Rosiglitazone reduces urinary albumin excretion in type II diabetes

C-reactive protein, its role in inflammation, Type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, and the effects of insulin-sensitizing treatment with thiazolidinediones

Increased concentrations of the marker of inflammation, C-reactive protein (CRP), are associated with insulin resistance, Type 2 diabetes and the development of cardiovascular disease. In particular, inflammation is closely associated with endothelial dysfunction and is recognized as one of the cardiovascular risk factors clustering in the Insulin Resistance Syndrome or Metabolic Syndrome. The exact mechanisms linking insulin resistance and inflammation remain unclear. However, the close association between insulin resistance and inflammation in atherogenesis suggests that therapies that address both parameters may have benefits in reducing diabetes-related macrovascular complications. The thiazolidinedione class of oral anti-diabetic agents are powerful insulin sensitizers that also have anti-inflammatory properties. Treatment with these agents has a range of anti-atherogenic effects, including reduced levels of CRP, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), TNF-alpha and reactive oxygen species. Additionally, the insulin-sensitizing effect of thiazolidinediones improves other factors of the Insulin Resistance Syndrome, including dyslipidaemia and hypertension. Outcome studies are underway to determine if the effects of improving insulin sensitivity and reducing inflammation will translate into clinical benefits and reduce the cardiovascular morbidity and mortality associated with insulin resistance and Type 2 diabetes.

The prospective pioglitazone clinical trial in macrovascular events (PROactive): can pioglitazone reduce cardiovascular events in diabetes? Study design and baseline characteristics of 5238 patients

OBJECTIVE

The PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macroVascular Events (PROactive) assesses the effect of pioglitazone, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonist, with anti-inflammatory and vascular properties, on the secondary prevention of macrovascular events in type 2 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

PROactive is an on-going randomized, double-blind outcome study in patients with type 2 diabetes managed with diet and/or oral blood glucose-lowering drugs (combination of oral agents with insulin is permitted) who have a history of macrovascular disease. Patients are randomized to receive pioglitazone (forced titration from 15 to 30 to 45 mg, depending on tolerability) or placebo in addition to existing therapy. The primary end point is the time from randomization to occurrence of a new macrovascular event or death. Follow-up is estimated to span 4 years.

RESULTS

A total of 5238 patients have been randomized from 19 countries. At entry into the study, patients enrolled are a mean age of 61.8 years, with type 2 diabetes for a mean of 9.5 years; 60.9 and 61.5% are taking metformin or a sulfonylurea, respectively; and 33.6% are using insulin in addition to oral glucose-lowering drugs. The majority of patients are men (66.1%). Patients are required to meet one or more of entry criteria, as follows: >6 months' history of myocardial infarction (46.7%); coronary artery revascularization (30.8%), stroke (18.8%), or acute coronary syndrome for >3 months (13.7%); other evidence of coronary artery disease (48.1%); or peripheral arterial occlusive disease (19.9%). One-half (48.5%) of the patients have two or more of these risk factors. Three-quarters (75.4%) have hypertension, and 58.8% are current or previous smokers.

CONCLUSIONS

The cohort of patients enrolled in PROactive is a typical type 2 diabetic population at high risk of further macrovascular events. The characteristics of this population are ideal for assessing the ability of pioglitazone to reduce the cardiovascular risk of patients with type 2 diabetes.

A comparison of the effects of thiazolidinediones and metformin on metabolic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a condition characterized by impaired insulin secretion and resistance to insulin-mediated glucose uptake and utilization. A number of oral antidiabetic medication are available for its treatment, including metformin and the thiazolidinediones (TZDs). The TZDs have been shown to improve insulin resistance, and it has been suggested that metformin has similar effects. Although both types of agents improve glycemic control, their mechanisms of action and effects on metabolic processes differ.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this review was to compare the effects of TZDs and metformin on metabolic control in patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

A search of MEDLINE to March 2004 using the terms metformin and biguanides, and thiazolidinediones and glitazones was conducted to identify preclinical and clinical studies focusing on the mechanisms of action and comparative effects of TZDs and metformin. Also searched were published abstracts from recent major diabetes and endocrinology conferences.

