groups. Despite the fact that the proportion of patients who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy was lower in the elderly group (62% vs 83%; P = 0.005), the overall survival of the elderly group was comparable with that of the younger group, and both groups had a significantly more favorable prognosis than that of 36 patients with unresected tumors (P = 0.006 and P < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreatoduodenectomy with portal vein resection is safe and potentially beneficial for elderly patients with pancreatic cancer.

Increasing age is a predictor of short-term outcomes in esophagectomy: a propensity score adjusted analysis

BACKGROUND

Esophagectomy is a high-risk surgical procedure. As the population ages, more elderly candidates are being evaluated for esophagectomy. The effects of patient age on outcomes after esophagectomy need to be evaluated.

STUDY DESIGN

We identified all nonemergent esophagectomies in patients at least 18 years of age within the University HealthSystems Consortium Clinical Database/Resource Manager from 2009 to 2012. Using univariate and multivariate methods, the impact of increasing age on outcomes was analyzed. Additionally, propensity scoring was used to match patients to further investigate the effect of age on the stated outcomes.

RESULTS

Increasing age is associated with increased mortality (p < 0.001), length of stay (p < 0.001), discharge to rehabilitative care (p < 0.001), and cost (p < 0.001). The effects of age on mortality (8.0 vs 4.2 %, p = 0.03) and discharge to rehabilitative care (44.1 vs 23.4 %, p < 0.01) were confirmed using propensity scoring, comparing patients above 80 with those age 70-79.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing age has a significant impact on outcomes following esophagectomy, particularly mortality and discharge disposition. Compared to patients under age 80, patients at least 80 years of age considering esophagectomy should be recognized as a high-risk cohort, and these patients must be carefully risk-stratified, counseled, and selected for surgical intervention to prevent unnecessary hospitalization and mortality.

Role of neoadjuvant therapy in the multimodality treatment of older patients with pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

A well-defined treatment strategy for elderly patients with resectable pancreatic cancer is lacking. Multiple reports have described highly selected older cancer patients who have successfully undergone pancreatectomy. However, multimodality therapy is essential for long-term survival, and elderly patients are at high risk for not receiving adjuvant therapy postoperatively. We sought to describe the treatment patterns and outcomes of a series of elderly patients with pancreatic cancer who were treated with a multimodality strategy that liberally used neoadjuvant therapy.

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively reviewed treatment plans, short-term outcomes, and overall survival of all patients 70 years old and older, presenting to our institution over a 9-year period, who were treated for potentially resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

RESULTS

There were 179 (76%) of 236 patients treated with curative intent. Of these patients, 153 (85%) initiated neoadjuvant therapy: 74 (48%) subsequently underwent pancreatectomy and 79 did not due to disease progression (n = 46), insufficient performance status (n = 23), or other reasons (n = 10). Eleven (42%) of 26 patients who underwent surgery first received postoperative therapy. Among patients treated with curative intent, the median overall survival of all patients initiating neoadjuvant therapy (16.6 months [range 2.1 to 142.7 months]) was similar to that of patients undergoing resection primarily (15.1 months [range 5.4 to 100.8 months]), p = 0.53. After pancreatectomy, patients had a 2% in-hospital mortality rate and 91% were discharged home.

CONCLUSIONS

Eighty-five percent of all patients 70 years old and older, who underwent pancreatectomy for potentially resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer, received multimodality therapy. More than 90% were discharged home. These data demonstrate a potential role for neoadjuvant therapy in selecting elderly patients for surgery, and support further studies to refine individualized treatment protocols for this high-risk population.

Creating an advance-care-planning decision aid for high-risk surgery: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

High-risk surgery patients may lose decision-making capacity as a result of surgical complications. Advance care planning prior to surgery may be beneficial, but remains controversial and is hindered by a lack of appropriate decision aids. This study sought to examine stakeholders' views on the appropriateness of using decision aids, in general, to support advance care planning among high-risk surgery populations and the design of such a decision aid.

METHODS

Key informants were recruited through purposive and snowball sampling. Semi-structured interviews were conducted by phone until data collected reached theoretical saturation. Key informants were asked to discuss their thoughts about advance care planning and interventions to support advance care planning, particularly for this population. Researchers took de-identified notes that were analyzed for emerging concordant, discordant, and recurrent themes using interpretative phenomenological analysis.

RESULTS

Key informants described the importance of initiating advance care planning preoperatively, despite potential challenges present in surgical settings. In general, decision aids were viewed as an appropriate approach to support advance care planning for this population. A recipe emerged from the data that outlines tools, ingredients, and tips for success that are needed to design an advance care planning decision aid for high-risk surgical settings.

