Advanced prostate cancer: the results of a randomized comparative trial of high dose irradiation boosting with conformal protons compared with conventional dose irradiation using photons alone

Evaluation of therapeutic potential of heavy ion therapy for patients with locally advanced prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To investigate the feasibility of raster scanned heavy charged particle therapy in the treatment of prostate cancer (PCa,) with special regard to the influence of internal organ motion on the dose distribution.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The CT data of 8 patients with PCa who underwent three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (RT) were chosen. In addition to the routine treatment planning scan, three to five additional positioning control CT scans were performed. The organs at risk and the target volumes were defined on all CT scans. Primary and boost carbon ion plans were calculated to deliver 66 Gy to the clinical target volume/planning target volume, with an additional 10 Gy to the gross tumor volume (GTV). To estimate the influence of internal organ motion on plan quality, the dose was recalculated on the basis of the control CT scans. The comparative analysis was based on the dose-volume histogram-derived physical parameters.

RESULTS

The average 90% target coverage was 99.1% for the GTV. The maximal dose to the rectum was 71.8 Gy. The average rectal mean dose was 19 Gy. The volume of the rectum receiving 70 and 68 Gy was 0.1 and 0.3 cm3. The average difference in the 90% coverage for the GTV on control CT cubes was 3.6%. The maximal rectal dose increased to 76.2 Gy. The deviation in the mean rectal dose was <1 Gy on average. The rectal volume receiving 70 and 68 Gy increased to 2.5 and 3.3 cm3.

CONCLUSION

The investigation demonstrated the feasibility of raster scanned carbon ions for PCa RT. Excellent coverage of the target volume and optimal sparing of the rectum were acquired. The combination of photon intensity-modulated RT and a carbon ion boost to the GTV is the most rational solution for the gain of clinical experience in heavy ion RT for PCa patients.

The relationship of increasing radiotherapy dose to reduced distant metastases and mortality in men with prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

The association of increasing radiotherapy (RT) dose with reduced biochemical failure (BF) is accepted widely. However, there is little direct evidence that dose escalation has an impact on distant metastasis (DM) or overall mortality (OM). These associations were examined in the current study.

METHODS

The outcome of 835 patients who were treated at the Fox Chase Cancer Center (Philadelphia, PA) between 1989 and 1997 using 3-dimensional, conformal RT alone (median dose, 74 Gray [Gy]) was analyzed. Stepwise multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses (MVAs) were performed with RT dose included as a covariate along with log-transformed initial pretreatment PSA level, Gleason score, palpation T status, age, and year of treatment (YOT), where indicated. To minimize the effect of YOT, an analysis was performed on a subgroup of 363 patients who were treated prior to 1994.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 64 months, there were 220 PSA failures, 44 distant metastases, and 162 deaths. In MVA, RT dose (as a continuous variable) was a significant predictor for BF, DM, and OM. When YOT was included as a covariate, it was related strongly to all endpoints, and the correlations of RT dose with DM and OM were lost. When the effect of YOT was minimized by limiting the MVA to patients who were treated prior to 1994, RT dose again emerged as a significant predictor of DM.

CONCLUSIONS

Escalation of RT dose reduced the rates of BF, DM, and OM significantly in patients with prostate cancer. The inclusion of YOT had a pronounced effect on these correlations that may confound interpretation.

Intensity modulated radiation therapy using laser-accelerated protons: a Monte Carlo dosimetric study

In this paper we present Monte Carlo studies of intensity modulated radiation therapy using laser-accelerated proton beams. Laser-accelerated protons coming out of a solid high-density target have broad energy and angular spectra leading to dose distributions that cannot be directly used for therapeutic applications. Through the introduction of a spectrometer-like particle selection system that delivers small pencil beams of protons with desired energy spectra it is feasible to use laser-accelerated protons for intensity modulated radiotherapy. The method presented in this paper is a three-dimensional modulation in which the proton energy spectrum and intensity of each individual beamlet are modulated to yield a homogeneous dose in both the longitudinal and lateral directions. As an evaluation of the efficacy of this method, it has been applied to two prostate cases using a variety of beam arrangements. We have performed a comparison study between intensity modulated photon plans and those for laser-accelerated protons. For identical beam arrangements and the same optimization parameters, proton plans exhibit superior coverage of the target and sparing of neighbouring critical structures. Dose-volume histogram analysis of the resulting dose distributions shows up to 50% reduction of dose to the critical structures. As the number of fields is decreased, the proton modality exhibits a better preservation of the optimization requirements on the target and critical structures. It is shown that for a two-beam arrangement (parallel-opposed) it is possible to achieve both superior target coverage with 5% dose inhomogeneity within the target and excellent sparing of surrounding tissue.

[Treatment with charged particles beams: hadrontherapy part I: physical basis and clinical experience of treatment with protons]

Protons have physical characteristics, which differ from those of photons used in conventional radiotherapy. Better shielding of critical organs is obtained by using their particular ballistic (Bragg peak and lateral narrow penumbra). Some indications as ocular melanoma, chordoma and chondrosarcoma of the base of skull are now strongly accepted by the radiation oncologist community. Others are still in evaluation: meningioma, locally advanced nasopharynx tumor and paediatric tumors. The aim of this review is to present the clinical results of a technic which seems "confidential" because of the rarety and the cost of equipments.

Dose escalation for localized prostate cancer: substantial benefit observed with 3D conformal therapy

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of radiation dose escalation on biochemical and/or disease failure in patients with localized prostate cancer treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between May 1987 and December 2000, 1473 patients were assessed after treatment with 3D-CRT. The mean patient age was 70.4 +/- 6.8 years, 1316 patients had T1-T2 disease, and 1150 had Gleason score <or=7. The median pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was 8.9 ng/mL. The mean dose was 71.7 +/- 4.3 Gy (range 60.0-80.4). Failure was defined as the first event of any of the following: biochemical failure, local recurrence or metastasis, postirradiation hormonal therapy, or death from disease.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 35.2 months, 395 failures (26.8%) had occurred. Adjusting for dose as a continuous variable, the hazard ratio for failure was 2.03 (p < 0.0001) for 569 intermediate-risk patients (stage T1-T2 and Gleason score 7 or PSA 10-20 ng/mL) and 5.16 (p < 0.0001) for 456 high-risk patients (stage T3-T4 or PSA >20 ng/mL or Gleason score >or=8) compared with 448 low-risk patients (stage T1-T2 and Gleason score <or=6 and PSA <10 ng/mL). For intermediate-risk patients, each 1-Gy increment in total radiation dose was associated with a highly significant 8% reduction in the probability of failure (hazard ratio = 0.92, p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Dose escalation using 3D-CRT significantly reduces the risk of biochemical/disease failure among intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients.

1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) (calcitriol) and its analogue, 19-nor-1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(2), potentiate the effects of ionising radiation on human prostate cancer cells

Radiotherapy with external beam radiation or brachytherapy is an established therapeutic modality for prostate cancer. Approximately 30% of patients with localised prostate cancer relapse at the irradiated site. Secondary effects of ionising radiation (IR), for example, bowel and bladder complications, are common. Thus, the search for biological response modifiers that could potentiate the therapeutic effects of radiation and limit the occurrence of serious side effects is an important task in prostate cancer therapy. 1alpha,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D(3) (calcitriol), the active metabolite of vitamin D, and its analogues are under investigation for the treatment of several malignancies including prostate cancer. Here, we report that 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) and its less calcaemic analogue 19-nor-1alpha,25-(OH)(2)D(2) (Zemplar) act synergistically with IR to inhibit the growth of the human prostate cancer cells in vitro. 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) potentiated IR-induced apoptosis of LNCaP cells, and nanomolar doses of 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) and 19-nor-1alpha,25-(OH)(2)D(2) showed synergistic inhibition of growth of LNCaP cells at radiobiologically relevant doses of IR (1-2 Gy). At higher doses of IR, the combination of 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) and IR or 19-nor-1alpha,25-(OH)(2)D(2) and IR resulted in moderate antagonism. The synergistic effect at radiobiologically relevant doses of radiation suggests that a combination of 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) or 19-nor-1alpha,25-(OH)(2)D(2) with IR could permit a reduction in the dose of radiation given clinically and thus potentially reduce treatment-related morbidity.