RESULTS

In the studies reviewed, both TZDs and metformin demonstrated the ability to improve glycemic control, although long-term monotherapy with TZDs appeared to be more effective than metformin. There continues to be debate about whether metformin is more effective than TZDs in terms of inhibition of hepatic glucose production. However, various studies have found TZDs to be more effective in promoting an increase in whole-body insulin sensitivity. With respect to lipid metabolism, patients who received TZDs had a greater reduction in concentrations of both plasma triglycerides and free fatty acids. Metformin was more effective in promoting weight loss in patients with type 2 diabetes, although TZDs may decrease visceral fat levels. Treatment with either metformin or TZDs was associated with a reduction in the risk of cardiovascular disease, although the mechanisms by which they accomplished this seem to differ.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence suggests that the predominant effect of metformin is inhibition of hepatic glucose production, whereas the primary effects of TZDs is reduction of insulin resistance and promotion of peripheral glucose uptake. TZDs appear to have more positive effects on other metabolic processes and to be associated with greater improvements in cardiovascular risk factors compared with metformin.

Effets cardiovasculaires de la rosiglitazone

PROVEN EFFICACY

Since their launch on the French market in 2002, thiazolidinediones ("glitazones") prescribing conditions and therapeutic indications have progressively widened, although remaining strictly defined by the marketing licence. Clinical efficacy on glycemic control (HbA1c and glycemia), as well as beneficial metabolic effects (on lipids, insulinresistance and beta-cellular function) are now well established. Their side effects, generally minor or mild, are also well known. The problem of cardiovascular adverse events, although of a low incidence, should be known and recognized, notably fluid retention (and oedema) and risk of heart failure, more frequent in diabetic than in non diabetic patients. Clinicians must know and take into account the particular risk factors, clinical and diagnosis characteristics, possible pathophysiological mechanisms and their main preventive measures. POTENTIAL BENEFICIAL EFFECTS: On the other hand, numerous experimental and/or preliminary data in type 2 diabetic patients, including favourable effects on the various pathophysiological mechanisms involved in atherosclerosis and effects on cardiovascular risk factors or markers, justifies further large prospective long term clinical studies to assess glitazone effects on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in type 2 diabetic patients at high cardiovascular risk. Several controlled studies are currently ongoing with rosiglitazone (ADOPT, BARI-2D, DREAM, RECORD, etc.), their results within the next coming Years will answer the questions on the anticipated benefits of rosiglitazone in terms of cardiovascular prevention and/or protection in type 2 diabetic patients.

Rosiglitazone increases extravasation of macromolecules and endothelial nitric oxide synthase in skeletal muscles of the fructose-fed rat model

Reduced extravasation of macromolecules in skeletal muscle has recently been documented in the fructose-fed rat model, corroborating a hypothesis that a functional obliteration of muscle regional microcirculation might lead to hypertension and restrict access of nutrients and hormones to their target cells. The goal of this study was to assess the impact of a treatment with rosiglitazone on the reduced muscle vasopermeability observed previously in the fructose-fed rat model. Fructose-fed Sprague-Dawley rats were gavaged with rosiglitazone (10 micromol kg(-1) per day; n = 21) or the vehicle only (n = 19) for 3 consecutive weeks before assessing the extravasation of Evans Blue (EB) dye in vivo in distinct muscle groups. Relative to control group, rosiglitazone reduced mean arterial blood pressure (Delta = -16.7%, P < 0.001), plasma insulin (Delta= -39.1%, P < 0.05) and plasma triglyceride (Delta= -32.8 %, P < 0.01) concentrations in a significant manner. Plasma VEGF concentrations were significantly lower in the rosiglitazone-treated animals compared to the control animals (32.7 +/- 0.8 pg ml(-1) versus 46.1 +/- 1.2 pg ml(-1), P < 0.001). While no changes were observed in the lungs or the kidneys, fructose-fed rats treated with rosiglitazone had a 30-50% increase (P < 0.005) in the extravasation of EB regardless of the skeletal muscle group studied (rectus femoris, soleus, gastrocnemius lateralis, vastus lateralis and tibialis cranalis). In homogenates of skeletal muscles (vastus lateralis) of fructose-fed rats, rosiglitazone resulted in a significant increase in NO synthase (NOS) activity (Delta = +41.9 %, P < 0.003) as well as endothelial NOS immunoreactive mass (Delta = +37.8 %, P < 0.01) compared to the control animals. There was no change in the immunoreactive level of the nNOS isoform, the most abundant muscle isoform, or in the immunoreactive levels of VEGF. In conclusion, rosiglitazone appears to restore a vascular dysfunction previously documented in the skeletal muscle microcirculation, as evidenced by improved skeletal muscle vasopermeability and upregulation of the muscle endothelium-NO system in the fructose-fed rat model. These effects on muscle per se might also result in a partial improvement of the insulin resistance phenomenon by improving the distribution of nutrients and insulin to skeletal muscle. This effect appears to be independent of circulating levels of VEGF since changes in plasma concentrations of this permeability factor were lower in the rosiglitazone-treated group.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma: therapeutic target for diseases beyond diabetes: quo vadis?