CONCLUSIONS

Stakeholders supported incorporating advance care planning in high-risk surgical settings and endorsed the appropriateness of using decision aids to do so. Findings will inform the next stages of developing the first advance care planning decision aid for high-risk surgery patients.

Geriatric assessment improves prediction of surgical outcomes in older adults undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively evaluate the additional value of geriatric assessment (GA) for predicting surgical outcomes in a cohort of older patients undergoing a pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic tumors.

BACKGROUND

Older patients are less often referred for possible PD. Standard preoperative assessments may underestimate the likelihood of significant adverse outcomes. The prospective utility of validated GA has not been studied in this group.

METHODS

PD-eligible patients were enrolled in a prospective outcome study. Standard preoperative assessments were recorded. Elements of validated GA were also measured, including components of Fried's model of frailty, the Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13), and the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). All postoperative adverse events were recorded, systematically reviewed, and graded using the Clavien-Dindo system by a surgeon blinded to the GA results. Multivariate regression analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

Seventy-six older patients underwent a PD. Significant unrecognized vulnerability was identified at the baseline: Fried's "exhaustion" (37.3%), SPPB <10 (28.5%), and VES-13 >3 (15.4%). Within 30 days of PD, 46% experienced a severe complication (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III). In regression analyses controlling for age, the body mass index, the American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and comorbidity burden, Fried's "exhaustion" predicted major complications [odds ratio (OR) = 4.06; P = 0.01], longer hospital stays (β = 0.27; P = 0.02), and surgical intensive care unit admissions (OR = 4.30; P = 0.01). Both SPPB (OR = 0.61; P = 0.04) and older age predicted discharge to a rehabilitation facility (OR = 1.1; P < 0.05) and age correlated with a lower likelihood of hospital readmission (OR = 0.94; P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Controlling for standard preoperative assessments, worse scores on GA prospectively and independently predicted important adverse outcomes. Geriatric assessment may help identify older patients at high risk for complications from PD.

Pancreatic resection in elderly patients: should it be denied?

BACKGROUND

Surgery remains the only potential curative therapy for pancreatic cancer, but compromised physiological reserve and comorbidities may deny pancreatic resection from elderly patients.

METHODS

The medical records of all patients who underwent pancreatic resection at our institution (2005-2012) were retrospectively reviewed. Postoperative and long-term outcomes were compared between patients with cutoff age of 70 years.

RESULTS

A total of 228 (66 %) and 116 (34 %) patients were <70 and ≥70 years, respectively. Elderly group had worse ASA scores (P < 0.0001) with higher rates of invasive malignant pathologies (75 vs. 67 %, P = 0.14), mainly pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (58.6 vs. 44.7 %, P = 0.01). The most common type of resection was pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) (59 %), followed by distal pancreatectomy (19.8 %). Mean hospital stay was comparable. Elderly patients had less grade ≥IIIb postoperative complications (12 vs. 20.1 %; P = 0.04) and higher postoperative mortality rates (12.9 vs. 3.9 %; P = 0.04). In multivariable Cox proportional hazards model for postoperative mortality, age ≥ 70 years (HR, 3.5; 95 % CI, 1.3-9.3), pancreaticoduodenectomy (HR, 12.6; 95 % CI, 1.6-96), and intraoperative blood loss were significant (P = 0.012; P = 0.015, and P = 0.005, respectively). The overall 5-year survival rates for all patients, for patients aged <70 and ≥70 years were 56, 55, and 41 %, respectively (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly patients are at higher risk of mortality after pancreatic resection than usually reported case series. Nonetheless, elderly patients can undergo pancreatic resection with acceptable 5-year survival results. Our results contribute for a better, informed decision-making for elderly patients and their family.

Management of localized esophageal cancer in the older patient

Most patients with gastroesophageal cancers are older than 65 years of age. The management of older patients poses challenges because they have multiple comorbidities and physiological changes associated with aging. Furthermore, data are limited on tolerance of cancer therapy and the use of combined-modality treatments in this patient population to guide their treatment. In this article, we focus on the management of older patients with localized esophageal cancer, highlighting the role of comprehensive geriatric assessment to identify and better tailor treatment approaches in this patient population. We review the literature and discuss the role of surgical resection and potential complications specific to an older patient. We review the rationale of combined-modality treatment and the potential benefits of a chemoradiotherapy-based approach in this patient population.