Particle selection for laser-accelerated proton therapy feasibility study

In this paper we present calculations for the design of a particle selection system for laser-accelerated proton therapy. Laser-accelerated protons coming from a thin high-density foil have broad energy and angular spectra leading to dose distributions that cannot be directly used for therapeutic applications. Our solution to this problem is a compact particle selection and collimation device that delivers small pencil beams of protons with desired energy spectra. We propose a spectrometer-like particle selection and beam modulation system in which the magnetic field will be used to spread the protons spatially according to their energies and emitting angles. Subsequently, an aperture will be used to select the protons within a therapeutic window of energy (energy modulation). It will be shown that for the effective proton spatial differentiation, the primary collimation device should be used, which will collimate protons to the desired angular distribution and limit the spatial mixing of different energy protons once they have traveled through the magnetic system. Due to the angular proton distribution, the spatial mixing of protons of different energies will always be present and it will result in a proton energy spread with the width depending on the energy. For 250 MeV protons, the width (from the maximum to the minimum energy) is found to be 50 MeV for the magnetic field configuration used in our calculations. As the proton energy decreases, its energy width decreases as well, and for 80 MeV protons it equals 9 MeV. The presence of the energy width in the proton energy distribution will modify the depth dose curves needed for the energy modulation calculation. The matching magnetic field setup will ensure the refocusing of the selected protons and the final beam will be collimated by the secondary collimator. The calculations presented in this article show that the dose rate that the selection system can yield is on the order of D=260 Gy/min for a field size of 1 x 1 cm2.

The potential of proton and light ion beams in radiotherapy

In an investigation by the Swedish Cancer Society, the present status, critical issues and future aspects and potentials were described by an expert group for each of nine major areas of radiation therapy research. The present report deals with the potential of proton and light ion beams in radiotherapy.

Radiotherapy for t3 prostate cancer

Throughout the past decade, significant improvements in optimizing the management of T3 prostate cancer have been made. Phase III randomized studies have demonstrated the superiority of combined hormone therapy and radiation therapy over radiation therapy alone. Radiotherapy dose escalation using conformal techniques has improved local control and lowered toxicity. These advances have changed the approach to treatment of T3 prostate cancer from that directed at palliation of symptoms to earlier interventions directed at prolongation of survival. The contemporary role of radiation therapy in clinical T3 prostate cancer in the context of other treatment options is reviewed in this article.

Conformal high dose rate brachytherapy improves biochemical control and cause specific survival in patients with prostate cancer and poor prognostic factors

PURPOSE

To improve outcome for patients with prostate cancer with poor prognostic factors higher than conventional radiation doses are required. To achieve this outcome a brachytherapy boost was given. We report the results of the first high dose rate dose-escalation brachytherapy trial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 1991 and 2000, 207 patients were prospectively enrolled in a dose escalation trial including pelvic radiotherapy and conformal high dose rate prostate brachytherapy boost. The dose was increased from 5.5 to 11.5 Gy. per implant. Patient eligibility for the study included pretreatment prostate specific antigen 10 or greater, Gleason 7 or greater or clinical stage T2b or higher. No patient received hormonal therapy. The American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus panel definition of biochemical failure was applied.

RESULTS

Median patient age was 69 years. Mean followup was 4.7 years (range 0.6 to 10.4). The 5-year actuarial biochemical control rate was 74%. The 5-year biochemical control was 85% for 1 poor prognostic factor, 75% for 2 and 50% for all 3 (p = 0.001). On Cox regression multivariate analysis lower brachytherapy dose, and higher Gleason and nadir value were associated with biochemical failure. The 5-year actuarial overall survival was 92%, cause specific survival 98% and disease-free survival 68%. The 5-year actuarial rates of complications were 8% and 0% for grades 3 and 4 genitourinary, and 0.5% and 0.5% for grades 3 and 4 gastrointestinal, respectively. The 5-year actuarial impotence rate was 51%.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with poor prognostic factors external beam radiation therapy with conformal high dose rate brachytherapy boost improved biochemical control, resulting in a high cause specific survival rate with low toxicity. Another important advantage is that the patient is not radioactive after the high dose rate implant.

Inverse and forward optimization of one- and two-dimensional intensity-modulated radiation therapy-based treatment of concave-shaped planning target volumes: the case of prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) was suggested as a suitable technique to protect the rectal wall, while maintaining a satisfactory planning target volume (PTV) irradiation in the case of high-dose radiotherapy of prostate cancer. However, up to now, few investigations tried to estimate the expected benefit with respect to conventional three-dimensional (3D) conformal radiotherapy (CRT).

PURPOSE

Estimating the expected clinical gain coming from both 1D and 2D IMRT against 3DCRT, in the case of prostate cancer by mean of radiobiological models. In order to enhance the impact of IMRT, the case of concave-shaped PTV including prostate and seminal vesicles (P+SV) was considered.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five patients with concave-shaped PTV including P+SV were selected. Two different sets of constraints were applied during planning: in the first one a quite large inhomogeneity of the dose distribution within the PTV was accepted (set (a)); in the other set (set (b)) a greater homogeneity was required. Tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue control probability (NTCP) indices were calculated through the Webb-Nahum and the Lyman-Kutcher models, respectively. Considering a dose interval from 64.8 to 100.8 Gy, the value giving a 5% NTCP for the rectum was found (D(NTCP(rectum)=5%)) using two different methods, and the corresponding TCP(NTCP(rectum)=5%) and NTCP(NTCP(rectum)=5%) for the other critical structures were derived. With the first method, the inverse optimization of the plans was performed just at a fixed 75.6 Gy ICRU dose; with the second method (applied to 2/5 patients) inverse treatment plannings were re-optimized at many dose levels (from 64.8 to 108 Gy with 3.6 Gy intervals). In this case, three different values of alpha/beta (10, 3, 1.5)were used for TCP calculation. The 3DCRT plan consisted of a 3-fields technique; in the IMRT plans, five equi-spaced beams were applied. The Helios Inverse Planning software from Varian was used for both the 2D IMRT and the 1D IMRT inverse optimization, the last one being performed fixing only one available pair of leaves for modulation. A previously proposed forward 1D IMRT 'class solution' technique was also considered, keeping the same irradiation geometry of the inversely optimized IMRT techniques.

RESULTS

With the first method, the average gains in TCP(NTCP(rectum)=5%) of the 2D IMRT technique, with respect 3DCRT, were 10.3 and 7.8%, depending on the choice of the DVHs constraints during the inverse optimization procedure (set (a) and set (b), respectively). The average gain (DeltaTCP(NTCP(rectum)=5%)) coming from the inverse 1D IMRT optimization was 5.0%, when fixing the set (b) DVHs constraints. Concerning the forward 1D IMRT optimization, the average gain in TCP(NTCP(rectum)=5%) was 4.5%. The gain was found to be correlated with the degree of overlapping between rectum and PTV. When comparing 2D IMRT and 1D IMRT, in the case of the more realistic set (b) constraints, DeltaTCP(NTCP(rectum)=5%) was always less than 3%, excepting one patient with a very large overlap region. Basing our choice on this result, the second method was applied to this patient and one of the remaining. Through the inverse re-optimization of the treatment plans at each dose level, the gain in TCP(NTCP(rectum)=5%) of the inverse 2D technique was significantly higher than the ones obtained by applying the first method (concerning the two patients: +6.1% and +2.4%), while no significant benefit was found for inverse 1D. The impact of changing the alpha/beta ratio was less evident in the patient with the lower gain in TCP(NTCP(rectum)=5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The expected benefit due to IMRT with respect to 3DCRT seems to be relevant when the overlap between PTV and rectum is high. Moreover, the difference between the inverse 2D and the simpler inverse or forward 1D IMRT techniques resulted in being relatively modest, with the exception of one patient, having a very large overlap between rectum and PTV. Optimizing the inverse planning at each dose level to find TCP(NTCP(rectum)=5%)e level to find TCP(NTCP(rectum)=5%) can improve the performances of inverse 2D IMRT, against a significant increase of the time for planning. These results suggest the importance of selecting the patients that could have significant benefit from the application of IMRT.