The discovery that the insulin-sensitising thiazolidinediones (TZDs), specific peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPARgamma) agonists, have antiproliferative, anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects has led to the evaluation of their potential use in the treatment of diabetic complications and inflammatory, proliferative diseases in non-insulin-resistant, euglycaemic individuals. Apart from improving insulin resistance, plasma lipids and systemic inflammatory markers, ameliorating atherosclerosis and preventing coronary artery restenosis in diabetic subjects, currently approved TZDs have been shown to improve psoriasis and ulcerative colitis in euglycaemic human subjects. These data imply that the activation of PPAR-gamma may improve cardiovascular risk factors and cardiovascular outcomes in both insulin-resistant diabetic and non-diabetic individuals. Through their immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory actions, TZDs and other PPAR-gamma agonists may prove to be effective in treating diseases unrelated to insulin resistance, such as autoimmune (e.g., multiple sclerosis), atopic (e.g., asthma, atopic dermatitis) and other inflammatory diseases (e.g., psoriasis, ulcerative colitis). Newer and safer selective PPAR-gamma agonists are presently under development. Furthermore, of considerable interest is the recent discovery that a unique subset of currently prescribed antihypertensive angiotensin II Type 1 receptor antagonists has selective PPAR-gamma-modulating activity. These discoveries pave the way for the development of drugs for treating chronic multigenic cardiovascular and metabolic diseases, for which therapy is presently insufficient or non-existent. The potential utility of the currently available TZDs rosiglitazone and pioglitazone and PPAR-gamma-modulating angiotensin II Type 1 receptor antagonists in treating cardiovascular, metabolic and inflammatory diseases in insulin resistant and euglycaemic states is of immense clinical potential and should be investigated.

Endothelial dysfunction in obesity and insulin resistance: a road to diabetes and heart disease

Obesity, insulin resistance, and endothelial dysfunction closely coexist throughout the natural history of type 2 diabetes. They all can be identified not only in people with type 2 diabetes, but also in various groups at risk for the disease, such as individuals with impaired glucose tolerance, family history of type 2 diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, prior gestational diabetes, or polycystic ovary syndrome. Whereas their evident association cannot fully establish a cause-effect relationship, fascinating mechanisms that bring them closer together than ever before are rapidly emerging. Central or abdominal obesity leads to insulin resistance and endothelial dysfunction through fat-derived metabolic products, hormones, and cytokines. Insulin resistance leads to endothelial dysfunction through the frequent association with traditional cardiovascular risk factors and through some more direct novel mechanisms. Some specific and shared insulin signaling abnormalities in muscle, fat, and endothelial cells, as well as some new genetic and nontraditional factors, may contribute to this interesting association. Some recent clinical studies demonstrate that nonpharmacological and pharmacological strategies targeting obesity and/or insulin resistance ameliorate endothelial function and low-grade inflammation. All these findings have added a new dimension to the association of obesity, insulin resistance, and endothelial dysfunction that may become a key target in the prevention of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

Cœur, Diabète et Glitazones

Beneficial metabolic effects of rosiglitazone are now well established and its adverse events, generally minor or mild well known too. Following a brief review of these metabolic effects and main adverse events, we mainly describe fluid retention (and edema) and the heart failure risk, their risk factors, clinical and diagnosis characteristics, possible pathophysiological mechanisms and the main preventive measures are reviewed. Numerous experimental data and/or preliminary studies in type 2 diabetic patients, including effects on cardiovascular risk factors or markers, justify to conduct a large prospective long term clinical program to assess rosiglitazone effects on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in type 2 diabetic patients at high cardiovascular risk, these studies are briefly described.