Age Influences Likelihood of Pancreatic Cancer Treatment, but not Outcome

Background

Pancreatic cancer (PanCA) is predominantly diagnosed in elderly patients; nevertheless, a significant number of young patients are affected. We hypothesized more aggressive treatment of young PanCA patients would result in better overall survival (OS).

Methods

A retrospective review of our institutional cancer database identified subjects for inclusion. Age 50 years was selected to stratify patients into age groups.

Results

Of 309 PanCA patients, 54 (17%) were ≤ 50 years old. Exocrine cancer was the most common histology (90%). Patients ≤ 50 years old were more likely to have endocrine cancer (22% vs. 7%, P = 0.001). There was no difference in stage or curative intent surgery between age groups. Despite patients ≤ 50 years old receiving more chemotherapy (61% vs. 41%, P = 0.007) and radiotherapy (28% vs. 15%, P = 0.03), there was no difference in OS (24.1 months vs. 14.1 months, P = 0.08). When only exocrine cancers were considered, there was no difference between young and old patients regarding stage, grade, location or surgery. Exocrine cancer patients ≤ 50 years old received more chemotherapy (67% vs. 42%, P = 0.003) and radiation therapy (36% vs. 17%, P = 0.004), but there was no difference in OS.

Conclusions

A substantial number of PanCA patients are ≤ 50 years old. Patients ≤ 50 years old received more treatment but did not have improved OS. Significant improvements in PanCA survival await development of new treatment strategies.

A prospective study examining the association between preoperative frailty and postoperative complications in patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Current surgical decision-making is overly subjective and often misjudges a patient's physiologic state. The concept of frailty has gained recent recognition and potentially represents a measureable phenotype, which can quantify a patient's physiologic reserve and risk of an adverse surgical outcome. We sought to investigate the relationship between preoperative markers of frailty and postoperative complications in patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery (MIS).

METHODS

Frailty, using the methodology described by Fried and coworkers, was prospectively measured in patients who presented to urology, general surgery, and surgical oncology clinics where major MIS (endoscopic, laparoscopic, or robotic) was planned. The relationship between preoperative markers of frailty and 30-day postoperative complications was our primary outcome measure.

RESULTS

Our cohort includes 80 patients. Mean age and body mass index were 60.0 (range 19-87) years and 29.2 (range 18.4-53.1) kg/m(2), respectively. The majority of patients were male (57.5%) and Caucasian (65.0%). Thirteen patients were deemed "intermediately frail" or "frail," and the remaining 67 were classified as "not frail." Thirteen (16.25%) patients experienced any postoperative complication. Five (38.5%) of the intermediately frail and frail patients experienced a complication, compared with eight (11.9%) of the not frail patients (odds ratio=5.914; 95% confidence interval=1.25-27.96; P=0.025).

CONCLUSION

The advent of MIS has potentially lured surgeons into thinking older and patients with comorbidities may more easily tolerate this surgical approach compared with traditional open techniques. Our data suggest, however, that intermediately frail or frail patients are at increased risk of experiencing postoperative complications compared with not frail patients.

Pancreatic surgery in the very old: face to face with a challenge of the near future

BACKGROUND

The proportion of octogenarians requiring surgery for pancreatic disease is rapidly growing. This trend will be continued during the next decades, posing a challenge to surgeons and the health care system worldwide. This study aimed to analyze the results of pancreatic surgery in octogenarians in terms of safety and survival based on a cohort of patients at a European high-volume center.

METHODS

During a 7-year period, 1,705 operations were performed, 76 in patients ≥ 80 years of age. Data on the octogenarians were retrospectively reviewed and compared to those of the whole collective and to contemporary data from the literature. Primary endpoints were mortality, morbidity, and survival.

RESULTS

Overall, 80 % had a malignant disease, and resections were performed in 50 % of all cases. Mortality was 11.8 % and morbidity 72.4 %. There were significantly more medical than surgical complications: 56.6 versus 34.2 %. Pancreatic fistula occurred in 5.3 %, postoperative bleeding in 3.9 %, and delayed gastric emptying in 19.7 %. The median hospital stay was 15 days and the intensive care unit stay 2 days. Mean survival was 28.2 months and in patients with cancer 22.6 months. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 61.4, 31.3, and 18.8 %, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite high mortality and morbidity rates, surgery remains the only chance for cure in most octogenarians with pancreatic disease. Careful patient selection is the key to success and improved long-term survival in this group, which will represent a substantial fraction of the population in the near future.

Improving mortality following emergent surgery in older patients requires focus on complication rescue

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a hospital's ability to rescue patients from major complications underlies variation in outcomes for elderly patients undergoing emergent surgery.