Particle in cell simulation of laser-accelerated proton beams for radiation therapy

In this article we present the results of particle in cell (PIC) simulations of laser plasma interaction for proton acceleration for radiation therapy treatments. We show that under optimal interaction conditions protons can be accelerated up to relativistic energies of 300 MeV by a petawatt laser field. The proton acceleration is due to the dragging Coulomb force arising from charge separation induced by the ponderomotive pressure (light pressure) of high-intensity laser. The proton energy and phase space distribution functions obtained from the PIC simulations are used in the calculations of dose distributions using the GEANT Monte Carlo simulation code. Because of the broad energy and angular spectra of the protons, a compact particle selection and beam collimation system will be needed to generate small beams of polyenergetic protons for intensity modulated proton therapy.

Primary radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer

Prostate cancer in men is similar to breast cancer in women; both cancers rank first, respectively, in incidence and are normally responsive to radiation therapy. In addition, advances in mammography help detect earlier breast cancers, and the development and refinement of prostatic specific antigen (PSA) has resulted in early detection of low-stage localized prostate cancers. This has generated debate over the proper management of localized prostate cancer. While there have not been any controlled, prospective, randomized trials of sufficient power to compare the various local therapies, based on the current available data, the three commonly used local modalities, surgery, and external beam radiation therapy and brachytherapy (radioactive seed implant), have similar efficacy controlling the disease up to 10 years in many patients. Technological advances in treatment delivery and planning have improved the treatment of prostate cancer with external-beam radiotherapy using three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), ultrasound-guided transperineal implant, or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), as well as proton or neutron beam based therapies.

Pathologic evidence of dose-response and dose-volume relationships for prostate cancer treated with combined external beam radiotherapy and high-dose-rate brachytherapy

PURPOSE

The clinical significance of postradiotherapy (RT) prostate biopsy characteristics is not well understood relative to the known prognostic factors. We performed a detailed pathologic review of posttreatment biopsy specimens in an attempt to clarify their relationship with clinical outcome and radiation dose.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1991 and 1998, 78 patients with locally advanced prostate cancer were prospectively treated with external beam RT in combination with high-dose-rate brachytherapy at William Beaumont Hospital and had post-RT biopsy material available for a complete pathologic review. Patients with any of the following characteristics were eligible for study entry: pretreatment prostate-specific antigen level > or =10.0 ng/mL, Gleason score > or =7, or clinical Stage T2b-T3cN0M0. Pelvic external beam RT (46.0 Gy) was supplemented with three (1991-1995) or two (1995-1998) ultrasound-guided transperineal interstitial (192)Ir high-dose-rate implants. The brachytherapy dose was escalated from 5.50 to 10.50 Gy per implant. Post-RT prostate biopsies were performed per protocol at a median interval of 1.5 years after RT. All pre- and post-RT biopsy specimen slides from each case were reviewed by a single pathologist (N.S.G.). The presence and amount of residual cancer, most common RT-effect score, and least amount RT-effect score were analyzed. The median follow-up was 5.7 years. Biochemical failure was defined as three consecutive prostate-specific antigen rises.

RESULTS

Forty patients (51%) had residual cancer in the post-RT biopsies. The 7-year biochemical control rate was 79% for patients with negative biopsies vs. 62% for those with positive biopsies with marked RT damage vs. 33% for those with positive biopsies with no or minimal RT damage. A greater percentage of positive pre-RT biopsy cores (p = 0.01), lower total RT dose (p = 0.001), lower dose per implant (p = 0.001), and greater percentage of positive post-RT biopsy cores (p = 0.01) were each associated with biochemical failure (Cox regression, univariate analysis). For patients with <25% positive post-RT biopsy cores, the 7-year biochemical control rate was 81% vs. a 62% biochemical control rate for those with 25-49% positive cores and only 32% for those with > or =50% positive cores (p = 0.01). On Cox multiple regression analysis, only the percentage of positive pre-RT biopsy cores and RT dose remained significantly associated with biochemical failure. Of all the factors analyzed, only the pretreatment cancer volume and lower RT dose were significantly associated with residual cancer and/or residual cancer with no or minimal RT damage. A greater percentage of positive pre-RT biopsy cores was associated with both a positive post-RT biopsy (p = 0.08) and a greater percentage of positive post-RT biopsy cores (p = 0.04). A lower total RT dose was associated with both a positive post-RT biopsy (p = 0.08) and a greater percentage of positive post-RT biopsy cores (p = 0.02). For patients who received <80 Gy (equivalent in 2-Gy fractions), 73% had positive post-RT biopsies vs. a 56% biopsy positivity rate for those who received 84-90 Gy and only 39% for those who received > or =92 Gy (p = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

Patients with positive post-RT biopsies are more likely to experience biochemical failure, especially when the RT damage is minimal. Patients who have a larger pretreatment tumor volume or receive a lower RT dose are more likely to demonstrate post-RT biopsy positivity and biochemical failure.

Prostate cancer radiation dose response: results of the M. D. Anderson phase III randomized trial

PURPOSE

A randomized radiotherapy dose escalation trial was undertaken between 1993 and 1998 to compare the efficacy of 70 vs. 78 Gy in controlling prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 305 Stage T1-T3 patients were entered into the trial and, of these, 301 with a median follow-up of 60 months, were assessable. Of the 301 patients, 150 were in the 70 Gy arm and 151 were in the 78 Gy arm. The primary end point was freedom from failure (FFF), including biochemical failure, which was defined as 3 rises in the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were calculated from the completion of radiotherapy. The log-rank test was used to compare the groups. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to examine the independence of study randomization in multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

There was an even distribution of patients by randomization arm and stage, Gleason score, and pretreatment PSA level. The FFF rates for the 70- and 78 Gy arms at 6 years were 64% and 70%, respectively (p = 0.03). Dose escalation to 78 Gy preferentially benefited those with a pretreatment PSA >10 ng/mL; the FFF rate was 62% for the 78 Gy arm vs. 43% for those who received 70 Gy (p = 0.01). For patients with a pretreatment PSA <or=10 ng/mL, no significant dose response was found, with an average 6-year FFF rate of about 75%. Although no difference occurred in overall survival, the freedom from distant metastasis rate was higher for those with PSA levels >10 ng/mL who were treated to 78 Gy (98% vs. 88% at 6 years, p = 0.056). Rectal side effects were also significantly greater in the 78 Gy group. Grade 2 or higher toxicity rates at 6 years were 12% and 26% for the 70 Gy and 78 Gy arms, respectively (p = 0.001). Grade 2 or higher bladder complications were similar at 10%. For patients in the 78 Gy arm, Grade 2 or higher rectal toxicity correlated highly with the proportion of the rectum treated to >70 Gy.

CONCLUSION

An increase of 8 Gy resulted in a highly significant improvement in FFF for patients at intermediate-to-high risk, although the rectal reactions were also increased. Dose escalation techniques that limit the rectal volume that receives >or=70 Gy to <25% should be used.

Radical radiation for localized prostate cancer: local persistence of disease results in a late wave of metastases

PURPOSE

To assess whether failure to maintain local control (LC) of prostate cancer after radiation therapy results in a higher incidence of distant metastasis (DM).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 1972 to 1999, 1,469 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were treated with radical radiation therapy. Disease outcome was retrospectively reviewed for all patients with more than 2 years of follow-up.