Progress with thiazolidinediones in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Much progress has been made in the field of medicine within the past 20 years; however, cardiovascular outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus have not improved to a corresponding degree. Although numerous treatments are available for the management of type 2 diabetes, current approaches appear to address the spectrum of the disease and its complications insufficiently.

OBJECTIVES

This article reviews evidence for the minimal effects of standard antidiabetic treatments on the macrovascular complications associated with type 2 diabetes, discusses the improvements in markers of cardiovascular risk seen with the thiazolidinediones (TZDs), and explores the rationale for their earlier use.

METHODS

Relevant articles and guidelines on the use of oral antidiabetic agents in the treatment of type 2 diabetes were identified through a search of MEDLINE for the past 15 years using the terms cardiovascular, insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome, metformin, sulfonylurea, type 2 diabetes, and thiazolidinediones. The reference lists of selected articles also were searched. Articles chosen for review were required to assess clinically important outcomes or surrogate markers that have been shown to have a direct link to clinically important outcomes.

RESULTS

The data reviewed suggest that the sulfonylureas and/or metformin are able to reduce microvascular complications associated with type 2 diabetes but do not substantially affect macrovascular complications. In contrast, the TZDs demonstrate insulin-sensitizing effects attributable to their novel mechanism of action on the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma. The resulting reduction in insulin resistance appears to improve many of the metabolic and cardiovascular pathways influenced by insulin activity. Blood pressure, vascular and coagulation defects, lipid abnormalities, and beta-cell function have been found to improve in patients receiving TZD treatment. For example, there are reports of significant reductions in levels of C-reactive protein (P < 0.01); small, dense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol particles (P < 0.05); and circulating free fatty acids (P < 0.003), in addition to improvements in the proinsulin-to-insulin ratio (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In this review of the literature, use of TZDs as monotherapy or as part of combination therapy has been associated with effective glycemic control and reductions in markers of various macrovascular complications of type 2 diabetes. Although outcomes trials are ongoing, the preliminary effects of TZD therapy are promising and suggest that earlier use of TZDs in the pharmacologic management of type 2 diabetes has the potential to minimize severe disease sequelae.

A Comparison of Agents Used to Manage Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, the traditional method of initiating therapy with a sulfonylurea and increasing the dosage until maximum levels are reached before adding an insulin-sensitizing agent has persisted and should be re-evaluated. Similarly, the current practice of starting therapy with one agent and increasing to maximum dosage before adding a second agent, rather than starting with combination therapy, also needs to be addressed. There is much evidence to suggest that initiating therapy with lower doses of two agents that have complementary effects can increase the overall efficacy and decrease the incidence of adverse effects. Clearly, there is a need for a paradigm shift away from the traditional approach of therapy using insulin secretagogues to a more pathophysiologic approach using an insulin-sensitizing agent, such as the thiazolidinediones. The thiazolidinediones have been shown to reduce insulin resistance, improve the ability of beta-cells to produce insulin, and decrease cardiac risk factors. By reducing insulin resistance, improving glycemic control, and preserving beta-cell function with a thiazolidinedione early in the course of therapy, it is likely that durable glycemic control will be achieved and both microvascular and macrovascular complications may be reduced. Furthermore, early use of an insulin-sensitizing agent either alone or incombination is expected to improve both acute and long-term outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Hypertension and nephropathy