BACKGROUND

Perioperative mortality rates in elderly patients undergoing emergent general/vascular operations are high and vary widely across Michigan hospitals.

METHODS

We identified 23,224 patients undergoing emergent general/vascular surgical procedures at 41 hospitals within the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative between 2006 and 2011. Hospitals were ranked by risk- and reliability-adjusted 30-day mortality rates and grouped into tertiles. We stratified patients by age (<75 and ≥75 years). Risk-adjusted major complication and failure-to-rescue (ie, mortality after major complication) rates were determined for each tertile of hospital mortality.

RESULTS

Risk-adjusted mortality rates in elderly patients varied 2-fold across all hospitals. Complication rates correlated poorly with mortality. Failure-to-rescue rates, however, were markedly higher in high-mortality hospitals (29% lowest tertile vs 41% highest tertile; P < 0.01). When compared with younger patients, overall failure-to-rescue rates were almost 2-fold greater in the elderly (36.1% ≥75 vs 18.7% <75; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

A hospital's failure to rescue patients from major complications seems to underlie the variation in mortality rates across Michigan hospitals after emergent surgery. Although higher failure-to-rescue rates in the elderly may signify their diminished physiological reserve for surviving critical illness, the wide variation across hospitals also highlights the importance of systems aimed at the early recognition and effective management of major complications in this vulnerable population.

Treatment of the postoperative recurrence of lung cancer in octogenarians

PURPOSE

Guidelines for the treatment of postoperative recurrent lung cancer in octogenarians do not exist. In this study, we investigated the prognosis of patients with recurrence after the resection of lung cancer and discuss the management of recurrent tumors in octogenarians.

METHODS

This study clinicopathologically evaluated 135 octogenarians who underwent resections for lung cancer at a single institution between 1992 and 2010. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 37 patients with confirmed recurrence. The overall survival of the patients and the treatments used for postoperative recurrence were evaluated.

RESULTS

Among 37 patients, six underwent intensive treatment, 14 underwent palliative treatment and 17 received supportive care only. The overall survival rates of the patients in the antitumor treatment groups tended to be associated with a better prognoses than those of the patients in the supportive care only group, but they did not exhibit significantly better prognoses at 1 year (p = 0.202). However, among the patients with a good performance status, the intensive treatment group tended to exhibit prolonged survival. Of the 37 patients with recurrent tumors, five (14%) died of other diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

Antitumor treatment of postoperative recurrent lung cancer in octogenarians may not always improve the survival rate. However, carefully selecting patients for intensive therapy, such as those with a good performance status, may lead to longer survival rates after postoperative recurrence in octogenarians.

Advancing age and 30-day adverse outcomes after nonemergent general surgeries

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether 30-day postoperative mortality, complications, failure-to-rescue (FTR) rates, and postoperative length of stay increase with advancing age.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Hospitals participating in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

PARTICIPANTS

Individuals undergoing nonemergent major general surgeries between 2005 and 2008 were studied (N = 165,600).

MEASUREMENTS

Postoperative outcomes of interest were complications occurring within 30 days of the index operation, return to the operating room within 30 days, FTR after a postoperative complication, postsurgical length of stay, and 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

Postoperative mortality, overall morbidity, and each type of postoperative complication increased with increasing age. Rates of FTR after each type of postoperative complication also increased with age. Mortality in individuals aged 80 and older after renal insufficiency (43.3%), stroke (36.5%), myocardial infarction (MI) (35.6%), and pulmonary complications (25-39%) were particularly high. Median postoperative length of stay increased with age after surgical site infection, urinary tract infection, pneumonia, return to the operating room, and overall morbidity but not after venous thromboembolism, stroke, MI, renal insufficiency, failure to wean from the ventilator, or reintubation.

CONCLUSION

Thirty-day mortality and complication and FTR rates increase with age after nonemergent general surgeries. Individuals aged 80 and older have especially high mortality after renal, cardiovascular, and pulmonary complications. Surgeons need to be more selective with advancing age regarding who will benefit from the surgical intervention.

Developments in early-stage NSCLC: advances in radiotherapy

An increase in the number of predominantly elderly patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer is anticipated in many Western populations. Patients often have major co-morbidities and are at increased risk for surgical morbidity and mortality. In the past decade, the use of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has achieved excellent results, with only mild toxicity in such vulnerable patient groups, leading to SABR becoming accepted as a standard of care for unfit patients in several countries. The planning and delivery of SABR has rapidly improved in recent years, particularly with the use of 'on-board' imaging at treatment units, and shortened treatment delivery times. Increasingly, more central tumors are being treated using lower doses per fraction (so-called risk-adapted schemes). It is also becoming clear that long-term follow-up should take place at specialist centers in order to distinguish the evolving fibrosis that is frequently observed from the relatively infrequent local recurrences. Given the high local control rates and limited toxicity, increasing attention is being paid to the use of SABR in the subgroup of so-called borderline operable patients, and clinical trials comparing surgery and SABR in these patients are ongoing.