RESULTS

The actuarial 10-year LC rate was 79%. Gleason score > or = 7, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) more than 15, and T3 to T4 tumors predicted a higher incidence of local failure (LF) (palpable recurrence or positive rebiopsy). The 10-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) was 74%. Gleason score > or = 7, PSA more than 15, and T3 to T4 tumors predicted a higher incidence of distant failure. LF was the strongest predictor for DM in a multivariate model. The 10-year DMFS for LC and LF patients was 77% and 61%, respectively. Median time to distant failure was prolonged in patients with LF compared with patients with locally controlled disease (54 v 34 months). Hazard rate analysis of the time to DM revealed that patients who maintain LC have a lower rate of DM, which remains constant over time. Patients who ultimately develop LF have a higher initial rate of DM, which increases with time.

CONCLUSION

Patients with locally persistent prostate cancer are at greater risk of DM. The higher initial hazard of DM is consistent either with an increased likelihood of subclinical micrometastases before treatment or with posttreatment tumor embolization. The prolonged time to appearance of DM in locally failing patients and the increasing hazard of DM over time is most consistent with a late wave of metastases from a locally persistent tumor.

Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) decreases treatment-related morbidity and potentially enhances tumor control

Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), a new form of three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT), optimizes the concept of computer-controlled radiation deposition in tumor (target) while sparing adjacent normal structures. A retrospective review was done on the initial 185 patients with tumors in different sites including prostate cancer, head and neck cancer, pediatric tumors, adult brain tumors, and previously irradiated recurrent tumors treated with IMRT. Preliminary findings indicate that IMRT is a new clinically feasible tool in radiation oncology. Treatment-related morbidity profile was favorable. Tumor response, local control, and the ability to palliate previously irradiated patients are encouraging. Intensity modulated radiation therapy will allow dose escalation, leading to better tumor control.

Dose escalation using conformal high-dose-rate brachytherapy improves outcome in unfavorable prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To overcome radioresistance for patients with unfavorable prostate cancer, a prospective trial of pelvic external beam irradiation (EBRT) interdigitated with dose-escalating conformal high-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy was performed.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between November 1991 and August 2000, 207 patients were treated with 46 Gy pelvic EBRT and increasing HDR brachytherapy boost doses (5.50-11.5 Gy/fraction) during 5 weeks. The eligibility criteria were pretreatment prostate-specific antigen level >or=10.0 ng/mL, Gleason score >or=7, or clinical Stage T2b or higher. Patients were divided into 2 dose levels, low-dose biologically effective dose <93 Gy (58 patients) and high-dose biologically effective dose >93 Gy (149 patients). No patient received hormones. We used the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology definition for biochemical failure.

RESULTS

The median age was 69 years. The mean follow-up for the group was 4.4 years, and for the low and high-dose levels, it was 7.0 and 3.4 years, respectively. The actuarial 5-year biochemical control rate was 74%, and the overall, cause-specific, and disease-free survival rate was 92%, 98%, and 68%, respectively. The 5-year biochemical control rate for the low-dose group was 52%; the rate for the high-dose group was 87% (p <0.001). Improvement occurred in the cause-specific survival in favor of the brachytherapy high-dose level (p = 0.014). On multivariate analysis, a low-dose level, higher Gleason score, and higher nadir value were associated with increased biochemical failure. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Grade 3 gastrointestinal/genitourinary complications ranged from 0.5% to 9%. The actuarial 5-year impotency rate was 51%.

CONCLUSION

Pelvic EBRT interdigitated with transrectal ultrasound-guided real-time conformal HDR prostate brachytherapy boost is both a precise dose delivery system and a very effective treatment for unfavorable prostate cancer. We demonstrated an incremental beneficial effect on biochemical control and cause-specific survival with higher doses. These results, coupled with the low risk of complications, the advantage of not being radioactive after implantation, and the real-time interactive planning, define a new standard for treatment.

Intrarectal application of amifostine for the prevention of radiation-induced rectal injury

Clinically symptomatic late injury to the rectal wall occurs in about one third of patients with prostate cancer treated with external beam irradiation. Reducing the physical dose to the anterior rectal wall without a similar reduction in the posterior peripheral zone is difficult because of the proximity of these structures. Based on our previous observations that intrarectal application of amifostine resulted in very high concentrations of amifostine and its active metabolite WR-1065 in the rectal wall of Copenhagen rats, the authors initiated a phase I clinical trial in 1998. Twenty-nine patients with localized prostate cancer were accrued. Eligibility criteria included histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma, a Karnofsky performance status of > or =70, and no pelvic lymphadenopathy or distant metastases. The total dose to the prostate was 70.2 Gy (20 patients) and 73.8 Gy (9 patients). Therapy was delivered using a 4-field axial technique and 3-dimensional conformal planning. Amifostine was administered intrarectally as an aqueous solution 30 minutes before irradiation on the first 15 days of therapy. Amifostine dose was escalated, in cohorts, from 500 mg to 2,500 mg. Toxicity was evaluated using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group late morbidity scale. All patients completed therapy with no amifostine-related toxicity at any dose level. The application was feasible and well tolerated. With a median follow-up time of 21 months, 9 patients (33%) had rectal bleeding (8 grade 1, 1 grade 2). Four patients (14%) had symptoms suggestive of radiation injury, which proved to be secondary to nonrelated processes. These included preexisting nonspecific proctitis (1 patient), diverticular disease of the sigmoid colon, rectal polyp (1 patient), and ulcerative colitis (1 patient). Symptoms developed significantly more often in patients receiving 500 to 1,000 mg than in patients receiving 1,500 to 2,500 mg amifostine (7 of 14 [50%] versus 2 of 13 [15%]; P =.0325, 1-sided chi(2) test). Intrarectal application of amifostine is feasible and well tolerated. A complete lack of systemic toxicity obviates the need for close monitoring of patients during and after administration. Rectal symptomatology after external beam radiotherapy to the pelvis cannot be assumed to reflect late radiation damage, because it often is a manifestation of an unrelated pathologic process. The preliminary efficacy data are encouraging and suggest that intrarectal administration of amifostine may reduce radiation damage. Further clinical studies are warranted.

Defining a dose-response relationship with radiotherapy for prostate cancer: is more really better?

PURPOSE

Data were reviewed addressing the association between radiation therapy (RT) dose and treatment outcome for localized prostate cancer to help clarify the existence of a potential dose-response relationship.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Articles were identified through the MEDLINE database, CancerLit database, and reference lists of relevant articles. Studies were categorized into four groups based upon the endpoint analyzed, including biochemical control (BC), local control (LC), pathologic control (PC), and cause-specific survival (CSS). The impact of increasing RT dose with each endpoint was recorded.

RESULTS

Twenty-two trials involving a total of 11,297 patients were identified. Of the 11 trials addressing the association of RT dose with LC, 9 showed statistically significant improvements. Of the 12 trials that reported BC with RT dose, all showed statistically significant improvements. Two out of 4 studies analyzing PC with increasing dose showed a positive correlation. Finally, 3 out of 9 studies addressing RT dose with CSS showed statistically significant improvements. Despite inconclusive results, patients with poor risk features (e.g., prostate-specific antigen [PSA] > or = 10, Gleason score [GS] > or = 7, or tumor stage > or = T2b) were most likely to benefit from increasing dose with respect to each endpoint. However, the optimal RT dose and the magnitude of benefit of dose escalation could not be identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Although RT dose appears to correlate with various measures of treatment outcome, objective, high-quality data addressing this critical issue are still lacking. At the present time, the absolute improvement in outcome due to dose escalation, the subset of patients benefitting most, and the optimal dose remain to be defined.

External-beam radiotherapy in the management of carcinoma of the prostate

BACKGROUND

External-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) has been used in the treatment of adenocarcinoma of the prostate gland for more than 30 years. Well-documented clinical series have demonstrated the effectiveness of EBRT in achieving both cause-specific survival and freedom from biochemical (prostate-specific antigen [PSA]) progression.