Nearly 90% of patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus do not reach the recommended systolic blood pressure goal of <130 mm Hg. Consequently, the risk of cardiovascular and renal complications remains significant in this patient population. Study results suggest that initiating therapy with inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system and adding diuretics may be useful in reducing arterial pressure to levels <130 mm Hg and may attenuate the progression of nephropathy. Recently, numerous studies have also found that the thiazolidinediones (TZDs) may improve insulin resistance and exert beneficial vascular effects in patients with type 2 diabetes. The TZDs have a range of vascular benefits, including mediating vasorelaxation, inhibiting angiogenesis, and improving inflammation. These findings have been associated with reduction in blood pressure and prevention of microalbuminuria. In patients with type 2 diabetes, early use of TZDs may be beneficial in both achieving glucose control and reducing the development or worsening of microalbuminuria or hypertension.

The patient with diabetes mellitus and heart failure: at-risk issues

The risk for cardiovascular disease, particularly congestive heart failure, is significantly higher in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus than in individuals without diabetes. The presence of hyperglycemia has been associated with changes in the myocardium that are characteristic of diabetic cardiomyopathy and heart failure. Furthermore, insulin resistance may be associated with cardiomyopathy, even in the absence of hyperglycemia, and has been linked with cardiovascular remodeling. The association between heart failure and insulin resistance suggests that agents that improve insulin sensitivity, such as the thiazolidinediones (TZDs), are likely to be of cardiovascular benefit in patients with diabetes and heart failure. Although TZDs have beneficial cardiovascular effects in patients with type 2 diabetes, such as reducing blood pressure, improving endothelial function, and exerting potential antiatherosclerotic effects, one must be aware of the potential of these agents to cause edema or weight gain as a result of fluid retention and fat accumulation. These issues are of particular concern in patients with diabetes who have heart failure. However, the glycemic and cardiovascular benefits of TZDs may outweigh the potential problems of weight gain and fluid retention noted in some patients. Thus the risk-benefit ratio of using TZDs in patients who have diabetes and heart failure must be carefully considered in this patient population with comorbid disorders.

Vascular reactivity and thiazolidinediones

Endothelial dysfunction is a critical factor in the development of vascular disease in patients with diabetes mellitus. Maintenance of the vascular tone and luminal diameter of a blood vessel is dependent on the net balance of vasoconstrictor and vasodilator forces. In both diabetes and obesity, vascular reactivity is abnormal. After ischemia, carbon dioxide challenge, thermal challenge, or exercise, individuals with diabetes do not exhibit the increase in blood flow or vasodilation observed in persons without diabetes. The mechanisms involved in abnormal reactivity may include both the endothelium and vascular smooth muscle. Major vasodilator factors that act on vascular smooth muscle cells are nitric oxide, prostacyclin, and hyperpolarizing factor. The main vasoconstrictors are endothelin, angiotensin II, norepinephrine, serotonin, and thromboxane A(2). In patients with diabetes, there is an increase in vasoconstrictors and a decrease in vasodilators. Thiazolidinediones (TZDs) improve vasodilative responses, which may be of importance in the treatment of vascular disease. The TZDs have anti-inflammatory effects and suppress free fatty acids and reactive oxygen species at the endothelial level, which may contribute to the improved vascular reactivity observed in patients treated with these agents. In addition, these effects of TZDs may have implications for reducing the incidence and severity of atherosclerosis in the long term.