Developments in stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for the treatment of early-stage lung cancer

SUMMARY Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), also known as stereotactic body radiation therapy, has emerged as an effective treatment for inoperable early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. SABR differs from conventional radiotherapy by virtue of its tight spatial tolerances and use of oligofractionated radiation. The modern technique is characterized by management of tumor motion, image guidance before each fraction and specialized radiation delivery techniques. The result is a highly conformal target dose with a sharp gradient that spares normal tissues with great accuracy. This enables delivery of very potent (ablative) doses, causing more rapid and durable responses than traditional radiation therapy treatment regimens can achieve. The established techniques, new developments and ongoing questions related to SABR for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer are reviewed herein.

Perioperative and long-term outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients 80 years of age and older

PURPOSE

Although a pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) has been recently regarded as a safe surgical procedure at high-volume centers, the efficacy of PD for patients 80 years of age and older is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the perioperative and long-term outcomes following PD in patients 80 years of age and older.

METHODS

Elderly patients 80 years of age and older who underwent PD between 2001 and 2009 were identified. The perioperative and long-term outcomes were compared with patients younger than 80 years of age.

RESULTS

Of 561 total patients, 22 patients (3.9 %) were 80 years of age or older. Mortality occurred in one patient (4.5 %). Postoperative major complications (Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ grade III) occurred in six patients (27.3 %) in this group, which was significantly higher than in patients younger than 80 years of age (P = 0.008). The survival of the elderly patients undergoing PD for pancreatic cancer was significantly shorter than that for the same patient group with other diseases (median survival, 13 versus 82 months; P = 0.014). Only one elderly patient with pancreatic cancer survived more than 3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

PD for pancreatic cancer in patients aged 80 and older should be carefully selected, because it is associated with a higher incidence of severe postoperative complications and a small change of long-term survival.

Evidence for treatment and survival disparities by age in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a population-based analysis

OBJECTIVES

Studies demonstrate safety and survival benefits of surgical resection in older individuals with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. We investigated treatment disparities by age.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database for survival and treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma between 1983 and 2007 stratified by age: younger than 50 years, between 50 and 70 years, or older than 70 years. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models were used for survival differences, and logistic regression models were used for treatment disparities and the decision to refuse surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 45,509 patients had microscopically confirmed pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Of these, 7374 (16%) received surgery and 9842 (22%) received radiation. Younger patients were more likely to receive both surgery and radiation. The prevalence of surgery decreased from 21% for those younger than 50 years to 19% for those between 50 and 70 years to 13% for those older than 70 years (P < 0.001). Radiation decreased from 28% to 25% to 17% (P < 0.001). Overall survival decreased with increasing age at diagnosis, 10.4 months (age <50 years) to 9.1 months (age 50-70 years) to 6.4 months (age >70 years) controlling for stage, sex, race, radiation, and surgery (P < 0.001). Increasing age negatively predicted the odds of receiving both surgery and radiation and increased the likelihood of refusing surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment disparities exist by age despite advances in radiation and surgical treatment. Increased treatment in the elderly will increase overall survival from pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Splenectomy in older adults: indications and clinical outcomes

The aim of this study was to improve the understanding of the indications and associated outcomes among older adults undergoing splenectomy. Data regarding patients of age ≥60 years treated between 1998 and 2008 were reviewed. Fifty patients (age 71.6 ± 8) were identified. Common indications for splenectomy included idiopathic thrombotic purpura (26.0 %) and lymphoma (28.0 %). Patient co-morbidities included hypertension (54 %), coronary artery disease (24 %) and diabetes mellitus (20 %). Twenty-seven patients (54 %) underwent laparoscopic surgery; 23 (46 %) had open procedures; more than half of open splenectomies were conversions from attempted laparoscopy. Mean post-operative length of stay (LOS) was 5.9 ± 5 days (range 1-21). Two patients died in hospital; an additional three died within 6 months. Five patients were discharged to an extended care facility (ECF). Three patients required readmission within 30 days. Increased age was associated with need for ECF (p = 0.01). Increasing LOS, but not age, was associated with 6-month mortality (p = 0.04). Although we noted a 10 % in hospital mortality rate, splenectomy appears to be safe for carefully selected older adults.