METHODS

The indications and expected treatment results for treatment by EBRT in the management of adenocarcinoma of the prostate gland are reviewed. The treatment of early-stage disease definitively by EBRT alone or as complement to radioactive seed implant is emphasized. In the management of locally advanced disease, the use of EBRT with combined androgen ablation is discussed as definitive therapy and also as indicated in the postoperative adjuvant management of surgically identified pathologic stage T3 disease.

RESULTS

The relative clinical benefit of EBRT compared with the mostly predictable and well-defined moderate side effects, which are manageable in most instances by conservative measures treatment, is well established. Advances in defining radiation-beam parameters have led to more effective and safer treatment for prostate cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

EBRT has historically been a mainstay in the management of prostate cancer. It remains a useful and indicated treatment modality in patients with early-stage, locally advanced, and metastatic disease.

Radiation therapy for the treatment of locally advanced and metastatic prostate cancer

Radiation therapy for locally advanced PCa continues to evolve. A current treatment recommendation for nonmetastatic, high-risk disease includes AS combined with RT. The precise duration and sequencing of AS has not been established but most frequently includes treatment in the neoadjuvant, concomitant and, occasionally, adjuvant periods. As technology allows higher doses without significant increases in morbidity and as clinical data provide proof of a radiation dose response, RT doses continue to escalate. The goal of therapy for metastatic disease continues to focus on the relief of pain and the improvement in quality of life. Multiple studies document the significant role RT plays in achieving these goals. Focal RT and systemic radioisotopes have become the mainstay of management in this patient group and the development of newer isotopes that cause less marrow toxicity will improve the therapeutic ratio and provide an opportunity for their use with systemic chemotherapy. As molecular and genomic technologies advance, directed targeting of critical cellular radiation-response pathways hold the promise of improved radiation response and individualized, tailored therapy.

Enhanced therapeutic effect of HSV-tk+GCV gene therapy and ionizing radiation for prostate cancer

Standard therapies for prostate cancer including radiation, prostatectomy, and hormone ablation have significant toxicities and recurrence risk. HSV-tk gene therapy may be effective in combination with radiation therapy due to complementary mechanisms and distinct toxicity profiles. Mouse prostate tumors transplanted subcutaneously were treated by either gene therapy involving intratumoral injection of AdV-tk followed by systemic ganciclovir or local radiation therapy or the combination of gene and radiation therapy. Both single-therapy modalities showed a 38% decrease in tumor growth compared to controls. The combined treatment resulted in a decrease of 61%. In addition the combined-therapy group had a mean survival of 22 days versus 16.6 days for single therapy and 13.8 days for nontreated controls. To analyze systemic anti-tumor activity, lung metastases were generated by tail vein injection of RM-1 prostate cancer cells on the same day that they were injected subcutaneously. The primary tumors were treated as before with AdV-tk followed by ganciclovir, radiation, or the combination. The number of lung nodules was reduced by 37% following treatment with AdV-tk, whereas radiotherapy alone had no effect on metastatic growth. The combination led to an additional 50% reduction in lung colonization. Primary tumors that received the combination therapy had a marked increase in CD4 T cell infiltrate. This is the first report showing a dramatic systemic effect following the local combination treatment of radiation and AdV-tk. A clinical study using this strategy has been initiated and patient accrual is ongoing.

Planning, computer optimization, and dosimetric verification of a segmented irradiation technique for prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To develop and verify a multisegment technique for prostate irradiation that results in better sparing of the rectal wall compared to a conventional three-field technique, for patients with a concave-shaped planning target volume (PTV) overlapping the rectal wall.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Five patients have been selected with various degrees of overlap between PTV and rectal wall. The planned dose to the ICRU reference point is 78 Gy. The new technique consists of five beams, each having an open segment covering the entire PTV and several smaller segments in which the rectum is shielded. Segment weights are computer-optimized using an algorithm based on simulated annealing. The score function to be minimized consists of dose-volume constraints for PTV, rectal wall, and femoral heads. The resulting dose distribution is verified for each patient by using point measurements and line scans made with an ionization chamber in a water tank and by using film in a cylindrical polystyrene phantom.

RESULTS

The final number of segments in the five-field technique ranges from 7 to 9 after optimization. Compared to the standard three-field technique, the maximum dose to the rectal wall decreases by approximately 3 Gy for patients with a large overlap and 1 Gy for patients with no overlap, resulting in a reduction of the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) by a factor of 1.3 and 1.2, respectively. The mean dose to the PTV is the same for the two techniques, but the dose distribution is slightly less homogeneous with the five-field technique (Average standard deviation of five patients is 1.1 Gy and 1.7 Gy for the three-field and five-field technique, respectively). Ionization chamber measurements show that in the PTV, the calculated dose is in general within 1% of the measured dose. Outside the PTV, systematic dose deviations of up to 3% exist. Film measurements show that for the complete treatment, the position of the isodose lines in sagittal and coronal planes is calculated fairly accurately, the maximum distance between measured and calculated isodoses being 4 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a relatively simple multisegment "step-and-shoot" technique that can be delivered within an acceptable time frame at the treatment machine (Extra time needed is approximately 3 minutes). The technique results in better sparing of the rectal wall compared to the conventional three-field technique. The technique can be planned and optimized relatively easily using automated procedures and a predefined score function. Dose calculation is accurate and can be verified for each patient individually.

Biological aspects of conformal therapy

Both conformal and intensity-modulated radiation therapy have great potential to further increase tumor control rates and decrease morbidity. A homogeneous escalation of 'biological' dose within a tumor should increase the likelihood of local cure, especially within the mid-range (e.g. 15% to 80%) of tumor control rates, and conversely, a lower control rate should follow a homogeneously reduced dose. However, when the dose to critical normal tissues is tightly constrained, the dose distributions within the treatment volume may necessarily be heterogeneous, and the effect on tumor control probability will depend upon the magnitude of over- or underdosage, and on the proportions of the tumor clonogen population receiving higher or lower than the nominal dose. Dose-volume histograms provide a measure of heterogeneity of dose within the planned treatment volume, but tumor control probability is also influenced by other variables, e.g. inherent tumor clonogen radiosensitivity and growth rates during a course of treatment, alpha/beta ratios, oxygenation and clonogen density throughout the target volume. Heterogeneity in these factors introduces heterogeneity in tumor responses and a less steep change in tumor control probability with change in dose, reducing the gains or losses that would be predicted to result from heterogeneity of dose. Similarly, modeling the effect of inhomogeneous dose distributions on estimates of probability of complications in normal tissues is hindered by uncertainty of estimates for alpha/beta ratios, especially for late-responding tissues, and lack of data on volume effects. Although the effects of dose inhomogeneity cannot be presented with sufficiently reliable quantitation to be directly applicable to dose prescriptions in radiation therapy, the relative influences of heterogeneities in dose and volume can be modeled to provide a framework for clinical decision-making. The magnitude of a dose reduction is the major determinant of decline in tumor control probability. A large dose reduction to even a small volume of tumor can profoundly decrease tumor control probability. Conversely, the most rapid improvement in tumor control probability occurs the closer to 100% the amount of tumor exposed to an increased dose. Escalation of dose is of little value unless it is distributed through most of the tumor: even very large increases in dose to small volumes are of little benefit.

Potential role of intensity modulated proton beams in prostate cancer radiotherapy

PURPOSE

The present study was undertaken to assess the potential benefit of intensity modulated (IM) proton beams in optimizing the dose distribution to safely escalate the tumor dose in prostate cancer radiotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Four treatment plans were compared in a prostate cancer patient aiming to deliver 81 Gy to the target: 1) conformal 18 MV X-rays, 6-fields; 2) 214 MeV protons, 2-fields; 3) IM 15 MV X-rays, 5-fields; and 4) 177-200 Mev IM protons, 5-fields as in Plan 3. In addition, IM methods were used to further escalate the tumor dose to 99 Gy. Dose-volume histograms (DVH) were used to physically compare the treatment plans. DVH data were also used to obtain normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) for the rectum, bladder, femoral heads, and tumor control probabilities.