Free fatty acids and type 2 diabetes mellitus

Acute elevation of plasma free fatty acids (FFAs) is necessary for insulin secretion. Sustained elevation, however, leads to apoptosis of pancreatic beta-cells and is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease and sudden death in patients with insulin resistance or a family history of diabetes mellitus, as well as in individuals with normal glucose tolerance. Data suggest that reduction of FFA plasma levels may reduce the incidence of cardiovascular disease in these at-risk patients. Thiazolidinediones have been shown not only to improve insulin sensitivity but also to reduce FFA plasma levels. Consequently, endothelial function is maintained, vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration are minimized, elevated blood pressure and microalbuminuria are reduced, and high-density lipoprotein and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol particle sizes are improved.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonists in atherosclerosis: current evidence and future directions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The prevalence of type 2 diabetes globally is reaching epidemic proportions. Type 2 diabetes is strongly associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Atherosclerosis is thought to arise as a result of a chronic inflammatory process within the arterial wall. Insulin resistance is central to the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes and may contribute to atherogenesis, either directly or through associated risk factors. The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonists, the thiazolidinediones, pioglitazone and rosiglitazone, are insulin sensitizing agents, that are licensed for the management of hyperglycaemia. Growing evidence supports an array of additional effects of thiazolidinedione therapy, both immunomodulatory and antiinflammatory, which may attenuate atherogenesis in type 2 diabetes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Studies have shown that thiazolidinedione therapy may lead to risk factor modulation in type 2 diabetes. Thiazolidinediones treatment has been shown to reduce blood pressure, modify the atherogenic lipid profile associated with type 2 diabetes, reduce microalbuminuria and ameliorate the prothrombotic diathesis. Further evidence suggests that thiazolidinediones therapy inhibits the inflammatory processes which may be involved in atherosclerotic plaque initiation, propagation and destabilization.

SUMMARY

Modification of insulin resistance by thiazolidinedione therapy in type 2 diabetes and the range of pleiotropic effects may not only impact on incident type 2 diabetes, but also on associated cardiovascular disease. Numerous large clinical endpoint studies are under way to investigate these issues.

Thiazolidinediones in type 2 diabetes mellitus: current clinical evidence

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is characterised by insulin resistance as well as progressive pancreatic beta cell dysfunction. The cornerstone of current oral blood-glucose lowering therapy consists of metformin, which primarily lowers hepatic glucose production, and the sulphonylureas that act by stimulating pancreatic beta-cells to secrete insulin. Recently, a novel class of agents, the thiazolidinediones, has been introduced that favourably influence insulin sensitivity and possibly also pancreatic beta-cell function. The thiazolidinediones are synthetic ligands that bind to the nuclear peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma and exert their action by activating transcription of genes that, among others, regulate adipocyte differentiation and adipogenesis as well as glucose and lipid metabolism. To date, the precise mechanisms underlying the actions of thiazolidinediones are largely unknown. When given as monotherapy or in combination with sulphonylureas, metformin or insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes, the currently available thiazolidinediones (rosiglitazone and pioglitazone) ameliorate glycaemic control, by lowering fasting and postprandial blood glucose levels, and improve insulin sensitivity in placebo-controlled trials. They seem to have differential effects on dyslipidaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes; rosiglitazone increases total cholesterol as well as high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and affects plasma triglyceride levels depending on the baseline values, whereas pioglitazone lowers triglycerides and increases HDL cholesterol levels. The adverse events of both agents that occur with greater frequency than in patients treated with placebo are fluid retention and oedema. As demonstrated, mainly in preclinical studies to date, rosiglitazone and pioglitazone possess beneficial effects on other cardiovascular risk factors associated with the insulin resistance syndrome. Thus, these agents were shown to decrease blood pressure, enhance myocardial function and fibrinolysis, as well as possess anti-inflammatory and other beneficial vascular effects. Long-term efficacy and surveillance of this promising class of drugs in patients, however, still need to be demonstrated in outcome trials.

How to titrate ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in renal patients: according to blood pressure or proteinuria?

The inhibition of the effects of angiotensin II is necessary to ensure the best degree of renal protection by the simultaneous control of blood pressure (BP) and the achievement of the maximal antiproteinuric capacity. The inhibition can be attained through the administration of either an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB). Uptitration of antihypertensive therapy is frequently required to achieve the desired BP goal in patients presenting with renal disease, with or without proteinuria. Control of BP is good for both cardiovascular and renal protection. Sometimes, in particular when BP levels are high in the absence of therapy, the simple control of BP without inhibiting the renin- angiotensin system can be accompanied by a significant drop in proteinuria. On the other hand, the possibility that an ACE inhibitor or an ARB diminishes protein excretion in urine in the absence of changes in BP has been considered after the known evidence that these classes of drugs are renoprotective independently of their effect on BP control. The aim of this paper is to briefly review the evidence in favor of uptitration of either class of inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system as compared with the combination of the two for the control of either BP or proteinuria.