Surgical outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary tumors in elderly patients

BACKGROUNDS

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is an aggressive surgery with considerable operative risks, but offers the only chance for cure in patients with periampullary tumors. A growing number of elderly patients are being offered PD because of the aging of populations in developed countries. We examined surgical outcomes of PD in patients aged 75 years and older (≥75 years).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed in 65 consecutive patients who underwent PD for periampullary tumors at a single medical center during the 5 years from 2006 to 2010. We analyzed surgical outcomes such as mortality and morbidity after PD in patients aged ≥75 years (n = 21) compared to those in patients aged <75 years (n = 44).

RESULTS

The positive rate of comorbidities such as hypertension was significantly higher in patients aged ≥75 years than in patients aged <75 years (76 vs. 48 %; p = 0.03). The incidence of wound infection was significantly higher in patients aged ≥75 years than in patients aged <75 years (19 vs. 0 %; p < 0.01). However, there was no significant difference in the mortality rate (0 vs. 2 %; p = 0.49) or the overall morbidity rate (33 vs. 32 %; p = 0.90). There was no significant difference in changes in body weight or serum albumin levels during the 3 months after PD between the two groups, but the recovery of serum prealbumin levels from 1 to 3 months after PD in patients aged ≥75 years was significantly delayed compared to that in patients aged <75 years (p = 0.04). There was no statistically significant difference in long-term survival between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Advanced age alone should not discourage surgeons from offering PD, although nutritional supports after PD for elderly patients aged ≥75 years are needed.

Obesity and readmission in elderly surgical patients

BACKGROUND

Reducing readmissions has become a focus in efforts by Medicare to improve health care quality and reduce costs. This study aimed to determine whether causes for readmission differed between obese and nonobese patients, possibly allowing for targeted interventions.

METHODS

A matched case control study of Medicare patients admitted between 2002 and 2006 who were readmitted after hip or knee surgery, colectomy, or thoracotomy was performed. Patients were matched exactly for procedure, while also balancing on hospital, age, and sex. Conditional logistic regression was used to study the odds of readmission for very obese cases (body mass index >35 kg/m2) versus normal weight patients (body mass index of 20-30 kg/m2) after also controlling for race, transfer-in and emergency status, and comorbidities.

RESULTS

Among 15,914 patient admissions, we identified 1,380 readmitted patients and 2,760 controls. The risk of readmission was increased for obese compared to nonobese patients both before and after controlling for comorbidities (before: odds ratio, 1.35; P = .003; after: odds ratio, 1.25; P = .04). Reasons for readmission varied by procedure but were not different by body mass index category.

CONCLUSION

Obese patients have an increased risk of readmission, yet the reasons for readmission in obese patients appear to be similar to those for nonobese patients, suggesting that improved postdischarge management for the obese cannot focus on a few specific causes of readmission but must instead provide a broad range of interventions.

Solid-organ transplantation in older adults: current status and future research

An increasing number of patients older than 65 years are referred for and have access to organ transplantation, and an increasing number of older adults are donating organs. Although short-term outcomes are similar in older versus younger transplant recipients, older donor or recipient age is associated with inferior long-term outcomes. However, age is often a proxy for other factors that might predict poor outcomes more strongly and better identify patients at risk for adverse events. Approaches to transplantation in older adults vary across programs, but despite recent gains in access and the increased use of marginal organs, older patients remain less likely than other groups to receive a transplant, and those who do are highly selected. Moreover, few studies have addressed geriatric issues in transplant patient selection or management, or the implications on health span and disability when patients age to late life with a transplanted organ. This paper summarizes a recent trans-disciplinary workshop held by ASP, in collaboration with NHLBI, NIA, NIAID, NIDDK and AGS, to address issues related to kidney, liver, lung, or heart transplantation in older adults and to propose a research agenda in these areas.

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for stage I NSCLC: Recent advances and controversies

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is a technique that has rapidly entered routine care for early-stage peripheral non-small cell lung cancer in many countries in the last decade. The adoption of SABR was partly stimulated by advances in the so-called 'image guided' radiotherapy delivery. In the last 2 years, a growing body of publications has reported on clinical outcomes, acute and late radiological changes after SABR, and sub-acute and late toxicity. The local control rates in many publications have exceeded 90% when tumors of up to 5 cm have been treated, with corresponding regional nodal failure rates of approximately 10%. However, these results are not universal: lower control rates reported by some authors serve to emphasize the importance of quality assurance in all steps of SABR treatment planning and delivery. High-grade toxicity is uncommon when so-called 'risk-adapted' fractionation schemes are applied; an approach which involves the use of lower daily doses and more fractions when critical normal organs are in the proximity of the tumor volume. This review will address the new data available on a number of controversial topics such as the treatment of patients without a tissue diagnosis of malignancy, data on SABR outcomes in patients with severe chronic obstructive airways disease, use of a classification system for late radiological changes post-SABR, late treatment-related toxicity, and the evidence to support a need for expert multi-disciplinary teams in the follow-up of such patients.