RESULTS

Although the planning target volume dose distribution was satisfactory with the four treatment plans, the homogeneity was slightly reduced in both X-ray plans (IM and standard) and the low-to-medium doses delivered to all organs at risk, and other normal tissues were significantly reduced by both proton plans. For a prescribed dose of 81 Gy, only the IM X-ray and IM proton plans both succeeded in predicting an acceptably low NTCP for the rectum (<5%, Grade 3). The integral nontarget dose was significantly reduced with IM proton beams (i.e., 3.1, 1.3, and 1.7 times less than Plans 1, 2, and 3, respectively). When escalating the dose to 99 Gy, no additional improvement between IM protons and IM X-ray beams was observed.

CONCLUSION

Both IM X-ray and proton beams were able to optimize the dose distribution and comply with the goal of delivering the highest dose to the target while reducing the risk of severe morbidity to acceptable levels. The main advantage compared to IM X-rays was that IM protons succeeded in significantly reducing the low-to-medium dose to the nontarget tissues and achieved a small improvement in planning target volume (PTV) dose heterogeneity.

Preliminary results of a randomized radiotherapy dose-escalation study comparing 70 Gy with 78 Gy for prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of radiotherapy dose on prostate cancer patient outcome and biopsy positivity in a phase III trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 305 stage T1 through T3 patients were randomized to receive 70 Gy or 78 Gy of external-beam radiotherapy between 1993 and 1998. Of these, 301 were assessable; stratification was based on pretreatment prostate-specific antigen level (PSA). Dose was prescribed to the isocenter at 2 Gy per fraction. All patients underwent planning pelvic computed tomography scan to confirm prostate position. Treatment failure was defined as an increasing PSA on three consecutive follow-up visits or the initiation of salvage treatment. Median follow-up was 40 months.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty patients were randomized to the 70-Gy arm and 151 to the 78-Gy arm. The difference in freedom from biochemical and/or disease failure (FFF) rates of 69% and 79% for the 70-Gy and 78-Gy groups, respectively, at 5 years was marginally significant (log-rank P: =.058). Multiple-covariate Cox proportional hazards regression showed that the study randomization was an independent correlate of FFF, along with pretreatment PSA, Gleason score, and stage. The patients who benefited most from the 8-Gy dose escalation were those with a pretreatment PSA of more than 10 ng/mL; 5-year FFF rates were 48% and 75% (P: =.011) for the 70-Gy and 78-Gy arms, respectively. There was no difference between the arms ( approximately 80% 5-year FFF) when the pretreatment PSA was < or = 10 ng/mL.

CONCLUSION

A modest dose increase of 8 Gy using conformal radiotherapy resulted in a substantial improvement in prostate cancer FFF rates for patients with a pretreatment PSA of more than 10 ng/mL. These findings document that local persistence of prostate cancer in intermediate- to high-risk patients is a major problem when doses of 70 Gy or less are used.

Complications from radiotherapy dose escalation in prostate cancer: preliminary results of a randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare early and late side effects in prostate cancer patients with Stage T1b-T3 disease randomized to receive 70 Gy or 78 Gy.

METHODS

There were 189 patients randomized with a minimum follow-up of 2 years, that were available for this analysis. All patients were initially treated with a 4-field box to an isocenter dose of 46 Gy at 2 Gy per fraction. In the 70-Gy arm, treatment was continued to a reduced volume using a 4-field box technique. In the 78-Gy arm, treatment was continued to a reduced volume using a conformal 6-field arrangement. Side effects were graded on a 1-4 scale, adapted from Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and Late Effects Normal Tissue Task Force criteria.

RESULTS

No significant differences in acute rectal or bladder toxicity were seen between the two treatment techniques (p > 0.6 for all comparisons). The 5-year Kaplan-Meier risks of Grade 2 or higher late bladder toxicity were 20% and 9% for 70-Gy and 78-Gy groups, respectively (log rank, p = 0.8). The 5-year risks of Grade 2 or higher late rectal toxicity were 14% and 21% for 70 Gy and 78 Gy, respectively (p = 0.4). Dose-volume histogram analysis of the 78-Gy patients showed a significant correlation between the percentage of rectum irradiated to 70 Gy or greater and the likelihood of developing late rectal complications. Patients with more than 25% of the rectum receiving 70 Gy or greater had a 5-year risk of Grade 2 or higher complications of 37% compared to 13% for patients with 25% or less (p = 0.05). All three Grade 3 complications occurred when greater than 30% of the rectum received 70 Gy or more.

CONCLUSION

The overall rate of complications was similar in both treatment arms. However, there is evidence for a significant increase in late rectal complications when more than 25% of the rectum received 70 Gy or greater. This parameter may serve as a benchmark for the design of future three-dimensional conformal trials.

The external radiotherapy with three-dimensional conformal boost after the neoadjuvant androgen suppression for patients with locally advanced prostatic carcinoma

PURPOSE

To analyze the results in patients with locally advanced prostatic carcinoma treated by hormonal therapy followed by external radiotherapy using three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) boost.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 1987 to 1995, 46 patients with histologically proven locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the prostate were treated with 3D-CRT at the National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo. The neoadjuvant androgen suppression started immediately after the diagnosis followed by radical radiation therapy, according to the prospective protocol. They were treated with photons of 6-14 MV for wide fields and the boost, of which a multiple-leaf collimator of 2-cm width was available. The boosted dose was delivered with the rotational 3D-CRT, after the delivery of whole pelvis 4-field box from a dose of 40-46 Gy up to 66 Gy. The planning target volume encompassed 1 cm outside throughout the clinical target volume, and the prostate and the seminal vesicles were included in the boost field.

RESULTS

The 3D-CRT boost treatment completed as planned in all 46 patients. The median follow-up for all the patients was 60 months (range, 5-120 months). Nineteen of 46 patients died. Of these, 11 patients died of the intercurrent diseases. For all 46 patients, the 5- and 8-year overall survival rates were 61.3% and 42.4%, and the 5- and 8-year cause-specific survival rates were 82.4% and 64.4%, respectively. The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) relapse-free rates for 5- and 8-year were 64.6% and 52.5%, and the clinical local control rates for 5 and 8 years were 75.3% and 69.9%, respectively. The preradiation therapy PSA and the Gleason score were the factors that significantly associated with PSA relapse-free survival. Sixteen of 46 patients (35%) showed at least one form of late toxicities. Of these, 3 patients experienced late complications of Grade 3 (urinary, 2, proctitis, 1).

CONCLUSION

The treatment results were fairly good and were consistent with those in Western countries, indicating that this study shows the preliminary status of 3D-CRT for the locally advanced prostate cancer in Japan. Preradiation therapy PSA seems to be a significant predictor of PSA relapse-free survival (p = 0.004) after neoadjuvant androgen suppression.

Matched-pair analysis of conformal high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost versus external-beam radiation therapy alone for locally advanced prostate cancer

PURPOSE

We performed a matched-pair analysis to compare our institution's experience in treating locally advanced prostate cancer with external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) alone to EBRT in combination with conformal interstitial high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy boosts (EBRT + HDR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 1991 to 1998, 161 patients with locally advanced prostate cancer were prospectively treated with EBRT + HDR at William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan. Patients with any of the following characteristics were eligible for study entry: pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of >/= 10.0 ng/mL, Gleason score >/= 7, or clinical stage T2b to T3c. Pelvic EBRT (46.0 Gy) was supplemented with three (1991 through 1995) or two (1995 through 1998) ultrasound-guided transperineal interstitial iridium-192 HDR implants. The brachytherapy dose was escalated from 5.50 to 10.50 Gy per implant. Each of the 161 EBRT + HDR patients was randomly matched with a unique EBRT-alone patient. Patients were matched according to PSA level, Gleason score, T stage, and follow-up duration. The median PSA follow-up was 2.5 years for both EBRT + HDR and EBRT alone.