Management of diabetes mellitus and insulin resistance in patients with cardiovascular disease

Patients with diabetes have a greatly increased relative risk of developing cardiovascular disease when compared with patients without diabetes. Much of this risk is related to insulin resistance and is associated with both traditional and nontraditional cardiovascular risk factors. Therapy for diabetes must address these risk factors in an attempt to prevent and adequately treat cardiovascular disease. Pharmacologic therapy directed toward dyslipidemia and hypertension has a beneficial effect on risk factors and has been shown to decrease cardiovascular events. The effects of insulin and oral hypoglycemic agents on insulin resistance are variable, and their direct effect on cardiovascular disease is less clear. Metformin is the only oral hypoglycemic agent shown to decrease cardiovascular events independent of glycemia. The thiazolidinediones directly improve insulin resistance, decrease plasma insulin concentration, and have the potential to decrease the risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes. A number of studies have demonstrated that the thiazolidinediones produce changes in several cardiovascular risk factors associated with the insulin resistance syndrome, including lowering blood pressure, correcting diabetic dyslipidemia, improving fibrinolysis, and decreasing carotid artery intima-medial thickness. These agents bind a newly described class of receptors, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors, which may have implications for atherosclerosis. Although these drugs increase low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, they induce a favorable change in the LDL particle size and susceptibility to oxidation. Long-term clinical trials are being conducted to determine the effect that thiazolidinediones have on cardiovascular events in individuals with type 2 diabetes.

The expanding scope of the metabolic syndrome and implications for the management of cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes with particular focus on the emerging role of the thiazolidinediones

Over the last decade, new factors including endothelial dysfunction, vascular inflammation, and abnormalities of blood coagulation have joined more established components of the metabolic syndrome, such as hyperglycemia, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and visceral obesity. Many of these factors are known to promote atherosclerosis and the clustering of metabolic abnormalities within the syndrome makes a major contribution to the increased risk of cardiovascular disease and death associated with type 2 diabetes. Given that most patients have multiple cardiovascular risk factors, good glycemic control does not, by itself, adequately reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease associated with diabetes and clinical management needs to address the full profile of cardiovascular risk. The thiazolidinediones have potentially beneficial effects on many components of the metabolic syndrome and so may help to improve cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes.

Microalbuminuria and hypertension with focus on type 1 and type 2 diabetes

Microalbuminuria and hypertension with Over the past decade, there has been considerable focus on the concept of microalbuminuria, not only because it predicts renal disease in type 1 and type 2 diabetes, but also because it relates to premature mortality in the diabetic and in the general population. More importantly, intervention at this stage is now possible with the perspective of preserving glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and ameliorating cardiovascular disease and ensuing strong end-points. INITIAL STUDIES: The concept of microalbuminuria was introduced about 20 years ago and since then there has been a multitude of studies and papers on this subject using the original definition, but not always, in the US. Before that time it was suggested, mainly from the US, that diabetic renal disease was an untreatable relentlessly progressive condition.