Standard radical gastrectomy in octogenarians and nonagenarians with gastric cancer: are short-term surgical results and long-term survival substantial?

BACKGROUND

The high incidence of gastric cancer among the octogenarians and nonagenarians (oldest old; age ≥ 80 years) is emerging as an important management issue. Herein, we report both the short-term outcomes and long-term survival results of standard radical gastrectomy in this group of patients.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of 164 oldest old patients (older group) and 2,258 younger patients (age <80 years; younger group) with gastric cancer who underwent curative resection between January 1994 and December 2006. Clinicopathologic data, long-term survival, and prognostic factors were analyzed.

RESULTS

Clinical tumor stage did not differ between the two groups at the time of diagnosis. Higher Charlson comorbidity index scores (≥ 5) were observed in the older group than in the younger group; this was associated with higher postoperative morbidity (P = 0.035) and in-hospital mortality rates (P = 0.015) in the older group. At a median follow-up of 37.8 months, the overall survival rate for the older group was lower than that for the younger group (P < 0.001). However, the cumulative incidence of gastric cancer-related deaths was comparable between the two groups. Nodal involvement and metastatic to retrieved lymph node ratio were the only independent predictors of survival in the older group.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients in the older group had a higher postoperative morbidity rate but comparable cancer-specific survival. Careful patient selection for gastrectomy is warranted in elderly patients, particularly those with high-grade nodal involvement.

Major abdominal surgery in nursing home residents: a national study

OBJECTIVE

To determine surgical risk in nursing home residents undergoing major abdominal surgery.

BACKGROUND

Recent studies suggest that surgery can be performed safely in the very old. Surgical risk in nursing home residents is poorly understood.

METHODS

We used national Medicare claims and the nursing home Minimum Data Set (1999-2006) to identify nursing home residents undergoing surgery (surgery for bleeding duodenal ulcer, cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and colectomy, n = 70,719). We compared operative mortality and use of invasive interventions (mechanical ventilation, intravascular hemodynamic monitoring, feeding tube placement, tracheostomy, and vena cava filters) among nursing home residents to rates among noninstitutionalized Medicare enrollees age 65 and older undergoing the same procedures. (n = 1,060,389). We adjusted for patient characteristics using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Operative mortality among nursing home residents was substantially higher than among noninstitutionalized Medicare enrollees for all procedures (surgery for bleeding duodenal ulcer, 42% versus 26%, adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.79; colectomy, 32% versus 13%, AOR 2.06; appendectomy, 12% versus 2%, AOR 3.27; cholecystectomy, 11% versus 3%, AOR 2.65; P < 0.001 for all comparisons). Overall, invasive interventions were more common among nursing home residents than controls (ranging from 18% and 5%, respectively, for cholecystectomy to 55% and 43%, respectively, for surgery for bleeding duodenal ulcer, P < 0.0001 for all comparisons).

CONCLUSIONS

Nursing home residents experience substantially higher rates of mortality and invasive interventions after major surgery than other Medicare beneficiaries that are independent of age and measured comorbidities. Our data suggest that the risks of major surgery are substantially higher in nursing home residents and this information should inform decisions of physicians and patients and their families.

Cancer surgery in the elderly

The proportions both of elderly patients in the world and of elderly patients with cancer are both increasing. In the evaluation of these patients, physiologic age, and not chronologic age, should be carefully considered in the decision-making process prior to both cancer screening and cancer treatment in an effort to avoid ageism. Many tools exist to help the practitioner determine the physiologic age of the patient, which allows for more appropriate and more individualized risk stratification, both in the pre- and postoperative periods as patients are evaluated for surgical treatments and monitored for surgical complications, respectively. During and after operations in the oncogeriatric populations, physiologic changes occuring that accompany aging include impaired stress response, increased senescence, and decreased immunity, all three of which impact the risk/benefit ratio associated with cancer surgery in the elderly.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy and 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: A pooled analysis of biological equivalent dose and local control

PURPOSE

To determine the relationship between tumor control probability (TCP) and biological effective dose (BED) for radiation therapy in medically inoperable stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Forty-two studies on 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) and SBRT for stage I NSCLC were reviewed for tumor control (TC), defined as crude local control ≥ 2 years, as a function of BED. For each dose-fractionation schedule, BED was calculated at isocenter using the linear quadratic (LQ) and universal survival curve (USC) models. A scatter plot of TC versus BED was generated and fitted to the standard TCP equation for both models.