RESULTS

EBRT + HDR patients demonstrated significantly lower PSA nadir levels (median, 0.4 ng/mL) compared with those receiving EBRT alone (median, 1.1 ng/mL). The 5-year biochemical control rates for EBRT + HDR versus EBRT-alone patients were 67% versus 44%, respectively (P <.001). On multivariate analyses, pretreatment PSA, Gleason score, T stage, and the use of EBRT alone were significantly associated with biochemical failure. Those patients in both treatment groups who experienced biochemical failure had a lower 5-year cause-specific survival rate than patients who were biochemically controlled (84% v 100%; P <.001).

CONCLUSION

Locally advanced prostate cancer patients treated with EBRT + HDR demonstrate improved biochemical control compared with those who are treated with conventional doses of EBRT alone.

Survival advantage from higher-dose radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer treated on the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trials

PURPOSE

We evaluated the effect of external-beam radiation therapy on disease-specific survival (death from causes related to prostate cancer) and overall survival in men with clinically localized prostate cancer.

METHODS

From 1975 to 1992, 1,465 men with clinically localized prostate cancer received radiation therapy on four Radiation Therapy Oncology Group phase III randomized trials and were pooled for this analysis. No one received androgen-deprivation therapy with his initial treatment. All original histology had central pathologic review for grading using the Gleason classification system. Total delivered radiation dose ranged from 60 to 78 Gy (median, 68.4 Gy). The median follow-up time was 8 years.

RESULTS

A Cox regression model revealed that Gleason score was an independent predictor of disease-specific survival and overall survival. The 10-year disease-specific survival rates by Gleason score were as follows: score of 2 through 5, 85%; score of 6, 79%; score of 7, 62%; and score of 8 through 10, 43%. Stratifying outcome by this important prognostic factor revealed that higher radiation dose was a significant predictor for improved disease-specific survival and overall survival only for those patients whose cancers had Gleason scores of 8 through 10 (P <.05). After adjusting for clinical T stage, nodal status, and age, treating with a higher radiation dose was associated with a 29% lower relative risk of death from prostate cancer and 27% reduced mortality rate (P <.05).

CONCLUSION

These data demonstrate that higher-dose radiation therapy can significantly reduce the risk of dying from prostate cancer in men with clinically localized disease. This survival benefit is restricted to men with poorly differentiated cancers.

Clinical experience with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To compare acute and late toxicities of high-dose radiation for prostate cancer delivered by either conventional three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) or intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between September 1992 and February 1998, 61 patients with clinical stage T1c- T3 prostate cancer were treated with 3D-CRT and 171 with IMRT to a prescribed dose of 81 Gy. To quantitatively evaluate the differences between conventional 3D-CRT and IMRT, 20 randomly selected patients were planned concomitantly by both techniques and the resulting treatment plans were compared. Acute and late radiation-induced morbidity was evaluated in all patients and graded according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group toxicity scale.

RESULTS

Compared with conventional 3D-CRT, IMRT improved the coverage of the clinical target volume (CTV) by the prescription dose and reduced the volumes of the rectal and bladder walls carried to high dose levels (P<0.01), indicating improved conformality with IMRT. Acute and late urinary toxicities were not significantly different for the two methods. However, the combined rates of acute grade 1 and 2 rectal toxicities and the risk of late grade 2 rectal bleeding were significantly lower in the IMRT patients. The 2-year actuarial risk of grade 2 bleeding was 2% for IMRT and 10% for conventional 3D-CRT (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The data demonstrate the feasibility and safety of high-dose IMRT for patients with localized prostate cancer and provide a proof-of-principle that this method improves dose conformality relative to tumor coverage and exposure to normal tissues.

Defining the appropriate radiation dose for pretreatment PSA < or = 10 ng/mL prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To investigate whether a dose response exists for biochemical no evidence of disease (bNED) control in prostate cancer patients with pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < or = 10 ng/mL and to identify the patient subgroups affected.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 5/89 and 10/97, 488 T1-T3 NX-0 M0 prostate cancer patients with PSA < or = 10 ng/mL were treated with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) alone. Median and mean pretreatment PSA values were 6.3 and 6.2, respectively. Gleason scores of 2-6 and 7-10 were noted in 386 and 102 men, respectively. AJCC 1992 palpation T1-T2AB tumors were noted in 415 patients. Perineural invasion (PNI) was noted in 60 men. Mean and median age was 67 and 68 years, respectively. Dose to the center of the prostate ranged from 6260 cGy to 8409 cGy with a mean and median of 7423 cGy and 7278 cGy, respectively. Patients were stratified into three groups according to dose: <7250 cGy, 7250-7599 cGy, and > or =7600 cGy. Median dose in these three groups was 7067 cGy, 7278 cGy, and 7734 cGy, respectively. Univariate analysis was performed to determine differences in bNED control (American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology [ASTRO] Consensus Guidelines definition of failure) by dose group for the entire cohort, for 310 good prognosis patients (T1-T2A, Gleason score 2-6, absence of PNI), and for 178 poor prognosis patients (T2B-T3 or Gleason score 7-10 or presence of PNI) (1). Multivariate analysis (MVA) was performed to determine if dose was an independent predictor of bNED control. Median follow-up was 36 months.

RESULTS

A dose response was not demonstrated for the entire group of patients with pretreatment PSA < or =10 ng/mL. Doses of <7250 cGy, 7250-7599 cGy, and > or =7600 cGy were associated with 5-year bNED control rates of 73%, 86%, and 89%, respectively (p = 0.12). MVA demonstrated prognosis group (p = 0. 038) to be the only independent predictor of bNED control. Good prognosis patients had a 5-year bNED of 85% and no dose response was seen. The subgroup of poor prognosis patients demonstrated a 5-year bNED control rate of 81% and a dose response was seen for those receiving > or =7600 cGy, compared to the two lower dose groups (94% vs. 75% vs. 70%; p = 0.0062). MVA for the poor prognosis subset demonstrated dose (p = 0.01) to be the only independent predictor for improved bNED control.

CONCLUSIONS

The poor prognosis subset of PSA < or =10 ng/mL prostate cancer patients benefit from dose escalation. A dose response is not demonstrated for prostate cancer patients with pretreatment PSA < or =10 ng/mL and other favorable features.

Interim report of image-guided conformal high-dose-rate brachytherapy for patients with unfavorable prostate cancer: the William Beaumont phase II dose-escalating trial

PURPOSE

We analyzed our institution's experience treating patients with unfavorable prostate cancer in a prospective Phase II dose-escalating trial of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) integrated with conformal high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy boosts. This interim report discusses treatment outcome and prognostic factors using this treatment approach.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From November 1991 through February 1998, 142 patients with unfavorable prostate cancer were prospectively treated in a dose-escalating trial with pelvic EBRT in combination with outpatient HDR brachytherapy at William Beaumont Hospital. Patients with any of the following characteristics were eligible: pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >/= 10.0 ng/ml, Gleason score >/= 7, or clinical stage T2b or higher. All patients received pelvic EBRT to a median total dose of 46.0 Gy. Pelvic EBRT was integrated with ultrasound-guided transperineal conformal interstitial iridium-192 HDR implants. From 1991 to 1995, 58 patients underwent three conformal interstitial HDR implants during the first, second, and third weeks of pelvic EBRT. After October 1995, 84 patients received two interstitial implants during the first and third weeks of pelvic EBRT. The dose delivered via interstitial brachytherapy was escalated from 5.50 Gy to 6.50 Gy for each implant in those patients receiving three implants, and subsequently, from 8.25 Gy to 9.50 Gy per fraction in those patients receiving two implants. To improve implant quality and reduce operator dependency, an on-line, image-guided interactive dose optimization program was utilized during each HDR implant. No patient received hormonal therapy unless treatment failure was documented. The median follow-up was 2.1 years (range: 0.2-7.2 years). Biochemical failure was defined according to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Consensus Panel definition.