GENETIC STUDIES

There is an overwhelming number of studies on genetics and diabetes and also covering the genetics of diabetic complications including nephropathy. However, so far the results are extremely disappointing. Patients at risk cannot be identified and genetic analyses are of no value as a guide to treatment. The notion that the development of complications is controlled mainly by a special genetic pattern is increasingly doubtful. In genetic studies, it is rather phenotypic well-accepted risk factors that dominate. STRUCTURAL BASIS OF MICROALBUMINURIA: Patients with microalbuminuria have significant abnormalities in the kidney, including glomeruli. This is quite clear in patients with type 1 diabetes, but is also seen in type 2 diabetes, where on the other hand, other risk factors such as hypertension and dyslipidaemia also seem to be of importance, including loss of autoregulation. Renal biopsies are generally not indicated in the management of diabetic patients. MICROALBUMINURIA AND EARLY MORTALITY: It is quite clear that microalbuminuria predicts early mortality both in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. The association to other risk factors may partly explain this--but this does not account for the whole picture. Endothelial dysfunction as well as inflammatory and arteriosclerotic abnormalities in blood vessels may be a relevant hypothesis that needs to be further explored along with other possibilities. CLINICAL COURSE AND ASSOCIATED ABNORMALITIES: The risk factor for progression in normoalbuminuric patients to microalbuminuria is higher than normal albumin excretion (strongest factor), poor glycaemic control, elevated blood pressure, and to some extent smoking. The clinical course of microalbuminuria is usually progressive, but with the more effective intervention now available we encounter that the so-called natural history (without intervention) is increasingly difficult to study. Microalbuminuria is clearly associated with a number of abnormalities, almost in all organs, but GFR is generally well preserved in spite of more advanced structural lesions. Therefore, microalbuminuria is an important marker for more pronounced diabetic vascular disease in general as well as for nephropathy. Regression to normoalbuminuria only rarely occurs during standard unchanged nonintensive treatment. TREATMENT STRATEGIES: The best possible glycaemic control is important in preventing and ameliorating the course of normo- and micro-albuminuria. Another major treatment strategy, especially in microalbuminuric patients, is antihypertensive treatment including inhibition of the renal angiotensin aldosterone system. Numerous new studies are available, both in type 1 and type 2 diabetes, documenting that not only microalbuminuria but also renal and cardiovascular complications in these patient are also far better controlled by early detection and treatment. Therefore, screening for microalbuminuria should be a strategy in all diabetes management followed by effective intervention as outlined in this paper.

Thiazolidinedione therapy: the benefits of aggressive and early use in type 2 diabetes

Type 2 diabetes is now a global epidemic, with the number of people affected worldwide predicted to more than double to 300 million by the year 2025. While the importance of good glycemic control in countering the microvascular and macrovascular complications of diabetes is widely recognized, monotherapy with sulfonylureas or metformin achieves target blood glucose levels in only a minority of patients. Consequently, there is a pressing need for new treatment strategies that are more effective in providing sustained glycemic control and so reducing the burden of morbidity and mortality associated with diabetes and its complications. There is growing evidence of the benefits of early intervention with aggressive treatment strategies in improving glycemic control and reducing diabetic complications. To provide sustained control, such strategies need to address the combination of insulin resistance and beta-cell dysfunction that underlies most cases of type 2 diabetes. At the same time, treatment needs to address not only glycemic control but also the range of cardiovascular risk factors that are often found clustered together in patients with type 2 diabetes. This paper reviews the rationale and evidence for early combination therapy including a thiazolidinedione in improving glycemic control, and considers the potential for such aggressive therapy in reducing diabetic complications.

Type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular risk, and the link to insulin resistance

BACKGROUND

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus frequently have coexistent dyslipidemia, hypertension, and obesity, and are at risk for microvascular and macrovascular disease complications such as myocardial infarction, stroke, retinopathy, and microalbuminuria. To optimize cardiovascular health outcomes for patients with type 2 diabetes, strategies to reduce the risks of microvascular and macrovascular disease are needed in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE

This article provides an overview of the cardiovascular risk profile of patients with type 2 diabetes and discusses the cardiovascular consequences of use of the thiazolidinediones (insulin-sensitizing agents) in the treatment of type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

A literature search of MEDLINE/PubMed was performed to identify relevant articles published from 1966 to April 2003. Search terms used were diabetes, cardiovascular disease, atherosclerosis, dyslipidemia, obesity, hypertension, blood pressure, hyperglycemia, inflammation, C-reactive protein, fibrinolysis, plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1, microalbuminuria, thiazolidinediones, safety, hepatotoxicity, and edema. Bibliographies within the identified articles were also evaluated for additional relevant articles and information.

RESULTS

Recommendations for cardiovascular risk reduction through preventive and therapeutic strategies that target the symptoms of insulin resistance may reduce the microvascular and macrovascular sequelae of diabetes and ameliorate the impact of other components of the metabolic syndrome, including hypertension, hyperglycemia, and obesity. In this regard, thiazolidinediones are promising therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

Early data suggest that, in addition to reducing hyperglycemia, pioglitazone and rosiglitazone effect changes in the dyslipidemic profile, hemodynamics, vascular inflammation, and endothelial functioning of patients with type 2 diabetes. Additional research is needed to further distinguish the cardiovascular benefits of these drugs.