RESULTS

A total of 2696 patients were included in this study (SBRT: 1640; 3D-CRT: 1056). Daily fraction size was 1.2-4 Gy (total dose: 48-102.9) with 3D-CRT and 6-26 (total dose: 20-66) with SBRT. Median BED was 118.6 Gy (range, 68.5-320.3) and 95.6 Gy (range, 46.1-178.1) for the LQ and USC models, respectively. According to the LQ model, BED to achieve 50% TC (TCD50) was 61 Gy (95% confidence interval, 50.2-71.1). TCP as a function of BED was sigmoidal, with TCP ≥ 90% achieved with BED ≥ 159 Gy and 124 Gy for the LQ and USC models, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Dose-escalation beyond a BED 159 by LQ model likely translates into clinically insignificant gain in TCP but may result in clinically significant toxicity. When delivered with SBRT, BED of 159 Gy corresponds to a total dose of 53 Gy in 3 fractions at the isocenter.

Lobectomy in octogenarians with non-small cell lung cancer: ramifications of increasing life expectancy and the benefits of minimally invasive surgery

BACKGROUND

As the population ages, clinicians are increasingly confronted with octogenarians with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We reviewed the outcomes of octogenarians who underwent lobectomy for NSCLC by video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) versus open thoracotomy, to determine if there was a benefit to the VATS approach in this group.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective single-institution review of patients age 80 years or greater who underwent a lobectomy for NSCLC from 1998 to 2009. Outcomes including complication rates, length of stay, disposition, and long-term survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-one octogenarians underwent lobectomy: 40 VATS and 81 through open thoracotomy. Compared with thoracotomy, VATS patients had fewer complications (35.0% vs 63.0%, p = 0.004), shorter length of stay (5 vs 6 days, p = 0.001), and were less likely to require admission to the intensive care unit (2.5% vs 14.8%, p = 0.038) or rehabilitation after discharge (5% vs 22.5%, p = 0.015). In multivariate analysis, VATS was an independent predictor of reduced complications (odds ratio, 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.15 to 0.84; p = 0.019). Survival comparisons demonstrated no significant difference between the two techniques, either in univariate analysis of stage I patients (5-year VATS, 76.0%; thoracotomy, 65.3%; p = 0.111) or multivariate analysis of the entire cohort (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.27 to 1.28; p = 0.183).

CONCLUSIONS

Octogenarians with NSCLC can undergo resection with low mortality and survival among stage I patients, which is comparable with the general lung cancer population. The VATS approach to resection reduces morbidity in this age demographic, resulting in shorter, less intensive hospitalization, and less frequent need for postoperative rehabilitation.

Thoracic surgery in octogenarians: CVTSA/Inova Fairfax hospital experience, 1990 to 2009

With an increasing proportion of U.S. individuals 80 years of age or older, the authors examined their surgical experience with octogenarians undergoing major, curative-intent thoracic surgery. Between January 1, 1990, and September 1, 2009, 102 octogenarians underwent curative-intent resection for nonsmall cell carcinoma of the lung (NSCCL), esophageal carcinoma (EC), or related surgery for thoracic esophageal perforation (EP). Analysis and reporting followed the guidelines of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database study (1994 to 2003). Eighty-six patients underwent curative-intent resection for NSCCL, 12 for EC, and four for surgery for EP. Hospital and 30-day mortalities were 0 per cent. Overall 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates were: 78, 58, and 32 per cent. Within the NSCCL cohort, minimally invasive exposures (video-assisted thoracic surgery [VATS] and video thoracoscopy [VT]) were associated with fewer and shorter duration of air leaks, leading to shorter length of stay. Since we began using minimally invasive exposure for NSCCL in 2007, the percentage of octogenarians discharged within 5 days of surgery has increased from 35.5 to 66.7 per cent (P = 0.01), and the percentage of patients discharged within 3 days of surgery has increased from 8.1 to 33.3 per cent (P = 0.006). Of 24 patients undergoing surgery for NSCCL since 2007, 18 (75%) underwent minimally invasive (VATS or VT) exposures, of which 15 patients (83.3%) were discharged home within 5 days and eight (44.4%) within 3 days of their procedure. Excellent, short- and longer-term results can be achieved in elderly patients if risks, exposures, and resections are appropriately matched to patient performance.