RESULTS

The pretreatment PSA level was >/= 10.0 ng/ml in 51% of patients. The biopsy Gleason score was >/= 7 in 58% of cases, and 75% of cases were clinical stage T2b or higher. Despite the high frequency of these poor prognostic factors, the actuarial biochemical control rate was 89% at 2 years and 63% at 5 years. On multivariate analysis, a higher pretreatment PSA level, higher Gleason score, higher PSA nadir level, and shorter time to nadir were associated with biochemical failure. In the entire population, 14 patients (10%) experienced clinical failure at a median interval of 1.7 years (range: 0.2-4.5 years) after completing RT. The 5-year actuarial clinical failure rate was 22%. The 5-year actuarial rates of local failure and distant metastasis were 16% and 14%, respectively. For all patients, the 5-year disease-free survival, overall survival, and cause-specific survival rates were 89%, 95%, and 96%, respectively. The 5-year actuarial rate of RTOG Grade 3 late complications was 9% with no patient experiencing Grade 4 or 5 acute or late toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Pelvic EBRT in combination with image-guided conformal HDR brachytherapy boosts appears to be an effective treatment for patients with unfavorable prostate cancer with minimal associated morbidity. Our dose-escalating trial will continue.

Intensity modulated radiation therapy: a clinical review

Intensity modulated radiotherapy represents a significant advance in conformal radiotherapy. In particular, it allows the delivery of dose distributions with concave isodose profiles such that radiosensitive normal tissue close to, or even within a concavity of, a tumour may be spared from radiation injury. This article reviews the clinical application of this technique to date, and discusses the practical issues of treatment planning and delivery from the clinician's perspective.

3D conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) for high grade prostate cancer: a multi-institutional review

PURPOSE

To evaluate the results of 3DCRT and the effect of higher than traditional doses in patients with high grade prostate cancer, we compiled data from three institutions and analyzed the outcome of this relatively uncommon subset of prostate cancer patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The 180 patients with Gleason score 8- 10 adenocarcinoma of the prostrate were treated with 3DCRT at the Univer sity of Michigan Health System, University of California-San Francisco, or Fox Chase Cancer. Eligible patients had T1-T4 NO or NX MO adenocarci noma with a pretreatment PSA. Pretreatment characteristics included: me dian age 72 years, 60.6% Gleason score 8 tumors, 57.6% T1-T2, and median pretreatment PSA 17.1 ng/ml (range 0.3-257.1). The total dose received was <70 Gy in 30%, 70-75 Gy in 37%, and >75 Gy in 33%, 27% received adju vant or neoadjuvant hormonal therapy. The median follow-up was 3.0 years for all patients and 16% of patients were followed up for at least 5 years.

RESULTS

The 5-year freedom from PSA failure was 62.5% for all patients and 79.3% in T1-T2 patients. Univariate analysis revealed that T-stage (T1-T2 vs. T3-T4), pretreatment PSA, and RT dose predicted for freedom from PSA failure. A 5-year overall survival for all patients was 67.3%. Only RT dose was predictive of 5-year overall survival on univariate analysis. Because a significant association was seen between T-stage and RT dose, the Cox proportional hazards model was performed separately for T1-T2 and T3-T4 tumors. None of the prognostic factors reached statistical significance for overall survival or freedom from PSA failure in T3-T4 patients or for overall survival in T1-T2 patients. Lower RT dose and higher pretreatment PSA predicted for PSA failure on multivariate analysis in T1-T2 patients.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study from three institutions with experience in dose escalation suggests a dose effect for PSA control above 70 Gy in patients with T1-T2 high grade prostate cancer. These results are superior to surgery and emphasize the need for dose escalation in treating Gleason 8-10 prostate cancer.

The effect of pressure from the table top and patient position on pelvic organ location in patients with prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To assess the impact of pressure from the table top and patient position on the relationship of the prostate, rectum, and bladder to the bony pelvis.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In 9 patients with prostate cancer (3 status postprostatectomy), computed tomography (CT) scans were obtained in four positions: supine with and without false table top under the buttocks, prone with and without false table top under the lower abdomen. In four patients, a fifth scan was obtained in the first position (supine with table top in place) to assess the impact of changes in bladder/rectal fullness over time. Urination and defecation were not permitted between scans. For each patient, the four (or five) CT scans were registered to each other.

RESULTS

The anal canal and the rectum caudal to the coccyx shifted posteriorly in 7/9 patients when the support under the buttocks was removed in the supine position. When pressure from the table top was removed in the prone position, the anterior bladder extension increased. The superior rectum was adjacent to the prostate in all scans and the prostate/superior rectum/bladder generally moved together. Rectal fullness changed with time and rectal gas position was gravity-dependent and shifted with patient position. Bladder volume increased with time. Organs had shifted and/or changed fullness between the first and fifth scan obtained in the same patient position approximately 90 min apart, mostly due to increase in bladder volume. All patients found the supine position most comfortable.

CONCLUSIONS

The bladder and rectal fullness vary with time, confounding the ability to attribute changes in organ location to positional factors. Pressure from the table top affects the relative location of pelvic organs and, in part, is responsible for changes previously attributed to position/gravity.

A bladder preservation regimen using intra-arterial chemotherapy and radiotherapy for invasive bladder cancer: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

A prospective study was performed to investigate combined treatment with intra-arterial chemotherapy and radiation therapy for bladder preservation in locally invasive bladder cancer.

METHODS

Patients with invasive bladder cancer, stage T2-3N0M0, were included in the study. Intra-arterial chemotherapy was performed with three injections of methotrexate and cisplatin at 3-week intervals. Simultaneously, the patients underwent X-ray irradiation (40 Gy) of the small pelvic space. Where a post-treatment transurethral resection (TUR) biopsy showed no residual tumor, the tumor site was irradiated by a 30 Gy proton beam and the bladder was preserved. Where tumors remained, radical cystectomy was performed.

RESULTS

Between 1990 and 1996, 42 patients were treated according to this protocol. Post-treatment TUR biopsy and urine cytology showed no residual tumors in 39 of 42 cases (93%). The bladder was preserved in accordance with the study protocol in 36 cases. A median follow-up of 38 months showed 3-year non-recurrence in 72% of bladder-preserved patients and the rate of bladder preservation was 84%. The nine recurrences included eight cases of superficial bladder recurrence. One cancer death occurred among the bladder-preservation patients, giving 3-year survival and cause-specific survival rates of 84% and 100%, respectively. Although bladder function decreased slightly in compliance, bladder capacity was retained in almost all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

This regimen is useful for bladder preservation in T2-3 locally invasive bladder cancer. Information from more cases and the results of more long-term observations are needed, as is an evaluation of appropriate subject selection and factors associated with quality of life issues, particularly regarding bladder function.

Caution in interpreting biochemical control rates after treatment of prostate cancer: length of follow-up influences results

OBJECTIVES

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) based end points are commonly used to report outcomes after treatment for prostate cancer. This study examines the influence of follow-up length on biochemical control (bNED) rates.

METHODS

We reviewed 437 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer treated with conformal radiotherapy without neoadjuvant androgen deprivation. Biochemical failure was defined as three consecutive PSA increases or an increase large enough to prompt androgen deprivation therapy. The failure date was projected back to the midpoint between the PSA nadir and the first PSA increase (or between the nadir and the initiation of androgen deprivation therapy). The analysis was performed by censoring patients with longer follow-up in a stepwise fashion, thus creating smaller subgroups with shorter follow-up intervals. Subgroup 1 (n = 191) and subgroup 2 (n = 273) were defined to include those patients monitored for up to 2 years and up to 3 years, respectively.

RESULTS

The median follow-up intervals for subgroup 1, subgroup 2, and the original study population were 1.1, 1.5, and 2.5 years. No significant differences were seen in pretreatment prognostic factors among the three groups. The 2-year bNED of subgroup 1, subgroup 2, and the original population was 86%, 77%, and 73%, respectively. Although subgroup 1 had a superior bNED compared with the original population (P = 0.04), no differences in clinical recurrence rates were seen among any of the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Because of projecting the biochemical failure dates back according to commonly used bNED definitions, control rates are highly dependent on the length of follow-up.